How Does A Plane Wing Work?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 13 чер 2019
  • Make your own paper plane wing, learn how it works and generates lift. Use a hair drier and watch it take off. Fun aerofoil science experiment for kids to try at home. We look at Bernoulli's principle and Newtons third law of motion. More Fun Science Projects: • Denser Than You Think ...
    Making SLIME at home: • How to Make Magnetic S...
    My Amazon shop here:www.amazon.com/shop/davehax
    Amazon Influencer Affiliate Shop.
    Contribute Subtitles Here: ua-cam.com/users/timedtext_vide...
    Latest Videos - • Dave Hax - Latest Videos
    Food and Cooking Hacks - • Super Quick Potato Pee...
    Amazing Life Hacks - • How to Fold a Shirt in...
    How To Make Fun Things - • How to Make a Simple P...
    Subscribe here: ua-cam.com/users/subscription_...
    Disclaimer: Items bought through my Amazon Influencer Affiliate Shop link will pay me a fee or compensation.
    Music: Olde Timey Kevin MacLeod (incompetech.com)
    Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 3.0 License
    creativecommons.org/licenses/b...
  • Навчання та стиль

КОМЕНТАРІ • 512

  • @DaveHax
    @DaveHax  5 років тому +140

    What was the last flight you went on? Where did you go?

  • @kokoslegend4850
    @kokoslegend4850 3 роки тому +40

    You missed the horizontal stabilizers in the drawing. Without that, a plane is uncontrollable.

    • @progamingyoutubevloger6620
      @progamingyoutubevloger6620 2 роки тому +2

      The only exception is the concord. But yes the elevator is for pitch/up and down.

    • @kokoslegend4850
      @kokoslegend4850 2 роки тому +1

      @@progamingyoutubevloger6620 that's because of the very wide wing shape, a concord can be controlled with elevons. This means that the ailerons can be the elevator at the same time. Horizontal stabilizers weren't needed because the wing was so wide: from the front to the tail. The plane he showed can't miss the horizontal stabilizers.

    • @maksedits933
      @maksedits933 2 роки тому +1

      I added them as you suggested and it works better, thanks!

    • @kv-2wotb146
      @kv-2wotb146 2 роки тому +1

      I noticed it too 😂

    • @O___A___O___A___O-x4l
      @O___A___O___A___O-x4l Рік тому

      ​@@progamingyoutubevloger6620"the only exception is concorde"
      They are many more who use elevons so yeah.... mainly with delta wings but yeah

  • @mikk.
    @mikk. 5 років тому +184

    Does anyone else legit just watch these videos but are too lazy to actually try and make it lol
    *_PRETTY COOL HUH_*

    • @badfutplayer6250
      @badfutplayer6250 5 років тому +1

      yeah me

    • @cool_mat99
      @cool_mat99 5 років тому

      This was just fuckin stupid kids woe do this they am into iPad n ps4 or xbox

    • @nawfpawz
      @nawfpawz 5 років тому +1

      I don't have any hairdryer. Would you like to bought me one?

    • @n0turm0m69
      @n0turm0m69 5 років тому +1

      Me to

    • @cool_mat99
      @cool_mat99 4 роки тому

      @Adrian 20 braćova only saying wha I think kids today they ay like how it was 15 years ago 20 ago

  • @peter_shadow7559
    @peter_shadow7559 2 роки тому +2

    Please folks, this is a simple experiment to understand how physics and an airplane can work. It's kind of silly to ask about horizontal stabilizer and other things that are obviously not relevant since the purpose of this video is to provide a basic explanation. Stop asking nonsense.

  • @reasonitout9087
    @reasonitout9087 Рік тому +3

    Dave, Thanks for explaining that Bernoulli's principle is a mis-applied and incorrect explanation for wing lift. The Coanda effect , or "Wall Attachment effect", is responsible for the laminar air flow on the top surface to follow the contour of the wing (if the angle if attack is not great enough to stall the wing).Proof experiment: gently hold a soup spoon with its convex surface slowly nearer and nearer to a running faucet's stream of running water. As soon as the water stream just touches the backside of the stream, the Coanda effect will attach the stream to the spoon and instantly pull the spoon (lift!) closer to the stream. The fluid pulls the air out from the boundary of the spoon and the water creating a low pressure area which allows atmospheric air pressure to push the spoon and water together. You will have created "horizontal" lift. Key point, the resultant water flow is now flowing in a new direction. THAT is the downward reflection of air coming off the trailing egde of the plane. If you put pressure gauges on the ground under the flight path of a plane just taking off, a higher pressure will be momentarily sensed. Now hear this: the total mass of downward moving air coming off the trailing edge of a flat or airfoil shaped wing is equal in that instant, to the TOTAL WEIGHT OF THE AIRCRAFT. Fly a giant imaginary scale under the plane as it is flying and it will measure most if the weight of the plane as it is flying....the giant air cushion is there. Wing tip vortices are simply the faster downward moving air and the realtively level air near the tips if the wing attempting to re-join...causing dangerous for too-close- following aircraft, rotary clear air horizontal rotary turbulence. Who said "Every force has an opposite but equal reaction." ? Right.
    Put an entire jumbo jet on a giant scale or table and the plane will transfer its weight through the table to the ground. How else could anything be supported? The push of the wings of a flying plane essentially push down on the air. The faster the air flow the "harder" or more solid the air becomes. Thus , faster plane, smaller wings.
    The final question NOBODY is asking is "why are wings fatter in the middle? Elementary dear Watson! Answer: That is where the support spar was when marerial science had provided only limited strength materials. Look at the airfoil of an X-15. Practically flat.
    And to make it very clear...planes actually can fly upside down. I learned this when I was 10 years old from flying .049 powered U-controlled (control line) model airplanes that I designed and Not from incorrect science books. I am a pilot.

  • @anthonyaddoumie8550
    @anthonyaddoumie8550 5 років тому +5

    I really enjoyed this video since it is a bit more science centered and it also has a pretty simple way for explanation that even kids will understand i would like to see more videos like this

  • @snchzls
    @snchzls 5 років тому +5

    (GASP!) The explanation was perfect. I hope you’ll make more educational videos like this one.

  • @jadecummings8093
    @jadecummings8093 5 років тому +4

    Wow, that's so awesome! Thanks for sharing about it! 😉

  • @azali284
    @azali284 5 років тому +5

    Never did I understand how planes really flew until your experiment. Thank you.

  • @geoffringham1051
    @geoffringham1051 5 років тому +1

    Very well explained and demonstrated Sir 👍 Thank you.

  • @rhyfelwrDuw
    @rhyfelwrDuw 5 років тому +4

    My son was studying aeronautical engineering in ICL - he did try and explain a few things, but it flew over my head (haha)!

  • @GoodKnight71
    @GoodKnight71 5 років тому

    Very cool. Nice demonstration!!

  • @n0turm0m69
    @n0turm0m69 5 років тому

    Im happy you made this channel bc a long time ago i suffered with sickness until i watched this channel thank you so much

  • @user-dv5yt9yc9x
    @user-dv5yt9yc9x 3 роки тому +3

    The lift force of the wing profile is created due to the difference (difference, Delta) in atmospheric pressure.
    Another thing is why two such zones are being created?
    The most working hypothesis is that the mass of air elements - molecules - have inertia. And this inertia of the air flowing around the front upper part of the wing creates a vacuum zone behind it, and the oncoming lower part of the wing is a very small seal.
    Compaction is a weak force in this pair, and vacuum is a much larger share in the lift of the wing.
    This is what explains the behavior of your model in the film.

  • @iamsherk2605
    @iamsherk2605 5 років тому +36

    Dude, now I think he's a professor.😂

    • @dark-shadow_
      @dark-shadow_ 5 років тому +3

      ѕαѕѕу Eઙŧɧεя internet

    • @byeetch
      @byeetch 5 років тому

      Doesn't that mean you didn't graduate high school?

    • @RizLazey
      @RizLazey 4 роки тому +1

      Im not a nerd nor a smart kid but those things exist in high school
      And i am very bad/noob at it XD

    • @iamsherk2605
      @iamsherk2605 4 роки тому +2

      @@byeetch Sorry for the late reply.
      I knew DaveHax is popularly known for his lifehacks and reviews and this video is clearly not a lifehack but more educational. This content is somewhat new for me to watch coming from his channel that's why I said that, maybe he's a professor in real life. And I graduated high school. 🙌

    • @byeetch
      @byeetch 4 роки тому

      @@iamsherk2605 Late reply? Bruh it's been 9 months. Also, my point was that at least where I live this stuff is already taught in like, high school rather than in college or university. So a better intepretation would probably be a teacher rather than a professor lmao.

  • @bro_FREE
    @bro_FREE 3 місяці тому

    Well explained. I was looking for a good way to explain this to my kids and will try the experiment with them.

  • @ImRyanP3756
    @ImRyanP3756 5 років тому +8

    I knew most things about airplanes
    Some of this I learned from you
    Thanks Dave

    • @marcago3710
      @marcago3710 4 роки тому

      I knew all of the plus some more

  • @ruthukumar9451
    @ruthukumar9451 3 роки тому

    Very nice trick of takeoff explained well here ...👌

  • @jakeharvey05
    @jakeharvey05 5 років тому

    Nice practical example

  • @kristjantiido3174
    @kristjantiido3174 5 років тому

    Very well explained

  • @vijayamalraj9679
    @vijayamalraj9679 3 роки тому

    Thank you very much ..,I like this experiment. Good

  • @MrBhujbalgv
    @MrBhujbalgv 3 роки тому

    DaveHx. You are wonderful teacher thanks for sharing this vedio.

  • @barrotem5627
    @barrotem5627 5 років тому +3

    Amazing ! Learned from this.

  • @aie007
    @aie007 5 років тому

    Thanks needed this

  • @dl6633
    @dl6633 5 років тому

    Wow! Pretty cool stuff!

  • @JENILJOSHI-qj6uq
    @JENILJOSHI-qj6uq 2 роки тому +1

    hi im jenil from india i would like to thank you that you made this video for us and i request you to make more videos on this in heavily detailed also some aerodynamics in simple language thx
    GREETINGS FROM INDIA

  • @engineerahmed7248
    @engineerahmed7248 3 роки тому +1

    u can put vertical tail below too to stabilize for wing from below too

  • @almaarias474
    @almaarias474 5 років тому

    You're a great drawer, dave hax!

  • @myusername3689
    @myusername3689 3 роки тому

    Modern fighter aircraft have fuselages shaped like airfoils to generate lift along with the wings to aid in slow speed stability as well as high speed maneuverability.

  • @ganprottas6259
    @ganprottas6259 4 роки тому

    you are right it is pretty cool!

  • @danielthomas6178
    @danielthomas6178 5 років тому +2

    LOVE YOUR VIDEOS!❤️

  • @anirudhmenon5280
    @anirudhmenon5280 Рік тому +1

    Great experiment showing how the airflow over the top of the airfoil can aid in the generation of lift. Also, good catch on how the equal transit time linked with Bernoulli’s explanation is false. Expanding on this by further placing an airfoil in a wind tunnel it can also be observed that the pressure in the Flow-field is the same around the airfoil (sourced from How do wings work? Holger Babinsky 2003 Phys. Educ. 38 497), thus further showing flaws in Bernoulli’s explanation of lift.

  • @srinivasguduru161
    @srinivasguduru161 3 роки тому

    Super explanation 👍

  • @PratikShankar18
    @PratikShankar18 2 роки тому

    Excellent explanation

  • @tahaansari5490
    @tahaansari5490 5 років тому +12

    You can see that the straw is tilting rightward, so maybe you could reduce friction between the straw and the string if the string was also slightly tilted rightward. great video as always :)

    • @carsoncornell697
      @carsoncornell697 3 роки тому

      He said he intentionally inserted it w a forward bias for the airfoil to tilt back, unfortunately that wasn’t the resulting behavior

  • @victortimi9264
    @victortimi9264 2 роки тому

    Wow wow wow this is really encouraging

  • @tinytonymaloney7832
    @tinytonymaloney7832 2 роки тому

    Well explained that

  • @muhammedali4306
    @muhammedali4306 5 років тому +1

    ur drawing is sooo beautiful I LIKE it

  • @ItsHorizonAviations
    @ItsHorizonAviations Місяць тому

    I could use this for my science fair! Thanks!

  • @socialawk965
    @socialawk965 5 років тому +8

    1:59 complicated talk
    Me: that looks like a whale and some waves... I can’t even draw like that...

    • @user-sf5iq2fl1l
      @user-sf5iq2fl1l 5 років тому +2

      Its not complicated if you know a little bit basic physics...its very simple actually.....

  • @heinnandaa4igcse870
    @heinnandaa4igcse870 3 роки тому

    You're very good at drawing, DaveHax

  • @toms5517
    @toms5517 2 роки тому

    You can try this experiment without the hair dryer. Use a length of fishing line(smoother, therefore less friction) about 3-4 ft long. Hold each end of the string in a vertical position with your left hand at the bottom and right at the top. Keeping the string taunt, spin in the direction of the leading edge(front) of the wing. You won’t make a whole revolution and the wing will climb from bottom to top quickly. The faster you spin, the quicker the wing climbs. You can also do this by holding the wing in front of a fan. If you are demonstrating this for younger students (elementary/jr high) it gets their attention quickly. I did this demonstration with my students(7th grade) and than broke into lab groups so they could build their own.

  • @lemon5155
    @lemon5155 3 роки тому

    Very deducational fir children
    Nice

  • @i_smoke_ghosts
    @i_smoke_ghosts 5 років тому

    go dave!

  • @nolongerwavey
    @nolongerwavey 5 років тому

    Love the music.😁

  • @sorenweyenberg3903
    @sorenweyenberg3903 5 років тому +3

    Honestly I learn more from this than school

  • @david_porthouse
    @david_porthouse Рік тому +1

    An aeroplane with a symmetrical wing section like NACA 0012 can fly quite easily, and can fly upside down as well. How do you explain this?
    The equal transit time theory is correct if the fluid is liquid helium, but no net lift is produced. Can you explain why?

  • @EthanDolan61101
    @EthanDolan61101 5 років тому

    Hey, Dave Could You please do an experiment showing the mechanics of Steam Locomotives?

  • @robertfernandes9783
    @robertfernandes9783 3 роки тому

    Nice job

  • @Resistculturaldecline
    @Resistculturaldecline 3 роки тому +1

    Cool project. Just needs a little longer straw

  • @sasmita_tripathy
    @sasmita_tripathy 4 роки тому

    My Son Loved This Experiment............He Will Try Sooner Or Later

  • @MrPoem-rq7pz
    @MrPoem-rq7pz 5 років тому +2

    Friend: Wassup
    Me: The sky...

  • @lucksman110
    @lucksman110 5 років тому

    The stabalizers also has the rudder to control the planes direction.

  • @-slemantech6136
    @-slemantech6136 5 років тому

    👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼fantastic

  • @jamsmoore
    @jamsmoore 5 років тому +11

    2:00 a.m
    no blue!!
    weird trick.. now look
    2:00 a.

  • @awesomeknowledge.awesomekn1411
    @awesomeknowledge.awesomekn1411 3 роки тому +5

    Actually, it is a combination of Newton's 3rd law, and the Coanda effect that makes a plane fly, not the Bernoulli principle. The Bernoulli principle is only applicable in a closed tube.

    • @Observ45er
      @Observ45er 2 роки тому

      That's not correct either. There is No Coanda effect near a wing. Coanda is defined as a jet or sheet of air blown into an otherwise still air environment. It also has constant entrainment. The wing has neither of these.
      The upward lift force comes from the top-bottom pressure difference. THAT is ALL the upward lifting force.
      .
      This short video explains the lower pressure above the wing.
      Give it a thumbs up if you understand it.
      *ua-cam.com/video/3MSqbnbKDmM/v-deo.html*
      .

    • @cndbrn7975
      @cndbrn7975 2 роки тому

      Lesson 8 - Adventures with Bernoulli - Demonstrations in Physics
      ua-cam.com/video/HZClP-m9g24/v-deo.html

    • @JesusCruz-my3ob
      @JesusCruz-my3ob Рік тому

      The upper flow is faster and from Bernoulli’s equation the pressure is lower.
      The difference in pressure across the airfoil produces the lift. As we have seen in Experiment #1, this part of the theory is correct. In fact, this theory is very appealing because many parts of the theory are correct. In our discussions on pressure-area integration to determine the force on a body immersed in a fluid, we mentioned that if we know the velocity, we can obtain the pressure and determine the force. The problem with the “Equal Transit” theory is that it attempts to provide us with the velocity based on a non-physical assumption as discussed above.
      NASA

  • @karunathilakaabeysekara8642
    @karunathilakaabeysekara8642 2 роки тому

    Thank you

  • @MenwalEdits
    @MenwalEdits Рік тому

    Hey dave, just wondering, does this work when you make the wing with normal A4 paper? or do you need it to be a bit stiff?

  • @rcaviationswitzerland186
    @rcaviationswitzerland186 5 років тому +8

    And the horizontal stabilize?

    • @liamgeula
      @liamgeula 5 років тому +3

      I was just looking in the comments to see if anyone would notice that

    • @josephobetta2732
      @josephobetta2732 4 роки тому

      @@liamgeula me too

  • @sagarmahey95
    @sagarmahey95 5 років тому

    Hats off

  • @Triggered-RC
    @Triggered-RC 3 роки тому

    Awesome. Bringing this to my science class tomorrow... The wing, not the video.

  • @Glicksman1
    @Glicksman1 2 роки тому +1

    Fits of all, air does not move past the wing. The wing moves through the air. Big difference.
    Downwash at the trailing ede= lift. Period. Other smaller effects (upwash, pressure differences, etc.) are not significant.

  • @SustPandaAli
    @SustPandaAli 5 років тому

    Awesome video

  • @marthadsilva2953
    @marthadsilva2953 5 років тому +8

    *PRETTY COOL HUH*
    THIS DIALOGUE NEVER GO OLD

  • @cronibet
    @cronibet 5 років тому +10

    Aerodynamics of an elephant

  • @multigamerinfinite
    @multigamerinfinite 5 років тому +5

    There' s *USUALLY* two wings
    ...and of course, the engines!Which *USUALLY* hang off the wings

    • @smilingmayonnaise8089
      @smilingmayonnaise8089 5 років тому

      About the engine, depends on the plane

    • @incog0956
      @incog0956 5 років тому

      Well yeah, you can have more wings. And engines don't have to hang off

    • @noobethgamingtonthethird
      @noobethgamingtonthethird 4 роки тому +1

      what engines
      I’m on a plane rn and there’s just fire and the pilot grabbing on to the wing and we are heading towards a island

    • @multigamerinfinite
      @multigamerinfinite 4 роки тому +1

      @@noobethgamingtonthethird oh you have a lucky plane!That's very rare

    • @noobethgamingtonthethird
      @noobethgamingtonthethird 4 роки тому +1

      yea I’m very lucky

  • @kashifa723
    @kashifa723 5 років тому

    I might make this for my science fair project

  • @samuelmolotov9441
    @samuelmolotov9441 4 роки тому

    What if i threw the paper plane (without wire/rope) from a 4 story building? Would it fly?

  • @hamijetdemiri8418
    @hamijetdemiri8418 5 років тому

    Love you

  • @reyankhasif8340
    @reyankhasif8340 5 років тому

    very good

  • @NivaldoRibeiro82
    @NivaldoRibeiro82 3 роки тому +1

    The shape of the wing is not the key point for 'why the airplanes flies'. Aerobatics airplanes has a symmetric wing :D

  • @tanmaymestry2209
    @tanmaymestry2209 5 років тому +2

    Dave hax
    Have you done aeronautical engineering?

    • @MASB29
      @MASB29 5 років тому

      I'm an aerospace engineering student, and I'm so impressed by the physics that he is trying to explain, that's so much more than what I get in high school

  • @bradybrother100
    @bradybrother100 5 років тому +2

    DaveHax- Planes generally have two wings...
    Me- Yah don't say

    • @spinoraptorex101
      @spinoraptorex101 5 років тому

      Well I thought they had 37. I was completely wrong

    • @g2ltt733
      @g2ltt733 5 років тому

      Some plane have 4 but ok

  • @ankanhalder8341
    @ankanhalder8341 4 роки тому

    Awesome

  • @luckypichuwu
    @luckypichuwu 5 років тому

    Wow I went on a plane when this came out

  • @zeromaster21_official
    @zeromaster21_official 4 роки тому

    best drawing ever..

  • @PhysiologyShark
    @PhysiologyShark 5 років тому +6

    The category should be EDUCATION

  • @tyronehernandez9962
    @tyronehernandez9962 2 роки тому

    Wish I had found this experiment instead of Pitsco. This is much more kid friendly

  • @donutsaviation2543
    @donutsaviation2543 5 років тому +1

    Better than learning this at school

  • @robertbarlow6359
    @robertbarlow6359 3 роки тому

    Love the Chaplin era piano tune heheh.

  • @anbee2221
    @anbee2221 4 роки тому

    Cool science

  • @allisona141
    @allisona141 2 роки тому

    You should start adding MLA format citations under your videos for easy citing.

  • @emilhagglund3318
    @emilhagglund3318 5 років тому

    Van you try with hot air?

  • @petuniaskunk2316
    @petuniaskunk2316 5 років тому +4

    (DaveHax Has Posted A Video On 6:18AM, June 14 2019

  • @valtertrash1647
    @valtertrash1647 2 роки тому

    this helped me so much for my school project! (:

  • @KiaraLionessTM
    @KiaraLionessTM Рік тому

    This guy can draw an airplane better than I can 😂❤

  • @thellamaking7248
    @thellamaking7248 3 роки тому

    Davehax the Science Teacher or I mean Physics Teacher

  • @nikolas6500
    @nikolas6500 5 років тому

    0:50 Did enyone rralise those engines are not goin to same direction?

  • @soulsfnn
    @soulsfnn 5 років тому

    Nice cool video

  • @Observ45er
    @Observ45er 2 роки тому

    Answer this.
    Why does it follow the upper surface behind it and flow down instead of following the lower surface and floe straight back? What it the physical law that determines that?

  • @emmanuelkebede806
    @emmanuelkebede806 3 роки тому

    This man can draw

  • @ni1220
    @ni1220 5 років тому +7

    Hiii we love u ♥️

  • @jjohns1988
    @jjohns1988 4 роки тому

    Dem wings 😂

  • @nousoualor8652
    @nousoualor8652 5 років тому

    Davehax is now Davefacts

  • @DownhillCube4
    @DownhillCube4 5 років тому +3

    What about the 2 small wings at the back of the plane with the flaps?

    • @DownhillCube4
      @DownhillCube4 5 років тому +1

      @Barron Celli don't all planes require them to fly ?

    • @Tom-tm6bu
      @Tom-tm6bu 4 роки тому

      @Adrian Stevanovic Uhm, planes do not need a vertical stabilizer, and the Concorde does not have a canard, so stop spreading bullshit yourself. Are you even a pilot?

    • @Tom-tm6bu
      @Tom-tm6bu 4 роки тому

      @@DownhillCube4 actually, most planes have them indeed to be able to vertically rotate. But some can fly without. Looking at the Concorde, the wing went far to the back of the plane, and had "elevators" next to the "ailerons". The elevator is the part that moves in the back wing, to make a downforce or upforce to rotate the plane vertically. The Concorde had the elevators at the back of the wings, and it works as good as a normal back wing. Planes can also have a "canard", which is a back wing, but placed in the front, like a tupolev 144, the Russian clone of the Concorde. This also works like a normal back wing, but then the other way around.

    • @Tom-tm6bu
      @Tom-tm6bu 4 роки тому

      @Adrian Stevanovic well, I am and have about 430 hours logged. About the Concorde, it has no horizontal stabilizer, but it has elevators next to the ailerons in the wing. I am pretty sure that is what I said. And there are planes that don't need a horizontal stabilizer, there are even planes with no tail and they can fly perfectly. About the TU-144, the stabilizers you were talking about are canards. Google it mate, it's not hard :)

    • @Tom-tm6bu
      @Tom-tm6bu 4 роки тому

      @Adrian Stevanovic And oh yeah, you said that the Concorde had small elevators at the nose. Where did you learn that?

  • @Donteatacowman
    @Donteatacowman 2 роки тому

    I'm still confused by why the air on top of the wing is faster. It is going the same speed as the bottom air originally, but it now has more distance to cover. You would think that it would be going slower, not faster. I mean... I do remember from physics that horizontal acceleration doesn't change even if vertical speed changes (so a thrown ball going 15 mph south would still be going 15mph south as it drops, except for friction slowing it down). So is the idea that the air is still going sideways at a constant speed, but a new force is making it go vertical? Because if that's the case, then because it is covering that same distance, it's going to be moving quicker... if there's some other force that is also keeping it stuck to the wing instead of climbing the first hump and then flying off parallel to the bottom wing. I'm not sure if I'm making sense but I feel like I'm missing something.

    • @MaxMustermann-bm7qt
      @MaxMustermann-bm7qt 2 роки тому

      Pressure, your missing pressure. You treat air like a stone. Sadly i cannot draw in a youtube comment.

    • @cndbrn7975
      @cndbrn7975 2 роки тому

      Lesson 8 - Adventures with Bernoulli - Demonstrations in Physics
      ua-cam.com/video/HZClP-m9g24/v-deo.html

  • @reenokopli
    @reenokopli 5 років тому +2

    0:10 4 wings
    2 big front ones
    2 small tail ones

  • @toxicghost_2599
    @toxicghost_2599 5 років тому

    Pretty cool huh..luv u so much💙🤩💙

  • @beast0791
    @beast0791 2 роки тому

    Bernoulli principles is for fluids so how can we apply it for air particles?

    • @IShowVelocity.
      @IShowVelocity. Рік тому

      Caz anything that is not a solid is a fluid
      Air is not solid, thus its a fluid

  • @ethantham9790
    @ethantham9790 5 років тому

    Nice