@@DavidM-um2uk It wouldn't be totally unnecessary - It would help reduce weight a little, and a little goes a long way for Olympic shooters. Nonetheless it does add somewhat of a niche comedic touch to the design. Certainly better than a big flat vacant block of steel laying there in the middle of an otherwise pleasant looking 'revolver'.
That thing is messing with my brain lol Its like staring at one of those optical illusion things. "And if you turn it this way, youll see that its actually...a swan."
Ruger made a single shot from their Blackhawk frame back in the 60s. They called it the Hawkeye and chambered it for .256 Winchester magnum. They didn't make many and are fairly rare today. If you ever see one it might make a cool video.
I saw one years ago. The seller said that the value was not that high due to the pistol being drilled and tapped for telescopic sight mounts. Later research revealed that the Hawkeye series were factory drilled and tapped. I did not have the money for that pistol in 1984.
The guy already has some magic going on where he is more accurate then the mechanical accuracy of the firearms he uses, so if anyone can use the fractions of seconds reduced lock time and very slight accuracy improvement over having a cylinder gap, it would be him.
Great work as usual Ian! Just one tip - there's no such thing as a "partridge" sight. What you're referring to is actually a "Patridge" sight, named after an E. E. Patridge from the 19th century. Keep up the great work - your breadth of firearms knowledge is unmatched!
My grandfather had something similar, but I seem to recall it was a top break S&W, again, single shot, single action with a flat fixed "cylinder". Grampa used it as a trapping pistol, in Northern Maine. I suspect my cousin has it.
I just had to tell you that I love the videos you put out. I've actually learned a ton about guns I thought I knew so I wanna say thank you for that. Can't put a price on knowledge.
Thanks lan! I got to handle a second type of this pistol 25 yrs ago. And didn't know much about it. It hung on the wall of the hardware store/gas station/sporting goods store where l worked at the time. God Bless mom and pop stores in rural Colorado.
It Was Made Specifically for the slow fire segment in bullseye competition; the timed (five shots in 20 seconds) and rapid fire (five shots in 10 seconds) portions of the match; were still shot with the officers model target.
Camp Perry is right by my house. It’s pretty neat place. And we had a charter boat it was always crazy you had to be careful fishing by there, there was a no go zone due to live rounds.
I have a picture of my dad at Camp Perry in his pre war Smokey Bear hat. He never said so but I think the hat had something to do with his joining. I guess the hats are lucky he's standing next to a guy that would become the father of his son's wife.......they didn't cross paths again till bro started dating. Their is something really elegant about that pistol, the balance, simplicity and look of the metal. I would definitely buy it just as a knick knack talk piece. I guess I would put it on the wall above the gold brick I use as a door stop.
The first design flaw I have spotted as a target shooter myself, is the front sight and rear sight is on two different moving parts of the gun. That is big no-no in a target pistol. No matter how tight it locks, both sights should have been installed solidly in relation to the barrel.
Ian - thanks, that's a very interesting design. It was interesting to learn how rare those are. In contrast, Webley .22LR single shot target pistols were commonplace in the UK. When I moved "up" from air pistols in the early 1980s, most clubs used a variety of different Webley models for initial training and some club members used them for slow fire comptetitions too. As private owners however, most of us only bought semi-autos, so we could also shoot in rapid fire competitions.
They missed the chance to make it a flipping 2 shot... I understand the point of it being monolithic for accuracy but still a 2 shot would be cool just because
@@SHAGG13 Having something with a coach gun style action and two barrels side by side would indeed be a nice fun gun. At, ahem, Fenland Polytechnic, we found that .22 rimfire shot shells worked great in our Webleys but were problematic in semi autos. By the time I was there, no working .22 revolvers were available for us to try.
If your objective is maximizing accuracy, why would you have everything swing away from the rear sight and introduce that potential play between the two sights?
Well, I'd assume because the long axis with an extremely positive mechanical lock provided by the single rotational point, and the fact that the sight bases are fixed and all provides for less margin of error than having a (relatively) short breech block/"cylinder" or side tilting breech or whatever, that was having to align to the barrel/breech as well as the hammer, and the resulting gap along with the (seeming) higher potential for "wobble" in the fit. But I really couldn't say for sure?
Troy, Something tilt barrel, with both sights mounted on barrel, like the Thompson Center Contender, would be slightly more accurate, if you are really going for it. It would be marginal, but if you were in a competition, every little bit counts. They would have done better on this colt, if they had been able to mount both the front and rear sights on the barrel. Even minutely, the front sight can vary in alignment with the rear sight on this pistol, due to thermal expansion or slight variances in the locking mechanism.
@@Gun4Freedom With the tolerance in this pistol the amount of misalignment would be minimal. I had the pleasure of shooting one of these units at Camp Perry back in the 70s, shoot a 100 with 9X.
In the early 1960's I worked at a sporting goods store after school. I remember the store manager trading for one of these pistols. We didn't really know what it was and just thought of it as a cheapened version of a revolver. It set in our pistol case for sale at something like $12 or $15 for over a year. This was at a time when we sold new Model 94 Winchesters for $95. I sure wish I had bought it.
Serial Number 35! 😎 I have a pre-Camp Perry with a 3xx serial number. The “Camp Perry” marking did *not* appear on the 1926 production guns and must have been added in 1927 when your gun returned to Hartford. Ian… buddy… “partridge front sight”? PATRIDGE (Only one “r”)
They need to remake it, that be a great 22 to have. With fiber optics, 10" barrel, bentz chamber, hogue grips & a bull barrel either threaded or unthreaded.
Very much like S&W's target .22. That was a tip up design that did not have a swing out cylinder so was potentially more accurate. I am fortunate enough to have one of those, spendy though it was.
I wasn't 100% paying attention to what Ian was saying, and I was just thinking "Oh, its just a normal revolver with a flat "cylinder" instead of a stock 6-shot cylinder" Then 4:11 happened and he physically twisted the "cylinder" and barrel assembly in tandem to the side If you could see the look on my face
Honestly, I would love to see a review and shooting, of the H&R (yes, that H&R) Model 195 USRA pistol, which according to the internet, was the superior single shot target pistol.
Hey Ian, I have a question regarding ~1880's firearm industry. I know that before the 1870's the US was not a huge contender in global politics or industry, and wouldnt become really influential until after 1900 (at least to my understanding) But I noticed that in your ww1 and turn of the century gun videos that the US seems to be a major producer for firearms for major nations around the world from providing high grade and capacity machinery for france for the Lebel, to producing hundreds of thousands of Mosins and 1895's for Russia, Remington split breech's for everyone etc. At that point in time was the US a major player in firearm manufacture or design? Or were they more influential than I realized in general?
Buy it Ian. I know you can kick butt with a specialized handgun like this one. I am doing a review on a Ruger SR22 and wish it was as accurate as this looks.
2500? thats ... actually quite excellent for a high end target pistol IMO. There are olympic re-curve bows which don't sell that much today with a significantly larger market.
I'm surprised that they fitted a coil mainspring to reduce lock time. I had understood the opposite to be true. I have always read that flat springs give a shorter lock time, and coil springs are more dependable because they are less prone to breakage and can often continue to work even when broken. I guess you learn something new every day.
A shop I worked at had a S&W topbreak in similar style (monolithic singleshot). Very cool, but expensive, and I was young and poor. I'm sure the Colt is mechanically superior, but the Smith was really cool.
Jack of all trades vs master of one. Any master craftsmen commands much more for his work than a lesser skilled craftsmen despite him knowing more skills that are in different fields or work. You see this with any highend market
I have a 1931 Camp Perry that cost me $1856 in 2017. I have not shot it yet. I left it with my brother. He is supposed to test fire it. I should call him.
Curious about the repeatable zero on a windage and elevation adjustable sight on separately moving parts. I almost feel like I'd want both mounted to the barrel and "cylinder", though I suppose at these ranges it might not make that much difference.
My local dealer had one for a hot minute. It was a neat gun. We just couldn’t really justify the price for a single shot 22. But it sold quickly. So it was priced correctly. -Marky
I was surprised and pleased to see the barrel/chamber was monolithic. But I too would not buy the gun were I a target shooter at the time. I would opt for a revolver. The extra rounds make it more practical. Also, I would imagine a competitive shooter would participate in multiple categories. To create a design that would prevent use in any other category would be a nuisance in itself.
Interesting. I would love to shoot it back to back with my S&W Model K-22 Masterpiece. It's hands down the most accurate and smooth shooting revolver I've ever shot. (Well, almost. I also have a Model 15 Combat Masterpiece in .38 special that's pretty damn smooth, but the Model 17 shoots better groups.)
*Question:* They went to all this trouble (lots of machining, single shot etc.) for a "pretty" target pistol with good accuracy, and they didn't mount the rear sight on the barrel/chamber block. Wouldn't that be an obvious and easy improvement? (Then the tightness of the locking of the barrel to the frame wouldn't be so critical, right?)
Question wouldn't that make the sight farther away from your eye? And also make the sight radius shorter? Yes obviously persoanally I would want a gun with sights mounted on the barrel its obvious it would be more accurate.
Isn't the front sight called a PATridge not PARTridge. I know I have to catch myself all the time from calling it a partridge sight. Similar to Mosin Nagant not a Moison Nagant.
Single Shot Revolver
*gets intrigued*
A one-bullet cylinder. It still spins, but the axis of rotation is the middle of the primer.
I laughed harder than I should have at that.
@@Lazyguy22 there's only one chamber still :p
I think the "fake" cylinder fluting was a nice touch.
It's very nice, especially since it's unnecessary for function. Extra machining steps for arts sake.
@@DavidM-um2uk It wouldn't be totally unnecessary - It would help reduce weight a little, and a little goes a long way for Olympic shooters. Nonetheless it does add somewhat of a niche comedic touch to the design. Certainly better than a big flat vacant block of steel laying there in the middle of an otherwise pleasant looking 'revolver'.
The oddity is why I clicked.
It looks good, I give props to the designer.
That thing is messing with my brain lol Its like staring at one of those optical illusion things. "And if you turn it this way, youll see that its actually...a swan."
Ruger made a single shot from their Blackhawk frame back in the 60s. They called it the Hawkeye and chambered it for .256 Winchester magnum. They didn't make many and are fairly rare today. If you ever see one it might make a cool video.
Came here to post this. I would LOVE to see a video on this gun and/or caliber.
I totes wanna see that done too.
I am quite positive there is a Ruger Hawkeye at the Evergreen Aviation and Space Museum in McMinnville, Oregon.
I saw one years ago. The seller said that the value was not that high due to the pistol being drilled and tapped for telescopic sight mounts.
Later research revealed that the Hawkeye series were factory drilled and tapped.
I did not have the money for that pistol in 1984.
i can almost hear 22plinkster drooling over this. Personally i think it would go quite well with what he does.
That was the first person I was thinking of myself lol!
The guy already has some magic going on where he is more accurate then the mechanical accuracy of the firearms he uses, so if anyone can use the fractions of seconds reduced lock time and very slight accuracy improvement over having a cylinder gap, it would be him.
yh this is definitly a bit of him hes loving his volquartzen at the moment
My dad inherited one of these camp perrys from my grand father after he passed away. Its a fun gun to shoot. Very accurate!
Take a moment to see what I'm featuring on my channel regarding firearms that you won't see in gunstores normally :)
Colt sent the revolver to the Hydraulic Press Channel, huh...
I'm just glad he didn't put it in the worm maker 5000000
For today's extra content we have this revolver. It is extremely dangerous and can attack at any moment, so we must deal with it.
Great work as usual Ian! Just one tip - there's no such thing as a "partridge" sight. What you're referring to is actually a "Patridge" sight, named after an E. E. Patridge from the 19th century. Keep up the great work - your breadth of firearms knowledge is unmatched!
My grandfather had something similar, but I seem to recall it was a top break S&W, again, single shot, single action with a flat fixed "cylinder".
Grampa used it as a trapping pistol, in Northern Maine. I suspect my cousin has it.
I just had to tell you that I love the videos you put out. I've actually learned a ton about guns I thought I knew so I wanna say thank you for that. Can't put a price on knowledge.
Hello sir! Take a moment to see what I'm featuring on my channel regarding firearms that you won't see in gunstores normally :)
Ian I gotta thank you, your videos helped me share my love of firearms with my girlfriend and now we bond over your videos!
The blueing looks nice for it's age.
05:19 Wow the machining is simply amazing. The seam between the two parts are perfectly fit.
Thanks lan! I got to handle a second type of this pistol 25 yrs ago. And didn't know much about it. It hung on the wall of the hardware store/gas station/sporting goods store where l worked at the time. God Bless mom and pop stores in rural Colorado.
Weirdly beautiful gun.
It Was Made Specifically for the slow fire segment in bullseye competition; the timed (five shots in 20 seconds) and rapid fire (five shots in 10 seconds) portions of the match; were still shot with the officers model target.
Beautiful engineering ...
It’s the big iron
Shoot the revolver
Shoot it again
My Johnny
*single iron
Thanks!
Camp Perry is right by my house. It’s pretty neat place. And we had a charter boat it was always crazy you had to be careful fishing by there, there was a no go zone due to live rounds.
I have a picture of my dad at Camp Perry in his pre war Smokey Bear hat. He never said so but I think the hat had something to do with his joining. I guess the hats are lucky he's standing next to a guy that would become the father of his son's wife.......they didn't cross paths again till bro started dating. Their is something really elegant about that pistol, the balance, simplicity and look of the metal. I would definitely buy it just as a knick knack talk piece. I guess I would put it on the wall above the gold brick I use as a door stop.
The first design flaw I have spotted as a target shooter myself, is the front sight and rear sight is on two different moving parts of the gun. That is big no-no in a target pistol. No matter how tight it locks, both sights should have been installed solidly in relation to the barrel.
Ian - thanks, that's a very interesting design.
It was interesting to learn how rare those are.
In contrast, Webley .22LR single shot target pistols were commonplace in the UK.
When I moved "up" from air pistols in the early 1980s, most clubs used a variety of different Webley models for initial training and some club members used them for slow fire comptetitions too.
As private owners however, most of us only bought semi-autos, so we could also shoot in rapid fire competitions.
Take a moment to see what I'm featuring on my channel regarding firearms that you won't see in gunstores normally :) enjoy :)
and nowdays are olympic team has to practice in france its a joke
They missed the chance to make it a flipping 2 shot... I understand the point of it being monolithic for accuracy but still a 2 shot would be cool just because
@@SHAGG13 Having something with a coach gun style action and two barrels side by side would indeed be a nice fun gun.
At, ahem, Fenland Polytechnic, we found that .22 rimfire shot shells worked great in our Webleys but were problematic in semi autos. By the time I was there, no working .22 revolvers were available for us to try.
I know it is an expensive and desirable collectible. Having said that, it would make a heck of a squirrel gun.
As a competitive pistol shooter and a history nerd I’ve always wanted one
Hi! Take a moment to see what I'm featuring on my channel regarding firearms that you won't see in gunstores normally :)
Might know where one is
Patridge sight. I said it wrong for years. The T is before the R. Now that's geeky!
If your objective is maximizing accuracy, why would you have everything swing away from the rear sight and introduce that potential play between the two sights?
Well, I'd assume because the long axis with an extremely positive mechanical lock provided by the single rotational point, and the fact that the sight bases are fixed and all provides for less margin of error than having a (relatively) short breech block/"cylinder" or side tilting breech or whatever, that was having to align to the barrel/breech as well as the hammer, and the resulting gap along with the (seeming) higher potential for "wobble" in the fit. But I really couldn't say for sure?
Troy, Something tilt barrel, with both sights mounted on barrel, like the Thompson Center Contender, would be slightly more accurate, if you are really going for it. It would be marginal, but if you were in a competition, every little bit counts. They would have done better on this colt, if they had been able to mount both the front and rear sights on the barrel. Even minutely, the front sight can vary in alignment with the rear sight on this pistol, due to thermal expansion or slight variances in the locking mechanism.
I was thinking the same.
your comment made me think of my basic training M16 HAHA I had to literally twist to get it to align the sights.
@@Gun4Freedom With the tolerance in this pistol the amount of misalignment would be minimal. I had the pleasure of shooting one of these units at Camp Perry back in the 70s, shoot a 100 with 9X.
"My seed could gain no purchase upon the rocky slopes of her womb." Love the older use of the word 'purchase'!
its a neat mix of 'new' and 'old' technology you don't usually see make it out of prototyping. its 1880s in the back, 1920s in the front
S&W had a similar pistol in their Model of 1891/91. It was a break top using their Number 3 revolver frame.
I just got one on Gunbroker. It is sweeet.
In the early 1960's I worked at a sporting goods store after school. I remember the store manager trading for one of these pistols. We didn't really know what it was and just thought of it as a cheapened version of a revolver. It set in our pistol case for sale at something like $12 or $15 for over a year. This was at a time when we sold new Model 94 Winchesters for $95. I sure wish I had bought it.
This is a really nice looking pistol. One shot guns have a place in my heart
Thanks Ian, these videos are great.
Just wanted to say I love your videos and keep them coming:)
I could be a really good -western gunslinger- target shooter.
@Max Pain What's up with people in the comment section using suspension points in place of comas and periods?
Do you mean ellipsis? I've never heard them called "suspension points" before.
@@jic1 It's a nickname for ellipses. Just like how we call an eroteme a question mark.
I got the concept, I've just never heard that particular nickname before.
Good gun to cover. Nice video. Only 1'r' in patridge.
Snazzy looking design, any exuse to make a gun look like a revolver is good in my book ;p
I always wanted one. Such a cool period in target guns. I get very tired of the "Pray and Spray" type of shooting.
Serial Number 35! 😎 I have a pre-Camp Perry with a 3xx serial number. The “Camp Perry” marking did *not* appear on the 1926 production guns and must have been added in 1927 when your gun returned to Hartford.
Ian… buddy… “partridge front sight”? PATRIDGE (Only one “r”)
1:13
I heard they recently decided to add more HOps to the mix
It's a charming single shot pistol, but it will never replace the Thompson Contender in my heart.
Awesome video Ian. Thanx.
They need to remake it, that be a great 22 to have. With fiber optics, 10" barrel, bentz chamber, hogue grips & a bull barrel either threaded or unthreaded.
Very much like S&W's target .22. That was a tip up design that did not have a swing out cylinder so was potentially more accurate. I am fortunate enough to have one of those, spendy though it was.
Harrington and Richardson made a similar single shot pistol on what I believe was their single action 999 Sportsman frame.
That’s really incredible. Thanks for sharing gems like these.
I wasn't 100% paying attention to what Ian was saying, and I was just thinking "Oh, its just a normal revolver with a flat "cylinder" instead of a stock 6-shot cylinder"
Then 4:11 happened and he physically twisted the "cylinder" and barrel assembly in tandem to the side
If you could see the look on my face
Honestly, I would love to see a review and shooting, of the H&R (yes, that H&R) Model 195 USRA pistol, which according to the internet, was the superior single shot target pistol.
Hey Ian, I have a question regarding ~1880's firearm industry. I know that before the 1870's the US was not a huge contender in global politics or industry, and wouldnt become really influential until after 1900 (at least to my understanding) But I noticed that in your ww1 and turn of the century gun videos that the US seems to be a major producer for firearms for major nations around the world from providing high grade and capacity machinery for france for the Lebel, to producing hundreds of thousands of Mosins and 1895's for Russia, Remington split breech's for everyone etc. At that point in time was the US a major player in firearm manufacture or design? Or were they more influential than I realized in general?
that looks quite fun to target shoot with
Buy it Ian. I know you can kick butt with a specialized handgun like this one. I am doing a review on a Ruger SR22 and wish it was as accurate as this looks.
Saw one of these in Cabelas last week, now I know what it is
Back when Colt was leading the pack. I'd take something like this if it was still made.
6:06 - "Patridge," not "partridge" front sight.
You're crying "Fowl" on the bird connection Jay....?
One is for target shooting, the other is for birds in pear trees.
Ian Macfarlane I don't mean to be picky. I enjoy your work!
He still can't pronounce "Saint-Étienne" correctly...but tries to do a French accent for "Berthier". Unreal.
2500? thats ... actually quite excellent for a high end target pistol IMO. There are olympic re-curve bows which don't sell that much today with a significantly larger market.
This thing is cool as hell
Now I know what you're thinking, did he fire one shot or only one?
I'm surprised that they fitted a coil mainspring to reduce lock time.
I had understood the opposite to be true.
I have always read that flat springs give a shorter lock time, and coil springs are more dependable because they are less prone to breakage and can often continue to work even when broken.
I guess you learn something new every day.
A shop I worked at had a S&W topbreak in similar style (monolithic singleshot). Very cool, but expensive, and I was young and poor. I'm sure the Colt is mechanically superior, but the Smith was really cool.
I just bought one of the S&W Model 3 Perfect Target Single shot 22s for $460 on on GB and I can indeed confirm it is really cool.
The Savage 101 single-shot .22 pistol had a similar design.
Allow me some nitpicking. The angeled cut in the rear sight is to reduce glare. Not for getting more light through it. Good job anyway.
5 to 7 thousend dollars...pfffffff....that's a lot of money for a one trick pony...ehm.... Colt
Jack of all trades vs master of one. Any master craftsmen commands much more for his work than a lesser skilled craftsmen despite him knowing more skills that are in different fields or work. You see this with any highend market
you mean that's a lot of money to pony up!
... i'll get my hat.
Why do I imagine this little guy having a 3 or 4 shot mag in that tiltable "cylinder"-barrel combo now? Ôo
I have a 1931 Camp Perry that cost me $1856 in 2017.
I have not shot it yet. I left it with my brother. He is supposed to test fire it. I should call him.
Curious about the repeatable zero on a windage and elevation adjustable sight on separately moving parts. I almost feel like I'd want both mounted to the barrel and "cylinder", though I suppose at these ranges it might not make that much difference.
Nice choice for shooting practice with small caliber like an .22 Long Rifle single shot target pistol.
Patridge!
It's interesting that the inside of the grip panel appeared to say 34 when the gun serial number is 35.
Good morning crew
Good morning from Ukraine.
17:33 on my clock :)
+Florida Man
Mild summer, sunshine, +27 .. + 30 degrees Celsius ( in Kyiv)
Good Morning there! Take a moment to see what I'm featuring on my channel regarding firearms that you won't see in gunstores normally :)
@@DEATH_TO_TYRANTS you're gonna have fun! Thank you!
That is in great condition, but I wouldn't expect that a target pistol like that would see any rough service.
As someone who lives right next to Camp Perry VA, I thought this was some super assassin CIA revolver at first.
My local dealer had one for a hot minute. It was a neat gun. We just couldn’t really justify the price for a single shot 22.
But it sold quickly. So it was priced correctly.
-Marky
Are golf shoes good for shooting?
Sweet piece!
Nice pistol.
What a pretty gun.
Was this ever offered in other calibers? It would be a nice hunting handgun in 45
Will you ever do a video on the Yugoslavian M76 rifle?
It looks like it was holstered and un-holstered quite a bit. Wonder where the holster is now.
Now I'm not one for video game comparisons, but the first thing that comes to my mind are the 2 shot revolvers in Borderlands.
Partridge sight, or Patridge sight?
That was my question whether it was DA/SA or SAO?Double action hardly seems useful on a single shot pistol.
O-H-I-O!!!! Also, I have said it before and I am gonna say it again, I love these unique design guns even if they have little purpose now.
What would have been the range of a target match back then?and what kind of groups could this produce?
I was surprised and pleased to see the barrel/chamber was monolithic. But I too would not buy the gun were I a target shooter at the time. I would opt for a revolver. The extra rounds make it more practical.
Also, I would imagine a competitive shooter would participate in multiple categories. To create a design that would prevent use in any other category would be a nuisance in itself.
The sights both be on the barrel as the hole barrel swings out.
Interesting. I would love to shoot it back to back with my S&W Model K-22 Masterpiece. It's hands down the most accurate and smooth shooting revolver I've ever shot. (Well, almost. I also have a Model 15 Combat Masterpiece in .38 special that's pretty damn smooth, but the Model 17 shoots better groups.)
*Question:* They went to all this trouble (lots of machining, single shot etc.) for a "pretty" target pistol with good accuracy, and they didn't mount the rear sight on the barrel/chamber block. Wouldn't that be an obvious and easy improvement?
(Then the tightness of the locking of the barrel to the frame wouldn't be so critical, right?)
Question wouldn't that make the sight farther away from your eye? And also make the sight radius shorter? Yes obviously persoanally I would want a gun with sights mounted on the barrel its obvious it would be more accurate.
Isn't the front sight called a PATridge not PARTridge. I know I have to catch myself all the time from calling it a partridge sight.
Similar to Mosin Nagant not a Moison Nagant.
That front sight would be a Patridge-style sight. A partridge is a bird.
beautiful.
I'd guess the reason the barrel swings out is easier cleaning (anyone who owns a revolver will know what I'm talking about).
Show us the M79!
...in its .22LR training version??? ;-)
Take a moment to see what I'm featuring on my channel regarding firearms that you won't see in gunstores normally :)
However, for the UK, we'd really need an airsoft version :-)
i love it id adore one in .17 m2
and a mineli ergonomic target grip
Artillery only when?
great info
Did someone scratch "34" on the inside of the grip?
No, RH
I understand the reason they wanted to make it like this but the flat, fake cylinder on a revolver shaped gun is unfathomably cursed
Beautiful gun. One is on Gunbroker listed at $3450. Whew.
Based on the thumbnail picture, my first thought was "Didn't I see this gun in Batman?'"
Reminds me of that method where people make 3D models from a 2D image.