Thank you for another brilliant video! Your explanation of NAPD 1 and 2, and the practical demonstration of how to fly it manually and using VNAV, has been incredibly helpful. I've been struggling with VNAV but your video has provided some much-needed clarity. I really appreciate your dedication to making these videos. They're not just informative, but also engaging and easy to understand. Even though they're not intended as professional training material, they're a great starting point for anyone interested in aviation. As a request, I was wondering if you could shed some light on the procedures that companies look for during a simulator assessment. It would be a huge help to have a direction to start training in the simulator, and to get an idea of what procedures they're looking for. I understand that your videos are intended to inform and demonstrate how things work, and are not meant for professional use. However, I believe that your videos can make the transition to professional training much easier, especially for those of us who are just starting out. Learning from others can make a big difference in the beginning. I just want to express my deepest gratitude for your help. Your videos have been a beacon of light in my journey towards understanding aviation. I am truly grateful for the time and effort you put into creating these informative and engaging videos. Your dedication to sharing your knowledge is inspiring and I can't thank you enough. 👍🙏
Company procedure. In my airline it was experimented with, and concluded that doing the bug up NAPD procedure manually, minimized the amount of errors made, resulting in a big decrease in noise sensitive area fines, and therefore they stuck with that.
Thank you for another brilliant video! Your explanation of NAPD 1 and 2, and the practical demonstration of how to fly it manually and using VNAV, has been incredibly helpful. I've been struggling with VNAV but your video has provided some much-needed clarity.
I really appreciate your dedication to making these videos. They're not just informative, but also engaging and easy to understand. Even though they're not intended as professional training material, they're a great starting point for anyone interested in aviation.
As a request, I was wondering if you could shed some light on the procedures that companies look for during a simulator assessment. It would be a huge help to have a direction to start training in the simulator, and to get an idea of what procedures they're looking for.
I understand that your videos are intended to inform and demonstrate how things work, and are not meant for professional use. However, I believe that your videos can make the transition to professional training much easier, especially for those of us who are just starting out. Learning from others can make a big difference in the beginning.
I just want to express my deepest gratitude for your help. Your videos have been a beacon of light in my journey towards understanding aviation. I am truly grateful for the time and effort you put into creating these informative and engaging videos. Your dedication to sharing your knowledge is inspiring and I can't thank you enough. 👍🙏
Keep making these videos...video on procedural VOR approach and ILS and also the holding would be of great help...keep up the good work
Hi! What happens to the speed window and vert modes if you are doing nadp1, NO VNAV engaged and connect autopilot at 1000 feet? Thanks!!
Thank you !
Great! Thnx!
Nice video, could could you do one explaining the defferent FMA modes and what they do?
Great video thank you. But where is the cutback option for?
Would be great to see you do a video about PIOSEE and possibly engine failure at V1?
Thanks for the suggestion.
So how come most American Airlines such as Southwest, Delta etc all use VNAV for takeoff?
Company procedure. In my airline it was experimented with, and concluded that doing the bug up NAPD procedure manually, minimized the amount of errors made, resulting in a big decrease in noise sensitive area fines, and therefore they stuck with that.