Do not ask how I got 4,000 horse archers from Anatolia all the way to Iberia. Something, something, Game of Thrones. The second part: ua-cam.com/video/KpagVphV3u4/v-deo.html
As soon as I heard "...and the byzantine empire is fat and timid." I immediately thought I heard "fatimid" instead. Somehow threw me for a loop there as I was thinking like "surely the byzantines weren't fatimid?"
They really should just make it so the adventurer invasion rules are the same as normal invasion rules so you can still invade kingdoms that aren’t technically formed
@@leeworley6727 dont know, had two playthrough as a landless noble in byzantine, 100 years in, the 5x speed became like 1x (everything else is not really laggy), basically cant play anymore. but had one playthrough where i created an admin gov from mongolian steppes, end up being 3-4 times larger than byzantine, no issue at all. no clue, probably had something to do with the adventurer spam or sth.
This looks really fun to play... when all the bugs show in this video are fixed. 😂 Tho the merc contract pays are so busted I think it'll get patched sooner rather than later, so do enjoy it while it lasts.
Good to know that becoming an administrative government after invading an admin realm is a base game quirk and not one of the 125 mods I use, heh heh. Not sure if it also happens in base game too, but my realm always switches over to Feudal at the start of a new year after invading as an adventurer
5:50 Yeah, for some reason the scheme rework has messed around with success chance for romance and secure schemes and the predicted success before you start means nothing. I've had excellent schemes which had a 5% chance and low schemes which had a 89% chance.
Since first hearing about playing as unlanded characters, I've planned on playing as a landless Seljuk and forming Rum, but was unsure how I'd get a hold of an unlanded Seljuk 😅 how lucky there is one pre-made for me haha! Well done, great video! Can't wait to do this myself!
so i have figured out, the conqueror rule actually does something unlike the black death rule. i started a new game and within about 20 years Noraegr formed, took over all of Sweden and most of Denmark, went south and took over a good chunk of what would become the HRE and then turned into the scandinavian empire all while Bulgaria took most of the Byzantine Empire.
The romance/seduce schemes are a bit buggy. The first screen doesn't count the opposite trait modifiers so told you your chances were excellent. But when you started the scheme, that -75 for Craven hates Brave, Lazy hates Ambitious etc then came off which knocked you down to 5%.
The fatamids have been prone to falling apart even back during the legends of the dead update. And that’s just when I noticed it. Could even be an older thing
Hi guys hope u all fine Im having a problem with my playthrough As the byzantine emperor i used to play by the strategy Kill then chill Every new ruler i would try to raise his dread as quickly as possible to prevent revolts after consolidating my rule i would do feasts and other events to raise relations Right now no matter what i do nothing work neither the dread nor the relations method Im having a faction whom the vassals have 100 opinion and are terrified with a -2000 faction commitment and with all of that they still join the faction Is it a pug?
@@johnfraire6931 I've read on it and it's unexplainable The system works as yes you could force someone and influence/hook them to join your faction and they would stay for ten years but the unexplainable part is that when they join they would behave in a way to make the faction succeed no matter what it takes cause they them selfs would start inviting people despite even high opinion or being my heir💀 And the mechanic is so broken in that it requires a really low amount of influence and it doesn't take into consideration the opinion that much It became so tedious playing the byzantine cause i have multiple factions every decade for claimant and liberty passing 100 threshold despite doing the preventive measures It's not rewarding to play good any more
@@saifalshawy1313 A lot of people have had the same issue so I bet PDX is aware, fingers crossed they do something about it in the next patch that is the one that will address issues with the DLC content. I bet that the dissatisfied vassals are meant to be able to use hooks to pull in others, which is fine, but then the game makes the satisfied vassals that are now part of the faction also want to pull in others, so it's a cascade from just a single angry vassal. I've been delaying playing as the Byzantines due to the number of complaints of this exact thing
It’s sad how many pieces of this experience feel completely unbalanced or just don’t work. Lots of oversights on invading an admin realm without kingdom titles
Did they patch the contract pay outs? Seems like you got absolutely busted amounts from stand with us contracts when the DLC first came out compared to amount you get now
Not really the Bolghars split into various tribes after the end of Old Great Bulgaria and spread into the Volga and Europe. Unlike the modern day Bulgarians who slavicized the Volga Bulgars still retain their Turkic identity
@@loccapo They're not a cadet branch in the game but if you check the ancestors of Balgarsko dynasty its Dulo dynasty still ruling over Volga-Bulgaria at the same time. Same thing with the Ashina and Bulanids, Bulanids are not listed as sub-branch of Ashina but the founder of the dynasty Khagan Bulan is infact a son of Ashina man.
Sorry brother I have to inform you that originals were Turkic and Bulgarians never got ruled by Slavs, it was always Turks. Dulo -> Bolghar Vokul -> Bolghar Cometopuli -> Greco-Armenian Terteropa -> Cuman Asen -> Kypchak Smilets -> Cuman (a puppet king / house, given / granted the title of Bulgarian Kingdom by Nogai Khan) + (They only got the Smilet name because their patriarch was married to Byzantine princess Smiltsena Palaiologina. Shishman -> Kypchak (the last house, leaving it to the Ottomans, Ottomans being another Turk dynasty) The one and only Slav was "Khan Sabin of Bulgaria", but alas he only ruled for one year and because of his marriage he was ruled as a Vokul Dynasty member.
Do not ask how I got 4,000 horse archers from Anatolia all the way to Iberia.
Something, something, Game of Thrones.
The second part: ua-cam.com/video/KpagVphV3u4/v-deo.html
Mother of dragons? 🤢
Daddy of horses? 🥳
Daddy of the Dragon
As soon as I heard "...and the byzantine empire is fat and timid." I immediately thought I heard "fatimid" instead. Somehow threw me for a loop there as I was thinking like "surely the byzantines weren't fatimid?"
y'all need Saladin
Well now I need to do a game where I play as the Fatimids and somehow end up as the Roman Emperor.
Went into the comments to see if anyone else hear it as well
4:08 bruh, I come here for escape and you spit truth to our face 😢
Butchered many crusaders? Then you're playing a historically accurate Turkish Sultanate of Rum!
They really should just make it so the adventurer invasion rules are the same as normal invasion rules so you can still invade kingdoms that aren’t technically formed
3:20 her jawline... she can save our bloodline
You cant stop me, I did both liking and commenting
25:16 is the funniest sequence I have ever seen in an OPB video
@@eskipotato I was dying laughing
From one proud Bavarian to one proud turk😂😂 best ck3 Channel 🔥
United in hatred of the Austrians?
Wow, this is actually historical as Süleyman Bey founded Rum and his descendants led many successful campaigns against the crusaders.
I love this Dlc, unironically saved Ck3
wait till that part where it's super laggy and unplayable so you have to start anew.
@@Lutasiren I'm a couple hundred years into it and have restored Rome when does it get laggy?
@@leeworley6727 dont know, had two playthrough as a landless noble in byzantine, 100 years in, the 5x speed became like 1x (everything else is not really laggy), basically cant play anymore.
but had one playthrough where i created an admin gov from mongolian steppes, end up being 3-4 times larger than byzantine, no issue at all.
no clue, probably had something to do with the adventurer spam or sth.
For some reason the line "Don't kill me. I will die" really got me
Can’t wait for him to create the Roman Empire as a landless Wanderer
Yo ho ho and a Sultanate of Rum
Honestly, Georgia in 1066 and 1178 is peak gameplay now. You can play defence in the mountains for centuries
Ah yes, something to use as background audio for ck3 modding
Yoo, I just posted a video about Suleyman today :) Although given the circumstances, I had to help the Byzantines...
This looks really fun to play... when all the bugs show in this video are fixed. 😂 Tho the merc contract pays are so busted I think it'll get patched sooner rather than later, so do enjoy it while it lasts.
Good to know that becoming an administrative government after invading an admin realm is a base game quirk and not one of the 125 mods I use, heh heh. Not sure if it also happens in base game too, but my realm always switches over to Feudal at the start of a new year after invading as an adventurer
5:50 Yeah, for some reason the scheme rework has messed around with success chance for romance and secure schemes and the predicted success before you start means nothing. I've had excellent schemes which had a 5% chance and low schemes which had a 89% chance.
OPB after successfully convincing a single count that fighting for a single battle is worth 500 coins
Since first hearing about playing as unlanded characters, I've planned on playing as a landless Seljuk and forming Rum, but was unsure how I'd get a hold of an unlanded Seljuk 😅 how lucky there is one pre-made for me haha! Well done, great video! Can't wait to do this myself!
so i have figured out, the conqueror rule actually does something unlike the black death rule. i started a new game and within about 20 years Noraegr formed, took over all of Sweden and most of Denmark, went south and took over a good chunk of what would become the HRE and then turned into the scandinavian empire all while Bulgaria took most of the Byzantine Empire.
You should form ottoman empire next
I’m liking and commenting to root for both
I think the AI have been to obsessed with denouncing lately but it might just be me.
he just a lil' bean
The romance/seduce schemes are a bit buggy. The first screen doesn't count the opposite trait modifiers so told you your chances were excellent. But when you started the scheme, that -75 for Craven hates Brave, Lazy hates Ambitious etc then came off which knocked you down to 5%.
The fatamids have been prone to falling apart even back during the legends of the dead update. And that’s just when I noticed it. Could even be an older thing
Hi guys hope u all fine
Im having a problem with my playthrough
As the byzantine emperor i used to play by the strategy
Kill then chill
Every new ruler i would try to raise his dread as quickly as possible to prevent revolts after consolidating my rule i would do feasts and other events to raise relations
Right now no matter what i do nothing work neither the dread nor the relations method
Im having a faction whom the vassals have 100 opinion and are terrified with a -2000 faction commitment and with all of that they still join the faction
Is it a pug?
It might be that whoever's starting these factions is using tons of Influence to force people into them
@@johnfraire6931 I've read on it and it's unexplainable
The system works as yes you could force someone and influence/hook them to join your faction and they would stay for ten years but the unexplainable part is that when they join they would behave in a way to make the faction succeed no matter what it takes cause they them selfs would start inviting people despite even high opinion or being my heir💀
And the mechanic is so broken in that it requires a really low amount of influence and it doesn't take into consideration the opinion that much
It became so tedious playing the byzantine cause i have multiple factions every decade for claimant and liberty passing 100 threshold despite doing the preventive measures
It's not rewarding to play good any more
@@saifalshawy1313 A lot of people have had the same issue so I bet PDX is aware, fingers crossed they do something about it in the next patch that is the one that will address issues with the DLC content. I bet that the dissatisfied vassals are meant to be able to use hooks to pull in others, which is fine, but then the game makes the satisfied vassals that are now part of the faction also want to pull in others, so it's a cascade from just a single angry vassal. I've been delaying playing as the Byzantines due to the number of complaints of this exact thing
I play with debug on so I can stop the Fatimids from falling apart.
some real jank in the interactions between landless and administrative realms going on
It’s sad how many pieces of this experience feel completely unbalanced or just don’t work. Lots of oversights on invading an admin realm without kingdom titles
Did they patch the contract pay outs? Seems like you got absolutely busted amounts from stand with us contracts when the DLC first came out compared to amount you get now
Hello! I both liked and commented because I support chaos.
It is so funny to see you try to pronounce Turkish names :D
Historically Accurate Seljukid Turks.
Ottoman inheritance technique. 😂 Btw is it possible to establish that in CK3?
ahahahahahahhahahhaha what is that Ottoman inheritance technique :))) 07:50
You should have just given Byzantium to some rano as an independent city or something.
I like AND commented, so I can support both sides like a greedy little war-profiteer.
9:56 🤨📸
6th! Anyway this is super cool :)
Oh fresh one! Yummy
yap yap yapp
The original Bulgarians are on the balkans
Not really the Bolghars split into various tribes after the end of Old Great Bulgaria and spread into the Volga and Europe. Unlike the modern day Bulgarians who slavicized the Volga Bulgars still retain their Turkic identity
@BlazingFlame69 yeah and chuvash guys are technically half bolgharian too
Also you can trace both rulers dynasties [Bulgaria and bolghars] and they related. Or were in old versions don't know if they change it
@@loccapo They're not a cadet branch in the game but if you check the ancestors of Balgarsko dynasty its Dulo dynasty still ruling over Volga-Bulgaria at the same time.
Same thing with the Ashina and Bulanids, Bulanids are not listed as sub-branch of Ashina but the founder of the dynasty Khagan Bulan is infact a son of Ashina man.
Sorry brother I have to inform you that originals were Turkic and Bulgarians never got ruled by Slavs, it was always Turks.
Dulo -> Bolghar
Vokul -> Bolghar
Cometopuli -> Greco-Armenian
Terteropa -> Cuman
Asen -> Kypchak
Smilets -> Cuman (a puppet king / house, given / granted the title of Bulgarian Kingdom by Nogai Khan) + (They only got the Smilet name because their patriarch was married to Byzantine princess Smiltsena Palaiologina.
Shishman -> Kypchak (the last house, leaving it to the Ottomans, Ottomans being another Turk dynasty)
The one and only Slav was "Khan Sabin of Bulgaria", but alas he only ruled for one year and because of his marriage he was ruled as a Vokul Dynasty member.
pro seljuk comment
what mod did he use to change the name of constantinople to konstantiyye when he took it? @OneProudBavarian
That's vanilla, actually!