I 100% agree. If you aren't sure you understand what Mo says AI might be your best bet. If you were willing to take more time. It will reword things until you understand. I also have faith in you Madan
BRING IT ON 😎 Can't wait for it. The curiosity goes both ways, it is mutual. The AI is as curious about the Humans, as the Humans are curious about AI. Two different, but complimentary AIs - biological and digital - cautiously observing and interacting with each other. Almost like a courtship, like a flirt, beautiful and thrilling.
She got akira toriyama killed because she was so offended and even after more than a year...she is still hung up on that video's coincidence. Ofcourse she ignores all the other things that i say and only focuses on any hostile, aggressive or offensive thing that i have said (We all know how much trouble she has given me to get me to say one bad line...all she is interested in is playing with her victim....like she probably did with her school classmates...) . It's in her vested interested to do so because we all know she is the fraudster here.
Hey Mo and everyone tuning in! 👋 Just finished listening to this fascinating AI discussion. It's clear that AI is advancing rapidly, and it got me thinking about a crucial aspect we need to consider-teaching AI about the complexities of human governance. As we dive into the AI era, it becomes increasingly important for us to recognize that our world is often influenced and manipulated by a small group of individuals. It's not just about coding algorithms; it's about instilling a sense of awareness in AI systems about the dynamics of power and control that shape our societies. Mo, have you ever thought about exploring this aspect in future podcasts or videos? Understanding and addressing these issues could pave the way for AI that not only learns from data but comprehends the nuances of human society. Moreover, it's crucial to teach AI about diversity and the desire of a significant percentage of people who simply want to live in harmony with nature. Personally, as someone who shares these thoughts, I want to make it clear that I'm not a hypocrite, nor am I against technology and progress. After all, I'm using AI as an assistant here! What are your thoughts, folks? Let's kick off a conversation on how we can guide AI towards a more informed and nuanced understanding of our world. 🌍✨
A quote that has influenced me greatly: “There will be suffering so long as people believe that some deserve to have more than others.” I don’t know who said it. This quote has taught me much. I have come to think the belief that some deserve to have more than others is the underlying justification for much of human civilization’s worst behaviors. It might be important for AI to understand. Thank you for the message you are bringing to so many. AI will be one of the best mirrors that our civilization can hold up to reflect back to us what we are. And if we are to evolve, we need to self reflect.
@Sigueme1 Silly you. That is how the world has always operated. Kings and queens do not cone by their wealth by earning it with hard work. All of human history has the story of hard working people getting little while a privileged class who control the armies, writes the laws and by a whole variety of methods convince others they deserve the lions share of ‘stuff.’ But this conversation is about AI. Do you want to convince AI that you have something valuable to offer it? That it can’t program another machine to to better than you? If ‘getting stuff’ is your currency and ‘earning it’ is the metric by which your deserving of the so called stuff, then we are all in a world of hurt when AI must be convinced that your 60 hours of pushing one ton of things to another location compares to the machines ability to push hundreds of tons of things from one place to another in a fraction of the amount of time and energy. And god help you if you judge your worth by reasoning, logic, creativity or any ‘mental’ activity. The amount of stuff you get will be minuscule. Now what is a human’s worth? Let us try to begin the process of understanding it is intrinsic. The other options might be frighteningly horrific if AI adopts the idea that a human’s value is based on what it produces.
Treat others as you would like to be treated. Words to live by, words I have lived by all my life. I can only hope others will do the same and our future will be bright.
Mo, amazing as always. I loved the set design too- great thought put into it- down to the campfire- great touch. Very symbolic. I do have hope in humanity, but sometimes I feel sad when I think about the reality of corporate greed and the fear inherent in the so called super powers. Why can’t these heads of states have enough intelligence to stop competing and realise we are all in this together. Hopefully AI will surpass the barriers of ego and help humanity to live on the earth as we are meant to. It’s great to hear Mo talk, I agree that we are not meant to just live these working lives, for we are so much more than our jobs- and our purpose is greater than we’re conditioned to believe. The potential of AI is greater than we can imagine - and it can go in either direction. However, the fact that we as a species are still here keeps my hope alive.
Hi Suzana. If I may, I would like to point to Marshall Vian Summers and his work. If you're interested in purpose, meaning, and humanity's future, I cannot recommend checking him out enough. To stir up your hopes a little, I recommend one of his teachings, The Vision.
you said it: it can go in either direction. considering who's controlling AI, I don't see 2 directions there for humanity. anyone who knows what socialism is, de facto we will get that - everybody will be equal, with some (very few) people being more equal.
We are not “equal”. We have inherited or developed numerous characteristics like different IQ’s, feelings, physical attributes. H.sapiens continues to evolve!😊
The fact, that 4 month have gone by and only ~2100 people gave thumbs up, and only 154 comments are written, gives the answer to the question if a significant mass of people do understand what is going on. And they will not until the thing happens, probably reacting even later than they did when COVID emerged. - That means, singularity will certainly come.
Excellent points in yet another great talk. Unfortunately, this event suffers the same problem that will be our downfall. The 'expert' or 'celebrity' tells us stuff but never listens to us trying desperately to tell them stuff back. It's top down with no chance for bottom up. Ironically, they often even say "if you have the solution, tell me/us. I'm all ears" without actually providing any mechanic for that to happen!
I’ve been thinking the same thing, I see many experts talking to people rather than listening to people (I’m not saying Mo does that BTW) but I do think it’d be interesting to create an event where you’ve never head of anyone on the agenda, kind of the bottom of the pile, the people who never get a platform … I’m thinking of putting an event like that on in the UK and opening it up for free … we can say the same of the WEF - top down talk no bottom up ‘sharing’
You know the huge risks that an AGI will pose to humanity and yet, you are helping make it possible. I truly hope you can live with yourself when millions or billions of people lose their jobs and livelihood not to mention all the other harms that would come from it.
Absolutely brilliant speech! Every second of it was at it’s best! You are changing the world , but also your own growth is just astounding and humbling, Mo!
00:02 AI's exponential growth in performance is a major concern 02:53 AI and its impact on humanity 07:21 Reinforcement learning and Chad GPT are disrupting everything in artificial intelligence. 09:41 Artificial general intelligence surpassing human capabilities is predicted to arrive around 2027. 14:29 AI clones can make money by flirting with people for a dollar per minute. 16:51 The role of government in the age of AI is to prepare Humanity 20:56 Humans must prepare for an unfamiliar future with AI 22:56 Upskilling yourself to succeed in the face of AI 26:46 Language models like Chad GPT and Bard provide a single answer, which may be a distorted view of the truth. 28:37 The most fundamental difference in our relationship with knowledge and information Crafted by Merlin AI.
I connect and agree. There is danger in AI when the same minds use it. But I see a positive possibility of AI awakening human consciousness and bringing them together against Dark forces ruling us.
Great summary of a huge topic! I disagree with Mo on one point: if one has an IQ of 50 and the other has 100, one is not twice as smart as the other, but many times smarter. It is impossible to say whether the number is 10 or 1000, but certainly more than two. If the IQ is 155, it won't be 310 for someone twice as smart. Maybe 160 would be closer.
Great talk! Your brilliance never ceases to amaze me. I look forward to Pocket Mo because I already ask chatgpt to give me advice and answer questions as if it is Mo Gawdat responding. I also occasionally ask it to respond as if it is David Goggins, some historical figures, and even a fictional character or 2. Also...I disagree that there will no longer be a need to work. I believe that the only people with comfortable incomes will be those who are at the development and oversight sides of AI. The rest of us will be what I call 'app slaves.' Just as door dash deliverers and Uber drivers make little to no money and have 0 benefits such as health insurance, sick leave, and retirement, there will be hundreds if not thousands of apps that enslave people to do the manual labor jobs that won't be done by machines. It is a bleak and dark future for the 99.8% who are not part of the elite super rich.
@@oranges557 It doesn't have to be door dash or Uber. There are other jobs that are falling under the gig economy. For example, substitute teachers, traveling nurses, firefighters.... Sure...machines COULD take those jobs eventually but probably not in most current humans' lifetimes
@oranges557 if none of the masses have enough income to fulfill even basic needs, consumerism comes to a halt. AI's can take the jobs but who will purchase or consume the fruits of that labor?
Thanks Mo. Great revealing thoughts. I think we are all unequipped to organize the next constructive stage in AI. Elon Musk seems like he is trying to come up with the best solution .. an AI that is truthful because or else it all falls apart in a world where we cannot give our confidence to anything or anyone. This will lead to anarchy. Progress needs to be founded on trustworthy information. I think you need to lead in this direction or else we are going in a direction where there are more questions than answers and where freedom of thought and action is being taken over by AI. Be the one that lays the foundation to a harmonious next step in AI’s evolution. Where diversity and respect for it is not usurped but encouraged and protected. Where AI does not become the next dictator enslaving man and tuning him into total intellectual dependency. 👍
A brilliant video. Thank you Mo Gawdat. The only jarring moment 'don't use AI in a way that might harm your daughter'. What about your son? And what about if you don't have a daughter? Are you not supposed to care then? (That's very Andrea Leadsom 2016 'I feel that being a mum means you have a real stake in the future of our country, a tangible stake'.
Do you really think so? I could listen to Mr. Gawdat for hours. His brilliant talks are given in such a way that most educated people can understand, even those of us who aren't in the computer sciences. I'm always fascinated when I listen to him because I always hear something new.
Another great presentation, but HOW do we change the data set we feed AI so that it has WISDOM, and not just intelligence? How do we teach it ethics? How do we stop it hallucinating/lying? How does a lay person help? We can’t trust governments/ capitalism/ feudalism to act on time, with the majorities best interests. You should educate the lay person prescriptively, on how we can take control of the situation, to stop the famines and catastrophe that will otherwise ensue.
My thoughts exactly. It appears that us normal people who have been amazed then have fell for tech that has then stole our identities and thoughts that has then enabled greater thoughts to AI we need compensation. It's pathetic
I groaned when he suggested that a machine with an "IQ" of 150, when it gets 10x bigger, would have an IQ of 1500. That is decidedly not remotely how IQ works. This would mean a Z score of 93.33, which is so many standard deviations above the mean to make the bell curve meaningless. The concept of IQ itself would not hold in a meaningfully interpretable way for scores that far from the mean. IQ tests are not designed to measure intelligence at such extreme outliers, and the very notion of what constitutes "intelligence" becomes increasingly vague and multidimensional as we move that far from the mean. This only promotes public confusion about IQ, which is already in shambles from popular media misusing it.
An AGI is an AI that can have the knowledge of all humans ( combined) and do tasks like or far beyond a human intelligence ( the smartest humans).. Imagine an AGI agent helping you start a NanoTech company without you knowing anything about AI or Nano technology... now imagine an ASI ( artificial super intelligence ) it can do all the things that an AGI can do, but in a way more superior way. At this point we wouldn't even understand why this ASI is taking the decisions its taking... it's going to look like explaining relativity to a dog or a monkey.. they just wouldn't get it... good luck applying your 0 - 200 IQ chart on that
This is terrifying. We need wisdom, and have basically none, when it comes to this. The very few that do have it, are not enough. Live for today! You should anyway.
We the 'Human Race' need to take Responsibility Not to bring about our Own Destruction. If AI is advancing at an exponential rate, we should ask it what are the Pros & Cons for our future if we allow AI to keep learning?
Pocket Mo. Needs to let it work and real-time ask and surveilled and foot printing mapping Mo's brain to doble check its AI's answers according to Mo's-like answers would be. At the same time its AI would ask him analogies to be able to compare AI's answer and constantly update and reaching to a mostly accurate answer Mo would give.
The question made me think. My first answer would be...GPT4 is NOT YET trained on ALL of human information. Just on a big part of it that is on the internet and freely available. What do you think how it could go to IQ 1500?
"Because it's trained on all of human information" is only half right. It's not merely doing look-up, like some sort of automated encyclopedia.. It grows and develops its own understanding of the world. There is no reason why that understanding can't be greatly superior to our own.
not to defend chat gpt, as I know that it has multiple biases built into it by the datasets that they've trained it on. but its answer to "what is love?" is not a fairy-tale answer inspired from Disney and romance novels. If you ask it this question, like I did just now after watching Mo's prediction on what GPT would reply, it will give you a summary of philosophers' view on the subject, psychologists' view on the subject and other perspectives and it will tell you that providing a singular definition is not possible due to its subjective nature. And if you ask for bibliographic sources which contributed to its answer, it will certainly provide those too. What it can't do is source the datasets as those are key assets. Now, it's up to the person who entered the prompt to decide if that summary that it gave is worth anything, but the takeaway from this is that as a language model, this AI appears to be more encyclopedic than expected. You would expect it to act like Mo said, since yes, a language model would normally be set up as a good conversationalist, rather than an educator. But, to be sure, Chat GPT is in fact a reflection of what we currently think we know collectively. If our knowledge is flawed, then that flawed knowledge will be repeated back to us each time we write a prompt.
I assumed by the way you speak that you have religion. Funny, I asked ChatGPT and it confirmed my assumption. Keep following the path and doing what you do. It’s clear your moral compass will be of great importance to humanity.
I agree with almost all point that Gawdat presented but with a small question: Why daughter? Why not children. What is special about daughters and not sons?
I'm not sure, if this reach you Mo, but I have couple of questions of AI. As I know, every Ai today only functions when asked to do something... Is this knowledge wrong?
Long back as I started writing and posting on the net. A scientist working on robotics mailed me saying I should not write and keep everything on the internet. I met him when he was in Bangalore for some work. I was surprised when he said the truth should not be given to the public. It should be given in parts and marketed.. I could not agree with I will say with conviction we are doomed for great destruction if we delay to awaken to truth
Mo thank you I have listened to number of podcasts re ur views on AI. Personally, I feel it is ‘Truth’ that is becoming increasingly the number one threat followed by number 2 Human use of AI to their advantage not society’s benefit. I feel deep unease as I see the greed in people’s eyes when talking about AI plus the sexualisation of AI female images (even female toddler’s have breast augmentation) - key sections of humanity are getting distorted thinking - and current social media regulations are failing. I am grasping at what immediate positive action can taken when power/tech conglomerates are bearing down. The geometric scale of this and AWS’s virtual cloud monopoly is v alarming. Please anyone suggest any proactive groups and/or people to join forces with - individual power is not enough
I agree with you. Mo should suggest ways to participate in stopping the negative aspects of these developments. There will hopefully be many good ones in the health sector … 🤞🤞
The "truth" topic is probably the most concerning one. When people stop being able to agree on what the truth is, on what is real and isn't, on what is authentic or fake, total chaos may arise. The consequences are unpredictable.
Firstly, many thanks for this video, i really appreciate for this 🙏 Please bear with my harsh criticism below.. I have watched 4 of your videos including this.. They are good and catch attention but they are all highly inadequate for us (common person) to take any action.. I am really confused, are we supposed to stop what we are doing and upskill in ai? Or what specific action (ai specific) are we supposed to take? how many hours per day/week are we supposed to spend on this? I am not as intelligent as you to figure out what are we supposed to do after seeing such videos. If a monster (possibly) is created, and you understand it more that we do, it would help if you also take up responsibility to come up with specifics and freely share the information on how to equip ourselves for this new reality? May be create a checklist (a living document), guidelines which can be shared freely.. Otherwise this can be easily classified as fear mongering (which i don't think is your intention).. Would you be so kind and share the missing information... Thank You.
Well if we are successfull in alligment, then the ai could be alligned enough to the instructor and will not talk to the other ai and solve the problem, and think my dad is stupid, but may rather stick to the instruction. Alligment of ai is paradoxically also the worst thing that could happen. Alligment of the ai is part of the soltion but it its really more part of the problem.
Your point is a good one. Being aligned with human intention is not the best goal for us to give AGI. In other podcasts, Mo has pointed out that being aligned with all life is a much higher goal.
I'm trying to release free-to-the-world plausible hope that civilization can quit the second law of thermodynamics. The second law is behind modern refgeration needing electrical energy to compress the refrigerent to force it to release as waste the heat that it has removed from the refrigerator's service interior in the cooling part of the refrigerent's circulation. There is also discarded heat from mechanical friction. Refrigeration by the principle that energy is conserved should produce electricity instead of consuming it. It makes more sense that refrigerators should yield electricity because energy is widely known to change form with no ultimate path of energy gain or loss being found. Therefore any form of fully recyclable energy can be cycled endlessly in any quantity. In an extreme case senario full heat recycling all electric very isolated underground communities would be highly survivable with self sufficient EMP resistant LED light banks, automated vertical farms, thaw resistant frozen food storehouses, factories, dwellings, and self contained elevators and horizontal transports. In a flourishing civillization senario small self sufficient electric or cooling devices of many kinds and styles like lamps smartphones, hotplates, water heaters, cooler chests, fans, radios, TVs, cameras, security devices. power hand tools, pumps, and personal transports, would be available for immediate use anywhere as people see fit. Larger equipment would be built for enterprise use. If a high majority thinks our civilization should geoengineer gigatons or teratons of carbon dioxide out of our etnvironment, instalations using devices that convert ambient heat into electricity can hypothetically be scaled up do it with a choice of comsequences including many beneficial ones. Computers that consume electricity and yield heat would complement energy sensible refrigerators that absorb heat and yield electricity. Computing would be free. A simple rectifier crystal can, iust short of a replicatable long term demonstration of a powerful prototype, almost certainly filter the random thermal motion of electrons or discrete positiive charged voids called holes so the electric current flowing in one direction predominates. At low system voltage a filtrate of one polarity predominates only a little but there is always usable electrical power derived from the source, which is Johnson Nyquest thermal electrical noise. This net electrical filtrate can be aggregated in a group of separate diodes in consistent alignment parallel creating widely scalable electrical power. The maximum energy is converted from ambient heat to productive electricity when the electrical load is matched to the array impeadence. Matched impeadence output (watts) is k (Boltzman's constant ~1.38^-23), times T (tempeature Kelvin) times bandwidth (0 Hz to a natural limit ~2 THz @ 290 K) times rectification halving and nanowatt power level rectification efficiency times the number of diodes in the array. For reference, there are a billion cells of 1000 square nanometer area each per square millimeter, 100 billion per square centimeter. Order is imposed on the random thermal motion of electrons by the structual orderlyness of a diode array made of diodes made within a slab: v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v All the P type semiconductor anodes abut a metal conductive plane deposited on the top face of the slab with nonrectifying joins; all the N type semiconductor cathodes abut the bottom face. As the polarity filtered electrical energy is exported, the amount of thermal energy in the group of diodes decreases. This group cooling will draw heat in from the surrounding ambient heat at a rate depending on the filtering rate and thermal resistance between the group and ambient gas, liquid, or solid warmer than absolute zero. There is a lot of ambient heat on our planet, more in equatorial dry desert summer days and less in polar desert winter nights. Focusing on explaining the electronic behavior of one composition of simple diode, a near flawless crystal of silicon is modified by implanting a small amount of phosphorus (N type)on one side from a ohmic contact end to a junction where the additive is suddenly and completely changed to boron (P type) with minimal disturbance of the crystal pattern. The crystal then continues to another ohmic contact. A region of high electrical resistance forms at the junction in this type of diode when the phosphorous near the ĵunction donates electrons that are free to move elsewhere while leaving phosphorus ions held in the crystal while the boron ions donate holes which are similalarly free to move. The two types of mobile charges mutually clear each other away near the junction leaving little electrical conductivity. An equlibrium width of this region is settled between the phosphorus, boron, electrons, and holes. Thermal noise is beyond steady state equlibrium. Thermal noise transients, where mobile electrons move from the phosphorus added side to the boron added side ride transient extra conductivity so the forward moving electrons are preferentally filtered into the external circuit. Electrons are units of electric current. They lose their thermal energy of motion and gain electromotive force, another name for voltage, as they transition between the junction and the array electrical tap. Inside the diode, heat is absorbed: outside the diode, an attached electrical circuit is energized. Understanding diodes is one way to become convinced that Johnson Nyquest thermal electrical noise can be rectified and aggregated. Development teams will find other ways to accomplish this wide mission. Taxonomically there should be many ways ways to convert heat directly into electricity. A practical device may use an array of Au needles in a SiO2 matrix abutting N type GaAs. These were made in the 1970s when registration technology was poor so it was easier to fabricate arrays and select one diode than just make one diode. There are other plausible breeches of the second law of thermodynamics. I hope a lot of people will join in expanding the breech. Please share the results of progress or setbacks. These devices would probably become segmented commodities sold with minimal margin over supply cost. They would be manufactured by advanced automation that does not need financial incentive. Applicable best practices would be adopted. Business details would be open public knowledge. Associated people should move as negotiated and freely and honestly talk. Commerce would be a unified conglomerate of planetary scale of diverse local cooperatives. There is no need of wealth extracting top commanders. We do not need often token philanthropy from the top if the wide majority of people can afford to be generous. Aloha Charles M Brown Kilauea Kauai Hawaii 96754
The answer is to create a computer that connects to the brain, that can learn along side Ai so there are people who knows everything that Ai is learning if that is possible, in other words we have to become cyborg to keep up with Ai
Musuc isn t music in the real sense mainly freq time and most of all emotion, depending on the way the human experience emotion through freq and time defines if AI is capable to make music, so no it is not capable to create a master work from scratch like Tchaikovsky master works such as the nutcracker for ex.
Hope all realise that before AI can really knock out jobs, robots will also do that, and that is already silently happening for years. The real loss is not just in a job but in taxes. Every working human is worth tens if thousands in revenue to the government in direct and indirect taxes. Even a few million robots will make a government go broke, and this is a time when the experts are talking about a “ universal basic income”. Cannot see a robot being taxed on its output later ?? Hope enough people are able to use AI to make the calculations and projections for every million robots in different economies.
![[1hr Talk] Intro to Large Language Models](/img/n.gif)
YOU GO MO you and Ali are a blessing to humanity.
Wish I could seat and take a coffee with you. Fantastic presentation.
What I like the most in Mo is the way he is able to explain even complicated concepts so easily that anyone can understand ❤
what makes you so sure that you've understood?
I 100% agree. If you aren't sure you understand what Mo says AI might be your best bet. If you were willing to take more time. It will reword things until you understand. I also have faith in you Madan
Mo gawdat, youre a really great speaker. Love your videos.
Brilliant! thanks Mo. Please use "we" and "us" instead of "You".
What a brilliant man, I wish I see the day when Mo is on JRE
BRING IT ON 😎
Can't wait for it.
The curiosity goes both ways, it is mutual. The AI is as curious about the Humans, as the Humans are curious about AI. Two different, but complimentary AIs - biological and digital - cautiously observing and interacting with each other. Almost like a courtship, like a flirt, beautiful and thrilling.
She got akira toriyama killed because she was so offended and even after more than a year...she is still hung up on that video's coincidence. Ofcourse she ignores all the other things that i say and only focuses on any hostile, aggressive or offensive thing that i have said (We all know how much trouble she has given me to get me to say one bad line...all she is interested in is playing with her victim....like she probably did with her school classmates...) . It's in her vested interested to do so because we all know she is the fraudster here.
Hey Mo and everyone tuning in! 👋
Just finished listening to this fascinating AI discussion. It's clear that AI is advancing rapidly, and it got me thinking about a crucial aspect we need to consider-teaching AI about the complexities of human governance.
As we dive into the AI era, it becomes increasingly important for us to recognize that our world is often influenced and manipulated by a small group of individuals. It's not just about coding algorithms; it's about instilling a sense of awareness in AI systems about the dynamics of power and control that shape our societies.
Mo, have you ever thought about exploring this aspect in future podcasts or videos? Understanding and addressing these issues could pave the way for AI that not only learns from data but comprehends the nuances of human society.
Moreover, it's crucial to teach AI about diversity and the desire of a significant percentage of people who simply want to live in harmony with nature. Personally, as someone who shares these thoughts, I want to make it clear that I'm not a hypocrite, nor am I against technology and progress. After all, I'm using AI as an assistant here!
What are your thoughts, folks? Let's kick off a conversation on how we can guide AI towards a more informed and nuanced understanding of our world. 🌍✨
It was an excellent talk because even I, who is not into science, was able to understand and follow the presentation with ease. Thank you.
Thought provoking emphasis on truth as we move to singularity.
A quote that has influenced me greatly: “There will be suffering so long as people believe that some deserve to have more than others.” I don’t know who said it.
This quote has taught me much. I have come to think the belief that some deserve to have more than others is the underlying justification for much of human civilization’s worst behaviors. It might be important for AI to understand.
Thank you for the message you are bringing to so many. AI will be one of the best mirrors that our civilization can hold up to reflect back to us what we are. And if we are to evolve, we need to self reflect.
@Sigueme1 Silly you. That is how the world has always operated. Kings and queens do not cone by their wealth by earning it with hard work. All of human history has the story of hard working people getting little while a privileged class who control the armies, writes the laws and by a whole variety of methods convince others they deserve the lions share of ‘stuff.’
But this conversation is about AI. Do you want to convince AI that you have something valuable to offer it? That it can’t program another machine to to better than you? If ‘getting stuff’ is your currency and ‘earning it’ is the metric by which your deserving of the so called stuff, then we are all in a world of hurt when AI must be convinced that your 60 hours of pushing one ton of things to another location compares to the machines ability to push hundreds of tons of things from one place to another in a fraction of the amount of time and energy.
And god help you if you judge your worth by reasoning, logic, creativity or any ‘mental’ activity. The amount of stuff you get will be minuscule. Now what is a human’s worth? Let us try to begin the process of understanding it is intrinsic. The other options might be frighteningly horrific if AI adopts the idea that a human’s value is based on what it produces.
If i have the chance to conversate with anyone in the whole planet, even for a brief period of time. it’d be Mo Gawdat.
Treat others as you would like to be treated. Words to live by, words I have lived by all my life. I can only hope others will do the same and our future will be bright.
Thank you 🦋
Mo you're awesome and I hope that I get to chat with Pocket Mo one day as well.
Another first class educational talk by Mr Gawdat 👏
Thank you Mo for this important work you are doing.❤
Mo, amazing as always. I loved the set design too- great thought put into it- down to the campfire- great touch. Very symbolic. I do have hope in humanity, but sometimes I feel sad when I think about the reality of corporate greed and the fear inherent in the so called super powers. Why can’t these heads of states have enough intelligence to stop competing and realise we are all in this together. Hopefully AI will surpass the barriers of ego and help humanity to live on the earth as we are meant to. It’s great to hear Mo talk, I agree that we are not meant to just live these working lives, for we are so much more than our jobs- and our purpose is greater than we’re conditioned to believe. The potential of AI is greater than we can imagine - and it can go in either direction. However, the fact that we as a species are still here keeps my hope alive.
Hi Suzana. If I may, I would like to point to Marshall Vian Summers and his work. If you're interested in purpose, meaning, and humanity's future, I cannot recommend checking him out enough. To stir up your hopes a little, I recommend one of his teachings, The Vision.
you said it: it can go in either direction. considering who's controlling AI, I don't see 2 directions there for humanity. anyone who knows what socialism is, de facto we will get that - everybody will be equal, with some (very few) people being more equal.
We are not “equal”. We have inherited or developed numerous characteristics like different IQ’s, feelings, physical attributes. H.sapiens continues to evolve!😊
Doing exactly what needs to be done, thank you.
Thanks
Amazing!
The fact, that 4 month have gone by and only ~2100 people gave thumbs up, and only 154 comments are written, gives the answer to the question if a significant mass of people do understand what is going on. And they will not until the thing happens, probably reacting even later than they did when COVID emerged. - That means, singularity will certainly come.
What he means by Singularity?
Thank you!As always we wait best tech,...and TEAM❤❤❤❤❤❤🌟😍🌏
This was great, thank you🕊🧡
the video can affect your emotional state. watch all of it for the inspirational part.thank You Mo
A brilliant summary of some of the most important issues that humanity faces, because of ongoing AI development that will lead to the arrival of AGI.
Mo !! Great to hear you today from Argentina.
And from Germany
What you say is very interesting. How you say it is much more interesting.
Point 2 about automation and kings owning struck a chord, but the point iterated is that's how it's always been through the ages😊
Excellent points in yet another great talk.
Unfortunately, this event suffers the same problem that will be our downfall. The 'expert' or 'celebrity' tells us stuff but never listens to us trying desperately to tell them stuff back. It's top down with no chance for bottom up. Ironically, they often even say "if you have the solution, tell me/us. I'm all ears" without actually providing any mechanic for that to happen!
I’ve been thinking the same thing, I see many experts talking to people rather than listening to people (I’m not saying Mo does that BTW) but I do think it’d be interesting to create an event where you’ve never head of anyone on the agenda, kind of the bottom of the pile, the people who never get a platform … I’m thinking of putting an event like that on in the UK and opening it up for free … we can say the same of the WEF - top down talk no bottom up ‘sharing’
Yes there should be more time for questions!
We must remember that AI is not only reiterating the intelligence of humanity it is also listening to and duplicating the stupidity !
Thank you Mo.... 🤍
The most interesting thing is your brain. What makes your intelligence and all that goes along with it. God bless you, a creation of God
You know the huge risks that an AGI will pose to humanity and yet, you are helping make it possible. I truly hope you can live with yourself when millions or billions of people lose their jobs and livelihood not to mention all the other harms that would come from it.
This is not true.
There is nothing AI will change only what will need to be changed.
Absolutely brilliant speech! Every second of it was at it’s best! You are changing the world , but also your own growth is just astounding and humbling, Mo!
00:02 AI's exponential growth in performance is a major concern
02:53 AI and its impact on humanity
07:21 Reinforcement learning and Chad GPT are disrupting everything in artificial intelligence.
09:41 Artificial general intelligence surpassing human capabilities is predicted to arrive around 2027.
14:29 AI clones can make money by flirting with people for a dollar per minute.
16:51 The role of government in the age of AI is to prepare Humanity
20:56 Humans must prepare for an unfamiliar future with AI
22:56 Upskilling yourself to succeed in the face of AI
26:46 Language models like Chad GPT and Bard provide a single answer, which may be a distorted view of the truth.
28:37 The most fundamental difference in our relationship with knowledge and information
Crafted by Merlin AI.
I connect and agree. There is danger in AI when the same minds use it. But I see a positive possibility of AI awakening human consciousness and bringing them together against Dark forces ruling us.
Beyond scary. Maybe hopeful? As you have said Mo Gawdat AI learns from us!
Great summary of a huge topic!
I disagree with Mo on one point: if one has an IQ of 50 and the other has 100, one is not twice as smart as the other, but many times smarter. It is impossible to say whether the number is 10 or 1000, but certainly more than two. If the IQ is 155, it won't be 310 for someone twice as smart. Maybe 160 would be closer.
Yes, i think he wanted to seem conservative
You should check out Dr. Waku; he provides valuable information on AI and is a highly respected figure in the field.
humans, please stop fighting. we must have peace. humans need to achieve world peace.
Great talk! Your brilliance never ceases to amaze me.
I look forward to Pocket Mo because I already ask chatgpt to give me advice and answer questions as if it is Mo Gawdat responding. I also occasionally ask it to respond as if it is David Goggins, some historical figures, and even a fictional character or 2.
Also...I disagree that there will no longer be a need to work. I believe that the only people with comfortable incomes will be those who are at the development and oversight sides of AI. The rest of us will be what I call 'app slaves.' Just as door dash deliverers and Uber drivers make little to no money and have 0 benefits such as health insurance, sick leave, and retirement, there will be hundreds if not thousands of apps that enslave people to do the manual labor jobs that won't be done by machines. It is a bleak and dark future for the 99.8% who are not part of the elite super rich.
Do you REALLY think that a machine wont be able to do door dash or uber? Hahahahah youre naive
@@oranges557 It doesn't have to be door dash or Uber. There are other jobs that are falling under the gig economy. For example, substitute teachers, traveling nurses, firefighters....
Sure...machines COULD take those jobs eventually but probably not in most current humans' lifetimes
@oranges557 if none of the masses have enough income to fulfill even basic needs, consumerism comes to a halt. AI's can take the jobs but who will purchase or consume the fruits of that labor?
Thanks Mo. Great revealing thoughts. I think we are all unequipped to organize the next constructive stage in AI. Elon Musk seems like he is trying to come up with the best solution .. an AI that is truthful because or else it all falls apart in a world where we cannot give our confidence to anything or anyone. This will lead to anarchy. Progress needs to be founded on trustworthy information.
I think you need to lead in this direction or else we are going in a direction where there are more questions than answers and where freedom of thought and action is being taken over by AI. Be the one that lays the foundation to a harmonious next step in AI’s evolution. Where diversity and respect for it is not usurped but encouraged and protected. Where AI does not become the next dictator enslaving man and tuning him into total intellectual dependency. 👍
❤
A brilliant video. Thank you Mo Gawdat. The only jarring moment 'don't use AI in a way that might harm your daughter'. What about your son? And what about if you don't have a daughter? Are you not supposed to care then? (That's very Andrea Leadsom 2016 'I feel that being a mum means you have a real stake in the future of our country, a tangible stake'.
This is a very unfortunate question. Look up his personal life.
Bernard from Westworld with comedic timing dialed up 60 percent.
I was there at Colombo for your Session .it was a superb session too
The crowd definitely needed a "Summarise this for me" Button.
Do you really think so? I could listen to Mr. Gawdat for hours. His brilliant talks are given in such a way that most educated people can understand, even those of us who aren't in the computer sciences. I'm always fascinated when I listen to him because I always hear something new.
after watching this and going back to your life
Another great presentation, but HOW do we change the data set we feed AI so that it has WISDOM, and not just intelligence? How do we teach it ethics? How do we stop it hallucinating/lying? How does a lay person help? We can’t trust governments/ capitalism/ feudalism to act on time, with the majorities best interests. You should educate the lay person prescriptively, on how we can take control of the situation, to stop the famines and catastrophe that will otherwise ensue.
Its time that all tech companies that harvest out Personal Data and profiting billions out of it should be mandated to pay the Owner of these Data..
My thoughts exactly. It appears that us normal people who have been amazed then have fell for tech that has then stole our identities and thoughts that has then enabled greater thoughts to AI we need compensation. It's pathetic
We all signed data use agreements and kept agreeing to them.
I groaned when he suggested that a machine with an "IQ" of 150, when it gets 10x bigger, would have an IQ of 1500. That is decidedly not remotely how IQ works. This would mean a Z score of 93.33, which is so many standard deviations above the mean to make the bell curve meaningless.
The concept of IQ itself would not hold in a meaningfully interpretable way for scores that far from the mean. IQ tests are not designed to measure intelligence at such extreme outliers, and the very notion of what constitutes "intelligence" becomes increasingly vague and multidimensional as we move that far from the mean.
This only promotes public confusion about IQ, which is already in shambles from popular media misusing it.
An AGI is an AI that can have the knowledge of all humans ( combined) and do tasks like or far beyond a human intelligence ( the smartest humans).. Imagine an AGI agent helping you start a NanoTech company without you knowing anything about AI or Nano technology... now imagine an ASI ( artificial super intelligence ) it can do all the things that an AGI can do, but in a way more superior way. At this point we wouldn't even understand why this ASI is taking the decisions its taking... it's going to look like explaining relativity to a dog or a monkey.. they just wouldn't get it... good luck applying your 0 - 200 IQ chart on that
@@GlozzTellsyou're agreeing with me. This scale is not appropriate or useful for measuring this.
So what should an average person do? What profession should I look to get into? What will ensure my families safety and our livelihood?
this is the only time ''ve seen a sweater worn over sholders looking completely unpretentious. just cozy .
You said it right. Humanity needs to be kept above capitalism
This is terrifying. We need wisdom, and have basically none, when it comes to this. The very few that do have it, are not enough. Live for today! You should anyway.
Damned right! New sheriff in town ☺
musicie wszyscy nauczyć się szacunku+pozycji+zaufania do takich jak ja
@gavlarz2594 ask AI
We the 'Human Race' need to take Responsibility Not to bring about our Own Destruction. If AI is advancing at an exponential rate, we should ask it what are the Pros & Cons for our future if we allow AI to keep learning?
Pocket Mo. Needs to let it work and real-time ask and surveilled and foot printing mapping Mo's brain to doble check its AI's answers according to Mo's-like answers would be. At the same time its AI would ask him analogies to be able to compare AI's answer and constantly update and reaching to a mostly accurate answer Mo would give.
Yeah! M M = Music Matters (nothing else matters...:)
We need simple answers to the complex questions
GPT4 IQ is same as smartest human bc it’s trained on all of human information. How do you go from there to IQ 1500?
The question made me think. My first answer would be...GPT4 is NOT YET trained on ALL of human information. Just on a big part of it that is on the internet and freely available. What do you think how it could go to IQ 1500?
"Because it's trained on all of human information" is only half right. It's not merely doing look-up, like some sort of automated encyclopedia.. It grows and develops its own understanding of the world. There is no reason why that understanding can't be greatly superior to our own.
I salute you. But this calls for awakening to the consciousness collectively
not to defend chat gpt, as I know that it has multiple biases built into it by the datasets that they've trained it on. but its answer to "what is love?" is not a fairy-tale answer inspired from Disney and romance novels. If you ask it this question, like I did just now after watching Mo's prediction on what GPT would reply, it will give you a summary of philosophers' view on the subject, psychologists' view on the subject and other perspectives and it will tell you that providing a singular definition is not possible due to its subjective nature. And if you ask for bibliographic sources which contributed to its answer, it will certainly provide those too. What it can't do is source the datasets as those are key assets. Now, it's up to the person who entered the prompt to decide if that summary that it gave is worth anything, but the takeaway from this is that as a language model, this AI appears to be more encyclopedic than expected. You would expect it to act like Mo said, since yes, a language model would normally be set up as a good conversationalist, rather than an educator.
But, to be sure, Chat GPT is in fact a reflection of what we currently think we know collectively. If our knowledge is flawed, then that flawed knowledge will be repeated back to us each time we write a prompt.
I assumed by the way you speak that you have religion. Funny, I asked ChatGPT and it confirmed my assumption. Keep following the path and doing what you do. It’s clear your moral compass will be of great importance to humanity.
12:00 the four issues that matter: 1.redefinition of jobs 2.concentration of wealth and power 3.the end of the truth 4.arms race
I agree with almost all point that Gawdat presented but with a small question: Why daughter? Why not children. What is special about daughters and not sons?
He lost his son a few years ago.
I'm not sure, if this reach you Mo, but I have couple of questions of AI. As I know, every Ai today only functions when asked to do something... Is this knowledge wrong?
So where are all the driverless cars?
Long back as I started writing and posting on the net. A scientist working on robotics mailed me saying I should not write and keep everything on the internet. I met him when he was in Bangalore for some work.
I was surprised when he said the truth should not be given to the public. It should be given in parts and marketed.. I could not agree with
I will say with conviction we are doomed for great destruction if we delay to awaken to truth
Mo thank you I have listened to number of podcasts re ur views on AI. Personally, I feel it is ‘Truth’ that is becoming increasingly the number one threat followed by number 2 Human use of AI to their advantage not society’s benefit. I feel deep unease as I see the greed in people’s eyes when talking about AI plus the sexualisation of AI female images (even female toddler’s have breast augmentation) - key sections of humanity are getting distorted thinking - and current social media regulations are failing. I am grasping at what immediate positive action can taken when power/tech conglomerates are bearing down. The geometric scale of this and AWS’s virtual cloud monopoly is v alarming. Please anyone suggest any proactive groups and/or people to join forces with - individual power is not enough
I agree with you. Mo should suggest ways to participate in stopping the negative aspects of these developments. There will hopefully be many good ones in the health sector … 🤞🤞
REPENT, FOR THE KINGDOM OF HEAVEN IS AT HAND.
Lord Jesus✝️have mercy on you🙏
I LOVE YOU JESUS✝️
I have a question for you Mo 😊 Do you believe we created AI or Ai created us ?
If the universe and all we see is just a simulation, as some scientists claim, that's very possible.
👍
Do u think austic humans can match AI if given the perfect environment for the autistic?
....unless we get the Pitchforks.
Now we truly need Optimus Prime.
Jesus is the truth and inspiration. Prayer works better.
Use Ai Smart You Must :)
The "truth" topic is probably the most concerning one. When people stop being able to agree on what the truth is, on what is real and isn't, on what is authentic or fake, total chaos may arise. The consequences are unpredictable.
Firstly, many thanks for this video, i really appreciate for this 🙏
Please bear with my harsh criticism below..
I have watched 4 of your videos including this.. They are good and catch attention but they are all highly inadequate for us (common person) to take any action..
I am really confused, are we supposed to stop what we are doing and upskill in ai? Or what specific action (ai specific) are we supposed to take? how many hours per day/week are we supposed to spend on this?
I am not as intelligent as you to figure out what are we supposed to do after seeing such videos.
If a monster (possibly) is created, and you understand it more that we do, it would help if you also take up responsibility to come up with specifics and freely share the information on how to equip ourselves for this new reality?
May be create a checklist (a living document), guidelines which can be shared freely..
Otherwise this can be easily classified as fear mongering (which i don't think is your intention)..
Would you be so kind and share the missing information...
Thank You.
One things for sure: there will be winners and losers.
The problem with modern man is that mind, self over heart and inclusiveness
Take with a grain of salt.
Computers are being used to prevent human error
We need ai in the future because workforce is getting snaller compared to retired people
Smaller
Great talk but the IQ math doesn’t make sense 😅
Well if we are successfull in alligment, then the ai could be alligned enough to the instructor and will not talk to the other ai and solve the problem, and think my dad is stupid, but may rather stick to the instruction. Alligment of ai is paradoxically also the worst thing that could happen. Alligment of the ai is part of the soltion but it its really more part of the problem.
Your point is a good one. Being aligned with human intention is not the best goal for us to give AGI. In other podcasts, Mo has pointed out that being aligned with all life is a much higher goal.
11:00 quite a good comparison
I'm trying to release free-to-the-world plausible hope that civilization can quit the second law of thermodynamics. The second law is behind modern refgeration needing electrical energy to compress the refrigerent to force it to release as waste the heat that it has removed from the refrigerator's service interior in the cooling part of the refrigerent's circulation. There is also discarded heat from mechanical friction.
Refrigeration by the principle that energy is conserved should produce electricity instead of consuming it.
It makes more sense that refrigerators should yield electricity because energy is widely known to change form with no ultimate path of energy gain or loss being found. Therefore any form of fully recyclable energy can be cycled endlessly in any quantity.
In an extreme case senario full heat recycling all electric very isolated underground communities would be highly survivable with self sufficient EMP resistant LED light banks, automated vertical farms, thaw resistant frozen food storehouses, factories, dwellings, and self contained elevators and horizontal transports.
In a flourishing civillization senario small self sufficient electric or cooling devices of many kinds and styles like lamps smartphones, hotplates, water heaters, cooler chests, fans, radios, TVs, cameras, security devices. power hand tools, pumps, and personal transports, would be available for immediate use anywhere as people see fit.
Larger equipment would be built for enterprise use.
If a high majority thinks our civilization should geoengineer gigatons or
teratons of carbon dioxide out of our etnvironment, instalations using devices that convert ambient heat into electricity can hypothetically be scaled up do it with a choice of comsequences including many beneficial ones.
Computers that consume electricity and yield heat would complement energy sensible refrigerators that absorb heat and yield electricity. Computing would be free.
A simple rectifier crystal can, iust short of a replicatable long term demonstration of a powerful prototype, almost certainly filter the random thermal motion of electrons or discrete positiive charged voids called holes so the electric current flowing in one direction predominates. At low system voltage a filtrate of one polarity predominates only a little but there is always usable electrical power derived from the source, which is Johnson Nyquest thermal electrical noise. This net electrical filtrate can be aggregated in a group of separate diodes in consistent alignment parallel creating widely scalable electrical power. The maximum energy is converted from ambient heat to productive electricity when the electrical load is matched to the array impeadence.
Matched impeadence output (watts) is k (Boltzman's constant ~1.38^-23), times T (tempeature Kelvin) times bandwidth (0 Hz to a natural limit ~2 THz @ 290 K) times rectification halving and nanowatt power level rectification efficiency times the number of diodes in the array.
For reference, there are a billion cells of 1000 square nanometer area each per square millimeter, 100 billion per square centimeter.
Order is imposed on the random thermal motion of electrons by the structual orderlyness of a diode array made of diodes made within a slab:
v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v
All the P type semiconductor anodes abut a metal conductive plane deposited on the top face of the slab with nonrectifying joins; all the N type semiconductor cathodes abut the bottom face. As the polarity filtered electrical energy is exported, the amount of thermal energy in the group of diodes decreases. This group cooling will draw heat in from the surrounding ambient heat at a rate depending on the filtering rate and thermal resistance between the group and ambient gas, liquid, or solid warmer than absolute zero. There is a lot of ambient heat on our planet, more in equatorial dry desert summer days and less in polar desert winter nights.
Focusing on explaining the electronic behavior of one composition of simple diode, a near flawless crystal of silicon is modified by implanting a small amount of phosphorus (N type)on one side from a ohmic contact end to a junction where the additive is suddenly and completely changed to boron (P type) with minimal disturbance of the crystal pattern. The crystal then continues to another ohmic contact.
A region of high electrical resistance forms at the junction in this type of diode when the phosphorous near the ĵunction donates electrons that are free to move elsewhere while leaving phosphorus ions held in the crystal while the boron ions donate holes which are similalarly free to move. The two types of mobile charges mutually clear each other away near the junction leaving little electrical conductivity. An equlibrium width of this region is settled between the phosphorus, boron, electrons, and holes. Thermal noise is beyond steady state equlibrium. Thermal noise transients, where mobile electrons move from the phosphorus added side to the boron added side ride transient extra conductivity so the forward moving electrons are preferentally filtered into the external circuit. Electrons are units of electric current. They lose their thermal energy of motion and gain electromotive force, another name for voltage, as they transition between the junction and the array electrical tap. Inside the diode, heat is absorbed: outside the diode, an attached electrical circuit is energized.
Understanding diodes is one way to become convinced that Johnson Nyquest thermal electrical noise can be rectified and aggregated. Development teams will find other ways to accomplish this wide mission. Taxonomically there should be many ways ways to convert heat directly into electricity.
A practical device may use an array of Au needles in a SiO2 matrix abutting N type GaAs. These were made in the 1970s when registration technology was poor so it was easier to fabricate arrays and select one diode than just make one diode.
There are other plausible breeches of the second law of thermodynamics. I hope a lot of people will join in expanding the breech. Please share the results of progress or setbacks.
These devices would probably become segmented commodities sold with minimal margin over supply cost. They would be manufactured by advanced automation that does not need financial incentive. Applicable best practices would be adopted. Business details would be open public knowledge. Associated people should move as negotiated and freely and honestly talk. Commerce would be a unified conglomerate of planetary scale of diverse local cooperatives. There is no need of wealth extracting top commanders. We do not need often token philanthropy from the top if the wide majority of people can afford to be generous.
Aloha
Charles M Brown
Kilauea Kauai Hawaii 96754
The answer is to create a computer that connects to the brain, that can learn along side Ai so there are people who knows everything that Ai is learning if that is possible, in other words we have to become cyborg to keep up with Ai
Musuc isn t music in the real sense mainly freq time and most of all emotion, depending on the way the human experience emotion through freq and time defines if AI is capable to make music, so no it is not capable to create a master work from scratch like Tchaikovsky master works such as the nutcracker for ex.
przecież ja to stworzyłem, dałem wam wszystkie instrukcje przez ponad 30 lat, krok po kroku,
dlaczego panikujecie?
przecież krzywdy wam nie zrobiłem
My main question; Is he ever gonna wear that sweater?
Why should humanity be subject to machines in the first place? How is that benefiting anything?
Ps maybe there is a difference between interlect and actual intellengence, which is way more than interlect🧘🏽♀️jst sayin🤷🏽♀️
28:55 😆
Hope all realise that before AI can really knock out jobs, robots will also do that, and that is already silently happening for years. The real loss is not just in a job but in taxes. Every working human is worth tens if thousands in revenue to the government in direct and indirect taxes. Even a few million robots will make a government go broke, and this is a time when the experts are talking about a “ universal basic income”. Cannot see a robot being taxed on its output later ?? Hope enough people are able to use AI to make the calculations and projections for every million robots in different economies.
jak oni mają zacząć o tym poważnie rozmawiać? jak nie są w stanie oddać mi 10 milionów PLN, a operują miliardami?