Katchen, Suk, Starker, Brahms Piano Trio No.2 in C major Op.87

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 11 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ •

  • @williamrappaport9203
    @williamrappaport9203 8 місяців тому +2

    This recording is one of the finest examples of music in any genre. The piece is sublime and the performers do it full justice, which almost never happens in any performance of any music.

  • @baolnguyen442
    @baolnguyen442 5 місяців тому +2

    Chamber music making at the highest level... Bravi!!!

  • @annjeanmillikan
    @annjeanmillikan 7 років тому +4

    MOST SUBLIME, favorite performance of this exquisitely divine Brahms Piano Trio. It sends me to HEAVEN with these ethereal sounds and gorgeous playing by this trio.

  • @pats2942
    @pats2942 9 років тому +7

    One of the best interpretations ever. Breathtaking, heartbreaking (5th variation in the 2d mvt ......). Thanks so much.

  • @gerardbegni2806
    @gerardbegni2806 7 років тому +7

    Nothing more has to be said conceernng the perfection of this trio, deliv=cately crafted by Brahms who was ending its "middle" period and about to start his "final" one - the third trio will initiate us to that. The interpretation is awesome, which is not surprising considering the virtuosos at work here.

  • @marinacaracciolo3161
    @marinacaracciolo3161 6 років тому

    Esecuzione impeccabile da parte di tre artisti di superba fama e maestria. Meraviglioso!

  • @josephleal529
    @josephleal529 8 років тому +8

    Allegro moderato- 0:00
    Andante con moto- 9:34
    Scherzo: Presto- 18:31
    Finale: Allegro Giocoso- 23:09

  • @cristofal1
    @cristofal1 9 років тому +2

    Il était une fois un monde merveilleux, un monde disparu ! Revient Brahms !!!!!!

  • @elchucabagra
    @elchucabagra 9 років тому +5

    Such good recording quality, fitting for this quality composition

  • @princeandrey
    @princeandrey 9 років тому +5

    When people say they don't like Brahms, I don't understand. The Andante has everything a piece should have. As lovely as Opus 8 is, this far exceeds it in depth if not lyricism. Mature Brahms is the best!

  • @Rickriquinho
    @Rickriquinho Рік тому

    Brahms style is fascinating!

  • @marcmitchel25
    @marcmitchel25 Рік тому

    This and two other versions: Hess/Szigeti/Casals, Pennario/Heifetz/Piatigorsky. Thank God for all!

  • @willetweeks2553
    @willetweeks2553 6 років тому +1

    Thanks for sharing this splendid performance, which had somehow passed me by. While it has all the bite and precision of attack that Brahms requires, it is less driven and goes farther than any other version I know in emphasizing the piece's lyrical side, particularly in the heart-stoppingly lilting approach they take in the Andante. Superlative.

    • @princeandrey
      @princeandrey 5 років тому

      "the heart-stoppingly lilting approach they take in the Andante." A thousand times, yes!

  • @sherryjakey1856
    @sherryjakey1856 9 років тому

    Loved this. So sensitive.

  • @princeandrey
    @princeandrey 5 років тому +1

    Just listened to the Rubenstein. Sorry. This is the best!

  • @jbondy6395
    @jbondy6395 3 місяці тому

    Thanks to Dave Hurwitz for sending me here. Great performance!

  • @felixdevilliers1
    @felixdevilliers1 4 роки тому

    I'm impressed rather by the way in which brahms in this work in C majhopr oes as it were for the kill. If ever there was protest music, this is it.

    • @princeandrey
      @princeandrey 3 роки тому

      How do you mean this? How is this political? I love this piece , especially the theme and variations in the Andante, and I greatly admire--and have participated in--political activism! I know a bit about Brahms' life, and that he was more or less a political "liberal," (though he admired Bismarck) but, of course, in many ways a musical "conservative." But I'm bewildered as to the "protest" characterization. Protesting against modernity/Wagnerism?

    • @felixdevilliers1
      @felixdevilliers1 3 роки тому

      @@princeandrey - Brahms was wrongly comsidered old hat by Wagner and Liszt. He was a modern as they were, as modern as anyone up to Boulez and beyond. It was Boulez who said all grreat composers are modern.. That Brahms idiotically supported Bismarck and his war against the French has noithing to do with his music which is a negation of his empirical self. Quite complicated to explain; I may come back to this.
      If put on a CD of Chopin's Preludes and think of Trump, Clinton etc their full significance emerges. Try this. He already knew about them.
      Remember that Emily Bronte said "It is the pen that writes, not I." Tolstoy read a newspaper account of a woman like Anna Karenina commiting suicide and wanted to write a novel condemning women like her but once his novel got under way he identified himself completely with her tragedy. His genius took over. This was obvious protest against the society she was trapped in. The novel went beyond his intentions.All great music tries to get out of the trap. Keats said "Beauty is truth and truth beauty."

  • @dmitrishteinbergpianist
    @dmitrishteinbergpianist 4 роки тому

    IV: 23:17

  • @dmitrishteinbergpianist
    @dmitrishteinbergpianist 4 роки тому

    III. 18:27

  • @dmitrishteinbergpianist
    @dmitrishteinbergpianist 4 роки тому

    II. 9:35

  • @khool63
    @khool63 7 років тому +1

    brahms bach schubert haydn beethoven , haydn , l'architecture de la musique , brahms n'est pas facilement accessible , il était perfectionniste à l'excès détruisait certaines oeuvres , en retravaillaient d'autres des décennies durant exemple ein deutsches requiem , mais quelle version ineffable , toute la magie de brahms est dans cette oeuvre mille et mille fois écoutée

    • @MashedTubers
      @MashedTubers 7 років тому +1

      Suayasia, speak English if you want to be understood.

    • @ernestofeuerhake
      @ernestofeuerhake 7 років тому

      brahms bach schubert haydn beethoven, haydn, the architecture of music. brahms is not easy to access. he was excessively perfectionnist, he destroyed some of his words, he worked on other works during decades: for example: deutsches requiem. but what an ineffable version! all of brahms' magic is here, in this work that has been listened to thousands and thousands of times

    • @najat5779
      @najat5779 7 років тому +1

      Mashid, je l'ai parfaitement compris. (-:

    • @MashedTubers
      @MashedTubers 7 років тому

      Najat57 I can't understand a word that you're saying. Don't use a language spoken by a people that considers adultery to be fine and normal.

    • @MashedTubers
      @MashedTubers 7 років тому

      Najat57 fine, hide behind French.

  • @zishuowang4513
    @zishuowang4513 Рік тому

    9:30
    2 moment

  • @onceltom
    @onceltom 5 років тому +1

    b compressed everything. shubert would have gone on for hours. b was no pol but clasical music was very political.

    • @princeandrey
      @princeandrey 3 роки тому

      I'd love to know what you mean! I am saying this sincerely.

    • @squirrel4727
      @squirrel4727 3 роки тому

      @@princeandrey me too

  • @e21big
    @e21big 9 років тому +1

    is it just me or Brahms actually a distant relative of Marx? XD

    • @princeandrey
      @princeandrey 9 років тому

      e21big Intriguing. How so?

    • @e21big
      @e21big 9 років тому +3

      Perry Weiner beard

    • @princeandrey
      @princeandrey 9 років тому +2

      +e21big But Brahms was actually a socially enlightened man. He condemned German anti-Semitism, once saying that it was a form of madness that would come to haunt Germany. It's hard to believe but his death came but forty years before Hitler's rise.

    • @gerardbegni2806
      @gerardbegni2806 7 років тому

      This point is disputed. Brahms was also a convinced nationalist (see triumphlied).

    • @princeandrey
      @princeandrey 5 років тому

      @@gerardbegni2806 You're right. But the point about anti-Semitism is not a controversial one, I don't think.

  • @meday1102
    @meday1102 4 роки тому

    C trop de la d son truc