It must be considered as part of a constitutional framework that the scope of presidential power is to be bound in respect to the limitations and restraints as imposed upon him by the Constitution. I agree with William Howard Taft because he knew that the emanation of president's mandate is from the Constitution, not from the people, which the latter may produce a demagogic spirit that would become as an argument for those who are supportive of a parliamentary system as to why presidents are stewards of the popular will and tend to obstruct the work of congress. In my opinion, I say that the president must be an impartial officeholder, knowing the explicit bounds of his mandate as the exerciser of the power of the sword and the power of the pen to issue directives, enshrining Jackson's Youngstown framework as the basis of restructuring the presidency, and, after winning an election, must resign his political affiliation, in order to make the president as a figure above politics.
@@sharmintania2827 I think of it as a collection of vague provisions. it lacks teeth regarding the limitations and accountability of presidential power.
Thank you so much for explaining this in a way normal people can understand. Your videos have really helped me out a lot
Thank you for explaining this Article very wisely.
THANK YOU FOR THIS INFORMATION
WE THE PEOPLE 🇺🇸🙏
JUDGE KAVANAUGH WROTE AN OPINION THE PRESIDENT AND THE INDEPENDENT COUNCIL this may help DEMOCRACY
It must be considered as part of a constitutional framework that the scope of presidential power is to be bound in respect to the limitations and restraints as imposed upon him by the Constitution. I agree with William Howard Taft because he knew that the emanation of president's mandate is from the Constitution, not from the people, which the latter may produce a demagogic spirit that would become as an argument for those who are supportive of a parliamentary system as to why presidents are stewards of the popular will and tend to obstruct the work of congress.
In my opinion, I say that the president must be an impartial officeholder, knowing the explicit bounds of his mandate as the exerciser of the power of the sword and the power of the pen to issue directives, enshrining Jackson's Youngstown framework as the basis of restructuring the presidency, and, after winning an election, must resign his political affiliation, in order to make the president as a figure above politics.
hey can u explain more about what u think about Article ii?
@@sharmintania2827 I think of it as a collection of vague provisions. it lacks teeth regarding the limitations and accountability of presidential power.
@@yurielastillero506 hmmm! interesting!! Btw what surprised u the most about the Article ii?
@@sharmintania2827 Presidential power and how it affects the American society.
I wanted a reading of the second not your interpretive lecture
MY WIFE...... MAMI.... SAYANG KU.... KAI MADISON TRUMP GANDHIJI..... MAHATMA ERWIN DULMIN GANDHIJI..... MAHATMA ERWIN DULMIN GANDHIJI......
MY WIFE...... MAMI.... SAYANG KU.... KAI MADISON TRUMP GANDHIJI.... MAHATMA ERWIN DULMIN GANDHIJI.... MAHATMA ERWIN DULMIN GANDHIJI.....