Deriving the Arc Length in Cartesian and Polar Coordinates

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 12 вер 2024
  • Help me create more free content! =)
    / mathable
    Merch :v - teespring.com/...
    shop.spreadshi...
    Let us go ahead and get started! Starting from the riemann sum definition of a line integral, we can actually evaluate the arc length of ( polar ) curves. Feel free advancing this idea to different coordinate systems, such as cylindrical, spherical and toroidal ones!
    ENjoy! =)
    My Website: www.papaflammy...
    Flammy's subreddit: / flammybois
    Twitter: / flammablemaths
    Facebook: / flammablemaths
    Got some time to spare? Make sure to add captions to my videos! =) www.youtube.com...

КОМЕНТАРІ • 133

  • @luchisevera1808
    @luchisevera1808 5 років тому +198

    Some people were straight before they found your channel

    • @PhasmidTutorials
      @PhasmidTutorials 5 років тому +1

      haha XD

    • @Cashman9111
      @Cashman9111 5 років тому +16

      so you saying he is so ugly that he turns girls into lesbians ? dude, that's rude

    • @orangesite7625
      @orangesite7625 2 роки тому +2

      @@Cashman9111 no turns dudes to dudees

    • @DendrocnideMoroides
      @DendrocnideMoroides Рік тому

      @@Cashman9111 maybe that means he is so handsome that he turns men into gays

  • @AndrewDotsonvideos
    @AndrewDotsonvideos 5 років тому +66

    Now I want to do this for curved spacetime.

    • @Ricocossa1
      @Ricocossa1 5 років тому +5

      If you define your manifold with a metric then it's practically in the definition. If you start from a connection and no metric, then you can't (unless you assume metric compatibility)

    • @parameshwarhazra2725
      @parameshwarhazra2725 4 роки тому +1

      This is what a physicist really likes to do😀

    • @tomkerruish2982
      @tomkerruish2982 3 роки тому

      Get a load of this guy!

  • @lumek4513
    @lumek4513 5 років тому +67

    I zoomed in very very close and now I'm straight! Thanks papa!

  • @omarino99
    @omarino99 5 років тому +60

    Once again Leibnitz notation proves its superiority.

    • @tianvlasic
      @tianvlasic 5 років тому

      Well, if you zoom in everything is straight😂😂😂

  • @danteduane9342
    @danteduane9342 5 років тому +21

    I'M NOT STRAIGHT
    * sees video *
    OK MAYBE I'M STRAIGHT

  • @OtiumAbscondita
    @OtiumAbscondita 5 років тому +79

    Oh boi I love this homophobic humor

    • @mononix5224
      @mononix5224 5 років тому +3

      please give me your definition of homophobia and not the one made up by second rate humies (i.e. SJWs)

    • @baguettegott3409
      @baguettegott3409 4 роки тому +4

      ​@@mononix5224 Aversion to and discriminations against homosexuality/homosexual people? What is the "made up" one? Because all definitions are made up by somebody...

    • @quantumbracket6995
      @quantumbracket6995 4 роки тому +6

      *Homomorphic

  • @OscarMtz88
    @OscarMtz88 5 років тому +2

    what are the odds that literally today I was assigned to derive arc length in polar coordinates for hw, I love you

    • @rot6015
      @rot6015 5 років тому +1

      I don't know you, but we have the same taste in music.

  • @DavidPumpernickel
    @DavidPumpernickel 3 роки тому +1

    lol i watched this last week, here i am again, because deriving arclength in polar coords is a homework problem. big happy :'D

  • @yeast4529
    @yeast4529 5 років тому +4

    Great timing papa flammy, I was about to try and manually reverse my sexuality without any help

  • @brechtbollaert8187
    @brechtbollaert8187 4 роки тому +2

    May i just say... you are legendary! Love all your meme sentences hahaha

  • @atrimandal4324
    @atrimandal4324 5 років тому +11

    Okay, this is epic❤️👌
    More Physics 😂😂

  • @hendrik2765
    @hendrik2765 5 років тому +9

    10:15 good that it is the same Spiel ^^

  • @paulg444
    @paulg444 4 роки тому +2

    great to see a young man just being himself !!

  • @pepperonisalad2304
    @pepperonisalad2304 5 років тому +6

    First. Definitely first.
    And this finally seems like within my area of current knowledge!

  • @tuggspeedman1359
    @tuggspeedman1359 5 років тому +1

    You explain what your doing really well.

  • @gvcallen
    @gvcallen 3 роки тому +2

    Great video! Do you have a video formalizing the concept of "playing physicist" i.e. some sort of rigorous proof that we can "always" formulate proofs using dy's, dx's etc. without the need to mess around with Riemann sums and limits?

  • @redstridetechnologies9400
    @redstridetechnologies9400 5 років тому +2

    Sometimes I don't know what you're talking about, but I still watch it to feel smart lol

  • @antonbordwine
    @antonbordwine 3 роки тому +1

    1:16 Awaapabaund 😍🥰

  • @engr.rimarc.liguan1795
    @engr.rimarc.liguan1795 5 років тому

    Im researching the derivation of arc length for polar equations, when i found out this video. My laught on that moment. Hahahaha. Nice one 😂 i really enjoyed your video so much. Lovelots from the Philippines 😆

  • @micayahritchie7158
    @micayahritchie7158 5 років тому +1

    Papa Flammy has mastered the sacred ancient art of the Chen Lu

  • @rayvianasampaio379
    @rayvianasampaio379 4 роки тому +1

    Guten Tag meister Sholze ; *please show us how is the Lagrangian formulation , if the fixed limits are not points in two dimensions ; but are lines in the three dimensional space*
    *In this case , what would be the """ minimum sheet """???*
    I would be very gratefull .
    Greetings from Brazil !!!
    Ray Viana Sampaio .

  • @wankar0388
    @wankar0388 5 років тому +1

    chen lu rule !¡!¡! yeaah papa!

  • @mostafaahmednasr621
    @mostafaahmednasr621 5 років тому +5

    When i grow up i dont want to get the rank of sir or doctor but i want to get the rank of PAPA

  • @christopherhorton1995
    @christopherhorton1995 5 років тому

    This is perfect timing papa, we just learned about arc length in class today. Thank you my boi

  • @minafawzy5086
    @minafawzy5086 4 роки тому +1

    What is delta L. Shouldn't it be just L. The length is the space cut from a point to another. So, what you call delta L is the length and not the change in it.

  • @EmissaryOfSmeagol
    @EmissaryOfSmeagol 5 років тому +1

    Charlie: :P
    Papa: "I'm looking at you my boy"
    Charlie: :o

    • @Ensivion
      @Ensivion 5 років тому +2

      The face when you're gay and named charlie watching papa flammy D:

    • @Ensivion
      @Ensivion 5 років тому +1

      @@PapaFlammy69 lol I have a rare-ish name, it was just really surprising. the subset of people must be very small: gay, named charlie, interested in math and science.

  • @asbjrnandersen4765
    @asbjrnandersen4765 5 років тому

    Who ever said germans don't have humor??? AJAHAHA that fucking killed me

  • @sahinc8
    @sahinc8 5 років тому

    As you said in 1:58 that we are going to do an approximation I felt like an engineer

  • @deemotion
    @deemotion 5 років тому

    OMG PAPA FLAMMY! IT'S WAS AMAZING!

  • @diszno20
    @diszno20 5 років тому

    Papa! When substituting the Cartesian coords with the polar ones shouldn't they be x ( t ) = r(t) * cos ( theta( t ) ) and likewise y ( t ) = r (t ) * sin ( theta ( t ) ) ? Luv ur videos, keep up the good work!

  • @emmadurza3
    @emmadurza3 5 років тому

    Papa flammy is kazuma!!!

  • @yumi-bv7gf
    @yumi-bv7gf 2 роки тому

    why the arc length formula( cartesian form) cannot be used to find the arc length

  • @Polaris_Babylon
    @Polaris_Babylon 5 років тому +1

    Have you used Riemannian manifold to define this things?

  • @deemotion
    @deemotion 5 років тому

    A true trip. Thank you so much

  • @9Banda6
    @9Banda6 4 роки тому

    Question: Shouldn't you say theta(r) in the argument of the trig functions when converting from cartesian to polar? The reason why I say this is because in polar sometimes the angle changes as well.

  • @tomkerruish2982
    @tomkerruish2982 3 роки тому

    9:15 I believe you confused theta with t. Shouldn't it be x(t) = r(t) cos(theta(t)) usw.?

  • @silasrodrigues1446
    @silasrodrigues1446 5 років тому

    Besides I think I'm still straight I love you Papa! You're one of [my] heroes!.....

  • @damiandassen7763
    @damiandassen7763 5 років тому +1

    Wouldn't it be fun to make a video of deriving the formula of the arc area in Cartesian, spherical and cylindrical coordinates?

  • @jonahansen
    @jonahansen 4 роки тому +1

    Not for clarification purposes, it was for obfuscation purposes.

  • @loukafortin6225
    @loukafortin6225 5 років тому

    Could you show us the contour special case from the beginning nextly?

  • @Mot-dh5sx
    @Mot-dh5sx 5 років тому

    Cool, but can you solve the integral from 0 to infinity of 1/(x^n + 1)? I started trying it.
    Dunno if this helps but I have a contour that’s a sector with angle 2*pi*n/2 with radius R as it approaches infinity. It’s not as messy as I thought.

  • @FGj-xj7rd
    @FGj-xj7rd 5 років тому +2

    9:43 x dot...
    🙏

  • @kaffeepause5807
    @kaffeepause5807 2 роки тому

    Min 9:49 - Polar Coordinates: It´s not the chain rule but the product rule.

  • @anilsharma-ev2my
    @anilsharma-ev2my 4 роки тому

    What is triangle area when its equal to parameters of area cover by function in any interval
    ??????????
    We need to know how hypotenuse of triangle regulated its position or unit circle multiple times the area of function under any interval ?
    How unit circle area equal to function under curve in a given interval
    So we found a simple percentage ???

  • @mariomuysensual
    @mariomuysensual 4 роки тому

    Papa I have a question, where does the integration limits move for the polar coordinates?

  • @abdullahalmasri612
    @abdullahalmasri612 5 років тому

    Oh nice! I learned about this the last week :D only 5 years left to start grasping your math knowledge
    But after 5 years you will have a 5years more knowledge than me... Oh welp at least I'm not going backwards lol
    Btw what is the rigorous relation between dl and dx,dy? I'm more interested in the rigorous way to deal with differential than actually coming up with normal formulas

  • @apolloniuspergus9295
    @apolloniuspergus9295 5 років тому +1

    Make a video deriving the Covariant Derivative (Riemann Geometry)

    • @Naverb
      @Naverb 5 років тому

      That's... A bit tougher than anything this channel usually covers. A fairly easy extrinsic definition of the Covariant derivative though is to embed your manifold in R^n (carrying the tangent bundle via the embedding in the natural way) and then orthogonally project down the tangent bundle in the sense that each tangent space in R^n gets orthogonally projected down to a tangent space on the embedded manifold.
      Intrinsic definitions can be nicer to actually work with, and the most common one involves two terms: Dv/dt = dv^k/dt d/dx^k + v^i dp^j/dt Christoffel(i, j, k) d/dx^k. In the intrinsic definition, the first term is what you would get if we were working over R^n or any "flat" space, while the second term is a correction that takes into account how our space is "curved". This is important since when we define the derivative we want it to act like an infinitesimal difference quotient, but nearby tangent spaces might "twist away" from each other if our manifold is curved (think of taking a block of rubber in both hands and twisting each hand in opposite directions. The rubber becomes twisted. The technical name for this is "Torsion" and is a tensor).

  • @rot6015
    @rot6015 5 років тому

    Thanks papa

  • @Everth97
    @Everth97 5 років тому

    Shouldn't x(t) and y(t) functions of r(t) and theta(t)? Like r(t)*cos(theta(t))?? @flammie

  • @rogerjohan9621
    @rogerjohan9621 3 роки тому

    I derived this result on my own when I was in 9th grade after my friend challenged me ;)

  • @denisyilmaz8968
    @denisyilmaz8968 5 років тому

    So r is the vector to any point on the curve?

  • @juggler3683
    @juggler3683 3 роки тому

    How could dt go with the absolute value

  • @morbidmanatee5550
    @morbidmanatee5550 5 років тому

    (Units don't match in final formula). Should be using x(t)=r(t) cos(theta(t)) -> xdot(t)=rdot(t) cos(theta(t))-r(t) sin(theta(t)) thetadot(t)

    • @badrunna-im
      @badrunna-im 5 років тому

      You can think of t being proportional to θ, or that it's sweeping with constant angular speed.

    • @morbidmanatee5550
      @morbidmanatee5550 5 років тому

      @@badrunna-im need angular frequency in from of the term. theta = omega * t to make it unitless ;)

  • @tytuer
    @tytuer 5 років тому

    I wrote same Spiel on my exam sheet. Now I am going to invade engineering faculty with a professor.

  • @isaacstamper7798
    @isaacstamper7798 5 років тому +1

    Are you trying to become a professor

  • @TUYUYUCUARTELERO
    @TUYUYUCUARTELERO 4 роки тому

    You are funny. Good explanation. Hope UA-cam don't censor your video. A fresh breath among the politically correct speeches.

  • @abdullasulfikkar5282
    @abdullasulfikkar5282 5 років тому

    Hi flammy ❤❤❤

  • @luis-vv3lw
    @luis-vv3lw 2 роки тому

    Nice 👍🙂

  • @prestonrobinson6569
    @prestonrobinson6569 5 років тому

    Wait, you cover this in calc 1?

    • @babycreeper98
      @babycreeper98 5 років тому

      Yea lol this was Calc three stuff for me

  • @cameronspalding9792
    @cameronspalding9792 4 роки тому

    Shouldn’t it be theta(t)

  • @alberbetico10
    @alberbetico10 5 років тому

    Wouldn't it be sqrt((r*dtheta/dt)^2 + (dr/dt)^2)?
    And... x = r(t)*cos(theta(t))
    y = r(t)*sin(theta(t))

  • @prestonrobinson6569
    @prestonrobinson6569 5 років тому

    Doing this with vectors in calc 3 rn. Not a fan of the new material lol

  • @alephnull6965
    @alephnull6965 5 років тому +1

    Soo... a circle is the gayest shape.

  • @federicobondi3038
    @federicobondi3038 5 років тому

    Am I the only one wanting him to derive something in toroidal coordinates?

  • @vk6297
    @vk6297 4 роки тому

    i think u r teaching in a higher level

  • @ilovecovid
    @ilovecovid 5 років тому

    Oh yeah yeah

  • @bestonyoutube
    @bestonyoutube 5 років тому +1

    I'm gay and I find you really cute.

  • @XanderGouws
    @XanderGouws 5 років тому

    9:47 *product rule :p

    • @babycreeper98
      @babycreeper98 5 років тому +1

      I only know the Chen lu no chain rule

  • @khemirimoez8661
    @khemirimoez8661 5 років тому

    Hi derive man

  • @Goku17yen
    @Goku17yen 5 років тому +1

    lets play physicist lmao

  • @keroleswael9332
    @keroleswael9332 5 років тому +1

    If physicists approximate, why do they make fun of engineers because of this?

    • @hOREP245
      @hOREP245 5 років тому +5

      Because stereotypically physicists approximate in a more rigorous way than engineers.

    • @robertleeshinkle8446
      @robertleeshinkle8446 5 років тому +1

      Because we are correct 😉 A&Ω

    • @uberless1
      @uberless1 5 років тому +3

      Because engineers shoot for +-30% so they can charge again later for the "redesign under new customer parameters" when it doesn't work. That's why engineering degrees require an Ethics class and degrees in Physics do not.

    • @luchisevera1808
      @luchisevera1808 5 років тому +3

      Engineers approximate physicist's approximations because they test the practicality of the theory and throw out the rest. But then again looking at field theory and relativity you get some heavy approximations that drive all research centers even today

    • @pedrolourenco9520
      @pedrolourenco9520 5 років тому

      because Pi=e=3

  • @benschreyer8295
    @benschreyer8295 5 років тому

    vruh

  • @Yellowgary
    @Yellowgary 5 років тому

    Chen lu😂

  • @spacejunk2186
    @spacejunk2186 5 років тому

    Lies!

  • @parasuramvenkatesh4401
    @parasuramvenkatesh4401 4 роки тому +1

    hahaha how is homosexuality even real hahaha just zoom in lol

  • @kentmcintosh8629
    @kentmcintosh8629 4 роки тому

    Homosexuality is not something that needs to be "cured"!

    • @baguettegott3409
      @baguettegott3409 4 роки тому

      It's obviously a joke, I'm fine with the video, though the comments are confusing in parts because some come across as actually homophobic and still got a like from him - maybe it's all ironic and joking, but I feel like if the joke becomes indistinguishable from actual homophobia it might not be a good joke.

  • @parameshwarhazra2725
    @parameshwarhazra2725 4 роки тому

    You are skinny.

  • @yajurphullera9396
    @yajurphullera9396 5 років тому

    First