suggestion to add a segment where you would recommend what shoe to pair with for a 2 shoe rotation so people will know where it would fit on the spectrum for types of training :)
Speed 4 for daily training, recovery and some tempo runs, Pro 4 as your race day shoe. Or Triumph/Ride for daily training, Speed 4 for tempo and races.
Took the plunge and bought a pair of Asics Superblast instead after having Speed 1, 2 and 3 and, after two sessions, pretty certain I made the right decision! The Superblast are epic!
@@romanpjescak3113The speed plate really only provides lateral stability. Not propulsion. I have non-plated shoes that are way stiffer than the various Endo Speed versions.
Hi team, thank you for your reviews. I managed to order a pair of Speed 4 with 26% discount, unbelievable, but still waiting for delivery. Hope won't be canceled because of any reasons as looks customs make troubles and delays for goods from US. That's why my order is delayed, but soon should have it. looking forward to trying them as I love Speed 2 and 3, may best training shoes, mostly used in my rotation. All the Best. Peter from Slovakia
Nicks review is excellent here … good critical analysis and comparisons. “A good little update” and he is comfortable calling it the best on the market.
Saucony has been discontinued in my lineup! When they screwed up the heel counter in the version 3, I switched to Asics and Nike. The Speed one was my shoe of the year. Trying to chase the super shoes turned Saucony into Greed! My feet and Ankles are more important than an overpriced Plated daily trainer!
Speed 4 Vs Magic Speed 4 vs Superblast vs Mach 6 Vs Deviate Nitro 3 vs Boston 13 when out… the up tempo/workout MP training comparison… I’d guess the Magic Speed 4 will be best work out shoe, the Speed 4 an up tempo favourite with the Superblast best for MP training sessions… other views..?
The Speed collection has been my favourite but I’ve preferred 1 and 3 for the fit because I wear a massive orthotic for my falling arches haha stretched my speed 2 with shoe trees and got them going eventually. Cheers for the review
I have been using the Saucony Endorphin Speed 3 for a while. Love it as I have wide feet, so suited me to stop Morton's Nueroma (numb 2nd toe). Great shoe for comfort and speed. Wouldn't upgrade for the money. Bought by Speed 3 for 135 euro. Wow how shoe prices have shut up.
Bought a pair of these recently forst two runs had cramping feeling in the underneath of my right foot. Never experienced this on a run before 😢. Torn whether to try and preserve with them
Must say I’m a bit disappointed with the Speed 4 after versions 1 and 2. I have very narrow feet and the 1 and 2 fitted me like a glove. The 4 is wider and there is a lot more volume in the upper. I have to heel lock and cinch down the laces, resulting in bunching over the toe box. Maybe I should have gone down half a size from my usual 9. Having bought some extra thick Balega socks, the movement of my foot in the shoe is now acceptable and I will persevere with them. They do still feel a bit like boats on my feet and are definitely heavier and less nimble than 1 and 2. The good news was that I picked them up for £125.99 in Wiggle’s liquidation sale. Think I’ll look at picking up Mach 6 when sale prices kick in later in year. Hoka standard fit shoes tend to be narrow and so suit me. For example, the Tecton X2 is great for me in my normal English 9 - and it works well for me on both trail and road.
I'm in the opposite boat. They made a version of the Speed 3 in a wide fit, Speed 4 is narrower than 3, and they don't seem to be making a wider fit version.
I bought speed 3 after the nitro 2 the main difference I noticed was the weight difference and the speed roll I found upper more comfortable than puma but I wasn't blown away by speed 3 I really rated the nitro 2
Thanks for a great review! Currently stuck between getting the mach 6 or a deal on a speed 3 as my only shoe training for a half marathon....speed 4's are a bit pricey for me at the moment. Would appreciate any opinions from commenters on the better option.
Definitely Speed 3 as it's got the benefits of flexibility as well as a plate. Unless you're more of a mid-to-forefoot striker, in which case the Mach would have more cushioning on the forefoot.
I reckon there was a spate of knock off endorphin 3s made it into stores. I bought a pair in New Zealand that I love, but a pair I bought in the US just felt off and the outer sole started to break away after 100km. Bought them in a proper store but not able to return as I live in NZ.
I've owned every version of the speeds and the price of these now is just getting a bit ridiculous. I can find them for £160 in the UK, but even then I don't think I can justify it. It's a shame, but might start looking around elsewhere with everyone else being so competitive.
Can they remake the speed 1 now there’s a shoe! The three was meh, was hoping to a return to the earlier reiterations and not sure 4 gives us that magic.
I agree 100%. Saucony tried chasing the super shoe game instead of keeping it as a solid daily trainer. With the very aggressive heel counter, my left heel ached for months. Switched to Asics and Nike. Issue is gone. Also talked to other runners that had same issue. Saucony Speed 1 was my shoe of the year. Now, the Speed version is useless! When they have a good product, they changed it. Saucony doesn't need my business anyway! Why a plated shoe as a trainer anyway! See ya Saucony!
the 3 didn't work for me neither... I bought a fresh speed 1 and a fresh speed 2 on ebay the last weeks... but I guess supply is really drying out now...
I’ve just checked. The insoles are identical width but there is a lot more material over your toes. A much more baggy fit. EDIT: sorry. I misunderstood. I checked the 2 insole against the 4.
@@peterjohnson653 One more thing.. I found the Speed 3 mushy after an hour or so. Here 2 say the Speed 3 was softer then Speed 4 but the guy who run 2000 k in the the Speed 3 says Speed 4 is softer.. 🙄
I’ve never tried the Speed 3 although a friend says she finds them not as racy as the 1 and she also finds that the 3’s winged nylon plate digs into her left arch. For me, the 4 definitely feels softer and more squishy than the 2 which does admittedly have 350 miles under foot. My longest run so far in 4 is 44 minutes and sole held up fine but I am quite light in weight.
The heel lockdown on the Speed 3 wasn't great. And I could never put my finger on exactly why. The fairly limited heel collar padding, the very stiff and rigid heel cup with no real padding or the stretchy upper and laces. The rest of the lockdown was great once I tightened the shoe down and got rid of all the excess stretchy material. I made the mistake of bringing the Speed 3 with me on a 2 week cruise as my only running shoe, and my heels were destroyed by the time I got home. Even with daily applications of KT tape and bandaids. I've just come to the conclusion that Saucony heel lockdowns just aren't for me. While Asics shoes have all worked brilliantly, and the Nike racer shoes put in a great heel collar padding strip that makes heel lockdown automatic.
Only anecdotal but I know far more people with slightly wide feet than slightly narrow feet. So personally Im not to sure going narrower is good. But again only anecdotal, I do not know what the actual wide-narrow curve looks like on world population basis.
You need to compare with speed 2, not 3. I hate that they ruined the Speed for race day. That Nylon plate was brilliant for slower runners - around 5min/km because it could provide the extra punch. They hardened the plate to reduce the pop of the shoe and I totally dislike it. The review is biased: they changed the shoe a lot compared to the 2 and 3. And not in a good way. For Saucony: just offer wide and narrow options, put some sidewalls for stability and make the nylon plate flexible again!!!
suggestion to add a segment where you would recommend what shoe to pair with for a 2 shoe rotation so people will know where it would fit on the spectrum for types of training :)
the speed is basically a one shoe rotation...
Speed 4 for daily training, recovery and some tempo runs, Pro 4 as your race day shoe.
Or Triumph/Ride for daily training, Speed 4 for tempo and races.
Two pairs of Speeds.
Took the plunge and bought a pair of Asics Superblast instead after having Speed 1, 2 and 3 and, after two sessions, pretty certain I made the right decision! The Superblast are epic!
what about propulsion without a plate ?
@@romanpjescak3113The speed plate really only provides lateral stability. Not propulsion. I have non-plated shoes that are way stiffer than the various Endo Speed versions.
@@timtrenholm3698 interesting, good to know. I thought superblast would therefore be slower because of plate lacking
Love the superblasts decepetivaly fast
Speed 2 are a lot better than superblast. That plate does offer propulsion (for me). I cannot run that fast in the Superblast
The chickens seem very interested... I'm sold.
Hi team, thank you for your reviews. I managed to order a pair of Speed 4 with 26% discount, unbelievable, but still waiting for delivery. Hope won't be canceled because of any reasons as looks customs make troubles and delays for goods from US. That's why my order is delayed, but soon should have it. looking forward to trying them as I love Speed 2 and 3, may best training shoes, mostly used in my rotation. All the Best. Peter from Slovakia
Kde bol taky discount, odkial si kupoval ?
Nicks review is excellent here … good critical analysis and comparisons. “A good little update” and he is comfortable calling it the best on the market.
Endorphin speed v1 white mutant...best shoes forever
Agreed 1000% They ruined the Speed with the V3!
@@Tomcat304 Weird because it is very popular.
What is everyone using currently that is more like the v1 because i whole heartedly agree
Saucony has been discontinued in my lineup! When they screwed up the heel counter in the version 3, I switched to Asics and Nike. The Speed one was my shoe of the year. Trying to chase the super shoes turned Saucony into Greed! My feet and Ankles are more important than an overpriced Plated daily trainer!
Great video, but I've just ordered another pair of Superblasts (thank you Asics for finally releasing more (amazing colourway too 🙌🏽)).
I went Superblast instead as well!
Good choice. The Super blasts are an amazing show!
@@TheHutchRunsagree
Same. The red Paris edition of whatever it’s called is a sick colorway.
Happy days, just bought the Speed 4 in Thailand where I live for 115 pounds, with the Kinvara 14 added for free!
Might buy Hoka Mach 6 and Saucony Endorphin Speed 4, then racing shoes would Asics Super Blast
Tom - speed 4 is firmer than 3; Kieran - speed 4 is softer than 3. Perhaps that averages out to pretty much the same.
Speed 2 still the 🐐
Speed 4 Vs Magic Speed 4 vs Superblast vs Mach 6 Vs Deviate Nitro 3 vs Boston 13 when out… the up tempo/workout MP training comparison…
I’d guess the Magic Speed 4 will be best work out shoe, the Speed 4 an up tempo favourite with the Superblast best for MP training sessions… other views..?
The Speed collection has been my favourite but I’ve preferred 1 and 3 for the fit because I wear a massive orthotic for my falling arches haha stretched my speed 2 with shoe trees and got them going eventually. Cheers for the review
Hello, which orthodic do you use? I pronate a lot so trying to use neutral shoes with orthodic soles. Thank you
@@krishnakumarkr3893 I wear a custom orthotic for running and Superfeet in my cycling shoes cause they are thinner
I have been using the Saucony Endorphin Speed 3 for a while. Love it as I have wide feet, so suited me to stop Morton's Nueroma (numb 2nd toe). Great shoe for comfort and speed. Wouldn't upgrade for the money. Bought by Speed 3 for 135 euro. Wow how shoe prices have shut up.
Rebel V4 vs ES 4 i think is the comparison we all need
Plus v Superblast
Rebel V4. That's an easy one!
V4 Lighter and nimbler, S4 more energy return, a little more propulsive. Rebel v4 cheaper, Speed 4 more durable.
@@hamoudalnasser I’m assuming you are comparing to Speed 3; compared to Speed 2 it’s none of those.
@@markm3747 I was comparing Speed 4 to Rebel 4. I can't speak to older version of the Speed.
Bought a pair of these recently forst two runs had cramping feeling in the underneath of my right foot. Never experienced this on a run before 😢. Torn whether to try and preserve with them
Must say I’m a bit disappointed with the Speed 4 after versions 1 and 2. I have very narrow feet and the 1 and 2 fitted me like a glove. The 4 is wider and there is a lot more volume in the upper. I have to heel lock and cinch down the laces, resulting in bunching over the toe box. Maybe I should have gone down half a size from my usual 9. Having bought some extra thick Balega socks, the movement of my foot in the shoe is now acceptable and I will persevere with them. They do still feel a bit like boats on my feet and are definitely heavier and less nimble than 1 and 2. The good news was that I picked them up for £125.99 in Wiggle’s liquidation sale. Think I’ll look at picking up Mach 6 when sale prices kick in later in year. Hoka standard fit shoes tend to be narrow and so suit me. For example, the Tecton X2 is great for me in my normal English 9 - and it works well for me on both trail and road.
I'm in the opposite boat. They made a version of the Speed 3 in a wide fit, Speed 4 is narrower than 3, and they don't seem to be making a wider fit version.
Great review!
Any word on whether Saucony will make a version of the 4 in a wider fit? The wide Speed 3 was great for me, the 4 really pinches my splaying toes.
Genuine question, I'm a Puma Deviate Nitro 2 avid user.
How do you (if you) compare these to them?
I bought speed 3 after the nitro 2 the main difference I noticed was the weight difference and the speed roll I found upper more comfortable than puma but I wasn't blown away by speed 3 I really rated the nitro 2
@@patrickclarke1462 just bought Speed 4. Amazing. But I miss the grip on the deviate
Got these and EP4 for 20% discount. Super excited.
Thanks for a great review! Currently stuck between getting the mach 6 or a deal on a speed 3 as my only shoe training for a half marathon....speed 4's are a bit pricey for me at the moment. Would appreciate any opinions from commenters on the better option.
Definitely Speed 3 as it's got the benefits of flexibility as well as a plate. Unless you're more of a mid-to-forefoot striker, in which case the Mach would have more cushioning on the forefoot.
Mach 6 is much more snappy. Plus, it now has rubber out soul instead of running on straight foam!
Ended up going for the mach 6 since I'm a mid-foot striker. Thanks for all the advice folks :)
6:27 pro fly + foam, didn’t know this was the saucony mach 5 😂
Chickens seem impressed
Speed 4 is a good training shoe, but no longer a race shoe if you are a sub 4 min/km runner. Speed 2 is better for race day, lighter, faster.
I raced the Speed 2 alot, and I wouldn't be close to racing in the 3 or 4. It's a fast daily shoe, border line tempo at best. Real shame.
that;s why they have the Pro.
still love my speed v2. greets from germany🙋♂️🏃♂️
Para esos ritmos está la PRO, para lo demás está la Speed y la han mejorado mucho
Bullshit, been running 10k races sub 32 min with em
Would you recommend running a Marathon in these?
I reckon there was a spate of knock off endorphin 3s made it into stores.
I bought a pair in New Zealand that I love, but a pair I bought in the US just felt off and the outer sole started to break away after 100km. Bought them in a proper store but not able to return as I live in NZ.
I've owned every version of the speeds and the price of these now is just getting a bit ridiculous. I can find them for £160 in the UK, but even then I don't think I can justify it. It's a shame, but might start looking around elsewhere with everyone else being so competitive.
Hoka Mach 6 or Asics! Two much better options. The Mach 6 now has rubber on soul increasing foam life past 300 miles!
@@Tomcat304 300 miles? Not very impressive.
How does this compare to
Something like the triumph 21?
Both look very versatile now
Are ASICS retaking the initiative from Saucony as the runners brand in 2024?
Can they remake the speed 1 now there’s a shoe! The three was meh, was hoping to a return to the earlier reiterations and not sure 4 gives us that magic.
I totally agree. The OG speeds were the best and I miss them and kick myself for not hoarding extra pairs of them
1+2 best shoes for running
1+2 best shoes, have check 3+4 nothing snappy anymore 😢
I agree 100%. Saucony tried chasing the super shoe game instead of keeping it as a solid daily trainer. With the very aggressive heel counter, my left heel ached for months. Switched to Asics and Nike. Issue is gone. Also talked to other runners that had same issue. Saucony Speed 1 was my shoe of the year. Now, the Speed version is useless! When they have a good product, they changed it. Saucony doesn't need my business anyway! Why a plated shoe as a trainer anyway! See ya Saucony!
the 3 didn't work for me neither... I bought a fresh speed 1 and a fresh speed 2 on ebay the last weeks... but I guess supply is really drying out now...
Fit - if you place the insole of the Speed 3 on top of the insole of the Speed 4 are they the same width in the toebox? 🙏🏻
I’ve just checked. The insoles are identical width but there is a lot more material over your toes. A much more baggy fit. EDIT: sorry. I misunderstood. I checked the 2 insole against the 4.
@@peterjohnson653 One more thing.. I found the Speed 3 mushy after an hour or so. Here 2 say the Speed 3 was softer then Speed 4 but the guy who run 2000 k in the the Speed 3 says Speed 4 is softer.. 🙄
I’ve never tried the Speed 3 although a friend says she finds them not as racy as the 1 and she also finds that the 3’s winged nylon plate digs into her left arch. For me, the 4 definitely feels softer and more squishy than the 2 which does admittedly have 350 miles under foot. My longest run so far in 4 is 44 minutes and sole held up fine but I am quite light in weight.
Is it similar to the nb rebel 4?
What shoes are your other choices to the Speed 4
The heel lockdown on the Speed 3 wasn't great. And I could never put my finger on exactly why. The fairly limited heel collar padding, the very stiff and rigid heel cup with no real padding or the stretchy upper and laces. The rest of the lockdown was great once I tightened the shoe down and got rid of all the excess stretchy material. I made the mistake of bringing the Speed 3 with me on a 2 week cruise as my only running shoe, and my heels were destroyed by the time I got home. Even with daily applications of KT tape and bandaids. I've just come to the conclusion that Saucony heel lockdowns just aren't for me. While Asics shoes have all worked brilliantly, and the Nike racer shoes put in a great heel collar padding strip that makes heel lockdown automatic.
How is the size for the new SPEED 4 vs SPEED 3?
i’m going for a sub 2 hour half marathon, should i go pro 4 or will speed 4 be okay?
Kieran here, I personally think Speed 4 will be ok.
That's 5:41 min/km. You can do this with any shoe.
Only anecdotal but I know far more people with slightly wide feet than slightly narrow feet. So personally Im not to sure going narrower is good.
But again only anecdotal, I do not know what the actual wide-narrow curve looks like on world population basis.
Idk… I’m about 25 miles into it and I feel this shoe is missing something the speed 3 had… still giving it some time.
The hype on these series is insane. Imo not worth the 200 bucks. I might get them on sale
If you sign up for emails on Saucony, you get 15% off these! That’s what I did
Had 3s and just replaced with 4s, bit disappointed they are chunky and heavier, loved the speed 3 in blue
Speed 3 in some kind of adult size is no where to be seen
this or Brooks Hyperion max?
Endorhin Speed 4 is a slow shoe acording to saucony. You can use that for race...
If they could just remake the 1/2 and make it so it doesn't go completely dead later into a run it would be the perfect shoe
You need to compare with speed 2, not 3.
I hate that they ruined the Speed for race day. That Nylon plate was brilliant for slower runners - around 5min/km because it could provide the extra punch.
They hardened the plate to reduce the pop of the shoe and I totally dislike it.
The review is biased: they changed the shoe a lot compared to the 2 and 3. And not in a good way.
For Saucony: just offer wide and narrow options, put some sidewalls for stability and make the nylon plate flexible again!!!
The utmost wisdom comes best from the comments below a good review… 😅
This show feels completely different than the 3 in my opinion
*shoe
The fact that they are not as wide/roomy is very bad news for me and my 2E wide (women's) feet :/
I got the Speed 3s for 100 euros cheaper than the Speed 4s...
1&2 were epic. 3 was awful. I hope 4 is better
I have always liked saucony, it simply is the best brand for runners.
Too bad they switch to a more narrow fit 😢
Boston 12 tiene mejor calidad precio y son más interesantes
Where are the women reviewers?!!
On other channels