Huge aircraft carrier HMS Prince of Wales steps up for NATO deployment at short notice 🇬🇧 ⚓️

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 9 сер 2024
  • HMS Prince of Wales deploys at short notice for large-scale NATO Exercise Steadfast Defender, filling in for HMS Queen Elizabeth with an issue.
    HMS Prince of Wales (R09) is the second Queen Elizabeth-class aircraft carrier and the largest warship in the Royal Navy. The carrier had to deploy with no more than an 8 day notice to cover for the other ship of the same class.
    HMS Queen Elizabeth was meant to deploy for NATO's largest exercise since the Cold War; Steadfast Defender, with over 50 ships and 90,000 armed forces personnel participating from all 31 allies and NATO partner, Sweden. However, the UK flagship suffered a starboard propeller shaft issue preventing it from sailing. The Prince of Wales sailed with just 8 days' notice, after originally being on notice for 30 days.
    3x Royal Navy Wildcat helicopters were embarked on board. F35B Lightning II fighter jets and any other aircraft will join the ship later at sea.
    All Exercise Steadfast Defender videos: • Exercise Steadfast Def...
    Recorded: 2024
    ---------------------------------------------------
    Outroduction Music: Watch it Glow - Silent Partner • Watch it Glow - Silent...
    ---------------------------------------------------
    Ⓒ CobraEmergency
  • Авто та транспорт

КОМЕНТАРІ • 219

  • @CobraEmergency
    @CobraEmergency  5 місяців тому +4

    All Exercise Steadfast Defender videos: ua-cam.com/play/PLnAhJyL1opj4esbwIQ5azIdn4C-VSIt9u.html

  • @UKSimon4170
    @UKSimon4170 5 місяців тому +43

    Thank you for showing this. I have family on board and be able to see her departure is very much appreciated.

    • @CobraEmergency
      @CobraEmergency  5 місяців тому

      You're most welcome! A few friends & family said they will watch. Happy to provide. Safe sails to your sailor(s)!

    • @ShariahThomas
      @ShariahThomas 5 місяців тому +1

      @@CobraEmergencythank you for your service appreciate it 😮😮😢😢😢😢🎉🎉😂😂🎉🎉😢😢😅😅😊

    • @FranzBieberkopf
      @FranzBieberkopf 5 місяців тому

      Best wishes to you and your family🙃😊

  • @anthonypope8429
    @anthonypope8429 5 місяців тому +13

    Keep safe guys I have a son in the army you all do a very good job on keeping our country safe

  • @soldier-Dave
    @soldier-Dave 5 місяців тому +22

    Well done Royal Navy and all 7 crewmen for getting this afloat in such a short time!

    • @scabthecat
      @scabthecat 5 місяців тому

      Under armed and minimally trained. I'm assuming she has a full escort.

  • @rmetcalfe8208
    @rmetcalfe8208 5 місяців тому +28

    To get a reserve aircraft carrier in operation within one week is a fantastic achievement. God bless all that sail with her...

    • @Aeronaut1975
      @Aeronaut1975 5 місяців тому

      Not to mention all the scaffolding that had to be taken down at short notice! I don't know if you saw the pictures of it beforeheand! I've never seen so much scaffolding in one place before!

    • @bartley7953
      @bartley7953 5 місяців тому +1

      @@Aeronaut1975 I think they mentioned it took around 6 months to put up and 6 days to take down , unbelievable .

    • @Aeronaut1975
      @Aeronaut1975 5 місяців тому

      @@bartley7953 They took it down in under half that, so that is an achievement in itself!

  • @user-pe5qf8ty9m
    @user-pe5qf8ty9m 5 місяців тому +5

    Brilliant effort - RN fulfilled its commitment despite the technical problem with HMS QE carrier. No sign of the french substituting at short notice !!

  • @johnniec9097
    @johnniec9097 5 місяців тому +36

    For those it applies . Stop doing this country down !🇬🇧

    • @charlieyerrell9146
      @charlieyerrell9146 5 місяців тому +1

      You are right , the people putting our country down live in freedom payed for by the lives of men and women who gave their lives for our country and its people. The people complaining do not have the balls or the guts to serve in the military. They are leeches on the backs of our services.

    • @vMaxHeadroom
      @vMaxHeadroom 5 місяців тому +1

      Absolutly agree...We are so lucky to live in this GREAT country and I so wish people would not put this country down. Sadly I am seeing so much division and it is just terrible to watch the negativity.

    • @Dewiart16
      @Dewiart16 5 місяців тому

      Try understanding the WEF's 'Sustainable' and 'Net Zero' policies for a global technocracy whereby we completely lose our sovereignty. Our navy has been hollowed-out deliberately. Just be honest with yourself. We haven't even got the vessels needed to protect our coastline.

  • @johnniec9097
    @johnniec9097 5 місяців тому +20

    Stop doing this Country Down ! 🇬🇧

  • @davidthomas6566
    @davidthomas6566 5 місяців тому +10

    We are a great country even if some Brits don't think so , it's hard times and you either man up and deal with it or you can be the first in line when shit goes down...

    • @raybenstead2548
      @raybenstead2548 5 місяців тому +1

      Well said, doubt any of the haters have ever served. Probably government artists, drawing the dole.

    • @kevinstreet5709
      @kevinstreet5709 5 місяців тому +1

      Agreed

  • @user-vk1tx7tv7e
    @user-vk1tx7tv7e 5 місяців тому +4

    safe seas, to all who serve and sail for the freedom of this country

  • @tudorroberts7843
    @tudorroberts7843 5 місяців тому +6

    Thank youI for sharing great pictures 😊

  • @RichardsCollins-ie3yg
    @RichardsCollins-ie3yg 5 місяців тому +3

    There is something about seeing military might, we need to support our serving men and women, and hope and pray that we are not heading for a war in the east or with Putin, I served in the army and was so proud, we need to make our armed services great again. God bless to those on board HMS prince of Wales. Stay safe, prayers for hope, love and peace. 🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧

  • @1chish
    @1chish 5 місяців тому +9

    Cue the usual idiots doing the carriers, Navy, air force, aircraft and the country down in their sad need to 'look clever'.
    Beats me why they need to do this. Have pride and change the CD ....

  • @theoccupier1652
    @theoccupier1652 5 місяців тому +11

    I wonder why the crew were not lining the decks ... we always lined the decks when leaving & entering port ... Ark Royal R09 ... The Mighty Ark :)

    • @neilsbs8273
      @neilsbs8273 5 місяців тому

      Time moves on, they are much leaner manned and are probably still busy after a week of getting her ready for sea ie stowing stuff. Todays RN still does proc A but only on special occasions ie if they have been away on a deployment for months. Normal operations is Proc C, just essential working watches on deck.

    • @user-xk2fr3se3t
      @user-xk2fr3se3t 5 місяців тому

      That was known as Procedure Alpha and is now for ceremonial entering or leaving harbour routines. Non ceremonial is the norm

  • @Corbots80
    @Corbots80 5 місяців тому +2

    Thankyou for protecting the free world

  • @alanmorgan7212
    @alanmorgan7212 5 місяців тому +6

    Don't worry there in the AA and RAC

  • @timbaskett6299
    @timbaskett6299 5 місяців тому +4

    As a former carrier sailor in the US Navy, I would love to be able to tour a Queen Elizabeth class carrier.

    • @griswald7156
      @griswald7156 5 місяців тому

      I think its nice sitting Portsmouth old town where all this stuff was filmed…then walking around the HMS “Mary Rose”
      And the “Victory”

  • @NathanAngel-oo1nr
    @NathanAngel-oo1nr 5 місяців тому +2

    I wish you all good luck and good health and serve us well like you always have. Go and show these whos boss . I love all you brave men and women who, at times, risk their own lives so we may all live in safety, peace and harmony

  • @Maurice_Moss
    @Maurice_Moss 5 місяців тому +7

    There's been so much negativity surrounding these carriers, but getting one ready within a week is very impressive tbh.

    • @CobraEmergency
      @CobraEmergency  5 місяців тому +1

      We're all impressed by how quickly they pulled it together when HMS Prince of Wales was expected to be undergoing regular maintenance in port.

    • @neilsbs8273
      @neilsbs8273 5 місяців тому

      Unfortunately the negativity comes from uninformed people who have no clue how the RN works and to be honest are spouting rubbish from years ago. Shame really, I thought this country was patriotic until the last few years when its obvious that a large percentage takes great pride in slagging anything off thats British.

  • @chizz32
    @chizz32 5 місяців тому +3

    Great video!!!

  • @Pesmog
    @Pesmog 5 місяців тому +11

    I presume that the F-35's are going to be flown on board from Marham in the next couple of days. I guess that way it keeps everyone guessing how many have been deployed for the exercise. Great effort by everyone to get the ship ready in such a short amount of time,

    • @tylerdurden4006
      @tylerdurden4006 5 місяців тому

      Lmfao, that is not how carriers work, nevermind ever since last year when you crashed one, they have been grounded and your carriers have no fighters and just helicopters all the time. 😂😂

    • @roadrunner2930
      @roadrunner2930 5 місяців тому

      @@tylerdurden4006🙄 wtf are you talking about? Dumb dumb

    • @roadrunner2930
      @roadrunner2930 5 місяців тому +4

      @cjjk9142 ignore him, clueless troll

    • @grahamcook9289
      @grahamcook9289 5 місяців тому +1

      R U joking? The Falklands Task Force left within 48 hours. FFS. And that wasn’t just a single carrier, but the whole bloody RN. 🤦‍♂️

    • @grahamcook9289
      @grahamcook9289 5 місяців тому

      R U joking? The Falklands Task Force left within 48 hours. FFS. And that wasn’t just a single carrier, but the whole bloody RN. 🤦‍♂️

  • @gazwild438
    @gazwild438 5 місяців тому +4

    This will be Great content as always

  • @theresa1305
    @theresa1305 5 місяців тому +1

    impressive! Be safe!!!

  • @andrewcollins8774
    @andrewcollins8774 5 місяців тому +1

    Thanks Cobra 👍

  • @lxpuma2412
    @lxpuma2412 5 місяців тому +1

    To think they want to mothball POW when it was in development just goes to show having two really helps imsgine we just had the one carrier

  • @helenlloyd6564
    @helenlloyd6564 5 місяців тому

    My prayers are with every single one of you ❤. Do us proud as always.😊

  • @gblim398
    @gblim398 4 місяці тому

    What a beauty!

  • @erwinsegers3696
    @erwinsegers3696 5 місяців тому

    "ICH DIEN" comes from the ancient Flemish "Ik DIEN" ( i serve) . Wales and Flanders had quite a history together since the middle ages ...

  • @garyroberts1496
    @garyroberts1496 5 місяців тому

    Least weve got 2 monster carriers now need these huge brutes at sea

  • @derekgalia776
    @derekgalia776 5 місяців тому +1

    To many Weapon platforms but no weapons on then to defend her self👏

    • @ENGBriseB
      @ENGBriseB 5 місяців тому

      It's loaded with weapons it's just incredible. There not going to let you know are they.

  • @markburston2741
    @markburston2741 5 місяців тому

    Hope this excercise isn't too far away.

  • @Old-Sole
    @Old-Sole 5 місяців тому +2

    Oh they got it going! For how long?

  • @johnsimons4738
    @johnsimons4738 5 місяців тому

    Wow!

  • @JohnAtkinson-wl2bw
    @JohnAtkinson-wl2bw 5 місяців тому +1

    Wow 3 Helicopters that will Scare the Russians.

  • @BIBIWCICC
    @BIBIWCICC 5 місяців тому +3

    Is it being towed all the way through the excessive?😅😂🤣

  • @womblestacker7993
    @womblestacker7993 5 місяців тому +1

    It break down as normal

  • @Phlegmwahn
    @Phlegmwahn 5 місяців тому +4

    Wow, we can do a lot of ‘power projection’ with three helicopters. No doubt they will fly on the three F-35s as soon as they can find them,😉

  • @user-jz6nn6hl3u
    @user-jz6nn6hl3u 5 місяців тому

    How embarrassing the other carrier breaking down these are modern ships, prince of wales has had its issues as well

  • @user-zp1fe8ju4g
    @user-zp1fe8ju4g 5 місяців тому

    I served in the RoyalNavy for many years on fixed wing carriers. These carriers have no catapults and so no Awacs. It's a massive design flaw.

    • @user-xk2fr3se3t
      @user-xk2fr3se3t 5 місяців тому +2

      We don't need cats and traps, our aircraft can cross pol onto any deck, those on cat carriers are massively restricted. We have merlin baggers for awacs and RAF Poseidon MRA1 operating globally for maritime surv

    • @Bimboysize15
      @Bimboysize15 5 місяців тому

      They have airborne radar carried on Merlin helos.

    • @BillyBatts714
      @BillyBatts714 5 місяців тому +1

      Back in the 1800s

    • @ENGBriseB
      @ENGBriseB 5 місяців тому

      This is the next generation. Plus on the 5th of February 2024 the ministry of defence will be getting 138 F-35Bs As we are the Only level one partner with the US we make 15% to 20% of every Jet made. And 50 by 2025 in the 1st tranche coming to the UK.

  • @paulodonoghue7478
    @paulodonoghue7478 5 місяців тому

    Did it actually sail out yet?

  • @peetsnort
    @peetsnort 5 місяців тому +5

    Only one kinzhal away from 2.9 billion down to daveys locker

    • @PotatoSalad614
      @PotatoSalad614 5 місяців тому +2

      "Only one Exocet away from 2.9 billion down to daveys locker" - Argie, 1982

    • @user-dj2ee9yu1y
      @user-dj2ee9yu1y 5 місяців тому

      instead of opening your gob. remember the lads that passed away in the falklands. @@PotatoSalad614

    • @peetsnort
      @peetsnort 5 місяців тому

      @@PotatoSalad614 ja.
      It's like what part of modern missiles don't you get.
      Besides being a hideous waste of money.
      Even I knew in the 80s that missiles were the new thing .and now drones..
      But they'll get the kickbacks from the arms manufacturer and no doubt keep buying jets and tanks..
      Bloody corrupt politicians

  • @ianrichards909
    @ianrichards909 5 місяців тому +5

    How long before it breaks down again… the HMS Prince of Wales has spent more time in dry docks than open oceans… what a joke!!!

    • @kenkan1963
      @kenkan1963 5 місяців тому

      Britain is becoming a joke as everything is headed towards stupid USA. That is why the cargo ship was on fire in Red Sea.

  • @brianmartin6016
    @brianmartin6016 5 місяців тому

    This is why you build no-less-than two. Maintenance and reliability are always an issue with large, complex naval vessels. EDIT: I wonder what HMS Hood's reliability and time-at-sea readiness numbers were? In the end a fatal construction flaw did the mighty Hood in. Sadly...over 1000 lives were lost that fateful day.

  • @You.are.boring.me.now2024
    @You.are.boring.me.now2024 5 місяців тому +3

    Big boat for a few helicopters.

    • @Aeronaut1975
      @Aeronaut1975 5 місяців тому +1

      The jets usually embark onto the ship a day or two after it leaves port, it gives the ships crew a chance to check that everything is working and rehearsed before beginning flight ops and embarking the jets onboard. All completely normal stuff. Having said that, yes, we are currently short of both jets and pilots...

    • @You.are.boring.me.now2024
      @You.are.boring.me.now2024 5 місяців тому

      @@Aeronaut1975
      If you say so but my recollection of the HMS Invincible being deployed on active service to a war zone (the Falklands war) was that it had a full squadron of sea Harriers on display on the deck , plus a few helicopters.

  • @user-fu1dn7re9p
    @user-fu1dn7re9p 5 місяців тому

    has it broken down yet ??

  • @StephenGrew
    @StephenGrew 5 місяців тому +1

    Metallic silliness

  • @neilkay159
    @neilkay159 5 місяців тому +5

    How long before it's back in Portsmouth? I know of at least 2-3 pubs that are running sweepstakes on when it will be back.

  • @ffrederickskitty214
    @ffrederickskitty214 5 місяців тому

    The best of our country are serving in our armed forces, while the worst of our country are at home reading The Guardian

  • @HAWKSTA24
    @HAWKSTA24 5 місяців тому +3

    Thought that boat had screw damage

    • @tylerdurden4006
      @tylerdurden4006 5 місяців тому +1

      It does, why do you think it needs 5 tugboats and all those generators where aircraft should be.

    • @Benjd0
      @Benjd0 5 місяців тому

      She did at the end of 2022. She was out of drydock for repairs in July last year and deployed to the US.

  • @davidnichol6282
    @davidnichol6282 5 місяців тому

    Impressive military craft noticed large openings on the side are those always open and what's there purpose.?

  • @abhinandanarivazhagan7493
    @abhinandanarivazhagan7493 5 місяців тому

    Pretty sure I was standing beside the guy who took this video, lol. Angle looks real familiar

  • @gloriaanderson8988
    @gloriaanderson8988 5 місяців тому +3

    Respect 🙏

  • @volt8684
    @volt8684 5 місяців тому

    Hope doesn’t break down

  • @Rob1972Gem
    @Rob1972Gem 5 місяців тому +4

    Do we actually have enough F35 as a nation for two aircraft carriers as well as some based at RAF Marham

    • @boringperson-zb8vy
      @boringperson-zb8vy 5 місяців тому +3

      F35s aren't meant to be in large squadrons. They're multi-role, and can down fighters from very far away without the enemy knowing they were there.
      Also, fighter jets don't stay on the ship when in dock. They join the ship when it's out at sea.

    • @tylerdurden4006
      @tylerdurden4006 5 місяців тому

      No, the navy version of the f 35's have been grounded since both america and britain crashed one at the same time last year.

    • @wowmanhaha
      @wowmanhaha 5 місяців тому

      @@tylerdurden4006 Yah need to stay under the bridge fella!

    • @Rob1972Gem
      @Rob1972Gem 5 місяців тому +1

      @cjjk9142 138 is nowhere near enough with the world in the mess it is we should’ve at least ordered twice that this is a trouble as a nation, if we’re going to operate on the world stage that is nowhere near enough frontline next generation aircraft

    • @neilsbs8273
      @neilsbs8273 5 місяців тому

      @@tylerdurden4006 so I dont see them flying over me on a daily basis then, strange, must be some new aircraft we have that look identical.

  • @Meep_meep7O
    @Meep_meep7O 5 місяців тому

    With no planes on it.

  • @grahamcook9289
    @grahamcook9289 5 місяців тому

    Look how high it is out of the water. There are no aircraft onboard.

    • @Aeronaut1975
      @Aeronaut1975 5 місяців тому

      It is standard practice for an aircraft carrier to leave port at the beginning of a deployment without an airwing aboard. The ships crew need a day or two to check that everything on the ship is working as it should before proceeding further, and embarking an airwing. This also gives the flight ops guys a chance to review and practice certain proceedures. It also works in reverse, at the end of a deployment, the airwings will usually depart the carrier a day or two before the ship docks when it is still a hundred or so miles from shore. They only dock with aircraft on board if it's mid-deployment for things like supplies, maintenance, or for a couple of days of shore leave to give some of the crew a break.

  • @Mk99987
    @Mk99987 5 місяців тому

    Where is it sailing from?

  • @antonpasternak-gw4dk
    @antonpasternak-gw4dk 5 місяців тому

    Stay Home and prevent more destruction in World.!

  • @parrotbrand2782
    @parrotbrand2782 5 місяців тому

    UK should make their own weapons and planes like the French. Cannot always rely on the Americans. They sell you expensive but substandard stuff

  • @lakedistrict9450
    @lakedistrict9450 5 місяців тому +1

    Stop the boats

  • @robertwren8878
    @robertwren8878 5 місяців тому

    No flag flying at the stern as she left harbour ?

    • @neilsbs8273
      @neilsbs8273 5 місяців тому

      Probably struck the ensign staff ready to embark the aircraft once she leaves the area. The ensign was on the main mast in the sea position,

  • @Makeyourselfbig
    @Makeyourselfbig 5 місяців тому

    You guys do realise a deterrent only works if your enemy knows about it. Constantly sending out a carrier bereft of aircraft isn't much a deterrent at all. Carriers are supposed to have the aircraft already on them at all times otherwise it's a pretty useless ship. The fact is it shouldn't need "getting ready". It should be ready at all times. The enemy, whoever that might be won't wait until we are.

    • @neilsbs8273
      @neilsbs8273 5 місяців тому +2

      So never do any maintenance, and keep the aircraft onboard at all times? tell me you dont know how the navy works without telling me.

    • @BillyBatts714
      @BillyBatts714 5 місяців тому +1

      Aircraft attend when out of port from different airbases.

  • @bruceburns1672
    @bruceburns1672 5 місяців тому

    I can't understand why such a mega size carrier for only what ?? 41 aircraft.

    • @Benjd0
      @Benjd0 5 місяців тому +3

      They deliberately designed it to be much larger than required for the planned air wing so they could achieve a specific sortie rate.
      Having such a big flight deck lets them land multiple aircraft while also launching them.
      They've also added a lot more automation on board which enables them to run the ship with a similar sized crew to the previous class they operated which were 1/3rd the size.

    • @bruceburns1672
      @bruceburns1672 5 місяців тому

      @@Benjd0 Thanks for the information.

  • @KingBob99Shorts
    @KingBob99Shorts 5 місяців тому

    Hi it’s ur best friend ❤🎉

  • @LordFlashheart.11
    @LordFlashheart.11 5 місяців тому

    Any chance of stopping the dinghies arriving instead of going to another country first???

  • @Brumie-qq4dc
    @Brumie-qq4dc 5 місяців тому

    Police always have to have there 2pence

  • @grahamcook9289
    @grahamcook9289 5 місяців тому

    Why are they operating the radars in Portsmouth harbour?

  • @johnmackintosh8113
    @johnmackintosh8113 5 місяців тому

    How far will it get this time

    • @jongulliver984
      @jongulliver984 5 місяців тому +2

      Well last time it crossed the Atlantic carried out flight trials and came back so what’s your point?

  • @tokugawa12able
    @tokugawa12able 5 місяців тому

    Why two on deck islands?

    • @CobraEmergency
      @CobraEmergency  5 місяців тому

      One's the bridge for the ship, the other's the air traffic control tower.

    • @Maurice_Moss
      @Maurice_Moss 5 місяців тому +1

      @CobraEmergency that's what they're used for, but the actual reason is due to there being 2 power units spaced out, so there's a redundancy as it can sail with one. And it was the twin power units that dictated the twin island design as the exhaust had to be directly above. 🙂

    • @CobraEmergency
      @CobraEmergency  5 місяців тому +1

      @Maurice_Moss Ahhh more insightful! Thank you.

  • @shaung8182
    @shaung8182 3 місяці тому

    All new ships have teething difficulties in the beginning of her life at sea!! P.O.E WILL BE AWESOME ONCE THE LITTLE ISSUES ARE SORTED OUT!!

  • @Noddy2750
    @Noddy2750 5 місяців тому

    Hope it works ok
    The poms don't have a great record with military stuff 😂😂😂

    • @parrotbrand2782
      @parrotbrand2782 5 місяців тому

      Better than Americans though

    • @PotatoSalad614
      @PotatoSalad614 5 місяців тому

      not a great record huh? The country with the second most amount of victories in the world.
      In what way to we not have a great record

  • @rhyswebb3581
    @rhyswebb3581 5 місяців тому

    Better take a tug for company

  • @michaelbutters5650
    @michaelbutters5650 5 місяців тому

    The thing keeps breaking down .
    Actually Admiralty recently announced they messed up having a ski ramp launch....they should have settled for a flat deck .
    What a Million pound for something they don't want and will spend another million converting it back ?
    Did the ever wonder why the American carriers are flat decks .
    What the heck it's only taxpayers money.
    No wonder their fleet is a total mess , many can't even do valuable sea time and trials 😊😊

  • @hurion
    @hurion 5 місяців тому +1

    humans do some cool stuff

  • @misterj1968
    @misterj1968 5 місяців тому +1

    Could you please edit out the spectators it distracts from the excellent filming....I really don't think we need the screaming and crying children

  • @grahamcook9289
    @grahamcook9289 5 місяців тому

    I see no aircraft. Well apart from some whirly birds.

    • @tricky1581
      @tricky1581 5 місяців тому +1

      F35's only join the ship once it is out at sea.

    • @grahamcook9289
      @grahamcook9289 5 місяців тому

      @@tricky1581 How many of the 8 available? And will they be piloted by Fleet Air Arm or RAF jockeys?

    • @tylerdurden4006
      @tylerdurden4006 5 місяців тому

      ​@@tricky1581 lmfao, that is not how carriers work. How does no one know that the navy version of the f 35 has been grounded since both america and britain crashed one at the same time last year?

    • @grahamcook9289
      @grahamcook9289 5 місяців тому

      @cjjk9142 What lie is that?

    • @Aeronaut1975
      @Aeronaut1975 5 місяців тому

      @@grahamcook9289 As far as I'm aware, much like "the Harrier task force", they all train and operate F-35s as a single entity now, so you could have an RAF guy and a FAA guy flying the same sortie together.

  • @johnfoster3918
    @johnfoster3918 5 місяців тому

    Where have the Phalynx CIWS gone

    • @Aeronaut1975
      @Aeronaut1975 5 місяців тому

      Don't ask, sore subject...

  • @VNinTexas
    @VNinTexas 5 місяців тому

    I am confused. Why do they has China flags in NATO ship??

    • @crzxr
      @crzxr 5 місяців тому

      Because it's been bought by selling shares in it to the CCP. Like Thames Water and other vital, critical strategic concerns.

  • @tylerdurden4006
    @tylerdurden4006 5 місяців тому +1

    Lol, still only 3 helicopters for those "super" carriers. You can see inside both aircraft bays and they are completely empty. Did they place a bunch of generators just so it doesn't look so empty all the time? Why generators? Doesn't it have its own power source? Lmfao 😂

    • @Benjd0
      @Benjd0 5 місяців тому

      Got to be a troll at this point. 🙄
      The carrier returned from deployment a few months ago, they're not going to store the aircraft in the ship the whole time.
      They're also not going to land fighter jets aboard her in the middle of Portsmouth, simply not how it's done.

  • @user-nx8ii4ef7f
    @user-nx8ii4ef7f 5 місяців тому

    Defending the American empire?

  • @karlwebber1628
    @karlwebber1628 5 місяців тому

    Beautiful ship .but all it takes is one missile and she would be gone .what would we replace it with .how many ships were lost in ww2 on a daily basis .Google it you would be horrified .its then reality sets in . We said the titanic was unsinkable remember that .dont belive the hype .we need at least 6 to 10 aircraft carriers plus cruisers destroyers subs corvettes .we are so so behind in our defence of this country its terrifying what goverments and poloticians have reduced us too but hay nice ship 👍

    • @PotatoSalad614
      @PotatoSalad614 5 місяців тому

      "Beautiful ship .but all it takes is one missile and she would be gone"
      so like any other warship in the world

  • @andrewparnell6656
    @andrewparnell6656 5 місяців тому +1

    The pantomime horse of our defence!

  • @Lel-lw8vi
    @Lel-lw8vi 5 місяців тому

    All for show

  • @robertcooper7157
    @robertcooper7157 5 місяців тому +2

    I hope this one does not break down, you are really struggling to keep your carries combat ready.

    • @1chish
      @1chish 5 місяців тому +5

      We have had ONE breakdown in two carriers in their combined 10 years service. And no we are NOT struggling at all Robert so stow your faux concern. try reading more and writing less.... 🤦‍♂

  • @1885DaveMFC
    @1885DaveMFC 5 місяців тому

    the Ship should be renamed King Charles 3rd

    • @1885DaveMFC
      @1885DaveMFC 5 місяців тому +2

      @@sarahkb7 so why is called the prince of Wales.. when built Charles was still prince of Wales," NoT" Dead . The current prince of Wales "Prince William" in not "dead " .. so your point has no justification or foundation 🤣🫣🫣

    • @habitualsinner4927
      @habitualsinner4927 5 місяців тому

      King Charles the third is a massive turd

    • @Maurice_Moss
      @Maurice_Moss 5 місяців тому +3

      Dumb comment alert ⚠️ prince of wales is a title given to a prince, not just an individual. King Clarles used to be the prince of wales, but not William is, it's been a title for a long time.
      And hms queen elizabeth contrary to popular belief is named after queen elizabeth the 1st, not the late queen elizabeth 2nd.

    • @habitualsinner4927
      @habitualsinner4927 5 місяців тому

      The massive floating turd

  • @ivortoad
    @ivortoad 5 місяців тому +4

    Probably got a submarine towing it.

  • @philkyle8919
    @philkyle8919 5 місяців тому

    Very small for a aircraft carrier

  • @iancraig6070
    @iancraig6070 5 місяців тому +1

    The best sailors in the world deserve a better ship/ fighting platform.

  • @willowwoods7343
    @willowwoods7343 5 місяців тому +3

    I feel so sorry for all the sailors on that deathtrap, if it is actually really heading out.

    • @Aeronaut1975
      @Aeronaut1975 5 місяців тому +6

      Tell us you know nothing, without telling us that you know nothing.

    • @ricky1231
      @ricky1231 5 місяців тому +2

      @willowwoods7343
      And how is the weather in Moscow Vlad ? 😅

    • @willowwoods7343
      @willowwoods7343 5 місяців тому

      No Ricky, just watching from Canada. LOL@@ricky1231

    • @user-dj2ee9yu1y
      @user-dj2ee9yu1y 5 місяців тому

      What a knob you are. if you live in our country you should support the forces.not slag them off.if it wasnt for people like them. you wouldnt be able to say that. you would be under the jack boot for the last 80 years.

    • @raybenstead2548
      @raybenstead2548 5 місяців тому

      Keep your fingers away from the keyboard and let us think you are stupid rather than type something and remove all doubt.

  • @aleksandrmotorin9326
    @aleksandrmotorin9326 5 місяців тому

    Утонет как якорь.

  • @charliedrake247
    @charliedrake247 5 місяців тому

    Will not last long it break down agian very soon 😅

  • @ShariahThomas
    @ShariahThomas 5 місяців тому

    😊😅😅😮😮😢😢🎉🎉🎉😂😂❤❤❤

  • @jamesjennings9907
    @jamesjennings9907 5 місяців тому +2

    🤣😅🤣😂🤣😅🤣😂🤣😅😆😅🤣😂🤣😅😆🤣🤣😂
    Pure BULL *HIT,
    A huge PR STUNT!

  • @BRIANJAMESGIBB
    @BRIANJAMESGIBB 5 місяців тому

    : )

  • @DanLewis90
    @DanLewis90 5 місяців тому

    What bloody use is it with 3 helicopters on board 😂 Americas is ram packing with jets and we have 3 helicopters

    • @PotatoSalad614
      @PotatoSalad614 5 місяців тому +2

      F35s are at RAF Marham, they join the carriers at sea

  • @FoodwaysDistribution
    @FoodwaysDistribution 5 місяців тому +4

    "short notice" !!! what are you on about. It was suppose to leave over 2 days ago and the piece of junk failed to start and it is now late for the nato exercise Steadfast Defender

    • @Swampy0110
      @Swampy0110 5 місяців тому +5

      It was in a support period with a lot of contractors and ancillary equipment on board that all had to be removed. You can’t just get a ship of that size to jump to and get sailing on the spot. Do some research before you comment shite

    • @FoodwaysDistribution
      @FoodwaysDistribution 5 місяців тому +1

      @@Swampy0110 you are talking out of your backside. The harbour was sealed for it to sail and it failed to start. There is even a bbc article reporting this matter. "HMS Prince of Wales fails to depart for Nato exercises"

    • @chrisharvey592
      @chrisharvey592 5 місяців тому +1

      Foodways is correct, a propellor coupling on the starboard side was found to be defective, same issue as the other carrier. Mission was aborted until repairs can be done. Its out of action for a few months.

    • @Benjd0
      @Benjd0 5 місяців тому +2

      ​@@chrisharvey592I think there's some confusion here.
      HMS Queen Elizabeth was due to depart last week, but aborted due to issues with the prop shaft found during checks. Likely similar to the issues PoW had last year which were resolved.
      HMS Prince of Wales was on 30 days notice to deploy, they believed they could have her ready by Sunday to replace her sister ship, but it was delayed until Monday when it eventually departed. Haven't heard anything other than rumours about mechanical issues, if there were mechanical issues then they must have been resolved, as she has departed already for the NATO exercise.

    • @Swampy0110
      @Swampy0110 5 місяців тому +1

      @@FoodwaysDistribution wow, BBC, the fountain of all knowledge

  • @grahamcook9289
    @grahamcook9289 5 місяців тому +1

    it's being moved by tugs! what a joke.

    • @tricky1581
      @tricky1581 5 місяців тому +7

      All vessels this size are escorted into and out of harbour by tugs. Apart from demonstrating your ignorance, what's your point?

    • @W.J.Blythe
      @W.J.Blythe 5 місяців тому

      @@tricky1581I think he broke every branch on the stupid tree when he was born 😉

    • @lg5819
      @lg5819 5 місяців тому +1

      @@tricky1581There’s a lot of trolls out there trying to discredit the Royal Navy. ✌️

  • @user-gp9vk8he5g
    @user-gp9vk8he5g 5 місяців тому

    Sad old wannabe navy and country, hope it doesn’t break down. Greetings from Australia.

  • @1XX1
    @1XX1 5 місяців тому

    Say goodbye to NATO if Trump gets re-elected.

  • @helainewilliams8253
    @helainewilliams8253 5 місяців тому

    Where is it's defence, sitting duck!

    • @sirrichardpumpaloaf8154
      @sirrichardpumpaloaf8154 5 місяців тому +3

      Are you being serious? It’s an aircraft carrier….there’s a clue for you!!