So Where Exactly Are We With Nanotechnology? | Answers With Joe

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 20 бер 2022
  • Get a year of Nebula and Curiosity Stream for only $14.79 when you sign up at www.curiositystream.com/joescott
    We've been hearing for years how nanotechnology is going to change the world. In movies and in headlines, nanotechnology is almost like "future magic" that will make the impossible possible. But how realistic are those predictions? And how close are we to seeing some of them come true? Let's take a look at the state of nanotechnology.
    Watch this video ad-free on Nebula: nebula.tv/videos/joescott-so-...
    Want to support the channel? Here's how:
    Patreon: / answerswithjoe
    Channel Memberships: / @joescott
    T-Shirts & Merch: www.answerswithjoe.com/store
    Check out my 2nd channel, Joe Scott TMI:
    / @joescott-tmi
    You can listen to my podcast, Conversations With Joe on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, Google Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
    Spotify 👉 spoti.fi/3AWUFAO
    Apple Podcasts 👉 apple.co/3Hngf3v
    Google Podcasts 👉 bit.ly/3s9Sq9b
    Interested in getting a Tesla or going solar? Use my referral link and get discounts and perks:
    ts.la/joe74700
    Follow me at all my places!
    Instagram: / answerswithjoe
    TikTok: / answerswithjoe
    Facebook: / answerswithjoe
    Twitter: / answerswithjoe
    LINKS LINKS LINKS:
    scitechconnect.elsevier.com/n...
    scitechdaily.com/mit-engineer...
    www.cnn.com/2004/TECH/science...
    www.nano.gov/about-nanotechno...
    www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/arti...
    A Boy With His Atom animation:
    • A Boy And His Atom: Th...
    newscenter.lbl.gov/2016/10/06...
    avantama.com/quantum-dot-tv/
    www.techinstro.com/difference...
    www.nanowerk.com/nanotechnolo...
    www.voanews.com/a/scientists-...
    theconversation.com/the-bs-an...
    news.mit.edu/2019/mit-enginee...
    physicsworld.com/a/materials-...
    biogenericpublishers.com/pdf/...
    www.azonano.com/article.aspx?...
    www.quora.com/What-are-the-da...
    www.medicalbag.com/home/more/...
    mems.duke.edu/faculty/christi...
    science.howstuffworks.com/gra...
  • Наука та технологія

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1,9 тис.

  • @tayzonday
    @tayzonday 2 роки тому +695

    This answers a question I didn’t know I had.

    • @justaguy6100
      @justaguy6100 2 роки тому +18

      👍Yeah, Joe's good at that!

    • @bonecanoe86
      @bonecanoe86 2 роки тому +26

      Hey, how's it going legend?

    • @Johncornwell103
      @Johncornwell103 2 роки тому +6

      Today I learned UA-cam auto unsubscribed your channel

    • @krashd
      @krashd 2 роки тому +8

      Have you any wisdom for us, Elder Zonday?

    • @joescott
      @joescott  2 роки тому +164

      Well this made my day!
      Or should I say... my Zonday?
      (I'll see myself out)

  • @mirror857
    @mirror857 2 роки тому +444

    As long as nanomachines doesn’t harden in response to physical trauma, we’re not far enough

    • @DerpyAngel09
      @DerpyAngel09 2 роки тому +76

      "Nanomachines, son! They harden in response to physical trauma! You can't hurt me, Jack!" 😏

    • @snippingtool7810
      @snippingtool7810 2 роки тому +34

      Need nanomachines for making the mother of all omelette, can't fret over every eggs

    • @left4deadian
      @left4deadian 2 роки тому +20

      Standing here i realize.

    • @stpidstuff
      @stpidstuff 2 роки тому +13

      @@left4deadian you are just like me

    • @Mausyboi
      @Mausyboi 2 роки тому +11

      @@stpidstuff trying to make history

  • @joeybaby6443
    @joeybaby6443 2 роки тому +4

    "Nanomachines son they harden in response to physical trama... you can't hurt me jack"

  • @ThisTrainIsLost
    @ThisTrainIsLost 2 роки тому +50

    I remember some years back when a tech company said they'd invented solar power paint. Once dry the surface generated electricity like a solar power panel. I thought back then that if it could integrated into clothing you could have a windbreaker that charged your phone. What ever happened with that stuff? I know this is off-topic but if I don't write down a thought right away I will soon forget it. Damaged. So it goes.

    • @Wordsmiths
      @Wordsmiths 2 роки тому +2

      yeah, I remember something of the sort. Then nothing. I guess it didn't work out for some reason...?

    • @darkmadder9897
      @darkmadder9897 2 роки тому +1

      There are a variety of these "paints" in development.
      The first demonstrable prototypes only reach 5% efficiency though, compared to 14% for the "solar brick/tile/shingle" also on the market now.
      Supplemental reduction/"greening" only.
      However -
      "A popular testing choice, CIGS-perovskite tandem cells have made big gains, from 17.8 % efficiency in late 2016 to 21.5 % in January 2019. And since CIGS thin-film is already successful at scale, improving the tandem performance of perovskite may be easier than working alone on the new technology. It is also not out of the question to pair Perovskite with silicon. IMEC researchers believe a silicon-perovskite stacked cell could easily push an efficiency of 30 %."
      thesolarlabs.com/ros/solar-paint/

    • @darkmadder9897
      @darkmadder9897 2 роки тому +5

      @@Wordsmiths When oligarchs spend more on suppression than on RND.

    • @defaultlogos2976
      @defaultlogos2976 2 роки тому +2

      It exist. Forget what it is called, but I remember reading an article that states this solar paint was capable of making Hydrogen energy with sunlight and water

    • @ThisTrainIsLost
      @ThisTrainIsLost 2 роки тому

      @@defaultlogos2976 While it has been long enough for me to have forgotten the technical details, the idea itself is both interesting and promising. The field of possible applications is wide indeed.
      (Thank you very much! I was beginning to doubt my own memory.)

  • @deathsyth8888
    @deathsyth8888 2 роки тому +46

    "Nanomachines son!"
    - Senator Steven Armstrong, 'Metal Gear Revengeance'

    • @h3xagon488
      @h3xagon488 2 роки тому +9

      they harden in respone to physical trauma

    • @alexkorocencev7689
      @alexkorocencev7689 2 роки тому +6

      Would have been so cool, if Joe included Senator Armstrong during the nanotechnology compilation from popular media

    • @MASKarade25
      @MASKarade25 Рік тому

      Metal gear… it can’t be

  • @brianbeswick
    @brianbeswick 2 роки тому +499

    I like these videos that examine the predictions of the past about current and future tech. Let’s get more of that.

    • @baneverything5580
      @baneverything5580 2 роки тому +2

      Brian Beeswax No way they`ll tell us what`s REALLY going on. Remember Smart Dust? Where did THAT go? We`re all probably already robots for China and don`t know it yet.

    • @inthso362
      @inthso362 2 роки тому +6

      In 1972, MIT predicted widespread societal collapse around 2040. With a few decades behind to use as a metric, an int'l accounting firm revisited it, and found we were right on track.
      You can forget about nanos, robots, AI. We're headed towards the iron age.

    • @zoranvujovic998
      @zoranvujovic998 2 роки тому

      Oh yeah, I'd love to see more videos like that! Moore's law over time and today/tomorrow could be a decent start.

    • @pvic6959
      @pvic6959 2 роки тому +2

      @@inthso362 oh cool! not even 20 years away :)
      I wont be 60. I hope theres no collapse so I can take money out of my retirement accounts lol

    • @Sam-tu4hp
      @Sam-tu4hp 2 роки тому +3

      @@inthso362 I’ll try to find this myself but if you happen to have a link to this, that would be nice. General predictions of doom are a dime a dozen, so I’d like to see if they get into any specifics

  • @jamesbond_007
    @jamesbond_007 2 роки тому +5

    Also a big thank you for the Curiosity Stream plug -- I signed up at the low rate you mentioned, and have been loving all the content I can now access. Thanks Joe!

  • @nikolinanebrigic5016
    @nikolinanebrigic5016 2 роки тому +37

    This video just gave me more motivation to study harder. I'm currently taking classes in nanotechnology and similar subjects, so to think that in 2-3 years I could be working on something as amazing as making limbs for amputees or making little robots that remove cancer is so uplifting. Thanks for the motivation!❤️

    • @neznamtija8081
      @neznamtija8081 Рік тому

      A gde to??

    • @nikolinanebrigic5016
      @nikolinanebrigic5016 Рік тому

      @@neznamtija8081 Na šta misliš ovim pitanjem? Gde studiram?

    • @neznamtija8081
      @neznamtija8081 Рік тому

      @@nikolinanebrigic5016 gde se bavis time, da. cudno mi je kad vidim nase na nekim normlnim videima hahaha

  • @Jacob_A_OBrien
    @Jacob_A_OBrien 2 роки тому +420

    As a molecular biologist, I always find it funny that nano-technology and bio-technology are considered two different things. Biology is the best example of nanotechnology we have today. Our cells consist of literally hundreds of thousands of gene products, thousands of different types of molecules, and most importantly, a massively information-dense architecture. Not the typical "DNA is digital" hoopla. DNA is a molecule in which one aspect can be compressed into an ordered sequence of A, G, C, T nucleotides. But it is a molecule, a big one, and how it interacts with other molecules is at the crux of its information density. Moreover, computational networks exist as the cell itself, not just DNA.
    Regardless, biologists use nanotech all the time, we just call it biology. Polymerase chain reaction is an example. We create a reaction of DNA polymerases, buffered salts, nucleotides, small DNA primers (~20 nucleotides long), and DNA templates. Combined with the correct application of periodic heating at three temperatures we generate a reaction that exponentially copies some DNA target.
    The RNA vaccine uses a lipid to enter cells. In the lab, we use this molecule mostly to get some desired RNA or DNA into cells for experimentation. This technique is ubiquitous nowadays. These lipids literally form into a sphere that encapsulates the DNA or RNA in solution. We then add this mixture to a plate of cells and this transfects the cell, beginning a process that ends in the breakdown of the lipid spheres and the release of the RNA/DNA into the cell. The DNA is then transported into the nucleus and a whole new round of nanomachines processes it in different ways.
    I'll stop there but there are thousands of techniques that use various organic molecules and proteins to perform some process which we can use to measure something, or produce some other molecules, or capture some molecules, etc.

    • @blueredbrick
      @blueredbrick 2 роки тому +13

      As a chemical engineer I fully agree.

    • @mycosys
      @mycosys 2 роки тому +19

      I was quite surprised he didnt mention liposomes and even CRISPR, particularly since liposome delivery is the breakthrough that made MRNA vaccines work

    • @disgruntledwookie369
      @disgruntledwookie369 2 роки тому +13

      Exactly. Nanotech has been around for billions of years. I think human nano tech would realistically look a lot like biology. When you get to that scale, mechanical engineering isn't practical, you need chemical engineering. Self replication is a lot easier too. If you can grow and divide then you're sorted. Machines as we know them cannot really do either. Maybe it can slice itself in two but without growth it each generation will get smaller and smaller. As wildly complex and intricate as cellular chemistry is, in principle its a lot easier to grow something which is essentially just a bubble of goo wrapped in lipids. Our tech will probably just be highly modified microbes. I say "will be".. but as you pointed out, in many ways we're doing it now.

    • @luminousfractal420
      @luminousfractal420 2 роки тому +2

      @Alien Demonic Deception 24 they'd just put it in the cornflakes m8, Again. What logic would there be to pointing it out to the public . Besides covid-19 is looking more and more like a Putin plot everyday. Be glad for a defense.

    • @theobserver9131
      @theobserver9131 2 роки тому +4

      Uneducated numbskull here... I love how bacteriophage look like engineered machines.

  • @Fixxitt412
    @Fixxitt412 2 роки тому +249

    Thinking about Nano stuff just makes me realize I was born so slightly too early to live forever. Darn it.

    • @jannisfaber
      @jannisfaber 2 роки тому +3

      How old are you?

    • @puck4801
      @puck4801 2 роки тому +52

      I think about this daily. The fact that all my wildest dreams will become daily norm, only long after I'm gone, causes me no end of depression...
      My deepest, truest desires, the few things that _really_ matter to me, the changes that would make me _truly_ content and happy to exist... are perfectly possible, just not today.

    • @RoScFan
      @RoScFan 2 роки тому +5

      @Fixxitt 412 @Wallung Dea @Puck Do you guys think millenials will catch the tech to become immortal? Well, really long lived. Born in the 90s... Too early? Or.... juuuuuuuuuuuust right?

    • @Sivanot
      @Sivanot 2 роки тому +26

      Personally I take the optimistic view of this. We may have incredible advances in medical technology within just a few decades. Maybe not the stuff I'm truly excited for yet, but possibly just enough to expand our lifespans to reach those things.

    • @Johncornwell103
      @Johncornwell103 2 роки тому +11

      Thanks Capitalism

  • @TreeCutterDoug
    @TreeCutterDoug 2 роки тому +28

    The fish puns were SOLID gold! Definitely Grammy material! As always: a fascinating and informative video! Thanks!

    • @TJfromEarth
      @TJfromEarth 2 роки тому +8

      how'd he miss the opportunity to call it teleFISHion?

  • @TheGeekyHippie
    @TheGeekyHippie 2 роки тому +8

    I really appreciated that segment on the fungus-treated wood flooring producing electricity simply by people standing or walking on it. I've been asking for a couple decades now why we can't have piezoelectric roads and parking lots, for the exact same reason they made that flooring: there is a LOT of free energy that could be generated.

    • @ZarHakkar
      @ZarHakkar 4 місяці тому

      Well, that energy isn't free per se. You're leeching it from cars and people who pay for gas and food. It's never generated for free, only transferred from somewhere.
      Now if these are ways to improve existing efficiency of transference without affecting the efficiency of other systems, that would be more ethical and essentially be the "free" energy you're looking for.

  • @jeffpkamp
    @jeffpkamp 2 роки тому +366

    It was the realization that viruses and bacteria were already capable of doing essentially all of the things that medical nanotechnology was supposed to do that made me become a microbiologist.
    Seriously, they are sub micron in size, have chemical sensors, motors, and can replicate from in situ resources as simple as water, sunlight, and carbon dioxide, and nitrogen gas.

    • @H34L5
      @H34L5 2 роки тому +12

      Very true. Bacteria and viruses are much more useful tools, because of what Jeffrey said. Who would want to rely on abiotic, metallic nanobots with a host of unknown complications/side-effects when you can hijack the naturally evolved roles and mechanisms of existent lifeforms?

    • @squamish4244
      @squamish4244 2 роки тому +1

      Awesome!

    • @somefuckstolemynick
      @somefuckstolemynick 2 роки тому +8

      Please don’t unleash some uncontrollable man-made self-replicator and kill us all.

    • @bokononbokomaru8156
      @bokononbokomaru8156 2 роки тому +4

      CRISPR...

    • @PlanetEarth3141
      @PlanetEarth3141 2 роки тому +2

      There is the possibility that tech replaces biology only to turn back to biology as the best overall evolution. Pros and cons and the circle of life that this universe has as a fundamental property.

  • @FeroxDeitas
    @FeroxDeitas 2 роки тому +88

    Oh, man! I nearly squealed when I saw the title for this video. I'm currently doing my Master's Degree on Nanotech, and listening to Joe explain some of the things I hear about everyday is just so exciting! Thanks for the education you bring, Joe.

    • @joescott
      @joescott  2 роки тому +16

      Hopefully I got it right!

    • @FeroxDeitas
      @FeroxDeitas 2 роки тому +11

      @@joescott You totally did! Very well informed. The effort you put into your videos is clearly noticed. Obviously there's A LOT you could not possibly cover in a single video, Nanotech has a very varied range of applications, but you covered it in general terms, love it.

    • @daemenoth
      @daemenoth 2 роки тому +4

      well hopefully you can join the future for nanotech and get that charge creating fungal material into shoe insoles that can charge our smart devices as we walk.

    • @MarcillaSmith
      @MarcillaSmith 2 роки тому +5

      @@daemenoth look, I don't want to jump the line here, but if we're taking requests: how about some of those nanobots that go inside us and fix everything? I'd appreciate it

    • @daemenoth
      @daemenoth 2 роки тому +5

      @@MarcillaSmith i'm pretty sure a full charge on my smart phone is more important than public health.... what is the point of being in good health and alive if your phone is dead lol

  • @the3cl3ctic
    @the3cl3ctic 2 роки тому +5

    Regardless that you can find an in depth documentary about the topics you cover I would argue that a 15 min sum-up definitely has its place. Keep up the good work Joe. For me AWJ is something I always look forward to and enjoy watching very much.

  • @edwhitney1862
    @edwhitney1862 2 роки тому +1

    Thanks Joe. I really enjoy all of your videos. No one else comes close to your method of informative teaching that you make so fun!

  • @doandroidsdream1748
    @doandroidsdream1748 2 роки тому +21

    These are my favourite kinds of videos. I really love getting updates on tech we first heard about years ago and have had advancements that perhaps wouldn’t necessarily garner a lot of media attention. Nanotech, Graphene, 3D printing etc.

  • @thesuki
    @thesuki 2 роки тому +8

    Nanophotonics is where the fun stuff is at. Something really cool to point out that nano materials tend to be at the same size of visible light and that can crate some really cool interactions. One thing I was hoping you’d talk about are Hyperbolic-metamaterials but they’re super recent.

    • @MrGnorts
      @MrGnorts Рік тому +1

      explain in a nutshell?
      please and thank you

  • @josenieto8256
    @josenieto8256 2 роки тому

    Thanks joe for all the contents in this channel and for teaching us amazing things thanks for your hard work!!

  • @Max.J.H.
    @Max.J.H. 2 роки тому +1

    Thank you Joe! Very informative and cool to watch video. Keep up good work!

  • @Mkoivuka
    @Mkoivuka 2 роки тому +60

    11:00 regarding nanotechnology and cancer - we're still at caveman level.
    Let me explain:
    Virtually every biomedical intervention relies on the circulatory system to deliver the thing to where it needs to be. Whether it be cancer cells in the brain or pain relief in a limb. This means that, over time, whatever you are wanting to put into [highly specific area of interest], will end up everywhere else as well.
    I'll give you an example case:
    Patient is a 15 year old male who has recently suffered a catastrophic impact with a tree while down-hill skiing. The patient presents with shock and a broken limb: the tibia has broken into two pieces, which have become disconnected. The patient is placed under medically induced coma for medical intervention - the bone is realigned, screws are put in place, and the incision is closed.
    The patient is weened off of the anesthetic and should recover within the hour.
    2 hours later the patient is still not recovering. The attending physician is shocked - the patient is at risk of brain damage!
    The attending is referred to the hospital neurosurgeon due to this being a brain circulatory issue - there is no clear reason why any of the drugs are at fault, the patient has no known allergies and nothing popped up in family screening.
    The neurosurgeon has seen just 2 such cases in his lifetime, having worked in a much larger hospital, and immediately recommends an x-ray of... The chest?
    The tibia is broken, the problem is clearly in the brain, and yet mr. Neurosurgeon wants to order an x-ray of the chest. Weird.
    X-ray comes back with something strange. The patient's lungs seem to have a polka dot pattern. Lots of small dots littering the chest. What's going on? The dots are fatty acids and, with a course of medication, quickly disappear into the bloodstream.
    The patient awakes. No brain damage. Discharged the following day.
    Okay what happened?
    When the patient's tibia broke, this exposed the blood marrow to the circulation. Fatty acids from the blood marrow seeped into the blood and went everywhere, including the brain and lungs. During the operation the patient was given blood thinners and other medications, which caused the fatty acids to get everywhere. After these were discontinued, the fatty acids then coagulated in the vasculature of the brain.
    Now, you don't x-ray the brain for fatty acids, because they won't show up. The entire brain has lots of fluids and has a consistency more of fat than lean muscle, is suspended in a sac of water, and so on. So you x-ray the chest, which has a large volume which gives a very nice contrast. Also, lots of vasculature, so higher numbers of "polka dots".
    Any nanotechnology has to wrestle with this problem. We even administer pain medication based on BMI for this reason - because BMI is highly correlated (though not perfectly, so we don't ONLY use BMI) with your blood volume, which in turn is highly correlated with the amount of blood circulation. We want a specific dose / blood volume, in very basic, non-medical terms.
    We are still at 10,000 BC technology level when it comes to medicines.
    .. Now if you want to talk progress, I warmly recommend hitting up the topic of "intraoperative (or interventional) MRI", "intraoperative Ultrasound", "stereotactic surgery", "image-guided surgery" and "minimally-invasive surgery".
    I would like you to contrast these topics with things like lobotomy, just to get an idea of how far we've come.
    The topics above could be simplified to:
    "Brain surgery - from an ineloquent to the eloquent brain".

    • @nicholasbrosseau6035
      @nicholasbrosseau6035 2 роки тому +10

      I read it all. You should write like this as a script.

    • @ThePentosin
      @ThePentosin 2 роки тому +1

      I've seen several videos of this Asian American explaining medical cases, this reminded me about those.
      I just can't find them at the moment... Weird.

    • @Mkoivuka
      @Mkoivuka 2 роки тому +5

      @@nicholasbrosseau6035 Thank you warmly.

    • @Mkoivuka
      @Mkoivuka 2 роки тому +8

      @@ThePentosin You're referring to Chubbyemu, I think. While writing this I thought of him too and posted my comment under his channel as well.

    • @ThePentosin
      @ThePentosin 2 роки тому +1

      Yes! Thank you.

  • @MarvMetal
    @MarvMetal 2 роки тому +25

    I've been studying Nanosciences for nearly 3 years now. Its amazing do see, what is possible with Nano and also seeing things humanity or nature have been doing forever that actually are Nanotec as well. On the other hand advancing the science to get the really cool futuristic stuff is hard as nails. And expensive, really expensive.

    • @bluewater454
      @bluewater454 2 роки тому +1

      It’s also scary as hell. So much potential for evil.

    • @MarvMetal
      @MarvMetal 2 роки тому

      @@bluewater454 Yeah, also many non toxic things can become toxic, once they are manufactured at the right size enabling interaction with biological stuff. But I would say with Nukes, Virus-editing capabilities and similar advances already "on the market" current nanotechnology is not really the threat we need to take most seriously. There is already plenty of other options around to express your evil. Once our monkey-brains have evolved enough to move past concepts like mutually assured destruction, then we may rack our brains about the threat of nanomachines, which may be bad, but is also decades from being reality. Recently read Prey by Micheal Crichton. While it points out some real concerns, tech like that is not going to happen soon or suddenly.

  • @jameselliott9055
    @jameselliott9055 2 роки тому

    Talking about, your videos be so consistently well done all the time. Don't know how you do it or how you keep doing it, but good job.
    . . .and, yes. You are correct. That WAS a lot of nouns and adjectives.

  • @ramsescampollo2506
    @ramsescampollo2506 Рік тому +3

    When are we getting nanomachines that harden in response to physical trauma

  • @macrayurish3552
    @macrayurish3552 2 роки тому +20

    Best channel on UA-cam. Thank you Joe for the consistent compelling content.

    • @joescott
      @joescott  2 роки тому +3

      That's too kind, thank you. :)

  • @TobaJones77
    @TobaJones77 2 роки тому +16

    Science fiction writers: "not sure how to get out of this corner I have written myself into."
    Friend: "you struggling to come up with an ending?"
    Writer: "no, I can't decide whether to use 'nano thing' or 'quantum thing'...."

    • @danielcurry1695
      @danielcurry1695 2 роки тому +3

      Sounds like a Marvel screenwriter...lol

    • @krashd
      @krashd 2 роки тому +2

      Friend: "Ahhh, you're struggling with 'Deus Ex Machina'."
      Writer: "Ohhh, that's a brilliant name for the teleporter doo-hickey in act 4!"

    • @NoActuallyGo-KCUF-Yourself
      @NoActuallyGo-KCUF-Yourself 2 роки тому +4

      Either way, make sure to put in a _quasi-_ somewhere.

    • @peter9477
      @peter9477 2 роки тому +1

      @@NoActuallyGo-KCUF-Yourself So it's either quasi-nano quantum tech, or quasi-quantum nanotech.

    • @NinjaRunningWild
      @NinjaRunningWild 2 роки тому

      Outer Limits did it just fine.

  • @gabrielpenix1371
    @gabrielpenix1371 2 роки тому

    I just Signed up for Curiosity Stream. Thanks Joe!

  • @fushey
    @fushey 2 роки тому +2

    I like this guy has remained consistent. Nostalgic of an era of the internet gone by

  • @rubybu1lds
    @rubybu1lds 2 роки тому +16

    I love how you tend to touch base with interesting topics every once in a while, to catch up with them. Especially this topic!

    • @joescott
      @joescott  2 роки тому +4

      Hehe, well I try to make them all interesting topics. :)

    • @myscreen2urs
      @myscreen2urs 2 роки тому +1

      @@joescott yeah, I really liked your piece on octopus🙃

  • @Jeff13mer
    @Jeff13mer 2 роки тому +9

    Always look forward these videos. I wonder what's next... Astroid detection? Geothermal science? Lasers? Future tech? Love it all. Keep up the good work team.

    • @joescott
      @joescott  2 роки тому +1

      Thanks!

    • @GizzyDillespee
      @GizzyDillespee 2 роки тому

      They made an android female whose buttocks could undulate. I don't remember the details, but I'm pretty sure it was this timeline.

  • @Albert-zh6ps
    @Albert-zh6ps Рік тому

    Another good job, keep up the good work buddy 👍

  • @danasherrick51
    @danasherrick51 Рік тому

    You put great videos together. Cheers.

  • @That_Freedom_Guy
    @That_Freedom_Guy 2 роки тому +34

    Some very cool things on the show today. I hadn't seen the nano animation before, so thanks for that, Joe.
    I wonder if we will ever get to pushing and pulling things around at the Plank constant limit?
    If we built a nano machine that could build even smaller devices to get very small, just rinse and repeat until small enough. Electron manipulation is certainly getting there!

    • @Ixidora
      @Ixidora 2 роки тому +2

      I think the real trick is designing the "next smaller" machine once we approach the size of simple molecules functioning as complex machine. How do you program a single atom? I'm personally very excited for where this field of science is heading.

    • @luminousfractal420
      @luminousfractal420 2 роки тому +1

      Go further...what if you could create mechanical properties using only wave energy. That is life.

    • @JM-zg2jg
      @JM-zg2jg 2 роки тому +4

      The biggest problem people overlook is the strength of “nano” machines.
      At those scales, binding energy’s in molecules far outstrip the energy capacity of an individual nano scale machine.
      Likely we will rely on a combination of chemistry principles and atomic scale 3d printing to produce our nano machines. Nano machines are highly unlikely to be able to disassemble materials due to binding strength. So they won’t be much use for complex building projects either.

    • @GizzyDillespee
      @GizzyDillespee 2 роки тому +1

      We need to start building with the fabric of space/time itself

  • @coolbeansdude2528
    @coolbeansdude2528 2 роки тому +36

    There’s nothing I love more than starting my morning with some big brain entertainment!! Thank you joe 💜

  • @ELWikiriWick
    @ELWikiriWick 2 роки тому

    Thanks for this video.

  • @dianawilson2534
    @dianawilson2534 2 роки тому

    Dude you are funny and filled with so many answers and just enough questions to keep ME returning for more .. thank you to SOPHIA for directing me to you or did she put you in my Path .. I love your presentation and content ~

  • @cill0rable
    @cill0rable 2 роки тому +3

    Once again, you were beat out on the subject by a day with Sabine's take on nano-bots!! LOL just no luck Joe. I like your take on things though, so keep up the awesome work.

  • @joyl7842
    @joyl7842 2 роки тому +10

    The problem with nanotechnology in computers is that it might not be small enough!
    We need a whole new way to manipulate matter at even smaller scales than the nanometer because we're already at the limit of what nanotech can do in computers.
    Edit: aaaand Joe just narrated me typing this comment 😆

    • @joescott
      @joescott  2 роки тому +4

      HA! I knew I'd catch someone!

    • @PeterBoggild
      @PeterBoggild 2 роки тому +1

      Well - my students do build materials up atomic layer by atomic layer in labs, using graphene and some of its many “family relatives” - just like Feynman predicted. Also, a modern iphone is packed with many kinds of bona fide nanotechnology. Is iPhone a practical application? I would say it is.

  • @adamreynolds3863
    @adamreynolds3863 2 роки тому +1

    DUDE THIS VIDEO IS AWESOME!

  • @mike-Occslong
    @mike-Occslong 2 роки тому

    Good vid joee 👍

  • @salmongod9115
    @salmongod9115 2 роки тому +3

    Surprised at no mention of Drexler. He was the person who introduced me to the idea nanotechnology, and got me sincerely interested in transhumanism as something possible within my lifetime when I was a teenager in the late 90's. I wrote my senior english class research paper on nanotechnology, mostly referencing him. I know he's kind of not respected anymore, due to not having practical ideas. But I don't think it can be argued that he wasn't a very influential figure, who spurred a lot of interest and energy into the development of nanotechnology.

  • @GhostFS
    @GhostFS 2 роки тому +4

    Ooo my field. The part about unexpected health effect made me a bit Anxious... considering ho much nano stuff I have handled as unexperienced student in stil pinioning phase :D
    Made my Master thesis on quantum dot. Phd on Nanostructured organic semiconductors. Also made some sortie on carbon nanotubes. Most for Photovoltaic application but also on sensors, catalyst and metamaterials. So participated in this slow, hard but steady revolution from 2007 to 2017 before changing sector.

  • @HowlinMadBob
    @HowlinMadBob 2 роки тому

    YOU ROCK MY WORLD JOE. KINDA SCARY BUT, I GET ALMOST ALL MY SCIENCE TYPE INFO FROM YOU BASICALLY.

  • @adriandeneler2343
    @adriandeneler2343 2 роки тому

    i like your take on alot, i allways look forword to the next show. love ya. thx

    • @keiths.taylor5293
      @keiths.taylor5293 2 роки тому

      Joe you didn't tell about nanobugged. the use of nano AM Crystal radio and etangled particles in the crystal which has been done by Oxford University since the late '80s and the internet particles according to Harvard are sensitive to a change in define of neurons and sensor in the a.m. crystal radio and another size coupled with a constituent that combines with the nervous system put it in your food or drink and it uses the iron crystal radio to pick up the vibrations in sound waves and the Ben Tangled particles I said anything Tangled it's going to say anything but entangled there you go are picking up the change in neurons so the same batch of nanobugges being the more metal you add for the antenna of the young crystal radio changes the frequency so everyone's not on the same hurtz and when I say everyone I mean anyone who happens to be nanobugged anyway the same batch is in the ra quantum computer and it matches the frequency of the iron crystal radio Crystal vibrating which is the same that the person is hearing and thinking to the changing neurons once it maps out that person's phonics to neuron change it needs not to listen to the vibration it changes the neuron change into vibration that it remembers when you think the computer talks if you happen to be then about 31 Crystal radio God voices because they vibration of the crystal on the little hairs inside that second fluid inside your ear can seem like sounds from the outside in. all this technology in pieces have been documented if I figured out how to combine I ain't the only one . read the book nanobugged the true story of today's nanotechnology 10 years ago

  • @DeltaNovum
    @DeltaNovum 2 роки тому +31

    Together with certain non addictive substances Joe Scotts infotainment helps me keep my sanity in an insane world! Thanks Joe

    • @aodigital9421
      @aodigital9421 2 роки тому +1

      You are the one that is insaneo!

    • @DeltaNovum
      @DeltaNovum 2 роки тому

      @@aodigital9421 it's all a matter of perspective.

    • @aodigital9421
      @aodigital9421 2 роки тому +2

      @@DeltaNovum Style.

    • @joescott
      @joescott  2 роки тому +7

      I do try to make my videos as addictive as possible.

    • @DeltaNovum
      @DeltaNovum 2 роки тому

      @@joescott Well it's my only addiction so job well done!

  • @davidanderson_surrey_bc
    @davidanderson_surrey_bc 2 роки тому +3

    For a couple of pretty entertaining treatments of the Grey Goo phenomenon, may I recommend later seasons of Stargate: SGI, and the second season of Lexx.

    • @madcow3417
      @madcow3417 2 роки тому

      I was just thinking about Deep Space 9. Are the founders evolved intelligent grey goo?

  • @TacoMighty
    @TacoMighty 2 роки тому

    Thanks again, Joe!

  • @creatrixpe4441
    @creatrixpe4441 2 роки тому

    1:09 First time in a while situation where I might say LOL describing my reaction, while actually laughing aloud rather than just saying it. Thank you for that, sir.

  • @unums
    @unums 2 роки тому +7

    It’s the “theoretical limit” so once we’re there in technology we will have the freedom to think about it more practically.
    I mean *in theory* we could find a way to manipulate Quantum Fluctuations that make up Atoms at the sub-atomic scale that work as transistors, etc.

    • @eugenemartone7023
      @eugenemartone7023 2 роки тому

      Won’t Heisenberg mess you up though? In theory I mean.

    • @krashd
      @krashd 2 роки тому +4

      @@eugenemartone7023 Heisenberg is still under house arrest for messing up the last guy.

  • @EricStott
    @EricStott 2 роки тому +5

    Are you going to do a separate video about the things that Richard Feynman did?

    • @PizikSpaeth
      @PizikSpaeth 2 роки тому +1

      Ooohhh, "Joe Reacts to... Richard Feynman: Fun To Imagine" :D

    • @joescott
      @joescott  2 роки тому

      Hmm... Maybe a short bio video on him would be cool. He just keeps popping up.

    • @EricStott
      @EricStott 2 роки тому +1

      @@joescott That would be a cool one to watch! You have to tell some of his funny stories that he relays in his book: "What Do You Care What Other People Think?": Further Adventures of a Curious Character

  • @eddiehazard3340
    @eddiehazard3340 2 роки тому +2

    Hi Joe, we like your videos and use them for homeschool- long time subscribers.
    We just joined Curiosity Stream under your link to also help support you further.
    Please keep the great videos coming, and thank you for not dropping F-bombs constantly, talking about bizarre sexual acts or other things we don't typically include our homeschool day. Keep the quality content coming; your dry sense of humor is appreciated!

    • @n111254789
      @n111254789 2 роки тому

      If you limit education to people who happen to express emotion more severely by cursing you're doing a disservice to your children. Learning to set apart differences in ideals to communicate and benefit from others you disagree with on some things, but do agree with on others is an important thing to learn in such a polarizing time. The earlier a kid learns to be uphold ideals of their own despite what others do the better off they will be in the age of social media. Limiting exposure is setting them up for being totally unprepared when they aren't under your guidance and your degree of influence on them will end earlier than you expect.

    • @eddiehazard3340
      @eddiehazard3340 2 роки тому

      @@n111254789 Yeah Jack, you took me way too extremely. I appreciate your thoughts. I'd still rather keep the wild stuff my kid sees in the format of things like "Venture Brothers" and perhaps not from his educators. Thanks again for your input.

  • @birgerjohansson8010
    @birgerjohansson8010 2 роки тому +1

    On the other side of the Iron Curtain where Feynman's lecture was unknown, Stanislaw Lem predicted the future importance of micro- and nanotech in his (nonfiction) Summa Technologia (Krakow, 1966).

  • @GoodOneLULE
    @GoodOneLULE 2 роки тому +8

    Can't wait for the invention of nanomachines that hardens in response to physical trauma.

    • @carlosgaspar8447
      @carlosgaspar8447 2 роки тому +1

      sounds like something M. Lewinsky was working on.

  • @tgazo5874
    @tgazo5874 Рік тому +5

    Glad you mentioned dangers, but why not mention soda, sun screen, food dyes, etc? Or how many non- fda approved nano products enter our markeplace each week?
    You should do a crossover on nanotech and aging, btw

  • @MrHighRaw
    @MrHighRaw 2 роки тому

    Haven't watch one of your videos in a while. They just stopped coming up on my feed and I forgot to look. Still as awesome as ever though :D

  • @doctorjules187
    @doctorjules187 2 роки тому

    You da bomb Joe, as always.

  • @whatthefunction9140
    @whatthefunction9140 2 роки тому +3

    My dream for many years:
    Nanobot that latch on to each of my my neurons to inhance its functionally and persist after the cell dies. Over time I would have a silicon brain.

  • @___Six___
    @___Six___ 2 роки тому +3

    Viruses and deseases: Why wont you die?!?!
    Me: *NANOMACHINES SON!*

  • @X1Y0Z0
    @X1Y0Z0 2 роки тому

    Informative!!

  • @justinjja2
    @justinjja2 2 роки тому

    0:15 Literally that exact scene came to mind, nice.

  • @Jo-bs2uu
    @Jo-bs2uu Рік тому +3

    Metal Girl Revengence, Son

  • @andybeans5790
    @andybeans5790 2 роки тому +6

    The funny thing about the electricity generating floor tiles is that it's not free energy, you're actually making the people walking around expend more energy working against the sponginess of the tiles. It's the start of the Matrix.

    • @Sivanot
      @Sivanot 2 роки тому

      Might not be free energy, but it's a decent way to get back some energy from work that wouldn't be used other than in walking lol

    • @krashd
      @krashd 2 роки тому

      We already walk around on spongy surfaces though since we need to cushion our footfalls to avoid damaging our feet and wearing out the floor, the former is solved by our padded feet and padded footwear and the latter by floor coverings like carpet or linoleum. Also energy-providing surfaces are not noticeably spongy so they would be imperceptible from a regular floor covering.

  • @deepview3296
    @deepview3296 2 роки тому

    love this channel

  • @TrebleSketch
    @TrebleSketch 2 роки тому

    Joe, regarding transistors at 5:45. They have not gone down to 5nm in size, but roughly 30-50nm in size (differ between manufacturing company).
    The name "5nm" is only a process node, the name for how transistors are made and is different between each company (TSMC vs Samsung vs Intel, etc).

  • @Jana-fp8qp
    @Jana-fp8qp 2 роки тому +3

    What, what? What did he say at 12:59 "This is what is happening at various trials around world" has got to be the greatest understatement ever. Joe, got to love how you blindly participate in the machine!

    • @someGuy-os3kg
      @someGuy-os3kg 2 роки тому

      So true😔, and most others

    • @krashd
      @krashd 2 роки тому

      I don't see how that is an understatement. He said 'various' and there _are_ several trials going on...

    • @n111254789
      @n111254789 2 роки тому +1

      What he stated was a fact. He said nothing false and he isn't participating in any 'machine' he's discussing areas nanotechnology is being used and that is an area. There are much more indepth trials aside from mrna that isn't a trial that is a vaccine that was created. Whether or not you agree on its efficacy or mandates is a separate topic. But what he is describing is on a different level than what companies like Pfizer are doing now for instance.

  • @chrispy1398
    @chrispy1398 2 роки тому +3

    Just a little joke: Back in college a group of friends and I would make the joke: "Carbon nano tubes are really [freakin'] light. But photon nano tubes are REALLY [freakin'] LIGHT!"

  • @buzzlightyearg3580
    @buzzlightyearg3580 2 роки тому

    Great coverage on nanotechnology

  • @katherinegilks3880
    @katherinegilks3880 2 роки тому

    Powering stadiums or dance clubs (or at least extra bits like lights and such) with the floor would be a great idea. It would also be awesome if they could harness the crowd energy from cheers, whistling, applause, etc.

  • @kelvinhbo
    @kelvinhbo 2 роки тому +7

    So Where Exactly Are We With Nanotechnology?
    Well Joe, half of the country doesn't think vaccines do anything, so we have a long long long way to go before we can even start talking about nano technology.

    • @michaelquinlan2121
      @michaelquinlan2121 2 роки тому +2

      But the 'vaccines' are doing a lot (just maybe not what you were told.)

    • @alexh1355
      @alexh1355 2 роки тому

      @@michaelquinlan2121 oooooh spooky

    • @scroopynooperz9051
      @scroopynooperz9051 2 роки тому

      Lol why do you think they are so eager to get EVERYONE injected with a non long term tested vaccine?
      Trying to bypass individual choice and body autonomy in the process.
      Their reasoning for wanting to have everyone vaccinated just doesn't hold water when natural immunity has been shown as superior.
      Thus one has to wonder why politicians are their pharmaceutical handlers are trying to rewrite known medical science & protocol.
      Either it's purely for the big universally mandated payday (at the expense of the tax payer) or there could other more insidious reasons.

    • @n111254789
      @n111254789 2 роки тому

      Wellp I am fully vaccinated and got the variant of covid I was supposed to be mostly immune to. It didn't reduce symptoms and I was in the hospital for nearly a month pretty healthy fella too I race dirt bikes and shoot basketball. Don't smoke, don't drink, no drugs, only issues I got are depression and my appendix and gallbladder had to be removed. The vaccine was rushed and no one should deny that as it was admitted to being rushed and it is only allowed to be distributed due to special circumstances granted by the fda. This isn't a normal development cycle and it didn't work for me and two others I know personally so blindly supporting something so new is a bad idea and the long term effects is unknown. What I've stated so far are facts. Essentially calling someone who is skeptical ignorant doesn't work in a lot of cases this being one of them.

    • @n111254789
      @n111254789 2 роки тому

      And nanotechnology already exists and is being developed so we can and have been talking about it for decades now.

  • @robertson.6110
    @robertson.6110 2 роки тому +23

    The pandemic came and taught everyone the importance of having multiple stream of income, unfortunately having a nice paying job doesn't mean you are financial secured anymore. So we all need to put in an etra-income earning chance, like investment.

    • @patrickgodwin8947
      @patrickgodwin8947 2 роки тому +1

      It requires money to make money this is the best secret I have ever heard we don’t make money we make multiple money.

    • @bernyjackson9245
      @bernyjackson9245 2 роки тому

      Interesting. I have a lump sum doing absolutely nothing at all in my bank account, I wanna get something started with it, any reasonable ideal?

    • @archivealexander1952
      @archivealexander1952 2 роки тому

      My crypto mentor Mr Andrew Jordan, you may have come across him on a few interviews I invested $3000 last two weeks and it profited me $11,410 a higher success.

    • @theresasidneyy5838
      @theresasidneyy5838 2 роки тому

      please 🙏 tell me how i can contact Mr Andrew Jordan I've lost alot of money trying to trade on my own😭

    • @cookpatrick.9737
      @cookpatrick.9737 2 роки тому +2

      ꧁༺༻꧂⌣༒𝟏𝟐𝟏𝟑𝟑𝟒𝟎𝟓𝟒𝟔𝟏⌣꧁༺༻꧂

  • @AlexSchendel
    @AlexSchendel 2 роки тому

    Important note about transistors is that once we hit a gate length of ~30nm, the node name no longer reflected any physical measurement of the transistor, so a "5nm" transistor is "5nm planar equivalent" roughly. As in, we have used FinFETs to scale transistors beyond what planar transistors could achieve and so although we still have transistors with physical measurements between 20-30nm, the performance and density of these transistors are roughly equivalent to a 5nm planar transistor.

  • @joemulkerins5250
    @joemulkerins5250 2 роки тому

    I will watch the ad just for how smooth that transition was 😂👍

  • @theblackswan2373
    @theblackswan2373 2 роки тому

    Definitely worth the rewatch....

  • @godsoloved24
    @godsoloved24 2 роки тому

    Joe, can you do a video on time zones? Specifically, when mankind realized that different locations had different local times, and what caused the creation of time zones?

  • @caryd67
    @caryd67 2 роки тому

    Some excellent audio references in this episode 👍🏻

  • @ivanostellato9478
    @ivanostellato9478 Рік тому

    another good point solids versus hollows ... a paper with holes cut out is almost as string but stacked the holed one is stronger relative to its weight

  • @Tony-vj9xu
    @Tony-vj9xu 2 роки тому +1

    Amazing Poison plug.. Rose/Thorn lol.. Salute Sir !

  • @NRNF1776
    @NRNF1776 2 роки тому +1

    I've been watching Joe's channel for 8 or so years now, and I honestly think he's one of the best UA-camrs out there... I think its crazy some idiots have 10 and 13 million subscribers, and he has under 1.5 only... But yea, the world is a weird place...
    Love you Joe!

    • @ethanstump
      @ethanstump 2 роки тому +1

      appealing to the lowest common dominator, means you have a crap ton of exposure to the lowest common denominator. in other words, those people who have millions of followers usually have low quality fans who are either toxic, idiotic. i'm not saying that has to be the case, however i do think that after a certain point of growth, it really doesn't matter to people. i'd rather have a good quality of people, than a large amount of people.

  • @ericmehoke8362
    @ericmehoke8362 2 роки тому

    That was cool! Even though the floor idea is probably the lesser impactful one, I think it is very neat.

  • @BG101UK
    @BG101UK 2 роки тому

    11:52 onwards: "The Grey Goo Effect" reminds me of the episode of Futurama where Bender clones into smaller and smaller duplicates, eventually entering the water stream etc.. ☺

  • @thecoobs8820
    @thecoobs8820 2 роки тому

    Been wondering about this lately

  • @ericparrish1515
    @ericparrish1515 2 роки тому

    I'm really glad you're ahead of the game on this technology. Not sure about the feed tho.

  • @andrewcapilli8379
    @andrewcapilli8379 2 роки тому

    I love the little jokes and the skits you put in .
    Clone skit was funny...
    Isthmus...
    Just makes me smile.
    My ex partner made me homeless.
    I had to live in my car for a year.
    Obviously with no TV......my phone and UA-cam were my go to at night.
    You kept me company and on many occasions the only time I had a smile on my face that night after having nothing to smile about all day.
    thank you Joe.🙏🙏
    When you have a smile on your face whilst learning something it makes it that much funner.
    Don't change.
    Keep doing what you're doing.
    "This moment of existential dread is brought to you by Curiosity Stream"
    🇦🇺🤔🙏🙏🤙👍💪

  • @corinaprinkeycp
    @corinaprinkeycp Рік тому

    Could you do a video on Richard Feynman? 🙏 your videos are always so good! Thank you for your creations Joe.

  • @Video-Game-OST-HQ
    @Video-Game-OST-HQ 2 роки тому

    I used to act on Japanese TV on the side for supplement income and I had a few jobs with a woman from Russia who was using acting to supplement her own income while she studied there in Tokyo. She was studying nanotechnology at a university, and it leads me to a useful suggestion for future videos: A note about how those of us interested in the field can get into it. Where should we study? How do we get into these fields?
    I’ve become bored of my 18 years in the video-game industry and haven’t worked in over a year while I try to find what else interests me and where my future should point, and when you present a video like this it makes me dream of new horizons!

  • @Doozler
    @Doozler Рік тому

    Keep making posts like this

  • @bradleycyrway8651
    @bradleycyrway8651 2 роки тому

    You got me on that first mind blow..

  • @greedowins2917
    @greedowins2917 2 роки тому

    That closing pun was 10/10

  • @Zanzopan
    @Zanzopan 2 роки тому

    You had to have teratoma right when I was eating. I assumed I was ok to eat with this video. Thanks Joe.

  • @ftumschk
    @ftumschk 2 роки тому

    8:50 The Fishy TV music was the theme from the "Blenny Eel" show, of course.

  • @clifffarion7448
    @clifffarion7448 Рік тому

    For those who are interested in this end of technology you might want to have a look at a company called Integran Technologies. I was honored to have a tour of their facility and see some of what they have done and what they can do. They have a very large list of prestigious clients with a wide variety of applications. As a nerd, it gives me the "Warm Fuzzies "when I think about what they do. They mostly into material coatings.

  • @MrKittykat111
    @MrKittykat111 2 роки тому +1

    Every door in every building should be spring loaded, self closing equipped and linked to a dynamo. We're some of the the most efficient generators at our disposal.

  • @dejaae8065
    @dejaae8065 2 роки тому

    Joe many celebrities and comedians are coming out and talking about there ‘tripping’ experiences on a series i’ve seen on TikTok. What are your thoughts on psychedelics? have you ever tried them?

  • @kalon2023
    @kalon2023 Рік тому

    Thanks you!

  • @trstmeimadctr
    @trstmeimadctr 2 роки тому

    The best way to visualize scale of ANYTHING is to go look up the demo "Scale of the Universe 2". It let's you slide along a logarithmic scale down from the planck length all the way to the size of the observable universe. When I saw it 10-ish years ago it totally changed my understanding of scale.

  • @PatrickGoodspeed
    @PatrickGoodspeed 2 роки тому +1

    Another researcher/writer to look into on nanotechnology is Eric Drexler. He wrote the book "Engines of Creation" (1986.) Going into a detailed discussion on nanotechnology in terms that's understandable to the average person (highly recommend.)

  • @derasor
    @derasor 2 роки тому

    Thanks!

  • @annabelsmart5305
    @annabelsmart5305 Рік тому

    ‘paperclip’ was an apt metaphor to use.

  • @VikingTeddy
    @VikingTeddy 2 роки тому

    You can find the universal paperclip machine online as a browser or mobile game. It's wicked fun, I recommend for any incremental game enthusiasts.

  • @alexandermadu3801
    @alexandermadu3801 2 роки тому

    Your sarcasm has earned you a new subscriber 😹😹