I remember when Americans used to ask with a mixture of astonishment and arrogance how the German people could ever have allowed Hitler to come to power. Well--now we know...
Canon didn’t write this decision it was written by member or members of the federalist society. Also look into which oligarch is assisted her financially aka Thomas.
yeah the timing is amazing, it is not just the RNC but also the attempt on Trump, so she chose the moment well, because there might be a bit of a pity sentiment towards Trump from people and amidst all the media chaos currently, alot of people will also miss it while they get the 24/7 live coverage about how Trump got grazed and 3 others who actually suffered, while Trump is described as "upbeat" and ready to go to the next rally, while not even wasting one word on the actual victims of the shooting.
yep this is a matter of hurt liberal feelings all any one has to do to understand it is watch all the compilations of trump will never be president and the video joe Scarborough did explaining what the real issues with the democratic party is and why they lost and its not because trumps the antichrist either.
I don't think it's that easy. Thomas is that corrupt, but the court has shown it's not completely as corrupt as Thomas. Obviously special counsels are completely legal, and Cannon is trying to legislate from the bench, it's only brought into question now because it's Trump - which highlights the corruption. They had no problem with Trump's special counsel going after Hillary and Obama (Durham), they had no problem with special counsel going after Biden's son - it's just Trump.
Complete corruption. Not only did Thomas violate the rules of the court, but Cannon just declared all cases that used a Special Council, going back into the 1800s, were illegal, which is BS, as it's already been ruled that Special Councils are allowed.
Respectfully, Thomas had to include that in his concurrence. If he had a majority on his side that would have been in the opinion. She's truly out in right field on this one!
@@TheAzmountaineerhe, even though he was not asked, questioned the status of a special counsel. Clearly implying how he will rule if this gets to SCOTUS, and it will…
I can only figure it's pure corruption (see the 6's decision in last terms' bribery case) or that the 6 live in such a right-wing echo chamber they really know nothing about America. They've been groomed and influenced for so long, since law school.
Steven - they stand it with cognitive dissonance. Their minds can't fathom facts if the facts disrupt their current mindsets. So they close their eyes and ignore what goes against their grain - no matter what.
If it was a clear and legit dismissal, why wasn't it used at the outset? Hint: it's not legit. It instead is a last straw attempt to help Trump, the defendant who hired the judge in the case. Judge Cannon argues about inappropriate prosecutor appointment, BUT FAILS TO RECUSE HERSELF from the very same case.
Cannon has effectively removed herself from the case, but has delayed so long that it is now impossible for any movement on the case until after the election. Just what Trump wanted. Vore blue do not let him get away with this.
Speaking of throwing up. Garland could have appointed a sitting counsel imeaditly instead of heming and hawing worrying about the political optics so long. Did he forget how Mitch wouldn't even let a vote come to the floor on his appointment to the so called supreme court?
@@MPMMPM-vy9cu Has been since the Democrats rolled over and let the Republicans steal a Supreme Court seat rather than taking drastic action to not allow it to happen. "Can't rock the boat". Ugh. Now the corrupt, stolen Court has been normalized and the dominos keep falling.
She needs to get off the bench. How can anyone expect her to be impartial when they bring a case before her? This is why people are losing faith with the US judicial system.
@@newelllondon724Don't have to when we've been following her behavior for months. She's like a high schooler trying to navigate international geopolitics-- she's in way over her head.
Weissman, Litman and Tribe are experts. They studied and practised law at an extremely high level. Unfortunately, when they studied law the expectation was that American democracy would continue for the considerable future. The law faculties had not banked on a Fascist overtake of the judicial system in 21st century.
You mean experts like in the Enron case ? Or are you talking about trying to impeach Pres Trump twice. Weissman is a dem hack who whines and never wins!
And instead of holding an Ex-President to a higher standing, he has gotten special treatment. I don't really believe bible nonsense, but if there were an Anti-Christ, he would look and act just like Drumpf.
We are living in dark times. If you don't like what is happening here imagine what is to come if trump is to set foot in the white house. No to kings. Vote blue 🌊🌊💙💙🌊🌊🌊
Corrupt ES&S voting machines in 40 out of 50 states. Do you thing Maga, GOP, SCOTUS, CNP, Heritage Foundation, and the Federalist Society, did all this just to put it to the whims of the voters??? There's no precedent in the law or the Constitution for the immunity ruling. There's power grabbing in the Chevron precedent reversal that now makes it practically impossible to regulate corrupt corporations.
Judges should not be political at all. First, you appoint them on the basis of them being either D or R, and then you ask them to be apolitical?! Bizarre.
That's a very good question I concur she has such lack of legal knowledge not to mention cases she has performed pinpoint who wrote that for her I totally agree I smell blue cheese LOL
@@papawheelie5576 Not once they're out of office, and they can't "retroactively declassify with their mind" like Trump is trying to claim he can do. Declassification requires written records from the white house showing said documents were declassified, and that action has to take place while the president is in office.
You seem to forget he was the president when he acquired them and the president can declassify them. Joe Biden wasn't the president when he took classified documents, he was a senator and a VP. Neither of those offices can declassify them. Look at the facts, not your opinions or your political beliefs. Let the courts settle the issue.
@@DenisBurke-vb6vhthe only thing wrong is your "personal" interpretation of the Presidential Papers act. Since Trump did not CREATE the content of the classified documents (the federal government did) he can't claim they are personal. There is a separate law that deals with classified documents and how they are handled. That was cited in the indictment. Note that Cannon did NOT dismiss based upon the Presidential Papers act.
The first federal special prosecutor, John B. Henderson, was appointed by Ulysses Grant in 1875 to investigate the Whiskey Ring scandal. After attempting to stifle Henderson's investigation of the president's personal secretary, Grant fired Henderson on the grounds that Henderson's statements to a grand jury regarding Grant were impertinent.[8] Following criticism, Grant appointed a new special prosecutor, James Broadhead, to continue the investigation. *** Hardly a novel concept for the SC! Precedent, and a lot of it.Cannon !
@@Americasinertia Do you have copies of reciepts or what just pops out of Trumps mouth? Naw you dont. You are just a poor little MAGA pawn repeating what he hears like a parrot. Whats funny to me is that you don't realize a radicalized Republican almost took out your god king. The thing about violent rhetoric is that it eventually ends up getting you.
😂😂the fix. Yes, you’re absolutely correct. The fix against Donald Trump. However, it appears that justice is prevailing here. All the other bulls^** cases will be either dismissed or overturn on appeal. You stay 🏳️🌈
If the USA had not checked off all the boxes of an oligarchy/kleptocracy, it surely has now. Why should any US citizen respect the law now when their own ex-President gets a free pass on blatant crime and violation of national security? While other legitimate whistleblowers went to prison for far, far less? What faith in a 'fair justice system' is there left to be had?
The President is the ultimate authority to declassify classified documents. But not a random "whistleblower". What is so difficult to understand there?
The Ethics in Government Act of 1978, including the independent counsel provisions, was passed by Congress and signed into law by President Jimmy Carter on October 26, 1978. So they are blocking Congress from making laws now?
*So everything in America ends up being decided by the Supreme Court, with Justices Thomas, Alito and Roberts **_et al_** sitting on it. How reassuring!*
So, now Smith will appeal this case to the appellate court. The court will most likely bring in the judge now working on the New York documents case and we will have a decent case.
She knows it will now go to 11 circuit but also knows it will then go to supreme court which will take months and then special council ruling in Trump favour.
All 93 US attorneys have to be appointed by the president and confirmed by the senate But a Special Counsel Attorney with more powers than those 93 does not need such an appointment? A Special Counsel can cross over into all the 93 districts but a individual US attorney cannot do that without the permission of the Attorney General We have a constitution. It’s not a suggestion box
Given Cannon has virtually NO EXPERIENCE presiding over actual court cases, she's got some major hubris thinking she cd make such a monumental ruling. She wasn't qualified to take this case in the first place. She's a real piece of work!
To be fair, judge Cannon is just a simple Columbian immigrant trying to find her way in a hostile environment and looking to further her career in a new land.
@@stitchcrafter that why she relied on Clarence Thomas’s concurring opinion in the Immunity case Because CT is the Associate Justice for her District and as soon as the 11th Circuit tries any BS he’ll kick it up for another 6-3 decision Bwahahahaha
I am surprised that the arguemnt by Cannon is that the Executive branch does not have the authority to appoint a special counsel when the supreme court just ruled that the President is King and can do whatever they want in pursuit of 'official' acts.
@@DenisBurke-vb6vh David Weiss was appointed the same way, without Senate confirmation. I look forward to Fox News arguing in defense of dismissing Hunter Biden's case, or witnessing the pretzel they fold themselves into trying to justify why Hunter's situation is different due to "reasons".
You are confused by the republican form of government. The Congress creates offices in the Executive branch and funds them. The Executive appoints officers to the offices created by Congress. Congress confirms the appointments. Maybe that helps clarify it.
These Republican operatives are specialists in cognitive dissonance and hypocrisy and also apparently now in Constitutional Law after just being appointed to the bench by the defendant.
Justice Thomas told her what to do in the immunity case. There's no precedent in the 11th Circuit. BUT, a "regular" DOJ district attorney can re-file the same case.
@@batsonelectronics And if Trump is elected, there will be no trial. We will have a de facto dictator, granted by the Supreme Court. Of course Biden *could* take drastic action now, but he won't. The Democrats never do. They would rather see our Democracy lost than do anything that might be criticized in the media as dramatic action.
What a blessing, a relief to hear Mr. Wiseman’s comments. Have absolute no understanding of anything law related. But this gentleman breaks down these complicated issues to a degree, for my naive understanding!! I pray this judge will be censored again and be made to leave this scene altogether!! Many thx and aloha from Hawaii, Mr. W.
@@heemlo649 She ruled by fiat that special council appointments were illegal, despite the law which explicitly makes them legal. She took advice from one of the most corrupt justices ever to serve - Clarence Thomas. Special counsel was never an issue, including the special counsel in Hunter Biden's case, or the one Trump had appointed to look into Hillary and Obama (Durham)... it only became an issue when it was Trump.
They will appeal and succeed with it, case continues. This is just another wrench thrown into the wheels to delay further with a "reason" to do so. Make sure to vote against Trump, and this case will come to a regular conclusion eventually, after the election, if Trump loses.
So when it's not the decision u wanted it's corruption. But like the Democrats always say when they get the decision they want "no one is above the law"
Nixon called; he wants his presidency back
lol
his spec pros was legal
@@FatManWalking18 CIA says no.
😂😂😂😂
He should have questioned the SCs validity
The law only applies to poor people. It does not apply the rich and powerful people.
That is true and has been for a long time. Since trump and the current Supreme Court things are quickly spiraling out of control.
@@whatisgoingon271 Are you claiming victimhood?
@@randyrod4298 Put the pipe down 🤡.
not if they are being protected by the CORRUPT RIGHT WING.
@@mytube8985Are you claiming ignorance?
I remember when Americans used to ask with a mixture of astonishment and arrogance how the German people could ever have allowed Hitler to come to power. Well--now we know...
Canon didn’t write this decision it was written by member or members of the federalist society. Also look into which oligarch is assisted her financially aka Thomas.
This is absolutely disgraceful. I'm so sick of the corruption that has taken place in our judicial system to be Trump's legal defense team.
Agreed - Trump, Johnson, MAGA SCOTUS and MAGA have no shame now - normalised by Trump.
Another leap toward the Whitehouse for Trump!
Power corrupts absolute power corrupts absolutely
@@nancydouglas8772 yeah Me too. FJB and his whole crime administration.
Cannon is out of her mind , completely insane .
Effectively, Cannon just removed herself from the case.
But also delayed it sufficiently that if Trump wins the election, he'll be in the clear.
I see u got a bad case of DAY DREAMING
Cope Harder 😂
agreed, unless the 11th circuit sends the case back to her. They were always going to have to deal with this case no matter the outcome.
Thomas agrees with her and he heads the appeals court for that district
I'm sure the corrupt judge Cannon got a good payoff to dismiss the case.
No defendant should be tried by a judge that they, personally, appointed.
This is disgusting she waited for a convenient republican moment to do this. She could have done this LONG AGO.
They shouldn't bering this in anyway. GOD IS WATCHING 👀 🙏 LET'S REPENT BEFORE IS TOO LATE
Or the moment was manufactured so that people wouldn’t pay attention to the ruling🤷🏽♀️
@@georgeburns8447 Interesting . . . if you yourself had possession of even one of those documents, you'd be in jail from the get-go.
@@jaygatz4335 Yet Burden was found to be too infirm to prosecute.
@@jaygatz4335 The discord documents kid is awaiting sentencing, in custody, as he has been every single day since he was arrested.
She dismissed the case the day of the Republican National Convention. Corruption is blatant.
Hahaha hahahaha cry baby cry
Cope Harder 😂
yeah the timing is amazing, it is not just the RNC but also the attempt on Trump, so she chose the moment well, because there might be a bit of a pity sentiment towards Trump from people and amidst all the media chaos currently, alot of people will also miss it while they get the 24/7 live coverage about how Trump got grazed and 3 others who actually suffered, while Trump is described as "upbeat" and ready to go to the next rally, while not even wasting one word on the actual victims of the shooting.
Sounds like a gift to the Big Guy. This little lady is heading for an impeachment. Ladies and gents, place your bets.
@justpassingthrough...2492 like all the kick backs from Ukraine to the BIG GUY???
Corruption at its finest.
Lol. Wait until all the Biden corruption is finally released
She is a waste of time and money. She is only parroting what Clarence Thomas said, she is in cahoots with clearance Thomas.
She probably first encountered Clarence Thomas when he and Harlen Crow were on vacation in Medellin.
We’re living in very dangerous and unprecedented times.
Cry harder 😂
Yes, and the Democrats are making it so
yep this is a matter of hurt liberal feelings all any one has to do to understand it is watch all the compilations of trump will never be president and the video joe Scarborough did explaining what the real issues with the democratic party is and why they lost and its not because trumps the antichrist either.
Very!!
@@jessesalinas8534think a little harder.
Clarence clearly signaled how she should dismiss the case, and Scotus will do the same if they get it.
I don't think it's that easy. Thomas is that corrupt, but the court has shown it's not completely as corrupt as Thomas. Obviously special counsels are completely legal, and Cannon is trying to legislate from the bench, it's only brought into question now because it's Trump - which highlights the corruption. They had no problem with Trump's special counsel going after Hillary and Obama (Durham), they had no problem with special counsel going after Biden's son - it's just Trump.
Complete corruption. Not only did Thomas violate the rules of the court, but Cannon just declared all cases that used a Special Council, going back into the 1800s, were illegal, which is BS, as it's already been ruled that Special Councils are allowed.
Respectfully, Thomas had to include that in his concurrence. If he had a majority on his side that would have been in the opinion. She's truly out in right field on this one!
Exactly.
But, will they?
Corruption plain and simple no matter how you try to spin it.
How can a Trump appointed judge dismiss a case against Trump without it being a conflict of interest?
How can an Obama appointed judge who was appointed run the Dc Case then?
@@DenisBurke-vb6vh Easy. Because Obama was NOT the defendant. Know the difference.
@@DenisBurke-vb6vh Is Obama a defendant in the DC case? Have you really thought this through?
@@enriqueamaya6351 "Have you really thought..." Imma stop you there. The answer is "No."
@@Patriot009 You didn't answer the questions either. Is Obama a defendant in the DC case?
Does this mean that Clarence and Cannon agree that Hunter Biden's special counsel charges should be kicked out as well?
Doesn't have anything to do with Thomas - at least not yet.
Neither did this case, until he interfered.@TheAzmountaineer
@@TheAzmountaineer Did you read Thomas opinion in the immunity ruling?
@@TheAzmountaineerhe, even though he was not asked, questioned the status of a special counsel. Clearly implying how he will rule if this gets to SCOTUS, and it will…
@@bellbookcandle3051 He made no ruling.
OMG. the corruption is so thick. How does anyone stand it? Between Thomas and Cannon, how do people keep defending the indefensible?
Who is her clerk? Bet me this has been done months ago.
@stevenpike7857 the only ones defending it are the ones who have no critical thinking skills...
I can only figure it's pure corruption (see the 6's decision in last terms' bribery case) or that the 6 live in such a right-wing echo chamber they really know nothing about America. They've been groomed and influenced for so long, since law school.
Steven - they stand it with cognitive dissonance. Their minds can't fathom facts if the facts disrupt their current mindsets. So they close their eyes and ignore what goes against their grain - no matter what.
Cope Harder 😂
Cannon has to be impeached and tried and sent to prison. She has been paid off.
I’d be really careful about making defamatory statements, you can be sued
Dennis Smallwood (perfect name) needs to get that case of TDS checked out. I hear there are meds for that.
PLEASE I implore you to stop showing that smirking picture of "Judge" Cannon
It’s just the worst.
I absolutely knew she would do this as soon as she was appointed judge on this case.
If it was a clear and legit dismissal, why wasn't it used at the outset? Hint: it's not legit. It instead is a last straw attempt to help Trump, the defendant who hired the judge in the case.
Judge Cannon argues about inappropriate prosecutor appointment, BUT FAILS TO RECUSE HERSELF from the very same case.
Cry Harder with your 'golden girls' haircut. 😂
@@jessesalinas8534 Why are you Trumpers always rude, and why don't you ever have any actual arguments?
@@RegebroRepairs why are you Mummy followers so slow? have you any actual thoughts of your own? 😂
@@stephaniegrow2001 LOL EL STOOP ED IT IS LEGIT
Cannon has effectively removed herself from the case, but has delayed so long that it is now impossible for any movement on the case until after the election. Just what Trump wanted. Vore blue do not let him get away with this.
He's already elected unless they make a successful hit. This was Hillary
Yeah, how about no!!!
@@matthewmillwood5607So now it can get appealed and heard by an honest judge. Now you're all caught up!
@@matthewmillwood5607 you think appeals don't exist? She's already been utterly humiliated twice by the appeals Court. This will be the 3rd.
@@carlosfer2201
😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢
Power corrupts absolute power corrupts absolutely
Judge Cannon is the best attorney Trump has ever hired.
How much did the DNC Pay you for this sound byte
@@newelllondon724 Not to worry. Totally free. Isn't she the absolute pits? Such a hack.
Well, at least we may be seeing less of Cannon’s high school yearbook picture that’s always thrown up!
😂😂
Speaking of throwing up. Garland could have appointed a sitting counsel imeaditly instead of heming and hawing worrying about the political optics so long. Did he forget how Mitch wouldn't even let a vote come to the floor on his appointment to the so called supreme court?
She looks larval.
That's funny and so true...tired of her skanky yearbook photo.
Yep, the fix is definitely in! 😡👎🏾😮
Cry Harder 😂
This ruling didn't help Biden's reelection. That doesn't mean it is wrong.
@@MPMMPM-vy9cu Has been since the Democrats rolled over and let the Republicans steal a Supreme Court seat rather than taking drastic action to not allow it to happen. "Can't rock the boat". Ugh. Now the corrupt, stolen Court has been normalized and the dominos keep falling.
It does smell.
@@KcityMikeThomasNah… on the contrary, it just did.
She needs to get off the bench. How can anyone expect her to be impartial when they bring a case before her? This is why people are losing faith with the US judicial system.
Did you even bother to read her entire decision instead of regurgitating TV BS
@@newelllondon724Don't have to when we've been following her behavior for months. She's like a high schooler trying to navigate international geopolitics-- she's in way over her head.
@@LulaMae21 go read her entire legal decision, I did. It wasn’t written by High School. It’s Phd level material
@@newelllondon724 I love regurgitating TV BS, don’t you?
You need help.
This is totally appalling. I never would have guessed our legal system was this bad.
Weissman, Litman and Tribe are experts. They studied and practised law at an extremely high level. Unfortunately, when they studied law the expectation was that American democracy would continue for the considerable future. The law faculties had not banked on a Fascist overtake of the judicial system in 21st century.
I fear you may be right.
Keep it up RADICAL EXTREMIST DEMORAT. U people AREN'T as smart as u think u r; ur actually pompous & self-centered.
Yes, like merchan, engoron, chutkin and fani.
You mean experts like in the Enron case ? Or are you talking about trying to impeach Pres Trump twice. Weissman is a dem hack who whines and never wins!
The only fascism is the democrat party platform.
If Trump is elected Cannon will be a Supreme Court Justice
Praise the Lord
@@norenekuhn1243 I think you mean Praise Satan 😆
I was thinking Thomas would retire and endorse Cannon for his seat.
If, he already won. Where have you been
@@norenekuhn1243 The Lord is on Aileen's side? Wow.
No justice for the American people. It's so wrong.
Most corrupt judge in history?
Some things never change. Sadly, it’s rather apparent that in our country, the “rich and powerful” are above the law.
How so?
All of recorded history backs you up.
Every single one of the cases against Trump is a distinct contrast with other cases!
And instead of holding an Ex-President to a higher standing, he has gotten special treatment. I don't really believe bible nonsense, but if there were an Anti-Christ, he would look and act just like Drumpf.
because he crimed against
AMERICA.
And HE IS GUILTY OF EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEM!
Key word here: CASES
@@Msmayberry55Yeah cause you are such a legal expert, after watching all the DNC paid mouthpieces on TV
... and justice for all, well, for some ... what a joke the US has become
Don't say that within earshot of Donald Trump ... oooppss.
Now that case is dismissed, the DOJ should put the evidence out to the media/public and the voters will have a chance to see.
We are living in dark times. If you don't like what is happening here imagine what is to come if trump is to set foot in the white house. No to kings. Vote blue 🌊🌊💙💙🌊🌊🌊
Reported
Corrupt ES&S voting machines in 40 out of 50 states. Do you thing Maga, GOP, SCOTUS, CNP, Heritage Foundation, and the Federalist Society, did all this just to put it to the whims of the voters???
There's no precedent in the law or the Constitution for the immunity ruling. There's power grabbing in the Chevron precedent reversal that now makes it practically impossible to regulate corrupt corporations.
Cope Harder 😂
So you're saying that you're afraid that Trump will allow Democrats to resign in dishonor....
@@user-zk1zy1fy7ocritical thinking.
Nixon is laughing.
He wants his Presidency back.
Judges should not be political at all. First, you appoint them on the basis of them being either D or R, and then you ask them to be apolitical?! Bizarre.
Yes, an absolutely problematic system. All the positions of power that are political in America. Rife for political corruption.
i wonder who wrote the 93 page opinion she issued when she dismissed this case?
That's a very good question I concur she has such lack of legal knowledge not to mention cases she has performed pinpoint who wrote that for her I totally agree I smell blue cheese LOL
AI did. AI = American Insurrectionists
Trump’s Attornies
Do you think if it was a simple white house employee who had STOLEN those boxes that corrupted cannon who have made the same decision?
Thank you.
Don’t get me started with Biden
POTUS can declassify. Keep up.
What’s your icon mean………
@@papawheelie5576 Not once they're out of office, and they can't "retroactively declassify with their mind" like Trump is trying to claim he can do. Declassification requires written records from the white house showing said documents were declassified, and that action has to take place while the president is in office.
@@papawheelie5576 No, he can't. He can request to declassify. That is all he can do. You have never worked classified I can see.
She's a disgrace. Vote Blue 💙🇺🇸
lol keep cryin......this is maga country
Whatever the federalist society wants Clarence Thomas gives,which is why Thomas makes a ruling on case not in front of Scotus
From Leo's lips to Cannon's ears.
someone needs to investigate Cannon's finances...
Conspiracy theory lol
I'm on it
I'm sure the mainstream media knows what kind of underwear she owns. Ask them about her finances.
😅😅 good luck, law Fair not going your way 🤔
Investigate her husband, Josh Lorence, who worked for a mob crime boss whom is a friend and contributor of Donald Trump. Google her husband.
He was a private citizen when the documents were found at his club and shouldn't have anything to do with a president immunity.Right?
Goes for biden also. He took them as a senator and vice president.
You seem to forget he was the president when he acquired them and the president can declassify them. Joe Biden wasn't the president when he took classified documents, he was a senator and a VP. Neither of those offices can declassify them. Look at the facts, not your opinions or your political beliefs. Let the courts settle the issue.
@@mre6227-uk4zowho gave them back. Didn’t lie and move them around. BIG difference.
The presidential records act makes you wrong
@@DenisBurke-vb6vhthe only thing wrong is your "personal" interpretation of the Presidential Papers act. Since Trump did not CREATE the content of the classified documents (the federal government did) he can't claim they are personal. There is a separate law that deals with classified documents and how they are handled. That was cited in the indictment. Note that Cannon did NOT dismiss based upon the Presidential Papers act.
The first federal special prosecutor, John B. Henderson, was appointed by Ulysses Grant in 1875 to investigate the Whiskey Ring scandal. After attempting to stifle Henderson's investigation of the president's personal secretary, Grant fired Henderson on the grounds that Henderson's statements to a grand jury regarding Grant were impertinent.[8] Following criticism, Grant appointed a new special prosecutor, James Broadhead, to continue the investigation. *** Hardly a novel concept for the SC! Precedent, and a lot of it.Cannon !
Lawyers are making a mess of our country.
So, the Hunter Biden case can be thrown out too?
what! what! why?
Correct
Well, I'm not voting for hunter.
@@DeepVerma728 he's being prosecuted by a SPECIAL COUNSEL.
@@bobcob3362 You do understand that Hunter isn't running for president, nor any political office.
At every turn, Aileen Cannon has proven herself to be MAGA first, and an American, never.
Not paid off like merchan, really bothers you. 😅😅
Democrat projection is strong in this one.
You been played. Time to accept it
@@Americasinertia Do you have copies of reciepts or what just pops out of Trumps mouth? Naw you dont. You are just a poor little MAGA pawn repeating what he hears like a parrot. Whats funny to me is that you don't realize a radicalized Republican almost took out your god king. The thing about violent rhetoric is that it eventually ends up getting you.
Americans love her. ❤💙❤💙
Impeach judge canon
I can't decide if Judge Cannon is applying to be Trump's AG or on his SCOTUS.
Can't say I'm surprised. We've known the fix was in from day one.
Yes only fools believe the news now adays
😂😂the fix. Yes, you’re absolutely correct. The fix against Donald Trump. However, it appears that justice is prevailing here. All the other bulls^** cases will be either dismissed or overturn on appeal. You stay 🏳️🌈
Yeah! you missed again.
Trump 2024
@@DeepVerma728😂😂😂
loose cannon doesn't have the knowledge to do this on her own, daddy clarence did it for her😢
Heritage Foundation is pulling all of the strings behind the scenes.
💣💥
@fendistarz100 I think so too... definitely not the brightest bulb in the bunch....
She went to a Federalist Society retreat, too. They’re all coaching her.
@@tbowers8398 LOL
She is bought and paid for.
I think she's been coached in how to string this along the whole way, then Thomas signaled the final move. 🤫
If the USA had not checked off all the boxes of an oligarchy/kleptocracy, it surely has now. Why should any US citizen respect the law now when their own ex-President gets a free pass on blatant crime and violation of national security? While other legitimate whistleblowers went to prison for far, far less? What faith in a 'fair justice system' is there left to be had?
And what crime is that? What violation of national security? Enlighten me
Triggered for sure. WAAAAAAAAAA! WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA! WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!
😂👍🏻🤣👍🏻
Biden did far worse with the classified documents at his homes. He’s not getting charged with anything so why should Trump?
The President is the ultimate authority to declassify classified documents.
But not a random "whistleblower".
What is so difficult to understand there?
The Ethics in Government Act of 1978, including the independent counsel provisions, was passed by Congress and signed into law by President Jimmy Carter on October 26, 1978.
So they are blocking Congress from making laws now?
Yep
The ethics in government act has nothing to do with this case.
Cope Harder 😂
This law had a sunset provision. It has not been a law for years.
@@jessesalinas8534Why do you stan criminals so bad. You love corruption don't you?
She does NOT have that power and continues to insults the integrity of the rule of law!
The laws were written for the rich to do anything while the middle an poor have to play by another set
Assume she erased Clarence Thomas’s name from the opinion
Biden wrote it. Just like his college papers! 🤣
Why would in matter?
That's ok, we know.
@@TheRealBuckFiden that makes no sense.
Right wingers NEVER follow the law. Ever.
Hands up if you think that the the timing of this ruling to coincide with the start of the Republican National Committee is a coincidence.
Coincidences take a lot of planning
And when the media is tripping all over themselves with the recent occurrence to not fully cover yet another consequential news event.
I'm not seeing any hands. :(
yeah, the polical equivalent of a friday evening bad news release.
Not a coincidence.
What a disgrace .
Vote blue to fix our courts
*So everything in America ends up being decided by the Supreme Court, with Justices Thomas, Alito and Roberts **_et al_** sitting on it. How reassuring!*
TRUMP 2024!
jsmith: would you like fries with that?
I'm more reassured than a bunch of internet know-it-alls who want outcomes that don't actually make sense based on the available information
nah this is a case of failed propaganda and hurt feelings
@@jeff3282 Go back to Russia!
Thank you, Mr weissmann!
Why thank him? He's been wrong. Litman has been wrong. Tribe has been wrong --- all of these 'supposed' experts have been wrong all year.
For What????
He sounds like a lady😂
FOR WHAT? HE IS LYING TO YOU
So, now Smith will appeal this case to the appellate court. The court will most likely bring in the judge now working on the New York documents case and we will have a decent case.
Corrupt judge to the core
Where is Barbara McQuade. In her book Attack from Within on pg 88 she talks about what’s going on right now.
She knows it will now go to 11 circuit but also knows it will then go to supreme court which will take months and then special council ruling in Trump favour.
All 93 US attorneys have to be appointed by the president and confirmed by the senate
But a Special Counsel Attorney with more powers than those 93 does not need such an appointment?
A Special Counsel can cross over into all the 93 districts but a individual US attorney cannot do that without the permission of the Attorney General
We have a constitution. It’s not a suggestion box
Given Cannon has virtually NO EXPERIENCE presiding over actual court cases, she's got some major hubris thinking she cd make such a monumental ruling. She wasn't qualified to take this case in the first place. She's a real piece of work!
To be fair, judge Cannon is just a simple Columbian immigrant trying to find her way in a hostile environment and looking to further her career in a new land.
@@JohnWerner-te5zy Funny. And btw, it's COLOMBIA...
@@stitchcrafter that why she relied on Clarence Thomas’s concurring opinion in the Immunity case
Because CT is the Associate Justice for her District and as soon as the 11th Circuit tries any BS he’ll kick it up for another 6-3 decision
Bwahahahaha
Cannon just went to the top of the list for Supreme Court nominees if Trump wins. Making America Gangster Again!
How do you spell corruption……..Aileen Cannon, Clarance Thomas, Alito ……. So shameful and disgusting
Winning 😂😂
They couldnt produce any documents. They made it all up
*joe.
ID10T
How do I spell corruption. B-i-d-e-n. Traitor joe
A swat team haul a kid out of his home for way far less & never seen day light again, was sentence & gone in no time
I am surprised that the arguemnt by Cannon is that the Executive branch does not have the authority to appoint a special counsel when the supreme court just ruled that the President is King and can do whatever they want in pursuit of 'official' acts.
They can as long as they are confirmed by the senate
@@DenisBurke-vb6vh David Weiss was appointed the same way, without Senate confirmation. I look forward to Fox News arguing in defense of dismissing Hunter Biden's case, or witnessing the pretzel they fold themselves into trying to justify why Hunter's situation is different due to "reasons".
You are confused by the republican form of government. The Congress creates offices in the Executive branch and funds them. The Executive appoints officers to the offices created by Congress. Congress confirms the appointments. Maybe that helps clarify it.
These Republican operatives are specialists in cognitive dissonance and hypocrisy and also apparently now in Constitutional Law after just being appointed to the bench by the defendant.
@@mako9673 It just tells you the Bidenistas are FoS
ONCE AGAIN DELAY!!!/This judge is corrupt!!!
Justice Thomas told her what to do in the immunity case. There's no precedent in the 11th Circuit. BUT, a "regular" DOJ district attorney can re-file the same case.
it just starts the process over and will take another year or 2 to get to trial. She did what trump needed, delayed again.
@@batsonelectronics And if Trump is elected, there will be no trial. We will have a de facto dictator, granted by the Supreme Court. Of course Biden *could* take drastic action now, but he won't. The Democrats never do. They would rather see our Democracy lost than do anything that might be criticized in the media as dramatic action.
depends did she dismiss with or without pred
And, since Thomas made an opinion in this case, he should recuse himself if the appeal reaches the Supreme Court.
@@jamesdouthat3999 without, no jury was seated so basically a mistrial. Charges can be filed again.
She obviously doesn't know what she is doing. Now she is official off the case.
ACTUALLY SHE DOES AND SHE ISNT GOING ANYWHERE
What a blessing, a relief to hear Mr. Wiseman’s comments. Have absolute no understanding of anything law related. But this gentleman breaks down these complicated issues to a degree, for my naive understanding!!
I pray this judge will be censored again and be made to leave this scene altogether!!
Many thx and aloha from Hawaii, Mr. W.
Good grief Patricia. Go back to bed.
2:30 - Is this the only picture of Aileen Cannon in existence?
High school photo from her Medellin days.
Guess he’ll just have to lose at the ballot box.
Again.
Biden?
Cry harder. Cry!!!
Not in 2024.....beta
Plan on stealing another one?!?!
Are you referring to Biden the sock puppet? Don't bet against president Trump.
The world is watching you.
And the world is not buying what Trump and republican bizzarro world media is peddling. Nor does the majority of voters in america.
Appeal yes. But can Garland simply refile the charges with himself as the prosecutor and ask for a different judge? Quickly?
This is clarence thomas who has been supporting her. She hasnt got the brains to think this one up and bring it up now.
I swear is this still real America or are we watching a season of Better Call Saul?
Someone should tell Ken Starr and Bill Clinton.
And the blue dress. And the cigar.
What does that have to do with this case?
@@heemlo649 She ruled by fiat that special council appointments were illegal, despite the law which explicitly makes them legal. She took advice from one of the most corrupt justices ever to serve - Clarence Thomas. Special counsel was never an issue, including the special counsel in Hunter Biden's case, or the one Trump had appointed to look into Hillary and Obama (Durham)... it only became an issue when it was Trump.
again starr was nominated
Cannon really wanted off this case, apparently. She was obviously in way over her head.
This news was NOT surprising to hear coming from this corrupt judge and also how timely, right after the attempt on TFG's life.
So much for equal justice under the law. She is a disgrace and justice, Thomas and Alito, and all the rest of them are all ready guilty of subversive.
STOP watching The View! 🤪
Cope Harder, John Behar 😂
They will appeal and succeed with it, case continues. This is just another wrench thrown into the wheels to delay further with a "reason" to do so. Make sure to vote against Trump, and this case will come to a regular conclusion eventually, after the election, if Trump loses.
@@MrSheduur Don't bet on it.
Is it unconstitutional to appoint a Special Master like she has done in this same case?
Yes. The Ninth Circuit court of Appeal so found.
She’s not a judge, she’s a political plant
A decision made by supreme court justices who should have no excuse for not recusing themselves should not be recognized as legitimate.
The fix is in
Cry. Cry harder. 🤣😂
@Mike_Baldwin oh mikie! Do you think they won't f you too? Lol.
What “fix”?
The FBI is clearly corrupt in this regard.
Enough already. The world is watching
You got grifted, now cope.
She is proving her corruption
Are you OK?
Are you sad?😥
So when it's not the decision u wanted it's corruption. But like the Democrats always say when they get the decision they want "no one is above the law"
She is proving she understands how the system is supposed to work.
She proved Garland's corruption. So DUMB!
Why have they not dismissed this judge from this case? I will tell you ,because she thinks just like Trump above the LAW .
We all must vote and keep Biden in power
So 175 years of special counsel cases would have to be overturned?
No, you see this only applies to the one appointed to look into Trump.
Worst judge ever?
You would think garland would know law............🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
All those years it went through congress or the president not AG
@@user-en9xe5yr4dbill Barr appointed people who were not confirmed. What do you say to that
Doesn’t matter what Trump’s AG did. Amazing.
Smith should bring charges in NJ where he also had "boxes" and in D.C. as that is where the boxes were originally located...with "sport trophies".
They are his documents as per the Presidental Records act and fall under immunity so you will lose twice lol
Good job Cannon justice was withheld Presidential Records Act!
What? A traitor appointed judge acted like a traitor appointed judge? I can’t even believe it...