@cameralabs Mr. Laing what is your perspective on X2D 100c paired with 28P and 90V as a more user friendly premium photography solution? Thanks so much for such high quality content recently, it has given me a lot to think about whilst saving.
@@johntupper1369 the choice of lenses is a very personal one. For me, I'd go for something closer to 35 equivalent, but if you're shooting portraits, the 90 is great.
We think that this is a good medium camera for both serious and hobby photographers. My wife is a retired commercial photographer and she still has 1 set of the 500 CM. Sold the others when she retired. It is a good investment too if you are a serious camera enthusiast or a professional photographer.
Mate I just discovered your channel as I am huge fan of x100 series and I think your videos are one of the best if not the best photography videos on YT. Thanks!!!!
Best review on UA-cam, I really mean that! I owned the Hasselblad X2D and switched to the 907X 100C and it’s been very rewarding. I love the simplicity of the controls and the three ways of shooting with the screen, face, shoulder and waist. This is how pictures should be taken, compose, focus and set - click! Greetings from 🇨🇦 eh!
Hi Gordon. That was a pleasant surprise and a great review. 😎 Already owning XCD glass I must admit I was very tempted when the camera was announced but came to the same conclusion that I reached earlier with the X2D that I didn't need the extra 40% of linear resolution. So my only reasons for buying the 907X plus CFV 100C would be to make me and those watching me feel that I'm a better photographer than I actually am. 😂 OK, that was slightly tongue in cheek but I am delighted that Hasselblad has moved both its X-system cameras on beyond the life expectancy of the old 50 megapixel sensor which, as I understand it, is no longer being made with consequent implications for future servicing. If my X1D II ever packs up or worse my lenses can still find a home so Hasselblad has protected my investment. Bravo to them and bravo to you for the review. 👏👏👏
Thanks Bob, and nice to hear from you. I wanted to include more tests than I'd seen in many of the reports so far, so hopefully some more detail for those who are into this system. It was certainly fun to try it out for a few weeks!
This was an excellent excellent video and review of an incredible camera. You really did a great service for the 907x as well as for Hasselblad. Thank you for all the work you put into your great videos
One of the best, if not the best, reviews of this camera. This is definitely the camera I would buy if a distant and hitherto unknown relative remembered me in their will. As a stills-only photographer it is my dream camera but sadly beyond my ability to own (right now but never say never!).
I am shooting the X2D 100C with the XCD 2,5/55V and XCD 2,5/90V lenses and currently shooting mainly portrait and fashion. Having shot on my 500 CM from the early 1980's, I was very intrigued by the 907X and CFV 50C but opted for the X2D for the 100 MP. I am very tempted to explore the 907X & CFV 100C since I can use it on my 500CM. I don't think I would really have any use for the 907X part of the system and really wish Hasselblad would just offer the 100C back on it's own. I did purchase the V-system lens adapter and the X2D works perfectly with all my old V lenses which give me a very nice "analogue" feel to the images. I have also, so far, not experienced any "rolling shutter" artifacts even when photographing flowing water. Just another note, I shot both sports and wildlife with my 500CM back in the film days and have had no problems shooting sport and wildlife with the X2D - it all comes down to being able to anticipate what your subject is going to do. Thank you for the review
Being a 50C owner, I love it for its historical look and for the fact that I can use the back on my 500CM. But, I don't love using it. So when they launched the 100C, I bought a X2D which I'm very happy with. The ergonomics are much much better and the colours are beautiful.
Well, I don't know. Besides the simple solution - put this camera on the shelf and admire it), there is a practical use - together with a technical camera. It is very difficult to shoot street with this camera. Maybe only landscape or in the studio. And my main question - what about the color? Many times I saw that the color of the photo from the 907x and x2d is slightly different. What do you say?
Love the clean and simple design (not to mention the elegant style and aesthetics).... Here's a thought 🤔, as mentioned it has no IBIS but would it work on a gimbal (to get stabilisation without the need of carrying an awkward tripod).... Maybe??? 🙂🙏
@@cameralabs No. I have modern Sony system for anything I'd ever want to shoot. The X2D just is a different take on that... chasing the ideal photo. The point of the Hassy is to be something beautiful and different. As the old man I'll be in a few years, that might work perfectly. Waiting for the IBIS. Thanks for a lovely review!
It's surprising that the review - which is otherwise very comprehensive - did not address or discuss using the 907x in portrait orientation. Waist level orientation is fine for a square image, but the CFV isn't square. Does Hasselblad expect users to crop? How feasible is it to turn the camera to the side for a vertical shot?
You're absolutely right, and I was so engrossed in shooting it horizontal, I didn't even think about portrait until afterwards. My part-excuse is that the original 500 series used square format film, so there was no need for portrait, and the 907X inherits that design BUT as you know the CFV 100C has a rectangular sensor. So there would be nefits to shooting it portrait but the ergonomics and design really discourage that to a point I don't think you'd bother. Luckily there's tons of resolution here though, so taking a portrait crop from the landscape shape isn't the end of the World, but again points to the X2D for greater flexibility.
The 907X screen isn't flipped horizontally like a V system camera screen that cannot be used vertically (with A16 film back) without an additional prism finder. You just turn the 907X vertical and framing is easy and fine. Thus you have no problem following a moving subject with the 907X as you have with the flipped image of a reflex waist level finder. The 907X isn't a waist level finder camera, even horizontally, as when the screen is turned up you cannot hold it against you belly as you would do it with a Hasselblad V or Rolleiflex.
Thanks for the thoughtful review gordon, i agree with the front and ring button customization, wish i could turn to change the speed shutter without pressing it
The best review of the camera to date. If this had come out before I bought my X2D, I'd have bought this instead. It's limited but as you point out, Gordon, it's sui generis and not trying to be like every other camera on the market. I doubt that people will but it as their only camera anyway. Despite the lack of IBIS, it is the ultimate travel camera in terms of size, weight and resolution.
Great review. I looked at the X2D and didn’t like the overall feel and experience. It feels not Hassy. One of the great joy of my H5D is the shutter sound. How about that for the CFV?
Do you think the beauty and backwards combability with the 500cm would be worth it over the form factor, viewfinder and sensor stabilization of the X2D. Pretend here you had the cash, and were in the market for one of these two?
It's heart vs head! The most sensible choice and most flexible is of course the X2D, but there's something about the 907X which is very inspirational. Tough choice!
I have an X2D but as nice as I think the 907x + back is, I can only see the V-mount support as a gimmick. I don't see it as supporting the older stuff because they don't even sell the older stuff. If it's broken, the party trick is done. I would like it if Hasselblad made a modern wasit-level camera based on their X mount.
Very true, I should have talked about that. The body design and concept was originally for square film, so there was no portrait or landscape shooting. But now with a rectangular sensor, it becomes more of a consideration unless you crop.
Not true, you can frame horizontally and vertically without flipped screen. The 907X isn't a real waist level camera. When you try to use it waist level horizontally it even becomes unstable because you cannot press it against your belly to block it like you do it with a real old time waist level camera.
Excellent review, Gordon. Very interesting camera indeed. A few years ago when they were still cheap, I purchased a 501C/M to play with. That was a nice experience. I ended up selling it and all the collected lenses and accessories, as the prices went up again. I could not resist, as I did not often use it, due to the overall bulkiness of the system. I wish the CFV camera back would have a dark slide, similar to the older 500 series film camera backs, in order to protect the sensor. The large open sensor makes me nervous.
Hasselblad & Linhof - two of my favourite brands (that I'll never be able to own). I only had 2 occasions when I had the privilege to use either brands (both were analogue cameras). I'll stick to using my "middle class" Nikon dslr. 😊
Nice to get your take on the 907X, Gordo. I dont feel satisfied with new camera review until I get yours. Hey Gordo, wouldn't be cool to get a FF, cheaper version of the modern Hasselblad? How well do you think a FF Hasselblad would do. Why can't they modernise and make $2500/$4000 full frame cameras!
Weeeeeell, in the dimmer UK, it was ok, but where you are it can get pretty bright. I'd see if you can rent or borrow one first to see if it's usable in your conditions.
i think hasselblad pure-photo direction is a big mistake. they should at least allow external recording via hdmi. The large sensor would make for an interesting capture. when you invest in those expensive high quality lenses, you do want to shoot a clip or two from time to time
@labs There's nothing to be suited to, I don't see how that would sacrifice it's current photo capabilities. If Fuji can do it, so can Hassleblad. It is to my belief they simply did that so that when they release "X3D" or "X2D II" they can have a meaningful "upgrade" by allowing video capabilities once again. A built digital photo camera is already 95% a video camera. That's why so many digital cameras include video capabilities. It doesn't take much to include the feature, so most decide to do it.
@@lowIQstuff I completely understand, and when you have live view on a screen, you are doing it with video, so it is built into all modern cameras. I guess they just wanted to appeal to purist photographers who get annoyed about video. I'd have preferred it was in there, but I know there's different preferences. Be interesting to see if the line stays pure photo or if they do add it as you suggest.
@@cameralabs Thank you very much for the reply. I'm curious, what about the hot shoe for the flash? Can it read something like Leica's or olympus detachable EVF like the VF-4? Thanks again in advance
@@cameralabs I see, video feed might be the keyword. So even though the hot shoe can trigger the flash, it cannot send the video signal. Focusing using the screen with glare will be difficult thing to do.
Great review, and yes, I want one! On the accesory grip- one of the reasons I use a Leica SL2 is because of the 'straight' grip. To me (large hands) it is hands down (no pun) the most comfortable to hold. The classic 'notch' gives me blisters after a short time. I never got why the shortest surface distance is under one's longest finger. My finger tip on those grips (99% of them out there) is always mashed into the body by the lens. For what it's worth...
I would like to try that for a future video. It's cropped compared to film as you know, plus you need to take photos in two stages. Hasselblad has a video showing how on their website.
You have only to take the photos in two stages if you want to shoot in live view. "Normal use" in SLR mode is exactly the same flow as you would shoot on film.
Thanks for the review Gordon. So, are we all just supposed to ignore the fact that this camera only works properly in landscape format? That modular design made sense for a square format film body but seems to be a significant drawback for a camera fitted with a rectangular sensor. It doesn't seem as though Hasselblad made any attempt to address the fact that you have to rotate the body 90 degrees to shoot in portrait orientation. I suppose that would have compromised the vintage aesthetics. The Form defies the Function IMO.
Oh how nice it would be to have a camera made to be just a camera in today's world. Just a tad bit more affordable than this one and leica. The nikon zf at least has the soul.
What a great review; I'm never going to own one but great none the less lol. One interesting idea, which you mentioned but didn't expand on; I realise that, like what you said; it's a camera, not for optically looking through, but, what about those people who want an optical view (this is no reflection on the review, or the video) could they not produce a new mid system, slimmer that the old Hasselblad's of the past, but giving the adaptability of a real optical view, through the lens. maybe a switchable mirror ; which could act as as an electronic display when locked up for shooting or bulb modes, or that when in mirror mode could superimpose electronic info on the backside of the mirror?
In theory they could, but since you'd need a mirror the same size as the sensor, you may as well stick with the mirrored body of an old 500 series I guess?
Just got mine its very very disappointing !!! in sunlight outside can't even see what your shooting. It gets to warm no IBIS and in M mode using the shutter button and the tiny wheel plus keeping your finger on the tiny button for adjustment forget about it. And some older lens can not work!! such as the 45mm 3.5 will not auto focus. By the X2d way better same price .
Sure thing, it's not for everyone or every situation. I found the screen was visible outdoors where I live, especially if I angled it to reduce glare, but if it's brighter where you are, it may not be as suitable. The X2D is certainly a lot more flexible and practical.
All XCD lenses are compatible and work properly, if the XCD45 3.5 doesn't work you have a problem. All X cameras get warm if you don't go to sleep mode between to sets, you can easily go manually to sleep mode by pressing shortly together the two far left and right buttons, it awakens when shortly pressing any button. If you use the 907X mainly you have to go with the grip that changes completely the experience, without grip it is meant to be used mainly as digital back and occasionally as X system camera. Week point is effectively the backscreen that shows nothing in bright sunlight.
Why, why, why they don't propose a full 6X6 (55x55 in fact) square digital back for their V system ??? I don't understand this... I'm not interested in an MF crop sensor... Hasselbald V series camera are square camera, with the ergonomic of the camera made for square shooting (so no vertical position !). And the old lenses cover this sensor/film area. The general rendering of the image (ex : the blur progressivity) will be much better with a full 55x55 square sensor. And I don't care if it have only 12Mpix... I want real MF rendering, not upper 24x36 rendering. (PS : it seems there eyeAF is not very precise for the moment, it appears the eyelash is often more in focus than the eye)
I agree, the holy grail here would be a large square sensor, but the reason they don't is sheer cost. There are some larger sensors available - see Phase One for instance, but they are stratospherically expensive, and their limited demand means they're unlikely to go down anytime soon. This product had to be more commercial, hence the smaller sensor, and was also limited by what sensors were actually available. But yes, a 6x6cm digital back would be amazing!
It would be possible, but how much would you expect to pay for such a camera? The sensor manufacturers don't commonly make this size of sensor, so it would need to be custom made for Hasselblad, and the bigger physical size equals more cost too. Therefore, I guess it is a simple case of economics... it is no doubt possible to have such a camera, but considering how the general opinion is that $8k already makes the 907X 100 MPixel an expensive camera, how many would buy the camera if it was multiple times the price of the 907X??? The lens range would also need to be considered too, as the XCD lenses have an image circle designed for the crop sensor, so to increase the size of the sensor would mean a whole new lens range would need to be developed as well, and the cost of such development would also add to the cost of the camera, etc.
@@jean-claudemuller3199 it already existed in the past (Phase One H20), so it is doable. For example you can associate 2 smaller rectangle sensor to do a bigger square sensor
@@cameralabs I am not sure why as the square 6X6 format is the cats meow. The square format fits the image circle perfectly. All of Hasselblad are made to shoot 6X6. It would be cool if Hasselblad stepped up and made a 6X6 sensor. It's not like the they are not charging enough for digtial the camera's.
@@gregoryrogalsky6937 I agree about the size and shape, I love 6x6, but in tech terms it's hugely complex to make a bigger sensor without any errors in it due to the way silicon wafter are manufactured. Companies like Phase One use some of the largest sensors around right now and I think some of their aren't even that big, but for fun, check their prices for certain sizes. Hasselblad also don't have the tech or budget to make their own sensors, only a few semi-conductor giants can actually do that.
With cameras like the Panasonic Lumix S1R and the Leica SL2, and they’re true, 187 megapixel shift mode. It’s starting to make cameras like this irrelevant.
@@jean-claudemuller3199 This is designed to be a tripod camera. No stabe. No continuous-servo AF. Moving subjects at night definitely not the best fit here. Unless motion blur is the goal.
Hasselblad manufactures CFV digital backs for V camera in different forms for a very long time, even with a sqare CCD sensor In todays form it existed: CFV 50 (CCD sensor) CFV 50C (Cmos sensor) CFV II 50C (with 907X) CFV 100C (with 907X)
Testing the Hasselblad 907X & CFV 100C medium format system!
Order the 907X & CFV 100C from B&H: bhpho.to/3SQBl1l or WEX UK: tidd.ly/3uOnaBT
More information: www.hasselblad.com/v-system/907x-cfv-100c/
Sell your used gear to MPB at: bit.ly/3ULU9yL
Buy used gear from MPB at: prf.hn/l/YLqwRAP
Buy Gordon a coffee: www.paypal.me/cameralabs
Gordon's In Camera book: amzn.to/2n61PfI / Amazon uk: amzn.to/2mBqRVZ
Cameralabs merchandise: redbubble.com/people/cameralabs/shop
Gordon’s retro gear channel: ua-cam.com/users/dinobytes
Equipment used for producing my videos
DJI Osmo Pocket 3: click.dji.com/AIOhqT-LWUFDq-bGk8hD4Q?pm=link
Panasonic Lumix S5 II: amzn.to/3Hf5IcI
Sony A6400: prf.hn/l/pRO0wp5
Sony e 24mm f1.8: amzn.to/2TqWNzk
Rode NT USB mic: amzn.to/3AdHcUp
Rode Wireless Go II mic: amzn.to/3xkCvGo
Rode Lavalier Go mic: amzn.to/3ygzzKY
Godox UL150 light: amzn.to/2VpVbXE
Godox QR-P70 softbox: amzn.to/3yQfGdF
MacBook Pro 14in (16GB / 1TB): amzn.to/3PrKbPV
00:00 - 907X & CFV 100C introduction and sponsorship
01:44 - 907X & CFV 100C concept and flexibility
03:38 - 907X & CFV 100C design and build quality
05:15 - 907X & CFV 100C sensor and IBIS (lack of)
07:09 - 907X & CFV 100C quality setting, crops
08:16 - 907X & CFV 100C burst shooting
08:24 - 907X & CFV 100C high ISO quality
09:06 - 907X & CFV 100C dynamic range
09:46 - 907X & CFV 100C battery, memory, SSD, ports, tethering
11:41 - 907X & CFV 100C controls and user interface
13:16 - 907X & CFV 100C optional grip
14:10 - 907X & CFV 100C viewfinder accessory
15:24 - 907X & CFV 100C screen quality
17:59 - 907X & CFV 100C autofocus performance
18:50 - 907X & CFV 100C face detection autofocus
20:19 - 907X & CFV 100C verdict and sample images
Music: www.davidcuttermusic.com / @dcuttermusic
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
"Cameras released after 1957 are supported..."
Hasselblad's commitment to producing products that refuse to die is unmatched.
I think some earlier ones may work too, but that's the date they'll be more certain of!
@cameralabs Mr. Laing what is your perspective on X2D 100c paired with 28P and 90V as a more user friendly premium photography solution?
Thanks so much for such high quality content recently, it has given me a lot to think about whilst saving.
@@johntupper1369 the choice of lenses is a very personal one. For me, I'd go for something closer to 35 equivalent, but if you're shooting portraits, the 90 is great.
We think that this is a good medium camera for both serious and hobby photographers.
My wife is a retired commercial photographer and she still has 1 set of the 500 CM. Sold the others when she retired. It is a good investment too if you are a serious camera enthusiast or a professional photographer.
Mate I just discovered your channel as I am huge fan of x100 series and I think your videos are one of the best if not the best photography videos on YT. Thanks!!!!
Thankyou, glad you found my channel!
Best review on UA-cam, I really mean that! I owned the Hasselblad X2D and switched to the 907X 100C and it’s been very rewarding. I love the simplicity of the controls and the three ways of shooting with the screen, face, shoulder and waist. This is how pictures should be taken, compose, focus and set - click! Greetings from 🇨🇦 eh!
Thanks!
Hi Gordon. That was a pleasant surprise and a great review. 😎 Already owning XCD glass I must admit I was very tempted when the camera was announced but came to the same conclusion that I reached earlier with the X2D that I didn't need the extra 40% of linear resolution. So my only reasons for buying the 907X plus CFV 100C would be to make me and those watching me feel that I'm a better photographer than I actually am. 😂 OK, that was slightly tongue in cheek but I am delighted that Hasselblad has moved both its X-system cameras on beyond the life expectancy of the old 50 megapixel sensor which, as I understand it, is no longer being made with consequent implications for future servicing. If my X1D II ever packs up or worse my lenses can still find a home so Hasselblad has protected my investment. Bravo to them and bravo to you for the review. 👏👏👏
Thanks Bob, and nice to hear from you. I wanted to include more tests than I'd seen in many of the reports so far, so hopefully some more detail for those who are into this system. It was certainly fun to try it out for a few weeks!
This was an excellent excellent video and review of an incredible camera. You really did a great service for the 907x as well as for Hasselblad.
Thank you for all the work you put into your great videos
Thanks, glad you enjoyed it!
Hasselblad has the best camera interface. I wish the other manufacturers would step up.
I was really impressed with it
Never heard of seen an Leica 😉
Very thorough review and I absolutely love the screen and menus on this camera. Hopefully other cameras companies take note of this user experience.
Thanks Ben, yes, the UI is really nice on it...
So excited to see a Hasselblad review from you. Would love to see your take on the x2d if you ever get one for review.
Thanks, and yes I wish I'd reviewed that one now. I'll probably wait until their next one.
One of the best, if not the best, reviews of this camera. This is definitely the camera I would buy if a distant and hitherto unknown relative remembered me in their will. As a stills-only photographer it is my dream camera but sadly beyond my ability to own (right now but never say never!).
Thanks, I wanted to do more tests than many of the videos I'd seen so far.
absolutely beautiful - doesnt need af - but this is a real camera.... come on fuji - give us something like this.....
I am shooting the X2D 100C with the XCD 2,5/55V and XCD 2,5/90V lenses and currently shooting mainly portrait and fashion.
Having shot on my 500 CM from the early 1980's, I was very intrigued by the 907X and CFV 50C but opted for the X2D for the 100 MP.
I am very tempted to explore the 907X & CFV 100C since I can use it on my 500CM. I don't think I would really have any use for the 907X part of the system and really wish Hasselblad would just offer the 100C back on it's own.
I did purchase the V-system lens adapter and the X2D works perfectly with all my old V lenses which give me a very nice "analogue" feel to the images. I have also, so far, not experienced any "rolling shutter" artifacts even when photographing flowing water.
Just another note, I shot both sports and wildlife with my 500CM back in the film days and have had no problems shooting sport and wildlife with the X2D - it all comes down to being able to anticipate what your subject is going to do.
Thank you for the review
Glad you enjoyed it! I agree, they should sell the back separately from the 907X. I can't see why they wouldn't.
Being a 50C owner, I love it for its historical look and for the fact that I can use the back on my 500CM. But, I don't love using it. So when they launched the 100C, I bought a X2D which I'm very happy with. The ergonomics are much much better and the colours are beautiful.
The modular idea is wonderful. Sony should be doing this. The internals and control survice should be separate elements.
I love this camera. If I ever give up wildlife photography I'll sell my RF600 F4 and R3 and pick this up and a couple lenses.
It'd be a very different experience, but a lot more portable!
You get what you pay for. This is definitely one of those situations. I'll never own one. But I'm glad it exists and that others will.
Well, I don't know. Besides the simple solution - put this camera on the shelf and admire it), there is a practical use - together with a technical camera. It is very difficult to shoot street with this camera. Maybe only landscape or in the studio. And my main question - what about the color? Many times I saw that the color of the photo from the 907x and x2d is slightly different. What do you say?
Love the clean and simple design (not to mention the elegant style and aesthetics).... Here's a thought 🤔, as mentioned it has no IBIS but would it work on a gimbal (to get stabilisation without the need of carrying an awkward tripod).... Maybe??? 🙂🙏
Gimbals are great, but you can't touch the camera, so while they're fine for video, they're not suitable for stills where you touch the camera.
❤ great video again. Systematic and highly educational. Thanks !
Thanks!
This camera, and the four lenses that I'd want (one zoom, three primes), would cost more than $20k. But I get it... very cool. Needs ibis, for sure.
Would you consider the X2D instead?
@@cameralabs No. I have modern Sony system for anything I'd ever want to shoot. The X2D just is a different take on that... chasing the ideal photo. The point of the Hassy is to be something beautiful and different. As the old man I'll be in a few years, that might work perfectly. Waiting for the IBIS. Thanks for a lovely review!
@@hatpeach1 you're welcome!
@@cameralabs that camera needs continuous auto focus and eye af. this should be a basic. Look out for Sony 102 medium format.
It's surprising that the review - which is otherwise very comprehensive - did not address or discuss using the 907x in portrait orientation. Waist level orientation is fine for a square image, but the CFV isn't square. Does Hasselblad expect users to crop? How feasible is it to turn the camera to the side for a vertical shot?
You're absolutely right, and I was so engrossed in shooting it horizontal, I didn't even think about portrait until afterwards. My part-excuse is that the original 500 series used square format film, so there was no need for portrait, and the 907X inherits that design BUT as you know the CFV 100C has a rectangular sensor. So there would be nefits to shooting it portrait but the ergonomics and design really discourage that to a point I don't think you'd bother. Luckily there's tons of resolution here though, so taking a portrait crop from the landscape shape isn't the end of the World, but again points to the X2D for greater flexibility.
You can flip it easily for portraits. I’m seriously surprised you didn’t know that!
The 907X screen isn't flipped horizontally like a V system camera screen that cannot be used vertically (with A16 film back) without an additional prism finder.
You just turn the 907X vertical and framing is easy and fine.
Thus you have no problem following a moving subject with the 907X as you have with the flipped image of a reflex waist level finder.
The 907X isn't a waist level finder camera, even horizontally, as when the screen is turned up you cannot hold it against you belly as you would do it with a Hasselblad V or Rolleiflex.
Thanks for the thoughtful review gordon, i agree with the front and ring button customization, wish i could turn to change the speed shutter without pressing it
The best review of the camera to date. If this had come out before I bought my X2D, I'd have bought this instead. It's limited but as you point out, Gordon, it's sui generis and not trying to be like every other camera on the market. I doubt that people will but it as their only camera anyway. Despite the lack of IBIS, it is the ultimate travel camera in terms of size, weight and resolution.
Glad you enjoyed it, and don't feel bad, the X2D is a tremendous camera.
Great review. I looked at the X2D and didn’t like the overall feel and experience. It feels not Hassy. One of the great joy of my H5D is the shutter sound. How about that for the CFV?
Well on this system it's a leaf shutter in the lens, so pretty quiet. Didn't I show a clip in the video, I meant to!
Do you think the beauty and backwards combability with the 500cm would be worth it over the form factor, viewfinder and sensor stabilization of the X2D. Pretend here you had the cash, and were in the market for one of these two?
It's heart vs head! The most sensible choice and most flexible is of course the X2D, but there's something about the 907X which is very inspirational. Tough choice!
@@cameralabs Alright, you win. I guess I'll have to buy both. Unrelated, if you're interested in a 2008 Honda Accord I can give you a good price.
@@lackoliver55 hah! I've just traded my old car for a slightly less old one.
I have an X2D but as nice as I think the 907x + back is, I can only see the V-mount support as a gimmick. I don't see it as supporting the older stuff because they don't even sell the older stuff. If it's broken, the party trick is done. I would like it if Hasselblad made a modern wasit-level camera based on their X mount.
The X2D is certainly a strong product.
Totally agree with you I have the X2D and its miles ahead this POS. In bright sunlight can't even see the LCD! It won't even AF with my 45 3.5 !
I don’t understand why they don’t have the LCD panel to also tilt upwards in a vertical orientation. This means we can only shoot horizontally.
Very true, I should have talked about that. The body design and concept was originally for square film, so there was no portrait or landscape shooting. But now with a rectangular sensor, it becomes more of a consideration unless you crop.
Not true, you can frame horizontally and vertically without flipped screen.
The 907X isn't a real waist level camera.
When you try to use it waist level horizontally it even becomes unstable because you cannot press it against your belly to block it like you do it with a real old time waist level camera.
Excellent review, Gordon. Very interesting camera indeed. A few years ago when they were still cheap, I purchased a 501C/M to play with. That was a nice experience. I ended up selling it and all the collected lenses and accessories, as the prices went up again. I could not resist, as I did not often use it, due to the overall bulkiness of the system. I wish the CFV camera back would have a dark slide, similar to the older 500 series film camera backs, in order to protect the sensor. The large open sensor makes me nervous.
I agree, i think it could do with a dark slide.
Hasselblad & Linhof - two of my favourite brands (that I'll never be able to own). I only had 2 occasions when I had the privilege to use either brands (both were analogue cameras). I'll stick to using my "middle class" Nikon dslr. 😊
Nothing wrong with Nikon, but equally we can dream!
Nice to get your take on the 907X, Gordo. I dont feel satisfied with new camera review until I get yours. Hey Gordo, wouldn't be cool to get a FF, cheaper version of the modern Hasselblad? How well do you think a FF Hasselblad would do. Why can't they modernise and make $2500/$4000 full frame cameras!
That could be fun, but I don't see it happening! Their lens system is designed fore bigger sensors.
Gordon, I am seriously considering this system. Direct sunlight in Australia is, at times, severe. How is the screen in very bright light ?
Weeeeeell, in the dimmer UK, it was ok, but where you are it can get pretty bright. I'd see if you can rent or borrow one first to see if it's usable in your conditions.
@@cameralabs thanks. I suspect that I am going to be an x2d boy
Such an enjoyable Review… thanks.
Thankyou!
Loved the Video! thanks Gordon, if i ever come across a wad of Cash I'll consider this camera lol.
thank you very much for the review
You're welcome!
Does Gordon still have his Hasselblad 500 series film camera?
I never had one surprisingly, but always had my eye on one. It may still happen!
i think hasselblad pure-photo direction is a big mistake. they should at least allow external recording via hdmi. The large sensor would make for an interesting capture.
when you invest in those expensive high quality lenses, you do want to shoot a clip or two from time to time
It won't suit everyone, but if you want video in this format, Fujifilm has you Covered
@labs There's nothing to be suited to, I don't see how that would sacrifice it's current photo capabilities.
If Fuji can do it, so can Hassleblad. It is to my belief they simply did that so that when they release "X3D" or "X2D II" they can have a meaningful "upgrade" by allowing video capabilities once again.
A built digital photo camera is already 95% a video camera. That's why so many digital cameras include video capabilities. It doesn't take much to include the feature, so most decide to do it.
@@lowIQstuff I completely understand, and when you have live view on a screen, you are doing it with video, so it is built into all modern cameras. I guess they just wanted to appeal to purist photographers who get annoyed about video. I'd have preferred it was in there, but I know there's different preferences. Be interesting to see if the line stays pure photo or if they do add it as you suggest.
If I may ask a quick question about the CFV, can it be used with a 3rd party EVF? Thanks in advance
There's nothing for it to connect to.
@@cameralabs Thank you very much for the reply. I'm curious, what about the hot shoe for the flash? Can it read something like Leica's or olympus detachable EVF like the VF-4?
Thanks again in advance
@@OrdLee no, there's no electrical connection for a video feed to an EVF.
@@cameralabs I see, video feed might be the keyword. So even though the hot shoe can trigger the flash, it cannot send the video signal.
Focusing using the screen with glare will be difficult thing to do.
@@OrdLee yes, it takes a lot of data for a video stream, so needs special connectors.
Great review, and yes, I want one! On the accesory grip- one of the reasons I use a Leica SL2 is because of the 'straight' grip. To me (large hands) it is hands down (no pun) the most comfortable to hold. The classic 'notch' gives me blisters after a short time. I never got why the shortest surface distance is under one's longest finger. My finger tip on those grips (99% of them out there) is always mashed into the body by the lens. For what it's worth...
you were in hk?
Not for about 20 years, why?
@@cameralabs 3'20" looks HK
@@jackymo820 ah I see what you mean, yes it does look like HK. I was using Hasselblad's footage there though.
Too bad you didn’t try it out on the 500C/M or something similar.
I would like to try that for a future video. It's cropped compared to film as you know, plus you need to take photos in two stages. Hasselblad has a video showing how on their website.
@@cameralabs I used it on a 1966 SWC (modified at the tripod mount to a swc/m). The results of the lens at f16 are astonishing!
You have only to take the photos in two stages if you want to shoot in live view.
"Normal use" in SLR mode is exactly the same flow as you would shoot on film.
Thanks for the review Gordon.
So, are we all just supposed to ignore the fact that this camera only works properly in landscape format? That modular design made sense for a square format film body but seems to be a significant drawback for a camera fitted with a rectangular sensor. It doesn't seem as though Hasselblad made any attempt to address the fact that you have to rotate the body 90 degrees to shoot in portrait orientation. I suppose that would have compromised the vintage aesthetics.
The Form defies the Function IMO.
Good point, I hadn't thought of that because you only hold it in the horizontal orientation.
Thanks Gordon. I've been wondering if it's just me. I keep thinking I'm missing something obvious.
Oh how nice it would be to have a camera made to be just a camera in today's world. Just a tad bit more affordable than this one and leica. The nikon zf at least has the soul.
can it be used with a gimbal?
In theory yes, but gimbals only work when you don't touch the camera - so they're fine for video, bit not really appropriate for photos.
When, ever, would one use a gimbal for still photography 😟
@@mcelliot instead of tripod
What a great review; I'm never going to own one but great none the less lol. One interesting idea, which you mentioned but didn't expand on; I realise that, like what you said; it's a camera, not for optically looking through, but, what about those people who want an optical view (this is no reflection on the review, or the video) could they not produce a new mid system, slimmer that the old Hasselblad's of the past, but giving the adaptability of a real optical view, through the lens. maybe a switchable mirror ; which could act as as an electronic display when locked up for shooting or bulb modes, or that when in mirror mode could superimpose electronic info on the backside of the mirror?
In theory they could, but since you'd need a mirror the same size as the sensor, you may as well stick with the mirrored body of an old 500 series I guess?
Just buy one of the remaining H6 cameras 😂
informative review
Thanks!
Just got mine its very very disappointing !!! in sunlight outside can't even see what your shooting. It gets to warm no IBIS and in M mode using the shutter button and the tiny wheel plus keeping your finger on the tiny button for adjustment forget about it. And some older lens can not work!! such as the 45mm 3.5 will not auto focus. By the X2d way better same price .
Sure thing, it's not for everyone or every situation. I found the screen was visible outdoors where I live, especially if I angled it to reduce glare, but if it's brighter where you are, it may not be as suitable. The X2D is certainly a lot more flexible and practical.
@@cameralabs oh ya that’s right UK no ☀️ where I live it’s 32c and sunny ☀️. I’ll stick with my X2D and picking up a GFX100/2
All XCD lenses are compatible and work properly, if the XCD45 3.5 doesn't work you have a problem.
All X cameras get warm if you don't go to sleep mode between to sets, you can easily go manually to sleep mode by pressing shortly together the two far left and right buttons, it awakens when shortly pressing any button.
If you use the 907X mainly you have to go with the grip that changes completely the experience, without grip it is meant to be used mainly as digital back and occasionally as X system camera.
Week point is effectively the backscreen that shows nothing in bright sunlight.
Why, why, why they don't propose a full 6X6 (55x55 in fact) square digital back for their V system ??? I don't understand this... I'm not interested in an MF crop sensor... Hasselbald V series camera are square camera, with the ergonomic of the camera made for square shooting (so no vertical position !). And the old lenses cover this sensor/film area. The general rendering of the image (ex : the blur progressivity) will be much better with a full 55x55 square sensor. And I don't care if it have only 12Mpix... I want real MF rendering, not upper 24x36 rendering. (PS : it seems there eyeAF is not very precise for the moment, it appears the eyelash is often more in focus than the eye)
I agree, the holy grail here would be a large square sensor, but the reason they don't is sheer cost. There are some larger sensors available - see Phase One for instance, but they are stratospherically expensive, and their limited demand means they're unlikely to go down anytime soon. This product had to be more commercial, hence the smaller sensor, and was also limited by what sensors were actually available. But yes, a 6x6cm digital back would be amazing!
It would be possible, but how much would you expect to pay for such a camera? The sensor manufacturers don't commonly make this size of sensor, so it would need to be custom made for Hasselblad, and the bigger physical size equals more cost too. Therefore, I guess it is a simple case of economics... it is no doubt possible to have such a camera, but considering how the general opinion is that $8k already makes the 907X 100 MPixel an expensive camera, how many would buy the camera if it was multiple times the price of the 907X???
The lens range would also need to be considered too, as the XCD lenses have an image circle designed for the crop sensor, so to increase the size of the sensor would mean a whole new lens range would need to be developed as well, and the cost of such development would also add to the cost of the camera, etc.
6X6 square digital sensors don't exist, Hasselblad and any other camera brand isn't able to do it without the sensor.
@@jean-claudemuller3199 it already existed in the past (Phase One H20), so it is doable. For example you can associate 2 smaller rectangle sensor to do a bigger square sensor
Shame about the cropped sensor.. 6X6 or nothing.
I'm not sure anyone makes a 6x6cm sensor, at least that's cheaper than a house
@@cameralabs I am not sure why as the square 6X6 format is the cats meow. The square format fits the image circle perfectly. All of Hasselblad are made to shoot 6X6. It would be cool if Hasselblad stepped up and made a 6X6 sensor. It's not like the they are not charging enough for digtial the camera's.
@@gregoryrogalsky6937 I agree about the size and shape, I love 6x6, but in tech terms it's hugely complex to make a bigger sensor without any errors in it due to the way silicon wafter are manufactured. Companies like Phase One use some of the largest sensors around right now and I think some of their aren't even that big, but for fun, check their prices for certain sizes. Hasselblad also don't have the tech or budget to make their own sensors, only a few semi-conductor giants can actually do that.
With cameras like the Panasonic Lumix S1R and the Leica SL2, and they’re true, 187 megapixel shift mode. It’s starting to make cameras like this irrelevant.
No, experience shows that pixel shift on consumer grade cameras give very little enhanced details, even if they increase massively pixel count.
I have both the SL2 and the older 907x II 50c and I don’t believe I’ve ever struggled to choose one for a shoot because one made the other irrelevant.
😂
Without 45° eye viewer this is as useless as my phone screen outdoors.
Sorry but a 45° eye viewfinder doesn't work for both horizontal and vertical.
Only a 90° viewfinder does it.
For super wealthy hipsters, expect to find a lot on the second hand market with a very low shutter count
It's always worth keeping an eye on the used market.
Totally. MPB have supplied my old D610 and D200.
The 907X is the only digital solution today when you want to go with film and digital with the same equipment, just adding a back to it.
Not very suitable to night street photography unfortunately.
I have no problem to use it as such
@@jean-claudemuller3199 This is designed to be a tripod camera. No stabe. No continuous-servo AF. Moving subjects at night definitely not the best fit here. Unless motion blur is the goal.
This is a niche product. Old school. I don't find it interesting.
Fair enough
I really don't know why Hasselblad took sooo long to lunch this back.
The old cameras would have held their value and prices.
Hasselblad manufactures CFV digital backs for V camera in different forms for a very long time, even with a sqare CCD sensor
In todays form it existed:
CFV 50 (CCD sensor)
CFV 50C (Cmos sensor)
CFV II 50C (with 907X)
CFV 100C (with 907X)