Amazing TaLk to know more about SCIENCE, really the best thrilling inventions as well discoveries brought to us with facts and figures authenticated at Global level,must be appreciated and encouraged, Global level reformation should be organized,
We really need open access and unrestricted use of data, knowledge, and information to make it possible for more scholars, policymakers, practitioners, clinicians, and the general public to be able to view, cite, and share every work.
En 0:30 aparece un gráfico sin referencias. De dónde saca esa información?? Me gusta el mensaje, pero creo que en este contexto podía haber mencionado la obra del difunto Aaron Swartz y de Alexandra Elbakyan.
Open Science shifts the payment burden from the 'reader/subscriber' to the 'author' who has conducted the research in the form of Article Processing Charges (APCs). Shouldn't a system be developed where the author benefits financially from their contributions? In a publish-or-perish world, this takes a toll on the authors.
Some good points, but she throws out a lot of numbers without telling where they come from. If "open science" includes all science, including that which is controversial and not just that which makes it past "fact checkers," then I'm all for it. However, if it's the same agenda of necessarily following the "settled" science narrative, then there is no progress. I am for "open science," but it's science only if it fosters open debate.
This sharp, German creature really knows what she speaks about. Certainly about money. All she knows is where the money is. I like the orange blond haircolor. Trés coquette.
Brilliant TED Talk! We have a right to the data and information that we fund.
Amazing TaLk to know more about SCIENCE, really the best thrilling inventions as well discoveries brought to us with facts and figures authenticated at Global level,must be appreciated and encouraged, Global level reformation should be organized,
Brilliant, data-driven and inspiring.
I enjoyed every minute of this TED Talk!
Great talk and to the point
Very agree with all of your argues !!
We really need open access and unrestricted use of data, knowledge, and information to make it possible for more scholars, policymakers, practitioners, clinicians, and the general public to be able to view, cite, and share every work.
Doesn't Frontiers charge APCs?
Excellent talk well supported by evidence!
En 0:30 aparece un gráfico sin referencias. De dónde saca esa información??
Me gusta el mensaje, pero creo que en este contexto podía haber mencionado la obra del difunto Aaron Swartz y de Alexandra Elbakyan.
Wonderful! Thank you 🙏
Incredible talk.
Thanks
Good point of view and perspective
great talk really, thank you!
Open Science shifts the payment burden from the 'reader/subscriber' to the 'author' who has conducted the research in the form of Article Processing Charges (APCs). Shouldn't a system be developed where the author benefits financially from their contributions? In a publish-or-perish world, this takes a toll on the authors.
great...
Stunning!
Great insights
Some good points, but she throws out a lot of numbers without telling where they come from.
If "open science" includes all science, including that which is controversial and not just that which makes it past "fact checkers," then I'm all for it. However, if it's the same agenda of necessarily following the "settled" science narrative, then there is no progress. I am for "open science," but it's science only if it fosters open debate.
Citing doesn't mean quality tho
This sharp, German creature really knows what she speaks about. Certainly about money. All she knows is where the money is.
I like the orange blond haircolor. Trés coquette.
Swiss
How else did Big Corporations ever become Big!