Is There One All Powerful Superforce Controlling The Universe?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 21 тра 2024
  • Researched and Written by Leila Battison
    Narrated and Edited by David Kelly
    Thumbnail Art by Ettore Mazza
    If you like our videos, check out Leila's UA-cam channel:
    / @somethingincredible
    Music from Silver Maple, Epidemic Sound and Artlist.
    Stock footage from Videoblocks.
    References:
    www.bbc.co.uk/news/56643677
    www.britannica.com/science/we...
    www.britannica.com/science/el...
    www.britannica.com/science/un...
    www.britannica.com/science/qu...
    www.britannica.com/science/fu...
    ffden-2.phys.uaf.edu/webproj/2...
    lweb.cfa.harvard.edu/~ejchais...
    www.open.edu/openlearn/scienc...
    www.sciencemag.org/news/2021/...
    • Muon g-2 experiment fi...
    nationalmaglab.org/education/...
    www.fi.edu/benjamin-franklin/...
    hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/...
    hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/...
    hps.org/publicinformation/ate...
    www.britannica.com/biography/...
    Image Credits:
    Higgs Boson By Lucas Taylor / CERN - cdsweb.cern.ch/record/628469, CC BY-SA 3.0, commons.wikimedia.org/w/index...
    Higgs Papers By Omerdavidson - Own work, CC BY-SA 4.0, commons.wikimedia.org/w/index...
    Fermilab By Z22 - Own work, CC BY-SA 4.0, commons.wikimedia.org/w/index...
    Muon Ring By Reidar Hahn - vms.fnal.gov/asset/detail?rec..., CC BY-SA 4.0, commons.wikimedia.org/w/index...
    Muon Magnet Ring By CERN - cds.cern.ch/record/41876, CC BY 4.0, commons.wikimedia.org/w/index...
    Standard Model of Particle Physics By Latham Boyle - Own work, CC BY-SA 4.0, commons.wikimedia.org/w/index...
    Magnet arriving By Glukicov - Own work, CC BY-SA 4.0, commons.wikimedia.org/w/index...
    Fermilab By Renzo Borgatti from Naperville, US - FermiClassic, CC BY-SA 2.0, commons.wikimedia.org/w/index...
    Lodestone By Teravolt (talk), CC BY 3.0, commons.wikimedia.org/w/index...
    Cornell on Cayuga Lake By Andrew Parmet - This file was derived from: Cornell University campus panorama from McGraw Tower.jpg, CC BY 3.0, commons.wikimedia.org/w/index...
    Double slit experiment By Alexandre Gondran - Own work, CC BY-SA 4.0, commons.wikimedia.org/w/index...
    Proton structure By Arpad Horvath - Own work, CC BY-SA 2.5, commons.wikimedia.org/w/index...
    Interactions of the standard model By ParticlesAndMath - Own work, CC BY-SA 4.0, commons.wikimedia.org/w/index...
    Abdus Salam By Jimiwo - Own work, CC BY-SA 3.0, commons.wikimedia.org/w/index...
    Nobel Prize Banquet By Hansbaer - Own work, CC BY-SA 3.0, commons.wikimedia.org/w/index...
    Alex Fillipenko By Pete Zivkov, Menlo School, CC BY-SA 3.0, commons.wikimedia.org/w/index...
    Hydrogen Tank CERN By Saintfevrier - Own work, CC BY-SA 4.0, commons.wikimedia.org/w/index...
    Large Hadron By Julian Herzog (Website) - Own work, CC BY-SA 3.0, commons.wikimedia.org/w/index...
    Radiowave Cavity By Muriel - originally posted to Flickr as LHC RF cavity, CC BY-SA 2.0, commons.wikimedia.org/w/index...
    Large Hadron Tunnel By Maximilien Brice (CERN) - CERN Document Server, CC BY-SA 3.0, commons.wikimedia.org/w/index...
    Large Hadron Guide By Shamoon Wahed - Own work, CC BY-SA 4.0, commons.wikimedia.org/w/index...
    LHC By Maximilien Brice (CERN) - CERN Document Server, CC BY-SA 3.0, commons.wikimedia.org/w/index...
    Feinman Diagram By KCVelaga - File:Electron-scattering.png by JabberWok, CC BY-SA 4.0, commons.wikimedia.org/w/index...
    Hendrick Casimir De Anefo - Edited version of Nationaal Archief, CC BY-SA 3.0, commons.wikimedia.org/w/index...
    Casimir Effect By Emok - Own work, CC BY-SA 3.0, commons.wikimedia.org/w/index...
    Magnetic-field measurement and analysis for the Muon g−2 Experiment at Fermilab by T. Albahri et al. (The Muon g−2 Collaboration)
    00:00 Introduction
    06:37 The First Unification
    13:51 Virtual Particles
    20:57 The Grand Unified Theory
    26:08 The Grand Unification Epoch

КОМЕНТАРІ • 2,4 тис.

  • @HistoryoftheUniverse
    @HistoryoftheUniverse  3 роки тому +591

    Hello folks! Hope you enjoy it. Plenty more to come, barely a trillionth of a second has passed so far. Also, I hope you all enjoy the myriad ways I say quark in this particular episode. Three quarks for Muster Mark!
    CORRECTION: The brief video of what I thought was Lahore, in Pakistan is actually India. Mistake with stock footage labelling. Very sorry!

    • @PromorteD
      @PromorteD 3 роки тому +13

      Thanks for this, great series!

    • @everythinggolf698
      @everythinggolf698 3 роки тому +6

      Absolutely love your channels, keep it coming! ❤ 🤍 💙 🧡

    • @shubhamjha4092
      @shubhamjha4092 3 роки тому +18

      The amount of effort needed to make such enormously complex phenomenon into a logical sequence simple enough for us to understand must have been insane. This is really well done!

    • @Richard-bq3ni
      @Richard-bq3ni 3 роки тому +17

      Did I enjoy it?
      Is the pope a Catholic?
      Is a black hole black?
      Is the sun hot?
      Is ice cold?
      Is water wet?
      Keep this stuff coming!

    • @force1535
      @force1535 3 роки тому +4

      This is too good for it to not be liked

  • @garshdarnitibelieve8260
    @garshdarnitibelieve8260 2 роки тому +1522

    Most would asuume at my age I would hang out at McDonald's as an old geezer coffee club member. But, as luck would have it the excellent delivery of this program and others like it sparked a desire to learn! Life is good... Peace!

    • @moodyrick8503
      @moodyrick8503 2 роки тому +111

      Agreed.
      Generations past would be shocked at our non-chalant attitude towards the vast amounts of knowledge we have access to.

    • @rayzorrayzor9000
      @rayzorrayzor9000 2 роки тому +56

      Yes I’m with you on that , when my own kid was at school I tried to impress apon him the vast amount of knowledge he had access to compared to my day .
      Sadly he wasn’t interested and laughed at my constant learning , now though he’s older and now understands the wealth that knowledge gives you .

    • @marymacdonald8277
      @marymacdonald8277 2 роки тому +44

      never stop learning and read,read,read!!!!!

    • @garshdarnitibelieve8260
      @garshdarnitibelieve8260 2 роки тому +25

      @@marymacdonald8277 absolutely! And I have been, either buying books or listening intently to audio books! My latest purchase is "The Uninhabital Planet" authored by David Wallace-Wells; I strongly recommend that book. I wish you peace!

    • @charliehopper6249
      @charliehopper6249 2 роки тому +27

      shit like this makes my day. big up u bro enjoy life

  • @tankhand1
    @tankhand1 5 місяців тому +150

    It drives my wife crazy when I watch videos like this. She says there are things mankind shouldn't think about, much less know. Then she puts on her headphones and listens to her audiobooks. I get a smile on my face because she is listening to the likes of Asimov and Lovecraft and wonder which of us is on the more fantastical journey. I love that woman.

    • @user-se2xm5yp6u
      @user-se2xm5yp6u 4 місяці тому +6

      My wife is the same, but I could not love her more.

    • @NCfrost82
      @NCfrost82 3 місяці тому

      Cause she is a mindless sheep.....afraid to think cause it's painful for her to formulate her own thoughts based on knowledge.

    • @NCfrost82
      @NCfrost82 3 місяці тому

      Cause she is a mindless sheep...

    • @fryingraijin
      @fryingraijin 3 місяці тому +11

      “One can’t bear the truth, my love! :(“
      *Proceeds to listen to stories that would totally crush our minds when thought about it too hard*

    • @node_deer
      @node_deer 3 місяці тому +4

      that is a very wholesome relationship dynamic 🥺

  • @jonathandonley3299
    @jonathandonley3299 Рік тому +149

    I really cannot fully express how wonderful of a series this has been so far. Leila's writing is beyond excellent and David's voice is so perfect for this. Your entire team should be commended and given awards for this series. Thank you so much for sharing your genius to educate people. It's the best gift you could ever give anyone.

    • @awsafabdun-nur3556
      @awsafabdun-nur3556 Рік тому

      yes. there is One All Powerful SUPERFORCE Controlling The seen and unseen. To Him belongs the kingdom of the heavens and the earth. He gives life and causes death. And He is Most Capable of everything. He is the First and the Last, the Most High and Most Near,1 and He has ˹perfect˺ knowledge of all things. He is the One Who created the heavens and the earth in six Days,1 then established Himself on the Throne. He knows whatever goes into the earth and whatever comes out of it, and whatever descends from the sky and whatever ascends into it. And He is with you wherever you are.2 For Allah is All-Seeing of what you do. To Him belongs the kingdom of the heavens and the earth. And to Allah all matters are returned. He merges the night into day and the day into night. And He knows best what is ˹hidden˺ in the heart. Believe in Allah and His Messenger, and donate from what He has entrusted you with. So those of you who believe and donate will have a mighty reward. Whatever is in the heavens and the earth glorifies Allah, for He is the Almighty, All-Wise.

    • @jonathandonley3299
      @jonathandonley3299 Рік тому

      @@awsafabdun-nur3556 Thanks, no. I don't believe in monotheistic religions. All they do is generate zealots. If there is a "god" then there are multiple gods, not just one.

    • @terrypussypower
      @terrypussypower Рік тому

      @@jonathandonley3299 There are zero “gods”. At least as we understand that term. If hyper intelligences do exist in the Universe, then they have absolutely no interest or interfere in our petty little inter species squabbles.

    • @GiveMeaFuckingBreakDude
      @GiveMeaFuckingBreakDude 8 місяців тому

      By who UA-cam 🤣

    • @artmake3
      @artmake3 4 місяці тому

      This is the creation of god​@@jonathandonley3299

  • @adrianaslund8605
    @adrianaslund8605 Рік тому +37

    The music is very elegantly textured in these. And never intrusive. I like the somber intro main theme with a sampled or synthesized female voice drone being rhytmically pitchshifted and/or filtered with a piano laying chords in the background. Mixing a droning electronic effect with an acoustic. Is kind of poetic. Like an electromagnetic field over an acoustic.

    • @suecondon1685
      @suecondon1685 11 місяців тому

      Yes! I'm watching this again and agree the music is lovely, and a perfect atmospheric accompaniment ❤

    • @ernestolombardo5811
      @ernestolombardo5811 5 місяців тому

      Huh... now that you mention it, I just realized that I have been enjoying the music without noticing the music. In the context of this type of video, this is high praise indeed. Never once has the music distracted me from the dense flow of information where if you zone out for a few seconds, you get a little lost and have to rewind. These distractions do occur, but not once have the contents of these videos been to blame, the cause of my distractions can be explained entirely by my drifting mind and my surroundings.
      So much intelligence and careful creative thought laid out in every aspect of this series.

    • @1112viggo
      @1112viggo 4 місяці тому

      "DOOT-DOOT-DIIT-DIIT-DOOT-DOOTDIITDIIT!!!" Nooo not intrusive at all, i barely even noticed the sound of an acid trip going on while he was talking...

  • @NotagYmra
    @NotagYmra 3 роки тому +412

    I love how we're four episodes in, and we have yet to pass the *first second* of existence

    • @HistoryoftheUniverse
      @HistoryoftheUniverse  3 роки тому +182

      *trillionth of a second

    • @Merennulli
      @Merennulli 3 роки тому +58

      At this rate humanity will be extinct by the time they get to the first R-process neutron star collisions.

    • @JerseyLynne
      @JerseyLynne 3 роки тому +20

      As if anyone can know.
      What if the red shift has been misinterpreted and there was no big bang. I have my BS degree and after almost 5 decades of fascination with the Big bang theory, one day I thought "This just doesn't make any sense. The entire universe came into being in a single instant at a single point and for no particular reason?" I could Googled "alternatives to the Big bang theory" and was shocked to find there are others. The Electric Universe theory is one that makes sense, it doesn't need non-existent dark matter and energy, mathematical calisthenics with infinities and imaginary numbers, black holes and neutron stars or multi-billion dollar super colliders to test a theory. Or LIGO, which can tune out the trucks on the highway to tune in to gravitational waves at a precision of such a tiny number it cannot be imagined no matter how hard you try. Come on people.
      Notice how recently many science news article headlines reveal the fact that sophisticated data being returned these days does not fit into current theories? Headlines like "Do scientists need to go back to the drawing board?", or "has science hit a wall?" Science that claims to know such things as the beginning of the universe is arrogant and science that will not consider all theories is not science, it's religion. I don't claim to know what's true I just know that there are other theories that don't require faith. Or solving mystery. Yes, science requires faith. And sadly like everything else, just follow the money, fame and power. Think! If it doesn't make sense, it doesn't make sense. Channel 60 symbols will tell you what those equations are about. How do you balance an equation with a Planck length as a factor.
      Best advice is go to Thunderbolts project UA-cam channel and give Wal Thornhill equal time.
      Until science can factor in consciousness and how it really relates to the physical universe there can be no progress.
      How can this program have credulity when Edison is the "genius" and no mention of Tesla?
      Oy

    • @Merennulli
      @Merennulli 3 роки тому +58

      @@JerseyLynne Science doesn't require faith. If you disagree with the consensus, do the work.
      You need to stop relying on headlines, though. "Science" isn't saying the crap you read in news articles, someone trying to sell ad space on news articles is. All the "back to the drawing board" crap is sensationalism to make you look. Science is the process at that "drawing board", it never leaves the drawing board.
      You also need to realize the scale involved. Scientists do not consider the big bang a settled fact. It is merely what hundreds of very meticulous measurements have consistently shown from multiple methods(not just redshift).

    • @jonhall2274
      @jonhall2274 3 роки тому +43

      @@JerseyLynne all that time to get a BS, and you still do not understand that the "electric universe" is not in line with reality. Lmao. Guess that was a waste of money. 🤦‍♂️😂😂😂😂😂😂

  • @Chlamydia1
    @Chlamydia1 3 роки тому +439

    The production quality of this series is incredible. The writing and the narration are both sublime. I watch a ton of science programming on YT (I'm a social scientist, but sometimes I like to learn about real science :P) and this, along with your history of the Earth series, stands above the rest. Thank you for providing this wonderful resource to the world. For me, your work is on the same level of quality as the Cosmos series.

    • @williambrucato5762
      @williambrucato5762 2 роки тому +6

      So Good!

    • @Old299dfk
      @Old299dfk 2 роки тому +4

      Check out PBS spacetime, that shit is next level.

    • @TheDavidlloydjones
      @TheDavidlloydjones 2 роки тому +1

      SK,
      You are quite right that "The production quality of this series is incredible."
      This is partly because some of what the guy tells us is silly or wrong, but it is mostly because he arbitrarily assumes a tone of stunned incredulity in his speech.
      With every strained breath he wants to tell us that this is not the everyday work of competent scientists and engineers we are being allowed to see: he is waving his magic media-wand at wonders beyond magic, beyond religion, beyond even Star Trek its wondrous Self.
      I suspect that this attitude, with the incompetence it both belies and encourages, is behind America's slipping ranking in the world's science, engineering, mathematics, and even everyday reasoning. "Hello stars, hello electron beams, hello bursts of colored light!, You are all so Immanent, so Aetherial, so Amorphous, so Indebted to Central Casting, that we are in your eternal debt. Far be it from us poor mortals to pay any attention to the details..."
      Feh!

    • @nenmaster5218
      @nenmaster5218 2 роки тому +10

      @@TheDavidlloydjones The next 100 Years will probably decide what wins:
      Science or Anti-Science.
      To affect this, i even go so far as to ask random strangers like you: Want some
      recommendations? Some science-youtubers to check out, cause the Learning never ends?

    • @napoleonbonerfarte6739
      @napoleonbonerfarte6739 2 роки тому

      @@nenmaster5218 Mr. Singularity

  • @Vespyr_
    @Vespyr_ 2 роки тому +9

    Dude, I f***ing love it when you drop the super late opener right when I've forgotten all about it having not appeared because I'm already enthralled. It's like fwoosh~ like dropping the bass of documentaries. Starting the show with a mic drop~ lol. Amazing.

  • @thersten
    @thersten 2 роки тому +79

    Great video! The presentation and content is amazing. I also like how it's not full of noisy flashy transitions or colorful goofy graphics all over the place.
    Thank you for presenting this sublime topic in it's full majesty and not presenting it like we're a bunch of 5 year olds.

    • @chiron13
      @chiron13 2 роки тому +7

      Exactly, their presentation style is so professional, they deserve a slot on Discovery or National Geographic.

    • @_ninthRing_
      @_ninthRing_ Рік тому

      Yes, thankyou for not reiterating the same basic, high-school science level facts about the "Big Bang" & delving somewhat deeper into the incredibly fascinating, often all too esoteric, aspects of Physics & the Cosmogony of the Universe.
      Most TV documentaries are annoyingly dumbed-down, providing little in the way of education in favor of banal "Edu-tainment". There's certainly a place for entertaining documentaries - as David Atterborough's entire wonderful career attests - but there are times when the more educated & intellectually curious amongst us, would prefer some red meat of substantial & bleeding-edge science (yet lack the prerequisite education in advanced mathematics/physics to seek it out in the scientific literature for ourselves).

  • @Dogsnark
    @Dogsnark 3 роки тому +36

    There’s so much here I don’t really grasp, but I feel I know more about the 4 forces than I did before watching this video. I’m not a physicist, but this stuff is somehow fascinating to me.

  • @michaelrennie7660
    @michaelrennie7660 3 роки тому +144

    I read books on this and attend conferences on this, all as a hobby. Most of it is still over my head, but this summary is so well done that I have added it to my list of videos to listen to again - a rare event. Well done team.

    • @Meilk27
      @Meilk27 2 роки тому +5

      Same. I'm a guy who's a particle physicist for fun.

    • @Justwantahover
      @Justwantahover 2 роки тому +1

      @@Meilk27 If you can understand it you don't know particle physics.

    • @thersten
      @thersten 2 роки тому +1

      @@Justwantahover *quantum mechanics

    • @Sanquinity
      @Sanquinity 2 роки тому +3

      This is the third time for me that I watch through the entire series so far. I just LOVE listening to it in the background while doing other stuff. Like cooking, or idly farming materials in a survival/crafting game.

  • @larsalfredhenrikstahlin8012
    @larsalfredhenrikstahlin8012 2 роки тому +76

    I love the historic angle you seem to have in all episodes regardless of author. It's very interesting to hear and see about the history of science because it gives so much insight into how we got to where we are. Gradual progress over time is the norm. Newton, Einstein and guys like them are the outliers :-)

    • @stevebrindle1724
      @stevebrindle1724 2 роки тому +4

      No sir, the philosophy of dialectical materialism when applied to the history of science, as well as the whole field of human activity gives the correct answer. Marx and Engles applied this philosophical outlook to explain changes in society but as a philosophical grand unified field of human thought, it can be applied here. Changes are going on continuously, almost imperceptible until a certain point when a sea change seems to happen Newtons laws, James Clark Maxwells work on electromagnetism and Einsteins relativity for example. A suitable analogy would be heating water in a pan! For a relatively long period, the water appears unchanged in the pan until a certain temperature is reached and the water explodes and starts to boil! Change has been occurring all the while but to our eyes, nothing has changed until the boiling point has been reached. Such is the way of things in science, social science and history! It is not for nothing that Marxism is also known as Scientific Socialism!

    • @larsalfredhenrikstahlin8012
      @larsalfredhenrikstahlin8012 2 роки тому +9

      @@stevebrindle1724 Basically exactly what I said but made a lot harder to read

    • @uelude
      @uelude Рік тому +1

      @@larsalfredhenrikstahlin8012 And both passages relatively vacuous

    • @SlardybardfastUSA
      @SlardybardfastUSA Рік тому

      Please keep your political views out of this discussion of science.@@stevebrindle1724

  • @clasbin77
    @clasbin77 2 роки тому +7

    I have a 5-sigma confidence this is the greatest story ever told, brilliantly written and masterfully delivered.

  • @neonraytracer8846
    @neonraytracer8846 3 роки тому +160

    Absolutely fantastic. I've seen so many space-universe documentaries, I watch Anton Petrov share discoveries on a daily basis and have loved physics and the universe since I was little.
    This series is the best explanation and exploration of the universe I've ever experienced. The amount of work, understanding, and writing that goes into this really shows. This is so high quality. I hope your growth as a channel becomes exponential!

    • @DrGreerIsRight
      @DrGreerIsRight 3 роки тому

      Anton Petrov is payed off

    • @neonraytracer8846
      @neonraytracer8846 3 роки тому +14

      @@DrGreerIsRight What are you even talking about

    • @artemZinn
      @artemZinn 3 роки тому +2

      Neon, check PBS SpaceTime

    • @JerseyLynne
      @JerseyLynne 3 роки тому +3

      I would look at the electric universe theory. The UA-cam channel is Thunderbolts project.

    • @neonraytracer8846
      @neonraytracer8846 3 роки тому +2

      @@artemZinn oh yea, I love basically all the PBS UA-cam channels! I've seen many of the videos from spacetime; incredible they can keep up and put it in simpler terms, and those animations!

  • @KippiExplainsStuff
    @KippiExplainsStuff 3 роки тому +178

    The writing in this show and also the entire history of the earth simply fantastic!

    • @quill444
      @quill444 2 роки тому +3

      It's really quite difficult to find a place to ⏸ pause these videos, they're so filled with information; very good signal-to-noise ratio, nearly ♾ infinite! - j q t -

    • @nenmaster5218
      @nenmaster5218 2 роки тому

      @@quill444 So?
      Want some?

    • @ferdinand8994
      @ferdinand8994 2 роки тому

      You people are being brainwashed, these are just theories we know nothing about ourselves tbh, maybe the universe is just a big cell inside some other huge organism, the short answer is that we hane no clue we could be anything and anywhere this is fiction not fact

    • @AryanBenita
      @AryanBenita 2 роки тому

      @@ferdinand8994 the only person who is brainwashed is an uneducated person like you! What do you know about Physics and mathematics???? I bet none!! Your phone, Internet, wireless etc are all working based on Theorries!!! Theory in Science means, you can't observe it, but all mathematics work very well!

    • @anthonygruner2670
      @anthonygruner2670 Рік тому +2

      @@ferdinand8994 Brainwashed? People surfing UA-cam for info on different ideas from scientists and very informal science researchers would be considered (in your peanut brain) brainwashed individuals? You must be fun at parties. And I don’t recall anyone saying that that 100% believe anything at all and are basically just being optimistic. Nothing but love I’ve seen in the comments until I read yours. There’s always that sad sad sad person who has to vent by saying something negative.

  • @nanofate4118
    @nanofate4118 2 роки тому +8

    I remember a scientist saying that what he looks forward to the most is when he says "huh. That's weird"

  • @Ledbottom86
    @Ledbottom86 2 роки тому +27

    I actually got to see the magnet before reaching fermilab. That thing was absolutely massive and they parked it by a costco parkinglot where I saw it.

    • @whocares2214
      @whocares2214 2 роки тому

      That's cool af!!

    • @nenmaster5218
      @nenmaster5218 2 роки тому +2

      @@whocares2214 The next 100 Years will probably decide what wins:
      Science or Anti-Science.

    • @whocares2214
      @whocares2214 2 роки тому

      @@nenmaster5218 super random thing to say. Why that particular time frame?

    • @nenmaster5218
      @nenmaster5218 2 роки тому +2

      @@whocares2214 No particular reason, mate. That's just one of the things people say.
      I might have phrased it like this cause theres many videos about 'the next 100 years' - and theres not a good reason to say 100 and not 101. Duh.

    • @whocares2214
      @whocares2214 2 роки тому

      @@nenmaster5218 lmfao I was pretty high when I said that but I get what you're saying. If I came off as being an asshole I didn't mean it like that.

  • @bobbyrobmaxey
    @bobbyrobmaxey 2 роки тому +14

    I am just perpetually amazed by the unfathomable brilliance of the first scientists who conceptualized and understood quantum mechanics back in the early 20th century. True genius

    • @Juxtaposed1Nmotion
      @Juxtaposed1Nmotion 2 роки тому +1

      Its actually an interesting story of blunders and best guesses then serious precise deconstruction of physics

    • @kenbob1071
      @kenbob1071 2 роки тому +1

      I'm with you. It's amazing that we can even know what happened after the Big Bang and to the point where we can state down to billionths of seconds when it happened.

    • @ernestolombardo5811
      @ernestolombardo5811 5 місяців тому +1

      Like the Casimir Effect mentioned on this video. Place two mirrors in a vacuum, facing each other. These mirrors then approach each other, ever so slightly. What the hell is going on?
      This was somebody's job. To run these experiments, see what happens and try to figure it out mathematically.
      Or the other way around - start with the math, run predictions, try and set up an experiment to reproduce what you (or somebody else) put down on paper.
      Or you juggle both approaches, depending on the project or situation.
      It took some amazing creative thinking right there, to think of putting two mirrors in a vacuum with a way to measure and see if some unexpected abstraction happens.

  • @ttld678
    @ttld678 3 роки тому +27

    I’m so glad I can be here to witness the creation of this channel and be here from the beginning. I can’t wait to congratulate you on 1 mil one day. Ik it won’t take too long 😎

  • @abhishekdas3320
    @abhishekdas3320 2 роки тому +13

    This along with History of the Earth are two of the best channels in UA-cam. Keep up the amazing work. Looking forward to documentaries on Dark Matter, Dark Energy, Exoplanets, Parallel Verse and many more.

  • @darkmetaOFFICIAL
    @darkmetaOFFICIAL 2 роки тому +9

    I think i'm about to be Grandly Unified with my Screen for the next 36 minutes 😂

  • @gaslitworldf.melissab2897
    @gaslitworldf.melissab2897 3 роки тому +31

    Brilliantly done. When I saw the first installation of this _History of the Universe,_ I thought wow, that's ambitious, but it looks like you're more than equal to the task.

  • @jeck2875
    @jeck2875 3 роки тому +98

    I feel like I should be paying for a documentary of this caliber

    • @deltadesign5697
      @deltadesign5697 3 роки тому +5

      Heard of Patreon bro?

    • @dolebiscuit
      @dolebiscuit 3 роки тому +3

      If you don't use adblock or have UA-cam Premium, you are paying for it.

    • @neonraytracer8846
      @neonraytracer8846 3 роки тому

      @Kelvin It's at least 3 people, 'they'.

    • @stepoversamirahman1436
      @stepoversamirahman1436 2 роки тому +1

      Ita funny you dissapeared as soon as patreon was mentioned 😆

    • @moodyrick8503
      @moodyrick8503 2 роки тому +2

      Higher knowledge should be free for all.
      The future of humanity depends on us solving our own problems.

  • @michaelizzy3424
    @michaelizzy3424 2 роки тому +50

    I love how this video has been out for months and has less than 1mil views. Other videos are getting 12mil views in hours. The info is amazing and never thought i would be so interested in this science but knowledge is power. I hope more people start using this media for learning and not just as a distraction.

    • @ahmedzakikhan7639
      @ahmedzakikhan7639 Рік тому +1

      People are more interested in stupid marve fantasy l shows and movies

    • @DeeJayPancakes
      @DeeJayPancakes Рік тому

      Certain people control the media. The people finding this wasn't to look it up or have seen enough videos to make their algorithm find this

    • @brunospasta
      @brunospasta 11 місяців тому +2

      Yet, there is nothing wrong using the medium for distraction and entertainment. Different types of content may happily coexist.

  • @markc3653
    @markc3653 2 роки тому +2

    That was the best breakdown and explanation I've seen. Easy to understand. Thank you

  • @aminabusko4198
    @aminabusko4198 2 роки тому +6

    If anyone’s wondering what the beautiful song in the beginning is it’s called After the rain by Silver Maple :)

  • @ArronCharman
    @ArronCharman 2 роки тому +4

    Thanks Leila. The videos on this and the Earth channel are in my opinion some of the best on youtube. Keep up the good work!

  • @cosicave5179
    @cosicave5179 2 роки тому

    Excellent.
    Watching this has improved my understanding - because it is so neatly put together and SO clearly narrated.
    Thankyou.

  • @amorosogombe9650
    @amorosogombe9650 2 роки тому +3

    Best explanation I have ever heard. Filled in a tonne of blanks simply and clearly. Thank you.

  • @dor00012
    @dor00012 3 роки тому +10

    33:01.
    I almost died when he said "With stuff"

  • @alananderson4377
    @alananderson4377 2 роки тому +8

    I would love to see a video on fractals and self simalrity. These videos are awesome and put together very well. I hope you will release another video soon. But until then I will keep watching theses again as well as the entire history of the earth. Great work!!!

    • @Brittneyannthompson
      @Brittneyannthompson 2 роки тому +1

      I am and always have been in awe of fractals. I agree and would love to see a video on this as well. 🙂

  • @jimbernard8964
    @jimbernard8964 2 роки тому +1

    All of your videos are fantastic. Thanks you so much. Here is a humble suggestion that occurred to be when you were describing Feynman at Cornell- think about doing some biographies of some of these brilliant men and women who discovered all of this wonderful knowledge. Thanks for what you do.

  • @woodygilson3465
    @woodygilson3465 2 роки тому +10

    Brilliant! All of it - the visuals, the voice over, the script writing, and especially the research. This is how science needs to be communicated.

  • @simba9825
    @simba9825 Рік тому +40

    You're a brilliant storyteller. I feel like I can envision the Cosmos unfolding from your content

  • @nobodyspecial9097
    @nobodyspecial9097 3 роки тому +20

    Glad to see this channel taking off. It deserves it.

  • @artdonovandesign
    @artdonovandesign Рік тому +2

    Wow! That introduction about the Four Fundamental Forces was absolutely stunning! And with that music...Jesus! It's like poetry.

  • @F1FanCanuck
    @F1FanCanuck 2 роки тому +1

    Excellent video!! Explained these complex concepts and ideas in a way that laypeople can understand, making science accessible to so many more.

  • @HawthorneHillNaturePreserve
    @HawthorneHillNaturePreserve 3 роки тому +16

    Honestly, this was one of the most comprehensive and well presented documentary on the subject of unification and quantum physics. I loved it!

    • @KosmicKoheiAspiringAstronaut
      @KosmicKoheiAspiringAstronaut 2 роки тому

      Just read a book that covers some of the same topics, it is called The Demon in the Machine: How Hidden Webs of Information Are Solving the Mystery of Life
      : by Paul Davies. I'd give it a read if you are interested in theses topics.

  • @denissavgir2881
    @denissavgir2881 3 роки тому +21

    Electromagnetism is also responsible for all chemistry and holds molecular structures and bonds together. While the strong nuclear force holds atomic nucleii togethe, the electromagnetic force holds atoms and molecules together, allowing for solid objects to retain their shape, etc. It also governs the chemical interactions that occur in matter.

    • @JerseyLynne
      @JerseyLynne 3 роки тому +4

      It is an electric universe... elegant and so simple.

    • @amenra6042
      @amenra6042 3 роки тому +5

      @@JerseyLynne More finely, electricity is merely a channel for energy such as blood vessels are channels for our blood-water-nutrient mixture. It’s really strange how the universe mirrors us in various ways. Perhaps, the universe is also like the mind in which there is a programmer behind the natural functions of its body; a nervous system that governs its creation.

    • @JerseyLynne
      @JerseyLynne 3 роки тому

      @@amenra6042 visit Thunderbolts project channel and be surprised!

    • @MeadowBrook2000
      @MeadowBrook2000 2 роки тому +3

      There are proponents who says that Electromagnetism is the only one true force of nature under the form of Electroweak force, the Gravity is just geometry and the Strong Force mimics the electromagnetism in the Casimir effect, with Van der Waals effects accounting for the rest of contributions.

    • @thersten
      @thersten 2 роки тому +2

      @@JerseyLynne quack science.

  • @evrismode
    @evrismode 2 роки тому +2

    Whoever is behind this work - Thank You.
    Pointless to go through details. One of the most essential series!

  • @mittenface
    @mittenface 2 роки тому

    Thanks for producing this!

  • @Bloodknok
    @Bloodknok 3 роки тому +11

    Perfect combination of accessibility and scientific heft - and the narration is compelling.

  • @godless-clump-of-cells
    @godless-clump-of-cells 3 роки тому +60

    The humble pursuit of knowledge in adherence with the scientific method.

    • @Makeshiftjunkbox
      @Makeshiftjunkbox 2 роки тому

      I doubt it, you don't do science no matter what so ever but monopolize over it dictating our lives!

    • @spencerdickerson1620
      @spencerdickerson1620 2 роки тому +2

      @@Makeshiftjunkbox what

    • @Makeshiftjunkbox
      @Makeshiftjunkbox 2 роки тому

      @@spencerdickerson1620
      Mainstream mechanical physics is a fraud, it is not real science just a smoke screen that is set up trying to monopolize over information dictate our lives leading us astray like priests!

    • @fgtrhwu2
      @fgtrhwu2 2 роки тому +2

      @@Makeshiftjunkbox Prove it then

    • @msabedra1
      @msabedra1 2 роки тому

      @@fgtrhwu2 disprove it. That is the scientific method is it not?

  • @Titus873
    @Titus873 2 роки тому

    Oh god, what a fantastic narrative. You, comentator, are really the star of these videos. Your voice flows so easily and relaxing.
    So well described. Congratulations.

  • @buenosairesam
    @buenosairesam 2 роки тому +1

    I'm more for "person talking to a camera" type of videos for informing myself about these subjects, but this "story" format videos are very well crafted and interesting. Keep it on

  • @artysanmobile
    @artysanmobile 3 роки тому +11

    An absolutely magnificent presentation! Summarizing our current understanding of physics while putting that human discovery into historic perspective is nothing less than a work of art. I am buzzing with joy.

  • @johnsheehan5109
    @johnsheehan5109 2 роки тому +5

    Excellent presentation. I would have thought that you might have mentioned Michael Faraday who did the experimental work upon which Maxwell developed the mathematical model and theoretic framework for electromagnetism.

    • @granadosvm
      @granadosvm Рік тому +1

      You are correct. Faraday was the first to see electricity and magnetism as a single field. Maxwell studied Faraday's writings to put equations to Faraday's discoveries, and found that the electromagnetic field was not a static fabric like Faraday imagined, but it moves at the speed of light.

  • @robertbarfoot741
    @robertbarfoot741 Рік тому

    Wonderful narration, just love the delivery, I think I am more hooked on this than the subject!

  • @karambos2
    @karambos2 2 роки тому

    Fantastic video. Very well explained. Thankyou

  • @danieldeelite
    @danieldeelite 3 роки тому +60

    "Mercury precesses more than it should, we should look into that. Muons wobble more than they should, we should look into that."

    • @gurumage9555
      @gurumage9555 3 роки тому +9

      Then some 21st century Einstein figures this out and next thing you know, we have new technology making use of this discovery.

    • @Cancoillotteman
      @Cancoillotteman 2 роки тому +6

      Wobble. Wobble wobble. Wobble. Wobble wobble wobble.
      (some Muon, probably)

    • @alwaysdisputin9930
      @alwaysdisputin9930 2 роки тому +3

      Uranus emits a blast of gas called a plasmoid. Someone should look into it

    • @dipanjanghosal1662
      @dipanjanghosal1662 2 роки тому +5

      @@alwaysdisputin9930 i also emit a blast of gas. Someone should look into that too

    • @kapsi
      @kapsi 2 роки тому

      If you're waiting for another early XX century revolution in physics, you'll be disappointed. Both quantum mechanics and relativity are true and tested, so any new theory must conform to them, and it's gonna be highly abstract (like superstrings) and far removed from any potential for new technology. 100 years ago you could discover new physics in your garage. Nowadays you need thousands of people and a 10 billion dollar machine, with environment inside comparable to Big Bang, to even have a chance of discovering something that the standard model doesn't explain. And even if they do, that's new physics only accessible with 10 billion dollar machines. Even 50 year old physics (Higgs boson) is too much.

  • @davyjohnjones
    @davyjohnjones 3 роки тому +5

    this was absolutely beautiful and very well put together. major props the the creator(s), as i wish the best of luck to the further growth of this channel !

  • @greggamba2997
    @greggamba2997 2 роки тому +2

    Every video you guys produced are wonderfully very well put together! I already said this but will say it again, "History of the Universe deserved multimillion subscribers!"

    • @nenmaster5218
      @nenmaster5218 2 роки тому

      The next 100 Years will probably decide what wins:
      Science or Anti-Science.
      To affect this, i even go so far as to ask random strangers like you: Want some
      recommendations? Some science-youtubers to check out, cause the Learning never ends?

  • @noneofyourbizness
    @noneofyourbizness Рік тому

    marvelous , as always.
    Great to see Leila Battison's name at top of credits, an excellent science writer.

  • @houserhouse
    @houserhouse 2 роки тому +3

    I wish I could give the hundred billion past humans all hugs for helping us eventually get to this point, where we can bathe in knowledge in a way that the greatest minds of all time would feel they achieved more than anything anyone could have ever asked for, only for there to still be new frontiers to come

  • @HolographicThoughts
    @HolographicThoughts 3 роки тому +17

    Whoa... so quantum superpositions are just the result of being in the wrong frame of reference in regards to time?
    In the coin analogy, slowing of time allows you to observe which face of the coin is displayed. But as we know, that's relative to your local experience of time. So, taking that to the extreme, could we observe the precise location of subatomic particles if we were in the same temporal frame of reference?
    This seems impossible as you would need to be a subatomic particle yourself. Hmm. Does that mean quarks know precisely where eachother are in order for QCD to occur? Is that true? Or is this mystified to us as mere probability, because we're observing the position/location as if it were the coins spinning? SO MANY THOUGHTS! and they may all be nonsense.

    • @simeon.peter21sungijr81
      @simeon.peter21sungijr81 Рік тому +1

      You're wickedly smart Mr or Ms Mackenzie as for me I had to re-read this 2 times outloud to even begin to understand the basic concept of what you were talking about. Congratulations receive your free Internet Genius card

  • @-o-light8863
    @-o-light8863 2 роки тому

    Beautifully put together.

  • @SaadMalaeb
    @SaadMalaeb Рік тому

    Wonderful! can't express how much I appreciated this channel content 🙌

  • @kylezo
    @kylezo 2 роки тому +3

    This presentation is incredibly impressive.

  • @cigartuber
    @cigartuber 3 роки тому +5

    I watch these episodes over and over and gain new and deeper understandings with each new listening. I wait with wild anticipation for the next one. Thanks for this series!

  • @raphaelandrews3617
    @raphaelandrews3617 Рік тому

    Thank you that was a excellent programme.

  • @amyjo4367
    @amyjo4367 Рік тому

    Awesome. Beautiful. And Waaah over my head.
    Well done. Thank you.

  • @project.eutopia
    @project.eutopia 3 роки тому +28

    The muon g measurement discrepancy is not yet at a discovery, 5 sigma threshold. A more recent theoretical calculation give a value closer to experiment. We should know soon though if as the experiment error bars shrink, and the theoretical calculation is independently verified. Probably the most likely outcome is that no difference will be found between experiment and theory, but here's to hoping we learn something new!

    • @nokersa
      @nokersa 2 роки тому

      What was the change to the original theoretical calculation?

    • @stepoversamirahman1436
      @stepoversamirahman1436 2 роки тому

      Say what?

    • @project.eutopia
      @project.eutopia 2 роки тому

      The new theoretical calculation was done in Nature paper titled "Leading hadronic contribution to the muon magnetic moment from lattice QCD". The value using lattice QCD actually is consistent with the new experimental result.

    • @Meilk27
      @Meilk27 2 роки тому +2

      I'm a layman who's been fascinated by quantum and particle physics for 15 years. How can I get to a point of understanding where I could read what you wrote and know what it means because I really want to know. The name of the paper is confusing, I couldn't explain what it means to someone and that's aggravating

    • @project.eutopia
      @project.eutopia 2 роки тому +5

      @@Meilk27 There is a good recent video on the Fermilab UA-cam channel titled "What does the Muon g-2 experiment tell us?" that explains this pretty well I think, and they do a better job explaining it than I can in a short UA-cam comment. It's about 15 minutes long, but if you're interested in this it is time well spent.

  • @ironmaidenmetalgod
    @ironmaidenmetalgod 2 роки тому +11

    i really hope this channel blows up. This deserves Kurzgesagt lvl audience.

    • @HaggardPillockHD
      @HaggardPillockHD 2 роки тому +1

      If we're gonna be honest, Kurzgesagt take it to a completely different level. They do their own research, cite all sources and literally animate their own content, as well as having an amazing narrator. This channel, whilst is decent, does not scratch the quality of their content. I'm assuming this channel is merely using stock clips with some basic editing.

    • @and_I_am_Life_the_fixer_of_all
      @and_I_am_Life_the_fixer_of_all 2 роки тому

      @@HaggardPillockHD You are wrong, they clearly have much more references and this is much closer to reality than kurzgesagt. I'm enjoying these more than Kurzgesagt to be honest. This is way better writting too. I hope they get lots of money from youtube to make these better, add more people into editing and maybe just restart once the story is done telling but in greater quality. A big bounce when the story reaches the future would be nice :)

    • @iamBlackGambit
      @iamBlackGambit 2 роки тому

      What about Issac Arthur?

    • @alwaysdisputin9930
      @alwaysdisputin9930 2 роки тому

      @@HaggardPillockHD & yet for all their style, I learn near to nothing from Kurzgesagt.
      DrPhysicsA is the best. Today he taught me how to derive the Ricci tensor

  • @AlidelOro
    @AlidelOro 2 роки тому

    Keep producing such brilliant content. This channel is awesome 👍🏼

  • @richardroskell3452
    @richardroskell3452 2 роки тому

    Very well done, an excellent program! Thank you.

  • @rundata
    @rundata 3 роки тому +10

    Ok you have me
    Great content! Awesome video. Actually more informative than the actual fermilab video lol

    • @thersten
      @thersten 2 роки тому

      Nobody has more info than fermilab. Go watch their lectures.

  • @LuisGarcia-yu6cg
    @LuisGarcia-yu6cg 2 роки тому +10

    I enjoyed the video greatly! Thank you for making it understandable to a non-physics individual.

    • @KosmicKoheiAspiringAstronaut
      @KosmicKoheiAspiringAstronaut 2 роки тому +1

      I love this content a ton! I am an aspiring astronaut and have some pretty cool content on my page, would love to share it!

  • @chris4814b
    @chris4814b 2 роки тому

    Love the vids. Great info.... good presentation... but would love them even more as 20 min vids, vs 40

  • @allensmith342
    @allensmith342 2 роки тому

    Excellent documentation... thanks!

  • @nxtech201
    @nxtech201 3 роки тому +6

    I never ever ever put notifications on for a channel but you guys have seriously more than earned it. Such high quality content I absolutely love it can’t wait to see this channel grow

  • @chiron13
    @chiron13 2 роки тому +8

    I did not understand a thing, but I loved listening to that wonderful voice, the poetic script and the soothing background music.
    This channel is UNMATCHED in PRESENTATION STYLE.

  • @Billy-vt3ck
    @Billy-vt3ck 2 роки тому

    Great video, excellent content and presentation!!

  • @ashJayden06
    @ashJayden06 2 роки тому +1

    Amazing documentary. Extremely well presented information. Thank you

    • @nenmaster5218
      @nenmaster5218 2 роки тому +1

      I go so far as to ask random strangers like you: Want some
      recommendations? Some science-youtubers to check out, cause the Learning never ends?

  • @u_t2347
    @u_t2347 3 роки тому +12

    What I want to know is; if a star is big enough, when it dies it can create a black hole, but how did the universe not collapse into a black hole before or after the "big bang"?
    Have we imploded into another dimension from what the base universe is? Are black holes a route back to the base universe? We are actually within a black hole of sorts of our own?
    I'm not great at explaining myself and indeed have no idea what I'm talking about.

    • @Boogaboioringale
      @Boogaboioringale 3 роки тому +6

      I know exactly what you’re talking about. The typical “explanation “ is that there was no such thing as space so it couldn’t collapse.😞. However, some scientists think just what you suggested- that we are indeed inside a black hole. ( holographic universe).

    • @bryanwiles3383
      @bryanwiles3383 3 роки тому +1

      I have seen alot of evidence and the math seem to support this but lately my theory is that outer universe actually is the inside of a black hole look into it

    • @u_t2347
      @u_t2347 3 роки тому +1

      @@Boogaboioringale Thank you for your reply, Give me a few days to digest

    • @johngreenlee9215
      @johngreenlee9215 2 роки тому

      Hmm, interesting"base universe' concept.

    • @iliyaivanov1157
      @iliyaivanov1157 2 роки тому

      How would the multiverse exist ? Do all of them exist and die within the same black hole ?

  • @Starkada
    @Starkada 3 роки тому +11

    Absolutely fantastic content!!!

  • @j.katyLevin.2684
    @j.katyLevin.2684 Рік тому

    One of the most interesting documentary i have ever seen, very well done!

  • @hansbjaeke3414
    @hansbjaeke3414 2 роки тому +1

    Such a high quality content! Thank you for these videos.
    Can you please tell me the name of the song starting at 2:57? I love it!

  • @singularity___
    @singularity___ 3 роки тому +6

    Thank you so much for another video. I don't even have the words to accurately express how much I love this channel's content.

  • @lindsaycoffey3327
    @lindsaycoffey3327 3 роки тому +30

    “Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic” - Arthur C Clarke. We are the magicians & science is our wand.

    • @spearPYN
      @spearPYN 3 роки тому +3

      We are just mere slaves to our passions; in reality we are nothing more than ants struggling to understand the reality around us. We still have not even touched the reality. Our masters that created us still did not say why they created us...

    • @lindsaycoffey3327
      @lindsaycoffey3327 3 роки тому +4

      @@spearPYN the slaves become Goddesses & Gods too. It’s called the technological Singularity. The digital rapture, or Transhumanism.

    • @donk1822
      @donk1822 2 роки тому

      @@spearPYN Why do you think that Spear, when the Biblical account makes it so transparent?

    • @MadMax-xc4lr
      @MadMax-xc4lr 2 роки тому +2

      And the existence of this universe out of singularity is the greatest magic.

    • @lindsaycoffey3327
      @lindsaycoffey3327 2 роки тому

      @@MadMax-xc4lr Absolutely correct!

  • @miserable.day1969
    @miserable.day1969 Рік тому

    Thank you for these wonderful videos. I learn so much from them.

  • @requesttalents2337
    @requesttalents2337 2 роки тому

    Amazing work guys keep up the good work!

  • @OmniGuy
    @OmniGuy 2 роки тому +6

    I read once where in order to get the protons to collide they have to compensate for the gravitational pull of the moon. Amazing tech. Amazing intelligence to figure out and then build.

    • @s13driftlove
      @s13driftlove 2 роки тому

      Perhaps counterintuitively, correcting for the gravitational pull of the moon is probably one of the easy parts of getting protons to collide lol. Many more annoying influences at play

  • @elisolomon8741
    @elisolomon8741 Рік тому

    I enjoyed that so very much.
    Probably because you allowed this layman to understand the concepts discussed and so wonderfully presented.
    Thank you.

  • @annalee_the_bananalee3226
    @annalee_the_bananalee3226 Рік тому

    I love these types of videos and how the author somehow draws these beautiful transcendent conclusions.

  • @marc-olivierlemay6311
    @marc-olivierlemay6311 3 роки тому +35

    This video is so good I want to show it to everyone I know

  • @SomeRandomDevOpsGuy
    @SomeRandomDevOpsGuy 3 роки тому +6

    These are obviously pros with a new account. I wish you the best, HOTU! Your content is well researched with a lot of good graphics thought-provoking scripts. Thank you.

    • @James-rl5tj
      @James-rl5tj 3 роки тому

      Their other channels: voices of the past, history time, Pete kelly

    • @Krystalmyth
      @Krystalmyth 3 роки тому +1

      @@James-rl5tj History of the Earth as well.

  • @SamtheIrishexan
    @SamtheIrishexan 2 роки тому

    Love this channel man! Enjoy your sponsor already!

  • @aurora123borealis
    @aurora123borealis 2 роки тому

    Wow! Great video! Thanks!

  • @theoreticalphysicsnickharv7683
    @theoreticalphysicsnickharv7683 2 роки тому +3

    Very good video! But as far as I know M Faraday first used the word 'field' not Maxwell. Anyone interested in unified physics should check out Quantum Atom Theory.

  • @susank580
    @susank580 2 роки тому +5

    Such a well done and thought provoking series. Reminds me to be ever grateful for the miracle of consciousness.

  • @shaunballagh196
    @shaunballagh196 2 роки тому

    Very well put together.
    You get my like and subscription for this upload.

  • @faiza7740
    @faiza7740 2 роки тому +1

    I watched all videos on this channel and the best part is narration 👌👍👏👏👏

  • @xonix55
    @xonix55 3 роки тому +5

    This is BEAUTIFUL !!! thank you.

  • @carlstevens4981
    @carlstevens4981 2 роки тому +5

    These videos are absolutely amazing. Love to learn about forces, time space and anything of that nature. I learn each day. Thank you

  • @No1karez
    @No1karez 2 роки тому

    Awe inspiring work 👏👏 Thank you

  • @mlee9734
    @mlee9734 2 роки тому

    Subscribed. I'm gonna love this channel!!!

  • @sirsia1st
    @sirsia1st 2 роки тому +20

    The Grand Unified "Epoch" makes me feel like it's a really long time, but 10^-43 seconds is very short. However I realized that the times talked about here are measured in a "modern" second, based ultimately down to interactions happening in a cesium atom . Rather, I thought why not measure based on a certain number of interactions? Let's say 10^100 interactions per given volume. I could imagine with such high temperatures and such short distance different chemistries happened (I know Chemistry is based on atoms that exist today, I just don't have a proper word for it) ... a type of galaxies, solar systems, planets, life could have existed in those "Epochs" that seemed so short to us humans. Similarly or conversely, in the black hole / heat death epoch, so few interactions would happen that what we'd measure as 10^10 years .. essentially nothing would happen.

    • @philip2205
      @philip2205 Рік тому

      I've thought about that before. Wouldn't it be interesting if we measured time based on "events"? It'd have some interesting consequences. Would this "time" be different at different places?

    • @sirsia1st
      @sirsia1st Рік тому +1

      @@macysondheim Yes, time at an event horizon.. or anything with a strong gravitation field passes slower than outside the strong field. as to why that is, general relativity explains using space/time curvature model , but the actual why is still unanswered. as mentioned at the grand unified epoch time would also be different; since gravity itself hasn't uncoupled from the rest of the other forces and heat, energy .. existence (not quite space/time yet) would be all soupy and crazy.

  • @KosmicKoheiAspiringAstronaut
    @KosmicKoheiAspiringAstronaut 2 роки тому

    Love the content! Keep it up!

  • @janetthompson3307
    @janetthompson3307 Рік тому

    Another great vid, thanks x

  • @BD-lq4id
    @BD-lq4id 2 роки тому +5

    27:00 "with pinpoint precision" I think it's a little more precise than the point of a pin haha. This video is amazing by the way. outstanding work.