Before you even ask, the silly four changes example will be refuted in the next couple of days. Not sure what I'm talking about? Well, you're not missing much. ;p
@Tauhida Khan its brubakers argument exposed of how it is ridiculous They look at other quranic manuscripts to show this etc read the beginning of the pdf again Check my website variances in quranic manuscripts i explain it there as well
@UC1RLXbS2aDIFtoC2bWzzvpg yes a course would be good you can find courses in Ulum Al Quran online perhaps Farid could reccomend one. This is me (UA-cam account) btw
@@Spreadingthetruth btw i know a play list of 6 week Quranic science course but link will not work here plzz come to Islamic defence UA-cam channel comments i will post that link do u know Islamic defence YT C ?
@The Crow Ok come argue with me. Let's see how knowledge you are. And before we start let me tell you something, we have different Qiraat of the Qur'an and which is Authenticated by authentic Hadith and these Qiraat don't have any contradictory statement which may change the whole doctrine of islam rather they complement each other. Can you please tell me where did Jesus(peace be upon him) said that Gospel was revealed in hundreds of different versions? Im waiting
@The Crow You're ridiculous buddy. What you're basically saying is that "in order for the Qur'an to be preserved, there MUST not be any scribal errors". You crazy or something? Scribal errors are common, they could easily be ignored in many ways. They do not imply that the Qur'an was not preserved. You gotta be kidding me. THESE SCRIBAL ERRORS WEREN'T DISSEMINATED TO THE PUBLIC. AS EASY AS THAT.
@The Crow Your first two sentences are nonsense. What can't you understand from the phrase "scribal errors"? Will all due respect, they were all "errors" that were not propagated. Allah did not prevent scribal errors from being made but that does not mean that he prevented the preservation to happen. "Nevertheless, even if we don't count it, we know that the quran has been changed. The Islamic sources speak of entire surahs that have been cut or have disappeared altogether. The goat is also supposed to have eaten verses (like the one about breastfeeding for adults) etc. Moreover, we know that the oldest qurans differ from the current ones (research done by Muslims themselves). And even in terms of contemporary qurans, at least 37 different versions have been found till today. " {We do not abrogate a verse or cause it to be forgotten except that We bring forth [one] better than it or similar to it. Do you not know that Allah is over all things competent?} [Quran 2: 106] Atleast cite the Muslim researchers themselves. Support your claims. It's ridiculous how you reject Islam so fast just because of a topic that is "uncertain" to you. Allah knows best!
Back When I was 6 I tried writing a verse in the Quran in a notebook and made a mistake. 12 years later while I was sorting boxes in my loft I had stumbled upon it again and immediately assumed that I had discovered another version of the Quran with scribal errors as verified by the worlds most renowned Quranic scholar David wood after I called him to report this news, therefore proving Islam wrong...
To those ignorant Christians and atheists who dont know what the word "Allah" is or from where did it come from, here is your answer: (Allah - الله) grammatically, and what does it means in arabic: Allah (الله) is an arabic word created from a letter and a word...and those are: First: (ال) which means (the) Second: (إله) which means (deity) or (god) In arabic (ال / the) is used to refer to things that are known and specific.. If you don't use (ال / the) it would be like you are referring to a random unknown thing. Basically if you join (ال / the) with the word (god / إله) - with a small (g) -, it becomes (the God - GOD / الإله).... in arabic there is a rule of joining two words to sound like one and that is called (joining words / إدغام - idgam) .. these both words that creat (الإله) join together in pronunciation to create the word (الله / THE GOD) under the (joining words / إدغام) rule.. Basically (Allah - الله) means (the God) If you don't believe me, all sematic languages (hebrew - aramiac - arabic) all fall under this rule that God in each language is from 3 main letters and those are: 1_ E-A 2_ L 3_ H The arabic translation of the bible also says Allah for God... Arabic Christians and Jews also say Allah regularly because thats what God means in arabic...
I really wish these arrogant Christians would take a minute out of their time to read this. But I doubt they would because they like to cover themselves in their own delusion. May Allah protect us all. And may Allah reward you for your efforts in making this well done explanation!
you said : Basically (Allah - الله) means (the God) wrong . because if i want to say my god in arabic i cant use the word allah what i have to do is to use the word elah therefore the word elah is god in arabic . allah is one of the 99 names of god in islam
@UCMXgn8f78IfeTp7A0RdUYyw I actually read a book recently refuting the claims of Christoph Luxembourg on syriac origins and it is just weak silly scholarship because the arabic text was developed fully before the 4th century evident by pre islamic poetry and papyrus in Egypt furthemore the syriac vowleing system is underdeveloped compared to arabic and was not complete till after 2nd century hijah Many other points aswell. We get it you've read a book well done it's a shame it's bad scholarship that even most orientalists take with a grain of salt 😂😂😂
@Apuss - The Adopted Son the fact that they have to do this gives me confidence in Islam.They also allow to learn more about Islam venturing into the academic domain 😂
in Malaysia there's an event held every year during Ramadhan called Musabaqa Tilawatul Quran. All nation can send their best reciter to present their recitation of the Holy Quran. The judge is will be the best master scholar of Quran from multiple nation. this event also presented live on tv an it has been held every year since 1961 So if anything wrong with the quran they recite will surely get known. This also prove that the Quran we around the world read and recite is one same Quran.
@@ABC-yh8bt Because human scribes write it and sometimes they accidentally make spelling mistakes like all humans or put the wrong word accidentally, but they correct it later because they know it from memory.
When I was a child, i was tired of tajweed lesson. Now I know how important tajweed to preserve Al Qur'an. But, only muslim know how detail Allah made rules and science to preserve his word until the end of time.
@@majeedm689 i will not say that. How dare I. It just a small part of the miracles that i understand. But, i will not debate anyone with my thought so they can twist it.
I had faced some similar questions from a Christian regarding preservation issue. But thank to Allah Almighty, when I read some of above text(book), now I can defend the preservation of Quran. I always believed that Quran is the only book on face of earth that is perfectly preserved. But obviously, I couldn't put my case with proofs. But now, I can........... again JazakAllah respect and love from Pakistan
So Uthman when he made the Quran in standard form changed the words but not the meaning or the words of today’s Quran are those coming out of the mouth of the prophet Muhammad SAW ?
Assalamu alaikum everyone. I have a test tomorrow on chemistry and I’m trying to get a good grade. Insha Allah if you could pray for me, I’ll be very happy and may Allah bless you all. Ameen.
@@jxcess3891 When you see the Prophet try his hardest for people in the hellfire to enter paradise in the day of resurrection, you’ll see how evil you really are.
@@jxcess3891 You would go to hell for rejecting the ultimate truth, yet the Prophet would still try his best for you, and you slander him? (Btw, the bridge to Jannah is above hell, that’s what the ayat means. Everyone will pass through hell, including the believers)
@aisha Bacon You dont even know what pedophilia is. Heck with parental consent in America some states don't have any age limit. Go study arabic then argue.
@aisha Bacon Yes there is evidence. Maybe not for any Bible but the quran does. Nuh uh. Youre literally more ignorant than someone who fixes shoes for a living
@aisha Bacon lol no he didn't. I bet you never saw the debate itself. Sam was literally saying names with 0 relevance to his idea and ijaz was answering the original argument.
@aisha Bacon Sam Shamoun? That’s who u r going with? Why dont you link the whole debate here so we can see? Also why didn’t Sam Shamoun show up with EFDawah streams to defend Christianity? Shame on him
Would you be able to get Brubaker on for a discussion about his works? Muslims and non-believers around the world need to see that hes not making a sincere academic argument.
Same:) After watching much videos from Mansur and from Farid I just realized how unbelievable much and important knowledge they have SubhanAllah. Now to see them together is amazing
David wood the most popular with 550k subs Mufti menk 1.5M His love interest APuss 230k The prophets path over 1.1M I'm sure you get the picture There is nothing to worry about.
*There is no God except Allah in the Bible* *God is Allah/YHWH* Numbers 23:19, John 1:18, 1 Timothy 6:16, Exodus 33: 20. *Jesus said God is Allah/YHWH* John, 20:17, John, 8:54, Matthew 18:19, Mark 10:18, Matthew, 7:21, Luke, 18:19, Matthew 19-17, Leviticus 19:31 & Isaiah 43:11. *Jesus said The One Almighty God (Allah/YHWH)* Matthew 4:10, Matthew 23: 8, Mark, 12:29, Mark 12:32, Luke 10:21, John 5:44, John 17: 3, Deuteronomy 4:35, Deuteronomy 6: 4, Exodus 3:15, Isaiah 46: 9. *Jesus said God is in heaven* Matthew 23: 9, Matthew 6: 9, Matthew 5:48, Matthew 10:32, Matthew 12:50, Matthew 15:13, Matthew 16:17, John 6: 32-33, Matthew 18:10, Matthew 18: 19, Matthew 7: 21-23. *God the Creator of the universe* Genesis 1-2, Luke 10: 2 *God cannot be seen on earth by human* John 1:18, 1Timothy 6:16, Exodus 19:24, Exodus 20:19, Exodus 33: 20-23. *Jesus said he was only an apostle/prophet/messenger of God* John 12:49, Matthew, 15: 24-26, John 17: 3, Matthew 10:40, Matthew 23:10, Mark 6: 4-6, Luke 4:18, Luke 4:24, Luke 4:43, Luke 7:16, Luke 7:39, Luke 9:48, Luke 10:16, John 4:34, John 4:44, John, 4:19, John, 6:38, John, 6:39, John, 6:57, John, 7:16, John, 7:33, John 8:29, John 8:18, John 9: 4, John 11:42, John 17: 6-9, John 17: 8. *All who are sent by God are servants of God* Matthew 12:17 & Acts 4:27. *Servants of God do not deserve to be called God:* Matthew 19:17 & Luke 18:18 & Mark 10:18. *God must have called Himself God* Leviticus 19:31 & Isaiah 43:11 kurios in Greek is lord/master NOT God. Theos is God. Jesus is kurios, *many people also called kurios.* But Theos only Allah/YHWH the Creator. *SO CLEAR, THERE IS NO GOD EXCEPT ALLAH*
*There is no God except Allah* Qur'an: Al Ikhlas 112:3-4 ٣ لَمْ يَلِدْ وَلَمْ يُولَدْ 3 He begets not, nor was He begotten. ٤ وَلَمْ يَكُنْ لَهُ كُفُوًا أَحَدٌ 4 And there is none comparable to Him." Qur'an: Al Jinn 72:3 ٣ وَأَنَّهُ تَعَالَىٰ جَدُّ رَبِّنَا مَا اتَّخَذَ صَاحِبَةً وَلَا وَلَدًا 3 And Exalted is the Grandeur of our Lord-He never had a mate, nor a child. Qur'an: Yūnus 10:68 ٦٨ قَالُوا اتَّخَذَ اللَّهُ وَلَدًا ۗ سُبْحَانَهُ ۖ هُوَ الْغَنِيُّ ۖ لَهُ مَا فِي السَّمَاوَاتِ وَمَا فِي الْأَرْضِ ۚ إِنْ عِنْدَكُمْ مِنْ سُلْطَانٍ بِهَٰذَا ۚ أَتَقُولُونَ عَلَى اللَّهِ مَا لَا تَعْلَمُونَ 68 And they said, "Allah has taken a son." Be He glorified. He is the Self-Sufficient. His is everything in the heavens and everything on earth. Do you have any proof for this? Or are you saying about Allah what you do not know? Qur'an: Maryam 19:88-93 ٨٨ وَقَالُوا اتَّخَذَ الرَّحْمَٰنُ وَلَدًا 88 And they say, "The Most Merciful has begotten a son." ٨٩ لَقَدْ جِئْتُمْ شَيْئًا إِدًّا 89 You have come up with something monstrous. ٩٠ تَكَادُ السَّمَاوَاتُ يَتَفَطَّرْنَ مِنْهُ وَتَنْشَقُّ الْأَرْضُ وَتَخِرُّ الْجِبَالُ هَدًّا 90 At which the heavens almost rupture, and the earth splits, and the mountains fall and crumble. ٩١ أَنْ دَعَوْا لِلرَّحْمَٰنِ وَلَدًا 91 Because they attribute a son to the Most Merciful. ٩٢ وَمَا يَنْبَغِي لِلرَّحْمَٰنِ أَنْ يَتَّخِذَ وَلَدًا 92 It is not fitting for the Most Merciful to have a son. ٩٣ إِنْ كُلُّ مَنْ فِي السَّمَاوَاتِ وَالْأَرْضِ إِلَّا آتِي الرَّحْمَٰنِ عَبْدًا 93 There is none in the heavens and the earth but will come to the Most Merciful as a servant. Qur'an: Al Maa’idah 5:17-18 ١٧ لَقَدْ كَفَرَ الَّذِينَ قَالُوا إِنَّ اللَّهَ هُوَ الْمَسِيحُ ابْنُ مَرْيَمَ ۚ قُلْ فَمَنْ يَمْلِكُ مِنَ اللَّهِ شَيْئًا إِنْ أَرَادَ أَنْ يُهْلِكَ الْمَسِيحَ ابْنَ مَرْيَمَ وَأُمَّهُ وَمَنْ فِي الْأَرْضِ جَمِيعًا ۗ وَلِلَّهِ مُلْكُ السَّمَاوَاتِ وَالْأَرْضِ وَمَا بَيْنَهُمَا ۚ يَخْلُقُ مَا يَشَاءُ ۚ وَاللَّهُ عَلَىٰ كُلِّ شَيْءٍ قَدِيرٌ 17 They disbelieve those who say, "Allah is the Christ, the son of Mary." Say, "Who can prevent Allah, if He willed, from annihilating the Christ son of Mary, and his mother, and everyone on earth?" To Allah belongs the sovereignty of the heavens and the earth and what is between them. He creates whatever He wills, and Allah has power over everything. ١٨ وَقَالَتِ الْيَهُودُ وَالنَّصَارَىٰ نَحْنُ أَبْنَاءُ اللَّهِ وَأَحِبَّاؤُهُ ۚ قُلْ فَلِمَ يُعَذِّبُكُمْ بِذُنُوبِكُمْ ۖ بَلْ أَنْتُمْ بَشَرٌ مِمَّنْ خَلَقَ ۚ يَغْفِرُ لِمَنْ يَشَاءُ وَيُعَذِّبُ مَنْ يَشَاءُ ۚ وَلِلَّهِ مُلْكُ السَّمَاوَاتِ وَالْأَرْضِ وَمَا بَيْنَهُمَا ۖ وَإِلَيْهِ الْمَصِيرُ 18 The Jews and the Christians say, "We are the children of Allah, and His beloved." Say, "Why then does He punish you for your sins?" In fact, you are humans from among those He created. He forgives whom He wills, and He punishes whom He wills. To Allah belongs the dominion of the heavens and the earth and what lies between them, and to Him is the return. Qur'an: Al-Mā’idah 5: 72-73 ٧٢ لَقَدْ كَفَرَ الَّذِينَ قَالُوا إِنَّ اللَّهَ هُوَ الْمَسِيحُ ابْنُ مَرْيَمَ ۖ وَقَالَ الْمَسِيحُ يَا بَنِي إِسْرَائِيلَ اعْبُدُوا اللَّهَ رَبِّي وَرَبَّكُمْ ۖ إِنَّهُ مَنْ يُشْرِكْ بِاللَّهِ فَقَدْ حَرَّمَ اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ الْجَنَّةَ وَمَأْوَاهُ النَّارُ ۖ وَمَا لِلظَّالِمِينَ مِنْ أَنْصَارٍ 72 They disbelieve those who say, "Allah is the Messiah the son of Mary." But the Messiah himself said, "O Children of Israel, worship Allah, my Lord and your Lord. Whoever associates others with Allah, Allah has forbidden him Paradise, and his dwelling is the Fire. The wrongdoers have no saviors." ٧٣ لَقَدْ كَفَرَ الَّذِينَ قَالُوا إِنَّ اللَّهَ ثَالِثُ ثَلَاثَةٍ ۘ وَمَا مِنْ إِلَٰهٍ إِلَّا إِلَٰهٌ وَاحِدٌ ۚ وَإِنْ لَمْ يَنْتَهُوا عَمَّا يَقُولُونَ لَيَمَسَّنَّ الَّذِينَ كَفَرُوا مِنْهُمْ عَذَابٌ أَلِيمٌ 73 They disbelieve those who say, "Allah is the third of three." But there is no deity except the One God. If they do not refrain from what they say, a painful torment will befall those among them who disbelieve. Qur'an: Maryam 19:36 ٣٦ وَإِنَّ اللَّهَ رَبِّي وَرَبُّكُمْ فَاعْبُدُوهُ ۚ هَٰذَا صِرَاطٌ مُسْتَقِيمٌ 36 "Allah is my Lord and your Lord, so worship Him. That is a straight path." Qur'an: Al Baqarah 2:120 ١٢٠ وَلَنْ تَرْضَىٰ عَنْكَ الْيَهُودُ وَلَا النَّصَارَىٰ حَتَّىٰ تَتَّبِعَ مِلَّتَهُمْ ۗ قُلْ إِنَّ هُدَى اللَّهِ هُوَ الْهُدَىٰ ۗ وَلَئِنِ اتَّبَعْتَ أَهْوَاءَهُمْ بَعْدَ الَّذِي جَاءَكَ مِنَ الْعِلْمِ ۙ مَا لَكَ مِنَ اللَّهِ مِنْ وَلِيٍّ وَلَا نَصِيرٍ 120 The Jews and the Christians will not approve of you, unless you follow their creed. Say, "Allah's guidance is the guidance." Should you follow their desires, after the knowledge that has come to you, you will have in Allah neither guardian nor helper. Qur'an: Al Baqarah 2:135 ١٣٥ وَقَالُوا كُونُوا هُودًا أَوْ نَصَارَىٰ تَهْتَدُوا ۗ قُلْ بَلْ مِلَّةَ إِبْرَاهِيمَ حَنِيفًا ۖ وَمَا كَانَ مِنَ الْمُشْرِكِينَ 135 And they say, "Be Jews or Christians, and you will be guided." Say, "Rather, the religion of Abraham, the Monotheist; he was not an idolater." Qur'an: Az Zukhruf 43:64 ٦٤ إِنَّ اللَّهَ هُوَ رَبِّي وَرَبُّكُمْ فَاعْبُدُوهُ ۚ هَٰذَا صِرَاطٌ مُسْتَقِيمٌ 64 Allah is my Lord and your Lord, so worship Him-this is a straight path."
*The word Allah comes from* Allah is the name of God in the Arabic dialect. Allah is God the creator of the universe and all the creatures, humans, animals, plants, angels, jin/ghost including devil, ect. The limitations of the human mind cannot think much about God the Creator. Just thinking about ghosts on earth, humans don't know what else is God. Allah's name comes from the name of God used by the Prophet Ibrahim AS / Abraham. Prophet Ibrahim AS / Abraham used Aramaic language. God in Aramaic dialect is El or Elah. The name of God is Alaah. God in Hebrew dialect is Eloh or Elohim. The name of God is YHWH. God in Arabic dialect is Ilah. The name of God is Allah. Elah = Eloh = Ilah. Alaah = YHWH = Allah. Qur'an: Al Baqarah 2:136 ١٣٦ قُولُوا آمَنَّا بِاللَّهِ وَمَا أُنْزِلَ إِلَيْنَا وَمَا أُنْزِلَ إِلَىٰ إِبْرَاهِيمَ وَإِسْمَاعِيلَ وَإِسْحَاقَ وَيَعْقُوبَ وَالْأَسْبَاطِ وَمَا أُوتِيَ مُوسَىٰ وَعِيسَىٰ وَمَا أُوتِيَ النَّبِيُّونَ مِنْ رَبِّهِمْ لَا نُفَرِّقُ بَيْنَ أَحَدٍ مِنْهُمْ وَنَحْنُ لَهُ مُسْلِمُونَ 136 Say, "We believe in Allah; and in what was revealed to us; and in what was revealed to Abraham, and Ishmael, and Isaac, and Jacob, and the Patriarchs; and in what was given to Moses and Jesus; and in what was given to the prophets-from their Lord. We make no distinction between any of them, and to Him we surrender." *ONLY One God* Qur'an As Fushilat 41:6 ٦ قُلْ إِنَّمَا أَنَا بَشَرٌ مِثْلُكُمْ يُوحَىٰ إِلَيَّ أَنَّمَا إِلَٰهُكُمْ إِلَٰهٌ وَاحِدٌ فَاسْتَقِيمُوا إِلَيْهِ وَاسْتَغْفِرُوهُ ۗ وَوَيْلٌ لِلْمُشْرِكِينَ 6 Say, "I am only a human like you; it is inspired in me that your God is One God. So be upright towards Him, and seek forgiveness from Him." And woe to the idolaters. Like Jesus teachings Mark 12:29 ONLY One God. All Prophet including Jesus taught to worship one God (Allah/YHWH) NOT himself. Why did Jesus teach if it not obeyed? Jesus often prayed to God (Allah/YHWH) NOT himself. Massiah the meaning that is anointed is not atone for sins. Massiah is a process of purification Imam or King Israel. Massiah is a common thing in Jews.
The Mercy Of Muhammad THE mercy of the Prophet (peace be upon him) even extended to those who brutally killed and then mutilated the body of his uncle Hamzah, one of the most beloved of people to the Prophet. Hamzah was one of the earliest to accept Islam and, through his power and position in the Quraishite hierarchy, diverted much harm from the Muslims. An Abyssinian slave of the wife of Abu Sufyan, Hind, sought out and killed Hamzah in the battle of Uhud. The night before the victory of Makkah, Abu Sufyan accepted Islam, fearing the vengeance of the Prophet (may the mercy and blessings of God be upon him). The latter forgave him and sought no retribution for his years of enmity. After Hind had killed Hamzah she mutilated his body by cutting his chest and tearing his liver and heart into pieces. When she quietly came to the Prophet and accepted Islam, he recognized her but did not say anything. She was so impressed by his magnanimity and stature that she said, “O Messenger of God, no tent was more deserted in my eyes than yours; but today no tent is more lovely in my eyes than yours.” Ikrama, son of Abu Jahl, was a great enemy of the Prophet and Islam. He ran away after the victory of Makkah and went to Yemen. After his wife embraced Islam, she brought him to the Prophet Muhammad under her protection. He was so pleased to see him that he greeted him with the words: “O emigrant rider, welcome.” Safwan bin Umaya, one of the chiefs of Makkah, was also a great enemy of Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) and Islam. He promised a reward to Umair ibn Wahab if he managed to kill Muhammad. When Makkah was conquered, Safwan ran away to Jeddah in the hope of finding a berth that would take him to Yemen by sea. Umair ibn Wahab came to Muhammad and said, “O Messenger of God! Safwan ibn Umayya, a chief of his tribe, has run away from fear of what you might do to him and threatens to cast himself into the sea.” The Prophet sent him a guarantee of protection and, when he returned, he requested Muhammad to give him two months to come to a decision. He was given four months, after which he became a Muslim by his own will. Habir ibn Al-Aswad was another vicious enemy of Muhammad and Islam. He inflicted a serious injury on Zainab, daughter of the Prophet when she decided to migrate to Madinah. She was pregnant when she started her migration, and the polytheists of Makkah tried to stop her from leaving. This particular man, Habbar bin Al-Aswad, physically assaulted her and intentionally caused her to fall down from her camel. Her fall had caused her to miscarry her baby, and she herself, was badly hurt. He had committed many other crimes against Muslims as well. He wanted flee to Persia but, when he decided to come to Muhammad instead, the Prophet magnanimously forgave him. In the tribe of Quraish were archenemies of Islam and, for a period of 13 years while he was still in Makkah, they would rebuke the Prophet, taunt and mock him, beat him and abuse him, both physically and mentally. They placed the afterbirth of a camel on his back while he prayed, and they boycotted him and his tribe until the social sanctions became unbearable. They plotted and attempted to kill him on more than one occasion, and when the Prophet migrated to Madinah, they rallied the majority of the Arab tribes and waged many wars against him. Yet, when he entered Makkah victorious with an army of 10,000, he did not take revenge on anyone. The Prophet said to the Quraish: “O people of Quraish! What do you think I will do to you?” Hoping for a good response, they said: “You will do good. You are a noble brother, son of a noble brother.” The Prophet then said: “Then I say to you what Joseph said to his brothers: ‘There is no blame upon you.’ Go! For you all free!” Rarely in the annals of history can we read such an instance of forgiveness. Even his deadliest enemy Abu Sufyan, who led so many battles against Islam, was forgiven, as was any person who stayed in his house and did not come to fight him. The Prophet was all for forgiveness. He was the complete example of forgiveness and kindness, as mentioned in the following verse of the Qur’an: “Keep to forgiveness (Muhammad), and enjoin kindness, and turn away from the ignorant.” (Qur’an 7:199) He always repelled evil with the good of forgiveness and kind behavior for, in his view, an antidote was better than poison. He believed and practiced the precept that love could foil hatred, and aggression could be won over by forgiveness. He overcame the ignorance of the people with the knowledge of Islam, and the folly and evil of the people with his kind and forgiving treatment. With his forgiveness, he freed people from the bondage of sin and crime, and also made them great friends of Islam. He was an epitome of the verse of the Qur’an: “Good and evil are not alike. Repel evil with what is better. Then he, between whom and you there was hatred, will become as though he was a bosom friend.” (Qur’an 41:34)
*Halal Parrot* I have subscribed your channel because of your channel's name. I also have a parrot. He is extremely handsome, beautiful, attractive & talented MashaAllah. He is a Muslim. He is going to be 18 years old on the August of next year. May Allah give him health, wealth, Eman & long life Ameen.
6 ways to earn deeds after death: 1) Give a copy of the Qur'an to someone. Each time one reads from it you gain. 2) Donate a wheelchair to a hospital. Each time a sick person uses it you gain. 3) Participate in building a masjid. 4) Place a watercooler in a public space. 5) Plant a tree. You gain whenever a person or an animal sits in it's shade or eats from it. 6) And the easiest of all, share this message with people.
Not only was he incompetent, not only was he not comprehensive , not only was he wrong but he had a motive. Man you guys are having a field day alhamdulillah
Late in the six year A.H., on his return from Hudaibiyah, the Prophet Muhammad , decided to send messages to the kings beyond Arabia calling them to Islam. In order to authenticate the credentials of his envoys, a silver seal was made in which were graven the words: "Muhammad the Messenger of Allâh" [Sahih Al-Bukhari 2/872,873]
@Denzo Dridz don't know, I'm still watching the video. But since jay smith and company are behind it, it's surely a failure as I've seen their 'criticism' before. They don't even care about even coming close to making legitimate points, they just wanna make money from their fanbase that thinks that they're actually saying solid stuff against Islam.
أَعُبّاد المسيح لنا سؤالٌ نريدُ جوابه ممّن وّعاهُ إذا مات الإله بصنع قومٍ أماتوه فما هذا الإله؟ وهل أرضاه ما نالوه منه؟ فبشراهم إذا نالوا رضاهُ وإن سخط الذي فعلوه فيه فقّوتهم إذا أوهت قواه وهل بقي الوجود بالا إله سميع يستجيب لمن دعاه؟ وهل خلت الطباق السبع لما ثوى تحت التراب وقد علاه؟ وهل خلت العوالم من إلهٍ يدبرها وقد سمرت يداه؟ وكيف تخلت الأملاك عنه بنصرهم وقد سمعوا بكاه؟ وكيف أطاقت الخشبات حمل الأله الحق شد على قفاهُ وكيف دنا الحديد إليه حتى يخالطه ويلحقه أذاه؟ وكيف تمكنت أيدي عداه وطالت حيث قد صفعوا قفاه؟ وهل عاد المسيح إلى حياة أم المحيي له رب سواه ويا عجباً لقبر ضم ربا وأعجب منه بطن قد حواهُ أقام هناك تسعاً من شهورٍ لدى الظلمات من حيض غذاه وشق الفرج مولوداً صغيراً ضعيفاً فاتحاً للثدي فاهُ ويأكل ثم يشرب ثم يأتي بلازم ذاك هل هذا إلهُ؟ تعالى الله عن إفك النصارى سيسأل كلهم عما افتراه أعباد الصليب بأيّ معنىً يُعظّم، أو يقبح من رماهُ وهل تقضي العقول بغير كسر وإحراق له ولمن بغاه إذا ركب الإله !! عليه كرهاً وقد شدت بتسمير يداه فذاك المركب الملعون حقاً فدسه لا تبسه إذ تراه يهان عليه رب الخلق طراً وتعبده؟ فإنك من عداه فإن عظمته من أجل أن قد حوى رب العباد وقد علاه فهلا للقبور سجدت طراً لضم القبر ربك في حشاه؟ فياعبد المسيح أفق فهذا بدايته وهذا منتهاه
*There is no God except Allah in the Bible* *God is Allah/YHWH* Numbers 23:19, John 1:18, 1 Timothy 6:16, Exodus 33: 20. *Jesus said God is Allah/YHWH* John, 20:17, John, 8:54, Matthew 18:19, Mark 10:18, Matthew, 7:21, Luke, 18:19, Matthew 19-17, Leviticus 19:31 & Isaiah 43:11. *Jesus said The One Almighty God (Allah/YHWH)* Matthew 4:10, Matthew 23: 8, Mark, 12:29, Mark 12:32, Luke 10:21, John 5:44, John 17: 3, Deuteronomy 4:35, Deuteronomy 6: 4, Exodus 3:15, Isaiah 46: 9. *Jesus said God is in heaven* Matthew 23: 9, Matthew 6: 9, Matthew 5:48, Matthew 10:32, Matthew 12:50, Matthew 15:13, Matthew 16:17, John 6: 32-33, Matthew 18:10, Matthew 18: 19, Matthew 7: 21-23. *God the Creator of the universe* Genesis 1-2, Luke 10: 2 *God cannot be seen on earth by human* John 1:18, 1Timothy 6:16, Exodus 19:24, Exodus 20:19, Exodus 33: 20-23. *Jesus said he was only an apostle/prophet/messenger of God* John 12:49, Matthew, 15: 24-26, John 17: 3, Matthew 10:40, Matthew 23:10, Mark 6: 4-6, Luke 4:18, Luke 4:24, Luke 4:43, Luke 7:16, Luke 7:39, Luke 9:48, Luke 10:16, John 4:34, John 4:44, John, 4:19, John, 6:38, John, 6:39, John, 6:57, John, 7:16, John, 7:33, John 8:29, John 8:18, John 9: 4, John 11:42, John 17: 6-9, John 17: 8. *All who are sent by God are servants of God* Matthew 12:17 & Acts 4:27. *Servants of God do not deserve to be called God:* Matthew 19:17 & Luke 18:18 & Mark 10:18. *God must have called Himself God* Leviticus 19:31 & Isaiah 43:11 kurios in Greek is lord/master NOT God. Theos is God. Jesus is kurios, *many people also called kurios.* But Theos only Allah/YHWH the Creator. *SO CLEAR, THERE IS NO GOD EXCEPT ALLAH*
ALhamdulillah. I downloaded your paper. and the first 10 pages already clarified the issue. The proper understandings of the definitions is very important. Jazakallahu Khairan.
@@jxcess3891 Your claim: "3. allah calls himself the best of deceivers in sura 3.54 which is a title given to satan and he also lies to..." Please share the verse which Allah gibes the same title to Satan. Thank you. "وَمَكَرُوا۟ وَمَكَرَ ٱللَّهُ وَٱللَّهُ خَيْرُ ٱلْمَٰكِرِينَ" Aal-i-Imraan (3:54) "And the disbelievers planned, but Allah planned. And Allah is the best of planners." Aal-i-Imraan (3:54)
@The Crow Fool what are telling me that there was one manuscript of the Quran, there was always a strong oral tradition along with a written tradition. Those Quran with scribal errors or whatever, existed at a time when Islam was in remote villages in Africa and Asia, there Oral based Quran and script are the same as us. Those errors that you mentioned were corrected, so what did they used to correct the errors, in fact how did they even know that it was an error, what were they using to correct those errant manuscripts? So who is the fool now you simpleton.
@The Crow Indeed you based your response on “Hatun and her team “, so I responded to that, if you meant something else then write it, but you only used her and her team as evidence in your reply. So who don’t know English now? Peace......
@The Crow Do you speak Arabic? Or are you quoting someone who doesn't speak basic elementary arabic and learned something from a person who claims to study quran manuscripts, and does not speak basic elementary arabic?
Alhamdolillah for Islam - so amazing to see Allah SWT grant us knowledgeable individuals who serve the deen selflessly to protect the imaan of the muskeen.
@The Crow FRIEND , IF YOU DIDNT KNOW THE MAIN WAY OF PRESERVING QURAN IS NOT WRITING DOWN , IT IS MEMORISATION . ITS PROOF IS THE NUMBER OF HUFAAZ IN THE WORLD , IT IS NOT IN THOUSANDS BUT IN MILLIONS . THANK U
@The Crow THEY ARE ALL RECITING THE SAME WAY MY FRIEND , MY WHOLE FAMILY ARE HUFFAAZ OF QURAN AND THEY REVISE DAILY , LITERALLY DAILY IN HOME AND MADJIDS , MILLIONS RECITE THE SAME IF YOU DON'T BELIEVE THEN DISPROVE IT , A QAARI MAY MAKE MISTAKE BUT OTHER QAARIS CORRECT HIM IF HE RECITES DIFFERENTLY OR MISTAKE THE WORDS , IT IS EVIDENT , A SMALL EXAMPLE TO DISPROVE YOUR POOR ARGUMENT IS THE NUMBER OF SONGS AND NURSERY POEMS A MAN CAN BY HEART , IF A PERSON JUST LIKE HIM STANDS AND LISTENS AND IF HE NOTICE A MISTAKE HE CAN CORRECT THE GUY ABOUT THE SONG / RHYME OR POEM HE WAS SINGING . SAME TGING GOES WITH HUFFAAZ AND BELIEVE ME OR DON'T I DON'T CARE BECAUSE I HAVE SEEN IT MYSELF THE FACT TGEY ALL RECITE THE SAME . YOY DONT HAVE BIBLE RECITATION COMPETITION DO YOU ? WELL WE EVEN HAVE QURAN MEMORIZATION COMPETITION ON WHO CAN RECITE BY HEART A VERSE FROM A SURAH RANDOMLY GIVEN TO HIM WITHOUT A MISTAKE , THERE ARE PEOPLE WHO CAN DO THIS IN GREAT NUMBER , MY FAMILY IS A PROOF FOR ME IN THAT. AND WHAT WE HAVE IS THE SKELETON OF THE QURAN THE RASM USMANI THE REAL QURAN WITH QURAYSHI DIALECT , THE REST AHRUF ARE DERIVED FROM THE SAME SOURCE THAT IS OF DIFFERENT DIALECT OF ARABIC . YOUR KIDS JAY AND CO CAN TRY TO DISPROVE THE MEMORIZATION FACT BUT THEY CANT OR WONT BECAUSE THE NUMBERS THAT THEY WILL HAVE TO DISPROVE IS LARGE , THEY MAY LIVE TO THEIR DEATH ONLY TRYING TO DISPROVE A FACT THAT WHICH IS NOT IN THEIR AGENDA / MOTIVE . I AM NOT REPLYING TO CONVINCE A JOKE LIKE YOU WHOSE NAME IS CROW , BALL-LESS TO EVEN GIVE UR REAL NAME . IT IS ONLY BECAUSE I HAVE SEEN IT , LIVED IT AND STUDIED IT AND I AM CONVINCED ABOUT THE PRESERVATION , ESPECIALLY BY ITS MEMORIZATION TO AN EXTENT THAT I WILL ONLY BE LYING TO MYSELF IF I WERE TO DENY IT . ( And me myself also has memorized parts of it 😉 and inshallah I will be finishing it completely soon . ) BE JEALOUS THAT YOU CANNOT MEMORIZE AND PRESERVE THE BIBLE , BUT MUSLIMS CAN PRESERVE THE QURAN DOING SO . OH AND BY THE WAY RAMADAN IS COMING IF YOU CAN'T BELIEVE THE MEMORIZATION FACT THEN ON THE QURAN CHANNELS WHERE YOU CAN SEE IMAMS LIVE RECITATING THE QURAN BY HEART FROM START TO FINISH . AND IF YOU SAY MUHAMMAD ( PBUH ) FORGOT THE VERSES , READ THE SURAH AL A'LAA . YOUR ANSWER IS THERE . AND REPLYING BACK WONT WORK WITH ME BECAUSE THE EVIDENCE IS TOO STRONG TO DISPROVE . LITTLE JEALOUS BOY CHRISTIANITY IS DYING I THINK YOU NEED TO SAVE IT BECAUSE EVEN TODAY WHEN I CHECKED TGE NUMBERS FOR NO REASON , STATISTICS SHOW THAT MOST ATHEISTS WILL COME FROM CHRISTIANS . SO GO TO THE CHRISTIANS AND ASK THE NOT TO LEAVE . AND TODAY I AM NOT IN A MOOD FOR A TALK , YOU CALLED ME STUPID , WELL I DON'T MIND THANK YOU FOR CALLING ME STUPID MY FRIEND . I AM HUMBLED BY YOUR ABUSE AND I SINCERELY THANK YOU FOR . I AM FASTING TODAY AND I PRAY THAT YOU BE SINCERE AND BE A TRAVELLER TO TRUTH , I WAS FASCINATED BY CHRISTIANITY WHEN I WAS A KID BUT THEN I READ AND STUDIED ABOUT IT , IT TOOK ME OUT . SO GOOD DAY AND STOP BEING JEALOUS B4 YOU BE EXPOSED BY YOURSELF .
The moment these people are born, their parents tell them about tooth fairy, Santa, Elfs and everything in between as the ultimate truth!!! - Now as adults, Why should they not Lie about and against Islam?! Think about it.
the last post video four changes example of Dan Brubaker has been refuted in the first picture in your book in The Significance Correction...Masha Allah brother Farid👍👍 This is my Analysis: This is like parablepsis or mix with repetitive formula. Notice that still on the same surah 9 but 30 verses before, in the verse 72 is preceded by the "formula" : WA RIDWANU MINALLAHI akbar. The word ridwan is put before minallah. So the scribe may think the word WA RIDWAN is put before the word minallah too in next 30 verses later, surah 9 verse 109 so that the wrong result of the scribe writing it becomes : taqwaa minallahi khairun..which should be corrected and has been done corrected by the scribe with : taqwaa MINALLAHI WA RIDWANI khairun am man 'assasa. *The repetitive formula : [WA RIDWAN] MINALLAH And amazingly, that's exactly in Surah 9 : 72 of the first picture in your response to Brubaker..masha Allah, Still waiting refutation from you Farid👍 Terima kasih banyak, from Indnesia
Alhamdulillah brother Farid, again an amazing video, continuing staying strong brother and refuting these people that hate against Islam, fantastic video as always brother Jzk
So Uthman when he made the Quran in standard form changed the words but not the meaning or the words of today’s Quran are those coming out of the mouth of the prophet Muhammad SAW ?
The Qur’an was revealed in the Arabic language. Allah said that the Qur’an was revealed “in the clear Arabic tongue” (26:195). However, the early Muslim community contained people of all backgrounds, young and old, those proficient in Arabic and those unlettered, as well as people from different Arab tribes, with different accents and different dialects. Since learning the Qur’an was the primary means by which the Islamic message itself was learned, practiced, and transmitted in the Prophet’s time, it was essential that learning the Qur’an be facilitated for diverse peoples. Thus, the Qur’anic text was recited in different ways (termed aḥruf) during the lifetime of the Prophet ﷺ. There are several authentic reports that support this fact, transmitted through so many chains from the earliest sources[17] that it reaches the level of mutawātir lafẓī (massively transmitted verbatim).[18] Ibn ʿAbbās narrated that the Prophet ﷺ said: “Jibrīl recited the Qur’an to me in one ḥarf. Then I requested him [to read it in another ḥarf] and continued asking him to recite in other aḥruf until he ultimately recited it in seven aḥruf.”[19] In another narration, the Prophet ﷺ says, “‘O Jibrīl! I have been sent to an illiterate nation among whom are the elderly woman, the old man, the boy and the girl, and the man who cannot read a book at all.’ He said: ‘O Muḥammad! Indeed the Qur’an was revealed in seven aḥruf (i.e., seven different ways of reciting).’”[20] The early Muslim scholar Ibn Qutaybah (d. 276 AH) said: In order for the Muslims to read the Qur’an easily, the Prophet was commanded to teach the Qur’an in accordance with people’s dialects…and if everyone was to abandon their dialect and what they were accustomed to speaking as a child, as a youth and in their old age, this would have imposed great difficulty and hardship on them…Thus, Allah intended for them ease by allowing some flexibility in the language in the multiplicity of readings.[21] Thus, the Qur’an was inherently a multiform recitation, with multiple diverse equally valid alternate readings of many verses. This phenomenon was explained explicitly by the Prophet ﷺ himself to the companions, as we see in the famous incident where ʿUmar ibn al-Khaṭṭāb and Hishām ibn Ḥakīm disagreed in their recitation of Surah Al-Furqān. ʿUmar narrates: I heard Hishām ibn Ḥakīm reciting Sūrah Al-Furqān during the lifetime of Allah's messenger. I listened to his recitation and noticed that he recited in several different ways which the Prophet had not taught me. I was about to jump over him during his prayer, but I was able to contain myself, and when he had completed his prayer, I put his upper garment around his neck and seized him by it and said, “Who taught you this Sūrah which I heard you reciting?” He replied, “The Prophet taught it to me.” I said, “You are wrong, for the Prophet has taught it to me in a different way from yours.” So I took him to Allah’s Messenger and said “O Messenger of Allah, I heard this individual reciting Sūrah Al-Furqān in a way that you did not teach me, and you have taught me Sūrah Al-Furqān.” The Prophet said, “O Hishām, recite!” So he recited in the same way as I heard him recite it before. On that Allah's Messenger ﷺ said, “It was revealed to be recited in this way.” Then Allah's Messenger ﷺ said, “Recite, O ʿUmar!” So I recited it as he had taught me. Allah's Messenger ﷺ then said, “It was revealed to be recited in this way.” Allah’s Apostle added, “This Qur’an has been revealed to be recited in seven different aḥruf, so recite it whichever way is easier for you.”[22] This narration provides explicit proof that the two different readings were taught by the Prophet ﷺ and that it was the Prophet himself who instructed each companion to recite it in the precise manner in which they did.
@The Crow Actually everything I have seen from contemporary critical scholarship on this topic have only corroborated and enforced the Muslims narrative and what the earliest records left by the Muslim scholars and historians so I am not sure what you are on about
@The Crow Actually you are only repeating false claims that only Christian apologists have made. So it appears you are the one who is not only unaware of the latest research in Quranic manuscripts but it also appears you don’t even understand those issues you described either. Your first point: The issue of the order of the verses of the Quran is a story that appears only in Shia literature as a justification far a claim about particular verses that gives credence to the Shia theological Creed of “Imamah”, but nothing at all was observed in any of the many manuscripts that were carbon dated to the first century of Islam that reflected an indication of such occurrence and everything that was observed in those manuscripts could be subsequently reconciled to what the Sunni Islamic literary sources described so it only works to solidify the Muslims narrative and the only manuscript that shows something that could cause a potential anomaly is the lower layer of the Sana palimpsest that subsequently got corrected, which is an indication that it is more likely to be a scribal error as opposed to intentional change particularly that it is the only manuscript example with this change and no one is able to observe a trend or a pattern in any cluster of manuscripts. Islamic literary sources tell us that the Qur’an was revealed in different “Ahruf”, and sometimes the Prophet taught one companion a surah differently to another (including differences in wording). In many instances we also have descriptions of some of those differences. It was only after Uthman standardized one codex did the other ‘companion codices’ fall out of use. But we are able to reconcile all of The variants and order of suras (chapters) in all the manuscripts to the information we have about the codices of the different companions based on the descriptions in the Islamic literary sources except for the Sana palimpsest Also nothing that was observed in the erased layer could have an impact at all on meaning or theology what so ever so the effect is negligible and gives more credence to those differences in the Sana palimpsest as being a scribal error or at best to the conclusion by Sadeghi, Goudarzi and Bergmann who have named the Sana’a’ manuscript as a “Companion Codex” which was previously not well described. Also the variants in the Sana palimpsest manuscript, even being an anomaly, are the same types of variants the Islamic sources tell us about and since the text is non-Uthmanic, and is very old, if it represents a different companion reading of the Qur’an that is different from the Uthmanic then if anything it stand as a whiteness that Uthman did not change the Qur’an. Your second point: If you are talking about the Dan Gibbson thing about Islam starting in the lavant then that is only a joke by academic standards and it was debunked already anyway and no serious scholar would consider it. Maybe You could have completely confused the issue with the recent scholarship on the stone carvings that shifted the story of the Arabic language starting in Yemen in the south to its formation in the north as the first recorded stone carvings showing early form of the Arabic language in the northern part of Arabia and southern part of the lavant. Those carvings are a thousand years earlier than what the consensus was about the time that the Arabic language emerged The general understanding was that the Arabs were a mixture of the Arabs “Ariba” meaning the people of southern part of Arabia in Yemen who are referred to as “Qah’tan” and the Arabs “Musta’raiba” meaning the people of northern part of Arabia who are referred to as “Adnan” and are the descendants of Ishmael. So it was previously believed that the Arabic language originated in the south by “Qahtan” the Arabs “Ariba” but now the stone carvings shifted the story of the Arabic language having started with the Arabs “Musta’raiba” meaning the people of northern part of Arabia who are referred to as “Adnan” and are the descendants of Ishmael and the evidence show early evidence of the Arabic language almost a thousand years earlier than what was previously thought was the time of the emergence of the Arabic language Please refer to real scholars as Christian apologists are not telling you the truth and when you repeat their claims it makes you look silly
@The Crow Both our posts are available above for everyone to read and the information we both mentioned is also available for everyone to verify and double check by reviewing the original sources that contain the information we gave and also using objective scholarly research from non Muslim secular academics. I never said in my above post the Shia changed the Quran, so if you are only going to present false information from Christian apologists and then you will also manipulate what I say in my posts as a response to your false claims then I am not seeing any value for me to move forward in this conversation seeing how manipulative your approach appears I explicitly said the only claim about any changes in the verses of the Quran came from Shia sources, but not a single manuscript from the first century that was studied have demonstrated anything that could give credence to those claims I also explained why I mentioned it, and I explicitly said that it is the only claim that could potentially have an impact on theology You need to explain to me why you have manipulated what I said in my above post Adding what you just did with you having also started by using false information that is being spread by particular Christian apologists and missionaries and also you are repeating the same debunked falsehood that those same fraudsters are spreading my conclusion is you obviously are not being honest at all I didn’t ask you before, and I am not asking you now to believe what I believe. What I asked you to do is to educate yourself before addressing other people with disparaging comments. If you do not agree that staying truthfully is important to continue any discussion, Then I don’t have a reason to engage further I am asking you and other readers to verify the information we both posted from objective scholars and take a bit of time to think about it and research it more in depth from objective sources. When you criticize me and my religion, I would prefer that you do that from the position of genuine knowledge and understanding of my beliefs and the history of the religion and what the most recent western secular scholars are discussing instead of doing it from a position of only making false claims This information is publicly available for everyone reading both our posts and I urge everyone to independently verify what we both said and judge for themselves It’s clear to me now that your refusal to learn from academic scholarship is causing you to remain ignorant. This is my clue to stop taking you seriously You just look foolish at this point Bye bye 👋 👋 👋
@The Crow One last thing before I stop responding to your uneducated comments that only show your complete ignorance and complete lack of understanding about the topic: First: It’s not the 1970s dude !!!! So All the views expressed in Patricia Crone book “Hagarism: The Making of the Islamic World” have been completely abandoned by western scholars. (including Patricia Crone herself before her passing away) Your comment could have been relevant if we were having this discussion sometimes in the end of the last century, which is the period where historical reconstructionism was gaining track in Quran studies (particularly under the leadership of Patricia Crone), but after the introduction of new technology such as carbon dating into the process, all the rules started changing and this reconstruction trend has predominantly subsided as the majority of western scholars have more and more moved away from the deconstructionism camp and have come to accept the Muslims historical narrative since it appears to be the best explanation for the increasing number of carbon dated Quran manuscripts as well as the increasing number of the other newly discovered historical archeological evidence such as the tens of thousands of stone carvings all over the Arab peninsula that I was talking about Second I am also happy you mentioned Dr Yasir Qadhi because in the same interview with Mohammed Hijab Dr Qadhi said the Quran is fully preserved and what Muslims are reading today goes back to the prophet Mohammed himself. So Please watch the interview a second time if you need to instead of falsely quoting from it because if you are going to quote Dr Yasir Qadhi like you have done above then do it properly and mention that In the interview Mohammed Hijab clearly asked what would Dr Qadi write down on paper as the Quran that is revelation from God without human interference, and Dr Qadi answered that the Quran that we are reading today was fully preserved and we can trace it back to Prophet Mohammed and he also explicitly said in minutes 1:31:50 “what we recite now is the speech of God and it’s revelation”. He also published a post on Facebook to explain how people like you were twisting what he said and he also made a video about it as well So it only shows more evidence for everyone to double check and verify that you have manipulated not only what I said in your above post but you are also manipulating what Dr Yasir Qadhi said in the interview You obviously do not understand the issue whatsoever that Dr Yassir Qadhi was talking about because it was about the understanding of the Ahruf and Qira’at (which are all part of the Quran that you proved to everyone that you are clueless about) so what you said in your above post is only further evidence that you are just making claims by superficially repeating things that you heard without having any real understanding of what those issues are A piece of advice: You have internet access so instead of spending time watching Christian apologists then posting the false content they are feeding you, like you did in your comments above, which only shows your ignorance, I highly advise you to start watching academic lectures about those topics instead then hopefully start reading the scholarly work as well because that would be a much more constructive use of your time I have no time to waste on you anymore Bye bye 👋 👋 👋
@The Crow You are so ignorant about the subject to the point that You just proved again everything I said about you above without even realizing it. This is brilliant 😂😂😂😂😂
Salam Br. Farid, I am completing my degree in Shari'ah from an Islamic university, but I find myself much less capable than yourself mashAllah in your ability to research and respond to attacks against Islam. Can you provide a reading list or syllabus for people who have some training in the Islamic tradition, but need to level-up their ability to respond to attacks against Islam?
@@quintuslentulus6183yes, capital punishment for apostasy has been prescribed by God in Judaism, Christianity and Islam. We Muslims follow the commands of God completely, if you're a Christian and you have a problem with capital punishment for apostasy then you have a problem with God because the punishment is also found in the Bible.
Well debunked, I really appreciated you guys, you have done well in discharging your duties towards protecting ISLAM against slander, masha Allah God bless all of you
Some Christians claim that the Quran has a scientific error in it regarding sperm production This is incorrect again. The critic focuses on the verses 86:6-7, especially verse 7 as this is where their contention is directed. The critic claims the Quran (86:7) is telling us that semen is produced between the backbone (sulb) and the ribs (tara’ib). The Arabic words mentioned by the Quran are sulb and tara’ib. Tara’ib is thought to mean ribs, though there is some dispute. However, the chief point of interest is the word sulb. Sulb can be translated as ‘loins’ or ‘backbone’ or ‘lower back’. The critic favours the translations which use the word ‘backbone’ as they use it to attack the Quran by claiming the Quran teaches that semen is produced between the backbone (sulb) and the ribs (tara’ib). However, the critic is very selective in deciding which translation to use as he/she avoids the numerous translations which translate ‘sulb’ as ‘loins’. They avoid these translations as they scupper their critical claims straight away as loins. Here, the word loins refers to: a. The region of the hips, groin, and lower abdomen. b. The reproductive organs. (1) So the critic refrains from using this translation for the word sulb as it is clearly scientifically accurate, ie the semen is produced in the are between the loins and ribs. So, if we translate the Quran (86:7) this way there is no contention. The misleading methodology of the critic is to avoid mention of the numerous translations which translate the word sulb as loins. Not only do they avoid mentioning the numerous translations using the word ‘loins’ they highlight translations which use the word ‘backbone’. This is rather deceptive, especially considering a number of non-Muslim translators, including a Christian translator, translates it as ‘loins’ ( A.J Arberry, George Sale, J.M Rodwell and Henry E Palmer) as well as a number of Muslim translators who also use the word loins (Hamid S Aziz, Muhammad M Ghali, Muhammad M Pickthall and Mohammad Asad) (4). It is unscholarly as well as misleading on the part of the critic not to mention this important fact. However, the critic does use Abdullah Yusuf Ali’s translation which translates it as ‘backbone’, therefore rendering a meaning of between the backbone and ribs. So the critic understands the Quran as teaching us that semen is produced between the backbone and ribs. In the way of intellectual honesty I do not want the reader to believe that only Abdullah Yusuf Ali translates this verse by using the word ‘backbone’, Shakir and Khan/Hilali also do this. The question still remains; which word should be used in the translation? Well, the critic does not tell you that Dr Edward William Lane’s Lexicon indicates the word sulb’ to mean ‘loins’ and even refers to the verse in question (86:7) as referring to the ‘loins’. So it does seem that the more accurate translation of this would be “between the loins and the ribs” as opposed to “between the backbone and the ribs” (4). Hence the critic uses the weaker translation. However, even if we assume the critic to be correct and take the translation; “between the backbone and the ribs” we still see no scientific error. The critic assumes that the ejaculate (semen) emanates from the testes, this is incorrect. Sperm is produced in the testes and is then transfered to the seminal vesicles awaiting ejaculation, the=is accounts for 5 % of the ejaculate, the rest of the ejaculate comes from the seminal vesicles (46-80%),with the prostate gland and the bulbourethral and urethral glands producing the rest of the ejaculate (2). At the time of ejaculation, all this (semen, which contains the sperm) is released From the seminal vesicles which are in fact between the backbone (coccyx, lower back) and the ribs! So if we run with the translation of the critics we see something that people would describe as a scientific miracle and not a scientific error. Osama Abdallah says the same thing but goes into a little more detail (bracketing is mine): “If one was to insist upon the literal meaning (the translation favoured by the critics), one would still find that the Quran is 100% correct literally, too. The seminal vesicles are anterior to the sacrum and coccyx (lower back, loin) and the ribs are anterior to the seminal vesicles. If one was to draw a line from the tip of the coccyx, to the upper portion of the seminal vesicle _ either one of the two_ and extend the line forward it will catch the ribcage.The seminal vesicles from which the semen spurts out during coitus, lies between the ribs and the coccyx (backbone)!” (3) The irony is that the critics accuse the Quran of making a scientific error yet the error is on their part as they only believe it to be an error as they wrongly believe semen emanates from the testes, while in fact in emanates from the seminal vesicles which are in between the backbone and the ribs! So now we all know the critics are being unfair, unscholarly and misleading when they claim the Quran (86:6-7) tells us that semen is produced in the kidneys etc.
@@jxcess3891 The Qur’an identifies the ruler of Egypt as “Pharaoh” sixty-five times, but only in the story of Moses (peace be upon him). Not a single time is Egypt’s earlier king during the time of Joseph (peace be upon him), called a “Pharaoh” in the Qur’an. This differs from the Old Testament which uses the label for both of these rulers (see: Genesis 40:7, 41:15/31/46, 50:7), though it has since been established that the term “Pharaoh” was first coined during the reign of Thutmose III (d. 1436 BC), the 18th dynasty of ancient Egypt.[16] Historians have further discovered that during the era of Joseph, the 15th to 17th dynasties of Egypt were an invading force from Palestine, and hence they were called the Hyksos (literally: foreign kings). Since “Pharaoh” meant “great house” or “elite bloodline,” and since the Hyksos were occupiers and not indigenous rulers, they were naturally ineligible for the honorific title-had it even existed.[17] Dr. Bucaille writes, I must confess that when the Qur’an was first being conveyed to people, the ancient Egyptian language had vanished from the collective memory of humanity for over two centuries, and remained that way until the nineteenth century. Therefore, it was impossible for us to know that the king of Egypt should be called anything other than the title mentioned in the Holy Bible. The subtle word choice of the Qur’an on this matter is thought-provoking.[18] The historical accuracy of the Qur’an is not just confirmed by recent archeological excavation; it astonished many early Jews and Christians just the same. The fact that Muhammad ﷺ could simply speak of personalities across different cultures like Abraham, Joseph, Moses, Jesus, Dhū al-Qarnayn, and others, with such detail was inexplicable. Similarly, the fact that he ﷺ could extensively illustrate scenes from the hereafter just as their earlier scriptures did was unbelievable for them, as Allah said, “Over it (Hellfire) are nineteen. And We have not made the keepers of the Hellfire but angels, and We have not made their number except as a trial for those who disbelieve (i.e., will they mock nineteen as few?), and so that those who were given the Scripture [prior] would be certain...” (74:31). Some Jews in Madīnah conceded that Muhammad ﷺ was, in fact, a true prophet, then resisted his message under the indefensible claim that it only applied to the Arabs. This was due to their inability to contest its divine origin, for they knew there was no access to any semblance of this history in the Arabic language whatsoever. As Allah says, “That is from the news of the unseen which We reveal to you, [O Muhammad]. You knew it not, neither you nor your people, before this” (11:49). Some of the toughest critics of the Qur’an today, like William Tisdall, confirm this: “There seems to be no satisfactory proof that an Arabic version of the New Testament existed in Muhammad’s time.”[19] In a similar vein, Pope Tawadrus II of Alexandria writes, “The first Arabic translation surfaced towards the end of the eighth Gregorian century and more than one hundred years after Islam. It was done by Bishop John of Seville in Spain. It was a partial translation that did not include the entire book, and was insufficiently circulated.”[20] As for the Torah, there is near consensus among Orientalist scholars that even incomplete translations of the Old Testament into Arabic did not exist until the 10th century.[21] Some detractors of Islam argue that none of this history is remarkable, let alone miraculous. They claim Muhammad ﷺ either learned these accounts directly from the mouths of his contemporaries or that he plagiarized them from manuscripts of the Bible that have since been lost. The accusation of being spoon-fed by others existed during the Prophet’s ﷺ life, but it quickly disappeared, and until today most serious Qur’an critics avoid citing such a ludicrous proposition because it risks their being perceived as desperate. First of all, this would be contrary to the historically indisputable integrity of Muhammad’s character. Secondly, the suggestions that Muhammad’s ﷺ knowledge of previous prophets and nations came from a Roman blacksmith in Mecca (a layman), or from a passing midday encounter with Baḥīrah the Monk, or to a single conversation with a dying Waraqah ibn Nawfal, are simply implausible. Sensible people realize that the bulk and veracity of what the Prophet ﷺ brought could only be attained with decades of apprenticeship that would be impossible for him to hide. “Say, ‘If Allah had willed, I would not have recited it to you, nor would He have made it known to you, for I had remained among you a lifetime before it. Then will you not reason?’” (10:16). As for the second accusation, that of plagiarism from the texts of Judeo-Christian scholars, only someone with a strong confirmation bias would consider this possibility, for two major reasons: As shown earlier, the Qur’an escapes the Bible’s minefield of historical inaccuracies unscathed. Therefore, in order for the unique Qur’anic narrative to be plagiarized from an earlier scripture, this would necessitate that the Prophet ﷺ somehow had access to the accurate version from the thousands of variant manuscripts. Moreover, this version would have existed only in 7th-century Arabia of all places, in a foreign language Muhammad ﷺ secretly learned, then vanished without a trace, never to be recovered again. Even if this bizarre hypothetical were true, it only accounts for the source of this incredible precision and ignores the miraculous nature of the end-product. The Qur’an responds to this notion, asserting, “And We certainly know that they say, ‘It is only a human being who teaches him [the Prophet].’ The tongue of the one they refer to is foreign, and this Qur’an is [in] a clear Arabic language” (16:103
@@cindylou3524 contradictions in the Bible It is mentioned in the 2nd Kings, Chapter No.8, Verse No.26, it says that ‘Ahezia, he was 22 years old, when he began to reign.’ 2nd Chronicles, Chapter No. 22, Verse No. 2, says that… ‘He was 42 years old, when he began to reign.’ Was he 22 years old, or was he 42 years old? - Mathematical contradiction. Further more, in 2nd Chronicles, Chapter No. 21, Verse No. 20, it says that… ‘Joaram, the father of Ahezia, he reigned at the age of 32 - and he reigned for 8 years, and he died at the age of 40. Immediately… Ahezia became the next ruler at the age of 42. Father died at the age of 40 - Immediately son takes over, who is at the age of 42. How can a son, be two years older than the father?’ Believe me even… even in Hollywood film, you will not be able to produce it. In Hollywood film, you can produce a ‘unicorn’ which I mentioned in my talk. Unicorn… you can have Coccrodyasis, which the Bible speaks about, Concrodyasis and dragons and serpents. But in Hollywood you cannot even show a son, being two years older than the father. It cannot even be a miracle - Even in miracles; it is not possible - Impossible. In miracle, you can have a person being born of a virgin birth - but in miracle you cannot have a son being older than the father, by 2 years. Further if you read - it is mentioned in the Bible, in 2nd Samuel Chapter No 24, Verse No 9, that… ‘The people that were involved in the battlefield. It gives a list of these people, in 2nd Samuel, Chapter 24, Verse No. 9, and it says that… ‘People that took part 800 thousand of the men of Israel, took part - and 500 thousand of the men of Judah same.’ If you see other places, 1st Chronicle, Chapter 21, Verse No. 5, it says that… ‘1 million - Hundred thousand people took part in the battle field, from the men of Israel - and ten thousand four hundred and sixty men took part of Judah.’ Was it 800 thousand people who took part from the men of Israel, or was it 1 million - 100 thousand? Was it 5 lakh people of Judah that took part or 10,460? A clear-cut contradiction. Further more, it is mentioned in the Bible in 2nd Samuel, Chapter No. 6, Verse No 23, that… ‘Michael the daughter of Saul - she had no sons’ - 2nd Samuel’, Chapter 21, Verse No. 8… ‘Michael the daughter of Saul had 5 sons.’ One place it says… ‘No children, no son, no daughter’ - Other place… ‘5 sons.’ Further more if you read, it is mentioned in Gospel of Mathew, Chapter No. 1, Verse No. 16 - it says about the genealogy of Jesus Christ peace be upon him - as well as Luke Chapter No. 3, Verse No. 23, and it says that… Jesus’ father, that is Joseph - his father was Jacob’ - Mathew, Chapter 1, Verse 16. And Luke, Chapter No 3, Verse No 23… Jesus’ father… Joseph - his father was Hailey. Did Jesus’ father… Joseph, had two fathers ? What do you call a person who has got two fathers ? Or was it Hailey - or was it Jacob ? Clear-cut contradiction.
Alhamdulillah, I found this channel. They need to know your response, ie David Wood, Christian Prince, Shamoun, and many others who reupload their videos.
Alhamdullilah if you are CHRISTIAN, JEW, or MUSLIM. If anyone out there can help me out, I ask everyone of you for some kind of a ONE ON ONE understanding and wish to seek information. By the way, you really don't need a PHD level in the Arabic language, you just need a PHD in CREATIVE WRITING. This is poetry, and not just an ordinary poem. It's a Riddle to which contains an ultimatum, that which the reader has to interpreted. It has allegories to which TRUE Believers can only decipher. These deciphering can in FACT even find faster ways to solve it.
Muslim scholars discussed the meaning of the seven aḥruf. However, they differed in defining the meaning of these seven aḥruf and whether or not those “seven” were intended to be interpreted metaphorically (to indicate multiplicity) or literally.[23] The purpose of this article is not to recapitulate the discussion of the diverse opinions, which is already available in numerous works in Arabic[24] and English.[25] The viewpoint espoused and elaborated in this article is one that enjoys the support of a vast majority of specialists in Qur’anic sciences, and that is that aḥruf can be explained simply as ways of varying. For example, the difference in words manifests in the following ways: Singularity, duality, plurality, masculinity, and femininity. Taṣrīf al-Afʿāl (Verbal Morphology)-verb tense, form, grammatical person. Iʿrāb (grammatical case endings). Omission, substitution, or addition of words. Word order. Ibdāl (alternation between two consonants or between words). This list of different types of Qur’anic variants was mentioned by Abū al-Faḍl al-Rāzī (d. 454 AH).[26] Among the many scholars who adopt this opinion are Ibn Qutaybah (d. 276 AH), al-Zarkashī (d. 794 AH), and Ibn al-Jazarī (d. 833 AH). Of course, these scholars differed over the precise categorization of differences and which categories to combine or split in the list of aḥruf. Therefore, it is best not to present such a list as an exclusive or exhaustive categorization but rather to use it simply as potential examples. The proposed examples of variation include phonetic, morphological, syntactic, and semantic variation. Furthermore, one must examine all the qirāʾāt (alternative readings of Qur’an) including non-canonical (shawādh) qirāʾāt[27] when attempting to explain the exact meaning of the seven aḥruf. Thus, one can say that the seven aḥruf are all the categories of variation to which the differences found within qirāʾāt correspond. In other words, they represent a menu of ingredients from which each qirāʾah selects its profile. Having said that, we can now examine the beginning of Sūrah al-Furqān in which ʿUmar ibn al-Khaṭṭāb and Hishām ibn Ḥakīm disagreed on the reading of certain verses. We know that they both recited the verses differently but we don’t know exactly what those differences were. Although the canonical qirāʾāt contain no significant differences in the first verse of Sūrat al-Furqān (Qur’anic chapter 25), there are some non-canonical readings in the first verse which may provide some clues to unveil the mystery of the disagreement between ʿUmar and Hishām in Sūrat al-Furqān; these are provided in the table below.[28] In his explanation of this very narration, the scholar Ibn ʿAbd al-Barr (d. 463 AH) also examined different readings of Sūrat al-Furqān to provide insight into the nature of the difference between these two companions’ readings.[29] The examples listed below of different readings also help illustrate the different categories of how the aḥruf vary.  The reading of the ṣaḥābah (companions of the Prophet) was not unified during the lifetime of the Prophet ﷺ. There were differences in the way they recited the Qur’an. This was due to the license of the seven aḥruf as they were taught different readings by the Prophet himself. When the ṣaḥābah disagreed on the reading of certain verses, they sought the guidance of the Prophet ﷺ. The Prophet would listen to each party and he would give his approval of these variants as being divine. This was reported in the previously mentioned incident of ʿUmar with Hishām in addition to several other recorded incidents. The reports of the seven aḥruf clearly indicate that the ṣaḥābah read precisely as they were taught by the Prophet ﷺ. Ibn Masʿūd narrated a similar incident when he had a disagreement with another companion in reading the Qur’an. The Prophet ﷺ was displeased and he commanded the Muslims to recite the Qur’an according to the ways they were taught.[30] Ibn ʿAbbās reported that the Prophet ﷺ used to teach them tashahhud as he would teach them a sūrah of the Qur’an.[31] ʿUmar ibn al-Khaṭṭāb said that the reading of the Qur’an is Sunnah and it is transmitted by the first generation to later generations.[32] In other words, one must have learned directly from the Prophet ﷺ or from him through his students and successors. There was nothing left to the discretion of the individual in this regard; it was necessary to recite precisely as one learned.
Well one of the holes is this: Sahih al-Bukhari 5005-Umar said, “Ubayy was the best of us in the recitation (of the Qur’an), yet we leave some of what he recites.” Ubayy says, “I have taken it from the mouth of Allah’s Messenger and will not leave it for anything whatever.” So some passages from best reciters are being left out. Yasir Qadhi knows this since he studied the sources, but he doesn't want to say it publicly, I have studied the sources too. Do you need more? Because I have plenty more
@Sovereign OK Yes everything is available online. The last part of hadith is Ubai talking, not Umar. Ubai says that he has heard it straight from Muhammad and will not change it for anything. Yet Umar says that although Ubai was one of the best reciters, yet we leave out some of what he recites. You have to read carefully to see who's talking here. It's plainly stated that certain recitations from Ubai, the best reciter, are left out. This is something that I'm not making up, it's straight from your sources. There are also many instances where people have forgotten certain passages. The fact that Yasir Qadhi says there are holes in the narrative is because he knows the sources, but he doesn't want publicly admit it. Check this one for example : Sahih Muslim 2286-Abu Musa al-Ash’ari sent for the reciters of Basra. They came to him and they were three hundred in number. They recited the Qur’an and he said: You are the best among the inhabitants of Basra, for you are the reciters among them. So continue to recite it. (But bear in mind) that your reciting for a long time may not harden your hearts as were hardened the hearts of those before you. We used to recite a surah which resembled in length and severity to (Surah) Bara’at. I have, however, forgotten it with the exception of this which I remember out of it: “If there were two valleys full of riches, for the son of Adam, he would long for a third valley, and nothing would fill the stomach of the son of Adam but dust.” And we used to recite a surah which resembled one of the surahs of Musabbihat, and I have forgotten it . . . There are many more examples, but as you can see, the myth that Quran was perfectly preserved is just that, a myth, easily verified in your own most trusted sources. But you'll never hear an imam or your religious leaders tell you this. Because they would rather you believe in a myth than in what your own sources say. These are sahih narrations which means authentic. Isn't it ironic? You believe in perfect preservation of Quran, word for word, letter for letter, yet your own Quran has a doctrine of abrogation, where new verses cancel out previous ones? What an irony of perfect preservation.
@@muhammedzafar1026 I have studied your sources and I can tell you Qur’anic revelation ceased when Muhammad died. Shortly after Muhammad’s death, Caliph Abu Bakr needed to suppress a rebellion, and he sent many huffaz (people who had memorized portions of the Qur’an) to fight at the Battle of Yamama. Many of these huffaz died, and Muslim sources say that portions of the Qur’an were lost: Ibn Abi Dawud, Kitab al-Masahif-Many (of the passages) of the Qur’an that were sent down were known by those who died on the day of Yamama . . . but they were not known (by those who) survived them, nor were they written down, nor had Abu Bakr, Umar or Uthman (by that time) collected the Qur’an, nor were they found with even one (person) after them. How do you explain this? Your own sources report verses permanently lost and never found with anyone ever again. That is AFTER MUHAMMAD'S DEATH. SO there would be anyone to abrogate anything after his death. The verses he revealed BEFORE his death were lost and forgotten AFTER HIS DEATH. So which Quran is perfectly preserved, the one that contains these forgotten verses or the one that doesn't?
It is all about the money. Writing against Islam is a profitable business and this is the reason broew bakery wrote against Islam . Salmon Rushdie got millions of dollars and protections from European governments just by writing against Quran
Salam Alaykom Farid, thank you guys for putting in the time and effort to compile all of these examples that clearly refutes his claims. I would like to ask if you published those notes in a book or any other sort of publications since I honestly believe that it deserves to be purchased not just downloaded. I have to pay some money to get it so that we can assure the continuity and sustainability of your work! May Allah bless you all.
BIBLE AS GOD'S WORD ❓ Can God be the author of confusion and contradiction? i) I John 5:7 which hinted at the Trinity is taken out of every modern version of the Bible as it is not to be found in the most ancient manuscripts (that they have access to today). There is therefore no longer any verse in the Bible which preaches three gods as one. The Koran preaches that God is one indivisible, and not a trinity ( Koran 4:171) ii) II Samuel 24 :1 says that God incited David to number Israel . I Chronicles 21:1 says that Satan incited David to number Israel. God and Satan are not synonymous. iii) II Chronicles 36:9 says that Jehoiachin was 8 years old when he became king. II Kings 24:8 says Jehoiachin was 18 years old when he became king. A difference of 10 years iv) II Samuel 10:18 talks about David slew the men of 700 chariots of the Syrians and 40,000 horsemen and Shobach the commander. I Chronicles 1:18 says that David slew the men of 7000 chariots and 40,000 footmen Contradiction: one says 700 the other 7000. One says 40,000 horsemen(cavalry), the other 40,000 footmen (infantry). v) I Chronicles 9:25 says that Solomon had 4000 stalls for horses and chariots. I Kings 4:26 says that he had 40,000 stalls for horses A difference of 36,000. vi) Ezra 2:5 talks about an exile Arah having 775 sons. Nehemiah 7:10 talks about the same exile Arah having 652 sons. vii) John the Baptist contradicts Jesus. According to Jesus, John the Baptist was Elijah in his 2nd coming Matthew 17:11. John the Baptist denied being Elijah when the priests and Levites questioned him (John 1:19-21). viii) Was Jesus put on a cross (Stauron in Greek) Mark 15:11 or on a tree (Ksulon in Greek) I Peter 2:24 ix) John 3:13 Jesus says that none has ascended into heaven except the son of man who descended from heaven. This contradicts II Kings 2:11 which says that Elijah ascended into heaven. x) Genealogy of Jesus. a) From David to Jesus 41 names (generations) are given by Matthew [although he claims there are 42] as against the 26 names [generations] given by Luke [Luke 3]. A difference of 15 whole generations in the genealogy of the same man. Matthew mentions that Jesus was the seed of David through Solomon while Luke says that Jesus was the seed of David through Nathan [Solomon's brother]. This is a contradiction as the seed of David could never reach Jesus through Solomon and his brother Nathan at the same time. According to Matthew Jesus' grandfather is Jacob [the father of Joseph] while according to Luke it is Heli. xi) Luke doesn't claim inspiration of his Gospel by God. He wrote it because he knew of the events and it "seemed good to him" ( Luke 1:1-5). Also see I Corinthians 7:25 where Paul, in this specific case says that he's informing without God's commandment. II Timothy 3:16 is presented to "prove" that all of the Bible is God's inspiration, the above 2 references apart from the many others disprove that. The point is that the Bible itself doesn't claim to be completely from God (as a whole by name). That is what the Muslim point of view is also. Since God is all- Knowing and isn't the author of confusion, the above references cannot be from God. "How can you say that we are wise and that the law of the Lord is with us but behold, the false pen of the scribe has made it into a lie." Bible. Jeremiah 8:8 "Woe to those who write the Book with their own hands and then say:"This is from God", that they may trade it for some miserable gain. So woe to them for what their hands do write and woe to them for what they gain with it." Koran 2:79 This paper is not intended to be an attack on the Bible but is supposed to be an objective study and is recommended to be used as such. Indeed if similar mistakes were found in the Koran, I would gladly reject it as being God's word based on its own test: "Do they not carefully consider the Koran? If it had been for anyone other than Allah (God), it would contain many contradictions. " (Koran 4:82) May God guide us always closer to the truth. BIBLE PEACE: 20:29-30 The Israelites smite 100,000 Syrian soldiers in one day. A wall falls on 27,000 remaining Syrians . 2KI NGS2:23-24 Forty-two children are mauled and killed, presumably according to the will of God, for having jeered at a man of God. .2KI NGS5:27 Elisha curses Gehazi and his descendants forever with leprosy. .2KINGS 6:29 "So we cooked my son and ate him. The next day I said to her, 'Give up your son so we may eat him,' but she had hidden him
Bible was been Changed for many Times through Ages..The Vatican had removed much of the content in the Bible especially Book of Enoch and apocrypha.. and none of these Islamophobic Christian dare to Answer towards me back when i ask about it Rather evading to another topic... 😂 None of it ...
Great work people! الله يبارك ويزيدكم علما. آمين Some polemicists are treating the Sanaa palimpsests as if they are 'the one and only ORIGINAL' and not one of hundreds or maybe even thousands of manuscripts that may have existed in that specific time period.
So Uthman when he made the Quran in standard form changed the words but not the meaning or the words of today’s Quran are those coming out of the mouth of the prophet Muhammad SAW ?
Does Islam Allow raping slaves? Recently a Muslim Preacher declared his ‘apostasy’ to Islam and has been giving us the reasons why he left Islam. His main reasoning for leaving Islam is that he claims that Islam allows raping slaves who are already married. He quotes 4.24 of the Quran where it says ‘ and (also prohibited for you are all) married women except those your right hand possesses.’ If one looks at this verse at first glance one might be tempted to agree that the Quran does indicate to this reality by saying ‘except what the right hand possesses’. The problem with this superficial reading of the meanings of the Quran in English it gives us this false impression. In Arabic, it is clear that the word ILA (meaning except) is ‘munqati3’ or disconnected. This means the Quran is NOT making an exception for us to marry married women if they are ‘what the right hand possesses’ as the apostate claims. This reality is substantiated by literally all of the classical Islamic scholars. As for rape, there will never be any evidences that islam allows the rape of any human being. in fact both Imaam Maalik and al Shafii mentioned severely punishing (publicly) those who rape slaves in particular. If we look at the Bible on the other hand, rape is clearly condoned as in the following verse: Deuteronomy 21:10-14 Good News Translation (GNT) “10 When the Lord your God gives you victory in battle and you take prisoners, 11 you may see among them a beautiful woman that you like and want to marry. 12 TAKE HER to your home, where she will shave her head, cut her fingernails, 13 and change her clothes. She is to stay in your home and mourn for her parents for a month; after that, you may marry her. 14 Later, if you no longer want her, you are to let her go free. Since you FORCED HER TO HAVE INTERCOURSE (ANAH) WITH YOU, you cannot treat her as a slave and sell her.” and New Living Translation “Our enemies RAPE THE WOMEN in Jerusalem and the young girls in all the towns of Judah.” - Lamentations 5:11 Below is the Bridgeway Bible commentary of lamentation 5:11: Conditions in Judah are terrible. The people have to search the barren country regions for food, and in doing so they risk death from desert bandits (9-10). Judean WOMEN ARE RAPED, former leaders are tortured, and children are forced to work like slaves (11-13). So tell your Christian neighbour not to throw stones if they live in a glass house.
Mashalla bro❤ you killed those silly people. no one can attack islam when Allah preserves his book by those intelligent muslim❤ Alhamdulila, love you from kurdistan-iraq
There are 7 qiraats, we still recite them to this day. Look up shaykhs reciting those dialects. You Christians have fallen so down and have lost all hope in defending the preservation of your books, hence why you are trying so hard as if the validity of your faith depends on refuting the preservation of the Quran. It's okay, calm down, proving Islam wrong won't make Christianity true, you still have the biggest kryptonite against Christianity to deal with: Actual authoritative academics.
If other religions' manuscripts were as preserved as the Quranic manuscripts and Ahaadeeth, they would say it's a miracle and proof that they are correct.
@ Farid responds: Please do a video on ka'ab ibn ashraf and how Muhammad bin maslama dealt with him. All i know about this incident was from the seera lecture of yasir qadi and I don't want to believe what YQ says.
Official written copy by Uthman The Quran was originally revealed in Quraishi dialect of Arabic. But to facilitate the people who speak other dialects, in their understanding and comprehension, Allah revealed the Quran finally in seven dialects of Arabic. During the period of Caliph Uthman (third successor to the Prophet) differences in reading the Quran among the various tribes became obvious, due to the various dialectical recitations. Dispute was arising, with each tribe calling its recitation as the correct one. This alarmed Uthman, who made an official copy in the Quraishi dialect, the dialect in which the Quran was revealed to the Prophet and was memorized by his companions. Thus this compilation by Uthman's Committee is not a different version of the Quran (like the Biblical versions) but the same original revelation given to the Prophet by One God, Allah. Narrated Anas bin Malik: Hudhaifa bin Al-Yaman came to Uthman at the time when the people of Sham (Syria) and the people of Iraq were waging war to conquer Armenia and Azherbijan. Hudhaifa was afraid of their differences in the recitation of the Quran, so he said to Uthman, 'O chief of the Believers! Save this nation before they differ about the Book (Quran) as Jews and Christians did before'. So Uthman sent a message to Hafsa saying, 'Send us the manuscripts of the Quran so that we may compile the Quranic materials in perfect copies and return the manuscripts to you'. Hafsa sent it to Uthman. 'Uthman then ordered Zaid bin Thabit, 'Abdullah bin Az-Zubair, Said bin Al-As and Abdur Rahman bin Harith bin Hisham to rewrite the manuscripts in perfect copies. Uthman said to the three Quraishi men, 'In case you disagree with Zaid bin Thabit on any point in the Quran, then write it in their (Quraishi) tongue'. They did so, and when they had written many copies, Uthman sent to every Muslim province one copy of what they had copied and ordered that all the other Quranic materials whether written in fragmentary manuscripts or whole copies, be burnt…" [29] Again a very stringent criteria was set up by this Committee to prevent any alteration of the Revelation. 1. The earlier recension (Original copy prepared by Abu Bakr) was to serve as the principal basis of the new one. [30] 2. Any doubt that might be raised as to the phrasing of a particular passage in the written text was to be dispelled by summoning persons known to have learned the passage in question from the Prophet. [31] 3. Uthman himself was to supervise the work of the Council. [32] When the final recension was completed, Uthman sent a copy of it to each of the major cities of Makka, Damascus, Kufa, Basra and Madina. The action of Uthman to burn the other copies besides the final recension, though obviously drastic, was for the betterment and harmony of the whole community and was unanimously approved by the Companions of the Prophet. Zaid ibn Thabit is reported to have said: "I saw the Companions of Muhammad (going about) saying, 'By God, Uthman has done well! By God, Uthman has done well!" [33] Another esteemed Companion Musab ibn Sad ibn Abi Waqqas said: "I saw the people assemble in large number at Uthman's burning of the prescribed copies (of the Quran), and they were all pleased with his action; not a one spoke out against him". [34] Ali ibn Abu Talib, the cousin of the Prophet and the fourth successor to the Prophet commented: "If I were in command in place of Uthman, I would have done the same". [35] Of the copies made by Uthman, two still exist to our day. One is in the city of Tashkent, (Uzbekistan) and the second one is in Istanbul (Turkey). Below is a brief account of both these copies: 1. The copy which Uthman sent to Madina was reportedly removed by the Turkish authorities to Istanbul, from where it came to Berlin during World War I. The Treaty of Versailles, which concluded World War I, contains the following clause: 'Article 246: Within six months from the coming into force of the present Treaty, Germany will restore to His Majesty, King of Hedjaz, the original Koran of Caliph Othman, which was removed from Madina by the Turkish authorities and is stated to have been presented to the ex-Emperor William II". [36] 'This manuscript then reached Istanbul, but not Madina (Where it now resides)'. [37] 2. The second copy in existence is kept in Tashkent, Uzbekistan. 'It may be the Imam (master) manuscript or one of the other copies made at the time of Uthman'. [38] It Came to Samarkand in 890 Hijra (1485) and remained there till 1868. Then it was taken to St.Petersburg by the Russians in 1869. It remained there till 1917. A Russian orientalist gave a detailed description of it, saying that many pages were damaged and some were missing. A facsimile, some 50 copies, of this mushaf (copy) was produced by S.Pisareff in 1905. A copy was sent to the Ottoman Sultan 'Abdul Hamid, to the Shah of Iran, to the Amir of Bukhara, to Afghanistan, to Fas and some important Muslim personalities. One copy is now in the Columbia University Library (U.S.A.). [39] 'The Manuscript was afterwards returned to its former place and reached Tashkent in 1924, where it has remained since'. [40]
So Uthman when he made the Quran in standard form changed the words but not the meaning or the words of today’s Quran are those coming out of the mouth of the prophet Muhammad SAW ?
MasyaaAllah barakaAllah fikum. Keep on exposing the enemies of the truth lies! They are on the quicksand! Digging their own hole ...can only goes deeper. Only showing their foolishness!
SubhanALLAH. When three or more Qur'an and Hadith experts (though they humbly call themselves as lay men) like Brothers Farid, Ijaz, and Mansur collaborated to refute something or someone like Dan Brubaker and Jay Smith, you're 101 percent sure that the latter are doomed. Good luck on hiding Dan & Jay! Lol
MashaaAllah for the effort and Jazakallah khyran. Arguing on the textual preservation of the Qur'an puts the cart before the horse. The Qur'an is a spoken, recited book. Since the Prophet (saw) till today, there is an unbroken chain of reciters of the complete Qur'an. There has never been a period since the Prophet (sAW) where the Complete Quran hasn't been in believers hearts. The written Qur'an is a secondary line of preservation not the main
The book is stupid, even majority orientalist see Muhammad S"A"W exist, see real academia book like "Muhammad and Empire of faith - Sean Anthony". Not bogus one..
@@majeedm689 Remmebering me about scattering evidence before seerah, but as long i see, there is no congreto about "tashcant" of Sebeos,. Its why is recommended Muhammad and Empire faith, hehe..
I read Brubaker's book a few days ago. To be honest, I found nothing controversial in it at all, except, perhaps, his suggestion that many of the corrections may have been made since 1924; in an attempt to make the early manuscripts conform to the Cairo edition of the Hafs Qur'an. Jay Smith has gone so far as to make the crazy suggestion that the corrections were made after 1985!
Before you even ask, the silly four changes example will be refuted in the next couple of days. Not sure what I'm talking about? Well, you're not missing much. ;p
Imam murrah, explain
Mashallah, continue brother farid.. Dont stop
@Tauhida Khan its brubakers argument exposed of how it is ridiculous
They look at other quranic manuscripts to show this etc read the beginning of the pdf again
Check my website variances in quranic manuscripts i explain it there as well
@UC1RLXbS2aDIFtoC2bWzzvpg yes a course would be good you can find courses in Ulum Al Quran online perhaps Farid could reccomend one.
This is me (UA-cam account) btw
@@Spreadingthetruth btw i know a play list of 6 week Quranic science course but link will not work here plzz come to Islamic defence UA-cam channel comments i will post that link do u know Islamic defence YT C ?
Its really funny seeing these guys who spend years trying to refute islam only to be refuted with a little over a week's effort. Love to see it.
@The Crow
Aren't you gonna reply to zebua mabua?
Don't be afraid.
I'm with you bro.
We can beat him together!
@The Crow Ok come argue with me. Let's see how knowledge you are. And before we start let me tell you something, we have different Qiraat of the Qur'an and which is Authenticated by authentic Hadith and these Qiraat don't have any contradictory statement which may change the whole doctrine of islam rather they complement each other. Can you please tell me where did Jesus(peace be upon him) said that Gospel was revealed in hundreds of different versions? Im waiting
@Zabua Mabua Bruh he clearly didn't watch the video completely. They are just mad because their arguments against Quran fail everytime
@The Crow You're ridiculous buddy. What you're basically saying is that "in order for the Qur'an to be preserved, there MUST not be any scribal errors". You crazy or something? Scribal errors are common, they could easily be ignored in many ways. They do not imply that the Qur'an was not preserved. You gotta be kidding me.
THESE SCRIBAL ERRORS WEREN'T DISSEMINATED TO THE PUBLIC. AS EASY AS THAT.
@The Crow Your first two sentences are nonsense. What can't you understand from the phrase "scribal errors"? Will all due respect, they were all "errors" that were not propagated.
Allah did not prevent scribal errors from being made but that does not mean that he prevented the preservation to happen.
"Nevertheless, even if we don't count it, we know that the quran has been changed. The Islamic sources speak of entire surahs that have been cut or have disappeared altogether. The goat is also supposed to have eaten verses (like the one about breastfeeding for adults) etc. Moreover, we know that the oldest qurans differ from the current ones (research done by Muslims themselves). And even in terms of contemporary qurans, at least 37 different versions have been found till today. "
{We do not abrogate a verse or cause it to be forgotten except that We bring forth [one] better than it or similar to it. Do you not know that Allah is over all things competent?} [Quran 2: 106]
Atleast cite the Muslim researchers themselves.
Support your claims.
It's ridiculous how you reject Islam so fast just because of a topic that is "uncertain" to you.
Allah knows best!
These three are ethenically from three different continents. It's surprising how diverse the deen of Islam really is.
Technically the Trini is ethnically South Asian.
@@thehalalreviewer People of Trinidad are a mix of African, Asian and HIspanic decent. By Trini, if you meant Ijaz, you could be correct.
@Abdallah Al Mansur definitely, without a shred of a doubt.
EngineeredMechanized yeah bro I was referring to Zika’s bcs his nickname is The Trini. Btw Hispanic isn’t an ethnicity my bro.
Where are they from
Please let me know?
Back When I was 6 I tried writing a verse in the Quran in a notebook and made a mistake. 12 years later while I was sorting boxes in my loft I had stumbled upon it again and immediately assumed that I had discovered another version of the Quran with scribal errors as verified by the worlds most renowned Quranic scholar David wood after I called him to report this news, therefore proving Islam wrong...
😂
🤣🤣🤣
😂
you should change your chanel to imam Murrah latest student
lol
To those ignorant Christians and atheists who dont know what the word "Allah" is or from where did it come from, here is your answer:
(Allah - الله) grammatically, and what does it means in arabic:
Allah (الله) is an arabic word created from a letter and a word...and those are:
First: (ال) which means (the)
Second: (إله) which means (deity) or (god)
In arabic (ال / the) is used to refer to things that are known and specific..
If you don't use (ال / the) it would be like you are referring to a random unknown thing.
Basically if you join (ال / the) with the word (god / إله) - with a small (g) -, it becomes (the God - GOD / الإله).... in arabic there is a rule of joining two words to sound like one and that is called (joining words / إدغام - idgam) .. these both words that creat (الإله) join together in pronunciation to create the word (الله / THE GOD) under the (joining words / إدغام) rule..
Basically (Allah - الله) means (the God)
If you don't believe me, all sematic languages (hebrew - aramiac - arabic) all fall under this rule that God in each language is from 3 main letters and those are:
1_ E-A
2_ L
3_ H
The arabic translation of the bible also says Allah for God...
Arabic Christians and Jews also say Allah regularly because thats what God means in arabic...
@Abdul-Haqq
The word إله basically means "deity"
@Abdul-Haqq
Yep😂
I really wish these arrogant Christians would take a minute out of their time to read this. But I doubt they would because they like to cover themselves in their own delusion. May Allah protect us all. And may Allah reward you for your efforts in making this well done explanation!
you said : Basically (Allah - الله) means (the God)
wrong . because if i want to say my god in arabic i cant use the word allah what i have to do is to use the word elah therefore the word elah is god in arabic . allah is one of the 99 names of god in islam
@@nightmare-yt4ff elah is not specific and generic and can refer to true God or false made up dieties.
If I am wrong then please correct me.
Getting PHD is going to become a joke if this is the level of work you need to produce to get it.
Western academia was never on the same level as classical Islamic academia.
U dont kbow the unseen say rather it very likely. U should edit ur comment and not be ignorantly
It’s been a joke
@W Grettum These three stooges are advanced literary scholars with crediblities lmfao
@W Grettum Which facts have been deflected away from?
Baker’s book doesn’t belong on a shelf, but rather a trash can.
Its not worth even the dust that sits on it
Just burn it.
Oh no. Looks like anon Ymous is back.
@UCMXgn8f78IfeTp7A0RdUYyw I actually read a book recently refuting the claims of Christoph Luxembourg on syriac origins and it is just weak silly scholarship because the arabic text was developed fully before the 4th century evident by pre islamic poetry and papyrus in Egypt furthemore the syriac vowleing system is underdeveloped compared to arabic and was not complete till after 2nd century hijah
Many other points aswell. We get it you've read a book well done it's a shame it's bad scholarship that even most orientalists take with a grain of salt 😂😂😂
@Apuss - The Adopted Son the fact that they have to do this gives me confidence in Islam.They also allow to learn more about Islam venturing into the academic domain 😂
in Malaysia there's an event held every year during Ramadhan called Musabaqa Tilawatul Quran. All nation can send their best reciter to present their recitation of the Holy Quran. The judge is will be the best master scholar of Quran from multiple nation. this event also presented live on tv an it has been held every year since 1961
So if anything wrong with the quran they recite will surely get known.
This also prove that the Quran we around the world read and recite is one same Quran.
@W Grettum Any. its all same quran. only variation of slang and all judge know all of those variation.
That is not the point, how come the Quran has been edited and corrected in the past?
@@ABC-yh8bt Because human scribes write it and sometimes they accidentally make spelling mistakes like all humans or put the wrong word accidentally, but they correct it later because they know it from memory.
alhamdulillah and when we see the signs are revealed we would see wont we?
@@ABC-yh8bt dittography.
When I was a child, i was tired of tajweed lesson. Now I know how important tajweed to preserve Al Qur'an. But, only muslim know how detail Allah made rules and science to preserve his word until the end of time.
@@majeedm689 i will not say that. How dare I. It just a small part of the miracles that i understand. But, i will not debate anyone with my thought so they can twist it.
@@majeedm689 sound provocative. Too lazy too argue.
@@majeedm689 lemme guess,,, ur anotehr fake ex muslim XD XD XD
exactly
@The Crow your argument was already debunked
I had faced some similar questions from a Christian regarding preservation issue. But thank to Allah Almighty, when I read some of above text(book), now I can defend the preservation of Quran. I always believed that Quran is the only book on face of earth that is perfectly preserved. But obviously, I couldn't put my case with proofs. But now, I can...........
again JazakAllah
respect and love from Pakistan
So Uthman when he made the Quran in standard form changed the words but not the meaning or the words of today’s Quran are those coming out of the mouth of the prophet Muhammad SAW ?
Assalamu alaikum everyone. I have a test tomorrow on chemistry and I’m trying to get a good grade. Insha Allah if you could pray for me, I’ll be very happy and may Allah bless you all. Ameen.
@Le Kot thank you brother 🙏❤️
Wa’alaikumussalam Aamiin
@@jxcess3891 Jesus will *pay* for you (insert cancer emoji)
@@jxcess3891 When you see the Prophet try his hardest for people in the hellfire to enter paradise in the day of resurrection, you’ll see how evil you really are.
@@jxcess3891 You would go to hell for rejecting the ultimate truth, yet the Prophet would still try his best for you, and you slander him?
(Btw, the bridge to Jannah is above hell, that’s what the ayat means. Everyone will pass through hell, including the believers)
When the gym teachers join your soccer team
loooooooooooooooool
@aisha Bacon
You dont even know what pedophilia is. Heck with parental consent in America some states don't have any age limit.
Go study arabic then argue.
@aisha Bacon
Yes there is evidence. Maybe not for any Bible but the quran does.
Nuh uh.
Youre literally more ignorant than someone who fixes shoes for a living
@aisha Bacon lol no he didn't. I bet you never saw the debate itself. Sam was literally saying names with 0 relevance to his idea and ijaz was answering the original argument.
@aisha Bacon Sam Shamoun? That’s who u r going with? Why dont you link the whole debate here so we can see?
Also why didn’t Sam Shamoun show up with EFDawah streams to defend Christianity? Shame on him
Would you be able to get Brubaker on for a discussion about his works? Muslims and non-believers around the world need to see that hes not making a sincere academic argument.
Brubaker won't join the conversation. He is no better than his buddy Jay Smith. Dishonest as one can get.
Feels like I'm watching the Avengers.
Denzo Dridz. Lol, he’s definitely Loki.
Same:) After watching much videos from Mansur and from Farid I just realized how unbelievable much and important knowledge they have SubhanAllah. Now to see them together is amazing
@The prophets follower oooohhhhhh🤣🤣🤣wallahhh brother your comment made my dayyyy may Allah bless youu
@@adamyahya4734 He's one of those 5 henchmen Thanos had. Forgot their names.
Refrain yourself from making reference to holywood regarding matters of Islam.
David wood the most popular with 550k subs
Mufti menk 1.5M
His love interest APuss 230k
The prophets path over 1.1M
I'm sure you get the picture
There is nothing to worry about.
@Amir Hossian I believe that some don't. I'm just not sure how many.
@@islamisthetruth3402 cause they are all blind followers
*There is no God except Allah in the Bible*
*God is Allah/YHWH*
Numbers 23:19, John 1:18, 1 Timothy 6:16, Exodus 33: 20.
*Jesus said God is Allah/YHWH*
John, 20:17, John, 8:54, Matthew 18:19, Mark 10:18, Matthew, 7:21, Luke, 18:19, Matthew 19-17, Leviticus 19:31 & Isaiah 43:11.
*Jesus said The One Almighty God (Allah/YHWH)*
Matthew 4:10, Matthew 23: 8, Mark, 12:29, Mark 12:32, Luke 10:21, John 5:44, John 17: 3, Deuteronomy 4:35, Deuteronomy 6: 4, Exodus 3:15, Isaiah 46: 9.
*Jesus said God is in heaven*
Matthew 23: 9, Matthew 6: 9, Matthew 5:48, Matthew 10:32, Matthew 12:50, Matthew 15:13, Matthew 16:17, John 6: 32-33, Matthew 18:10, Matthew 18: 19, Matthew 7: 21-23.
*God the Creator of the universe*
Genesis 1-2, Luke 10: 2
*God cannot be seen on earth by human*
John 1:18, 1Timothy 6:16, Exodus 19:24, Exodus 20:19, Exodus 33: 20-23.
*Jesus said he was only an apostle/prophet/messenger of God* John 12:49, Matthew, 15: 24-26, John 17: 3, Matthew 10:40, Matthew 23:10, Mark 6: 4-6, Luke 4:18, Luke 4:24, Luke 4:43, Luke 7:16, Luke 7:39, Luke 9:48, Luke 10:16, John 4:34, John 4:44, John, 4:19, John, 6:38, John, 6:39, John, 6:57, John, 7:16, John, 7:33, John 8:29, John 8:18, John 9: 4, John 11:42, John 17: 6-9, John 17: 8.
*All who are sent by God are servants of God*
Matthew 12:17 & Acts 4:27.
*Servants of God do not deserve to be called God:*
Matthew 19:17 & Luke 18:18 & Mark 10:18.
*God must have called Himself God*
Leviticus 19:31 & Isaiah 43:11
kurios in Greek is lord/master NOT God. Theos is God. Jesus is kurios, *many people also called kurios.* But Theos only Allah/YHWH the Creator.
*SO CLEAR, THERE IS NO GOD EXCEPT ALLAH*
*There is no God except Allah*
Qur'an: Al Ikhlas 112:3-4
٣ لَمْ يَلِدْ وَلَمْ يُولَدْ
3 He begets not, nor was He begotten.
٤ وَلَمْ يَكُنْ لَهُ كُفُوًا أَحَدٌ
4 And there is none comparable to Him."
Qur'an: Al Jinn 72:3
٣ وَأَنَّهُ تَعَالَىٰ جَدُّ رَبِّنَا مَا اتَّخَذَ صَاحِبَةً وَلَا وَلَدًا
3 And Exalted is the Grandeur of our Lord-He never had a mate, nor a child.
Qur'an: Yūnus 10:68
٦٨ قَالُوا اتَّخَذَ اللَّهُ وَلَدًا ۗ سُبْحَانَهُ ۖ هُوَ الْغَنِيُّ ۖ لَهُ مَا فِي السَّمَاوَاتِ وَمَا فِي الْأَرْضِ ۚ إِنْ عِنْدَكُمْ مِنْ سُلْطَانٍ بِهَٰذَا ۚ أَتَقُولُونَ عَلَى اللَّهِ مَا لَا تَعْلَمُونَ
68 And they said, "Allah has taken a son." Be He glorified. He is the Self-Sufficient. His is everything in the heavens and everything on earth. Do you have any proof for this? Or are you saying about Allah what you do not know?
Qur'an: Maryam 19:88-93
٨٨ وَقَالُوا اتَّخَذَ الرَّحْمَٰنُ وَلَدًا
88 And they say, "The Most Merciful has begotten a son."
٨٩ لَقَدْ جِئْتُمْ شَيْئًا إِدًّا
89 You have come up with something monstrous.
٩٠ تَكَادُ السَّمَاوَاتُ يَتَفَطَّرْنَ مِنْهُ وَتَنْشَقُّ الْأَرْضُ وَتَخِرُّ الْجِبَالُ هَدًّا
90 At which the heavens almost rupture, and the earth splits, and the mountains fall and crumble.
٩١ أَنْ دَعَوْا لِلرَّحْمَٰنِ وَلَدًا
91 Because they attribute a son to the Most Merciful.
٩٢ وَمَا يَنْبَغِي لِلرَّحْمَٰنِ أَنْ يَتَّخِذَ وَلَدًا
92 It is not fitting for the Most Merciful to have a son.
٩٣ إِنْ كُلُّ مَنْ فِي السَّمَاوَاتِ وَالْأَرْضِ إِلَّا آتِي الرَّحْمَٰنِ عَبْدًا
93 There is none in the heavens and the earth but will come to the Most Merciful as a servant.
Qur'an: Al Maa’idah 5:17-18
١٧ لَقَدْ كَفَرَ الَّذِينَ قَالُوا إِنَّ اللَّهَ هُوَ الْمَسِيحُ ابْنُ مَرْيَمَ ۚ قُلْ فَمَنْ يَمْلِكُ مِنَ اللَّهِ شَيْئًا إِنْ أَرَادَ أَنْ يُهْلِكَ الْمَسِيحَ ابْنَ مَرْيَمَ وَأُمَّهُ وَمَنْ فِي الْأَرْضِ جَمِيعًا ۗ وَلِلَّهِ مُلْكُ السَّمَاوَاتِ وَالْأَرْضِ وَمَا بَيْنَهُمَا ۚ يَخْلُقُ مَا يَشَاءُ ۚ وَاللَّهُ عَلَىٰ كُلِّ شَيْءٍ قَدِيرٌ
17 They disbelieve those who say, "Allah is the Christ, the son of Mary." Say, "Who can prevent Allah, if He willed, from annihilating the Christ son of Mary, and his mother, and everyone on earth?" To Allah belongs the sovereignty of the heavens and the earth and what is between them. He creates whatever He wills, and Allah has power over everything.
١٨ وَقَالَتِ الْيَهُودُ وَالنَّصَارَىٰ نَحْنُ أَبْنَاءُ اللَّهِ وَأَحِبَّاؤُهُ ۚ قُلْ فَلِمَ يُعَذِّبُكُمْ بِذُنُوبِكُمْ ۖ بَلْ أَنْتُمْ بَشَرٌ مِمَّنْ خَلَقَ ۚ يَغْفِرُ لِمَنْ يَشَاءُ وَيُعَذِّبُ مَنْ يَشَاءُ ۚ وَلِلَّهِ مُلْكُ السَّمَاوَاتِ وَالْأَرْضِ وَمَا بَيْنَهُمَا ۖ وَإِلَيْهِ الْمَصِيرُ
18 The Jews and the Christians say, "We are the children of Allah, and His beloved." Say, "Why then does He punish you for your sins?" In fact, you are humans from among those He created. He forgives whom He wills, and He punishes whom He wills. To Allah belongs the dominion of the heavens and the earth and what lies between them, and to Him is the return.
Qur'an: Al-Mā’idah 5: 72-73
٧٢ لَقَدْ كَفَرَ الَّذِينَ قَالُوا إِنَّ اللَّهَ هُوَ الْمَسِيحُ ابْنُ مَرْيَمَ ۖ وَقَالَ الْمَسِيحُ يَا بَنِي إِسْرَائِيلَ اعْبُدُوا اللَّهَ رَبِّي وَرَبَّكُمْ ۖ إِنَّهُ مَنْ يُشْرِكْ بِاللَّهِ فَقَدْ حَرَّمَ اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ الْجَنَّةَ وَمَأْوَاهُ النَّارُ ۖ وَمَا لِلظَّالِمِينَ مِنْ أَنْصَارٍ
72 They disbelieve those who say, "Allah is the Messiah the son of Mary." But the Messiah himself said, "O Children of Israel, worship Allah, my Lord and your Lord. Whoever associates others with Allah, Allah has forbidden him Paradise, and his dwelling is the Fire. The wrongdoers have no saviors."
٧٣ لَقَدْ كَفَرَ الَّذِينَ قَالُوا إِنَّ اللَّهَ ثَالِثُ ثَلَاثَةٍ ۘ وَمَا مِنْ إِلَٰهٍ إِلَّا إِلَٰهٌ وَاحِدٌ ۚ وَإِنْ لَمْ يَنْتَهُوا عَمَّا يَقُولُونَ لَيَمَسَّنَّ الَّذِينَ كَفَرُوا مِنْهُمْ عَذَابٌ أَلِيمٌ
73 They disbelieve those who say, "Allah is the third of three." But there is no deity except the One God. If they do not refrain from what they say, a painful torment will befall those among them who disbelieve.
Qur'an: Maryam 19:36
٣٦ وَإِنَّ اللَّهَ رَبِّي وَرَبُّكُمْ فَاعْبُدُوهُ ۚ هَٰذَا صِرَاطٌ مُسْتَقِيمٌ
36 "Allah is my Lord and your Lord, so worship Him. That is a straight path."
Qur'an: Al Baqarah 2:120
١٢٠ وَلَنْ تَرْضَىٰ عَنْكَ الْيَهُودُ وَلَا النَّصَارَىٰ حَتَّىٰ تَتَّبِعَ مِلَّتَهُمْ ۗ قُلْ إِنَّ هُدَى اللَّهِ هُوَ الْهُدَىٰ ۗ وَلَئِنِ اتَّبَعْتَ أَهْوَاءَهُمْ بَعْدَ الَّذِي جَاءَكَ مِنَ الْعِلْمِ ۙ مَا لَكَ مِنَ اللَّهِ مِنْ وَلِيٍّ وَلَا نَصِيرٍ
120 The Jews and the Christians will not approve of you, unless you follow their creed. Say, "Allah's guidance is the guidance." Should you follow their desires, after the knowledge that has come to you, you will have in Allah neither guardian nor helper.
Qur'an: Al Baqarah 2:135
١٣٥ وَقَالُوا كُونُوا هُودًا أَوْ نَصَارَىٰ تَهْتَدُوا ۗ قُلْ بَلْ مِلَّةَ إِبْرَاهِيمَ حَنِيفًا ۖ وَمَا كَانَ مِنَ الْمُشْرِكِينَ
135 And they say, "Be Jews or Christians, and you will be guided." Say, "Rather, the religion of Abraham, the Monotheist; he was not an idolater."
Qur'an: Az Zukhruf 43:64
٦٤ إِنَّ اللَّهَ هُوَ رَبِّي وَرَبُّكُمْ فَاعْبُدُوهُ ۚ هَٰذَا صِرَاطٌ مُسْتَقِيمٌ
64 Allah is my Lord and your Lord, so worship Him-this is a straight path."
*The word Allah comes from*
Allah is the name of God in the Arabic dialect. Allah is God the creator of the universe and all the creatures, humans, animals, plants, angels, jin/ghost including devil, ect.
The limitations of the human mind cannot think much about God the Creator. Just thinking about ghosts on earth, humans don't know what else is God.
Allah's name comes from the name of God used by the Prophet Ibrahim AS / Abraham.
Prophet Ibrahim AS / Abraham used Aramaic language.
God in Aramaic dialect is El or Elah. The name of God is Alaah.
God in Hebrew dialect is Eloh or Elohim. The name of God is YHWH.
God in Arabic dialect is Ilah. The name of God is Allah.
Elah = Eloh = Ilah.
Alaah = YHWH = Allah.
Qur'an: Al Baqarah 2:136
١٣٦ قُولُوا آمَنَّا بِاللَّهِ وَمَا أُنْزِلَ إِلَيْنَا وَمَا أُنْزِلَ إِلَىٰ إِبْرَاهِيمَ وَإِسْمَاعِيلَ وَإِسْحَاقَ وَيَعْقُوبَ وَالْأَسْبَاطِ وَمَا أُوتِيَ مُوسَىٰ وَعِيسَىٰ وَمَا أُوتِيَ النَّبِيُّونَ مِنْ رَبِّهِمْ لَا نُفَرِّقُ بَيْنَ أَحَدٍ مِنْهُمْ وَنَحْنُ لَهُ مُسْلِمُونَ
136 Say, "We believe in Allah; and in what was revealed to us; and in what was revealed to Abraham, and Ishmael, and Isaac, and Jacob, and the Patriarchs; and in what was given to Moses and Jesus; and in what was given to the prophets-from their Lord. We make no distinction between any of them, and to Him we surrender."
*ONLY One God*
Qur'an As Fushilat 41:6
٦ قُلْ إِنَّمَا أَنَا بَشَرٌ مِثْلُكُمْ يُوحَىٰ إِلَيَّ أَنَّمَا إِلَٰهُكُمْ إِلَٰهٌ وَاحِدٌ فَاسْتَقِيمُوا إِلَيْهِ وَاسْتَغْفِرُوهُ ۗ وَوَيْلٌ لِلْمُشْرِكِينَ
6 Say, "I am only a human like you; it is inspired in me that your God is One God. So be upright towards Him, and seek forgiveness from Him." And woe to the idolaters.
Like Jesus teachings Mark 12:29 ONLY One God.
All Prophet including Jesus taught to worship one God (Allah/YHWH) NOT himself. Why did Jesus teach if it not obeyed?
Jesus often prayed to God (Allah/YHWH) NOT himself.
Massiah the meaning that is anointed is not atone for sins. Massiah is a process of purification Imam or King Israel. Massiah is a common thing in Jews.
The Mercy Of Muhammad
THE mercy of the Prophet (peace be upon him) even extended to those who brutally killed and then mutilated the body of his uncle Hamzah, one of the most beloved of people to the Prophet. Hamzah was one of the earliest to accept Islam and, through his power and position in the Quraishite hierarchy, diverted much harm from the Muslims. An Abyssinian slave of the wife of Abu Sufyan, Hind, sought out and killed Hamzah in the battle of Uhud. The night before the victory of Makkah, Abu Sufyan accepted Islam, fearing the vengeance of the Prophet (may the mercy and blessings of God be upon him). The latter forgave him and sought no retribution for his years of enmity.
After Hind had killed Hamzah she mutilated his body by cutting his chest and tearing his liver and heart into pieces. When she quietly came to the Prophet and accepted Islam, he recognized her but did not say anything. She was so impressed by his magnanimity and stature that she said, “O Messenger of God, no tent was more deserted in my eyes than yours; but today no tent is more lovely in my eyes than yours.”
Ikrama, son of Abu Jahl, was a great enemy of the Prophet and Islam. He ran away after the victory of Makkah and went to Yemen. After his wife embraced Islam, she brought him to the Prophet Muhammad under her protection. He was so pleased to see him that he greeted him with the words:
“O emigrant rider, welcome.”
Safwan bin Umaya, one of the chiefs of Makkah, was also a great enemy of Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) and Islam. He promised a reward to Umair ibn Wahab if he managed to kill Muhammad. When Makkah was conquered, Safwan ran away to Jeddah in the hope of finding a berth that would take him to Yemen by sea. Umair ibn Wahab came to Muhammad and said, “O Messenger of God! Safwan ibn Umayya, a chief of his tribe, has run away from fear of what you might do to him and threatens to cast himself into the sea.”
The Prophet sent him a guarantee of protection and, when he returned, he requested Muhammad to give him two months to come to a decision. He was given four months, after which he became a Muslim by his own will.
Habir ibn Al-Aswad was another vicious enemy of Muhammad and Islam. He inflicted a serious injury on Zainab, daughter of the Prophet when she decided to migrate to Madinah. She was pregnant when she started her migration, and the polytheists of Makkah tried to stop her from leaving. This particular man, Habbar bin Al-Aswad, physically assaulted her and intentionally caused her to fall down from her camel. Her fall had caused her to miscarry her baby, and she herself, was badly hurt. He had committed many other crimes against Muslims as well. He wanted flee to Persia but, when he decided to come to Muhammad instead, the Prophet magnanimously forgave him.
In the tribe of Quraish were archenemies of Islam and, for a period of 13 years while he was still in Makkah, they would rebuke the Prophet, taunt and mock him, beat him and abuse him, both physically and mentally. They placed the afterbirth of a camel on his back while he prayed, and they boycotted him and his tribe until the social sanctions became unbearable. They plotted and attempted to kill him on more than one occasion, and when the Prophet migrated to Madinah, they rallied the majority of the Arab tribes and waged many wars against him. Yet, when he entered Makkah victorious with an army of 10,000, he did not take revenge on anyone. The Prophet said to the Quraish:
“O people of Quraish! What do you think I will do to you?”
Hoping for a good response, they said: “You will do good. You are a noble brother, son of a noble brother.”
The Prophet then said:
“Then I say to you what Joseph said to his brothers: ‘There is no blame upon you.’ Go! For you all free!”
Rarely in the annals of history can we read such an instance of forgiveness. Even his deadliest enemy Abu Sufyan, who led so many battles against Islam, was forgiven, as was any person who stayed in his house and did not come to fight him. The Prophet was all for forgiveness. He was the complete example of forgiveness and kindness, as mentioned in the following verse of the Qur’an:
“Keep to forgiveness (Muhammad), and enjoin kindness, and turn away from the ignorant.” (Qur’an 7:199)
He always repelled evil with the good of forgiveness and kind behavior for, in his view, an antidote was better than poison. He believed and practiced the precept that love could foil hatred, and aggression could be won over by forgiveness. He overcame the ignorance of the people with the knowledge of Islam, and the folly and evil of the people with his kind and forgiving treatment. With his forgiveness, he freed people from the bondage of sin and crime, and also made them great friends of Islam. He was an epitome of the verse of the Qur’an:
“Good and evil are not alike. Repel evil with what is better. Then he, between whom and you there was hatred, will become as though he was a bosom friend.” (Qur’an 41:34)
@@jxcess3891 stop spamming else you will be banned
*Halal Parrot*
I have subscribed your channel because of your channel's name. I also have a parrot. He is extremely handsome, beautiful, attractive & talented MashaAllah. He is a Muslim. He is going to be 18 years old on the August of next year. May Allah give him health, wealth, Eman & long life Ameen.
6 ways to earn deeds after death:
1) Give a copy of the Qur'an to someone. Each time one reads from it you gain.
2) Donate a wheelchair to a hospital. Each time a sick person uses it you gain.
3) Participate in building a masjid.
4) Place a watercooler in a public space.
5) Plant a tree. You gain whenever a person or an animal sits in it's shade or eats from it.
6) And the easiest of all, share this message with people.
baker's book?
i thought it was all about how to make some cake, or cookies book.. 🤭
Lol
Not only was he incompetent, not only was he not comprehensive , not only was he wrong but he had a motive.
Man you guys are having a field day alhamdulillah
ALLAH IS THE GREATEST!!!!!!!
@Apuss - The Adopted Son
Where are his comments?
Lol I see ijaz there and am OK hes a one man army
@GuruTruthSpeak
Aameen Allahumma aameen
@@joemacarra Ah, yes. Look at your David-19 :(
Late in the six year A.H., on his return from Hudaibiyah, the
Prophet Muhammad , decided to send messages to the kings
beyond Arabia calling them to Islam. In order to authenticate the
credentials of his envoys, a silver seal was made in which were
graven the words: "Muhammad the Messenger of Allâh"
[Sahih Al-Bukhari 2/872,873]
So, basically the book promised 16 times the details but failed miserably when it came out?
@Denzo Dridz don't know, I'm still watching the video. But since jay smith and company are behind it, it's surely a failure as I've seen their 'criticism' before. They don't even care about even coming close to making legitimate points, they just wanna make money from their fanbase that thinks that they're actually saying solid stuff against Islam.
@@asifmehedi4774 Is that a fallout reference?
@@hamzazulfi it most certainly is. But in my opinion todd howard is better than jay smith from what I've seen.
@@asifmehedi4774 Sure. Atleast he doesn't falsely attacks Islam and Muslims on a regular basis.
@@hamzazulfi yeah, at least he spends his time directing the development of games that just work.
However if the script was flipped and the Bible was to be defended, there would be no such work published
Mashallah been waiting for this ,jazakallahkhair akhi Farid when I see a notification from you I immediately go to watch.
Mind boggling.......my emaaan increased multiple times just because of this video 📹 Rubica go ahead u r helping Muslims ☪️
@Rummpot loooool
Walakum asalam, and beautiful video, mashallah and it was amazing that you released the response book!!!
أَعُبّاد المسيح لنا سؤالٌ نريدُ جوابه ممّن وّعاهُ
إذا مات الإله بصنع قومٍ أماتوه فما هذا الإله؟
وهل أرضاه ما نالوه منه؟ فبشراهم إذا نالوا رضاهُ
وإن سخط الذي فعلوه فيه فقّوتهم إذا أوهت قواه
وهل بقي الوجود بالا إله سميع يستجيب لمن دعاه؟
وهل خلت الطباق السبع لما ثوى تحت التراب وقد علاه؟
وهل خلت العوالم من إلهٍ يدبرها وقد سمرت يداه؟
وكيف تخلت الأملاك عنه بنصرهم وقد سمعوا بكاه؟
وكيف أطاقت الخشبات حمل الأله الحق شد على قفاهُ
وكيف دنا الحديد إليه حتى يخالطه ويلحقه أذاه؟
وكيف تمكنت أيدي عداه وطالت حيث قد صفعوا قفاه؟
وهل عاد المسيح إلى حياة أم المحيي له رب سواه
ويا عجباً لقبر ضم ربا وأعجب منه بطن قد حواهُ
أقام هناك تسعاً من شهورٍ لدى الظلمات من حيض غذاه
وشق الفرج مولوداً صغيراً ضعيفاً فاتحاً للثدي فاهُ
ويأكل ثم يشرب ثم يأتي بلازم ذاك هل هذا إلهُ؟
تعالى الله عن إفك النصارى سيسأل كلهم عما افتراه
أعباد الصليب بأيّ معنىً يُعظّم، أو يقبح من رماهُ
وهل تقضي العقول بغير كسر وإحراق له ولمن بغاه
إذا ركب الإله !! عليه كرهاً وقد شدت بتسمير يداه
فذاك المركب الملعون حقاً فدسه لا تبسه إذ تراه
يهان عليه رب الخلق طراً وتعبده؟ فإنك من عداه
فإن عظمته من أجل أن قد حوى رب العباد وقد علاه
فهلا للقبور سجدت طراً لضم القبر ربك في حشاه؟
فياعبد المسيح أفق فهذا بدايته وهذا منتهاه
@Abdul-Haqq
Yep
@Xue Xiang
You read Arabic?
@Abdul-Haqq there is a UA-cam translation I saw it few days ago
David Wood and Jay Smith have already disliked the video lol
@GABRIELA MENDOZA ALHAMDULILLAH
@Amer Jodeh sure
@Yes You are right you forgot me.
@Yes You are right what? bruh.....😆😆😆
*There is no God except Allah in the Bible*
*God is Allah/YHWH*
Numbers 23:19, John 1:18, 1 Timothy 6:16, Exodus 33: 20.
*Jesus said God is Allah/YHWH*
John, 20:17, John, 8:54, Matthew 18:19, Mark 10:18, Matthew, 7:21, Luke, 18:19, Matthew 19-17, Leviticus 19:31 & Isaiah 43:11.
*Jesus said The One Almighty God (Allah/YHWH)*
Matthew 4:10, Matthew 23: 8, Mark, 12:29, Mark 12:32, Luke 10:21, John 5:44, John 17: 3, Deuteronomy 4:35, Deuteronomy 6: 4, Exodus 3:15, Isaiah 46: 9.
*Jesus said God is in heaven*
Matthew 23: 9, Matthew 6: 9, Matthew 5:48, Matthew 10:32, Matthew 12:50, Matthew 15:13, Matthew 16:17, John 6: 32-33, Matthew 18:10, Matthew 18: 19, Matthew 7: 21-23.
*God the Creator of the universe*
Genesis 1-2, Luke 10: 2
*God cannot be seen on earth by human*
John 1:18, 1Timothy 6:16, Exodus 19:24, Exodus 20:19, Exodus 33: 20-23.
*Jesus said he was only an apostle/prophet/messenger of God* John 12:49, Matthew, 15: 24-26, John 17: 3, Matthew 10:40, Matthew 23:10, Mark 6: 4-6, Luke 4:18, Luke 4:24, Luke 4:43, Luke 7:16, Luke 7:39, Luke 9:48, Luke 10:16, John 4:34, John 4:44, John, 4:19, John, 6:38, John, 6:39, John, 6:57, John, 7:16, John, 7:33, John 8:29, John 8:18, John 9: 4, John 11:42, John 17: 6-9, John 17: 8.
*All who are sent by God are servants of God*
Matthew 12:17 & Acts 4:27.
*Servants of God do not deserve to be called God:*
Matthew 19:17 & Luke 18:18 & Mark 10:18.
*God must have called Himself God*
Leviticus 19:31 & Isaiah 43:11
kurios in Greek is lord/master NOT God. Theos is God. Jesus is kurios, *many people also called kurios.* But Theos only Allah/YHWH the Creator.
*SO CLEAR, THERE IS NO GOD EXCEPT ALLAH*
BarakAllahu fikum.
3 brothers I truly admire. Awesome presentation, I'll definitely read the book inshallah.
ALhamdulillah. I downloaded your paper. and the first 10 pages already clarified the issue. The proper understandings of the definitions is very important.
Jazakallahu Khairan.
@@jxcess3891 daamn, nice copypasta you got there. I am pretty sure you didn't even bother to look up the references yourself and copy pasted it here.
@@jxcess3891
Your claim:
"3. allah calls himself the best of deceivers in sura 3.54 which is a title given to satan and he also lies to..."
Please share the verse which Allah gibes the same title to Satan. Thank you.
"وَمَكَرُوا۟ وَمَكَرَ ٱللَّهُ وَٱللَّهُ خَيْرُ ٱلْمَٰكِرِينَ" Aal-i-Imraan (3:54)
"And the disbelievers planned, but Allah planned. And Allah is the best of planners." Aal-i-Imraan (3:54)
Its 1 AM here but Farid is the real moon. 🤎
Amazing refutation. I went through it fastly. May Allah SWT bless you all.
Thanks for this bro. Farid, Mansur and Ijaz. May Allah reward you all for defence of the Diyn,
@The Crow Fool what are telling me that there was one manuscript of the Quran, there was always a strong oral tradition along with a written tradition. Those Quran with scribal errors or whatever, existed at a time when Islam was in remote villages in Africa and Asia, there Oral based Quran and script are the same as us.
Those errors that you mentioned were corrected, so what did they used to correct the errors, in fact how did they even know that it was an error, what were they using to correct those errant manuscripts?
So who is the fool now you simpleton.
@The Crow so your evidence is Hatun, then I rest my case. Salam!
@The Crow Indeed you based your response on “Hatun and her team “, so I responded to that, if you meant something else then write it, but you only used her and her team as evidence in your reply. So who don’t know English now? Peace......
@The Crow
Do you speak Arabic?
Or are you quoting someone who doesn't speak basic elementary arabic and learned something from a person who claims to study quran manuscripts, and does not speak basic elementary arabic?
@@hasananyabwile3538
THE Crow
This guy is ignorant.
Alhamdolillah for Islam - so amazing to see Allah SWT grant us knowledgeable individuals who serve the deen selflessly to protect the imaan of the muskeen.
May Allah preserve you guys. You guys are a gem to our community
There’s a group out there who value anti-Islam books more than their own scriptureS. Not mentioning name for safety purpose
Hindus?
We are mujahidinet from Indonesia, support your content overall.. Keep fighting, akhi!!! Assalamu'alaikum
8-10 counter evidence for every single example. Man you guys killed his book. His PhD should be taken back.
May Allah preserve you all of this
@The Crow FRIEND , IF YOU DIDNT KNOW THE MAIN WAY OF PRESERVING QURAN IS NOT WRITING DOWN , IT IS MEMORISATION . ITS PROOF IS THE NUMBER OF HUFAAZ IN THE WORLD , IT IS NOT IN THOUSANDS BUT IN MILLIONS . THANK U
@The Crow THEY ARE ALL RECITING THE SAME WAY MY FRIEND , MY WHOLE FAMILY ARE HUFFAAZ OF QURAN AND THEY REVISE DAILY , LITERALLY DAILY IN HOME AND MADJIDS , MILLIONS RECITE THE SAME IF YOU DON'T BELIEVE THEN DISPROVE IT , A QAARI MAY MAKE MISTAKE BUT OTHER QAARIS CORRECT HIM IF HE RECITES DIFFERENTLY OR MISTAKE THE WORDS , IT IS EVIDENT , A SMALL EXAMPLE TO DISPROVE YOUR POOR ARGUMENT IS THE NUMBER OF SONGS AND NURSERY POEMS A MAN CAN BY HEART , IF A PERSON JUST LIKE HIM STANDS AND LISTENS AND IF HE NOTICE A MISTAKE HE CAN CORRECT THE GUY ABOUT THE SONG / RHYME OR POEM HE WAS SINGING . SAME TGING GOES WITH HUFFAAZ AND BELIEVE ME OR DON'T I DON'T CARE BECAUSE I HAVE SEEN IT MYSELF THE FACT TGEY ALL RECITE THE SAME . YOY DONT HAVE BIBLE RECITATION COMPETITION DO YOU ? WELL WE EVEN HAVE QURAN MEMORIZATION COMPETITION ON WHO CAN RECITE BY HEART A VERSE FROM A SURAH RANDOMLY GIVEN TO HIM WITHOUT A MISTAKE , THERE ARE PEOPLE WHO CAN DO THIS IN GREAT NUMBER , MY FAMILY IS A PROOF FOR ME IN THAT. AND WHAT WE HAVE IS THE SKELETON OF THE QURAN THE RASM USMANI THE REAL QURAN WITH QURAYSHI DIALECT , THE REST AHRUF ARE DERIVED FROM THE SAME SOURCE THAT IS OF DIFFERENT DIALECT OF ARABIC . YOUR KIDS JAY AND CO CAN TRY TO DISPROVE THE MEMORIZATION FACT BUT THEY CANT OR WONT BECAUSE THE NUMBERS THAT THEY WILL HAVE TO DISPROVE IS LARGE , THEY MAY LIVE TO THEIR DEATH ONLY TRYING TO DISPROVE A FACT THAT WHICH IS NOT IN THEIR AGENDA / MOTIVE . I AM NOT REPLYING TO CONVINCE A JOKE LIKE YOU WHOSE NAME IS CROW , BALL-LESS TO EVEN GIVE UR REAL NAME . IT IS ONLY BECAUSE I HAVE SEEN IT , LIVED IT AND STUDIED IT AND I AM CONVINCED ABOUT THE PRESERVATION , ESPECIALLY BY ITS MEMORIZATION TO AN EXTENT THAT I WILL ONLY BE LYING TO MYSELF IF I WERE TO DENY IT . ( And me myself also has memorized parts of it 😉 and inshallah I will be finishing it completely soon . ) BE JEALOUS THAT YOU CANNOT MEMORIZE AND PRESERVE THE BIBLE , BUT MUSLIMS CAN PRESERVE THE QURAN DOING SO . OH AND BY THE WAY RAMADAN IS COMING IF YOU CAN'T BELIEVE THE MEMORIZATION FACT THEN ON THE QURAN CHANNELS WHERE YOU CAN SEE IMAMS LIVE RECITATING THE QURAN BY HEART FROM START TO FINISH .
AND IF YOU SAY MUHAMMAD ( PBUH ) FORGOT THE VERSES , READ THE SURAH AL A'LAA . YOUR ANSWER IS THERE .
AND REPLYING BACK WONT WORK WITH ME BECAUSE THE EVIDENCE IS TOO STRONG TO DISPROVE . LITTLE JEALOUS BOY CHRISTIANITY IS DYING I THINK YOU NEED TO SAVE IT BECAUSE EVEN TODAY WHEN I CHECKED TGE NUMBERS FOR NO REASON , STATISTICS SHOW THAT MOST ATHEISTS WILL COME FROM CHRISTIANS . SO GO TO THE CHRISTIANS AND ASK THE NOT TO LEAVE . AND TODAY I AM NOT IN A MOOD FOR A TALK , YOU CALLED ME STUPID , WELL I DON'T MIND THANK YOU FOR CALLING ME STUPID MY FRIEND . I AM HUMBLED BY YOUR ABUSE AND I SINCERELY THANK YOU FOR . I AM FASTING TODAY AND I PRAY THAT YOU BE SINCERE AND BE A TRAVELLER TO TRUTH , I WAS FASCINATED BY CHRISTIANITY WHEN I WAS A KID BUT THEN I READ AND STUDIED ABOUT IT , IT TOOK ME OUT .
SO GOOD DAY AND STOP BEING JEALOUS B4 YOU BE EXPOSED BY YOURSELF .
The moment these people are born, their parents tell them about tooth fairy, Santa, Elfs and everything in between as the ultimate truth!!! - Now as adults, Why should they not Lie about and against Islam?!
Think about it.
I think they wrote it, so basic level Christians, who are not familiar with academics so much, would be able to refer to this book in debates.
Formidable team!
Came across many gems on academia site, now I have one more.
Nicely done brothers
As-Salam Alaykum
Oh my Allah (Subhanahu wa ta ala) we have the best Collab Everrrr on the channel SUBHANALLAH
the last post video four changes example of Dan Brubaker has been refuted in the first picture in your book in The Significance Correction...Masha Allah brother Farid👍👍
This is my Analysis:
This is like parablepsis or mix with repetitive formula. Notice that still on the same surah 9 but 30 verses before, in the verse 72 is preceded by the "formula" : WA RIDWANU MINALLAHI akbar. The word ridwan is put before minallah. So the scribe may think the word WA RIDWAN is put before the word minallah too in next 30 verses later, surah 9 verse 109 so that the wrong result of the scribe writing it becomes : taqwaa minallahi khairun..which should be corrected and has been done corrected by the scribe with : taqwaa MINALLAHI WA RIDWANI khairun am man 'assasa.
*The repetitive formula : [WA RIDWAN] MINALLAH
And amazingly, that's exactly in Surah 9 : 72 of the first picture in your response to Brubaker..masha Allah,
Still waiting refutation from you Farid👍
Terima kasih banyak, from Indnesia
Alhamdulillah brother Farid, again an amazing video, continuing staying strong brother and refuting these people that hate against Islam, fantastic video as always brother Jzk
So Uthman when he made the Quran in standard form changed the words but not the meaning or the words of today’s Quran are those coming out of the mouth of the prophet Muhammad SAW ?
The Qur’an was revealed in the Arabic language. Allah said that the Qur’an was revealed “in the clear Arabic tongue” (26:195). However, the early Muslim community contained people of all backgrounds, young and old, those proficient in Arabic and those unlettered, as well as people from different Arab tribes, with different accents and different dialects. Since learning the Qur’an was the primary means by which the Islamic message itself was learned, practiced, and transmitted in the Prophet’s time, it was essential that learning the Qur’an be facilitated for diverse peoples. Thus, the Qur’anic text was recited in different ways (termed aḥruf) during the lifetime of the Prophet ﷺ. There are several authentic reports that support this fact, transmitted through so many chains from the earliest sources[17] that it reaches the level of mutawātir lafẓī (massively transmitted verbatim).[18]
Ibn ʿAbbās narrated that the Prophet ﷺ said: “Jibrīl recited the Qur’an to me in one ḥarf. Then I requested him [to read it in another ḥarf] and continued asking him to recite in other aḥruf until he ultimately recited it in seven aḥruf.”[19] In another narration, the Prophet ﷺ says, “‘O Jibrīl! I have been sent to an illiterate nation among whom are the elderly woman, the old man, the boy and the girl, and the man who cannot read a book at all.’ He said: ‘O Muḥammad! Indeed the Qur’an was revealed in seven aḥruf (i.e., seven different ways of reciting).’”[20]
The early Muslim scholar Ibn Qutaybah (d. 276 AH) said:
In order for the Muslims to read the Qur’an easily, the Prophet was commanded to teach the Qur’an in accordance with people’s dialects…and if everyone was to abandon their dialect and what they were accustomed to speaking as a child, as a youth and in their old age, this would have imposed great difficulty and hardship on them…Thus, Allah intended for them ease by allowing some flexibility in the language in the multiplicity of readings.[21]
Thus, the Qur’an was inherently a multiform recitation, with multiple diverse equally valid alternate readings of many verses. This phenomenon was explained explicitly by the Prophet ﷺ himself to the companions, as we see in the famous incident where ʿUmar ibn al-Khaṭṭāb and Hishām ibn Ḥakīm disagreed in their recitation of Surah Al-Furqān. ʿUmar narrates:
I heard Hishām ibn Ḥakīm reciting Sūrah Al-Furqān during the lifetime of Allah's messenger. I listened to his recitation and noticed that he recited in several different ways which the Prophet had not taught me. I was about to jump over him during his prayer, but I was able to contain myself, and when he had completed his prayer, I put his upper garment around his neck and seized him by it and said, “Who taught you this Sūrah which I heard you reciting?” He replied, “The Prophet taught it to me.” I said, “You are wrong, for the Prophet has taught it to me in a different way from yours.”
So I took him to Allah’s Messenger and said “O Messenger of Allah, I heard this individual reciting Sūrah Al-Furqān in a way that you did not teach me, and you have taught me Sūrah Al-Furqān.”
The Prophet said, “O Hishām, recite!” So he recited in the same way as I heard him recite it before. On that Allah's Messenger ﷺ said, “It was revealed to be recited in this way.” Then Allah's Messenger ﷺ said, “Recite, O ʿUmar!” So I recited it as he had taught me. Allah's Messenger ﷺ then said, “It was revealed to be recited in this way.” Allah’s Apostle added, “This Qur’an has been revealed to be recited in seven different aḥruf, so recite it whichever way is easier for you.”[22]
This narration provides explicit proof that the two different readings were taught by the Prophet ﷺ and that it was the Prophet himself who instructed each companion to recite it in the precise manner in which they did.
Dan Brubaker built a very weak house. These guys knocked it down by blowing on it!
@The Crow Actually everything I have seen from contemporary critical scholarship on this topic have only corroborated and enforced the Muslims narrative and what the earliest records left by the Muslim scholars and historians so I am not sure what you are on about
@The Crow Actually you are only repeating false claims that only Christian apologists have made. So it appears you are the one who is not only unaware of the latest research in Quranic manuscripts but it also appears you don’t even understand those issues you described either.
Your first point:
The issue of the order of the verses of the Quran is a story that appears only in Shia literature as a justification far a claim about particular verses that gives credence to the Shia theological Creed of “Imamah”, but nothing at all was observed in any of the many manuscripts that were carbon dated to the first century of Islam that reflected an indication of such occurrence and everything that was observed in those manuscripts could be subsequently reconciled to what the Sunni Islamic literary sources described so it only works to solidify the Muslims narrative and the only manuscript that shows something that could cause a potential anomaly is the lower layer of the Sana palimpsest that subsequently got corrected, which is an indication that it is more likely to be a scribal error as opposed to intentional change particularly that it is the only manuscript example with this change and no one is able to observe a trend or a pattern in any cluster of manuscripts.
Islamic literary sources tell us that the Qur’an was revealed in different “Ahruf”, and sometimes the Prophet taught one companion a surah differently to another (including differences in wording). In many instances we also have descriptions of some of those differences. It was only after Uthman standardized one codex did the other ‘companion codices’ fall out of use. But we are able to reconcile all of The variants and order of suras (chapters) in all the manuscripts to the information we have about the codices of the different companions based on the descriptions in the Islamic literary sources except for the Sana palimpsest
Also nothing that was observed in the erased layer could have an impact at all on meaning or theology what so ever so the effect is negligible and gives more credence to those differences in the Sana palimpsest as being a scribal error or at best to the conclusion by Sadeghi, Goudarzi and Bergmann who have named the Sana’a’ manuscript as a “Companion Codex” which was previously not well described.
Also the variants in the Sana palimpsest manuscript, even being an anomaly, are the same types of variants the Islamic sources tell us about and since the text is non-Uthmanic, and is very old, if it represents a different companion reading of the Qur’an that is different from the Uthmanic then if anything it stand as a whiteness that Uthman did not change the Qur’an.
Your second point:
If you are talking about the Dan Gibbson thing about Islam starting in the lavant then that is only a joke by academic standards and it was debunked already anyway and no serious scholar would consider it.
Maybe You could have completely confused the issue with the recent scholarship on the stone carvings that shifted the story of the Arabic language starting in Yemen in the south to its formation in the north as the first recorded stone carvings showing early form of the Arabic language in the northern part of Arabia and southern part of the lavant. Those carvings are a thousand years earlier than what the consensus was about the time that the Arabic language emerged
The general understanding was that the Arabs were a mixture of the Arabs “Ariba” meaning the people of southern part of Arabia in Yemen who are referred to as “Qah’tan” and the Arabs “Musta’raiba” meaning the people of northern part of Arabia who are referred to as “Adnan” and are the descendants of Ishmael.
So it was previously believed that the Arabic language originated in the south by “Qahtan” the Arabs “Ariba” but now the stone carvings shifted the story of the Arabic language having started with the Arabs “Musta’raiba” meaning the people of northern part of Arabia who are referred to as “Adnan” and are the descendants of Ishmael and the evidence show early evidence of the Arabic language almost a thousand years earlier than what was previously thought was the time of the emergence of the Arabic language
Please refer to real scholars as Christian apologists are not telling you the truth and when you repeat their claims it makes you look silly
@The Crow Both our posts are available above for everyone to read and the information we both mentioned is also available for everyone to verify and double check by reviewing the original sources that contain the information we gave and also using objective scholarly research from non Muslim secular academics.
I never said in my above post the Shia changed the Quran, so if you are only going to present false information from Christian apologists and then you will also manipulate what I say in my posts as a response to your false claims then I am not seeing any value for me to move forward in this conversation seeing how manipulative your approach appears
I explicitly said the only claim about any changes in the verses of the Quran came from Shia sources, but not a single manuscript from the first century that was studied have demonstrated anything that could give credence to those claims
I also explained why I mentioned it, and I explicitly said that it is the only claim that could potentially have an impact on theology
You need to explain to me why you have manipulated what I said in my above post
Adding what you just did with you having also started by using false information that is being spread by particular Christian apologists and missionaries and also you are repeating the same debunked falsehood that those same fraudsters are spreading my conclusion is you obviously are not being honest at all
I didn’t ask you before, and I am not asking you now to believe what I believe.
What I asked you to do is to educate yourself before addressing other people with disparaging comments.
If you do not agree that staying truthfully is important to continue any discussion,
Then I don’t have a reason to engage further
I am asking you and other readers to verify the information we both posted from objective scholars and take a bit of time to think about it and research it more in depth from objective sources.
When you criticize me and my religion, I would prefer that you do that from the position of genuine knowledge and understanding of my beliefs and the history of the religion and what the most recent western secular scholars are discussing instead of doing it from a position of only making false claims
This information is publicly available for everyone reading both our posts and I urge everyone to independently verify what we both said and judge for themselves
It’s clear to me now that your refusal to learn from academic scholarship is causing you to remain ignorant.
This is my clue to stop taking you seriously
You just look foolish at this point
Bye bye 👋 👋 👋
@The Crow One last thing before I stop responding to your uneducated comments that only show your complete ignorance and complete lack of understanding about the topic:
First:
It’s not the 1970s dude !!!! So All the views expressed in Patricia Crone book “Hagarism: The Making of the Islamic World” have been completely abandoned by western scholars. (including Patricia Crone herself before her passing away)
Your comment could have been relevant if we were having this discussion sometimes in the end of the last century, which is the period where historical reconstructionism was gaining track in Quran studies (particularly under the leadership of Patricia Crone), but after the introduction of new technology such as carbon dating into the process, all the rules started changing and this reconstruction trend has predominantly subsided as the majority of western scholars have more and more moved away from the deconstructionism camp and have come to accept the Muslims historical narrative since it appears to be the best explanation for the increasing number of carbon dated Quran manuscripts as well as the increasing number of the other newly discovered historical archeological evidence such as the tens of thousands of stone carvings all over the Arab peninsula that I was talking about
Second
I am also happy you mentioned Dr Yasir Qadhi because in the same interview with Mohammed Hijab Dr Qadhi said the Quran is fully preserved and what Muslims are reading today goes back to the prophet Mohammed himself. So Please watch the interview a second time if you need to instead of falsely quoting from it because if you are going to quote Dr Yasir Qadhi like you have done above then do it properly and mention that In the interview Mohammed Hijab clearly asked what would Dr Qadi write down on paper as the Quran that is revelation from God without human interference, and Dr Qadi answered that the Quran that we are reading today was fully preserved and we can trace it back to Prophet Mohammed and he also explicitly said in minutes 1:31:50 “what we recite now is the speech of God and it’s revelation”.
He also published a post on Facebook to explain how people like you were twisting what he said and he also made a video about it as well
So it only shows more evidence for everyone to double check and verify that you have manipulated not only what I said in your above post but you are also manipulating what Dr Yasir Qadhi said in the interview
You obviously do not understand the issue whatsoever that Dr Yassir Qadhi was talking about because it was about the understanding of the Ahruf and Qira’at (which are all part of the Quran that you proved to everyone that you are clueless about) so what you said in your above post is only further evidence that you are just making claims by superficially repeating things that you heard without having any real understanding of what those issues are
A piece of advice: You have internet access so instead of spending time watching Christian apologists then posting the false content they are feeding you, like you did in your comments above, which only shows your ignorance, I highly advise you to start watching academic lectures about those topics instead then hopefully start reading the scholarly work as well because that would be a much more constructive use of your time
I have no time to waste on you anymore
Bye bye 👋 👋 👋
@The Crow You are so ignorant about the subject to the point that You just proved again everything I said about you above without even realizing it.
This is brilliant 😂😂😂😂😂
Salam Br. Farid, I am completing my degree in Shari'ah from an Islamic university, but I find myself much less capable than yourself mashAllah in your ability to research and respond to attacks against Islam. Can you provide a reading list or syllabus for people who have some training in the Islamic tradition, but need to level-up their ability to respond to attacks against Islam?
Are you ok with capital punishment for anyone that wants to leave Islam?
@@quintuslentulus6183yes, capital punishment for apostasy has been prescribed by God in Judaism, Christianity and Islam.
We Muslims follow the commands of God completely, if you're a Christian and you have a problem with capital punishment for apostasy then you have a problem with God because the punishment is also found in the Bible.
Well debunked, I really appreciated you guys, you have done well in discharging your duties towards protecting ISLAM against slander, masha Allah God bless all of you
I was in the imam hurrah discord group and wondered why you stopped posting
Some Christians claim that the Quran has a scientific error in it regarding sperm production
This is incorrect again. The critic focuses on the verses 86:6-7, especially verse 7 as this is where their contention is directed. The critic claims the Quran (86:7) is telling us that semen is produced between the backbone (sulb) and the ribs (tara’ib). The Arabic words mentioned by the Quran are sulb and tara’ib. Tara’ib is thought to mean ribs, though there is some dispute. However, the chief point of interest is the word sulb. Sulb can be translated as ‘loins’ or ‘backbone’ or ‘lower back’. The critic favours the translations which use the word ‘backbone’ as they use it to attack the Quran by claiming the Quran teaches that semen is produced between the backbone (sulb) and the ribs (tara’ib).
However, the critic is very selective in deciding which translation to use as he/she avoids the numerous translations which translate ‘sulb’ as ‘loins’. They avoid these translations as they scupper their critical claims straight away as loins. Here, the word loins refers to:
a. The region of the hips, groin, and lower abdomen.
b. The reproductive organs. (1)
So the critic refrains from using this translation for the word sulb as it is clearly scientifically accurate, ie the semen is produced in the are between the loins and ribs. So, if we translate the Quran (86:7) this way there is no contention. The misleading methodology of the critic is to avoid mention of the numerous translations which translate the word sulb as loins. Not only do they avoid mentioning the numerous translations using the word ‘loins’ they highlight translations which use the word ‘backbone’. This is rather deceptive, especially considering a number of non-Muslim translators, including a Christian translator, translates it as ‘loins’ ( A.J Arberry, George Sale, J.M Rodwell and Henry E Palmer) as well as a number of Muslim translators who also use the word loins (Hamid S Aziz, Muhammad M Ghali, Muhammad M Pickthall and Mohammad Asad) (4). It is unscholarly as well as misleading on the part of the critic not to mention this important fact.
However, the critic does use Abdullah Yusuf Ali’s translation which translates it as ‘backbone’, therefore rendering a meaning of between the backbone and ribs. So the critic understands the Quran as teaching us that semen is produced between the backbone and ribs. In the way of intellectual honesty I do not want the reader to believe that only Abdullah Yusuf Ali translates this verse by using the word ‘backbone’, Shakir and Khan/Hilali also do this. The question still remains; which word should be used in the translation?
Well, the critic does not tell you that Dr Edward William Lane’s Lexicon indicates the word sulb’ to mean ‘loins’ and even refers to the verse in question (86:7) as referring to the ‘loins’. So it does seem that the more accurate translation of this would be “between the loins and the ribs” as opposed to “between the backbone and the ribs” (4). Hence the critic uses the weaker translation.
However, even if we assume the critic to be correct and take the translation; “between the backbone and the ribs” we still see no scientific error. The critic assumes that the ejaculate (semen) emanates from the testes, this is incorrect. Sperm is produced in the testes and is then transfered to the seminal vesicles awaiting ejaculation, the=is accounts for 5 % of the ejaculate, the rest of the ejaculate comes from the seminal vesicles (46-80%),with the prostate gland and the bulbourethral and urethral glands producing the rest of the ejaculate (2). At the time of ejaculation, all this (semen, which contains the sperm) is released
From the seminal vesicles which are in fact between the backbone (coccyx, lower back) and the ribs! So if we run with the translation of the critics we see something that people would describe as a scientific miracle and not a scientific error.
Osama Abdallah says the same thing but goes into a little more detail (bracketing is mine):
“If one was to insist upon the literal meaning (the translation favoured by the critics), one would still find that the Quran is 100% correct literally, too. The seminal vesicles are anterior to the sacrum and coccyx (lower back, loin) and the ribs are anterior to the seminal vesicles.
If one was to draw a line from the tip of the coccyx, to the upper portion of the seminal vesicle _ either one of the two_ and extend the line forward it will catch the ribcage.The seminal vesicles from which the semen spurts out during coitus, lies between the ribs and the coccyx (backbone)!” (3)
The irony is that the critics accuse the Quran of making a scientific error yet the error is on their part as they only believe it to be an error as they wrongly believe semen emanates from the testes, while in fact in emanates from the seminal vesicles which are in between the backbone and the ribs! So now we all know the critics are being unfair, unscholarly and misleading when they claim the Quran (86:6-7) tells us that semen is produced in the kidneys etc.
@@jxcess3891 The Qur’an identifies the ruler of Egypt as “Pharaoh” sixty-five times, but only in the story of Moses (peace be upon him). Not a single time is Egypt’s earlier king during the time of Joseph (peace be upon him), called a “Pharaoh” in the Qur’an. This differs from the Old Testament which uses the label for both of these rulers (see: Genesis 40:7, 41:15/31/46, 50:7), though it has since been established that the term “Pharaoh” was first coined during the reign of Thutmose III (d. 1436 BC), the 18th dynasty of ancient Egypt.[16] Historians have further discovered that during the era of Joseph, the 15th to 17th dynasties of Egypt were an invading force from Palestine, and hence they were called the Hyksos (literally: foreign kings). Since “Pharaoh” meant “great house” or “elite bloodline,” and since the Hyksos were occupiers and not indigenous rulers, they were naturally ineligible for the honorific title-had it even existed.[17] Dr. Bucaille writes,
I must confess that when the Qur’an was first being conveyed to people, the ancient Egyptian language had vanished from the collective memory of humanity for over two centuries, and remained that way until the nineteenth century. Therefore, it was impossible for us to know that the king of Egypt should be called anything other than the title mentioned in the Holy Bible. The subtle word choice of the Qur’an on this matter is thought-provoking.[18]
The historical accuracy of the Qur’an is not just confirmed by recent archeological excavation; it astonished many early Jews and Christians just the same. The fact that Muhammad ﷺ could simply speak of personalities across different cultures like Abraham, Joseph, Moses, Jesus, Dhū al-Qarnayn, and others, with such detail was inexplicable. Similarly, the fact that he ﷺ could extensively illustrate scenes from the hereafter just as their earlier scriptures did was unbelievable for them, as Allah said, “Over it (Hellfire) are nineteen. And We have not made the keepers of the Hellfire but angels, and We have not made their number except as a trial for those who disbelieve (i.e., will they mock nineteen as few?), and so that those who were given the Scripture [prior] would be certain...” (74:31).
Some Jews in Madīnah conceded that Muhammad ﷺ was, in fact, a true prophet, then resisted his message under the indefensible claim that it only applied to the Arabs. This was due to their inability to contest its divine origin, for they knew there was no access to any semblance of this history in the Arabic language whatsoever. As Allah says, “That is from the news of the unseen which We reveal to you, [O Muhammad]. You knew it not, neither you nor your people, before this” (11:49). Some of the toughest critics of the Qur’an today, like William Tisdall, confirm this: “There seems to be no satisfactory proof that an Arabic version of the New Testament existed in Muhammad’s time.”[19] In a similar vein, Pope Tawadrus II of Alexandria writes, “The first Arabic translation surfaced towards the end of the eighth Gregorian century and more than one hundred years after Islam. It was done by Bishop John of Seville in Spain. It was a partial translation that did not include the entire book, and was insufficiently circulated.”[20] As for the Torah, there is near consensus among Orientalist scholars that even incomplete translations of the Old Testament into Arabic did not exist until the 10th century.[21]
Some detractors of Islam argue that none of this history is remarkable, let alone miraculous. They claim Muhammad ﷺ either learned these accounts directly from the mouths of his contemporaries or that he plagiarized them from manuscripts of the Bible that have since been lost. The accusation of being spoon-fed by others existed during the Prophet’s ﷺ life, but it quickly disappeared, and until today most serious Qur’an critics avoid citing such a ludicrous proposition because it risks their being perceived as desperate. First of all, this would be contrary to the historically indisputable integrity of Muhammad’s character. Secondly, the suggestions that Muhammad’s ﷺ knowledge of previous prophets and nations came from a Roman blacksmith in Mecca (a layman), or from a passing midday encounter with Baḥīrah the Monk, or to a single conversation with a dying Waraqah ibn Nawfal, are simply implausible. Sensible people realize that the bulk and veracity of what the Prophet ﷺ brought could only be attained with decades of apprenticeship that would be impossible for him to hide. “Say, ‘If Allah had willed, I would not have recited it to you, nor would He have made it known to you, for I had remained among you a lifetime before it. Then will you not reason?’” (10:16). As for the second accusation, that of plagiarism from the texts of Judeo-Christian scholars, only someone with a strong confirmation bias would consider this possibility, for two major reasons:
As shown earlier, the Qur’an escapes the Bible’s minefield of historical inaccuracies unscathed. Therefore, in order for the unique Qur’anic narrative to be plagiarized from an earlier scripture, this would necessitate that the Prophet ﷺ somehow had access to the accurate version from the thousands of variant manuscripts. Moreover, this version would have existed only in 7th-century Arabia of all places, in a foreign language Muhammad ﷺ secretly learned, then vanished without a trace, never to be recovered again.
Even if this bizarre hypothetical were true, it only accounts for the source of this incredible precision and ignores the miraculous nature of the end-product. The Qur’an responds to this notion, asserting, “And We certainly know that they say, ‘It is only a human being who teaches him [the Prophet].’ The tongue of the one they refer to is foreign, and this Qur’an is [in] a clear Arabic language” (16:103
@@cindylou3524 contradictions in the Bible It is mentioned in the 2nd Kings, Chapter No.8, Verse No.26, it says that ‘Ahezia, he was 22 years old, when he began to reign.’ 2nd Chronicles, Chapter No. 22, Verse No. 2, says that… ‘He was 42 years old, when he began to reign.’ Was he 22 years old, or was he 42 years old? - Mathematical contradiction. Further more, in 2nd Chronicles, Chapter No. 21, Verse No. 20, it says that… ‘Joaram, the father of Ahezia, he reigned at the age of 32 - and he reigned for 8 years, and he died at the age of 40. Immediately… Ahezia became the next ruler at the age of 42. Father died at the age of 40 - Immediately son takes over, who is at the age of 42. How can a son, be two years older than the father?’ Believe me even… even in Hollywood film, you will not be able to produce it. In Hollywood film, you can produce a ‘unicorn’ which I mentioned in my talk. Unicorn… you can have Coccrodyasis, which the Bible speaks about, Concrodyasis and dragons and serpents. But in Hollywood you cannot even show a son, being two years older than the father. It cannot even be a miracle - Even in miracles; it is not possible - Impossible. In miracle, you can have a person being born of a virgin birth - but in miracle you cannot have a son being older than the father, by 2 years. Further if you read - it is mentioned in the Bible, in 2nd Samuel Chapter No 24, Verse No 9, that… ‘The people that were involved in the battlefield. It gives a list of these people, in 2nd Samuel, Chapter 24, Verse No. 9, and it says that… ‘People that took part 800 thousand of the men of Israel, took part - and 500 thousand of the men of Judah same.’ If you see other places, 1st Chronicle, Chapter 21, Verse No. 5, it says that… ‘1 million - Hundred thousand people took part in the battle field, from the men of Israel - and ten thousand four hundred and sixty men took part of Judah.’ Was it 800 thousand people who took part from the men of Israel, or was it 1 million - 100 thousand? Was it 5 lakh people of Judah that took part or 10,460? A clear-cut contradiction. Further more, it is mentioned in the Bible in 2nd Samuel, Chapter No. 6, Verse No 23, that… ‘Michael the daughter of Saul - she had no sons’ - 2nd Samuel’, Chapter 21, Verse No. 8… ‘Michael the daughter of Saul had 5 sons.’ One place it says… ‘No children, no son, no daughter’ - Other place… ‘5 sons.’ Further more if you read, it is mentioned in Gospel of Mathew, Chapter No. 1, Verse No. 16 - it says about the genealogy of Jesus Christ peace be upon him - as well as Luke Chapter No. 3, Verse No. 23, and it says that… Jesus’ father, that is Joseph - his father was Jacob’ - Mathew, Chapter 1, Verse 16. And Luke, Chapter No 3, Verse No 23… Jesus’ father… Joseph - his father was Hailey. Did Jesus’ father… Joseph, had two fathers ? What do you call a person who has got two fathers ? Or was it Hailey - or was it Jacob ? Clear-cut contradiction.
@@cindylou3524 arguing not interesting in truth
@@cindylou3524 if I you ask to answer your question what would that mean to you
@@cindylou3524 if I was to to prove to you what you think is a mistake in the Quran is that you're mistaken or that make you consider your position
Alhamdulillah, I found this channel. They need to know your response, ie David Wood, Christian Prince, Shamoun, and many others who reupload their videos.
Alhamdullilah if you are CHRISTIAN, JEW, or MUSLIM. If anyone out there can help me out, I ask everyone of you for some kind of a ONE ON ONE understanding and wish to seek information. By the way, you really don't need a PHD level in the Arabic language, you just need a PHD in CREATIVE WRITING. This is poetry, and not just an ordinary poem. It's a Riddle to which contains an ultimatum, that which the reader has to interpreted. It has allegories to which TRUE Believers can only decipher. These deciphering can in FACT even find faster ways to solve it.
May Allah bless you all for your magnificent efforts. Thank you so much .
Muslim scholars discussed the meaning of the seven aḥruf. However, they differed in defining the meaning of these seven aḥruf and whether or not those “seven” were intended to be interpreted metaphorically (to indicate multiplicity) or literally.[23] The purpose of this article is not to recapitulate the discussion of the diverse opinions, which is already available in numerous works in Arabic[24] and English.[25]
The viewpoint espoused and elaborated in this article is one that enjoys the support of a vast majority of specialists in Qur’anic sciences, and that is that aḥruf can be explained simply as ways of varying. For example, the difference in words manifests in the following ways:
Singularity, duality, plurality, masculinity, and femininity.
Taṣrīf al-Afʿāl (Verbal Morphology)-verb tense, form, grammatical person.
Iʿrāb (grammatical case endings).
Omission, substitution, or addition of words.
Word order.
Ibdāl (alternation between two consonants or between words).
This list of different types of Qur’anic variants was mentioned by Abū al-Faḍl al-Rāzī (d. 454 AH).[26] Among the many scholars who adopt this opinion are Ibn Qutaybah (d. 276 AH), al-Zarkashī (d. 794 AH), and Ibn al-Jazarī (d. 833 AH). Of course, these scholars differed over the precise categorization of differences and which categories to combine or split in the list of aḥruf. Therefore, it is best not to present such a list as an exclusive or exhaustive categorization but rather to use it simply as potential examples. The proposed examples of variation include phonetic, morphological, syntactic, and semantic variation. Furthermore, one must examine all the qirāʾāt (alternative readings of Qur’an) including non-canonical (shawādh) qirāʾāt[27] when attempting to explain the exact meaning of the seven aḥruf. Thus, one can say that the seven aḥruf are all the categories of variation to which the differences found within qirāʾāt correspond. In other words, they represent a menu of ingredients from which each qirāʾah selects its profile.
Having said that, we can now examine the beginning of Sūrah al-Furqān in which ʿUmar ibn al-Khaṭṭāb and Hishām ibn Ḥakīm disagreed on the reading of certain verses. We know that they both recited the verses differently but we don’t know exactly what those differences were. Although the canonical qirāʾāt contain no significant differences in the first verse of Sūrat al-Furqān (Qur’anic chapter 25), there are some non-canonical readings in the first verse which may provide some clues to unveil the mystery of the disagreement between ʿUmar and Hishām in Sūrat al-Furqān; these are provided in the table below.[28] In his explanation of this very narration, the scholar Ibn ʿAbd al-Barr (d. 463 AH) also examined different readings of Sūrat al-Furqān to provide insight into the nature of the difference between these two companions’ readings.[29] The examples listed below of different readings also help illustrate the different categories of how the aḥruf vary.

The reading of the ṣaḥābah (companions of the Prophet) was not unified during the lifetime of the Prophet ﷺ. There were differences in the way they recited the Qur’an. This was due to the license of the seven aḥruf as they were taught different readings by the Prophet himself. When the ṣaḥābah disagreed on the reading of certain verses, they sought the guidance of the Prophet ﷺ. The Prophet would listen to each party and he would give his approval of these variants as being divine. This was reported in the previously mentioned incident of ʿUmar with Hishām in addition to several other recorded incidents. The reports of the seven aḥruf clearly indicate that the ṣaḥābah read precisely as they were taught by the Prophet ﷺ.
Ibn Masʿūd narrated a similar incident when he had a disagreement with another companion in reading the Qur’an. The Prophet ﷺ was displeased and he commanded the Muslims to recite the Qur’an according to the ways they were taught.[30] Ibn ʿAbbās reported that the Prophet ﷺ used to teach them tashahhud as he would teach them a sūrah of the Qur’an.[31]
ʿUmar ibn al-Khaṭṭāb said that the reading of the Qur’an is Sunnah and it is transmitted by the first generation to later generations.[32] In other words, one must have learned directly from the Prophet ﷺ or from him through his students and successors. There was nothing left to the discretion of the individual in this regard; it was necessary to recite precisely as one learned.
Nice info jzk. Where is it from
@@SB-mn3ui yaqeen Institute
YQ: standard narrative have holes.
Christians : Quran have holes.
Muslims : what are those?
Christians :
Well one of the holes is this: Sahih al-Bukhari 5005-Umar said, “Ubayy was the best of us in the recitation (of the Qur’an), yet we leave some of what he recites.” Ubayy says, “I have taken it from the mouth of Allah’s Messenger and will not leave it for anything whatever.”
So some passages from best reciters are being left out. Yasir Qadhi knows this since he studied the sources, but he doesn't want to say it publicly, I have studied the sources too. Do you need more? Because I have plenty more
@Sovereign OK Yes everything is available online. The last part of hadith is Ubai talking, not Umar. Ubai says that he has heard it straight from Muhammad and will not change it for anything. Yet Umar says that although Ubai was one of the best reciters, yet we leave out some of what he recites. You have to read carefully to see who's talking here. It's plainly stated that certain recitations from Ubai, the best reciter, are left out. This is something that I'm not making up, it's straight from your sources.
There are also many instances where people have forgotten certain passages. The fact that Yasir Qadhi says there are holes in the narrative is because he knows the sources, but he doesn't want publicly admit it. Check this one for example :
Sahih Muslim 2286-Abu Musa al-Ash’ari sent for the reciters of Basra. They came to him and they were three hundred in number. They recited the Qur’an and he said: You are the best among the inhabitants of Basra, for you are the reciters among them. So continue to recite it. (But bear in mind) that your reciting for a long time may not harden your hearts as were hardened the hearts of those before you. We used to recite a surah which resembled in length and severity to (Surah) Bara’at. I have, however, forgotten it with the exception of this which I remember out of it: “If there were two valleys full of riches, for the son of Adam, he would long for a third valley, and nothing would fill the stomach of the son of Adam but dust.” And we used to recite a surah which resembled one of the surahs of Musabbihat, and I have forgotten it . . .
There are many more examples, but as you can see, the myth that Quran was perfectly preserved is just that, a myth, easily verified in your own most trusted sources. But you'll never hear an imam or your religious leaders tell you this. Because they would rather you believe in a myth than in what your own sources say. These are sahih narrations which means authentic.
Isn't it ironic? You believe in perfect preservation of Quran, word for word, letter for letter, yet your own Quran has a doctrine of abrogation, where new verses cancel out previous ones? What an irony of perfect preservation.
@@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543 So now he lies when he doesn't agree with you? What if he studied and is telling the truth?
@@muhammedzafar1026 How can you believe in Abrogation and perfect preservation of Quran at the same time?
@@muhammedzafar1026 I have studied your sources and I can tell you Qur’anic revelation ceased when Muhammad died. Shortly after Muhammad’s death, Caliph Abu Bakr needed to suppress a rebellion, and he sent many huffaz (people who had memorized portions of the Qur’an) to fight at the Battle of Yamama. Many of these huffaz died, and Muslim sources say that portions of the Qur’an were lost:
Ibn Abi Dawud, Kitab al-Masahif-Many (of the passages) of the Qur’an that were sent down were known by those who died on the day of Yamama . . . but they were not known (by those who) survived them, nor were they written down, nor had Abu Bakr, Umar or Uthman (by that time) collected the Qur’an, nor were they found with even one (person) after them.
How do you explain this? Your own sources report verses permanently lost and never found with anyone ever again. That is AFTER MUHAMMAD'S DEATH. SO there would be anyone to abrogate anything after his death. The verses he revealed BEFORE his death were lost and forgotten AFTER HIS DEATH. So which Quran is perfectly preserved, the one that contains these forgotten verses or the one that doesn't?
It is all about the money. Writing against Islam is a profitable business and this is the reason broew bakery wrote against Islam . Salmon Rushdie got millions of dollars and protections from European governments just by writing against Quran
Looks like three College Students group studying in zoom call 😂
I have written to Bro. Mansur and he have even answered. How else can I get in touch with him?
Salam Alaykom Farid, thank you guys for putting in the time and effort to compile all of these examples that clearly refutes his claims. I would like to ask if you published those notes in a book or any other sort of publications since I honestly believe that it deserves to be purchased not just downloaded. I have to pay some money to get it so that we can assure the continuity and sustainability of your work!
May Allah bless you all.
Really good job explaining the topic. Straight forward and easy to understand. Brilliant stuff guys.
Mashallah you’re doing a great work. I have always wanted our side to reply effectively and establish a good platform. May Almoghty bless you.
May Allah bless and pour His mercy upon on all of you.
those 10 dislikes are from david wood followers
BIBLE AS GOD'S WORD ❓
Can God be the author of confusion and contradiction?
i) I John 5:7 which hinted at the Trinity is taken out of every modern version of the Bible as it is not to be found in the most ancient manuscripts (that they have access to today).
There is therefore no longer any verse in the Bible which preaches three gods as one. The Koran preaches that God is one indivisible, and not a trinity ( Koran 4:171)
ii) II Samuel 24 :1 says that God incited David to number Israel .
I Chronicles 21:1 says that Satan incited David to number Israel. God and Satan are not synonymous.
iii) II Chronicles 36:9 says that Jehoiachin was 8 years old when he became king.
II Kings 24:8 says Jehoiachin was 18 years old when he became king.
A difference of 10 years
iv) II Samuel 10:18 talks about David slew the men of 700 chariots of the Syrians and 40,000 horsemen and Shobach the commander.
I Chronicles 1:18 says that David slew the men of 7000 chariots and 40,000 footmen
Contradiction: one says 700 the other 7000. One says 40,000 horsemen(cavalry), the other 40,000 footmen (infantry).
v) I Chronicles 9:25 says that Solomon had 4000 stalls for horses and chariots.
I Kings 4:26 says that he had 40,000 stalls for horses
A difference of 36,000.
vi) Ezra 2:5 talks about an exile Arah having 775 sons.
Nehemiah 7:10 talks about the same exile Arah having 652 sons.
vii) John the Baptist contradicts Jesus.
According to Jesus, John the Baptist was Elijah in his 2nd coming Matthew 17:11.
John the Baptist denied being Elijah when the priests and Levites questioned him
(John 1:19-21).
viii) Was Jesus put on a cross (Stauron in Greek) Mark 15:11 or on a tree (Ksulon in Greek) I Peter 2:24
ix) John 3:13 Jesus says that none has ascended into heaven except the son of man who descended from heaven.
This contradicts II Kings 2:11 which says that Elijah ascended into heaven.
x) Genealogy of Jesus.
a) From David to Jesus 41 names (generations) are given by Matthew [although he claims
there are 42] as against the 26 names [generations] given by Luke [Luke 3]. A difference
of 15 whole generations in the genealogy of the same man.
Matthew mentions that Jesus was the seed of David through Solomon while Luke says that Jesus was the seed of David through Nathan [Solomon's brother]. This is a contradiction as the seed of David could never reach Jesus through Solomon and his brother Nathan at the same time. According to Matthew Jesus' grandfather is Jacob [the father of Joseph] while according to Luke it is Heli.
xi) Luke doesn't claim inspiration of his Gospel by God. He wrote it because he knew of the events and it "seemed good to him" ( Luke 1:1-5). Also see I Corinthians 7:25 where Paul, in this specific case says that he's informing without God's commandment. II Timothy 3:16 is presented to "prove" that all of the Bible is God's inspiration, the above 2 references apart from the many others disprove that.
The point is that the Bible itself doesn't claim to be completely from God (as a whole by name). That is what the Muslim point of view is also. Since God is all- Knowing and isn't the author of confusion, the above references cannot be from God.
"How can you say that we are wise and that the law of the Lord is with us but behold, the false pen of the scribe has made it into a lie." Bible. Jeremiah 8:8
"Woe to those who write the Book with their own hands and then say:"This is from God", that they may trade it for some miserable gain. So woe to them for what their hands do write and woe to them for what they gain with it." Koran 2:79
This paper is not intended to be an attack on the Bible but is supposed to be an objective study and is recommended to be used as such. Indeed if similar mistakes were found in the Koran, I would gladly reject it as being God's word based on its own test:
"Do they not carefully consider the Koran? If it had been for anyone other than Allah (God), it would contain many contradictions. " (Koran 4:82)
May God guide us always closer to the truth.
BIBLE PEACE:
20:29-30 The Israelites smite 100,000 Syrian soldiers in one day. A wall falls on 27,000 remaining Syrians
.
2KI NGS2:23-24 Forty-two children are mauled and killed, presumably according to the will of God, for having jeered at a man of God.
.2KI NGS5:27 Elisha curses Gehazi and his descendants forever with leprosy.
.2KINGS 6:29 "So we cooked my son and ate him. The next day I said to her, 'Give up your son so we may eat him,' but she had hidden him
Bible was been Changed for many Times through Ages..The Vatican had removed much of the content in the Bible especially Book of Enoch and apocrypha.. and none of these Islamophobic Christian dare to Answer towards me back when i ask about it Rather evading to another topic... 😂 None of it ...
Great work people! الله يبارك ويزيدكم علما. آمين
Some polemicists are treating the Sanaa palimpsests as if they are 'the one and only ORIGINAL' and not one of hundreds or maybe even thousands of manuscripts that may have existed in that specific time period.
I heard the Mingana collection was earlier?
@@SB-mn3ui That is interesting.
So Uthman when he made the Quran in standard form changed the words but not the meaning or the words of today’s Quran are those coming out of the mouth of the prophet Muhammad SAW ?
Brother Farids face on the thumbnail is priceless 👌🤣
May Allah bless you guys for such an incredible work
I'm waiting for hamza's book on Christianity😎
Does Islam Allow raping slaves?
Recently a Muslim Preacher declared his ‘apostasy’ to Islam and has been giving us the reasons why he left Islam. His main reasoning for leaving Islam is that he claims that Islam allows raping slaves who are already married.
He quotes 4.24 of the Quran where it says ‘ and (also prohibited for you are all) married women except those your right hand possesses.’ If one looks at this verse at first glance one might be tempted to agree that the Quran does indicate to this reality by saying ‘except what the right hand possesses’. The problem with this superficial reading of the meanings of the Quran in English it gives us this false impression. In Arabic, it is clear that the word ILA (meaning except) is ‘munqati3’ or disconnected. This means the Quran is NOT making an exception for us to marry married women if they are ‘what the right hand possesses’ as the apostate claims. This reality is substantiated by literally all of the classical Islamic scholars. As for rape, there will never be any evidences that islam allows the rape of any human being. in fact both Imaam Maalik and al Shafii mentioned severely punishing (publicly) those who rape slaves in particular.
If we look at the Bible on the other hand, rape is clearly condoned as in the following verse:
Deuteronomy 21:10-14 Good News Translation (GNT)
“10 When the Lord your God gives you victory in battle and you take prisoners, 11 you may see among them a beautiful woman that you like and want to marry. 12 TAKE HER to your home, where she will shave her head, cut her fingernails, 13 and change her clothes. She is to stay in your home and mourn for her parents for a month; after that, you may marry her. 14 Later, if you no longer want her, you are to let her go free. Since you FORCED HER TO HAVE INTERCOURSE (ANAH) WITH YOU, you cannot treat her as a slave and sell her.”
and
New Living Translation
“Our enemies RAPE THE WOMEN in Jerusalem and the young girls in all the towns of Judah.” - Lamentations 5:11
Below is the Bridgeway Bible commentary of lamentation 5:11:
Conditions in Judah are terrible. The people have to search the barren country regions for food, and in doing so they risk death from desert bandits (9-10). Judean WOMEN ARE RAPED, former leaders are tortured, and children are forced to work like slaves (11-13).
So tell your Christian neighbour not to throw stones if they live in a glass house.
@Truth hurts liars MashAllah
Do you have any blog where you're storing these things or are you taking these stuff from any other websites?
Farid had promised and Farid delivered
Barakallah Fik ya akhi
Mashalla bro❤ you killed those silly people. no one can attack islam when Allah preserves his book by those intelligent muslim❤ Alhamdulila, love you from kurdistan-iraq
Aslam-mualykum warahmatullahi wabarakatuhu..Audience be aware of these trolls.. "jxcess3891" and "smidlee"
Salam Alaykoum dear brothers, very great job ! Barakallah fikoum. Does the book exists in paper ? Can we order it ?
Subhan'Allah Farid and u guys! Ur wrk is incredibly important, and Insha'Allah may Allah reward u
Which Qiraʼat is the quran revealed to Muhammad? Different words different meaning = different version. So much for preservation
There are 7 qiraats, we still recite them to this day. Look up shaykhs reciting those dialects. You Christians have fallen so down and have lost all hope in defending the preservation of your books, hence why you are trying so hard as if the validity of your faith depends on refuting the preservation of the Quran. It's okay, calm down, proving Islam wrong won't make Christianity true, you still have the biggest kryptonite against Christianity to deal with: Actual authoritative academics.
The soldiers of Islam sharpen their swords on the ignorance of the ignorant. It is Allah and His messager who will prevail.
If other religions' manuscripts were as preserved as the Quranic manuscripts and Ahaadeeth, they would say it's a miracle and proof that they are correct.
@ Farid responds: Please do a video on ka'ab ibn ashraf and how Muhammad bin maslama dealt with him. All i know about this incident was from the seera lecture of yasir qadi and I don't want to believe what YQ says.
Official written copy by Uthman
The Quran was originally revealed in Quraishi dialect of Arabic. But to facilitate the people who speak other dialects, in their understanding and comprehension, Allah revealed the Quran finally in seven dialects of Arabic. During the period of Caliph Uthman (third successor to the Prophet) differences in reading the Quran among the various tribes became obvious, due to the various dialectical recitations. Dispute was arising, with each tribe calling its recitation as the correct one. This alarmed Uthman, who made an official copy in the Quraishi dialect, the dialect in which the Quran was revealed to the Prophet and was memorized by his companions. Thus this compilation by Uthman's Committee is not a different version of the Quran (like the Biblical versions) but the same original revelation given to the Prophet by One God, Allah.
Narrated Anas bin Malik: Hudhaifa bin Al-Yaman came to Uthman at the time when the people of Sham (Syria) and the people of Iraq were waging war to conquer Armenia and Azherbijan. Hudhaifa was afraid of their differences in the recitation of the Quran, so he said to Uthman, 'O chief of the Believers! Save this nation before they differ about the Book (Quran) as Jews and Christians did before'. So Uthman sent a message to Hafsa saying, 'Send us the manuscripts of the Quran so that we may compile the Quranic materials in perfect copies and return the manuscripts to you'. Hafsa sent it to Uthman. 'Uthman then ordered Zaid bin Thabit, 'Abdullah bin Az-Zubair, Said bin Al-As and Abdur Rahman bin Harith bin Hisham to rewrite the manuscripts in perfect copies. Uthman said to the three Quraishi men, 'In case you disagree with Zaid bin Thabit on any point in the Quran, then write it in their (Quraishi) tongue'. They did so, and when they had written many copies, Uthman sent to every Muslim province one copy of what they had copied and ordered that all the other Quranic materials whether written in fragmentary manuscripts or whole copies, be burnt…" [29]
Again a very stringent criteria was set up by this Committee to prevent any alteration of the Revelation.
1. The earlier recension (Original copy prepared by Abu Bakr) was to serve as the principal basis of the new one. [30]
2. Any doubt that might be raised as to the phrasing of a particular passage in the written text was to be dispelled by summoning persons known to have learned the passage in question from the Prophet. [31]
3. Uthman himself was to supervise the work of the Council. [32]
When the final recension was completed, Uthman sent a copy of it to each of the major cities of Makka, Damascus, Kufa, Basra and Madina.
The action of Uthman to burn the other copies besides the final recension, though obviously drastic, was for the betterment and harmony of the whole community and was unanimously approved by the Companions of the Prophet.
Zaid ibn Thabit is reported to have said: "I saw the Companions of Muhammad (going about) saying, 'By God, Uthman has done well! By God, Uthman has done well!" [33]
Another esteemed Companion Musab ibn Sad ibn Abi Waqqas said: "I saw the people assemble in large number at Uthman's burning of the prescribed copies (of the Quran), and they were all pleased with his action; not a one spoke out against him". [34]
Ali ibn Abu Talib, the cousin of the Prophet and the fourth successor to the Prophet commented: "If I were in command in place of Uthman, I would have done the same". [35]
Of the copies made by Uthman, two still exist to our day. One is in the city of Tashkent, (Uzbekistan) and the second one is in Istanbul (Turkey). Below is a brief account of both these copies:
1. The copy which Uthman sent to Madina was reportedly removed by the Turkish authorities to Istanbul, from where it came to Berlin during World War I. The Treaty of Versailles, which concluded World War I, contains the following clause:
'Article 246: Within six months from the coming into force of the present Treaty, Germany will restore to His Majesty, King of Hedjaz, the original Koran of Caliph Othman, which was removed from Madina by the Turkish authorities and is stated to have been presented to the ex-Emperor William II". [36]
'This manuscript then reached Istanbul, but not Madina (Where it now resides)'. [37]
2. The second copy in existence is kept in Tashkent, Uzbekistan. 'It may be the Imam (master) manuscript or one of the other copies made at the time of Uthman'. [38]
It Came to Samarkand in 890 Hijra (1485) and remained there till 1868. Then it was taken to St.Petersburg by the Russians in 1869. It remained there till 1917. A Russian orientalist gave a detailed description of it, saying that many pages were damaged and some were missing. A facsimile, some 50 copies, of this mushaf (copy) was produced by S.Pisareff in 1905. A copy was sent to the Ottoman Sultan 'Abdul Hamid, to the Shah of Iran, to the Amir of Bukhara, to Afghanistan, to Fas and some important Muslim personalities. One copy is now in the Columbia University Library (U.S.A.). [39]
'The Manuscript was afterwards returned to its former place and reached Tashkent in 1924, where it has remained since'. [40]
So Uthman when he made the Quran in standard form changed the words but not the meaning or the words of today’s Quran are those coming out of the mouth of the prophet Muhammad SAW ?
this is the only acceptable trinity 😤
@Smidlee the state of being three.
noun: trinity
Can we have a video with the claims and refutation brothers. This discussion is long and doesn't give us clear facts to work with.
@Xue Xiang
I'll try to check it out
MasyaaAllah barakaAllah fikum.
Keep on exposing the enemies of the truth lies!
They are on the quicksand!
Digging their own hole ...can only goes deeper.
Only showing their foolishness!
I love these brothers for the sake of Allah
It’s woodnesday!
@@jxcess3891 go cry
Brother Farid, next live with brother Hashim please.
Thank you immeasurably for your hard work
jazakom Allah khair brothers .
YEEEEEESS, always a pleasure.
Salaam Alaikum Brother Farid! Great video MashAllah. Have you considered having an online debate with David Wood? That would be amazing.
68 dislikes??? Why solider of Fitnah??? Cant handle the truth??? You have been proven wrong that quran was never changed. Your dislikes do not matter.
MashAllah.....my emaan increased 1000 times more
Masya Allaah. Excellent important stream.
SubhanALLAH. When three or more Qur'an and Hadith experts (though they humbly call themselves as lay men) like Brothers Farid, Ijaz, and Mansur collaborated to refute something or someone like Dan Brubaker and Jay Smith, you're 101 percent sure that the latter are doomed. Good luck on hiding Dan & Jay! Lol
Qibla and coins issue still aren't resolved ... 😂 But stay in ignorance
MashaaAllah for the effort and Jazakallah khyran. Arguing on the textual preservation of the Qur'an puts the cart before the horse. The Qur'an is a spoken, recited book. Since the Prophet (saw) till today, there is an unbroken chain of reciters of the complete Qur'an. There has never been a period since the Prophet (sAW) where the Complete Quran hasn't been in believers hearts. The written Qur'an is a secondary line of preservation not the main
You guys make his work look like the work of shaitan.
"he should've for the 20 he decided to write a book about"
LOOOOOOOOOOL
can't argue with that.
plz make a video on robert spencer book"did Muhammad exist"
The book is stupid, even majority orientalist see Muhammad S"A"W exist, see real academia book like "Muhammad and Empire of faith - Sean Anthony".
Not bogus one..
@@majeedm689 Remmebering me about scattering evidence before seerah, but as long i see, there is no congreto about "tashcant" of Sebeos,.
Its why is recommended Muhammad and Empire faith, hehe..
@@majeedm689 Yes, i used english just from search some source to observated, hehe..
Answer is his prophecies and biography
I read Brubaker's book a few days ago. To be honest, I found nothing controversial in it at all, except, perhaps, his suggestion that many of the corrections may have been made since 1924; in an attempt to make the early manuscripts conform to the Cairo edition of the Hafs Qur'an. Jay Smith has gone so far as to make the crazy suggestion that the corrections were made after 1985!
Mashallah..... Jazakallahu khairan for the awesome work brothers.