SPACEX | What we learned from Starship rocket launch
Вставка
- Опубліковано 13 бер 2024
- CTV science and technology expert Dan Riskin breaks down the successful launch of SpaceX's Starship rocket and what the goals of the flight are.
Subscribe to CTV News to watch more videos: / ctvnews
Connect with CTV News:
For live updates and latest headlines visit: www.ctvnews.ca/
For breaking news, fast, download the CTV News App: www.ctvnews.ca/app
Must-watch stories and full programs at www.ctvnews.ca/video
CTV News on TikTok: www.tiktok.com/discover/CTV-News
CTV News on X (formerly Twitter): / ctvnews
CTV News on Reddit: / ctvnews
CTV News on LinkedIn: / ctv-news
---
CTV News is Canada's most-watched news organization both locally and nationally, and has a network of national, international, and local news operations.
WAY TO GO SPACEX !!!
Great success
LOL
Incredible! The footage was mind-blowing. IFT-4 will be even more successful.
Successful test, a lot of things went right this time! Next launch maybe a bit earlier this time, like in 3 or 4 months? Exciting stuff, well done SpaceX engineers and techs!
They have *permission* for several more this yr. (forget exact number) That implies 3 months or less.
Successful? I think a lot went better than last time, but the goals have been missed. The booster failed the landing burn, and the ship did not survive the reentry.
@@gottfriedheumesser1994 Metrics for success are not just how much better than last test or how many boxes ticked off, but what we can't entirely know--how much they learned, that's the biggest potential gain.
@@gottfriedheumesser1994Those were not the make or break goals, those were just things they planned to do if the vehicle somehow survived so that they wouldn’t waste the test opportunity. Making it past ship engine cutoff was the main goal
@@GrapeFlavoredAntifreeze It is nice to adapt the goals after knowing what was a mishap.
Reusability is part of the testing. This can literally save billions. There were failures this time but SpaceX is the only company which has developed reusable rockets so it’s just a matter of time and testing. Assembly line rockets is the other innovation. It’s hard to communicate to the casual viewer what’s actually happening here.
It is so profound that average citizens doesn't get it
Spinning ship.... What a charm
Dancing of joy! Exiting with their analysis of this Flight 3. Something I would like to read.
I didn't like the spinning on the way down.
@@aboucard93 Believe the spinning was not intentional, that could have caused it being out of control during decent... Therefore not reaching the sea in one peace.
Probably the cause of the RUD
@@amirshahab3400I think the spin was initially intentional to do a fuel transfer test and an engine relite test. The spin is necessary to conglomerate all the fuel at one end of the tank instead of it just floating around haphazardly. Looks like they lost the ability to stop the spin after the test.
The spaceX haters have to get a grip that everything they are doing is a step forward for humanity.
Even this guy doesn't get SpaceX. They've had 3 successful launches.
@@terryfish6900 and how many successful launches with falcon 9? More than your IQ. This is super heavy's 3rd launch, the largest rocket ever built so far, larger than Saturn V which sent men to the moon. Just the tip of the iceberg for SpaceX accomplishments.
I'm not a SpaceX fan by any means, but the way this is going in 5-8 years they'll be planning trips to the moon.
@@CJFreezaAnd waaay cheaper & more reliable than other NASA suppliers.
@@CJFreezaSpacex are aiming for another 6 launches of starship this year, with the improvements made on each flight it isn't going to be that long before they have an operational re-usable superheavy rocket.
just with the successful launch and bay doors opening and closing ok this rocket is capable putting 200 tons in orbit. to put that in perspective, the entire iss with all its additions after all these years circling the earth weighs 465 tons. so already they have proven they could have another iss in orbit with 2 launches !!!
Unfortunately bay doors opened okay but they couldn't get to close fully. Not a big deal. Should be an easy fix.
Can't find information about the fuel transfer test. Were they able to do it?
@@mpr746 Apparently they did, though I've not seen any visual confirmation.
@@mpr746the fuel transfer was a success
@@davefarmery8180 Operation successful. Patient died.
One more step.
The future of space flight is now alive🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉
Great reportage. Very informative!
reportage? lol
So close!!!
Baby steps now. Walking soon. Running down the road.
More like tumbling down the stairs.
@@Arcturus-0.05 Do you remember the early days of the Falcon rocket testing. Exploding rockets, boosters falling over on landings. Now they launch Falcons and recover boosters so often no one even pays attention.
@@davidboivin7996 Remember Saturn V sending humans to the moon in 1969? And now you have Musk third time launching a tin can without any intellect and failing to reach orbit yet again. Calling it success every time even though nothing has changed. Did you see SLS reach the moon? Starship is pathetic.
Go SpaceX Go!!
SpaceX is amazing!!
Pi day is also Spacex's birthday - 22 years old now.
Didn’t it burn up on re-entry?
It definitely did not make it down in one piece, as far as we know. SpaceX is still trying to figure out what happened.
Pretty fly for a pie guy
Still not a paying mission as of yet so how this dispensing system works is effected for Starlink is what will in fact make this a working system.
Your sentence didn't make any sense.
Tiles flying off like a sparkler…
It was doing barrel rolls while it was up there. As it got lower into the atmosphere, the barrel rolls may have exposed the non-tiled side to the plasma and could have burned up. Learning experience. JustSaying.
So when you can't get the Pez door to close, don't you know that's a real problem when you return into the earth's atmosphere at 17.500 ?MPH?
And Flatearthers discussing the fisheye-lens 🙈🙈🤪
Where's Elon?
Why so many launches. Im suspicious. This can't be all satts for phones.
I am confused I thought everything blew up.
Booster 10 hit the ocean. Ship 28 most likely melted and broke up
Yess, but that was planned. This was a flight test, a rough prototype to test whether it can launch and operate in space. SpaceX will collect massive amounts of data to make each iteration better, to eventually make the rocket fully reusable
These are test flights, success is learning what works but more importantly, what goes wrong and why.
Everything landed where it was planned. Some things harder than others
Made to space and orbited around the earth. Blew up on the way back.
👽🖖🥧
What's this thing about the moon? The prime mission is Mars, not the moon, that's just to keep NASA happy.
a contract is a contract, so in that sense the Moon is more important than Mars.
SpaceX is never gonna land humans on Mars with this thing. Musk said in 2016 it would happen this year. Nope, nada.
That's how this all is financed. Americans payed tax, and NASA payed SpaceX.
@@harrynac6017 how much has nasa payed spacex for the starship program and how much has the starship program cost so far? Do you know the figures?
The moon is a contract that lets them test their interplanetary systems and gets additional funding for doing so.
Spacex needs 20 launches to refuel Starship to go to the moon.
Little detail ;)
Going great until the end when the lady showed her ignorance about science. JustSaying.
She's female....
Great news: we lost the ship!
Let's gather some more tax money and try it again and again....
Space travel... what everyone is concerned about these days...
Much better than blowing ourselves up, right?
You worry about your stuff and I’ll worry about mine. How about we do that?
We’d already be a multi planetary species if we stopped with our wars and religions…
We’d already be a multi planetary species if we stopped with our wars and religions
LOL what success? Pathetic fail for the third time. Didn't even reach orbit yet.
it did
🐑🐑🐑
Another failure. Booster and Starship were lost.
progress is not failure.
They were not planned to be saved no matter how the flight ended.
We were going back in 1980, oopsie.. 1988, oopsie 1990, oopsie 1996, oopsie 2000 were going back, oopsie 2009 definitely going back...uh oh, 2012, for sure!! Uh oh..oopsie 2018 ABSOLUTELY a moon mission, oopsie 2020, uh oh, now? 2025, oops 2026.
Ever been abused? And promised it'll change?
Since 1980?
Yall got Stockholm disorder imo
Buy MAYBE, I'm wrong and they WILL go to the moon?
Dont think that will happen for a few more years.
who said we were going back to the moon during the shuttle era?
Terrible CGI.
Wow. Delusion is alive and strong.
@@cinnamonrollypolyHe's just a troll.
@@Smokey.Tackle maybe, but who can tell anymore?
yeah. said by a flat earther 😂
Ridiculous
Bla Bla Bla !!!!
russian troll
Where's Elon?