How would these be for security? I've always wanted to set up a really secure banking terminal with two VMs. One would have no network access and would be used to store all the records, access codes etc. while the other would have no persistence and would be used to run a browser to actually access the banking web sites. I tried to do this using Windows Sandbox and found to my amazement and shock that you actually cannot have more than one Sandbox running simultaneously! Looks like with these, you can control file system access and can have multiple VMs running simultaneously, but can you robustly prevent network access from within a VM? Also, how is licensing? Windows seems to want a separate licence for each VM, even if the VM is running on a licensed Windows machine, but can you virtualise Mac on a Mac with no issues? Is there anything about having host and VM on the same Apple ID, or not?
Hey James, about the pre-allocated disk files - check if they really take that space on disk in file info, it might be just sparse file. For instance, here is what I see for MacOS disk file in a UTM VM: 549,755,813,888 bytes (63.68 GB on disk). For macOS VMs all virtualization SW uses apple virtualization framework, which essentially implements almost everything, including virtual file system, so it should behave the same with any virtualisation SW.
@@JamesMontemagno I can pick up original audio and caption, but title and video description are in Italian only. At the bottom of video description there is a link about Auto translate, but the instructions to disabled it are for video creator only. It seems strange to me I cannot disable this by my side. Thank you anyway.
Quite impressive job. I wonder which of VM's running nativelyon actual Mac OS X 11.3+ has the best performance overall including responsiveness of the UI / OpenGL 3.0 support or hardware write-throught using something like Re-BAR or analogue techniques like videoacceleration hardware sharing between virtualization environments and the OS host system
Quite impressive job. I wonder which of VM's running nativelyon actual Mac OS X 11.3+ has the best performance overall including responsiveness of the UI / OpenGL 3.0 support or hardware write-throught using something like Re-BAR or analogue techniques like videoacceleration hardware sharing between virtualization environments and the OS host system
How would these be for security? I've always wanted to set up a really secure banking terminal with two VMs. One would have no network access and would be used to store all the records, access codes etc. while the other would have no persistence and would be used to run a browser to actually access the banking web sites. I tried to do this using Windows Sandbox and found to my amazement and shock that you actually cannot have more than one Sandbox running simultaneously! Looks like with these, you can control file system access and can have multiple VMs running simultaneously, but can you robustly prevent network access from within a VM? Also, how is licensing? Windows seems to want a separate licence for each VM, even if the VM is running on a licensed Windows machine, but can you virtualise Mac on a Mac with no issues? Is there anything about having host and VM on the same Apple ID, or not?
Hey James, about the pre-allocated disk files - check if they really take that space on disk in file info, it might be just sparse file. For instance, here is what I see for MacOS disk file in a UTM VM: 549,755,813,888 bytes (63.68 GB on disk). For macOS VMs all virtualization SW uses apple virtualization framework, which essentially implements almost everything, including virtual file system, so it should behave the same with any virtualisation SW.
Hmmmmmmm I’ll take a look at that. That would be nice if so!
Mostre como fazer no ProxMox, esse seria muito bom.
I see the title of this video in my native Italian language, but I would like to disable the translation and see the original English title
Google has started to auto translate and dub everything. You should be able to pick the audio and caption track on the player
@@JamesMontemagno I can pick up original audio and caption, but title and video description are in Italian only. At the bottom of video description there is a link about Auto translate, but the instructions to disabled it are for video creator only. It seems strange to me I cannot disable this by my side. Thank you anyway.
Quite impressive job. I wonder which of VM's running nativelyon actual Mac OS X 11.3+ has the best performance overall including responsiveness of the UI / OpenGL 3.0 support or hardware write-throught using something like Re-BAR or analogue techniques like videoacceleration hardware sharing between virtualization environments and the OS host system
Quite impressive job. I wonder which of VM's running nativelyon actual Mac OS X 11.3+ has the best performance overall including responsiveness of the UI / OpenGL 3.0 support or hardware write-throught using something like Re-BAR or analogue techniques like videoacceleration hardware sharing between virtualization environments and the OS host system