It's important to distinguish bridging and bonding social capital, which is between and within groups, respectively. Within group bonding social capital is often based on sameness, but the nature of sameness is usually based, as Durkheim suggested, on the division of labor. If you have a community of factory workers, they have a lot in common. But if everyone does a different job, they have less in common (Durkheim would say they have organic instead of mechanical solidarity). The term homophily is used to identify bonds based on sameness. Homophily can be based on several different criteria, such as growing up in the same neighborhood, attending the same place of worship, rooting for the same football team, and so on. As Flora and Flora point out, you can have high within group bonding social capital and still have a fractured community--you need bridging social capital ties between groups.
Social capital! This reminds me of the movie “It’s a wonderful life” where everyone at the end, all his neighbors, everyone in his community come together at the end to pitch in and help, him and his family.
I would have to disagree. Social capital comes from a developing relationship between people. It is the by product. In reality it is part of being in a connected community.
@@herdingtogether8822 there are no indicators of communities that are highly diverse and have high social capital in any of the data reports on social capital so your idealism is wrong.
It's important to distinguish bridging and bonding social capital, which is between and within groups, respectively. Within group bonding social capital is often based on sameness, but the nature of sameness is usually based, as Durkheim suggested, on the division of labor. If you have a community of factory workers, they have a lot in common. But if everyone does a different job, they have less in common (Durkheim would say they have organic instead of mechanical solidarity). The term homophily is used to identify bonds based on sameness. Homophily can be based on several different criteria, such as growing up in the same neighborhood, attending the same place of worship, rooting for the same football team, and so on. As Flora and Flora point out, you can have high within group bonding social capital and still have a fractured community--you need bridging social capital ties between groups.
Exactly. This is just a simple introduction to the basic concept. But there is a big difference between both types of social capital.
Social capital!
This reminds me of the movie “It’s a wonderful life” where everyone at the end, all his neighbors, everyone in his community come together at the end to pitch in and help, him and his family.
Amazing
You can't have diversity and high social capital. You need to be from a similar culture, background, and possible racial group.
I would have to disagree. Social capital comes from a developing relationship between people. It is the by product. In reality it is part of being in a connected community.
@@herdingtogether8822 there are no indicators of communities that are highly diverse and have high social capital in any of the data reports on social capital so your idealism is wrong.
@@herdingtogether8822 name me several town, city or village that have high social capital and is racially diverse
@@steve19811New York city.
@@dhshsvsingd3374 New York does not have high social capital.