Johnny Depp trial new details: Marilyn Manson binge, explicit tirade about James Franco

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 18 кві 2022
  • Jurors in the defamation trial between Johnny Depp and his ex-wife Amber Heard watched explosive testimony from Keenan Wyatt, a sound engineer and friend of Depp who worked on many of the actor's films. Wyatt was asked about a number of topics including a multi-day drinking binge Depp allegedly had with Marilyn Manson and a time on a private plane where Depp went on an explicit tirade toward Heard related to actor James Franco.
    Subscribe to LiveNOW from FOX! ua-cam.com/users/livenowfox?su...
    Where to watch LiveNOW from FOX: www.livenowfox.com/
    Follow us @LiveNOWFOX on Twitter: / livenowfox
    Raw and unfiltered. Watch a non-stop stream of breaking news, live events and stories across the nation. Limited commentary. No opinion. Experience LiveNOW from FOX.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 6 тис.

  • @laesquire
    @laesquire 2 роки тому +3626

    As a trial lawyer (25 years of experience) I say this lady is one of the worst lawyers I have ever heard conducting examination of a witness.

    • @melissalinton386
      @melissalinton386 2 роки тому +325

      My Mother in law is a trial lawyer and said the same exact thing.

    • @denipavlovic7309
      @denipavlovic7309 2 роки тому +371

      As a non lawyer im highly irritated by these repeated questions, this is like 5 year old keeps asking you same question over and over again because he is bored.

    • @Melinda8162
      @Melinda8162 2 роки тому +52

      Did she say someone accused Johnny of punching someone?..?
      Never heard of that!

    • @AliceNsWonderland
      @AliceNsWonderland 2 роки тому +115

      @@Melinda8162 there was allegedly a man *picking* on a homeless woman on a set... Johnny allegedly set him straight 😏

    • @earlmartin2769
      @earlmartin2769 2 роки тому +7

      Dam...

  • @ChrisWegoda
    @ChrisWegoda 2 роки тому +1474

    "Did you see any pigs fly?"
    "No"
    "So there could have been pigs flying?"
    "Not that I recall."

    • @heidinewman9335
      @heidinewman9335 2 роки тому +55

      OMG I laughed for 5 minutes at this.

    • @alkatiwari5501
      @alkatiwari5501 2 роки тому +59

      This is hilariously summing up the whole video. Bravo!

    • @esterhudson5104
      @esterhudson5104 2 роки тому +21

      Perfect!! 😂😂🤣🤣

    • @ritabarker6802
      @ritabarker6802 2 роки тому +8

      😂😂😂

    • @blove3405
      @blove3405 2 роки тому +32

      "But you saw that pigs fly, correct?"

  • @goulash64
    @goulash64 Рік тому +347

    This sound technician guy is extremely patient. I would have already told Amber's attorney to STOP barking at me like I was on trial for murder. She was so rude to him because they have NO CASE.

    • @dvml45
      @dvml45 Рік тому +23

      Exactly! Amber's attorney gets on my last nerve! She is rude when she doesn't even need to be. She is very aggressive.

    • @kristentrep5038
      @kristentrep5038 Рік тому +10

      Birds of a feather! If Amber (or even Nasty old Elaine) think that nasty and obnoxious behavior is winning any points, they are nuts! I’m watching the sound guy now.., and he must be one helluva nice guy! I’d have asked her to stop yelling at me! (Like he’s on trial for gods sakes!!) JD recommend him as his sound guy.., and yes, they are prob friendly.. but it seems to me that everyone likes Johnny.., probably bc he’s a genuinely nice guy! Amber is a slippery snake of a liar whose prob burned every bridge she’d ever crossed, and has no true friends.. even her parents are afraid of her! (Her mom seemed to be before she’d passed) this is frustrating to watch!

    • @lordgrimm2905
      @lordgrimm2905 Рік тому +6

      She wants that, she wants an emotional and angry reaction, that way she can descredit him

    • @sharonsobolewski3707
      @sharonsobolewski3707 Рік тому +1

      THATS WHY THEY CALL THEM THE DEFENSE ALWAYS ON THE DEFENSIVE LOL

    • @annettegower2962
      @annettegower2962 Рік тому +1

      I hadn't seen this b4 must have missed it, what is the point of it.

  • @TheSecretCafe
    @TheSecretCafe 2 роки тому +421

    This witness seems like such a chill guy, I feel bad for him to have to put up with this horrible woman

    • @YA-qj8fx
      @YA-qj8fx Рік тому +9

      I think he's good looking. 👌

    • @TheSecretCafe
      @TheSecretCafe Рік тому +3

      @@YA-qj8fx that too!

    • @BenExists7
      @BenExists7 Рік тому +8

      @@YA-qj8fx the man has aged like a mega pint of fine wine

    • @janetrabideau4562
      @janetrabideau4562 Рік тому +1

      Do you guys even know who Marilyn Manson is?

    • @sharonsobolewski3707
      @sharonsobolewski3707 Рік тому +3

      LMAO I CANT STOP LAUGHING THIS CHILL GUY GOOD ONE AND HORRIBLE WOMAN LOL

  • @OliviaTessaPlayChannel
    @OliviaTessaPlayChannel 2 роки тому +1525

    Imagine finding out 20 years later that your friend had your back the entire time and you had no clue you were significant enough to him that he made sure you were taking care of the whole time without your knowledge. Damn good friend

    • @sofyabet66
      @sofyabet66 2 роки тому +93

      Its also possible this witness is smart enough to derail this line of interrogation by stating he doesn't know. Technically no one can disprove his "ignorance". Shrewd, is how his response strikes me. People are willing to go the extra mile for JD - obviously he's well liked & his easy-going generosity is legendary.

    • @sweetpea4967
      @sweetpea4967 2 роки тому +86

      @@sofyabet66 seriously? You just called the man a liar for saying he doesn't remember the fairy tales Amber has concocted.

    • @sofyabet66
      @sofyabet66 2 роки тому +94

      @@sweetpea4967 actually I just called him smart for sidestepping this BS line of interrogation- much of which attempted to paint him as someone beholden to JD

    • @nolmage2607
      @nolmage2607 2 роки тому +25

      That's how l view it too ,he is well aware that he had his back all along

    • @lizlagle671
      @lizlagle671 2 роки тому +5

      Yeah, it defies reality. If it didn't matter he wouldn't be in the contract.

  • @darlenea653
    @darlenea653 2 роки тому +1840

    She’s a terrible attorney fighting a losing case. I’m embarrassed for her. I can’t believe the judge allowed the line of questioning to go in circles over information that this witness would not be privy to. Ridiculous!

    • @iamsatanjr
      @iamsatanjr 2 роки тому +72

      To be fair, I wouldn't say she's a terrible attorney. She and the rest of the legal team are trying to make as strong of an argument as possible while having really shitty situation on their hand. It's not a case if you want an easy win, but intead it's a case where everyone is getting a huge paycheck for trying - because regardless of the outcome someone's going to cover the legal expenses 100%.
      With all of this going down I think they're doing their best to not look like complete fools in court, which is a challenge of it's own considering what they have to work with, and present with a straight face.

    • @gilraenn29
      @gilraenn29 2 роки тому +11

      I don’t know the ages of the commentators here. BuI am old enough to remember the damage to property, the bloody fights between him and the model Kate Moss for a long time before he met Ms Parisi. There were other women, but back in the day the “Me Too” movement was just wishful thinking and we women were silent. We all saw how rape victims were treated in court. If a woman dare to bring her case to court more than not Women were discouraged by police and others to drop charges. I love Mr. Depp’s work and I want to see more of it. But his reputation as a drinker and drug user has always been an open secret in Hollywood. He is a heavy drinker and passes out. People who drink heavily can become quiet or mean. They can be physical too. I’m not saying anything people who deal with heavy drinkers don’t know. She has a lot of issues too. I think this is mostly very sad. I know women love him but he’s putting on a good performance and he’s a great actor, remember that. She didn’t ruin his career she just gave the studios another reason to not work with him because of his erratic behavior on set and the money it cost them to delay the picture. While he was with Ms Parisi, he was so much better and in a good place. If he really wants to work he can do what a lot of actors are doing. He has the money to be the producer of independent films and he can get good people and good writers and he has fans who will come to see him. He needs to take responsibility for his behavior and why studios don’t want to work with him. Word of mouth and losing money travel fast in Hollywood. This woman fought back. Most women do nowadays and they have the support women like me; your mothers, grandmas,aunts, didn’t have back in the day.I love the phrase, “I don’t remember”, excellently coached by lawyers to not lie on the stand, but to evade.

    • @tobiathon80
      @tobiathon80 2 роки тому +16

      I don't think she's terrible, he's a solid witness though.

    • @andrewbocho3896
      @andrewbocho3896 2 роки тому +14

      "I can’t believe the judge allowed the line of questioning to go in circles over information that this witness would not be privy to. Ridiculous!" She could be a lesbian?

    • @JayNAmyHiatt
      @JayNAmyHiatt 2 роки тому +40

      I'm only 13 minutes into this but I don't see any benefit or detriment to this attorney's questioning. What does it have to do with anything? It seems like a big waste of time.

  • @Dreaming_Aya
    @Dreaming_Aya Рік тому +200

    5 minutes in and all she's proven is that johnny is so generous and kind and genuinely wants the best for the people he loves and tries his best to help them lmao 🤣

    • @nancybatch7007
      @nancybatch7007 Рік тому +7

      It seems like she was trying to prove that Wyatt was somehow beholden to Depp or had been bought somehow. I don't think it ever occurred to her that the contract clauses were acts of pure generosity.

    • @dvml45
      @dvml45 Рік тому +4

      Ya, that sure backfired on her! Loved every minute of it. She is so rude!

    • @heidikickhouse-
      @heidikickhouse- Рік тому +3

      I genuinely don't understand the point though. If he was being paid the Union Minimum, as he here testified several times, how is Johnny being 'generous' by having that written into his contract, which Elaine alleges (without proving) several times? Why is the Union Minimum so freaking "generous"? What is her point, what the hell is she trying to prove with this? I hope the jury is not as confused and dizzy as I feel right now. Why does Elaine think it's so extraordinary, perhaps corrupt, that his hotel was paid for? Does she think think people performing important jobs on movie sets pay for their own location accommodations, so that all professionals can only afford to work in their own hometowns? (She might be completely 100% shielded, like Dr. Spiegel, from all information about acting, and does not even know these people might be caught rehearsing.)

    • @heidikickhouse-
      @heidikickhouse- Рік тому +2

      What do you mean "generous"? Yes, of course, normally he is to a fault, but I do not see that here in anything Elaine has obtained, I am just confused - he's getting Union minimum for God's sake!

    • @Dreaming_Aya
      @Dreaming_Aya Рік тому +3

      It's about the fact that johnny puts him in his contract and so giving him work opportunities, and she's trying to prove he also asks to give him nice hotels and other privileges, and by that proves that he is a paid witness ''on his pay rolls like they liked to say

  • @meg27mm
    @meg27mm Рік тому +39

    Well done to this witness for staying completely calm throughout this stupid attorney’s barrage.

    • @sula1529
      @sula1529 Рік тому

      I agree. I don't think i could be so calm. Why did she even ask this guy all those questions they were for other people not even for him.. IMO

  • @davidthompson1529
    @davidthompson1529 2 роки тому +497

    This Judge sure is allowing a great deal of bs from this attorney.

    • @IvelisseEP
      @IvelisseEP 2 роки тому +29

      I was thinking the same!

    • @lorenapaniagua1271
      @lorenapaniagua1271 2 роки тому +37

      Agree this lawyer is so rude unprofessional

    • @j-s-m-rasmr5292
      @j-s-m-rasmr5292 2 роки тому +33

      Exactly! And she didn’t allow simple questions from Johnny attorney to Johnny so crazy!

    • @TheKnutification
      @TheKnutification 2 роки тому

      I mean look at the genderless weirdo, what did you expect.

    • @JennyWren333
      @JennyWren333 2 роки тому +3

      Agreed!

  • @bendakstarkiller1270
    @bendakstarkiller1270 2 роки тому +568

    Guys, I am not a lawyer, but it seems like 80% of the questions she asked him had no relevance to the abuses and fights. Why was she allowed to go on with it?

    • @TheEconomicElder
      @TheEconomicElder 2 роки тому +35

      It is relevant, it's shows that he makes money from Jonny so his statement may be bais

    • @miss_treeliv8204
      @miss_treeliv8204 2 роки тому +8

      Maybe to make the lawyer look like an a$$ and make him more likable?

    • @ischmidt007
      @ischmidt007 2 роки тому +9

      To paint Depp in bad light and give him less credibility

    • @dragonlady3278
      @dragonlady3278 2 роки тому +6

      @@lightinthedusk wait WHAT!? She had a relationship of some sort with the judge?

    • @liarliar7491
      @liarliar7491 2 роки тому +17

      @@dragonlady3278 the judge was involved with her lawyer all entangled with the me too movement.. popcorn planet on youtube has the details

  • @kirpdeb
    @kirpdeb Рік тому +71

    I had forgotten how NASTY ELAINE was and how she put in statements that she knew would be rightfully objected to. She didn’t care as long as the Judge was cool and the jury had heard it. She went DIRTY to try to win this case even if she had to throw innuendos and fecal material at decent people in the process. I hope she loses the case just like she lost her integrity and human decency.

  • @DC-tm7ys
    @DC-tm7ys 2 роки тому +43

    This "attorney" is pathetic. Asked 25 times if he was drunk or high in different ways. Gets the same answer every time and ignores the answers.

    • @404.forbidden
      @404.forbidden Рік тому

      „Did he take any Red Bulls?“
      …Whisky? Vodka? Champagne? Or maybe Gin? But what is about Rum? 😂

  • @runningfromManda
    @runningfromManda 2 роки тому +2284

    The way Amber’s attorney is behaving should be illegal. Literally putting words into the witnesses mouth and not giving him a chance to answer the question. Even if he says no, she badgers him trying to get him to change the answer. It’s disgusting.

    • @patrickreynolds5463
      @patrickreynolds5463 2 роки тому +125

      Lol you are describing cross-examination. The whole point is to badger someone into saying what you want them to say. She was pretty clunky though, and talking over the answers was not good.

    • @tangie06_33
      @tangie06_33 2 роки тому +148

      She is annoying to us. She will also be annoying to the jury. It will not bode well for Amber. Good.

    • @SuzD0n
      @SuzD0n 2 роки тому +64

      @@davidthompson1529 Agree, and she seems to allow far fewer objections than from Johnny's legal team yesterday.

    • @adamlv1
      @adamlv1 2 роки тому +56

      It’s actually a pretty good indicator of desperation. Yea, there’s value in getting a witness to break down on the stand or badger them to get them to lose their cool. But if you have a true and compelling argument I think a good attorney can just use the truth to destroy witnesses.

    • @quickreviews4546
      @quickreviews4546 2 роки тому +78

      I agree, I think Amber's team has too much on their hands trying to defend that woman. She's guilty as sin. You can tell by the way the attorneys behave, they have nothing so they try to make something out of nothing.

  • @deborahh3912
    @deborahh3912 2 роки тому +899

    What an awful interrogation. This is almost abuse in itself. On top of it all this lawyer does not even seem to understand the film industry. Horrific.

    • @patrickreynolds5463
      @patrickreynolds5463 2 роки тому +20

      It's just mediocre cross-examination - go into any courtroom any day of the week and you will see something similar going on lol

    • @jutarzo
      @jutarzo 2 роки тому

      There is a presiding Judge, if it was abuse she would stop the so called interrogation, it's cross examination and designed to help people who have bad memories recall what happened.

    • @lindasmith1105
      @lindasmith1105 2 роки тому +23

      I thought this witness was so cool.

    • @whitneyangelie3682
      @whitneyangelie3682 2 роки тому +5

      You sound so naive… “abuse” 🤣🤣🤣

    • @stevie5550
      @stevie5550 2 роки тому +17

      @@whitneyangelie3682 While I wouldn’t use the word ‘abuse’ to describe their motives/wording, but it is most definitely textbook manipulation to get a witness to try to come to the same delusional portrayal that they came up with.

  • @jeffreyhughes8185
    @jeffreyhughes8185 2 роки тому +35

    Lawyer: "Do you know the details about a wedding that you never attended!!!?"
    Witness: "no, I don't"

    • @Anomynous
      @Anomynous 2 роки тому +2

      There's another one. I don't know what the question was, but the answer from the wintness:"After I left I wasn't there, that's correct!" referring to seeing something that would be in favor of AH.

    • @ini2108
      @ini2108 Місяць тому

      😂

  • @ScytheNoire
    @ScytheNoire 2 роки тому +72

    This line of questioning is absurd. Every actor has people they like to work with regularly, and all the production staff on a movie are in hotels.

    • @sula1529
      @sula1529 Рік тому +1

      Yes and that woman AH has no shame IMO

  • @traceyesparza7824
    @traceyesparza7824 2 роки тому +274

    Geez this lawyer is so annoying. Let him finish his answer!

    • @lisanardine9002
      @lisanardine9002 2 роки тому +2

      I totally agree!

    • @jacobgomez2682
      @jacobgomez2682 2 роки тому +3

      Just trying to get any info she can to catch him in something totfaly honest and flip it, shes a losing lawyer trying anything

    • @fire12731
      @fire12731 2 роки тому +1

      Yes she is . 🤬🤬🤬

    • @garyhillman4993
      @garyhillman4993 2 роки тому +2

      She s trying to stop the flow of questions every minute cos she knows she wont like the answers coming in johnnys favour

    • @Asidebar
      @Asidebar 2 роки тому +3

      Judge should be firm with her constant talking over witness and interrupting him. Depp's attorney should be objecting to that kind of rudeness and unprofessional behavior.

  • @djholliday5132
    @djholliday5132 2 роки тому +1265

    Basically, all this horrible attorney proved, was that Johnny is an even greater man & employer than this guy thought. He treats ALL of his employees, and everyone around him very well.

    • @patricksearles9169
      @patricksearles9169 2 роки тому +16

      Amen!!!

    • @thenecessarynews9371
      @thenecessarynews9371 2 роки тому +26

      Exactly Lol and the funny thing is she thinks she doing a good job

    • @djholliday5132
      @djholliday5132 2 роки тому +13

      @@thenecessarynews9371 TRUTH! Her facial expressions say it all. She is wacko!

    • @MisterMister5893
      @MisterMister5893 2 роки тому +10

      Smart man takes care of his friends, his friend will take care of him. We just don't know how truthful these testimonies are that we're hearing here. Could they be perjuring themselves for Johnny Depp? If he falls, they fall. If he doesn't work, they don't get paid.

    • @SoulMammoth
      @SoulMammoth 2 роки тому +2

      Because Johnny surrounds himself with enablers of his drug use, through even long-standing contractual agreements (ensuring subsequent productions hire certain personnel who happen to be enablers). This power structure helps to compare the levels of control over the dysfunctional relationship between he and Amber. Furthermore, does Johnny’s using adversely affect his reliability as a victim of ‘Amber as sole abuser.’ Clearly, it was sadly a dysfunctional marriage largely in part due to the bubble of substance abuse in which toxicity was maintained, and if Johnny’s using was often an impetus of dysfunction, then Amber’s defense has a valid foundation of argument.

  • @Nick-zm2vm
    @Nick-zm2vm Рік тому +29

    This lawyer's logic is so flawed. "You didn't see it happen so it could have still happened and no one saw" yeah and Johnny Depp could have preformed open heart surgery on the back of the plane. You just didn't see it,

  • @bizzarothings9724
    @bizzarothings9724 Рік тому +55

    Johnny deserves his life, career and reputation restored. Justice for Johnny!
    The world stands with you!

  • @wintersteale8869
    @wintersteale8869 2 роки тому +1339

    This woman is awful. She's clearly trying to lead the witness and is failing miserably. I can't believe this judge allowed her to badger the witness like this. How appalling and pathetic.

    • @NoobGaming-cv6bp
      @NoobGaming-cv6bp 2 роки тому +47

      right just thinking the same, America seems terrible corruption.

    • @pixel5341
      @pixel5341 2 роки тому +36

      That is her job. She is trying to extract information in a way that supports Heard's defense. Maybe you can critique her style and effectiveness, but saying, "[she] needs to be fired" is ridiculous. Heard's position is losing from the start, so of course, her defense will try to grab the smallest of leads to persuade the jury.

    • @pixel5341
      @pixel5341 2 роки тому +9

      @@NoobGaming-cv6bp There is corruption, but so far, this trial is absent of it.

    • @morbidmanmusic
      @morbidmanmusic 2 роки тому +6

      Stop gaming, and learn to put a thought together.

    • @mycologymadeeasy5585
      @mycologymadeeasy5585 2 роки тому +4

      It's cringe

  • @jimenalautenslager1900
    @jimenalautenslager1900 2 роки тому +260

    Awful attorney. You can tell she’s desperate

    • @allanjames4795
      @allanjames4795 2 роки тому +1

      No she’s doomed!!! So is that ex

    • @lezamac6
      @lezamac6 2 роки тому

      Lol you know he just got caught lying, unfortunately this guy gave a stronger case for amber

    • @B_Bodziak
      @B_Bodziak 2 роки тому +1

      @@lezamac6 100% disagree. This witness comes across as very truthful, likeable and undeserving of being aggressively questioned in this manner. This entire cross comes across as desperate. She didn't do herself any favors.

    • @janeward722
      @janeward722 2 роки тому

      Yes, she is asking questions that have really nothing to do with him abusing her. Amber has already admitted to hitting him on tape, who is the abuser here?

  • @jameskennedy5824
    @jameskennedy5824 2 роки тому +48

    Absolutely disgusting how she is treating this poor man. Where is she getting this information from the question the witness. How can this be allowed to carry on? Farcical

    • @k.hendrickson8735
      @k.hendrickson8735 Рік тому

      But everyone IS LEARNING that Dep is frequently very drunk!
      And they ARE learning that Dep's "FRIENDS" are really paid employees.... (rolling eye emoji)

  • @qua9
    @qua9 2 роки тому +24

    I don't know why I like his testimony so much. I think it's because he just seems so straightforward - mildly baffled by the statements the attorney keeps pressing upon him and just mildly stating and re-stating what he knows. At one point he can't help but laugh at the extreme statements Amber accuses JD of saying.

  • @msmaam2040
    @msmaam2040 2 роки тому +682

    Imagine just thinking that you're good friends with Depp but he's been looking after you and other crews all these years. Really goes to show how he just wants to help without feeling the need to fuel his ego.

    • @jsully8076
      @jsully8076 2 роки тому +19

      He's a beautiful, gentle, giving man. Johnny forever. ❤️

    • @k.hendrickson8735
      @k.hendrickson8735 Рік тому +3

      That has NOTHING to do with the actual defamation case though. I don't see it that way AT ALL. I see this EMPLOYEE of Dep's is typical of Hollyweird "Friendships". They barter EVERYTHING - and EVERYTHING is in exchange for something....

    • @jsully8076
      @jsully8076 Рік тому +8

      @@k.hendrickson8735 Ok, bye!

    • @nancybatch7007
      @nancybatch7007 Рік тому +11

      And this was essentially done anonymously; Wyatt had no idea that Depp had included him in his contracts.

    • @sadhu7191
      @sadhu7191 Рік тому +2

      Must be weird getting rich for being yourself in the public eye for years

  • @michaellitton4380
    @michaellitton4380 2 роки тому +146

    She is quite possibly the worst attorney I’ve ever witnessed.

    • @debibelden906
      @debibelden906 2 роки тому +5

      They are bullies all of her attorneys

    • @TauxWau
      @TauxWau 2 роки тому +7

      But you have witnessed her...

  • @WendyUsher70
    @WendyUsher70 Рік тому +61

    The moment when it dawns on this witness that Johnny's been taking care of him for so long...you can literally see the second he realizes it. Can you even imagine? You're testifying in a case and suddenly you realize that one of the people in the case is actually probably one of the best people you've ever had in your life.

  • @dustinthegreat4696
    @dustinthegreat4696 Рік тому +32

    This attorney sounds like she's fed up with this case. Doesn't she know she's throwing her career out the window? She must by her tone and how she is going in circles. She sounds like she's going to need psychological help after this case.

    • @yoya4766
      @yoya4766 Рік тому

      And a new career. Her legal career is finished.

    • @astrialindah2773
      @astrialindah2773 Рік тому

      I'm pretty sure she has PTSD from being scambers lawyer..

  • @xm1k3y101x
    @xm1k3y101x 2 роки тому +1163

    What’s crazy is you can tell he’s actually surprised Johnny made sure he was in his personal contracts to make sure he was absolutely secured everything he would need even if the other company’s had any kind of mess up Johnny would use his own contract to make sure he’s secured that’s one hell of a good friend.

    • @anthonyarcanumsanctumregnu9551
      @anthonyarcanumsanctumregnu9551 2 роки тому +33

      I agree with that for sure!

    • @chosenone2363
      @chosenone2363 2 роки тому

      Stop Over rated Johnny Depp is No Angel! He verbal abuse and did drugs! Just ignoring that! Wow 😒

    • @jessepuppy01
      @jessepuppy01 2 роки тому +93

      What I don't understand is how the judge allowed her lawyer to press him about Depp's contracts. It's beyond hearsay. He has no way of knowing yet the judge allowed it.

    • @bellacarroll
      @bellacarroll 2 роки тому +31

      Why does this judge allow anything to fly from her lawyers?

    • @V3rnSqwd5611
      @V3rnSqwd5611 2 роки тому +40

      All my dogs gone eat. Johnny fed his people

  • @SB-bh8bg
    @SB-bh8bg 2 роки тому +687

    It is a shame only those testifying can be treated as "hostile" and not the lawyers themselves. Why the judge didn't tell this lawyer to move on is beyond common sense.

    • @Franaflyby
      @Franaflyby 2 роки тому

      Because the judge is obviously a man hater and probably prefers women if ya get my drift.

    • @donharrold1375
      @donharrold1375 2 роки тому +2

      That’s the whole system of English Law? It’s the only workable approach. Lawyers aren’t in court to be cross examined? They are there to expose the evidence and the facts.

    • @YortOK
      @YortOK 2 роки тому +8

      Depends on you pov. They are there to "guide" the "truth" in a certain direction

    • @gilraenn29
      @gilraenn29 2 роки тому +6

      He doesn’t know what he makes re: salary? Please, we all know what we make. This guy doesn’t recall much. Does he have dementia?

    • @12-grid89
      @12-grid89 2 роки тому +2

      I saw no hostility in this questioning. And clearly the witness had no problem with the questions.

  • @dbzgameplay9034
    @dbzgameplay9034 Рік тому +31

    I feel confident of 2 things after this trial. As a lawyer, she will have a significant pay cut moving forward IF she is ever hired again. She is absolute rubbish. She stumbles, asks irrelevant questions and you walk away wondering what the point was to her questions

  • @05carsm
    @05carsm 2 роки тому +55

    This lady got stuck in the '90s, nobody does this kind of aggressive questioning anymore, and I'll add, this is literally the 'you can´t handle the truth' kind of vibes giving

    • @taylorjeremy71
      @taylorjeremy71 2 роки тому +10

      Her haircut is stuck in the Great Depression

    • @sadhu7191
      @sadhu7191 Рік тому

      She was 30 in the 90s

    • @jlks24_nm97
      @jlks24_nm97 Рік тому

      This is an absolute birds of a feather situation. Have you noticed some district differences in witnesses too.

    • @c2cooler2
      @c2cooler2 Рік тому

      Her hairstyle, makeup, and fashion are all stuck in the 90s!!

    • @autumnlarbre
      @autumnlarbre Рік тому

      Not taking sides but the dark-haired lawyer lady on johnnys side was massively combative.

  • @rosemariebredahl9519
    @rosemariebredahl9519 2 роки тому +773

    I believe that Amber's female lawyer's behavior verging on abusive doesn't help her. I almost feel attacked just listening.

    • @aimeerice4687
      @aimeerice4687 2 роки тому +30

      I'm literally feeling it viscerally

    • @danas6398
      @danas6398 2 роки тому +10

      Same!

    • @japaneseninja33
      @japaneseninja33 2 роки тому +38

      Hah I feel traumatized listening to her lascivious comments involving James Franco. She’s bossy and disgusting

    • @Cafeallday222
      @Cafeallday222 2 роки тому

      She’s so annoying

    • @1chienandalou
      @1chienandalou 2 роки тому +28

      If y’all wanna palate cleanser, I recommend watching the video of Amber‘s former assistant. It’s the male lawyer but he tries to badger her as well but she’s not having it. She’s my new favorite person.

  • @Mk-yg4vf
    @Mk-yg4vf 2 роки тому +420

    This “lawyer” is an embarrassment to the legal profession…..

    • @yourmomshouse8993
      @yourmomshouse8993 2 роки тому +7

      Unfortunately every lawyer I’ve been against in court behaves this way I can’t figure out why my attorneys aren’t this aggressive.

    • @TomasTitan08
      @TomasTitan08 2 роки тому +1

      @@yourmomshouse8993 what were you in court for? (I’m curious not a cop)

    • @missyreed1804
      @missyreed1804 2 роки тому

      Yep 👍

    • @jonahjameson8224
      @jonahjameson8224 2 роки тому

      @@yourmomshouse8993 because you pay them very little. Pay them a few 100k. They'll fight for you then.

    • @yourmomshouse8993
      @yourmomshouse8993 2 роки тому

      @@jonahjameson8224 I agree with what you’re saying but if I tell you I’ve paid them a few 100k would you believe me? I think it’s a very dirty world but honestly I’m considering going to law school so I can defend myself going forward.

  • @giacomo7481
    @giacomo7481 2 роки тому +87

    This lawyer can’t help herself , she’s Condescending and Rude when there’s absolutely no need for it , all she does is make herself sound combative towards witnesses and has no basis for half her questions, they already can’t stand her client , she should try being polite and less nasty cause all it does is reflect back to her Client, this dude isn’t a witness where u gotta be aggressive with , her overall TONE speaks for Ambers personality - NASTY

  • @lydiamalone1859
    @lydiamalone1859 2 роки тому +23

    attorney is helping the other side! Can't believe the judge is allowing us. We all hear all kinds of things that are rumors or whatever about third parties we don't know. She's trying to force it that if he didn't see it it doesn't mean it didn't happen. It's almost like she's trying to plant seeds in minds of the jurors that it did happen he just didn't see it. That is insane-- what else is he supposed to say? It blows my mind that this is an American Court. I would call this witness badgering.

  • @tracymoyers5564
    @tracymoyers5564 2 роки тому +146

    Somebody shut her lawyer up. She's just as sleezy as Amber.

    • @normafoster1959
      @normafoster1959 2 роки тому +9

      Her lawyer is just like Amber.

    • @senpaisear-edge
      @senpaisear-edge 2 роки тому +7

      literally. like how did amber hire the most annoying lawyers ever?

    • @scottf5791
      @scottf5791 2 роки тому

      I would never want to be around these two woman. Unbearable

    • @julienewman1761
      @julienewman1761 2 роки тому +1

      It must be narcissist Aunt that's her lawyer.

    • @Tammy-Jeanne-Movies
      @Tammy-Jeanne-Movies 2 роки тому

      Lol

  • @teddybear2U
    @teddybear2U 2 роки тому +793

    I love this witness, he stands up to this attorney. And she makes herself look bad. As a lawyer , she is badgering the witness.
    But, she is making herself look terrible to the jurors. Johnny, looking good.

    • @normafoster1959
      @normafoster1959 2 роки тому

      she doesn't seem bright. Comes across as an auld fart too. AH reckoned she'd coast through this pile of steaming lies. She was mistaken.

    • @therealdiegoalunan
      @therealdiegoalunan 2 роки тому +28

      Is this the same “amica” cream lawyer ?

    • @wendywehner2320
      @wendywehner2320 2 роки тому +4

      @@therealdiegoalunan Yes

    • @1966vonny
      @1966vonny 2 роки тому +14

      Amica cream 🤦‍♀️ 🤣🤣 How long did that go on for?!

    • @lindasmith1105
      @lindasmith1105 2 роки тому

      He missed work because your psycho client severed his finger. And it got infected

  • @pAusten
    @pAusten Рік тому +61

    *best quote from this witness: "the only reason I remember that flight is because Amber yelled at me."
    I'm catching up from this testimony 2 weeks ago. I'm curious what performance Amber is giving this Monday, May 16.
    This witness proves what a great guy Johnny Depp is. Amber's attorney came off as combative. She might watch too many fictional tv law and court programs.

    • @C4RL1NN
      @C4RL1NN Рік тому

      That’s what I’ve been saying all along- she is coming off as the EXACT opposite of genuine. Real. Truthful. Honest. Etc.
      She needs to have some sense slapped into her (no pun intended). She needs to wake tf up and realize that the public isn’t half as dumb as she apparently believes them to be. And that life isn’t one big performance. It’s not a movie. She stinks of a false sense of superiority. As though she can just buy the best PR team and lawyers and it’ll all be good and she can continue on with her horrid people skills and awful self-serving habits.

    • @kristiinakapinen2071
      @kristiinakapinen2071 Рік тому +1

      That’s what’s so ridiculous! Like she’s watched too much Murder She Wrote - but I still don’t understand how that’s made her even more incompetent as an attorney... and somehow it clearly has😅 She amazes me, truly. It’s scary that Bredehof has any effect on people’s lives.

  • @The.Nasty.
    @The.Nasty. 2 роки тому +41

    I love how all of her questions trying to frame this guy as unreliable, due to favoritism towards Johnny, completely backfire on her.
    Dude was getting perks from Johnny he didn’t even know about, and relaxing in nice hotels because everyone on Johnny’s crew stayed in nice hotels… just proves how awesome Johnny is. 😂

    • @BobTaile
      @BobTaile 2 роки тому

      The Nasty: It is very telling that you are not able to write the word 'man' and 'he' and you use immature alternatives.
      Yet you are able to bring yourself to write the word "she".
      Quite probably you have the same mental struggle to say the word "man".
      This may demonstrate that you have a subconscious problem in recognising the witness is actually - A MAN.
      Hmm... very interesting.

    • @The.Nasty.
      @The.Nasty. 2 роки тому

      @@BobTaile lmfao you sound like you jar and sniff your own farts, kick rocks weirdo. 😂

  • @earthling1984
    @earthling1984 2 роки тому +2588

    This is crazy. All I can say is, this dude has true friends. It seems she is the aggressor. And he is the submissive/introvert. But, when your friends love you, it shows something.

    • @g.b.5206
      @g.b.5206 2 роки тому

      Or maybe is because she is the aggressor and everyone else knows!

    • @lizlagle671
      @lizlagle671 2 роки тому +36

      Especially if you pay them. Or benefit them in some way.

    • @Oshaoxin
      @Oshaoxin 2 роки тому +16

      @@charlottecannon314 These true friends are not allowed in court :p

    • @ohyeahokay3494
      @ohyeahokay3494 2 роки тому +50

      I'd like the hear from Amber's "friends"

    • @jlee733
      @jlee733 2 роки тому +3

      Well said

  • @AgitpropPsyop
    @AgitpropPsyop 2 роки тому +358

    “You don’t know what happens behind closed doors… DO YOU?”
    *no one does… this is ridiculous*

    • @beatleschick1000
      @beatleschick1000 2 роки тому +16

      Reading all these comments, this one for some reason made me laugh out loud, truly. It’s exactly how she sounds!

    • @PinkyGirlstyle23
      @PinkyGirlstyle23 2 роки тому

      She is ridiculous in general.

    • @jfrsnjhnsn
      @jfrsnjhnsn Рік тому +17

      “You don’t know what happens behind closed doors… DO YOU?”
      "No."
      "So then do you know what happened behind THESE closed doors?"
      "Still no"
      "How about THESE closed doors?"
      "Still no."
      "Okay, and how about THEEEESSSEE closed doors?"
      "Your Honor, objection, ridiculous"
      "I'll allow it"
      "DO YOU?"
      "Still no."
      "ok and then so what about THESE closed doors???????"

    • @Roxy-tw4hi
      @Roxy-tw4hi Рік тому +1

      and there're Johnny and Amber's friends living behind closed doors with them but they also saw nothing.

    • @christinebelliveau7318
      @christinebelliveau7318 Рік тому +1

      Sometimes you hear stuff...

  • @nickkerr8775
    @nickkerr8775 Рік тому +18

    How is she allowed to attack this guy so much, u would think he's on trial for homicide or something.

  • @pakONEoh
    @pakONEoh Рік тому +4

    "You don't know so I guess I shouldn't ask you."
    Heard's lawyer finally got it at the end 🤣

  • @Britneyfurg
    @Britneyfurg 2 роки тому +353

    This attorney is so frustrating. Why is the judge allowing her to attack the witnesses over questions that are almost irrelevant?

    • @jasonr5989
      @jasonr5989 2 роки тому +42

      Maybe the judge is allowing the defence to hang itself in the eyes of the jury...?

    • @Britneyfurg
      @Britneyfurg 2 роки тому +3

      @@jasonr5989 Valid point!

    • @yourmomshouse8993
      @yourmomshouse8993 2 роки тому +3

      Judges put their fingers on the scale

    • @katokamakazie5549
      @katokamakazie5549 2 роки тому +14

      I have been sussing this judge since day 1 with the first witness she seems bias to Amber's side. These questions though and if the witness does not give her the answer she wants them to she strikes it so why ask the question in the first place? unlike her client some people actually prefer telling the truth on that stand

    • @Silverlane.
      @Silverlane. 2 роки тому

      Right!!

  • @sempergumby2341
    @sempergumby2341 2 роки тому +614

    Everyone keeps talking about Amber's attorney in this comment section but this judge is absolutely horrid to allow her to continue this line of questioning.

    • @TheSusansweeney
      @TheSusansweeney 2 роки тому +25

      Agree 100%

    • @salninethousand2496
      @salninethousand2496 2 роки тому +52

      She was trying to discredit him - repeatedly ask him a bunch of mostly irrelevant questions about people dates, events, etc., trying to catch him up. Suffice it to say, it backfired hugely. This guy's solid and the lawyer looked ridiculous.

    • @Bowzerbro
      @Bowzerbro 2 роки тому +54

      Judge seem bias towards Amber's side.

    • @Jason_Van_Stone
      @Jason_Van_Stone 2 роки тому +39

      She looks like she has a whole room in her house dedicated to hating men.

    • @OkieBadu
      @OkieBadu 2 роки тому

      No they should keep letting them talk because all they're doing is making themselves look retarded.

  • @melief469
    @melief469 2 роки тому +19

    She harassed him so much and interrupted him so much that he just started saying ‘I don’t know.’ Can’t blame him.

  • @Santor-
    @Santor- Рік тому +32

    Painful to listen to this lawyer, and she never seems to be able to make an actual point, just harassing thevwitnesses.

    • @simmyz
      @simmyz Рік тому +1

      exactly, witness should sue AH attorneys for harrassment

  • @cherylcascone7840
    @cherylcascone7840 2 роки тому +400

    Why is this Judge allowing such repetitive, questions, over and over. Just to confuse the jurors? The Attorney is ridiculous. How can he answer questions about things he wasn’t privy to. Just a ridiculous waste of time.

    • @amandataylor8745
      @amandataylor8745 2 роки тому +8

      Agreed

    • @gordonkruger7588
      @gordonkruger7588 2 роки тому +24

      This lawyer is so disrespectful to the judge! She does not even wait for her to react to the objections raised. She just steamroller on! The judge should not allow this bullying from her!

    • @rhianng9981
      @rhianng9981 2 роки тому +8

      Im hoping that it will be so that if he wins, there can be little to no challenge later. Give her side everything they ask. Good judges, if she transpires to be 1 of them, also have strategy and foresight

    • @jonfreeman9682
      @jonfreeman9682 2 роки тому

      Was wondering the same thing. What an idiot prosecutor. Clearly low IQ who just scraped thru the bar and deserves to go to jail for lowering American IQ.

    • @lightingthedarkremoteviewi8086
      @lightingthedarkremoteviewi8086 2 роки тому

      She's sooo annoying

  • @grahamdavis22
    @grahamdavis22 2 роки тому +292

    I really like this person. He puts up with the hassling and repetition and deliberately confusing nonsense so politely and coolie. Makes the lawyer look like a desperate arse.

    • @Thumperoo
      @Thumperoo 2 роки тому +6

      that's because she is ! Well put.

    • @99shoebox
      @99shoebox 2 роки тому +3

      me too. what a cool dude. showed the lawyer up, that’s for sure. she’s incompetent! asking the most ridiculous and irrelevant questions! the judge is not much better, letting her witter on and harassing a perfectly innocent witness! I’m quite shocked. leading the witness etc. Disgraceful.

    • @cappsginny699
      @cappsginny699 2 роки тому

      *witter on?

  • @kaitlyne1870
    @kaitlyne1870 Рік тому +16

    This line of questioning was so bizarre, nonsensical, and frustrating to listen to! How can someone with as much money as Amber Heard not be able to afford a better lawyer? Did the respectable ones just all turn down her case?!

    • @sharonsobolewski3707
      @sharonsobolewski3707 Рік тому +2

      THATS WHAT I WONDERED A POOR LIAR NEEDS A GOOD LAWYER LOL

    • @theraregazelle
      @theraregazelle Рік тому +1

      I was honestly thinking the same thing … I personally feel she was denied a lot and not many wanted to defend her !

  • @FrustratedBaboon
    @FrustratedBaboon 2 роки тому +28

    You have to understand that she is looking to catch someone in a lie or fraud so they can use that. She is just defending Amber by asking any stupid questions because they have nothing on Johnny.

  • @MaybeNextYear03
    @MaybeNextYear03 2 роки тому +243

    This lawyer makes me cringe with every question. Let the guy speak, and try not to sound like you want to leap the stand and attack him please.

    • @vivianezogg6794
      @vivianezogg6794 2 роки тому +5

      She's trying unsuccessfully to pull a Juan Martinez here. 🤣

    • @B_Bodziak
      @B_Bodziak 2 роки тому +12

      Usually, the defense's attorneys try not to be confrontational with the plaintiff's witnesses because it makes the jury dislike them. She's doing a good job of being dislikeable.

    • @maamemyk9756
      @maamemyk9756 2 роки тому +5

      this lawyer is terrible, feels like she is bullying the poor guy

    • @wendylu6939
      @wendylu6939 2 роки тому +6

      I know! She's beyond rude.

    • @thewizardsofthezoo5376
      @thewizardsofthezoo5376 2 роки тому +5

      ... and you were lodged in a Hotel, not a shack or a kennel, ... that's suspicious...

  • @jamedeo4555
    @jamedeo4555 2 роки тому +168

    This judge is useless at controlling her court room.

  • @reeafu9290
    @reeafu9290 2 роки тому +23

    This witness seems to be so gentle, kind and well behaved. I don’t have that much experience, but I’ve followed and studied cases and never in my life would I imagine to hear such an idiot interrogatoire from a lawyer. This woman is ridiculous!

  • @angztekindustries
    @angztekindustries Рік тому +8

    Johnny won't let himself be a victim and it's refreshing. There's worse habits than drugs...like abusing "loved ones".🕵🏽‍♂️

  • @korinaellis3738
    @korinaellis3738 2 роки тому +137

    This is a true Gentleman and a friend.

    • @expressivepets1
      @expressivepets1 2 роки тому +6

      He comes across very credible.

    • @B_Bodziak
      @B_Bodziak 2 роки тому +2

      @x x I've watched his full testimony twice. What did she expose?

  • @vanessadavis5771
    @vanessadavis5771 2 роки тому +335

    This judge is so bias it’s embarrassing that she’s not even trying to hide it

    • @whitehouse9999
      @whitehouse9999 2 роки тому +34

      Looks like amber’s gonna win this if it was up to the judge. Sickening 😤

    • @sgt_loeram1933
      @sgt_loeram1933 2 роки тому

      @@whitehouse9999 Amber is a psychopath

    • @Raussl
      @Raussl 2 роки тому +25

      defamation lawsuits are always difficult to pull through. That ain't actually a bias, unless you can provide specific examples. And even if Johnny prevails, he won't get even close to the money he wants. And before you say that I'm on Amber's side here...I'm not. Actually rooting for Johnny, but unfortunately manipulative narcissists get off extremely easy in US courts.

    • @bonniehowell9206
      @bonniehowell9206 2 роки тому +4

      @@Raussl I completely agree. All the defense needs to do is show clear and convincing evidence that what Amber quoted in that article wasn't libel. I wonder when she takes the stand she will try to claim it wasn't about Depp.

    • @WE-ci8cq
      @WE-ci8cq 2 роки тому

      @@bonniehowell9206 I think they have it with the kitchen cabinet slamming video. No excuse for that. Most comments are making the excuse that his mother just died and he just found out he was getting robbed. I would not live with the person who behaved that way. And I’m sure it wasn’t the first time. They are both sick people and the whole thing should be dropped and they should not be together

  • @andreamoroso6198
    @andreamoroso6198 Рік тому +3

    What is this attorney’s point regarding this man’s pay? She just goes on and on with pointless questions. She is badgering this guy.

  • @lisafield4154
    @lisafield4154 Рік тому +19

    How ridiculously aggressive this incompetent woman attorney is. She is literally badgering a witness, why is this allowed? I would just say F you and walk out or look at the judge and say I will leave if you don't calm this woman down because I'm not even able to concentrate.

    • @MENTY-B
      @MENTY-B Рік тому +2

      I’d take the contempt of court at this point-
      She is 🤬 ridiculous, “Trying, or Not”…
      Which she is clearly NOT. She’s just butthurt after being BULLDOGGED BY JD’S team.

    • @sharonsobolewski3707
      @sharonsobolewski3707 Рік тому +2

      I WONDER IF THE WITNESS MAY SAY MAY I APPROACH AND ASK FOR ASYLUM FROM HER LOL

  • @barrymcdougal4816
    @barrymcdougal4816 2 роки тому +230

    HOW THE JUDGE ALLOWS THIS CRAP TO CONTINUE IS STARTLING.

    • @jackpack3506
      @jackpack3506 2 роки тому

      I agree

    • @kimberlybecker9560
      @kimberlybecker9560 2 роки тому +10

      I agree! The judge seems incompetent also.

    • @jaysencorbett1855
      @jaysencorbett1855 2 роки тому +12

      Family court is the same, if not worst. Opinions are allowed as evidence. Facts are overlooked or dismissed. Anyone can lie under oath. Without consequences. It’s a joke. Johnny has cleared his name regardless of the outcome and I will never watch any film she is in.

    • @xlawliipop
      @xlawliipop 2 роки тому +9

      She let's Heard's lawyers make asses of themselves.

    • @natalyaborgul153
      @natalyaborgul153 Рік тому

      She must have fallen asleep listening to the same and illogical questions

  • @melodysill4532
    @melodysill4532 2 роки тому +382

    I was married to a drug addict for 7 years and never once did he lay a finger on me. Horrible line of questioning and ridiculous path for this attorney to take.

    • @ashleymeggan
      @ashleymeggan 2 роки тому +32

      Thank you. It is incredible - the casual demonization of addiction is simply stunning.

    • @SGTSLACKASS
      @SGTSLACKASS 2 роки тому +10

      Most women would never admit that they have a need to play the victim. So they will use anything they can to help them achieve sympathy.

    • @estelleceleste2765
      @estelleceleste2765 2 роки тому

      Isn't AH an addict herself; as i understand? She might cover herself as well with her own violence...

    • @deerheart87
      @deerheart87 2 роки тому

      You were lucky , Remember Depp is a drunk and is drunk 7 days a week , plus using drugs .

    • @danielledrouin1944
      @danielledrouin1944 2 роки тому +34

      I too was married to an addict for close to 10 years ,we have children together. He unfortunately died of an overdose . He may have been loaded all the time but he never would have laid a hand on me or the children. He was a beautiful soul ♡

  • @valley5617
    @valley5617 Рік тому +6

    How in the world is the judge allowing the lawyer to enter evidence? “Have you heard of Greg accusing JD of attacking him?” She may as well ask, “ have you ever heard of Sally, Cindy and Susie accusing him of attacking him?”

  • @Vitagirl
    @Vitagirl Рік тому +4

    This is disgraceful and I’m just blown away by this attorney’s line of questioning

  • @authoredens581
    @authoredens581 2 роки тому +212

    "Johnny could have kicked Amber on the flight right" "not that I recall", "so he could have killed Amber as well" . This is quite possibly the worst trial lawyer ever.

    • @Missglam67
      @Missglam67 2 роки тому +16

      I agree! Her line of questions are ridiculous! “So he could have done this to Amber, right? “ you didn’t see any violence but he could have been, right?” That is like asking roses are red violets are blue but they could be pink and purple right? It’s stupid!

    • @Atychiphobe
      @Atychiphobe 2 роки тому +14

      This lawyer could have kicked Amber on the flight.

    • @MolokoMinus
      @MolokoMinus 2 роки тому

      Especially since there’s nothing that can be known with 100% certainty when using this lawyers logic. For all anybody knows, Johnny could’ve stuck a swarm of hornets up Amber Heard’s ass, removed them and used a straw to spitball each one individually at her face for the duration of the flight. We weren’t there so how do you know that DIDNT happen?!

    • @cappsginny699
      @cappsginny699 2 роки тому +1

      He's obviously being ver evasive because there's just too many things he can't recall. He's such a good friend of JD's that they often vacation together. He not going to rat him out, no way!

  • @ssuz3832
    @ssuz3832 2 роки тому +119

    OMG FINALLY HEARSAY!!!! Wtf as soon as the attorney said “he said” that entire line of questioning became hearsay.. I can’t take it lol

    • @lilmama4426
      @lilmama4426 2 роки тому

      I’ve been thinking the same thing; been trying to figure out why this witness is allowed to answer most of the defendant’s attorney questions about hearsay (except one maybe)but when the Witnesses for Mr. Depp are being questioned by his attorney the witnesses are shut down & aren’t allowed to answer because it’s “hearsay”(esp his security guard). Seems kinda off balanced to me.🤔

  • @natakyi1
    @natakyi1 Рік тому +7

    "I guess you don't know so I shouldn't ask you that question!". Holy smokes what kinda of lawyer humiliates herself like this on live TV. Amber needs to go for her change!

  • @lordgrimm2905
    @lordgrimm2905 Рік тому +5

    The way a man treats those who serve him tells you all you need about his character

  • @billieboybuddha4238
    @billieboybuddha4238 2 роки тому +357

    Does this woman realize this man is just a witness and not there to be sentenced? And anyway, what does this all have to do with this case? It's total madness!

    • @DavidMartinez-pq4yk
      @DavidMartinez-pq4yk 2 роки тому

      She’s going to say that they don’t recall anything in order to discredit them. Related or not doesn’t really matter. She is building a case to say JD’s witnesses are unreliable, that they are only remembering testimony against AH. She’s unpleasant for sure but she’s not quite as stupid as she seems.

    • @philswaim392
      @philswaim392 2 роки тому +10

      Theyre trying to get witnesses to corroborate Ambers claims that Johnny beat her yelled at her abusively etc.
      They also at the beginning were using facts to place the witness with Johnny Depp so as to claim he MUST HAVE witnessed these events.
      Unfortunately the lawyer doesnt understand the film industry and how logistics works.

    • @RK-ej1to
      @RK-ej1to 2 роки тому +2

      The projects and dates are to prove either Johnny’s career was either not effected by the claims or that he was ruining his own career. They seem to jump between the two narratives quite frequently.

    • @philswaim392
      @philswaim392 2 роки тому +1

      @@RK-ej1to well that too kinda but more so to corroborate the events. Basically to beat defamation they just have to prove johnnys alleged abuse of Amber is true. But theyre also claiming theres no way someone could know the oped was talking about Johnny.....but one witness did question that saying "what other husband did she have?"
      That wasnt challeneged or stricken from the record. The jury will remember that

    • @philswaim392
      @philswaim392 2 роки тому +1

      @@Jaac822 trying to establish that johnny and him are close, he should have seen these things, or that hes clearly biased towards johnnys largesse andnso wont tell the truth

  • @taraderosa2969
    @taraderosa2969 2 роки тому +230

    I cannot stand Heard’s lawyer. The woman treats witnesses and the other attorneys like annoying children. I suspect the jury is already sick of her BS and she hasn’t even started her case yet!

    • @valley5617
      @valley5617 Рік тому +2

      She likes saying nasty words.

    • @cynthialinton5427
      @cynthialinton5427 Рік тому

      The lady for Heard is STUPID… not just this questioning but all her questioning, she is an embarrassment for all attorneys. I can’t believe she passed law school

    • @christophercolumbus8944
      @christophercolumbus8944 Рік тому

      how is that? what trial were you watching
      the guy is clearly withholding truth
      he is not being completely honest so she is pushing for answers

    • @ceem3349
      @ceem3349 Рік тому

      How come no one is stopping grandma lawyer from blabbing

    • @sharonsobolewski3707
      @sharonsobolewski3707 Рік тому +1

      JUSTICE FOR THE JURY AND EVERYONE IN COURT FOR TORTURE

  • @persphoneplumbottom720
    @persphoneplumbottom720 2 роки тому +2

    The defense lawyer is so rude.

  • @eliseluetjen5242
    @eliseluetjen5242 Рік тому +4

    His testimony has NOTHING to do with this!!! Even if he was struggling with drugs and alcohol it does not make him an abuser!!!!!!!

  • @emmyabbottoriginals
    @emmyabbottoriginals 2 роки тому +32

    Is this guy on trial for being Johnny's favorite sound guy?
    This questioning is ridiculous.

  • @Pink_143_6
    @Pink_143_6 2 роки тому +192

    Ambers attorney imo was badgering this witness with questions that are irrelevant to the case. What does his earned income have to do with anything?

    • @MyWadester
      @MyWadester 2 роки тому +26

      They are trying to focus/distract the jury with other crap. This cross examiner is terrible! She sinking the team with her stupid questions.

    • @crystalregan2481
      @crystalregan2481 2 роки тому +16

      Yes she is badgering the witness! 💯 Judge what does this have to do with the case really he also made it clear they're good friends what the hell! Does this have to do with abuse or the case at all! 🤬

    • @nicovalentine5353
      @nicovalentine5353 2 роки тому +13

      Right?! "You're aware that Mr. Depp has put you in to his contracts, correct?!" Yeah, so TF what, Good God...

    • @rhondagodwin3991
      @rhondagodwin3991 2 роки тому +6

      Badgering - Exactly.

    • @DJ-ri7me
      @DJ-ri7me 2 роки тому +9

      I see it as they are trying to get him to admit johnny is incompetent, I feel that's the narrative they are going with, a guy forgets lines etc, but all have said positive things about him. They are asking about his income to prove he is beholden to Johnny and to paint him as not a credible witness.

  • @ABC-48483
    @ABC-48483 Рік тому +3

    "Did you see any powders?" Cmon man. JUSTICE FOR JOHNNY!!!!!

  • @cinemastudios9836
    @cinemastudios9836 Рік тому

    "I guess you don't know so I shouldn't ask you if you know." PRICELESS 😆😆😆

  • @GreaseGrime
    @GreaseGrime 2 роки тому +239

    This lawyer is a joke. OBVIOUSLY, he doesn't know what happened when he wasn't there. So, she proved the sound guy isn't a psychic.....

    • @silverkitty2503
      @silverkitty2503 2 роки тому +5

      THAT is what she is trying to show ...he doesn't know what he hasn't seen therefore what he says he has seen ...is not relevant...and proves NOTHING. There is also a way to paint a picture with questions ...and to make people think of possible answers and that is what she is doing.

    • @kunal07ma
      @kunal07ma 2 роки тому +1

      😅🤣

    • @kennikia2234
      @kennikia2234 2 роки тому

      @@silverkitty2503 Of course what people do see is still relevant. No witness is omnipotent or psychic, there will be limits to all witnesses. That does not mean that their testimony is worthless. Otherwise ALL witness testimony would be worthless lmao

    • @silverkitty2503
      @silverkitty2503 2 роки тому

      @@kennikia2234 I went to law school....depp is losing because of a shitty legal team ..and i can see why he lost the uk trial ..a judge instructs a jury as to which paradigms or constraints along which they can give a verdict ..they are not allowed to to give a verdict based on who they think is the nicest person. A judge is going to come along and say ..yeah you have to ignore that and only return a verdict based within these rules ...his legal team is rubbish

    • @caspar_gomez
      @caspar_gomez 2 роки тому

      @@silverkitty2503 thats ridiculous, if you're right you're just confirming what we all know... the legal system is a joke. Also why would you say you went to law school, rather than just say you're a lawyer. Did you not ever actually practice law?

  • @nikkibayo
    @nikkibayo 2 роки тому +368

    This lawyer is hurting her client’s case, in my opinion. Given the fact that her client, is Amber, I’m not too sad about it.

    • @DocOrtmeyer
      @DocOrtmeyer 2 роки тому +14

      I feel bad for her, until I remember that Amber deserves ALL OF THIS.

    • @usermc1234
      @usermc1234 2 роки тому +8

      Cos the defendant has a weak claim, there's not enough information to defend her.. she could pick side information like verbal sparring and exchange of mutual insults or probe into whatever the witnesses said and try to uncover a bad side to it. Unfortunately for them, it uncovered info detrimental to her client.

    • @danielwhite5773
      @danielwhite5773 2 роки тому

      I just saw this on the news that the last time we we

    • @ancutaferaru5191
      @ancutaferaru5191 2 роки тому +1

      Lol.. Totally agree !!!

    • @MH-zg5yw
      @MH-zg5yw 2 роки тому

      Heard's attorney's know they have a weak defense, so it seems their main tactic is to work hard to impeach Depp's witnesses.

  • @amritashar9592
    @amritashar9592 Рік тому +1

    I am second hand embarrassed by her line of questions.

  • @aportman58
    @aportman58 Рік тому +3

    This female attorney is horrible...she would make me so mad I would dig in that much harder to defend as a witness. She has got to be the most annoying bullying attorneys I have ever listened to!

  • @user-vo2cj3fx8s
    @user-vo2cj3fx8s 2 роки тому +299

    This lawyer is not good. She is grasping for straws and is leading the witness, along with phrasing so much as asked and answered that they would have to object to everything she asked. She also said the contract for Pirates of the Caribbean was dated 2022, not 2002. So for someone trying to be so specific, she is making mistakes in front of the jury.

    • @Michele-pt6uw
      @Michele-pt6uw 2 роки тому +15

      She's bn making mistakes left n right

    • @nevadagrace3514
      @nevadagrace3514 2 роки тому +6

      You are corrrect B! It’s hard to try and prove her accusations when they are not true!

    • @jesusfeliciano2977
      @jesusfeliciano2977 2 роки тому +3

      Agreed

    • @lottatroublemaker6130
      @lottatroublemaker6130 2 роки тому +1

      @Mami Makala She said «Amica Cream».

    • @tiahuianikau2806
      @tiahuianikau2806 2 роки тому

      Even i heard that 2022 even the poor man getting harassed heard it than she returned to 2oo2

  • @gostreiver8036
    @gostreiver8036 2 роки тому +279

    Imagine being an “esteemed” lawyer representing a high profile celebrity client. And resorting to using tabloid news papers as “evidence”
    I love how he just laughs at her and says. I wouldn’t find this credible anyway

    • @pier-lucgaranddion1527
      @pier-lucgaranddion1527 2 роки тому +4

      Immediately stricken down from the court transcript, BUT NOT FORM OUR MINDS. We all heard it, haha. And now it's on the internet. Also, it was stricken because it's an opinion and wasn't related to the question, but I'm pretty sure almost all of us agree with him!

    • @buttaflyykiss
      @buttaflyykiss 2 роки тому

      time stamp ?

    • @sebastian5742
      @sebastian5742 2 роки тому

      The part of this trial is how JD position was destroyed by Amber. That's why they use those tabloids. Not as a source of truth. Just to show that he didn't have a perfectly clear account before the whole AH situation.

    • @biancaenera2500
      @biancaenera2500 Рік тому

      @@sebastian5742 oh well, or using the brain could it be that such newspapers wanted to do articles used to sell more at that time especially? You know, what kind of gossip is saying "he's a great actor"??? We need the "blood" the hard gossips and juicy lies or exaggerations here and there to be interested. This happens to anybody else in the world every single day... Not so hard to understand. 😉

    • @sebastian5742
      @sebastian5742 Рік тому

      @@biancaenera2500 Chill... We all get it, but they still scored a few points doing that. You like it or not.

  • @mannaphilips4623
    @mannaphilips4623 Рік тому +1

    Please stop this lawyer!

  • @JerrodAmolyan
    @JerrodAmolyan 2 роки тому +4

    Team AH: "Is it true that you were paid money for work?"
    Witness: "...Yes?"
    What kinda gotcha moment is this? :D

  • @weenfain2321
    @weenfain2321 2 роки тому +512

    I’ve watched a LOT of trials read case studies transcripts etc. I’ve never in my life seen attorneys this inadequate and unable to do their job

    • @EvakerstinL
      @EvakerstinL 2 роки тому

      Yes it's a joke 🤣🤣 so many stupid often irrelevant

    • @Freakazoid12345
      @Freakazoid12345 2 роки тому

      You into that for work or pleasure?

    • @Brythemagicguy1
      @Brythemagicguy1 2 роки тому +7

      Kyle rittenhouse case

    • @hopebullard460
      @hopebullard460 2 роки тому

      They have no evidence to go on! It's aLl hearsay!!!

    • @VogtTD
      @VogtTD Рік тому

      What about the Rittenhouse prosecuter?

  • @georgecarberry9222
    @georgecarberry9222 2 роки тому +154

    The lawyer is harassing the witness. She's virtually attacking him about things he doesn't know anything about. She's trying to get him to answer questions regarding information to which he has no knowledge.

    • @nealm6764
      @nealm6764 2 роки тому +1

      He is up there lying away to protect his friend and sugar daddy, of course she is going to be hostile.

    • @ThePaintedHope
      @ThePaintedHope 2 роки тому +2

      George this is emberassing. The lawyer is doing their job. Your bias towards Depp shouldnt influence your view thos much.

    • @kennikia2234
      @kennikia2234 2 роки тому +5

      @@nealm6764 I genuinely do not understand how you can watch this trial so far and believe anything other than Johnny is a battered husband with a substance abuse problem, while Amber is a lying, manipulative, and violent partner that has already been arrested for domestic abuse of her previous spouse. Seriously, get real.

    • @nealm6764
      @nealm6764 2 роки тому +2

      @@kennikia2234 The lawyers job is to do their best for their client, not cater to what UA-cam commenters think.
      So while you have the luxury of gushing for charming Johnny and all of his sycophants that he surrounds himself with who will say anything to protect him, the lawyer doesn't have that luxury.
      This guy dated Johnny's sister who wrote/handled Johnny's contracts and he wants to pretend he doesn't know she was writing him into them? Come on.

    • @drrelaxgaming9481
      @drrelaxgaming9481 2 роки тому +1

      @@kennikia2234 its obvious that @Neal M is a bot 😂😂😂

  • @stickingupformyrights
    @stickingupformyrights 2 роки тому +2

    How does that judge allow her to keep asking the same question and answered over again and again .

  • @fakename503
    @fakename503 Рік тому +1

    Why does the judge constantly let the defense attorney talk back to the plantiff's team/attorney? Like when they object she (usually the older woman does it), she goes, "No it's not, (trying to explain).". Like, she's not really even talking to the judge sometimes.

  • @morgantucker3556
    @morgantucker3556 2 роки тому +87

    How many times did he CLEARLY answer “no” yet she keeps asking the same questions just in different ways. It’s lousy and crappy.

  • @bittnerbs
    @bittnerbs 2 роки тому +368

    This attorney makes you really really really not like her. She’s unnecessarily aggressive and not doing her client any favors (not that anyone could do Amber any favors). Amber is going to have to pay this man!

    • @billbailey7193
      @billbailey7193 2 роки тому +8

      She’s showboating half the time

    • @craiggallagher7292
      @craiggallagher7292 2 роки тому +5

      I have been on the periphery of this case, but it has gotten under my skin and now I have it on, at least in the background, most of the day. Does Amber's $100 million counter suit have any merit?

    • @sheilagravely5621
      @sheilagravely5621 2 роки тому +5

      I'm praying for Johnny.

    • @rosemariefrusteri4087
      @rosemariefrusteri4087 2 роки тому +7

      This attorney is all over the board!!!
      LACK OF FOUNDATION!!!!!
      UNREAL how off point this whole trial has become! DERAILED

    • @mammeljuice
      @mammeljuice 2 роки тому +5

      alot of attorneys are not easily liked. But the question is: is this attorney effective? Its ok to not be liked if you are effective as an attorney. Most attorneys have many "enemies". But overall i feel like this attorney is not effective. ALso heard's male attorney on cross with JD did nothing but reference text messages the whole time and that seemedVERY ineffective. overall so far, not very effective cross from heard's attorneys

  • @stevemcmillan2213
    @stevemcmillan2213 Рік тому +3

    I suggest that the attorney continuing to suggest to Mr Wyatt that even though he never witnessed Mr. Depp being violent towards Amber Heard in front of him, that may have been behind closed doors, applies to her also. She's never seen Mr. Depp being violent either, nor does she know if he had been in private and yet she asserts that he was, based on her client's assertions. I suggest that the fact that no one has ever seen this happen holds more weight than her inferences.

  • @akmileas9847
    @akmileas9847 Рік тому +3

    This is the worst cross examination by a lawyer I have ever seen ....how is she practicing law ???? she asks stupid question and couldn't prove anything and lost a chance to establish anything critical and literally wasted Court's time ....mind boggling !!!!

  • @ratkeller9608
    @ratkeller9608 2 роки тому +378

    The fact this guy is in a contract tell =s us all not that he is a freaking madman, it tells us that this guy is one of the best sound men there are, and that he wasn't even aware that Johnny had secured his position on set. It tells us that Johnny truly appreciated the man's talents and work ethic, and experience. why is she asking him if Disney lost money because of Depp? He is a Sound Guy!

    • @AB-nb2ic
      @AB-nb2ic 2 роки тому +28

      Not the best necessarily, but Depp trusts him and doesn't want to take a chance with someone else for sure.
      I work in the industry. Sometimes the most talented person is an a-hole that no one wants to work with.

    • @staceyboomboom8031
      @staceyboomboom8031 2 роки тому +4

      @@AB-nb2ic I also work in the industry. I've never seen the contents of any other cast or crew members contract. Same goes with any occupation really. This lawyer could have asked questions that actually had relevance rather than wasting time.

    • @susanbajjada2960
      @susanbajjada2960 2 роки тому

      @@AB-nb2ic You mean trusts him not to reveal the truth?😉

    • @-BuddyGuy
      @-BuddyGuy 2 роки тому +1

      A-Listers usually come with a list of crew that they want to work with. So for example a makeup artist might be hired for a film but on the days where the A Lister is working their own makeup artist will take over. This ensures their brand is consistent in terms of the quality of the makeup or whatever else is important to them

    • @withloveiya2825
      @withloveiya2825 2 роки тому

      Which truth are you referring? He basically said that amber yelled at him, which she clearly doesn't have any right to given the fact that 1. He is not her staff and 2. He is not under her payroll.
      It only goes to show that Amber exhibit abusive behavior and can lash out to anyone she feels like. I will not be surprised that she's also capable of abusing Johnny Depp behind closed doors.

  • @patriciatardugno7275
    @patriciatardugno7275 2 роки тому +233

    Holy crap the Lawyer's questioning has it's own psycho mood swings. Why is she asking that Sound Technition any of these questions? Is she going to question everyone from on sets, the same bulldoggish way?!

    • @lindasmith1105
      @lindasmith1105 2 роки тому +14

      I'm waiting for this guy to bust out laughing.

    • @Mjansen77
      @Mjansen77 2 роки тому +8

      I think she is trying to paint a picture of Johnny. She is trying to make him seem like a guy who is intoxicated, one way or another, all of the time and because people dont actually see it, they cannot testify as to if he was or wasnt to depict Johnny as a belligerent drunk/drug user. Sad to see this but it is actually better for Johnny because her questions are getting the same answers from every person.

    • @jamesgunning9940
      @jamesgunning9940 2 роки тому +9

      @@lindasmith1105 Bro I burst out laughing when she asked him if he had known of any violence between Johnny and another woman WHEN HE WASN'T THERE!!!! That was hilarious

    • @loveconquerall8181
      @loveconquerall8181 2 роки тому +14

      Most irritating lawyers ever.she was literally on psycho mode

    • @JL-zn7me
      @JL-zn7me 2 роки тому

      Agreed!!!! Heard’s lawyers only want to hear themselves talk, much like Heard!!!!

  • @shawndella1
    @shawndella1 2 роки тому +5

    That attorney is nothing but a bully. She thinks she is some kind of crackpot attorney and she just keeps asking the same already answered questions. I can't believe that judge lets this continue.

  • @deniskearney2368
    @deniskearney2368 2 роки тому +3

    Whatever this lawyer is being paid it’s far too much.

  • @psyanide1603
    @psyanide1603 2 роки тому +214

    All this is proving is how good Johnny treats his friends, he's a reserved guy but he's also a ''make my table longer, not shorter'' kind of guy. Imagine being worked into a actor friends contract to be THEIR expert in an area, guaranteeing you a decent living. Same with his artist buddy he gave a penthouse and gave money while he built himself up doing what he loved.
    Johnny is a damn legend.

    • @Nobodyknows89
      @Nobodyknows89 2 роки тому +7

      Not only did he work him in he didn’t tell him.

  • @rogue1573
    @rogue1573 2 роки тому +412

    Sounds like this lady is constantly trying to bully the judge or other lawyers in a passive aggressive way to allow her to continue her waste of time line of questioning.

    • @shamhakim5851
      @shamhakim5851 2 роки тому +8

      Yes. She was aggressive just to sway the jury-cortroom, is my guess. Made me ask the reason to the questioning in the first place. This is a show of good lawyers vs horrible lawyers.

    • @coldhardtruth333
      @coldhardtruth333 2 роки тому +4

      That’s why the Judge is allowing it .. They’re both on a Power trip ..

    • @tonycross5589
      @tonycross5589 Рік тому

      @@shamhakim5851
      Ok
      I

    • @TheeAutumnOne
      @TheeAutumnOne Рік тому

      They have no case after amber tanked it so she has to waste time to get paid those billable hours 🤣

    • @christophercolumbus8944
      @christophercolumbus8944 Рік тому

      not at all she is very professional and patience with her questions she is being nice to this LYING witness

  • @mannyasg5647
    @mannyasg5647 Рік тому +4

    I got hot flashes from embarrassment and cringe when she stated yelling “Pus**” 😧 like WTF lady… this is beyond unprofessional

  • @LauraRodriguez-qv4kq
    @LauraRodriguez-qv4kq Рік тому +2

    Where’s “Judge Judy” when you need her!!! This lawyer is HORRIBLE!!