Is SpaceX's Raptor engine the king of rocket engines?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 6 чер 2024
  • 00:00 - Intro
    02:55 - Basic physics of rocket engines
    06:10 - Rocket engine cycles
    20:30 - Rocket fuel comparison
    30:40 - Raptor vs other rocket engines
    44:05 - Summary
    Article version - everydayastronaut.com/?p=9823...
    SpaceX's new raptor engine is a methane fueled full flow staged combustion cycle engine and its so hard to develop, no engine like this has ever flown before!
    Now this topic can be really intimidating so in order to bring the Raptor engine into context, we’re going to do an overview of a few common types of rocket engine cycles then compare the Raptor to a few other common rocket engines, like SpaceX’s current work horse, the Merlin, The Space Shuttle’s RS-25, the RD-180, Blue Origin’s BE-4 and the F-1 engine.
    And if that’s not enough, not only is SpaceX using a crazy engine cycle, they’re also going to be using Liquid Methane as their fuel, again something that no orbital rocket has ever used! So we’ll also go over the unique characteristics of liquid methane as a rocket fuel and see if we can figure out why SpaceX went with Methane for the Raptor engine.
    We'll also break down and explain all the different engine cycle types so you know what the full flow staged combustion cycle is, how it works, and how it compares to the other cycles.
    So by the end of this video hopefully we’ll have the context to know why the raptor engine is special, how it compares to other rocket engines, why it’s using methane and hopefully find out if the Raptor engine will be the new king of rocket engines…
    -----------------------------------------------
    Rocket engine renders by @MartianDays / martiandays
    F-1 Turbopump photo provided by Mike Jetzer/heroicrelics.org
    HUGE thanks to my Moon Walker Patreon supporters! Blake Jacobs, Eli Burton, Jethro, Mac Malkawi, Neurostream, Ole Mathias Heggem
    Want to support what I do? Consider becoming a Patreon supporter for access to exclusive livestreams, our discord channel and subreddit! - / everydayastronaut
    The best place for all your space merch needs!
    everydayastronaut.com/shop/
    All music is original! Check out my album "Maximum Aerodynamic Pressure" anywhere you listen to music (Spotify, iTunes, Google Play, Amazon, etc) or click here for easy links - everydayastronaut.com/music
    I'm the cohost of an awesome podcast where we talk all about current technologies and how they shape our future! ourludicrousfuture.com or here on UA-cam / ourludicrousfuture
  • Наука та технологія

КОМЕНТАРІ • 8 тис.

  • @VulpeculaJoy
    @VulpeculaJoy 5 років тому +895

    There are people that try to stretch a 1min topic into 15min to gain more watch time and then there is cramming a 3 hour lecture on ROCKET SCIENCE into 49 minutes...

    • @carefulpolarbear
      @carefulpolarbear 5 років тому +21

      I hate 'Now You Know' channel for stretching his videos.

    • @andrewzhang1290
      @andrewzhang1290 5 років тому +9

      Amar Khandve bright side too, they are all and channels you shouldn’t watch, and not just because they stretch their videos

    • @CookingWithCows
      @CookingWithCows 5 років тому +21

      @@andrewzhang1290 The problem is that videos of less than 10 minutes are not considered as much by the youtube algorithm. It's Google's fault for forcing people to make 10min+ videos or risk disappearing from feeds (even of people who already subscribed!). If youtube is your income, you better do what you need to survive and not get drowned out by the masses of content uploaded each day.

    • @My-Opinion-Doesnt-Matter
      @My-Opinion-Doesnt-Matter 5 років тому +2

      More like 5 min of kindergarten rocket science stretched to 49 minutes.

    • @befer
      @befer 5 років тому +2

      @@CookingWithCows UA-cam is simply a platform for people to upload videos. It's purely UA-camr's fault to stretch his videos sacrificing quality

  • @scottmanley
    @scottmanley 5 років тому +2484

    No.
    Because raptors commonly optimize for small agile males and larger females able to carry more.
    Thus, they would be queens.
    Good job on those animations!

    • @Aarlington
      @Aarlington 5 років тому +43

      Spot on.

    • @christianpattison8238
      @christianpattison8238 5 років тому +78

      Scott , you had to be that guy “ ACTUALLY “, 😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣. And Actually you are correct. BTW really enjoy your work

    • @stanislavzoldak2198
      @stanislavzoldak2198 5 років тому +150

      Scott, you are the daddest dad to ever dad.

    • @mwnciboo
      @mwnciboo 5 років тому +48

      Clever girl....

    • @SternLX
      @SternLX 5 років тому +25

      Are we talking avian or reptilian here? There are raptors in both families.

  • @bennybooboobear3940
    @bennybooboobear3940 3 роки тому +405

    Me before the video: “gosh 50 mins? Better be good.”
    Me after the video: “gosh 50 mins? Why so short?”

    • @fille0078
      @fille0078 3 роки тому +1

      u illigal its 49:01

    • @pedrobreyner7204
      @pedrobreyner7204 3 роки тому +2

      @@fille0078 49:02

    • @flamu9183
      @flamu9183 3 роки тому

      @@fille0078 Are you 5 years old?

    • @fille0078
      @fille0078 3 роки тому

      @@flamu9183 ehh no. what my spelling? well im from Sweden. so if thats the case then you judged a book by its cover?

  • @HoHhoch
    @HoHhoch Рік тому +110

    The fact that the F-1 holds up as well as it does despite how old it is speaks volumes about the sheer engineering that went into the Saturn V. Truly a beautiful craft that I hope will always be remembered in this new era of spaceflight ushered in by SpaceX and beyond.

    • @grizbizusa
      @grizbizusa Рік тому +2

      Very well said. Bravo.

    • @johnabsher6518
      @johnabsher6518 4 місяці тому

      Didn't the center engine on Apollo 13 shut off?

    • @Gaming1Doge
      @Gaming1Doge 3 місяці тому

      I mean, the F-1 did have 2 total military fundings, the first was for ICBMs, and the second for Apollo. So it's numbers are insane in even more ways, sadly that also includes price.

  • @alrightydave
    @alrightydave 3 роки тому +2802

    Absolutely incredible. I’m speechless. Can’t believe I actually just watched this video on UA-cam for free...

    • @Kevin-jb2pv
      @Kevin-jb2pv 3 роки тому +55

      Wait, what? You got this for free? What the hell, Tim?

    • @brianrufh3684
      @brianrufh3684 3 роки тому +22

      Haha this an excellent video. Wouldn't have paid for it though.

    • @JayPixx
      @JayPixx 3 роки тому +57

      Wtf is wrong with you people? Why everyone keeps saying that. And they are saying that more and more often every day. WTF?! Do you really want UA-cam to shift to paid platform? I mean it - UA-cam is already WAY more commercials rich than ever before. 💰 just keep reminding them how ready you are to pay them.. F**k sake... Can't you just admit that particular author of the video is great and is making great content, period?
      What is wrong with you people 💲 💵 💸

    • @mastershooter64
      @mastershooter64 3 роки тому +32

      @@JayPixx chill dude, he didn't go and tell youtube to make every video paid stop overreacting also, are you high?

    • @JayPixx
      @JayPixx 3 роки тому +8

      @@mastershooter64 the thing is, it's not about him (as I stated clearly in my comment). It's about general "trend", call it anyway you want, that people are putting this comments under every long, good quality video. Come on, seriously?

  • @Aaron7075
    @Aaron7075 5 років тому +420

    As an aerospace engineering student, I can say that some of this video is basically a sophomore class, but the real propulsion stuff, that’s straight up senior year content, this video is a senior year Aerospace engineering lecture. Here’s the classes you hit on:
    Intro to Aerospace Engineering 2
    Thermodynamics
    Propulsion
    Advanced space propulsion

    • @Aaron7075
      @Aaron7075 5 років тому +15

      THE Ohio State University lol

    • @jplflyer
      @jplflyer 5 років тому +13

      Given that most of the people watching this aren't aerospace engineers, I thought it was perfect.

    • @__-fm5qv
      @__-fm5qv 4 роки тому +2

      I mean in class the maths of everything is done too, but the concepts are here pretty well.

    • @SgtSayWhat
      @SgtSayWhat 4 роки тому +2

      I'm at Swansea University and I'd say this was a nice summary of a view of the early lectures in my Rocket and Space Technology module in 2nd year. Great video, really well presented!

    • @__-fm5qv
      @__-fm5qv 4 роки тому

      @@SgtSayWhat Hey fellow swansea student! :D I graduated last year.

  • @briansmobile1
    @briansmobile1 2 роки тому +485

    BAM!!! That's a high grade script, animation and delivery! Well done!

    • @supazt
      @supazt 2 роки тому +3

      Q

    • @silas-the-person3895
      @silas-the-person3895 2 роки тому

      Q

    • @madintheheid
      @madintheheid 2 роки тому

      Agreed. If only he could learn when to use 'there are', instead of 'there's', and stop using 'literally' when there is no literal reference, then I'd stop questioning if the rest of it is based on wrong assumptions.

    • @CSpottsGaming
      @CSpottsGaming 2 роки тому +3

      @@madintheheid Imagine disregarding the entirety of an hour long video about literal rocket science because you don't understand that language changes over time.

  • @mq-9reaperdrone530
    @mq-9reaperdrone530 3 роки тому +484

    The fact that this is free to watch is insane. Excellent work!

    • @solventtrapdotcom6676
      @solventtrapdotcom6676 2 роки тому +6

      I'm so old, I remember when TV was educational...

    • @longerino
      @longerino 2 роки тому +1

      I'm guessing you owe a lot of money.

    • @skankhunt9078
      @skankhunt9078 Рік тому

      It's not free you watch a ton of ads

    • @IceColdProfessional
      @IceColdProfessional 10 місяців тому

      Stop mentioning it. You're giving Google ideas for monetization.

    • @rabidbeaver167
      @rabidbeaver167 9 місяців тому

      Lol stfu its youtube.

  • @franksqrow6717
    @franksqrow6717 4 роки тому +486

    I'm retired from a technical career. Over the years it was clear, whenever I was given a technical briefing on a subject I was unfamiliar with, and the person giving the briefing was unable to adequately explain the subject in "layman's" terms, it indicated that the person doing the briefing did not truly understand the technology. It is obvious that that is not the case here. Excellent orientation! Very impressive!

    • @E-Kat
      @E-Kat 4 роки тому +12

      "just read the instructions"!

    • @effexon
      @effexon 4 роки тому +1

      @@E-Kat rolf

    • @subscriber6181
      @subscriber6181 4 роки тому

      Or s/he was Dyslexic

    • @subscriber6181
      @subscriber6181 4 роки тому +5

      @@MFKR696 Actually, technical careers are some of the best careers for Dyslexics. Dyslexics also make up a whopping 25% of CEOs. So, it's safe to assume that they could easily be Dyslexic.

    • @craigrmeyer
      @craigrmeyer 3 роки тому +2

      “If we can’t explain something to undergraduates then we don’t really understand it ourselves.” -Richard Feynman (paraphrased)

  • @tomanderson848
    @tomanderson848 4 роки тому +910

    This is what I was hoping the internet would be. Thanks for your hard work!

  • @carteretherington6700
    @carteretherington6700 3 роки тому +47

    Best 49 minutes I've ever spent!

  • @MrGrace
    @MrGrace 3 роки тому +7

    I would just like to say that I appreciate the production value of your videos. You make it easy to follow along, even though you're explaining highly complicated topics to lesser thinkers like me lol

  • @justrelax3012
    @justrelax3012 5 років тому +664

    This is probably one of the best videos on rockets I have ever seen. The amount of information you crammed into 49 minutes is crazy. Thanks!

    • @Reach3DPrinters
      @Reach3DPrinters 5 років тому +3

      Decidedly so. :)

    • @ChristianTreber
      @ChristianTreber 5 років тому +10

      That was 49mins? Yikes... but speaks for the content!

    • @deeas6518
      @deeas6518 4 роки тому +5

      Everyday Astronaut has a high information density compared to other videos

    • @ps200306
      @ps200306 4 роки тому +2

      Insanely great production, including the animations and footage. Just as a general comment on the growing quality of the better youtube channels ... it's the clearest indicator yet that the end is nigh for broadcast TV. On TV this would be dumbed down to moronic levels, while advertisers would be scattergun-blasting to a dwindling and fragmented audience.

    • @radiofreealbemuth8540
      @radiofreealbemuth8540 4 роки тому

      Falcon Heavy yep. Amazing quality.

  • @phye5063
    @phye5063 5 років тому +214

    It's so good to hear "we'll talk more about that in a second" than "we'll talk more about that in the next video"

  • @larsholland1879
    @larsholland1879 3 роки тому +5

    I just discovered your channel. Thank you for the deep dives. I have learn a ton from you over the past week or so. Keep up the great work

  • @darnellarford2439
    @darnellarford2439 3 роки тому +11

    This video is a timeless work of art. I plan on watching it many more times. Thank you so much for making it.

  • @ob0273
    @ob0273 5 років тому +1286

    Me: "I'm definitely not going to watch the whole video"
    *49 mins 1 sec later*
    "Ups.."

    • @TheDevilWAH
      @TheDevilWAH 5 років тому +39

      I was a bit like that, "I'll just see how this starts..... "

    • @benheinz8817
      @benheinz8817 5 років тому +9

      Yeah, same.

    • @arandomcrusaderonjerusalem5840
      @arandomcrusaderonjerusalem5840 5 років тому +6

      I watched it

    • @MonsoonEast
      @MonsoonEast 5 років тому +4

      I came to the end and was like "What, he can't be done already!"... Really looking forward to more!

    • @David-fg4nu
      @David-fg4nu 5 років тому +10

      For real tho. I’m supposed to wake up at 6:30 and it’s 2:30. RIP

  • @EverydayAstronaut
    @EverydayAstronaut  5 років тому +3494

    Elon watched the video and provided some additional input in this tweet - twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1132386984444383233?s=20
    "Great video. Couple notes: Raptor designed for subcooled CH4/O2, so propellant density & thrust increase up to ~8%, as needed for mission. 380 Isp & up to 50% thrust/weight improvement over time. Merlin thrust/weight doubled from V1, but Raptor is closer to optimum."
    and this one - twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1132389917722419200
    "Propellant stays same, but almost everything else improves. Fundamental goal is minimize cost per ton to surface of Mars."

    • @MatterBeamTSF
      @MatterBeamTSF 5 років тому +16

      That's awesome! Does this mean the TWR increases to about 150?

    • @alexkorocencev7689
      @alexkorocencev7689 5 років тому +220

      If Elon is interested, you clearly did something right!

    • @oliverriall
      @oliverriall 5 років тому +88

      Do you think he watched the whole thing through? Probably on x2. Job offer from SpaceX not far behind.

    • @DrNemea
      @DrNemea 5 років тому +36

      Congratulations.. and Thank you for all your hard works and commitments 🙏

    • @casinivan
      @casinivan 5 років тому +43

      Amazing video! Took time but totally worth it. For future reference, this is the go to video for any rocket-engine related things

  • @carlatteniese2
    @carlatteniese2 Рік тому +32

    This is the second time I am watching this; I am slowly educating myself (or NASA and others are educating me at You Tube) in orbital mechanics and you are educating me in rocketry--for starters. I also want to complement you in the way you present. As an ESL instructor in Asia for nearly 20 years, I understand the challenge of explaining ideas to people which are complex--in your case, because it's rocket science, in mine, because I only use English--and my point is, you have a way of talking that is clear, emotional (difference in voice pitch and expression delineates concepts more easily than in monotone--the way many science teachers speak)--and you repeat, Tim, which is essential. I could probably help you with the writing; maybe when I have extra cash, I will join on Patreon and give ideas. But, thank you, and excellent job. Your knowledge alone earns you a valuable seat on the Dear Moon flight. Congrats on that! You deserve it.

  • @rafaelsanson3124
    @rafaelsanson3124 2 роки тому +11

    All the time and effort put in this video is insane. GREAT WORK!

  • @jarno_de_wit
    @jarno_de_wit 5 років тому +191

    And I was just about to go to sleep.........
    I would have stayed up for 2 hours if the video had been that long. This was just amazing.

    • @robertgable2544
      @robertgable2544 5 років тому

      I started the video, fell asleep, slept for 10 hours, woke up, and finished the video.

  • @jerry3790
    @jerry3790 5 років тому +2222

    Is this video the king of everyday astronaut videos?

    • @JamesCutts22
      @JamesCutts22 5 років тому +31

      Yes for sure

    • @kerbonautics5217
      @kerbonautics5217 5 років тому +55

      So overall, this video is the king for this application.

    • @phil4826
      @phil4826 5 років тому +17

      Kudos to Tim. He's really studied hard and has come up to speed on rocket technology. He's now a good resource on the topic and is entertaining at the same time.

    • @ke6gwf
      @ke6gwf 5 років тому +18

      @@SpaceReportNews Or, just getting started!
      SpaceX sucks at making long form videos, Elon needs to use Tim to channel his inner space geek

    • @firexgodx980
      @firexgodx980 5 років тому +12

      It not only has the highest information density, but it's also the longest ever video he's ever produced so yes

  • @gregderise9969
    @gregderise9969 2 роки тому +2

    Amazing work on a complex topic. Fanatically educating. Really appreciated the quality of your production and script. Great work. I know you put a lot of effort into, first learning the details of the cycles, but also then gathering all the information together on the different rocket engines and putting into tabular and graphical form to help us understand. Your enthusiasm showed through. Your explanation is next level excellent for people approaching this topic for the first time. I found this interesting and completely engaging to watch. BTW I was in high school during the Apollo program, living only 40 miles from the NASA test facility in Mississippi. I got to see an S-1 stage test firing, full duration of those incredibly deafening F-1 engines, from one mile away with the press. The sound pressure rocked the NASA bus from side to side. I chipped my hands around a friend’s ear and shouted instructions from one inch away at the top of my lungs on the photography we were doing. He was unable to hear me. The legs of the slacks I was wearing were flapping as if a wind was hitting them. It was completely calm. The flame shooting sideways out of the flame bucket was a few stories High and I guessed about 700’ long horizontally. It was wickedly ferocious looking. It’s been a little over half a century now but I’m still impressed by my memory of it. I later flew down to the cape and watched the final flight of Apollo, Apollo 17, lift off at night from 10 miles away. We could barely hear it by comparison at that distance, but it lit the sky up like a sunrise. After staging with the hydrogen burning second stage engines, it looked like a breeding start moving rapidly through the constellations. Many years later, during the Shuttle program, I saw one reentering the atmosphere late at night from Gulfport Mississippi heading south to fly over the Gulf of Mexico toward Florida at an altitude of 35 miles at a speed of 5000 mph. I got that information the next day via a phone call to the Johnson Space Center. It looked like an orange meteor with a long white tail of ionized gas. It casts moving shadow under a bright streetlight. Two minutes after it faded out over the Gulf I heard a characteristic double sonic boom. I never saw it launched though I drove down to KSC and waited once. I never had another proper opportunity. Hopefully the SLS will become a flying vehicle one day, assuming a lot of things, and I can go see it. I have a much longer way to go to beer there these days. I now live in Iowa, only about 2-1/2 hours south of you! SRBs are very very bright. I saw the launch of Voyager 2 in 1977 from 4 miles away on a tour bus on a sunny summer Saturday. It like looking at two Suns, the pair of solid rocket boosters strapped on the Titan rocket. Of course those were much smaller than the ones on the Space Shuttle and what will be on the SLS. I’m looking forward to seeing if I can get as close or closer to a launch and get “blinded” by the light. We’ll see…🤷🏼‍♂️(Wow WOW would I like to see a full up flight of Starship some day too. That would be incredible. The noise!)

  • @SpeedemonR1
    @SpeedemonR1 3 роки тому +4

    Brilliant explanation of the different types of rockets in a simplistic yet informative manner. Great work, looking forward to seeing the future of rocket development thru your eyes.

  • @dongurudebro4579
    @dongurudebro4579 5 років тому +1751

    Ok i must say you have surpassed yourself
    , a very complex subject simple explained and visualized!
    Great Job, probably the best video of you yet!

    • @theanonymous393
      @theanonymous393 5 років тому +8

      Ich: klicke auf ein Everyday Astronaut Video
      Sehe Don Guru de Bro & Paul Paulson als Top Comment
      Checke ob ich mich nicht verklickt hab und bei PietSmiet gelandet bin :D

    • @matthysk1479
      @matthysk1479 5 років тому

      Yes agreed! Great video💪🏻💪🏻

    • @cymrych79
      @cymrych79 5 років тому +5

      Agreed! Wish I could punch the "Like" button a couple dozen more times. Excellent video.

    • @gamefrySE
      @gamefrySE 5 років тому +5

      Came here to say the same thing. Incredibly well researched but easy to understand. One of the best videos he's done!

    • @rfrnet1
      @rfrnet1 5 років тому

      Wow! Great video.

  • @jb0433628
    @jb0433628 5 років тому +219

    Upvoted because for the first time ever I heard an understandable description of specific impulse.

  • @alekseimarianov3388
    @alekseimarianov3388 2 роки тому +1

    Tim, do I need to mention how much we appreciate your work and especially the consistent use of metric system? Thank you!

  • @chucks2k
    @chucks2k 3 роки тому

    By far your best effort yet. Thanks so much for your easily digestible treatment of these complex engines.

  • @txetxurodriguez
    @txetxurodriguez 5 років тому +277

    Man, this video has a LOT or work behind. Thank you Tim.

  • @Paul-iw9mb
    @Paul-iw9mb 5 років тому +43

    My sister asked me today to help her with a presentation about rocket engines, so this video came at exactly the right moment.
    It's really impressive how you managed to explain that deep topic with so much detail, but in a understandable way. Most videos about engines I know are to basic and don't go into so much detail. Amazing work putting this together!
    Thank you very much for this.

  • @jacekciszewski3889
    @jacekciszewski3889 3 роки тому +2

    You explain Rocket science in a way that I could say "It's not a rocket science dude! It's easy!"
    Great job! Please do more.

  • @willhofner6903
    @willhofner6903 3 роки тому

    I've never felt more drawn to join a patreon for a yt channel than I am for this one. Truly inspiring stuff

  • @ceeyloc
    @ceeyloc 5 років тому +65

    Best 48:45 mins:secs that I've spent in 67 yrs. Well done!

  • @vaibhavpoke8357
    @vaibhavpoke8357 5 років тому +138

    That honestly didn't feel like 49 minutes. This was so interesting and well done. Keep it up Tim. We really appreciate it.

    • @Andytlp
      @Andytlp 5 років тому

      just watch at 2x its like 24:30 min video bro.

  • @EngiTrek
    @EngiTrek 2 роки тому +4

    Excellent! When comparing fuels, it’s more appropriate to compare characteristic velocities as the specific impulse is dependent on engine architecture.
    Keep up the great work!

  • @michaelpal7641
    @michaelpal7641 3 роки тому +4

    And lastly-This video is truly one of the greatest videos on the Internet!

  • @hoedoe5981
    @hoedoe5981 4 роки тому +485

    Me at first : 49 mins ?!!!
    Me after 49mins : "Definitely worth it"

  • @albertcaro6191
    @albertcaro6191 5 років тому +320

    This is a contender for best video on youtube for the year. Astonishingly good

    • @bennoz2
      @bennoz2 5 років тому

      @Gmail X lol... russian botttttt

    • @awuma
      @awuma 5 років тому

      @Gmail X I often imagine that Elon Musk is Sergei Pavlovich reincarnated...

    • @bennoz2
      @bennoz2 5 років тому

      @Gmail X OK comrade... hahaha

    • @bennoz2
      @bennoz2 5 років тому

      @Gmail X "and is triumph of marketing" and "you must educate yourself moron" is a double negative and cancelled each other out... one of us need to get an education Comrade... 🤭

    • @bennoz2
      @bennoz2 5 років тому

      @Gmail X Trump.... lol not my problem bro...

  • @philflip1963
    @philflip1963 3 роки тому +1

    Just about the finest video I've seen you do, congrats!

  • @peacenow42
    @peacenow42 5 років тому +351

    People like this are a gift to the world because there is so much to teach and learn now and they help us put it all into the right context while making us curious to know more.

  • @mithiraudugama800
    @mithiraudugama800 5 років тому +482

    Wow super interesting video man. Didn't even felt it's 50 mins. Thank you

    • @germanher7528
      @germanher7528 5 років тому +1

      +1!

    • @stormsurge1
      @stormsurge1 5 років тому +2

      *didn't feel

    • @NaenaeGaming
      @NaenaeGaming 5 років тому +1

      Wait it’s 50 minutes? I’ve only just started watching...

    • @davemwangi05
      @davemwangi05 4 роки тому +1

      I wondered how it ended fast. I often get tired of 5 minute videos. Not this one though.

    • @aw195
      @aw195 4 роки тому +1

      It wasn't 50 mins

  • @omgitsflying
    @omgitsflying 3 роки тому +2

    Amazingly well documented and presented. Fantastic

  • @gianlucanordio7200
    @gianlucanordio7200 3 роки тому +2

    Crazy how you can explain in a easy way such a hard matter, amazing video 🔥

  • @arturfraniuk1128
    @arturfraniuk1128 5 років тому +361

    This is what I call good journalism. Thank you Tim

    • @clausejoke1985
      @clausejoke1985 5 років тому +3

      That's not journalism that's shilling.

    • @jessiejanson1528
      @jessiejanson1528 5 років тому +10

      jou-na-li-sam... what is that? i havnt .. Oh.. Yes, now i remember, it was that thing the news did over 20 years ago where they presented facts on different subjects or investigated problems. Nice to see it existing, sadly never on the news channels, those just lies and clickbait BS...

    • @linecraftman3907
      @linecraftman3907 5 років тому +1

      @@clausejoke1985 do you really think tim is getting paid by spacex to promote their rockets?

    • @clausejoke1985
      @clausejoke1985 5 років тому +1

      @@linecraftman3907
      I don't know, but he is definitely a victim of SpaceX's PR and hype.
      None of Musks companies has ever invented any groundbreaking/new technology.
      Landing is a maneuver not a technology, this should tell you everything you have to know about Musk and his companies.
      A lot of bullshit claims and promises, but no substance.
      Highest paid CEO but he is doing it for mankind.... dear god you guys are naive.
      www.bizjournals.com/sanjose/news/2019/04/02/tsla-median-pay-musk-compensation.html
      He is also a union busting drug addict and convicted fraud.
      Do you want me to stop now?

    • @linecraftman3907
      @linecraftman3907 5 років тому +2

      @@clausejoke1985 it's not about inventing new technologies, it's about making it work in real life. Drug addict? People don't choose to be drug addicts most of the time. However I do agree about shady business practices and bad work conditions , but who is holding the workers in the companies?

  • @zachm4635
    @zachm4635 5 років тому +295

    Never clicked so fast. been waiting ever since you announced it on OLF.

    • @MS-dp3py
      @MS-dp3py 5 років тому +2

      OLF FTW, Its a great podcast.

    • @CKalitin
      @CKalitin 5 років тому +3

      It surprises me how little people watch/listen to OLF. Only ~15k!

    • @zachm4635
      @zachm4635 5 років тому +3

      Blah Cga our ludicrous future. Look it up as our ludicrous future it’s a podcast with joe Scott(answers with joe), Tim(everydayastronuaght), and Ben sullins(teslanomics)

  • @SWard7292
    @SWard7292 2 роки тому

    Great video. Didn’t know if I could sit through a 45 minute UA-cam video, but it was so well done and so much good information presented so well. Thank you for putting the time and effort into this.

  • @gregsworldkitchen6764
    @gregsworldkitchen6764 3 роки тому +1

    Thanks for putting the hard work in for this video. I had no idea that rocket fuel pumps were turbo powered. I'd assumed they were electric. Learned something new. Also very interesting were the difference in fuel properties and the explanation of why CH4 is a good compromise. Well worth the watch and those 49 mins flew buy.

  • @slimeking101
    @slimeking101 5 років тому +64

    5 freaking months for this? 100% worth it

  • @ralph17p
    @ralph17p 4 роки тому +758

    You know, when people say "it's not rocket science", I hadn't realised the bar was quite that high.

    • @MaxMustermann-bm7qt
      @MaxMustermann-bm7qt 4 роки тому +59

      Ralph Pickering i’ve heard in rocket science you say

    • @youfreaker
      @youfreaker 4 роки тому +14

      It seems way more difficult because people don't come across the information in regular life so everything is completely new. I mean you can show a person a simple scientific formula, e.g. to calculate the average, and most people still wouldn't understand it

    • @uropygid
      @uropygid 4 роки тому +19

      @@MaxMustermann-bm7qt Oh my goodness! Rocket science is so simple compared to music theory. I can read music and play guitar. Still I have almost no comprehension of music theory in general, and guitar theory in particular.

    • @not1but2and37
      @not1but2and37 4 роки тому +3

      I saw what you did there.

    • @joethomasld
      @joethomasld 4 роки тому

      👏🏻

  • @rolliebca
    @rolliebca 5 місяців тому +2

    Now this is a fantastic video! Thank you for your efforts. Very well done. Cheers.

  • @everydayspacenerd8192
    @everydayspacenerd8192 3 роки тому

    @Everyday Astronaut Best video yet! Very detailed and informative keep up the good work!

  • @albertopajuelomontes2066
    @albertopajuelomontes2066 5 років тому +87

    despite being 49 minutes long, I was enjoing it so much it felt really short.

  • @stefanblack3909
    @stefanblack3909 5 років тому +393

    The professors in my aerospace engineering program didnt deliver this info a 10th as well as you have. And this video was free, where as my degree... was not.

    • @nicolacornolti7796
      @nicolacornolti7796 5 років тому +24

      @Cosmonauteable mhhh okay, but you're saying he could have learned it by himself without going to school. This means the teacher was not good anyways

    • @Ernomouse
      @Ernomouse 5 років тому +10

      I don't think any given professor has five months to prepare for a single lesson. Sure, he should know his field in general, but consider this: how do you keep up with the fast pace of science if you have to teach students, plan lessons and correct tests and essays full-time? While you would also love to advance your own research?

    • @CookingWithCows
      @CookingWithCows 5 років тому

      And how does your free youtube history do when applying for a job?

    • @RandomNumber141
      @RandomNumber141 5 років тому +1

      Try putting your UA-cam history on a job application.

    • @stefanblack3909
      @stefanblack3909 5 років тому +3

      @@RandomNumber141 try making an original comment

  • @gango4436
    @gango4436 2 роки тому +1

    Thank you so much brother , this simplified explanation was so great for me . Keep going 🔥

  • @spencerjensen1993
    @spencerjensen1993 2 роки тому +3

    Seriously one of my favorite videos on the platform. A close second is drachinifel’s video about navy ship boilers.

  • @Nayte08
    @Nayte08 5 років тому +267

    Amazing how you were not only able to inform me of the basics of rocket engines, but you kept my attention for the entirety of the video. Tough thing to do these days, absolutely wonderful video.

    • @TheAefril
      @TheAefril 5 років тому +1

      Totally agree with you, and well put Nathan!

    • @thatjeff7550
      @thatjeff7550 5 років тому

      I had to cheat and boost the speed of the vid to 1.25%.

  • @theologyrules6146
    @theologyrules6146 4 роки тому +133

    "Rocket science, like all things, is a complex set of compromises." -- best line of the whole video.
    One should not take lightly the expression, 'It's not rocket science.' again. Rocket science ought to be applied to every day thinking really. Balancing proportion, Goldilocks principle. Deep video. New sub.

  • @wafikiri_
    @wafikiri_ 2 роки тому

    First of your videos I've seen. I liked it so much that I subscribed without hesitation.

  • @AffectiveApe
    @AffectiveApe 2 роки тому +2

    I am doing some catch up on my knowledge of the current progress with spacex, thanks for making this incredible historical record of our progress for folks not in the industry.

  • @Wintergatan
    @Wintergatan 5 років тому +608

    Thank you for making this!

    • @thestudentofficial5483
      @thestudentofficial5483 3 роки тому +23

      Didn't know you watched Tim also. I like your music, G.

    • @Cryseris
      @Cryseris 3 роки тому +3

      Weird to see you here, also when is the marble machine X gonna be done

    • @anthrazite
      @anthrazite 3 роки тому +6

      @@Cryseris Maybe watch his stuff, then you'd see ^^

    • @HeidenLam
      @HeidenLam 3 роки тому +4

      Wasn’t expecting you to be here

    • @ivminic1949
      @ivminic1949 3 роки тому +1

      U americans think u r exceptional in everything u think u. Hope and talk about going 2 Mara soon. U haven t even gone 2 the moon yet

  • @jesseharp2400
    @jesseharp2400 Рік тому +1

    This is so awesome so glad I found this channel thank you for doing what you do

  • @lizzylue92
    @lizzylue92 2 роки тому +2

    This helped me prepare for my spaceX interview! Thank you for your hard work!

  • @Elimino_P
    @Elimino_P 5 років тому +94

    Best animations detailing different engine types. Super good job!

  • @paulshedleski7063
    @paulshedleski7063 5 років тому +121

    Wow! So much information coming at just the right speed for comprehension, the time flew by! All in one video was the right call

  • @iamarobotninja
    @iamarobotninja Рік тому

    Incredible amount of work put into this channel. Thank you

  • @rmatveev
    @rmatveev 3 роки тому +1

    Great video, Tim!
    Watched it twice with the same amount of joy!!!

  • @WillCocking04
    @WillCocking04 3 роки тому +809

    "So why did spacex use methane?" Thrust is blue and look cool

    • @xtremeownagedotcom
      @xtremeownagedotcom 3 роки тому +78

      blue flame go brrr

    • @NHAFFFF
      @NHAFFFF 3 роки тому +20

      It might be blue but it's the bomb

    • @Migger_29
      @Migger_29 3 роки тому +32

      I bet they got the idea while farting on matches.

    • @simonenarsson8978
      @simonenarsson8978 3 роки тому +3

      NHAFXD GLITCHER シ i got the reference 🥳

    • @chasepatesel7118
      @chasepatesel7118 3 роки тому +13

      Because we are able to produce it fairly easily, unlike hydrocarbons like traditional rocket fuel..if we find the right materials we could make it on Mars..

  • @odie6789
    @odie6789 4 роки тому +781

    I feel like I should have earned college credits for this.

    • @SuperDave-vj9en
      @SuperDave-vj9en 4 роки тому +15

      You would pass the exam.
      Congratulations!

    • @BxBxProductions
      @BxBxProductions 4 роки тому +17

      I literally took a class on orbital physics and spaceflight and the math/calculations involved is soooooooo tedious.
      It isn't for everyone but it was worth it!

    • @drx1xym154
      @drx1xym154 4 роки тому +5

      They give some degrees out for less, these days!
      .
      Feelings!
      soooo woke?

    • @robh467
      @robh467 3 роки тому

      Somewhere between history and antique methods for propulsion.

    • @robh467
      @robh467 3 роки тому +2

      @@BxBxProductions welcome to modern academia.
      Okay, the student is finally ready to think freely and have original thought patterns.
      Let's see..... Dangit.
      Again, before we could unlock free thinking; the student died of old age.

  • @CharlesBurnsPrime
    @CharlesBurnsPrime 2 роки тому

    This may be the best video on UA-cam. Interesting, educational, well-produced, the presenter is clearly a well-balanced human being, and it was even funny here and there. Complex topics (literally rocket science) are presented in a digestible manner, and the animations are both useful and very professionally done. This video is a masterpiece.

  • @albertpeugh9367
    @albertpeugh9367 5 місяців тому

    Great video, loved the fathom quip, you slid it in quite nicely.

  • @TheBalefire
    @TheBalefire 4 роки тому +355

    I can fill in some of the knowledge on Metallurgy, if you are interested.
    Basically, the mechanism by which metals fail, or "yield," is by the propagation of imperfections in the crystal lattice. The imperfections are called "dislocations" and there are usually millions of them in any cubic millimeter of metal. Dislocations tend to move more easily as you raise the temperature of a metal, causing yield strengths to decrease with higher temperature. The methods of strengthening metals generally center around trying to halt the motion of these dislocations, either by adding alloy elements which tend to stabilize dislocations at the atomic level (such as adding carbon to steel), or by precipitating secondary phases (like small crystals within the crystal) which act as roadblocks to dislocation movement.
    Secondary phases are usually precipitated by raising the temperature of the metal and aging it for a certain duration. Aluminum is an example where this is very common. Metallurgists have determined the proper time and temperature to age metals to get the maximum strength. The longer you age, the larger the precipitates grow. If the precipitates are too small, dislocations cut through them. If they are too large, dislocations will bend around them. If you age at the wrong temperature, or the wrong combination of elements, precipitates will form along grain boundaries instead of inside crystal grains, which doesn't add strength, and can weaken the metal. Precipitates must be fairly small, and uniformly spread throughout the crystal in order to add strength to the metal
    Precipitation hardening is especially common in Aluminum alloys. Part of the reason aluminum is fine for airplane skins but not good for engines revolves around the fact that precipitation hardening is lost once you raise the temperature above a few hundred degrees, as the high temps will cause precipitates to grow, combine, and migrate to grain boundaries.
    You mentioned work-hardening of stainless steel. Work hardening is a mechanism where you basically limit dislocation movement by adding a whole lot more dislocations, and forcing them to move until they run into each other. By deforming the material, you push the dislocations until they start to stack up, which gives resistance to further propagation of dislocations. The downside of this is that you lose some of the metal's ductility, which is the ability to "bend before breaking." This means that if you have sudden, large force on your structure (shock load), it is more likely to fracture rather than bending or denting. No doubt the engineers at SpaceX are aware of this, and have adjusted their safety factors and fatigue analysis numbers to compensate.

    • @arekingi
      @arekingi 4 роки тому +32

      I'm two months late, but I'll say it anyway, as a fabricator who is very much NOT a metallurgist, I appreciated reading your comment and learned a bunch. Cheers!

    • @aboeckmann
      @aboeckmann 4 роки тому +19

      Wow! Very informative comment. Thanks

    • @doolittlegeorge
      @doolittlegeorge 4 роки тому +5

      *through use you find fatigue.* Simple as that. Just look at the number of launches *AND* landings.

    • @jeremytaylor3532
      @jeremytaylor3532 4 роки тому +5

      Popular Science had a great article back in the day about turbine blades in jets and how they would specially heat the blades and then cool them from one end to the other producing a blade that was essentially a single crystal.

    • @ryanbriggs3391
      @ryanbriggs3391 4 роки тому +1

      Wow, that explanation makes all kinds of sense:) Well done!

  • @deshmukhshrut
    @deshmukhshrut 5 років тому +78

    Einstein said time is relative, today I experienced it. Never felt 49:02 minutes pass so fast.

    • @AkashYadav-mr4hg
      @AkashYadav-mr4hg 5 років тому

      were you travelling at the or near the speed of light ?

  • @otpyrcralphpierre1742
    @otpyrcralphpierre1742 3 роки тому

    I watch this video about once a month. It's still just as fascinating. Excellent work!

  • @snuffeldjuret
    @snuffeldjuret 6 місяців тому +4

    I remember watching this thinking the raptor numbers were aspirational that would never be achieve. Boy was I wrong, we are already past those.

  • @robsonhahn
    @robsonhahn 5 років тому +20

    Info #1 and #2
    RD171 actually flew almost 100 times. Much more than F1
    Also, the RD170 (differs from RD171 basically with relation to the gimbal direction) was able to achieve a peak pressure of 306,2bar at chamber pressure.

  • @josephsalomone
    @josephsalomone 3 роки тому +131

    You are the first person to make specific impulse make sense. Everyone else is just like, well it is in seconds because that's how the math works out.

    • @marcopohl4875
      @marcopohl4875 2 роки тому +3

      that's why I prefer Isaac Arthur's approach: specific impulse can go take a hike, exhaust velocity is way better!

    • @dwarvenmoray
      @dwarvenmoray 2 роки тому +1

      Because that's how mafia work.

    • @joshsvoss
      @joshsvoss 2 роки тому

      Hahahah

    • @andrew34765
      @andrew34765 2 роки тому +4

      The reason they use seconds is because the math works out to being the equivalent of "how many seconds would sea level gravity need to pull on the exhaust to counter its acceleration"
      If gravity is 9.8 m/s^2, then a fuel with an exhaust velocity of 980 meters per second would have a specific impulse of 100 seconds.

    • @josephsalomone
      @josephsalomone 2 роки тому +1

      @@andrew34765 I get that now, but no one ever explained that. And wikipedia wasn't much help either. People would stop their explanation at, that's just how the math works, and not go any further.

  • @PramochanYaan
    @PramochanYaan 4 місяці тому

    Really Fun and Informative Video, Thanks for Making it!!!

  • @fishing1335
    @fishing1335 3 роки тому

    Love your videos. Me and my dad are hooked on rockets. We watch every spaceX livestream. Really appreciate you putting out these videos.

  • @InventorZahran
    @InventorZahran 3 роки тому +273

    "The Raptor is truly a GoldieLOX engine..."

    • @implodingbaby
      @implodingbaby 3 роки тому +3

      A AAA AAAH

    • @karanguyen7569
      @karanguyen7569 3 роки тому +5

      Absolutely incredible. I’m speechless. Can’t believe I actually just watched this video on UA-cam for free...

    • @small_SHOT
      @small_SHOT 3 роки тому

      Not funny
      Didn’t laugh

    • @thenativemartian5169
      @thenativemartian5169 3 роки тому +1

      *sighs in defeat.* you got me bro

    • @ismawan1980
      @ismawan1980 3 роки тому

      @@karanguyen7569 you copied another comment, oh well

  • @zayedmohamed4063
    @zayedmohamed4063 5 років тому +142

    This was very well explained. The visualizations were very helpful.

  • @steveharris4296
    @steveharris4296 2 роки тому +1

    Tim, this is a masterpiece. Thank you so much! You are such a excellent teacher. All the best from NC.

  • @jemakrol
    @jemakrol 2 роки тому

    I cannot fathom the quality I find in this video. Part from being enlighted and encouraged - I realised that it sucks to live too far away. Just tried to order some merch only to find out that it cost $15 to buy and in addition tripple that amount in delivery costs. Doh!
    Still. What you do here is just friggin awesome! Thanks for doing this, delivering it with enthusiasm and easy to understand narrative. You truly brinng space to earth. :)

  • @davidhilton3453
    @davidhilton3453 4 роки тому +463

    This is the most interesting online class I've ever taken. Can't take my eyes off the screen. Keep it up.

    • @hemprope4326
      @hemprope4326 4 роки тому +2

      Much more interesting than quarantine

    • @tiborpurzsas2136
      @tiborpurzsas2136 4 роки тому +1

      He is not that good looking.....)

    • @frederic.marquis7361
      @frederic.marquis7361 4 роки тому +3

      @@tiborpurzsas2136 dumbest comment ever !!
      Get a brain, Ken !!

    • @RmX.
      @RmX. 4 роки тому

      @@tiborpurzsas2136 what r u gay?

    • @davidpinto7975
      @davidpinto7975 4 роки тому

      @@tiborpurzsas2136 I actually think he is good looking :D

  • @DanielZajic
    @DanielZajic 3 роки тому +155

    You deserve awards for this work. Truly outstanding, Tim.

    • @Benn25
      @Benn25 8 місяців тому +1

      Yeah, like going around the moon? :p

  • @dukeoversteer
    @dukeoversteer 11 місяців тому

    Great job Tim. Your explanations are very clear. Combined with the excellent graphics this is a very instructional video. Keep up the good work.

  • @trevorpullen3199
    @trevorpullen3199 3 роки тому

    I have to go back and re-watch this video every few months. It makes more sense every time.

  • @angel-nw4in
    @angel-nw4in 5 років тому +50

    I almost never watch a video longer than 30 minutes, but you kept me interested! Awesome video!

  • @JackLe1127
    @JackLe1127 5 років тому +48

    4:28 I like how you spent at least an hour blending their faces on the picture for just 3 seconds in the video.

  • @user-wo2ny7ym4l
    @user-wo2ny7ym4l 3 роки тому +33

    38:11 As for current time, seems Merlin engine has proven at least 10 times reusability with real flights, after 10th launch of B1051

    • @abzy2470
      @abzy2470 Рік тому +3

      March 2023 booster 1058 15 launches 15 landings

    • @brain82862
      @brain82862 5 місяців тому

      December 23rd, 2023. Booster 1058 has completed 19 launches and 19 landings.

  • @michaelcasareo8450
    @michaelcasareo8450 2 роки тому

    Tim Dodd, thanks for all the awesome videos. You inspire me to study Aerospace Engineering. Your teaching and explaining things on very high technical subjects makes it easier to understand. I watch the video over and over, I learn more about rocket engine - physics, thermodynamic etc. than reading it from the book. I watch all your videos while doing cardio exercise at the gym...it becomes my daily routine studies, it makes time flies just like the rocket engine going into space. :P :)

  • @xrayaiz74
    @xrayaiz74 4 роки тому +201

    The best technical video I've seen on UA-cam in 2019! And...it's about rockets!! Excellent job! I could actually follow along with your explanations and data without getting bored. Keep producing more videos like this.

  • @trblmkr5139
    @trblmkr5139 Рік тому

    this is dope I'm gonna search your videos to see if you talk about the RS-68 ever! New subscriber @everydayastronaut great work!

  • @chance1986
    @chance1986 5 років тому +163

    The most informative 50 minutes I ever spent on UA-cam. Thank you.

    • @glassooy1
      @glassooy1 5 років тому +1

      thank you , its a great honor to see a master at work

    • @davemwangi05
      @davemwangi05 4 роки тому

      I sometimes encounter some 5 minutes video and feel pretty wasted. This 50 minutes felt like a 5 min video. cool informative

  • @rdawood
    @rdawood 3 роки тому

    I don't usually comment on videos but had to stop and say thanks for making this. Incredible work! Subscribed

  • @craigdeandean4036
    @craigdeandean4036 2 роки тому +1

    I wonder how many engineering classes you would have saved rocket engine designers. Great job I was totally enthralled!!

  • @danielp1839
    @danielp1839 3 роки тому +885

    Who else is here after raptor achieved 330 bar?

  • @stan.rarick8556
    @stan.rarick8556 4 роки тому +900

    If cars can be rated in horsepower, can methane powered rockets be rated in cowpower?

    • @rudolfkratky36
      @rudolfkratky36 4 роки тому +32

      -bigbraintime-

    • @coonjamalay
      @coonjamalay 4 роки тому +2

      @@ryp1562 the joke went over your head

    • @user-sf5iq2fl1l
      @user-sf5iq2fl1l 4 роки тому +2

      Cowpat

    • @Physiac
      @Physiac 4 роки тому +8

      It should be rated in llama thrust

    • @juniperpansy
      @juniperpansy 4 роки тому +3

      This would a great engineering project for Mennonites. A cow rocket fueled by hay. Probably would get their cattle faster to market too

  • @TheMan4407
    @TheMan4407 3 роки тому

    Had to watch this again for the large amount of information to sink in. Well done, and very well explained!

  • @bryansimon4072
    @bryansimon4072 2 роки тому

    Very nicely done. Glad I watched. Your explanation and presentation are awesome. Thanks

  • @mollymarsgal3377
    @mollymarsgal3377 5 років тому +59

    WOW! Just finished this video. Even though I knew most of this stuff partially, this video helped put it together in my head. Amazing Job!!

    • @FiferSkipper
      @FiferSkipper 5 років тому

      I was at the same spot with my rocket knowledge... It was nice to finally put all the pieces together.