@@njokic2176 couldn't agree more. I think team India should trust in his batting and play him as the 1st spinner. The team has to trust the top order batsmen to do their job rather than benching the best spinner. Remember, you can win a test match only by picking 20 wickets.
Dont fret . They did this podcast before Bangladesh series. And Rishabh was coming in tests after 2 years. Meanwhile Marsh has been performing quite good in tests recently. So their were fair in their assessment.
Marsh since his comeback has averaged 45, pant hasnt played in a long long time, especially against high quality opposition, its a tough call but a good one
@@uditshivaram6538 Marsh average is also inflated bcoz of Playing Pakistan and West Indies at home so his average is also not against High Quality Oppositions like England,India,South Africa..
Dont fret . They did this podcast before Bangladesh series. And Rishabh was coming in tests after 2 years. Meanwhile Marsh has been performing quite good in tests recently. So their were fair in their assessment.
Dont fret . They did this podcast before Bangladesh series. And Rishabh was coming in tests after 2 years. Meanwhile Marsh has been performing quite good in tests recently. So their were fair in their assessment.
One of the most awaited test series in recent memory, it’s good advert for the game… BCCI with all the money should make this series broadcast free on air across the world, the interest in other countries would also be astounding
If hardik isn’t fit, India will definitely go with both ash and jadeja. They did that last time as well and it worked especially cause most Australian pitches by the end are wearing. Maybe they’ll play one spinner in Gabba where it doesn’t deteriorate as much
Is deep smoking smth? Who tf not has Cummins in the top 3 bowlers in the world forget these 2 teams. And why did they both pick Hazlewood in the top 3 in the series, it is very obviously shami, bumrah and Cummins
Hazlewood has more searing line than Cummins if one had to be totally honest. I would pick Hazlewood over maybe even Bumrah. But Cummins could replace Shami if at all. He is very good, not the best. Don’t care what VK thinks.
@@dchopra6629 Rahul won't make it has better counterparts in Australia, Pant would make it as the Better WK Batsman or even as a pure batter at No 5 or 6
I just wasted 10 mins of my life when I realized this was shot before the BD series... This is misleading in so many ways, its a post dated analysis making this whole conversation absolutely redundant, Look how Pant played in the BD series!!!! Smhhhhhhhhhhh
Y'all should have a white board to list down the final XI. It becomes confusing to keep track of the agreed XI amidst all the talk. Also, Deep Dasgupta should lighten up a bit. People are less serious at a funeral.
Jadeja bowled better then Ash in that BGT 20-21 series and almost everyone ignores his performance in that series. In that series Ashwin played 6 Innings and took 12 Wickets at the Avg. of 29 Jadeja bowled just 2 Innings and took 7 wickets at the Avg. of 15 😲 (which was best in that series of between all bowlers).. So Jadeja bowled better then Ashwin in that series Jadeja is too too underrated bowler then Ashwin in SENA Countries. Ashwin has yet to take Fifer in SENA Countries even after playing 25 matches but Jadeja has with playing lesser matches. And we all know Jadeja's Batting. Jaddu will play in playing XI without a doubt. He has more impact then Ashwin in SENA Countries.
@@nitin3837 4 Pacers are needed, India should play with 4 Seamers + 1 Spinner (Jaddu).... Only chance India can play both Jaddu and Ashwin is in Sydney (where pitch suits Spin) or may be in Melbourne If Shardul is fully fit and performing he should be 4th Seamer in playing XI and should bat at no. 8 And If Hardik Plays that is Huge Bonus.....
Composite side: top 4 all Indians, Head and Green at 5 and 6 (Marsh's form dipped). Pant at 7, Ashwin at 8. Bumrah, Pat and Josh will be the pacers. As for Australian side, not giving Bancroft the opportunity at the top only to send the most in form middle order batter who can't defend fourth stump line deliveries to open is the kind of overthinking Australia has only done once in the past: when they played 4 pacers and no spinners in India
Jaiswal will leave his mark in the coming BG test series couple of hundreds and few 50s Rohit will be as usual I think akashdeep may chip in as third seamer in couple of matches
We want Siddhu on this channel in place of Deep. He would say something like this: Cricket ka Einstein hai, par look mein stylish hai Kimber, Shots ke analysis mein lagaaye chatakdaar timber! Ballebaazon ki pol khole jaise samose ka masala, Iske tweets se zyada spicy toh bas biryani ka chaawal wala! Credit: ChatGPT 😂😂
Seems like jarrod read my comment regarding his criticism on jaiswal. Lol! I just hope they don't call him "just hype" if he does decently in Australia and scores at least 2 centuries or they don't go "oh well Australia let him get those runs or Australia let India win" or something. If Virat scores well in the NZ, I guess that bodes well for him in Australia. He has a century everywhere in Australia except the Gabba/Brisbane test which is the 3rd one in the series. Hope he gets at least his gabba century.
Harry Brook hasnt pplayed in India yet, but he is one of the best already as per English and Australian cricket commentators but an Indian player has to perform in Australia and England to be validated by them... Hmmm
@@Bhavik630 It's double standards. Players should only be judged when they've played a reasonable amount of cricket both home and overseas. It makes no sense to engage in hyperbole when someone has only played well at home and has barely started their career.
@@nandraclan1493 agreed, but then same logic applies on English and Australian batsmen too.. they cant be called greats unless they perform in india the number one test team in the world
Kimber should objectively analyse Kohli stats since 2020 and make a case for his inclusion in any test squad. Kohli's occasional brilliance in limited overs and past reputation has been carrying him for far too long. No other batsman will ever get away with such a serious slump.
Hah so give objective analysis sir...? Performed well in challenging conditions every now and then, performed brilliantly in South Africa this year (better than everyone else combined tbh)... he is slowly coming back....do your objective analysis, go on😊😂
Cummins also has a better strike rate than both shami and hazlewood? And hes got one of the best false shot percentages of any current gen bowler? Plus you just watch cummins bowl and he looks amazingly threatening
Cummins is one of australias greatest ever seamers, and is one of the top three best seamers in the world rn, he rabada and bumrah are in a different league altogether when it comes to test cricket, meanwhile shami hasnt played in a year and his last two tests hes taken 4 wickets for 260, wonderful deep
This is where Hardik and his lack of fitness for Tests (i am assuming the reason) is a problem. Having a player who can bowl fast and bat like Green, Marsh and Pandya are worth their weight in gold in Tests.
"Rohit played well in Australian conditions before," says Kimber. Sad to see one of the best cricket analysts being so ignorant of facts. Rohit has a Test average of 31 in Australia. Mediocre is what I would call it. No doubt about his talent, though. I would choose Jaiswal and Khawaja on current form as my openers.
Why are we comparing position wise - let’s pic the best team from the total pool of 22 players and my team would be: 1.Rohit 2.Khwaja 3.Smith/Gill 4.Kohli 5.Head 6.Pant 7.Ashwin 8.Cummins 9. Kuldeep/Starc 10.Bumrah 11. Hazelwood
Jadeja ahead of Ashwin, this is no brainer... Jadeja bowled better then Ash in that BGT 20-21 series and almost everyone ignores his performance in that series. In that series Ashwin played 6 Innings and took 12 Wickets at the Avg. of 29 Jadeja bowled just 2 Innings and took 7 wickets at the Avg. of 15 😲 (which was best in that series of between all bowlers).. So Jadeja bowled better then Ashwin in that series Jadeja is too too underrated bowler then Ashwin in SENA Countries. Ashwin has yet to take Fifer in SENA Countries even after playing 25 matches but Jadeja has with playing lesser matches. And we all know Jadeja's Batting. Jaddu will play in playing XI without a doubt.
Ashwin was India's best bowler last time around. Picked more wickets at a better avg than even Bumrah. That being said, this discussion is clearly outdated as opinions might have changed post Bangladesh series. Rishab came back with a bang, Rahul did well, 4th seam option in Akashdeep(wasn't even discussed) is almost settled, Gill seemed a bit more comfortable in his role and Ashwin notched up another 5-fer and a 100. I'd play Jadeja purely as a batter who can come in handy depending on the situation and pick Ashwin as the primary spinner.
You are showing wrong stats about Ashwin. Jadeja bowled better then Ash in that BGT 20-21 series and almost everyone ignores his performance in that series. In that series Ashwin played 6 Innings and took 12 Wickets at the Avg. of 29 Jadeja bowled just 2 Innings and took 7 wickets at the Avg. of 15 😲 (which was best in that series of between all bowlers).. So Jadeja bowled better then Ashwin in that series Jadeja is too too underrated bowler then Ashwin in SENA Countries. Ashwin has yet to take Fifer in SENA Countries even after playing 25 matches but Jadeja has with playing lesser matches. And we all know Jadeja's Batting. Jaddu will play in playing XI without a doubt.
@@madhavrathore5988 Which is the wrong 'stat' that you're talking about? Jadeja played just 3 innings and that is too small a no. As you play more the law of averages catches up. For eg. Ashwin took 8 wickets @ 13.25 in his first 3 innings of the tour. Also, Ashwin was picking up top 7 wickets in that series. 10 of his 12 wickets were from top 7(batsmen). Steve Smith was literally his bunny. 3 bowlers played 6 innings for Ind. Ash, Bumrah and Siraj. Ash was the best of these 3. Also, 5fers are a poor way to judge. Jadeja also has just 1 5fer and that was in SA '14. Probably, the last time SA gave a relatively spin friendly surface for India. Our spinners don't need to take 5fers in SENA coz we have an amazing fast bowling attack. Also, I've literally said that Jadeja should play purely for his batting. Ash is the better spinner, Jadeja is the better batsmanand allrounder. My point was that both should play for Ind. I don't know why you'd be upset?
@@abhinavnair790 If it is only about Bowling then look at their Overall bowling Stats in Australia:- Bowling Stats Avg. SR Jadeja in Aus 21.79 54 Ashwin in Aus 42.25 86 And Mind you, Jadeja also got wickets of Smith and Marnus in that series + that "Iconic" Run Out of Steve Smith in that BGT 20-21 and Smith said it on Records many times that Jadeja is the most difficult bowler to face. Again my point is, if India has to play only one spinner "In Australia" purely on bowling basis then Jadeja should play there in Australia, he is criminally underrated there. Jadeja is better bowler then Ash in Aus. Yes Ashwin is 1000× times better bowler then Jaddu on Indian Pitches.
@@madhavrathore5988 Still irrelevant. Ashwin's overall Aus stats are bad coz of the 6 matches he played in 2012 and 15. Both the series had absolute roads. Spinners had terrible record in both the series. You can go check the performance of spinners(nathan included) in the 6 matches Ash played. In fact Indian bowlers in general had terrible record. Jadeja was lucky to not play in them. In SENA only 2 countries should ideally count, Aus and Eng. Nz and SA surfaces for Ind series over the past 8-10 years have made spinners redundant. Either the sample size and/or bowling spells are small and/or the conditions extremely unfriendly. So here's the relevant stats. Since 2016, in Aus and Eng, Ash avg's 27 and jadeja 36 In SENA overall Ash avg's 30.5 and Jadeja 32.5. ----- Overall outside India- Ash 30 Jadeja 33 Outside Asia- Ash 33 Jadeja 33.5(this includes Ash's horrible pre 2015 6 Aus matches and Jadeja's pre 2015 horrible 6 Nz+Eng matches)
@@abhinavnair790 still Overall SENA Bowling Stats of Ashwin are just a inches better then Jaddu which is Avg. of just around 1.8 And still from 2016 Ashwin Bowling Avg. in Australia is 27 and Jadeja's is 21.5 👉 It's very unfortunate that Jadeja's bowling always gets Unnoticed on Australia conditions. 🚨🚨 Again I am telling, If playing only 1 Spinner purely on Bowling basis "In Australia" it has to be Jadeja. 🚨🚨 ****************************** On any other places Ashwin could be better bowler then Jaddu. Here I haven't mentioned the Batting records of both from 2016 in Australia, since I told that "based on purely bowling basis on Australian pitches. But still look from 2016 Batting Avg. in Aus:- Jadeja 43.75 Ashwin 18 👉👉 My main point is still same:- Jadeja is better Spinner then Ashwin in Australia conditions. Overall Ashwin is surely better then Jaddu in India.
nonsense. gupta totally missed the point. siraj+bhumra a must and nobody knows shammi is available or not. what about parag who bowls medium pace? what about dubhe who also can bowl medium pace? in sydney jaddu/axar/kuldeep/ashwin a must. go with all 4 or 3 and 2 fast bowlers. India must trap aussies by spin. both ashwin and axar can get enormous bounce and that will trouble aussies to no end. ------------ aussies are in trouble facing bhumra but shammi has to get ready. I do not know whats up with him as he has done nothing since world cup. But siraj will come to play. he loves australia and this time he might be that guy.
So much biasness against India as always. Rohit Jaiswal KL Rahul Virat Pant Jadeja Ashwin Akashdeep/Shardul/NK Reddy Bumrah Shami Siraj Additional Fast Bowlers: Mayank Yadav(after his debut yesterday), Yash Dayal, Arshdeep We need 4 fast bowlers and 2 all rounder spinners. KL is a better option at 3 than Gill because he has shown patience and maturity in batting and you need dependability. Unfortunately our top 4 don't bowl or else we could have Gill but he would only workout at 5 because he has been found out now against swing and fast bowling. Also, remember, bowling wins you series.
jesus my guy, they are different challenges. The wickets in Australia are far closer to those south african pitches vs the indian turning wickets. Why are you guys so sensitive to criticism? all he said was we arent sure if Jaiswal can perform on fast bouncy wickets yet, given when havent seen him do so?
@@njokic2176 I never said anything about Jaiswal... Its about the glaring double standards.. Those south african wickets were deadly and unplayable.. I mean SA was bowled out for 50 odd runs in the first innings.. but there was hardly any criticism from the English and the Australian commentators back then... and even now those are only "tough" wickets.. now compare that with the way the Indian wickets are criticized though there has never been an instance where a side got bowled out under 100 in the first innings... I am not against criticism .. I am against selective criticism
@@Bhavik630 if you google "107 overs of chaos jarrod kimber" you'll see Jarrod's report on the Ind SA Cape Town test you were talking about - He pretty unambiguously says the pitch was poor and if the match had gone on any longer it should have received an "unfit" rating, which is the worst rating the ICC can give (Plus the pitch got a demerit point from the ICC). The guy is pretty fair in his assessments, he's not like Michael Vaughan for example
I'm not really sure how he is at number 6. He missed a whole chunk of tests including all 5 tests vs Eng and didn't have to do much vs Bangladesh. He had a good 2023 but it was on the back of two hundreds on absolutely dead wickets. I think his best test batting performance in a long while has been the 70 odd he made in SA on a seaming wicket where no one else scored.
@@nikunjdixit1175 I think averaging 48 in tests since 2023 gets you there. You cannot call that slump. Scoring 700+ in ODI World Cup. Scoring 700+ in IPL at above 150 strike rate. How can that be a slump? How????
@@vibhor5015 ODI WC and IPL are irrelevant numbers when talking about tests. Like I mentioned, the test average is inflated because of two hundreds on remarkably dead pitches.
Jadeja bowled better then Ash in that BGT 20-21 series and almost everyone ignores his performance in that series. In that series Ashwin played 6 Innings and took 12 Wickets at the Avg. of 29 Jadeja bowled just 2 Innings and took 7 wickets at the Avg. of 15 😲 (which was best in that series of between all bowlers).. So Jadeja bowled better then Ashwin in that series Jadeja is too too underrated bowler then Ashwin in SENA Countries. Ashwin has yet to take Fifer in SENA Countries even after playing 25 matches but Jadeja has with playing lesser matches. And we all know Jadeja's Batting. Jaddu will play in playing XI without a doubt.
Mitch Marsh (a batter with an average of 30) is chosen over Pant who is averaging 45. How? And Deep is like yeah! Pant coming out of car crash with one knees is better than Marsh. Yup, this is unwatchable.
Sorry Deep doesn't know much! Gill on medi has said he likes to bat at No 3. Even Under 19 days he used to bat no 3 and he told Dravid i would like to bat at No 3! But deep says he has never batter at no 3😬
If you are going for current form youd select india wouldnt you? Theyve been playing bangladesh at home havent they? Marnus has struggled ill admit it, but he has gotten fifties consistently, averaged 30 in the ashes, 40 in the aussie summer and had a game changing 90 in nz, hes not useless and is still one of the best test batters in the world. Shubman is more talented but hes nowhere close to the temperement, defensive game or even the technique as marnus, he isnt the same player, one averages 50 and the other 37, stupid recency bias, the same way i wouldnt select mohammad rizwan over kohli even tho one has been doing better than the other
Again, underestimating Ashwin is one of the biggest mistakes one makes. He is a legend and has proved it in Australia in the last 2 tours.
will cost em again..and then they will realize
As an aussie, I can never understand why ashwin doesnt play overseas, he always scares me more than jadeja, particularly in overseas conditions
He won't even play. Can't do anything outside of Asia
@@njokic2176 couldn't agree more. I think team India should trust in his batting and play him as the 1st spinner. The team has to trust the top order batsmen to do their job rather than benching the best spinner. Remember, you can win a test match only by picking 20 wickets.
@@louquay : Do you know how many times he took the wicket of Smith and Labuschange in the last BGT series in Australia?
Marsh over pant are you guys high ,with all due respect
Dont fret . They did this podcast before Bangladesh series. And Rishabh was coming in tests after 2 years. Meanwhile Marsh has been performing quite good in tests recently. So their were fair in their assessment.
im as high as kite rn
Marsh since his comeback has averaged 45, pant hasnt played in a long long time, especially against high quality opposition, its a tough call but a good one
@@uditshivaram6538 Marsh average is also inflated bcoz of Playing Pakistan and West Indies at home so his average is also not against High Quality Oppositions like England,India,South Africa..
@@aamejshreyansh5868 he scored a 100 and a 50 in ENG in 3 tests last year, what's your point?
Cummins over Shami is a no Brainer.
deep dasupta has clear bias.
Don’t agree. I think both of them are very good. It’s not a no brainer
It's a literal no brainer@@visheshgoel6671
but Cummins is far better than Shami in Test
@@visheshgoel6671it is bro, Cummins is just so accurate it’s unbelievable
Rishab Pant over Mitch Marsh, any day day after day
Mitch marsh has been aus best batter in last 1 year...
@@lj4daniel70 Pant is been best batter for ind in test for a while on
😂😂😂😂
Dont fret . They did this podcast before Bangladesh series. And Rishabh was coming in tests after 2 years. Meanwhile Marsh has been performing quite good in tests recently. So their were fair in their assessment.
@@lj4daniel70 Doesn't make him better than Rishabh that too in Ind Aus Combined XI
Isn't pant obvious?
Dont fret . They did this podcast before Bangladesh series. And Rishabh was coming in tests after 2 years. Meanwhile Marsh has been performing quite good in tests recently. So their were fair in their assessment.
@@himanshusharma4478Nobody is "Fretting" , stop spamming 😂
@@PS-ug7nm begani shadi m abdulla deewana.
@@himanshusharma4478 Aur us shaadi mein bhi tu bakchodi hi kar raha ha tha 😂
Bowling is straightforward. 3 quicks, 1 spinner & a all rounder.
Bumrah, Hazelwood, Cummins, Lyon & Mitch Marsh.
I'll give you Lyon over Ashwin, but you've got to pick Shami Over Hazelwood.
@@prasadmahale3092 But hazlewood is infinitely better than shami, in test cricket at least
@@uditshivaram6538 infinitely🤣🤣
@@anubhav111196he is?
I just wanna know what they smoke before choosing anyone over Rishabh Pant. This man can walk into any test side.
One of the most awaited test series in recent memory, it’s good advert for the game… BCCI with all the money should make this series broadcast free on air across the world, the interest in other countries would also be astounding
If hardik isn’t fit, India will definitely go with both ash and jadeja. They did that last time as well and it worked especially cause most Australian pitches by the end are wearing. Maybe they’ll play one spinner in Gabba where it doesn’t deteriorate as much
In Melbourne and Sydney yess
How can deep das Gupta not mention akash deep as a 4th seam option for India. 🤦
They mentioned that this was recorded before the Bangladesh series
1. Y. Jaiswal
2. Rohit
3. Gill
4. Kohli
5. Rahul
6. Pant
7. Jadeja
8. (Ashwin/Kuldeep)/(Hardik/Axar)
9. Bumrah
10. Shami
11. AkashDeep(Siraj/Arshdeep)
Reserve batter : Sarfaraz Khan
My opinion 😊
I think one of jadeja Or ashwin will sit, I think India will go with four fast bowler option.
Axar won't be in the main squad
Good list
Axar need to be there before jadeja.
@@KICK839 both are quite good batsman,but axar never played in Australia so Jadeja has the upper hand.
Is deep smoking smth? Who tf not has Cummins in the top 3 bowlers in the world forget these 2 teams. And why did they both pick Hazlewood in the top 3 in the series, it is very obviously shami, bumrah and Cummins
you dont watch test cricket if hazelwood is not in your list.. he is the best bowler in test
Hazlewood>shami
Hazlewood has more searing line than Cummins if one had to be totally honest. I would pick Hazlewood over maybe even Bumrah. But Cummins could replace Shami if at all. He is very good, not the best. Don’t care what VK thinks.
Hazelwood is probably the most consistent fast bowler in the world, esp post Anderson
Hazlewood is easily the second best bowler in test cricketer
They recorded this before the Test series with Bangladesh; so it’s aged well.
We saw what Pant, Rahul did…
@@dchopra6629 Rahul won't make it has better counterparts in Australia, Pant would make it as the Better WK Batsman or even as a pure batter at No 5 or 6
I just wasted 10 mins of my life when I realized this was shot before the BD series... This is misleading in so many ways, its a post dated analysis making this whole conversation absolutely redundant, Look how Pant played in the BD series!!!! Smhhhhhhhhhhh
Y'all should have a white board to list down the final XI. It becomes confusing to keep track of the agreed XI amidst all the talk.
Also, Deep Dasgupta should lighten up a bit. People are less serious at a funeral.
Deep is Mr. I mean. He used that filler 77 thousand times in this short video. I mean common.
Why can’t ashwin be he 3rd bowler? He bowled exceptionally last tour. A lot of Indian pundits like to ignore that .
Jadeja bowled better then Ash in that BGT 20-21 series and almost everyone ignores his performance in that series.
In that series Ashwin played 6 Innings and took 12 Wickets at the Avg. of 29
Jadeja bowled just 2 Innings and took 7 wickets at the Avg. of 15 😲 (which was best in that series of between all bowlers)..
So Jadeja bowled better then Ashwin in that series
Jadeja is too too underrated bowler then Ashwin in SENA Countries.
Ashwin has yet to take Fifer in SENA Countries even after playing 25 matches but Jadeja has with playing lesser matches.
And we all know Jadeja's Batting.
Jaddu will play in playing XI without a doubt.
He has more impact then Ashwin in SENA Countries.
@@madhavrathore5988 what stops India from playing both? What Jarrod says is true, India’s 4th choice seamer isn’t good enough
@@nitin3837 4 Pacers are needed, India should play with 4 Seamers + 1 Spinner (Jaddu)....
Only chance India can play both Jaddu and Ashwin is in Sydney (where pitch suits Spin) or may be in Melbourne
If Shardul is fully fit and performing he should be 4th Seamer in playing XI and should bat at no. 8 And If Hardik Plays that is Huge Bonus.....
Nope. He didn't bowl exceptionally. India won without him. Sunday and thakur were better..plus Ashwins record in sena countries is bad
Rohit Khawaja Smith Kohli Head Pant Marsh Cummins Bumrah Hazlewood lyon
If you go current form Neither Smith or Kohli male it into xi
Lyon over ashwin ?
In Australia yes @@rajreddy2458
@@rajreddy2458Lyon has a way way better record in Australia bud.
That's because we haven't played ash in aus. Whenever he has played as a bowler, he's been decent in aus@@Marto2168
Rohit Jaiswal Gill Kohli Pant Head
Ash Cummins Josh Bumrah Shami
Composite side: top 4 all Indians, Head and Green at 5 and 6 (Marsh's form dipped). Pant at 7, Ashwin at 8. Bumrah, Pat and Josh will be the pacers.
As for Australian side, not giving Bancroft the opportunity at the top only to send the most in form middle order batter who can't defend fourth stump line deliveries to open is the kind of overthinking Australia has only done once in the past: when they played 4 pacers and no spinners in India
1. Khwaja
2. Rohit
3. Smith
4. Kohli
5. Head
6. Pant
7. Jadeja
8. Pat Cummins
9. Bumrha
10. Lyon
11. Shami
Jaiswal will leave his mark in the coming BG test series couple of hundreds and few 50s Rohit will be as usual I think akashdeep may chip in as third seamer in couple of matches
What about Akash deep
Pat Cummins is the second best test seamer after Bumrah. Shami doesn't have amazing stats in Aus. Cummins would be picked over Hazelwood.
I would do...
Rohit
Khawaja
Smith
Kohli
Head
Pant (wk)
Marsh
Ashwin
Cummins
Bumrah
Hazlewood
India's side...
Rohit
Jaiswal
Gill
Kohli
Pant
Rahul
Jadeja
Ashwin / Akashdeep
Shami
Bumrah
Siraj
We want Siddhu on this channel in place of Deep. He would say something like this:
Cricket ka Einstein hai, par look mein stylish hai Kimber,
Shots ke analysis mein lagaaye chatakdaar timber!
Ballebaazon ki pol khole jaise samose ka masala,
Iske tweets se zyada spicy toh bas biryani ka chaawal wala!
Credit: ChatGPT 😂😂
Seems like jarrod read my comment regarding his criticism on jaiswal. Lol! I just hope they don't call him "just hype" if he does decently in Australia and scores at least 2 centuries or they don't go "oh well Australia let him get those runs or Australia let India win" or something. If Virat scores well in the NZ, I guess that bodes well for him in Australia. He has a century everywhere in Australia except the Gabba/Brisbane test which is the 3rd one in the series. Hope he gets at least his gabba century.
Ind - NZ series is in India not NZ.
Harry Brook hasnt pplayed in India yet, but he is one of the best already as per English and Australian cricket commentators but an Indian player has to perform in Australia and England to be validated by them... Hmmm
@@Bhavik630 It's double standards. Players should only be judged when they've played a reasonable amount of cricket both home and overseas. It makes no sense to engage in hyperbole when someone has only played well at home and has barely started their career.
@@nandraclan1493 agreed, but then same logic applies on English and Australian batsmen too.. they cant be called greats unless they perform in india the number one test team in the world
There is Only One GOAT, "VIRAT KOHLI"👑🐐🙌👏💓
Gill over labuchane in test 😂😂😂
Deep bro messed up by picking shami over cummins but it was more messed up when he tried to defend his mess.
Kl Rahul hasn't made runs in Australia he has a 100 and avgs 20 overall. He's been terrible
Don't u dare to pick Mitch Marsh over Pant
Kimber should objectively analyse Kohli stats since 2020 and make a case for his inclusion in any test squad. Kohli's occasional brilliance in limited overs and past reputation has been carrying him for far too long. No other batsman will ever get away with such a serious slump.
Thanks for getting over this maddening Kohli obsession
@@visheshgoel6671 Cry More Haters 😂, He is The KING OF CRICKET 👑🐐🙌💓
Hah so give objective analysis sir...? Performed well in challenging conditions every now and then, performed brilliantly in South Africa this year (better than everyone else combined tbh)... he is slowly coming back....do your objective analysis, go on😊😂
Why there is no discussion about akash deep?
Pant was the best Batsman between both teams when last time they toured Australia and these people didn't pick him 😂😂😂
Cummins also has a better strike rate than both shami and hazlewood? And hes got one of the best false shot percentages of any current gen bowler? Plus you just watch cummins bowl and he looks amazingly threatening
I think Australia taking this series easily,i know we have talent but our team has so many new players and returning players
Indian team:
Jaiswal
Rohit
Gill
Virat
Pant
Rahul
Jadeja/Hardik (sources)
Ashwin
Bumrah
Siraj
Shami*/Akashdeep/Mayank
Poms speak as if no one was playing aggressive before Bazball lol.
Cummins is one of australias greatest ever seamers, and is one of the top three best seamers in the world rn, he rabada and bumrah are in a different league altogether when it comes to test cricket, meanwhile shami hasnt played in a year and his last two tests hes taken 4 wickets for 260, wonderful deep
What about scott boland?
Again Deep 😡
Can you please give some context
Perfect cuckh
Are you dumb?
@@tarunpreet7386 I don't want BCCI advicates to analyze cricket with Kimber. Far better people out there to bring on the show.
Do you want sanjay manjrekar 🤣
This is where Hardik and his lack of fitness for Tests (i am assuming the reason) is a problem. Having a player who can bowl fast and bat like Green, Marsh and Pandya are worth their weight in gold in Tests.
If Smith and Kohli get going....cinema👑🔥❤️🥵
Head
Smith
Labuchagne
Virat
Kl
Panth(wk)
Marsh
Ashwin
Cummins
Bumrah
Shami ❤
😂😂
ROHIT
KHWAJA
SHUBMAN
VIRAT
HEAD
PANT
GREEN
LYON
BUMRAH
CUMMINS
HAZLEWOOD
What they are saying?? Pat Cummins is by far the best australian bowler now
Team India's Squad for BGT 2024:-
1. Rohit Sharma
2. Yashasvi Jaiswal
3. Shubhman Gill
4. Virat Kohli
5. KL Rahul
6. Rishabh Pant (WK)
7. Jadeja
8. Shardul Thakur
9. Shami
10. Bumrah
11. Siraj
***********************
12. R Ashwin
13. Kuldeep Yadav
14. Dhruv Jurel (WK)
15. Ruturaj Gaikwad (Res. Opener)
16. Sarfaraz Khan (Batter)
17. Akashdeep
*18. Hardik Pandya (if he agrees) / Or any other quick fast bowler*
That's a perfect squad.
I think this is the team that will go to Australia.
No KLQaeda, put Ashwin in his place
Siraj waste
@@akhilenvinod that doesn't mean he will be out of the Team Squad. He will have a great Competition from Akashdeep.
Frankly speaking, we are hugely disrespecting and disregarding NZ's tour of India , by constantly buzzing about BGT
"Rohit played well in Australian conditions before," says Kimber. Sad to see one of the best cricket analysts being so ignorant of facts. Rohit has a Test average of 31 in Australia. Mediocre is what I would call it. No doubt about his talent, though. I would choose Jaiswal and Khawaja on current form as my openers.
Deepdas ‘Ameen’ (I mean) Gupta 🫡
Why are we comparing position wise - let’s pic the best team from the total pool of 22 players and my team would be:
1.Rohit
2.Khwaja
3.Smith/Gill
4.Kohli
5.Head
6.Pant
7.Ashwin
8.Cummins
9. Kuldeep/Starc
10.Bumrah
11. Hazelwood
Not gonna pick Ashwin over Lyon in australia
Smith at 4 Kohli drop
Jadeja ahead of Ashwin, this is no brainer...
Jadeja bowled better then Ash in that BGT 20-21 series and almost everyone ignores his performance in that series.
In that series Ashwin played 6 Innings and took 12 Wickets at the Avg. of 29
Jadeja bowled just 2 Innings and took 7 wickets at the Avg. of 15 😲 (which was best in that series of between all bowlers)..
So Jadeja bowled better then Ashwin in that series
Jadeja is too too underrated bowler then Ashwin in SENA Countries.
Ashwin has yet to take Fifer in SENA Countries even after playing 25 matches but Jadeja has with playing lesser matches.
And we all know Jadeja's Batting.
Jaddu will play in playing XI without a doubt.
Hello have u seen Bangladesh series , R u guys high Pant plays no matter what?
Ashwin was India's best bowler last time around. Picked more wickets at a better avg than even Bumrah.
That being said, this discussion is clearly outdated as opinions might have changed post Bangladesh series. Rishab came back with a bang, Rahul did well, 4th seam option in Akashdeep(wasn't even discussed) is almost settled, Gill seemed a bit more comfortable in his role and Ashwin notched up another 5-fer and a 100.
I'd play Jadeja purely as a batter who can come in handy depending on the situation and pick Ashwin as the primary spinner.
You are showing wrong stats about Ashwin.
Jadeja bowled better then Ash in that BGT 20-21 series and almost everyone ignores his performance in that series.
In that series Ashwin played 6 Innings and took 12 Wickets at the Avg. of 29
Jadeja bowled just 2 Innings and took 7 wickets at the Avg. of 15 😲 (which was best in that series of between all bowlers)..
So Jadeja bowled better then Ashwin in that series
Jadeja is too too underrated bowler then Ashwin in SENA Countries.
Ashwin has yet to take Fifer in SENA Countries even after playing 25 matches but Jadeja has with playing lesser matches.
And we all know Jadeja's Batting.
Jaddu will play in playing XI without a doubt.
@@madhavrathore5988 Which is the wrong 'stat' that you're talking about?
Jadeja played just 3 innings and that is too small a no. As you play more the law of averages catches up.
For eg. Ashwin took 8 wickets @ 13.25 in his first 3 innings of the tour.
Also, Ashwin was picking up top 7 wickets in that series. 10 of his 12 wickets were from top 7(batsmen). Steve Smith was literally his bunny.
3 bowlers played 6 innings for Ind. Ash, Bumrah and Siraj. Ash was the best of these 3.
Also, 5fers are a poor way to judge. Jadeja also has just 1 5fer and that was in SA '14. Probably, the last time SA gave a relatively spin friendly surface for India. Our spinners don't need to take 5fers in SENA coz we have an amazing fast bowling attack.
Also, I've literally said that Jadeja should play purely for his batting. Ash is the better spinner, Jadeja is the better batsmanand allrounder.
My point was that both should play for Ind.
I don't know why you'd be upset?
@@abhinavnair790 If it is only about Bowling then look at their Overall bowling Stats in Australia:-
Bowling Stats Avg. SR
Jadeja in Aus 21.79 54
Ashwin in Aus 42.25 86
And Mind you, Jadeja also got wickets of Smith and Marnus in that series + that "Iconic" Run Out of Steve Smith in that BGT 20-21 and Smith said it on Records many times that Jadeja is the most difficult bowler to face.
Again my point is, if India has to play only one spinner "In Australia" purely on bowling basis then Jadeja should play there in Australia, he is criminally underrated there.
Jadeja is better bowler then Ash in Aus.
Yes Ashwin is 1000× times better bowler then Jaddu on Indian Pitches.
@@madhavrathore5988 Still irrelevant. Ashwin's overall Aus stats are bad coz of the 6 matches he played in 2012 and 15. Both the series had absolute roads. Spinners had terrible record in both the series. You can go check the performance of spinners(nathan included) in the 6 matches Ash played.
In fact Indian bowlers in general had terrible record. Jadeja was lucky to not play in them.
In SENA only 2 countries should ideally count, Aus and Eng. Nz and SA surfaces for Ind series over the past 8-10 years have made spinners redundant. Either the sample size and/or bowling spells are small and/or the conditions extremely unfriendly.
So here's the relevant stats. Since 2016, in Aus and Eng, Ash avg's 27 and jadeja 36
In SENA overall Ash avg's 30.5 and Jadeja 32.5.
-----
Overall
outside India- Ash 30 Jadeja 33
Outside Asia- Ash 33 Jadeja 33.5(this includes Ash's horrible pre 2015 6 Aus matches and Jadeja's pre 2015 horrible 6 Nz+Eng matches)
@@abhinavnair790 still Overall SENA Bowling Stats of Ashwin are just a inches better then Jaddu which is Avg. of just around 1.8
And still from 2016 Ashwin Bowling Avg. in Australia is 27 and Jadeja's is 21.5
👉 It's very unfortunate that Jadeja's bowling always gets Unnoticed on Australia conditions.
🚨🚨 Again I am telling, If playing only 1 Spinner purely on Bowling basis "In Australia" it has to be Jadeja. 🚨🚨
******************************
On any other places Ashwin could be better bowler then Jaddu.
Here I haven't mentioned the Batting records of both from 2016 in Australia, since I told that "based on purely bowling basis on Australian pitches.
But still look from 2016
Batting Avg. in Aus:-
Jadeja 43.75
Ashwin 18
👉👉 My main point is still same:- Jadeja is better Spinner then Ashwin in Australia conditions. Overall Ashwin is surely better then Jaddu in India.
KL's record in Australia is horrific
Very hard to pick the winner for this series
Irritated because axar is not around.
He need to be there.
He is just in a zone right now
nonsense. gupta totally missed the point. siraj+bhumra a must and nobody knows shammi is available or not. what about parag who bowls medium pace? what about dubhe who also can bowl medium pace?
in sydney jaddu/axar/kuldeep/ashwin a must. go with all 4 or 3 and 2 fast bowlers. India must trap aussies by spin. both ashwin and axar can get enormous bounce and that will trouble aussies to no end.
------------
aussies are in trouble facing bhumra but shammi has to get ready. I do not know whats up with him as he has done nothing since world cup. But siraj will come to play. he loves australia and this time he might be that guy.
Kohli is struggling for the last four years....money is on Smith
No ashwin ? There is a chance they bring in Hardik and play both Ashwin and jadeja ?
Mostly good analysis but Shami isnt committed to fitness? What is this based on?
For India who’s going to play Pujara’s role? There’s no Rahane either, they’re all stroke makers no grinders…
Gill will do it,
Green head, smith batting up aus 5/0 win, 👑 austreliya all taem love me 🙏❤️
Australia 5/0 loss😢😢
@@rameshdetcic9114 1996 why growond killing you country fans, semi sri lanka win, 😂😂😂😂😂💔✌️
learn to talk and be realistic fcuking gawar
@@rameshdetcic9114WTC final 😢
November 19 😢
Men’s U19 World Cup 😢😢
@@Sanjaya610Your English makes my kidney have heartattack.
So much biasness against India as always.
Rohit
Jaiswal
KL Rahul
Virat
Pant
Jadeja
Ashwin
Akashdeep/Shardul/NK Reddy
Bumrah
Shami
Siraj
Additional Fast Bowlers: Mayank Yadav(after his debut yesterday), Yash Dayal, Arshdeep
We need 4 fast bowlers and 2 all rounder spinners. KL is a better option at 3 than Gill because he has shown patience and maturity in batting and you need dependability. Unfortunately our top 4 don't bowl or else we could have Gill but he would only workout at 5 because he has been found out now against swing and fast bowling. Also, remember, bowling wins you series.
What do you want?
Like to have a conversation on drop in chit pitches done by Australia from decades?🤫
Jarrod on South African dangerous deadly wickets call its tough wickets..
Jarrond on Indian rank turners calls its pathetic disgraceful wickets
Hmmmm
jesus my guy, they are different challenges. The wickets in Australia are far closer to those south african pitches vs the indian turning wickets. Why are you guys so sensitive to criticism? all he said was we arent sure if Jaiswal can perform on fast bouncy wickets yet, given when havent seen him do so?
@@njokic2176 I never said anything about Jaiswal... Its about the glaring double standards.. Those south african wickets were deadly and unplayable.. I mean SA was bowled out for 50 odd runs in the first innings.. but there was hardly any criticism from the English and the Australian commentators back then... and even now those are only "tough" wickets..
now compare that with the way the Indian wickets are criticized though there has never been an instance where a side got bowled out under 100 in the first innings...
I am not against criticism .. I am against selective criticism
@@Bhavik630 As far as I am aware, Jarrod said none of that
@@denkid4478 You are not aware then. Go back to his videos he made when Australia had travelled to India...
@@Bhavik630 if you google "107 overs of chaos jarrod kimber" you'll see Jarrod's report on the Ind SA Cape Town test you were talking about - He pretty unambiguously says the pitch was poor and if the match had gone on any longer it should have received an "unfit" rating, which is the worst rating the ICC can give (Plus the pitch got a demerit point from the ICC). The guy is pretty fair in his assessments, he's not like Michael Vaughan for example
Akashdeep should be the 3rd seemer.
arshdeep will be good combination with bumrah
Why no one even considering ash?
How well Bumrah performs? Answer to this question decides the winner of the series.
The better question will Cummins vs Bumrah in the series
Lol Gill over Labuschagne..in Australia🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Smith definitely
What is slump? He is ranked #6 in tests currently. 😂😂
Number 1 can only take him out slump.
I'm not really sure how he is at number 6. He missed a whole chunk of tests including all 5 tests vs Eng and didn't have to do much vs Bangladesh. He had a good 2023 but it was on the back of two hundreds on absolutely dead wickets. I think his best test batting performance in a long while has been the 70 odd he made in SA on a seaming wicket where no one else scored.
@@nikunjdixit1175 I think averaging 48 in tests since 2023 gets you there. You cannot call that slump.
Scoring 700+ in ODI World Cup.
Scoring 700+ in IPL at above 150 strike rate.
How can that be a slump? How????
@@vibhor5015 ODI WC and IPL are irrelevant numbers when talking about tests. Like I mentioned, the test average is inflated because of two hundreds on remarkably dead pitches.
Akasdeep should be picked ahead of siraj.
Thed did this pod before Bangladesh series.
Ashwin still not first choice??
I don’t know what else he needs to do ..
Jadeja bowled better then Ash in that BGT 20-21 series and almost everyone ignores his performance in that series.
In that series Ashwin played 6 Innings and took 12 Wickets at the Avg. of 29
Jadeja bowled just 2 Innings and took 7 wickets at the Avg. of 15 😲 (which was best in that series of between all bowlers)..
So Jadeja bowled better then Ashwin in that series
Jadeja is too too underrated bowler then Ashwin in SENA Countries.
Ashwin has yet to take Fifer in SENA Countries even after playing 25 matches but Jadeja has with playing lesser matches.
And we all know Jadeja's Batting.
Jaddu will play in playing XI without a doubt.
He needs to perform on pitches that are not rank turners. He never does that which is why his record in sena countries is poor
What.aboutlabu
Shardul is ruled out... Hardik/Nitish Reddy..
Love to see Deep defending India.
Now, who is again...dropping pant😅😅😅😅
They clearly said they shot it before the series...are you tarded or something
Shami over Cummins 😂😂
India win 4-1
Guys sometimes you dudes talk like kids have no logic on this comparison theory.. and the cricket IQ of you guys really needs some polish..
Mayank yadav go to Australia
Aakash deep .............
Mitch Marsh (a batter with an average of 30) is chosen over Pant who is averaging 45. How? And Deep is like yeah! Pant coming out of car crash with one knees is better than Marsh.
Yup, this is unwatchable.
He’s also a good second change bowler tbf
Because marsh is better in Australia simple
Deep das gupta may be the good commentator but really bad analyst he doesn't know about players
Rohit
Khawaja
Gill
Smith
Head
Pant
Jadeja
Cummins
Bumrah
Hazelwood
Shami
This is objectively the best 11 for sure,just going by statistics
Marsh instead of jadeja and lyon instead of shami and its perfect
By your logic marnus's stats are better than gill
aus will win easily 3-0.
Sorry Deep doesn't know much! Gill on medi has said he likes to bat at No 3. Even Under 19 days he used to bat no 3 and he told Dravid i would like to bat at No 3! But deep says he has never batter at no 3😬
Depends on where its happening
I am pick Pat Cummins over Shami everyday of the weeks
Deep is biased
True
Smith
Rohit
Marnus
Virat(most run)
Head
Rishabh(wk)
Marsh
Ashwin
Cummins(c)(most wickets)
Bumrah
Siraj
I will take hazzlewood or akashdeep over siraj
In test captain will be Virat anyday..
@@someoneschannel5142 I've chosen captain based on guessing bgt 2024-25 result
@@Legendgaming-tp1is siraj always peak in tour test matches
@@a_kashchauhan but the captain will be Virat Kohli if not than Rohit Sharma for sure not pat Cummins
If you are going for current form youd select india wouldnt you? Theyve been playing bangladesh at home havent they? Marnus has struggled ill admit it, but he has gotten fifties consistently, averaged 30 in the ashes, 40 in the aussie summer and had a game changing 90 in nz, hes not useless and is still one of the best test batters in the world. Shubman is more talented but hes nowhere close to the temperement, defensive game or even the technique as marnus, he isnt the same player, one averages 50 and the other 37, stupid recency bias, the same way i wouldnt select mohammad rizwan over kohli even tho one has been doing better than the other
Rohit Jaiswal Marnus Smith/Kohli Head Pant Jadeja Lyon Cummins Bumrah Hazlewood