LEGO Star Wars UCS Sail Barge brutal thoughts: It's good, not perfect, price is PREPOSTEROUS | 75397

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 20 вер 2024
  • If you decide to order online, please consider using my affiliate links for LEGO US: tinyurl.com/le... Amazon US: amzn.to/43M8pLv or LEGO Canada: tinyurl.com/le... if you'd like to help support my independent channels a tiny way at no cost to you! As an Amazon Associate & Rakuten affiliate, I may receive a commission if you make a purchase.
    ⭐ / jangslegoreviews Non-sponsored LEGO reviews
    / thejang Twitch live LEGO & Gundam streams
    / jangcity My all-custom LEGO city / railroad
    / purebuilds Chill real-time binaural builds
    / jangbricks Support my work via Patreon
    / jangbricks4real LEGO Instagram
    / jangmecha Gundam Instagram
    / jangbricks4real TikTok medium-length LEGO vids
    / jangbricks Twitter
    All comments are moderated to maintain a safe, positive environment. Bad behavior is rejected, abusers are reported & blocked. jangbricks.com...
    The opinions I express are mine and mine alone and not for sale for any price. Ads, when shown, are selected & placed by UA-cam itself.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 346

  • @JANGBRiCKS
    @JANGBRiCKS  12 годин тому +262

    Video is "late" because I was on forced break due to a huge charity fundraising milestone surpassed last month; promise made, promise delivered. Now I'm back to work 7 days/week for you all!

    • @Goat4459
      @Goat4459 11 годин тому +19

      @@JANGBRiCKS no worries jang 👍 keep up the good work

    • @sarablackham1886
      @sarablackham1886 11 годин тому +18

      if you need a break jang don't stress wed never abandon you!!

    • @digitalMark3t3r
      @digitalMark3t3r 9 годин тому +3

      We love you big dawg!

    • @phroz3n
      @phroz3n 9 годин тому +1

      “A wizard is never late, nor is he early, he arrives precisely when he means to.”

    • @StrykeSZN
      @StrykeSZN 8 годин тому

      no worries jang, take breaks when you need to

  • @Ruune__
    @Ruune__ 12 годин тому +253

    At $400 and with 3PO’s silver leg and an accurate Bib Fortuna I would’ve been perfectly satisfied. $500 is definitely too much.

    • @joevictor53
      @joevictor53 11 годин тому +26

      Yeah I was shocked about 3PO's leg when I first saw this. I'm not getting this nor am I obsessed with minifigures but come on! You guys have a better 3PO. Why are you not including that in this set for the price you're charging? Ahhh who cares? Star Wars fans will whine about it and go and buy it day one anyway so Lego will continue doing this

    • @coraldiamond1922
      @coraldiamond1922 11 годин тому +21

      The price would have been fine had they thrown in another Dessert Skiff.

    • @Ronno8567
      @Ronno8567 11 годин тому +12

      I prefer spending $460 on Barad Dur for the Sauron, Gothmog and Mouth of Sauron minifigures… I’m not spending $500 on the Jabba’s Sail Sarge

    • @arghjayem
      @arghjayem 11 годин тому +9

      And a desert skiff so you don’t have to buy two copies of the sarlac set to get a second skiff! I mean there were two in the film, they’ve already put one in the sarlac set, least they could’ve done is include one in UCS set.

    • @Hyper_1989
      @Hyper_1989 10 годин тому +7

      ​@@arghjayemI was expecting there to be a second skiff in the set when it was first leaked. It would have made perfect sense!

  • @somehalonerd1176
    @somehalonerd1176 12 годин тому +385

    Thank god someone who has to actually pay for the sets is calling out the absurd price and p2p ratio

  • @inkomi2142
    @inkomi2142 11 годин тому +160

    I know this didn't happen, but I like to think the reason this video took so long to arrive was because Jang was looking at the price with an open mouth this whole time

    • @FlymanMS
      @FlymanMS 11 годин тому +13

      Or was trying to compute it at all.

  • @SittaCarolinensis
    @SittaCarolinensis 11 годин тому +156

    At that price I would have expected the skiff and it's figures to be included.

    • @FlymanMS
      @FlymanMS 11 годин тому +28

      But think about poor Lego company, how else are they going to squeeze another $80 out of your wallet?

    • @saltylemonton5537
      @saltylemonton5537 10 годин тому +15

      At that price I would expect Jabbas palace. This thing should be 300 dollars tops.

    • @OtisCluck
      @OtisCluck 3 години тому

      I have the original sail barge from 2005, it had the skiff and Sarlacc pit included with it, and was only $75 when it came out

  • @ThirdBrickBlitz
    @ThirdBrickBlitz 9 годин тому +119

    "Somone who also has to pay his way through life, who doesn't get the Lego sets for free, and has to pay a mortgage and other adult kind of things."
    This is why we support you Jang 🙌

  • @brickslayur4410
    @brickslayur4410 9 годин тому +37

    To add to that one comment; also the fact that Barad Dur is $40 cheaper and includes 1,500 more pieces, 1 less “big fig” if you want to call Jabba that, and looks to be an infinitely better display product/build experience, really hammers home how overpriced this is if the three prior examples didn’t already. I love star wars, but I’m absolutely saving to buy Rivendell instead of this.

  • @Joramee
    @Joramee 11 годин тому +81

    Jang I love your real opinions. You are not sponsored by Lego and I appreciate your videos 100% more than all the Lego 'ambassadors' out there, who gush over sets shamefully despite the outrageous pricing and nonsense Lego tries to push on fans. Thanks for the video and please continue to do you, it is appreciated by us the real people, that don't have a lot of expendable income.

    • @thatfunkymonkey7667
      @thatfunkymonkey7667 9 годин тому +7

      Yeah I watched a few of those ambassadors reviews on this they do all comment on the price and usually say “$500 is a lot for this set but it’s great” and that’s usually the extent they’ll comment on the price, but they never say not to pay for it and a lot of them even have Rivendell or Avengers tower they could easily compare the amount of stuff you get with those sets with the barge yet they don’t.

  • @andrewlee6025
    @andrewlee6025 11 годин тому +37

    12:42 Jang doing his best Todd Howard impression.

  • @joevictor53
    @joevictor53 10 годин тому +36

    I'd love to hear more about Jang's views on the pupils of figures like Salacious Crumb, Darth Maul and Gollum. I think a big reason why people are disliking them is because they seem to go against Lego's design rules for other figures. Like most figures just have black with the white highlight. That represents the pupil and the light reflecting. But then these characters are given their eye colour. They don't do that for most figures. Darth Maul is given yellow eyes with white on them. But he doesn't have yellow pupils. He has yellow irises. Gollum has green irises not green pupils. Luke Skywalker has blue eyes and Princess Leia has brown eyes but both their figures have black eyes.

    • @cjp1599
      @cjp1599 9 годин тому

      ninjago Lloyd has green eyes, with the white being the pupils looks great.

    • @jinpayne
      @jinpayne 3 години тому

      Im mixed but for some characters the iris color is more prominent and necessary to the characters portrayal.

  • @oppressioneditor9840
    @oppressioneditor9840 10 годин тому +14

    Jang is so real. Love that he can always have a level headed take when it comes to Lego. His rant at the end actually sold me on getting the rivendell set, the passion for Lego is infectious!!

  • @blarebear6972
    @blarebear6972 11 годин тому +42

    Completely ridiculous price. I feel like Lego is trying to see how overpriced they can make a set and what sort of excuses people will use to defend them. I wouldn't even say the minifigures are that good, just average.

    • @coraldiamond1922
      @coraldiamond1922 10 годин тому

      With few exceptions the minifigures are mostly good renditions but there are a few misses which for a set that commands such a high entry price is certainly the issue.

    • @michaelmatthews6014
      @michaelmatthews6014 6 годин тому

      They are absolutely making a conscious effort to see how far they can push Star Wars fans specifically.
      And so far Star Wars fans have taken the bait every time.

  • @puffylacike
    @puffylacike 11 годин тому +15

    I absolutely agree with you. $350 would be an adequate price. $500 is crazy.

  • @FlymanMS
    @FlymanMS 11 годин тому +62

    Finally something other than a bunch of Lego Star Wars Grey… Lego Star Wars Brown!

    • @coraldiamond1922
      @coraldiamond1922 11 годин тому +14

      So long as its not revenge of the Brittle Brown.

    • @cooperv.6083
      @cooperv.6083 9 годин тому +2

      Bricklink should categorize the theme this way

  • @lordly123
    @lordly123 4 години тому +6

    Big fan of Jang’s extensive knowledge on three incredibly random alien characters who never have any lines and are only in the opening act of one movie. That’s what being a Star Wars fan is all about.

  • @aslamc9288
    @aslamc9288 10 годин тому +15

    I…I don’t know, my gut instinct here is that this is $200 overpriced. I saw it and I thought “Without the skiff and pit, that’s a decent $300 set”. But to have so few minifigs, using the not best C-3PO, locking scene-appropriate figures behind an extra $80 set, I honestly hope this set tanks and Lego is sent a message. My favorite thing about this set is the “free” gift that I’ll never be able to get my hands on anyway.

    • @eightcoins4401
      @eightcoins4401 7 годин тому +2

      The most hilarious part to me is that the GWP is based on the scene on the Skiff. That is not included in the UCS set.

  • @chocolate_maned_wolf
    @chocolate_maned_wolf 10 годин тому +17

    You could bricklink this entire thing for significantly less, using used parts, and save even more by getting yellowed stuff, since a SAND BARGE would actually look significantly more realistic like that lol

    • @mathewcurtis8484
      @mathewcurtis8484 9 годин тому +1

      Typically I’d agree but most of the parts that aren’t new recolors would be the brittle brown and it wouldn’t be a great experience

    • @thatfunkymonkey7667
      @thatfunkymonkey7667 8 годин тому

      It would still cost a lot also you have to consider how expensive shipping is on bricklink. Further more the sails will NOT be cheap to acquire by themselves once this gets parted out on bricklink. With all that into consideration you would probably be better off just getting the original set and just selling some of the figures if you didn’t care about them and just the ship

    • @g.williams2047
      @g.williams2047 6 годин тому

      You could probably use alternative parts and get it for even cheaper. Get some older mini figures and bam, you’ve got it.

  • @mastterby
    @mastterby 10 годин тому +7

    I think another issue with the minifigs that is so evident in the marketing, is that the whole scene becomes quite tragic without Luke coming to the rescue. It feels like a darker timeline where Leia and the droids were stuck with Jabba forever!

  • @AHYL88
    @AHYL88 11 годин тому +19

    Agreed, the value of this set is absolutely atrocious next to those three sets you mentioned; granted they're all incredibly expensive but those three gave you so much more despite costing the same. Heck right at this moment, the UCS Razor Crest is heavily discounted from a retailer called John Lewis in the UK and is a bit cheaper than this Barge at £390; granted nowhere near as many figures but it's a much more substantial build!
    Or even worse, when looking outside of licensed sets, 71741 NINJAGO City Gardens is a massive $150 cheaper, has 1,700 more pieces (mostly tiny but some large) and DOUBLE the number of figures over the Barge!

    • @joevictor53
      @joevictor53 10 годин тому +3

      People should refuse to buy this and force Lego to drop the price like they have done previously when sets have sold poorly. But unfortunately they won't because it's Star Wars and they'll just run out and buy stuff on day one at full price even though those same people complained about it.

    • @MindKog
      @MindKog 5 годин тому +1

      @@joevictor53 Im genuinely curious if the pricing is due to a shrinking customer base for starwars in general, having to squeeze more to get the same profits. Personally I haven't picked up anything lego SW since like 2019. Just fed up with being expected to throw money at disney.

  • @1983Corolla
    @1983Corolla 10 годин тому +12

    Unpopular opinion maybe, but I think this whole "Adults Welcome" black box era of Lego is almost working against the consumer at this point because were getting desired properties and things we've always wanted from Lego finally but now ALL of them are at this single set "display piece worthy" quality and specifically the biggest things they could possibly make from that property, so the price reflects it and now all of these desired properties are shoved over into the incredibly expensive array of giant sets the average person can't reasonably buy more than 1 of or fit more than 1 or 2 anywhere. Lord of the Rings for example went from an affordable theme with loads of sets to now a single gigantic $500 set, it's ridiculous and stupid.

  • @mastterby
    @mastterby 12 годин тому +15

    Needed to hear this! Love the source material so much but have been having so many doubts about the value of this set, thanks Jang 🙏

  • @pakochanchan881
    @pakochanchan881 11 годин тому +18

    I'm never too fussed about accuracy since I'm used to Marvel using concept designs, but when it comes to how pricey this set is, the lacking aspects for minifigures stick out really bad. It's silly and odd prioritizing giving Leia dual molded legs over C3PO (who has had a far more detailed version), there's frankly no win in that choice considering this product is aimed towards older audiences anyway like you said. IMO the appeal of the sail barge is its variety of characters present in the scene, and unfortunately this set does not do it properly.

    • @coraldiamond1922
      @coraldiamond1922 11 годин тому +1

      Yea C3PO really should have the same legs from the C3PO set released in August.

  • @Ravedaze.
    @Ravedaze. 11 годин тому +24

    I have the first sail Barge that was released, I highly modified it and added much needed minifigures that wasn’t included, saved me £500

    • @logroll2353
      @logroll2353 6 годин тому

      And that one includes a skiff and sarlac pitt and more scene important figures…

  • @av5504
    @av5504 11 годин тому +16

    Given there will probably be fewer people buying this than other UCS sets, it could go the path of the razor crest and be marked down 30% in a few years. When that happens I will buy it.

    • @stephenphillips6456
      @stephenphillips6456 9 годин тому +7

      Perhaps that is Lego's new game. Set a price of $500 to get all of the suckers. Then discount it to the real price of $350, to look like a great deal, and sell even more units.

    • @eightcoins4401
      @eightcoins4401 7 годин тому

      @@stephenphillips6456 Not really since lego themselves most of the time are allergic to discounts. Its only really getting discounted by third party stores.

    • @av5504
      @av5504 7 годин тому

      @@stephenphillips6456 most likely their strategy. They’re hoping most people buy this at full price with the help of influencers and the ambassadors who will push this product. They make the most profit per unit at the full price. They only put the Razer crest on sale because it was sitting on shelves and not moving. The same may occur with this set as most of to early adopters will buy it in the first couple of months and then very little stock will move.

    • @PhoenixFyre
      @PhoenixFyre 3 години тому

      Where are you finding the razor crest at 30% off?

  • @campbellroehrich7146
    @campbellroehrich7146 11 годин тому +20

    This set was missing too many figures, not just the obvious ones like Boba Fett, Luke and the rest of the gang. We could of got so many exclusive characters such as Tanus Spijek, J'Quille, Shasa Tiel, Geezum, Saelt-Marae. Still not sure if I will purchase it or not.

    • @copyer9088
      @copyer9088 9 годин тому

      @@campbellroehrich7146 you get them in desert skiff so they are there they split the set into two which I like because it means if you don’t want this set your forced to buy it to get a desert skiff

    • @mykytaradko5776
      @mykytaradko5776 4 години тому +1

      @@campbellroehrich7146 and Yee Yee

  • @YellowHands
    @YellowHands 9 годин тому +6

    thank you Jang for standing up to the lego group

  • @WhittaKEE
    @WhittaKEE 9 годин тому +5

    No matter how advanced other reviewers post their views, I will always watch and like your videos, keep up the good work 😊

  • @worldsheaviestjamband93
    @worldsheaviestjamband93 10 годин тому +4

    I definitely respect the fact that you won’t be picking this one up even as a major fan. Honestly, the price is absurdly difficult to justify.

  • @Jacko75041
    @Jacko75041 11 годин тому +11

    This set should have included 2 skiff speeders and the sarlacc pit that is the only way i could justify this costing $500 dollars

  • @michaelreilly7106
    @michaelreilly7106 10 годин тому +8

    Jang. The interior of the barge itself was really dark, especially after Leia shorted out all the windows. As for the price? Holy Moley! They should’ve included the Skiff set for 500 bucks. It’s insane that they want $600 for the total set..
    Edit: on a sidenote, one of the early reviewers actually said I wouldn’t buy this on day one unless you can get the light saber and resell it. I was like wait a minute, you’re saying to justify the price of this LEGO set I need to buy and scalp another LEGO set?

    • @FlymanMS
      @FlymanMS 9 годин тому +2

      What's the big deal with lightsaber? It's not that pretty and it's not hard to build, I bet there are better MOCs out there that are way cheaper.

  • @MakeItPerfectlyWrong
    @MakeItPerfectlyWrong 10 годин тому +5

    $500, no Luke is absolutely diabolical behavior- I agree

    • @turorudi346
      @turorudi346 8 годин тому

      Yeah, Luke's in the 80 usd sarlacc pit set...

    • @Tyrant18able
      @Tyrant18able 6 годин тому

      Where's the movie accurate boba fett at? LOL

  • @starscream7755
    @starscream7755 11 годин тому +8

    Unfortunately the prices are only gonna get worse because people are still going to buy it.

  • @OrionInception
    @OrionInception 11 годин тому +4

    This set should have been $350-$400 at most! $500 is insanity!!

  • @shvansee216
    @shvansee216 11 годин тому +5

    I feel like lego is just testing the willingness of star wars fans. I bet the next UCS set they will make will be another 50 dollars above the price, and they will keep going higher and higher until the fans finally notice it in a few years. When they do, they will mercifully take the price down to only 250% from the 300%, and it will start selling more than ever before. Or maybe they are just taking into account that the investors will do the math of "I buy this for 500, sell the thing for 200, so i have the barge for 300" inside their head, and price it with the GWP in mind.

    • @FlymanMS
      @FlymanMS 9 годин тому

      Please don't call these speculators "investors".

  • @Goose_Willis
    @Goose_Willis 11 годин тому +6

    I broke my addiction to UCS sets a few years ago. My last UCS was the 2nd UCS Star Destroyer. That was the final one. The price has become too ridiculous. I like the all of them a lot, but that price.... Just too much. But I'm probably not the target audience for this type of product anymore. And that's okay.

  • @TheInfamousCloaker
    @TheInfamousCloaker 12 годин тому +99

    So, are they going to call her "Boba Fett's starship" Leia now?

    • @JANGBRiCKS
      @JANGBRiCKS  12 годин тому +93

    • @TheProtonist
      @TheProtonist 11 годин тому +10

      Wouldn't shock me lol!! I feel like it'll just be like Sail Barge Leia, sadly

    • @wombleingfree
      @wombleingfree 11 годин тому +7

      Hutt Slayer?

    • @legomattie3295
      @legomattie3295 10 годин тому +1

      Just princess Leia according to box

    • @kavaltto
      @kavaltto 8 годин тому

      Raygun Leia

  • @imlewishehe
    @imlewishehe 11 годин тому +10

    The figures beside Leia seem like an afterthought. They focused only on the set itself, then realised when they were done that they still had to include figures, so designed the most basic minifigures and threw in Bib Fortuna from the BoBF throne room set because they ran out of time. They could've done so much more, and tried to at least make the price tag reasonable. However, Lego has lately been upping prices to a ridiculous degree, with no justification behind it. They need to be transparent about these decisions

    • @coraldiamond1922
      @coraldiamond1922 11 годин тому

      Well we know that over 2 years ago now I think, Lego increased the price on a number of sets on shelves so I think the price for what we see from a lot of sets this year doesn't match as well with what we actually get because of that price hike.

  • @adamlarson6821
    @adamlarson6821 6 годин тому +1

    This is why Jang is the only reviewer I trust. Someone who has to buy the stuff, and gives his honest thoughts. Great video!

  • @bdablader95
    @bdablader95 11 годин тому +4

    Man why is this not $399? This screams "I'm exactly $400 in value" that licensing fee is getting too high man. Disney is going to be the death of the UCS line...

    • @JANGBRiCKS
      @JANGBRiCKS  10 годин тому +13

      It's not Disney. Avengers Tower is Disney, has almost 3x the figures, 1000+ more pieces, same price, current (no inflation adjustment needed). Disney did not set the price. They don't set the price for any LEGO product. LEGO does.

  • @harrisonpennington5784
    @harrisonpennington5784 8 годин тому +4

    For $500 you can get your hands on Max Rebo, plus a free sail barge on the side!

  • @Lordodragonss
    @Lordodragonss 9 годин тому +4

    11:18 MY FAV JANG NOISE

  • @CalebDennis1
    @CalebDennis1 11 годин тому +4

    The gift with purchase lightsaber is so frustrating to me. If those lightsaber sets were widely available, I'd buy every single one, day one, and probably be willing to pay more than $22 (because I'm a little delusional). I bought all the helmets, I'd love to have all the lightsabers to go with them. It's infuriating to have desirable, reasonably priced, adult-oriented products locked behind $500 gates and only available for 1-2 hours before being gone forever. Also goes for the Fell Beast that released with Barad-dûr.

  • @kobewan9028
    @kobewan9028 9 годин тому +4

    Thanks Jang. I’m getting a bit frustrated with the price defenders. I wish there was a way to get Lego to make some high quality sets at better prices. Feels rare for themes I enjoy

  • @moonshoes11
    @moonshoes11 10 годин тому +3

    Regarding the price: “I don’t care what galaxy you’re from….that’s gotta hurt”

  • @intense79nick
    @intense79nick 10 годин тому +4

    Rivendell's roof 1x1 tiles are cancelled out by the dumb black minifigure display in the sail barge.

  • @Ronno8567
    @Ronno8567 11 годин тому +4

    I agree with you, $500 is outrageous, same price as the Rivendell set… Disney is greedy and they using Marvel and Star Wars to increase the price of their sets

    • @JANGBRiCKS
      @JANGBRiCKS  11 годин тому +11

      Disney didn't price & develop the set though, LEGO did. Meanwhile LEGO also priced & developed the Disney Marvel Avengers Tower which has almost three times the figures as this and over a ThOuSaNd more pieces, yet costs the same. The price insanity of this set is 100% on LEGO IMO. They're doing it because they can, because enough potential buyers are rich and/or "investors" and keep paying ever more inflated prices no matter what the number -- basically blank checks.

    • @Ronno8567
      @Ronno8567 11 годин тому +1

      @@JANGBRiCKS thanks Jang, I would rather buy Barad Dur for $460 😊

  • @samscholes9727
    @samscholes9727 11 годин тому +7

    Jang I love you, thank you for calling out this price!

  • @TwistedCarbonite
    @TwistedCarbonite 10 годин тому +2

    Jang: I love your reviews. I appreciate that you actually buy all the sets that you review as opposed to being sent them. I watched your reviews of the old Sail Barge & Skiff sets from 2013 - I bought them both. I then added the characters, weequay, Han & Cheebacca from the 2016/17 skiff and it looks so much better. I intend to buy a couple of the minifigs from the UCS set to add to my 2013 Sail Barge. I can have all of that for under £300 and in my opinion, the 2013 sets are still better looking and more fun.

  • @MartenFerret
    @MartenFerret 9 годин тому +3

    Some AFoLs will 'punish' Lego for this obscene price by only buying three of them.

  • @antraxxslingshots
    @antraxxslingshots 9 годин тому +4

    If Jang, who usually tries to be as fair and nice as one could be, tells you its overpriced....IT IS overpriced.
    Really sad, because the Model looks cool :(

  • @fuzzlekitty
    @fuzzlekitty 7 годин тому +1

    You're one of my favorite lego reviewrs. You keep it real and dont fawn all over the product like some reviews do. Also for most people halfway to $1000 is not an easy spend when we have bills and living expenses. Of course getting free product makes them lose sight of that issue.
    Thanks for an honest review. ❤

  • @bagelman10
    @bagelman10 8 годин тому +3

    Lay it out there Jang, great job. Much love and support, glad you’re in it for the HOBBY

  • @russianblunt248
    @russianblunt248 5 годин тому +1

    yup this video has cemented you as the most honest lego reviewer out there. So tired of "thanks lego for sending me this set!" at the start of these reviews, it instantly makes me question the bias aspect of not having to drop freaking 500 bucks for this thing.

  • @lucajunk6544
    @lucajunk6544 10 годин тому +2

    I just feel dissappointed and my wishful thinking is that LEGO somehow realizes that they have gone to far and apologize. This will never happen and I genuinely believe they are testing how far they can go and what the market will bear. I love the idea of buying a huge a UCS set as something special and "once in a lifetime" but this just doesn't feel right. Even if I was willing to pay 500€ for it, I don't want LEGO to go away with this. Maybe I'm a bit to invested in this but I'm honestly really sad about it. Thank you JANG for your opinion.

  • @sejadlulic8377
    @sejadlulic8377 11 годин тому +4

    ship looks good but there are 2 MAJOR problems with this set:
    1. value for your money. This set is hella overpriced. 350 would be reasonable, not good but worth a look. As it counts for every other product, if you buy a bigger thing from the same brand it should be a better deal than buying 10x a smaller thing. If you spend more youre exchange value should greatly increase but in this case you get a worse price per piece / price for weight / amount of detail, prints and minifigs than what you would have gotten if you bought a lot of smaller sw sets. Thats a no go. Make it 400 bucks and include a skiff and 3 more figs, people would be ok with it. But this is simply a ripoff.
    2. the figures are really underwhelming. Nowadays the only thing that lego has compared to its competition that justifies them charging more money for their product than other companies is license and minifigure exclusivity. Therefore it is reasonable to analyse the figures more precisly than other parts of the set. And this is where this set fails.
    - Jabba looks basically the same as his former figs (printing is a tiny bit different, ok)
    - Pig guard, max reebo and R2 are what you expect, as good as the former versions (ok)
    - the 3 other henchmen are kinda exciting because they are "new" (kithaba not so much though) but all three lack even the detail that should be considered "normal" for new figures: leg printing on the front of the piece. they just look underdevelopped for a premium priced product / brand
    - C3P0, Leia, Salacious Crumb and Bib Fortuna are worse than other existing figures of that costume. C3P0 lacks the dual moalded, side printed legs, Leia lacks the more accurate skirt-underpants legs, Salacious Crumb lacks the pupils and Bib Fortuna is the worst by having that wrongly reused headpiece that doesnt match the movie depiction. For all of these figures better versions exist (C3P0: land speeder/ big fig; Leia: last sailbarge; Salacious Crumb and Bib Fortuna: Jabbas palace.
    For these reasons in particular, ignoring other issues (f. ex. the sails that come dammaged because they arent protected properly in a hardcase or something and are therefore bend pre opening the box), this product feels like a scam.

  • @TheShadowCookie
    @TheShadowCookie 8 годин тому +2

    Solely going to focus on the price here - yes, that comment sums it up so perfectly. From Germany, and Lego has a rather bad reputation here these days. The pricing for many of the bigger sets just seems so random, as if they are throwing dice and checking if they can get away with it. Year after year, the sets contain less pieces and figures for ever-growing prices. My own salary certainly hasn't been going up that much, and I can in no way allow myself to buy these sets, even though I would love to have many of them. People might now suggest that one should just save up and get one of them eventually - but come on. If this is your hobby and passion, then obviously you would like to buy them a little more often. Unfortunately, the trend seems to be that Lego is becoming more and more of an item for rich collectors, not average consumers.

  • @greenhill004
    @greenhill004 11 годин тому +3

    I always try to do the parts and minifigures of sets and people are like 'That's because those sets came out in the past and INFLATION!!!!'.
    Those people are fools.

    • @JANGBRiCKS
      @JANGBRiCKS  11 годин тому +12

      I mean, inflation is real, and is a valid argument... IF you do the math (by plugging in the numbers to a site that'll do the math for you) and it checks out. Folks need to understand they can't just wield the "i" word and magically justify every single new product's price by default.

    • @Roland314
      @Roland314 9 годин тому +2

      @@JANGBRiCKS Also, inflation isn't a good defense here because, in regards to both Rivendell and Avengers Tower, these are super recent sets. It's a better argument for older sets compared to modern equivalents, like the Millennium Falcon from Force Awakens vs. the Black Falcon released this year.

  • @37TrillionWasps
    @37TrillionWasps 10 годин тому +4

    But Jang, you don't understand; that Max Rebo figure alone will be worth a hundred and fifty bucks at the very least.
    /s

    • @Spacejuno
      @Spacejuno 9 годин тому +1

      It won’t even be that valuable because it’s the same max rebo figure from 2013

  • @KazudaXiono
    @KazudaXiono 8 годин тому +2

    As someone who has been struggling to decide whether to get the Sail Barge, Avengers Tower, or Rivendell… and has been leaning Sail Barge. You definitely changed my mind quite a bit. I love this set… I think it’s *cooler* to me than Rivendell and the AT, (just more of a Star Wars fan) but the price is just ludicrous.

  • @Bricksnaps
    @Bricksnaps 11 годин тому +4

    LEGO are high. They have lost touch with reality. It’s not the actual dollar amount, it’s the value that dollar gets you. Would love to see a ‘rotten tomatoes’ guide for LEGO sets based on pure value

    • @FlymanMS
      @FlymanMS 9 годин тому +1

      No, they know what they're doing. They know there's enough rich people who are going to buy this. They calculate it. They don't have average Lego enjoyer in mind when they roll out overpriced sets like this.

  • @luxuriasmodeus500
    @luxuriasmodeus500 8 годин тому +1

    I'm just blown away with the price of Lego Star Wars nowadays. Like I saw at Walmart yesterday the new small mandalorian battle pack is $25 which for such a small set blows me away. Same with the sand skiff at $80! Crazy

  • @fgdj2000
    @fgdj2000 9 годин тому +4

    300$, maybe 400 with the companion set (sarlacc Pitt and sciff) and maybe another skiff.

  • @bluegoose7832
    @bluegoose7832 9 годин тому +5

    So for $500:
    - missing Luke
    - missing Han
    - missing Chewbacca
    - missing Lando
    - missing Boba Fett
    - missing sarlacc pit
    - missing skiff
    - needlessly inaccurate Leia that looks like she's wearing shorts... censored for the "adults welcome" set...
    - an inferior C3PO than current cheaper sets
    - a piece count that doesn't justify the price
    - a $80 DLC set sold separately that has the other characters, which also has inaccurate characters
    - if you get the $80 set, you've now got two different looking stands...

  • @captain-brickhead8317
    @captain-brickhead8317 11 годин тому +7

    Respect for putting your foot down on the absurd pricing. I’m a collector and love GWP’s, but this is a hard pass for a day 1 purchase….

  • @fevinman7162
    @fevinman7162 11 годин тому +2

    Thanks for the great video Jang! This is definitely one of the sets where I’ve been a bit on the fence, not about purchasing (this subject matter would never tempt my wallet at this price) but as an observer who loves Lego and Lego Star Wars. Your video firmly swayed me to agreeing with your opinion on this set. Major props on showing the comment from the blog site with the price comparisons and testing down any argument made to justify the price here.
    I hope this set doesn’t succeed for Lego and that fans vote with their wallets. If the set was $350-400, I think it gets a pass. Part count and figure count for that size of vehicle would seem appropriate, especially for a subject matter that will draw less attention than a Venator or Slave 1.
    If they have their $500 price point set ahead of time, fine, but make it bigger with more parts so there is more space for more figures. If you can’t do that as it will screw up the scale, fine, include the Skiff and essential characters from 75396 with this and sell a separate version with some of the same characters and some different. The scene does have TWO Skiffs. For collectors that would allow for the optimum display/collection/etc. , while also still allowing for fans who do not/can not spend $500 on a Sail Barge set to recreate the sarlaac pit scene from ROTJ.

  • @outsider238
    @outsider238 10 годин тому +2

    Like my UCS Millennium Falcon and Star Destroyer, this too would eventually end up taken apart and sitting in a bin a year later because I would need the space it takes up. Like the two aforementioned sets, this too will end up being a regretted purchase once the reality sets in of how much I spent on it and the space it takes up.

  • @fgdj2000
    @fgdj2000 9 годин тому +2

    I think the Lego bubble will soon burst. Lots of other companies make sets at least as good for less. Cobi, Gobricks, Bluebrixx, Cada, Funwhole, Pantasy. With the recent drop in quality that Lego had (incorrect colours, big sprue points) many of them have even better bricks than Lego. They often give you better designed sets at lesser price or at least just the smaller price, some even have cool extras (Funwhole always comes with an entire LED USB set, Cada put glue and cotton wool in a recent rocket set so you could basically create a mid-launch display setup) and often have prints instead of stickers. It makes Lego look like cheapshots and I‘ve also heard of Lego employees (second hand accounts) who were told to design a set for a specific price range only for the money makers to basically decide to sell the set for significantly more than originally intended without changes. It’s appalling. Especially since I think Lego in the past 5 years had so many fantastic sets that were jut way too overpriced. They probably lost 1000s of dollars on me for overpricing their sets - I would have bought this sail barge at 300 easily. I would have bought the cantina at 250, the Razor Quest UCS at 300, or the recent Lego Star Wars book at 40-50. (for 150 I get one of the massive Star Wars Archives books from Taschen). Alas, it’s not meant to be. Last I want to tell you how much I appreciate your reviews, often positively biased but not blind to Lego‘s faults, and I appreciate that you are drawing a line here.

    • @FlymanMS
      @FlymanMS 8 годин тому +1

      Unlikely, Lego knows their marketing and they have a good diversity of themes, including originals. And, forgetting the overpriced licensed sets that underdeliver, I still lover Lego and want them to keep coming up with new exciting things.

  • @Lordodragonss
    @Lordodragonss 9 годин тому +2

    Just a reminder you can get a old Jabba barge for HALF this price on BL.
    Also Compare this to cantina. Way more content for what you pay.

  • @orien2v2
    @orien2v2 11 годин тому +3

    This price is perfectly reasonable...for me to quit Lego from here on. Not that I needed it. Stopped buying for a year now without regrets. This is the final nail in the coffin. I hope more will stop feeding the greedy cashgrab by a toy brand mainly profiting from nostalgia, recyclable artificial material with artificially induced scarcity. Sincere thanks to Lego, and best wishes to whoever is still feeding this beast.

  • @js5861
    @js5861 10 годин тому +2

    This is why Jang is the only LEGO reviewer I watch anymore. The minifigure selection on this contains multiple inaccuracies and is disappointingly small for 4,000 pieces and $500. This is a low quality UCS set.

  • @Roland314
    @Roland314 9 годин тому +1

    Totally agree with everything you said here. That being said, you asked viewers about buying the Legend of Zelda Deku Tree, which is not AS overpriced but is certainly pricey, and I am curious if you'll build that. I mention that because I'd love to see you do a video about how you see that value compared to this and some other larger sets where the price seems to be heading in a troubling direction (the X-Jet, for example). I feel like a video expressly addressing Lego's value might get more traction/be more effective instead of the message being tucked into videos like this where hype over an individual set might overcome the larger message. Just a suggestion.
    For myself, I thought that was a fun, interesting build that somewhat justified the cost with a large number of new parts/molds, a TON of exclusive prints, no stickers, and lots of care into premium figures (all with dual molding on legs and arms). Yet the price still stung a little. Regardless, keep doing the great work, and I appreciate someone speaking up honestly.

  • @austinwoods466
    @austinwoods466 9 годин тому +7

    11:21 Word. No Luke... Leia in a kilt? No thanks.

  • @uchihajoel3064
    @uchihajoel3064 9 годин тому +1

    I had been waiting to make a big boy Lego purchase until the sail barge reveal. Now that purchase is Rivendell.

  • @bricksbeersbeards9368
    @bricksbeersbeards9368 11 годин тому +3

    Excellent, thanks Jang!

  • @ronaldrede9167
    @ronaldrede9167 9 годин тому +2

    I think LEGO shot themselves in the foot with this one. After the initial release I bet the sales will plummet and you’ll find deep discounts on this set in the near future. Great set. Horrible price. I’ll wait to buy this one for sure. If I buy it.

  • @RonVining
    @RonVining 7 годин тому +2

    I love the galley kitchen and I like the top deck. I think they needed to go 1 stud taller, as you can’t see Jabba’s head unless looking, up at the model.

  • @faroffgrace5490
    @faroffgrace5490 10 годин тому +2

    Tbh I don't mind the changes made to Leia (I'm a sucker for dual moulded legs, even if they're not accurate) and Salacious Crumb (I like the new eyes tbh), but man... that price is way too much. And while the Leia figure doesn't bother me in isolation, the fact that it's a less accurate figure for a price THAT steep is what really lets it down. Also, we got the better C-3PO in the buildable C-3PO set earlier this year, which was waaaay cheaper than this set... and yet they didn't use it here?
    I was probably gonna skip this one because I don't have the space for a set this big, but after seeing the price and details... yeah, I don't feel bad about skipping on it at all.

  • @OneNationUnderPug
    @OneNationUnderPug 8 годин тому +1

    I think reason for the duel model legs on Leia is so you have red color on the back of the legs and avoid the exposed butt look the older figures had.

  • @migatron1
    @migatron1 9 годин тому +3

    9:26 You made me crack! I was having an underwhelming day, and this made me laugh, genuinely!!

  • @lego4virgo
    @lego4virgo 9 годин тому +1

    The skiff set should've been included in this, and kept it at $350 - maybe $520, but nothing more.

  • @gerriti
    @gerriti 10 годин тому +1

    300/350 would be a much better price to me. I wouldn't be terribly surprised it fit gets some big discounts like the black panther bust or hulk buster

  • @type_s_tyler7547
    @type_s_tyler7547 9 годин тому +1

    I think most id pay for this is $400 WITH the skiff. Its a cool set, I like it, but I dont care that much.

  • @JASpringers
    @JASpringers 9 годин тому

    Thanks for your work, Jang! Jedi was my first Star Wars movie in a theater and, for a long time, it was my favorite. Therefore, I really wanted to forgive this set's price and add it to my collection. Your honest review (and your reference to being about my age so I know we're coming at this from a similar angle) helped me overcome my nostalgia and realize that I should find a better use of my LEGO dollars. Thanks again!

  • @isaacreuben2926
    @isaacreuben2926 9 годин тому +1

    JANGBRiCKS? Na, GOATBRiCKS!
    Never change Jang, never change!

  • @NotSoFinalProductions
    @NotSoFinalProductions 9 годин тому

    Splitting off the Sarlac and the barges rather than bundling them into this under the same price point is genuinely diabolical.

  • @Wafflemciron
    @Wafflemciron 3 години тому +1

    Thanks, Jang. I just made the decision to pass on this set as well, for many of the same reasons you laid out. It really hurts to do so, since I’m such a huge fan of Lego Star Wars. Let’s hope it doesn’t sell well and Lego learns something.

  • @joelh.2124
    @joelh.2124 8 годин тому

    I'm glad you had some time off, and I'm very glad you're back. This video is excellent. :)

  • @TheRocco96
    @TheRocco96 11 годин тому +4

    This Sailbarge-Leia is wearing shorts instead of just a narrow piece of cloth. She doesn't look like slave Leia in the movie at all.

  • @LeePrice-r9u
    @LeePrice-r9u 11 годин тому +3

    It's a $400 set with a 25% tax

  • @mitchhirt
    @mitchhirt 9 годин тому +2

    I live in a state with 10% sales tax so for me this is a $550 set 😂. Good thing I was already happy with the 2013 play scale sail barge. Maybe if this ends up on UCS hulkbuster level clearance I'll pick it up

    • @biIIybob858
      @biIIybob858 9 годин тому

      lol even with the heavy discount that hulkbuster set doesnt sell

  • @i-muts
    @i-muts 8 годин тому

    some of these renders legitimately look like lego games i played on my DS.

  • @borodo2072
    @borodo2072 5 годин тому

    Yeah being a Canadian LEGO fan is starting to hurt more and more with these insane prices. Larger sets are NEVER a day one purchase at this point, waiting for sales is a must. Also really like how you touch on using VIP points being essentially an 'opportunity cost' because those points could have gone towards something else.

  • @cantumason4o
    @cantumason4o 10 годин тому +1

    That's a double points day for sure.

  • @UKnightedGames1234
    @UKnightedGames1234 9 годин тому +2

    Appreciate the integrity lol, don’t buy something and perpetuate the cycle

  • @natron1973
    @natron1973 5 годин тому

    A free market economy will decide whether or not this is over priced. If it sells well, Lego will have learned that the price doesn’t matter and will continue to price things accordingly. It’s simple economics. If they want to make boutique toys for the Uber rich, as a business, that’s their decision and their choice.

  • @cryinbryan
    @cryinbryan 8 годин тому

    Jang is COOKING in this video and I'm here for it

  • @Modfulness
    @Modfulness 9 годин тому +2

    Waiting for the sale...

  • @OffTheRailsPodcast
    @OffTheRailsPodcast 9 годин тому +2

    Hoooo boy Jang is going off

  • @idonjohnson6999
    @idonjohnson6999 Годину тому

    Lego: “adults welcome”
    They should change that into “adults only”.

  • @BlyCustoms
    @BlyCustoms 8 годин тому

    I'm glad I bought a used OG Sail barge previously for 100€.
    Remember guys, used Lego is better than new Lego at this point (maybe not in terms of details but with playfeatures, nostalgia etc)