Ron let it go brother people have already bought into the out of focus stars. The FE community will believe all the bigger channels that promote this way over us little channels. Haven't you noticed every time you bring this up you get shit for view counts? Even clouds behind the sun and moon are believed and if you prove clouds aren't going behind them you are now the enemy of truth. Now we have 2 suns according to Bob from GB'ers and when I stood up to him I came out holding the shit end of the stick. He claimed I went crazy on him but it was him that made hateful comments to me on my channel. He later removed his comments and then accused me of removing them. I did record them and was going to make a video showing how untruthful Bob was. I lost my best FE friend over it even though he won't admit it. He sided with Bob without hearing my side and my evidence that Bob was the real asshole. I'm pretty much done with FE because I don't want to be part of a community that blindly follows lies told by people that are making money off of FE. My next video will be me apologizing to those that do appreciate the work I've done. Other than that I'm finished.
I don't know if I can let it go, it drives me crazy. I have backed off some but every time I see that nonsense it gets me fired up. I usually get a couple of people to see the error in this every time I make a video about it, but the backlash I get is almost not worth the trouble. The FE movement is not going any further with all of the disinformation out there and the big channels seem more than happy to keep it going.
@@ronhagberg I can't hang in because the bigger channels control all the narrative of FE. They also don't support us because if they did they'd have to admit they were wrong but I don't ever see that happening. I'm tired of spinning my wheels for a handful of people that already know earth isn't a globe. Those are the people that I will owe an apology to though. I used to get s lot of comments and that's what has kept me going but now I'm luck to get 100 comments. Hell anymore I get more comments from the trolls than I get from FE'ers. I can't say I'm totally giving up but for now I'm done with wasting my valuable time.
Thx for this, been saying it for years. All anyone has to do, even with the P900, is turn the focus till the object is smallest, go a little forward and back to confirm, and they will know that a focused star isn't a watery-looking mysterious shape.
Thanks Ron Greatly appreciated, and remember everything is frequency and vibration like the Proton, neutron and electron, and stacking more of the same particles gives all the different ELements, but they are technically all the same particles, this realm is well disguised!! And set your sights as high as you can so that you are never shocked when things transpire :-)) We dont need to know everything, but its always good to know what its NOT!! Thanks again Ron, Honest and above all else meek and humble, Top Job brother, :-))
Another thing that you will notice is that like at 0:51 when the moon is exposed properly you cannot see any stars near it. If you kept the same exposure in manual setting, no stars would show up anywhere in the sky. You could possibly see Venus or Jupiter (planets) because they are much brighter than how bright the stars appear to us. So, when people ask why you can't see stars on the Apollo photos, that is the answer. They are too dim to see when the moon's surface is properly exposed. Your video is a good demonstration, not only of how focus affects the appearance of stars, but also how exposure affects the ability to even see them. If you want to photograph stars you need to adjust the exposure settings. Either by opening the aperture, doing a longer exposure or changing the ISO setting to a higher number. Equivalent of using faster film in a film camera.
I've been calling out these out of focus lies as well. Even went so far as to replicate "waters above" using nothing more than a fiber optic cable and a space heater to show how easy it is to fake. The same video where I did this ended up getting trimmed and popping up as a "proof". I still get folks commenting on my vids claiming I have no idea what in focus is, and saying I should upgrade to a P1000. My smallest scope is custom 100mm Russian LZOS astrograph.
Ron let it go brother people have already bought into the out of focus stars. The FE community will believe all the bigger channels that promote this way over us little channels.
Haven't you noticed every time you bring this up you get shit for view counts? Even clouds behind the sun and moon are believed and if you prove clouds aren't going behind them you are now the enemy of truth. Now we have 2 suns according to Bob from GB'ers and when I stood up to him I came out holding the shit end of the stick. He claimed I went crazy on him but it was him that made hateful comments to me on my channel. He later removed his comments and then accused me of removing them. I did record them and was going to make a video showing how untruthful Bob was. I lost my best FE friend over it even though he won't admit it. He sided with Bob without hearing my side and my evidence that Bob was the real asshole.
I'm pretty much done with FE because I don't want to be part of a community that blindly follows lies told by people that are making money off of FE.
My next video will be me apologizing to those that do appreciate the work I've done. Other than that I'm finished.
I don't know if I can let it go, it drives me crazy. I have backed off some but every time I see that nonsense it gets me fired up. I usually get a couple of people to see the error in this every time I make a video about it, but the backlash I get is almost not worth the trouble. The FE movement is not going any further with all of the disinformation out there and the big channels seem more than happy to keep it going.
And hang in there, the big channels want us gone, I plan on being a thorn in their side for a while longer, lol.
Wide Awake, Are you saying the sun is burning through all clouds? Not being a smart ass here, asking a genuine question.
@@painttank68
It has a lot to do with the light settings but a simple filter will take all the guess work out.
@@ronhagberg
I can't hang in because the bigger channels control all the narrative of FE. They also don't support us because if they did they'd have to admit they were wrong but I don't ever see that happening. I'm tired of spinning my wheels for a handful of people that already know earth isn't a globe. Those are the people that I will owe an apology to though.
I used to get s lot of comments and that's what has kept me going but now I'm luck to get 100 comments. Hell anymore I get more comments from the trolls than I get from FE'ers.
I can't say I'm totally giving up but for now I'm done with wasting my valuable time.
you said it. They want the stars to be " out of focus"
Great job Ron !
Great job again Ron. Thank you for sharing. Tried to show some people your other stuff but they don't want to know.
Thank you.
Thx for this, been saying it for years. All anyone has to do, even with the P900, is turn the focus till the object is smallest, go a little forward and back to confirm, and they will know that a focused star isn't a watery-looking mysterious shape.
Thank you :)
Thanks Ron Greatly appreciated, and remember everything is frequency and vibration like the Proton, neutron and electron, and stacking more of the same particles gives all the different ELements, but they are technically all the same particles, this realm is well disguised!! And set your sights as high as you can so that you are never shocked when things transpire :-)) We dont need to know everything, but its always good to know what its NOT!! Thanks again Ron, Honest and above all else meek and humble, Top Job brother, :-))
Another thing that you will notice is that like at 0:51 when the moon is exposed properly you cannot see any stars near it. If you kept the same exposure in manual setting, no stars would show up anywhere in the sky. You could possibly see Venus or Jupiter (planets) because they are much brighter than how bright the stars appear to us.
So, when people ask why you can't see stars on the Apollo photos, that is the answer. They are too dim to see when the moon's surface is properly exposed.
Your video is a good demonstration, not only of how focus affects the appearance of stars, but also how exposure affects the ability to even see them. If you want to photograph stars you need to adjust the exposure settings. Either by opening the aperture, doing a longer exposure or changing the ISO setting to a higher number. Equivalent of using faster film in a film camera.
I've been calling out these out of focus lies as well. Even went so far as to replicate "waters above" using nothing more than a fiber optic cable and a space heater to show how easy it is to fake. The same video where I did this ended up getting trimmed and popping up as a "proof".
I still get folks commenting on my vids claiming I have no idea what in focus is, and saying I should upgrade to a P1000. My smallest scope is custom 100mm Russian LZOS astrograph.
I just asked Siri if they're serious how far Sirius is.
😆 🤣
So, what was the answer? 😂