DON'T BUY A Skoda Enyaq Coupe Before Watching This!

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 25 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 31

  • @pristak
    @pristak 2 роки тому +7

    Consumption and trip information in the small display were added in ME 3.1 update :)
    Also the navigation sometimes just doesn't want to search anything, not sure why it is, but I think that is what happened to you as well. Search after ME3.0 update is generally working fine. Also, the car will search for destinations close to you first, so searching las vegas may not be ideal :)
    About the battery - rear-wheel models have different battery, which is much more e-tron like (flat charging curve (135-100kw) until 85%) and charges 10-->80% in 29mins (7 min faster than GTX/vRS batteries)

  • @guykedem54
    @guykedem54 2 роки тому +5

    The back center storage is removable. Have the same in my Enyaq.

  • @tomoldigs1353
    @tomoldigs1353 2 роки тому +5

    Enyaq definitely has the better look and feel, then the Q4 e-tron, but there are still a lot people willing to invest more then €20‘000 extra money, for exactly the same drivetrain an a less specious cabin. Comparing them head to head, for example close the rear doors, the Q4 sounds like body panel on body panel, the Enyaq normally solid. Same with the dashboard, thin black plastic to nice alcantara with stitching.

    • @Kai99342
      @Kai99342 Рік тому

      So you’re saying people will go for the Audi because of the name

    • @tomoldigs1353
      @tomoldigs1353 Рік тому +1

      @@Kai99342 yes

    • @Kai99342
      @Kai99342 Рік тому

      @@tomoldigs1353 so if you had a choice between the ID5 and Enyaq Coupe on a mobility scheme you would go for the enyaq. (Just asking for research purposes)

    • @tomoldigs1353
      @tomoldigs1353 Рік тому +1

      @@Kai99342 yes

  • @850bimmer
    @850bimmer 2 роки тому +4

    I ordered one on June 9th when they opened up the sale. I spent May looking at the competition and this car came up on top. The Id5 was was just too weird and simple looking inside (minimalistic) for me, the Audi has that hideous oversized grill that just look completely disproportioned to the rest of the front of the car, might have better interior quality, but not design. Never even considered the Hyundai. BMW and MB did not have any SUV/crossovers with 500km range, well there is the iX, but that thing is hideous (coming from someone that has only driven BMW for 20 years, that says something).
    The Enyaq RS won on exterior looks, interior design, the 13" screen, range and over all comfort from testing a regular Enyaq sport line.
    I guess if Mercedes had managed to release their EQE SUV in time I would have gone for that, but the Enyaq RS will probably be the perfect daily driver.
    For fun/sportiness one can always have a second and third car with more of a purpose.

  • @hottilieottini8296
    @hottilieottini8296 2 роки тому +2

    You can't by a Skoda Enyaq Coupe, it can only be ordered. But will not be delievered before 12 or 18 months. They can provide you as many as press cars they like to, but never of this cars is available in short time at your local dealer. our any dealer at global level all.

  • @jonpetter8921
    @jonpetter8921 2 роки тому +1

    I actually like the original Enyaq compared to the other original MEB cars

  • @cuteduckdontlie4636
    @cuteduckdontlie4636 Рік тому +1

    It’s a mix of BMW and Tesla Y. I saw it few days on the streets of north Germany. I thought it was a fake Tesla Y 😂 looked like and wasn’t it than I check it again it was a Skoda. 😂

  • @michaelwhite6461
    @michaelwhite6461 2 роки тому +3

    Use the satnav every day?!?!? If you're a taxi driver, maybe. Otherwise, that's a very minor irritation and is almost inconsequential when compared to the awful touch sensitive steering wheel controls in the ID4 ;-)

  • @roghach2994
    @roghach2994 Рік тому +1

    I like your rewievs Kris, well done.

    • @KrisRifa
      @KrisRifa  Рік тому

      Thanks mate, appreciate it!

  • @TheRedstonelabz1
    @TheRedstonelabz1 Рік тому +3

    All i wanted to know was if this is better than the polestar. Buy ofcourse a lady had to cross the street and make this guy all confused.

  • @ksprr6856
    @ksprr6856 2 роки тому +2

    That screen looks malplaced

  • @ozturert
    @ozturert 2 роки тому +1

    Those UI issues with touch screen and tiny information screen makes it more difficult to recommend. I hated the ID4 screen and touch controls everywhere, this is better in that sense but that bad laggy touch screen and weird menu layout are not good. Audi Q4 UI is miles better (dashboard is bigger and shows everything you need, touchscreen isn't that laggy, controls on wheel are both touch and clicky/mechanical). But then Skoda has better interior material quality. Overall I'd choose Audi though.

    • @josmorsch4118
      @josmorsch4118 2 роки тому +2

      True, the UI of the Q4 is smoother, though, some things can be updated and I like the interior of the Enyaq more. Also the price is at least 15k Euro’s less than the Q4 with full specs.

    • @ozturert
      @ozturert 2 роки тому

      @@josmorsch4118 Yes I wonder why Audi is so much more expensive. Driving experience of Audi is also better I think. Somehow Audi feels much smoother when driving.

    • @josmorsch4118
      @josmorsch4118 2 роки тому +1

      @@ozturert I don’t know if it is smoother. I think it is all a feeling because of the Audi logo. Personally I liked the Enyaq more driving wise. But like I sat, they share technology. There are Audi parts in a Skoda as well.
      For me the price was the decision maker. Full spec Enyaq RS with better looks and all the options I wanted, costed me 67k. The Audi Q4 Quattro was above 80k without all options checked.

    • @automaniak1115
      @automaniak1115 2 роки тому

      @@josmorsch4118 Enyaq has only DCC, Q4 has air suspension

    • @josmorsch4118
      @josmorsch4118 2 роки тому +1

      @@automaniak1115 In the Netherlands only DCC, no air suspension. Also made a configuration with same specs….. 87k vs 67 🤔
      The Skoda is a better deal…

  • @BBKing-yh3gn
    @BBKing-yh3gn 2 роки тому

    Hi Kris. Is 300k NOK a good price for a used ID.3 1st Plus (mid trim) including winter tyres? It's my parents car, 2 years old and driven 23k KM.

  • @RJ-nk9wb
    @RJ-nk9wb 9 місяців тому

    Heat pump not included! 😡 Hopefully Skoda will change there mind.

  • @RobertsMikiasvili
    @RobertsMikiasvili 2 роки тому

    5.3” you have to be kidding me… 😂

  • @wilkoone9155
    @wilkoone9155 Рік тому

    I think coupe body shapes are completely pointless, a complete waste of space. I have just loaded my Enyaq IV80x to the roof with plants from a wholesale plant nursery which we nearly towed our box trailer to.

  • @jimnasr9529
    @jimnasr9529 2 роки тому +2

    man the ID4 is a really ugly piece of a car... it´s front looks like foot toes, inside all cheap plastic....

  • @Unicornmeme123
    @Unicornmeme123 Рік тому

    Ewerything too much is bad and I just think this is too much I miss the basic cars with normal clasic cluster and clasic engine where the engine was not monitoring by eletric sensors and all that litle pece of mess as this make a car runn much often with issues and then wisiting garage its not cheap.

  • @basedw
    @basedw 2 роки тому +2

    Please can you say coupé, not coup 😄