You got it very wrong. Kimi sets the car different to the knifes edge where only he car drive it. For example Lotus they refused to set the car the way Kimi wanted it. But after lot discussion and argument they did to prove Kimi wrong. But Kimi was 1 second faster. It is the fast hands and control that no one else has. Romain they had to opt for a longer wheelbase and different front suspension. When in Ferrari Kimi was neber number one driver. 2007 he was just good and Massa lost all mathematical chances. Rest is history how Ferrari screwed Kimi. For example 2014 suspension was so terrible in purpose that Kimi was not able to drive it. Plus Kimi was rendered to racing test driver for Ferrari and to find equivalent electronic traction control that RB was using from Magneti Marelli. Ferrari failed and opted to Magneti Marelli also. Ferrari never gave Kimi any chances. It is pointless to even compere. 2013 for Ferrari lost to Lotus. Ferrari had to get Kimi and Allison to Ferrari and destroy the pair. +4 billion in stake from Alonso/Santander was the price.
If you have ever driven even say passenger cars, you'll understand why his preference is for strong front end. i.e. FWD vs RWD, fwd it's understeer and even accounting for the difference torque-steer makes if you break traction you go straight no exceptions. With a strong turn in on a rwd vehicle you can adjust to the surface and immediately accelerate, only cure for understeer even with RWD is to slow down. Ask any slightly skilled driver from an inclement weather area (snow, heavy rain, ice, sand, mud) and they'll likely agree with Kimi's style if understand
Vettel's opinion was that Kimi was the best at quickly adapting to a new car or new conditions on pure instinct. I'm sure there are setups he works worse on though, but especially his driving in wet conditions shows how good his feel is for exactly where the limits of grip and the car are.
Ok before I made this comment I want to clear one thing, this is not a Hamilton hate comment but it's a far fetched to say Hamilton is adaptable because we never saw Hamilton have a car with bad characteristics because every lewis' teammates won at least one race in a same car he never ever had a bad car. And not to mention kimi won a championship with bridge stone, yes he struggled we also have to realise Michael schumacher accepted that he cocked up in 2008 while giving Ferrari feedback during the test and pleasing the development of the car
And Ferrari sabotaged a lot of times with kmi giving him older suspension parts ot cocking up his strategy yes in 2014 to 2016 he did struggle a lot but in 17 and 18 he was on point and would've should've won a few more races if Ferrari didn't favoured vettel right fully so. And over the years kimi has driven 6 different cars 2 different Ferrari's and 2 different saubers from different eras mclaren and , lotus, but coming back to the point how can one say lewis is adaptable when we never saw him have a bad car or a car that didn't suit his driving style because mclaren was a well planted car with good rear grip and even Mercedes had a car similar to that set up good rear grip and a understeery car a bit weird to say lewis is adabtle for Pedro to say because we never saw him in a car that was bad because his teammate also won races in the same car
@@dragmedia963 Bottas never won in 2018. lewis wants an oversteery car, like max, schumi and Kimi, the mercedes is an overall gripy car and there are different setups, for particular drivers.
@@puiahnamte4763 not sure abt lewis wants an oversteery car, becuase lewis brakes late and when u brake late u will also brake harder, and when u brake harder the load and weight of the car transfers to the front giving more grip at the front. So if lewis wants an oversteery car plus he brakes late the car would be very very oversteery and u might also spin. That is why checo is a lil bit uncomfortable with the redbull becuase he likes an understeery car and the rb is oversteery, I think one of the examples of this is when Checo spins out of his final flying lap in Monaco 2022
“Kimi needs a sharp front end or he won’t drive it” Has raced in 6 very different car concepts and been fairly successful in all of them except the saubers which are always at the back anyway. So you’re wrong. Then immediately you start comparing Hamilton with Alonso?? 😆🥴😆🥴😆🥴😆🥴 Good job making it obvious within the first 30 seconds that it’s not worth listening to a word you have to say! 🤣
Thank you for watching, please remember to Like and Subscribe for more content!
You got it very wrong. Kimi sets the car different to the knifes edge where only he car drive it. For example Lotus they refused to set the car the way Kimi wanted it. But after lot discussion and argument they did to prove Kimi wrong. But Kimi was 1 second faster. It is the fast hands and control that no one else has. Romain they had to opt for a longer wheelbase and different front suspension. When in Ferrari Kimi was neber number one driver. 2007 he was just good and Massa lost all mathematical chances. Rest is history how Ferrari screwed Kimi. For example 2014 suspension was so terrible in purpose that Kimi was not able to drive it. Plus Kimi was rendered to racing test driver for Ferrari and to find equivalent electronic traction control that RB was using from Magneti Marelli. Ferrari failed and opted to Magneti Marelli also. Ferrari never gave Kimi any chances. It is pointless to even compere. 2013 for Ferrari lost to Lotus. Ferrari had to get Kimi and Allison to Ferrari and destroy the pair. +4 billion in stake from Alonso/Santander was the price.
Kimi was really a different beast with the Michelins
he really was! I will be making more driving style compilations. please subscribe for more content
@@nandilemsweli6943 cant wait 😀
Thank you for watching. Please subscribe for mlre
Yeah, Kimi's meta was really something else.
If you have ever driven even say passenger cars, you'll understand why his preference is for strong front end. i.e. FWD vs RWD, fwd it's understeer and even accounting for the difference torque-steer makes if you break traction you go straight no exceptions. With a strong turn in on a rwd vehicle you can adjust to the surface and immediately accelerate, only cure for understeer even with RWD is to slow down. Ask any slightly skilled driver from an inclement weather area (snow, heavy rain, ice, sand, mud) and they'll likely agree with Kimi's style if understand
Pedro is a legend! I love how precise and intelligent shows in here. Probably the best test driver of his generation.
i love to see how lewis adapts to 2019 and 2020 ferrari
Vettel's opinion was that Kimi was the best at quickly adapting to a new car or new conditions on pure instinct. I'm sure there are setups he works worse on though, but especially his driving in wet conditions shows how good his feel is for exactly where the limits of grip and the car are.
Great video!
Ok before I made this comment I want to clear one thing, this is not a Hamilton hate comment but it's a far fetched to say Hamilton is adaptable because we never saw Hamilton have a car with bad characteristics because every lewis' teammates won at least one race in a same car he never ever had a bad car. And not to mention kimi won a championship with bridge stone, yes he struggled we also have to realise Michael schumacher accepted that he cocked up in 2008 while giving Ferrari feedback during the test and pleasing the development of the car
And Ferrari sabotaged a lot of times with kmi giving him older suspension parts ot cocking up his strategy yes in 2014 to 2016 he did struggle a lot but in 17 and 18 he was on point and would've should've won a few more races if Ferrari didn't favoured vettel right fully so. And over the years kimi has driven 6 different cars 2 different Ferrari's and 2 different saubers from different eras mclaren and , lotus, but coming back to the point how can one say lewis is adaptable when we never saw him have a bad car or a car that didn't suit his driving style because mclaren was a well planted car with good rear grip and even Mercedes had a car similar to that set up good rear grip and a understeery car a bit weird to say lewis is adabtle for Pedro to say because we never saw him in a car that was bad because his teammate also won races in the same car
@@dragmedia963 Bottas never won in 2018. lewis wants an oversteery car, like max, schumi and Kimi, the mercedes is an overall gripy car and there are different setups, for particular drivers.
Lewis never having a bad car is revisionist at best
@@puiahnamte4763 not sure abt lewis wants an oversteery car, becuase lewis brakes late and when u brake late u will also brake harder, and when u brake harder the load and weight of the car transfers to the front giving more grip at the front. So if lewis wants an oversteery car plus he brakes late the car would be very very oversteery and u might also spin. That is why checo is a lil bit uncomfortable with the redbull becuase he likes an understeery car and the rb is oversteery, I think one of the examples of this is when Checo spins out of his final flying lap in Monaco 2022
Kimi the best for ever
Kimi was thr greatest 😮😊❤
king kimi
Who was talking?
Pedro de la Rosa. On the beyond the grid podcast
Dahora dms
“Kimi needs a sharp front end or he won’t drive it”
Has raced in 6 very different car concepts and been fairly successful in all of them except the saubers which are always at the back anyway. So you’re wrong.
Then immediately you start comparing Hamilton with Alonso??
😆🥴😆🥴😆🥴😆🥴
Good job making it obvious within the first 30 seconds that it’s not worth listening to a word you have to say!
🤣
You obviously didn't understand what Pedro was trying to say
So you r trying to say u know more about f1 than de la rossa
I'll take Pedro De La Rosa's thoughts on the subject over yours.