CLARIFICATIONS: 1) I shouldn't have repeatedly used the word "prostitute" but instead "full service sex worker". Some sex workers find it derogatory, some reclaim it - it's not up to me to decide what's best as I'm not a sex worker. Apologies for this and will bear in mind in future! This is a SW-friendly channel. 2) Carrie Chapman Catt initially opposed a *NATIONAL* suffrage amendment, similarly to some of the anti-suffragists in England. She believed women should gain the vote state by state. This was so contentious that it led to the split of the National American Women Suffrage Association. She later changed her mind and campaigned for national suffrage. Apologies for misspeaking here, to say she was against "suffrage" was a sweeping statement. In hindsight, I should have made the distinction between local and national suffrage clearer.
I’m so glad you pointed this out, because the factor that makes Carrie Chapman Catt one of the most noteworthy feminists of the time was her adaptability. She first joined NAWSA during a time where grassroots, local election efforts were the norm - making her anti-national suffrage. As the progressive era dawned, and more cries rose for an amendment, Catt found it all too radical. She eventually realized that her views had to evolve with the times, and grassroots efforts were not the best way to advance women. Thus, she started campaigning for the vote on both the national and state level, being president of NAWSA when the 19th amendment was passed. Carrie Chapman Catt is a perfect study on how viewpoints need to evolve, and recognizing the flaws in your advocacy is crucial for the continuation of a movement.
Prostitutes is exactly what they are. Why do they not like it, are they ashamed? Are we not supposed to "embrace" prostitution? Is it not "female empowerment"?🤣 Oh and btw "lame" is also a derogatory term against the mentally slow apparently, might wanna address that before the snowflakes rip you apart in the comments. Cheers!
As a man who already has a lot of adult responsibilities, I can almost understand the desire to just opt out of participating in society. Almost. Having the right to do something but opting not to use it is far, far better than not having the right to begin with.
Some people really would rather get rid of all their civil rights than be honest about not wanting to participate in society because they think people will judge them for the latter. And somehow being embarrassed registers as worse to them than the prospect of being legally treated like an animal. Human brains really are something else.
@Ciuta Should domestic responsibilities and societal responsibilities be mutually exclusive? I know you're being sarcastic, but I'm not sure I'm understanding the point you're trying to make.
My dude child care is an adult responsibility. In fact, it is the single most important one because literally all of society hinges on new generations being raised. The problem with conservative tradwives is that they want to force all women into that role, not the role itself.
I find it funny the Woman in the video saying women were emotional thinkers and therefore shouldnt vote was a women herself, therefore she should be an emotional thinker herself meaning her argument would be flawed from her own logic🤷♀️
Have you seen articles of men literally hurting and taking the lives of women who simply said 'no' and rejected them? But yeah sure. Women are emotional I guess...
@@principleshipcoleoid8095 it's not that bad until you have to take care of the children alone, until he comes home and beats you, until he cheats on you and you have no way out.
It sounds great when things are going good. But let's assume your spouse dies or gets disabled and can't work. Then having no career experience makes things a lot more difficult.
@@emmakaisa27 these "feminine" women are living in fairy tail where they think that being a stay at home is so good . They dont take this account how men are , that too after this tater thots era . They dont consider the possibility that having no money , being dependent on someone for money is just giving someone control over you . They can definitely use your 'dependency on them' as way to dominate and control you . I have seen millions of stay at home , who have deal with these things- 1)cooking and serving three times meal , 2)washing dishes of whole family , 3)washing of clothes of thenselves ,children and their husband , 4)helping children in studies , 5)cleaning whole house , purchasing groceries , 6) keeping up with relations among relatives and family 7) more work when your baby is young , crying all the time 8 ) doing housework even doing pregnancy (yeah my mom suuffered that) 9) keeping up with your nosy complaining mother in law if you are in joint family 10) Having to deal with slaps & belts of husband if food isnt good enough or if you answer back to his mom's bullshit ( i am not talking about women of PAST . my own aunt born in 1970s had to suffer this , my maid who is same age had to deal with on daily basis) 11) being demeaned by your own husband and being told how youre less than him cause he is THE BREADWINNER and youre just a caretaker 12) not being able to divorce him cause now you have no money and 2 children to care for Basically 18 hours work with no leaves and After All This you WONT be given much respect cause youre not the one who is EARNING . One who is earning i.e. your husband will always have last word in every decision . Being working , having my own money , having a position in my office and society , achieving my carrier goals , taking my own decisions , doing 9-5 job (10 hrs of work ) , not having to compromise with desrespect seems much less of burden than being a housewife
@@principleshipcoleoid8095 My mother and every woman I know from her generation are stay at home moms. And they BEG girls not to be stay at home moms. The lack of choice and freedom they suffered from in their lives fucking sucks. Also what if the husband dies, what happens to the wife and kids?
@@nsjhdhdhdbhsudgvdydb7751They´re too selfish for that. I would agree for them not to pay taxes, but in return NOT USE ANYTHING PAID FOR BY TAXPAYERS MONEY. Let´s see how far they get.
I was raised in a very conservative and homogenous community that held strong beliefs about the correct roles for women. “Tradwife life” was expected and enforced whenever possible and yall, it was no picnic. It’s not flouncing around your lovely garden in a pretty dress before your doting husband comes home. It’s hard, hard work and when that’s your only “choice”? It’s hell. I so deeply resent the women who put forth this life as if it’s easily attainable and easily maintained.
@Moon Child...Women have always revoulted and even k1lled themselves to fight for themselves. British suffragists chained themselves to fences and went on hunger strikes, or even threw themselves under horses. And and there's no doubt that all throughout history women, privately, fought to regain power in their households, their stories just weren't told
@@moonchild2190at the end of the day I think its because men are taught to reject their own humanity, to sacrifice their body and life, especially in war, or like working a backbreaking labor job 60 hours a week. Which I think is abhorrent. And women, while they still can be expected to sacrifice everything for babies and supporting men, are allowed to be more in touch with their emotions and their own humanity. We are not taught that we are expendable in the same way men are. And we are used to having to nice our way out a tought situation because we are unlikely to be able to punch our way out of it. Genders all fucked up basically.
@@Lerian_V why do you bring up men in a conversation about women’s rights? It’s like talking about black peoples problems and saying “but white people suffer too” like why? We’re not even talking about it grow up
I did a paper on this for my sophomore seminar and I just remembered laughing my ass off at how some of these women were super outspoken, but also didn’t want women to be outspoken. It’s still something seen today and it’s so bizarre to me.
Reminds me of people like Girl Defined and The Transformed Wife who claim women aren't supposed to preach, when that is literally what they are doing, and you know they would never give it up.
All those people preaching for the "traditional female role" are literally contradicting themselves through their actions, so how do they think anyone is going to take them seriously? "Us women shouldn't have a voice, or be a part of those decisions"--okay, then shut tf up then? It would make everyone happier, especially those who don't want to hear their aggravating hypocrisy.
I almost wonder if other things like this could appear in the next few decades. “Women against the right to Divorce” “Women against the right to Drive a Car” “Women against affordable Childcare”
The idea of having enough rights/basic respect to feel like some aren’t needed is bonkers. Also you don’t need to lobby not to vote, you can just choose not to like tons of Americans (women included) already do! We’re literally trying to get more people to vote
You can tell how privileged they are. Other women wished they had what we have, others are being stoned to death over something stupid and these girls want to eliminate all that.
Anne Coulter has aptly explained this. She's happy to give away her own vote on the basis of her gender on the understanding that more people who are inclined to vote against her than with her will be disenfranchised, and so she gets more of what she wants. This is actually the most rational thing Anne Coulter has EVER said. It's also not the most awful thing, although it's fairly awful.
Voting is irrelevant if districts are gerrymandered and those being voted for don't represent real change. Like Bernie Sanders. What good is power if you don't use it? He knows the moment he tries, they'll get rid of him.
It's like a broader trend of people seeking to infantilize themselves. No one wants to work or worry about politics, but women in particular can sort of lean on these historically oppressive structures to try and escape modern day responsibilities through being "traditional" and all that jazz.
_Learned helplessness_ may be a better term than _infantalization._ Whatever term you like, Nietzsche knocked it out of the park with _On the Genealogy of Morals._ (That's a baseball metaphor, you lot.)
@Church of Aunt Cass Yup. I guess everyone thinks it won't happen to THEM. Wrong to rely on that, obvs, but people do things against their self interest all the time. Just annoys me when they want me to do the same.
My great grandma also nana use to tell me “women are not as smart as you think we are, we didn’t want to vote because we didn’t want to be treated like the men. So we bitched and complained til we got treated like men, just to bitch and complain that now we are oppressed for getting what we wanted and we don’t even have the responsibility men have that come with voting” I use to think she was crazy until I got older now I see she was right
I am going through a naturalization process right now and you better believe if I get citizenship, I and gonna get my grubby little mitts on every ballot ever
Men over the age of 35 either. The age of draft usually ends there. And women have been trying to get the ERA to pass in the USA for years so women would be drafted equally, but CONSERVATIVES are the ones who keep shooting it down, not left-wing feminists.
Yeah. It’s more like I don’t think anyone should be mandated to go to war, but war is an unfortunate reality of society so anyone should be potentially at risk (without being privileged by class to escape). That included myself before I became disabled. It’s literally the only reason I stopped getting insane amounts of recruitment mail (about four times more than my male friends, probably because I come from a poor military family and my friends mostly don’t have veterans in their families).
@@Liboo52ancient Sparta? They killed their kids in order to "train" them. Also, women shaved their heads because men were so isolated from them that when marriage came around, they felt uncomfortable kissing someone who looked different from a man. I don't think they had a great government.
You can tell they’re extremely privileged. We’re not being stoned to death over something stupid. They’ve never been through real struggles and it shows. They’ll be *crying* begging for women’s rights, something other women do not have and have been fighting for for years still.
Yeah but look at how they talk like this one clip shown, it was a bingo card of phrases almost to the point where it felt like satire because how phony they sound. Like “omg look how quirky I’m being because I don’t have to worry about anything thanks to being in a high social class”.
@@idontevenknow9758 I am convinced that is pretty much all it is. They have no worry because their life won't change except for how they are looked at. They want to be accepted in a group they're not welcome and believe this bs is their ticket into that group. Not realizing the group would use them and kick them out in a heartbeat and then they're stuck with the laws they voted for. Reminds me of the woman (or women, I read multiple by now) who got pregnant in Texas, the fetus unfortunately didn't make it, but she wasn't allowed to abort it even though it was already dead, eventually became septic and nearly died. And realized that is also part of the law she voted against and regretted it.
Doesn't it feel a little oxymoronic to be on a platform and demanding people STOP listening to what you have to say? That's what anti-suffragettes/1 vote per house people are saying, right? It really feels like that bit from The Venture Brothers with the giant robot-alien shouting "IGNORE ME!"
I have always had that same thought. The right-wing women who are out there campaigning for women to have no voice, power, or equity are only able to have their voice heard because they’ve accumulated power by having a job outside the home-i.e. a social media influencer. If they’re aware of the irony, they’re keeping it to themselves.
Yeah honestly, these women make a bunch of points on why you should "not listen to women" and not take their opinion into account, so I can't help but think... well why the hell should I listen to you then? If you're out here self-reporting that you believe you're so emotional and so politically incapable that you should have less rights than a 18 year old teenager, I don't see any reason to take you seriously.
Lmao "women shouldn't vote because they aren't voting for the party I like". A Child's mentality. Also, instead of advocating for taking away womens' votes because only men have to sign up for the draft, how about advocating to abolish the draft? Because it's clear to me that women voting is not the issue here, the draft is. My country doesn't have mandatory military service and anyone over 18 can sign up.
It's such a non argument too because the draft has been such an unpopular thing for so long in the states that if it were attempted it would fail miserably like it did in the 70s. I don't believe there will ever be another draft unless there is an actual global war and even then I doubt it'll be a thing. They're literally just making up imaginary scenarios to justify their stupid misogynistic opinions
It doesn't matter tho. When it really comes down to it you know which part of the population will actually be fo rced on the front lines. Ukraine had a gender neutral draft and we know how that turned out
You think when a war erupts that enough people will sign up with their own free will to get themselves slaughtered? You have to have a draft and its very naive to think otherwise. The argument is that if you want equal say, you must have equal duty. Look for example at Ukraine, the men must fight, and the women leave through the back door. When the shit hits the fan, the men catch the bullets and the women leave through the back door, that is universal no matter where you are from. Why would women deserve the right to vote without the duty of the draft? In short, why should women deserve equal say without equal repercussions?
It's interesting how they will recognize that most women do not support conservative politics, but then they don't make the obvious connection there that maybe those politics are not in women's best interests
I thought the right to vote includes the right to not vote. That's perfectly fine. If some woman doesn't want to exercise her right to vote, that's perfectly find. What's not ok is her waiving MY right to vote. No, sis, don't do that
These "women" makes no sense to me. They must be heavily brainwashed or just plain F st0pid. It's disgusting. I hate them. Why should they be treated like human beings when they so so much harm....
Conservatives: We shouldn't let women vote (which is already a current right)! OR have a choice what to do with their own bodies (which *used* to be a right until very very recently)! Also Conservatives: OMG THE DEMS ARE TRYING TO TAKE AWAY YOUR RIGHTS usdjgfyhiusgaofais
Seriously, a lot of guys are acusing women to take away their rights while it was always about men having all the rights in the world, and putting these nonsensical rules in place regarding gender etc: Today they still cry about it all, which is what THEY put in place and STILL force unto us all AND themselves, but blame women for it.
That’s not true cause this time it’s the privileged cry because they are being held accountable 😂 women get the privilege of voting without the responsibility men have
I'm excited for the pro-life feminist video. My cousin is a semi-prominent pro-life "feminist" so I've had a degree of exposure to it that I think some people don't see. It's truly bizarre.
It’s not bizarre. Being pro-life has nothing to do with being against women and everything to do with being against killing babies. It is truly bizarre that you can support women’s rights except for the “right” that allows them to kill their own kids and be considered not a feminist. Do you have to agree with every feminist talking point to be a feminist? Now that’s truly bizarre.
@@AutismGaming489 You mean eliminating an embryo safely because the mother is not ready for it instead of banning it and risking more abortions don’t make them go away, it makes them go underground.
My sister is similar; she sees each woman as individuals and they should be judged based on their personal character, not every woman as a whole group. As if there’s going to be a board set up to “judge” each and every woman independently 😂. She “deserves” HER rights though, never contemplating where they came from of course! She’s super conservative/MAGA, Baptist fundamentalist but also a witch. It’s like a trip to crazy town and I hate it
I find something about a woman opposing the right to vote being really funny. I mean, I imagine plenty were just apathetic (a very human thing), but I'd love to hear honey at the dinner table, 'They're letting women vote! Unthinkable!' Me: 'Right, dear.'
@@trekadouble757 i would rather serve in the military . The problem is that the military is a hell for women, many rapes go unreported/ dismissed , women being disrespected and looked down on , and so on.
@@trekadouble757 women should do mandated military service if men have too. While in ww2,women didnt fight in the frontline,they still contributed. Many actually k1l.l3d by using the fact they were women to make the n4..z1 feel safe. I'm pretty sure in ancient rome or greek, women were taught how to fight to not be a liability even throught they didnt fight directly. Knowing how to defend oneself in case of a w4r, is important. The only big problem with it is how common r4p3 on women is in the military.
@@reno8494 yes, it make sense that women should serve too. Especially in country who border a hostile country. Ex south korea. It make no sense that only men learn what to do in case of a war. Like you said the danger of being r4p3d and even k1ll3d by their own comrade is to big tho. A soldier from the US got r4p3d and after k1ll3d when she reported to her superior what happened to her. It took years to figure out what happened because they covered it up. They would rather defend r4pist and murd3rer than punish them. They werent even a high rank soldier.
I think I’m online too much because now just the sight of Pearl’s face fills me with dread. That Vice discussion she took part in felt like mental torture
I don't debate these women. I just remind them that being young and pretty doesnt last forever. Either she gets older while her ex's wives stay the same age, or he keeps bringing women home and she can't do anything about it because she trapped herself in a marriage with no way out.
Here in Ukraine March 8th has always been a national holiday called "International Woman's Day" and now they want to cancel it! It's so frustrating! Please spread the word to keep this holiday. Ukraine is not a bad place for women, but it's far from being progressive.
Wow. On one hand, I think these types of holidays are superficial identity politics and insignificant to the actual needs of women. But I still don’t want them to be disposed of because.. idk. It just rubs me the wrong way.
always fascinated to probe deeper when a comment is a) provocative and b) vague as F, and c) from a user name that looks like an autogenerated alphanumeric string. in this case literally a handful of mps supported a *proposal* by a single hard right politician. nobody is voting on this, nobody is taking it particularly seriously. basically a standard 'bait the libs' move. so, when our friend here says "they want to" super-vaguely implying it's the actual ruling party that's pushing this idea or that it is a change that's real and imminent... no. nope. nopedy-nope.
I’m gonna go on a limb n say the govt prob thinks woman’s day is communist (it is) and want to undo anything cool or interesting the soviets did for Ukraine.
they are mostly trying to erase that day due to the fact that “it’s connected to the communist USSR” (which it is not, soviets made it all about femininity, motherhood and spring but it has existed outside the soviet bubble before that). and many still believe this day is all about giving girls flowers instead of acknowledging women’s fight for rights throughout the years and what we still have to fight for. and as a feminist i will never give up my rights or stop talking about abuse that women are experiencing. i want my dear Ukraine to stand strong 😢
Wanting "freedom without responsibility" sounds more like the woman who expects her husband to cast a vote in her best interest rather than get up and do it herself. These arguments are so bizarre and mind blowing. I can't even.
It's kinda obvious women are the more vocal group in discussions about abortion. They are the ones that have to think about these issues. If fatherhood were as compulsory as motherhood in our society, things could be different. Actually if men were more pressured into fatherly roles I believe access to abortion would be waaaay more widespread
thats more than wishful thinking on your part because that gives them ammo to say "see we're equals when it comes to parenthood so the men™need to be consulted reg. your bodily rights too!11!1!" ( I'm not saying fathers shouldn't bear more parental work, but expecting it to erase misogyny teeters on delusion)
I think it's not the same everywhere, but where I live men can kinda be forced into fatherhood, at minimum monetary support. Once proved a man is the father, DNA usually, he need at least to pay alimony. Some women use that, sometimes using tricks such as piercing condoms, to have children and live of the father's money. Now, this are edge cases, women in general still get the short end, and as is their body, it's my opinion that women should have the choice alone about carrying the pregnancy to term. But just to show that the system such as it is now can be bad for everyone, even if not equally bad.
@@Melggart What country do you live in? In the US a mother can get a child support order & if they ever apply for any state assistance program will be forced to help the state track down the father if it isn't known who or where he is then enable them to get a child support order.] However, two things about those is that 1) In like 96% of cases child support amounts are nowhere close to enough to live off of. 2) Child support is not the same as alimony. Child support money is to cover the non-custodial parent's financial obligation of the costs involved with caring for a child/children. Alimony is called spousal support in the US nowadays & while even in the 1960s was pretty uncommon [25% roughly of divorces,] it is even rarer today at only roughly 10% of divorces. The amounts for both child support & spousal support orders are pretty complicated & based quite a bit on various individual situations. A rough idea on child support amounts would be in my state if the custodial parent makes $2,000 a month in gross income & the non-custodial parent makes $3,000, if there is 1 child & that child stays overnight at the non-custodial parents home between 36 & 72 nights out of the year then the non-custodial parent would have to pay $487 in child support a month to the custodial parent. Subject to adjustment based on some other individual factors [mainly due to special expenses a child has that is outside the usual expenses considered in the calculation such as work-related child care costs, insurance/medical costs, or any other "extraordinary costs".] Also, here in my state at least there has to be a DNA paternity test to prove fatherhood. Even for normal parental rights if someone has a child outside of marriage then for the father to get any sort of parental rights [& to put any obligations on them,] they have to get a court-ordered DNA test... even if they are on the birth certificate as the father [which requires their signature to do.]
Men are forced into raising other men’s children all the time. Paternity fraud is about 30-35% of the average population. Women selling their bodies and having babies does not constitute a father walking away. That man was never a father.
A former college classmate of mine is a Trans non binary lesbian feminist who is also catholic and pro life. The day roe v wade fell, they posted a celebratory tweet and facebook post while all of my other friends in our social circle were mourning, including me. As far as I know, many of us have since unfollowed/unfriended and blocked them. They even started some lgbt+ anti-abortion group in my local city with other lgbt+ religious feminists, so bizarre and sad and betraying. Edit: to people that day they sound cool, no. Being anti- choice/anti-abortion is being pro- forced birth, pro-oppressing people of color, pro- rape, and pro-incest. No matter how much cutesy wording "pro-life" is, it is a Christian movement that prioritizes the holy suffering and non-consentual martyr dom of women and others with uteruses. Look up the deaths of Savita Halappanavar and Sheila Hodgers. Or, more recently, the 10 year old Ohio girl who was raped and almost didn't get an abortion. Also, slightly related, look up how child marriage is still legal in the USA and how the pro-life men of the GOP keep blocking bills to make it illegal. It's shocking how much being "pro-life" is connected to denial of medical care and human rights for women and girls. That's why we were so shocked that our friend, a "woke" afab trans person, was on the side of rape and incest and pro-oppressing women and girls and other afab individuals.
Look up the recent death of Izabela Sajbor. Made me cry. ''My life is in danger. Thanks to this law, doctors can't help me. A woman is like an incubator. Let's hope I don't get sepsis or I will never leave this place'' she texted her mom before dying of sepsis from a miscarriage.
@@elianagross9507 It's not just an "opinion" when it's concretely affecting other people's lives. What kind of music you like is just an opinion. Forcing politics on people is not an "opinion", it's an ACT.
@@elianagross9507 it’s more than an opinion. They organized around it, and voted to take right away from people. It’s literally redefining the laws for those who disagree with their opinions. In a pro choice world, every pro life person gets to give birth. The reverse isn’t true. And please do reply back, would love to see your mental gymnastics play out if you have more of it to show off.
It is odd and aggravating that became the term used. I notice many pro-choice people, including myself, slipping, and using the term "pro-life". It is so ingrained in our language. All we can do is try to encourage and remind others to use "anti-choice". I obviously don't think that the anti-choice thinkers will begin to use it, but, hopefully the more the term is used, the more it will become the norm. I have met people, not so much anymore, that had never used, or heard, the term anti- choice instead of pro-life. It gives it such a different feeling!
the only fathomable way they could call themselves “pro-life” is if they’re ONLY referring to unborn fetuses. clearly they have no regard for the safety of the person carrying said fetus, or the child after they’re born. it’s infuriating.
The ‘women shouldn’t be allowed to vote because of the draft’ is such a bizarre take. As though the draft is a fact of nature that exists in every country and hasn’t historically been an issue which has determined elections before. (I understand that electoral politics are not perfect, and often it is unable to make substantial changes when against lobbying groups and industry. However, couldn’t the right to vote be theoretically used as a tool to get rid of the draft?)
I mean, women weren’t part of the draft because _men_ designed it that way. It’s the weirdest thing ever to me that misogynists point to the draft as though it’s an evil idea that was implemented by women. The Selective Service Act was passed before women had the right to vote in the US. In total contrast, women have had to fight in order to be permitted to serve in the US military. It was _men_ keeping women out of the military, not women refusing to participate. Additionally, legislation to end Selective Service or include women has been repeatedly introduced-including within the last two years. And it’s never passed because _men_ vote against it.
@@alexwyatt2911 And I expect if you asked a lot of those men why they vote against it, you'd hear a lot of the same biological determinist arguments that flood the UA-cam comments any time you mention women or trans people in the military. "If I wAs iN thE miLiTaRy I'd wAnT mY sQuAdMatE tO bE StRonG EnOuGh tO cArRY mE. WaAAaaaamEn aRe tOo wEaK. Give me a big strong muscly hard juicy- I mean I only trust a man to carry my wounded body out of a foxhole!" Even ignoring the fact that the gap between the average man and woman is WAY smaller than people think, and is at least in part due to societal expectations for men to be strong and women to be pretty, there's just the simple fact that in a modern military, the vast majority of roles are non-combat roles. Most people will never be dug into a trench hoisting wounded beefcakes up onto their shoulders. They'll be behind a desk doing analyses, or fixing a broken APC, or loading medical supplies onto a cargo plane. Even then, if your role demands strength, you will be trained accordingly, and if you are too weak, you will be given a different role. For example, my friend wanted to be an RAF pilot but because he had mild hearing damage that would have affected his ability to hear commands up in the air, they reassigned him to maintenance. Basically, people are sexist and try to write off their sexism as pragmatism while ignoring EVERY other pragmatic approach to modern military recruitment.
also most men in the world will never have to be drafted. The draft doesnt come into play all that often, especially now in the west. Its not an issue most people face everyday or will even ever face. Yet laws that affect women specifically affect women's lives every single day. Also women are much less likely to support war hungry politicians, so her argument is dumb on multiple levels
As an American, this argument is so ridiculous and people still make it. The draft has been defunct for decades, for a reason. Women can now vote, for a reason. They aren't even comparative anymore.
I think it's also bizarre, if you think through the results of being drafted. Say your husband gets drafted then is killed - so you have no say??? Tf or he comes back but you end up getting divorced or become estranged what then?
Tradwife life is always portrayed as middle/upper class. All floral dresses and crafts. It’s never minimum wage or zero hours contracts and council housing where one wage just doesn’t cut it.
I'm also reminded of what Susan Faludi wrote about anti-feminist women in the seventies and eighties. For a lot of the rank-and-file of them, they tended to associate their positions with their communities more than themselves as autonomous individuals. For example, they might be part of a religious community with a highly complimentarian norm that more equality between the sexes and genders would disrupt. So for them, they saw feminism as a danger to their communities, families, ways of life, etcetera, even if feminism sought to further liberate them as individual women. What Faludi wrote about the women in positions of leadership and influence among the anti-feminist movement back then tracks a bit with what you are saying about the anti-suffragettes' leadership and the "not real" influencer types today. A lot of them were already in positions of relative privilege inside their own communities, and some of that privilege came from the privilege of the husbands they married. Equality was a threat to that intra-community privilege they had built and so it was in their self-interest to oppose it. For example, Phyllis Schlafly had a position of privilege within the broader right-wing ecosystem in large part because she opposed women having positions of privilege and influence. If any women could have the kind of influence Schlafly had then Schlafly wouldn't be an "exceptional" women anymore and would lose her power base.
"When you've lived in privilege for so long, equality can feel like oppression," - Dr MLKJ. my take: "Some folks would rather be kings (or queens in this instance) of the junkyard than a commoner of a golden city,"
I have a feeling that these women who don't believe women should have rights would be singing a different tune if they got their way. Just a feeling, though.
they would end up like Serena Joy; miserable and confined to their homes like a prison. With not even the right to read or write. Just wasting away knitting, smoking, gardening, and nothing else.
Yes, they wouldn't even have a platform either, they wouldn't be allowed one but I have an inkling that they think they'll still be above the rules if women lost their rights. Honnestly these women should just practice what they preach and leave the rest of us alone.
@@zhen86 Then who is paying the prostitutes then genius, to keep them in business? Maybe it's those men, rich or poor, that also shouldn't have the right to vote? If we're using that logic.
@zhen86 I try very hard to even understand your comment. I simply can't. Successfull men pay women for sex. So what? They should be allowed to vote just because they're successfull? Being successfull doesn't make you a good person. Or willing to vote for a candidate good for the country. Maybe the candidate is enables creation of monopol in certain industries. In might be bad for the country but good for the successfull CEO. Also many female sex worker are successfull. Which means they also should be allowed to vote I have no idea what you're trying to say
I love how informative this is!! Felt like I was listening to an audio version of an academic paper. Super well done Tara! As a gay man in the US, I try to keep as up to date on women's issues, as they don't always naturally surface in my life. Thank you for shedding a helpful light on the historical and modern aspect of this!! ❤
With women like that Pearl, is it just an escalation of her ideas over time just to maintain an audience? Like she starts off by having a pretty light pickme take on something, sees a bunch of new dude subscribers, but has to keep chasing more and more extreme positions to keep attention on her?
She can keep these dudes. No self-respecting women would claim them in any form (husband/boyfriend/ father/son/etc) so she can deal with them man babies. 😂
Probably, she certainly is very very far right. Like cartooney right. But the dame way there id a cartooney far left. Some poeple are just ridiculous no matter their political views
Yeah. I get the same impression. It actually makes me feel bad for her because those audiences always end up turning on you when you say one thing they don’t approve of. I remember when Lauren Southern got dragged by her own audience for the unspeakable crime of having an Asian ex-boyfriend or something like that (/s). On one hand, they bring it on themselves. But at the same time, it’s gotta suck to have cultivated an audience that you can’t really control anymore.
Grift 101 - say anything until you get an audience, then say whatever gets the most agreement and engagement - rinse and repeat until you become Alex Jones.
Why dont we take these women serious and just see them for what they are: Fascists. They are not necessarily stupid or are just having a kink, they belivie this shit, its their ideology. And I feel we should take them serious and fight them like the political enemy and not like stupid children who dont know better.
@@Jell0be3n Even now the same thing is happening Ukrainian men were not allowed to leave their country because they were the one's to protect or ensure safety who forced or imposed that on Ukrainian women? Also people say how many children died or women died in Palestine or Gaza again and again as if men's lives don't even matter ya that is their so called equality demand 😁😁😁
Im scared for the future. I feel like anything could be at risk. Never in all my life did I think my right to bodily autonomy would be stolen from me, yet here we are...
@Electroencefalografista i know, i really want to be a mom but I feel selfish bringing children into such a gross world. I feel like adopting would be better.
@@mo.ka.9661 did you know that doctors wont just take good organs from a corpse? Even though those organs are good and could save someones life, they legally cannot take them without consent. A person has to consent to be an organ donor before passing and sign paperwork. If they haven't then drs have no choice but to respect your corpse and they wont take your organs. Yet a living breathing woman isnt allowed to choose whether or not she'll grow a fetus inside her body. She no longer has a choice if her body, womb, energy, calories, nutrients are all given to a fetus. A corpse's bodily autonomy is respected more than a living womans.
There was not a day in my teenage life where my mom did not say “it’s better to have something and not need it, than need something and not have it.” If you don’t wanna vote, go ahead, nobody is forcing you to. But don’t take away my right to have a say just because I’m not suffering from your same case of delusion.
Over the last few years I noticed how the more conservative tik toks have become more extreme. Like you said it’s to gain a reaction and not because they believe it truly. But I think it’s kinda starting to bite them back because in the last midterms their overall output was well below expectations. Part of that is because a new generation of voters are coming in who are much more internet savvy and are seeing this stuff and thinking they are either being sincere or just so bonkers they rationally think, no way should they run any thing. Being controversial in purpose for attention only goes so far before you find yourself in a place you don’t want to be in
i'm a teenager in india and i do seem to see this in my social circle. It is so frustrating when other girls and women do this, and the end of it i'm left really angry . But i had long decided that i was not going to bash other girls especially in the presence of boys. What kills me more is these people actually believe that an opportunity that has long been given to men, if given to women , would be unjust to men. i'm mad just writing this. And if at all i try to approach the subject even in a civil and calm manner , i'm just labeled as 'the crazy feminist friend'
Arent women already allowed to vote in India? Why do you say that people believe that it would be unjust to men if women were allowed to vote? Maybe im misinterpreting your comment, but that makes it sound like women still arent allowed to vote where you live. Also, I want to point out that there is a big difference between bashing and criticising girls. If a girl says that women shouldnt be allowed to vote, she should immediately be criticised for it, regardless of whether there are boys present or not. If people arent criticised for their ignorant beliefs, then they will never change. I understand its difficult to publically criticise others when nobody is on your side and everyone else disagrees with you, but please never feel like its a morally bad thing to criticise other girls or feel like you're "bashing" them.
@@FirstnameLastname-zq8oy hey, what i was referring to was not the right to vote but rather opportunities. Like jobs or social positions. also thank you for your kind words, when i was writing that comment a year ago i felt incredibly cornered for merely pointing out the unfairness in society around us. And you are right, at that point i had been afraid that even my fair criticism would be labelled as women bringing down other women .but in reality i have grown to start having these conversations even in the presence of boys as if i didnt point out unfair statements right then it did feel like i was validating them, even if for that brief moment. Once again i thank you for your kind comment, it has further assured me that i'm not doing anything wrong.
Gotta love how these people always reduce war to forntlines , in fact usually women kept the agriculture , economy and weapon industry going during wartime , not to mention they worked as nurses in military and field hospitals .
Also the reason Women aren't the subject of the draft is because when it was created they weren't allowed to fight on the Frontline, so it was useless to draft them, and since they were allowed in combat roles we haven't needed to use the draft so there was no reason to change it.
Yeah. My mom still recognizes the dissonance of that and tells any woman she meets who is against women voting “then you don’t vote, but don’t tell others not to!” She’s awfully misogynistic but deeply values the rights of women and wants to keep perpetuating and strengthening the equal status of all people (sounds feminist but seriously… the horrible things that she spews make it clear she’s not even someone who says “I’m an egalitarian” because of a misunderstanding of what feminism is about).
I fell down this type of brain washing when I was younger. Almost married an abusive 30 year old when I was 19. I wanted to be the cute little cottage core trad wife. Out of pure luck I broke free and saw the brain washing before my life got trapped.
Hey, my sister did a prestation on woman's suffrage today, AND I just binged some of your channel. This is one of the biggest coincidences that ever happened to me on UA-cam.
Gonna send this to my sister, I'm not the biggest voter and neither is her boyfriend. We both kind of look at it as "I don't understand politics well enough to make an informed decision and we're all fucked over either way." But my sister is a very adamant voter partly because of the history of women not being allowed to vote and partly due to the corruption in my country (N. Ireland) that within living memory meant that a Catholic vote only counted as half a vote and was not considered a "real vote" (hence why we were always told not to use contraception- contrary to popular belief it had nothing to do with the church and was more about producing more voters). She is adamant at voting in every election regardless of who is running or what the election is for and has said to me "I'm not going to tell you who to vote for, I'm not going to tell you not to waste your vote, I'm not going to ask you about it unless you want to tell me but so many people over here died so that we could have a voice in politics and to ignore that would be disrespectful". She's a smart girl and I've a lot of respect for that mentality.
I’m from Australia where we have compulsory voting so I find it kinda odd when people don’t vote. Like sure basically all politicians are corrupt, but opting for the lesser of two evils is def better. Also because basically everyone votes at home if you feel like there is no good options you cast a donkey vote, basically an incorrectly filled vote or a blank one, people draw obscene doodles or write F*** you all on the ballot paper and all those votes get counted so when the results come in there is a count of all the invalid donkey votes. Personally I think that matters, because a big increase in donkey votes indicates dissatisfaction and that sometimes least to party changes. There are other issues with Australian politics, but personally I like the compulsory voting part. It also means that campaign money doesn’t have to go to trying to get people to go vote, parties can focus on voicing their platform instead.
@@thebeaside I heard about compulsory voting in Australia, from my knowledge you've to pay a fine if you don't vote but correct me if I'm wrong. It's good to hear from the perspective of someone who has that and a donkey vote is a bit like when someone chooses to "waste" their vote over here by stating that they don't like any of the above options, it is good to hear that the dissatisfaction is taken seriously
@@ed-wh8ih Yeah, it’s a fine, it’s small enough to not be financially devastating but big enough to make it worth voting. I think it’s like 50 bucks these days. But also postal voting is easy and there are lots of polling places and it’s always on a Saturday so it’s not too hard to do. Also most polling places have a charity BBQ so you can pay a couple of bucks for a sausage after voting, people generally don’t mind going to vote because the barriers aren’t high.
"I would rather have the right to bear arms so I can engage in a civil war with my government than have the right to vote on what it does." Unfathomable takes, genuinely.
I think really this is a perfect example that these "takes" are not intended to be rational in any meaningful way. They exist because guns are a right wing issue and, for some reason, voting is a left-wing issue, and that is the only thing that matters in the brains that occupy these spaces. They are zero percent interested in the rational ramifications or logical backing of such ideas.
Exactly. How would they guarantee that if the right to vote is taken away on the basis of sex and a rationale like "women are overly emotional", that the right to bear arms wouldn't also be taken away on the same basis?
@@carolinemcgovern4488 and isn't it their side always telling women to carry to prevent being raped? By their own logic, they would be allowing rape while telling us we're too emotional to have all the means available to us to prevent it
I'm from Chile, and I read a book on women's right to vote nationally some years ago, and one bit of info that has stuck with me from it was that the arguments against it from both sides basically boiled down to the right side going "but what if they vote for the left?!" and the left side going "but what if they vote for the right?!" in a weird mutually paranoid loop. Which is funny to me in an ironic, either-I-laugh-or-I'll-want-to-punch-someone-in-the-face, kinda way. Wonderful video! Will be subscribing and waiting for that Pro-Life video thingy!
Women, if you can vote, PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE vote. Voting is not only good for you, but it gives the polls a reason to love Noodles the Chicken. I had something poinant to say, but Noodles came on screen.
I 100% disagree about debating with these.... I recognize that I am biased in this regard... But having to "debate" my right to exist is 1) something that shouldn't need be... And 2) never amounts to anything. No one who is a bigot ever ceases their bigotry over seeing some nonsensical farce of a "debate".
That's true, the way I look at it though is that you're not doing it for them, you're doing it for the people watching who's minds haven't been made up on the issue yet. That being said though, just because you're a woman doesn't mean it's your job to engage in all that.
Haven't watched this yet but these women on tiktok joking about the women who fought to have the right to work---no one's telling them they HAVE to work. They can, by all means, just marry a man and not work. Some women, however, love financial independence. Imagine having to ask your husband if it's okay to buy self-treat items like shampoos and lotions that are a little more expensive but high quality, and your husband telling you no because it's his money. Or not being able to buy the ice cream you like just because you want to. I could NEVER. My money will be MINE to spend however I please.
They kept women down with lack of education and autonomy. From fathers grip straight to authoritative husband and in many cases in the past it was someone much older being promised an underaged girl. Nothing but exploitation and abuse of power.
In France, we have a say : Better alone than in bad company. The pick-me women should keep that idea in mind because if to get the men's attention you have to give up on your rights or simply depreciate yourself, that's no good for both women and men. A lot of people forget that behind a great man is a greater woman. It's actually true since no brilliant and wise man is looking for someone that can't be his equal at every level or even be better at some. Take all the powerful men from the 19th and 20th centuries : the vast majority were married or in a long-term relatioship with an amazing woman that was just as gifted as them but they hadn't the same social and legal status. A lot of straight women never got married before or never knew a man. That's life ! But that doesn't mean they should desperately give up on themselves to end up with a moron.
This is honestly such a frustrating and downright infuriating thing. It's one thing if _you_ don't wanna vote or have the rights of a fully grown adult with all the responsibilities that come with it. But it's downright selfish to try and take that right away from everyone else that actually enjoys being acknowledged as a fully fledged human being. Do these idiot grifters realize they can just not vote and sink further into their hole of idiocy and self infantilization?
Fight to end the draft and circumcision then maybe I’ll think your right to vote is important. Until then I look upon all of you with nothing but disdain.
I grew up conservative Christian and had a full body shudder at the mention of complementarianism. The fact that it’s still an alive and thriving idea in so many places genuinely scares me.
Guys... I'm beginning to think that she'll never actually show us the cow... it's clear that the cow thinks she's above us because she always finds something better to do🙄
This message is for every single woman. you're special and don't let anyone tells you the opposite , no one in this World has the same features , body ,experiences exactly how you do , so you're freaking special , just value yourself and appreciate yourself and stay true to yourself and Always remember that you're the main character in your life and dedicate your life in what makes you happy because u know life is short . Stay strong ladies ❤️.
Lyman Abbott is giving me Andrew Tate vibes , trying to speak for women and trying to explain that us having basic rights goes against our very nature . 🤣
I used to get angry and argue with people who would argue against basic feminist rights or treat me disrespectfully. Now I just move on, because they are not to be taken seriously and are showing you that they are not worth investing time in. Love the Yoshi story music at the end.
Last year I became 18 and I was so excited to finally have the chance to vote and make a change. So I started studying all of the political parties' programmes and after that I just realized with horror that the only options were right-winged and very right-winged. I did the only thing I could do and voted the less terrible option which obviously was a super small party who nobody ever heard of. After that the super right-winged party won and I've never felt so insignificant. Thank you for showing clips of Giorgia Meloni in this video, for now nothing terrible happend, but I am very angered that many more years will pass before basic rights like same sex marriages and adoptions, trans healthcare, abortion and total equality between women and men will come to fruition for the public. That said I will keep fighting and I will keep voting until things get better, I'm positive that one day we will make it and I can't wait for it happen.
It's sad that even though you did not mention the country you're from, from your description I thought you were from mine but there are dozens of countries you could be from
I assume you're from Italy? If so, so am i, and the situation really sucks :/ I really hope Giorgia ends up derailing the voterbase, but it's really sad that the best most of us can hope for is "let's hope they accomplish nothing"
Isn’t the birth rate in Italy one of the lowest? Gotta wonder, in a couple centuries, will Italy exist? The land will, but maybe instead of a predominantly Catholic county, it will be a Muslim country, etc? Several countries are dealing with this reality. Most people don’t think a century or two out, but I think South Korea is the most in jeopardy of disappearing, then possibly Japan.
When I turned 18, the first election I could vote in was a city council election. There were 3 open seats on the city council, and 3 people running for them. The instructions were "vote for 3 of 3". I was excited to vote, but there was literally no difference I could make.
I started debating right wingers in 2016 and kept at it pretty aggressively for a few years, but it just left me drained and with very little faith in humanity. Most people spouting these kinds of opinions are not looking to have their minds changed, and attempting to do so is insanely unlikely to work online. If you have family or friends who are conservative, that’s a different story because you have real leverage there, socially. My opinion on how to be proactive online, though, is to simply focus on educating moderates and the politically apathetic on these issues and why they should care, because I think a lot of centrism comes from ignorance, but that a lot of them are trying to do what they think is best for everyone. I also think arguing for the lurkers is way more the point if you are going to debate an alt right reactionary, so stay calm and educational if you can, and don’t resort to slurs please. I think shaming reactionaries is fine, but don’t do it in a divide and conquer way, us vs them. It’s everyone vs harmful ideologies.
what really gets me about these super conservative women saying women shouldn't have rights etc etc is that they're all talking about this in huge platforms: podcasts, tiktok, twitter. if they genuinely believed in the "traditional way of life" that women should live, then they wouldn't even be in those platforms in the first place! you can't say you think women shouldn't have rights and hold no value in their opinions while expressing those rights & opinions yourself. I don't think they truly understand what that would mean for themselves because they've never actually lived through it.
It's very strange that politics can never be simple, no matter the issue. Recently my mind was blown when I learned that the super-racist, hyper-traditionalist H.P. Lovecraft was explicitly a socialist, at least for awhile. And I myself was anti-abortion for a long time after becoming Catholic, because I was inspired by radicals like Dorothy Day. I tried to justify my position in feminist/socialist terms as much as I could, with help from various pro-life feminist writings. So I guess I shouldn't be surprised that some women manage to find ways to be against the right to vote.
@@colonelweird no, he was an anti-religious atheist. But that doesn't mean much if you're steeped in white supremacist, Christian culture like he was. From what I understand his beliefs changed for the better towards the end of his life. I brought up religion because I can't deny that it's reasonable for someone who believes in an eternal soul to think that abortion qualifies as murder. The same way I thought proselytizing and spreading Christianity around the world was a positive when I was a Christian. I'm not trying to psychoanalyze you but I interpreted what you said as you becoming pro-life due to Catholicism.
Someone posted a long response to my comment and argued that HPL was not a socialist, then apparently they deleted it. But I will respond anyway. Maybe it will help someone else interested in the subject. I read about Lovecraft becoming a socialist a few months ago, but I've forgotten where. So I did a bit of digging and found that the subject is discussed in S.T. Joshi's massive biography of Lovecraft, I Am Providence, chapter 23. He goes into some detail to show how Lovecraft "converted to moderate socialism" in the early 1930s. HPL stated explicitly that his contempt for socialism in the past had been wrong, and he adopted the term deliberately and with due consideration. Also, after digging into this book to find out about HPL's socialism, I'm interested in reading the whole thing. It includes a lot of fascinating details on HPL's intellectual development, and the ways he engaged the currents of thought in his day.
Thank you for talking about this. To me, these women appear strong but I think they feel incredibly helpless and instead of becoming more compassionate and thoughtful they turn into bullies. And when bullies search for victims, it’s people they feel they can easily victimize - in this case, other women. Instead of learning history and discussing the impact that voting had on men as young as 18 (being drafted), they turn their eye towards women and say, these things wouldn’t happen if you were never allowed to vote. It’s really sad to see…
God I remember 10 years ago having this type of argument in an AP language class in high school. It was more specifically on whether or not women should be drafted but lots of overlap
@@widgie161 A big part of the reason why Russia got their ass kicked in Ukraine is that they sent in a bunch of draftees to fight professional soldiers who were highly motivated to defend their homeland. It's a proven fact that conscripts fare poorly against an all-volunteer force, even if they have a numerical advantage. Aside from being just bad and unjust to begin with it also doesn't provide a meaningful tactical or strategic advantage in modern warfare.
6:11 A little funny that they've been doing the 'We're the silent majority, trust me bro I speak for a ton of people too afraid to speak' bit for so long
CLARIFICATIONS:
1) I shouldn't have repeatedly used the word "prostitute" but instead "full service sex worker". Some sex workers find it derogatory, some reclaim it - it's not up to me to decide what's best as I'm not a sex worker. Apologies for this and will bear in mind in future! This is a SW-friendly channel.
2) Carrie Chapman Catt initially opposed a *NATIONAL* suffrage amendment, similarly to some of the anti-suffragists in England. She believed women should gain the vote state by state. This was so contentious that it led to the split of the National American Women Suffrage Association. She later changed her mind and campaigned for national suffrage. Apologies for misspeaking here, to say she was against "suffrage" was a sweeping statement. In hindsight, I should have made the distinction between local and national suffrage clearer.
PS. Thank you to the lovely commenter who pointed this out to me: wording is important!
I’m so glad you pointed this out, because the factor that makes Carrie Chapman Catt one of the most noteworthy feminists of the time was her adaptability. She first joined NAWSA during a time where grassroots, local election efforts were the norm - making her anti-national suffrage. As the progressive era dawned, and more cries rose for an amendment, Catt found it all too radical. She eventually realized that her views had to evolve with the times, and grassroots efforts were not the best way to advance women. Thus, she started campaigning for the vote on both the national and state level, being president of NAWSA when the 19th amendment was passed. Carrie Chapman Catt is a perfect study on how viewpoints need to evolve, and recognizing the flaws in your advocacy is crucial for the continuation of a movement.
I never know how to feel about stuff like this, bc I’m sw positive so I don’t think there’s anything wrong with the word prostitute.
@@lemongrabthesecond I’m an ex sex worker and definitely find the word “prostitute” can have some stink on it like “female”. But of course not always
Prostitutes is exactly what they are. Why do they not like it, are they ashamed? Are we not supposed to "embrace" prostitution? Is it not "female empowerment"?🤣
Oh and btw "lame" is also a derogatory term against the mentally slow apparently, might wanna address that before the snowflakes rip you apart in the comments. Cheers!
As a man who already has a lot of adult responsibilities, I can almost understand the desire to just opt out of participating in society.
Almost.
Having the right to do something but opting not to use it is far, far better than not having the right to begin with.
Exactly. As long there is the option I honestly don't care if someone doesn't want to vote or exercise their rights. That should be their own choice
Some people really would rather get rid of all their civil rights than be honest about not wanting to participate in society because they think people will judge them for the latter. And somehow being embarrassed registers as worse to them than the prospect of being legally treated like an animal.
Human brains really are something else.
ah yes because raising children 24/7 for 18 years, caring for a husband and house all on your own is ‘opting out of responsibilities’
@Ciuta Should domestic responsibilities and societal responsibilities be mutually exclusive? I know you're being sarcastic, but I'm not sure I'm understanding the point you're trying to make.
My dude child care is an adult responsibility. In fact, it is the single most important one because literally all of society hinges on new generations being raised. The problem with conservative tradwives is that they want to force all women into that role, not the role itself.
Imagine watching The Handmaid's Tale and going like "Wow Serena Waterford's spitting low-key fire."
😂 It’s literally playing out. It’s crazy when you think about how long ago that book was written.
American supreme court be like:
Women really be out there reading The Handmaid's Tale and going; "Gilead sounds rad as hell, sign me up"
Serena Waterford was based on real women that existed at the time the book was written. For example, Anita Bryant.
@@onceuponamelody who dat
Women are emotional thinkers, unlike men who are always 100% super chill when they shout slurs at kids in their FPS games.
As a man I have never had a logical thought
I find it funny the Woman in the video saying women were emotional thinkers and therefore shouldnt vote was a women herself, therefore she should be an emotional thinker herself meaning her argument would be flawed from her own logic🤷♀️
Hey, if someone isn't capable of identifying and naming the experiences of their inner self, they dont count as emotions. Everyone* knows that.
Have you seen articles of men literally hurting and taking the lives of women who simply said 'no' and rejected them? But yeah sure. Women are emotional I guess...
Women will only get my respect when they step up and Contribute to society on all levels
I'm sorry, I can't get past that lady saying "women don't pay taxes." Sounds like she might be committing some tax fraud...
Or maybe she is at home and does not earn money. Tbh, being able to stay at home while the other person earns the money sounds not that bad.
@@principleshipcoleoid8095 it's not that bad until you have to take care of the children alone, until he comes home and beats you, until he cheats on you and you have no way out.
It sounds great when things are going good. But let's assume your spouse dies or gets disabled and can't work. Then having no career experience makes things a lot more difficult.
@@emmakaisa27 these "feminine" women are living in fairy tail where they think that being a stay at home is so good . They dont take this account how men are , that too after this tater thots era . They dont consider the possibility that having no money , being dependent on someone for money is just giving someone control over you . They can definitely use your 'dependency on them' as way to dominate and control you .
I have seen millions of stay at home , who have deal with these things-
1)cooking and serving three times meal ,
2)washing dishes of whole family , 3)washing of clothes of thenselves ,children and their husband ,
4)helping children in studies , 5)cleaning whole house , purchasing groceries ,
6) keeping up with relations among relatives and family
7) more work when your baby is young , crying all the time
8 ) doing housework even doing pregnancy (yeah my mom suuffered that)
9) keeping up with your nosy complaining mother in law if you are in joint family
10) Having to deal with slaps & belts of husband if food isnt good enough or if you answer back to his mom's bullshit ( i am not talking about women of PAST . my own aunt born in 1970s had to suffer this , my maid who is same age had to deal with on daily basis)
11) being demeaned by your own husband and being told how youre less than him cause he is THE BREADWINNER and youre just a caretaker
12) not being able to divorce him cause now you have no money and 2 children to care for
Basically 18 hours work with no leaves and After All This you WONT be given much respect cause youre not the one who is EARNING . One who is earning i.e. your husband will always have last word in every decision .
Being working , having my own money , having a position in my office and society , achieving my carrier goals , taking my own decisions , doing 9-5 job (10 hrs of work ) , not having to compromise with desrespect seems much less of burden than being a housewife
@@principleshipcoleoid8095 My mother and every woman I know from her generation are stay at home moms. And they BEG girls not to be stay at home moms. The lack of choice and freedom they suffered from in their lives fucking sucks. Also what if the husband dies, what happens to the wife and kids?
"Women don't pay taxes" where is she living and how can I move there
North Korea: no one pays taxes. Unfortunately, it’s hell on Earth.
Net taxes
pay your taxes! you can make healthcare and public transportation free.
I’m paying a lot in taxes.
@@nsjhdhdhdbhsudgvdydb7751They´re too selfish for that. I would agree for them not to pay taxes, but in return NOT USE ANYTHING PAID FOR BY TAXPAYERS MONEY. Let´s see how far they get.
I was raised in a very conservative and homogenous community that held strong beliefs about the correct roles for women. “Tradwife life” was expected and enforced whenever possible and yall, it was no picnic. It’s not flouncing around your lovely garden in a pretty dress before your doting husband comes home. It’s hard, hard work and when that’s your only “choice”? It’s hell. I so deeply resent the women who put forth this life as if it’s easily attainable and easily maintained.
@Moon Child...Women have always revoulted and even k1lled themselves to fight for themselves. British suffragists chained themselves to fences and went on hunger strikes, or even threw themselves under horses. And and there's no doubt that all throughout history women, privately, fought to regain power in their households, their stories just weren't told
@@moonchild2190at the end of the day I think its because men are taught to reject their own humanity, to sacrifice their body and life, especially in war, or like working a backbreaking labor job 60 hours a week. Which I think is abhorrent. And women, while they still can be expected to sacrifice everything for babies and supporting men, are allowed to be more in touch with their emotions and their own humanity. We are not taught that we are expendable in the same way men are. And we are used to having to nice our way out a tought situation because we are unlikely to be able to punch our way out of it.
Genders all fucked up basically.
@Moon Child Long-suffering is a virtue for both sexes.
@@Lerian_V why do you bring up men in a conversation about women’s rights? It’s like talking about black peoples problems and saying “but white people suffer too” like why? We’re not even talking about it grow up
@@Lerian_V SUFFERING IS NOT A VIRTUE. SUFFERING IS SOMETHING WE SHOULD AVOID.
I did a paper on this for my sophomore seminar and I just remembered laughing my ass off at how some of these women were super outspoken, but also didn’t want women to be outspoken. It’s still something seen today and it’s so bizarre to me.
Reminds me of people like Girl Defined and The Transformed Wife who claim women aren't supposed to preach, when that is literally what they are doing, and you know they would never give it up.
Rules for thee, but not for me.
Like Serena in the Handmaid's Tale...
All those people preaching for the "traditional female role" are literally contradicting themselves through their actions, so how do they think anyone is going to take them seriously? "Us women shouldn't have a voice, or be a part of those decisions"--okay, then shut tf up then? It would make everyone happier, especially those who don't want to hear their aggravating hypocrisy.
@@rachelsnee8926 bingo
I almost wonder if other things like this could appear in the next few decades.
“Women against the right to Divorce”
“Women against the right to Drive a Car”
“Women against affordable Childcare”
Well I already know individuals who would join those movements, so let's hope no one decides to create them.
Stop you're scaring me wtf
Women against the right to divorce sounds the most realistic.
I hope the drive a car thing DOES become a reality though
@@brookejon3695 I'm creating the car one 😈
Shout out to the woman who believes women are too emotional to vote but can be trusted with firearms.
What is a woman?
Mean while in the states it's men who are far too emotional for a fire arm. Clearly
A social construct
Physical objects are now social constructs lmao
@@liampatrick3110a human adult that identifies as a woman. Next question ?
The idea of having enough rights/basic respect to feel like some aren’t needed is bonkers. Also you don’t need to lobby not to vote, you can just choose not to like tons of Americans (women included) already do! We’re literally trying to get more people to vote
Because such a significant chunk chooses not to
You can tell how privileged they are. Other women wished they had what we have, others are being stoned to death over something stupid and these girls want to eliminate all that.
Anne Coulter has aptly explained this. She's happy to give away her own vote on the basis of her gender on the understanding that more people who are inclined to vote against her than with her will be disenfranchised, and so she gets more of what she wants. This is actually the most rational thing Anne Coulter has EVER said. It's also not the most awful thing, although it's fairly awful.
Voting is irrelevant if districts are gerrymandered and those being voted for don't represent real change. Like Bernie Sanders. What good is power if you don't use it? He knows the moment he tries, they'll get rid of him.
@@erikjohnson6423 That is disturbingly anti-democratic, but also frustratingly logical. It's gerrymandering gender.
It's like a broader trend of people seeking to infantilize themselves. No one wants to work or worry about politics, but women in particular can sort of lean on these historically oppressive structures to try and escape modern day responsibilities through being "traditional" and all that jazz.
Until their husband decides to either cheat on them, beat the shit out of them, or prevent them from working.
Correction: no one wants to be exploited.
I'd be a trad wife in an instant, as would my gf. No one wants to be exploited.
_Learned helplessness_ may be a better term than _infantalization._ Whatever term you like, Nietzsche knocked it out of the park with _On the Genealogy of Morals._ (That's a baseball metaphor, you lot.)
@Church of Aunt Cass Yup. I guess everyone thinks it won't happen to THEM. Wrong to rely on that, obvs, but people do things against their self interest all the time. Just annoys me when they want me to do the same.
My Nanna told me I should always vote, because as a woman from a poor background, there will always be people who don't want me to.
Hot take but if you always vote no matter what, nobody needs to buy your vote - you devalue it
❤
My great grandma also nana use to tell me “women are not as smart as you think we are, we didn’t want to vote because we didn’t want to be treated like the men. So we bitched and complained til we got treated like men, just to bitch and complain that now we are oppressed for getting what we wanted and we don’t even have the responsibility men have that come with voting” I use to think she was crazy until I got older now I see she was right
@@KingAries85 She didn't say that shit Bfr
@@KingAries85 your great grandma sounds insane sexist. that's a shame.
There's only one thing I love more than getting my grubby little mitts on a ballot: helping other women get their grubby little mitts on ballots too.
Argh, those darn pesky female activists
I am going through a naturalization process right now and you better believe if I get citizenship, I and gonna get my grubby little mitts on every ballot ever
When I turned 18 I was more than pleased to get my grubby little mitts straight on to a ballot paper, and have been happily doing it since.
@@destaabigael9004 Rooting for you girl!
@@TiffyVella1You didn’t earn your right though like men have to with selective service.
Even when Tara says female, my sphincter clenches like arthur's fist ✊🏿
That is an amazing phrase.
😂
Lmao this made my morning. Love your videos btw!
Bars
What a way to phrase that 😂😂😂
If the argument is, “women shouldn’t have the right to vote because they’re not expected to go to war,” then rich men shouldn’t get to vote either
@@trekadouble757 obviously, Ancient Sparta was the only decent government in human history
Men over the age of 35 either. The age of draft usually ends there. And women have been trying to get the ERA to pass in the USA for years so women would be drafted equally, but CONSERVATIVES are the ones who keep shooting it down, not left-wing feminists.
Classic whataboutism the point is you shouldn't be allowed to vote and not have to serve at the same time.
Yeah. It’s more like I don’t think anyone should be mandated to go to war, but war is an unfortunate reality of society so anyone should be potentially at risk (without being privileged by class to escape). That included myself before I became disabled. It’s literally the only reason I stopped getting insane amounts of recruitment mail (about four times more than my male friends, probably because I come from a poor military family and my friends mostly don’t have veterans in their families).
@@Liboo52ancient Sparta? They killed their kids in order to "train" them. Also, women shaved their heads because men were so isolated from them that when marriage came around, they felt uncomfortable kissing someone who looked different from a man. I don't think they had a great government.
You can tell they’re extremely privileged. We’re not being stoned to death over something stupid. They’ve never been through real struggles and it shows. They’ll be *crying* begging for women’s rights, something other women do not have and have been fighting for for years still.
Exactly this.
WHY in the world would any women do this to others and themselves?????
They make me so F mad.
Disgusting.
Yeah but look at how they talk like this one clip shown, it was a bingo card of phrases almost to the point where it felt like satire because how phony they sound. Like “omg look how quirky I’m being because I don’t have to worry about anything thanks to being in a high social class”.
Same with gay republicans, they have what they have because people before them fought tooth and nail for it. ungrateful brats
Women hate women.
@@idontevenknow9758 I am convinced that is pretty much all it is. They have no worry because their life won't change except for how they are looked at. They want to be accepted in a group they're not welcome and believe this bs is their ticket into that group. Not realizing the group would use them and kick them out in a heartbeat and then they're stuck with the laws they voted for.
Reminds me of the woman (or women, I read multiple by now) who got pregnant in Texas, the fetus unfortunately didn't make it, but she wasn't allowed to abort it even though it was already dead, eventually became septic and nearly died. And realized that is also part of the law she voted against and regretted it.
Doesn't it feel a little oxymoronic to be on a platform and demanding people STOP listening to what you have to say? That's what anti-suffragettes/1 vote per house people are saying, right?
It really feels like that bit from The Venture Brothers with the giant robot-alien shouting "IGNORE ME!"
I have always had that same thought. The right-wing women who are out there campaigning for women to have no voice, power, or equity are only able to have their voice heard because they’ve accumulated power by having a job outside the home-i.e. a social media influencer.
If they’re aware of the irony, they’re keeping it to themselves.
Yeah honestly, these women make a bunch of points on why you should "not listen to women" and not take their opinion into account, so I can't help but think... well why the hell should I listen to you then? If you're out here self-reporting that you believe you're so emotional and so politically incapable that you should have less rights than a 18 year old teenager, I don't see any reason to take you seriously.
SOMEBODY LEFT A BABY
Lmao "women shouldn't vote because they aren't voting for the party I like". A Child's mentality.
Also, instead of advocating for taking away womens' votes because only men have to sign up for the draft, how about advocating to abolish the draft? Because it's clear to me that women voting is not the issue here, the draft is. My country doesn't have mandatory military service and anyone over 18 can sign up.
War is the problem
It's such a non argument too because the draft has been such an unpopular thing for so long in the states that if it were attempted it would fail miserably like it did in the 70s. I don't believe there will ever be another draft unless there is an actual global war and even then I doubt it'll be a thing. They're literally just making up imaginary scenarios to justify their stupid misogynistic opinions
It doesn't matter tho. When it really comes down to it you know which part of the population will actually be fo rced on the front lines. Ukraine had a gender neutral draft and we know how that turned out
You think when a war erupts that enough people will sign up with their own free will to get themselves slaughtered?
You have to have a draft and its very naive to think otherwise.
The argument is that if you want equal say, you must have equal duty.
Look for example at Ukraine, the men must fight, and the women leave through the back door.
When the shit hits the fan, the men catch the bullets and the women leave through the back door, that is universal no matter where you are from.
Why would women deserve the right to vote without the duty of the draft?
In short, why should women deserve equal say without equal repercussions?
But then how could the state get its young boys killed efficiently?!
It's interesting how they will recognize that most women do not support conservative politics, but then they don't make the obvious connection there that maybe those politics are not in women's best interests
*so close to getting it*
The exception is married white women
@@mo.ka.9661 Even for them. Just bc your married doesn't mean you wouldn't want the same amount of money or fair care work distribution😭
@@elena0351 these types of women are less likely to be in the workforce.
it's not that they haven't made the connection. they just think women are stupid, so we don't know what's in our best interests
I thought the right to vote includes the right to not vote. That's perfectly fine. If some woman doesn't want to exercise her right to vote, that's perfectly find. What's not ok is her waiving MY right to vote. No, sis, don't do that
@benjaminollis7621...okay?
@benjaminollis7621Okay.It's compulsory in my country too but people don't because the government dose that for them by stealing.
These women fighting against their rights isn’t new. But when they have the right they fought against they are happy. I hate it
Yes, the hypocrisy it's ironic. The only reason you have a platform is because of women's rights, but yeah women shouldn't be able to do XYZ.
These "women" makes no sense to me.
They must be heavily brainwashed or just plain F st0pid.
It's disgusting.
I hate them.
Why should they be treated like human beings when they so so much harm....
wow, took me a while to understand the second sentence, but I got it lol
@@Tijggie82 sorry english isn’t my native language 💀 !!!
@@nairobi8337 no worries! It is a great sentence, just takes some thinking :D
Conservatives: We shouldn't let women vote (which is already a current right)! OR have a choice what to do with their own bodies (which *used* to be a right until very very recently)!
Also Conservatives: OMG THE DEMS ARE TRYING TO TAKE AWAY YOUR RIGHTS usdjgfyhiusgaofais
(The 2nd thing you said was never a right)
classic "Rules for Thee, but Not for Me" hypocrisy, pretty standard stuff coming from conservatives
OOF is all I’m going to say
Seriously, a lot of guys are acusing women to take away their rights while it was always about men having all the rights in the world, and putting these nonsensical rules in place regarding gender etc:
Today they still cry about it all, which is what THEY put in place and STILL force unto us all AND themselves, but blame women for it.
@@emposiblethegamer639 when did bodily autonomy stop being a right?
it always boils down to the priveleged saying, "Well it doesn't affect _me_ so clearly you're lying"
That’s not true cause this time it’s the privileged cry because they are being held accountable 😂 women get the privilege of voting without the responsibility men have
I'm excited for the pro-life feminist video. My cousin is a semi-prominent pro-life "feminist" so I've had a degree of exposure to it that I think some people don't see. It's truly bizarre.
If you're interested in sharing about it email me! talktotaramooknee@gmail.com
It’s not bizarre. Being pro-life has nothing to do with being against women and everything to do with being against killing babies. It is truly bizarre that you can support women’s rights except for the “right” that allows them to kill their own kids and be considered not a feminist. Do you have to agree with every feminist talking point to be a feminist? Now that’s truly bizarre.
What the hell? That will be a very interesting video
@@AutismGaming489 You mean eliminating an embryo safely because the mother is not ready for it instead of banning it and risking more abortions don’t make them go away, it makes them go underground.
My sister is similar; she sees each woman as individuals and they should be judged based on their personal character, not every woman as a whole group. As if there’s going to be a board set up to “judge” each and every woman independently 😂. She “deserves” HER rights though, never contemplating where they came from of course!
She’s super conservative/MAGA, Baptist fundamentalist but also a witch. It’s like a trip to crazy town and I hate it
I find something about a woman opposing the right to vote being really funny. I mean, I imagine plenty were just apathetic (a very human thing), but I'd love to hear honey at the dinner table, 'They're letting women vote! Unthinkable!' Me: 'Right, dear.'
That sounds like the setup for a Monty Python sketch
@@trekadouble757 good for them!
@@trekadouble757 i would rather serve in the military . The problem is that the military is a hell for women, many rapes go unreported/ dismissed , women being disrespected and looked down on , and so on.
@@trekadouble757 women should do mandated military service if men have too. While in ww2,women didnt fight in the frontline,they still contributed. Many actually k1l.l3d by using the fact they were women to make the n4..z1 feel safe. I'm pretty sure in ancient rome or greek, women were taught how to fight to not be a liability even throught they didnt fight directly. Knowing how to defend oneself in case of a w4r, is important. The only big problem with it is how common r4p3 on women is in the military.
@@reno8494 yes, it make sense that women should serve too. Especially in country who border a hostile country. Ex south korea. It make no sense that only men learn what to do in case of a war. Like you said the danger of being r4p3d and even k1ll3d by their own comrade is to big tho. A soldier from the US got r4p3d and after k1ll3d when she reported to her superior what happened to her. It took years to figure out what happened because they covered it up. They would rather defend r4pist and murd3rer than punish them. They werent even a high rank soldier.
I think I’m online too much because now just the sight of Pearl’s face fills me with dread. That Vice discussion she took part in felt like mental torture
God don’t remind me about that vice video… I still hold mental scars…
I don't debate these women. I just remind them that being young and pretty doesnt last forever. Either she gets older while her ex's wives stay the same age, or he keeps bringing women home and she can't do anything about it because she trapped herself in a marriage with no way out.
Here in Ukraine March 8th has always been a national holiday called "International Woman's Day" and now they want to cancel it! It's so frustrating! Please spread the word to keep this holiday. Ukraine is not a bad place for women, but it's far from being progressive.
Wow. On one hand, I think these types of holidays are superficial identity politics and insignificant to the actual needs of women. But I still don’t want them to be disposed of because.. idk. It just rubs me the wrong way.
always fascinated to probe deeper when a comment is a) provocative and b) vague as F, and c) from a user name that looks like an autogenerated alphanumeric string.
in this case literally a handful of mps supported a *proposal* by a single hard right politician. nobody is voting on this, nobody is taking it particularly seriously. basically a standard 'bait the libs' move. so, when our friend here says "they want to" super-vaguely implying it's the actual ruling party that's pushing this idea or that it is a change that's real and imminent... no. nope. nopedy-nope.
I’m gonna go on a limb n say the govt prob thinks woman’s day is communist (it is) and want to undo anything cool or interesting the soviets did for Ukraine.
they are mostly trying to erase that day due to the fact that “it’s connected to the communist USSR” (which it is not, soviets made it all about femininity, motherhood and spring but it has existed outside the soviet bubble before that). and many still believe this day is all about giving girls flowers instead of acknowledging women’s fight for rights throughout the years and what we still have to fight for. and as a feminist i will never give up my rights or stop talking about abuse that women are experiencing. i want my dear Ukraine to stand strong 😢
@Akairo Kaminari Slavs historically arent considered white
Wanting "freedom without responsibility" sounds more like the woman who expects her husband to cast a vote in her best interest rather than get up and do it herself. These arguments are so bizarre and mind blowing. I can't even.
Wow, I never knew that cows are allowed to vote now, definitely gonna inform mine, I'm sure she'll be thrilled
You just said "she." That makes her invalid anyway
It's kinda obvious women are the more vocal group in discussions about abortion. They are the ones that have to think about these issues. If fatherhood were as compulsory as motherhood in our society, things could be different. Actually if men were more pressured into fatherly roles I believe access to abortion would be waaaay more widespread
thats more than wishful thinking on your part because that gives them ammo to say "see we're equals when it comes to parenthood so the men™need to be consulted reg. your bodily rights too!11!1!" ( I'm not saying fathers shouldn't bear more parental work, but expecting it to erase misogyny teeters on delusion)
I think it's not the same everywhere, but where I live men can kinda be forced into fatherhood, at minimum monetary support. Once proved a man is the father, DNA usually, he need at least to pay alimony. Some women use that, sometimes using tricks such as piercing condoms, to have children and live of the father's money.
Now, this are edge cases, women in general still get the short end, and as is their body, it's my opinion that women should have the choice alone about carrying the pregnancy to term. But just to show that the system such as it is now can be bad for everyone, even if not equally bad.
@@Melggart
What country do you live in? In the US a mother can get a child support order & if they ever apply for any state assistance program will be forced to help the state track down the father if it isn't known who or where he is then enable them to get a child support order.] However, two things about those is that
1) In like 96% of cases child support amounts are nowhere close to enough to live off of.
2) Child support is not the same as alimony. Child support money is to cover the non-custodial parent's financial obligation of the costs involved with caring for a child/children. Alimony is called spousal support in the US nowadays & while even in the 1960s was pretty uncommon [25% roughly of divorces,] it is even rarer today at only roughly 10% of divorces.
The amounts for both child support & spousal support orders are pretty complicated & based quite a bit on various individual situations. A rough idea on child support amounts would be in my state if the custodial parent makes $2,000 a month in gross income & the non-custodial parent makes $3,000, if there is 1 child & that child stays overnight at the non-custodial parents home between 36 & 72 nights out of the year then the non-custodial parent would have to pay $487 in child support a month to the custodial parent. Subject to adjustment based on some other individual factors [mainly due to special expenses a child has that is outside the usual expenses considered in the calculation such as work-related child care costs, insurance/medical costs, or any other "extraordinary costs".]
Also, here in my state at least there has to be a DNA paternity test to prove fatherhood. Even for normal parental rights if someone has a child outside of marriage then for the father to get any sort of parental rights [& to put any obligations on them,] they have to get a court-ordered DNA test... even if they are on the birth certificate as the father [which requires their signature to do.]
makes sense, I mean, there was the West Virginia lawmaker who proposed getting rid of child support to keep men from pressuring women into abortions
Men are forced into raising other men’s children all the time. Paternity fraud is about 30-35% of the average population. Women selling their bodies and having babies does not constitute a father walking away. That man was never a father.
A former college classmate of mine is a Trans non binary lesbian feminist who is also catholic and pro life. The day roe v wade fell, they posted a celebratory tweet and facebook post while all of my other friends in our social circle were mourning, including me. As far as I know, many of us have since unfollowed/unfriended and blocked them. They even started some lgbt+ anti-abortion group in my local city with other lgbt+ religious feminists, so bizarre and sad and betraying.
Edit: to people that day they sound cool, no. Being anti- choice/anti-abortion is being pro- forced birth, pro-oppressing people of color, pro- rape, and pro-incest. No matter how much cutesy wording "pro-life" is, it is a Christian movement that prioritizes the holy suffering and non-consentual martyr dom of women and others with uteruses. Look up the deaths of Savita Halappanavar and Sheila Hodgers. Or, more recently, the 10 year old Ohio girl who was raped and almost didn't get an abortion. Also, slightly related, look up how child marriage is still legal in the USA and how the pro-life men of the GOP keep blocking bills to make it illegal. It's shocking how much being "pro-life" is connected to denial of medical care and human rights for women and girls. That's why we were so shocked that our friend, a "woke" afab trans person, was on the side of rape and incest and pro-oppressing women and girls and other afab individuals.
@@isOOlzzlzlzks789 Sounds cool to me too.
They are allowed to have an opinion that differs from yours
Look up the recent death of Izabela Sajbor. Made me cry. ''My life is in danger. Thanks to this law, doctors can't help me. A woman is like an incubator. Let's hope I don't get sepsis or I will never leave this place'' she texted her mom before dying of sepsis from a miscarriage.
@@elianagross9507 It's not just an "opinion" when it's concretely affecting other people's lives. What kind of music you like is just an opinion. Forcing politics on people is not an "opinion", it's an ACT.
@@elianagross9507 it’s more than an opinion. They organized around it, and voted to take right away from people. It’s literally redefining the laws for those who disagree with their opinions. In a pro choice world, every pro life person gets to give birth. The reverse isn’t true. And please do reply back, would love to see your mental gymnastics play out if you have more of it to show off.
Holy Cow she is back!
*Pun intended*
Nice pun
All of your outfits are Iconic, i love that you stuck with the purple/white/green palette for the suffergette symbolism!
I REALLY wish we would not allow them to call themselves "pro-life," as they are entirely anti-choice.
Laws denying women autonomy over their own bodies has always been based in class warfare.
It is odd and aggravating that became the term used.
I notice many pro-choice people, including myself, slipping, and using the term "pro-life". It is so ingrained in our language.
All we can do is try to encourage and remind others to use "anti-choice". I obviously don't think that the anti-choice thinkers will begin to use it, but, hopefully the more the term is used, the more it will become the norm. I have met people, not so much anymore, that had never used, or heard, the term anti- choice instead of pro-life. It gives it such a different feeling!
the only fathomable way they could call themselves “pro-life” is if they’re ONLY referring to unborn fetuses. clearly they have no regard for the safety of the person carrying said fetus, or the child after they’re born. it’s infuriating.
Everyone who is against homicide is "anti-choice" then
@@he.said.teenjiejer yes they still believe that the mother and the child after birth should not be able to legally be killed for no reason
I will be voting next Wednesday. Just because I can. Well done Sister Suffragette!
Wilde net zeggen!
Me too. There’s not an election on, but damn it I’m voting anyway.
@@skyclawglhf
The ‘women shouldn’t be allowed to vote because of the draft’ is such a bizarre take. As though the draft is a fact of nature that exists in every country and hasn’t historically been an issue which has determined elections before. (I understand that electoral politics are not perfect, and often it is unable to make substantial changes when against lobbying groups and industry. However, couldn’t the right to vote be theoretically used as a tool to get rid of the draft?)
I mean, women weren’t part of the draft because _men_ designed it that way. It’s the weirdest thing ever to me that misogynists point to the draft as though it’s an evil idea that was implemented by women. The Selective Service Act was passed before women had the right to vote in the US.
In total contrast, women have had to fight in order to be permitted to serve in the US military. It was _men_ keeping women out of the military, not women refusing to participate.
Additionally, legislation to end Selective Service or include women has been repeatedly introduced-including within the last two years. And it’s never passed because _men_ vote against it.
@@alexwyatt2911 And I expect if you asked a lot of those men why they vote against it, you'd hear a lot of the same biological determinist arguments that flood the UA-cam comments any time you mention women or trans people in the military.
"If I wAs iN thE miLiTaRy I'd wAnT mY sQuAdMatE tO bE StRonG EnOuGh tO cArRY mE. WaAAaaaamEn aRe tOo wEaK. Give me a big strong muscly hard juicy- I mean I only trust a man to carry my wounded body out of a foxhole!"
Even ignoring the fact that the gap between the average man and woman is WAY smaller than people think, and is at least in part due to societal expectations for men to be strong and women to be pretty, there's just the simple fact that in a modern military, the vast majority of roles are non-combat roles. Most people will never be dug into a trench hoisting wounded beefcakes up onto their shoulders. They'll be behind a desk doing analyses, or fixing a broken APC, or loading medical supplies onto a cargo plane. Even then, if your role demands strength, you will be trained accordingly, and if you are too weak, you will be given a different role. For example, my friend wanted to be an RAF pilot but because he had mild hearing damage that would have affected his ability to hear commands up in the air, they reassigned him to maintenance.
Basically, people are sexist and try to write off their sexism as pragmatism while ignoring EVERY other pragmatic approach to modern military recruitment.
also most men in the world will never have to be drafted. The draft doesnt come into play all that often, especially now in the west. Its not an issue most people face everyday or will even ever face. Yet laws that affect women specifically affect women's lives every single day. Also women are much less likely to support war hungry politicians, so her argument is dumb on multiple levels
As an American, this argument is so ridiculous and people still make it. The draft has been defunct for decades, for a reason. Women can now vote, for a reason. They aren't even comparative anymore.
I think it's also bizarre, if you think through the results of being drafted. Say your husband gets drafted then is killed - so you have no say??? Tf or he comes back but you end up getting divorced or become estranged what then?
Tradwife life is always portrayed as middle/upper class. All floral dresses and crafts. It’s never minimum wage or zero hours contracts and council housing where one wage just doesn’t cut it.
I'm also reminded of what Susan Faludi wrote about anti-feminist women in the seventies and eighties. For a lot of the rank-and-file of them, they tended to associate their positions with their communities more than themselves as autonomous individuals. For example, they might be part of a religious community with a highly complimentarian norm that more equality between the sexes and genders would disrupt. So for them, they saw feminism as a danger to their communities, families, ways of life, etcetera, even if feminism sought to further liberate them as individual women.
What Faludi wrote about the women in positions of leadership and influence among the anti-feminist movement back then tracks a bit with what you are saying about the anti-suffragettes' leadership and the "not real" influencer types today. A lot of them were already in positions of relative privilege inside their own communities, and some of that privilege came from the privilege of the husbands they married. Equality was a threat to that intra-community privilege they had built and so it was in their self-interest to oppose it. For example, Phyllis Schlafly had a position of privilege within the broader right-wing ecosystem in large part because she opposed women having positions of privilege and influence. If any women could have the kind of influence Schlafly had then Schlafly wouldn't be an "exceptional" women anymore and would lose her power base.
"When you've lived in privilege for so long, equality can feel like oppression," - Dr MLKJ.
my take: "Some folks would rather be kings (or queens in this instance) of the junkyard than a commoner of a golden city,"
@@J-manli i mean you still inhale all the fumes anyway might aswell have nice surroundings
I have a feeling that these women who don't believe women should have rights would be singing a different tune if they got their way.
Just a feeling, though.
they would end up like Serena Joy; miserable and confined to their homes like a prison. With not even the right to read or write. Just wasting away knitting, smoking, gardening, and nothing else.
Yeah, I bet a lot of them actually do vote.
Yes, they wouldn't even have a platform either, they wouldn't be allowed one but I have an inkling that they think they'll still be above the rules if women lost their rights. Honnestly these women should just practice what they preach and leave the rest of us alone.
They all think they'll somehow be immune to the consequences of their words & actions.
Yeah they definitely think they are immune. Oh sweet summer child...
How could giving prostitutes the right to vote be any worse than giving the right to vote to men who frequent prostitutes?!
Different. Successful man frequently go prostitiutes too.many successful man do not need to go as women threw themself to them.
@@zhen86Dude,What?
@@zhen86But they’re the ones paying the ladies, thats the prostitutes job
@@zhen86 Then who is paying the prostitutes then genius, to keep them in business? Maybe it's those men, rich or poor, that also shouldn't have the right to vote? If we're using that logic.
@zhen86
I try very hard to even understand your comment. I simply can't. Successfull men pay women for sex. So what? They should be allowed to vote just because they're successfull? Being successfull doesn't make you a good person. Or willing to vote for a candidate good for the country. Maybe the candidate is enables creation of monopol in certain industries. In might be bad for the country but good for the successfull CEO. Also many female sex worker are successfull. Which means they also should be allowed to vote
I have no idea what you're trying to say
Life hack for Twitter users: if someone has the suffragette colours in their bio (💜🤍💚) they’re probably a terf 😬
because of course they did that
Yup :/ gotta love terfs just stealing history wholesale
remember peeps, VPN companies often sell data too.
Just an FYI, those are actually also the genderqueer pride colors!
damn not the genderqueer flag
When the world needed her the most she returned!!
I love how informative this is!! Felt like I was listening to an audio version of an academic paper. Super well done Tara! As a gay man in the US, I try to keep as up to date on women's issues, as they don't always naturally surface in my life. Thank you for shedding a helpful light on the historical and modern aspect of this!! ❤
I respect the hell out of you for that man, keep doing what you do!
pearl's context of "serve in war vs voting rights" is straight up "what if the world was made of pudding" shit.
I have never heard this expression. It is very powerful, and I thank you for bequeathing it to me.
@@ms.aelanwyr.ilaicos it's from the song/video "story from north america"
As if every man in the US has served in a war. Is she proposing only military men should be able to vote going forward?
hahahah 😂
First women in Canada who got the vote were serving volunteraly in a war. Many as nurses and doctors.
With women like that Pearl, is it just an escalation of her ideas over time just to maintain an audience? Like she starts off by having a pretty light pickme take on something, sees a bunch of new dude subscribers, but has to keep chasing more and more extreme positions to keep attention on her?
She can keep these dudes. No self-respecting women would claim them in any form (husband/boyfriend/ father/son/etc) so she can deal with them man babies. 😂
Probably, she certainly is very very far right. Like cartooney right. But the dame way there id a cartooney far left. Some poeple are just ridiculous no matter their political views
Yeah. I get the same impression. It actually makes me feel bad for her because those audiences always end up turning on you when you say one thing they don’t approve of. I remember when Lauren Southern got dragged by her own audience for the unspeakable crime of having an Asian ex-boyfriend or something like that (/s). On one hand, they bring it on themselves. But at the same time, it’s gotta suck to have cultivated an audience that you can’t really control anymore.
Grift 101 - say anything until you get an audience, then say whatever gets the most agreement and engagement - rinse and repeat until you become Alex Jones.
Yes. What else is she gonna do?
Begging people to not make their domination kinks a political issue
Bro, we living in an age where a dying breed of conservatives are adjusting the law to their breeding kink let alone rule American politics. 🤢🤢🤢
Why dont we take these women serious and just see them for what they are: Fascists. They are not necessarily stupid or are just having a kink, they belivie this shit, its their ideology. And I feel we should take them serious and fight them like the political enemy and not like stupid children who dont know better.
Everyone is a feminist until the Titanic starts sinking 😂😂😂
@@anthonycosta128no one was openly feminist back then. Also, feminism was just the right to vote back then, nothing else. It was the 1910's.
@@Jell0be3n Even now the same thing is happening Ukrainian men were not allowed to leave their country because they were the one's to protect or ensure safety who forced or imposed that on Ukrainian women? Also people say how many children died or women died in Palestine or Gaza again and again as if men's lives don't even matter ya that is their so called equality demand 😁😁😁
Im scared for the future. I feel like anything could be at risk. Never in all my life did I think my right to bodily autonomy would be stolen from me, yet here we are...
@Electroencefalografista i know, i really want to be a mom but I feel selfish bringing children into such a gross world. I feel like adopting would be better.
You have never had the right to sell your kidneys
@@mo.ka.9661 did you know that doctors wont just take good organs from a corpse? Even though those organs are good and could save someones life, they legally cannot take them without consent. A person has to consent to be an organ donor before passing and sign paperwork. If they haven't then drs have no choice but to respect your corpse and they wont take your organs. Yet a living breathing woman isnt allowed to choose whether or not she'll grow a fetus inside her body. She no longer has a choice if her body, womb, energy, calories, nutrients are all given to a fetus.
A corpse's bodily autonomy is respected more than a living womans.
@@mo.ka.9661 Where can I sell my kidney?
@@cloudstrife8596 probably Amazon
That pearly things woman is such an obvious pick me. She stares into men's eyes to see their reaction while she says it, it's so cringe.
Just pearly things is the pick me you want to avoid in life she brings every women depression.
Many men want to buy into the fantasy that some women care about them lol.
@benjaminollis7621 *_S I M P_*
@benjaminollis7621 Dog
@benjaminollis7621ew
There was not a day in my teenage life where my mom did not say “it’s better to have something and not need it, than need something and not have it.” If you don’t wanna vote, go ahead, nobody is forcing you to. But don’t take away my right to have a say just because I’m not suffering from your same case of delusion.
Over the last few years I noticed how the more conservative tik toks have become more extreme. Like you said it’s to gain a reaction and not because they believe it truly. But I think it’s kinda starting to bite them back because in the last midterms their overall output was well below expectations. Part of that is because a new generation of voters are coming in who are much more internet savvy and are seeing this stuff and thinking they are either being sincere or just so bonkers they rationally think, no way should they run any thing. Being controversial in purpose for attention only goes so far before you find yourself in a place you don’t want to be in
I will forever love the commitment to the cow bit. ...I mean, there is definitely a cow....definitely.
Someday we're gonna see the cow! And it'll be amazing!
@@Mathee Ooo, a deep fake of an editing cow! ...I mean, actual footage of her at her computer.
@@LaurenAnne6i think you mean "a deep real"
i'm a teenager in india and i do seem to see this in my social circle. It is so frustrating when other girls and women do this, and the end of it i'm left really angry . But i had long decided that i was not going to bash other girls especially in the presence of boys. What kills me more is these people actually believe that an opportunity that has long been given to men, if given to women , would be unjust to men. i'm mad just writing this. And if at all i try to approach the subject even in a civil and calm manner , i'm just labeled as 'the crazy feminist friend'
Arent women already allowed to vote in India? Why do you say that people believe that it would be unjust to men if women were allowed to vote? Maybe im misinterpreting your comment, but that makes it sound like women still arent allowed to vote where you live.
Also, I want to point out that there is a big difference between bashing and criticising girls. If a girl says that women shouldnt be allowed to vote, she should immediately be criticised for it, regardless of whether there are boys present or not. If people arent criticised for their ignorant beliefs, then they will never change. I understand its difficult to publically criticise others when nobody is on your side and everyone else disagrees with you, but please never feel like its a morally bad thing to criticise other girls or feel like you're "bashing" them.
@@FirstnameLastname-zq8oy hey, what i was referring to was not the right to vote but rather opportunities. Like jobs or social positions. also thank you for your kind words, when i was writing that comment a year ago i felt incredibly cornered for merely pointing out the unfairness in society around us. And you are right, at that point i had been afraid that even my fair criticism would be labelled as women bringing down other women .but in reality i have grown to start having these conversations even in the presence of boys as if i didnt point out unfair statements right then it did feel like i was validating them, even if for that brief moment. Once again i thank you for your kind comment, it has further assured me that i'm not doing anything wrong.
to whoever sees this but especially tara: you’re awesome
Ty, I try
Right back at ya!
No, you!
@@ariw9405 ty!! :)
Disagree
I don't believe we have seen Tara and miss the cow in the same place before… 👀
Coincidence?
yes
Frankly I admire how good the cow’s Tara suit is. That’s some S-tier costuming.
Gotta love how these people always reduce war to forntlines , in fact usually women kept the agriculture , economy and weapon industry going during wartime , not to mention they worked as nurses in military and field hospitals .
Exactly. And I bet living in cities Like London, Warsaw or Berlin during wartime wasn't exactly easy for women either.
Also the reason Women aren't the subject of the draft is because when it was created they weren't allowed to fight on the Frontline, so it was useless to draft them, and since they were allowed in combat roles we haven't needed to use the draft so there was no reason to change it.
A woman signing a petition against her right to vote is the most ironic thing I've heard all day.
"I elect to forgo my right to vote! . . . Wait"
@@aegisScalelol right they’re literally voting to have their right to vote be taken away. The ridiculousness of it all lol
So, women should be drafted for the MILITARY and the next big war then. It's only fair. It just can't be men.
Back then voting meant also being conscripted but as because of female privilege they didn't have to.
Yeah. My mom still recognizes the dissonance of that and tells any woman she meets who is against women voting “then you don’t vote, but don’t tell others not to!” She’s awfully misogynistic but deeply values the rights of women and wants to keep perpetuating and strengthening the equal status of all people (sounds feminist but seriously… the horrible things that she spews make it clear she’s not even someone who says “I’m an egalitarian” because of a misunderstanding of what feminism is about).
man this video just made me sad about what’s happened to the suffragette colors :(
Yep. Terfs ruin everything
I fell down this type of brain washing when I was younger. Almost married an abusive 30 year old when I was 19. I wanted to be the cute little cottage core trad wife. Out of pure luck I broke free and saw the brain washing before my life got trapped.
Hey, my sister did a prestation on woman's suffrage today, AND I just binged some of your channel. This is one of the biggest coincidences that ever happened to me on UA-cam.
Gonna send this to my sister, I'm not the biggest voter and neither is her boyfriend. We both kind of look at it as "I don't understand politics well enough to make an informed decision and we're all fucked over either way." But my sister is a very adamant voter partly because of the history of women not being allowed to vote and partly due to the corruption in my country (N. Ireland) that within living memory meant that a Catholic vote only counted as half a vote and was not considered a "real vote" (hence why we were always told not to use contraception- contrary to popular belief it had nothing to do with the church and was more about producing more voters). She is adamant at voting in every election regardless of who is running or what the election is for and has said to me "I'm not going to tell you who to vote for, I'm not going to tell you not to waste your vote, I'm not going to ask you about it unless you want to tell me but so many people over here died so that we could have a voice in politics and to ignore that would be disrespectful". She's a smart girl and I've a lot of respect for that mentality.
She's so cool
mad respect for your sister
I’m from Australia where we have compulsory voting so I find it kinda odd when people don’t vote. Like sure basically all politicians are corrupt, but opting for the lesser of two evils is def better. Also because basically everyone votes at home if you feel like there is no good options you cast a donkey vote, basically an incorrectly filled vote or a blank one, people draw obscene doodles or write F*** you all on the ballot paper and all those votes get counted so when the results come in there is a count of all the invalid donkey votes. Personally I think that matters, because a big increase in donkey votes indicates dissatisfaction and that sometimes least to party changes. There are other issues with Australian politics, but personally I like the compulsory voting part. It also means that campaign money doesn’t have to go to trying to get people to go vote, parties can focus on voicing their platform instead.
@@thebeaside I heard about compulsory voting in Australia, from my knowledge you've to pay a fine if you don't vote but correct me if I'm wrong. It's good to hear from the perspective of someone who has that and a donkey vote is a bit like when someone chooses to "waste" their vote over here by stating that they don't like any of the above options, it is good to hear that the dissatisfaction is taken seriously
@@ed-wh8ih Yeah, it’s a fine, it’s small enough to not be financially devastating but big enough to make it worth voting. I think it’s like 50 bucks these days. But also postal voting is easy and there are lots of polling places and it’s always on a Saturday so it’s not too hard to do. Also most polling places have a charity BBQ so you can pay a couple of bucks for a sausage after voting, people generally don’t mind going to vote because the barriers aren’t high.
"I would rather have the right to bear arms so I can engage in a civil war with my government than have the right to vote on what it does." Unfathomable takes, genuinely.
Guns are WAY more important that voting.
I think really this is a perfect example that these "takes" are not intended to be rational in any meaningful way. They exist because guns are a right wing issue and, for some reason, voting is a left-wing issue, and that is the only thing that matters in the brains that occupy these spaces. They are zero percent interested in the rational ramifications or logical backing of such ideas.
I appreciate women's role in politics more than I did before this video
Funny how they think that the right to bear arms would be excluded when losing rights. 🤦♀️
Exactly. How would they guarantee that if the right to vote is taken away on the basis of sex and a rationale like "women are overly emotional", that the right to bear arms wouldn't also be taken away on the same basis?
@@alexavasquez1992 Like did they think it through? Do they think firing a gun isn't emotional or something?
@@carolinemcgovern4488 and isn't it their side always telling women to carry to prevent being raped? By their own logic, they would be allowing rape while telling us we're too emotional to have all the means available to us to prevent it
I'm from Chile, and I read a book on women's right to vote nationally some years ago, and one bit of info that has stuck with me from it was that the arguments against it from both sides basically boiled down to the right side going "but what if they vote for the left?!" and the left side going "but what if they vote for the right?!" in a weird mutually paranoid loop. Which is funny to me in an ironic, either-I-laugh-or-I'll-want-to-punch-someone-in-the-face, kinda way.
Wonderful video! Will be subscribing and waiting for that Pro-Life video thingy!
Women, if you can vote, PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE vote. Voting is not only good for you, but it gives the polls a reason to love Noodles the Chicken.
I had something poinant to say, but Noodles came on screen.
I 100% disagree about debating with these....
I recognize that I am biased in this regard... But having to "debate" my right to exist is 1) something that shouldn't need be... And 2) never amounts to anything.
No one who is a bigot ever ceases their bigotry over seeing some nonsensical farce of a "debate".
That's true, the way I look at it though is that you're not doing it for them, you're doing it for the people watching who's minds haven't been made up on the issue yet. That being said though, just because you're a woman doesn't mean it's your job to engage in all that.
The mindset of " If I don't want to, then nobody should" is so beyond childish. Republican's try to grow up challenge: IMPOSSIBLE?!?!
There should be a rule that the moment someone calls women emotional, they are discredited for eternity.
Haven't watched this yet but these women on tiktok joking about the women who fought to have the right to work---no one's telling them they HAVE to work. They can, by all means, just marry a man and not work. Some women, however, love financial independence.
Imagine having to ask your husband if it's okay to buy self-treat items like shampoos and lotions that are a little more expensive but high quality, and your husband telling you no because it's his money. Or not being able to buy the ice cream you like just because you want to. I could NEVER. My money will be MINE to spend however I please.
They kept women down with lack of education and autonomy. From fathers grip straight to authoritative husband and in many cases in the past it was someone much older being promised an underaged girl. Nothing but exploitation and abuse of power.
Exactly this. Women have always been working, the difference is that now it's outside of the house and we're getting paid for it.
“Women don’t do taxes” you mean to tell me I didn’t have to file this whole time …damn 😂
Women do not pay net taxes. They drain more out of the system then they pay in taxes. Women are a subsidized government program.
IRS entered the chat
I hate Mondays but not this Monday.
Ah yes the classic 'I never thought that the leopards would eat MY face'.
In France, we have a say : Better alone than in bad company. The pick-me women should keep that idea in mind because if to get the men's attention you have to give up on your rights or simply depreciate yourself, that's no good for both women and men.
A lot of people forget that behind a great man is a greater woman. It's actually true since no brilliant and wise man is looking for someone that can't be his equal at every level or even be better at some. Take all the powerful men from the 19th and 20th centuries : the vast majority were married or in a long-term relatioship with an amazing woman that was just as gifted as them but they hadn't the same social and legal status.
A lot of straight women never got married before or never knew a man. That's life ! But that doesn't mean they should desperately give up on themselves to end up with a moron.
The misandary is showing with 'greater woman' part
She's also single anyway. And, in her own words, past her prime
This is honestly such a frustrating and downright infuriating thing. It's one thing if _you_ don't wanna vote or have the rights of a fully grown adult with all the responsibilities that come with it. But it's downright selfish to try and take that right away from everyone else that actually enjoys being acknowledged as a fully fledged human being. Do these idiot grifters realize they can just not vote and sink further into their hole of idiocy and self infantilization?
Fight to end the draft and circumcision then maybe I’ll think your right to vote is important. Until then I look upon all of you with nothing but disdain.
"Local bovine cow-ncil elections".....I'll see myself out.
Oh, do moo...ve along. 🐮
I grew up conservative Christian and had a full body shudder at the mention of complementarianism. The fact that it’s still an alive and thriving idea in so many places genuinely scares me.
You know why a dick fits in a pussy? It’s cause of complimentatianism. Next time you have heterosexual sex remember you’re engaging in the patriarchy.
Guys... I'm beginning to think that she'll never actually show us the cow... it's clear that the cow thinks she's above us because she always finds something better to do🙄
This message is for every single woman. you're special and don't let anyone tells you the opposite , no one in this World has the same features , body ,experiences exactly how you do , so you're freaking special , just value yourself and appreciate yourself and stay true to yourself and Always remember that you're the main character in your life and dedicate your life in what makes you happy because u know life is short . Stay strong ladies ❤️.
did that one lady say "women don't pay taxes"? someone have the IRS check on her
Thank you for making this ♥️
Thank you Tara and your cowmrad. As always an excellent video.
the fact that this discussion even exists makes me feel like we're becoming the world of The Handmaid's Tale
Lyman Abbott is giving me Andrew Tate vibes , trying to speak for women and trying to explain that us having basic rights goes against our very nature . 🤣
Love to hear about all these women getting so politically active to deny themselves political rights.
I used to get angry and argue with people who would argue against basic feminist rights or treat me disrespectfully. Now I just move on, because they are not to be taken seriously and are showing you that they are not worth investing time in.
Love the Yoshi story music at the end.
Last year I became 18 and I was so excited to finally have the chance to vote and make a change. So I started studying all of the political parties' programmes and after that I just realized with horror that the only options were right-winged and very right-winged. I did the only thing I could do and voted the less terrible option which obviously was a super small party who nobody ever heard of. After that the super right-winged party won and I've never felt so insignificant. Thank you for showing clips of Giorgia Meloni in this video, for now nothing terrible happend, but I am very angered that many more years will pass before basic rights like same sex marriages and adoptions, trans healthcare, abortion and total equality between women and men will come to fruition for the public. That said I will keep fighting and I will keep voting until things get better, I'm positive that one day we will make it and I can't wait for it happen.
It's sad that even though you did not mention the country you're from, from your description I thought you were from mine but there are dozens of countries you could be from
I assume you're from Italy? If so, so am i, and the situation really sucks :/ I really hope Giorgia ends up derailing the voterbase, but it's really sad that the best most of us can hope for is "let's hope they accomplish nothing"
Isn’t the birth rate in Italy one of the lowest? Gotta wonder, in a couple centuries, will Italy exist? The land will, but maybe instead of a predominantly Catholic county, it will be a Muslim country, etc? Several countries are dealing with this reality. Most people don’t think a century or two out, but I think South Korea is the most in jeopardy of disappearing, then possibly Japan.
When I turned 18, the first election I could vote in was a city council election. There were 3 open seats on the city council, and 3 people running for them. The instructions were "vote for 3 of 3". I was excited to vote, but there was literally no difference I could make.
I started debating right wingers in 2016 and kept at it pretty aggressively for a few years, but it just left me drained and with very little faith in humanity. Most people spouting these kinds of opinions are not looking to have their minds changed, and attempting to do so is insanely unlikely to work online. If you have family or friends who are conservative, that’s a different story because you have real leverage there, socially. My opinion on how to be proactive online, though, is to simply focus on educating moderates and the politically apathetic on these issues and why they should care, because I think a lot of centrism comes from ignorance, but that a lot of them are trying to do what they think is best for everyone. I also think arguing for the lurkers is way more the point if you are going to debate an alt right reactionary, so stay calm and educational if you can, and don’t resort to slurs please. I think shaming reactionaries is fine, but don’t do it in a divide and conquer way, us vs them. It’s everyone vs harmful ideologies.
LOVE this video!!! The research, history, editing, commentary, THE OUTFIT, literally all amazing
so exciting to see Tara dropping videooos
Another great video from Tara and the Cow 🐄
Go Cows!
what really gets me about these super conservative women saying women shouldn't have rights etc etc is that they're all talking about this in huge platforms: podcasts, tiktok, twitter. if they genuinely believed in the "traditional way of life" that women should live, then they wouldn't even be in those platforms in the first place! you can't say you think women shouldn't have rights and hold no value in their opinions while expressing those rights & opinions yourself. I don't think they truly understand what that would mean for themselves because they've never actually lived through it.
But how would we be able to get support if you're exclaiming what hypocrites they are, then it would only be men arguing to repeal the 19th
It's very strange that politics can never be simple, no matter the issue. Recently my mind was blown when I learned that the super-racist, hyper-traditionalist H.P. Lovecraft was explicitly a socialist, at least for awhile. And I myself was anti-abortion for a long time after becoming Catholic, because I was inspired by radicals like Dorothy Day. I tried to justify my position in feminist/socialist terms as much as I could, with help from various pro-life feminist writings. So I guess I shouldn't be surprised that some women manage to find ways to be against the right to vote.
I have a feeling that religion is a common factor in this trend
@@TwoForFlinchin1 Was Lovecraft religious?
@@colonelweird no, he was an anti-religious atheist. But that doesn't mean much if you're steeped in white supremacist, Christian culture like he was. From what I understand his beliefs changed for the better towards the end of his life.
I brought up religion because I can't deny that it's reasonable for someone who believes in an eternal soul to think that abortion qualifies as murder. The same way I thought proselytizing and spreading Christianity around the world was a positive when I was a Christian.
I'm not trying to psychoanalyze you but I interpreted what you said as you becoming pro-life due to Catholicism.
Someone posted a long response to my comment and argued that HPL was not a socialist, then apparently they deleted it. But I will respond anyway. Maybe it will help someone else interested in the subject. I read about Lovecraft becoming a socialist a few months ago, but I've forgotten where. So I did a bit of digging and found that the subject is discussed in S.T. Joshi's massive biography of Lovecraft, I Am Providence, chapter 23. He goes into some detail to show how Lovecraft "converted to moderate socialism" in the early 1930s. HPL stated explicitly that his contempt for socialism in the past had been wrong, and he adopted the term deliberately and with due consideration.
Also, after digging into this book to find out about HPL's socialism, I'm interested in reading the whole thing. It includes a lot of fascinating details on HPL's intellectual development, and the ways he engaged the currents of thought in his day.
To answer my own question: no, he was an atheist.
Great video!
I'll never forgive the fact that you made me remember Kaitlin Bennett exists.
Thank you for talking about this. To me, these women appear strong but I think they feel incredibly helpless and instead of becoming more compassionate and thoughtful they turn into bullies. And when bullies search for victims, it’s people they feel they can easily victimize - in this case, other women. Instead of learning history and discussing the impact that voting had on men as young as 18 (being drafted), they turn their eye towards women and say, these things wouldn’t happen if you were never allowed to vote. It’s really sad to see…
God I remember 10 years ago having this type of argument in an AP language class in high school. It was more specifically on whether or not women should be drafted but lots of overlap
Drafting in general is a terrible idea.
@@ManiaMac1613 for sure, against the draft
@@widgie161 A big part of the reason why Russia got their ass kicked in Ukraine is that they sent in a bunch of draftees to fight professional soldiers who were highly motivated to defend their homeland. It's a proven fact that conscripts fare poorly against an all-volunteer force, even if they have a numerical advantage. Aside from being just bad and unjust to begin with it also doesn't provide a meaningful tactical or strategic advantage in modern warfare.
@@ManiaMac1613lmao Ukraine just lost, your comment is mute
yet another successful collaboration between bovine and human being, cows are our future
I’m so happy that we’ve come so far. The suffrage act really helped society greatly, no matter what anti-suffrage people say
the first things women instituted in the US after gaining the right to vote was Prohibition and alimony
Try again
Lmao you think society is better right now 😂😂😂😂
@@berrymckockiner5883 I never said that
@@clivematthews95 so how did They help society if society is worse
@@berrymckockiner5883 ask someone else, I said what I said
6:11 A little funny that they've been doing the 'We're the silent majority, trust me bro I speak for a ton of people too afraid to speak' bit for so long