The Worst Legendary in Hearthstone

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 20 тра 2023
  • In This Hearthstone Video, Rarran does a King of the Hill Format to find the worst legendary in all of hearthstone
    You should watch me live on Twitch:
    / rarran
    ▶Discord: / discord
    ▶Twitter: / rarranhs
    ▶TikTok: / rarranhs
    Edited By: / mf_daveed
    Thumbnail: dees_nook?s=21&t=...
    #Hearthstone #Rarran #hs
  • Ігри

КОМЕНТАРІ • 360

  • @GumshoeClassic
    @GumshoeClassic Рік тому +835

    The Hir'eek vs. Aviana discussion is essentially "What is worse: An empty gun or one that shoots you in your knee?"

    • @darkumineru1681
      @darkumineru1681 Рік тому +50

      more like a toy gun thats broken vs aviana's give the opponent a nuke to do has they please with

    • @BaBaNaNaBa
      @BaBaNaNaBa Рік тому +11

      aviana 100% of the time

    • @r3zaful
      @r3zaful Рік тому +4

      Aviana can be good if you have a temporary silencer. Part of the problem is hs doesn't have this a 2 mana minion that have battle cry to silence for a turn or just temporary dormand minion.

    • @lukesteiner8934
      @lukesteiner8934 Рік тому +2

      ​@@r3zaful maiev and incarceration

    • @thiccnoodles6767
      @thiccnoodles6767 Рік тому +4

      I played aviana on 5 once. Immediately lost to malygos.

  • @Vynecloud
    @Vynecloud Рік тому +289

    "There is never a use-case for fucking the Boogeymonster"
    -Rarran, 2023
    16:13

    • @ZoMbi5lAy3r
      @ZoMbi5lAy3r Рік тому +18

      Boogeymonster is literally me?

    • @dsalucas
      @dsalucas Рік тому +5

      Now the Boogie Monster, on the other hand... Sheesh.

  • @nikospyridis9579
    @nikospyridis9579 Рік тому +243

    About the Aviana Duskfallen vs Temporus debate, keep in mind that Temporus gets HARD countered by Aviana, as you can Aviana the first turn given by Temporus and then use the effect the 2nd turn. I'm surprised noone considered the famous Aviana Duskfallen Druid vs TTK (Two Turn Kill) Temporus Priest matchup.

    • @shardgunner4815
      @shardgunner4815 Рік тому +27

      This is such a funny comment

    • @susamogus8331
      @susamogus8331 Рік тому +3

      Weren't both cards hall of famed

    • @GaussianEntity
      @GaussianEntity Рік тому +1

      Temporus is usable in Rogue. Aviana is not. Temporus is also a dragon. Temporus wins.

    • @Cuestrupaster
      @Cuestrupaster Рік тому +3

      Oh yeah the very famous, well known and overplayed left and right until exhaustion, Duskfallen Druid vs Temporus Priest...

    • @shardgunner4815
      @shardgunner4815 Рік тому

      @@Cuestrupaster this is such a redundant comment

  • @ryanmoore8346
    @ryanmoore8346 Рік тому +35

    Real talk- Gruul was in classic for the ENTIRETY of The Boogeymonster's existence, and the ONLY WAY Boogey beat Gruul was if you gave it Windfury, and cleared minions, and honestly, if you're giving your 8 mana minion windfury and it can attack, you've kinda already won. So.... boogeyman was dogshit

  • @walkytalky6372
    @walkytalky6372 Рік тому +123

    I think one important point missed with Hir'eek is the set of was printed in. It had overkill as a keyword, meaning that if you cast it you not only spent 8 mana to fill your bourd with worthless imps but you also just gave your opponent 7 chances to trigger overkill.

    • @LordDany
      @LordDany Рік тому +1

      Wich makes it worser

    • @walkytalky6372
      @walkytalky6372 Рік тому +8

      @@LordDany That it does.

    • @LordDany
      @LordDany Рік тому +3

      I remenber i stoped playing for a while after getting hireek
      I just quit out of trying to make it work
      If Warlock had good hand buffs that would be other story
      But it does not Therefore it isnt.

    • @LordDany
      @LordDany Рік тому +1

      I remenber i stoped playing for a while after getting hireek
      I just quit out of trying to make it work among other things
      If Warlock had good hand buffs that would be other story
      But it does not Therefore it isnt.

    • @TheAndreyCraft
      @TheAndreyCraft Місяць тому

      ​@@LordDanywarlock had 1 mana spell that gave your leftmost minion i hand +2/+2. I've used to use both of that spells on hireek and that's 7 5/5 minions for 8 mana

  • @kokioen
    @kokioen Рік тому +33

    Chat: "This card is awful. You need a very specific circumstance for this to do something"
    Also chat: "this card is fine, as long as you get a specific circumstance, this card can actually do something"

  • @Buzzgrim
    @Buzzgrim Рік тому +91

    Getting people to comment on discord really makes the video more interactive and adds different perspectives. Nice one Rarran!

    • @nathanbienias2761
      @nathanbienias2761 Рік тому +8

      Unfortunately some dude had to put a wet blanket on it so I'm not sure how much we'll see it in the future. It sucks cause I agree with you.

    • @nathanbienias2761
      @nathanbienias2761 Рік тому +4

      @Radigan That a take from Crowder or Sargon?

    • @naplockblubba5369
      @naplockblubba5369 Рік тому

      @Radigan The fuck?

    • @coleeberhard4194
      @coleeberhard4194 8 місяців тому

      Agreed

  • @nonrepeating_nonterminating
    @nonrepeating_nonterminating Рік тому +25

    I think this is so much better than the previous king of the hill video since there's more discussion on why a card is bad than why a card is good

    • @sora8711
      @sora8711 Рік тому +3

      Problem is with the good card king of the hill, the rules were all over the place. "We're judging a card based on how it is currently"
      "Patches too good, winner"
      Cards that were too good and got nerfed "Nah, it's bad now." but patches? Patches is eternal even though I never see it played anymore.

  • @Salem_Sage
    @Salem_Sage Рік тому +53

    I opened a Golden Temporus and I honestly played it back when it was in standard as a 2 turn kill play alongside Dragon Soul
    It was not a good deck but against a slower deck it honestly pulled out a fair number of wins
    Temporus may go down in history as one of the worst legendaries ever but I will always keep it in my heart

  • @steffenml
    @steffenml Рік тому +28

    I remember when Aviana came on the screen, the absolute SPAM of “IT’S OVER” and “THIS IS IT”. It was glorious to watch.
    Great stream, Rarran, thank you for all the laughs.

  • @megatenshi
    @megatenshi Рік тому +45

    I think another thing that theoretically makes Millhouse less garbage than Aviana is the fact he can come down so much earlier, when decks playing a lot of big cards should theoretically have a smaller hand(and thus be less likely to demolish you.) The fact it makes ALL spells cost 0 is garbage, but as we saw during your video of trying to play him a lot, sometimes people just don't have spells worth using on turn 2. They'll ALWAYS have something to use Aviana on, even if it's just killing her for a tempo boost.

    • @ympalympa6796
      @ympalympa6796 Рік тому

      And Millhouse was played with Drek'thar

    • @megatenshi
      @megatenshi Рік тому +5

      @@ympalympa6796 Mhm, he's been played in a few ways to cheat him out, but Rarran already mentioned that in the video

    • @gimmethegepgun
      @gimmethegepgun 3 місяці тому +1

      Also, if you get Millhouse early, there's a high chance that the opponent specifically doesn't have high-cost spells, because they would've mulliganed them in their starting hand.

  • @Symptomofsynesthesy
    @Symptomofsynesthesy Рік тому +10

    I remember the Boogeymonster being the very first legendary I opened when I started playing the game. It was like the week Whisper of the Old God was out, I was free to play, and that was the first legendary I got. I was so excited, I put him on every deck I owned, then I discovered the truth and it sucked. A lot. I don't know why I kept playing to this day.

  • @ShadowmancerLord
    @ShadowmancerLord Рік тому +15

    "There is never a use case for fucking the Boogeymonster"
    Rarran stop kinkshaming me

  • @snakeking5009
    @snakeking5009 6 місяців тому +4

    You can make a solid argument that if your opponent fails to kill you through temporus you can almost assuredly kill them so it’s at least coinflipping the game to win rather than coinflipping the game to potentially get a 0 mana big guy that does nothing.

  • @Q_z_
    @Q_z_ Рік тому +15

    "If you put him [sic] in your deck that's one less spot for Guff" sent me 😂

  • @sakarivaariskoski7700
    @sakarivaariskoski7700 Рік тому +7

    If I remember correctly Hemet was added to counter a beast deck that blizz thought would be meta, making it the original "unicorn" deck.

  • @michaellatner975
    @michaellatner975 Рік тому +8

    Just wanna mention that millhouse did see a decent amount of play, but not from hand, the paladin deck that was all about recruiting cheap minions from the deck ran millhouse cause of the fact he was tiny, but huge.

  • @erik060208
    @erik060208 Рік тому +26

    I missed Marjordomo Executus, that card made you lose on the next turn around 60% of the time

    • @solkvist8668
      @solkvist8668 Рік тому +12

      But it could also be used in combo lists at the least, or given to your opponent for a kill. Aviana just doesn’t have an upside. They get a free card, kill it, and you die.

    • @TheTomoyaNagase
      @TheTomoyaNagase Рік тому +3

      the issue with that is that it was used in a couple decks to great effect, both by turning into ragnaros and heropowering the enemy todeath and by giving him to the enemy then oneshotting them once their new max HP becomes 8. therefor It was "bad" enouth to have 2 otk decks built around it which kind of makes it a "good" card again.

    • @mangouschase
      @mangouschase Рік тому

      @@TheTomoyaNagase same case for hi'reek being able to phylactery, it's just a worse case of wicked shipment/dragon that sets a hero at 15

    • @benjaminmoulden7829
      @benjaminmoulden7829 9 місяців тому

      There was a video by kripp. Major domo was so bad, you would try and give it to your opponent! By some mc shenanigans.

  • @rique02
    @rique02 Рік тому +136

    I remember someone defending Temporus against Aviana in live 👀

    • @CodTheBoyz
      @CodTheBoyz Рік тому +2

      Hmmm what did he say?🤔

    • @captainsargas1606
      @captainsargas1606 Рік тому +1

      You and me both

    • @KrazyKrab7
      @KrazyKrab7 Рік тому

      I'd like to forget

    • @EZ-eu1cv
      @EZ-eu1cv Рік тому +7

      I wonder why Rarran cut them from the video they made such a good point

    • @capitanMCmufin
      @capitanMCmufin Рік тому

      ​@@EZ-eu1cvwell Aviana lost (or won?) Anyway, don't see the point

  • @Sithspartan666
    @Sithspartan666 Рік тому +1

    I appreciate this new method of polling chat on these ranking streams. There is a lot more accountability when someone has to talk to you, one on one, and your charisma really shines through when you are the interviewer.

  • @the_doug_digital
    @the_doug_digital Рік тому +94

    Can’t believe my favorite Hearthstone UA-camr is finally doing a video on me! I’m so flattered

    • @adumbfurry7036
      @adumbfurry7036 11 місяців тому

      I think you changing your pfp and name ruined the joke.

    • @the_doug_digital
      @the_doug_digital 11 місяців тому

      @@adumbfurry7036 I didn’t change my name, Rarran changed the title of the video

  • @adamstadick2044
    @adamstadick2044 Рік тому +36

    16:30 hir’eek is definitely the better card, niether of them have seen play in any competent wild or standard deck but you can actually create a semi decent meme deck around hand buffing in wild and have hir’eek be somewhat good. Sure it’s not a good deck but the boogeyman is a useless card that doesn’t fit into any deck, hir’eek actually has a semi reasonable deck.

    • @redwood1542
      @redwood1542 Рік тому +4

      Hir'eek also gets better as more support is printed even if the archetype will likely always be bad.

    • @decoy9854
      @decoy9854 Рік тому +3

      Yeah, Hir'eek actually has potential to do something. Boogeymonster is just useless, always.

  • @simpcat4415
    @simpcat4415 Рік тому +1

    This was really funny, I’d love to see more of these. Maybe do like debating which is the most fun legendary between the two, would lead to some interesting and funny takes

  • @1Glotzer1
    @1Glotzer1 Рік тому +71

    No one respects Malorne for his place in Mill Druid back in the day. The disrespect! He was there when the mill-archetype was created!

    • @shardgunner4815
      @shardgunner4815 Рік тому +19

      Yeah I actually think it’s crazy how hated Malorne is. Not a great card by any means, but definitely some niche use cases, and not the worst card you could put in your deck.

    • @lewst
      @lewst Рік тому +7

      ​@Lukas Nero the deck had one good match up. Control warrior. It was like 80:20. And Malorn was good in that match up and made it a 90:10. Yes it was bad vs aggro and something like tree of life was better, but the matchup still stayed bad. For ladder I agree, malorn was probably worse. But if you wanted to counter cw specifically in a tournament like setting a case can be made for malorn.

    • @raz1572
      @raz1572 Рік тому

      Malorne was a bad card in mill druid too

  • @Dj18Xero316
    @Dj18Xero316 Рік тому +3

    Wow. I hope you do more King of the Hill style videos.
    This was funny, had good discussion, and was a genuinely good time. Great video dude.

  • @Riwul
    @Riwul Рік тому +7

    Eydis Darkbane was a semi competent inclusion in wild when librams where at their peak there. They where never really meta in wild but she is by no means a bad card anymore since librams got released.

    • @GaussianEntity
      @GaussianEntity Рік тому

      Now she has synergy with Hunter bananas. Eydis can only get better imo

  • @AMG19610
    @AMG19610 Рік тому +15

    I really liked my Val’anyr deck back in the day. It was a lot of fun.

  • @stephenpettersson990
    @stephenpettersson990 Рік тому

    I really liked that you brought the viewers in for this type of video, super fun!

  • @InterloperBob
    @InterloperBob 10 місяців тому +2

    I got legend with Temporus in priest. I played a deck called Wall priest that was about cheating out big minions. It struggled with some tempo decks, but it would often be at 30 health since you played like tar creeper and similar taunts early on. So I'd play this guy, or even cheat him out, and give the opponent two turns with an empty board and no threats. He does like 15 damage, but i can always clear the board as priest at this point and Priest had a 4 mana heal 12 card. Basically this was an anti tempo tech in a tier 2 deck.

  • @christianandersson4345
    @christianandersson4345 Рік тому +18

    The Aviana incident 💀

  • @lazybooba
    @lazybooba Рік тому +5

    Now you need to make a video using both the Worse (Duskfallen Aviana) and the Best (Patches the Pirate) in the same deck and see how many games you can win!

  • @JamJestKesh
    @JamJestKesh Рік тому +7

    boogeymonster will forever be the worst in my heart, i've had to quadraple check, that it's a real legendary, and not just some bad packfiller uncommon

  • @jaeusa160
    @jaeusa160 Рік тому +5

    Poor Prince Valanar. Honestly, if he was a 4/4 Taunt Lifesteal WITH NO CONDITION whatsoever, he would've struggled to be anything more than a good Arena pick even when he was new. It's like sure, that's not bad, but it's not bad in the way a lot of fringe playable pack filler is not bad.

  • @Nightknight1992
    @Nightknight1992 Рік тому +2

    anomalus was so bad for random minions being created, it definitely wrecked yourself way more often than the opponent.

  • @snowy4460
    @snowy4460 Рік тому

    It was really fun to participate in this video (i was the dude who sounded baked as hell)

  • @PenguinWithInternetAccess
    @PenguinWithInternetAccess Рік тому +3

    I used to play Val'anyr in my handbuff pally when i had no cards at all lmao, was really good when it hit dopplegangster or pre nerf saronite chain gang

  • @bryanarms788
    @bryanarms788 Рік тому +2

    Something i wanted to say in defense of anomalous vs Malorne, is that Anomalous can actually lose you a game, via being randomly generated/ evolved into, not as much as an octosari can though.

  • @angelalawter2663
    @angelalawter2663 Рік тому +2

    Deck of Chaos into Hir'eek makes it a one mana card that fills your board with 9/1s. It'll probably get cleared, but it's still pretty threatening.

  • @pigmentedflame67
    @pigmentedflame67 10 місяців тому +2

    Such memories my first golden legendary being The boogeymonster 😂 definitely dusted after a few failed played attempts and now I've got the base one just so it doest show up in a pack again

  • @matheusmterra
    @matheusmterra Рік тому +3

    Just for posterity sake, I'm gonna repeat here what I said in chat:
    Temporus, as much as it would lose you the game now, it ACTUALL saw play! Not competitive, but there was a strong deck ot Miracle Dragon Priest that ran it.
    You gotta remember that Temporus was in standard at the same time as Awaken the Makers, Raza, Lyra, Radiant Elemental, Shadow Reaper Anduin, the dragon synergies from Priests and most importantly Divine Spirit and Inner Fire.
    Back then you would play this card in the late game, when you already used your Mara to heal up to 40 health, and you already transformed into Shadow Reaper Anduin. You play Temporus while ahead, the opponent responds to it and another threat you might have on the board, but unless they are Quest Mage or Bloodreaver Gul'Dan, no deck could stop what came next.
    No deck could muster 30+ damage to kill you in two turns, specially if you played Temporus when you had a board, they would take their two turns, damage you a bit. Then on your turn, you play Lyra, then Radiant Elemental, then another Radiant Elemental you would copy or discover, then the miracle happens. On your full extra turn you have 10 mana, spells discounted by 2, Lyra generating you extra free spells, among them Inner Fire and Divine Spirit, plus the Anduin hero power dealing 2 damage for free and reseting with every card played, and you finish them off going face with a 48/48 Radiant Elemental.
    The only reason why Quest Mage would stop it is that they want an extra turn to kill you with Antonidas, that was the entire point of the quest, and Bloodreaver Gul'Dan could be slapped with no drawbacks and put a couple Voidlords between him and your buffed minion. But guess what? Against those decks you just don't play Temporus.
    For a small frame of time, Temporus allowed a combo Priest deck to be consistent and be meta, and the only reason it didn't see play in competitive was because two of the most popular tournament decks were exactly Quest Mage and Cubelock.

    • @matheusmterra
      @matheusmterra Рік тому +1

      Oh, and if you think I'm full of shyat here, check out the old Brian Kibler videos, the deck was his creation.

  • @AugustoValentini
    @AugustoValentini Рік тому +4

    Aviana has to be the worse because no other legendary makes you lose the game whenever you play or get it randomly. There are a bunch of useless legendaries, there are legendaries that waste your mana, there are a bunch that could backfire and sometimes make you lose. But Aviana is the only one that's an instant concede button, so she is our one and only queen of the hill 👑

  • @mbb0909
    @mbb0909 Рік тому

    Great video! The best you've done in a minute :))

  • @psychoinferno4480
    @psychoinferno4480 Рік тому +2

    Hmm makes me question whos a better bait card? Aviana(1st enemy card cost 0) millhouse(all enemies spells zero for a turn) or ulthok (all enemy cards cost health)

  • @ScoutrunnerTopic
    @ScoutrunnerTopic Рік тому +5

    Just wanted to say the clash Royale content on the second channel has been absolutely amazing! Lol

    • @Rarran
      @Rarran  Рік тому +5

      Thanks dude! Actually think the second channel content is better than main channel atm

  • @boc7104
    @boc7104 Рік тому +1

    Although i'm not the biggest hearthstone fan i really liked the in-call argument gimmick, really fun video!

  • @cathulionetharn5139
    @cathulionetharn5139 8 місяців тому +1

    in defence of hogger (however late it is) it was released alongside C'thun as a hard counter in case C'thun gets too powerful

  • @anoldman9743
    @anoldman9743 Рік тому +2

    The only defence I have for Malorne is that it’s useful as a random hit or a discover if nothing else is appealing

  • @wildcatterry17
    @wildcatterry17 Рік тому +13

    If Hir’eek was a Paladin card it’d be very playable. Duskfallen Aviana, in almost all situations it loses the game no matter what class it’s in.

  • @adamstadick2044
    @adamstadick2044 Рік тому +4

    24:31 but Hemet kills silveryback patriarch, think of that value.

  • @itztoa5t483
    @itztoa5t483 3 місяці тому +1

    Tbf Malorne was used in the old druid undertaker deck which I think everyone forgets about

  • @nerferedit
    @nerferedit Рік тому +2

    cant believe the temoporus interview got cut

  • @rodrigonarvaes7032
    @rodrigonarvaes7032 Рік тому +1

    Now you need to build a deck with the both Kings of the Hill and play a 100 matches with it.

  • @mdme
    @mdme 10 місяців тому +1

    Boogeymonster's value = 2 mana. It forces the opponent to react and spend 7 damage. Doomsayer essentially.

  • @juliusmalmskov3334
    @juliusmalmskov3334 Рік тому

    can you do the best card from each ekspansion?(love this series keep it going)

  • @ravensequinox3515
    @ravensequinox3515 Рік тому +1

    After seeing Hemit, a card I forgot about. I think you should do a challenge of trying to win with a deck using ONLY Tech cards, if thats possible

  • @dradedeadeye2310
    @dradedeadeye2310 Рік тому +3

    is there a chance other rarity cards would have a king of the hill vid? (all doe common looks really tedious)

  • @johnnydropkick
    @johnnydropkick Рік тому

    Loved this vid just because of how pumped I got with the random matchups I’d just go OHHHHHHHHHH when aviana came up against hireek

  • @sotakoira1390
    @sotakoira1390 7 місяців тому

    I once played Milhouse as a meme and coined it out, never have I ever lost a game as fast.

  • @Ariassss
    @Ariassss Рік тому

    I was there during the live and this stream was the greatest thing ive ever watched

  • @sajtjakab
    @sajtjakab Рік тому +10

    Malorne was played in hadronox decks

    • @impkiller5932
      @impkiller5932 Рік тому +1

      Why? You should play only 1 beast to revive him with 3 mana spell? Like you are playing 3 mana spell and cubing spider. Ehy would you play another beast to always have 50/50 chance to revive spider?

    • @sajtjakab
      @sajtjakab Рік тому +1

      @@impkiller5932 iirc it was a secondary win condition to go infinite against any type of mill

    • @impkiller5932
      @impkiller5932 Рік тому

      @@sajtjakab why do you need to play against mill? Its literally was 0% to play against a mill deck that time? There was only fun mill rogue, but you would beat her to death mith spiders

    • @sajtjakab
      @sajtjakab Рік тому

      @@impkiller5932 I'll level with you.. I haven't got the slightest idea why things were the way they were 6 years ago X)

    • @impkiller5932
      @impkiller5932 Рік тому

      @@sajtjakab I am sure remember that druid was playing no beast except spider. This druid dont even played hero card bc 1/5 beetles and 1/2 spiders was beasts. So you are playing first spider and killing it with naturalise. Then you revive him with witch hour and cube him to get another 2 spiders. And then you are reviving him again to cube him second time. So you would have a total amount of 7 spiders and 7 waves of taunts.

  • @Fledermausmann
    @Fledermausmann Рік тому +2

    I watched the live stream it was wild. If Rarran had included the man defending Temporus, well, let's just say that it would be a dark day for him.

  • @leolusanez5378
    @leolusanez5378 10 місяців тому

    That "human greed" guy had me going like WTF are you talking about

  • @zqmfbg1
    @zqmfbg1 8 місяців тому

    Back in the days of Kobolds and Catacombs, I actually got close to legend playing a Call to Arms paladin deck with Dirty Rat and Millhouse. Turn 4 Call was so insane when you got those two because you get a big taunt to shut down aggro, and a beefy 4/4 to contend with other midrange threats. I even played Millhouse on turn 2 if I had it in hand, which admittedly lost me some games, but a surprising amount of the time, his battlecry actually didn't end up backfiring too horribly, so it was just a solid card.

  • @TheDepressure
    @TheDepressure 7 місяців тому

    what is the name of the site where he played king of the hill?

  • @AnimateD_GR
    @AnimateD_GR Рік тому +1

    no way that you say at 5:30 that anomalus is better,I always remember evolving into anomalus as shaman and instantly losing my game

  • @Sithspartan666
    @Sithspartan666 Рік тому

    Close call with Val'anyr and Valanar, when all that separates the two is an apostrophe and a vowel ;p

  • @MCCompanyPL
    @MCCompanyPL Рік тому

    I played krul with guldan hero from litchking exp - you could've summoned a lot of nice demons in handlock, very gut

  • @rougeric87
    @rougeric87 Рік тому

    I thought I'd found the video kinda mid but it was pretty good. Having short interactions/arguments from viewers and with montage making it a bit dynamic was nice.

  • @jonaswestman1245
    @jonaswestman1245 Рік тому +6

    no one ever mentioned how boogie monster was tier 6 in battlegorunds season 1
    '

    • @impkiller5932
      @impkiller5932 Рік тому

      No way it was tier 6. I think tier 4-5?

    • @jonaswestman1245
      @jonaswestman1245 Рік тому +1

      @@impkiller5932 yes sorry, was tier 4 it seems

    • @richard-pv4ff
      @richard-pv4ff Рік тому +1

      @@jonaswestman1245 originally t5 i remember then buffed to t4

  • @grimgorlefort
    @grimgorlefort Рік тому

    Along time ago malorne was played , cuz the dominant deck was warrior fatigue and malorne kinda play around the fatigue

  • @samkennedy6501
    @samkennedy6501 Рік тому +1

    I am absolutely loving the way these random people shit talk different cards

  • @PeterZaitcev
    @PeterZaitcev Рік тому

    Boogiemonster actually did see some play and it was a good addition to your Tirion warband on BGs...

  • @elibaumann9718
    @elibaumann9718 21 день тому

    Madame Lazul is used in every Standard Priest deck ever right now as a tech to counter Handbuff Paladin.

  • @FeRReTNS
    @FeRReTNS Рік тому

    Oh shit, that title. I thought this video was going to be about me.

  • @tappy8741
    @tappy8741 3 місяці тому

    I used malorne in a mill deck, as a way to have a threat the opponent had to deal with and thickening my deck. It was fun.

  • @jamesstallworth3340
    @jamesstallworth3340 Рік тому

    There was a cooperative Tavern Brawl where Aviana was broken. By the end of the week everyone was playing this druid deck with her. I've never seen a first where Hireek was ever remotely good.

  • @JustK4fun
    @JustK4fun 5 місяців тому

    Temporus beats Aviana because you'd never play either, but Temporus triggers your "if you're holding a dragon" cards from hand

  • @AntheanCeilliers
    @AntheanCeilliers Рік тому +1

    Malorne was my first legendary and I desperately tried to make it work. No one wanted it to work more than me, and it didn't.

  • @WaterbuffelNL
    @WaterbuffelNL Рік тому +11

    Acidmaw actually did see play, but only very early in the Grand Tournament. I saw them mainly on some aggro hunters as a good way to clear any big taunts you're desperately throwing on the board to stay alive. They usually had their board full with small minions, threw down Acidmaw, killed your 2-3 taunt minions and have the rest continue to go face. After that you couldn't throw down any taunt minions again because the hunter would just keep clearing with his small minions, and with every minion being so small the hunter had nothing to lose on their side. You had to answer it and yet stay alive. Along the way we got plenty of cards that are simply way better than Acidmaw, that's why it never seen any play again.

  • @muskotnoet2910
    @muskotnoet2910 Рік тому

    Great fun video! You should advertise ur second channel more tho. Link it in the description or shout it out at the end of the video. Cuz u make great content over there too.

  • @vijaygarv
    @vijaygarv 9 місяців тому

    22:48 The original recruit card was Y’Shaarj from WotOG

  • @BeardoOfficial
    @BeardoOfficial Рік тому +1

    Would have loved if you made a deck around the worst card and tried to win a game

  • @underfall2749
    @underfall2749 10 місяців тому

    is weird looking at this video after the update where some of these "trash" legendries got changed and buffed to ungodly extremes

  • @Drake-yg9cn
    @Drake-yg9cn Рік тому

    new rarran video be like; "Winning with the worst legendary in hearthstone!"

  • @YoungClarke
    @YoungClarke Рік тому +2

    If I remember right, malorne was in the classic set, right? (It has been quite a while) I remember it popping as just a reoccurring resource. Just a threat that you’d always (eventually) get back
    And Boogeymonster saw play it battlegrounds, specifically, in battlegrounds where you are losing terribly and convince yourself that maybe it will pop off THIS time (it wouldn’t.)

    • @Rarran
      @Rarran  Рік тому +3

      Malorne is from gvg, same set with dr.boom

    • @YoungClarke
      @YoungClarke Рік тому

      @@Rarran must be what I am thinking of. I remember druid basically tried to end games by ramping to the savage roar combo or just huge minions since most classes only had a handful of ways to deal with big threats.
      Druid also was on the better end in terms of card draw so they didn't stall out as quickly and had a decent chance of playing it again if the opponent used their BGH on it. (God, I'm now remembering when BGH, ironbeak and acidic ooze were just common cards to include in a deck).
      I don't remember what rank I played back then, so might have been he only showed up in wood league.

  • @cryogenical_
    @cryogenical_ 11 місяців тому +9

    I think you passed over Prince Valanar too quickly without really discussing the fact that he never ever saw a lick of play, not even an attempt, because 4 mana was the most powerful mana cost at the time (fireball, conc, eternal servitude). You were never going to run an understatted minion with a terrible effect for that payoff.

    • @julienrougerie1148
      @julienrougerie1148 4 місяці тому +3

      The chater is right though. There were decks in frozen throne that didn't have anything good on 4 so valnar was a good play. Course, that was a really short time before people saw saronite+keleseth

  • @codycoy2943
    @codycoy2943 Рік тому +1

    The best argument for hir’eek vs aviana. Hir’eek might lose you the game, but aviana will make your opponent win the game.

  • @jkw6259
    @jkw6259 Рік тому +1

    Aviana is 5 mana so you got 5 more mana to try to force your enemy to response. removing 7hp minion is not always easy. especialy in druid hoden behind taunt.

  • @mitchelltague3674
    @mitchelltague3674 Рік тому

    "Duskfallen ANIVIA is the worst card because if you put HIM in your deck that's one less spot for Guff" broke my fucking brain.

  • @Bl_ss_m
    @Bl_ss_m Рік тому +1

    It's so crazy to me that melorne beat krul... At least when you rng a melorne it's a 7m 9/7 with upside vs krul which is a 9m conditional summon 2 or 3 minions

  • @vadermardark
    @vadermardark Рік тому

    Was handlock a thing when Hir eek was in standard?

  • @Chuaaaaaaaaaaaaa
    @Chuaaaaaaaaaaaaa 5 місяців тому

    I've not seen the video yet but you just have to click left untill Duskfallen Aviana appears, then click right the rest.

  • @Dunhilina
    @Dunhilina Рік тому +1

    Anomalus should have been carried until Aviana, completely unplayable in mage because mage has pretty much no way to activate it as a board wipe and every RNG way to summon it meant you were pretty much guaranteed to nuke your own board.

  • @TwoCentReview
    @TwoCentReview 7 місяців тому

    With Milhouse, your opponent might not be playing spells or have few or no spells in hand. It may also be that it doesn’t make sense for them to play the card at the time. You can also evolve into Milhouse, recruit or cheat him out in other ways.
    Aviana’s main disadvantage is that she’s mid game and gives a huge advantage to your opponent as long as they have a minion. Aviana also has to survive this next turn. You don’t want someone to evolve or recruit Aviana because you already had to use a card to do this, so you don’t get the benefit. One of the only exceptions would be Y’sharj pulling her from your deck at start of turn and allowing you to cheat out something big. It’s very hard to get it to feel good to cheat her out, so I would call her worse.

  • @ryanmoore8346
    @ryanmoore8346 Рік тому +1

    Also, ffs, Hir'eek at LEAST has the possibility of getting future support in Wild. The effect is goofy enough to MAYBE have a tier 4 come around and use it as a "hehe" Win Condition. Boogeymonster? Never in a million years.

  • @ratman505
    @ratman505 Рік тому

    I am expecting a boogeymonster video from you in the next few days

  • @darkjackl999
    @darkjackl999 Рік тому

    What im hearing is duskfallen aviana is gonna be your next challenge

  • @xTobsecretx
    @xTobsecretx Рік тому

    Wait, were these calls actually randos from discord? I'm glad it worked out without getting weird or awkward!

  • @CreeperSlayer365
    @CreeperSlayer365 5 місяців тому +1

    Temporus is worse because you have to play priest in order to use it

  • @thiccnoodles6767
    @thiccnoodles6767 Рік тому

    4:25 Since anomalus was an elemental, it would be a deathrattle reno effect on DK jaina if it was active, otherwise nope it saw 0 play otherwise