I'm a retired police officer , and I am appalled by the ignorance of those officers, particularly the idiot who is allegedly a sergeant. He has no idea about the laws identifying 'suspects' and he has no idea of the laws relating the use of drones. The detention was completely unlawful, and well done to the cameras man for not providing his drivers licence. THE REAL PROBLEM TODAY IS THAT THE POLICE ARE TERRIFIED OF CAMERAS, AND CANNOT COPE WHEN LAW ABIDING MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC TELL THEM HOW THE LAW ACTUALLY WORKS. YET THE COURTS AND SENIOR POLICE MANAGEMENT HAVE STATED THAT PUBLIC PHOTOGRAPHY IS NOT ILLEGAL. YET THE MORONS EMPLOYED IN THE POLICE THESE DAYS CONTINUE TO BULLY THE PUBLIC BECAUSE THEY CANT GET THEIR OWN WAY. The sergeant had finally resort to apologising ,but then told the cameraman that he had to provide his 'permit ' for the drone within 7 days. The requirement to produce documents within 7 days applies to matter under THE ROAD TRAFFIC ACT . That sergeant is just another ignorant bully The other officer with him is nothing less that a prick with ears.
You claim to be a retired police officer, I highly doubt you was ever in the job. Your written skills are questionable to say the least, particularly when you have initiated a sentence, with the word - “Yet”.
nope , this is the cream of the crop they need people to bend the rules and intimidate the week and who fuels they ego by doing so until we are totally in fear and control.
The law is very clear on this. You only have to provide your details if you are being arrested or reported for an offense. Not giving your details is a secondary offense only, and cannot, alone, be the grounds for an arrest. It is not an offense in and of itself.
I haven't watched the full video yet but I think there is certain section were you after ID it doesn't matter if you've committed a crime I'm not sure it's section one of p.a.c.e..... I may get back to you later if I can find the comment again👍👍👍
@@kevgray. The precedent as already been set in 1966 and pace does not over rule what's set in a high court Rice v. Connolly (1966) is an English legal precedent holding that there is no strict, general legal duty to assist a police officer prior to any possible arrest or caution, with even basic police enquiries nor to accompany the officer to a requested location.
@@kevgray. fortunatly you only have to provide details to a Cuntstable if you are suspected, having or about to comit a crime. Unless they jam you up with Section 50 of PACE but they have to prove unsocial behavior for that one. If ever in dought dont say anything and dont provide anything but say very clearly and loudly that you do not wish to answer any futher questions withou your solicitor present and you would like to consult a solicitor before answering any questions then just repeat this each time you are asked somthing (its similer to pleading the 5th in america)
The first line of a police caution is "You do not have to say anything". So no you don't have to give your details if you've been arrested or suspected of any crime. We all have a common law right to remain silent, at all times.
@BeverlycandaceRose Well, the sad thing is, that Holland, being so ethnically and culturally close to the UK is under the German and French boots for decades, not to mention being bullied by the mere existence of this abomination called Belgium
Jesus christ ...... the PCSO handled the situation better than the alleged sergeant. This video is anprime example of where public money is being set on fire
Their arrest was purely retaliatory; they were frustrated you were pointing out their rules violations (cameras, etc.) and generally showing the world their abject ignorance of the laws they are supposed to enforce. So they put handcuffs on you, just to retaliate and humiliate you. Shameful behavior.
These police sadly have an institutional belief that people should instantly obey their rules and never bother to follow their own rules. That's disrespectful and drives a wedge between the police and the public. These officers approach was antagonistic based on assumption that any person with a camera is a foe..Assumption is fatal to any true investigator. The sergeant wasn't very bright (sorry) his communication skills dire and his knowledge of the law limited. The other officer is more problematic antagonistic, ill informed no people skills. He seems more suited to being a pub bouncer.
Basically coppers think, I'm telling you what to do. now do it. Purely a retaliation arrest. No grounds just because cameraman/drone flyer knows more about the relevant laws than the coppers.
Never been in trouble with the law in my life but at 51 years of age I was assaulted by a policeman in Oxford demanding my information and my phone details and home address over an alleged charge that wasn’t me, after bruising on my arm I wish now I had made a complaint against him, too late I guess but I no longer have respect for the police or the little bully boys that they enlist 👎
They should change the law so the arresting officer is personally liable in court proceedings against false arrest and such other mismanaged activity with the public.
@@paulfriend3190 As seen in recent court cases. Ex military myself. Never read about ignorant filth having to answer in court for their disgusting misuse of power in uniform.
That Sargent at 10:33 was an utter tool. From the moment he walked up it was obvious he would cause issues. His body and verbal language reeked of belligerence. Doesn't like being told no, and just can't help himself getting the last word in or being challenged. He says he didn't step over to you, but over the course of the first minute of you both talking about how long until you land he leans in, then shuffles up to you about 4 times, each time you step back and he does it again. Leans in to you, but then doesn't lean back, but shuffles forward. He's a liar, a creep, not listening to anything you say. Would probably gaslight anyone without cameras to cover his own arse. It's dangerous to put anyone like that in a position of power over anyone, the ignorance, combined with the belligerence, lack of self-awareness, propensity to lie, the constant passive aggressive tone, and the snap when he actually arrested you.... Get him away from any job with power or authority before he hurts someone!
4381 Sergeant didn't state that he was recording either (or did I miss that), he hardly looks at the info offered showing that flyer ID not needed, and says you are free to go, no issues but minutes later is arresting over same points already covered - not providing a flyer ID that was established as not needed. Bullying tactics and wrongful arrest.
He has about as much chance of understanding the law as he has of making a snowball from a bucket of sand. He’s a hopeless case and so is the other dope.
Well handled DJ, as per usual the police want to Gas Light. The Sargent didn't inform you if he was recording. Terrible handling of the situation. I hope you take it further and I wish you success.
Just a small point DJ --- The document you quoted from and highlighted states they 'SHOULD' verbally announce that they are recording" This seems to indicate a suggestion and not an order. An easy 'get out' for the cops if contested in a court, what it should say is 'MUST' rather than should......Just saying 🙂
This officer arrested you for not answering a question he didn’t actually ask you 😲 Absolutely ridiculous no wonder they sent these officers to stand in a field….
I am truly shocked at the appearance and demeanor of these officers. The PCSO was hopeless and made me cringe with embarrassment for him. The constable can only be described as slovenly in both his appearance and the way he dealt with you. He had his hands in his pockets while he spoke to you and completely lacked gravitas. The sergeant was just as woeful and seemed out of his depth over such a trifling matter. The whole interaction was pitiful. Is this really what the police force has turned into? Laurel and Hardy more like.
No accountability. No consquences. Weak leadership. Make a complaint and they move heaven and earth to protect their colleagues- all at the tax payers expense
It's like telling a 5 year old to be quiet for 2 minutes, it just never happens. I assume this type of bullying approach normally works for them, when it fails they are completely lost .
They are heading in the way of being totally lost to the public already. I reckon there is very little support in the population for their bully boy tactics. Most people I know have no respect for cops and not one of the people I know have any convictions. These cops do themselves no favours ever, however I doubt that they care about that any more than they care about the general public.
@@jamesleate disagree with your comment, I think he is polite and honest without be antagonising, and that something we don’t get from a very large percentage of police
What's worse is, every court in the land has already agreed that refusing to give details when not legally obliged to is [i] not an offence, and [ii] cannot be used as grounds for suspicion of an offence (Rice v Connally 1966). Therefore, the Officer is guilty of false imprisonment and assault (Section 39 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988) as the arrest was presupposed on a false premise.
@@m4rt1n0nY0utub3 Pedantic anorak steps in to defend pedantic anorak for being pedantic and wasting police time. "Yeah Cecil, teach that policeman that it is official policy to put the left handcuff on first. Let's waste everybody's time and complain about nothing,to prove we are "correct" which is important to us because we are pathetic, weak, gerbils of men who are at the very bottom of the gene pool. Being "correct" is all we have in our limp wristed, bespectacled, acne scarred, trainspotting, zeta male, brown cardigan wearing lives."
*THE SERGEANT WAS COMPLETLY CONFUSED AND SHOULD NOT BE IN A POSITION OF TRUST TO DEAL WITH THESE INTERACTIONS* *I FEEL THAT POLICE WHO DO WRONGDOING SHOULD BE PENALISED ,THIS WAY THEY WILL FINALY GET EDUCATED*
That's what you get with young'ns who are fast-tracked through the ranks. My understanding is if you join after leaving university, you are promoted every 2 years. Future of the police force is quite concerning. A danger to themselves and their colleagues.
Absolutely agree. As long as the police can get away with screwing up and then shrugging their shoulders nothing will change. The only way to penalise the police, meaningfully, is to hit them in the pocket. Set up a system whereby EVERY time a cop misunderstands a law or misapplies it, a report is raised and then then a suitably qualified expert is called in to provide training and then invoices the police authority at a suitable rate. After a couple of years of seeing millions spent on this training, high-ranking cops will start to realise the seriousness of the problem and will start instructing cops to NOT attempt to misapply laws or use inappropriate laws when dealing with the public.
@@anonomous8719 I'm a geologist, my mistakes can kill people and destroy lives. You are not allowed to make mistakes under the burden of public responsibility.
@@anonomous8719 Do the mistakes have consequences when they are to do with your employment? I know that in my job if I make a mistake I not only will be disciplined, I can be charged and taken to court and potentially be struck off the register and no longer allowed to work in my profession. Do you think police officers should be treated differently to the rest of us? In these cases it always seems to be about ego and power and the public not doing as they are told by what are basically bullies.
He did ask him for his details and he refused rewind it. He was kinda cocky in the video. But let's be honest I think most have problems because he's a Muslim.
@@shuggiemcg1 it’s an offence to fail to disclose your details when an officer asks you to do so. It’s the same whether it’s this scenario or you fail to respond to the police for a driving conviction. Etc
No the British police needs recruitment of decent British people. That pair of lowlivs didn't want to be trained, they just want to harrass those who arent't like them.
The sargeant has been promoted beyond the limit of his capability. He hasn't got a clue, he is arrogant and was determined to get you for something. Abuse of power and ignorance.
What a despicable set of officers, other than the PCSO, who was polite, but clueless. The first officer was an utter ignoramus and hostile. Adam the sergeant was completely clueless of the law and legislation, and incapable of making his request clear, resulting in miscommunication and an unwarranted arrest. They made the Keystone cops look good.
This is the one though, if you are paid by Google for the videos, technically it's a business which you need to declare to the HMRC. I imagine it's just a waiting game for them till they catch up in January for no filing of accounts.
@@AshMan-wn8fs so your assuming that dj earns a revenue from the video upload , not sure of anyone else’s but I have never seen an ad with djs videos . Might be nice to hear from dj if he does earn a revenue but I’m of the inclination he doesn’t .
This is an all too common thing now, that you don't actually deal with the police, you're dealing with their ego. They need way more reports against them.
Complaining won't make any difference unless it is deemed very serious, the Police hide behind PACE, the only way is to get your complaint "Heard” is get it to the Independent Office for Police Conduct even then it's an uphill battle, the only way to seek justice is in a civil court.
I've finally found out what the cordon was for after speaking to locals. A member of staff at the ASDA store nearby was seen to be moving several trays of doughnuts from the confectionery aisle to the reduced price shelves. The police were on it straight away, sealing off the area.
@@DJAUDITS Do not provide them with any ID in 7 days let them bring it to court, stand your ground 100% they are wrong in every way even if they arrest you again remain silent demand a solicitor and also do not inform them you know they are recording as not telling you and suddenly producing it in court as evidence will help your case massively and possibly make it inadmissible as evidence. This approach will aslo save you the cost of bringing them to justice for the false arrest and multiple assaults from using the handcuffs as the judge can make the decision in your favour there and then. Just remember to make the claims as detailed as possible to the judge (recompense for time spent kidnapped, for the assaults, mental impact of being arrested and everything else you can think of)
@chrispassmore4461 the crime committed isn't the fault of the general public mate. This could have been deescalated very quickly with decent conversation. Unfortunately the attitude of the police causes more problems than necessary.
@@JH24820 the assault is for unwanted touching as the officer arrested him for a non crime making it unlawful followed by a common law assault as he was outside of his scope as a police officer
The threat of arrest is an assault,the actual arrest is the battery. Then we have false imprisonment , unlawful arrest, possibly malfeasance in a public office.
Its shocking how little they know about law - but how eager they are to get violent ! Disgraceful, shameful employees - unemployable elsewhere, except in this sector, where ignorance, aggression and thuggery is encouraged ! Thats why the police are hated & despised !
What would be shocking is discovering a police officer with even a gcse level awareness of the law. Police do not uphold the law, do not serve & protect, do not act on their oaths....it is all a smokescreen to deflect attention from their true agenda which is as corporate errand boys.
I have to disagree. There are some fine police officers out there. Generally they seem not to be uniform wearing officers, but Serious Crime, Fraud, Anti-Terrorism, Special Branch etc. Do you take my point?
@@TheBeaumarisEcho - If they are 'Fine' then why aren't they exposing (& arresting) the law-breaking corrupt ones ??? That simple act of 'looking the other way' is negligence in itself !
I find it hard to think there is anyone that would look at the behaviour of those two fools and support them. The real problem is they are as thick a brick with little education or insight into how to treat people. Your knowledgeable and pleasant but firm approach they should consider and learn from. I hope you make a complaint to the CS.
policing has certainly changed, my old man was a sergeant and if he'd have turned up the copper would have been told to do some proper policework and the PCSO told to make some tea. Tragic
@@cowardsallaround98 Back in 08, Swindon police force, sorry service labeled it 'positive discrimination' when recruiting but wanting ethnic minorities to add to the diversity of local communities.
ALL CRIMINALS MUST BE BOUGHT TO JUSTICE NO MATTER WHAT UNIFORM OR BADGE THEY WEAR. Because of their incompetence these uneducated officers arrested a man for no crime or offence of any kind. The ONLY way these officers will learn is as a defendant in court. Please.
The arrest was presupposed on a false premise, i.e., unlawful. Which means the Officers are guilty of false imprisonment and assault under Section 30 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988. Whether they will be arrested and charged with these criminal offences is another matter.
@@juliandavies1974 Firstly, who is Banaman? Secondly, provided details when legally obliged to is what you, and everyone is supposed to do. He only declines to oblige the request when not legally obliged to.
@@juliandavies1974 Because Rice v Connolly 1966 means that citizens are free to go about their lawful business in public without fear of interference from the government in regards to who they are, or who they are associating with. RvC1966 means the Police cannot oblige you to provide your details unless you are arrested for an offence. Even PACE Section 24(5)(a) requires the presupposition of an offence, i.e., that a person has or is about to commit an offence, in order for the Police to arrest you to obtain your details as part of an investigation. This is tyranny: the government has powers to stop you and demand your details without a valid premise, i.e., suspicion of an offence. This is NOT tyranny: the government has no powers to stop you and demand your details without a valid premise, i.e., suspicion of an offence.
@@juliandavies1974 That's right. I've been watching audit videos for several years, heck i've been tempted to make my own, but i've never heard of anyone, in any auditing video, referred to as Bananaman. Could I prevail upon your good favour to elucidate further on who Bananaman is?
What is it with that fucking cop going on and on when asked, please stop talking to me I'm flying but he kept on doing it. And secondly what's with the childish attitude from the cops, fucking paranoid
I think its been going on for a long time, but now we see it on camera, what we did not before... IMAGINE all the unlawfull arrest was happening before cameras. It blows my mind to think, all the bullshit was happening before cameras.
@@DJAUDITStwo years ago I'm commenting on your videos..I said to you a year ago, that I've been following u since you STARTED ,your response was kind of like yea yea I'm sure, as maybe everyone tells u this..but I remember the very first week you came on here,I remember because of your tbh, jobsworth nature 😂 I remember watching u moaning for 20 mins to some police receptionist about the disabled chord in the toilets didn't reach the floor and went into all the legal and moral ramifications of such. I'm pretty sure u didnt do keyrings either.anyway I've just liked my 2 comments which u also liked , so u can see I wasnt just saying bs to appease the creator like some fanboy. I used to watch lots of audits once , my favourite as told u before being live free (Chris) I really miss his posts, I used to attend his lives online and spent 24hrs with him once when he went homeless in Birmingham (I think, could have been London) and the police gave him hassle. He travelled down there by getting a lift in the back of some random guys van. He was very much appreciative of having real members of the public along with him keeping a eye as it were and company. It was a great live and the amount of hassle, fun and good things were done..I was on live with him when he went to Wales to fight old matey which is what finished his channel and got him put in prison. I'd been on must have been over a hundred lives and u do get to become quite a part of what's going on as he obviously interacted with the viewers. Anyway , now I only watch you, dje and ab..that's it..keep up the good work..til the next comment. 😉😉😉
@@DJAUDITSoh and just having read that back - when I said about the toilets and the disabled chord I'm sure that wasn't at the start of your venture here but was just saying it's one I remember that gives a example of your approach and the reason I remember your channel differentiate from say someone else's. I'm not sure I've always had this picture on the left because a few year ago I had another channel , still sol-cutta but that one got wiped from UA-cam and I started this one. Anyway til next time...😏😉
Hi. I'd just like to commend you on how polite and assertive you were in your dealings with these Police. Basically, for decades the Police have been getting away with either making up the laws as they go along, abusing their authority, and ignoring their own responsibilities towards members of the public, while exploiting the assumed ignorance of the law from the public's perspective, and it's thanks to UA-camrs like yourself that have the patience and integrity to challenge them when they're in the wrong, legally, which is probably happening most of the time, I think. Terrorism laws are the only ones he could have used to arrest you under those circumstances, and they clearly didn't apply in that situation. PACE is regularly abused by the Police these days. Once you make any civil claim against the Police, I'm afraid you make yourself a target for the Police to abuse their authority against you, but I applaud you for keeping so calm with them. He was looking for any excuse to arrest you.
If that's the case, you become a target ,then that's the next step up,level ongoing bullying and intimidation and abuse of power. In other words corruption.
i sued the police for wrongful arrest and was compensated 2.500 pound over 27 yrs ago so your comment they will make your life hell you chatting bull shit as when i was pulled when they asked my name did a check they would do no further checking
Are we going to see more apologies issued by the head of policing for the area...this is becoming a regular thing at the moment. Police are making more and more mistakes and it is time they were brought to task.
@MartinSanders-ut9qqCorrect and illegally detained him at least 5minutes. Have seen other Auditors (mainly AB) then put in court case to claim compensation for being illegally detained, even if it's only a few seconds
@MartinSanders-ut9qq yeah. Thanks to auditors like DJ I’m definitely more comfortable knowing more about what’s legally expected of me as member of public. Before I’d happily give name etc but now know it’s not mandatory to do, unless you’re being detained. Even if detained you only need to tell your details and think have 48 hours to show driving licence (for driving offences) etc
@MartinSanders-ut9qq nice. I’m a very vanilla guy so shouldn’t be in situations like shown here but yeah definitely good to know more about what police can and can’t demand.
@@caolkyle Don't talk nonsense. AB has never brought a court case, and he has been compensated precisely once (probably for less than he claimed) because in most cases it's the policy of the police claims department to settle small claims, rather than going to the expense of letting a court decide, knowing that when the claimant loses, he won't have enough money to cover the costs of the case (or the wasted time of the officers involved.).
It started going down hill when the sargeant kept interupting you while flying the drone. When you told him you would "talk to him in 5 mins" he looked like you had slapped him round the face. He couldn't believe anyone would talk to him like that and his ego was destroyed. He tried everything after that jolt, even arresting you, which was totally over the top as well as illegal. The pair of them were rude, unprofessional and egotistical, a claim or complaint would definately be in order as these two jokers think they can carry on like this, one even said he DOSEN'T have to inform a member of the public when their bodycam is switched on, the other said they DO. It's the illegal arrest that i would not let slide.
In this instance the use of handcuffs was an assault, cuffs should only be used where the arresting officer has objective grounds for their use. In this case he is under no threat and the person being arrested has shown no indication they are likely to be a threat. No law has been broken so an arrest had no basis either, there was nothing handled correctly by the officer in this interaction.
@@schrodingerscat1863 agreed , it was a battery ,, PC needs 2 elements for lawful arrest,, both elements HAVE to be met then there is the "necessity criteria" 1 element is missing = "objective basis" = grounds before geetting to the "necessity criteria",, and yes PC needs "reflective practice" ASAP,, good to read your message has "common sense" all the best ,🙏
@@jamesleate Come on, be sensible. The Police obviously did not know what they were doing, immediately came in with the "Jack Boot" approach, Andrew unfortunately is typical of someone who believes they answer to no one and can do as he pleases because he is in uniform, and the Sergeant, who was a little more informed, kinda got himself into bother when he over stepped his knowledge. Police officers do a really difficult job, I know, I work with them on a daily basis, but being civil when being asked all the right questions by someone who clearly knows their rights is part of basic training. This whole incident should be used as an example to probationers as how "not" to conduct a contact in a public area. I will add, this is not how all officers act, there are indeed some excellent police officers out there.
@@theoldhobbit3640 This guy just winds up the police for no reason. If I beat him up, I guarantee he would go running to the Police for protection. Some anorak pedant annoying people trying to do their jobs is not in any way productive. He is wasting people's time and public money just to annoy people and make himself look clever in front of all the other trainspotters. He is an antisocial nuisance and should be locked up in a mental home. Little insignificant nobody trying to seem important, I can't help but hate the fool. I've been seriously stitched up by the Police in the past, very seriously, but I don't pretend for one second that we don't need the Police.
@@jamesleate That Sir, is your opinion and I respect that. As someone who just clicked on a video and seen what I saw, I would say he is justified in exposing the ignorance of some of those who are placed in places of authority. Incidentally, he has every right to report an assault and hopefully if he is dealing with a well balanced properly trained non egotistical officer, it will get handled correctly. All of us want to have confidence that those we call upon in or times of need are indeed true to their calling, but in many cases that is not what we find. No, I do not agree with those who would go out of their way to deliberately bait officers, but in this case the chap was well mannered, articulate and knowledgeable in the field of drone law and photography in a public place, the police were not. If he was seen to be interfering with an ongoing investigation or prohibiting or obstructing a police officer from carrying out their duties, then fair enough, but he was in the right on each occasion and embarrassed the officers on site. As you so rightly point out, what a waste of police time, however if they knew the law, then they did not have to attend based on the say so of the PCSO who clearly called it in.
@@jamesleate when has he ever said he has a dislike for police? This guy roams to different places to see how they react and if they speak to him with disrespect he will back to them. No laws are ever broken by him and you’re saying he deserves to be locked up...
PACE section 24(5)(a) gives the Police powers to arrest a person to obtain their details, or to confirm the correct details have been given. However, PACE 24(5)(a) is presupposed on PACE 24(1), 24(2), 24(3) and 24(4) which states that 24(5)(a) can only be used for an arrest if there a pre-existing reasonable suspicion that a person has, or is about to commit an office, e.g., the Officer suspects the person has committed theft, and wishes to obtain the person's details to determine if they are the person wanted for theft. The summary of this, is that it is only lawful to carry out an arrest to obtain details if there is an existing suspicion of an offence; however, refusing to give details in itself is not a valid premise to carry out an arrest to obtain details. Therefore, the arrest was presupposed on a false premise, which means the Officers carried out unlawful imprisonment and assault under Section 39 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988. Further, every court in the land has agreed that refusing to give details when not legally required to cannot be used as a premise for reasonable suspicion as a consequence of Rice v Connolly 1966; which, states that a person is not obliged to talk to the Police, or remain with the Police unless arrested. RVC1966 means that if the Police talk to you, you are free to walk away unless detained or arrested. In conclusion, unless you are arrested, you are not obliged to answer any questions from the Police. And, invoking the right not to answer questions cannot be used as a premise to suspect that person has or is about to commit an offence.
A professional and calm auditor who the police should learn some basic interpersonal skills from. The sergeant was out of his depth dealing with a man with a little (legal) plastic drone, so god help us if he has to deal with an actual crime (clearly the standards to join the police are dropping significantly). The auditor was falsely arrested and handcuffed for the crime of not providing his name/address when there were no grounds for providing his details because no crime/offence had been committed!!!
Its police basics that arrest for not giving details is not a standalone offence. The arrest is for the primary offence. This is so that police have reasonable suspicion that a person has committed an offence but they do not wish to make an immediate arrest. I know you understand but others don't.
damn...Ihope they wont be in cornwall,as i might get arrested,handcuffed and bundled into a cop car for flying my kite(no licence,insurance,tax or mot-it's a fair cop,cop.....) [-)
I watched for 5 minutes and couldn't watch any more as you came across as a pedantic, annoying asshole looking for an argument. I don't know what happened after that, so I can't comment.
@@freqeist Diane Abbott=James Abbott-Thompson, 28, was arrested on Friday afternoon last week after police were called to the Foreign Office in Westminster, . He was later charged with two counts of assault by beating an emergency services worker and a public order offence.
@@cedenullis5906 That's what you snowflakes want,Always ranting on about racism,Well put a few immigrants in the police to balance things up and now you snowflakes don't like it,You want better calibre people well not for £20,000+ you won't
You are under no obligation to help the police before or after an arrest. Rice v. Connolly (1966) is an English legal precedent holding that there is no strict, general legal duty to assist a police officer prior to any possible arrest or caution, with even basic police enquiries nor to accompany the officer to a requested location. Never talk to them
@@davidkn Incorrect, he was approached by a Police officer who started questioning him despite him saying that he's busy and the drone was in the air. The police are fault here but nice try Officer Knight!
I would still take it further. He was too quick to escalate the situation and put cuffs on you. For a SGT that is extremely poor. Needs demotion and further training.
It’s disgusting that we pay our taxes for a policing force that generally bully the public and are often not even well read around basic law - even when members of the public ARE well read and show the police the law they’re still breaking the rules of law (as in this case handcuffing and arresting this innocent person). I know this guy is a bit of a wind up at times but I admire what he’s doing to show the cracks in our policing.
Love how rattled he was getting. The arrest was done in a way (quickly grabbing your wrist and cuffing you) where he wanted you to instinctively react by either assaulting him or resisting. Fair play because you did neither. The only downside is the arrest rattled you enough to show your ID.
The policeman wasn't rattled at all. In fact things could have gone really badly with the attitude shown by DJ audit. He was lucky imho not to be detained for harassment or impeding an officer
He did a great job of being annoying and irritating and obstructive. A much better auditor would have simply and easily showed how incompetent the cops were. Sadly he just made himself look like the end of the bell. @@gibbs677bg
An unlawful arrest should have a heavy lawsuit against them. Make them think twice...50 thousand out of their own pockets each time they arrested unlawfully.
@@mrhairypalm5006 of course the case is held in a civil court…that’s obvious. However any compensation order against an individual officer is paid by the officer’s own force not the individual officer. If an individual officer had to pay potentially a million pounds out of his own savings there would be no police on duty! If you Google compensation claims against police officers in 2022 you will see how much each individual police force ….not any individual officers…..has paid. It totals £105 million. Do you really think that individual officers have paid £105 million from their own pockets?
@johnmanning5568 incorrect, the police force cannot help financially or legally their police officers who are taken by a member of the public to a civil court. And all fines are to be paid by the defendant as well as Solicitor's fees of both parties and court costs. I was taken to court by a police officer for swearing. And the judge ruled in my favour because it was an illegal detention and arrest. Because they cannot be offended When wearing a uniform. That's when you take it to civil court and you will win. I had a monthly check for 17 months off. That copper and it came out of his pay packet.
@@mrhairypalm5006 so you’re saying that the individual officers have paid £105 million out of their savings in the last five years. With respect you’re talking nonsense. How on Earth would you know it came out of his pay packet? That’s nonsense. The Police Officers Union would be a very weak union if it allowed its officers to be bankrupted every time there was a compensation claim.
@@tonygarlingewarren7456 I'm glad you typed "trying" to do their job. One without his card the next neglected to tell him he was filming (with his ego attitude) and the arresting officer oh hang on your not arrested now. Very trying.
It’s worse than just scraping the barrel because at one stage the sergeant did say he’s free to go. So if he was free to go then how suddenly has he got arrested when he could’ve left a long time ago ? The sergeant just changed his mind to suit himself right ?
It is also an offence for anyone to disturb you whilst drone is in the air, due to safety, as you are required to have eyes on drone at all times whilst it is flying. Tell them to wait until drone landed before speaking to you. Plod should also respect this. On CAA website.
Operatives can use handcuffs to control and limit the mobility of people who demonstrate severe aggression and greater risk. And also as a last alternative for individuals who fails to cooperate, And I totally agree that you were acting in a normal manner, this just shows the police abusing powers
This just shows they don't like being filmed so you have to wonder what they want to hide and not one of them know what the law is just a joke, well done fella keep it up and stay safe and thank you 👍👍👍🇬🇧
Don't the police just hate it when they come across someone who knows what they are talking about and come across who is assertive, you usually find that the police end up walking the walk of shame and they have to be corrected.
As some have already pointed out - R v Connelly 1966, the court held that members of the public are not obliged to reveal their identity to police simply because they want them, furthermore, refusing to engage with police cannot amount to a obstructing an officer in the course of their duty.
How pleased and satisfied Adam was to get your details. He took away your privacy and satisfied his fetish. He got his way by arresting you. It’s the pretence of friendliness that upsets me. The Corruption.
@Louis They train them to do the complete opposite they teach them to provoke intimidate and attack because soon as it gets a vague response or u hold ur hands up to shield yourself it then gives them the excuse to instantly jump on you and use physical force "for their own safety" lol its a scumbag tactic and very effective because its natrual to move back or try block or defend yourself in some way so it manipulates majority of people into making sudden slight movements which justifies them to then use force on you or detain you! Sadly de escalating isnt something they are expected to do as part of the job and as proven by sooo many experiments wearing a uniform and acting as part of a group makes people more likely to mistreat and abuse those not in uniform so they should be kept so much more under scrutiny than they are and be subject to regular exams psych testing and re humanizing excercises or breaks/time away to re humanise to ensure they maintain a healthy normal and fair mindset and dont just become a cog in the machine like is currently happening! I think this is a huge issue tbh
They're still at it, obviously I'm speaking from December 2023 and they have mistreated Tommy Robinson since then and allowed Hamas supporters to do what they want.
I am really happy that people like you spend the time and effort to test and measure the quality of our law enforcement. There has to be a more stringent approach on recruiting the right people into the police profession, maintaining their knowledge of the law and advising them how to interact properly with the public. We are witnessing repeated episodes of officers enforcing what they believe is the law, when they are clearly incorrect, encroaching on the rights of the public and exhibiting ego, rather than following clearly documented policy. I have always wanted to respect our police force - this was truly shattered after the disgusting crimes of Metropolitan Police officer Wayne Couzens and the tragic murder of the lovely girl Ms.Sarah Everard - who is the same age as my daughter. I keep hearing more and more examples of police officers who have behaved criminally and others who simply don't understand the law and hence have no real ability to enforce. It is surely time for a thorough overhaul of the service - also needed to protect the good and hardworking officers in the system. People like you help this process - sensible pressure needs to be applied from all angles to make our police service accountable and to become the ultimate example to the world of how this vitally important job should be done.
Another example of policing at its worst, this sergeant has no idea what he was talking about and needs serious re-education. Embarrassment to the force.
Some people will watch this and think DJ is just being awkward for the sake of it. I was one of them unfortunately. Recent events in this country try have demonstrated how important this work is highlighting the flawed training in the policing system. These coppers will be trying to arrest you for misgendering someone or telling jokes soon, know your rights, watch this space.
We should all know this 'stuff'. Being empowered pisses the police off, especially in the US where we have amendments or the bill of rights. I'm sure the UK has them too.
I'm a retired police officer , and I am appalled by the ignorance of those officers, particularly the idiot who is allegedly a sergeant.
He has no idea about the laws identifying 'suspects' and he has no idea of the laws relating the use of drones.
The detention was completely unlawful, and well done to the cameras man for not providing his drivers licence.
THE REAL PROBLEM TODAY IS THAT THE POLICE ARE TERRIFIED OF CAMERAS, AND CANNOT COPE WHEN LAW ABIDING MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC TELL THEM HOW THE LAW ACTUALLY WORKS.
YET THE COURTS AND SENIOR POLICE MANAGEMENT HAVE STATED THAT PUBLIC PHOTOGRAPHY IS NOT ILLEGAL.
YET THE MORONS EMPLOYED IN THE POLICE THESE DAYS CONTINUE TO BULLY THE PUBLIC BECAUSE THEY CANT GET THEIR OWN WAY.
The sergeant had finally resort to apologising ,but then told the cameraman that he had to provide his 'permit ' for the drone within 7 days.
The requirement to produce documents within 7 days applies to matter under THE ROAD TRAFFIC ACT . That sergeant is just another ignorant bully
The other officer with him is nothing less that a prick with ears.
Keeps trying to talk when he has been told 5 minuts.
Everybody is now fully aware that the police are not here for the good of the public. Something good came out of the pandemic.
You claim to be a retired police officer, I highly doubt you was ever in the job. Your written skills are questionable to say the least, particularly when you have initiated a sentence, with the word - “Yet”.
@@ste9071 your written skills are wonderful....
@@ste9071 I would suggest that you ensure your comments are written out properly before you decide to pass judgement on another persons literacy.
“I’ll talk to you in 5 minutes mate” - that was gold.
Using handcuffs on a person who hasn't committed to crime is an abuse of power and excessive force.
@@shredder1uk, prove it; don't just repeat an unsupported claim.
@@shredder1uk Exactly. 💪🏻
@@shredder1uk It's called "WRONGFUL ARREST" Chris with a compensation by Law payable to The Drone Pilot.
@@Biggles2498 CORRECT
@@shredder1uk incorrect
DJ : "five minutes and you can talk". Pause...pause... "so, do you live locally round here then?". Fell on floor laughing. Impeccable comic timing.
that moment was priceless
These 2 cops are really examples of police recruitment hitting the bottom of the barrel …
Absolutely, shameful toads
nope , this is the cream of the crop they need people to bend the rules and intimidate the week and who fuels they ego by doing so until we are totally in fear and control.
Low calibre pigs
@Tracy you fucking mutant 😂😂😂
YOU MEAN THE BOTTOM OF THE SEWER!
I can see why the station sent these Officers to stand in a field.
They are going to audition for worzel gummidge!!!
@@andrewstratford4753 Don't meet the qualifications or have the brain power. I think you just insulted scarecrows'
Shame they gave them a car for travel to & fro, bikes look more suitable, strong in the leg weak in the head....
Yep you plant turnips in a field to grow, would imagine the inspector was hoping they would grow brain cells.
The PCSO said they wanted more experience in the field. So voila , his wish was granted.🤗
The law is very clear on this. You only have to provide your details if you are being arrested or reported for an offense. Not giving your details is a secondary offense only, and cannot, alone, be the grounds for an arrest. It is not an offense in and of itself.
I haven't watched the full video yet but I think there is certain section were you after ID it doesn't matter if you've committed a crime I'm not sure it's section one of p.a.c.e..... I may get back to you later if I can find the comment again👍👍👍
@@kevgray. The precedent as already been set in 1966 and pace does not over rule what's set in a high court
Rice v. Connolly (1966) is an English legal precedent holding that there is no strict, general legal duty to assist a police officer prior to any possible arrest or caution, with even basic police enquiries nor to accompany the officer to a requested location.
@@MrPhiliphoward OK I'm still watching the video so bear with
@@kevgray. fortunatly you only have to provide details to a Cuntstable if you are suspected, having or about to comit a crime. Unless they jam you up with Section 50 of PACE but they have to prove unsocial behavior for that one. If ever in dought dont say anything and dont provide anything but say very clearly and loudly that you do not wish to answer any futher questions withou your solicitor present and you would like to consult a solicitor before answering any questions then just repeat this each time you are asked somthing (its similer to pleading the 5th in america)
The first line of a police caution is "You do not have to say anything".
So no you don't have to give your details if you've been arrested or suspected of any crime.
We all have a common law right to remain silent, at all times.
You are not required by law to carry any ID these cops need to learn the law.
The Netherlands require ID at all times when in public. Or a fine.
@BeverlycandaceRose But we're not in Holland
@@szymi97 well then your free from that.
@BeverlycandaceRose Well, the sad thing is, that Holland, being so ethnically and culturally close to the UK is under the German and French boots for decades, not to mention being bullied by the mere existence of this abomination called Belgium
Jesus christ ...... the PCSO handled the situation better than the alleged sergeant. This video is anprime example of where public money is being set on fire
Yeh and he was an absolute bumbling weapon. Atleast he was loveable in his idiocy though.
I'm just re-watching and that silly prick with the ginger beard that kept on pulling down his useless mask, he's obviously upset about being ginger.
Their arrest was purely retaliatory; they were frustrated you were pointing out their rules violations (cameras, etc.) and generally showing the world their abject ignorance of the laws they are supposed to enforce. So they put handcuffs on you, just to retaliate and humiliate you. Shameful behavior.
ye looked like a power trip to me.... showing who is in control.
Best part is when these mugs in costumes realise they need to de-arrest you😆
This is an everyday occurrence in the States. They are known as the “ Blue line of cowardice “.
I can’t believe they arrested you. They should know the law.
Why sit in their car ? So they have a right to do this ?!
These police sadly have an institutional belief that people should instantly obey their rules and never bother to follow their own rules. That's disrespectful and drives a wedge between the police and the public. These officers approach was antagonistic based on assumption that any person with a camera is a foe..Assumption is fatal to any true investigator. The sergeant wasn't very bright (sorry) his communication skills dire and his knowledge of the law limited. The other officer is more problematic antagonistic, ill informed no people skills. He seems more suited to being a pub bouncer.
Agree
that's an insult to doormen.
You will respect my authoriteh.
Basically coppers think, I'm telling you what to do. now do it.
Purely a retaliation arrest.
No grounds just because cameraman/drone flyer knows more about the relevant laws than the coppers.
Read my separate comment to DJ
Never been in trouble with the law in my life but at 51 years of age I was assaulted by a policeman in Oxford demanding my information and my phone details and home address over an alleged charge that wasn’t me, after bruising on my arm I wish now I had made a complaint against him, too late I guess but I no longer have respect for the police or the little bully boys that they enlist 👎
They should change the law so the arresting officer is personally liable in court proceedings against false arrest and such other mismanaged activity with the public.
Never gunna happen. It be like making soilders responsible. There's a reason why they don't.
@@ryanmac9628 soldiers are responsible.
@@paulfriend3190 As seen in recent court cases. Ex military myself.
Never read about ignorant filth having to answer in court for their disgusting misuse of power in uniform.
They arrested you. I'd be putting in a claim for that.
Sue those corrupt cretins for false imprisonment and abuse of power 🧐
@@grahampawson1502 people should just do what police officers tell them to do instead for arguing just makes it worse
@@taliamar8115 you my fellow human is what is wrong with this world if that's how you think things should go
@@taliamar8115like Sarah Everard did ?
No, @@taliamar8115 they are supposed to do what we need, not what they want. It's called policing by concent.
That Sargent at 10:33 was an utter tool. From the moment he walked up it was obvious he would cause issues. His body and verbal language reeked of belligerence. Doesn't like being told no, and just can't help himself getting the last word in or being challenged.
He says he didn't step over to you, but over the course of the first minute of you both talking about how long until you land he leans in, then shuffles up to you about 4 times, each time you step back and he does it again. Leans in to you, but then doesn't lean back, but shuffles forward.
He's a liar, a creep, not listening to anything you say. Would probably gaslight anyone without cameras to cover his own arse. It's dangerous to put anyone like that in a position of power over anyone, the ignorance, combined with the belligerence, lack of self-awareness, propensity to lie, the constant passive aggressive tone, and the snap when he actually arrested you.... Get him away from any job with power or authority before he hurts someone!
You describe the auditor perfectly!
4381 Sergeant didn't state that he was recording either (or did I miss that), he hardly looks at the info offered showing that flyer ID not needed, and says you are free to go, no issues but minutes later is arresting over same points already covered - not providing a flyer ID that was established as not needed. Bullying tactics and wrongful arrest.
How did he get to be a Sargent 😂
How many times does this cooper.have to be told..how dumb
Now the coooer is in the shit..😂😂😂
I felt sorry for Andrew, thought he was about to start crying. I hope he tries harder to get a grasp of the law.
He's a bellend
He has about as much chance of understanding the law as he has of making a snowball from a bucket of sand. He’s a hopeless case and so is the other dope.
i did not feel bad for him. He is an idiot
Just a PCSO, I give them benefit of the doubt usually they are clearly way under trained and just a cheap labour force for the police
Well handled DJ, as per usual the police want to Gas Light.
The Sargent didn't inform you if he was recording.
Terrible handling of the situation.
I hope you take it further and I wish you success.
These officers prove exactly why we need the auditors.
What a joke 😂😂
I still don't think it's the public duty to educate the wooden tops. Tell them as little as possible
Just a small point DJ --- The document you quoted from and highlighted states they 'SHOULD' verbally announce that they are recording" This seems to indicate a suggestion and not an order. An easy 'get out' for the cops if contested in a court, what it should say is 'MUST' rather than should......Just saying 🙂
Should: used to indicate obligation, duty, or correctness, typically when criticizing someone's actions.
@@rainbowdeep9234 It was clearly a typo, this isn't English class.
@@neil_mch -- yeah sure mate, there you go, off wit ya.
@@rainbowdeep9234Show me where my comment touched you.
FdX@@neil_mch
This officer arrested you for not answering a question he didn’t actually ask you 😲 Absolutely ridiculous no wonder they sent these officers to stand in a field….
I think they sent them to stand in a field BECAUSE nothing was happening there, they just wanted them out of the way of real policing.
I am truly shocked at the appearance and demeanor of these officers. The PCSO was hopeless and made me cringe with embarrassment for him. The constable can only be described as slovenly in both his appearance and the way he dealt with you. He had his hands in his pockets while he spoke to you and completely lacked gravitas. The sergeant was just as woeful and seemed out of his depth over such a trifling matter. The whole interaction was pitiful. Is this really what the police force has turned into? Laurel and Hardy more like.
No accountability. No consquences. Weak leadership. Make a complaint and they move heaven and earth to protect their colleagues- all at the tax payers expense
Sargent
It's like telling a 5 year old to be quiet for 2 minutes, it just never happens.
I assume this type of bullying approach normally works for them, when it fails they are completely lost .
They are heading in the way of being totally lost to the public already. I reckon there is very little support in the population for their bully boy tactics. Most people I know have no respect for cops and not one of the people I know have any convictions. These cops do themselves no favours ever, however I doubt that they care about that any more than they care about the general public.
@@davidlacey7982 This idiot just annoys people, he serves no purpose but to waste time and money for his sad little trainspotter ego.
@@jamesleate disagree with your comment, I think he is polite and honest without be antagonising, and that something we don’t get from a very large percentage of police
What's worse is, every court in the land has already agreed that refusing to give details when not legally obliged to is [i] not an offence, and [ii] cannot be used as grounds for suspicion of an offence (Rice v Connally 1966). Therefore, the Officer is guilty of false imprisonment and assault (Section 39 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988) as the arrest was presupposed on a false premise.
@@m4rt1n0nY0utub3 Pedantic anorak steps in to defend pedantic anorak for being pedantic and wasting police time.
"Yeah Cecil, teach that policeman that it is official policy to put the left handcuff on first. Let's waste everybody's time and complain about nothing,to prove we are "correct" which is important to us because we are pathetic, weak, gerbils of men who are at the very bottom of the gene pool. Being "correct" is all we have in our limp wristed, bespectacled, acne scarred, trainspotting, zeta male, brown cardigan wearing lives."
“BECOME A POLICE OFFICER TODAY” AD UNDERNEATH THIS VIDEO 🤣 THE IRONY 😩CANT MAKE IT UP
*THE SERGEANT WAS COMPLETLY CONFUSED AND SHOULD NOT BE IN A POSITION OF TRUST TO DEAL WITH THESE INTERACTIONS*
*I FEEL THAT POLICE WHO DO WRONGDOING SHOULD BE PENALISED ,THIS WAY THEY WILL FINALY GET EDUCATED*
analyzed ?
he ticks a box hence the problem of woke policing
That's what you get with young'ns who are fast-tracked through the ranks. My understanding is if you join after leaving university, you are promoted every 2 years. Future of the police force is quite concerning. A danger to themselves and their colleagues.
Diversity hire
Absolutely agree.
As long as the police can get away with screwing up and then shrugging their shoulders nothing will change.
The only way to penalise the police, meaningfully, is to hit them in the pocket.
Set up a system whereby EVERY time a cop misunderstands a law or misapplies it, a report is raised and then then a suitably qualified expert is called in to provide training and then invoices the police authority at a suitable rate.
After a couple of years of seeing millions spent on this training, high-ranking cops will start to realise the seriousness of the problem and will start instructing cops to NOT attempt to misapply laws or use inappropriate laws when dealing with the public.
Ilegal arrest , civil action required against the butt hurt inexperienced officer, retraining required
not retraining the sack required these illegal arrests have a huge impact on people's lives.
@@ianking8315 everyone makes mistakes
@@anonomous8719 I'm a geologist, my mistakes can kill people and destroy lives. You are not allowed to make mistakes under the burden of public responsibility.
@@anonomous8719 Do the mistakes have consequences when they are to do with your employment? I know that in my job if I make a mistake I not only will be disciplined, I can be charged and taken to court and potentially be struck off the register and no longer allowed to work in my profession. Do you think police officers should be treated differently to the rest of us? In these cases it always seems to be about ego and power and the public not doing as they are told by what are basically bullies.
@@anonomous8719 This wasn't a mistake, it was quite deliberate because their feelings and ego were hurt.
Illegal arrest and false imprisonment. An awful attitude from the SGT. He needs to be held accountable for his actions that day.
You need to learn the law.
He did ask him for his details and he refused rewind it. He was kinda cocky in the video. But let's be honest I think most have problems because he's a Muslim.
@@stinga_ was he obliged to give his details?? What crime did he commit?
@@shuggiemcg1 The drone he was flying has to be registered in his name as he states the law was changed in June.
@@shuggiemcg1 it’s an offence to fail to disclose your details when an officer asks you to do so. It’s the same whether it’s this scenario or you fail to respond to the police for a driving conviction. Etc
Gosh, this man is a supervisor also. What an absolute mess. Total shambles. No faith in these people, whatsoever. Total embarrassment to this country.
If I was fleeing a crime scene I'd choose Adam to chase after me.
Lol x
😂😂😂
Absolutely frightening. The British Police really need better training. How many times have they been told the law. That officer an embarrassment.
No the British police needs recruitment of decent British people. That pair of lowlivs didn't want to be trained, they just want to harrass those who arent't like them.
It's more than that, what's going on on this land???
The sargeant has been promoted beyond the limit of his capability. He hasn't got a clue, he is arrogant and was determined to get you for something. Abuse of power and ignorance.
Diversity promotion ... maybe ???
@@Jester-Riddle , either a racial bias or sexual orientation. Could be either.
seargeant comes from one of the low IQ races
That's the quota system for you rather than getting promoted on merit.
Agreed. He acted contrary to PACE Section 24(5)(a) and also contrary to Rice v Connolly 1966.
If you are locked in the back of a cop car, ie child locks, is that not unlawful imprisonment?
What a despicable set of officers, other than the PCSO, who was polite, but clueless. The first officer was an utter ignoramus and hostile. Adam the sergeant was completely clueless of the law and legislation, and incapable of making his request clear, resulting in miscommunication and an unwarranted arrest. They made the Keystone cops look good.
Press charges for assault and battery and false imprisonment . Disgusting actions by the officer
@@AshMan-wn8fs is dj audits a registered business and held to them them regulations ? Is the footage from the drone for commercial purposes ?
@Tom Foster dj doesn’t have to accept their offer , and if won at court ( yes more time consuming and difficult ) but a lot higher reward and result .
England’s finest , congratulations Cressida , you must be proud of these muppets.
This is the one though, if you are paid by Google for the videos, technically it's a business which you need to declare to the HMRC. I imagine it's just a waiting game for them till they catch up in January for no filing of accounts.
@@AshMan-wn8fs so your assuming that dj earns a revenue from the video upload , not sure of anyone else’s but I have never seen an ad with djs videos . Might be nice to hear from dj if he does earn a revenue but I’m of the inclination he doesn’t .
This is an all too common thing now, that you don't actually deal with the police, you're dealing with their ego. They need way more reports against them.
Ego world, culturally subverted ourselves
Yea spot on.
Complaining won't make any difference unless it is deemed very serious, the Police hide behind PACE, the only way is to get your complaint "Heard” is get it to the Independent Office for Police Conduct even then it's an uphill battle, the only way to seek justice is in a civil court.
Or alter ego in a few cases.
I get an impression from the second office he has no desire to serve the public, who happen to pay his wages, he wants to rule the public.!!
Badly trained, ill diciplined, rude, arogant, entitled, badly spoken police.
And then some 👍
These incompetent bullies are out of control. Disgusting use of the law.
Found your UA-cam a few days ago and now I am addicted! Keep up the good work .love your content.
I can not believe what's gone on DJ... Hope your safe and well matey.. Hope you will be making a complaint
when they put the handcuffs on him i bet pound signs were spinning on his eyes lol like a bandit machine
😂😂😂😂😂😂. Brilliant comment 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
I've finally found out what the cordon was for after speaking to locals. A member of staff at the ASDA store nearby was seen to be moving several trays of doughnuts from the confectionery aisle to the reduced price shelves. The police were on it straight away, sealing off the area.
🤣🤣🤣
@@DJAUDITS Do not provide them with any ID in 7 days let them bring it to court, stand your ground 100% they are wrong in every way even if they arrest you again remain silent demand a solicitor and also do not inform them you know they are recording as not telling you and suddenly producing it in court as evidence will help your case massively and possibly make it inadmissible as evidence.
This approach will aslo save you the cost of bringing them to justice for the false arrest and multiple assaults from using the handcuffs as the judge can make the decision in your favour there and then. Just remember to make the claims as detailed as possible to the judge (recompense for time spent kidnapped, for the assaults, mental impact of being arrested and everything else you can think of)
And i wonder which one ate all the evidence? Any clues? What do those masks hide?
Yes donoughs and filming police private vehicles seems to be about the only thing police respond to these days.
Doughnuts involved! I'm surprised they didn't cancel all police leave and have the helicopter up and dogs on the ground.
These cops waste ages with this useless activity. We are paying for them. When my house was broken into they did absolutely nothing.
Plonkers
Comparing a house break in with a crime scene when a woman was gang raped !
Comparing a house break in with a crime scene when a woman was gang raped !
@chrispassmore4461 the crime committed isn't the fault of the general public mate. This could have been deescalated very quickly with decent conversation. Unfortunately the attitude of the police causes more problems than necessary.
Looks like malicious arrest , or if not arrest just saying that is classed as assault .
Chick sat on my lap and I felt and smelt the fart do you think that was assault?
@@JH24820 what bs you chatting you absolute cabbage
@@JH24820 the assault is for unwanted touching as the officer arrested him for a non crime making it unlawful followed by a common law assault as he was outside of his scope as a police officer
The threat of arrest is an assault,the actual arrest is the battery. Then we have false imprisonment , unlawful arrest, possibly malfeasance in a public office.
@@JH24820 You wish.
They just wants to show us who´s in control, ignorance of those officers
Absolutely.
Its shocking how little they know about law - but how eager they are to get violent !
Disgraceful, shameful employees - unemployable elsewhere, except in this sector, where ignorance, aggression and thuggery is encouraged !
Thats why the police are hated & despised !
What would be shocking is discovering a police officer with even a gcse level awareness of the law. Police do not uphold the law, do not serve & protect, do not act on their oaths....it is all a smokescreen to deflect attention from their true agenda which is as corporate errand boys.
@@dyschromotopia 100% spot on comment
I have to disagree. There are some fine police officers out there. Generally they seem not to be uniform wearing officers, but Serious Crime, Fraud, Anti-Terrorism, Special Branch etc. Do you take my point?
@@TheBeaumarisEcho - If they are 'Fine' then why aren't they exposing (& arresting) the law-breaking corrupt ones ???
That simple act of 'looking the other way' is negligence in itself !
DJ agreed with their interpretation of the law because he gave his details.
I find it hard to think there is anyone that would look at the behaviour of those two fools and support them. The real problem is they are as thick a brick with little education or insight into how to treat people. Your knowledgeable and pleasant but firm approach they should consider and learn from. I hope you make a complaint to the CS.
Respect man, consistently good even when arrested
He couldn't wait to put the cuff on ,mommy mommy I did it I did it I used my bracelets I mean handcuffs.. Priceless
policing has certainly changed, my old man was a sergeant and if he'd have turned up the copper would have been told to do some proper policework and the PCSO told to make some tea. Tragic
All cops are pigs simple
@@cowardsallaround98 Real school policing died out in years early 90's. It's all about meeting a quota system now and the softly softly approach.
@@cowardsallaround98 Back in 08, Swindon police force, sorry service labeled it 'positive discrimination' when recruiting but wanting ethnic minorities to add to the diversity of local communities.
@@cowardsallaround98 Denial: the action of denying something.
ALL CRIMINALS MUST BE BOUGHT TO JUSTICE NO MATTER WHAT UNIFORM OR BADGE THEY WEAR. Because of their incompetence these uneducated officers arrested a man for no crime or offence of any kind. The ONLY way these officers will learn is as a defendant in court. Please.
The arrest was presupposed on a false premise, i.e., unlawful. Which means the Officers are guilty of false imprisonment and assault under Section 30 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988.
Whether they will be arrested and charged with these criminal offences is another matter.
@@juliandavies1974 Firstly, who is Banaman?
Secondly, provided details when legally obliged to is what you, and everyone is supposed to do. He only declines to oblige the request when not legally obliged to.
@@juliandavies1974 Because Rice v Connolly 1966 means that citizens are free to go about their lawful business in public without fear of interference from the government in regards to who they are, or who they are associating with. RvC1966 means the Police cannot oblige you to provide your details unless you are arrested for an offence.
Even PACE Section 24(5)(a) requires the presupposition of an offence, i.e., that a person has or is about to commit an offence, in order for the Police to arrest you to obtain your details as part of an investigation.
This is tyranny: the government has powers to stop you and demand your details without a valid premise, i.e., suspicion of an offence.
This is NOT tyranny: the government has no powers to stop you and demand your details without a valid premise, i.e., suspicion of an offence.
@@juliandavies1974 That's right. I've been watching audit videos for several years, heck i've been tempted to make my own, but i've never heard of anyone, in any auditing video, referred to as Bananaman.
Could I prevail upon your good favour to elucidate further on who Bananaman is?
@@juliandavies1974 Oh that.
This is a perfect example why the public does not trust the police any longer.
What is it with that fucking cop going on and on when asked, please stop talking to me I'm flying but he kept on doing it. And secondly what's with the childish attitude from the cops, fucking paranoid
@@wix7657 Right on Bro
@@cryptonewbie3699 I like bacon
@@wix7657 Sadly, that is true.
I think its been going on for a long time, but now we see it on camera, what we did not before... IMAGINE all the unlawfull arrest was happening before cameras. It blows my mind to think, all the bullshit was happening before cameras.
Police trying to claw back some status by arresting DJ. Pure ego only
Thanks to DJ and AB I was able to hold my own last night against 2 officers who wanted to stitch me up by "helping me" 👍
That's so nice to hear. Well done Winston. 👍
AB seems extremely passive aggressive towards immigrants.
@@DJAUDITStwo years ago I'm commenting on your videos..I said to you a year ago, that I've been following u since you STARTED ,your response was kind of like yea yea I'm sure, as maybe everyone tells u this..but I remember the very first week you came on here,I remember because of your tbh, jobsworth nature 😂 I remember watching u moaning for 20 mins to some police receptionist about the disabled chord in the toilets didn't reach the floor and went into all the legal and moral ramifications of such. I'm pretty sure u didnt do keyrings either.anyway I've just liked my 2 comments which u also liked , so u can see I wasnt just saying bs to appease the creator like some fanboy. I used to watch lots of audits once , my favourite as told u before being live free (Chris) I really miss his posts, I used to attend his lives online and spent 24hrs with him once when he went homeless in Birmingham (I think, could have been London) and the police gave him hassle. He travelled down there by getting a lift in the back of some random guys van. He was very much appreciative of having real members of the public along with him keeping a eye as it were and company. It was a great live and the amount of hassle, fun and good things were done..I was on live with him when he went to Wales to fight old matey which is what finished his channel and got him put in prison. I'd been on must have been over a hundred lives and u do get to become quite a part of what's going on as he obviously interacted with the viewers. Anyway , now I only watch you, dje and ab..that's it..keep up the good work..til the next comment.
😉😉😉
@@DJAUDITSoh and just having read that back - when I said about the toilets and the disabled chord I'm sure that wasn't at the start of your venture here but was just saying it's one I remember that gives a example of your approach and the reason I remember your channel differentiate from say someone else's. I'm not sure I've always had this picture on the left because a few year ago I had another channel , still sol-cutta but that one got wiped from UA-cam and I started this one. Anyway til next time...😏😉
Hi. I'd just like to commend you on how polite and assertive you were in your dealings with these Police. Basically, for decades the Police have been getting away with either making up the laws as they go along, abusing their authority, and ignoring their own responsibilities towards members of the public, while exploiting the assumed ignorance of the law from the public's perspective, and it's thanks to UA-camrs like yourself that have the patience and integrity to challenge them when they're in the wrong, legally, which is probably happening most of the time, I think. Terrorism laws are the only ones he could have used to arrest you under those circumstances, and they clearly didn't apply in that situation. PACE is regularly abused by the Police these days.
Once you make any civil claim against the Police, I'm afraid you make yourself a target for the Police to abuse their authority against you, but I applaud you for keeping so calm with them. He was looking for any excuse to arrest you.
If that's the case, you become a target ,then that's the next step up,level ongoing bullying and intimidation and abuse of power. In other words corruption.
i sued the police for wrongful arrest and was compensated 2.500 pound over 27 yrs ago so your comment they will make your life hell you chatting bull shit as when i was pulled when they asked my name did a check they would do no further checking
You don't have to give any details to the police or be arrested unless they suspect you in commiting a crime.
which they did and he still didn't give them info
@@cheeseyman1 I'm pretty sure he gave them a photo of his passport.
@@rorybrowne4973 indeed he did. he caved in. shame
You're guilty till proven innocent with this crowd these days
He did commit a crime so he is required by law to ID himself, you clueless fool
Just a note, "should" by law is not the same as "must".
That officer’s feelings were hurt because the auditor knew more about the law than he did and made him look foolish.
This is why they don't attend burglaries any more, pissing about wasting time bothering this bloke
Are we going to see more apologies issued by the head of policing for the area...this is becoming a regular thing at the moment.
Police are making more and more mistakes and it is time they were brought to task.
The box ticker sergeant is one of the best examples why they made him a sergeant as he clearly didn't become one through intelligence.
@MartinSanders-ut9qqCorrect and illegally detained him at least 5minutes. Have seen other Auditors (mainly AB) then put in court case to claim compensation for being illegally detained, even if it's only a few seconds
@MartinSanders-ut9qq yeah. Thanks to auditors like DJ I’m definitely more comfortable knowing more about what’s legally expected of me as member of public.
Before I’d happily give name etc but now know it’s not mandatory to do, unless you’re being detained. Even if detained you only need to tell your details and think have 48 hours to show driving licence (for driving offences) etc
@MartinSanders-ut9qq nice. I’m a very vanilla guy so shouldn’t be in situations like shown here but yeah definitely good to know more about what police can and can’t demand.
Bet he wouldn't have treated one of his own "brothers" like that. Makes me sick.
@@caolkyle Don't talk nonsense. AB has never brought a court case, and he has been compensated precisely once (probably for less than he claimed) because in most cases it's the policy of the police claims department to settle small claims, rather than going to the expense of letting a court decide, knowing that when the claimant loses, he won't have enough money to cover the costs of the case (or the wasted time of the officers involved.).
The funny bit is she is actually assuming the role of the police telling the cyclist she cant go that way hahaha
It started going down hill when the sargeant kept interupting you while flying the drone. When you told him you would "talk to him in 5 mins" he looked like you had slapped him round the face. He couldn't believe anyone would talk to him like that and his ego was destroyed. He tried everything after that jolt, even arresting you, which was totally over the top as well as illegal. The pair of them were rude, unprofessional and egotistical, a claim or complaint would definately be in order as these two jokers think they can carry on like this, one even said he DOSEN'T have to inform a member of the public when their bodycam is switched on, the other said they DO. It's the illegal arrest that i would not let slide.
It's so great that DJ is clude up on the police policys , great mannered man well done get them reported asap !!!
Well done to inform us what happened. You can write a book now. Haha inspired in your imagination.
@@ruthmaldonadoponton1189 What ???
Not me either 👍
Let it slide☝
Police were exceptionally unprofessional, using cuffs as a first resort is always a sign that it’s purely a power trip
Culturally incompatible.
@@sirvivor7835 you know 👍🏻
In this instance the use of handcuffs was an assault, cuffs should only be used where the arresting officer has objective grounds for their use. In this case he is under no threat and the person being arrested has shown no indication they are likely to be a threat. No law has been broken so an arrest had no basis either, there was nothing handled correctly by the officer in this interaction.
@@schrodingerscat1863 agreed , it was a battery ,, PC needs 2 elements for lawful arrest,, both elements HAVE to be met then there is the "necessity criteria" 1 element is missing = "objective basis" = grounds before geetting to the "necessity criteria",, and yes PC needs "reflective practice" ASAP,, good to read your message has "common sense" all the best ,🙏
Unfit to be officers 👮♀️
The Sergeant realised he had messed up after he'd arrested you. You should follow up on this and file a claim.
Yeah, brilliant idea waste more police time and precious court time for an anorak pedant who was just trying to annoy everyone to feel important.
@@jamesleate Come on, be sensible. The Police obviously did not know what they were doing, immediately came in with the "Jack Boot" approach, Andrew unfortunately is typical of someone who believes they answer to no one and can do as he pleases because he is in uniform, and the Sergeant, who was a little more informed, kinda got himself into bother when he over stepped his knowledge. Police officers do a really difficult job, I know, I work with them on a daily basis, but being civil when being asked all the right questions by someone who clearly knows their rights is part of basic training. This whole incident should be used as an example to probationers as how "not" to conduct a contact in a public area. I will add, this is not how all officers act, there are indeed some excellent police officers out there.
@@theoldhobbit3640 This guy just winds up the police for no reason. If I beat him up, I guarantee he would go running to the Police for protection.
Some anorak pedant annoying people trying to do their jobs is not in any way productive. He is wasting people's time and public money just to annoy people and make himself look clever in front of all the other trainspotters.
He is an antisocial nuisance and should be locked up in a mental home. Little insignificant nobody trying to seem important, I can't help but hate the fool.
I've been seriously stitched up by the Police in the past, very seriously, but I don't pretend for one second that we don't need the Police.
@@jamesleate That Sir, is your opinion and I respect that. As someone who just clicked on a video and seen what I saw, I would say he is justified in exposing the ignorance of some of those who are placed in places of authority. Incidentally, he has every right to report an assault and hopefully if he is dealing with a well balanced properly trained non egotistical officer, it will get handled correctly. All of us want to have confidence that those we call upon in or times of need are indeed true to their calling, but in many cases that is not what we find. No, I do not agree with those who would go out of their way to deliberately bait officers, but in this case the chap was well mannered, articulate and knowledgeable in the field of drone law and photography in a public place, the police were not. If he was seen to be interfering with an ongoing investigation or prohibiting or obstructing a police officer from carrying out their duties, then fair enough, but he was in the right on each occasion and embarrassed the officers on site. As you so rightly point out, what a waste of police time, however if they knew the law, then they did not have to attend based on the say so of the PCSO who clearly called it in.
@@jamesleate when has he ever said he has a dislike for police? This guy roams to different places to see how they react and if they speak to him with disrespect he will back to them. No laws are ever broken by him and you’re saying he deserves to be locked up...
They claim that you're not detained, then later handcuff you, such consistency.
being arrested is unlawful if you havnt done anything wrong
Don't worry, the police are very good at thinking stuff up, they're sure to find something.
PACE section 24(5)(a) gives the Police powers to arrest a person to obtain their details, or to confirm the correct details have been given.
However, PACE 24(5)(a) is presupposed on PACE 24(1), 24(2), 24(3) and 24(4) which states that 24(5)(a) can only be used for an arrest if there a pre-existing reasonable suspicion that a person has, or is about to commit an office, e.g., the Officer suspects the person has committed theft, and wishes to obtain the person's details to determine if they are the person wanted for theft.
The summary of this, is that it is only lawful to carry out an arrest to obtain details if there is an existing suspicion of an offence; however, refusing to give details in itself is not a valid premise to carry out an arrest to obtain details. Therefore, the arrest was presupposed on a false premise, which means the Officers carried out unlawful imprisonment and assault under Section 39 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988.
Further, every court in the land has agreed that refusing to give details when not legally required to cannot be used as a premise for reasonable suspicion as a consequence of Rice v Connolly 1966; which, states that a person is not obliged to talk to the Police, or remain with the Police unless arrested. RVC1966 means that if the Police talk to you, you are free to walk away unless detained or arrested.
In conclusion, unless you are arrested, you are not obliged to answer any questions from the Police. And, invoking the right not to answer questions cannot be used as a premise to suspect that person has or is about to commit an offence.
@@m4rt1n0nY0utub3 good info thank you
@@townseydroidborleyboy8024 👍
The filth do this on a daily basis
A professional and calm auditor who the police should learn some basic interpersonal skills from. The sergeant was out of his depth dealing with a man with a little (legal) plastic drone, so god help us if he has to deal with an actual crime (clearly the standards to join the police are dropping significantly). The auditor was falsely arrested and handcuffed for the crime of not providing his name/address when there were no grounds for providing his details because no crime/offence had been committed!!!
Its police basics that arrest for not giving details is not a standalone offence. The arrest is for the primary offence. This is so that police have reasonable suspicion that a person has committed an offence but they do not wish to make an immediate arrest. I know you understand but others don't.
damn...Ihope they wont be in cornwall,as i might get arrested,handcuffed and bundled into a cop car for flying my kite(no licence,insurance,tax or mot-it's a fair cop,cop.....) [-)
I watched for 5 minutes and couldn't watch any more as you came across as a pedantic, annoying asshole looking for an argument. I don't know what happened after that, so I can't comment.
@@ARC_1969 Just do as you are told.
@@ronburden7236 ay be quiet,, or you,l may have to get a licence,,, shhhhhhh, jokeing,
What a waste of time. These police have nothing else to do then arrest a man with a toy.
@inowiamgoodlooking10 They were probably bored with scanning Facebook accounts looking for non crime hate comments.
This is what happens when you box tick. Calling a member of the public 'man'.
This is the weirdest arrest I've ever seen, complete amateur, unbelievable.
This is what you get when the police recruit illiterate ethnic immigrants, otherwise known as ‘box tickers’ into the Civil police.
uniform??
PC_amjad__Ditta, Yorkshire POL!CEman in Court soon
@@benlotus2703 its not him is it?
@@freqeist Diane Abbott=James Abbott-Thompson, 28, was arrested on Friday afternoon last week after police were called to the Foreign Office in Westminster, .
He was later charged with two counts of assault by beating an emergency services worker and a public order offence.
@@cedenullis5906 That's what you snowflakes want,Always ranting on about racism,Well put a few immigrants in the police to balance things up and now you snowflakes don't like it,You want better calibre people well not for £20,000+ you won't
You are under no obligation to help the police before or after an arrest. Rice v. Connolly (1966) is an English legal precedent holding that there is no strict, general legal duty to assist a police officer prior to any possible arrest or caution, with even basic police enquiries nor to accompany the officer to a requested location. Never talk to them
Nice one DJ....well done with the calm way you tried to educate the constables about what is required of them.
How embarrassing the auditor knows the law on filming than the police officer.
What a dirty way to get someone's id when they know you don't have to give it corrupt cops
Here in America, interfering with a drone pilot while drone is in the air, is a federal crime just like interfering with an airplane pilot.
@@davidkn Incorrect, he was approached by a Police officer who started questioning him despite him saying that he's busy and the drone was in the air. The police are fault here but nice try Officer Knight!
@@davidkn If the police approached him, they took his attention away from flying. That should be the crime.
I would still take it further. He was too quick to escalate the situation and put cuffs on you. For a SGT that is extremely poor. Needs demotion and further training.
That Sgt needs to find himself on the wrong end of a personal legal claim and be reported to his Chief Constable for committing offences himself !
Demotion and then fired.
needs firing. not retraining!
It’s disgusting that we pay our taxes for a policing force that generally bully the public and are often not even well read around basic law - even when members of the public ARE well read and show the police the law they’re still breaking the rules of law (as in this case handcuffing and arresting this innocent person). I know this guy is a bit of a wind up at times but I admire what he’s doing to show the cracks in our policing.
Love how rattled he was getting. The arrest was done in a way (quickly grabbing your wrist and cuffing you) where he wanted you to instinctively react by either assaulting him or resisting. Fair play because you did neither.
The only downside is the arrest rattled you enough to show your ID.
The policeman wasn't rattled at all. In fact things could have gone really badly with the attitude shown by DJ audit. He was lucky imho not to be detained for harassment or impeding an officer
@@mymobile5014 Harassment? 😅🤣😂 Clearly you're one of the gang. DJ Audit done a great job of proving how little the police actually know about the law.
He did a great job of being annoying and irritating and obstructive. A much better auditor would have simply and easily showed how incompetent the cops were. Sadly he just made himself look like the end of the bell. @@gibbs677bg
@mymobile5014 what force you work for baconboy?
@@mymobile5014That’s the dumbest comment on this video. Well done. 😂
An unlawful arrest should have a heavy lawsuit against them.
Make them think twice...50 thousand out of their own pockets each time they arrested unlawfully.
Unfortunately they don’t pay any law suit out of their own pocket. You pay it yourself as a tax payer.
@@johnmanning5568Yeah, that's why you take them to civil court. They have to pay out of their own pocket.
@@mrhairypalm5006 of course the case is held in a civil court…that’s obvious. However any compensation order against an individual officer is paid by the officer’s own force not the individual officer. If an individual officer had to pay potentially a million pounds out of his own savings there would be no police on duty! If you Google compensation claims against police officers in 2022 you will see how much each individual police force ….not any individual officers…..has paid. It totals £105 million. Do you really think that individual officers have paid £105 million from their own pockets?
@johnmanning5568 incorrect, the police force cannot help financially or legally their police officers who are taken by a member of the public to a civil court. And all fines are to be paid by the defendant as well as Solicitor's fees of both parties and court costs. I was taken to court by a police officer for swearing. And the judge ruled in my favour because it was an illegal detention and arrest. Because they cannot be offended When wearing a uniform. That's when you take it to civil court and you will win. I had a monthly check for 17 months off. That copper and it came out of his pay packet.
@@mrhairypalm5006 so you’re saying that the individual officers have paid £105 million out of their savings in the last five years. With respect you’re talking nonsense. How on Earth would you know it came out of his pay packet? That’s nonsense. The Police Officers Union would be a very weak union if it allowed its officers to be bankrupted every time there was a compensation claim.
I can’t believe they handcuffed you in this situation. Very well handled and entertaining video.
This was about power and control for the police
He's a very entertaining busybody.
@@dtz1000 I imagine he'd rather be both than neither, you sound like a nob mate
@@laurarules3642 it was cowardice thru and thru.
This was the first dj audits video I watched 2 years ago since I subscribed here thanks for the keyring m8
DJ, you are by far one of the best. You are intelligent, interesting, knowledgeable and bloody entertaining. So glad I found your channel
You've wrote this before. I'm glad FJ saw your comment eventually.
He's not intelligent he just likes to antagonise people trying to do their job, may be he need a hobby. Like watching paint dry
Tony needs to put his uniform away
That's nice.....
@@tonygarlingewarren7456 I'm glad you typed "trying" to do their job.
One without his card the next neglected to tell him he was filming (with his ego attitude) and the arresting officer oh hang on your not arrested now.
Very trying.
How he is a Sargent, just shows the state of the police. They are really scraping the barrel these days
It’s worse than just scraping the barrel because at one stage the sergeant did say he’s free to go.
So if he was free to go then how suddenly has he got arrested when he could’ve left a long time ago ?
The sergeant just changed his mind to suit himself right ?
The “ Barrel of cowardice “
Right colour
@@junelawson5100 racist b*tch they don't pick based on colour, shows you are a moron with a sad comment like that.
It is also an offence for anyone to disturb you whilst drone is in the air, due to safety, as you are required to have eyes on drone at all times whilst it is flying. Tell them to wait until drone landed before speaking to you. Plod should also respect this. On CAA website.
This country has got a knack of making you pay out money no matter what your involved with .
I love how you’re so polite, all the other auditors would have been gobbing off. Keep up the good work.
Nah.
"Yeah you keep asking but you're not gonna be told, are ya?"
= Gobbing off "auditor" 🤣
Operatives can use handcuffs to control and limit the mobility of people who demonstrate severe aggression and greater risk. And also as a last alternative for individuals who fails to cooperate,
And I totally agree that you were acting in a normal manner, this just shows the police abusing powers
Ye, he couldn't wait to get his handcuffs out and arrest him. I bet he felt superior
Maybe wanting promotion!😂😂😂😂
This just shows they don't like being filmed so you have to wonder what they want to hide and not one of them know what the law is just a joke, well done fella keep it up and stay safe and thank you 👍👍👍🇬🇧
Police officer punctuates his sentences with a 'yeah'. How very professional!
I like your politeness DJ.
I also like the way you don't let them distract you by them trying to change the subject.
Don't the police just hate it when they come across someone who knows what they are talking about and come across who is assertive, you usually find that the police end up walking the walk of shame and they have to be corrected.
Clown.
As some have already pointed out - R v Connelly 1966, the court held that members of the public are not obliged to reveal their identity to police simply because they want them, furthermore, refusing to engage with police cannot amount to a obstructing an officer in the course of their duty.
DJ Audits! You are an incredible auditor. I cringe at some of the uncomfortable conversations, but they are absolutely necessary.
How pleased and satisfied Adam was to get your details. He took away your privacy and satisfied his fetish. He got his way by arresting you. It’s the pretence of friendliness that upsets me. The Corruption.
The cowardice
Sue them ?
@@stephencollins9062 not an easy thing.
@Louis They train them to do the complete opposite they teach them to provoke intimidate and attack because soon as it gets a vague response or u hold ur hands up to shield yourself it then gives them the excuse to instantly jump on you and use physical force "for their own safety" lol its a scumbag tactic and very effective because its natrual to move back or try block or defend yourself in some way so it manipulates majority of people into making sudden slight movements which justifies them to then use force on you or detain you! Sadly de escalating isnt something they are expected to do as part of the job and as proven by sooo many experiments wearing a uniform and acting as part of a group makes people more likely to mistreat and abuse those not in uniform so they should be kept so much more under scrutiny than they are and be subject to regular exams psych testing and re humanizing excercises or breaks/time away to re humanise to ensure they maintain a healthy normal and fair mindset and dont just become a cog in the machine like is currently happening! I think this is a huge issue tbh
Yea...probably rubbed them into his crotch 🐷👮😆
I really enjoy how polite Brits are. The West isn’t even close to being as polite as you guys are. I’m speaking in general terms obviously.
After the last two years of excessive police enforcement and emergency powers we need to keep the police informed
They're still at it, obviously I'm speaking from December 2023 and they have mistreated Tommy Robinson since then and allowed Hamas supporters to do what they want.
Well done mate! You held your ground nicely with knowledge and respect.....that takes courage!
Are you kidding, he folded like a cheap suit.
@@guckfoogle1096 Like to see you deal with it! HAHA 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
I am really happy that people like you spend the time and effort to test and measure the quality of our law enforcement. There has to be a more stringent approach on recruiting the right people into the police profession, maintaining their knowledge of the law and advising them how to interact properly with the public. We are witnessing repeated episodes of officers enforcing what they believe is the law, when they are clearly incorrect, encroaching on the rights of the public and exhibiting ego, rather than following clearly documented policy. I have always wanted to respect our police force - this was truly shattered after the disgusting crimes of Metropolitan Police officer Wayne Couzens and the tragic murder of the lovely girl Ms.Sarah Everard - who is the same age as my daughter. I keep hearing more and more examples of police officers who have behaved criminally and others who simply don't understand the law and hence have no real ability to enforce. It is surely time for a thorough overhaul of the service - also needed to protect the good and hardworking officers in the system. People like you help this process - sensible pressure needs to be applied from all angles to make our police service accountable and to become the ultimate example to the world of how this vitally important job should be done.
agreed another example of lies and incompetence by the UK police...country's turning into Venezuela
Culdnt agree more as sum1 who now has 6 civil claims in against Durham police SYP BTP LIDL LNER SCOTRIAL and others FOOTAGE 2 FOLLOW
Spot n ❤
Another example of policing at its worst, this sergeant has no idea what he was talking about and needs serious re-education. Embarrassment to the force.
They are trained to be this horrible, they ain’t embarrassing anything, true shining examples of the reputation they earned
Some people will watch this and think DJ is just being awkward for the sake of it. I was one of them unfortunately. Recent events in this country try have demonstrated how important this work is highlighting the flawed training in the policing system. These coppers will be trying to arrest you for misgendering someone or telling jokes soon, know your rights, watch this space.
I like how calm you stay under the pressure, you know your stuff!
If it wasnt for UA-cam he would be your average dole dosser.
We should all know this 'stuff'. Being empowered pisses the police off, especially in the US where we have amendments or the bill of rights. I'm sure the UK has them too.
Brilliant isn't he, this is what a public service looks like
@@aliasofanalias7448 awful that you think this guy is brilliant
Too calm to my liking, after that sudden Arrest I would of been unnice and vented my outrage, and made complaint, unlawful demand of ID.