I do think it's weird they had all those little diving boards, I think it should have been at least as deep as a ball pit, although I havnt been in a ball pit since I was 10 so maybe they are not as deep as I remember lol
Ball pits do very little to slow your fall. You shouldn't jump in those as an adult either. Kids that weigh 90 pounds or less are going to have a much easier time jumping into this pool than an adult weighing over 130 pounds. It's basic physics. It's the same reason why a squirrel can fall out of a tree and be just fine afterward. The staff want the kids to be able to enjoy themselves, but children in adult bodies cannot resist the opportunity to injure themselves for a video on social media.
Bro I’m pretty sure it’s not made for adults, even if it was Adult mid-friendly then where is the common sense… Also kids are like 3ft or 4ft tall, I’m pretty sure it’s not meant for adults who are over 5ft
There’s a lot of case law about the effectiveness of a waiver. It depends on a lot of variables. Google “Lord Denning’s big red hand” for the UK/Canadian take on it.
A similar thing happened at TwitchCon a few years ago where a girl broke her back. There could be something despite the waver. Its not a catch all get out of jail free card. Though the posted rules could harm the case.
@@poa2.0surface77 why would you ask me to look it up, when if you do you find completely different descriptions. Of course these words can be used in other contexts, particularly jumping like "I jumped his bones" or a jump cut in a film. But in the context of it being a verb about kinesthetically moving your body; "dive 1 (dīv) v. dived or dove (dōv), dived, div·ing, dives vb 1a. To plunge, especially headfirst, into water jump (dʒʌmp) vb 1. to leap or spring clear of the ground or other surface by using the muscles in the legs and feet. To dive implies to go headfirst (well arms then head) into the water. Whereas a jump doesn't, I'm not saying you can't loosely interchange them, but if I go to a swimming pool that has a no diving sign (which always has a drawing of someone going headfirst) I can still jump into the pool, I just can't dive into it.....
Why would they put a diving board there though if it is not safe to jump off? I do think this guy was being foolish but why on earth would the put a diving board like that there.
@@brandonn3543 exactly my point. That's why there are so many personal injury lawyer ads on TV. Also why insurance is so expensive... so they can pay idiots who successfully scam them.
why woulda grown man jump into something designed for little children, thats like diving into the kids pool at the water park, he shouldnt be able to sue for his stupidity
@@h2ojr1 lava temperature coffee that melts your skin is reasonable grounds for a lawsuit. that's why she won and mcdonald's made it their mission to slander her name and make it almost impossible to sue corporations for their mishaps.
@@h2ojr1 ok the “coffee is hot” lady actually had a reasonable argument though. The lid was not properly secured and the coffee was served so hot that it melted her skin. And she only asked for medical expenses covered initially.
It would be more accurately to compare this to that guy who died the man that HE TRIED TO ROB FOR INJURIES HE GOT FROM THE MAN'S DOG WHILE FAILING TO ROB THE MAN@@h2ojr1
He's also the person that dives in head first next to the pool stairs. 🤦 I say, just give him some money and wait for him to use it to finish Darwining himself. Help the guy out with a ticket for bungee jumping, or a free parkour lesson.
Adults can play video games, board games, DND, with hot wheels or stuffed animals for all I care. No problem as long as it isn't interfering with responsibilities. But in a public space with other people's children? Is sensible to watch with a suspicious eye in case the adult isn't right in the head (mental illness, drugs, developmental delay, etc. could result in inadvertently causing harm) or might try to lure a child. It is sensible to maintain some boundary so we know when someone is crossing it. The crossing isn't proof positive of malfeasance, but rather a sign to be alert.
To be fair, the diving board is pretty much an invitation to jump. There isn't a sign for age or weight restrictions for people diving into the sprinkles. You don't know if there's a hard floor underneath either. It really seems like someone can get seriously injured eventually.
The museum is absolutely in the wrong here. This pool is intended to be jumped into. There are zero warnings about jumping, and they have boards on the side designed to jump off of.
The business will be sued for negligence and they will lose. They will settle and remove the pool before they get sued again. The waiver is useless in court.
It is not "supposed to be for kids" most of the exhibits at those types of museums are for all to enjoy. You just have to enjoy some differently than a kid would if you are full sized grown adult man.
Bro it’s not water. Wtf is he doing. And it is not that deep. Been there, if you jump into plastic it won’t magically get softer or turn into liquid, it will feel like plastic.
They set up a diving board. But for that I agree. But since they set one up that is akin to inviting people to jump in. What else is a diving board for?
@@xx133yes well as an adult if you see a bunch of kids jumping into a Sprinkle pool you might want to stick your legs in first before you jump into a Sprinkle pool he's just looking for a lawsuit this is made for kids he was an idiot adult who wanted to be this young dad and he needs to realize this is like a ride at Disneyland that's made for kids only
It’s super lame and so overpriced! Don’t bother! My niece begged me to take her cuz she saw something on stupid tik tok. No I did not dive or go into that nasty sticky shallow sprinkle pool, that would be dumb!
Been there. It’s not particularly good, and SO crowded, but the snacks are cute and you can occasionally get some good pictures. It’s more a place to take selfies than an actual museum.
You know what?, i seen news of some one who traped in balls pool, its dangerous if its go to deep, you can be traped in it, but now people find another way to make it dangerous huh?, i think the maker of the pool just need to install soft ground beneath the pool.
The adult getting hurt is just funny. But after seeing the “no diving”sign they make it seem like it’s multiple feet deep. The no diving sign should really for kids sake show the floor right below the colored pink on the image
one the most disgusting things on the planet are ball pits. Sprinkle pits would be no different. Seriously though, they have found nearly every body fluid in ball pits ☣️🤢
Quit being a germaphobe. We used to do the ball pits all the time as kids and we are still standing. Give your immune system a chance to work instead of panpering it with bubble wrap.
@@TheDarkPixie991:29 it says "NO DIVING" and also in Capital letters 😂. Why would they need to include the area or how deep the pool is if it clearly says no diving.
How ridiculous. The sprinkle pool is NOT an actual pool, and you aren’t meant to jump or dive into it. It’s a shallow “pool” of large plastic capsules, not water 🙄
@@snakenbits4279 - Yeah, I agree. The crux of this is that the business has a diving board, which is inviting people to jump into it. I hate to say, but I think the business messed up on this one. They are inviting people to jump into the sprinkle pool, but it isn't deep enough to safely do that.
@@ChristophProbst True, but it’s not only the lack of depth. It’s an unstable surface made up of something harder and less forgiving than water. I could see this being a viable case if it was a kid, but any adult should know that landing would probably be uncomfortable at best, even if they ignored the multiple warning signs. It’s sort of like Scrooge McDuck diving into a room full of gold coins - it looks cool on TV, but most people know it’d end extremely badly if a real person tried that.
I understand that he should have used better sense and not jumped into an art exhibit as if it were a diving pool. BUT there needs to be some accountability placed onto the museum when they included a diving board. “BuT tHeRe ArE sIGnS tHaT sAy No DiViNg.” Yeah yeah. But if you all agreed that this guy was right and that his injury was the museums fault, then you’d all be saying “signs and waivers don’t excuse the museum’s liability”. This comment section is just full of people who have decided that the guy was a complete idiot. If enough people in the comments section start to believe the museum was at fault, then all of you will be editing your opinions. We went to a local aquarium that has a kids splash pad. One of the features is a flower bowl that fills up with water. It’s literally shaped and sized so that kids can sit on the petals and put their feet down into the bowl full of water. A staff member kept coming up to kids and saying, “no sitting in the flower!” Well ma’am, then remove it. Because it’s the only thing in the splash pad that you won’t let the kids climb on. It’s sized and shaped for kids to sit on it. Remove it if you don’t want kids to use it for its obvious purpose. So the first thing this museum should have done was remove the diving board.
I hope he wins just so I can see the precedent set into law. According to the JACKSON Vs. MUSEUM OF ICECREAM (2024) the signs can be displayed and still the patron can sue for wrongful injury even if they willingly ignore the sign.
I actually saw a video of a ball pit getting all the balls industrially sanitized and replaced. Don't know about the sprinkles but they have special machines they put the ball pit balls in at least.
My kids and Iwent to the Los Angeles based Ice Cream museum years ago and it absolutely told us NOT to jump into the sprinkles pool.....idk about this suit sir.
@@FormigaFit it’s an area for kids. Kids see a diving board, they dive. They won’t always notice or even be able to read the signs. That an adult didn’t exercise more awareness is embarrassing, sure. But the museum is definitely in hot water
The museum has visitors sign a waiver saying they are not responsible for injury or death. Now, everybody jump into a pool of sprinkles! Oh, you didn't read the sign first that said the pool is only a few inches deep? Have a nice day at the emergency room?
@@davidtherwhanger6795he also likely didn't dive, just jumped based on it being an ankle injury Thankfully, waivers do not cover negligence on part of the business.
THANK YOU! I was starting to worry, getting this far down the comments w/o one person acknowledging that there's a "diving" board in a "no diving zone" ...also I've gotta add, notice the signs delivery of the rule almost exclusively needed for kids 3 & under has words that make sense sure but the picture, that's really a clear diversion (lol), a couple of shapes, I'm sure that'll be a clear message. Sorry it's gotten so long but I also wanted to add, sure I get that there's the waivers but there's also such a thing as bad design & I feel pretty safe saying this is a good example of it.
Nowhere in this video did they show a sign or mention any sign of the depth of the pool. The waiver is useless in court. It will not absolve the business of liability for it's negligence. The diving board is an open invitation to jump in. There is a sign showing not to dive in head first, but nothing about jumping in. I would not have jumped in. Maybe the guest isn't that bright, but that doesn't matter. The business should have seen this coming from the start. This is what will happen: the business will be served papers that they are being sued, then their attorney will advise them to settle out of court, then they will settle out of court as fast as possible and admit no wrong doing, then they will immediately close off the pool and have it removed if they haven't done so already because the last thing they want is another lawsuit for negligence after already having been sued for the same thing knowing it is not safe, then they will quickly pay the settlement amount to the court with guaranteed funds, then the guest will receive those funds from the court. The guest is made whole for his injuries, his attorney gets paid, and the business will not get sued again for that same foreseeable mistake.
Although it was certainly unwise to jump before knowing depth, I am a bit perplexed that the museum would provide diving boards if they don't anticipate people jumping? Like what do they expect people to do with an item that is literally designed to be jumped off of?
Well they did say no diving. It's designed to look like a pool. Did he also expect it to actually be made of water?. Also children are much lighter and bendier than adults and can almost cannon ball into the ground. Seems the adult acted the fool and I hope he feels better soon
They should have changed the way they do things after the the first few complaints and videos surfaced. Maybe make the signs more clear about jumping in and how deep it is. Hey, this is 2024, they could even have videos playing in the background of people jumping in. I'm sure some people would still do it and possibly get hurt, but I would feel better about the museum's liability. This one is still a little iffy to me.
@RocLobo358 no diving is different than no jumping. No diving could also be seen as kinda of cute or cheeky since it is definitely obvious you wouldn't want to do that since diving is done head first. The problem, in addition to literally providing equipment to jump off of, is that this sprinkle pool is intentionally designed to mimic a ball pit and everybody jumps into ball pits with no problem.
@@ruffrider2626 you honestly sound like the kind of commentor who never gets laid and is dangerously unhappy with their lives in real life. Maybe stick to the actual substance of the topic rather than devolving into strange personal attacks. Makes ya look weird and unstable.
Because then the kids could be injured by getting stuck at the bottom. The "pool" is so shallow so that a child (that this place is intended for) is less likely to get hurt. If it were deeper a child could get stuck underneath the plastic sprinkles and suffocate, or another person could jump on or step on them.
@@edmundblackaddercoc8522lol they straight up need a “lifeguard”. Or strict age restrictions that should ever prevent an injury from just being too big for it.
@@marvdatboiwaivers do not cover negligence on part of the business. It being an ankle injury suggests it's more likely jumped in instead of dived, depending on definition of dive. The diving board however and advertisment are neglectful and put responsible on the business. Also it's probably the health insurance company forcing this suit due to how health care works in usa
Sorry but I’m not following the crowd here, I remember around 1-2 years ago a lady at twitchcon fractured her spine at a foam pit because the bottom of it was improperly padded, just because you signed a waiver doesn’t mean your illegible to sue for negligence. It seems like a similar situation here, don’t just assume because they’re an adult they should know better. The organizing entity really should plan for areas to be accessible safely.
@@oude_henkythe sign says no DIVING. Diving is different than killing in feet first. If they had a sign saying "danger: don't jump or dive" then I would agree with you, but obviously from the video, multiple people incorrectly assumed it would be safe to jump in, like any ball pit.
@@MaxMax-ly6lu Yup and the dumb visitors who are apparently adults that signed a waiver saying that the museum is not responsible for the injuries are flat out karens who got their heads dropped on the floor real hard when they were toddlers.
@@RowdyJr Just because they have waviers doesn't mean they can't be held accountable for there negligence. They literally have a diving board with 6in deep plastic sprinkles. There is nowhere saying don't jump THEY LITERALLY HAVE A DIVING BOARD!!!!!
Do you have small kids and have you ever taken them somewhere and played along with them to help them enjoy themselves, particularly when everyone else is a stranger?
@@wutsit2yuhhuh246people like you are why we can’t have fun things and everything has to have a million different labels and warnings……everybody else has to use common sense you so clearly lack.
I do think it's weird they had all those little diving boards, I think it should have been at least as deep as a ball pit, although I havnt been in a ball pit since I was 10 so maybe they are not as deep as I remember lol
It is called a museum, but it is not really preserving anything. Should not be allowed, but there it is. Same as the selfie museums, neon sign museums and other tourist traps
Where does it say an adult can't go in? Why do they have diving boards set up if you're not supposed to jump in? There's an expectation that people might jump and dive in. That's why it says no diving.
Yeah I wouldn't have jumped. But sometimes adults act like kids when they're with their kids, so it's understandable, just an adult apparently having fun with his kids
Why should museum of ice cream be responsible for someone's stoopidity and incompetence? how about you use common sense? that girl at 0:44 has more common sense than adults. honestly this made me angry, how can you possibly sue someone over your own incompetence? what you mean warning signs? i swear soon those 50 IQ people will start demanding that knives and forks should have a WARNING SIGN on them, saying that "forks are pointy" and "knives are sharp" being dumb is not an excuse to sue someone. i've been a kid, i never fell down or broke any bones, because i used common sense.
My heat shield (the thing you put up on your car's dashboard spanning the entirety of the windshield to reflect the sun's rays to keep the car less hot) has a warning label to not use the device while driving.
Ever wonder why we can't have cool things like this public anymore? Because fools like this exist. It's certainly a culture here in America to seek out anyone to sue for just about anything.
Exactly, ambulance chasing lawyers crush the ability of everyone to have fun by forcing governments and companies to shut down fun things. I'm supprised swings are still allowed in parks.
I do feel like the adults who dived in are dumb but at the same time who makes a ball pit shallow. Sounds boring and unfun. And as demonstrated, unsafe
Not true..... At all. A waiver doesn't protect you from negligence. it's not deep.... A kid could also jump from the diving board and be seriously injured..... I personally think he has a decent chance of winning. Especially with the museum in its own ads showing ppl jumping in
@@chilogutierrez695sort of true. The add shows people jumping. No children have claimed injuries that we know of yet. If children had been injured most likely we would have heard about it because parents tend to be very vocal and protective about their children
@@chilogutierrez695 that’s like saying you have a good chance of winning because 200 out of 10,000 people that used “Clorox” got cancer, it must be Clorox’s fault, right??
@@chilogutierrez695it's up to the parents to go over the rules with their kids like I did and I'm tired of society being the blame because parents want to take the lazy way out you go over the rules you tell your kids it's not deep and you live with the consequences
Okay, here is the opposite side of it. They're calling it a pool, right? There's even a fake diving board looking structure on the side. No real pool in existence has a diving board on it. So that could be where the confusion is happening, as diving boards are always associated with deep water. While it may be obvious to you or I that the "pool" is pretend, clearly there are other people who made the same mistake and also got hurt. It wouldn't be too difficult to remove that fake diving board and put another slide instead. Maybe even post the "depth" of the pool as a number on the side.
They have a sign that says no diving. They have a waiver that says you could die or get injured. Their lawyers did a good job. He's just gonna be embarrassed like that man that wasted time suing Buffalo Wild Wings for false advertising boneless wings.
@@elizabethwilliams4705 The man has a permanent injury. I don't think the boneless wings incident is comparable, respectfully. From a business perspective, I would want to be as clear as possible. Can't assume that all your patrons are going to be smart enough to not be tricked by the diving board. If the sign says no diving, there probably shouldn't be a diving board structure, in my honest opinion.
@@BenMonaresthe issue here is your expecting people to have common sense. There are many many not very intelligent people, and we all know how common that so called common sense actually is.
Out of the mouth of babes: Even the teenage girl was like, you can see that it's not that deep. He should have put his foot in first and tested it. The kids could figure it out but he couldn't. And he signed a waiver. No money for you sir!
Sounds like my 65 year old sister who broke her ankle and leg by going down a slide after a music concert. She had to have 2 surgeries on the leg and ankle and she had months of recovery. I was very sorry she got hurt, but maybe she should have considered her age a little bit.
These frivolous lawsuits drive me crazy, people wanna be compensated for their irresponsible actions and the museum has to fund their own defense. The warning signs and waiver will hopefully get this dismissed.
Sounds stupid but he’s gonna win, or at least receive a settlement. That signage is not adequate. “No diving” on the sign but a dive board is still accessible, should be at least roped off. Also it warns of “no diving” but says nothing about jumping and does not advertise how deep the “pool” is.
Maybe the museum shouldn’t have people diving into the pool on their ads. Maybe don’t have a diving board. Maybe post a sign saying only 2 feet deep, no jumping, in addition to the no diving sign.
Sadly it does have diving platforms which shouldn’t be there. I actually retract my statement kind of. Kids had no problem playing in there. The adult will probably lose the suit. As an adult, I wouldn’t play in the McDonald’s playroom that’s too small for me. If they built the pool deeper, kids would probably get lost in it. I played in the ball pits back in the day and don’t remember if I got hurt or not. This kind of lawsuit is why there’s a sign “warning: coffee is hot, it will burn you” allow to cool a bit before consuming “Don’t eat the sprinkles???
@@wandibanda1590 that wouldn't count for the court. They could have taken it down because kids might think its a literal diving board. And that they should have put a sign
@@wandibanda1590 I’m not about to let kids play with my UCS MILLENNIUM falcon 7,541 pieces, so I keep it out of reach. Kids see a “diving platform”, they’re going to play whether it’s prohibited or not
@@honesteagle98 You have said it yourself , "kids". But in this situation we are talking about adults. Do you expect an adult to play with your falcon, get hurt and then sue?
@@midlyte7903 No lawsuit was because of kids getting injured. It was about a full grown adult who should and is expected to use common sense besides there was a sign and a WAVER to that effect
Who jumps in when you can clearly see children standing up.
😂😂😂
@@Tjd1982 am guessing his next lawsuit is that the sprinkles are plastic and not candy
The video shows kids but if no one else is in the pool you don’t know. One would assume it’s like a ball pit.
@@sunshiniesmileone would assume a grown man isn’t jumping into a sprinkle ball pit and then crying he got a boo boo
@@Tjd1982 -idiots.
Well. Specifically Karens and male-Karens, it seems?
That kid saying you should at least put your foot in first has more common sense than most adults.
Umm. Reference the word common. When toddlers are standing knee deep, its the uncommon adults that jump in like its a las vegas pool party.
I do think it's weird they had all those little diving boards, I think it should have been at least as deep as a ball pit, although I havnt been in a ball pit since I was 10 so maybe they are not as deep as I remember lol
Ball pits do very little to slow your fall. You shouldn't jump in those as an adult either.
Kids that weigh 90 pounds or less are going to have a much easier time jumping into this pool than an adult weighing over 130 pounds. It's basic physics. It's the same reason why a squirrel can fall out of a tree and be just fine afterward. The staff want the kids to be able to enjoy themselves, but children in adult bodies cannot resist the opportunity to injure themselves for a video on social media.
Bro I’m pretty sure it’s not made for adults, even if it was Adult mid-friendly then where is the common sense… Also kids are like 3ft or 4ft tall, I’m pretty sure it’s not meant for adults who are over 5ft
Adults are the new children stg
any adult that dives into that pool deserves a darwin award
nobody. the father jumped in, he didnt dive in. 😜
Including kids who other peoples nasty disgusting feet are in.
@darkpisces8125 Yeah, it's better to keep your socks on than going barefoot.
Bro is suing over jumping into a shallow pool filled with sprinkles. What a time to be alive
Lmao
There is a warning. And wow it’s less than a foot deep, makes everyone who jumped in look like an idiot
😂😂😂😂😂
Karens gonna Karen.
That was made for the enjoyment of children
He signed a waiver. He already lost this lawsuit before it even started.
If he took that ish to Judge Judy this case would've been over in 30 seconds flat
There’s a lot of case law about the effectiveness of a waiver.
It depends on a lot of variables.
Google “Lord Denning’s big red hand” for the UK/Canadian take on it.
Waivers aren’t 100%, but yeah, that makes his case a lot more difficult.
@@jonathanzigterman2379 Judge Judy would be in the ER recieveing emergency treatment from being unable to stop laughing at this df.
A similar thing happened at TwitchCon a few years ago where a girl broke her back. There could be something despite the waver. Its not a catch all get out of jail free card. Though the posted rules could harm the case.
it. says on the wall “no diving.” IT SAYS ON THE WALL “NO DIVING.” maybe some people don’t deserve free will.
Jumping in feet-first isn't diving, so calm tf down. While the guy is clearly an idiot, the sign does NOT say "no jumping."
No diving and no jumping are two different things. But yes still idiototic.
@@poa2.0surface77 why would you ask me to look it up, when if you do you find completely different descriptions. Of course these words can be used in other contexts, particularly jumping like "I jumped his bones" or a jump cut in a film. But in the context of it being a verb about kinesthetically moving your body;
"dive 1
(dīv)
v. dived or dove (dōv), dived, div·ing, dives
vb
1a. To plunge, especially headfirst, into water
jump (dʒʌmp)
vb
1. to leap or spring clear of the ground or other surface by using the muscles in the legs and feet.
To dive implies to go headfirst (well arms then head) into the water. Whereas a jump doesn't, I'm not saying you can't loosely interchange them, but if I go to a swimming pool that has a no diving sign (which always has a drawing of someone going headfirst) I can still jump into the pool, I just can't dive into it.....
Why would they put a diving board there though if it is not safe to jump off? I do think this guy was being foolish but why on earth would the put a diving board like that there.
He still sued them despite waiver, maybe he cant read any of the warning
Guy signed all the documents and still want to sue. This is the problem in America.
that's a true American: I'm stupid but it's not my fault. Someone should pay for my stupidity.
I was with you until they showed there was a diving board set up.
America, where the court, judge & lawyer made all the money. If people are stupid then that is on them.
@@brandonn3543 exactly my point. That's why there are so many personal injury lawyer ads on TV. Also why insurance is so expensive... so they can pay idiots who successfully scam them.
@@brandonn3543
I really hope you’re being sarcastic.
I don't hear kids being injured only stupid parents
😂😂😂
That’s what I was thinking.
I bet kids are hurt more often than you think.
Lmao 😂😂😂 hahaha
Omg, right!?
I wouldn't even touch it.. I just know those little "sprinkles" are so nasty all those kids playing in it.. 🤢
That whole pool is an all-around bad idea. Why is it only a few inches deep? Why is there a diving board? Its existence doesn't make sense.
I was in a ball pit recently. First thing I did when I got home was throw the clothes in the laundry and shower.
@@777Skeptic now the washing machine is contaminated
@@SeminarioMAESo what do you do now? Burn the clothes?
@@ToonyTails now the air is contaminated. Put it in a metal box and weld it shut.
why woulda grown man jump into something designed for little children, thats like diving into the kids pool at the water park, he shouldnt be able to sue for his stupidity
tell that to the "coffee is hot" lady
@@h2ojr1 lava temperature coffee that melts your skin is reasonable grounds for a lawsuit. that's why she won and mcdonald's made it their mission to slander her name and make it almost impossible to sue corporations for their mishaps.
@@h2ojr1 ok the “coffee is hot” lady actually had a reasonable argument though. The lid was not properly secured and the coffee was served so hot that it melted her skin. And she only asked for medical expenses covered initially.
@@thatonepossum5766 Oh yea, the documentary about it
It would be more accurately to compare this to that guy who died the man that HE TRIED TO ROB FOR INJURIES HE GOT FROM THE MAN'S DOG WHILE FAILING TO ROB THE MAN@@h2ojr1
If you know not to jump into a body of water without knowing how deep it is, why would you jump in a pool of sprinkles
And soon nobody will be able to go into the pool at all. Americans do nothing but ruin the good things we have in America with their nonsense 🙄😡🤦
Facts...plastic is NOT the same as water. There's a reason the rules say no diving
He's also the person that dives in head first next to the pool stairs. 🤦 I say, just give him some money and wait for him to use it to finish Darwining himself. Help the guy out with a ticket for bungee jumping, or a free parkour lesson.
@lamar310 More of a reason not to jump, jumping into plastic. I cannot tell, which side of the argument you're on?
@@zairac2564Yeah, we all know the saying, fool & money ect. He will have fun buying crayons.
You CHOSE to jump in and you have to deal with the consequences of YOUR actions. What a tool.
A tool-shed!
DEAR ADULTS, If you're too big to play in the McDonald's play area, you're too big to play in the sprinkle pool...🙄🙄
@@Rockitsteady8513 Rollercoasters are for everyone, as long as they meet the height requirement and can fit.
No the hell im not, get over it, your never too old
@@Rockitsteady8513no, that's why you guys are so mean and angry, you don't still play, your not too old to jump in a ball pit
Adults can play video games, board games, DND, with hot wheels or stuffed animals for all I care. No problem as long as it isn't interfering with responsibilities. But in a public space with other people's children? Is sensible to watch with a suspicious eye in case the adult isn't right in the head (mental illness, drugs, developmental delay, etc. could result in inadvertently causing harm) or might try to lure a child. It is sensible to maintain some boundary so we know when someone is crossing it. The crossing isn't proof positive of malfeasance, but rather a sign to be alert.
I wouldn't be surprised if in USA adults also play in the play area , just by this video
Why is an adult jumping into a kids sprinkle pool? Another grifter with a lawsuit.
There's an adult only section. I got injured too hahahaha
Could have jumped in with his kid?
why jump into anything in the first place when you can see people standing on the very same thing????
To be fair, the diving board is pretty much an invitation to jump. There isn't a sign for age or weight restrictions for people diving into the sprinkles. You don't know if there's a hard floor underneath either. It really seems like someone can get seriously injured eventually.
There's literally a sign that says "No Diving". Some people are just stupid and lack common sense
There's a sign and warning not to dive in.
There’s a sign tht says no diving, even tho it could be tempting he can’t use tht as an excuse.. too grown!
Especially when it’s advertised with people jumping in.
@@quenainonchalant9205yeah no one is going to dive head first into the floor… a no jumping sign would probably help.
I cant help but think its his own fault ... Not the museum.
That’s what I think, he’s probably blaming them for his inability to think.
Reminds me of that episode of family guy where peter jumps in a pool of money & ends up Effing himself up.. 💀😭🤣😂😅😅😅😅😅😂
He was definitely acting dumb, but… there was a diving board.
There is always one idiot who ruins things for everyone, this is that guy
@@averycheesypotatofor kids 😂
he needs brain surgery, not ankle surgery
No, this is common. People think it’s deeper than it actually is. There is normally a warning
@@xx133 But there is no cure for stupid!
@@Bill-im6nt stop pretending that he knew how deep it was
@@xx133 Let's say it was 100 feet deep, diving into plastic still isn't a common sense thing.
He can't fix what he doesn't have
0:51 clearly says "NO DIVING".
You would think he would be too embarrassed of his stupidity to sue and make this public
👆🏽
Probably he just want to pay the medical bill.
The museum is absolutely in the wrong here. This pool is intended to be jumped into. There are zero warnings about jumping, and they have boards on the side designed to jump off of.
Right…
@@jaredf6205exxxxxxxcept…… that sign that says “no diving”!!!! Did you even watch the video???
Seems like he should be sued for jumping into a children’s play area.
Exactly!
Mhmm!
The business will be sued for negligence and they will lose. They will settle and remove the pool before they get sued again. The waiver is useless in court.
Yep!!
Wtf was he doing in children's play area
He signed an agreement and still sues. I hope this gets thrown out.
So people out here filing lawsuits over stuff that is supposed to be for kids bruh you're not a kid anymore you're an adult act like one
🎯🎯🎯
It's completely an optical illusion and very dangerous, I can see why people see it so inviting to jump in, you have to account for the slow folks too
@@Johnny.Naturaland the diving board lol
Yeah, playing with your kids is so unadult like.
It is not "supposed to be for kids" most of the exhibits at those types of museums are for all to enjoy. You just have to enjoy some differently than a kid would if you are full sized grown adult man.
Bro it’s not water. Wtf is he doing. And it is not that deep. Been there, if you jump into plastic it won’t magically get softer or turn into liquid, it will feel like plastic.
No, it looks deeper than it is, which is why nearly all of these have warnings stating so.
Even water isn't soft and fluffy when a body hits it.
They set up a diving board. But for that I agree. But since they set one up that is akin to inviting people to jump in. What else is a diving board for?
@@KayJay940
This part is the only reason that guy could have a chance at winning the case. Although he did sign the waiver 🤷♀️
@@xx133yes well as an adult if you see a bunch of kids jumping into a Sprinkle pool you might want to stick your legs in first before you jump into a Sprinkle pool he's just looking for a lawsuit this is made for kids he was an idiot adult who wanted to be this young dad and he needs to realize this is like a ride at Disneyland that's made for kids only
Case dismissed on grounds of stupidity.
Today I learned there’s a museum of ice cream
That was literally the best part about the story! 🤣
It’s super lame and so overpriced! Don’t bother! My niece begged me to take her cuz she saw something on stupid tik tok. No I did not dive or go into that nasty sticky shallow sprinkle pool, that would be dumb!
By coincidence, I found out about it 4 days ago.
Been there. It’s not particularly good, and SO crowded, but the snacks are cute and you can occasionally get some good pictures. It’s more a place to take selfies than an actual museum.
…thats not ice cream.
-The wisest man alive, 2we1ve
Isn’t that why the adults are supposed to stay out of the kids area?
Parents enjoy bonding with their children in physical activities. Parents in ball pits, bouncy houses and water fights are normal.
@@AllGreyEverythingno
@@V0YAG3R dude yes they do, because your non loving parents didn't doesn't mean other parents dont
So he should’ve just left his daughter unattended in a museum?
You know what?, i seen news of some one who traped in balls pool, its dangerous if its go to deep, you can be traped in it, but now people find another way to make it dangerous huh?, i think the maker of the pool just need to install soft ground beneath the pool.
I hope they don’t settle. It’s clear he’s just after cash. What a terrible example he’s setting for his daughter.
Adults should take accountability for not checking where they’re jumping.
The adult getting hurt is just funny. But after seeing the “no diving”sign they make it seem like it’s multiple feet deep. The no diving sign should really for kids sake show the floor right below the colored pink on the image
Imagine the filth coating the sprinkles.
one the most disgusting things on the planet are ball pits. Sprinkle pits would be no different. Seriously though, they have found nearly every body fluid in ball pits ☣️🤢
😮The amount of hairs..........
That’s why you don’t see many ball pits anymore
Quit being a germaphobe. We used to do the ball pits all the time as kids and we are still standing. Give your immune system a chance to work instead of panpering it with bubble wrap.
Not bad like McDonald's.
WHY would an adult jump into something that is clearly intended to entertain *children?* 😮
An adult not obeying signs and being in denial of the contract he signed. What an idiot.
What signs? There are no depth labels visible like real pools are required to have.
@@TheDarkPixie99the one that says no diving…
@@TheDarkPixie991:29 it says "NO DIVING" and also in Capital letters 😂. Why would they need to include the area or how deep the pool is if it clearly says no diving.
That's society now.
@@joeofmacabre07Diving is defined as jumping in head first. I'm pretty sure he didn't do that.
How ridiculous. The sprinkle pool is NOT an actual pool, and you aren’t meant to jump or dive into it. It’s a shallow “pool” of large plastic capsules, not water 🙄
They probably should have taken the diving board down though, just to maybe discourage people from using it.
@@snakenbits4279 - Yeah, I agree. The crux of this is that the business has a diving board, which is inviting people to jump into it. I hate to say, but I think the business messed up on this one. They are inviting people to jump into the sprinkle pool, but it isn't deep enough to safely do that.
@@ChristophProbst True, but it’s not only the lack of depth. It’s an unstable surface made up of something harder and less forgiving than water. I could see this being a viable case if it was a kid, but any adult should know that landing would probably be uncomfortable at best, even if they ignored the multiple warning signs. It’s sort of like Scrooge McDuck diving into a room full of gold coins - it looks cool on TV, but most people know it’d end extremely badly if a real person tried that.
@snakenbits4279 but the sign clearly says no diving.
@@finally97yes, but it clearly doesn't say no jumping. There's a difference.
I understand that he should have used better sense and not jumped into an art exhibit as if it were a diving pool. BUT there needs to be some accountability placed onto the museum when they included a diving board.
“BuT tHeRe ArE sIGnS tHaT sAy No DiViNg.”
Yeah yeah. But if you all agreed that this guy was right and that his injury was the museums fault, then you’d all be saying “signs and waivers don’t excuse the museum’s liability”. This comment section is just full of people who have decided that the guy was a complete idiot. If enough people in the comments section start to believe the museum was at fault, then all of you will be editing your opinions.
We went to a local aquarium that has a kids splash pad. One of the features is a flower bowl that fills up with water. It’s literally shaped and sized so that kids can sit on the petals and put their feet down into the bowl full of water. A staff member kept coming up to kids and saying, “no sitting in the flower!” Well ma’am, then remove it. Because it’s the only thing in the splash pad that you won’t let the kids climb on. It’s sized and shaped for kids to sit on it. Remove it if you don’t want kids to use it for its obvious purpose.
So the first thing this museum should have done was remove the diving board.
I hope he's laughed out of court.
I hope he wins just so I can see the precedent set into law. According to the JACKSON Vs. MUSEUM OF ICECREAM (2024) the signs can be displayed and still the patron can sue for wrongful injury even if they willingly ignore the sign.
I doubt that.
@@geigertec5921he will win.
He will be. Out of all the shady businesses in the United States, this isn't one of them. We don't need more frivolous lawsuits
@geigertec5921 😂
Nothing like diving into a bunch of recycled plastic that never gets washed ever.
McDonald playground anyone?
@@Blahcvgfg I found food in mine as a kid. Gross!
I actually saw a video of a ball pit getting all the balls industrially sanitized and replaced. Don't know about the sprinkles but they have special machines they put the ball pit balls in at least.
@@Blahcvgfg
Eww No thank you ! 😅😂😂
The balls to sue, you’re literally embarrassing yourself in front of the entire world.
My kids and Iwent to the Los Angeles based Ice Cream museum years ago and it absolutely told us NOT to jump into the sprinkles pool.....idk about this suit sir.
I cant figure out anymore if its stupidity or opportunism..
Stupidity followed by opportunism.
Greed
why not both?
Nah, the correct answer’s natural selection at this point
@@Danube-TVDoesn’t natural selection involve death?
Why are kids better at reading and respecting clearly outlined rules than fully grown adults
I mean it’s all pretty dumb, but why did the museum install a DIVING BOARD over a shallow pit of hard plastic?
It doesn’t matter, what matters is common sense
The diving board is kind of the oxymoron of the whole story. You can’t have that and expect a grown adult to have the common sense God gave an ant.
It's a diving board for looks, duh...it's a museum.
@@BenMonaresThat's not how the legal system works my dude. The museums in the wrong here and they're going to lose this lawsuit.
@@FormigaFit it’s an area for kids. Kids see a diving board, they dive. They won’t always notice or even be able to read the signs.
That an adult didn’t exercise more awareness is embarrassing, sure. But the museum is definitely in hot water
These adults need to be sued 🤦🏾♀️🤬
They kept "Not to Dive" and still adults are diving and sueing 😅😅😅😅
This proves adults are just children with big bodies.
They could say it's only gen z adults acting like kids in big bodies but gen x and millennial adults are the same way too.
Yeah, big bodies that no longer bounce like they used to. 😂
How dare you compare children with them, they are pure
Then how come it's only adults getting injured and not kids? Children are clearly smarter than these dumb excuse for adults
This doesn't prove it.. adult Behavior has been proving it for the last 10 years or so...
Jump at your own risk! Fools!
AAAAGH! It's not a liquid! It's a great many pieces of solid matter that form a hard, floor-like surface!
The museum has visitors sign a waiver saying they are not responsible for injury or death. Now, everybody jump into a pool of sprinkles! Oh, you didn't read the sign first that said the pool is only a few inches deep? Have a nice day at the emergency room?
That's what got me. If the rules are and the sign says 'No Diving', then why did they put in a diving board/ platform?
@@davidtherwhanger6795he also likely didn't dive, just jumped based on it being an ankle injury
Thankfully, waivers do not cover negligence on part of the business.
THANK YOU! I was starting to worry, getting this far down the comments w/o one person acknowledging that there's a "diving" board in a "no diving zone" ...also I've gotta add, notice the signs delivery of the rule almost exclusively needed for kids 3 & under has words that make sense sure but the picture, that's really a clear diversion (lol), a couple of shapes, I'm sure that'll be a clear message.
Sorry it's gotten so long but I also wanted to add, sure I get that there's the waivers but there's also such a thing as bad design & I feel pretty safe saying this is a good example of it.
Yeah but a shallow pool is deep than one foot and you can see how deep the poor is, this is way shallower than a typical ball pit even.
Nowhere in this video did they show a sign or mention any sign of the depth of the pool. The waiver is useless in court. It will not absolve the business of liability for it's negligence. The diving board is an open invitation to jump in. There is a sign showing not to dive in head first, but nothing about jumping in. I would not have jumped in. Maybe the guest isn't that bright, but that doesn't matter. The business should have seen this coming from the start. This is what will happen: the business will be served papers that they are being sued, then their attorney will advise them to settle out of court, then they will settle out of court as fast as possible and admit no wrong doing, then they will immediately close off the pool and have it removed if they haven't done so already because the last thing they want is another lawsuit for negligence after already having been sued for the same thing knowing it is not safe, then they will quickly pay the settlement amount to the court with guaranteed funds, then the guest will receive those funds from the court. The guest is made whole for his injuries, his attorney gets paid, and the business will not get sued again for that same foreseeable mistake.
This is why we can’t have nice things
Theres always someone who ruins it for everyone else 🤬😡😡🤬
Although it was certainly unwise to jump before knowing depth, I am a bit perplexed that the museum would provide diving boards if they don't anticipate people jumping? Like what do they expect people to do with an item that is literally designed to be jumped off of?
Well they did say no diving. It's designed to look like a pool. Did he also expect it to actually be made of water?. Also children are much lighter and bendier than adults and can almost cannon ball into the ground. Seems the adult acted the fool and I hope he feels better soon
They should have changed the way they do things after the the first few complaints and videos surfaced. Maybe make the signs more clear about jumping in and how deep it is. Hey, this is 2024, they could even have videos playing in the background of people jumping in. I'm sure some people would still do it and possibly get hurt, but I would feel better about the museum's liability. This one is still a little iffy to me.
Found the 2 out of 2,500 commenters that you would never want at any activity. 1 out of 1,250 seems about right.
@RocLobo358 no diving is different than no jumping. No diving could also be seen as kinda of cute or cheeky since it is definitely obvious you wouldn't want to do that since diving is done head first. The problem, in addition to literally providing equipment to jump off of, is that this sprinkle pool is intentionally designed to mimic a ball pit and everybody jumps into ball pits with no problem.
@@ruffrider2626 you honestly sound like the kind of commentor who never gets laid and is dangerously unhappy with their lives in real life. Maybe stick to the actual substance of the topic rather than devolving into strange personal attacks. Makes ya look weird and unstable.
They need a dense foam base underneath, at the very least- and to remove the diving objects. Ramps or little slides to enter and exit.
There’s literally a sign behind the lady saying not to dive!
In all fairness having a actual diving board present is a bit iffy,why not just get rid of it or make it deeper?!
Because then the kids could be injured by getting stuck at the bottom. The "pool" is so shallow so that a child (that this place is intended for) is less likely to get hurt. If it were deeper a child could get stuck underneath the plastic sprinkles and suffocate, or another person could jump on or step on them.
@@abbirussell4310 then they need a lifeguard 🤣
Deeper wouldn't work, but they should definitely get rid of the diving board.
@@edmundblackaddercoc8522lol they straight up need a “lifeguard”. Or strict age restrictions that should ever prevent an injury from just being too big for it.
Suing someone else for your own stupidity!
@MrTsiolkovsky tiny hat people are the ones running the business and are too cheap to increase the depth of the pool
Why do they have diving boards if you're not supposed to jump in?
It’s art
All of his problems are self-inflicted, good luck with that lawsuit.
He will win. No signs about jumping in. Its a small surgery. Honestly they should have already given it to him.
@@louispeddiltton47it clearly says no diving. Furthermore more he signed a waiver 🙄
If I were there, prime example? I'd point & laugh my *ss off big time 💀😭🤣😅😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
@@louispeddiltton47He signed a waiver and there’s signs. I wouldn’t pay him a dime.
@@marvdatboiwaivers do not cover negligence on part of the business. It being an ankle injury suggests it's more likely jumped in instead of dived, depending on definition of dive. The diving board however and advertisment are neglectful and put responsible on the business.
Also it's probably the health insurance company forcing this suit due to how health care works in usa
Another lazy dad trying to get quick and easy money
👍
Sorry but I’m not following the crowd here, I remember around 1-2 years ago a lady at twitchcon fractured her spine at a foam pit because the bottom of it was improperly padded, just because you signed a waiver doesn’t mean your illegible to sue for negligence. It seems like a similar situation here, don’t just assume because they’re an adult they should know better. The organizing entity really should plan for areas to be accessible safely.
Did the foam pit say you couldn't jump in? There were clear guidelines set in place and the adult broke them, period
im gonna need you to pause at 1:30 PLEASE 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@@oude_henkythe sign says no DIVING. Diving is different than killing in feet first. If they had a sign saying "danger: don't jump or dive" then I would agree with you, but obviously from the video, multiple people incorrectly assumed it would be safe to jump in, like any ball pit.
Common sense is rare nowadays 😩
Why was there a diving board in a kids play area knowing that there's concrete underneath. Any reasonable person would jump on the diving board
@@MaxMax-ly6lu
Yup and the dumb visitors who are apparently adults that signed a waiver saying that the museum is not responsible for the injuries are flat out karens who got their heads dropped on the floor real hard when they were toddlers.
@@RowdyJr Just because they have waviers doesn't mean they can't be held accountable for there negligence. They literally have a diving board with 6in deep plastic sprinkles. There is nowhere saying don't jump THEY LITERALLY HAVE A DIVING BOARD!!!!!
@@MaxMax-ly6lu
Well I don't work for them 😂 Chill out boomer
@@MaxMax-ly6luDid you watch the video? They have signs up that say no diving.
First off why would a full grown man jump in that , it’s clearly for kids.
Exactly exactly but some people are big kids themselves
My first thought right there
Do you have small kids and have you ever taken them somewhere and played along with them to help them enjoy themselves, particularly when everyone else is a stranger?
@@NegatingSilenceNo need to jump in 😂
@@NegatingSilence So you injure yourself so you need to be taken to the hospital and neither you nor your kids get to have fun. Brilliant.
Sign: No diving.
Adults: That sign can't stop me because I can't read!
Sprinkles? I see hotdogs
I bet you do!!!!
Slurp slurp slurp 👅💦💦💦
Remember that Family Guy Cutaway, when Peter decided to jump into a pool of coins? Yeah that's that guy
Yes, I think you're right
I forgot about that one 😂
I was thinking the same thing.
He should be sued for being stupid and trying to sue.
That guy is a true party pooper
And ankle breaker.
Yeah you can’t just dive in mate! It’s not a bottomless pool of water is it?!
He signed the waiver...case dismissed
unfortunately liberal judges have disregarded waivers and clear warnings in past lawsuits and New York judges are about as liberal as they get
Not necessarily
@@codyhadrianreidif one can’t have common sense, it’s natural selection
not when in gross negligence but yeah his fault
was it a chocolate wafer?
BRO... YOU CAN LITERALLY SEE THE SIGN ON THE WALL IN THE VIDEO SAYS "NO DIVING." DUDE ALSO SIGNED THE WAIVER. WHY IS HE EVEN ALLOWED TO SUE??
He jumped in. Didn't dive head first
Because someone’s gotta entertain the judge with their stupidity XD
@@wutsit2yuhhuh246people like you are why we can’t have fun things and everything has to have a million different labels and warnings……everybody else has to use common sense you so clearly lack.
I do think it's weird they had all those little diving boards, I think it should have been at least as deep as a ball pit, although I havnt been in a ball pit since I was 10 so maybe they are not as deep as I remember lol
No diving means no diving.
Jumping in is not diving.
They say its a museum not freaking playground.
It is called a museum, but it is not really preserving anything. Should not be allowed, but there it is. Same as the selfie museums, neon sign museums and other tourist traps
And why is the adult jumping into a sprinkle pool exactly
Playing along with his kids he brought to it.
Where does it say an adult can't go in? Why do they have diving boards set up if you're not supposed to jump in? There's an expectation that people might jump and dive in. That's why it says no diving.
Yeah I wouldn't have jumped. But sometimes adults act like kids when they're with their kids, so it's understandable, just an adult apparently having fun with his kids
your kids hate you
Why should museum of ice cream be responsible for someone's stoopidity and incompetence? how about you use common sense? that girl at 0:44 has more common sense than adults.
honestly this made me angry, how can you possibly sue someone over your own incompetence? what you mean warning signs? i swear soon those 50 IQ people will start demanding that knives and forks should have a WARNING SIGN on them, saying that "forks are pointy" and "knives are sharp"
being dumb is not an excuse to sue someone. i've been a kid, i never fell down or broke any bones, because i used common sense.
My heat shield (the thing you put up on your car's dashboard spanning the entirety of the windshield to reflect the sun's rays to keep the car less hot) has a warning label to not use the device while driving.
Awww I thought it was “actual” sprinkles
Ever wonder why we can't have cool things like this public anymore? Because fools like this exist. It's certainly a culture here in America to seek out anyone to sue for just about anything.
People ruin it for everyone because they want money
Exactly, ambulance chasing lawyers crush the ability of everyone to have fun by forcing governments and companies to shut down fun things. I'm supprised swings are still allowed in parks.
Imagine suing an ice cream museum over a sprinkle pool.
It's American. Nothing is off the table.
@@Kay_Watermelon Fair point, we be wylin out.
Then why he jumped?
Im mixed on this. To be fair the sprinkle pool has diving boards there.. The rules sign mentions no diving. It should have said no jumping period.
Not the teenager being interviewed having more common sense than an adult jumping into a pool full of sprinkles...hahaha
Absolutely love calling out the stupidity of this man. 😂
Imagine being the kid of this dad, the embarrassment.
Injuring yourself while blaming others seems to be most idiotic thing you could have done in your miserable none sense life.
Should have kept his old *ss out of it!
I do feel like the adults who dived in are dumb but at the same time who makes a ball pit shallow. Sounds boring and unfun. And as demonstrated, unsafe
I knew they will be sued: Why would you have a diving pool stand if you expect people NOT to dive?
If ya signed a waiver, you accept the risk……
Not true..... At all. A waiver doesn't protect you from negligence. it's not deep.... A kid could also jump from the diving board and be seriously injured..... I personally think he has a decent chance of winning. Especially with the museum in its own ads showing ppl jumping in
@@chilogutierrez695sort of true. The add shows people jumping. No children have claimed injuries that we know of yet. If children had been injured most likely we would have heard about it because parents tend to be very vocal and protective about their children
@@chilogutierrez695 that’s like saying you have a good chance of winning because 200 out of 10,000 people that used “Clorox” got cancer, it must be Clorox’s fault, right??
@@chilogutierrez695 do you need warning labels on everything?
@@chilogutierrez695it's up to the parents to go over the rules with their kids like I did and I'm tired of society being the blame because parents want to take the lazy way out you go over the rules you tell your kids it's not deep and you live with the consequences
He should be sued for jumping into a pool made for kids. 😂
Okay, here is the opposite side of it. They're calling it a pool, right? There's even a fake diving board looking structure on the side.
No real pool in existence has a diving board on it. So that could be where the confusion is happening, as diving boards are always associated with deep water.
While it may be obvious to you or I that the "pool" is pretend, clearly there are other people who made the same mistake and also got hurt. It wouldn't be too difficult to remove that fake diving board and put another slide instead. Maybe even post the "depth" of the pool as a number on the side.
They have a sign that says no diving. They have a waiver that says you could die or get injured. Their lawyers did a good job. He's just gonna be embarrassed like that man that wasted time suing Buffalo Wild Wings for false advertising boneless wings.
@@elizabethwilliams4705 The man has a permanent injury. I don't think the boneless wings incident is comparable, respectfully.
From a business perspective, I would want to be as clear as possible. Can't assume that all your patrons are going to be smart enough to not be tricked by the diving board.
If the sign says no diving, there probably shouldn't be a diving board structure, in my honest opinion.
Also I'm glad everyone understood what I meant because I forgot to include the word "shallow" in the second paragraph lol.
@@elizabethwilliams4705 Diving and jumping are very different things. In a typical pool when it says no diving, you are still allowed to jump.
Then why in hell do they have diving boards for Gods sake
It doesn’t matter, people should use common sense
Why is there a diving board? @@BenMonares
Well, they aren't actually diving boards. It's a static platform.
For aesthetics purposes. So if you see a pool with shallow water, will you still jump in because there is a diving board
@@BenMonaresthe issue here is your expecting people to have common sense. There are many many not very intelligent people, and we all know how common that so called common sense actually is.
I’m immensely disappointed those aren’t real sprinkles
The sign Literally says no diving.
Yh but why add a diving board/platform. It's like they were secretly encouraging it 🤔
He didn't dive, he jumped in.
@@hottuna2006true but others might try and even the video showed people using the diving board 🤔
Use proper English. ‘The sign says No Diving’
@@djrosetteit is a decoration. It is for aesthetics
Out of the mouth of babes: Even the teenage girl was like, you can see that it's not that deep. He should have put his foot in first and tested it. The kids could figure it out but he couldn't. And he signed a waiver. No money for you sir!
@@queenbee4350 the adults have no common sense even after the teen addresses that as well😭😭 they’re just as dumb as the man suing 😫
There are literally no jumping signs there
Why do they have a diving board over a pool that you're not supposed to jump into? Take out the diving board at least.
they dont expect full grown idiots to dive bomb into a clearly shallow sprinkle pool for kids 😂
It's a decorative diving board for a decorative pool covered in a half inch of foam.
You don't need a brain to know you shouldn't dive off that board.
@@georgiegirl8345
They are confusing the platform the lady tried to cannonball from, for one...
For decoration-
If they take out the diving board now the guy will use that as proof they knew the pool is dangerous. What a world we live in
I hope they didn't give him ice-cream at hospital
😂 sorry that caught me off guard lol
Do adults really need to be warned not to be idiots?! Give me strength!
People always gotta get their panties in a "swirl" over something.
🥁🥁🔔
He's a male that wears panties I'm sure. He's a sad example of a dad.
Lmao 🤣
No thats the toilet pool
Sounds like my 65 year old sister who broke her ankle and leg by going down a slide after a music concert. She had to have 2 surgeries on the leg and ankle and she had months of recovery. I was very sorry she got hurt, but maybe she should have considered her age a little bit.
What??no!! Personal responsibility doesn't exist anymore!
These frivolous lawsuits drive me crazy, people wanna be compensated for their irresponsible actions and the museum has to fund their own defense. The warning signs and waiver will hopefully get this dismissed.
If parents can’t figure out there’s a risk then I feel bad for their kids.
✔️
Sounds stupid but he’s gonna win, or at least receive a settlement. That signage is not adequate. “No diving” on the sign but a dive board is still accessible, should be at least roped off. Also it warns of “no diving” but says nothing about jumping and does not advertise how deep the “pool” is.
How can he sue if he signed a waiver
Maybe the museum shouldn’t have people diving into the pool on their ads.
Maybe don’t have a diving board.
Maybe post a sign saying only 2 feet deep, no jumping, in addition to the no diving sign.
Sadly it does have diving platforms which shouldn’t be there. I actually retract my statement kind of. Kids had no problem playing in there. The adult will probably lose the suit. As an adult, I wouldn’t play in the McDonald’s playroom that’s too small for me.
If they built the pool deeper, kids would probably get lost in it. I played in the ball pits back in the day and don’t remember if I got hurt or not.
This kind of lawsuit is why there’s a sign “warning: coffee is hot, it will burn you” allow to cool a bit before consuming
“Don’t eat the sprinkles???
It is for aesthetics purposes. For show and not for use especially by an adult
@@wandibanda1590 that wouldn't count for the court. They could have taken it down because kids might think its a literal diving board. And that they should have put a sign
@@wandibanda1590 I’m not about to let kids play with my UCS MILLENNIUM falcon 7,541 pieces, so I keep it out of reach. Kids see a “diving platform”, they’re going to play whether it’s prohibited or not
@@honesteagle98 You have said it yourself , "kids". But in this situation we are talking about adults. Do you expect an adult to play with your falcon, get hurt and then sue?
@@midlyte7903 No lawsuit was because of kids getting injured. It was about a full grown adult who should and is expected to use common sense besides there was a sign and a WAVER to that effect