14:17. Real pilot here - yes jets really do recover that easy (I’ve flown the A320 and B777). But you made a very common mistake by recovering too early - when you said “it’s recovered already” and pulled up you entered a secondary accelerated stall. Need to keep the nose down to get more speed before you pull to recover. The difference to stalling a light plane is that a big jet needs a lot more time and altitude to recover from a full stall. But it’s perfectly doable.
@Another Virtual Identity of Someone Who Isn't Me so it's not a game because it tries to simulate something real? isn't that just most games? i'm not even trying to troll at this point, i honestly don't understand why people get all worked up when you call a 'sim' a game. can't it be both?
It's not a move to trash or get rid of the crate. If something is faulty in the setup or something breaks and u gotta send it back they only accept it with the box.
@@Canoodlan ultra. its about experience. That was the games selling point. why should i have to turn down settings. MY landing and taking off is only 25-35 fps.The game is CPU limited, GPU doesn't have that big of an effect. The game wont use more then 4 cores. idk what Microsoft was thinking making it directX11 and limiting cores on such a demanding game. It may "run" smooth but the lower frames are noticeable. This sim just turned into a consoled arcade game
@@Randy-rs1cg Have you played many other flight sims? X-plane 11, the other big GA sim runs about as well or worse than the new MSFS. Doesn't make it any less of a sim and more arcadey.
Imagine playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 on a plane Then looking outside the window and seeing the plane you're flying in game pass by you in real life The truth was it wasn't a simulator all along.
As a UPS loader: Yes that footprint is genuine. I cannot help if your package is a part of the mountain I'm constantly climbing over in the trailers while trying to break jams. Thanks inbound for f'ing me over and f'ing up the belt.
Jay: "This is not a game, it's a simulator." Also Jay: First thing he does, tries stalling at 1200 ft. in a Cessna just for funsies, and tries landing a 747 on the freeway.
"911 whats your emergency?" - ahh well, i was playing flight sim 2020 and i swear i saw a plane crash into the ocean, i can provide the coordinates... 911 : *hangs up thinking its a joke*
Yeah. Its supposed to use the ADS-B data to have actual active air traffic. That is a really crazy idea that someone could witness a crash while playing.
I get the comment / joke before you whoosh me I feel like this could actually happen though, there would have to be extra steps taken by all emergency operators as soon as flight simulator 2020 is mentioned, due to its real time air traffic features. It may actually save lives.
I've relied on Jay to explain complicated computer things to me for so long and watching him struggle with that box was satisfying. It was like when your teacher couldn't figure out their iPhone and needed help.
It's like when Linus Sebastian got the Digital Storm PC that was so heavy he could not lift it up to the table unassisted! I swear that PC weighed more than he did!
11:05 I’m German and am absolutely stunned about how accurate jay said “Feueralarm” during the world of warships gameplay, no English accent whatsoever!
Eric Nar haha you think 3GBs/hr is bad??? Try having NO internet connection other than your phones hotspot!!! I'm lucky if I get 50MBs an hour!!! 😂🤦♂️
@@cn2673 lmao no they do not. I had 4 TUFs have dead pixels and really bright yellow lights in the corners when it was black. And when I talked to the guy a microcenter he said they have at least one a day come back.
@@lukemarch7757 I really dont know anymore, I just went threw 2 Samsung G7's that was a $750.00 monitor. Then yesterday I listened to the guys at Microcenter and got another Asus but this one being the top end same price as the Samsung. ASUS PG279. I get it home last night I kind of felt something was wrong , plug it in and what do I see a dead F$#King pixel I was so pissed. I'm actually waiting till 11 to swap it out again. I'm gonna try this one again because its a nice monitor so ill give it one more try. But this now the 5th one. So those odds aren't looking good for Asus.
I've seen some HP computers with so tight cable management, that I said I'd just save the case for the future or make pictures of it for reference for me how to really do it.
The instructor in me couldn't help but go "noooo....no no, Jay, noooooo". The gamer in me was mesmerized at the graphics, despite the fact I have it and play it haha. Just fun watching another aviation nerd love the game!
my first lesson the door flew open on the 150 as I was climbing and turning into a left hand circuit, i crapped myself. The Instructor casually leaned over and was like 'that happens all the time, this old girl is like 40 years old'
I'm betting he has better speakers for his personal rig. Speakers won't matter as much for test setups where he would care more about other aspects of his setup.
@@jaalan7896 College keeps eating my cash at the moment, but I'll be gaming with everyone eventually! Glad to hear others made it to higher systems, gives me hope.
Around 30-35 for me on ultrawide. Seemed perfectly fine. The buuldings in non mapped cities are funny. Oil refinery has office blocks instead of oil tanks for example
@@winngedhussarmalaka7685 I doubt its gonna fail with a 750w psu, the gpu itself draws 600w and your cpu is maybe around 60 to 120w, and nothing in the system draws as much power as the gpu and cpu, so i might say you are good to go.
What really impressed me was the reflections of the cockpit interior in the cockpit window as you were looking out the side. That was some great unexpected detail.
It should be. Origin charges HUGE bucks to build it for you. Their prices are in the stratosphere. You need the wooden crate to sleep in after you sold your home and both kidneys to pay for your new PC.
Aerospace Engineer here (who works on B747) I also work on 747 sims (747-400 to be more specific). I agree with Iain Millar. The 747 can recover quickly, depending on your configuration (dirty vs clean and payload). But just be careful, if you haven't fully recovered from the primary stall, the secondary stall is worse than the primary. Also, the Aural Stall Warning sounds wrong. Try flying around KEGE. Will all the extra geometry flying through the mountains, that would be interesting.
I could have sworn Area 51 is blacked out or blurred, but I could see it in Google Earth, just low-res. So it probably should be in FS2020. That's really surprising.
Area51 can't be a full-on No Fly Zone, because there's daily staff flights in and out of that area. However R-4808-N is a permanent restricted airspace that's been clearly listed on sectional maps forever. Also according to the interwebs, a transponder will show a light in the cockpit when it's being queried by a ground based radar, or well any radar. Apparently this light doesn't turn off when you wander too close to R-4808-N, which would imply that some sort of radar site is tracking you across the sky. So yeah, it's a permanent restricted airspace, to which you could theoretically be given clearance. Emphasis on theoretically. Disneyland is different, they lobbied a law into existence which prohibits flights below 3000' AGL within a 3NM radius of some point in the park. All the airspace surrounding that area is Class C or Class B, airliners fly over Disneyland all the time. You could fly a plane over Disneyland provided you stay above 3000' AGL and have the appropriate Class C clearance. You can fly from KSNA to KFUL at 3500ft AGL and go straight over Disneyland if ATC clears you to do so. Bubbles like this aren't as uncommon as they're made out to be, there are plenty of places around the world where there's a minimum altitude pilots have to maintain, for example bird sanctuary nature reserves and built up areas with noise abatement rules in place. Also there are a few stories on the interwebs of people hugging the border of R-4808-N and politely being told to not do that even if they technically weren't doing anything wrong. But let's be realistic from the get-go USAF has understood the fact that Soviet satellites don't give a hoot about their restricted airspace. Russian sats still don't and neither do Chinese sats and there's very little the US can do about that. The restricted airspace mostly exists to protect pilots, rather than to protect Area 51. This kind of restricted airspace exists just about everywhere where there's military installations and testing ranges. You don't want to go there because you don't want to get mistaken for a practice target by whatever it is they are testing there.
I'm not 100% certain but I think the no fly zone over Disney is due to both the pyrotechnics that go off there regularly, and due to the number of people at the park regularly. Again could be completely mistaken on that.
@@fermitupoupon1754 Even though AREA 51 is an airbase, it is 100 percent a strict "no fly zone" for everyone unless you are cleared in beforehand. Case and point. The Air Force and Navy runs training all around AREA 51. This is where the famous "Red Flag" training sessions occur. The fly out of Nellis AB and perform training operations all in that area, except for 1 grid that sits right smack in the middle of the training area. Grid 4808 or Groom Lake. Even for those US military pilots, encroaching into that airspace is no joke. Of course, they (the AWACS on duty during training) would attempt to warn you if you are approaching that grid section. From what I hear, it's an extremely serious offense if you infringe in that grid, and a pilot better have a good explanation. Even in DCS, this is modeled in some of the Red Flag campaigns that were aided in creation by current and former military aviators. Cross that grid space, you fail the mission instantly.
I just "flew" from Long Beach to Disneyland and saw up to 45 fps, but I was amazed that the typical values were around 35 - 40 fps. I bought my new Origin at exactly the wrong time (never had heard of the RTX 3080 or the new 3950x cpu). Mine has the RTX2080ti and an I9-10940X processor with 128GB RAM etc. Monitor is a LG 144fps, 27". The highest fps was on the ground waiting to take off! Love your videos.
The engine limitation is that Flight Sim currently runs off of DirectX11, when they release DirectX12 version that is able to use more than 4 cores of the CPU, it will open things up quite a bit.
If you had probleme to find titles like this.. you never had 4k running till now. Its like: But can it run crysis in 720x480? If you dont have 4k.. ur still in the past and not allowed to say "there are no titles to push this setup to the limit"....
Andree H. I don’t think resolution alone counts cause duh you can obviously crank up lots of titles to 4K and stress hardware but I’m talking about the rendering tech a game uses specifically.
Real CFI here. Just a comment about your stalling for your information. The stall is not a maneuver that we teach. We have the students perform a stall only so that we can teach to recognize what a stall is and recover from a stall. In a small single-engine Cessna, an approach to landing stall (incorrectly called power-off stall) the aircraft is in a landing configuration, gear down, full flaps, and power to idle. The recovery should be, nose or pitch to the horizon, full power, and flaps up one notch or a three-count if there are no notches (one 1000, two 1000, three 1000), if the student pilot lost more than 100 feet they failed. They have not fully recovered until they have a positive rate of climb while slowly bringing the flaps up all the way.
From google images you can see some bunkers built into the hillsides. Also, I’d rather fly over the pyramids. Area 51 might have aliens in it. The pyramids were built by aliens.
I remember playing the original Flight Simulator on my uncles old Tandy back in the mid 80’s he had to actually enter all of the code manually and you manually set it up on DOS. And it took 2 joysticks. One for the throttle and one for flight controls.
The thing about low fps in flight - the ground is so far away that the ground geometry crawls very slowly, slowly enough that it looks fine even at low fps. Other than that, you're just staring at the sky, so how much does fps matter there.
Imagine playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 on a plane, then looking outside your window seeing the plane you're flying in mfs pass you by in real life, _realizing it wasn't a simulator all along_
You are really one of my favourite youtubers. Commenting about wire art with flight sim, man it really puts some perspective on how things have changed so much over the years. afterburner was good fun back in the day :). Thanks for the entertainment over the years mate.
60fps is important for games that require fast reaction times and split second decisions. 99% of flight sim is just cruising, making small adjustments, and planning/preparing moves well ahead of time. 45fps is absolutely fine, 30fps is even quite adequate.
Id love to get 30 FPS in this game. My poor i5 4690k can’t keep up even at 4.6Ghz. Pegged at 100% giving me less than 10fps and constant frame spikes :( Still having fun though!!
Can confirm you do NOT need the Win10 1909 version. I've been running 1607 since years, and can still play MSFS2020 without any issues. The only games i cannot play due to my Win10 version, is Cyberpunk and Forza Horizon.
Just upgraded to a 1440p 144hz display. Thought I would be sick playing MS flightsim 2020 cause the fps hovers around 20-30 on my build. Felt just fine tbh with adaptive sync on. Nothing near native 144hz but it was perfectly fine for a low motion flight sim.
@@DiDe273 Freesync is the fancy AMD name for Adaptive Sync, GSync is a proprietary technology made by Nvidia that does the same thing but it costs more, but is also specifically designed for GeForce GPU's so it works a little bit better, but again it costs a ton of more money
G-Sync has slightly less issues - for example no flickering problems in low FPS - as well as it works at a higher FPS range (starts at around 20 FPS as opposed to Freesync's 44). It's also more expensive.
@J M I'm disappointed nvidia refuses to bring gsync to Windows 7. I have a 144hz panel, and even with the newest drivers and the monitor's freesynch option enabled, I can't enable this stupid variable refresh rate technology in the nvidia control panel because I'm on 7. They do something equally stupid for multi monitor setups, too: nvidia has default behavior set up to force the gpu to run at full clock speed with 2 or more monitors if you're on 7.
Negative pressure case , then it should really never get dirty inside which is a good thing. I do refrigeration at a Hospital most of your COVID patient's are in a negative pressure room. We simply slow the supply air down and take out more air via return, making the room negative pressure. EVERYTHING is being sucked out of that room. The same is happening with that case via the fan set up exhausting.
@@Sweedster It's just a well-known thing among most Arma communities that the game is very poorly optimized, particularly in reference to multiplayer frame-rates. It really only utilizes single core performance on your CPU, so even if you have a beast of a machine, Arma can still run pretty poorly depending on how many mods you're running and how you have your server set up. If you're group is smart and doesn't overload terrains with too many units, you can get pretty decent performance, but 60+ FPS is basically unheard of. I usually get around 40-50fps when we run operations. To be fair, it is an 8+ year old game designed to be released internationally (meaning it was designed so that anyone with a potato could enjoy it). It's pretty amazing really how even after nearly a decade, there are still quite a few new players joining the community. I'm excited to see what Bohemia Interactive comes out with next. We've been patiently waiting for a better optimized Arma 4 title for years now lol. With 4+ core CPUs having become the norm internationally, I imagine the developers have far more reason to allocated resources such that multiple cores can spread out the workload and yield better performance. I guess we'll have to see though. Anyway, if you're new to playing Arma, welcome! There's really nothing else like it, which is why we still play it even 8+ years after release despite all of its shortcomings.
CowboyDiplomacy I know most of the Garmin and Dynon stuff, engine management and radio ops. The settings of the actual core simulation is what I’m referring to. I suppose you just tinker until things look good.
I've been playing MFS20 since day one. I had to build an entirely new system to even play it and have since built another. I was playing FDX on a 4350-based setup with 4GB of memory, a Radeon HD 7970 and a hybrid drive. It barely played FSX on low. Ended up with a Ryzen 3100 system for Modern Warfare 2019 and later, MSFS20. 8GB of memory, 1650 Super, and a 1TB SSD. Fast forward to now and I'm running a Ryzen 5600X with 32GB of memory, dual 1GB nvme drives, 4 ssd storage drives, an RTX 3060ti, and am working with a local machine shop to create a water block for the MSI Gaming X 3060 since nobody makes one.
Fun story, I believe this is finally a game truly optimized for AMD... my 5700XT on ultra preset with a 3800X holds 50fps stable (including in NYC) with live traffic, weather, and HD graphics on. I'd be curious to see others results.
John Longbow same, vista made my old PC so much more stable at the time. The people who hated it didn’t understand what was going on, this was clear when they loved windows 7 which was basically a face lifted vista.
@@oxfordsparky what exactly was the misunderstood about Vista? The permanent blue screens or the processor at 90% just running Windows? What exactly is there not to "understand" ?
I had same feeling with rdr2 i have oldie skylake with 1070 playing 1440p... i prefered to play that game at 40 fps tweaked high settings it had feeling of smooth gameplay.
The problem with most games is that they have some fps drops, if you start out at 40fps and drop by 30 your in powerpoint land :P Doing the same form 200 and even dropping 60, your just down to what your monitor can show anyway so never notice
@@dousek777 Same... I play AC Odyssey 1440p ultra settings locked at 35 fps, and I dont care. The game is gorgeous and I dont notice any issue with the fps.
Actually, the flight sims´, in a more broad manner of speaking, as a genre, high demands killed the home computers (Amiga, ST), or at least "helped" a lot. On many systems, the frame rates flight sims used to run on would be entirely inacceptable by today´s standards, going as low as 2 (two!) FPS. OTOH, on early PCs they have always been a prime choice for testing the capabilities of your system (and showing it off). So your observation differs from mine: For me it´s not exceptional that a flight sim is setting the standards for hardware - for me that´s normal and actually the rule, sort of. There were times, when there wasnt much else to "play" on the PC (except chess and zork and XY Quest). "Can your PC run Falcon 4.0?" "Yes." "Oh that´s so cool - cause my Amiga cant. Guess i am gonna buy a PC soon" Flight Unlimited was the prioneer for home-3D-graphic-cards. On a personal note: I assume you are just pretty young and somehow had the impression flight sims from back in the day looked as crappy and ran so slow by today´s standard on purpose, or because they didnt put much effort in coding them. The truth is the opposite. Each flight sim of it´s time shows pretty much the pinnacle of its contemporary 3D-graphics hardware capabilities. 200x160 with 4 colors at ~2 fps and close to no ground models is the best the c64 could do and back then, it was impressive.
FS2020 was one of the first games I tried on PC and the whole "you can get away with less than 60 FPS" thing is completely true. I got a PC because I wanted more than 120 FPS for Call of Duty, but when I tried FS2020 (on a 2070S and 10700F, mind you) I only got 35-43 FPS. Perfectly doable. Anything below 25 starts to get pretty rough though
FWIW for decades the flight sims used to train airline pilots were only set up for night time "flying" because ground lights are far less demanding on the visual system than daylight terrain and buildings. More recent sims have improved to have near real visual fidelity any time of day.
I love how Jay freaks out waiting for it to download the game... :D I'm a Sim pilot by myself and still amazed by the looks of that Sim. Had to put tonloads of money and time into the last Versions to get a look nothing near the latest MSFS
EXACTLY right. Paid huge bucks to ORBX for Global FTX and all manner of better buildings, better trees, better airports ... yada yada. MSFS blows the competition away - no question. It's not quite perfect but the pretty girl with the body that won't quit works EVERY TIME.
14:17. Real pilot here - yes jets really do recover that easy (I’ve flown the A320 and B777). But you made a very common mistake by recovering too early - when you said “it’s recovered already” and pulled up you entered a secondary accelerated stall. Need to keep the nose down to get more speed before you pull to recover. The difference to stalling a light plane is that a big jet needs a lot more time and altitude to recover from a full stall. But it’s perfectly doable.
"I've flown the A320 and B777" when I first read that I thought you were talking about motherboards
You can't stall an Airbus in normal law.
@@aspecreviews AIRBUS OBEYS NO LAW
Wait so does this mean to say you have been in a situation irl where you stalled a A320?
TheLittleAcura aka A-SPEC! Tell that to air france rio paris pilots
Jay: This is not a game this is a sim
Also Jay: Let's do a barrel roll and crash a 747 into an overpass in the freeway
Is it still a simulator if i play it with a guitar hero controller?
@@luxie8097 just... How?
"demonetization lurking in the background"
@Another Virtual Identity of Someone Who Isn't Me so it's not a game because it tries to simulate something real? isn't that just most games? i'm not even trying to troll at this point, i honestly don't understand why people get all worked up when you call a 'sim' a game. can't it be both?
@@luxie8097 there's a difference between gamers and simmers
My Origin crate became my coffee table. You unnecessarily trashed a perfectly good coffee table.
Imagine having all those computers.. and being unable to look up how to open a crate.
@@silvermediastudio yeap unreal.. haha.
Congratulations God bless you😃
s m a r t
It's not a move to trash or get rid of the crate. If something is faulty in the setup or something breaks and u gotta send it back they only accept it with the box.
Jay: "We're in a new crisis era..."
Nvidia.... "Well let me introduce you to Ampere"
1 week of Crysis era. Was fun.
"Man, we dont have hardware good enough for this gam-"
Nvidia, microsoft and sony: bonjour
Let me introduce you to crisis remastered
3090 can easily run this at 4k 60hz.
@@jesuschristislord7754 It can run 4k at 144hz
"jay where are the benchmarks??"
"haha i fly plane"
Plane engine go brrrr
even with a 3950 and 2080ti you wont see over 65 fps in 1080p. check out hardware unboxed benchmarks
@@Randy-rs1cg on ultra? For me on high everywhere and ultra textures with 1070ti and 3700x I can get up to 85fps in the wilderness
@@Canoodlan ultra. its about experience. That was the games selling point. why should i have to turn down settings. MY landing and taking off is only 25-35 fps.The game is CPU limited, GPU doesn't have that big of an effect. The game wont use more then 4 cores. idk what Microsoft was thinking making it directX11 and limiting cores on such a demanding game. It may "run" smooth but the lower frames are noticeable. This sim just turned into a consoled arcade game
@@Randy-rs1cg Have you played many other flight sims? X-plane 11, the other big GA sim runs about as well or worse than the new MSFS. Doesn't make it any less of a sim and more arcadey.
Imagine playing Microsoft flight simulator 2020 on a plane
Then you end up seeing yourself in game playing flight simulator on the plane
Imagine playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 on a plane
Then looking outside the window and seeing the plane you're flying in game pass by you in real life
The truth was it wasn't a simulator all along.
@@spaghettiupseti9990 Wow, that's actually pretty insane. Can you see real planes crash in real life too?
Bruh
very surreal
@@micsss_ oh no
As a UPS loader: Yes that footprint is genuine. I cannot help if your package is a part of the mountain I'm constantly climbing over in the trailers while trying to break jams. Thanks inbound for f'ing me over and f'ing up the belt.
I worked UPS back in 1987 when in HS. Supervisors were all over your a$$ to unload and load trucks as fast and tight as possible. Crazy!
I worked 2 days with perfect packed trucks and was fired for no reason fuck ups 😅
When it absolutely positively has to get there undamaged - put it in a BOAT!
It occurred to me, that not only is that a flight simulator, but also a "virtual tour" of wherever you are able to fly... very cool. 👍
Jay: "This is not a game, it's a simulator."
Also Jay: First thing he does, tries stalling at 1200 ft. in a Cessna just for funsies, and tries landing a 747 on the freeway.
He's just simulating a maniac
This is why Jay can NEVER BE A PILOT!!!
@@Rekhan4242 But he was
Which is SCARY!
Um 1200 feet agl stalls is about the height I did my stall training at in flight straining in a 172
"911 whats your emergency?"
- ahh well, i was playing flight sim 2020 and i swear i saw a plane crash into the ocean, i can provide the coordinates...
911 : *hangs up thinking its a joke*
Oh shit that would be some explaining
Clever comment! Hahaha
Yeah. Its supposed to use the ADS-B data to have actual active air traffic. That is a really crazy idea that someone could witness a crash while playing.
I get the comment / joke before you whoosh me
I feel like this could actually happen though, there would have to be extra steps taken by all emergency operators as soon as flight simulator 2020 is mentioned, due to its real time air traffic features. It may actually save lives.
ya, but if you saw a plane crash on a data stream that would mean they already have the data and are taking action
Didn't even realize that I started to grin somewhere along the way. Jay's so excited about the sim, it's super fun to watch!
I've relied on Jay to explain complicated computer things to me for so long and watching him struggle with that box was satisfying. It was like when your teacher couldn't figure out their iPhone and needed help.
It's like when Linus Sebastian got the Digital Storm PC that was so heavy he could not lift it up to the table unassisted! I swear that PC weighed more than he did!
"It uses real time air traffic control data fot the AI"
Me casually flying and seeing an AI plane barreling toward the ocean. Rip.
I feel like given how populated this game may get, that someone at some point will witness an incident like this via the realtime data stream
maybe we will actually find the downed planes now
@@chinchy111 they've had that same data since before the simulator though so no.
@@chinchy111 😂
Malaysian airlines
11:05 I’m German and am absolutely stunned about how accurate jay said “Feueralarm” during the world of warships gameplay, no English accent whatsoever!
Er hats halt echt gut ausgesprochen respekt an jay ^^
@@flopana5762 Vermutlich nicht das erste mal das ihm eins seiner Schiffe abgefackelt ist ;)
"Three hours?!?" - meanwhile out here in the middle of nowhere I'm lucky to be able to download 3GBs/hr.
My thoughts exactly. It took me over 30 hours to download FS2020.
Eric Nar haha you think 3GBs/hr is bad??? Try having NO internet connection other than your phones hotspot!!! I'm lucky if I get 50MBs an hour!!! 😂🤦♂️
@Check This Out took me more than 35 hours to download
Gets absolute beast of machine, gets yoke controller... connects to a 24" monitor.. lol
A garbage asus one to top it off.
@@cn2673 lmao no they do not. I had 4 TUFs have dead pixels and really bright yellow lights in the corners when it was black. And when I talked to the guy a microcenter he said they have at least one a day come back.
@@Inknov83d what would you recommend?
@Manny Torres $200-400 range for video editing & gaming
@@lukemarch7757 I really dont know anymore, I just went threw 2 Samsung G7's that was a $750.00 monitor. Then yesterday I listened to the guys at Microcenter and got another Asus but this one being the top end same price as the Samsung. ASUS PG279. I get it home last night I kind of felt something was wrong , plug it in and what do I see a dead F$#King pixel I was so pissed. I'm actually waiting till 11 to swap it out again. I'm gonna try this one again because its a nice monitor so ill give it one more try.
But this now the 5th one. So those odds aren't looking good for Asus.
Sitting at 35 FPS on the ground "the worst FPS you'll get it on the ground"
30 seconds previous he was in the 20s in the sky
He said it used to be in the previous title actually
NEEEERRRDDDDSSSS!,
Neeeeeeerrrrrrrrrrrrdddddddsss
7:20 Whoever did that cable work has spent some serious time in data centre cabinets. Work of art.
I've seen some HP computers with so tight cable management, that I said I'd just save the case for the future or make pictures of it for reference for me how to really do it.
Jay: Oh nice, look at that boot print!
UPS: *sweating intensifies*
nawl UPS DGAF, there's a UPS employee now going "yeah that's my foot print" lol
Lets get that out onto a tray. Nice.
FedEx - "You're MINE!"
The instructor in me couldn't help but go "noooo....no no, Jay, noooooo". The gamer in me was mesmerized at the graphics, despite the fact I have it and play it haha. Just fun watching another aviation nerd love the game!
As a flight instructor, everything that jay did during his flights happens to us on the daily.
That sounds scary af!! I don't know if my ticker could handle all those near death experiences
troll
You guys fly passenger planes into overpasses every day? :D
@@covoeus feels like thats what our student try and do
my first lesson the door flew open on the 150 as I was climbing and turning into a left hand circuit, i crapped myself. The Instructor casually leaned over and was like 'that happens all the time, this old girl is like 40 years old'
Jay: Uses a High-End Setup
Also Jay: Uses Amazon Basics Speakers
I'm betting he has better speakers for his personal rig. Speakers won't matter as much for test setups where he would care more about other aspects of his setup.
We are all cheapskates at heart. Been there. Done that! Love the Amazon Basics! Cables are great!
Flight simulator has come a long way. It used to mostly have a 2D map, with 3d airport buildings and sky scrapers in downtown areas.
WHY I WANT TO PLAY FLIGHT SIMULATOR??
-> IT Has Great Graphics ❌
-> I want To See My House ✅😂😂
Better..... crash into it lol
Jay: "I know 45 FPS probably isn't what you want, but..."
Me: *looks at my HP Pavillion which I've lightly modded*
Me: "Yes, yes it is."
I feel you bro. Thats what I had before I buiot my PC a year or so ago.
@@jaalan7896 College keeps eating my cash at the moment, but I'll be gaming with everyone eventually! Glad to hear others made it to higher systems, gives me hope.
Best comment 😂😂
@@dominick9961 Origin has discontinued the wooden crate. They now ship their PC's in GARDA armored vehicles.
How do you mod a laptop?
I was playing happily at 25 fps yesterday, never thought i would see the day.
30 fps in a flight sim is fine
Yep, it isn't a twitch shooter... it just has to deal with the textures.
@@jekanyika What if you're in a fighter jet?
@@itIsI988 More frames would be appreciated in a fighter jet, but unless you are dog fighting its not too much of a game breaker.
Around 30-35 for me on ultrawide. Seemed perfectly fine. The buuldings in non mapped cities are funny. Oil refinery has office blocks instead of oil tanks for example
"It'd be so cool if they modeled the screaming"
(glares at selfloadingcargo mod...)
Here's a thought... The boot print was from someone walking on the sheet of plywood before the crate was ever built.
20:48
that is the most realistic visual I've ever seen come out of a computer
It looks like a live video feed.
Oh my. OH MY GOOOODNESS!
Jay: *playing games at 30fps*
Me: "first time?"
You play at 30fps. Im. still running a laptop for the last 8 years. Yeah to finish my build all i need is gpu so i cant wait for the 3070
@@winngedhussarmalaka7685 same but im still planning my pc
@@JanyaAndromedaGalactic i hope 750 psu will work cause thats what i have :P
I've always been an 8-10 fps guy. :)
@@winngedhussarmalaka7685 I doubt its gonna fail with a 750w psu, the gpu itself draws 600w and your cpu is maybe around 60 to 120w, and nothing in the system draws as much power as the gpu and cpu, so i might say you are good to go.
What really impressed me was the reflections of the cockpit interior in the cockpit window as you were looking out the side. That was some great unexpected detail.
As a pilot seeing youtubers trying to fly in flightsim can be so cringy sometimes.
Very impressed you actually know how
That might seriously be the best behind the mobo tray cable management I've ever seen, puts me to shame
Dell: You guys put cables behind the motherboard tray?
I was going to comment on that. They really did a 10+ job with the unit altogether.
If the panel goes on without bulging or breaking, it's done!
It should be. Origin charges HUGE bucks to build it for you. Their prices are in the stratosphere. You need the wooden crate to sleep in after you sold your home and both kidneys to pay for your new PC.
"it would be so cool if they modeled the screaming"
-jayztwocents 2020
Fs Passengers had screaming lol
Someone will find a way to add it soon enough.
They do have real-world unruly passengers who refuse to wear masks.
Aerospace Engineer here (who works on B747) I also work on 747 sims (747-400 to be more specific). I agree with Iain Millar. The 747 can recover quickly, depending on your configuration (dirty vs clean and payload). But just be careful, if you haven't fully recovered from the primary stall, the secondary stall is worse than the primary. Also, the Aural Stall Warning sounds wrong.
Try flying around KEGE. Will all the extra geometry flying through the mountains, that would be interesting.
Jay: MS flight simulator is the new crysis
Crysis remastered: hold my ray traced slide show
I imagine that Disney has surface to air mousesiles at the ready for anyone that dares challenge their airspace.
Underrated comment lmfao
Hahahahaha
this man has a video with 3.9m views
Might accidentally rain debris over the park that way. They just hack your flight computer.
Vrqr dafuq
Jay: So now I'm going to fly over a place with a permanent no fly zone
Me: Area 51?
Jay: DISNEY!
I could have sworn Area 51 is blacked out or blurred, but I could see it in Google Earth, just low-res. So it probably should be in FS2020. That's really surprising.
Area51 can't be a full-on No Fly Zone, because there's daily staff flights in and out of that area. However R-4808-N is a permanent restricted airspace that's been clearly listed on sectional maps forever. Also according to the interwebs, a transponder will show a light in the cockpit when it's being queried by a ground based radar, or well any radar. Apparently this light doesn't turn off when you wander too close to R-4808-N, which would imply that some sort of radar site is tracking you across the sky.
So yeah, it's a permanent restricted airspace, to which you could theoretically be given clearance. Emphasis on theoretically.
Disneyland is different, they lobbied a law into existence which prohibits flights below 3000' AGL within a 3NM radius of some point in the park. All the airspace surrounding that area is Class C or Class B, airliners fly over Disneyland all the time. You could fly a plane over Disneyland provided you stay above 3000' AGL and have the appropriate Class C clearance. You can fly from KSNA to KFUL at 3500ft AGL and go straight over Disneyland if ATC clears you to do so. Bubbles like this aren't as uncommon as they're made out to be, there are plenty of places around the world where there's a minimum altitude pilots have to maintain, for example bird sanctuary nature reserves and built up areas with noise abatement rules in place.
Also there are a few stories on the interwebs of people hugging the border of R-4808-N and politely being told to not do that even if they technically weren't doing anything wrong. But let's be realistic from the get-go USAF has understood the fact that Soviet satellites don't give a hoot about their restricted airspace. Russian sats still don't and neither do Chinese sats and there's very little the US can do about that. The restricted airspace mostly exists to protect pilots, rather than to protect Area 51.
This kind of restricted airspace exists just about everywhere where there's military installations and testing ranges. You don't want to go there because you don't want to get mistaken for a practice target by whatever it is they are testing there.
I'm not 100% certain but I think the no fly zone over Disney is due to both the pyrotechnics that go off there regularly, and due to the number of people at the park regularly. Again could be completely mistaken on that.
Its also to prevent companies from flying banners around the park constantly
@@fermitupoupon1754
Even though AREA 51 is an airbase, it is 100 percent a strict "no fly zone" for everyone unless you are cleared in beforehand. Case and point. The Air Force and Navy runs training all around AREA 51. This is where the famous "Red Flag" training sessions occur. The fly out of Nellis AB and perform training operations all in that area, except for 1 grid that sits right smack in the middle of the training area. Grid 4808 or Groom Lake. Even for those US military pilots, encroaching into that airspace is no joke. Of course, they (the AWACS on duty during training) would attempt to warn you if you are approaching that grid section. From what I hear, it's an extremely serious offense if you infringe in that grid, and a pilot better have a good explanation. Even in DCS, this is modeled in some of the Red Flag campaigns that were aided in creation by current and former military aviators. Cross that grid space, you fail the mission instantly.
3:29 Some "howtobasic" video edits style right there :D
u right brother going to watch him 🤣
When I run flight sim, my pc itself sounds like it's gonna take off.
Wait till you see how servers sound !
@@ReversedTech They probably melted like Chernobyl.
"It show flight in real time" Goes to Bermuda Triangle
Didnt Thought That One 🤯🤯🤯
@@Plofomeister english:
Adiós
Marnick Bär nice format, very original
Disappears anyways
Changes date to 9/11/2001 and goes to World Trade Center
I just "flew" from Long Beach to Disneyland and saw up to 45 fps, but I was amazed that the typical values were around 35 - 40 fps. I bought my new Origin at exactly the wrong time (never had heard of the RTX 3080 or the new 3950x cpu). Mine has the RTX2080ti and an I9-10940X processor with 128GB RAM etc. Monitor is a LG 144fps, 27". The highest fps was on the ground waiting to take off! Love your videos.
128gb of ram is completely unnecessary you wasted your money
The engine limitation is that Flight Sim currently runs off of DirectX11, when they release DirectX12 version that is able to use more than 4 cores of the CPU, it will open things up quite a bit.
About time we get a title that actually pushes hardware to the limit.
If you had probleme to find titles like this.. you never had 4k running till now. Its like: But can it run crysis in 720x480?
If you dont have 4k.. ur still in the past and not allowed to say "there are no titles to push this setup to the limit"....
@Fraser Donaldson wdym
Andree H. I don’t think resolution alone counts cause duh you can obviously crank up lots of titles to 4K and stress hardware but I’m talking about the rendering tech a game uses specifically.
Well the thing is that when you want to sell a game you generally want people to be able to run it
Rdr2 already does
Jay : This case can also be used as a storage server .... even we can use it , maybe!
Linus : *Laughs in Protocase sponsorship*
"Dont do this in assessment people"
hahahaha made me laugh so much.
I love watching his videos just reminding myself ill probably get 1 fps with my dell laptop
You're probably high on that estimate for the DELL.
"Is that an overpass?"
*seconds before disaster intensifies*
it do go down energy
Jay: 95 GB wow
Modern Warfare Players: Must be nice
That game just gets bigger and bigger!
lol hopefully the new Black Ops will be better with storage
The reason i deleted that piece of shit, every 2 days a30-60gb update.
My first thoughts exactly. GTA V is 7 years old and it’s something like 120 gb.
@@wy206 You may want to look up what the conversion between a terabyte and a gigabyte is.
Man, 360p youtube video without buffering is already a luxury for me.
You can fly over disneyland, you just need to ask SoCal, they always say yes.
yup i think he mixed up with Disneyworld where it is a no fly zone. He also called it the Magic Kingdom instead of Disneyland.
Jayztwocents: flight simulator is not a game
Recommended: Flight Simulator Epstein island WR speed run
Underrated comment right here
blue jay It’s a joke lmao
@blue jay r/woooooosh
Had to search youtube for 'flight simulator 2020 Epstein island' after seeing this comment and it already brings up a wall of videos lmao
Epstein's plane crash wasn't an accident
Him: *downloaded 90+ GBs in 3 hours*
“3 HOURS??!!”
Me: cry at 500kb/s
I would take 3 days
Hear ya, have been downloading since 2:30PM, hope to have it downloaded by tomorrow night...(serious)
it take me about 40hrs
Well, i did in 2 hours 😎
took me just over an hour
When the babydoll starts crying you push forward on the yoke and use rudder to keep it straight.
Real CFI here. Just a comment about your stalling for your information. The stall is not a maneuver that we teach. We have the students perform a stall only so that we can teach to recognize what a stall is and recover from a stall. In a small single-engine Cessna, an approach to landing stall (incorrectly called power-off stall) the aircraft is in a landing configuration, gear down, full flaps, and power to idle. The recovery should be, nose or pitch to the horizon, full power, and flaps up one notch or a three-count if there are no notches (one 1000, two 1000, three 1000), if the student pilot lost more than 100 feet they failed. They have not fully recovered until they have a positive rate of climb while slowly bringing the flaps up all the way.
"It show flight in real time"
My brain:
"Cool, then I'll be able to see crashes in real time"
@Marik Ishtar lol that'd be something.
Sadly no. I wish it had crash stuff but i dont think it does yet. Ive tried.
Was literally thinking of recreating 9/11
@@kronks4 You've tried? So you fly a plane irl while also flying in FS20 at the same time and crash your irl plane to see if you can see it in FS20?
Because plane crashes are so funny and entertaining right? Morons
So you’re gonna sit here and tell me that you wanted to fly over Disneyland, since it’s a no-fly zone.... but not AREA 51!?
𝔸ℝ𝔼𝔸 𝟝𝟙 𝕚𝕤 𝕒 𝕕𝕖𝕔𝕠𝕪❕
I tried it. Nothing exciting is there.
nothing to see at Area 51. its all hidden in buildings or underground
From google images you can see some bunkers built into the hillsides. Also, I’d rather fly over the pyramids. Area 51 might have aliens in it. The pyramids were built by aliens.
Ryan Isacuc pyramids? made by aliens? u sure bro
I remember playing the original Flight Simulator on my uncles old Tandy back in the mid 80’s he had to actually enter all of the code manually and you manually set it up on DOS. And it took 2 joysticks. One for the throttle and one for flight controls.
The thing about low fps in flight - the ground is so far away that the ground geometry crawls very slowly, slowly enough that it looks fine even at low fps.
Other than that, you're just staring at the sky, so how much does fps matter there.
Everyone gangsta till you see a real plane in the sim start to fall and crash.
Imagine playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 on a plane,
then looking outside your window seeing the plane you're flying in mfs pass you by in real life, _realizing it wasn't a simulator all along_
bro. thank you
Oh, Microsoft finds the best pilots in the simulator, let's them control real planes and BOOM, an army of free pilot workforce
That explains 9/11
And you skip all the tutorials on how to land a plane
We need a movie that contains this plot
You are really one of my favourite youtubers. Commenting about wire art with flight sim, man it really puts some perspective on how things have changed so much over the years. afterburner was good fun back in the day :). Thanks for the entertainment over the years mate.
No question - this is a summary achievement compared to the original flight sims.
Chuck Yeager's Air Combat was my 1st flight sim, built my first computer, 486DX/33 2MB of Ram and a Trident video card 512KB
"don't forget to squawk 7600" lol that was great at the end
60fps is important for games that require fast reaction times and split second decisions.
99% of flight sim is just cruising, making small adjustments, and planning/preparing moves well ahead of time. 45fps is absolutely fine, 30fps is even quite adequate.
Yeah, but you get these elitist fuck-sticks today that are like "I can't play on less than 120fps or I go blind" and other ridiculous shit.
Any slower paced game you don't really need high fps, that looked really smooth and the details were awesome.
Id love to get 30 FPS in this game. My poor i5 4690k can’t keep up even at 4.6Ghz. Pegged at 100% giving me less than 10fps and constant frame spikes :( Still having fun though!!
Let em be. We know better.
i play everything on 30 fps. a constant 30 is perfectly playable on any game. people who obsess over 60 have money to waste
Jay: "We are in a new Crysis Era!"
Me: *Looks at upload date* 2020...
Me: YUP!
Can confirm you do NOT need the Win10 1909 version.
I've been running 1607 since years, and can still play MSFS2020 without any issues.
The only games i cannot play due to my Win10 version, is Cyberpunk and Forza Horizon.
"It didn't feel that low" is the beauty of Adaptive Sync displays.
Just upgraded to a 1440p 144hz display. Thought I would be sick playing MS flightsim 2020 cause the fps hovers around 20-30 on my build. Felt just fine tbh with adaptive sync on. Nothing near native 144hz but it was perfectly fine for a low motion flight sim.
@J M isn't all the same technology but with different names? 🤔
@@DiDe273 Freesync is the fancy AMD name for Adaptive Sync, GSync is a proprietary technology made by Nvidia that does the same thing but it costs more, but is also specifically designed for GeForce GPU's so it works a little bit better, but again it costs a ton of more money
G-Sync has slightly less issues - for example no flickering problems in low FPS - as well as it works at a higher FPS range (starts at around 20 FPS as opposed to Freesync's 44). It's also more expensive.
@J M I'm disappointed nvidia refuses to bring gsync to Windows 7. I have a 144hz panel, and even with the newest drivers and the monitor's freesynch option enabled, I can't enable this stupid variable refresh rate technology in the nvidia control panel because I'm on 7. They do something equally stupid for multi monitor setups, too: nvidia has default behavior set up to force the gpu to run at full clock speed with 2 or more monitors if you're on 7.
When Jay said he was going to fly over a permanent "no-fly" area I thought he was going to fly over Area-51... No its Disney World... LOL
Disneyland not world. Jeez! /s
r/wooooshh
@Cody Jones doesn't really matter
I thought he was going to fly over North Korea
so now we know it's a good thing you didn't finished getting your real license, the world is a safer place now.
Led switch off button is the most interesting thing about that case.
"it would be so cool if they modeled the screaming"
Dude, QualityWings does. But it's for FSX/P3D
That is AMAZING 😂
It will come to msfs 2020
JayzTwoCents
: "I can just hear the comments bleh bleh bleh pcmasterrace"
Comments: "Seems fine."
PC only. all other things never ever exists for me. fuck them.
I would believe it would be with the game not being optimized and not the "PC"
Plot Twist: He's controlling the airplane remotely, this is not flight sim.
Negative pressure case , then it should really never get dirty inside which is a good thing. I do refrigeration at a Hospital most of your COVID patient's are in a negative pressure room. We simply slow the supply air down and take out more air via return, making the room negative pressure. EVERYTHING is being sucked out of that room. The same is happening with that case via the fan set up exhausting.
Jay: 30fps is totally playable!
Arma 3 enthusiasts: behold my immersive slideshow!
What kind of potato are you running that you’re getting under 30 FPS on arma 3 😂
@@Sweedster Have you tried multiplayer with mods yet?
JesseArt no, but you probably should’ve specified that lol
@@Sweedster It's just a well-known thing among most Arma communities that the game is very poorly optimized, particularly in reference to multiplayer frame-rates. It really only utilizes single core performance on your CPU, so even if you have a beast of a machine, Arma can still run pretty poorly depending on how many mods you're running and how you have your server set up. If you're group is smart and doesn't overload terrains with too many units, you can get pretty decent performance, but 60+ FPS is basically unheard of. I usually get around 40-50fps when we run operations. To be fair, it is an 8+ year old game designed to be released internationally (meaning it was designed so that anyone with a potato could enjoy it). It's pretty amazing really how even after nearly a decade, there are still quite a few new players joining the community. I'm excited to see what Bohemia Interactive comes out with next. We've been patiently waiting for a better optimized Arma 4 title for years now lol. With 4+ core CPUs having become the norm internationally, I imagine the developers have far more reason to allocated resources such that multiple cores can spread out the workload and yield better performance. I guess we'll have to see though. Anyway, if you're new to playing Arma, welcome! There's really nothing else like it, which is why we still play it even 8+ years after release despite all of its shortcomings.
I’ll drink to that
Crysis remake minimum recommendation spec:
Look at Flight Simulator manual
RandomgamingHD just made a video lol
They didn’t even release a manual with MSFS 2020, if you can believe it.
CowboyDiplomacy
I know most of the Garmin and Dynon stuff, engine management and radio ops. The settings of the actual core simulation is what I’m referring to. I suppose you just tinker until things look good.
Been doing it since Jane’s Combat Simulations...
Tip: add a flat prybar and carpenter's claw hammer into your shop tool inventory.
“It would be cool if they modeled the SCREAMING 😱 “
🤔
u got some psycho material there bro
Modders will take care of that
"I want to die like my father, peacefully in sleep. Not like his passengers, screaming in terror."
“That would be cool if they modeled the screaming” lol wut
😂😂
just like rollercoaster tycoon.
Wtf lololololololol
put some mods
@@gatsbygaming_gg na
Just got an Origin system last months. It kicks serious butt. P3Dv5 and FS2020 run smooth as silk.
I've been playing MFS20 since day one. I had to build an entirely new system to even play it and have since built another. I was playing FDX on a 4350-based setup with 4GB of memory, a Radeon HD 7970 and a hybrid drive. It barely played FSX on low.
Ended up with a Ryzen 3100 system for Modern Warfare 2019 and later, MSFS20. 8GB of memory, 1650 Super, and a 1TB SSD. Fast forward to now and I'm running a Ryzen 5600X with 32GB of memory, dual 1GB nvme drives, 4 ssd storage drives, an RTX 3060ti, and am working with a local machine shop to create a water block for the MSI Gaming X 3060 since nobody makes one.
Fun story, I believe this is finally a game truly optimized for AMD... my 5700XT on ultra preset with a 3800X holds 50fps stable (including in NYC) with live traffic, weather, and HD graphics on.
I'd be curious to see others results.
"Building their maximum settings into the future"
Vista: 👀
underrated
Neko Master I actually liked Vista, it looked amazing back then.
John Longbow same, vista made my old PC so much more stable at the time.
The people who hated it didn’t understand what was going on, this was clear when they loved windows 7 which was basically a face lifted vista.
ben weston hahaha true, base Windows 7 was basically Windows Vista 😉
@@oxfordsparky what exactly was the misunderstood about Vista? The permanent blue screens or the processor at 90% just running Windows? What exactly is there not to "understand" ?
I saw las vegas and an overpass and got traumatic flashbacks of ConAir. Thanks for that
I've never played flight sim but i want this one to tour different places virtually! and visit my home of course.
This is the first game I’ve played at 30-40fps in literally years, I’m doing it on a 144hz monitor too. It honestly is fine
yeah same, i was blown away at the number once i displayed fps, i was damn sure we were above 80, so smooth.
I had same feeling with rdr2 i have oldie skylake with 1070 playing 1440p... i prefered to play that game at 40 fps tweaked high settings it had feeling of smooth gameplay.
The problem with most games is that they have some fps drops, if you start out at 40fps and drop by 30 your in powerpoint land :P
Doing the same form 200 and even dropping 60, your just down to what your monitor can show anyway so never notice
@@ssu7653 running a 144hz monitor and honestly, stable fps is way more important than high fps with frame-drops
@@dousek777 Same... I play AC Odyssey 1440p ultra settings locked at 35 fps, and I dont care. The game is gorgeous and I dont notice any issue with the fps.
"That would be so cool if they modeled the passengers screaming" LMFAO Jay you are a sadist.
"That'd be so cool if they'd modelled the screaming." Well, Imma add that to things I didn't know I needed.
Jay: Ima lock it @ 60fps...
Me: ambitious...
Jay: were are gonna fly over an area you cant fly over in real life.
Area 51: am i a joke to you
Was seriously hoping that was the plan.
But in DCS we can do it for years already!
There's nothing there really. Just a runway and generic buildings
the gloomy kid and a couple aliens and some kids Naruto running
Does it in Flight Sim, total blackout. Nothing visible outside of the cockpit
who would ever imagine that flight sim become the new standard of benchmark "Can your PC run ___?" lol
Not sure, it wasn't taking advantage of the hardware, so how is that a good benchmark.
Actually, the flight sims´, in a more broad manner of speaking, as a genre, high demands killed the home computers (Amiga, ST), or at least "helped" a lot.
On many systems, the frame rates flight sims used to run on would be entirely inacceptable by today´s standards, going as low as 2 (two!) FPS. OTOH, on early PCs they have always been a prime choice for testing the capabilities of your system (and showing it off).
So your observation differs from mine: For me it´s not exceptional that a flight sim is setting the standards for hardware - for me that´s normal and actually the rule, sort of. There were times, when there wasnt much else to "play" on the PC (except chess and zork and XY Quest).
"Can your PC run Falcon 4.0?"
"Yes."
"Oh that´s so cool - cause my Amiga cant. Guess i am gonna buy a PC soon"
Flight Unlimited was the prioneer for home-3D-graphic-cards.
On a personal note: I assume you are just pretty young and somehow had the impression flight sims from back in the day looked as crappy and ran so slow by today´s standard on purpose, or because they didnt put much effort in coding them. The truth is the opposite. Each flight sim of it´s time shows pretty much the pinnacle of its contemporary 3D-graphics hardware capabilities. 200x160 with 4 colors at ~2 fps and close to no ground models is the best the c64 could do and back then, it was impressive.
Anyone who has ever played actual sim games like flight sim would imagine telling you that. Because it's always been that way.
But can it run -Crysis- Microsoft Flight Simulator?
@@mrscruffy8045 Lovely reply!
FS2020 was one of the first games I tried on PC and the whole "you can get away with less than 60 FPS" thing is completely true. I got a PC because I wanted more than 120 FPS for Call of Duty, but when I tried FS2020 (on a 2070S and 10700F, mind you) I only got 35-43 FPS. Perfectly doable. Anything below 25 starts to get pretty rough though
The 'roll' in stall is called a snaproll. You can do this in straight flight as well by going full deflection on all steering surfaces at once.
5:08. "I know it's really hard for you to see up there Phil"
I'm sensing a short joke lol
“It uses real time air traffic control data” so we’ll be able to help out with the next Malaysian Airlines search.
I will freak out if I noticed a Malaysian 777 lands in my country since the entire fleet have since been retired
Hahahah
@@richietxy6723 and you can see the next terror attack live too.
UToons Also the air traffic setting would have been pretty useless now cuz of the pandemic reducing air travel...
you can actually see the Malaysian plane on google earth
FWIW for decades the flight sims used to train airline pilots were only set up for night time "flying" because ground lights are far less demanding on the visual system than daylight terrain and buildings. More recent sims have improved to have near real visual fidelity any time of day.
I love how Jay freaks out waiting for it to download the game... :D I'm a Sim pilot by myself and still amazed by the looks of that Sim. Had to put tonloads of money and time into the last Versions to get a look nothing near the latest MSFS
EXACTLY right. Paid huge bucks to ORBX for Global FTX and all manner of better buildings, better trees, better airports ... yada yada. MSFS blows the competition away - no question. It's not quite perfect but the pretty girl with the body that won't quit works EVERY TIME.
Jay: MS Flight Sim is NOT a game
Also Jay: HEeeeeEEEheee I did a roll WHEEEEE