I agree with you to some extent; the way it's moving, especially with AI Text-to-Video, is moving at a rapid pace. A few later, a new announcement of the latest AI software. How do you think it'll develop over the rest of the year?
The example AI images I used from Leonardo AI are part of the user agreement (the creator mentioned in the video). However, for ethics, I delete the images afterwards as I won't use them and claim them as my own. The other images are my own generated images.
@@futurefuelcafe The pic at 12:20 is from the June 1985 cover of National Geographic Magazine. If you use a photograph taken by an actual photographer, how does that photographer get paid for their work being used to create an AI image?
@@80sFootballCards Correct, and I've used it under "Fair Usage" showing you what inspired the AI image I created through MidJourney. However, when creating that image in MidJourney, I didn't upload the "Afghan Girl" girl image to MidJourney for the AI tech to copy it; I only used prompts to describe what I wanted. So, I didn't use the photographer's image, compared to uploading the AI-generated image to Kling AI from Leonardo. These are 2 completely separate use case scenarios, and I've made sure to be ethical with usage in both, as I don't steal other people's work.
LLMs at present... want guess how much Energy is required to train 'em? NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS, do you want to take a swing at the environmental impact as in CO2? likely not but when Generative AI have an energy demand so ridiculous and provided that Generative Pre-trained Transformers scale exponentially... do you not see how this is not SUSTAINABLE? There are countries that freeze to death which need not be the case... so you are telling me, in light of this fact you support this over humanity? No to worry, but see here is the thing, that is your choice. But mark my words, this will fall apart, already the case and one day, 2 maybe 3 years from now many advocating / promoting this hype will face a mirror and it will go something like "magic mirror on the wall it was a hype, all just a hype, and I fell for it all" ... Of course no disrespect, perhaps a foreshadowing of things to come ... and the research is there, it is conclusive, FinalSpark understands this well, and while they prefer 'wetworks' which have ethical implications, cybernetics is really the ONLY way they will achieve what 'AI experts' call 'AGI' these Sora AI is just a new toy, no real utility, but that is the whole point, keep 'em busy lest they know what WE ARE TRULY up to. I do not support AI, nor cybernetics, see there are those who will get Neuralink, great, but then there are people like me, but unlike me these hackers will show how those with these implants did not get connectivity is bi-directional and who wants to be be a puppet, cause that is what highly skilled, BH Hackers will do, I have been around for 43 years, have four degrees and really, people need to make up their mind on this. This is not a joking matter, and treating it as such, will change nothing, the outcome is as I said conclusive.
Hello, thanks for watching. You bring up some interesting points. I agree with some of them and the others not really. I suggest you watch some of my other videos and podcast episodes where I talk about the real-life implications of AI and the effect it will have on humans, jobs, society, life, etc... (ua-cam.com/video/tdmZ5dOR2Zo/v-deo.html) The way I view it is very simple, AI is coming whether I or anyone else likes it or not. No governments are asking our opinion about it or should we vote on it. You have only one of 2 choices, react and do something about it, or be replaced by AI. As a professional, I advocate for using AI in a balanced, common-sense way so you can stay relevant and earn a living to provide for yourself, your family, etc... Again, I'm a massive believer in freedom of speech, and I will never tell you what to do, it's completely up to you as an adult, but (in my opinion) just putting your head in the sand and doing nothing will not help you. But again, thanks for sharing your point and watching the video. 😁
@@futurefuelcafe you are welcome, thanks for the reply. My proficiency is hacking, there are things we know, things we know we do not know and then are things we do not know we know. but some of us do, it will be evident over time, why this is essentially smoke and mirrors with a Trillion dollar price tag I, they are not making any money so why do you think they are so persistent? There is SOME utility to GPT-based 'AI' But some ~2 yrs ago they did a Turing test pitting ChatGPT against ELIZA (1960's tech) and 60 year old 'AI' model did better at the Turing test. This you can find, what you will not find is the 'Why' Job displacement and layoff, is no accident, but as I said I don't support this tech, there is no reason, this will become clear soon enough, what I mentioned is what I can. I appreciate it but I am sorry, I cannot support this and I lost enough sleep over how sick and twisted this is, Remember what Oppenheimer said in his "I have become death" after he realized what he created. This will have the same outcome just far worse. Thanks
Do you think Kling AI is now the best AI Video Generator? 🧐
Very well explained. I will certainly try it out
Thank you, it's by far the best AI video generator that's been released yet (in my opinion)!
2 weeks from now : "Good bye to Kling AI!"... 4 weeks from now "Good bye WHATEVER AI"
I agree with you to some extent; the way it's moving, especially with AI Text-to-Video, is moving at a rapid pace. A few later, a new announcement of the latest AI software. How do you think it'll develop over the rest of the year?
Too bad we can’t pay yet for High quality mode I am waiting
I agree, I'm very intrigued to see what we can do with that. What do you think of Kling overall so far? 🤔
For your reference images and works that you use to create your images, do you pay the original creators for their creative work?
The example AI images I used from Leonardo AI are part of the user agreement (the creator mentioned in the video). However, for ethics, I delete the images afterwards as I won't use them and claim them as my own. The other images are my own generated images.
@@futurefuelcafe The pic at 12:20 is from the June 1985 cover of National Geographic Magazine. If you use a photograph taken by an actual photographer, how does that photographer get paid for their work being used to create an AI image?
@@80sFootballCards Correct, and I've used it under "Fair Usage" showing you what inspired the AI image I created through MidJourney. However, when creating that image in MidJourney, I didn't upload the "Afghan Girl" girl image to MidJourney for the AI tech to copy it; I only used prompts to describe what I wanted. So, I didn't use the photographer's image, compared to uploading the AI-generated image to Kling AI from Leonardo. These are 2 completely separate use case scenarios, and I've made sure to be ethical with usage in both, as I don't steal other people's work.
@@futurefuelcafe Cool! Thanks for explaining it that way. Hopefully most people using AI think to do the same.
@@80sFootballCards I hope so also! :)
LLMs at present... want guess how much Energy is required to train 'em? NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS, do you want to take a swing at the environmental impact as in CO2? likely not but when Generative AI have an energy demand so ridiculous and provided that Generative Pre-trained Transformers scale exponentially... do you not see how this is not SUSTAINABLE? There are countries that freeze to death which need not be the case... so you are telling me, in light of this fact you support this over humanity? No to worry, but see here is the thing, that is your choice.
But mark my words, this will fall apart, already the case and one day, 2 maybe 3 years from now many advocating / promoting this hype will face a mirror and it will go something like
"magic mirror on the wall it was a hype, all just a hype, and I fell for it all"
... Of course no disrespect, perhaps a foreshadowing of things to come ... and the research is there, it is conclusive, FinalSpark understands this well, and while they prefer 'wetworks' which have ethical implications, cybernetics is really the ONLY way they will achieve what 'AI experts' call 'AGI' these Sora AI is just a new toy, no real utility, but that is the whole point, keep 'em busy lest they know what WE ARE TRULY up to.
I do not support AI, nor cybernetics, see there are those who will get Neuralink, great, but then there are people like me, but unlike me these hackers will show how those with these implants did not get connectivity is bi-directional and who wants to be be a puppet, cause that is what highly skilled, BH Hackers will do, I have been around for 43 years, have four degrees and really, people need to make up their mind on this.
This is not a joking matter, and treating it as such, will change nothing, the outcome is as I said conclusive.
Hello, thanks for watching. You bring up some interesting points. I agree with some of them and the others not really.
I suggest you watch some of my other videos and podcast episodes where I talk about the real-life implications of AI and the effect it will have on humans, jobs, society, life, etc... (ua-cam.com/video/tdmZ5dOR2Zo/v-deo.html)
The way I view it is very simple, AI is coming whether I or anyone else likes it or not. No governments are asking our opinion about it or should we vote on it. You have only one of 2 choices, react and do something about it, or be replaced by AI.
As a professional, I advocate for using AI in a balanced, common-sense way so you can stay relevant and earn a living to provide for yourself, your family, etc... Again, I'm a massive believer in freedom of speech, and I will never tell you what to do, it's completely up to you as an adult, but (in my opinion) just putting your head in the sand and doing nothing will not help you.
But again, thanks for sharing your point and watching the video. 😁
@@futurefuelcafe you are welcome, thanks for the reply. My proficiency is hacking, there are things we know, things we know we do not know and then are things we do not know we know. but some of us do, it will be evident over time, why this is essentially smoke and mirrors with a Trillion dollar price tag I, they are not making any money so why do you think they are so persistent? There is SOME utility to GPT-based 'AI'
But some ~2 yrs ago they did a Turing test pitting ChatGPT against ELIZA (1960's tech) and 60 year old 'AI' model did better at the Turing test. This you can find, what you will not find is the 'Why'
Job displacement and layoff, is no accident, but as I said I don't support this tech, there is no reason, this will become clear soon enough, what I mentioned is what I can.
I appreciate it but I am sorry, I cannot support this and I lost enough sleep over how sick and twisted this is, Remember what Oppenheimer said in his "I have become death" after he realized what he created. This will have the same outcome just far worse. Thanks