This is the galactic equivalent of being neighbors of the nuclear boy scout, you wake up one day and he’s irradiated the whole neighborhood from a makeshift reactor in his shed
When I was a teenager I read everything I could find on cosmology. What JWST discovers now is exactly what I hoped we would see one day with much better instruments. This is indeed the Golden Era of observational cosmology.
The computer revolution added orders of magnitude to this field of knowledge. I remember what it was like in the 1970s when it started to take off, black holes were still a theoretical thing🙂
Personally, the golden age for me will be when we have multiple JWSTs in various Lagrange points in the solar system. But I agree, this is all awesome.
I really thought by this time we would have several 1000m aperture optical telescopes in space and multiple large radio telescopes co-orbital with Earth giving us a 2au aperture radio telescope. Instead we've wasted billions of dollars destroying sacred mountains, imprisoning indigenous people and making them pay for their own beatings. Overall it's been pretty disappointing.
Sorry to rain on your parade but here is no scientific evidence for BHs...and math is NOT science. These mathamagicians are inventing things with math and pretending they are real. Scientists will do almost anything for grant $. Check some articles about academic/research fraud. === 🤜⚡💥⚡🤛 LOL LOL LOL The hubris and arrogance to think we understand star/galactic evolution. But of course they are WRONG!!!All this and more is better explained with experiment-based plasma science; i.e. Plasma Cosmology. 1] the Universe is based on plasma; 2] plasma's are electric in nature/origin; 3] plasmas inherently self-organize into structures; 4] plasma's produce many EM-band emissions (light, 'rays' and radio frequencies). Conclusion: just another plasma emission. Move on! Nothing unusual here. Astronomer Halton Arp made a good case for it in his books. Similar to the item in this video, Halton showed galaxies and star clusters that are connected by bridges...yet have vastly different red shifts. This occurs because a parent galaxy can eject smaller bodies which then grow in size with time to become galaxies. MSS will continue to be clueless until the scientists admit they have been wrong and adopt new physics in dealing with the 'mysteries' they don't understand. Clearly the current approach doesn't serve them well. == Carrying on with darkwhatever is like religions claiming that Earth etc. are evidence of god. It's all misappropriation just the same. If you can't understand something DON'T just invent fairy tales. Geezus!!! Yeah, science has gone off the rails on other things too. Yes, there are so many blunders that it's become a joke. Some scientists, like Sabine Hossenfelder comment on some of these fallacies. 💥 Moreover, black holes do not exist. No 'Onerock' rings have been detected for Milkyway's central BH, Sagittarius A, proving that gravity does not bend light, thereby nullifying/disproving Onerock's theories. Dr. Dowdye demonstrated that the Eddington light bending experiment to prove Onerock's theories was a sham. It was simply atmospheric diffraction within the limb of the Sun. Bending due to grabbity would have been detectable up to 0.1 AU from the Sun's surface but this was not observed thus Onerock was wrong. Whenever I think about gravity it brings me down. ))) == My comment to Anton Petrov's video *"One of the Largest Stars Known Dimmed Just Like Betelgeuse"* -- don't be surprised when a red supergiant splits into 2 stars or ejects a hot object[s] that will cool to form a planet[s]._ is relevant here, Conventional science is oblivious to this fact... for now, but evidence/observations will force this conclusion. Another observation/fact they will have to concede is that stars of same or similar class will, on average, have similar types of planets with the exception of stars whose Birkeland current has gone through a structural and energetic change in the past which occurs frequently. Variable output stars/objects demonstrate this. Other electrical phenomena affect the aforementioned which add to variations. 🤜⚡💥⚡🤛 ... .. .
What is really mind-blowing is the fact that a region 16,000,000 light-years across is nothing more than a statistical anomaly on the scale of the entire universe.
I've had my view of space changed by this. I was under the impression it was possible to be safe with enough distance and that events were more or less confined to galactic regions. I viewed things like galactic clusters are mostly abstraction where for all intents and purposes galaxies were all isolated and that grouping them was a bit academic. But the idea of a single blackhole's accretion disc sterilizing an area 16 million lightyears wide changes my perception utterly. Simply incomprehensible power. I thought magnetars were insane. This is unimaginable.
Galactic clusters aren't abstractions, because the galaxies are held together by gravity, which prevents them from flying away too much, and maybe is enough to counteract the dark energy.
Correct. It is unimaginable...because it's FALSE. There is no scientific evidence for BHs...and math is NOT science. These mathamagicians are inventing things with math and pretending they are real. Scientists will do almost anything for grant $. Check some articles about academic/research fraud. === 🤜⚡💥⚡🤛 LOL LOL LOL The hubris and arrogance to think we understand star/galactic evolution. But of course they are WRONG!!!All this and more is better explained with experiment-based plasma science; i.e. Plasma Cosmology. 1] the Universe is based on plasma; 2] plasma's are electric in nature/origin; 3] plasmas inherently self-organize into structures; 4] plasma's produce many EM-band emissions (light, 'rays' and radio frequencies). Conclusion: just another plasma emission. Move on! Nothing unusual here. Astronomer Halton Arp made a good case for it in his books. Similar to the item in this video, Halton showed galaxies and star clusters that are connected by bridges...yet have vastly different red shifts. This occurs because a parent galaxy can eject smaller bodies which then grow in size with time to become galaxies. MSS will continue to be clueless until the scientists admit they have been wrong and adopt new physics in dealing with the 'mysteries' they don't understand. Clearly the current approach doesn't serve them well. == Carrying on with darkwhatever is like religions claiming that Earth etc. are evidence of god. It's all misappropriation just the same. If you can't understand something DON'T just invent fairy tales. Geezus!!! Yeah, science has gone off the rails on other things too. Yes, there are so many blunders that it's become a joke. Some scientists, like Sabine Hossenfelder comment on some of these fallacies. 💥 Moreover, black holes do not exist. No 'Onerock' rings have been detected for Milkyway's central BH, Sagittarius A, proving that gravity does not bend light, thereby nullifying/disproving Onerock's theories. Dr. Dowdye demonstrated that the Eddington light bending experiment to prove Onerock's theories was a sham. It was simply atmospheric diffraction within the limb of the Sun. Bending due to grabbity would have been detectable up to 0.1 AU from the Sun's surface but this was not observed thus Onerock was wrong. Whenever I think about gravity it brings me down. ))) == My comment to Anton Petrov's video *"One of the Largest Stars Known Dimmed Just Like Betelgeuse"* -- don't be surprised when a red supergiant splits into 2 stars or ejects a hot object[s] that will cool to form a planet[s]._ is relevant here, Conventional science is oblivious to this fact... for now, but evidence/observations will force this conclusion. Another observation/fact they will have to concede is that stars of same or similar class will, on average, have similar types of planets with the exception of stars whose Birkeland current has gone through a structural and energetic change in the past which occurs frequently. Variable output stars/objects demonstrate this. Other electrical phenomena affect the aforementioned which add to variations. 🤜⚡💥⚡🤛
@@Toxicpoolofreekingmascul-lj4yd no, not at all. That's more of an unwritten constant, sort of how no one questions how much air is around us volumetrically, but marvels at mountains or oceans.
@@khumokwezimashapa2245 I was gonna try and use a Dragonball Z reference like the guy above my comment used but even that crazy series has nothing that could compare to this event.
@@RJ-Numen That's what makes this event so crazy. I think in DBZ at least. The most destructive feat was Broly destroying the South or East Galaxy. I know those movies aren't canon, but I think that's the most a single character has destroyed in Z. This would clap a lot of the DBZ characters, which is insane to think. This Quaser unironically solos a lot of verses 😂😂
There is no evidence that the eruption of the magnetar SGR 1806-20 in 2004 caused any damage to the Earth's ozone layer. Here are some key reasons: ## Distance from Earth Magnetar SGR 1806-20 is located about 50,000 light-years away from Earth. This vast distance means that even a powerful eruption could not have had a direct physical impact on our planet. ## Nature of the Radiation The eruption emitted primarily intense bursts of gamma radiation. While this was the strongest gamma radiation recorded to date, the ozone layer effectively protects life on Earth from this type of radiation. ## Lack of Observational Evidence Scientists closely monitored Earth and its atmosphere during and after the magnetar eruption. No anomalies in ozone levels or other atmospheric gases were observed that could indicate damage to the ozone layer. ## Mechanism of Ozone Formation The ozone layer is formed through photochemical reactions driven by ultraviolet radiation from the Sun. Gamma radiation from the magnetar eruption could not disrupt this natural process. In summary, while the eruption of magnetar SGR 1806-20 was a spectacular astronomical event, it had no measurable impact on the Earth's ozone layer due to the immense distance of the source and the nature of the emitted radiation. The ozone layer remained intact
Where is evidence that there was ozone damage to earth's atmosphere? I have only seen reports that our ozone was not affected by the 2004 magnatar star quake.
These astronomical units and the reality they convey are always baffling to me. Our brains haven't evolved to think on these scales, so I can only 'picture' them in a logical, abstract way. Thanks for your thorough, constant uploads. I always wait to see your lovely smile at the end :)
I just imagine it in photoshop pixel terms. We are a single pixel in an infinite canvas of an untold sea of pixels. This quasar event is the equivalent of someone taking the eraser tool and gently tapping on the infinite canvas once.
And your teach was correct. There is no scientific evidence for BHs...and math is NOT science. These mathamagicians are inventing things with math and pretending they are real. Scientists will do almost anything for grant $. Check some articles about academic/research fraud. === 🤜⚡💥⚡🤛 LOL LOL LOL The hubris and arrogance to think we understand star/galactic evolution. But of course they are WRONG!!!All this and more is better explained with experiment-based plasma science; i.e. Plasma Cosmology. 1] the Universe is based on plasma; 2] plasma's are electric in nature/origin; 3] plasmas inherently self-organize into structures; 4] plasma's produce many EM-band emissions (light, 'rays' and radio frequencies). Conclusion: just another plasma emission. Move on! Nothing unusual here. Astronomer Halton Arp made a good case for it in his books. Similar to the item in this video, Halton showed galaxies and star clusters that are connected by bridges...yet have vastly different red shifts. This occurs because a parent galaxy can eject smaller bodies which then grow in size with time to become galaxies. MSS will continue to be clueless until the scientists admit they have been wrong and adopt new physics in dealing with the 'mysteries' they don't understand. Clearly the current approach doesn't serve them well. == Carrying on with darkwhatever is like religions claiming that Earth etc. are evidence of god. It's all misappropriation just the same. If you can't understand something DON'T just invent fairy tales. Geezus!!! Yeah, science has gone off the rails on other things too. Yes, there are so many blunders that it's become a joke. Some scientists, like Sabine Hossenfelder comment on some of these fallacies. 💥 Moreover, black holes do not exist. No 'Onerock' rings have been detected for Milkyway's central BH, Sagittarius A, proving that gravity does not bend light, thereby nullifying/disproving Onerock's theories. Dr. Dowdye demonstrated that the Eddington light bending experiment to prove Onerock's theories was a sham. It was simply atmospheric diffraction within the limb of the Sun. Bending due to grabbity would have been detectable up to 0.1 AU from the Sun's surface but this was not observed thus Onerock was wrong. Whenever I think about gravity it brings me down. ))) == My comment to Anton Petrov's video *"One of the Largest Stars Known Dimmed Just Like Betelgeuse"* -- don't be surprised when a red supergiant splits into 2 stars or ejects a hot object[s] that will cool to form a planet[s]._ is relevant here, Conventional science is oblivious to this fact... for now, but evidence/observations will force this conclusion. Another observation/fact they will have to concede is that stars of same or similar class will, on average, have similar types of planets with the exception of stars whose Birkeland current has gone through a structural and energetic change in the past which occurs frequently. Variable output stars/objects demonstrate this. Other electrical phenomena affect the aforementioned which add to variations. 🤜⚡💥⚡🤛
Sadly I find this very believable. I was taught Bohr's atom 50 years after that model was abandoned. I was also taught that the earth is flat and infinite, (though to be fair I don't think my teachers understood that was what they were saying when they said that a dropped object had constant acceleration). They called it "Newtonian" which was interesting because it was actually Newton who first realised that acceleration due to gravity is not constant, but varies as the inverse square of the distance between objects. So they were teaching pre-newtonian. 400+ years out of date
An old ad for a TV set, in my youth: Zenith came out with a "Quasar TV" in 1967 (now Panasonic, I think.) Quasars were the new marvel as I recall. Oh and it was a transistorized TV -- selling point -- fewer tubes to replace?
We got the "Motorola Works in a drawer" All the circuitry pulled out on a tall tray in the front. Everything was marked. What a Fun TV to learn and adjust. You sort of go for clean Black & White then bring the colors up from there. Alignment, nice. 26 inch classic. Worked for decades with a little love.
We had a Quasar. It's true, it required less service. Back then, home visits by TV repairmen were a big thing. Sometimes they could replace the tubes in your house, and sometimes not. The Quasar was made with banks of solid state components. If something went bad, you replaced the whole board. Service calls were fewer and faster with the Quasar.
@@paleixs96 When I first heard of quasars in the 1970s, they were very bright objects receding at high speeds no one understood. today they are black hole-based phenomena the more we learn about them the more they seem important in shaping the very structure of the universe.
The sheer power responsible for this is insane “normal” quasars are crazy powerful but this a new mind boggling level. I’d make an educated guess the black hole responsible would have to dwarf most supermassive black holes to produce a quasar that extreme either that it could be unique environmental factors. If primordial black holes exist that black hole would probably fit the bill.
Any supermassive black hole would do, the difference is the amount of matter in its accretion disk. Usually there is a local limitation on the amount of matter that can accumulate into an accretion disk, but if conditions local to the black hole are sufficiently unusual then the accretion disk can become much denser and therefore much more powerful than usual. This is likely an exceptional event, given that so far it is the only one found with such power. Of course as our instruments become more sensitive we may learn that they were more common earlier in the universe's history, or it may remain an exceptional event. I will find it interesting when enough evidence accumulates to answer that question.
Holy guacamole! The destructive power of this quasar makes an Imperial Death Star seem like something all the way down at the Planck scale - and it's not sci-fi, it's *_REAL!!!_*
@@ConsciousApostle999 Curious if this is a troll and did you watch the video. The quasar "killed", Antons words, Galaxies with 16 million light years. So going with me feeding the troll. Now go away and watch the videos instead of harassing those with a large intellectual capacity then your own!
@@danieltal3d Nothing can kill an effing galaxy is my point… y’all are sorely mislead. The magnitudes of difference between the largest black hole, and even the smallest of galaxy’s is fairly large, meanwhile the difference between the largest black hole and a mid size galaxy such as our Milky Way is incomprehensible. A quasar hitting a galaxy is like a human being pepper sprayed… All of these galaxies will most likely live on and integrate with other nearby galactic neighbors/accumulate gas for the rest of infinity while this quasars dies out in the next few million years, sterilizing neighbor galaxies for less than a few thousand years, which is insignificant when stars are forming every second for billions upon billions of years. 9/10 people watching this video, unironically think there are 100 less galaxies in the universe, like this is dbz in the buu saga during the age of Kai’s, give me a break😂
I feel like a peasant in the middle ages who believed oceans were filled with giant monsters, demons and temperamental gods. I used to think of space in more romantic and benign ways and now I'm becoming like that middle-aged peasant only now I'm on a small island surrounded by an ocean more hostile than I can imagine.
@@ganymede6535Yes, the metalicity of the universe was not high enough to produce rocky planets and provide elements needed for life until it was about 8 billion years old (per Isaac Arthur )
The scale of things in the universe is mind boggling. 16.8 million light years, and we're only 2.5 million from Andromeda. Radiation so strong it sends gases away at 10,000 miles per second.
*Imagine right now, gamma rays from a pulsar 15 million light years away (150x the diameter of our entire galaxy), just instantaneously ended the entire galaxy, from an explosion 15 million years ago.* This is truly beyond human comprehension.
Your own two eyes are about a half nano light second apart meaning they see events at slightly different times and each sees a slight different edge to the visible universe as both are at different centers. On a short timescale there really isn’t even a definite present, it’s relative.
This is literally a major plot point of the Ringworld series. The "solution" there was to run away, on an unbelievably massive scale.... we're probably thousands of years from tech that would make that feasible, if all goes well. And if it doesn't, we'll never get there
First you need to convince everyone that climate change is real, otherwise it will not be a problem that mankind needs to worry about. See Fermi paradox.
@@bobkoroua Do you think humans have the capacity to harness the global climate? It would be insane to believe so. We'd sooner develop light speed travel, because while light speed is a simple energy transfer in physics, you can't just pump energy into controlling the climate, unless you somehow intend to install global scale air conditioners, which would also not be a solution, because even if you had one the size of the moon on earth, you wouldn't be able to do anything with it without killing everyone on the planet. Volume, location, and physics....along with a thousand different processes taking place in the earth itself, and space weather, the suns maximums and minimums, etc. It's soo much to account for that just the natural processes of the earth itself would throw any attempts out of wack. For example, if we could somehow control the entire earths climate and make it all a nice 70 degrees everywhere all the time....but nope, because you have volcanoes going off, emissions of stuff from permafrost, stuff bubbling up from below the ocean. So it's literally not as simple as just running some device somewhere or putting a weather controlling device every square mile across the entire planet, because there's too many things going on all the time everywhere that you'll never be able to account for it all. You pull one thread tight, another one comes loose, a trillion times a second, at a trillion metric tons a second. Or in other words, what you think is achievable, is actually impossible. By the time we might have technology that could handle that, the planet itself would be pointless for our needs because we will be at a point where we can simply move beyond it.
@@bobkoroua Climate change is not going to wipe humanity out unless it goes the other way and we get a snowball Earth again. Warming from CO2 is bad but not an extinction-level event, or even a civilization collapsing one.
I wonder if it might be a bit dramatic to say that these quasars "killed" the neighnoring galaxies. The effect is apparently not permenant. Maybe it would be better to say that the quasars "quenched" neighboring galaxies.
This Quasar's destructive force really has me rethink the likelihood of the existence of ET. I'm somewhat familiar with the Drake Equation. The Time variable in the equation, I may be wrong, but it doesn't seem to factor in actual age of this whole thing. What I mean to say is, there may have been multiple advanced civilizations, but they are gone. No longer around, thanks to the greatest and most prevalent forces of this WHOLE THING. There is a cycle to this all. Everything that come into existence eventually becomes no longer. Everything is temporary
It's hard to fathom the amount of energy that it would take to essentially sterilize 16 million light years of space. It's truly mind-blowing. Terrifying and cool at the same time
I wonder if things like this might be responsible for the increase in the speed of the expansion of the Universe? If it is not expanding in a uniform manner but something more like clouds, here on Earth, then some parts would move faster than others and this may be what powers that uneven expansion. Just a thought.
what about like a bubble that expands and contracts in different ways, but ultimately holds shape? instead of constant expansion it just expands in some areas for trillions of years, and then contracts back down again for trillions of years and all in different areas that have different "pressures" for lack of a better term. maybe in each pressure zone you have a bunch of different "big bangs" and "big rips" that ultimately increase or decrease "pressure" in that area before the cycle repeats. maybe background radiation is just radiation reflecting from tons of these events that effectively have no true end.
Interesting conjecture, however these accelerations powered by solar wind appear to be accelerating due to the force of the quasars energy within space, while the expansion the universe is more fundamental; it is space time ITSELF that is expanding. Its like drawing two dots on a balloon and then expanding the balloon. The dots are not moving but they are expanding away from each other.
That would have to mean that there are galaxy killers spread evenly throughout the universe and that they kill galaxies often enough to keep life from ever succeeding in the universe. Idk about that
Quasars were already a solution. They say the number of quasars has decreased dramatically over time. This allowed life to finally grow without getting snuffed out. I believe it is part of the hypothesis that life began here on Earth as soon as it was possible to in the universe. Which is why we don't see others, yet.
Radiation pressure. The massive quantities of high energy radiation blasting out from the quasar in every direction slams into the gas and pushes it faster and faster.
If a neutron star has a binary partner from which it can acrete gas it can become a micro quasar with relativistic particle jets. shooting out of its two poles.
Quasar formation occurs in locations with highest average density of matter, dense enough to allow formation of supermassive black holes. Voids are the lowest density regions. So ... no.
No that makes 0 sense. Voids are a lack of galaxies that span hundreds of millions of light years across. No, it is completely and utterly impossible to kill of a galaxy, you got clickbaited, and no, a void is normally much larger than 16 million light years
Im not quite understanding how the solar winds destroyed stars and thier formation. Is it just heavy radiation? Or is more what we think of as wind that exerts force? Is it a constant force or a singular burst? I listen to Anton while I work, Im a supply chain analyst so I hardly understand what Anton is saying most the time! But im always interested! 😊
These are powerful winds created by the accretion disk and they end up heating up the gas in the entire galaxy, preventing it from forming chunks that would usually form stars. The wind itself is made of various gas particles but moving at a fraction of the speed of light (1000s of km/s)
@@whatdamath oh wow .. thank you for explaining in shorthand and adding the perspective of km/s that is something I can grasp even if it is mind boggling 😳 Will definitely watch the whole video when I'm done with work
he ain't talking about peasly solar winds. he's talking about the radiation created by the accretion disc a black hole 2 BILLION times the mass of the sun blasting star forming gases out of star-forming commission in galaxies for a whopping 16 million LIGHT YEARS (a volume of 20,000,000,000,000 kms X 16,000,000 years, cubed) of the space around that black hole's galaxy. space is where size really matters ...
@@josephc8440hate to sound nihilistic but I highly doubt humans will exist and same with any intelligent species. Time and space is too damn grand that it’s impossible to do anything. This is why we’re alone. I don’t think intelligent species can’t avoid catastrophic extinction before space can hit us to our demise too.
@@davidmacphee3549 lol it’s so crazy that science fiction level destruction of starwars does not compare to our reality where entire light years of galaxy’s can be deleted. We need to make peace with eachother and get out of our cluster ASAP
That's just Broly doing his thing in the first 10 seconds of the original non-canon DBZ Broly movie. Just casually destroying galaxies like nobody's business.
I guess the Fermi Equation isn't a Paradox because quasars keep culling galaxies everywhere. You have to be a type 3 to be able to survive something that kills multiple galaxies.
oh wait, I don't think that scientists have said that the mass of black holes are infinite, but instead it's extremely concentrated. unrelated, but a new insight on my part.
The current math says it should be infinite, but it's known that infinity shouldn't really exist in nature in that way. That's the whole reason connecting relativity to quantum mechanics is such a big deal. It'll resolve the whole infinity issue.
I believe its the density that is believed to be infinite, as well as having a volume of 0. the mass is not infinite, we can measure the mass of a blackhole based on how it interacts with objects gravitationally.
@@Toxicpoolofreekingmascul-lj4yd how much effort have made to come to that "conclusion"? ... ZERO .... Start with studying Dr. Pim Lommel his research in Near Death Experiences ... Study his publication in The Lancet (Peer Reviewed!) ... and that is just the beginning of a much longer journey of discoveries & insights you have NO CLUE about!
What if some of the things we think of as dark matter is actually astral winds, radiation, and magnetic forces from various nova, quasars, black holes and magnatars.
Oh, surprising results. Super quick is really unbelievable. Once I had the hypothesis of beyond relativistic speed limit. Mechanism of speeding. Today I have solved gravity and quantum interactions in same unification. I have found in one stage infinite acceleration is possible. The law of nature in isolated system. I am delighted by you and your channel's Communication. Namaste 🙏
a forest fire is not alive but it consumes and grows and extinguishing it stops the chemical reaction. ... when you blow out a candle you become a killer 🤔?
What inspires awe about the Quasar is it's enormous energy comes from kinetic energy not nuclear reactions, basically particles rubbing against each other while travelling at relativistic speeds as they circle the black hole.
Sounds like terrible neighbours are a universal problem
Lol. As above so below
When your neighbors are resident aliens, cultural wars manifest on a regional multi-galactic scale.
ba da dum tsssssss
Dad. Joke. Of the. Year.
This is the galactic equivalent of being neighbors of the nuclear boy scout, you wake up one day and he’s irradiated the whole neighborhood from a makeshift reactor in his shed
The quasar shot black energy
Now THAT’S a weapon of MASS destruction! 😳🤯
Quasar: Thats it, its over.
The Great Attractor: Nah, after the hissy fit, he'll back with us at the bar.
History quickly crashing through your space
Telescopes make your wonder where it went
Chocolate Radiation
YOU CAN NEVER HIDE FROM THE CHOCOLATE RAIN BABYY
*halo music*
When I was a teenager I read everything I could find on cosmology. What JWST discovers now is exactly what I hoped we would see one day with much better instruments. This is indeed the Golden Era of observational cosmology.
The computer revolution added orders of magnitude to this field of knowledge. I remember what it was like in the 1970s when it started to take off, black holes were still a theoretical thing🙂
Something tells me we ain't seen nuthin' yet.
Personally, the golden age for me will be when we have multiple JWSTs in various Lagrange points in the solar system. But I agree, this is all awesome.
I really thought by this time we would have several 1000m aperture optical telescopes in space and multiple large radio telescopes co-orbital with Earth giving us a 2au aperture radio telescope.
Instead we've wasted billions of dollars destroying sacred mountains, imprisoning indigenous people and making them pay for their own beatings.
Overall it's been pretty disappointing.
Sorry to rain on your parade but here is no scientific evidence for BHs...and math is NOT science. These mathamagicians are inventing things with math and pretending they are real. Scientists will do almost anything for grant $. Check some articles about academic/research fraud.
===
🤜⚡💥⚡🤛 LOL LOL LOL The hubris and arrogance to think we understand star/galactic evolution. But of course they are WRONG!!!All this and more is better explained with experiment-based plasma science; i.e. Plasma Cosmology. 1] the Universe is based on plasma; 2] plasma's are electric in nature/origin; 3] plasmas inherently self-organize into structures; 4] plasma's produce many EM-band emissions (light, 'rays' and radio frequencies). Conclusion: just another plasma emission. Move on! Nothing unusual here.
Astronomer Halton Arp made a good case for it in his books. Similar to the item in this video, Halton showed galaxies and star clusters that are connected by bridges...yet have vastly different red shifts. This occurs because a parent galaxy can eject smaller bodies which then grow in size with time to become galaxies. MSS will continue to be clueless until the scientists admit they have been wrong and adopt new physics in dealing with the 'mysteries' they don't understand. Clearly the current approach doesn't serve them well.
==
Carrying on with darkwhatever is like religions claiming that Earth etc. are evidence of god. It's all misappropriation just the same. If you can't understand something DON'T just invent fairy tales. Geezus!!! Yeah, science has gone off the rails on other things too. Yes, there are so many blunders that it's become a joke. Some scientists, like Sabine Hossenfelder comment on some of these fallacies.
💥 Moreover, black holes do not exist. No 'Onerock' rings have been detected for Milkyway's central BH, Sagittarius A, proving that gravity does not bend light, thereby nullifying/disproving Onerock's theories. Dr. Dowdye demonstrated that the Eddington light bending experiment to prove Onerock's theories was a sham. It was simply atmospheric diffraction within the limb of the Sun. Bending due to grabbity would have been detectable up to 0.1 AU from the Sun's surface but this was not observed thus Onerock was wrong.
Whenever I think about gravity it brings me down. )))
==
My comment to Anton Petrov's video *"One of the Largest Stars Known Dimmed Just Like Betelgeuse"* -- don't be surprised when a red supergiant splits into 2 stars or ejects a hot object[s] that will cool to form a planet[s]._ is relevant here, Conventional science is oblivious to this fact... for now, but evidence/observations will force this conclusion. Another observation/fact they will have to concede is that stars of same or similar class will, on average, have similar types of planets with the exception of stars whose Birkeland current has gone through a structural and energetic change in the past which occurs frequently. Variable output stars/objects demonstrate this. Other electrical phenomena affect the aforementioned which add to variations. 🤜⚡💥⚡🤛
...
..
.
Quasar: "It's my 700 millionth birthday" "First, I'm going to blow out these candles."
and then Quasar declares "I am the champion of the Universe!"
😂
Random alien living his happiest life until 💀
how would it count its birthday?
Super comment
What is really mind-blowing is the fact that a region 16,000,000 light-years across is nothing more than a statistical anomaly on the scale of the entire universe.
I've had my view of space changed by this. I was under the impression it was possible to be safe with enough distance and that events were more or less confined to galactic regions. I viewed things like galactic clusters are mostly abstraction where for all intents and purposes galaxies were all isolated and that grouping them was a bit academic. But the idea of a single blackhole's accretion disc sterilizing an area 16 million lightyears wide changes my perception utterly. Simply incomprehensible power. I thought magnetars were insane. This is unimaginable.
yea i never thought it'd reach this far
@@TheDredConspiracy In this case, if it were nearby, it would kill us even if we stayed... horrifying
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤ I feel threatened …. And my friends, the elephants feel frightened as well. ……. Let’s all go to Sugar rock Candy Mountain.
@99guspuppet8 ok
Galactic clusters aren't abstractions, because the galaxies are held together by gravity, which prevents them from flying away too much, and maybe is enough to counteract the dark energy.
It's difficult for me to imagine or comprehend something powerful enough to exert its influence over millions of light years.
Time warping.
Correct. It is unimaginable...because it's FALSE. There is no scientific evidence for BHs...and math is NOT science. These mathamagicians are inventing things with math and pretending they are real. Scientists will do almost anything for grant $. Check some articles about academic/research fraud.
===
🤜⚡💥⚡🤛 LOL LOL LOL The hubris and arrogance to think we understand star/galactic evolution. But of course they are WRONG!!!All this and more is better explained with experiment-based plasma science; i.e. Plasma Cosmology. 1] the Universe is based on plasma; 2] plasma's are electric in nature/origin; 3] plasmas inherently self-organize into structures; 4] plasma's produce many EM-band emissions (light, 'rays' and radio frequencies). Conclusion: just another plasma emission. Move on! Nothing unusual here.
Astronomer Halton Arp made a good case for it in his books. Similar to the item in this video, Halton showed galaxies and star clusters that are connected by bridges...yet have vastly different red shifts. This occurs because a parent galaxy can eject smaller bodies which then grow in size with time to become galaxies. MSS will continue to be clueless until the scientists admit they have been wrong and adopt new physics in dealing with the 'mysteries' they don't understand. Clearly the current approach doesn't serve them well.
==
Carrying on with darkwhatever is like religions claiming that Earth etc. are evidence of god. It's all misappropriation just the same. If you can't understand something DON'T just invent fairy tales. Geezus!!! Yeah, science has gone off the rails on other things too. Yes, there are so many blunders that it's become a joke. Some scientists, like Sabine Hossenfelder comment on some of these fallacies.
💥 Moreover, black holes do not exist. No 'Onerock' rings have been detected for Milkyway's central BH, Sagittarius A, proving that gravity does not bend light, thereby nullifying/disproving Onerock's theories. Dr. Dowdye demonstrated that the Eddington light bending experiment to prove Onerock's theories was a sham. It was simply atmospheric diffraction within the limb of the Sun. Bending due to grabbity would have been detectable up to 0.1 AU from the Sun's surface but this was not observed thus Onerock was wrong.
Whenever I think about gravity it brings me down. )))
==
My comment to Anton Petrov's video *"One of the Largest Stars Known Dimmed Just Like Betelgeuse"* -- don't be surprised when a red supergiant splits into 2 stars or ejects a hot object[s] that will cool to form a planet[s]._ is relevant here, Conventional science is oblivious to this fact... for now, but evidence/observations will force this conclusion. Another observation/fact they will have to concede is that stars of same or similar class will, on average, have similar types of planets with the exception of stars whose Birkeland current has gone through a structural and energetic change in the past which occurs frequently. Variable output stars/objects demonstrate this. Other electrical phenomena affect the aforementioned which add to variations. 🤜⚡💥⚡🤛
@@Toxicpoolofreekingmascul-lj4yd no, not at all. That's more of an unwritten constant, sort of how no one questions how much air is around us volumetrically, but marvels at mountains or oceans.
@@Toxicpoolofreekingmascul-lj4yd No, not like gravity. Gravity is not a force.
Comprehending anything at a large scale seems to be difficult for humans. Even the size of earth is relatively hard to get a grasp of.
This is the first cosmological event that has ever truly made me fearful of the Universe, 16 million light years in every direction? That’s absurd.
I feel the same way. That's such an absurd distance. There's no analogy you could come up with to understand how stupid this was
@@khumokwezimashapa2245 DBZ power scaler: " pffft, kinda weak brah"
@@khumokwezimashapa2245 I was gonna try and use a Dragonball Z reference like the guy above my comment used but even that crazy series has nothing that could compare to this event.
@@lordlittletoeq8537 😂😂😂
@@RJ-Numen That's what makes this event so crazy. I think in DBZ at least. The most destructive feat was Broly destroying the South or East Galaxy. I know those movies aren't canon, but I think that's the most a single character has destroyed in Z.
This would clap a lot of the DBZ characters, which is insane to think. This Quaser unironically solos a lot of verses 😂😂
....Now witness the firepower of this fully armed and operational quasar....
Quasi-Stellar Obliterator
"Local Thug"
LOL!
@@htos1av nothing for me? It wiped out a local group sized neighborhood! C'mon
@@TypeZeta2the BFG 900,000
In 2004 a magnetar had a star quake and it damaged our ozone from the other side of our Galaxy
Awesome in the truest sense of the word.
magnetar*
Earth is sturdy from one angle, and resembles a soap bubble from most others.
There is no evidence that the eruption of the magnetar SGR 1806-20 in 2004 caused any damage to the Earth's ozone layer. Here are some key reasons:
## Distance from Earth
Magnetar SGR 1806-20 is located about 50,000 light-years away from Earth. This vast distance means that even a powerful eruption could not have had a direct physical impact on our planet.
## Nature of the Radiation
The eruption emitted primarily intense bursts of gamma radiation. While this was the strongest gamma radiation recorded to date, the ozone layer effectively protects life on Earth from this type of radiation.
## Lack of Observational Evidence
Scientists closely monitored Earth and its atmosphere during and after the magnetar eruption. No anomalies in ozone levels or other atmospheric gases were observed that could indicate damage to the ozone layer.
## Mechanism of Ozone Formation
The ozone layer is formed through photochemical reactions driven by ultraviolet radiation from the Sun. Gamma radiation from the magnetar eruption could not disrupt this natural process.
In summary, while the eruption of magnetar SGR 1806-20 was a spectacular astronomical event, it had no measurable impact on the Earth's ozone layer due to the immense distance of the source and the nature of the emitted radiation. The ozone layer remained intact
Where is evidence that there was ozone damage to earth's atmosphere? I have only seen reports that our ozone was not affected by the 2004 magnatar star quake.
Beautiful, Awe inspiring and bringing existential horror and dread all in one.
Cosmology is truly remarkable.
These astronomical units and the reality they convey are always baffling to me. Our brains haven't evolved to think on these scales, so I can only 'picture' them in a logical, abstract way. Thanks for your thorough, constant uploads. I always wait to see your lovely smile at the end :)
it also works on the sub atomic level...... we have not looked inward as far as we have looked outward. if infinity is a reality it goes both ways
@@thomasyunick3726 at this point I think we are tucked in a reality that goes infinite in quite a few ways.
Space engine legitimately scared the crap out of me back in the day when i accelerated my camera to parsecs/s for the first time. Too huge, too fast
It's not that hard to imagine... Just imagine the distance from Earth to the Sun, and make that journey 1.0118 trillion times. Easy peasy! 😅
I just imagine it in photoshop pixel terms.
We are a single pixel in an infinite canvas of an untold sea of pixels.
This quasar event is the equivalent of someone taking the eraser tool and gently tapping on the infinite canvas once.
I had a middle school science teacher tell me black holes didn't exist in 2005
Why? Had they all gone on holiday? Or maybe they didn't/don't? (exist)
And your teach was correct. There is no scientific evidence for BHs...and math is NOT science. These mathamagicians are inventing things with math and pretending they are real. Scientists will do almost anything for grant $. Check some articles about academic/research fraud.
===
🤜⚡💥⚡🤛 LOL LOL LOL The hubris and arrogance to think we understand star/galactic evolution. But of course they are WRONG!!!All this and more is better explained with experiment-based plasma science; i.e. Plasma Cosmology. 1] the Universe is based on plasma; 2] plasma's are electric in nature/origin; 3] plasmas inherently self-organize into structures; 4] plasma's produce many EM-band emissions (light, 'rays' and radio frequencies). Conclusion: just another plasma emission. Move on! Nothing unusual here.
Astronomer Halton Arp made a good case for it in his books. Similar to the item in this video, Halton showed galaxies and star clusters that are connected by bridges...yet have vastly different red shifts. This occurs because a parent galaxy can eject smaller bodies which then grow in size with time to become galaxies. MSS will continue to be clueless until the scientists admit they have been wrong and adopt new physics in dealing with the 'mysteries' they don't understand. Clearly the current approach doesn't serve them well.
==
Carrying on with darkwhatever is like religions claiming that Earth etc. are evidence of god. It's all misappropriation just the same. If you can't understand something DON'T just invent fairy tales. Geezus!!! Yeah, science has gone off the rails on other things too. Yes, there are so many blunders that it's become a joke. Some scientists, like Sabine Hossenfelder comment on some of these fallacies.
💥 Moreover, black holes do not exist. No 'Onerock' rings have been detected for Milkyway's central BH, Sagittarius A, proving that gravity does not bend light, thereby nullifying/disproving Onerock's theories. Dr. Dowdye demonstrated that the Eddington light bending experiment to prove Onerock's theories was a sham. It was simply atmospheric diffraction within the limb of the Sun. Bending due to grabbity would have been detectable up to 0.1 AU from the Sun's surface but this was not observed thus Onerock was wrong.
Whenever I think about gravity it brings me down. )))
==
My comment to Anton Petrov's video *"One of the Largest Stars Known Dimmed Just Like Betelgeuse"* -- don't be surprised when a red supergiant splits into 2 stars or ejects a hot object[s] that will cool to form a planet[s]._ is relevant here, Conventional science is oblivious to this fact... for now, but evidence/observations will force this conclusion. Another observation/fact they will have to concede is that stars of same or similar class will, on average, have similar types of planets with the exception of stars whose Birkeland current has gone through a structural and energetic change in the past which occurs frequently. Variable output stars/objects demonstrate this. Other electrical phenomena affect the aforementioned which add to variations. 🤜⚡💥⚡🤛
Sadly I find this very believable.
I was taught Bohr's atom 50 years after that model was abandoned.
I was also taught that the earth is flat and infinite, (though to be fair I don't think my teachers understood that was what they were saying when they said that a dropped object had constant acceleration).
They called it "Newtonian" which was interesting because it was actually Newton who first realised that acceleration due to gravity is not constant, but varies as the inverse square of the distance between objects. So they were teaching pre-newtonian. 400+ years out of date
Me too, caused a huge argument. Got asked to leave.
He should have checked with Steven Hawking. Who?
Anton Petrov, Keep making videos!
That shockwave is moving 2 light minutes every hour? Holy shit.
Jack Bauer " I'm fine " .
At least it's not 2 light minutes every second! That would have been mind-blowing.
With all the anal references in this vid, you'd be right. HAHAHA
@@milutzukQuasar (blowing out the cosmic candles): _For my birthday I wish to violate relativity!_
That hurts my brain
And then we wonder if or why life is rare... damn, the universe is fucking hostile.
We are damn lucky to be here.
Yea, even our planet and sun hostile towards us, we can live here only because our body repairs itself 24/7, DNA is OP in surviving.
There may be someone lucky than us living somewhere far away from us😢
@@abhijithp2116 I hope so. To think of us as being the only intelligent life in the universe is utterly depressing.
I mean, we really don't know how rare life actually is. There might be life on Europa, but we just haven't discovered it yet.
@@RayThackeray Calling humans intelligent is a bit of a stretch.
Now we have galaxy killers!
Can't wait for this to find it's way into science fiction, if it hasn't already.
It has, check the redemption of time by Baoshu if you are interested
Literally a lot of X3 games like endless space 2 and stellaris
Master Chief has entered the chat
Ringworld, anyone?
Thanks so much. My knowledge stops at _Star Wars_ , _Trek_ & _Dune_ .
An old ad for a TV set, in my youth:
Zenith came out with a "Quasar TV" in 1967 (now Panasonic, I think.)
Quasars were the new marvel as I recall.
Oh and it was a transistorized TV -- selling point -- fewer tubes to replace?
We got the "Motorola Works in a drawer" All the circuitry pulled out on a tall tray in the front. Everything was marked. What a Fun TV to learn and adjust. You sort of go for clean Black & White then bring the colors up from there. Alignment, nice. 26 inch classic. Worked for decades with a little love.
The push to solid state was inevitable, but I miss the days when you could smack the side of your TV to improve the picture. 😊
We had a Quasar. It's true, it required less service. Back then, home visits by TV repairmen were a big thing. Sometimes they could replace the tubes in your house, and sometimes not. The Quasar was made with banks of solid state components. If something went bad, you replaced the whole board. Service calls were fewer and faster with the Quasar.
Its so amazing that we have our own way to travel through time. So far back in time, seeing events lime this.. its absolutely beautiful
This quasar is the ultimate death- star. It makes the Star Wars Death-Star look like a soggy firecracker.
So every time we look at quasars they seem more consequential
Can you explain?
Or you mean it in a joke way
@@paleixs96 When I first heard of quasars in the 1970s, they were very bright objects receding at high speeds no one understood. today they are black hole-based phenomena the more we learn about them the more they seem important in shaping the very structure of the universe.
Good job, wonderful person.
Very interesting topic, well presented.
The sheer power responsible for this is insane “normal” quasars are crazy powerful but this a new mind boggling level. I’d make an educated guess the black hole responsible would have to dwarf most supermassive black holes to produce a quasar that extreme either that it could be unique environmental factors. If primordial black holes exist that black hole would probably fit the bill.
Any supermassive black hole would do, the difference is the amount of matter in its accretion disk. Usually there is a local limitation on the amount of matter that can accumulate into an accretion disk, but if conditions local to the black hole are sufficiently unusual then the accretion disk can become much denser and therefore much more powerful than usual. This is likely an exceptional event, given that so far it is the only one found with such power. Of course as our instruments become more sensitive we may learn that they were more common earlier in the universe's history, or it may remain an exceptional event. I will find it interesting when enough evidence accumulates to answer that question.
Holy guacamole! The destructive power of this quasar makes an Imperial Death Star seem like something all the way down at the Planck scale - and it's not sci-fi, it's *_REAL!!!_*
And yet it's effect is only barely observable.
Talk about a Great Filter!! I don't fully comprehended what kind of force would kill off Galaxies over 16 million light years?
It was probably some avengers type good alien bad alien fighting
Curious question, do you really think a quasar completely destroyed a galaxy? Because this is real life, not dragonball super🤦🏿♂️
@@ConsciousApostle999 Curious if this is a troll and did you watch the video. The quasar "killed", Antons words, Galaxies with 16 million light years. So going with me feeding the troll. Now go away and watch the videos instead of harassing those with a large intellectual capacity then your own!
@@danieltal3d Nothing can kill an effing galaxy is my point… y’all are sorely mislead. The magnitudes of difference between the largest black hole, and even the smallest of galaxy’s is fairly large, meanwhile the difference between the largest black hole and a mid size galaxy such as our Milky Way is incomprehensible.
A quasar hitting a galaxy is like a human being pepper sprayed… All of these galaxies will most likely live on and integrate with other nearby galactic neighbors/accumulate gas for the rest of infinity while this quasars dies out in the next few million years, sterilizing neighbor galaxies for less than a few thousand years, which is insignificant when stars are forming every second for billions upon billions of years.
9/10 people watching this video, unironically think there are 100 less galaxies in the universe, like this is dbz in the buu saga during the age of Kai’s, give me a break😂
@@ConsciousApostle999 what a more thoughtful answer. Thank you.
I feel like a peasant in the middle ages who believed oceans were filled with giant monsters, demons and temperamental gods. I used to think of space in more romantic and benign ways and now I'm becoming like that middle-aged peasant only now I'm on a small island surrounded by an ocean more hostile than I can imagine.
Wonderful as always Anton. Thank you. 🤘☺️
I'm just glad we're a bit further down the timeline.
Anton's got the best quasar updates on UA-cam
You have easily become one of the best channels on youtube Anton.
Keep them coming.
Thanks, Anton. Cheers from the Pacific West Coast of Canada.
Dang. It's crazy to think something could be so dangerous.
Really gives me second thoughts about keeping one in the house.
Always a joy to watch your videos, Anton!
Looking good Anton. Many years of invaluable information has come from your channel, thank you for everything
Thank you for the great content!
anton, your videos are always interesting and often have a "wow" factor. thankyou~
Every time Anton comes out with a video like this I think of Death’s End and Redemption of Time.
Oh, no!
RIP FIRST (probably intelligent too) life forms!
RIP Grandmas and Papas!
Remember this is only 2 billion years after the Big Bang so no life would of been around at that time especially intelligent life
@@ganymede6535Yes, the metalicity of the universe was not high enough to produce rocky planets and provide elements needed for life until it was about 8 billion years old (per Isaac Arthur )
The scale of things in the universe is mind boggling. 16.8 million light years, and we're only 2.5 million from Andromeda. Radiation so strong it sends gases away at 10,000 miles per second.
Well that's not unnerving at all.
"Absolutely ridiculous". Yep, that's a perfect description.
yes not even possible
*Imagine right now, gamma rays from a pulsar 15 million light years away (150x the diameter of our entire galaxy), just instantaneously ended the entire galaxy, from an explosion 15 million years ago.*
This is truly beyond human comprehension.
*_"Quasar Söze"_* aka the usual suspect 😉
I see what you did there!
Some of those galaxies were pretty young too
@@whatdamathYou answered some questions. Good job!
" The greatest trick a black hole ever pulled .....was looking like it didn't exist ...
And like that... He is gone 😃
Unbelievable
Thank you very much Anton and have a nice week :)
In theory, we could already be dead and just not know it yet.
Yup. The light to tell us we're doomed just hasn't reached us yet.
Your own two eyes are about a half nano light second apart meaning they see events at slightly different times and each sees a slight different edge to the visible universe as both are at different centers. On a short timescale there really isn’t even a definite present, it’s relative.
The more of these existential threats I learn about, the more I realize - and I despise admitting this - ignorance truly is sometimes bliss.
@@sidpomy So true!
We are already dead, we just don't know it yet 🎅🎅🐡
Anton, thank you so much for these scienxe news stories. Your love of science shows.
This is literally a major plot point of the Ringworld series. The "solution" there was to run away, on an unbelievably massive scale.... we're probably thousands of years from tech that would make that feasible, if all goes well. And if it doesn't, we'll never get there
First you need to convince everyone that climate change is real, otherwise it will not be a problem that mankind needs to worry about.
See Fermi paradox.
@@bobkoroua Do you think humans have the capacity to harness the global climate? It would be insane to believe so. We'd sooner develop light speed travel, because while light speed is a simple energy transfer in physics, you can't just pump energy into controlling the climate, unless you somehow intend to install global scale air conditioners, which would also not be a solution, because even if you had one the size of the moon on earth, you wouldn't be able to do anything with it without killing everyone on the planet. Volume, location, and physics....along with a thousand different processes taking place in the earth itself, and space weather, the suns maximums and minimums, etc. It's soo much to account for that just the natural processes of the earth itself would throw any attempts out of wack.
For example, if we could somehow control the entire earths climate and make it all a nice 70 degrees everywhere all the time....but nope, because you have volcanoes going off, emissions of stuff from permafrost, stuff bubbling up from below the ocean. So it's literally not as simple as just running some device somewhere or putting a weather controlling device every square mile across the entire planet, because there's too many things going on all the time everywhere that you'll never be able to account for it all. You pull one thread tight, another one comes loose, a trillion times a second, at a trillion metric tons a second. Or in other words, what you think is achievable, is actually impossible. By the time we might have technology that could handle that, the planet itself would be pointless for our needs because we will be at a point where we can simply move beyond it.
@@bobkoroua Climate change is not going to wipe humanity out unless it goes the other way and we get a snowball Earth again. Warming from CO2 is bad but not an extinction-level event, or even a civilization collapsing one.
@peoplez129 Not to mention the classic cosmic rays. We are constantly bombarded by alterations from outside our planet as well.
Puppeteers really be like "Hmm. The galaxy is exploding." "How long until it gets to us?" "200,000 years." "I'll start the car."
I wonder if quasars of this type are the cause of some of the voids we see: blowing everything within range away, then ultimately expiring
0:14 Hey, What's up, Anton?😎
Ey wassup J man J?
Thank you for all your awesome content sir. ❤
Actually terrifying, most galaxies are 1/20th that distance across.
Well, I must say that I found this very fascinating! Keep it up.
Weird how life is such a precarious and unlikely scenario that it should be a myth of imaginations that shouldn’t exist.
what are you talking about?
but with infinity everything exists
Really like the graphics in your vids!
I wonder if it might be a bit dramatic to say that these quasars "killed" the neighnoring galaxies. The effect is apparently not permenant. Maybe it would be better to say that the quasars "quenched" neighboring galaxies.
How about quasars "Cleansed" neighboring galaxies?
This Quasar's destructive force really has me rethink the likelihood of the existence of ET.
I'm somewhat familiar with the Drake Equation. The Time variable in the equation, I may be wrong, but it doesn't seem to factor in actual age of this whole thing.
What I mean to say is, there may have been multiple advanced civilizations, but they are gone. No longer around, thanks to the greatest and most prevalent forces of this WHOLE THING. There is a cycle to this all. Everything that come into existence eventually becomes no longer.
Everything is temporary
Drake equation is flawed by its own premises.
It's hard to fathom the amount of energy that it would take to essentially sterilize 16 million light years of space. It's truly mind-blowing. Terrifying and cool at the same time
Mind blowing. Thank you for the video.
I wonder if things like this might be responsible for the increase in the speed of the expansion of the Universe? If it is not expanding in a uniform manner but something more like clouds, here on Earth, then some parts would move faster than others and this may be what powers that uneven expansion. Just a thought.
what about like a bubble that expands and contracts in different ways, but ultimately holds shape? instead of constant expansion it just expands in some areas for trillions of years, and then contracts back down again for trillions of years and all in different areas that have different "pressures" for lack of a better term. maybe in each pressure zone you have a bunch of different "big bangs" and "big rips" that ultimately increase or decrease "pressure" in that area before the cycle repeats. maybe background radiation is just radiation reflecting from tons of these events that effectively have no true end.
Interesting conjecture, however these accelerations powered by solar wind appear to be accelerating due to the force of the quasars energy within space, while the expansion the universe is more fundamental; it is space time ITSELF that is expanding. Its like drawing two dots on a balloon and then expanding the balloon. The dots are not moving but they are expanding away from each other.
Excellent stuff. Just needs an edit at 8.20. Thank you, Anton.
A new solution to the Fermi paradox?
That would have to mean that there are galaxy killers spread evenly throughout the universe and that they kill galaxies often enough to keep life from ever succeeding in the universe. Idk about that
If this solved it we wouldnt need to look 16 billion lightyears away into 10 pixels. Pretty rare event.
Quasars were already a solution. They say the number of quasars has decreased dramatically over time. This allowed life to finally grow without getting snuffed out. I believe it is part of the hypothesis that life began here on Earth as soon as it was possible to in the universe. Which is why we don't see others, yet.
Fermi paradox is unfeasible, they’re already here.
That is frigging mind boggling! Such power
3:00 What is the reason the gas accelerated away from the quasar?
Radiation pressure. The massive quantities of high energy radiation blasting out from the quasar in every direction slams into the gas and pushes it faster and faster.
@@hayatofalconchild intresting thanks. The more a particle is away from the source the more it got accelarated by the radiation. makes sense.
Wow! A smile! Nice video mate
So …. Not all Black holes are Quasars but all Quasars are black holes 🤔
Yessir, that's correct. And an active galactic nuclei is essentially a quasar as well
They're blackholes with my kingdom come.
If a neutron star has a binary partner from which it can acrete gas it can become a micro quasar with relativistic particle jets. shooting out of its two poles.
It's a blackhole that's gooning
Yes
Fascinating knowledge, thanks👍❤
Sounds like it could explain the Voids.
I was thinking the same thing
Didnt think of this until now, thank you
Quasar formation occurs in locations with highest average density of matter, dense enough to allow formation of supermassive black holes. Voids are the lowest density regions. So ... no.
No that makes 0 sense. Voids are a lack of galaxies that span hundreds of millions of light years across.
No, it is completely and utterly impossible to kill of a galaxy, you got clickbaited, and no, a void is normally much larger than 16 million light years
@@ConsciousApostle999 Agree i think its just coy to make alien life less possible through statistics
thanks for the video
orange was an interesting choice
Im not quite understanding how the solar winds destroyed stars and thier formation. Is it just heavy radiation? Or is more what we think of as wind that exerts force? Is it a constant force or a singular burst?
I listen to Anton while I work, Im a supply chain analyst so I hardly understand what Anton is saying most the time! But im always interested!
😊
These are powerful winds created by the accretion disk and they end up heating up the gas in the entire galaxy, preventing it from forming chunks that would usually form stars. The wind itself is made of various gas particles but moving at a fraction of the speed of light (1000s of km/s)
@@whatdamath talk about your cool answers, thanks!
@@whatdamath oh wow .. thank you for explaining in shorthand and adding the perspective of km/s
that is something I can grasp even if it is mind boggling 😳
Will definitely watch the whole video when I'm done with work
Excellently put, Anton.
he ain't talking about peasly solar winds. he's talking about the radiation created by the accretion disc a black hole 2 BILLION times the mass of the sun blasting star forming gases out of star-forming commission in galaxies for a whopping 16 million LIGHT YEARS (a volume of 20,000,000,000,000 kms X 16,000,000 years, cubed) of the space around that black hole's galaxy.
space is where size really matters ...
Hi anton,very interesting,I often wonder how big a plasmoid can get.that must be a record.
This is why we're alone
Will probably happen to us if we don’t get our act together too
@@josephc8440hate to sound nihilistic but I highly doubt humans will exist and same with any intelligent species. Time and space is too damn grand that it’s impossible to do anything. This is why we’re alone. I don’t think intelligent species can’t avoid catastrophic extinction before space can hit us to our demise too.
@@josephc8440 Darth Vader thought he was special. Hold my beer...
@@davidmacphee3549 lol it’s so crazy that science fiction level destruction of starwars does not compare to our reality where entire light years of galaxy’s can be deleted. We need to make peace with eachother and get out of our cluster ASAP
@@josephc8440 not even a type 3 civilization would be able to escape something that big going off in their vacinity
Amazing. Thanks!
16 million lightyears... One in the Milky way galaxy would sterilise the whole galaxy
This puts some of the most terribly powerful weapons sci-fi has ever put to paper to shame, Jesus....
Brilliant stuff!
I love way Anton is so understated, imagine going for full National Geographic drama ;-)
That's just Broly doing his thing in the first 10 seconds of the original non-canon DBZ Broly movie. Just casually destroying galaxies like nobody's business.
I guess the Fermi Equation isn't a Paradox because quasars keep culling galaxies everywhere. You have to be a type 3 to be able to survive something that kills multiple galaxies.
3:30 super accurate FTW, let's GOOOOOOOOOO
I have no words for this. A whole great group of galaxies just snuffed out by one event!
oh wait, I don't think that scientists have said that the mass of black holes are infinite, but instead it's extremely concentrated. unrelated, but a new insight on my part.
We are surrounded by those things in every direction across all of time. Major time warp going on.
The current math says it should be infinite, but it's known that infinity shouldn't really exist in nature in that way. That's the whole reason connecting relativity to quantum mechanics is such a big deal. It'll resolve the whole infinity issue.
I believe its the density that is believed to be infinite, as well as having a volume of 0. the mass is not infinite, we can measure the mass of a blackhole based on how it interacts with objects gravitationally.
Great video again thanks
No worries, Elon will save us.
How many souls were killed?
0. No life wouldve been there at that time
@@Toxicpoolofreekingmascul-lj4yd how much effort have made to come to that "conclusion"? ... ZERO .... Start with studying Dr. Pim Lommel his research in Near Death Experiences ... Study his publication in The Lancet (Peer Reviewed!) ... and that is just the beginning of a much longer journey of discoveries & insights you have NO CLUE about!
Cool. Thanks for sharing.
Thanks Anton, wow, that's would be 100 galaxies in our neighbourhood!
Just imagining how much force it takes to make something like this happen. Its an absolute nightmare out there.
What if some of the things we think of as dark matter is actually astral winds, radiation, and magnetic forces from various nova, quasars, black holes and magnatars.
I am talking about. . . just the title alone is WOW! 🤯
Oh, surprising results. Super quick is really unbelievable. Once I had the hypothesis of beyond relativistic speed limit. Mechanism of speeding.
Today I have solved gravity and quantum interactions in same unification. I have found in one stage infinite acceleration is possible.
The law of nature in isolated system.
I am delighted by you and your channel's
Communication.
Namaste 🙏
Feels like this also might be a good explanation to why everything is moving away from each other
Anton, wonderful person❤
Thanks Anton. 🙂👍
Wow, this is amazing, never knew that galaxies are alive, and can be killed. Thank you.
a forest fire is not alive but it consumes and grows and extinguishing it stops the chemical reaction. ... when you blow out a candle you become a killer 🤔?
That’s terrifying
I like the speaker's understated style.
Thanks for posting the actual telescope photos and not just rely on the artist impressions of the Quasars
I will comeback to this channel in billion years to see if you were correct.
What inspires awe about the Quasar is it's enormous energy comes from kinetic energy not nuclear reactions, basically particles rubbing against each other while travelling at relativistic speeds as they circle the black hole.