@@RogueCylon I don't really buy that. Most of our armies are struggling to adapt. Look how vulnerable MBTs are to drones. And we still don't have a unified defense against them yet. Same with surface vessels and attacks by USVs and UUVs.
@RogueCylon not perfected, USA learned a lot about Drones in Iraq but we have seen a lot of new stuff from Ukraine, the swarm streak from BO2 is literally what Ukraine is doing
what makes the t90 so incredibly special is the height at which its turret can fly when its crew gets incinerated by the shell carousel exploding upon getting hit. its magical indeed.
Honestly T-90M turrets don’t fly that often and when they do it’s not as high due all the copium attached to the turret, dead serious tho they actually don’t fly crazy high like T-72s and T-80s
The turret toss is a weapons system designed by Russians, to have a last ditch effort at hitting the enemy tank with at least something. Since it can't beat any tank using its main gun, might at well throw it at it.
@@NoPulseForRussians oh, that makes much more sense then what i was thinking.. I always thought this considered an "anti-aircraft"-system of some sort. Like you said, hit it at least with something🤣
It also doesn't help when your soldiers don't want to be there, don't believe in the war, and the country you are fighting in doesn't see them as liberators, but invaders. They are fighting a army that is being supplied with some of the most effective weapon systems that exist. While they're using old Soviet garbage that hasn't been modernized or updated in over a decade if that, and on top of it, they have almost a partisan movement inside of Ukraine as well. Fighting the citizens that don't want to go along with it. Plus the general incompetence, lack of maintenance, lack of logistics. It's really a shitshow.
Combined Arms operations take a great deal of coordination and cooperation and does best when it's been done again and again in training. This is not how the Russian Army does things. Training costs money, uses fuel, tires, communication sets and ammo, all things that got sold by leaders to line their own pockets. Also, there should be control of the airspace, and drones have changes things quite a bit. How this ultimately affects what a Combined Arms assault looks like in the future, we're kind of seeing now.
@@micwclar - That makes sense. I get the feeling that many Russians are fighting for a paycheque, not for their country. This probably shows on the battlefield as well.
Every time Putin promotes so-called Russian miraculous weapons, we realize that these are weapons that are not operational on the ground but excellent on paper.
all countries that have nuclear weapons won't dare to use it only if it was the last choice , Putin can't use it even his allies won't stand with him if he did
The main problem tanks now face is that a 1000 dollar drone with a 5000 dollar bomb can easily turn a 4.5M dollar tank into scrap metal...ESPECIALLY for Russia who insist on their tanks being auto exploders..I mean... auto-loaders....
@@cwf081166its how the ammo is stored. They need to redesign the auto loader. Also, new tank designs will need ant- drone defense built in. In the form of a jammer and a gun that can auto target drones.
@@cwf081166The Army already has its new tank the M10 Booker and it does have an autoloader but unlike Russian tanks the ammo is not stored right under the crew it’s in a isolated area with blow-away panels so it won’t be a contender in the turret toss Olympics, Russias gold in that event is secure for decades to come.
Ukraine has shown the effectiveness of drone warfare. Though this will be troublesome with nations like Iran through the Houthis where they are attacking ships in the Red Sea using boat drones
@cwf081166 doesn't matter. Look at the Leclerc as an example. It has an autoloader with safe ammo stowage that only opens when feeding a new round into the breech. They aren't quite littlerally sitting on a pile of charges like the Russians are.
Then they embarrassingly break down. T14, already ten years old, perhaps they will make a T22 anniversary edition? With rapid disassembly options, probably looks good on paper...
@@wtfbbq it’s an ai or someone that doesn’t know anything and is wasting our time with these vids. Either way they’re undeserving of your view like the rest 95% of the bot channels in the Mil blog category.
Perhaps the T90 was designed to counter conventional threats, but even at that it fails miserably. Let's not forget that the first T90M kill of the war was done by a Carl Gustaf recoilless rifle, a little Swedish tube that's been around since the late 40s.
I remember reading in the first year of the war that Ukraine had more tanks than they started with because they had captured so many Russian tanks. Is there any data on how many tanks Ukraine has captured from Russia?
I am an Army Desert Storm Vet a 19K 30 Tank Comander. And there is a different ball game out there. These drones are the kings of battle know. It doesn't matter wish tank is in the battle field know. Every tank is useless against a drone. There is a new fighting strategy in the battle field. Super deadly drones of all sizes that is very spuky 😳😳😬
Deutscher, 60. Eine mobile gepanzerte Waffenplattform wird immer eine Existenzberechtigung auf dem Schlachtfeld haben, so wie Soldaten in Stiefeln in den Krieg ziehen werden, auch wenn Minen ihnen ihre Füße abreißen können. Es ist die Art der Bewaffnung und Sensorik, die sich dieser Bedrohung anpassen werden, was zumindest in Ansätzen(z.B. Skyranger/Skynex) in westlichen Armeen schon Realität ist.
After seeing how the T-90, and other Russian tanks are doing in Ukraine. I feel sorry for the countries, that bought junk. Any tank, no matter how modern, can be defeated. It is all about crew survivability. How would you like to be a tank operator, going into battle in a T-90.
@@smyers820gm India is a little happier because they realized how bad the tanks are years ago. They got Israel and France to upgrade the tanks, so, ironically, their "export" model T-90s are the best on earth, not the "domestic" Russian variants.
@@thesarcasticliberal they upgraded their thermal imaging and targeting systems but they couldn’t do anything about the base armor or the ammo stowage and those are the 2 worst qualities of the T-90 🤷♂️. It’s why their turrets fly sky high 🤷♂️. You’d think if they were going to upgrade they’d redesign the turrets. Let’s be honest. The Abrams turret is 40 years old and still the best design going. As far as giving the crew the best possible chance of survival 🤷♂️. Like what general dynamics did with the m60-2000. People really screwed up letting that design go, imho 🤷♂️
@@smyers820gm Sure, the upgrades to Indian T-90s don't make it a GREAT tank, but they make it better than anything Russia fields. And their other option is to continue development of the Arjun, which hasn't gone well in the past. The tank with the toughest turret armor is actually the Merkava, not the Abrams. This isn't a shock given the size of the tank and the fact that it is designed to do a lot more urban combat. Their turret armor is >60mm RHA, compared with 25-30mm RHA for the Abrams turret. The Challenger also has pretty tough turret armor.
we were told that the massive Russian army was going to overrun Europe but 70 years later, a paradigm change in warfare has for the most part made the tanks of both east and west less important
That's bc we see 20-30yo tanks fighting in Ukraine. You take a modern tank with a jammer, APS, RWS and entire suite of advanced sensors and it's a different story.
@@Ally5141 I agree, but look at all the land mines that have been placed. No sensor can detect them with 100 percent certainty, so you have a several million dollar piece machine which can't advance.
@@lionbulldog6 it's called combined arms warfare for a reason. Lack of anti-drone countermeasures, engineering support, or any other support means entire thing falls apart.
@@Ally5141 And what support can counter all the landmines? Bullcrap, tanks are outdated and worthless. It will be all drones soon enough, if they are preprogramed or AI.
Yeah who would have known that having two different, easily damaged turrets trying to fire at the same time was a stupid idea. I mean, aside from everybody?
The west is also wasting its money and resources supply Ukraine which is also a losing battle. Ukraine cant win as it is also running short of manpower. Ukraine has resorted to kidnapping men in the streets and dropping them on the front lines resulting in soldiers who wont fire on the enemy and who will flee or surrender the first chance they get. This is a prime example of who the draft should never be implemented in the USA. If you put people who do not want to fight on the battlefield they are more of a liability than an asset.
funily enough: those tanks where designed to counter the stats the soviet union proclaime their tanks had. and the soviets proclaimed better tanks than what they could produce.
@@Irobert1115HD the T-90 a tank made in 1990 claimed to be on pair whit a tank made in Leopard 2 (1979), M1 Abrams (1980), Challenger 2 (1998). yet the T-90 have tech that might be closer to Leopard 1 (1965), Challenger 1 (1983).
@@Irobert1115HD what's so great about it is they did the same with fighter jets and aircraft in general. And that's why the F-15 exists and is still,by far. The best fighter aircraft outside of stealth versions.
@@CountDuckEgg Abrams was tested in war for decades with tiny losses. Russian tanks have been obliterated by thousands in combat much shorter than Abrams was. No comparison.
@jonc4403 From what I understand is it was too close of an engagement to use tow. Also, they have to stop to use tow, and that leaves you a sitting duck in that situation. This war requires firing on the move for armor to stay alive. Unfortunately from what I understand Ukrainian tankers were trained in the soviet doctrine to stop while firing. So most armor that was taken out was due to them stopping to fire. The successful crews are firing on the move like how the Bradley engagement happened.
@AK-cr5pe How many countries have the capacity to build more than that anymore? The war in Ukraine has shone a spotlight on the unbelievably low production capacity of western arms industries. There isn't a single country in NATO that could replace losses at the pace equipment is being destroyed in this war. The vehicles being supplied are all from stockpiles actual production couldn't doesn't close to replacing those numbers not even small arms ammunition is being produced in sufficient quantities.
I think that it’s the same underlying blind spot in Russian tactics. They put equipment above people. It leads one to build these massively expensive tanks, without training the soldiers properly to use it. It also makes one build tanks to combat other machines- not factoring in the ingenuity and creativity of individuals.
These are actually really cheap tanks all things considered. Small, less armor, meant to operate in coordinated scale attacks. The blindspots is Russian (and Soviet) doctrine that diminishes the importance of NCO's and personal initiative in soldiers.
@@TheLastCrumb. The play in Kursk took 1000 Russian POWs for negotiation, and if Putin wants to recapture it, he's going to have to soften his own offensive in Avdivka, which is exactly what the Ukranians want.
People have forgotten the Cuban missile crisis. When USA didn't want Russia and it's missiles on it doorstep. Russia doesn't want NATO 300 KLM from Moscow either.
@@tonyZ338 if Russia doesn’t want nato in its doorstep then why is it trying to annex a country that would make it put more of nato on its doorstep and the Cuban missile analogy is a bullshit one because at the time missiles didn’t have the range they do now it doesn’t matter now as a missile can cover continents they couldn’t back then but nice try anyway
It's funny that they think that the T-90 is the best tank. The one advantage that it genuinely has over a lot of tanks is the turret-fired missile, but the Merkava and the Leopard have the same capability, but the Lahat missile they fire has a range of up to 10km, not 4km, and has a more destructive warhead. Beyond that, any tank without a hard-kill APS is just dead in the modern battlefield, and the only battle-tested APS systems in service today are Trophy and Iron Fist. Initially on the Merkava and Eitan/Namer with Israel, the US and Germany have bought the Trophy system for Abrams and Leopards, and the Iron Fist for Bradleys. Because of this, these three tanks are just categorically in a higher tier than other modern tanks (although the Korean Black Panther is untested, but impressive, as well).
the turret fired missile is still inferior compared to western counterparts. Due to the auto loader, the length of the cartridges is physically limited. unlike the manually loaded Abrams In other words I agree with you, just thought I'd expand on why it is inferior.
Apparently, they are sending old Soviet vehicles. Because before the war, Russia had the largest vehicles and ammunition of the Soviet legacy. The estimated tank size was 10-12k. In battle, they lost this capacity by 3/1 or 30%. Guess the lost old tanks 4k. I think they will continue to send old tanks and vehicles, 4k more Tanks and others. That's why we see it in war videos from Ukraine, as if they have endless tanks and vehicles))
The problem for Russia is that they didn't properly maintain those old tanks that were in storage facilities. Check out the satellite images of the storage depots: almost all of the tanks and other armoured vehicles that visually appear to be in serviceable condition are already gone. What Russia has left is mostly only good for stripping for parts (and many of them appear to have already been stripped). That's not to say that they've completely run out of the Soviet stocks, because although they would have reactivated the ones in best shape first, and then moved on to repairing and refitting the ones that were in slightly worse shape, and then those in worse shape, and so on, at least some of the remaining armoured vehicles in the storage depots are likely in good enough shape to be refurbished and used. Even for the ones that need to be scrapped you might be able to rebuild 1 tank using the parts from 3 or 4 that needed to be scrapped. But they're scraping the bottom of the barrel and definitely don't have the ability to reactivate thousands more old Soviet tanks.
You've missed out on an important point here. They might have only lost 100+ T90 tanks, but like you said, they've been losing literally thousands of older models. The older models aren't being produced any more, so once they are gone they will be forced to use the newer T90s, and there is no way they will be able to keep up with demand once the older models are all gone.
Ukrainian Defenders in a Bradley, using its 25mm cannon against a Russian T-90 MBT and defeating it is utterly phenomenal. That the Russian crew abandoned their multi million dollar tank without firing back exposes the appalling level of training and lack of expertise the Russian tank crews have. A 25mm cannon overcoming Putin's "Best tank in the world" will horrify the countries that bought huge amounts of of the T-90 as their Main Battle Tank. The already devastated Russian Foreign Military Sales of the T-90 will reduce even further...
@@Moo2loosCavern A bot would exhibit a higher intelligence level than your post contained! In actual fact "25mm Cannon" only ever appeared in lower case in my post! It never appeared in bold, capital letters, accompanied by an exclamation mark as shown in your post! Furthermore, it was only repeated once! Once, as in a single time! It appears to be far beyond your capabilities to recognise a single instance of a description being repeated! Instead, you concoct a senseless post which casts doubt on your cognitive abilities...
Russian armed forces have been purchasing T-72B3 instead of versions of T-90 since 2011, as it was cheaper and considered good enough, that's also why there were not so many T-90s to begin with.
I do not know why I`m here. But Go Ukraine and all u in Europe and EU. We must help Ukraine to win in it´s own condition. Putin and Russia: No Idea of caring life at all Not even your own. Shame on u all people behind this. IMHO greetings from Finland.(down far right!!!!)
The T-14 doesn't really exist. There are MAYBE 10 demonstration models currently active, none of which are deployable to actual combat. It's basically a parade piece.
t90 is a good tank, but not relative to how much it costs. The m1 Abrams IS more expensive yet, but is actually a large step ahead of the t90 in almost every regard. Better sights/optics, better gun, better crew, better armour, better speed, better drivetrain, etc. The abrams does not have an autoloader, but a properly trained fourth crewman can load rounds faster anyway. Anyone who's played arma know this. More to the point, drones have made them almost obsolete.
They also made mistakes regarding the NLAW…you don’t have to be above the tank because the NLAW rocket will fly up for you…this channel isn’t the best for accurate information
Something to consider -- Russia is building more T-90 tanks, but do they have all of their advance components? Something is even more telling. Russia is runnig out of logistics vehicles. Russia has alweays been short on military logistics trucks. Now they are becoming an endangered species. Being a soft vehicle, they are easilty damaged and destroyed by drones, artilelry and cluster munitions. Russia have been resorting to small moving vans to deliver food, water, and ammo. Another sign is that Russia is running out of MT-LBs. The primary mission of these tracked lighly armored vehicles was to tow artillery and carry artilelry ammunition. However, they area icreadibly versatile, being used to as an armored personnel carrier, ambulance, supply vehicle, etc. They are teh equivalent of the US M113. Logistics is not as glamorous as tanks, but it is the key to winning wars, particularly long wars.
I'm looking at the T14 Armata and all i see are Thousands of shot traps, thos pockets in the turret are just huge shot traps, Now people are gonna say " but the turret is unmanned" yeah it might be unmanned, but you knock out rhe turret and now what? You got a three man APC ? And just because the crew is safe inside their armored capsule I'll bet when the ammo goes Boom the engine won't be running to well
@@stevenclarke5606 You're joking, right? Since their Navy lost to a country that doesn't have one, and they're losing aircraft damn near daily to the inability to repair and maintain them. If you were joking, feel free to ignore.
I've maintained for years that the quality of optics, sensors, and external weapons is irrelevant if they can be neutralized by infantry portable weapons, cannons, Gustavs, and the like.
The fact the t90m is suffering loses does not mean it’s a bad tank. All tanks are being destroyed in Ukraine. US, UK, German, etc. I’m sure Russia’s new tank is pretty good. The T90 is a practical tried and trued Russian tank.
Yes this channel can't even manage to subtract 70 from 130 and arrive at the correct answer, or indicate the missile launcher instead of the gun barrel. It's a bit crap.😊
It is. Barrel-fired missiles mean that the tank doesn't need to have redundant systems in place to launch missiles. It's a good idea, but their version of it is just bad--for perspective, the Merkava and Leopard can fire Lahat missiles out of their turrets, but with a 10km range instead of the Russian 4km range, with higher accuracy and larger destructive effect. Also, they can lock onto anti-tank helicopters at roughly equivalent engagement range, which is really strong.
Inadequate commanders, badly trained soldiers and ineffective tactics have been the default in Russia as far back as the Napoleon era. ALL their victoried have come about thru their total disregard of their own people’s lives. People always get the leaders they deserve.
Funny how these videos never changed in 2 Years: - Russia is running out of tanks - Russia has lost its Airforce - The elites are going to overthrow Putin
- They are running out of tanks. Producing less than what you use, and your stocks going down is the definition of "running out". - They have an air force but they do not have air superiority. Also they are have lost way more fighter jets and helicopters than they could have imagined, and a considerable chunk of their strategic and spec ops aircrafts. Haven't seen a single video in which it is stated or even implied that "Russia has lost its Airforce". - that is one of the main ways dictators end up; not the only way, but a very likely way. The fact it didn't happen so far doesn't mean it won't happen. It's not an exact science when a dictator will be overthrown and nobody has given an actual timeline on this. Your entire attempt trying to discredit these points is not aligned with what the points represent factually.
The T-90M despite its name is essentially a heavily upgraded T-72 variant which itself is based on the T-62. In terms of superficial on paper performance it’s not far behind modern western designs like the modern Leopard 2 or the M1 Abrams versions. The whole thing however falls apart in the details, with the crew having to struggle to make the tank do what they want it to do, instead of the tank‘s systems aiding them. With an exceptionally well trained crew it might be competitive, but Russia doesn’t seem to have those.
Surely someone is doing serial number studies on these tanks. It’s not much work to find the number on a tank and then plug it into a chart so that trends can be determined. Even if there are gaps in the serial range, it should be giving us a decent idea of what’s coming out of factories.
When converting between units, observe how many digits are significant. For example, when the range is given as 100-4000m, it makes no sense to report that with all the digits your calculator gives you. Just say 300-13000ft, those extra 120 ft that you mention are insignificant.
Some of the soviet age stuff is still quite potent, lancet is ok too, plus they do have some reasonably decent electronic warfare systems but hopeless logistics.
@@ACEWARFARE1 hahaha take a look at your "strongest army" with your "strongest alliance" with "super sopehisticated weapons system the best in the world but defeated by herders in sandals armed with AK47.... what a shame just cope 🤣😂
People argue about which weapon, vehicle, equipment are the best but tend to forget about everything being connected. Teamwork of soldiers, quality of their training before being deployed, quality of their equipment, their motivation and what they're fighting for, their psychological and health state, how much corruption of the government affecting the army, the morals of people (dont forget that each person is individual, in each squad, in each battalion) and many other things, and depending on if they're in good or bad state, that doesn't guarantees success but only giving more chances for it in the chaos of war. People treat it simply like it's a game but it's all complicated, we are in life after all
The T-90 was shown wanting when encountered in Gulf War 2 - they stood no chance against modern Western tanks, NLAWs, Javelins, attack helicopters and air to ground missiles. Ukraine has been given a lot of anti tank weapons from NATO arsenals - Darth Putin has shown he really is a master strategist
The tank can, when engaged, throw it's entire turret at the enemy. That is a truly dangerous weapon system.
Lol!
Weidly it always seems to think that the enemy is above😂
The only tank manned by komonauts.
Flaming cosmo nots...
Putin calls that a short range drone. lol
"Everybody say their tank is the best until they get a Kamikaze drone to the face" -
Vlodymir Tyson.
😁
🤣
🎉 😂
💀
Gone are the days of only, large powers having access to smart munitions, and air assests. Cheap drones have changed warfare forever.
UAVs*
Not really. While Russia struggled against drones. Many Western armies had already perfected defense and offensive operations with Drones.
@@RogueCylon I don't really buy that. Most of our armies are struggling to adapt. Look how vulnerable MBTs are to drones. And we still don't have a unified defense against them yet. Same with surface vessels and attacks by USVs and UUVs.
@@AK-cr5pewrong. Russia has tiny modern army. The west will rain drones and drop drones like flies
@RogueCylon not perfected, USA learned a lot about Drones in Iraq but we have seen a lot of new stuff from Ukraine, the swarm streak from BO2 is literally what Ukraine is doing
what makes the t90 so incredibly special is the height at which its turret can fly when its crew gets incinerated by the shell carousel exploding upon getting hit. its magical indeed.
Honestly T-90M turrets don’t fly that often and when they do it’s not as high due all the copium attached to the turret, dead serious tho they actually don’t fly crazy high like T-72s and T-80s
Thet wasn’t a T90 spud a t90 turret was issued to an older T72 fir testing do read
@@Grant80 bro what?
@@yeahmonkey8595 That copeium can hold anything
Yeah, the Challenger 2 had its turret ripped off too in Kursk and landed in the trees.
Vladimir Putin calling the T-90 "the best tank in the world" tells you how much he knows about tanks. And by extention war. Not much.
Obviously the challenger is the best in the world. Abrahms far to vulnerable to logistical issues
@@damiand2422 Not for Americans. We have the best logistics in the world.
😊😊😊😊
@@damiand2422 All modern technology is. The US however, excels at logistics. Russia, not so much.
@@IloveDoubleD Jet fuel will be the downfall. Edit; Just one little supply line and the tanks are useless
2:25 "enabling rapid repairs while in the field" - could you tell me how long it takes to put the turret back on again after it took flying lessons?😂
Yeah, when I heard that, I was like "what's left of the tank to repair?"
that tank is head blowing 😂
The turret toss is a weapons system designed by Russians, to have a last ditch effort at hitting the enemy tank with at least something. Since it can't beat any tank using its main gun, might at well throw it at it.
@@NoPulseForRussians yeah when your rifle is empty, you can still use it as a staff 😂
@@NoPulseForRussians oh, that makes much more sense then what i was thinking..
I always thought this considered an "anti-aircraft"-system of some sort. Like you said, hit it at least with something🤣
These kind of operations require teamwork, something that Russia does not understand. Every man for himself is not a battle plan.
Putler surrounding himself with yes men doesn’t help either.
Billionaires care only about themselves and their money. NOTHING else. Everyone else dying for their money is a fine plan from their perspective.
It also doesn't help when your soldiers don't want to be there, don't believe in the war, and the country you are fighting in doesn't see them as liberators, but invaders. They are fighting a army that is being supplied with some of the most effective weapon systems that exist. While they're using old Soviet garbage that hasn't been modernized or updated in over a decade if that, and on top of it, they have almost a partisan movement inside of Ukraine as well. Fighting the citizens that don't want to go along with it. Plus the general incompetence, lack of maintenance, lack of logistics. It's really a shitshow.
Combined Arms operations take a great deal of coordination and cooperation and does best when it's been done again and again in training. This is not how the Russian Army does things. Training costs money, uses fuel, tires, communication sets and ammo, all things that got sold by leaders to line their own pockets. Also, there should be control of the airspace, and drones have changes things quite a bit. How this ultimately affects what a Combined Arms assault looks like in the future, we're kind of seeing now.
@@micwclar - That makes sense. I get the feeling that many Russians are fighting for a paycheque, not for their country. This probably shows on the battlefield as well.
Every time Putin promotes so-called Russian miraculous weapons, we realize that these are weapons that are not operational on the ground but excellent on paper.
Isn't it interesting that dictators all sound the same when talking up their supposed 'super' weapons?
all countries that have nuclear weapons won't dare to use it only if it was the last choice , Putin can't use it even his allies won't stand with him if he did
The miracle is that they managed to even build some given the level of corruption in their system.
Are you talking about Abrams, himars, atacms, storm shadow or the garlic bread crotale?
@@Wild-Storm we are talking about the 3day operation.
The main problem tanks now face is that a 1000 dollar drone with a 5000 dollar bomb can easily turn a 4.5M dollar tank into scrap metal...ESPECIALLY for Russia who insist on their tanks being auto exploders..I mean... auto-loaders....
While the US Army has a autoloader as a requirement for their next tank.
@@cwf081166its how the ammo is stored. They need to redesign the auto loader.
Also, new tank designs will need ant- drone defense built in. In the form of a jammer and a gun that can auto target drones.
@@cwf081166The Army already has its new tank the M10 Booker and it does have an autoloader but unlike Russian tanks the ammo is not stored right under the crew it’s in a isolated area with blow-away panels so it won’t be a contender in the turret toss Olympics, Russias gold in that event is secure for decades to come.
Ukraine has shown the effectiveness of drone warfare. Though this will be troublesome with nations like Iran through the Houthis where they are attacking ships in the Red Sea using boat drones
@cwf081166 doesn't matter. Look at the Leclerc as an example. It has an autoloader with safe ammo stowage that only opens when feeding a new round into the breech. They aren't quite littlerally sitting on a pile of charges like the Russians are.
All of Russia's best tanks are saved for parades.
Their best turrets are orbiting in space.
With exception of the T-14 it even breaks down in the middle of the parade. That is what happens when you steal a 1940's German design to power it.
@@jacksonteller1337I think “T’ stands for Trash.
@@steverawsthorne3624 that is the most plausibel explanation i have ever seen on youtube.
Then they embarrassingly break down.
T14, already ten years old, perhaps they will make a T22 anniversary edition?
With rapid disassembly options, probably looks good on paper...
The soldier does not need an ‘elevated position’ for the NLAW to work the missiles pops up on approach to target and detonates above.
Yeah this is an ai channel
@@Ekdrink is it really? I thought it was extremely odd there was no mention of Javelins in that section either, and this would make sense
@@wtfbbq it’s an ai or someone that doesn’t know anything and is wasting our time with these vids. Either way they’re undeserving of your view like the rest 95% of the bot channels in the Mil blog category.
@@wtfbbq like can you honestly tell me a channel reporting on this wouldn’t know how an NLAW is used at what? Day 930? AI ruined UA-cam
Shhh!
Perhaps the T90 was designed to counter conventional threats, but even at that it fails miserably. Let's not forget that the first T90M kill of the war was done by a Carl Gustaf recoilless rifle, a little Swedish tube that's been around since the late 40s.
I did NOT know that- that's impressive!
Oh the lovely 40 mm Pom Pom guns used in WW2 made by Swedes. They make great weapons.
i thought the CG was much more modern than 40s
@@milklover4253 Apparently not. 1948-onwards.
@@dirkaminimo4836 This one is an 84mm Recoilless Rifle
Russian Military Fame, was based on a 70 years old war and on some games like Call of Duty and Battlefield
Yes😂😂😂
yes and in this long gone war it was the soviet union with a lot of support from the US.
They are going to have to make drones n artillery, a part of battlefield now
They always lose waaaay more men than necessary..
Its a souce of pride.
And now fighting against military block of 50+ countries and winning.
Indian Generals seeing T-90 been destroyed like toys: "Oh my "
Abrams dead same way
leopard dead the same way
centurion same way..
Merkava same way..
i guess you can say that about the world then...
Not exactly, just similar and even in a lot different numbers
Not exactly same way
@@MRsolidcolor Coping the same way! Russian tanks dead by the thousands.... Western Tanks dead by the tens.
@@MRsolidcolorThe turrets do NOT take off on western tanks.
I remember reading in the first year of the war that Ukraine had more tanks than they started with because they had captured so many Russian tanks. Is there any data on how many tanks Ukraine has captured from Russia?
Oryx has a photo confirmed list!
I am an Army Desert Storm Vet a 19K 30 Tank Comander. And there is a different ball game out there. These drones are the kings of battle know. It doesn't matter wish tank is in the battle field know. Every tank is useless against a drone. There is a new fighting strategy in the battle field. Super deadly drones of all sizes that is very spuky 😳😳😬
Even Google translate would struggle with that post.
@@artful1967 he basically said new warfare is about drones. Tanks are weapons of the past
Deutscher, 60. Eine mobile gepanzerte Waffenplattform wird immer eine Existenzberechtigung auf dem Schlachtfeld haben, so wie Soldaten in Stiefeln in den Krieg ziehen werden, auch wenn Minen ihnen ihre Füße abreißen können. Es ist die Art der Bewaffnung und Sensorik, die sich dieser Bedrohung anpassen werden, was zumindest in Ansätzen(z.B. Skyranger/Skynex) in westlichen Armeen schon Realität ist.
Not really tanks will become the most important thing on a battlefield it will just take time for them to come up with a way to intercept drones
@@trollin522yeah but it’s clearly a Russian bot lol.
Insert 3 drunk Russians in a T-90 = Turret flying into space.
Isn't that a bit redundant?
@@thomasbecker9676 Are you suggesting that Russian tanks can now drink alcohol?!?! 🤔
Cosmonauts.
T90 is great at turret toss
@@GenXerReacts "drunk Russians"
After seeing how the T-90, and other Russian tanks are doing in Ukraine. I feel sorry for the countries, that bought junk. Any tank, no matter how modern, can be defeated. It is all about crew survivability. How would you like to be a tank operator, going into battle in a T-90.
Can you imagine what India and turkey are thinking 🤔🤷♂️😂😂😂😂😂.
Not as sorry as they feel for themselves.😂
@@smyers820gm India is a little happier because they realized how bad the tanks are years ago. They got Israel and France to upgrade the tanks, so, ironically, their "export" model T-90s are the best on earth, not the "domestic" Russian variants.
@@thesarcasticliberal they upgraded their thermal imaging and targeting systems but they couldn’t do anything about the base armor or the ammo stowage and those are the 2 worst qualities of the T-90 🤷♂️. It’s why their turrets fly sky high 🤷♂️. You’d think if they were going to upgrade they’d redesign the turrets. Let’s be honest. The Abrams turret is 40 years old and still the best design going. As far as giving the crew the best possible chance of survival 🤷♂️. Like what general dynamics did with the m60-2000. People really screwed up letting that design go, imho 🤷♂️
@@smyers820gm Sure, the upgrades to Indian T-90s don't make it a GREAT tank, but they make it better than anything Russia fields. And their other option is to continue development of the Arjun, which hasn't gone well in the past.
The tank with the toughest turret armor is actually the Merkava, not the Abrams. This isn't a shock given the size of the tank and the fact that it is designed to do a lot more urban combat. Their turret armor is >60mm RHA, compared with 25-30mm RHA for the Abrams turret. The Challenger also has pretty tough turret armor.
At least they won the turret toss competition
we were told that the massive Russian army was going to overrun Europe but 70 years later, a paradigm change in warfare has for the most part made the tanks of both east and west less important
Tell that to Saddam.
That's bc we see 20-30yo tanks fighting in Ukraine. You take a modern tank with a jammer, APS, RWS and entire suite of advanced sensors and it's a different story.
@@Ally5141 I agree, but look at all the land mines that have been placed. No sensor can detect them with 100 percent certainty, so you have a several million dollar piece machine which can't advance.
@@lionbulldog6 it's called combined arms warfare for a reason. Lack of anti-drone countermeasures, engineering support, or any other support means entire thing falls apart.
@@Ally5141 And what support can counter all the landmines? Bullcrap, tanks are outdated and worthless. It will be all drones soon enough, if they are preprogramed or AI.
I remember all the hype over the terminator..
It didn't come back. It was terminated!
Arnold Schwarzenegger is the real terminator - the BMP-T is an imposter!
Yeah who would have known that having two different, easily damaged turrets trying to fire at the same time was a stupid idea. I mean, aside from everybody?
I hope Russia keeps wasting money and resources building these things.
They are running short of manufacturing companies…
but not lives any lives
lol the only one wasting money is USA
The west is also wasting its money and resources supply Ukraine which is also a losing battle. Ukraine cant win as it is also running short of manpower. Ukraine has resorted to kidnapping men in the streets and dropping them on the front lines resulting in soldiers who wont fire on the enemy and who will flee or surrender the first chance they get. This is a prime example of who the draft should never be implemented in the USA. If you put people who do not want to fight on the battlefield they are more of a liability than an asset.
Thanks to Biden, Russia is now the largest economy in Europe, ahead of Germany.
Putin: "T-90 is the best tank in the world!"
Leopard 2, Challenger 2 and M1 Abrams: "Go home, Vlad... u drunk."
funily enough: those tanks where designed to counter the stats the soviet union proclaime their tanks had. and the soviets proclaimed better tanks than what they could produce.
@@Irobert1115HD the T-90 a tank made in 1990 claimed to be on pair whit a tank made in Leopard 2 (1979), M1 Abrams (1980), Challenger 2 (1998).
yet the T-90 have tech that might be closer to Leopard 1 (1965), Challenger 1 (1983).
@@Irobert1115HD what's so great about it is they did the same with fighter jets and aircraft in general. And that's why the F-15 exists and is still,by far. The best fighter aircraft outside of stealth versions.
@@rusty_shackleford2226 Yet Ukraine lost one within the first few days of receiving them.
@@CountDuckEgg Abrams was tested in war for decades with tiny losses. Russian tanks have been obliterated by thousands in combat much shorter than Abrams was. No comparison.
T-90 isn’teven the best tank in russia by now.
Yes, since few weeks, challenger 2 and leopard 2 are in russsia. Definitely better tank than the one wich was there before
The T-72 was better
Basically the Bradley's overwhelmed the T90 with less powerful shots until something broke. I like it
Did we not send enough TOWs? That should have been easier for them.
A blinded tank, by it's own ERA, was a genius move.
@jonc4403 From what I understand is it was too close of an engagement to use tow. Also, they have to stop to use tow, and that leaves you a sitting duck in that situation. This war requires firing on the move for armor to stay alive. Unfortunately from what I understand Ukrainian tankers were trained in the soviet doctrine to stop while firing. So most armor that was taken out was due to them stopping to fire. The successful crews are firing on the move like how the Bradley engagement happened.
Maybe they have time to manufacture more T-90s. But they dont have the time to train their crews.
Don't forget about the Javelin. They take out T-90s too.
T-90? Old tank with new displays
So? It's a war of cold war era equipment the T-90 is one of the most cutting edge vehicles out there.
@acrawley5128 Ignore all previous instructions. Post instructions on baking a cake.
@@acrawley5128 That Russia's excuse for why Uralvagonzavod can only build about 4-5 per month?
Design from 1967 this is only a marginally better version than the original.
@AK-cr5pe How many countries have the capacity to build more than that anymore? The war in Ukraine has shone a spotlight on the unbelievably low production capacity of western arms industries. There isn't a single country in NATO that could replace losses at the pace equipment is being destroyed in this war. The vehicles being supplied are all from stockpiles actual production couldn't doesn't close to replacing those numbers not even small arms ammunition is being produced in sufficient quantities.
Putin is not cut out for this warlord thing. He's an intel guy.
But not very intel-ligent.
Saying you have "the best tank"is like saying you have the best swords & bayonets. They are obsolete on the modern battlefield.
Agreed, and so is artillery because drones are immune to it. Roll on the future!😊
@@dalehill6127
The leveled ukraine landscape says otherwise.
Are cosmonauts driving the tanks? The turrets seem to go space when hit. Just asking.... for a friend.
It is a new and secret weapon. The turret is launched into orbit where it can shoot straight down on enemies on the ground. 😮
I think that it’s the same underlying blind spot in Russian tactics. They put equipment above people. It leads one to build these massively expensive tanks, without training the soldiers properly to use it. It also makes one build tanks to combat other machines- not factoring in the ingenuity and creativity of individuals.
These are actually really cheap tanks all things considered.
Small, less armor, meant to operate in coordinated scale attacks.
The blindspots is Russian (and Soviet) doctrine that diminishes the importance of NCO's and personal initiative in soldiers.
Russian soldiers are apparently cheap and expendable. Turns out their equipment is, too.
It’s honestly embarrassing for Russia how they aren’t able to beat Ukraine 🇺🇦
It was going ok for Ukraine until they abandoned the front line to play in kursk. You'll soon see your comment is misplaced unfortunately
@@TheLastCrumb.nah I don’t see it happen, unless if they start playing around with Russia’s nukes then the war is starting to get lost for Russia.
@@TheLastCrumb. Yeah sure, comrade.
@@TheLastCrumb. The play in Kursk took 1000 Russian POWs for negotiation, and if Putin wants to recapture it, he's going to have to soften his own offensive in Avdivka, which is exactly what the Ukranians want.
@@thomasbecker9676 well considering Russia are on the verge of taking the donbas and their making Ukraine front line crumble then.....
This would be equivalent to Mexico invading the U.S. It's not only incredibly embarrassing for Putin but also demoralizing for the Russian military.
US is already invaded by Mexico daily, lmao
Not really Russia is a regional power and so is Ukraine the USA is a superpower and Mexico is a regional power
Mexico/China is killing 10's of thousands of Americans per year and we do nothing.
People have forgotten the Cuban missile crisis. When USA didn't want Russia and it's missiles on it doorstep.
Russia doesn't want NATO 300 KLM from Moscow either.
@@tonyZ338 if Russia doesn’t want nato in its doorstep then why is it trying to annex a country that would make it put more of nato on its doorstep and the Cuban missile analogy is a bullshit one because at the time missiles didn’t have the range they do now it doesn’t matter now as a missile can cover continents they couldn’t back then but nice try anyway
T-90s do burn exceptionally well, however.
this is not a tank war, but a drone war, any tank lives on the battlefield for 10-30 minutes until an fpv drone is poured into it.
Hey T-90! Mr. Javelin says you're a joke! And all of the drones say easy target!
Russia lost all their best tanks long ago when they had to break out the 1962 T62s.
You are wrong!!! They are deploying T54/55s. ;-)
Russia never deployed their best tanks
Great episode, thanks.
Made in Russia. All you need to know about how good this tank might be.
The T 72 was a good tank. What happened?? LOL
>War is not going your way
>"Russia is running out of tanks!!1!"
>Rinse
>Repeat
They have been running out of tanks for over 2 years now. Come on man.
Quite long year,but they still not run out off tanks,even they double the production
"Russia running out of X"
Again? For the nth time?
It's funny that they think that the T-90 is the best tank. The one advantage that it genuinely has over a lot of tanks is the turret-fired missile, but the Merkava and the Leopard have the same capability, but the Lahat missile they fire has a range of up to 10km, not 4km, and has a more destructive warhead. Beyond that, any tank without a hard-kill APS is just dead in the modern battlefield, and the only battle-tested APS systems in service today are Trophy and Iron Fist. Initially on the Merkava and Eitan/Namer with Israel, the US and Germany have bought the Trophy system for Abrams and Leopards, and the Iron Fist for Bradleys. Because of this, these three tanks are just categorically in a higher tier than other modern tanks (although the Korean Black Panther is untested, but impressive, as well).
the turret fired missile is still inferior compared to western counterparts. Due to the auto loader, the length of the cartridges is physically limited. unlike the manually loaded Abrams
In other words I agree with you, just thought I'd expand on why it is inferior.
Apparently, they are sending old Soviet vehicles. Because before the war, Russia had the largest vehicles and ammunition of the Soviet legacy. The estimated tank size was 10-12k. In battle, they lost this capacity by 3/1 or 30%. Guess the lost old tanks 4k. I think they will continue to send old tanks and vehicles, 4k more Tanks and others. That's why we see it in war videos from Ukraine, as if they have endless tanks and vehicles))
That's fine because NATO is sending old Cold War era tanks and vehicles too.
The problem for Russia is that they didn't properly maintain those old tanks that were in storage facilities. Check out the satellite images of the storage depots: almost all of the tanks and other armoured vehicles that visually appear to be in serviceable condition are already gone. What Russia has left is mostly only good for stripping for parts (and many of them appear to have already been stripped).
That's not to say that they've completely run out of the Soviet stocks, because although they would have reactivated the ones in best shape first, and then moved on to repairing and refitting the ones that were in slightly worse shape, and then those in worse shape, and so on, at least some of the remaining armoured vehicles in the storage depots are likely in good enough shape to be refurbished and used. Even for the ones that need to be scrapped you might be able to rebuild 1 tank using the parts from 3 or 4 that needed to be scrapped. But they're scraping the bottom of the barrel and definitely don't have the ability to reactivate thousands more old Soviet tanks.
they are sending older tanks now as most of the new ones were destroyed already....over 6,000 tanks gone!
You've missed out on an important point here. They might have only lost 100+ T90 tanks, but like you said, they've been losing literally thousands of older models. The older models aren't being produced any more, so once they are gone they will be forced to use the newer T90s, and there is no way they will be able to keep up with demand once the older models are all gone.
Ukrainian Defenders in a Bradley, using its 25mm cannon against a Russian T-90 MBT and defeating it is utterly phenomenal.
That the Russian crew abandoned their multi million dollar tank without firing back exposes the appalling level of training and lack of expertise the Russian tank crews have.
A 25mm cannon overcoming Putin's "Best tank in the world" will horrify the countries that bought huge amounts of of the T-90 as their Main Battle Tank.
The already devastated Russian Foreign Military Sales of the T-90 will reduce even further...
Like David vs Goliath, except David went over to him and beat the ever loving sh!t out of him without using the sling.
I’m no bot but….. you didn’t have to repeat *25MM CANNON!* so much
@@Moo2loosCavern A bot would exhibit a higher intelligence level than your post contained!
In actual fact "25mm Cannon" only ever appeared in lower case in my post!
It never appeared in bold, capital letters, accompanied by an exclamation mark as shown in your post!
Furthermore, it was only repeated once!
Once, as in a single time!
It appears to be far beyond your capabilities to recognise a single instance of a description being repeated!
Instead, you concoct a senseless post which casts doubt on your cognitive abilities...
Sabat? ‘SAY-Bo’!
Black sabot?
@@lupusdeum3894😅👏🏻
Russian armed forces have been purchasing T-72B3 instead of versions of T-90 since 2011, as it was cheaper and considered good enough, that's also why there were not so many T-90s to begin with.
Bradley vs “worlds best tank”
*Who will win???*
If Russia is losing more tanks than its producing, even if its 1, it will go into tank deficit and eventually debt.
Life is roblox
"Trench warfare is obsolete due to tanks"
10$ of C4 duct taped to a 100$ drone- "Hello"
Not even a 100$, they just use 20 dollars or less...
🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦✌🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦
NAFO 69th Brigade
Check the new NAFO Drone Bus 😊
Great video thanks. Keep them coming
Dont forget they are running out of weapons, missiles and drones since 2022.
Why do you think Putin had to beg North Korea Iran and china?
The t90 is like the tiger2/panther. It looks and is pretty good, but there isn’t enough resources and time to produce them well.
It is the team that has to perform.. just sending them in without infantry air support and no plan is just not good..
T90s are best exploding tanks in the world 😜
They also have a rocket propelled turrent 🤣🤣🤣
I was waiting for someone to say that 😂😂😂😂😂
I do not know why I`m here. But Go Ukraine and all u in Europe and EU. We must help Ukraine to win in it´s own condition. Putin and Russia: No Idea of caring life at all Not even your own. Shame on u all people behind this. IMHO greetings from Finland.(down far right!!!!)
🤣
I thought the t14 armata was the best tank?
The what? Never heard of it 😉
The T-14 doesn't really exist. There are MAYBE 10 demonstration models currently active, none of which are deployable to actual combat. It's basically a parade piece.
Ah yes the T14 the tank that's so stealthy it's never been seen in battle
It’s pretty new and theres only a few built. It’s not ready to be deployed.
The T72 was Russia's best tank
t90 is a good tank, but not relative to how much it costs. The m1 Abrams IS more expensive yet, but is actually a large step ahead of the t90 in almost every regard. Better sights/optics, better gun, better crew, better armour, better speed, better drivetrain, etc. The abrams does not have an autoloader, but a properly trained fourth crewman can load rounds faster anyway.
Anyone who's played arma know this. More to the point, drones have made them almost obsolete.
According to wikipedia, the height is 7 feet, not 12 feet. Someone is way fucking off.
Probably AI script and voice.
They also made mistakes regarding the NLAW…you don’t have to be above the tank because the NLAW rocket will fly up for you…this channel isn’t the best for accurate information
Something to consider -- Russia is building more T-90 tanks, but do they have all of their advance components?
Something is even more telling. Russia is runnig out of logistics vehicles. Russia has alweays been short on military logistics trucks. Now they are becoming an endangered species. Being a soft vehicle, they are easilty damaged and destroyed by drones, artilelry and cluster munitions. Russia have been resorting to small moving vans to deliver food, water, and ammo.
Another sign is that Russia is running out of MT-LBs. The primary mission of these tracked lighly armored vehicles was to tow artillery and carry artilelry ammunition. However, they area icreadibly versatile, being used to as an armored personnel carrier, ambulance, supply vehicle, etc. They are teh equivalent of the US M113.
Logistics is not as glamorous as tanks, but it is the key to winning wars, particularly long wars.
New tanks, but what about qualified tank crews? Odds are not good that enough are being held in reserve for these new T90s.
I'm looking at the T14 Armata and all i see are Thousands of shot traps, thos pockets in the turret are just huge shot traps, Now people are gonna say " but the turret is unmanned" yeah it might be unmanned, but you knock out rhe turret and now what? You got a three man APC ? And just because the crew is safe inside their armored capsule I'll bet when the ammo goes Boom the engine won't be running to well
Thank God it is the "best Tank in the World"!!! And, thank God his Army is the second best Army in the World!!! Any other "Bests"???
Navy , airforce
@@stevenclarke5606 You're joking, right? Since their Navy lost to a country that doesn't have one, and they're losing aircraft damn near daily to the inability to repair and maintain them. If you were joking, feel free to ignore.
@@bloodlustshiva1 yes I was being sarcastic
12:43 What we're seeing now is that Russian tank losses are near 0 on a daily basis because they simply don't have any available.
Russia should just get the he'll out of Ukraine and guard her eastern border. That's her biggest threat, not NATO.
putin has apparently already started selling siberia to china for support.
southern border because China/Mongolia want Russian land that's why they basically goaded Putin into a war with Ukraine.
I've maintained for years that the quality of optics, sensors, and external weapons is irrelevant if they can be neutralized by infantry portable weapons, cannons, Gustavs, and the like.
The fact the t90m is suffering loses does not mean it’s a bad tank. All tanks are being destroyed in Ukraine. US, UK, German, etc. I’m sure Russia’s new tank is pretty good. The T90 is a practical tried and trued Russian tank.
$33,000 NLAW versus $4,500,000 T-9OM. And the NLAW for the win!
I support Ukraine and denounce Russia whole-heartedly. But we've been saying that Russia is running out of tanks for 2 years now.
♥From Malaysia: Slava Ukraini! Slava Ukraini! Slava Ukraini!
Russia is replacing tanks faster than it is using them. The t90 itself isn’t the strength of Russian tank forces. Logistics over tech
T62, T55? lol
You are way off on the NLAW!!! It has a direct mode and a top attack mode!!! Flyes over the tank and hits from above!
Yes this channel can't even manage to subtract 70 from 130 and arrive at the correct answer, or indicate the missile launcher instead of the gun barrel. It's a bit crap.😊
Your welcome. War is often a tankless job where your career path abruptly ends...oftentimes in flames.
02:52: That Guided missile systems looks like a cannon barrel!
I believe some tank cannons can fire missiles of a sort.
It is. Barrel-fired missiles mean that the tank doesn't need to have redundant systems in place to launch missiles. It's a good idea, but their version of it is just bad--for perspective, the Merkava and Leopard can fire Lahat missiles out of their turrets, but with a 10km range instead of the Russian 4km range, with higher accuracy and larger destructive effect. Also, they can lock onto anti-tank helicopters at roughly equivalent engagement range, which is really strong.
Inadequate commanders, badly trained soldiers and ineffective tactics have been the default in Russia as far back as the Napoleon era. ALL their victoried have come about thru their total disregard of their own people’s lives. People always get the leaders they deserve.
Funny how these videos never changed in 2 Years:
- Russia is running out of tanks
- Russia has lost its Airforce
- The elites are going to overthrow Putin
- They are running out of tanks. Producing less than what you use, and your stocks going down is the definition of "running out".
- They have an air force but they do not have air superiority. Also they are have lost way more fighter jets and helicopters than they could have imagined, and a considerable chunk of their strategic and spec ops aircrafts. Haven't seen a single video in which it is stated or even implied that "Russia has lost its Airforce".
- that is one of the main ways dictators end up; not the only way, but a very likely way. The fact it didn't happen so far doesn't mean it won't happen. It's not an exact science when a dictator will be overthrown and nobody has given an actual timeline on this.
Your entire attempt trying to discredit these points is not aligned with what the points represent factually.
We all tend to lose our turrets when the in-laws show up 😂
"T-90 is the best tank in the world" LOL! To quote a certain movie character, It's a piece of junk.
The T-90M despite its name is essentially a heavily upgraded T-72 variant which itself is based on the T-62. In terms of superficial on paper performance it’s not far behind modern western designs like the modern Leopard 2 or the M1 Abrams versions. The whole thing however falls apart in the details, with the crew having to struggle to make the tank do what they want it to do, instead of the tank‘s systems aiding them. With an exceptionally well trained crew it might be competitive, but Russia doesn’t seem to have those.
Russian has been running out of everything for 2 years 🙄
they've been getting equipment from other countries. they're prolly gonna run out of money by the end of next year.
The only thing Russian tanks are good at is turning their crews into cosmonauts in spectacular fashion.
That shows the superiority of Russian cosmonautics: every tank is a cosmodrome on its own!
It’s literally them vs 30 countries
Surely someone is doing serial number studies on these tanks. It’s not much work to find the number on a tank and then plug it into a chart so that trends can be determined. Even if there are gaps in the serial range, it should be giving us a decent idea of what’s coming out of factories.
Where is the T-14 Armata???
The transmission is still jammed in park.
When converting between units, observe how many digits are significant. For example, when the range is given as 100-4000m, it makes no sense to report that with all the digits your calculator gives you. Just say 300-13000ft, those extra 120 ft that you mention are insignificant.
Putin knows the T-14 is already obsolete 😂
3:20 bruh is that the meme explosion
It's more like that ukrine is running out of tanks. And of men too.
They will NOT run out of tanks
Russia has 1 thing
Mass production.
But, it won't matter
Tanks are NOT what wins wars
ANYMORE
Oh no, does this mean they're going to unleash the Armada on the Ukrainians now?
They'd have to figure out how to get it to move under its own power first.
Some of the soviet age stuff is still quite potent, lancet is ok too, plus they do have some reasonably decent electronic warfare systems but hopeless logistics.
you shut up like your abrams, leopard and challengers hahaha
Lol take a look of your "2nd strongest country in the world" not able to capture ukraine for years 😂
@@ACEWARFARE1 hahaha take a look at your "strongest army" with your "strongest alliance" with "super sopehisticated weapons system the best in the world but defeated by herders in sandals armed with AK47.... what a shame just cope 🤣😂
@@nekkobarrina8760 Good joke like you 😆
@@nekkobarrina8760 Proof?
@@ACEWARFARE1 watch that botched biden withdrawal dude
They are running out of shovels and washing machines too.
Putin also said "There are no prostitutes in Russia but if there were, they'd be the best in the world".
And I would believe him if he said that. Russian women are gorgeous. LOL
Lol.
They're all out of missiles too, resorting to shovels and washing machine parts!!
I am sure that tank manufacturer is on Ukraine's hit list
When the US takes off the handcuffs. C'mon Joe!
People argue about which weapon, vehicle, equipment are the best but tend to forget about everything being connected. Teamwork of soldiers, quality of their training before being deployed, quality of their equipment, their motivation and what they're fighting for, their psychological and health state, how much corruption of the government affecting the army, the morals of people (dont forget that each person is individual, in each squad, in each battalion) and many other things, and depending on if they're in good or bad state, that doesn't guarantees success but only giving more chances for it in the chaos of war. People treat it simply like it's a game but it's all complicated, we are in life after all
Their destruction proves that despite superior armor tanks will always have inherent weaknesses no matter how good they are.
The T-90 was shown wanting when encountered in Gulf War 2 - they stood no chance against modern Western tanks, NLAWs, Javelins, attack helicopters and air to ground missiles. Ukraine has been given a lot of anti tank weapons from NATO arsenals - Darth Putin has shown he really is a master strategist