String theory, when explained, always sounds to me like they have the right general idea, but they've got the order of things wrong- Or even completely backwards. What I mean by this is that they have the physical nature of the system inverted, because they rely too heavily on math and not enough on logic. So prodding around in the dark with math, but they're blind to the fact they've arranged everything inside out. I would like to know if string theorists have tried seeing if they can, for instance, make the math work with the assumption that branes aren't wrapping around strings, but rather strings are pulled from the surface of branes. Similar to loose threads and stitching in a quilt. If the math for the strings and branes themselves works super well, and is super elegant, maybe it is describing something real, but they got the relationship between these fundamental objects wrong. If that's what's going on, fixing the relationship in the theory may produce testable predictions, through a better understanding of what's physically happening, and describe how the quantum world produces the classical one. Just a thought, anyway.
Anydesk is a common method for scammers to steal from you. It is far from safe and secure if you're not aware the tactics they use concerning that software. Plenty of scambait channels like Kitboga and Scammer Payback exemplify their methods and what to look for. Knowledge is power; protect yourselves.
Will try AnyDesk, but I want to tell you that I believe your channel is the best on UA-cam and that I and many others depend on it almost like life giving air ... Hope you read my comment, otherwise I'll feel my appreciation didn't reach you!
I listen to all of your channels on repeat and have to say - you have an immense gift to be able to convey all topics you speak on with such clarity and calmness, while staying grounded in reality. That it makes difficult topics appeal to everyone. You and your team do great work - keep it up!
These docs are well-written, expertly narrated, and in my opinion, far better than anything produced by major tv networks or streaming services in recent years. Much thanks to the creators for this content. Keep doing what you're doing and I'll consume with fervor.
@@onehighman3071 Dear brothers and sisters, I made an effort and have published a series of papers (totally 9 nos.) on "Theory of Singularity" based on real dimensions of space-time. You shall check my work, in which the path(quantum orbits) of the fundamental particle are waves giving shape to the particles as strings. Also, you will see the curled up dimensions in my articles. I have tabulated total no. of dimensions required for theory of everything. "New study of Gravitation and Fundamental theory of Singularity" [Volume 10; issue 03,04; 2023] - ARC JOURNALS - International journal of advanced research in physical science - Open access for free download. Hope this new study serves one fundamental for general relativity and quantum mechanics. Theory of everything is not an easy task, as gravitation is nothing but a path to singularity. Gravitation is not a wave at any point of space-time, as it is believed to be in existing researches. I have shown to run along the axis of the detected waves or ripples and terminating in singularity. Moreover, as far as I worked, universally gravitation is only used to channel the forces for creation and destruction by nature....thank you
I'm no expert, but I know a thing or two about getting lost in the elegance of a problem and over-engineering a solution until it has no practical value. String Theory has always felt exactly like that to me.
"We got too many damn zeroes around here, and that blows stuff up into these pesky infinities. What we do is, we take all the zeroes and we say they're all little itsy-bitsies. And since the Central Limit Theorem and musical plucked strings have been around for three thousand years, so, well, the little itsy-bities are all going to vibrate sinusoidally before we even bother to look for them. We'll say they're strings, so at last we get the music of the spheres for a freebie," got it? What could possibly go wrong? It's all obvious! Shee-yit, a thing that obvious don't need no freakin' evidence.
While not a theoretical physicist or a mathematician of this caliber, I have, for years, followed the development of the various theories. The explanation of ideas presented in this video is the clearest I have seen. And for the first time, I understand how the theory works. Thank you.
You are so good at explaining things. Your voice is so soothing and simple, no extreme accent, and easily understandable. Also, the analogies you choose are amazing. For example, one analogy you used was “Like building Lego with boxing gloves” to describe our technology being too big to observe small things, and was super simple to understand. I fall asleep to your videos and they are amazing to think about. I hope you keep doing this and you find success in it.
I could listen to hours upon hours of this and never get tired. Sad how so much of society dont care about this sort of stuff anymore. Its literally learning how the universe works how cool is that???
These videos have deeply broadened my understanding of physics, cosmology, and the greater universe. The way you break down complex technical terms is incredible, and people with non-scientific backgrounds like myself can really expand their knowledge of the universe. Thank you so much, and please keep these coming!
21:41 Your videos are alway so clear and accessible it makes laymen-the average person-feel as though we’re a part of the conversation, rather than just on-lookers. Thank you for that-the inclusive way you present the science!
Your voice on these videos is single-handedly bringing my blood pressure down to manageable levels. And I get to hear some awesome science as a bonus! Thank you for sharing your video’s, they are simply a vacation from the craziness in my life!
I literally check constantly for updates from this channel. it is my favorite channels on all of UA-cam. I seriously believe that you, and your team make the best content in the world. On any medium plausible.
Yes, I have to know what is going on in the world so S2 underground and Perun are important, too but those are not fun. This channel is fun and I find myself checking for updates a couple times a week.
Wow, this vid is incredible. The subject matter, the way it's explained, the graphics, bloody brilliant, love it!! Much love and appreciation to the creators.
Just epic!!! You lads managed to put in simple words very complex and fundamental concepts of how our entire Universe works. This channel is definitely among the top 🔝 five best channels on UA-cam that actually address this fundamental physics problems in a deep meaningful manner 😁👏👏👏👌
" fundamental concepts of how our entire Universe works." i would rather say "of how we currently think our Universe works"... there is no doubt that our perception of how this universe works has dramatically changed over the last few centuries alone...there are many more centuries to come. Never be so arrogant and assume WE are the smartest right now and have figured it out finally! ...we are not...we havn't... but it's the best we have for now.
@@prince-solomon I couldn't agreed more, the standard model is the best and more precise theory we currently have, and it has not revealed of what the 95% of the universe it is made of... Although I must say our understanding of 3 of the fundamental forces is almost completed... but Gravity probably the one Force that should be better understood is at the moment a complete mystery... We still lack the mathematics to unifying it to the other three... But anyways I truly believe we are closer than ever to finally comprehending how the internal machinery of our universe works but we never know.... it could just be the tip of the iceberg 😉👌 Cheers and thanks for the comment my friend.
As a struggling layperson with an electrical background, in my attempts in trying to catch up with some of these quantum concepts, I find the rational explainers like these to be easier to visualise and kind of follow... even if I'm not able to get a grasp on everything... but the graphics are phenomenal on this and your other channels.... I often pause and/or rewind a section of the screen to admire some of the historic artwork, diagrams and photographs of important people places and things.
I'm honestly happy with reading your comment. Keep that desire of knowledge no matter at what pace. I agree though, his graphics and explainations are the best and he's not shy with taking his time.
As a person with an electrical background, I recommend my book - "Theory of Everything in Physics and The Universe". It is in accessible language and explains the origin of electromagnetic polarity which will be of interest to you.
I dab cannabis oil then run the vids twice at 75% speed. At 67 understanding displaces passions at best! it's a quantum thing. Pauli exclusion principle be damned.
To a science enthusiast such as my self who knows very little about physics, this explanation… or rather explanations about String Theory was easy to understand (at an elementary level) and utterly enjoyable to learn. Thank you for this. Your work is appreciated.
I'm an experimental physicist and there's one thing about String Theory and also M-theory which has to be said: Every prediction so far made by both that has been possible to test has been proven wrong. After them being proven wrong, the theorists behind it then set out to modify the theory, so that it says the same or a similar thing, just reducing the scale to one which cannot be proven either right or wrong at the time, and when that is proven incorrect, they then set out to repeat this. So, to me, M-Theory stands for Mysticist Theory.
@@shifusensei6442 Not quite. If it was the scientific method applied, then the hypothesis would be proven at least not entirely incorrect. But String theory and therefore all of its derivatives have been proven more than incorrect. oftentimes the opposite to the predictions has been proven. But then the string theorists go: "No, this is too beautiful mathematically to be incorrect." and adjust only that part, so that it would simply not be measurable. That is NOT the scientific method! If it WAS the scientific method applied, then it would work exactly like what has happened to the maco-description of gravity, where first, Newton described it as a force field, which worked well enough, then it was adjusted by several people, until the minutae didn't fit quite right anymore, but mostly right, and then Einstein came up with general relativity, which was mostly right, but flawed, and then it was corrected upon further. So, we can see, we had several flawed theories for gravitational attraction, which were mostly correct in their predictions, but just not quite right. Note the word: Flawed. If "String theory" (and thereby "M-Theory") was a flawed hypothesis, as most hypothesies are, then fine, no problem. Adjust the hypothesis. But it is a WRONG hypothesis, not a flawed one.
I am not aware of any predictions from string theory or even M Theory that can be tested (unless you are suggesting for example supersymmetry)? Please let me know which predictions have been tested that you refer to. However, it has passed countless theoretical and mathematical tests, like being reduced to other theories.
What do you think of the general idea of there being a higher dimension? To me, the way subatomic particles behave, popping in and out of existence seemingly at random, is indicative of a higher dimensional object being viewed at a lower dimension. The whole 10-26 dimensions seems ridiculous, but just a 4th spatial dimension does not seem ridiculous. I also recall reading that general relativity does hold up with a 4th spatial dimension added.
Woah… this is really interesting. It’s so cool to hear more of the cutting edge of the progress of physics. So much of this information just isn’t as widely available for us laymen, but it’s always fascinated me and it’s so good to return to it.
@@axeman2638 lol imagine saying physics is fiction. Yes string theory is theoretical but I challlenge you right now to point out any inconsistencies in the theory. Wait a second for that you would need a PHD and a whole life time of experience studying it
@@jackbradley4737 you need to go much deeper grasshopper. Maths is not physics. Theory does not create or define reality, it is at best a limited model, not reality itself. Reasoning from false assumptions gets you nowhere. Observation does not create reality, if a tree falls in a forest it makes a noise whether there is someone there to hear it or not. Where is the experimental evidence?
Great video! Congratulations on communicating so effectively such complex concepts to those who don't understand the language of mathematics, but are yet capable of an intuitive grasp of such concepts. I'm sure we are all very grateful to you! 🤓
I greatly love this channel! I find the script compelling, and the visuals are marvelous. I will admit that my math aptitude was the lowest of all on those tests we took as students. Yet, while being challenged by ideas that are far over my head, my little peanut brain is stimulated here in exciting ways. There is excitement in the quest for understanding - the reach for comprehension, the yearning for meaning. Even though I remain hopelessly unqualified to engage these topics, the way these programs are put together is so verbally and visually beautiful, I cannot stop watching. Thank you.
Great video! One thing I would appreciate would be actual related equations shown on screen more often in place of some of the b-roll of swimming through a sea of unrelated mathematical expressions
Thanks. One of the best material I've seen on string theory. Going to depth other videos / books often won't go, while keeping an extremely clear and fairly non-technical language 👍
I hope to prove you wrong about books. There is a book with the title - "Theory of Everything in Physics and The Universe" which in simple and clear language is explaining the fundamental elements and forces of the Universe"
as an artist, this gave me shivers, and i felt something deep within me understand the truth within a lot of this, even though as you said, we might not be able to "resolve" those things at such small dimensions... wow. its kind of like the idea of being the artist who makes the picture, and knows every last little bit that went into its development and creation as a finished picture, versus the person who observes the finished picture and comments on what it is.
I also was also a professional artist in the past. Still, for unknown reasons, I turned to physics and managed to produce the final theory - the book - "Theory of Everything in Physics and The Universe" of course, they are trying to hide it. Still, it is available on Amazon and the major book outlets.
@@tiergeist2639 For the same reason which they establish the inquisition and branded the scientists "heretics" They burn Giordano Bruno silenced Galileo and threatened Copernicus. You are an intelligent person and can figure it out by yourself.
It's been forever, but i remember Brian Greenes book vaguely blowing my mind. Wow. Great videos guys .This is really down to earth for being some impossibly complex!
Your videos have done an incredible job of helping me understand things that previously went over my head. Your videos aren't just helping me learn the topics you've covered, but also have given me the context I need to understand things I'd been struggling to understand from other sources. I've been watching PBS spacetime for years, and I've struggled with some of the topics they cover, but since I found your channel, I've found that more and more of the topics covered over there have started to click for me. You have a gift, and you are a gift. This channel is what we were promised the internet would be.
Why did they make physics so boring in school ?! Your videos are so engaging and interesting. Second time watching this trying to get my head around it. Thank you for the content!
Because this is an interesting topic, but in school you have to learn boring stuff as well like electronics. Plus you are probably older now so naturally have an interest, unlike in your teenage years.
@@craigfowler7098 I was interested back then, but I think the problem is that school gets too cough up in formulas and forget how interesting the theory actually is. I'm not saying we shouldn't study the mathematical aspect of it, I'm just saying that interest could be raised through thought provoking exercises and the practical applicability of the theory, just like in this video
Because its not useful for us low class workers. All we need to know is how to obey and work. After all, public school isn't interested in actually teaching us or expanding our intelligence. Its interested in beating out our individuality and make us compliant.
I have just had my mind blown. This video was so good that I now actually in some minuscule way, feel like I slightly understand this fascinating topic. I’m also humbled by how ridiculously brilliant some people truly are. Mind boggling.
All this content is amazing enough, but stands out to me even more is the excellence your team achieve in telling the story in a gripping manner while explaining arcane concepts in such a manner it makes it easy to understand even to a mere mortal like me. Really incredible achievement, well done.
god i love your videos. i look forward to every upload! you and “SEA” are by far the best space and physics doc channels that exist on youtube. please never stop!!
WOW! I am going to be watching this one a few more times. Phenomenally exposition of a complex topic. The structure of the presentation, sprinkled with historical accounts of the theoretical developments is just SUPERB
I narrator gets much well deserved praise but would especially like to praise the writer(s) on this one. I was on the edge of my seat the entire time. What an incredible gift of turning complex research into an inspiring narrative. You guys are the best in the business!
This dropped on the same day as the Learning Curve, so two great channels dropped at the same time. Thanks for another fantastic upload. I have mentioned your channel on their channel as well as mentioned them on yours. The more views science channels get the more the UA-cam algorithm might recommend them to more and more people.
I've been struggling for years to wrap my mathmetically challenged mind around some aspects of M theory and this forty five minute video has given me the closest peek yet. I've got just enough background to realise I'll probably never get there, even with this wonderful series.
Could you PLEASE acknowledge both the writer and narrator of this fascinating and remarkable video? The explanations and pictorials are so remarkably clear and coherent that they reveal a depth of linguistic and diagrammatic expertise not normally gifted to us ordinary persons! Without being unnecessarily submerged in esoteric and arcane mathematics, I can now understand the (theoretical, at least) structure of the environment within which we all experience reality!
Such a privilege to listen to these extraordinary topics be explained calmly and factually without clickbaity titles or having scientists be “in crisis” for one reason or another, like a lot of other channels do. These remind me of the Horizon series of the BBC. Great work.
This is very challenging material for a non-mathematician like me. But it’s all presented in manner that keeps my attention and encourages me think that some of it will stick to my brain eventually!
I love how the riemann zeta function naturally gives rise to group theories because of the varying point symmetry of the prime spiral. It's really pretty looking
My favourite channel, so pleased to see another upload! Your content makes me feel different about everything, in a good way. It puts mundane worries in perspective and gives me fascinating ideas to contemplate instead. Just thank you, you are so greatly appreciated. ❤️
Thank you for finally being the one and only person to vocalize many of the insights Ive had but never could find anyone to comfirm I was understanding correctly.
This was awesome! M theory and String theory always makes my head hurt and they are hard to wrap my head around them but, you make this more digestible. Do you plan to do any on super/ quantum gravity ( or have you already done them). I am fascinated by the idea that its so weak in comparison to the other forces but that it may permeate thru the brane in to the higher dimensions but how its also not like the other forces in that it currently exists as result of massive objects bending space /time and doesn't have a force carrier like the others.
They aren't actual theories, though. They are hypoethisis that can't be measured or observed on any scale whatsoever. It's like asking if aliens exist. It's a question, nothing more. Mathematics can be used to both prove you exist as well as prove you don't exist. So just because the math is somewhat sound, it doesn't make it correct.
@@gmork1090 thanks but I’m Versed enough in science to understand the difference. Are you the creator of the channel, can you answer my actual question?
There's a very famous astrophysicist science communicator out there that could probably learn a thing or two about science communication by listening to this series of videos. Superb work! I can not express how exited I get when I get a notification for a new "History of..." Video!
Continue to approach these scientific topics like a writer. Like KB CW series we are interested because you are interested in your research. Also like KB you have found the perfect music to tell your stories. Apparently it matters because I find your early works difficult, and I think it is the music and echoing narration. The soundscape is almost perfect now, except that the narration could improve with the right microphone and a carpeted room. Learning lots. I've heard you summarize a whole summer's reading in half an hour, so I know these require a massive amount of research. Keep it up. We are learning physics to our surprise, just as we were surprised by our interest in KB's CW.
It is such a joy to find your chanel in an ocean of shallow and useless content. It also makes me happy to see that so many people are interested and delighted to watch it. A big kudos to you, keep up the great work.
Well this was something else. I can't believe there is just an coincidence between the ideea presented and the experience the writing and the narration gives us. This was in amazing, intense,experience and i never felt something like this whaching a video . I am truly in awe. My utmost respect to this team!
I have been falling down this rabbit hole for a while now but hadn't gotten the chance to watch this video until now. Excellent video, Had my utmost attention the whole way through watching.
Genuine questions I’m asking you for myself: how are you able to find solace in a universe indifferent to the preservation of life? How does the loveless, and strictly factual mathematics describing our cosmos aid as therapy? I’d want to start perceiving the physics of our cosmos as you do
@@Cardioid2035 for me it’s a combination of: the answer to it all is out there and the looking unveils crazy and wonderful happenings, and also knowledge of the vastness and power of the universe shows me that it’s in control, so all the energy I put into worrying or stressing can be relaxed a little, because I truly don’t have much effect on things. Much better to enjoy life
@@Cardioid2035 The idea of powerful external forces having any control over our lives and deciding that a world full of suffering is what they wanted to create sounds terrifying to me. I'm not sure how *that* gives people happiness, as opposed to the idea that we have the freedom to give our own lives meaning.
This channel is brilliant. I actually held a talk about AdS/CFT correspondence in a seminar, based on a chapter of a book. While the book of course describes the math in detail, it failes to describe the basic physical concept behind it as clearly as this video.
Its kinda insane where it feels like this theory could lead, like it'll lead to a greater understanding of where we are, our place in the universe, how vast dimensions can be beyond our own and what lies beyond there
I can't tell you how eagerly I wait for every new video!!! I have a question though: What would be the universe from the perspective of a photon? Do they feel infinite speed or no time?
If you study how muons are detected in the surface of earth despite having a mean lifetime of 2.2 μs, from there you can solve your question... I think.
@@AnotherFancyUser Thanks for the suggestion. I think i do know about that. But I am not referring to the time dilation from our frame of reference. I am wondering what the universe is from the frame of a photon. For it, there is no time lapsed between emitting and getting absorbed. If there is no time, how can there be any event(like emissions or absorption), any causality etc.
@@manuagrawal7468 Good question! Hmm.. perhaps it looks as though everything is frozen in place. Everything but the photon itself. So then it would travel from the point of emission to the point of absorption without anything, other than it's relative position, ever changing. Or another way to look at it would be that the entire universe looks like a picture moving at the speed of light while the photon remains still (as it would have to be if we are in its frame of reference). So time moves normally from the perspective of a photon, but nothing changes with time as the "proper time" of everything else would be constant. Idk either that's just my guess. Hope that made sense!
I'm confused by 12:05. It is often said - e.g. on Wikipedia - that there is only one type I theory and two heterotic theories; so which count is correct? Or are there two competing terminologies?
What an incredible moment for not only Professor Maldacena to have discovered the Ads/CFT Correspondence, but for each physicist that went from thinking it nonsensical to mind blowing. The equivalence of string theory on Anti- de Sitter space and a conformal field theory defined on the boundary of the AdS space to be discovered by a man who was proficient in both mathematics and physics was just serendipitous. What a well deserved Field's medal. To think, if Princeton had not realized his potential he very well may have wound up doing some menial task such as showing a first year grad student how to use an oscilloscope instead of being encouraged to think big. This was a fantastic video. I've always been fascinated with science and finding the underlying truth. I wish I weren't so bad at mathematics. Lol. 😆
Thanks, that did give me a tiny grasp of the similarities and differences between string theory, M Theory and ads/CFT correspondence. Now that's what I call a deep rabbit hole. Very informative.
Wow! What a brilliant, graspable, profoundly moving way of presenting this material! Having read Brian Greene and other physics for laymen books, it seems this summarizes and moves beyond these to help us see the geometry of h these theories. And I love the epistemology part, asking the questions “how do know this describes reality?” THANK YOU FOR THESE PROGRAMS!
This is fascinating how we are finding and searching for the nature of reality to know where we exist what we made up of and many people like you are dedicated to it thank you for explaining such a complex topic in very simple way
One theory that is being used to develop items for the DoD, since 1986, is by Applied Research Associates under license from Brilliant Light and Power, Inc. The theory used, Grand Unified Theory-Classical Physics, was used to develop 3 items, all working exactly as predicted by that theory. This is all past the stage of research, past the point of proof of principle and past the stage of a working lab version, and currently in an alpha version that is running in a pilot plant since October, 2022. After a year, the data from these pilots will be used for final engineering to make the first beta version for full commercial use. Hermann Haus, Institute professor of Electronic Engineering at MIT was approached in 1986 by the DoD to provide an explanation for how the Free Electron Laser works, at the QM scale. Haus' student, Randell Mills, continued that derivation into his full fledged GUT. This is all classical, with no assumptions such as waves and certainly not the point topology of the electron.
Thanks to AnyDesk, the blazing-fast Remote Desktop Software. Try it at: anydesk.com/en/downloads/windows?amp;amp;amp;amp;
yes
I see Zeta functions
String theory, when explained, always sounds to me like they have the right general idea, but they've got the order of things wrong- Or even completely backwards. What I mean by this is that they have the physical nature of the system inverted, because they rely too heavily on math and not enough on logic. So prodding around in the dark with math, but they're blind to the fact they've arranged everything inside out.
I would like to know if string theorists have tried seeing if they can, for instance, make the math work with the assumption that branes aren't wrapping around strings, but rather strings are pulled from the surface of branes. Similar to loose threads and stitching in a quilt. If the math for the strings and branes themselves works super well, and is super elegant, maybe it is describing something real, but they got the relationship between these fundamental objects wrong.
If that's what's going on, fixing the relationship in the theory may produce testable predictions, through a better understanding of what's physically happening, and describe how the quantum world produces the classical one.
Just a thought, anyway.
Anydesk is a common method for scammers to steal from you. It is far from safe and secure if you're not aware the tactics they use concerning that software. Plenty of scambait channels like Kitboga and Scammer Payback exemplify their methods and what to look for. Knowledge is power; protect yourselves.
Will try AnyDesk, but I want to tell you that I believe your channel is the best on UA-cam and that I and many others depend on it almost like life giving air ... Hope you read my comment, otherwise I'll feel my appreciation didn't reach you!
I listen to all of your channels on repeat and have to say - you have an immense gift to be able to convey all topics you speak on with such clarity and calmness, while staying grounded in reality. That it makes difficult topics appeal to everyone. You and your team do great work - keep it up!
I do not know that he has more channels, amazing!!!!
@@27122712ful Check out “The Entire History of the Earth” and his bro “Pete Kelly” his channel is “History Time”
Agreed
@@Chill_Mode_JD Thanks for the recommendation, I will do it. He is a truly encyclopedist and have a passion to explain.
I remember he has a medieval history channel... if my memory serves me well
These docs are well-written, expertly narrated, and in my opinion, far better than anything produced by major tv networks or streaming services in recent years. Much thanks to the creators for this content. Keep doing what you're doing and I'll consume with fervor.
You can not really find The Theory Of Everything till you know and understand as to who is it that who wants to know the theory of everything.
lol
@@onehighman3071
Dear brothers and sisters,
I made an effort and have published a series of papers (totally 9 nos.) on "Theory of Singularity" based on real dimensions of space-time. You shall check my work, in which the path(quantum orbits) of the fundamental particle are waves giving shape to the particles as strings. Also, you will see the curled up dimensions in my articles. I have tabulated total no. of dimensions required for theory of everything.
"New study of Gravitation and Fundamental theory of Singularity" [Volume 10; issue 03,04; 2023] - ARC JOURNALS - International journal of advanced research in physical science - Open access for free download.
Hope this new study serves one fundamental for general relativity and quantum mechanics. Theory of everything is not an easy task, as gravitation is nothing but a path to singularity. Gravitation is not a wave at any point of space-time, as it is believed to be in existing researches. I have shown to run along the axis of the detected waves or ripples and terminating in singularity. Moreover, as far as I worked, universally gravitation is only used to channel the forces for creation and destruction by nature....thank you
I'm no expert, but I know a thing or two about getting lost in the elegance of a problem and over-engineering a solution until it has no practical value. String Theory has always felt exactly like that to me.
If I’m recalling correctly this is similar topic of Sabine Hossenfelders book
Lost in Math
“How Beauty Leads Physics Astray”
"We got too many damn zeroes around here, and that blows stuff up into these pesky infinities. What we do is, we take all the zeroes and we say they're all little itsy-bitsies. And since the Central Limit Theorem and musical plucked strings have been around for three thousand years, so, well, the little itsy-bities are all going to vibrate sinusoidally before we even bother to look for them. We'll say they're strings, so at last we get the music of the spheres for a freebie," got it?
What could possibly go wrong? It's all obvious!
Shee-yit, a thing that obvious don't need no freakin' evidence.
What's elegant about it? I can let you borrow my dictionary if you want
String theory is full of holes it has more holes then standard model of particles.
@@Chill_Mode_JDI read that one! That's an excellent book! It really makes you think :)
While not a theoretical physicist or a mathematician of this caliber, I have, for years, followed the development of the various theories. The explanation of ideas presented in this video is the clearest I have seen. And for the first time, I understand how the theory works. Thank you.
You are so good at explaining things. Your voice is so soothing and simple, no extreme accent, and easily understandable. Also, the analogies you choose are amazing. For example, one analogy you used was “Like building Lego with boxing gloves” to describe our technology being too big to observe small things, and was super simple to understand. I fall asleep to your videos and they are amazing to think about. I hope you keep doing this and you find success in it.
Also, the analogies that are chosen are things observable in everyday life, which just furthers the ability to explain.
Looks like I'm sleeping good tonight! Thank you for continuing to be my favorite channel on this site.
Can I also pay with Schmeckels? I am just cracking a joke mate, I like what you did. Ohm, could you explain to me what NOK‘s are ?
I could listen to hours upon hours of this and never get tired. Sad how so much of society dont care about this sort of stuff anymore. Its literally learning how the universe works how cool is that???
These videos have deeply broadened my understanding of physics, cosmology, and the greater universe. The way you break down complex technical terms is incredible, and people with non-scientific backgrounds like myself can really expand their knowledge of the universe. Thank you so much, and please keep these coming!
I love how he blends every topic with the fascinating history of the science and scientists that led us to our modern theories.
21:41 Your videos are alway so clear and accessible it makes laymen-the average person-feel as though we’re a part of the conversation, rather than just on-lookers. Thank you for that-the inclusive way you present the science!
Your voice on these videos is single-handedly bringing my blood pressure down to manageable levels. And I get to hear some awesome science as a bonus! Thank you for sharing your video’s, they are simply a vacation from the craziness in my life!
I literally check constantly for updates from this channel. it is my favorite channels on all of UA-cam. I seriously believe that you, and your team make the best content in the world. On any medium plausible.
this is the way
Hi, if you sub to a channel then each new video will come in your sub feed. So you don't have to check for updates.
@@AboveEmAllProduction I have it set. I just don't see community posts
Yes, I have to know what is going on in the world so S2 underground and Perun are important, too but those are not fun. This channel is fun and I find myself checking for updates a couple times a week.
I can’t believe your videos are free. Seriously man, you are straight up gifted to be able to convey this stuff to people. Bravo! I’m here to stay!
Wow, this vid is incredible. The subject matter, the way it's explained, the graphics, bloody brilliant, love it!! Much love and appreciation to the creators.
Just epic!!! You lads managed to put in simple words very complex and fundamental concepts of how our entire Universe works. This channel is definitely among the top 🔝 five best channels on UA-cam that actually address this fundamental physics problems in a deep meaningful manner 😁👏👏👏👌
" fundamental concepts of how our entire Universe works."
i would rather say "of how we currently think our Universe works"... there is no doubt that our perception of how this universe works has dramatically changed over the last few centuries alone...there are many more centuries to come. Never be so arrogant and assume WE are the smartest right now and have figured it out finally! ...we are not...we havn't... but it's the best we have for now.
@@prince-solomon I couldn't agreed more, the standard model is the best and more precise theory we currently have, and it has not revealed of what the 95% of the universe it is made of... Although I must say our understanding of 3 of the fundamental forces is almost completed... but Gravity probably the one Force that should be better understood is at the moment a complete mystery... We still lack the mathematics to unifying it to the other three... But anyways I truly believe we are closer than ever to finally comprehending how the internal machinery of our universe works but we never know.... it could just be the tip of the iceberg 😉👌
Cheers and thanks for the comment my friend.
I never had such a clear explanation. You are a really good educator.
As a struggling layperson with an electrical background, in my attempts in trying to catch up with some of these quantum concepts, I find the rational explainers like these to be easier to visualise and kind of follow... even if I'm not able to get a grasp on everything... but the graphics are phenomenal on this and your other channels.... I often pause and/or rewind a section of the screen to admire some of the historic artwork, diagrams and photographs of important people places and things.
PBS spacetime is also really good but I agree. This channel is awesome.
I'm honestly happy with reading your comment. Keep that desire of knowledge no matter at what pace. I agree though, his graphics and explainations are the best and he's not shy with taking his time.
As a person with an electrical background, I recommend my book - "Theory of Everything in Physics and The Universe". It is in accessible language and explains the origin of electromagnetic polarity which will be of interest to you.
@@valentinmalinov8424 if you are advocating for electric universe, don't. It's been debunked so many times.
I dab cannabis oil then run the vids twice at 75% speed. At 67 understanding displaces passions at best! it's a quantum thing. Pauli exclusion principle be damned.
To a science enthusiast such as my self who knows very little about physics, this explanation… or rather explanations about String Theory was easy to understand (at an elementary level) and utterly enjoyable to learn. Thank you for this. Your work is appreciated.
I'm an experimental physicist and there's one thing about String Theory and also M-theory which has to be said:
Every prediction so far made by both that has been possible to test has been proven wrong.
After them being proven wrong, the theorists behind it then set out to modify the theory, so that it says the same or a similar thing, just reducing the scale to one which cannot be proven either right or wrong at the time, and when that is proven incorrect, they then set out to repeat this.
So, to me, M-Theory stands for Mysticist Theory.
There should be more comments like this on this video.
Aren't you just describing the scientific method? Form hypothesis, determine accuracy of hypothesis, refine hypothesis... Repeat?
@@shifusensei6442 Not quite.
If it was the scientific method applied, then the hypothesis would be proven at least not entirely incorrect.
But String theory and therefore all of its derivatives have been proven more than incorrect. oftentimes the opposite to the predictions has been proven.
But then the string theorists go: "No, this is too beautiful mathematically to be incorrect." and adjust only that part, so that it would simply not be measurable.
That is NOT the scientific method!
If it WAS the scientific method applied, then it would work exactly like what has happened to the maco-description of gravity, where first, Newton described it as a force field, which worked well enough, then it was adjusted by several people, until the minutae didn't fit quite right anymore, but mostly right, and then Einstein came up with general relativity, which was mostly right, but flawed, and then it was corrected upon further.
So, we can see, we had several flawed theories for gravitational attraction, which were mostly correct in their predictions, but just not quite right.
Note the word: Flawed.
If "String theory" (and thereby "M-Theory") was a flawed hypothesis, as most hypothesies are, then fine, no problem. Adjust the hypothesis.
But it is a WRONG hypothesis, not a flawed one.
I am not aware of any predictions from string theory or even M Theory that can be tested (unless you are suggesting for example supersymmetry)?
Please let me know which predictions have been tested that you refer to.
However, it has passed countless theoretical and mathematical tests, like being reduced to other theories.
What do you think of the general idea of there being a higher dimension?
To me, the way subatomic particles behave, popping in and out of existence seemingly at random, is indicative of a higher dimensional object being viewed at a lower dimension. The whole 10-26 dimensions seems ridiculous, but just a 4th spatial dimension does not seem ridiculous. I also recall reading that general relativity does hold up with a 4th spatial dimension added.
I subscribed to this channel a few months ago. The narrator makes me understand in a deeper way than other channels. Well done!
History of the Universe is by far the most interesting, and enlightening scientific series I ever found on the Net. Keep going, please!
Woah… this is really interesting. It’s so cool to hear more of the cutting edge of the progress of physics. So much of this information just isn’t as widely available for us laymen, but it’s always fascinated me and it’s so good to return to it.
progress in fiction
@@axeman2638 lol imagine saying physics is fiction. Yes string theory is theoretical but I challlenge you right now to point out any inconsistencies in the theory. Wait a second for that you would need a PHD and a whole life time of experience studying it
@@jackbradley4737 you need to go much deeper grasshopper.
Maths is not physics.
Theory does not create or define reality, it is at best a limited model, not reality itself.
Reasoning from false assumptions gets you nowhere.
Observation does not create reality, if a tree falls in a forest it makes a noise whether there is someone there to hear it or not.
Where is the experimental evidence?
@@axeman2638 lmao, ok armchair philosopher
@@axeman2638 and here we find the crazy intelligent contrarian who ironically cannot add anything to the conversation. A self professed genius.
Great video! Congratulations on communicating so effectively such complex concepts to those who don't understand the language of mathematics, but are yet capable of an intuitive grasp of such concepts. I'm sure we are all very grateful to you! 🤓
I greatly love this channel! I find the script compelling, and the visuals are marvelous. I will admit that my math aptitude was the lowest of all on those tests we took as students. Yet, while being challenged by ideas that are far over my head, my little peanut brain is stimulated here in exciting ways. There is excitement in the quest for understanding - the reach for comprehension, the yearning for meaning. Even though I remain hopelessly unqualified to engage these topics, the way these programs are put together is so verbally and visually beautiful, I cannot stop watching. Thank you.
Don't feel too bad about it, maths and reality are different things.
Beautifully said sir
E3
Great video! One thing I would appreciate would be actual related equations shown on screen more often in place of some of the b-roll of swimming through a sea of unrelated mathematical expressions
Good point
Thanks. One of the best material I've seen on string theory. Going to depth other videos / books often won't go, while keeping an extremely clear and fairly non-technical language 👍
I hope to prove you wrong about books. There is a book with the title - "Theory of Everything in Physics and The Universe" which in simple and clear language is explaining the fundamental elements and forces of the Universe"
I love your deep insight not only on the theories but on the meta level of physics as well
as an artist, this gave me shivers, and i felt something deep within me understand the truth within a lot of this, even though as you said, we might not be able to "resolve" those things at such small dimensions... wow. its kind of like the idea of being the artist who makes the picture, and knows every last little bit that went into its development and creation as a finished picture, versus the person who observes the finished picture and comments on what it is.
I also was also a professional artist in the past. Still, for unknown reasons, I turned to physics and managed to produce the final theory - the book - "Theory of Everything in Physics and The Universe" of course, they are trying to hide it. Still, it is available on Amazon and the major book outlets.
@@valentinmalinov8424 why they hide it?
@@valentinmalinov8424 in another comment you said you had an electrical background so I'm gonna call bs
@@tiergeist2639 For the same reason which they establish the inquisition and branded the scientists "heretics" They burn Giordano Bruno silenced Galileo and threatened Copernicus. You are an intelligent person and can figure it out by yourself.
@@valentinmalinov8424 that is true, just wanted to know your answer. They control everything sadly...
It's been forever, but i remember Brian Greenes book vaguely blowing my mind. Wow. Great videos guys .This is really down to earth for being some impossibly complex!
I think it's safe to say that I absolutely didn't understand this video but nevertheless enjoyed it. Spectacular work!
This is the best explanation of these fields of research I've ever heard! Very concise and interesting. Thank you
Your videos have done an incredible job of helping me understand things that previously went over my head. Your videos aren't just helping me learn the topics you've covered, but also have given me the context I need to understand things I'd been struggling to understand from other sources. I've been watching PBS spacetime for years, and I've struggled with some of the topics they cover, but since I found your channel, I've found that more and more of the topics covered over there have started to click for me. You have a gift, and you are a gift. This channel is what we were promised the internet would be.
God I love this channel so much
Don’t think God reads the comments
10% useful info, 90% useless filler garbage
Same. Only criticism is that he keeps talking about the cause moss, but never mentions the effect moss.
@@appleratpipe pretentious
You and me both.
Why did they make physics so boring in school ?! Your videos are so engaging and interesting. Second time watching this trying to get my head around it. Thank you for the content!
Because this is an interesting topic, but in school you have to learn boring stuff as well like electronics.
Plus you are probably older now so naturally have an interest, unlike in your teenage years.
@@craigfowler7098 I was interested back then, but I think the problem is that school gets too cough up in formulas and forget how interesting the theory actually is. I'm not saying we shouldn't study the mathematical aspect of it, I'm just saying that interest could be raised through thought provoking exercises and the practical applicability of the theory, just like in this video
Because its not useful for us low class workers. All we need to know is how to obey and work. After all, public school isn't interested in actually teaching us or expanding our intelligence. Its interested in beating out our individuality and make us compliant.
@@bfreitas456they also have trouble teaching math in an interesting manner.
I have just had my mind blown. This video was so good that I now actually in some minuscule way, feel like I slightly understand this fascinating topic. I’m also humbled by how ridiculously brilliant some people truly are. Mind boggling.
Yep the mathematics is horrendously complicated. I studied physics at degree level and I would struggle with it.
There’s not a better Chanel on UA-cam, I can’t believe these masterpieces of documentaries/videos are free.
All this content is amazing enough, but stands out to me even more is the excellence your team achieve in telling the story in a gripping manner while explaining arcane concepts in such a manner it makes it easy to understand even to a mere mortal like me.
Really incredible achievement, well done.
we are all mere mortals, buddy. 🙃
god i love your videos. i look forward to every upload! you and “SEA” are by far the best space and physics doc channels that exist on youtube. please never stop!!
WOW! I am going to be watching this one a few more times. Phenomenally exposition of a complex topic. The structure of the presentation, sprinkled with historical accounts of the theoretical developments is just SUPERB
I narrator gets much well deserved praise but would especially like to praise the writer(s) on this one. I was on the edge of my seat the entire time. What an incredible gift of turning complex research into an inspiring narrative. You guys are the best in the business!
so very well-articulated. Daniel nailed it on clarity and deliverance talents you show. Thanks for the great work by you and your team.
This dropped on the same day as the Learning Curve, so two great channels dropped at the same time. Thanks for another fantastic upload. I have mentioned your channel on their channel as well as mentioned them on yours. The more views science channels get the more the UA-cam algorithm might recommend them to more and more people.
I've been struggling for years to wrap my mathmetically challenged mind around some aspects of M theory and this forty five minute video has given me the closest peek yet. I've got just enough background to realise I'll probably never get there, even with this wonderful series.
then u know more then 99% of people claiming to understand how quantumphysics work^^
@@certaindeath7776 lolo, I'd consider myself a well read layman at best.
10:08 reminds me of how people kept with the Ptolemaic idea of the solar system because it seemed too neat and as it “should” be.
Could you PLEASE acknowledge both the writer and narrator of this fascinating and remarkable video? The explanations and pictorials are so remarkably clear and coherent that they reveal a depth of linguistic and diagrammatic expertise not normally gifted to us ordinary persons! Without being unnecessarily submerged in esoteric and arcane mathematics, I can now understand the (theoretical, at least) structure of the environment within which we all experience reality!
It seems like I'm always in a state of waiting for your next video to come out. Definitely my favorite space/science YT channel by far.
Are you still waiting
@@peter10195 of course!
Such a privilege to listen to these extraordinary topics be explained calmly and factually without clickbaity titles or having scientists be “in crisis” for one reason or another, like a lot of other channels do. These remind me of the Horizon series of the BBC. Great work.
This is very challenging material for a non-mathematician like me. But it’s all presented in manner that keeps my attention and encourages me think that some of it will stick to my brain eventually!
I love the soundtrack so much. The intro music just puts me in such a happy, curious mood regarding what I'm about to learn...
I love how the riemann zeta function naturally gives rise to group theories because of the varying point symmetry of the prime spiral. It's really pretty looking
My favourite channel, so pleased to see another upload! Your content makes me feel different about everything, in a good way. It puts mundane worries in perspective and gives me fascinating ideas to contemplate instead. Just thank you, you are so greatly appreciated. ❤️
I adore the way you deliver this topic with such tranquility and wonder. Going to definitely binge your videos!
Thank you for finally being the one and only person to vocalize many of the insights Ive had but never could find anyone to comfirm I was understanding correctly.
Thanks!
This was awesome! M theory and String theory always makes my head hurt and they are hard to wrap my head around them but, you make this more digestible. Do you plan to do any on super/ quantum gravity ( or have you already done them). I am fascinated by the idea that its so weak in comparison to the other forces but that it may permeate thru the brane in to the higher dimensions but how its also not like the other forces in that it currently exists as result of massive objects bending space /time and doesn't have a force carrier like the others.
They aren't actual theories, though. They are hypoethisis that can't be measured or observed on any scale whatsoever. It's like asking if aliens exist. It's a question, nothing more. Mathematics can be used to both prove you exist as well as prove you don't exist. So just because the math is somewhat sound, it doesn't make it correct.
@@gmork1090 thanks but I’m
Versed enough in science to understand the difference. Are you the creator of the channel, can you answer my actual question?
There's a very famous astrophysicist science communicator out there that could probably learn a thing or two about science communication by listening to this series of videos.
Superb work! I can not express how exited I get when I get a notification for a new "History of..." Video!
Ha Ha . Are you talking about the US or the UK ?
@@greywolf271 I think NDT.
@@Jack-pz4my That's what I thought too.
What do you think is the difference?
The quality of your videos is amazing. Thank you!
Continue to approach these scientific topics like a writer. Like KB CW series we are interested because you are interested in your research. Also like KB you have found the perfect music to tell your stories. Apparently it matters because I find your early works difficult, and I think it is the music and echoing narration. The soundscape is almost perfect now, except that the narration could improve with the right microphone and a carpeted room. Learning lots. I've heard you summarize a whole summer's reading in half an hour, so I know these require a massive amount of research. Keep it up. We are learning physics to our surprise, just as we were surprised by our interest in KB's CW.
It is such a joy to find your chanel in an ocean of shallow and useless content. It also makes me happy to see that so many people are interested and delighted to watch it. A big kudos to you, keep up the great work.
Well this was something else. I can't believe there is just an coincidence between the ideea presented and the experience the writing and the narration gives us. This was in amazing, intense,experience and i never felt something like this whaching a video . I am truly in awe. My utmost respect to this team!
Amazing content!! I am left speechless. You have really really inspired me with your work on physics. Thank you so much!
Already added Cecil a mil. Thanks to this channel
Please never stop sharing these great videos with us.
I have been falling down this rabbit hole for a while now but hadn't gotten the chance to watch this video until now. Excellent video, Had my utmost attention the whole way through watching.
you do an amazing job of explaining complex subjects in a digestable way, thank you
Always excited to see a new video on your channels! They are genuinely therapeutic!
Genuine questions I’m asking you for myself: how are you able to find solace in a universe indifferent to the preservation of life? How does the loveless, and strictly factual mathematics describing our cosmos aid as therapy? I’d want to start perceiving the physics of our cosmos as you do
@@Cardioid2035 for me it’s a combination of: the answer to it all is out there and the looking unveils crazy and wonderful happenings, and also knowledge of the vastness and power of the universe shows me that it’s in control, so all the energy I put into worrying or stressing can be relaxed a little, because I truly don’t have much effect on things. Much better to enjoy life
@@Cardioid2035 The idea of powerful external forces having any control over our lives and deciding that a world full of suffering is what they wanted to create sounds terrifying to me. I'm not sure how *that* gives people happiness, as opposed to the idea that we have the freedom to give our own lives meaning.
@@Cardioid2035 you good g?
@@Timurkani I’m a fully fledged human being with emotional intelligence… I’d say nowadays, no.
Chaos leads to order.
Order leads to chaos.
Equelibream returns to Order.
Order returns to chaos.
Rinse and repeat
This is the first time I’ve listened to something about string theory and was able to fully follow along. Great video.
😂
This channel is brilliant. I actually held a talk about AdS/CFT correspondence in a seminar, based on a chapter of a book. While the book of course describes the math in detail, it failes to describe the basic physical concept behind it as clearly as this video.
Its kinda insane where it feels like this theory could lead, like it'll lead to a greater understanding of where we are, our place in the universe, how vast dimensions can be beyond our own and what lies beyond there
I can't tell you how eagerly I wait for every new video!!!
I have a question though:
What would be the universe from the perspective of a photon? Do they feel infinite speed or no time?
That is literally the next video 🤗
If you study how muons are detected in the surface of earth despite having a mean lifetime of 2.2 μs, from there you can solve your question... I think.
@@AnotherFancyUser Thanks for the suggestion. I think i do know about that. But I am not referring to the time dilation from our frame of reference. I am wondering what the universe is from the frame of a photon. For it, there is no time lapsed between emitting and getting absorbed. If there is no time, how can there be any event(like emissions or absorption), any causality etc.
@@HistoryoftheUniverse Wow 😁! Seems I am in luck here!!
@@manuagrawal7468 Good question! Hmm.. perhaps it looks as though everything is frozen in place. Everything but the photon itself. So then it would travel from the point of emission to the point of absorption without anything, other than it's relative position, ever changing. Or another way to look at it would be that the entire universe looks like a picture moving at the speed of light while the photon remains still (as it would have to be if we are in its frame of reference). So time moves normally from the perspective of a photon, but nothing changes with time as the "proper time" of everything else would be constant. Idk either that's just my guess. Hope that made sense!
Now that you've reminded the world, you've probably started a rapidly-growing "flogiston truther" movement.
I will NEVER tell my Dad about it.
Truly well written and produced.
Thanks Jack.
Thank you for this very clear description of some very hard-to-describe concepts.
Very clear delivery of sometimes confusing material. I hope to see more of your work...
the quality of the videos and the script writings are superb.
You deserve more subs and views!
Raise your hands if you fall asleep daily to history of the universe and are now equipped with fun cosmology facts at parties 😊
I'm confused by 12:05. It is often said - e.g. on Wikipedia - that there is only one type I theory and two heterotic theories; so which count is correct? Or are there two competing terminologies?
ur vids help me fall asleep, not to say that they r boring, i find them rly relaxing. thank you
Shout-out to Joseph Conlon for his work on this vid. Good job guys
What an incredible moment for not only Professor Maldacena to have discovered the Ads/CFT Correspondence, but for each physicist that went from thinking it nonsensical to mind blowing. The equivalence of string theory on Anti- de Sitter space and a conformal field theory defined on the boundary of the AdS space to be discovered by a man who was proficient in both mathematics and physics was just serendipitous. What a well deserved Field's medal. To think, if Princeton had not realized his potential he very well may have wound up doing some menial task such as showing a first year grad student how to use an oscilloscope instead of being encouraged to think big. This was a fantastic video. I've always been fascinated with science and finding the underlying truth. I wish I weren't so bad at mathematics. Lol. 😆
*_Science & history, what a truly awesome combo_** .*
Could not agree more.
Thanks, that did give me a tiny grasp of the similarities and differences between string theory, M Theory and ads/CFT correspondence. Now that's what I call a deep rabbit hole. Very informative.
Wow! What a brilliant, graspable, profoundly moving way of presenting this material! Having read Brian Greene and other physics for laymen books, it seems this summarizes and moves beyond these to help us see the geometry of h these theories. And I love the epistemology part, asking the questions “how do know this describes reality?” THANK YOU FOR THESE PROGRAMS!
Brilliant, as usual, it's this channel and their fantastic posts that bring you to the epiphany that we're living in a simulation.
Thank you for all of your hard work! Our knowledge is increasing rapidly and its super exciting!
Check out my Theory of Warples here on UA-cam! 🤓
I saw the title and my brain was just like: GEOMETRY DASH
Wait till they find the Theory of Everything 2
This is fascinating how we are finding and searching for the nature of reality to know where we exist what we made up of and many people like you are dedicated to it thank you for explaining such a complex topic in very simple way
my favorite YT series...I'm shocked at this amazing content! THANK YOU! I believe I can fly!!!!!!!!
yall the m is clearly “membrane theory” what else would it be 😭
menace theory
It's easier to think of it as a 1D boundary. By 1D I mean one dimensional
You need a Patreon!
M-theory is pretty much a fact!
One theory that is being used to develop items for the DoD, since 1986, is by Applied Research Associates under license from Brilliant Light and Power, Inc. The theory used, Grand Unified Theory-Classical Physics, was used to develop 3 items, all working exactly as predicted by that theory. This is all past the stage of research, past the point of proof of principle and past the stage of a working lab version, and currently in an alpha version that is running in a pilot plant since October, 2022. After a year, the data from these pilots will be used for final engineering to make the first beta version for full commercial use. Hermann Haus, Institute professor of Electronic Engineering at MIT was approached in 1986 by the DoD to provide an explanation for how the Free Electron Laser works, at the QM scale. Haus' student, Randell Mills, continued that derivation into his full fledged GUT. This is all classical, with no assumptions such as waves and certainly not the point topology of the electron.
I have learned to take two excedrin and a zantac before watching your videos...it helps. Really love this channel and glad I found it.
I hate these videos. They show me how low my IQ is.
Thank you for such informative and beautifully composed videos. I have enjoyed many of your videos and I have found them to be top notch.
This is entirely over my head and yet, it’s still somehow fascinating lol
WHat is the symbol at 40:31 between the fraction and the bracket? Would really appreciate it if anyone knows
I have watched this 3 more times since it was published and I still love it. Thank you
That was the best description of how and why M theory works mathematically and is consistent with what we can test. Wow
Nowhere has it been said its testable except mathematically, even then not sure