Why Don't Any Cars Use V4 Engines?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 19 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 36

  • @jeffsaxton716
    @jeffsaxton716 17 днів тому +3

    I'm old school. The best engine ever is a straight six.

  • @JamesWilliamson-w8y
    @JamesWilliamson-w8y 20 днів тому +3

    A V4 was used in the Ford Corsair back in the 1970's.

    • @grahambell4298
      @grahambell4298 20 днів тому +1

      And the Capri.

    • @kevinjones3900
      @kevinjones3900 20 днів тому +2

      Will I be correct in saying some MK1 transit vans?

    • @JamesWilliamson-w8y
      @JamesWilliamson-w8y 20 днів тому

      @@kevinjones3900 Yes. In London they were popular with criminals because they were faster than any vehicle the Police had.

    • @muddywater6856
      @muddywater6856 18 днів тому +1

      SAAB

    • @colindavies3029
      @colindavies3029 17 днів тому +1

      I had the corsair v4 nothing but trouble

  • @browserrr1
    @browserrr1 17 днів тому +1

    Ford produced two V4's, the English Essex engine and the German Cologne engine. Partswise they have nothing in common. The Essex engines were notouriously unreliable, the Cologne engines are almost bullet proof. Used as stationary engines and in fork lifts and quite a few different cars, with Saab as the longest user, up to 1980. No spectacular performance in bog standard shape, but very tuneable without sacrificing reliability.

  • @jellybean1976928
    @jellybean1976928 21 день тому +1

    Love my V4 Evinrude 2 stroke outboard.

  • @brianb-p6586
    @brianb-p6586 16 днів тому

    Inline-4's package better than V4's _in transverse installations_ ; however, in a longitudinal installation the V4 has a substantial length advantage and extra width is not a problem. Ford, Lancia, and ZAZ production V4's (and the Porsche racing V4) were all designed because the V4 configuration packaged better in the target vehicles than an inline-4 would.

  • @brianb-p6586
    @brianb-p6586 16 днів тому

    Firing order and balance are two separate issues, which you are confusing. A V4 can be balanced without a balance shaft, or it can fire at equal 180 degree intervals, but not both in the same design.

  • @MikkoHamunen
    @MikkoHamunen 17 днів тому +1

    6:35 "Better spread of torque over rpm range". What do you base your information on or did you just make up the claim yourself? Do you even know what torque means?

  • @jamesgudgeon4868
    @jamesgudgeon4868 21 день тому +1

    The Ford Transit Van Used A V4 0:54

  • @hiromihonda9424
    @hiromihonda9424 22 дні тому +1

    Inline 4s have the natural imbalance and require counter rotating shafts. V4s have much less of an issues or even no issue if it's horizotally opposed.

    • @elemar5
      @elemar5 20 днів тому

      WTF is a horizontally opposed V engine?

    • @harrybarnhill8029
      @harrybarnhill8029 20 днів тому

      Toyota 20r and 3rzfe are straight four, no balancing shafts, sure they run a little rough, but easily go 300,000+ miles with maintenance

    • @MrJamesonStyles
      @MrJamesonStyles 20 днів тому

      @elemar5 Yeah, isn't that a boxer?

    • @brianb-p6586
      @brianb-p6586 16 днів тому

      A horizontally opposed (flat) engine is not a V engine. If you think any two-bank engine with shared crankpins is a V (which is nonsense), a shared-crankpin flat 4 is horribly imbalanced and a boxer 4 does not have shared crankpins.
      Any even-firing V4 configuration is inherently balanced poorly compared to an inline-4.

  • @JamesPink-j2k
    @JamesPink-j2k 20 днів тому

    I have had a V4 Ford Corsair and a V4 Lancia Flavia

  • @jamesgudgeon4868
    @jamesgudgeon4868 21 день тому +1

    Lancia tried A V4 5:26

    • @roybatty2030
      @roybatty2030 17 днів тому +1

      Very successful in several Lancia models, a thing of over-engineered beauty.

  • @Nakkisampyla
    @Nakkisampyla 21 день тому +3

    Too complicated design and the main reason is less profit.

  • @gerritgovaerts8443
    @gerritgovaerts8443 21 день тому

    an inline 4 has horrendous secondary balance , a V4 much less so

  • @OverstuurmetMaurice
    @OverstuurmetMaurice 20 днів тому

    ZAZ used a V4 engine for many years in their cars:
    ua-cam.com/video/1i7YmBQRzr4/v-deo.htmlsi=5egxO_IqIaJnuhjb

  • @kevinjones3900
    @kevinjones3900 20 днів тому

    Give me a Ducati or aprilia v4 and i will put it in a mr2

  • @georgesheffield1580
    @georgesheffield1580 21 день тому

    Wher you been , a nimber of European manufactures ues or used V4's . VW/ PORSCHE ,SUBARU ALL USE or used a 180 ° v4 . Learn your geometry . The Porsche 919 evo uses a 2 liter turbocharged V4 ( ~1000 hp)

    • @grahambell4298
      @grahambell4298 20 днів тому +2

      A 180 degree V4 is NOT A V4! It's a flat 4.

    • @delahayenator
      @delahayenator 20 днів тому

      @grahambell4298 a flat 4 meaning a boxer engine like in a beetle? Not perse when using a different crank setup. So not perse true. You mix up boxer configuration with 180 degree V setup. Most famous wrongly called a boxer is Ferrari flat 12. Even the BB name mistakenly always said as Berlinetta Boxer while it originally Berlinetta Bialbero(twin cam) as explained by its engineer Mauro Forghieri in an interview with Davide Cironi. The name came from journalists and Ferrari stuck to it, while it’s not a boxer but a flat V12. Very interesting interview bybthe way

    • @delahayenator
      @delahayenator 20 днів тому

      Check out the difference. A boxer engine has opposite piston movement so no balance issues.

    • @delahayenator
      @delahayenator 20 днів тому +3

      @ George the engines you call 180degree V4’s Porsche/VW and Subaru(Japanese, not European) are boxer engines(or flat 4), not flat V’s. There’s a big difference.

    • @delahayenator
      @delahayenator 20 днів тому +1

      The only real V4 is the 90degree 919 engine, but that’s not a production engine.

  • @phillipkelly736
    @phillipkelly736 15 днів тому

    Lancia used them and so did ford