Gavin, still unbelievable to me that you have only 90k followers… your channel is one of THE best for photo beauty and a dapple of entertainment. As an Upstate NYer we are spoiled with having these amazing state parks just an hour away. If you have not been already, come back in the Fall and visit Letchworth… unbelievable colors.
there is two pretty significant differences between the X2D and the GFX 100S first one is the type of shutter used. The X2D is using leaf shutters inside the lens, making it a lot quieter and stable compared to the GFX 100S that uses a focal plane shutter. I don't know how well dampened the GFX's shutter is, but focal plane shutters introduce a lot more movement in the camera than leaf shutters, and with 102MP sensors, even with IBIS units, the slightest movement might be the thing tipping the edge between sharp and blurry. I don't think it has to do with the ISO, but the shutter type. Second difference is the lenses you can put on the camera. Hasselblad needs to put a leaf shutter inside each of their lenses, which is definitely adding cost and/or reliability issues since there is more moving parts in each lens. Fujifilm went the simple way, their lenses are just lenses, and the shutter is in the camera, reducing the cost, making them simpler without compromising image quality. The GFX lenses are also more numerous and versatile compared to the Hasselblad system, with access to good primes, but also good zooms. So looking at both of these cameras, the X2D really falls into the "luxury" camera category, like Leica does: it's special (Leica does rangefinder, Hasselblad does leaf shutters), it achieves very good image quality and some people claim that they have the best color science of all cameras, so far it seems to be the case for both brands. But for both brands as well, there is a cheaper camera with the same sensor, very close image quality and much more pragmatic approach (Sony for Leica, Fuji GFX for Hasselblad) Fujifilm might have little worse colors compared to the X2D, but their more fleshed out lens ecosystem, more affordable cameras, access to pretty good quality video in the 100S makes it a no brainer for a lot of people, just like the color science, superior stability and/or super fast flash sync speeds will make the X2D a no brainer for other people Two excellent cameras at the top of the food chain.
Came to look for this. Leaf shutter is the difference for this handheld shots. I already witnessed this with GFX50S vs X1D (1st generation). X1D was remarkably more handheld friendly due to less vibration from the leaf shutter. That said, I would still pick GFX00S over X2D. Just something which makes me think Fujifilm’s future is more financially secure compared to Hasselblad now owned by the Chinese….
I almost bought the Hasselblad. The colors are one thing, the interface, and leaf shutter is the main draw. Portrait shooters will appreciate the leaf shutter and colors. Forget the video function and just get a separate video camera! People say that you can just adjust the colors, but it is time wasted (and that's money). The Fuji colors have a red tint that's similar to Canon. The X2D has beautiful natural tones and gradation.
Honestly, this channel is the only UA-cam channel that has me and the wife both absolutely buckled laughing. Only found it relatively recently and we both sit and binge it. Last night we found the outtakes videos and I was up late watching them… so much so that I had 38 minutes sleep and because of that I have a face like a bucket of angry frogs 😂😂 Thanks for not only the incredible photography but such a unique take on what is usually such a dry and humourless genre.
This helped me pick the Hasselblad. Took it out to Bryce Canyon and Rocky Mountain NP the last couple of weeks and you weren’t lying about those colors. Incredible. I don’t even like processing my photos anymore because I don’t want to ruin these amazing Hasselblad files
Hello, interesting video and fun! but honestly, wouldn't you prefer to use another camera just for video along with the Hasselblad for photography if your business depends so much on colours straight out of your camera? (I know that the overall budget would be a lot higher)
Thanks great video all the way around. The X2D has been on my list for quite some time. The colors are incredible, and the imagestabilaztion is unbelievable , the menu as well. Overall if someone didn't fall in love with that camera I would be very suspicious. Thanks again great video.
Amazed they let you both in the country!😂 great comparison. Really appreciate the observations and experience. I loved hassle film cameras and would love to own the x2d.
Thanks for a great comparison video. I went through the agony of deciding between the Hasselblad H2D and the Fuji 100S for about 6 months. Finally, I settled on the 100S, but for a reason you did not really explore in your video. I have been a Hasselblad shooter for about 50 years, from the old 500C and CW film cameras, the H1D and up through the H5D-50 cameras, and finally to the H1D-50C. And for my favorite type of shooting, landscapes, the H2D is a perfect camera. The well documented shortcomings in focusing speed and lack of video do not effect me at all. I really loved the H2D; however, in a test at a local camera shop the Fuji produced beautiful images with breathtaking detail. I think the magnificent Hassy color and sharpness can be matched by the Fuji with post processing in Photoshop/Lightroom. What really convinced me was the fact that Fuji has a superb line of lenses for its GFX cameras. (And remember, the Hassy H series lenses were made by Fuji.) Hassy has only one zoom for its X cameras, 35 to 75 mm. If they had also had, say a 60-120mm, or a 70-140mm zoom, I would have bought the X2D with the two zoom lenses. I now have the Fuji 100s, three Fuji zoom lenses, 32-64mm, 45-100mm and the 100-200mm, plus the 1.4 extender for the long zoom. This gives me a 100 megapixel camera and lenses with a focal lengths from 32mm to 280mm, in a backpack that weighs only 16 lbs., including other paraphernalia.
And of course the GFX100 is more affordable. A few years ago, a local Fuji product specialist told me that Fuji's vision is to bring medium format to bigger audience. Yep, I can definitely see that.
There's some issues with this comparison. 1) SOOC JPEG on Fuji means what film simulation? There's a bunch and all look different. 2) where as X2D ibis may be better than Fuji's, you need to do a bit more testing, especially as your posture changes a lot. I can achieve sharp 1s exposures with GFX100S with proper posture at 35mm focal length. Maybe I could achieve 3s with X2D, but if we are serious, one should not rely on IBIS at longer exposures than the 1/focal length -rule, unless in a emergency. It nice to have that option though. 3) Adobe RAW for some reason has really bad default settings for GFX100S, which makes awful colors and oversharpened detail as "SOOC RAW" conversion. Capture One is way better. I'd love to see X2D raw made with Phocus and GFX100s made with C1, as Phocus is fantastic with Hasselblad files and C1 is way better than Adobe RAW with GFX100s files. That would even out the RAW conversion SW factors, and leave us as with the "best possible image out of these" result. And don't get me wrong, I do like hasselblad color science a lot, but Fuji is way cheaper and way more accessible.
Enjoyable video but in all honesty I find it largely misleading. In my opinion doing a comparison of color rendering with auto white balance on is completely useless. In every comparison there was a very noticable difference especially in tint and even exposure of the shots in some cases, which would make greens look totally different even if they had been done with the exact same camera. So while this was very calming to watch and I appreciate the "real life usage" approach, I think making the shots comparable in the first place by being technically correct is still in order.
No video is a plus for me. Not to mention a super simplified menu. So ... I have the Hasselblad 907X CVF100C. The image quality is crazy good. 40 years of image making and I'm astounded by how advanced it has all become. Amazing.
Both cameras use the exact same Sony sensor. If there's a difference in the way the data from the sensor is processed, it can most likely be corrected in post. In terms of sharpness, it is the lens that really determines that (how exact the focus is, the lens elements and quality etc)
Gavin, Did you vary the Fujifilm jpeg film simulations to match the Hassy? If not, you're getting Adobe "standard" in ACR which is very suboptimal for any kind of legit comparison.
The color of the brick wall in the zoomed in comparison seemed natural in the GFX image, but a greenish cast in the X2D. I was surprised you didn't comment on that, Gavin.
I think your comparison was not fair. You can't expect to take the perfect shot with the Hasselblad, and then use those same settings on the Fuji and then compare results. You should have simply tried to get the best results with each camera independently. All that driving, and you used a flawed process to compare. Damn shame.
Hey Gavin, thanks for that comparison. According to your perception, what’s been the natural colour of that bricks in the wall at 18:24? (No Pink Floyd plagiarism 😂). Shouldn’t you get the better results from the Hasselblad raw files using Phocus, for full HNCS support?
The color comparison looked to be skewed. What FIlm Simulation did you use for the GFX100S? You are doing landscape, so you should have used the Velvia Simulation.
Is this a comparison of the quality of each camera or a comparison of image stabilization? As a landscape photographer, i would like to see side by side shots with the same lens ON A TRIPOD. The X2D looks like it has a greenish cast.
Why not compare the two cameras at the same settings? Also the colors were completely different I would like to know which one was closer to what you saw with your eye
Great content Gavin and amazing cameras BUT OMG waterfall heaven I live in Northumberland and we have some amazing waterfalls but nothing like that outstanding defo a book image in there 👌👌
Fairly new to the channel, generally hate gear comparisons but your narrative style is enjoyable and entertaining, good job sir. As it happens I just bought the Fuji 100s as I enjoy landscape photography in the pursuit of mindfulness. I got it on sale for ~7000au, a quick search shows the XD2 at ~15000au and building as for aquiring a lens set, with my current budget, I dont have any spare organs to sell. If I had oodles of $$$ then I’d have reconsidered, but as it is, no one’s paying me for my photographic interest, and brand loyalty or colour science seems worth less than it was pre LR-PShop.
Very helpful video and review. Absolutely love the Hasselblad colours. Image stabilisation in X2D is a game changer. This scene had a relatively limited range of colours so I suspect the difference will be even greater in images with greater colour range. Thanks for sharing and a great location as well.
Hasselblad has always ruled on top for image quality over the years. Its truly a professional photography system. You proofed that it is in this video. I loved that waterfall scene , you need to go back when no one is there.
I liked the GFX colours, it looked like they got a better white balance, which is hard to do in a forest. In my edit I would have the shadows have less green, and allow a bit more green in the midtones. Anyway it's hard to judge, but maybe it's time to poll your viewers, and offer a few edits on screen? I terns of camera choice, I think the without tripod X2d would allow you to explore new angles, which would result in different and new images. I'm sure you can find a way to make an interesting video without the internal video recording the GFX offers.
I really enjoyed this, if you ask, although I will never buy a medium format system. Some clever remarks at the border crossing! But observed from Europe there is a minimal difference between Canada and the US. You've found a perfect spot for the shoot out; you include your lovely wife in it (but don't pay enough attention to her!) thus creating family suggestions which are (to me) always pleasant; you are not afraid to show big differences between these two ridiculously expensive cameras and the advantage of the one of them. The only thing I miss are the raws edited in a quest to minimize the mutual color differences, and a display of the 100% or 200% detail in shots done from the tripod, where the camera shake doesn't play a role. You know how to profit from your language advantage/skills, the Røde wireless system works fine but the use and the fill-up of your voice over is superb too. All in all, no wonder you've got that many views, likes and comments...
From personal experience, the Hasselblad's images are much more filmic. However, one thing not mentioned in the review is that the Fujifilm's autofocus is vastly superior. Also, the price gap between the two systems increases massively if you need multiple focal lengths. But the Hassy is just such a beautiful thing to use the one that gets used the most.
The image stabilization difference is probably because "Blad is now owned by DJI, and who know more about stabilization. Back in the darkroom days we always referred to images from Hassy and Leica as having 'presence' . Don't overlook using Google Photo's when you want to edit JPEG images. It's surprisingly powerful. I use it in the field, downloading to my tablet, via camera wifi, to view the JPEG images quickly, occasionally sending an image to social media. It's much faster than using Lightroom, superior to seeing the images on the camera back, and the tablet takes no real space in the backpack.
Hey Gavin, from my point of view, the x2d is too grennisch. For post I prefer more neutral colors. I can always boost them like I want to have them. But this is my personal preference. Because of this I do not shoot with the film simulations of my GFX. One question, why do you compare JPG SOC and images with different ISO?
Sorry, to me, the last 2 images did-NOT look like they were shot either at the same (effective) exposure nor near the same time/lighting conditions. There are too many elements (such as the foreground in front of the big tree and others left-and behind) that definitely show less lighting for the GFX. I will say overall that I did (in this case) generally like the images from the Hasselblad better than the GFX. I think everyone should bear in mind, that there are so many camera settings, that conclusions like this are impossible without extensive and multiple shooting-sessions with many different settings-combinations. I do appreciate the effort and time put into this video. Thank You!
I am looking at both cameras for boudoir “style” photos. Lots of lower and natural light moody but all handheld. Probably with Hassy would use the 80/1.9 a lot. Already have a Lumix S5 that I can use for video and would be ok with just straight photo camera. Any thoughts on which direction to go?
Good Stuff Gavin. I am a commercial portrait photographer, Not landscape, but have used both bodies more than once. What I found, particularly with skin tones in the Hassleblad really cranks up the luminance and hues in camera, hence the green shift on everything. I agree its more appealing in the greens of nature but on skin, its awful. worse than sony's red shift. Maybee the Hassy is the right tool for the job with landscapes? quite possibly but definately not portrait. It would be really interesting to see how it performs with critical WB in the snow...food for thought.
all i could notice was the fuji seemed to handle the highlights a little better and the hassy baby was better with the shadows. bot are dream cameras an di think the other issue you might have is lens options as i think with the medium format level lens options seem to be the biggest draw back with even teh fuji not having many options compared to say a full frame camera options ?
Hasselblad colours were much more beautiful. Also the contrast and sharpness were nicer. It’s the camera I would choose between those two all day long (saying that as a Fuji fan and previous owner of X-Pro 2). The GFX100S might cost less, but it’s still a lot of money and doesn’t feel any different from the cheaper Fujis to me. The Hasselblad on the other hand feels like a million dollars. I’ve never held a camera that feels so premium. Leica is the only comparison really in terms of build quality. Also as a lover of flash photography nothing beats leaf shutter lenses.
"Beautiful" color is in the eye of the beholder. There is also something called color accuracy. Sometimes extreme accuracy is required, and sometimes less than accurate can actually be an artistic choice, just as choosing between Kodachrome, Fujichrome, and Ektachrome. I love Kodachrome and Fujichrome, but for different reasons. But I was NEVER a fan of any sort of Ektachrome. The only time I found Ektachrome more or less acceptable was virtually at sea level, and in more or less semi bright light. I even liked the ISO 200 Kodachrome better than I liked the ISO 100 Ektachrome. Or was Ektachrome only 64 ISO? I can't remember. Yes, I'm sure your Hassy feels like a million dollars, because it costs almost a million dollars, and is FAR far far out of reach for the average person, even for countless professional photographers. This is why Fuji outsells a Hassy 10 to 1. People who buy a Hassy only want to make a statement, and that statement is ... "I have shitloads of cash to spend." Fuji most assuredly knows color science, because Fuji is also a film manufacturer. It's not necessary to manufacture film in order to comprehend color science for digital. But then again, Hasselblad has never manufactured a single role of film. Wow, seriously? - - You told me that you can't tell a lot of difference between the Fuji GFS100S and the smaller format Fuji cameras? Are you BLIND?
@@scotthullinger4684 When I had my Fuji's, I thought the skinstones were great. However, the colors weren't what I'd call accurate. Both the greens and the reds were off. It was not a big deal since I shoot raw, but some products I shot I've noticed reds shifted to oranges more. In addition, this was a weird worm artifact even in raw files. Both of these cameras are expensive, and both have plus and minuses. I'd be happy to own either.
Glad you and Amanda are enjoying your business holiday in NY State. Also glad that I don't have to make your decision on which camera to buy. Pretty sure that you will choose the Fuji because of the video capability. Also sure that if you could find a workaround you would choose the Hassy. Take a sheet of paper and draw a line down the middle of the page. List all the pros on one side and the negatives on the other. Then wrack your brain between the two until you decide. 😁 Forgot to say that Amanda looked great again, as usual.
The colors and handheld clarity with the Hasselblad are amazing I think that’s the “sexy” you felt. Almost had a meltdown when I saw where the test shoot was it’s my former back yard 🥰
I've been on the brink of cancelling my too-many months long order for the super, sphincter tightening-ly expensive new Nikon 600mm and put the budget toward the super, sphincter tightening-ly expensive Hasselblad X2D (and a portrait lens of a length not yet decided). This video of yours is not helping LOL Hasselblad renders human flesh as exquisitely as you experienced it does with landscape colours and detail. Always wanted one and it'll look better on me than a sports car in my old age :) Cheers!
I was surprised that I enjoyed the UI of the X2D so much what with it being mostly touch screen. Took about 2 days to get used to it. At times it felt faster to adjust things than the GFX but it does have odd quirks such as not being able to reverse the aperture/shutter dials like you can on pretty much any camera. They could fix this with firmware.
Hmm, a bit dubious about this, especially around the 13:30 mark comparing image stabilization? I own neither of these cameras but I do have a Fuji 50r which has NO built in stabilization. So after watching this video I decided to do some test shots with my 100-200 GF as it's the only OIS lens I own. Shooting at the 200mm handheld I can get a perfectly sharp image at 1/4 second? As every photographer knows the longer the focal length the faster the shutter speed needed for sharp images. So, how can I get a perfectly sharp image shot at 1/4 second using a 200mm focal length when the poster can't get the same at 1/3rd second using a 23mm lens? Yes I know the OIS on the 100s may not be the same as the OIS on the 100-200mm but there's a huge difference between handholding a 23mm and a 200mm so I cannot see the two OIS systems being that radically different? And while I'm not that well up on color palette's I know that shooting in "Velvia" setting for example the OOC images have much more vibrant greens than the examples shown.
It seems to me this video is really about comparing the results of the .jpg's of "hand-held" shots between the cameras... so a very narrow comparison overall.
jesus christ "RAW SOOC" is already an oxymoron. What software was used to load the raw file? it will be down to that software how it is rendering your greens. TBH I prefer greens of fuji but it is complete personal taste so no right or wrong there
I shoot black and white primarily so color is not too important to me. I bought the FujiFilm GFX 100 II. Much of my landscape work is shot at a lower angle and the tilt adapter is priceless to me! I also shoot portraits and eye/face detection is very nice to have. Finally when I do shoot color FujiFilm’s film simulations remind me of choosing different film stocks. They’re great starting points in post.
@fototripper the Hasselblad X2D seems wonderful, is there a reason you choosed the Sony A7IV for the day after? Curious since I'm looking for what I should switch to, and there's a lot of good videos out there by UA-camrs saying this and that, but use something else Good day, and wonderful pictures!
I don't know what you are using, but here's my take: Sony A7R5 and previously A9 - autofocus is just phenomenal, which also helped to get crazy sharp detail shots as it's accurate. Color not so much from JPEG, very typical Sony color as in their TV. Nikon D5 - nice machinegun sound, but DR is just bad when compared to other offering. Focusing is actually pretty good and likely better than the Z7. I love that 3D C-AF. Nikon Z9 - this one is overhyped IMO. It's quick and fast, but lost DR in the process due to e-shutter only. Focusing is actually worse than the A7R5 even after upgrading firmware. But I still like Nikon ergonomics since I'm too used to them (from D600 till now), and that silent shutter is useful in certain scenario Leica M10R/M11 - A camera you use to enjoy photography, if you have time and leisure. I missed a couple shots having to manual focus. Anyway, Leica glass are very nice, and combined with the M it's an experience. The M11 got 100 mark from DXO too so don't worry about the image quality - it's sharp and detailed, but you need to hold still without IBIS. X2D - A great auto-focus IBIS medium format camera. The perspective and FOV is quite different from 35mm, and also DOF. It's much faster than X1D which I tried before. Auto-focus is accurate but not as fast as 35mm counter parts. I do like the color, as mentioned in the video it looks like the "real color" I saw on the scene. Make sure you have a fast computer to deal with the files. If I don't want to do manual focus, this will be my choice. I used to have X-Pro1 a decade or more ago. Same as the X100 series I don't see the point of having optical finder where you cannot check focus optically. Leica uses the rangefinder window in the center. I currently have the Z9, A7R5, M11 and X2D (plus an Q2 but that's mostly for my wife). Z9 - for fast moving things and wildlife, A7R5 - if I want 100% sure I can take the shot quickly (e.g. traveling in a group) and if I wanna pack light-er. M11 if I know I have time to spend walking around with the camera slowly alone. X2D similar with M11, depends on if I want to do manual focus on the trip or not, and if I have the space in my backpack.
As someone that is currently in the market for a new camera, I was really enjoying the video until, I looked at the prices. I am now going to have to put the money towards batteries for my pacemaker...
Difference is not only video, but also third party lens and better customer support. I am in the UK: 1. No shop has a x2d on display and hassy remains silent when asked about test drive. So I don’t know if I can trust them for after support 2. Gfx has a shutter and many adapter with AF, so much better for third party lens.
I’d never use Hasselblad due to the fact you can’t use capture one. Their software is atrocious the last time I used it. That was a couple of years ago so maybe it’s better?
to be honest the colours of the fujifilm is subjective to which colour simulation is set. Provia, Astia, Velvia all produce drastically different base look in terms of colour. I wouldnt say one is superior to one or another-- it's just different. The biggest issue of the Hassleblad system is it's lens selection.
I know that park very well. I used to be a Naturalist for NYS Parks, and though that park was not in my region, I went to it many times.That whole area of NYS is very beautiful. I assume you wish to not name the park.
Maybe an idea for a follow up video.. How do the colours compare if you trick a little and set the Fuji Raw file to the Hassey X2D Color profile in Capture one or Lightroom?
Fast forward to August 2+24, the new Fuji 100 S II is a much better Camera than the X2D if you not need a lot of flash photography, you save a lot of money with the Fuji, the only downsize with the Fuji Lenses is that the optical image quality of Fuji Lenses could have been better and the size could be more compact, the weight could also have been lower of the Fuji Lenses. The worst with the DJI "Hasselblad" X2D is that in several countries the service has either closed or worse ! A premium Camera needs to have a really good service !
The lens in fuji actually does better, it don't have obvious falloff and vignette to the edge but hasselblad do. It's not compact due to its true mf lens.
@@monstermiu First of all it is NOT true medium format, the image circle of fx 6x6cm cameras are 78+mm, the image circle of Fuji GFX cameras are 55mm, full frame cameras are 43mm. Lenses for Fuji GFX can be more compact and light weight, the new Hasselblad Lenses are more compact and light weight though they also have a leaf shutter inside the Lens !!!
Order My Book Here www.fototripper.com/chasing-awe-landscape-photography-book-gavin-hardcastle/
What book? Landscape photography on location?
The shenanigans are why I’m here, on top of the comparison.
Wow. Fuji color science is already top top tier. But man, Hasselblad color is unbeatable.
Gavin, still unbelievable to me that you have only 90k followers… your channel is one of THE best for photo beauty and a dapple of entertainment. As an Upstate NYer we are spoiled with having these amazing state parks just an hour away. If you have not been already, come back in the Fall and visit Letchworth… unbelievable colors.
Totally agree
Absolutely.
Thank you.
Danke!
Vey kind :)
there is two pretty significant differences between the X2D and the GFX 100S
first one is the type of shutter used. The X2D is using leaf shutters inside the lens, making it a lot quieter and stable compared to the GFX 100S that uses a focal plane shutter. I don't know how well dampened the GFX's shutter is, but focal plane shutters introduce a lot more movement in the camera than leaf shutters, and with 102MP sensors, even with IBIS units, the slightest movement might be the thing tipping the edge between sharp and blurry.
I don't think it has to do with the ISO, but the shutter type.
Second difference is the lenses you can put on the camera. Hasselblad needs to put a leaf shutter inside each of their lenses, which is definitely adding cost and/or reliability issues since there is more moving parts in each lens. Fujifilm went the simple way, their lenses are just lenses, and the shutter is in the camera, reducing the cost, making them simpler without compromising image quality. The GFX lenses are also more numerous and versatile compared to the Hasselblad system, with access to good primes, but also good zooms.
So looking at both of these cameras, the X2D really falls into the "luxury" camera category, like Leica does: it's special (Leica does rangefinder, Hasselblad does leaf shutters), it achieves very good image quality and some people claim that they have the best color science of all cameras, so far it seems to be the case for both brands. But for both brands as well, there is a cheaper camera with the same sensor, very close image quality and much more pragmatic approach (Sony for Leica, Fuji GFX for Hasselblad)
Fujifilm might have little worse colors compared to the X2D, but their more fleshed out lens ecosystem, more affordable cameras, access to pretty good quality video in the 100S makes it a no brainer for a lot of people, just like the color science, superior stability and/or super fast flash sync speeds will make the X2D a no brainer for other people
Two excellent cameras at the top of the food chain.
Nice comparison.
Came to look for this. Leaf shutter is the difference for this handheld shots. I already witnessed this with GFX50S vs X1D (1st generation). X1D was remarkably more handheld friendly due to less vibration from the leaf shutter.
That said, I would still pick GFX00S over X2D. Just something which makes me think Fujifilm’s future is more financially secure compared to Hasselblad now owned by the Chinese….
I almost bought the Hasselblad. The colors are one thing, the interface, and leaf shutter is the main draw. Portrait shooters will appreciate the leaf shutter and colors. Forget the video function and just get a separate video camera! People say that you can just adjust the colors, but it is time wasted (and that's money).
The Fuji colors have a red tint that's similar to Canon. The X2D has beautiful natural tones and gradation.
Honestly, this channel is the only UA-cam channel that has me and the wife both absolutely buckled laughing. Only found it relatively recently and we both sit and binge it. Last night we found the outtakes videos and I was up late watching them… so much so that I had 38 minutes sleep and because of that I have a face like a bucket of angry frogs 😂😂
Thanks for not only the incredible photography but such a unique take on what is usually such a dry and humourless genre.
Thanks, I love your vids
Thank you too!
It is nice the Hasselblad renders green better in the photos as the Fuji renders green better in your wallet.
nice one
A finally another Fototripper video, yeah. Was missing them!
For anything photograpy, the X2D reigns supreme. The color science is outstanding.
Why would you be doing a side-by-side comparison and not use the same iso ,…and the same aperture setting ,…and same shutter speed in both cameras?
This helped me pick the Hasselblad. Took it out to Bryce Canyon and Rocky Mountain NP the last couple of weeks and you weren’t lying about those colors. Incredible. I don’t even like processing my photos anymore because I don’t want to ruin these amazing Hasselblad files
Hello, interesting video and fun! but honestly, wouldn't you prefer to use another camera just for video along with the Hasselblad for photography if your business depends so much on colours straight out of your camera? (I know that the overall budget would be a lot higher)
Perhaps if I had someone to carry extra cameras for me.
@@fototripper good point
Thanks great video all the way around. The X2D has been on my list for quite some time. The colors are incredible, and the imagestabilaztion is unbelievable , the menu as well. Overall if someone didn't fall in love with that camera I would be very suspicious. Thanks again great video.
The Hasselblad Natural Colour Solution - HNCS - is unbeaten. Nothing else can compete with that.
18:22 Question: how can it be the same setting and the colours so far off
For this expenditure - a major question. How many years will DJI support the camera? Fuji? Spare parts & labour, eg a new screen 10 years from now...
Two great cameras to get to use, but wow what a fantastic venue to be able to visit. Thanks
Amazed they let you both in the country!😂 great comparison. Really appreciate the observations and experience. I loved hassle film cameras and would love to own the x2d.
Thanks for a great comparison video. I went through the agony of deciding between the Hasselblad H2D and the Fuji 100S for about 6 months. Finally, I settled on the 100S, but for a reason you did not really explore in your video. I have been a Hasselblad shooter for about 50 years, from the old 500C and CW film cameras, the H1D and up through the H5D-50 cameras, and finally to the H1D-50C. And for my favorite type of shooting, landscapes, the H2D is a perfect camera. The well documented shortcomings in focusing speed and lack of video do not effect me at all. I really loved the H2D; however, in a test at a local camera shop the Fuji produced beautiful images with breathtaking detail. I think the magnificent Hassy color and sharpness can be matched by the Fuji with post processing in Photoshop/Lightroom. What really convinced me was the fact that Fuji has a superb line of lenses for its GFX cameras. (And remember, the Hassy H series lenses were made by Fuji.) Hassy has only one zoom for its X cameras, 35 to 75 mm. If they had also had, say a 60-120mm, or a 70-140mm zoom, I would have bought the X2D with the two zoom lenses. I now have the Fuji 100s, three Fuji zoom lenses, 32-64mm, 45-100mm and the 100-200mm, plus the 1.4 extender for the long zoom. This gives me a 100 megapixel camera and lenses with a focal lengths from 32mm to 280mm, in a backpack that weighs only 16 lbs., including other paraphernalia.
And of course the GFX100 is more affordable. A few years ago, a local Fuji product specialist told me that Fuji's vision is to bring medium format to bigger audience. Yep, I can definitely see that.
There's some issues with this comparison. 1) SOOC JPEG on Fuji means what film simulation? There's a bunch and all look different. 2) where as X2D ibis may be better than Fuji's, you need to do a bit more testing, especially as your posture changes a lot. I can achieve sharp 1s exposures with GFX100S with proper posture at 35mm focal length. Maybe I could achieve 3s with X2D, but if we are serious, one should not rely on IBIS at longer exposures than the 1/focal length -rule, unless in a emergency. It nice to have that option though. 3) Adobe RAW for some reason has really bad default settings for GFX100S, which makes awful colors and oversharpened detail as "SOOC RAW" conversion. Capture One is way better. I'd love to see X2D raw made with Phocus and GFX100s made with C1, as Phocus is fantastic with Hasselblad files and C1 is way better than Adobe RAW with GFX100s files. That would even out the RAW conversion SW factors, and leave us as with the "best possible image out of these" result. And don't get me wrong, I do like hasselblad color science a lot, but Fuji is way cheaper and way more accessible.
Enjoyable video but in all honesty I find it largely misleading. In my opinion doing a comparison of color rendering with auto white balance on is completely useless. In every comparison there was a very noticable difference especially in tint and even exposure of the shots in some cases, which would make greens look totally different even if they had been done with the exact same camera. So while this was very calming to watch and I appreciate the "real life usage" approach, I think making the shots comparable in the first place by being technically correct is still in order.
No video is a plus for me. Not to mention a super simplified menu. So ... I have the Hasselblad 907X CVF100C. The image quality is crazy good. 40 years of image making and I'm astounded by how advanced it has all become. Amazing.
Have tried both. The x2d gets better images in my hands -bought the x2d. It is also nicer to hold by a lot.
Both cameras use the exact same Sony sensor. If there's a difference in the way the data from the sensor is processed, it can most likely be corrected in post. In terms of sharpness, it is the lens that really determines that (how exact the focus is, the lens elements and quality etc)
how can I can which sensor they are using? ıs there any website?
@@rüzgarınadı Both use the Sony IMX461AQR sensor.
Gavin, Did you vary the Fujifilm jpeg film simulations to match the Hassy? If not, you're getting Adobe "standard" in ACR which is very suboptimal for any kind of legit comparison.
Both were in sRGB and both were displayed in the same software.
Another great one! Thanks for the comparison.
The color of the brick wall in the zoomed in comparison seemed natural in the GFX image, but a greenish cast in the X2D. I was surprised you didn't comment on that, Gavin.
I believe it was due to the color cast by all the moss. I thought the same thing at first.then I paused it to see if I could find an explanation.
I was thinking the same thing
What’s ailing your leg? I hope you recover quickly. Thanks for the video, I’ll never buy either one, but I love your videos.
I think your comparison was not fair. You can't expect to take the perfect shot with the Hasselblad, and then use those same settings on the Fuji and then compare results. You should have simply tried to get the best results with each camera independently. All that driving, and you used a flawed process to compare. Damn shame.
EXACTLY RIGHT - don
Karen
@@JeDxDeVu You are forgiven. You just don't know enough to understand. Now go eat your noodles, Skippy.
Hey Gavin, thanks for that comparison. According to your perception, what’s been the natural colour of that bricks in the wall at 18:24? (No Pink Floyd plagiarism 😂). Shouldn’t you get the better results from the Hasselblad raw files using Phocus, for full HNCS support?
Oh no doubt but I use ACR.
with the hasselblad it actually made everything more green, so much so that even the boulders and waterfall had a hint of green in them.
❤ your choice for location on that shoot. I was just there on June 24th and did have rain. Glad it's only a 3.5 hour drive for me.
Whats the name of this exact location. Would love to visit
The color comparison looked to be skewed. What FIlm Simulation did you use for the GFX100S? You are doing landscape, so you should have used the Velvia Simulation.
Is this a comparison of the quality of each camera or a comparison of image stabilization? As a landscape photographer, i would like to see side by side shots with the same lens ON A TRIPOD. The X2D looks like it has a greenish cast.
Yes, the color of the brick wall looked way off.
Why not compare the two cameras at the same settings? Also the colors were completely different I would like to know which one was closer to what you saw with your eye
Great content Gavin and amazing cameras BUT OMG waterfall heaven I live in Northumberland and we have some amazing waterfalls but nothing like that outstanding defo a book image in there 👌👌
Fairly new to the channel, generally hate gear comparisons but your narrative style is enjoyable and entertaining, good job sir. As it happens I just bought the Fuji 100s as I enjoy landscape photography in the pursuit of mindfulness. I got it on sale for ~7000au, a quick search shows the XD2 at ~15000au and building as for aquiring a lens set, with my current budget, I dont have any spare organs to sell. If I had oodles of $$$ then I’d have reconsidered, but as it is, no one’s paying me for my photographic interest, and brand loyalty or colour science seems worth less than it was pre LR-PShop.
Very helpful video and review. Absolutely love the Hasselblad colours. Image stabilisation in X2D is a game changer. This scene had a relatively limited range of colours so I suspect the difference will be even greater in images with greater colour range. Thanks for sharing and a great location as well.
What film simulation were you using on the fujifilm camera?
Hasselblad has always ruled on top for image quality over the years. Its truly a professional photography system. You proofed that it is in this video. I loved that waterfall scene , you need to go back when no one is there.
Stunning images of a beautiful place. Thanks for the camera reviews. The location deserves best!
I love going to the Glen. And we every time I’ve been there I start at dawn to get shots without ppl.
I liked the GFX colours, it looked like they got a better white balance, which is hard to do in a forest. In my edit I would have the shadows have less green, and allow a bit more green in the midtones. Anyway it's hard to judge, but maybe it's time to poll your viewers, and offer a few edits on screen?
I terns of camera choice, I think the without tripod X2d would allow you to explore new angles, which would result in different and new images. I'm sure you can find a way to make an interesting video without the internal video recording the GFX offers.
J'adore ce que vous faites... Et surtout vôtre humour.
I really enjoyed this, if you ask, although I will never buy a medium format system. Some clever remarks at the border crossing! But observed from Europe there is a minimal difference between Canada and the US. You've found a perfect spot for the shoot out; you include your lovely wife in it (but don't pay enough attention to her!) thus creating family suggestions which are (to me) always pleasant; you are not afraid to show big differences between these two ridiculously expensive cameras and the advantage of the one of them. The only thing I miss are the raws edited in a quest to minimize the mutual color differences, and a display of the 100% or 200% detail in shots done from the tripod, where the camera shake doesn't play a role. You know how to profit from your language advantage/skills, the Røde wireless system works fine but the use and the fill-up of your voice over is superb too. All in all, no wonder you've got that many views, likes and comments...
I’ve hiked there, it’s beautiful. Great photo’s!
From personal experience, the Hasselblad's images are much more filmic. However, one thing not mentioned in the review is that the Fujifilm's autofocus is vastly superior. Also, the price gap between the two systems increases massively if you need multiple focal lengths. But the Hassy is just such a beautiful thing to use the one that gets used the most.
great comparison Gavin both awesome cameras like you say.
The image stabilization difference is probably because "Blad is now owned by DJI, and who know more about stabilization. Back in the darkroom days we always referred to images from Hassy and Leica as having 'presence' . Don't overlook using Google Photo's when you want to edit JPEG images. It's surprisingly powerful. I use it in the field, downloading to my tablet, via camera wifi, to view the JPEG images quickly, occasionally sending an image to social media. It's much faster than using Lightroom, superior to seeing the images on the camera back, and the tablet takes no real space in the backpack.
Hey Gavin, from my point of view, the x2d is too grennisch. For post I prefer more neutral colors. I can always boost them like I want to have them. But this is my personal preference. Because of this I do not shoot with the film simulations of my GFX.
One question, why do you compare JPG SOC and images with different ISO?
the different ISO on the cave shot was accidental.
Sorry, to me, the last 2 images did-NOT look like they were shot either at the same (effective) exposure nor near the same time/lighting conditions.
There are too many elements (such as the foreground in front of the big tree and others left-and behind) that definitely show less lighting for the GFX.
I will say overall that I did (in this case) generally like the images from the Hasselblad better than the GFX.
I think everyone should bear in mind, that there are so many camera settings, that conclusions like this are impossible without extensive and multiple shooting-sessions with many different settings-combinations. I do appreciate the effort and time put into this video. Thank You!
This video gets better every time it is replayed! Just superb!
So when in Bangor Maine did you stop by to see Stephen Kings home there?
I am looking at both cameras for boudoir “style” photos. Lots of lower and natural light moody but all handheld. Probably with Hassy would use the 80/1.9 a lot. Already have a Lumix S5 that I can use for video and would be ok with just straight photo camera. Any thoughts on which direction to go?
nice video thx, but I did not see one comparisson with the same settings and lighting... Hasselblad always wider, with different settings
Taking the bear spray into Walmart is the smartest thing you’ve ever done
Good Stuff Gavin. I am a commercial portrait photographer, Not landscape, but have used both bodies more than once. What I found, particularly with skin tones in the Hassleblad really cranks up the luminance and hues in camera, hence the green shift on everything. I agree its more appealing in the greens of nature but on skin, its awful. worse than sony's red shift. Maybee the Hassy is the right tool for the job with landscapes? quite possibly but definately not portrait. It would be really interesting to see how it performs with critical WB in the snow...food for thought.
And what is your favorite camera body and lenses for portraits?
I noticed the Fujifilm GFX 100's muted colors for some time.. which is why i chose to buy an old CCD Phase One XF kit instead.
all i could notice was the fuji seemed to handle the highlights a little better and the hassy baby was better with the shadows. bot are dream cameras an di think the other issue you might have is lens options as i think with the medium format level lens options seem to be the biggest draw back with even teh fuji not having many options compared to say a full frame camera options ?
Hey hey! Which type of drone are you using for this video!?
Hasselblad colours were much more beautiful. Also the contrast and sharpness were nicer. It’s the camera I would choose between those two all day long (saying that as a Fuji fan and previous owner of X-Pro 2). The GFX100S might cost less, but it’s still a lot of money and doesn’t feel any different from the cheaper Fujis to me. The Hasselblad on the other hand feels like a million dollars. I’ve never held a camera that feels so premium. Leica is the only comparison really in terms of build quality.
Also as a lover of flash photography nothing beats leaf shutter lenses.
Same here. Agreed on all counts.
"Beautiful" color is in the eye of the beholder.
There is also something called color accuracy.
Sometimes extreme accuracy is required, and sometimes less than accurate can actually be an artistic choice, just as choosing between Kodachrome, Fujichrome, and Ektachrome. I love Kodachrome and Fujichrome, but for different reasons. But I was NEVER a fan of any sort of Ektachrome. The only time I found Ektachrome more or less acceptable was virtually at sea level, and in more or less semi bright light.
I even liked the ISO 200 Kodachrome better than I liked the ISO 100 Ektachrome. Or was Ektachrome only 64 ISO? I can't remember.
Yes, I'm sure your Hassy feels like a million dollars, because it costs almost a million dollars, and is FAR far far out of reach for the average person, even for countless professional photographers. This is why Fuji outsells a Hassy 10 to 1. People who buy a Hassy only want to make a statement, and that statement is ... "I have shitloads of cash to spend."
Fuji most assuredly knows color science, because Fuji is also a film manufacturer.
It's not necessary to manufacture film in order to comprehend color science for digital.
But then again, Hasselblad has never manufactured a single role of film.
Wow, seriously? - -
You told me that you can't tell a lot of difference between the Fuji GFS100S and the smaller format Fuji cameras? Are you BLIND?
@@scotthullinger4684 When I had my Fuji's, I thought the skinstones were great. However, the colors weren't what I'd call accurate. Both the greens and the reds were off. It was not a big deal since I shoot raw, but some products I shot I've noticed reds shifted to oranges more. In addition, this was a weird worm artifact even in raw files. Both of these cameras are expensive, and both have plus and minuses. I'd be happy to own either.
Glad you and Amanda are enjoying your business holiday in NY State. Also glad that I don't have to make your decision on which camera to buy. Pretty sure that you will choose the Fuji because of the video capability. Also sure that if you could find a workaround you would choose the Hassy. Take a sheet of paper and draw a line down the middle of the page. List all the pros on one side and the negatives on the other. Then wrack your brain between the two until you decide. 😁 Forgot to say that Amanda looked great again, as usual.
The colors and handheld clarity with the Hasselblad are amazing I think that’s the “sexy” you felt. Almost had a meltdown when I saw where the test shoot was it’s my former back yard 🥰
I've been on the brink of cancelling my too-many months long order for the super, sphincter tightening-ly expensive new Nikon 600mm and put the budget toward the super, sphincter tightening-ly expensive Hasselblad X2D (and a portrait lens of a length not yet decided). This video of yours is not helping LOL Hasselblad renders human flesh as exquisitely as you experienced it does with landscape colours and detail. Always wanted one and it'll look better on me than a sports car in my old age :) Cheers!
Would also love to hear your opinion on the ergonomics of both cameras in day to day use?
I was surprised that I enjoyed the UI of the X2D so much what with it being mostly touch screen. Took about 2 days to get used to it. At times it felt faster to adjust things than the GFX but it does have odd quirks such as not being able to reverse the aperture/shutter dials like you can on pretty much any camera. They could fix this with firmware.
Were the saturated greens in Gamut?
Wow amazing waterfalls great video
Hmm, a bit dubious about this, especially around the 13:30 mark comparing image stabilization?
I own neither of these cameras but I do have a Fuji 50r which has NO built in stabilization.
So after watching this video I decided to do some test shots with my 100-200 GF as it's the only OIS lens I own.
Shooting at the 200mm handheld I can get a perfectly sharp image at 1/4 second?
As every photographer knows the longer the focal length the faster the shutter speed needed for sharp images.
So, how can I get a perfectly sharp image shot at 1/4 second using a 200mm focal length when the poster can't get the same at 1/3rd second using a 23mm lens?
Yes I know the OIS on the 100s may not be the same as the OIS on the 100-200mm but there's a huge difference between handholding a 23mm and a 200mm so I cannot see the two OIS systems being that radically different?
And while I'm not that well up on color palette's I know that shooting in "Velvia" setting for example the OOC images have much more vibrant greens than the examples shown.
It seems to me this video is really about comparing the results of the .jpg's of "hand-held" shots between the cameras... so a very narrow comparison overall.
You are not using the same setting in each camera to compere, and that dose not make since.
jesus christ "RAW SOOC" is already an oxymoron. What software was used to load the raw file? it will be down to that software how it is rendering your greens. TBH I prefer greens of fuji but it is complete personal taste so no right or wrong there
Hello, sorry if this has been asked before but how did you sort your sleeping issues from a few months ago? Be nice to know. Thanks
Great video Gareth! Maybe Amanda will let you use her Hasselblad from time to time since it is the better camera.
I shoot black and white primarily so color is not too important to me. I bought the FujiFilm GFX 100 II. Much of my landscape work is shot at a lower angle and the tilt adapter is priceless to me! I also shoot portraits and eye/face detection is very nice to have. Finally when I do shoot color FujiFilm’s film simulations remind me of choosing different film stocks. They’re great starting points in post.
I love your content! Thanks for sharing.
Here for the comedy while using my old canon 6D today. 😆😆. Nice shots buddy.
@fototripper the Hasselblad X2D seems wonderful, is there a reason you choosed the Sony A7IV for the day after?
Curious since I'm looking for what I should switch to, and there's a lot of good videos out there by UA-camrs saying this and that, but use something else
Good day, and wonderful pictures!
I don't know what you are using, but here's my take:
Sony A7R5 and previously A9 - autofocus is just phenomenal, which also helped to get crazy sharp detail shots as it's accurate. Color not so much from JPEG, very typical Sony color as in their TV.
Nikon D5 - nice machinegun sound, but DR is just bad when compared to other offering. Focusing is actually pretty good and likely better than the Z7. I love that 3D C-AF.
Nikon Z9 - this one is overhyped IMO. It's quick and fast, but lost DR in the process due to e-shutter only. Focusing is actually worse than the A7R5 even after upgrading firmware. But I still like Nikon ergonomics since I'm too used to them (from D600 till now), and that silent shutter is useful in certain scenario
Leica M10R/M11 - A camera you use to enjoy photography, if you have time and leisure. I missed a couple shots having to manual focus. Anyway, Leica glass are very nice, and combined with the M it's an experience. The M11 got 100 mark from DXO too so don't worry about the image quality - it's sharp and detailed, but you need to hold still without IBIS.
X2D - A great auto-focus IBIS medium format camera. The perspective and FOV is quite different from 35mm, and also DOF. It's much faster than X1D which I tried before. Auto-focus is accurate but not as fast as 35mm counter parts. I do like the color, as mentioned in the video it looks like the "real color" I saw on the scene. Make sure you have a fast computer to deal with the files. If I don't want to do manual focus, this will be my choice.
I used to have X-Pro1 a decade or more ago. Same as the X100 series I don't see the point of having optical finder where you cannot check focus optically. Leica uses the rangefinder window in the center.
I currently have the Z9, A7R5, M11 and X2D (plus an Q2 but that's mostly for my wife). Z9 - for fast moving things and wildlife, A7R5 - if I want 100% sure I can take the shot quickly (e.g. traveling in a group) and if I wanna pack light-er. M11 if I know I have time to spend walking around with the camera slowly alone. X2D similar with M11, depends on if I want to do manual focus on the trip or not, and if I have the space in my backpack.
Nice video I enjoyed it. Can I ask what is your normal vlog camera that that your using?
You need to compare the Fuji GFX 100II thats much more of a comparison with both being their new cameras
As someone that is currently in the market for a new camera, I was really enjoying the video until, I looked at the prices. I am now going to have to put the money towards batteries for my pacemaker...
Thank you for the comparison. That was great!
Difference is not only video, but also third party lens and better customer support.
I am in the UK:
1. No shop has a x2d on display and hassy remains silent when asked about test drive. So I don’t know if I can trust them for after support
2. Gfx has a shutter and many adapter with AF, so much better for third party lens.
yes I think higher iso effects image stabilization by giving more info to the sensor for tracking.
I’d never use Hasselblad due to the fact you can’t use capture one. Their software is atrocious the last time I used it. That was a couple of years ago so maybe it’s better?
to be honest the colours of the fujifilm is subjective to which colour simulation is set. Provia, Astia, Velvia all produce drastically different base look in terms of colour. I wouldnt say one is superior to one or another-- it's just different. The biggest issue of the Hassleblad system is it's lens selection.
You finally came back in style... I miss the old place movies with old friends. Well you can't have everything.
This place is stunning…it was all froze over and closed when I went. When are WE are going back. I feel the Hasselblad wins this contest for sure.
I know that park very well. I used to be a Naturalist for NYS Parks, and though that park was not in my region, I went to it many times.That whole area of NYS is very beautiful. I assume you wish to not name the park.
Maybe an idea for a follow up video.. How do the colours compare if you trick a little and set the Fuji Raw file to the Hassey X2D Color profile in Capture one or Lightroom?
Fast forward to August 2+24, the new Fuji 100 S II is a much better Camera than the X2D if you not need a lot of flash photography, you save a lot of money with the Fuji, the only downsize with the Fuji Lenses is that the optical image quality of Fuji Lenses could have been better and the size could be more compact, the weight could also have been lower of the Fuji Lenses. The worst with the DJI "Hasselblad" X2D is that in several countries the service has either closed or worse ! A premium Camera needs to have a really good service !
The lens in fuji actually does better, it don't have obvious falloff and vignette to the edge but hasselblad do. It's not compact due to its true mf lens.
@@monstermiu First of all it is NOT true medium format, the image circle of fx 6x6cm cameras are 78+mm, the image circle of Fuji GFX cameras are 55mm, full frame cameras are 43mm. Lenses for Fuji GFX can be more compact and light weight, the new Hasselblad Lenses are more compact and light weight though they also have a leaf shutter inside the Lens !!!
Hi good comparison, the color are very different, which better for you?
Great idea in taking bear spray into Walmart. You can clear the check out line a lot faster! Nice! I must try that at my local Walmart. 😂😂😂😂
Hey! You're finally in my home state! A good spot to check out next time you go through Maine is Baxter State Park. All kinds of scenic places.
2:30 Taking bear spray into Walmart with you? Good idea, I'm going to do that from now on.
A comparison between a GFX file processed in C1 vs. a Blad file processed in Phocus would be nice to see…
Wow what a beautiful scene!…. Words don’t do it any justice
Excellent video Gav, one of your best. I'd kill for that 'blad.
Brilliant! Another great video . Your storytelling is as good as your photography. I loved the reverse motion clips, and the panoramic compositions.