New World's Biggest Prime Number (PRINTED FULLY ON PAPER) - Numberphile

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 19 січ 2016
  • Matt Parker on the latest Mersenne Prime to take the title of "world's biggest prime". He had it printed!
    More links & stuff in full description below ↓↓↓
    More from this interview very soon, including details of how the prime was found.
    PART TWO: • How they found the Wor...
    PART THREE on Numberphile2: • More details about the...
    Matt's interview with Curtis Cooper: • New World-Record Large...
    The previous record: • New Largest Known Prim...
    Mersenne Numbers and Mersenne Primes: • 31 and Mersenne Primes...
    More on Mersenne Primes: • Perfect Numbers and Me...
    GIMPS: www.mersenne.org
    Prime Playlist: bit.ly/primevids
    Support us on Patreon: / numberphile
    NUMBERPHILE
    Website: www.numberphile.com/
    Numberphile on Facebook: / numberphile
    Numberphile tweets: / numberphile
    Subscribe: bit.ly/Numberphile_Sub
    Numberphile is supported by the Mathematical Sciences Research Institute (MSRI): bit.ly/MSRINumberphile
    Videos by Brady Haran
    Brady's videos subreddit: / bradyharan
    Brady's latest videos across all channels: www.bradyharanblog.com/
    Sign up for (occasional) emails: eepurl.com/YdjL9
    Numberphile T-Shirts: teespring.com/stores/numberphile
    Other merchandise: store.dftba.com/collections/n...
  • Наука та технологія

КОМЕНТАРІ • 2,1 тис.

  • @FilipeDGuedes
    @FilipeDGuedes 8 років тому +1431

    that number isn't prime. it was divided into three volumes.

    • @powerpc127
      @powerpc127 8 років тому +71

      +Filipe Guedes I got the joke, for the record.

    • @edinburghcopyshop1705
      @edinburghcopyshop1705 8 років тому +13

      +Filipe Guedes volume 3 is actually 10 sides shorter than the first two

    • @andrewsvega2023
      @andrewsvega2023 8 років тому +18

      +Filipe Guedes ;) hahaha. Excellent joke. It is clear you are an intelligent person :)

    • @internettrend
      @internettrend 8 років тому +6

      +Filipe Guedes very clever comment man!

    • @naoimporta58
      @naoimporta58 8 років тому +5

      +Filipe Guedes awesome joke .

  • @TofranBohk
    @TofranBohk 8 років тому +3351

    I demand an audiobook version!

    • @jamdaly329
      @jamdaly329 8 років тому +18

      If you had to guess, how long would that audio book be?

    • @Agent29416
      @Agent29416 8 років тому +146

      +Jam Daly at 3 digits a second 190 hours

    • @Agent29416
      @Agent29416 8 років тому +5

      +Jam Daly at 3 digits a second 190 hours

    • @Agent29416
      @Agent29416 8 років тому +6

      +Jam Daly at 3 digits a second 190 hours

    • @Matt-no7gg
      @Matt-no7gg 8 років тому +39

      Aaaahhhh.... Numbering myself to sleep.

  • @drewsauveterre8867
    @drewsauveterre8867 8 років тому +1554

    Title of the book gives away the entire story. Not worth reading.

    • @slush0puppy
      @slush0puppy 6 років тому +105

      Don't judge a book by its cover!

    • @AndreaCicko
      @AndreaCicko 6 років тому +9

      hahahahah

    • @Geert2682
      @Geert2682 6 років тому +94

      Just from the title you can tell the ending will be odd af

    • @crashw1n5t0n
      @crashw1n5t0n 6 років тому +5

      you sir, you are a genious :D

    • @Grozdor
      @Grozdor 6 років тому +7

      Still my favorite comment of this video.

  • @clangerbasher
    @clangerbasher 8 років тому +379

    Not reading that, I will wait for the film thank you.

    • @Moxie9
      @Moxie9 7 років тому +17

      You do realise this is the film :D

    • @bryanchavez1362
      @bryanchavez1362 6 років тому +4

      clangerbasher sorry but the manga will always be better

  • @FrostedSapling
    @FrostedSapling 8 років тому +921

    I laughed so hard when he said there was a mistake!

    • @ColinCarmody
      @ColinCarmody 8 років тому +2

      Lol. Me too!

    • @ColinCarmody
      @ColinCarmody 8 років тому +1

      Lol. Me too!

    • @Goldfish_Vender
      @Goldfish_Vender 8 років тому +78

      +Ivan Navarro There could be many mistakes. But no one would ever notice.

    • @TUNK92
      @TUNK92 8 років тому +3

      they should send it back and let it print with the mistake! imagine that

    • @TUNK92
      @TUNK92 8 років тому

      they should send it back and let it print with the mistake! imagine that

  • @GuildmasterWigglytuff
    @GuildmasterWigglytuff 8 років тому +1820

    man, this pay 2 win stuff is getting out of hand.

    • @flexico64
      @flexico64 8 років тому +80

      +Guildmaster Wigglytuff Yeah, that's what I was thinking. This isn't about doing mathematics, it's about who has the beefiest computer.

    • @kingpopaul
      @kingpopaul 8 років тому +38

      +Flexico Crux Not the beefiest, just the most computers...

    • @Bignic2008
      @Bignic2008 8 років тому +59

      +Guildmaster Wigglytuff If you can come up with an efficient way to test for primes, undoubtedly you'll be more famous than people that search for primes. And you don't need more money than others to figure it out :)

    • @crazycanadian7223
      @crazycanadian7223 8 років тому

      +Guildmaster Wigglytuff That's a Warframe reference, isn't it?

    • @HOrseshoeM
      @HOrseshoeM 8 років тому +6

      +Reflective Ducky ... well, it's not rocket science, you just make up fictional internet 'digital coins' and you'll see the flocks of imbeciles using their computing power (GPUs wasting electric energy all over the world) to mine whatever you want and need...

  • @RADZIO895
    @RADZIO895 7 років тому +509

    so this is what mathematicians read before sleeping

    • @Pet_Hedgehog
      @Pet_Hedgehog 6 років тому +10

      French Bread you know, that probably is true but you would have a mental breakdown before you finish.....

    • @Triantalex
      @Triantalex 8 місяців тому

      false.

  • @willpugh8865
    @willpugh8865 7 років тому +82

    id print "donkey fucker" or "i bet your not even reading any of this", every so often just to see who found it

    • @Daniel-dc5mr
      @Daniel-dc5mr 7 років тому +1

      will pugh lol

    • @MarcoVenustus
      @MarcoVenustus 7 років тому +2

      you're*

    • @teovinokur9362
      @teovinokur9362 7 років тому +2

      I'd print "Honk/like if you see this" or "You get a cookie" and if you went to our company and showed us it, you'd actually get a cookie.

  • @0ijm3409fiwrekj
    @0ijm3409fiwrekj 8 років тому +254

    when he said vol 2 i was like WHAAAT

    • @yinge101
      @yinge101 8 років тому +18

      +L King Oh, that doesn't look that big, actually.
      "Volume 2"
      Whaaaaaaaaat

    • @sirgreggorygroda
      @sirgreggorygroda 8 років тому

      When he said 2 of 3 I was slightly disapointed. had it been more volumes I might have been able to convince my boss that it could make a nice backdrop to our reception.

    • @sirgreggorygroda
      @sirgreggorygroda 8 років тому

      When he said 2 of 3 I was slightly disapointed. had it been more volumes I might have been able to convince my boss that it could make a nice backdrop to our reception.

    • @sirgreggorygroda
      @sirgreggorygroda 8 років тому

      When he said 2 of 3 I was slightly disapointed. had it been more volumes I might have been able to convince my boss that it could make a nice backdrop to our reception.

  • @diegosanchez894
    @diegosanchez894 8 років тому +979

    The largest prime number should be called Optimus prime

    • @JoCE2305
      @JoCE2305 6 років тому +39

      Diego Sanchez Infinite numbers infinite primes.

    • @silviaiftime2115
      @silviaiftime2115 6 років тому +19

      10^TREE(3) + 9
      Not the largest but it's probably prime

    • @theleftuprightatsoldierfield
      @theleftuprightatsoldierfield 6 років тому +4

      Silvia Iftime wait seriously?

    • @aeop
      @aeop 6 років тому

      Mega prime

    • @munjee2
      @munjee2 6 років тому

      PotatoNation21 and infinite gaps between primes that could begin any where but also can't

  • @debestisme
    @debestisme 8 років тому +210

    Are you going to release an audiobook?

  • @hannahmorris1835
    @hannahmorris1835 7 років тому +724

    I'll make this number my phone password... no one will ever guess it.

    • @cykat2998
      @cykat2998 6 років тому +160

      Not even you

    • @radiofrog
      @radiofrog 6 років тому +44

      I wonder how long it would take for a computer to guess your password.

    • @nguyenhoangquockhanh4930
      @nguyenhoangquockhanh4930 6 років тому +6

      Uraneum about a few days

    • @Biskwyy
      @Biskwyy 6 років тому +54

      nguyen hoang quoc khanh False. It'll take so long that the universe will end. To decrypt a simple eight block password requires around a little under or over a week with high processing power through brute force. That is just eight alphabetic/numeric password. 22 million? Don't kid yourself.

    • @thesphericalguy9018
      @thesphericalguy9018 6 років тому +81

      "a few days", are you running a million quantum computers in parallel or what?

  • @antiantiderivative
    @antiantiderivative 8 років тому +252

    You guys should make a new series: Prime Unboxings

    • @Nmonk09
      @Nmonk09 8 років тому

      +iamanenigma unknowntotheworld That's something I would actually watch.

    • @Matt-no7gg
      @Matt-no7gg 8 років тому

      Unbox 2nd-4th place.

    • @glittercatstudios
      @glittercatstudios 8 років тому +3

      +iamanenigma unknowntotheworld Ha! "Hey, guys, come and see my video on my mathematical HAUL!" :D

    • @standupmaths
      @standupmaths 8 років тому +4

      +Carla René I would totally do a prime haul video. Can I include some pseudo-primes I got at a discount?

    • @theatheistpaladin
      @theatheistpaladin 8 років тому

      +iamanenigma unknowntotheworld
      Or Amazon Prime unboxings...

  • @Teekles
    @Teekles 8 років тому +51

    It's a win for information theory when a number that large can be described so succinctly in exponential form.

    • @iprice77
      @iprice77 8 років тому +7

      +Timothy Retter I think thats more how they're generated, 2^n-1 is more likely to be a prime so rather than stepping through every odd number you just hand out some 6 digit long 'n' from the 2^n-1 and give the next person the next 'n'. Given it takes a month per number at this point, thats a lot of computermonths...

    • @officialurl
      @officialurl 8 років тому +9

      +Timothy Retter No. They are explicitly looking for numbers of the form 2^n-1, as there are tests that can tell you if a number of such form is prime or not without having to check the factors one by one.

    • @maniacpwnageking
      @maniacpwnageking 8 років тому

      +Timothy Retter *(2^n) - 1

    • @groszak1
      @groszak1 8 років тому

      +iprice77 n has to be prime; for example if n is 14, then 2^14-1 in binary would be 11111111111111=11*1010101010101=1111111*10000001

  • @12tone
    @12tone 8 років тому +87

    Out of curiosity, how do they actually check if it's prime? My first guess would be to check its divisibility by each known prime less than its square root, but that can't work because, since it's only checking Mersenne numbers, it'll eventually get past the point where all the primes below its square root are known. So what test does it do to confirm or disprove that a given candidate is prime? Or have we just not yet passed the point where that ambiguity would be a concern?

    • @12tone
      @12tone 8 років тому +29

      +12tone Oh, whoops, just realized you did a whole video about this. Never mind.

    • @MasterofBeats
      @MasterofBeats 3 роки тому +6

      @@12tone lol

    • @guitarslim56
      @guitarslim56 3 роки тому +2

      The computer checks it.

    • @funkdefied1
      @funkdefied1 2 роки тому

      Love your stuff

    • @kjl3080
      @kjl3080 2 роки тому +1

      @@12tone lol

  • @pete275
    @pete275 8 років тому +35

    I love the "trivial at the size", even tho it would make the number not prime XD

  • @YipYapYoup
    @YipYapYoup 8 років тому +276

    I'll be impressed when they print out Graham's number. Minus one.

    • @salientsoul
      @salientsoul 8 років тому +91

      Haha not enough atoms in the universe mate

    • @cnano98
      @cnano98 8 років тому +48

      ***** If you split every square Planck distance in the universe into a googolplexian squares (which is impossible, since a Planck distance is the smallest --possible-- measurable distance) and wrote a single digit on each one, you still couldn't write out Graham's Number. The order of magnitude of the number of digits in Grahams Number is unimaginable. In fact, the number of arrows in G3 (maybe even G2, it's been a while) is unimaginable.

    • @cnano98
      @cnano98 8 років тому +2

      ***** Every square planck distance* I'm on my phone, I'll try to remember to edit it next time I'm on my PC.

    • @allensmith2342
      @allensmith2342 8 років тому +9

      The Planck length is not the smallest possible distance. That's a misconception that implies that space is discrete which there is no evidence for.

    • @pezpeculiar9557
      @pezpeculiar9557 8 років тому

      +IPVentertainment
      Then just put them on quarks.

  • @gemini915
    @gemini915 8 років тому +275

    Did you have it shipped for free in 2-days via Amazon Prime?

    • @Matt-no7gg
      @Matt-no7gg 8 років тому +14

      I think that would have taken 2 days to print.

    • @DaiLoDong
      @DaiLoDong 8 років тому +62

      +Matt11111 but amazon PRIME tho

    • @caseythimm5522
      @caseythimm5522 8 років тому +3

      +Anne Frankenstein I see what you did there...

    • @KrisKrisKrisKrisKris
      @KrisKrisKrisKrisKris 8 років тому +4

      +Matt11111 he explains that it's only been a day since it was even announced at the beginning of the video so it actually took less than a day to print and ship it

    • @KrisKrisKrisKrisKris
      @KrisKrisKrisKrisKris 8 років тому

      +Matt11111 he explains that it's only been a day since it was even announced at the beginning of the video so it actually took less than a day to print and ship it

  • @Jakub1989YTb
    @Jakub1989YTb 8 років тому +401

    Still a better story than Twilight.

  • @OlaNordmann123
    @OlaNordmann123 8 років тому +216

    If you search the number, you will find the combinations:
    "1234567" - one time (It doesn't go higher than this)
    "7654321" - two times
    "1337" - 2085 times
    "1111111" - four times
    "77777777" - one time (longest single digit line)
    My own "DD.MM.YY" birthday date - four times (DD.MM.YYYY was not there :( )
    and...
    "69" - 221 893 times

  • @mighty8357
    @mighty8357 8 років тому +80

    You should have given us the first and last digit of that new legendary Prime number

    • @NathanRichan
      @NathanRichan 8 років тому

      +Phil Diesch He did on his channel standupmaths

    • @MisterBrauer
      @MisterBrauer 8 років тому +32

      +Phil Diesch
      3003764180846061820529860983591660500568758630303014848439416933455477232190679942968936553007726883... (22,338,418 digits omitted) ...3646879425801445107393100212927181629335931494239018213879217671164956287190498687010073391086436351

    • @bgezal
      @bgezal 8 років тому +21

      +Phil Diesch The only legendary prime is Optimus Prime.

    • @Ethernet3
      @Ethernet3 8 років тому +5

      +Phil Diesch In binary it's all ones

    • @benjoe1993
      @benjoe1993 8 років тому

      +ProxyBarracks How many tho? :P

  • @Ostsol
    @Ostsol 8 років тому +214

    Me: Wow, that's a big coil book!
    Video: Volume 2.
    Me: !!!

  • @vi.shyyyy
    @vi.shyyyy 7 років тому +78

    'Environmentally friendly'...
    Prints the actual prime number that has millions of digits!

    • @QweRinatrtY
      @QweRinatrtY 7 років тому +9

      recycled paper

    • @MasterTeeee
      @MasterTeeee 5 років тому

      Yeah.
      'Cos everyone knows that paper is the expensive bit to printing...
      Not the ink, or the energy required to run a laser for hours.

    • @sunk6478
      @sunk6478 4 роки тому

      "millions"

  • @tuxino
    @tuxino 8 років тому +39

    Since the search is only considering Mersenne numbers, there are a bunch of primes that have been skipped along the way. So what is the largest number, where for every number below it, we know whether or not that number is a prime?

    • @rewrose2838
      @rewrose2838 3 роки тому +1

      I just read your comment and it sounds interesting, did you look into this in the past 4 years? I'd be interested to hear

    • @oleyespop
      @oleyespop 3 роки тому +3

      If we take any prime number, then multiple it by 2, at least one prime is between p and 2p

    • @shashankambone6920
      @shashankambone6920 3 роки тому +2

      @@oleyespop why is it so? Is there a simple proof for this? If yes, i'd like to to see it.

    • @oleyespop
      @oleyespop 3 роки тому +2

      shashank ambone search up bertland’s postulate.

    • @guitarslim56
      @guitarslim56 3 роки тому +1

      We don't care about that number. We only care about the biggest one.

  • @xXIronManXx1000
    @xXIronManXx1000 8 років тому +562

    Awesome video!
    Would you do another calculator unboxing? The previous ones were amazing!

    • @numberphile
      @numberphile  8 років тому +168

      +Omni presence stay tuned... ;)

    • @gojoubabee
      @gojoubabee 8 років тому +26

      +Numberphile Really??!!?!!?? You're doing another??? Those are awesome!!!!!!

    • @stainman7
      @stainman7 8 років тому +4

      Soo... The next prime is between this number and double this number, if I remember from a previous video right?

    • @dizont
      @dizont 8 років тому

      +stainman7 so you say this number is not even double of previous number ? with 5 million digits more ?

    • @stainman7
      @stainman7 8 років тому +1

      +Ergo Proxy Yeah if I remember correctly the next prime will be less than double this number... So less that 52 million digits long.. Correct me if I'm wrong..

  • @oisiaa
    @oisiaa 8 років тому +253

    I wonder how much electricity this cost the University of Missouri to find???

    • @jamesburrows7634
      @jamesburrows7634 6 років тому +1

      5:30 PM

    • @davecrupel2817
      @davecrupel2817 6 років тому +10

      I wonder how many calories and Whoppers it took you to write that comment.

    • @jordandawson1015
      @jordandawson1015 6 років тому

      oisiaa ye

    • @ChaiWithSpice
      @ChaiWithSpice 6 років тому +1

      The better question is how much electricity was used printing

    • @General12th
      @General12th 6 років тому +3

      Absurdly little. Electricity is incredibly cheap.

  • @Octojoint
    @Octojoint 8 років тому +174

    Somebody should tell Matt Parker about PDF files...

    • @mr.questionmark5038
      @mr.questionmark5038 6 років тому

      ...

    • @joyitadarling5815
      @joyitadarling5815 6 років тому +15

      I think seeing it all in a book form gives the audience (you+me+who ever watching this) deeper understanding of how big the number is. Scrolling through this on pdf just wouldn't be the same, and it would take forever

    • @LephroBeast
      @LephroBeast 5 років тому +1

      @@joyitadarling5815 I think he means so we can print it ourselves and have our own copies

    • @bobbycraig2583
      @bobbycraig2583 4 роки тому +1

      txt files are smaller

    • @guitarslim56
      @guitarslim56 3 роки тому

      PDF files have no heft. You can't appreciate the enormity of a number by holding a PDF in your hands.

  • @johnchessant3012
    @johnchessant3012 5 років тому +3

    I love that one of the suggestions on the end-screen is a placeholder for the video they do on "the new record-holder".

  • @kiffe22
    @kiffe22 8 років тому +134

    Is the brown paper a coincidence?

  • @peerzadazayyanahmad
    @peerzadazayyanahmad 8 років тому +107

    Professor Curtis Cooper of the University of Central Missouri should call himself Optimus Prime or the Prime Minister.

  • @JMcMillen
    @JMcMillen 6 років тому +22

    Guess what? They found a bigger one. 2^77,232,917 − 1

    • @noodboy4633
      @noodboy4633 4 роки тому +2

      That’s not the record anymore

    • @JMcMillen
      @JMcMillen 4 роки тому +3

      @@noodboy4633 Well duh. My comments over 2 years old. Not surprising that they've found an even bigger one since then.

    • @noodboy4633
      @noodboy4633 4 роки тому +1

      @@JMcMillen as long as humans exist...

    • @bulgaria9003
      @bulgaria9003 3 роки тому +2

      HEY 2^82589933 - 1

    • @prasannashrestha3519
      @prasannashrestha3519 3 роки тому

      @@JMcMillen did they find even larger one now?

  • @svavarkjarrval8757
    @svavarkjarrval8757 4 роки тому +6

    One of the proofreaders, about 200 years later:
    "Shouldn't this be a 1 instead of a 3?"

  • @Ed__Powell
    @Ed__Powell 8 років тому +21

    Clearly, Matt Parker is the next Doctor Who.

  • @ClaudioIbarra
    @ClaudioIbarra 8 років тому +15

    But has the printed volume been checked? What if there's a typo on page 487?

  • @Nnyerix
    @Nnyerix 8 років тому +1

    When I read this I was wondering when there would be a numberphile video on it. Neat!

  • @nemodot
    @nemodot 8 років тому +4

    I can't belive you brady! Where do you find that much cool people to amaze us about numbers and maths? I'm deeply grateful for your series. Saludos.

  • @GroovingPict
    @GroovingPict 8 років тому +88

    how do you know there are no typos on it?

    • @belleren9375
      @belleren9375 8 років тому +75

      That's the best part

    • @garydunken7934
      @garydunken7934 8 років тому +17

      Lol... I would think they are copied and pasted, not typed. :)

    • @GroovingPict
      @GroovingPict 8 років тому +1

      +G Yogaraja I trust you are joking

    • @WarpRulez
      @WarpRulez 8 років тому +11

      +G Yogaraja
      No, I think it was typed by hand.

    • @fgm887
      @fgm887 8 років тому +8

      +G Yogaraja I think it's a algorithm that do the calculation and spits out the result. For example, in wolframalpha you can type 2^20 and he will give you the result. I guess that in some kind of supercomputer you should be able to type 2^(whatever) - 1 and get to correct result, and then just hit Ctrl+P.

  • @DatHamTho
    @DatHamTho 8 років тому +37

    where can I order one?

  • @geerrooo
    @geerrooo 8 років тому +36

    why do they call it volume 1,2 and 3 .. i am not a native english speaker .. if any could give me other meaning of volume?

    • @alliekaylor641
      @alliekaylor641 8 років тому +36

      Volumes are similar to a series. The encyclopedia comes in different volumes, in order. It would have the exact same meaning if you said book 1, book 2, and book 3.

    • @whatisthis2809
      @whatisthis2809 5 років тому +2

      Volume in books is kind of the word part.

    • @guitarslim56
      @guitarslim56 3 роки тому

      1 is first. 2 is second. 3 is third.

  • @matthieu9792
    @matthieu9792 8 років тому

    THE best unboxing video of all youtube's content. Period. That's just insanely funny !

  • @hikari_no_yume
    @hikari_no_yume 8 років тому +26

    Most importantly, it's a *Mersenne* Prime. They're special.

    • @GTLugo
      @GTLugo 8 років тому +20

      +TazeTSchnitzel All the top ten primes are mersenne primes. They are easier to find.

    • @Ovenman940
      @Ovenman940 8 років тому +2

      +TazeTSchnitzel Yes I watched the video too

    • @bgezal
      @bgezal 8 років тому +21

      +TazeTSchnitzel Mersenne primes are just the low hanging fruit of primes.

    • @pikdame
      @pikdame 8 років тому

      +TazeTSchnitzel what is a Mersenne Prime?

    • @pikdame
      @pikdame 8 років тому

      ***** ah ok-I mean it does make sure its uneven/odd

  • @firelow
    @firelow 8 років тому +191

    I watched this whole video naked

    • @yalamix
      @yalamix 8 років тому +7

      +William Pereira Gomes tinha que ser br

    • @villanelo1987
      @villanelo1987 8 років тому +4

      +William Pereira Gomes
      Last time I got a few free days ( in summer, 3 weeks), I undressed the first day, and never touched any clothes till the day I had to go back to work. xD
      There is something about doing day to day things totally naked that makes them a lot more appealing. :p

    • @BigMiau
      @BigMiau 8 років тому +3

      +William Pereira Gomes I thought I was the only one ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

    • @RoflZack
      @RoflZack 8 років тому

      I just got out of the shower so... Me too. But not in whatever weird way the other people in this comment thread are on about.

    • @hey8174
      @hey8174 8 років тому +1

      +William Pereira Gomes "gimps"

  • @Tiqerboy
    @Tiqerboy 8 років тому +4

    I just downloaded the zip file containing the decimal representation of this prime from the Mersenne website. That didn't take long. Now I have an idea of how much paper I need to load into the copier, LOL

  • @Martymer81
    @Martymer81 8 років тому +347

    I WANT THAT BOOK!!! I'd never read it. But come on! NERDGASM!!! :D

    • @factsverse9957
      @factsverse9957 6 років тому +3

      Martymer 81 Count it by yourself.

    • @hectobreak8097
      @hectobreak8097 6 років тому +2

      Martymer 81 What are you doing you're not debunking Spirit Science?
      luv ya

    • @theywalkinguptoyouand4060
      @theywalkinguptoyouand4060 6 років тому +3

      Martymer 81 You want a book to show off but you're not even gonna read it or make use of it or gain knowledge from it?
      Wow, "nerds" are stupider than people realize.

    • @hectobreak8097
      @hectobreak8097 6 років тому +8

      That's basically what Matt did, right?
      He just kinda printed those books to show off, but he's never going to read them, neither is he going to gain knowledge from them.

    • @EvolBob1
      @EvolBob1 6 років тому +2

      Late night reading?

  • @stellarfirefly
    @stellarfirefly 8 років тому +146

    Computers use a significantly greater amount of electricity when their CPU is running full bore and checking a candidate prime. Having 800 of them going from idle to pegging all cores of all CPUs, that is a major increase in their electric bill. (My own computer goes from about a 45W idle draw to over 165W with pegged cores, and up to 240W when I also peg the GPU.) Makes me wonder if USM knows this about Curtis' calculations.

    • @frankschneider6156
      @frankschneider6156 8 років тому +41

      +stellarfirefly
      Even if you have 800 of them, that'pretty much peanuts for a decent university, especially when it turns out like this, they got lucky, so they'll earn reputation, which hauls in money significantly money, than it costs. Every university would be out of their mind-happy, if funding all of scientific research would be that inexpensive.

    • @HOrseshoeM
      @HOrseshoeM 8 років тому +12

      +stellarfirefly ... you don't use your own CPUs, you use other people GPUs if you're smart!

    • @bgezal
      @bgezal 8 років тому +17

      +stellarfirefly People (and schools and workplaces) have lent idle computing power for 15 years now to scientific projects like folding.stanford.edu/ Maybe helping the cure for Alzheimer's is more of a heartwarming charity than finding primes.

    • @iPelaaja1
      @iPelaaja1 8 років тому +4

      +Frank Schneider yep, the cost is pretty much nothing for a university. Plus many have their own powerstations anyways, at least ours has, so not a big deal :) Obviously the gas will cost money. But it would be burnt for heating anyways. CHP just uses it to make electricity and heat the buildings.

    • @frankschneider6156
      @frankschneider6156 8 років тому +8

      iPelaaja1
      E.g. Technical University Munich has its own nuclear reactor (although for experimentation, not energy creation). I guess they couldn't care less about costs using 800 or 8000 of their PCs in the night for calculating primes if some Math Prof would whine just loud enough.

  • @EugeneKhutoryansky
    @EugeneKhutoryansky 8 років тому +65

    The "minus one" is not trivial, as otherwise it would obviously be divisible by two. And by four. And by eight. Etc.

    • @AbsolutGB96
      @AbsolutGB96 8 років тому +77

      Google what a joke is

    • @AdamPFarnsworth
      @AdamPFarnsworth 8 років тому

      .

    • @YipYapYoup
      @YipYapYoup 8 років тому +3

      +Adam Farnsworth As if we didn't know that already, he was just joking.

    • @DavidVaughan00
      @DavidVaughan00 8 років тому +14

      +eodguy83 It's not that it's an even number - It's that it's a power of two.

    • @awsomebot1
      @awsomebot1 8 років тому +5

      It's trivial because people who are interested in the number already know it's -1. It's always 2^n - 1

  • @Schobbish
    @Schobbish 8 років тому +3

    I just realized that you (Matt Parker) are on Outrageous Acts of Science

  • @latenightlogic
    @latenightlogic 7 років тому +8

    I like this guy the most.

  • @Shrillwhip
    @Shrillwhip 8 років тому +54

    cool

  • @VreelDanelli
    @VreelDanelli 8 років тому +124

    You'd save even more paper by printing in dozenal :P

  • @klemenkekec7034
    @klemenkekec7034 7 років тому +26

    1:34.. at the end of the 6th row there is a mistake... there should be a 7

  • @freemanedwards5663
    @freemanedwards5663 6 років тому +1

    That's a lot of paper and a lot of awesomeness in this vid

  • @alfredomarquez1916
    @alfredomarquez1916 8 років тому +32

    Do you have a Matt Parker playlist? Dude's real funny.

    • @Vulcapyro
      @Vulcapyro 8 років тому +7

      +Alfredo Marquez There's a Matt Parker channel.

    • @standupmaths
      @standupmaths 8 років тому +26

      You can search my name but there is not a playlist. I have my own channel as well for when you run out of Numberphiles.

  • @puupipo
    @puupipo 8 років тому +120

    Starving children could have eaten that prime...

  • @JabaDr
    @JabaDr 6 років тому

    This is amazing! Love it! RESPECT

  • @parkers.8748
    @parkers.8748 8 років тому +46

    ...and this the beginning of Gravity Falls.

    • @alliekaylor641
      @alliekaylor641 8 років тому +4

      I choked when I read that. Brilliant comment

    • @parkers.8748
      @parkers.8748 8 років тому +2

      Thanks :)

    • @erez6800
      @erez6800 7 років тому +1

      I'm a huge fan of the show but I don't get it

    • @alliekaylor641
      @alliekaylor641 7 років тому +6

      Erez Barzilay It's split into three books.

  • @joacolerer861
    @joacolerer861 8 років тому +16

    hey could you please do a video about the fraction 1/999,999,999,999,999,999,999,998,999,999,999,999,999,999,999,999 that gives weird fibonacci answers? i would like to konw a bit more about this. Thanks, love the videos

  • @aappaapp6627
    @aappaapp6627 8 років тому +19

    I think that it's interesting that when you're looking for prime numbers, you automatically rule out half of all numbers in existence because of even numbers

    • @XxRiseagainstfanxX
      @XxRiseagainstfanxX 8 років тому +20

      It feels like ruling out half of all numbers but there are as many left as there were before, infinitly many.

    • @XxRiseagainstfanxX
      @XxRiseagainstfanxX 8 років тому

      It feels like ruling out half of all numbers but there are as many left as there were before, infinitly many.

    • @andrew74127
      @andrew74127 8 років тому +9

      you can also rule out all numbers that end in 5.

    • @aappaapp6627
      @aappaapp6627 8 років тому

      ***** I know, and that's awesome!!

    • @felipe970421
      @felipe970421 8 років тому +4

      +Adam Prueher You then proceed to rule out a 3rd of what remains, which is the multiples of 3, then a fifth of what remains, which is the multiples of 5, etc...

  • @Nastybeanlady
    @Nastybeanlady 8 років тому +2

    I did a google image search on that "Gimps" program. I have to say, I like what I saw.

  • @thanksfordoxingpeopleyoutube
    @thanksfordoxingpeopleyoutube 8 років тому +20

    because they were only looking for mersen primes is it possible there are primes smaller that we dont know about

    • @jadenhenderson1451
      @jadenhenderson1451 6 років тому +19

      Yes, there are smaller primes. After running multiple tests on high-end servers, I calculated that the number 5 to be an ideal candidate

    • @kappadistributive
      @kappadistributive 5 років тому +3

      If you mean between the previous record holder and the new one, there are in fact other primes in-between because of the following theorem: For every natural number n there is always a prime p such that n ≤ p ≤ 2n

  • @asdasdasdasd7483
    @asdasdasdasd7483 8 років тому +16

    well... I googled "gimps"
    .___.

    • @agfd5659
      @agfd5659 6 років тому +1

      I did too and the first thing that came out was Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search - PrimeNet.

    • @Ren_Egade
      @Ren_Egade 6 років тому

      Image search it

    • @omikronweapon
      @omikronweapon 4 роки тому

      regular google gives me a full page of primes, and the graphic software. image search gives the results you'd expect...
      but why would you image search prime numbers?

  • @AcoN0Five
    @AcoN0Five 6 років тому +23

    I bet MrBeast will record himself reading this

  • @neddyladdy
    @neddyladdy 8 років тому

    Si it is after all. That's a relief, I've been kept awake at night wondering.

  • @notanonymous3976
    @notanonymous3976 6 років тому +1

    this is actually one of the best unoboxing vid ive seen

  • @bikedeliveries
    @bikedeliveries 8 років тому +3

    I have a question!
    Fair enough, this is great we know this huge prime, but obviously we missed millions of non-mersenne primes.
    What is the biggest prime number in a sequence where non is missing?
    So every number has been checked up until that.

  • @AliHSyed
    @AliHSyed 8 років тому +10

    Is it the NEXT prime after the previous record? or is it just A prime bigger than the previous record?

    • @arcanesepulcher760
      @arcanesepulcher760 8 років тому

      It's the next mersenne prime after the previous record (2^n-1). There may be other numbers that are primes in between, but they are much much harder to find compared to mersenne primes, they ignore those same, as it'd take so much computing power to test just every single number...

    • @robin-vt1qj
      @robin-vt1qj 8 років тому

      the biggest found many inbetween

    • @standupmaths
      @standupmaths 8 років тому +2

      It is just one prime number which is bigger. There are definitely other primes in-between and maybe other Mersenne primes which have been skipped. With so many people working on them, the Mersenne numbers are checked in a slightly haphazard order.

    • @innertubez
      @innertubez 8 років тому

      +Ali Syed Great question! I was wondering the same thing. I also wonder, shouldn't there also be Mersenne twin primes? Are those possible?

    • @innertubez
      @innertubez 8 років тому

      ***** Cool, thanks!

  • @Anthony-pr7yc
    @Anthony-pr7yc 4 роки тому +2

    Them: "What kind of books do you like?
    "
    Me: "It's complicated..."

  • @valdris3
    @valdris3 8 років тому

    He is just so happy!

  • @siddkumar8032
    @siddkumar8032 6 років тому +6

    That was a Parker square attempt on trying to say the number

  • @chillsahoy2640
    @chillsahoy2640 8 років тому +4

    Sorry, I know this isn't directly related to mathematics, it includes all science AND math too. There are many distributed computing projects (you can find entire lists on Wikipedia and elsewhere) just like the one used to find prime numbers (GIMPS). If you're interested in science or math at all, I recommend that you find a project you believe in and run the software whenever your computer is idling. It really can help with computationally intensive projects where building a supercomputer capable of performing all these calculations at once is just too expensive and impractical, and the results can help further our understanding of science and math.

  • @95BassLover
    @95BassLover 8 років тому

    You have printed tangible history. Nicely done.

  • @GordonjSmith1
    @GordonjSmith1 7 років тому +1

    I would love the pdf to print my own version. Love collecting history making papers/proofs/output. Brilliant!

  • @kyrla
    @kyrla 7 років тому +15

    The unboxing video of... a number.
    (insert amazon prime joke here)

  • @aikensource
    @aikensource 7 років тому +16

    what if you raised 2 to the power of the number in this video and subtracted 1?

    • @aikensource
      @aikensource 7 років тому +1

      Howluinb Ah, actually, I do. I'd have to prove it using GIMPS for the world record but since the number in the video is prime, raising 2 to any prime and subtracting 1 yields a prime number, therefore raising 2 to the number in this video and subtracting 1 would yield the new world record... ain't nobody got time for that though.

    • @aikensource
      @aikensource 7 років тому

      Howluinb look up mersenne prime numbers! I think the only issue is it takes so long to compute and it doesn't count unless one has actually seen the number.

    • @aikensource
      @aikensource 7 років тому

      Howluinb although I admitedly understand that mersenne formula numbers aren't always necessarily prime, I don't think, but there are a lot of them. Lol

    • @aikensource
      @aikensource 7 років тому +1

      Howluinb you're being a bit of a brat, friend. I'm just a calc 1 student.

    • @aikensource
      @aikensource 7 років тому +3

      Akshay C.S. not 2 to any prime power, 2 to a mersenne's prime power.

  • @adityajha4887
    @adityajha4887 7 років тому

    That's the number of times I felt fascinated watching numberphile

  • @Kram1032
    @Kram1032 8 років тому +2

    That -1 might be trivial for the size, but it's absolutely essential to its prime status

  • @danmeyer0552
    @danmeyer0552 6 років тому +3

    There is a new record holder. The largest prime number ever found is now (2^77232917)-1.

  • @Spiderlanky
    @Spiderlanky 8 років тому +5

    "-1 pfft trivial at this size"
    Lol not really, you do that and you suddenly find all these factors appear ;)

  • @whitrenee1
    @whitrenee1 3 роки тому

    I Am EXTREMELY Lucky To Know So Much And Loaders Number And SCG(13) Must Be Made

  • @frostcrackle2374
    @frostcrackle2374 8 років тому

    Ooh, I can't wait to read _that._

    • @frostcrackle2374
      @frostcrackle2374 8 років тому

      Alright, looks like I got most of it memorized. I think there're a few 999's in there, right? Those were the most important bits that we were gonna be tested on. Man, this class really isn't easy.

  • @hey8174
    @hey8174 8 років тому +180

    Nope nope.. I checked. I'm pretty sure its divisible by 3572346872345608234768903479342786023847602934876938476098496970806892387592365829385729683406938469347682734634986794672852635892769875908357023957239867209678240634978629385723867482395872985672395872395867234056872069347625872508756293582084679208526935823650283692365723806592380572039652739085723952637057826707897769595898477366252517181912384758493209875483938475647384756473829345687654532434156782934506968576437845

    • @crazykhespar8487
      @crazykhespar8487 8 років тому +153

      But it isn't divisible by 5. so.

    • @hey8174
      @hey8174 8 років тому +64

      Trevor Mccord damn you got me.

    • @hellterminator
      @hellterminator 8 років тому +11

      +Trevor Mccord Actually, if it were divisible by the number +Tucense posted, it would also be divisible by 5. Just saying.

    • @crazykhespar8487
      @crazykhespar8487 8 років тому +7

      +hellterminator Well obviously. And with a massive amount of other numbers.

    • @crazykhespar8487
      @crazykhespar8487 8 років тому +2

      +hellterminator Your argument makes no sense, and is therefore invalid.
      kappa

  • @pbni8572
    @pbni8572 8 років тому

    This is the kind of unboxing I like!

  • @amoledzeppelin
    @amoledzeppelin 7 років тому +1

    The interesting thing though is, when we write it as a bit sequence into a file and then zip it, it should be pretty small because it's all ones. Probably that zip archive would even fit on a floppy disk.

  • @harunazhar3309
    @harunazhar3309 6 років тому +5

    Do a full reading please.

  • @nephew_
    @nephew_ 6 років тому +91

    Give it to MrBeast and he will know what to do with it 😎

    • @arcticmonkeysfan1990
      @arcticmonkeysfan1990 6 років тому +3

      if he read 1 a second all day every day it would take him 254 days lol

    • @Aiden-vg4xs
      @Aiden-vg4xs 4 роки тому +1

      MrBeasts next video: Reading the largest prime number.

  • @Lugmillord
    @Lugmillord 8 років тому +1

    Man, those books must be an awesome read :D

  • @filipsperl
    @filipsperl 8 років тому

    I watched the previous 'biggest prime' video yesterday :)

  • @chipmunk449
    @chipmunk449 8 років тому +6

    Well if he is "Captain Prime" You have to be "Optimist Prime". ;P

  • @mabelsizzurp
    @mabelsizzurp 8 років тому +14

    Why was this suggested?

    • @POVboxing
      @POVboxing 8 років тому

      Ikr

    • @Schobbish
      @Schobbish 8 років тому +3

      Why should this not be suggested?

    • @universalmartialartscenter360
      @universalmartialartscenter360 8 років тому +16

      UA-cam thought you were smarter than you really are. Apparently they were wrong. Send them a complaint. Tell them your daily dose of sheep media is being replaced by mathematical videos.

  • @LucasGuillemette
    @LucasGuillemette 6 років тому

    This is getting me so primed!

  • @abidabegum4836
    @abidabegum4836 7 років тому +1

    Unsure if mentioned in video, but where could you buy this? The books containing the number I mean.

  • @sadhlife
    @sadhlife 6 років тому +29

    *2^(74,207,281).*
    *74+207=281.*
    *coincidence?*

  • @thatoneguy9582
    @thatoneguy9582 8 років тому +3

    now we make 2^this-1

  • @KillianDefaoite
    @KillianDefaoite 3 роки тому +1

    Update: The current record is now 2^(82589933) -1.

  • @stumbling
    @stumbling 8 років тому +2

    I love the idea of these university computers trying to find prime numbers in their "down time". A fitting hobby for a little computer. :)

  • @AtheistCitizen
    @AtheistCitizen 8 років тому +4

    [straighten me out but] had you expressed it in binary digits wouldnt it be just 74,207,280 consecutive 1's [no 0s] ?

    • @black_platypus
      @black_platypus 8 років тому +2

      +AtheistCitizen Yes, it would! :)
      At first I thought "No, that doesn't sound right"... but of course it HAS to be^^

  • @howardfaegen7684
    @howardfaegen7684 8 років тому +5

    In accordance with the twin prime conjecture, has anyone checked to see if 2^74,207,281 + 1 is prime?? Because if so, then that would be the worlds largest prime number discovered wouldn't it?
    I would check it myself, but my computer can't count that high.
    ... Oh, and how about 2^74,207,281 - 3?

    • @toddbiesel4288
      @toddbiesel4288 6 років тому +4

      Howard Faegen Any number in the form (2^n + 1) will be divisible by 3 when n is odd.

  • @cristianocabrera9500
    @cristianocabrera9500 7 років тому

    Curious as to what the software you guys recommend for searching for primes? I've also wanted to try looking too, since the more people looking, the more chance of finding a new one. Thank you!

  • @elhopper3735
    @elhopper3735 5 років тому

    This channel has the best comment section

  • @marksmithwas12
    @marksmithwas12 8 років тому +5

    Why's the audio so quiet?