Thanks for the review! The biggest size they have this ski in is 176. Would that work for someone like me, 6'2 and 185 lbs (188cm - 84kg). And how would it compare to the Deacon 72, size 178? I was first looking at the Deacon 72 size 173 because I like the shorter radius (15.4). Then I figured 173 might be too short for my body size so I considered the Deacon 72 size 178, but then I would give up a bit on the shorter radius. My challenge is that I want a not too racy carve ski with a shorter radius to improve my carving skills and enjoying the shorter turns. But I end up mostly with ski's that are either too short for my body size or have a too large radius to my likings. Therefore the Q7 you reviewed in this video seems like a potential fit, although 176 might be a bit short for my body? Any other alternatives I should consider? Any feedback would be much appreciated!
I generally think if you're concerned that skis will be too short, you are correct. The Deacon makes more sense in two ways. First, it's a bit longer, but second, it's a sturdier build. The Q7 isn't as damp or stable as the Deacon, and especially at higher speeds. You still get the shorter arc, but it's more capable and smooth at higher velocities. I'd also check out the Rossignol Forza 70 in the 181.
MX is more of a narrow all-mountain ski while the Redster is based much more off a race ski. This gives the Kastle the leg up when it comes to versatility while still carving very clean turns. Q7 is more married to the on-piste scenarios, so if you spend most of your time there, go with the Atomic.
Thanks for the review. Looking for a piste ski to add to the quiver that offers good carving and speed capabilities. Don't want an all out race machine as want something with a bit of forgiveness. So if you are skiing with the family its not going to catch you out or be too tiring. Ski must also be happy charging through the crud at the end of the day. Was considering this or the Q7.8 or Declivity 82ti. Any recommendations.
It seems like the 82Ti makes more sense as it's a great carver but it also has a lot of versatility. You're not getting that well-roundedness from the Redster.
The Deacon feels more powerful and smooth while the Redster has a bit more kick out of the tail. I like the versatility of the Deacon as well, with longer rocker in both tips and tails while the Atomic is a fully-cambered ski that really prefers to be on edge all the time.
Not comparable! Volkl is a pro-ski, Atomic Q7 is for beginners. Just look at the constant slip in the demonstration. No tailrocker and too light. No value for money. For the same price or cheaper you will have the pro-ski of Volkl! This is my own experience with both types of skis.
While not a race ski, there is a high level of performance that is attainable here. Surely both Volkl and Atomic make higher-end carvers than the Q7, but the point of this one is that it's accessible for a lot of skiers who spend most of their time on groomers.
Thanks for the review! The biggest size they have this ski in is 176. Would that work for someone like me, 6'2 and 185 lbs (188cm - 84kg). And how would it compare to the Deacon 72, size 178? I was first looking at the Deacon 72 size 173 because I like the shorter radius (15.4). Then I figured 173 might be too short for my body size so I considered the Deacon 72 size 178, but then I would give up a bit on the shorter radius.
My challenge is that I want a not too racy carve ski with a shorter radius to improve my carving skills and enjoying the shorter turns. But I end up mostly with ski's that are either too short for my body size or have a too large radius to my likings. Therefore the Q7 you reviewed in this video seems like a potential fit, although 176 might be a bit short for my body?
Any other alternatives I should consider?
Any feedback would be much appreciated!
I generally think if you're concerned that skis will be too short, you are correct. The Deacon makes more sense in two ways. First, it's a bit longer, but second, it's a sturdier build. The Q7 isn't as damp or stable as the Deacon, and especially at higher speeds. You still get the shorter arc, but it's more capable and smooth at higher velocities. I'd also check out the Rossignol Forza 70 in the 181.
Thanx for the introduction. What would you say which ski is more fatiguing: Head Supershape e-rally (156cm) or Q7 (152cm)?
I would say the Rally is more fatiguing than the Q7.
How would you compare these skis with Kastle MX 75 ?
MX is more of a narrow all-mountain ski while the Redster is based much more off a race ski. This gives the Kastle the leg up when it comes to versatility while still carving very clean turns. Q7 is more married to the on-piste scenarios, so if you spend most of your time there, go with the Atomic.
Thanks for the review. Looking for a piste ski to add to the quiver that offers good carving and speed capabilities. Don't want an all out race machine as want something with a bit of forgiveness. So if you are skiing with the family its not going to catch you out or be too tiring. Ski must also be happy charging through the crud at the end of the day. Was considering this or the Q7.8 or Declivity 82ti. Any recommendations.
It seems like the 82Ti makes more sense as it's a great carver but it also has a lot of versatility. You're not getting that well-roundedness from the Redster.
How would you compare it to the völkl deavon 84?
The Deacon feels more powerful and smooth while the Redster has a bit more kick out of the tail. I like the versatility of the Deacon as well, with longer rocker in both tips and tails while the Atomic is a fully-cambered ski that really prefers to be on edge all the time.
Not comparable! Volkl is a pro-ski, Atomic Q7 is for beginners. Just look at the constant slip in the demonstration. No tailrocker and too light. No value for money. For the same price or cheaper you will have the pro-ski of Volkl! This is my own experience with both types of skis.
While not a race ski, there is a high level of performance that is attainable here. Surely both Volkl and Atomic make higher-end carvers than the Q7, but the point of this one is that it's accessible for a lot of skiers who spend most of their time on groomers.