World of Warships - Raeders' Raider

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 4 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 320

  • @skepticistr4326
    @skepticistr4326 Рік тому +60

    This video reminds me of Yuro’s guide to the Scharnhorst many moons ago. “It is a d-wagon with semi-auto rifle which is great for gunning down peasants while running away from the authority. AND YOU WILL RUN AWAY FROM THE AUTHORITY.”

    • @gyrene_asea4133
      @gyrene_asea4133 Рік тому +2

      yes. a much under-appreciated You-tube episode.

  • @Aelxi
    @Aelxi Рік тому +342

    With my 10yrs of expertise in historical naval warfare, I can say that Scharnhorst is definitely a battlestar

    • @smilingpolitely12345
      @smilingpolitely12345 Рік тому +6

      Yeah buddy I would disagree , that was a nazi ship operated by nazi sailors , that aided nazi ragime ... and at the end got sunk = he was a looser .

    • @TheSegert
      @TheSegert Рік тому +1

      @@smilingpolitely12345 Dude not al germans where nazi's. I dont think that many in the kriegsmarine where really nazi's. Just germans fighting for their country.

    • @rohesilmnelohe
      @rohesilmnelohe Рік тому +33

      ​@@smilingpolitely12345at least it wasn't soviet

    • @smilingpolitely12345
      @smilingpolitely12345 Рік тому +1

      @@rohesilmnelohe ...soviet , nazi same shit , they where ally after all ...

    • @marcl.1346
      @marcl.1346 Рік тому +13

      Galactica

  • @yayeet7274
    @yayeet7274 Рік тому +56

    Look at the spray that Atlantic bow is creating. Art department on their A game as per usual

  • @mrjockt
    @mrjockt Рік тому +126

    An addendum to the Glorious and Courageous story, their conversion to carriers gave the Royal Navy four spare 15” twin turrets which were eventually fitted to the Royal Navy’s last battleship H.M.S. Vanguard.

    • @TheKazragore
      @TheKazragore Рік тому +5

      Not just the Royal Navy's last battleship, I believe she was the last battleship *ever* made.

  • @tomvsas
    @tomvsas Рік тому +74

    Another great thing that I noticed about the Scharnhorst is that it actually uptiers surprisingly well. Why do I say so? The higher tiers tend to have a lot of large cruisers with big guns. In a higher tier game, you can actually use the Scharnhorst as such. It has guns big enough to punish cruisers, while also having the reload to consistently set fires. Besides, it also has enough range (and a spotter plane) for attacking ships at longer ranges. The only downside of course is that the guns aren't quite as accurate, but well, it's still a tier 7 battleship... it cannot have everything.

    • @hashteraksgage3281
      @hashteraksgage3281 Рік тому +4

      It's also tanky and slippery enough for it to not be focused by higher tier BBs like a Colorado or Kansas would

    • @plektosgaming
      @plektosgaming Рік тому +3

      The spotter plane also works well as a makeshift radar. It won't light up everything, but it will allow your team to see farther and behind things. There are many times that I've dropped a spotter plane and suddenly my whole team can see those fools who committed to the "death run" on Two Brothers. :). My only complaint is that there aren't more ships with 10-11 inch guns as 8-9 bounces, and 12+ overpens most things.

    • @gd88467
      @gd88467 Рік тому +1

      @@hashteraksgage3281​​⁠ and if played correctly those torps can surprise enemies and add a edge in bb brawls. Lol just don’t go Leroy on it haha

    • @grahamstrouse1165
      @grahamstrouse1165 Рік тому +1

      Scharnhorst matches up quite well the the tier IX super-cruisers.

    • @tomvsas
      @tomvsas Рік тому +1

      @@grahamstrouse1165 That's the point. When bottom tier, it's basically a tier 9 super cruiser that takes a battleship slot.

  • @tomekes5782
    @tomekes5782 Рік тому +33

    Heh, the Scharnhorst practically made a circle around the entire map. Using mobility to its best. Well played.
    Love this ship as well.

  • @jamesfisher5233
    @jamesfisher5233 Рік тому +142

    It was convoy PQ17 not PQ13. Never change Jingles

    • @korbell1089
      @korbell1089 Рік тому +6

      beat me to it. Although PQ13 did have it's own moment in history.👍

    • @justandy333
      @justandy333 Рік тому +6

      Umm Actually Jingles...🤣🤣🤣

    • @MadmanJnr
      @MadmanJnr Рік тому +3

      @jamesfisher5233 curious to know if you looked it up or knew about it before hand? I had no clue until I saw your comment

    • @DevSolar
      @DevSolar Рік тому +3

      @@MadmanJnr Read about it back when Jingles was probably still a fresh seaman. (sp!, I am not *that* old. ;-) )

    • @dbracer
      @dbracer Рік тому +2

      I imagine him looking at the comment section and going "waaaaaah!" the traditional UK armed forces response to someone who bites on an obvious falsehood. See also the "Um, Actually" online game show.

  • @t.a.ackerman4098
    @t.a.ackerman4098 Рік тому +110

    Does anyone else think that the Schanhorst is a really nice 'looking' ship?

    • @onnihalme2047
      @onnihalme2047 Рік тому +3

      I used to not care for the german designs earlier but theyve definetely grown on me and i think a lot of them look great nowadays. great proportions

    • @gothamgoon4237
      @gothamgoon4237 Рік тому +5

      Look at the lines of the gneisenau. Beautiful looking ship even though it's quite shiite in the game and it's the sister ship of the Sharnhorst. Germany knew how to build beautiful looking ships. I like the look of the Japanese Amagi too.

    • @gmansplit
      @gmansplit Рік тому

      Why did you put "looking" in quotation marks?

    • @t.a.ackerman4098
      @t.a.ackerman4098 Рік тому

      @@gmansplit 'cause my diction ain't good. 😉

    • @byz-blade
      @byz-blade Рік тому

      Yes!

  • @jimbe01
    @jimbe01 Рік тому +2

    Jingles, It was PQ-17 that was “scattered” as a result of the (non-actual) threat of the Tirpitz sortie ing against the Murmansk bound convoy.

  • @jarrodkopf6813
    @jarrodkopf6813 Рік тому +3

    4:57
    Fun Fact: Karl Doenitz actually proposed the Kriegsmarine should have built a bunch of U-Boats and small surface ships, such as destroyers and torpedo boats, ready to sink the Royal Navy's convoys in case war broke out between the Germans and the British as these small vessels are cheaper to build than battleships and battlecruisers. Karl Doenitz also learned from the First World War that their U-Boats were also really good at sinking merchant ships. However, Hitler refused Doenitz's proposal because he pretty much was a megalomaniac when he wanted the Kriegsmarine to build bigger and more powerful warships than the Royal Navy.

  • @kartavianmacrath7219
    @kartavianmacrath7219 Рік тому +3

    That was beautifully played by the Scharnhorst and Serov. I definitely agree about the North Carolina driver, they were probably riding the hype all the way to the collision, lol.

  • @Tarris_
    @Tarris_ Рік тому +26

    Woo nothing like Jingles to end the night

    • @lcarus42
      @lcarus42 Рік тому +8

      or start the day...

    • @pereponsa7206
      @pereponsa7206 Рік тому +6

      ​@@lcarus42truly the channel where the sun never sets

    • @chriszaiser
      @chriszaiser Рік тому +3

      It's 5:33 am.... well over here 😂😅

    • @NoName-sb9tp
      @NoName-sb9tp Рік тому +1

      @@chriszaiserfor me it's 3:17 at the time of upload lol

    • @bearcatracing007
      @bearcatracing007 Рік тому

      Giggity

  • @paulochon8664
    @paulochon8664 Рік тому +10

    Actually Jingles (tm), your description of commerce raiders applies to the Deutschland class, not the Scharnhorst & Gneisenau. These were designed as fast battleships (a response to Dunkerque and Strasbourg), and the reason they had 11" guns was that naval rearmament was a huge mess and the Germans didn't have time to come up with their 15" turrets in time, so they went with 11" - a caliber that they had lots of experience with - with plans to refit to 8 x 15" (like the Gneisenau in WoWS). That refitting never happened as they never had the spare drydock space for it.
    Also, when the twins did go out in the Atlantic, the Admiralty had to shut down all convoys until the Germans were back in Brest, resulting in severe disruption of Britain's economic and supply situation.
    That said, I'm loving the history lesson, for the same reason I love his linguistic lessons: a lot of it's wrong, but it's entertaining.
    P.S. the French destroyer Guepard is pronounced "Gay - par"

  • @Peaky17
    @Peaky17 Рік тому +12

    Wow, just received this ship in a Super Container (literally 5 minutes ago) and then Jingles drops this video. First tier 7 premium as well, pretty good for a f2p

  • @TehKang
    @TehKang Рік тому +11

    Not sure why he chose to use the port side torps on the Bismark when she was going to cross his bow. Better to take the Bismark's salvo on the bow while turning port to then strike with the starboard torps. Worked out in the end but definitely didn't need to risk it like he did. Solid Kraken all the same

    • @yashma4187
      @yashma4187 Рік тому +1

      I think the logic was to use the port side torpedoes so that he had the option of going for the starboard side if the first rack didn't secure the kill

    • @TehKang
      @TehKang Рік тому +3

      @@yashma4187 I agree that that was probably the train of thought. Just in my mind I wouldn't want to risk my broadside like that. If he'd been slightly lower health Bismark would have deleted him before torps could be launched

  • @notsureyou
    @notsureyou Рік тому +8

    Jingles: "It has certain limitations"
    Me: "And a man has got to know it's limitations"

    • @fruxyeah1780
      @fruxyeah1780 Рік тому +2

      Harry Callahan ?

    • @notsureyou
      @notsureyou Рік тому

      @@fruxyeah1780 As Teal'c would say.... "Indeed"

  • @danielpayne1597
    @danielpayne1597 Рік тому

    Super enjoyed the explanation of the German WWII naval strategy and its roots in The Great War's strategic defeat. Also, Scharnhorst is my favorite T7. So much fun to play

  • @Bigbatmatt
    @Bigbatmatt Рік тому +5

    Always enjoy watching this ship. It’s such a beautiful ship

  • @gouriel
    @gouriel 11 місяців тому

    Love this video and the historical background, this is why Jingles is a star!

  • @SgtMclupus
    @SgtMclupus Рік тому +38

    It's the TOP FOUR on the winning team, not top two...
    I begin to think Jingles is doing these fails intentionally to get more comments 😂

    • @thomaskositzki9424
      @thomaskositzki9424 Рік тому

      He's an attention wh**e for sure! 🤣

    • @murasame5071
      @murasame5071 Рік тому +2

      you asume english education system is capable of teaching them how to count properly ? :D

    • @markswalley8716
      @markswalley8716 Рік тому

      Well actually... I think you might be right 😆

    • @sebastiant4597
      @sebastiant4597 Рік тому +2

      Jingles just gives a sh*t about details. Guess he couldn't be bothered to care even if Queen Charles II was going to knight him in Buckingham fountain (wich is in Santiago btw).

  • @windborne8795
    @windborne8795 Рік тому +3

    Man I missed these style of Jingles' WoWs replays! Bravo Mr. Carlton! Bravo! May we have some more please?!

  • @SLO-Ride
    @SLO-Ride Рік тому +2

    Did anyone else notice the new graphics, of the waves crashing over the bow? Good job WoW!!

  • @tommasocreatini2513
    @tommasocreatini2513 Рік тому +1

    always love the history lesson from professor jingles

  • @leeroyjenkins422
    @leeroyjenkins422 Рік тому

    Another great video! Tks! I love the historic stories you include in the videos. It really sets you apart from just a regular WOW review.

  • @Zorglub1966
    @Zorglub1966 Рік тому +1

    The sun shines, and there is a new Jingles video. It's better than an Hamlet cigar ad!

  • @benhall7574
    @benhall7574 Рік тому +1

    Love getting the history lesson on the scharnhorst! :)

  • @alanhughes6753
    @alanhughes6753 Рік тому +2

    Jingles - other WW1 naval battles include the Battle of Heligoland Bight and the Battle of Dogger Bank - both significant battles (much bigger than the fracas at the Falkland Islands).

  • @Dikin-pj6lk
    @Dikin-pj6lk Рік тому +2

    Thank You Jingles !!!🎉

  • @justandy333
    @justandy333 Рік тому +1

    I love it when Jingles goes on a good history ramble. Although it was PQ17 that got into trouble. Rather than PQ13.
    Its also interesting to read, if Karl Donitz had his way, the Kreigsmarine wouldn't have had the battleships they did. He wanted to focus on building submarines....alot of submarines. But alas Hitler wanted a very visible big gun battleship fleet so thats what they got. I fear if they instead focused on churning out better and more numerous submarines, the war would have gone very very differently.

    • @battleship6177
      @battleship6177 Рік тому

      no, more or less the same concerning Allied technology especially by 1943

  • @phillipm9285
    @phillipm9285 Рік тому

    I appreciate the history lessons that you give during gameplay.

  • @heneagedundas
    @heneagedundas Рік тому +3

    Actually Jingles, it was PQ-17, not PQ-13. And the High Seas Fleet did venture out again after Jutland, just not to any effect. It's a common myth though.

  • @Alex-jk7vc
    @Alex-jk7vc Рік тому +8

    Love the history lessons by Jingles! Really interesting to listen to him :D

    • @luke_3_113
      @luke_3_113 Рік тому +2

      Seems like it's been a while - often a little bit of Jingly misinformation in them, but great backdrop to the battle being played. :)

  • @7thsealord888
    @7thsealord888 Рік тому +1

    I THINK it was PQ17, that got the infamous "convoy will scatter" order/

  • @chipwaiter
    @chipwaiter Рік тому

    Love getting history with these videos

  • @vregile
    @vregile Рік тому +4

    I just know everyone was rooting for a cool Flesh Wound torpedo run by the end.

  • @tsunami729
    @tsunami729 Рік тому +1

    Ahhh…a Jingles post late during a hot California night…glorious

  • @markalvarado4450
    @markalvarado4450 Рік тому

    i love the history lessons from jingles vidoes

  • @paulhorrox6478
    @paulhorrox6478 Рік тому +3

    4:30 I'm not sure how any fleet that gets its T crossed twice in the same battle and as a result gets shot so full of holes that they barely managed to (mostly) limp back to port can count Jutland as a tactical victory.

    • @karlchenkarolinger5799
      @karlchenkarolinger5799 Рік тому

      just ask admiral Hood

    • @paulshaffer3001
      @paulshaffer3001 Рік тому +1

      by tonnage and by sailors lost. depending on source, GB lost 113,300 and the germans lost 62,300. In terms of sailors, GB lost 6748 and Germany 3039.

  • @sourvad
    @sourvad Рік тому

    Oh I remember when you played as the Furious and Acasta in your Cold Waters video. How time has passed..

  • @Nerezza1
    @Nerezza1 Рік тому

    The Scharnhorsts were built to counter the Dunkerque class. They were fitted with 11" guns(not the same gun though )like the Deutschland-class to not anger Britain.
    They were based on German WW1 battlecruiser designs due to the fact that german shipyards no longer had any experience in building capital ships.
    All in all they were pretty good ships, but they were never intended to raid British shipping. This was demonstrated quite well when HMS Renown chased both of them off in an artic storm.

  • @johnaloi7750
    @johnaloi7750 Рік тому +2

    Supporting jingles!

  • @Mike34916
    @Mike34916 Рік тому +2

    "The Little Austrian Corporal" is one of the most generous descriptions and, simultaneously, derogatory descriptions I have ever heard used.

  • @rvsonthelevel8746
    @rvsonthelevel8746 Рік тому

    That outlook sound was making me go crazy, kept checking my email lol

  • @iamjordandavis
    @iamjordandavis Рік тому

    Old boy coming through with the goods, keep up the good work!

  • @kuhluhOG
    @kuhluhOG Рік тому

    8:45 Actually, it did sail. They just turned around after the scattered.
    The Germans obviously knew that the British will know when the Tirpitz moves and where it will move.
    So they pretty much used it to their advantage.

  • @geographyRyan
    @geographyRyan Рік тому +4

    *"Similar to the Gneisenau"*
    Yes, they're the same class. Jingles moment

  • @michaeljacob9381
    @michaeljacob9381 Рік тому

    Great video, thanks!

  • @loanstowalruses
    @loanstowalruses Рік тому +6

    It's also worth noting on Jutland that while the German navy escaped with fewer outright losses, most of their battle line were floating wrecks needing substantial dockyard time. The Germans came out of that battle fully aware that a slightly better fuse on the British side leaves well over half their battle line on the bottom of the North Sea. They had absorbed hits at something like a 10 to 1 rare through much of that battle once the bulk of the Grand Fleet under Jellicoe joined the battleship action.

    • @karlchenkarolinger5799
      @karlchenkarolinger5799 Рік тому +1

      the high seas fleet was back at the north sea at august... no substantial dockyard time. and the story that they never sailed after jutland is also false

    • @Nerezza1
      @Nerezza1 Рік тому

      ​​@@karlchenkarolinger5799Most of their damaged ships needed substantial dockyard time, at least one even needed refloating.
      The British fleet was up to the same strength in two weeks and as displayed by the Bayern gunnery tests, the Germans were exceedingly lucky that Jellicoe was too busy with other matters to follow up on the faulty shells after he took command of the Grand Fleet.

  • @Apollyon-er4ut
    @Apollyon-er4ut Рік тому +1

    The Scharny was my first premium, I was offered 50% off by WG, as a new player. I wasn't a very good player, but had some pretty awesome games just because of its toughness. It's still my highest kill ship (7 kills, about 2 years after I got it) and still enjoy it, but I play it a lot better.

  • @samuelhartmann1824
    @samuelhartmann1824 Рік тому

    I remember outplaying a scharnhorst in an Arizona because he kept firing ap at me so I would angle bounce his shells and then dump 12 14 inch shells into his upper works.

  • @thijshagenbeek6554
    @thijshagenbeek6554 Рік тому +2

    Sharnhorst and the Bismarck are everything the German BB tech line should be. But I prefer the Scharnhorst, its such a stunner of a ship.

  • @terryvickers5986
    @terryvickers5986 4 місяці тому

    The Sharnhost seems to be popular in brawls right now. Makes it impossible for my Lightning and the Leander I got paired with repeatedly, to even have a ghost of a chance.

  • @lindaorr1805
    @lindaorr1805 Рік тому +3

    As always jingles you speak from the heart and experience. Thanks much !!!!!!!!//!

  • @Xander3509
    @Xander3509 Рік тому +2

    Random challenge, how many years until Jingles gets a screen where he can still read the results when he's editing a video?

  • @Dem0nActual
    @Dem0nActual Рік тому +1

    "the Scharnhorst and Gneisenau are actually very similar." Well Jingles, its funny you should say that....

  • @donaldbraugh2314
    @donaldbraugh2314 Рік тому

    I like best the Jingles narrated and produced videos wherein historical context is contained.

  • @kigyar1776
    @kigyar1776 Рік тому +2

    When i play this ship i run it like a cruiser and like to brawl at times, i really like this ship.

  • @8RedBear5
    @8RedBear5 Рік тому

    The Scharnhorst was one of the first Premium ships I won in a player ran forum contest. RIP the good ol' forum contests.
    You must remember the Scharnhorst is listed as a Battleship, she must be played like a cruiser but The Shiny Horse thinks she is a Destroyer. I just wish they would fix her main guns accuracy because I've seen some weird stuff from those 11inch rifles. Like missing a broad side cruiser from close range with the front guns and drilling a Battleships Citadel at almost max range with the rear gun. AT The Same TIME!?!?!

  • @jkausti6737
    @jkausti6737 Рік тому +1

    Actually Jingles.... Wargamings latest trick is to bring air craft carrier submarine hybrids into the game. Yes, they are actually doing that.

    • @BinkyTheElf1
      @BinkyTheElf1 Рік тому

      Don’t be so silly. It’s going to be a CV-BB-Sub-Cruiser-DD-Tier 12 class. Very special, expensive, and they double-pinky-swear promise that’s the end of silly ship money-grabs. 🤨

  • @davidlabedz2046
    @davidlabedz2046 Рік тому

    Very interesting to watch!😊

  • @tigeriussvarne177
    @tigeriussvarne177 Рік тому +1

    Funfact: Germans still pay a tax on sparkling wine, that was introduced by Kaiser Wilhelm II. for his fleet and the Kaiser-Wilhelm-Kanal.

  • @Julius_Hardware
    @Julius_Hardware Рік тому +18

    Actually Jingles, the Kriegsmarine certainly wanted to build a big battle fleet (the Z plan) - because they were massive noobs.
    The Scharnhorsts were built for political reasons due to the London Naval Treaty - the navy for a moment had Hitler's favour and the Ok from the British to build some capital ships. So they built the biggest they could with the money and tech available - so 11" guns as 15"s were not yet available. In an ideal world they would rather have waited, and always intended to convert then to 15".
    When WWII did break out, the KM conducted raider warfare as it was the only choice for the surface fleet. By accident rather than design, Scharnhorst and Gneisenau turned out to be rather good at it.

  • @jwiwahn3516
    @jwiwahn3516 Рік тому

    One of your best Videos! Love you! Grüsse aus Deutschland!

  • @DualorProductions
    @DualorProductions Рік тому

    Just seen jingles appear on a BBC news article for the bovingtons youtube article :)

  • @lokai7914
    @lokai7914 Рік тому

    Nicely done!

  • @xxmedalofhonorxx6744
    @xxmedalofhonorxx6744 Рік тому

    I still love how every other Nation except the one that build the ship still classifies the Scharnhorst and Gneisenau as Battlecruisers rather than Battleships like the German Navy did

  • @jcorbett9620
    @jcorbett9620 Рік тому

    8:20 Think you are getting your PQs mixed up, Jingles ol' boy. PQ13 successfully made it to Murmansk with the loss of 5 freighters and one escort, with the cruiser HMS Trinidad damaged. It was PQ17 that suffered almost total annihilation at the hands of the U-boats and Luftwaffe, due to the 'implied' threat of Tirpitz.
    Pretty sure it was 4, not 2, of Byzantineblades team who got more base XP than the Bismark and Nebraska, as both the Gepard and N. Carolina score over 1400 base, as opposed to the Bismark and Nebraskas 1200+ base.

  • @Ushio01
    @Ushio01 Рік тому +1

    Jutland ended up being much worse for Germany since the UK was able to get all their damaged ships repaired and fighting again within 6 months while Germany couldn't get even lightly damaged ships back to sea again for 18 months or longer.

  • @Terrathrax
    @Terrathrax Рік тому

    Wow WTF, that Nebraska turning quick like a cruiser.

  • @jacoblansman8147
    @jacoblansman8147 Рік тому

    What Jingles says in this video regarding why the Scharnhorst was produced and what the British did in response makes it sound like the German combat operation Rheinubung was devised in response to the British stationing battleships and fleets in the Atlantic.
    For those unaware, Rheinubung was the German combat operation that the Bismarck took part in, alongside the Prinz Eugen. It was initially supposed to be the Bismarck, Tirpitz, Gneisenau and Scharnhorst cruising around in the Atlantic bullying Allied fleets and convoys, but the Tirpitz wasn't completed in time, the Gneisenau was damaged by a torpedo attack and later bombed while in dry dock, and the Scharnhorst required a boiler overhaul, as her boilers were found to be in worse condition than anticipated. The Fleet Chief of the Kriegsmarine, who was leading the combat operation, wanted to delay it until either the Tirpitz or the Scharnhorst became available, but the German Naval High Command, commanded by one Erich Raeder, ordered them to proceed on schedule and the Bismarck had only the Prinz Eugen to assist them.

  • @minneiskian
    @minneiskian Рік тому

    Here's a scary hypothetical matchmaking fail to purge you night of sleep, a tier 8 battle against Kaga, Indomitable, Nebraska, Ise, Tone, U-190, Salmon, and whatever else fills the enemy team slots.

  • @ryanbrewis6990
    @ryanbrewis6990 Рік тому +3

    The issue with the HSF was it was big enough to threaten the RN's dominance but wasn't strong enough to truly defeat it.
    As for Germany not thinking about the same thing in WW2, I'll just say Plan Z. And in regard to PQ17, the heavies could probably have taken Tirpitz. Pound however was suffering from a brain tumour I believe and that affected his decision making accordingly.

  • @CherriPicking
    @CherriPicking Рік тому

    i do think the turn to the right at the end was a mistake, even if he didn't want to go for the ram - turning left also allows him to get the torpedoes away without exposing quite as much broadside. that said, still a great game!

  • @Bayou_Russ
    @Bayou_Russ Рік тому

    Good Ol’ Shiney Hoss, making medium to baby size reefs since 1939

  • @gabewilson5845
    @gabewilson5845 Рік тому +1

    5 am on the US easy coast, good morning

  • @chloehennessey6813
    @chloehennessey6813 Рік тому

    “There seems to be something bloody wrong with our ships today”.

  • @stevenhaffner3299
    @stevenhaffner3299 Рік тому +2

    Jingles murders players names like a battleship murders light cruisers.

  • @johnwinslow4860
    @johnwinslow4860 Рік тому

    The Shiny Horse rides again!!!

  • @LewisPulsipher
    @LewisPulsipher Рік тому

    I don't recall for sure, but didn't the between-wars treaties limit the German navy to 11 inch guns? The German plan was for the 11 inchers on Scharnhorst and her sister to be replaced with 15s as war approached.

    • @jaredthehawk3870
      @jaredthehawk3870 Рік тому

      More like they didn't have the experience or industry knowledge to build bigger guns yet. The KM was basically trying to relearn everything the HSF had, including ship design and building. This is why KM ships were rather inefficient in terms of design. Also the Gneisenau in game was what the 15in conversion would have been.

    • @LewisPulsipher
      @LewisPulsipher Рік тому

      @@jaredthehawk3870 "the Treaty of Versailles, which initially limited German battleships to 10,000 tons and 11 inch main battery guns". Which is what the "pocket battleships" were meant to conform to. In 1935 Germany was limited (Anglo-German treaty) to 35000 ton BB, which is where Scharnhorst and sister come in.

    • @jaredthehawk3870
      @jaredthehawk3870 Рік тому

      @LewisPulsipher not quite, they stuck to the smaller caliber as to not to provoke the British too much. The Anglo German Naval Treaty of 1935 allowed the German Navy guns a maximum of 16in. However developing bigger guns would take time (all the data from the High Seas Fleet had been lost), and bad mustache man wanted ships now, so they had to settle for the smaller caliber already in use by the Deutschlands.

  • @DragonSt3alth
    @DragonSt3alth Рік тому

    The Scharnhorst was the epitome of the majority of German surface ship fleet design... to destroy supply lines, not for major surface engagements

  • @tomaseidtner8116
    @tomaseidtner8116 Рік тому

    well there is another spot, why the germans had the scharnhorst and gneisenau used 11inch(28cm) guns. Versailles (WW1 End.Treaty) only allowed them to maintain 6 older predeadnaught class ships, and they were armed with 11inchers. So germany could not build any gun with a bigger caliber (they could remake and improve the 11ers, but nothing bigger)- they had planed to use the 15inch on both, but the war and problems within krupp (the manufactorer) made that impossible-at the end they designed both ship with the idea of swaping out the tripple11 for dual15s asap. But only gneisenau got those at the end of the war. Scharnhorst was sunk, befor they got to that. (by Duke of York- another Ship available in WoW)

  • @stmichaelminion
    @stmichaelminion Рік тому

    Great engaging video

  • @Quenstar
    @Quenstar Рік тому

    The CLEVELAND was my first tier 8 ship, because they moved it up from tier 6.

  • @jessieevans8258
    @jessieevans8258 Рік тому

    18:34 Jingles moment.🙂

  • @YiotisTheGnome
    @YiotisTheGnome Рік тому

    Ah, a secret history lesson from jingles. Today is a good day.

  • @chunkylover108
    @chunkylover108 Рік тому +1

    Turning to launch the torps… could easily have ended up a Game of Throws vid! 😂

  • @tomhollins5303
    @tomhollins5303 Рік тому

    18:28 Pulling a Jingle there I see

  • @pissedoffhobbit974
    @pissedoffhobbit974 Рік тому

    Quick question might overlord. Are the ports that are rendered at the beginning of battles and on players ship select screens based on real locations. I very much enjoyed your flight simulator tour of ports that you had been while you were in the Navy. So if anyone would know you would.

  • @cgross82
    @cgross82 Рік тому

    Well done, Byzantine Blade!

  • @limbekcs
    @limbekcs Рік тому

    18:27 - actually Jingles, more than the top 4 (not 2 : )

  • @notsureyou
    @notsureyou Рік тому

    In the fight with the Battle with the Glorious,
    Only the twins were present.

  • @kuwanger12
    @kuwanger12 Рік тому

    1. It was Convoy PQ-17, not PQ-13
    2. You're overthinking it. 11 inch guns were put in Scharnhorst and Gneisenau because at the time they were built, that was the largest gun that Germany had the technology to build. They lost the technology to build larger ones in the fallout following WW1. The Germans made plans to upgun Scharnhorst and Gneisenau as soon as they worked out how to build larger guns again.
    3. The *battleships* Scharnhorst and Gneisenau weren't built as battlecruisers (which, by the way, is defined more by specification than role. The Ugly Sisters were battleships through and through), they just happened to be used as raiders because that's all they *could* be used for.

  • @lumpilumpinski9951
    @lumpilumpinski9951 Рік тому

    I could listen to your voice, even if you read a telephonebook.

  • @niallcunningham642
    @niallcunningham642 Рік тому

    Tirpitz DID sortie against PQ17.
    I don't know why but it is something you see in a lot of accounts about PQ17, the idea that the surface threat against was largely imaginary and that Tirpitz stayed safe in harbour all the time. Make no doubt, PQ17 was a major screwup by Admiral Pound and the RN with consequences way beyond the loss of 2/3rds of the convoy - but the threat was very real.
    The Germans threw pretty much every surface vessel they had against PQ17 - they sortied 2 major surface combatant groups - Tirpitz, Hipper and 4xDDs left Trondheim on the 2nd, Lutzow, Scheer and 5xDDs left Narvik on the 3rd and their objective was the destruction of PQ17. Things went wrong for the Germans almost immediately with Lutzow and most of Tirpitz's DD escort running aground on rocks. Now the RN didn't exactly know where Tirpitz & Hipper had gone to - but they knew they had headed north, and it was unlikely to be for the scenery (which is beautiful btw)
    At the time the scatter order was given (22:00 on the 4th) the remnants of both surface groups has assembled in Altenfjord, but that is right up at the northern tip of Norway. The convoy was just north of Bear Island at the time and Bear Island to Altenfjord is only about 10-12 hours steaming for the big ships if they put their foot down.
    Indeed on the 5th the entire group (1xBB, 2x CA and 7x DD) were given final permission to attack and left the fjord - heading for the now scattered PQ17, but after about 6 hours the germans lost their nerve and recalled them again.
    It was a major effort by the Germans, they blew 3x months fuel supply on the operation, and it was mainly the very convoluted and cautious command structure for the operation that meant there was not a major engagement between the 2x surface combat groups and the RN covering force.
    Although ironically they ended succeeding in spite of themselves.

  • @WandererRTF
    @WandererRTF Рік тому

    Shiny horse is my favorite destroyer (a bit on the heavy side...) in the game.

  • @clintonturner5545
    @clintonturner5545 10 місяців тому

    Watch out for those Cylon Raiders.

  • @swordmonkey6635
    @swordmonkey6635 Рік тому

    Germany's goal in WW1 wasn't to avoid combat. It was to divide and conquer the RN's superior fleet. Germany tried numerous times to lure small parts of the RN out to engage with mixed results. Jutland was brought about by Germany attempting to lure a part of the RN to destroy it, without realizing the entire RN fleet was in tow.
    The German Naval Admirals wanted to engage the RN, but the Kaiser refused to allow is navy to engage in "even" combat in fear of losing his precious ships. The German Admirals, Hipper especially resented the Kaiser for his lack of aggression.

  • @usssimshullnumberdd-4095
    @usssimshullnumberdd-4095 Рік тому

    "The Scharnhorst is kinda the same as the Gniesnenau."
    Hmmm, I wonder why that might be Jingles. It couldn't POSSIBLY be because they are the same class of ship with different guns. That would be silly... oh wait

  • @seinexer
    @seinexer Рік тому +1

    And soon the I-54 will join the hybrid party and we have a hybrid sub, what a time in WoWs

    • @russward2612
      @russward2612 Рік тому

      How about the IJN 400 class subs? Submarine/Aircraft carrier hybrids, not many planes but still something you'd never expect.

    • @seinexer
      @seinexer Рік тому

      @@russward2612 these will possibly be implemented with the next Arpeggio collab

  • @battleship6177
    @battleship6177 Рік тому

    Jingles... I really want you to explain to me how the Scharnhorst is a Battlecruiser... even by British doctrine this doesn't make sense with her 13.8in of belt.
    Also the Scharnhorst class were supposed to be fitted with 15in guns (like the Gneisenau in WoWs) but didnt have any at the time, so opted for the already available 11in guns.