"NOT ALL MEN!" - Three Words Feminists Hate (and why they should be said)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 28 вер 2024
  • The Douchebag Bible | PERSONALIZED & SIGNED - taastore.storen...
    The Douchebag Bible | Digital Download - pul.ly/b/129136
    Science and Atheism Tees - AmazingAtheistT...
    GET A FREE AUDIO BOOK WITH www.audibletria...
    SUBSCRIBE - goo.gl/zXMlJB
    The Drunken Peasants Podcast - / drunkenpeasants
    Facebook - / youtubetaa
    Tumblr - / amazingatheist
    Twitter - #!...
    Reddit - / taaofficial
    Instagram - / officialamazingatheist
    * * *
    Not All Men: A Brief History of Every Dude's Favorite Argument
    by Jess Zimmerman @j_zimms
    time.com/79357/...
    Marine Corps’ women-in-combat experiment gets mixed results
    www.washington...
    How people react to domestic violence against men
    • Video
    IT'S ONLY SEXIST WHEN MEN DO IT
    part 1
    • It's Only Sexist When ...
    part 2
    • It's Only Sexist When ...
    * * *
    All videos written and performed by TJ Kirk
    Additional writing & research by Scotty Kirk
    Music + Sound Effects by Audio Micro
    audiomicro.com/...
    Addition Music + Sound Effects by Jingle Punks

КОМЕНТАРІ • 6 тис.

  • @gfkxj123
    @gfkxj123 9 років тому +826

    Reverse: Going in or turned toward the direction opposite to that previously stated.
    Sexism: Prejudice, stereotyping, or discrimination, typically against women, on the basis of sex.
    Reverse Sexism: Complete fairness, tolerance, and equity towards any gender/sex.

    • @leroy92TX
      @leroy92TX 9 років тому +7

      haha no shit dude? Nice 👽

    • @jasonbrown4526
      @jasonbrown4526 9 років тому +31

      +gfkxj123
      You win the comment section.

    • @unaisnh
      @unaisnh 9 років тому +10

      +gfkxj123 Now that makes much more sense.

    • @SuperMClone
      @SuperMClone 9 років тому +3

      +gfkxj123 YES!

    • @TheCloverskull
      @TheCloverskull 9 років тому +10

      +gfkxj123 So that's why feminists claim that reverse sexism isn't possible.

  • @littleman1242
    @littleman1242 9 років тому +207

    "Sometimes men get so confused about why I block or mute them instead of arguing, I will tell you a secret, it’s because you’re not important" -Jess Zimmerman
    What a great way to advance humanity

    • @theamazingatheist
      @theamazingatheist  9 років тому +40

      +Julian Sioulas I am more important than she is. But that's not saying much.

    • @treyroberson7296
      @treyroberson7296 8 років тому +6

      +Julian Sioulas yeah how is it great advice to block people with views opposing that of your own from a dialogue? and this is a sexist ass statement anyway. would she only have a debate with someone of her sex? because thats called sexism you dumb beaver

    • @irishboymalloy
      @irishboymalloy 8 років тому +2

      +Julian Sioulas If you are going to make a bold statement on any subject you should have to back it up with why you think that way you should not be able to block or ignore some one who as a counter argument, that just shows how stupid and shallow you are as a person.

    • @irishboymalloy
      @irishboymalloy 8 років тому

      N0va Cygni i know that, i was just putting the way i feel about the situation. Smoke a bowl and chill the fuck out

    • @juzeus9
      @juzeus9 8 років тому +1

      define projection:
      "Every man, deep down, knows he's a worthless piece of shit."
      -Valerie Solanas

  • @VGamingJunkieVT
    @VGamingJunkieVT 8 років тому +1358

    Women in the military is fine, as long as they pass the same physical standard and aren't given an easier time. Political correctness doesn't mean much when you're on the battlefield and how capable you are is life or death.

    • @juzeus9
      @juzeus9 8 років тому +17

      Women in the military isn't fine when they are there by choice, rather than threat; and it isn't fine when they get the fast track to higher positions because they are delicate flowers who cannot possibly brave the front lines; and it isn't fine when they have 10x the rate of "unplanned pregnancy" vs the general public, as to get out of their obligations without consequence.
      as for physical standards, i don't quite understand (although i suspect it's just bureaucracy) why they can't have lower standards and use different/ i guess smaller weapons.. like a ninja squad or something.. expecting a 300lb man and a 120lb woman to use the same weapons and fight the same way - is basically retarded. we don't put a 120 mm cannon on an aircraft, yet we don't say the aircraft is useless.

    • @VGamingJunkieVT
      @VGamingJunkieVT 8 років тому +93

      ac05jn Getting pregnant while on active duty should be considered grounds for immediate dishonorable discharge. The reason for the same physical standards is they need to be able to carry the same equipment in the same environments. If the women are weaker, they drag their entire squadrons down with them.

    • @juzeus9
      @juzeus9 8 років тому +7

      MetroidJunkie2007 agree on pregnancy.
      i know that's the reason for physical standard, but i don't understand why women would be issued the same equipment as men..
      an easier example to illustrate my point would be firefighters -
      oxygen usage: "33 milliliters of oxygen per kilogram of body mass per minute for average young women and around 42 ml/kg/min for average young men." so women not only use less by mass, but they also weigh less; so are they issued smaller air tanks??? probably not.

    • @VGamingJunkieVT
      @VGamingJunkieVT 8 років тому +37

      ac05jn Unless we're taking this fight underwater or in outer space, I doubt air tanks will be a part of military equipment.

    • @juzeus9
      @juzeus9 8 років тому +1

      MetroidJunkie2007 as i said, it was just an example. i'm not familiar with what equipment or tasks military would need; and was wondering if similar changes could be made to utilize women with less strength.

  • @grimmreapergaming5858
    @grimmreapergaming5858 7 років тому +1599

    "I don't have a voice" says the woman being published in time magazine.

    • @Anti-HyperLink
      @Anti-HyperLink 6 років тому +14

      grimm reapergaming58 I also watched the video

    • @ryanjarvis2178
      @ryanjarvis2178 6 років тому +3

      grimm reapergaming58 hilarious and observe irony lol

    • @ryanjarvis2178
      @ryanjarvis2178 6 років тому +2

      April Rodger some people doesn't either. They need a vocal box to speak through o those things people use to talk through a computer voice lol

    • @TheBrimmyRat
      @TheBrimmyRat 6 років тому +3

      thats like the religious people that say:atheist are opressing us, but then most of people are religious, and have a voice, and most of religious would kill an atheist if he/she could

    • @Kierawolf
      @Kierawolf 5 років тому

      ikr?

  • @digizilla164
    @digizilla164 9 років тому +500

    Feminism isnt bad but modern feminism is, if you can even call it that.

    • @thechunkytrucker5111
      @thechunkytrucker5111 9 років тому +16

      *Gynocentrism.

    • @dr.fedora
      @dr.fedora 9 років тому +31

      modern feminisim aka feminazisim

    • @crashunderride
      @crashunderride 8 років тому +12

      +digizilla164 Yeah, first wave feminists have actually said that modern "feminists" aren't feminists are all. That they just took and co-oped the term.

    • @hallowedfool
      @hallowedfool 8 років тому +7

      +crashunderride All the first wave feminists are dead, surely you mean second wave? First wave was like getting the vote around a hundred years ago

    • @crashunderride
      @crashunderride 8 років тому +2

      Yeah, I was talkin' about the bra burners. lol

  • @ljaquos
    @ljaquos 9 років тому +560

    I just...wow. Feminism has gone downhill, hasn't it?
    Ya know what? I consider myself a bit of a Feminist, because as I was taught initially, feminists are SUPPOSED to want everyone to be equal. That sounds wonderful to me. Everyone SHOULD be equal. That doesn't mean EVERY man is a douchebag, and dear god they give women a bad name...

    • @ljaquos
      @ljaquos 9 років тому +15

      lovevideojuegos
      I believe the term began along with women's suffrage, but you get the idea. I suppose Humanist is a better term though, so thank you for that! Much better way to explain it!
      I've never claimed to have the most expansive vocabulary, haha.

    • @MrNiceGuyGames
      @MrNiceGuyGames 9 років тому +23

      +ljaquos I personally use the term gender egalitarian.

    • @ArnabAnimeshDas
      @ArnabAnimeshDas 8 років тому +7

      +ljaquos The word should be gender equality, why is it feminism though? The word itself sounds biased. I don't think anybody supporting gender equality could write such an article. It would sound "hypocritical". If you think about it for a while, you will notice feminism promotes different kind of mindset and it's not healthy. Biased term of any form is never healthy.Well, then again, it might just be me.

    • @lovevideojuegos
      @lovevideojuegos 8 років тому

      Arnab Animesh Das
      I pretty much said that in my comment *flies away*

    • @ArnabAnimeshDas
      @ArnabAnimeshDas 8 років тому

      lovevideojuegos I just exaggerated your point...

  • @SirClawedfrog
    @SirClawedfrog 9 років тому +453

    All people are equal. Women are more equal than everyone else doe.

    • @gameman9706
      @gameman9706 9 років тому +7

      and this kids is why feminists hate us

    • @gameman9706
      @gameman9706 9 років тому +2

      *****
      that's dumb as fuck

    • @K3wlG33k
      @K3wlG33k 9 років тому +1

      +Soberum Yeah, I know. I can't help but think, "What did Homer Simpson do this time?"

    • @HECKproductions
      @HECKproductions 9 років тому +1

      +SirClawedfrog "human farm"

    • @MegaHayran
      @MegaHayran 9 років тому +1

      +SirClawedfrog Animal Farm! *put capt. america meme here*

  • @mayamagination
    @mayamagination 8 років тому +1734

    I said 'not all men' at my feminist friend and .. well .. we're not friends anymore

    • @cedar6794
      @cedar6794 8 років тому +157

      Good for you

    • @mayamagination
      @mayamagination 8 років тому +69

      Rumbling thanks mom

    • @cedar6794
      @cedar6794 8 років тому +99

      +Maya Magination I wasn't saying it sarcastically, I actually meant good for you, because I know how bad they are in person. So I'm glad that they aren't your friend anymore. Not all people on the Internet are assholes. Goes with this video.

    • @mayamagination
      @mayamagination 8 років тому +50

      Rumbling well then thanks anyway ^-^

    • @jakomioftherose2434
      @jakomioftherose2434 8 років тому +50

      I had a feminist friend who was a SJW. HAD. Shame. She was a good friend. *Sad sigh* Well, moving on.

  • @Caught_You200
    @Caught_You200 9 років тому +137

    Saying "reverse sexism" is just as dumb as saying "reverse racism".

    • @ApocalypticBlades
      @ApocalypticBlades 9 років тому +10

      they say both.

    • @jayr.5875
      @jayr.5875 9 років тому +1

      +apollo moore They also uttack muh familee.

    • @karenkilljoyd4235
      @karenkilljoyd4235 9 років тому +1

      +Chasen Tom TTATT Sad, but true. So. Stupid.

    • @acbeaumo
      @acbeaumo 9 років тому +13

      +apollo moore And if you ask them to define "reverse racism", they will tell you that it's discrimination against a race that has formerly engaged in racial discrimination. In other words, just racism. So it's possible to be racist and reverse racist at the same time. They ought to just call it Schrödinger's racism.

    • @Caught_You200
      @Caught_You200 9 років тому

      Inquisitive Lady if you're anti-anything, rather.

  • @themuzicman7021
    @themuzicman7021 7 років тому +511

    "Being an ugly woman is like being a man, you're going to have to work." - Daniel Tosh

    • @spartan2ar949
      @spartan2ar949 5 років тому +25

      Except people like this don't want to work.

    • @aquiline-eagle9669
      @aquiline-eagle9669 5 років тому +12

      That's untrue and highly sexist.

    • @TnD_BigJax
      @TnD_BigJax 5 років тому +13

      @@aquiline-eagle9669 prove it.

    • @aquiline-eagle9669
      @aquiline-eagle9669 5 років тому +4

      Logan Fraser because many establishments have young working women. You dumbass.

    • @TnD_BigJax
      @TnD_BigJax 5 років тому +12

      @@aquiline-eagle9669 you do realize there are women out there who believe their looks are all they need for a successful life, right? Don't call people names like dumbass, boy.

  • @direwolf8703
    @direwolf8703 9 років тому +300

    anyone complaining about women having no voice now need to be reminded how zoe and anita were both invited to the un to talk about their "harassment"

    • @direwolf8703
      @direwolf8703 9 років тому +32

      I highly doubt that anything will come from it but fucking hell wasting the un's time because you don't like being told "you suck" sounds like you have a huge fucking voice

    • @wrathbladedementus9169
      @wrathbladedementus9169 9 років тому +24

      Just remember that the un let those fucking morons in. I mean seriously, was this really a un issue? They were just trying desperately to censor their critics. Fucking hate sarkeesian.

    • @direwolf8703
      @direwolf8703 9 років тому +8

      Wrathblade Dementus agreed but that proves beyond a doubt that they have a voice

    • @wrathbladedementus9169
      @wrathbladedementus9169 9 років тому +1

      +Lucian Wolf exactly

    • @paggodiablo01
      @paggodiablo01 9 років тому +1

      +Lucian Wolf UN useless morons, more like a third world fiasco. They can't even produce a decent Christmas Card.

  • @FishOfTheSea
    @FishOfTheSea 9 років тому +365

    I identify as a table and find it offensive to say break a leg.

    • @nicklemay8056
      @nicklemay8056 9 років тому +12

      leg a break

    • @Encoun2er
      @Encoun2er 9 років тому +4

      Yea that's not pc. Privileged people don't understand the pain of people and their struggle with broken legs....

    • @Lanturnt
      @Lanturnt 9 років тому

      +Encoun2er pc? what is that supposed to stand for?

    • @man4437
      @man4437 9 років тому

      I identify myself as a banjo.

    • @robrod7120
      @robrod7120 9 років тому +2

      +S For Satan the acronym "pc" triggers me. I personally have a shitty Mac and cannot afford a pc, so whenever someone says pc I get triggered and remember that I am a poor fuck. plz have trigger warnings next time you fucking inconsiderate loser

  • @dmsdmullins
    @dmsdmullins 8 років тому +539

    I have yet to find a single law that gives a man a right a woman doesn't have... Not one.

    • @nathanwright8520
      @nathanwright8520 8 років тому +91

      +Damien Mullins Nor have the feminists.

    • @maddimyers4139
      @maddimyers4139 8 років тому +180

      A man does have a right that a woman doesn't have.
      The right to be arrested and treated like shit because a woman lied about him. In other words: Guilty until proven innocent. And even if you're in ocent, you're still guilty

    • @thedogsbollocksgaming6393
      @thedogsbollocksgaming6393 8 років тому +75

      In the UK there are 40+ laws that discriminate against men, the same cannot be said for women.

    • @coreyg7575
      @coreyg7575 8 років тому +38

      anti-abortion laws are discriminatory against women, but I guess, men can't have abortions either.

    • @JohnDoe-mv6go
      @JohnDoe-mv6go 8 років тому +7

      Cjay LeBron What anti-abortion laws are there in the United States?

  • @lucybunnies3047
    @lucybunnies3047 8 років тому +310

    Sexism towards both genders need to stop

  • @HelloFade2
    @HelloFade2 9 років тому +400

    While I agree with what TJ says here,I really don't know why he or anyone bothers making videos targeted at feminists,because it's highly unlikely that any feminists will ever watch it,because as most of you know,most feminists are unwilling to listen to any disagreements,opposition or counter arguments.They'd rather just stay in their safe space,or hugbox or echo chamber or whatever..

    • @theamazingatheist
      @theamazingatheist  9 років тому +139

      +Tony Seyffer I have definitely had former feminists come to me and say that I helped open their eyes. Just because most won't listen doesn't mean none will.

    • @Xpwnxage
      @Xpwnxage 9 років тому +5

      +The Amazing Atheist That's quite a situation you have there.

    • @RDSk0
      @RDSk0 9 років тому +16

      +Tony Seyffer Well, the video is not aimed at those radical feminists, it's more towards the pluralist ones, those who don't know what have they gotten into.
      Plus, in any community there always are people who like watching "shit" and spreading said "shit" in their community for everyone to mock it, which gains the video more views.

    • @christophercrafte
      @christophercrafte 9 років тому +11

      +The Amazing Atheist so what you are saying is not all feminists?

    • @K05H
      @K05H 9 років тому

      +Tony Seyffer These video's are for everyone else and if it helps the occasional Feminist break free from the cult then all the better.

  • @femmefuntime
    @femmefuntime 8 років тому +214

    Not all men is to feminazis what voldemort is to wizards

    • @c1ouding___765
      @c1ouding___765 8 років тому +20

      You mean what cancer is to normal people

    • @sebgiannotti9370
      @sebgiannotti9370 8 років тому +7

      Or what Keemstar is to the internet

    • @femmefuntime
      @femmefuntime 8 років тому +1

      ***** i mean they cringe at the mention of it

    • @enactiv6235
      @enactiv6235 8 років тому

      😂😂😂 I love this comment would like it but I'm on mobile 😕

    • @sbeg1436
      @sbeg1436 8 років тому +2

      wizards criticise others who say voldemort for fear that they will be killed, feminazis criticise people who say not all men for fear they will be proved wrong.

  • @Spacehawk2000
    @Spacehawk2000 8 років тому +201

    I could hear this dude describe stuff all day
    I love it

    • @malikathueler2529
      @malikathueler2529 6 років тому

      😂😂😂

    • @anywaythewindblows8912
      @anywaythewindblows8912 5 років тому

      He reminds me of Donal Logue

    • @bluehockey-martin5698
      @bluehockey-martin5698 5 років тому

      You are stronger than most, I couldn’t cope with losing that many brain cells in 23 minutes

    • @bluehockey-martin5698
      @bluehockey-martin5698 5 років тому

      Leath-bit 1/10, unoriginal, insult could use some work

    • @bluehockey-martin5698
      @bluehockey-martin5698 5 років тому

      Leath-bit may i suggest more descriptive language. i mean damn, if I’m getting notifications from this comments section I at least want to read some creative comebacks

  • @5uicideLeopard
    @5uicideLeopard 9 років тому +52

    people cant say "not all men" , but feminists can say "not all feminists"
    i dont get it??????????????????????

    • @joejones9497
      @joejones9497 9 років тому +5

      +IdentityDis0rder Exactly. And the men that are the problem (e.g. Jian Ghomeshi) are extremely rare and all the rest of the men are emphatically and vocally unsupportive of them. And the feminists that are the problem are in power and get to write magazine articles and the rest of women (except a minority) just remain silent and therefore tacitly approve of the blatant misandy.

    • @joejones9497
      @joejones9497 9 років тому +4

      ras144 Do you tell the media and the vocal feminists how you feel? No.

    • @The_Queen_Chrysalis
      @The_Queen_Chrysalis 9 років тому

      +ras144 Because not all men are sexist, people are different, no one is the same, regardless of gender, race, religion, or location. Assuming anything in this world is a waste of time, time that is better spent putting whatever you think bothers you out of mind, and enjoying what you can, while you can.

    • @5uicideLeopard
      @5uicideLeopard 9 років тому +1

      +ras144 I think you completely missed the point of my comment.

    • @5uicideLeopard
      @5uicideLeopard 9 років тому +1

      +ras144 feminists think they can't be hypocrites because they're female and everything is a-ok when they say shit but not when men or anti feminists say the SAME EXACT THINGS.

  • @charlesbanks498
    @charlesbanks498 9 років тому +185

    I sexually identify as a transgender werewolf and have recently attended my brother's bar mitzvah where macadamia nuts were being served. The nuts triggered me and so has your joke. You have until the next full moon to live.

    • @The_Keh27
      @The_Keh27 9 років тому +14

      +Charles Banks Now you're just being nuts

    • @kittycatz11
      @kittycatz11 9 років тому

      This.

    • @kittycatz11
      @kittycatz11 9 років тому

      +Korahn27 And This. 10/10 m8s.

    • @Revenant-Will
      @Revenant-Will 9 років тому +2

      7 days......nice joke

    • @AnxiousObserver
      @AnxiousObserver 9 років тому

      I lost my hair going bald. Your blatant disregard for the bald and hairless severely triggered me and is highly offensive.

  • @alexandrk.5052
    @alexandrk.5052 9 років тому +38

    I used to date a feminist and he was crazy. I said "not all men are evil" and he freaked out saying we can only use the term "not all men" when saying "not all men have penises, etc."

    • @yaochimama
      @yaochimama 9 років тому

      +Alexandr K. how was the sex though, did he follow the yes mean yes rule? did you give enthusiastic consent?

    • @annimu9081
      @annimu9081 9 років тому +5

      I'm not saying that all feminists do bad in relationships with men but I don't see how someone can openly talk ill about a sex/gender and expect the relationship with that sex/gender to work out.

    • @alexandrk.5052
      @alexandrk.5052 9 років тому

      +yaochimama We only dated a month, and it never went that far.

    • @alexandrk.5052
      @alexandrk.5052 9 років тому +4

      +TwoFaced Barricade He was strange. He's a trans-man who hates men and follows the "new age" feminist redirect.

    • @charliethesuperfloofer
      @charliethesuperfloofer 9 років тому +2

      +Alexandr K. Don't some (or should I say all?) Feminazis say transmen are basically scum? I remember reading that somewhere but can't remember where and don't really keep up with all the bullshit.

  • @TurboEZ666
    @TurboEZ666 9 років тому +236

    Feminism? Oh another excuse for my sandwich not being made.

    • @ninekings3139
      @ninekings3139 9 років тому +1

      Feminism? Probably time to start making your own sandwich, just to be on the safe side.....

    • @canaryco-op
      @canaryco-op 8 років тому +6

      LMAO 😂😂😂

    • @anonpowers3841
      @anonpowers3841 8 років тому +11

      wow I'm not a femmenist but that's low dude :/

    • @sashacollins5399
      @sashacollins5399 8 років тому +1

      anon powers If you look further up, I pointed out the ridiculousness of that statement by applying it to stereotypically male activities.

    • @anonpowers3841
      @anonpowers3841 8 років тому +3

      Umm I don't know if you noticed but there isn't another comment by you on here exept the one you made

  • @fangrift3516
    @fangrift3516 8 років тому +72

    if we cant say "not all men" then they cant say "not all feminist"

  • @itsjustnils
    @itsjustnils 8 років тому +71

    To feminists: Yeah there are not many Womens in high politic jobs, Angela Merkel isnt a Women m8

    • @Rubbswe
      @Rubbswe 8 років тому

      yo where is tthat picture from?

    • @itsjustnils
      @itsjustnils 8 років тому +1

      Synt hex My profile? It's a parody on a Gaming Studio from Russia (Gaijin) and their Game War Thunder (long story ^^)

    • @Rubbswe
      @Rubbswe 8 років тому

      ItsJustNils yeah we have a painting with the same picture at home, but i never understood what it was, thanks

    • @itsjustnils
      @itsjustnils 8 років тому

      Synt hex My is a special one, it's edited, (The Gaijin Logo on the Uniform and the Sekrit dokumintz on the book) but I thinks it's like Soviet Union time Propaganda Poster or something

    • @meeprat7086
      @meeprat7086 8 років тому

      K

  • @Exar_Kun
    @Exar_Kun 8 років тому +248

    Wait why is our species called "Human" and not "Hupeople"? Oh shit I prolly started a "gender war" somewhere. #DadJokes

    • @Psychofuechschen
      @Psychofuechschen 8 років тому +39

      the species is homosapiens, so why aren't all people gay?

    • @Exar_Kun
      @Exar_Kun 8 років тому +4

      +Psychofuechschen Exactly!!

    • @D0N4R_
      @D0N4R_ 8 років тому

      Psychofuechschen Ja, aber ich habe mich auf das lateinische Wort "Homo", was Mensch bedeutet, berufen.

    • @CrashCraftLabs
      @CrashCraftLabs 8 років тому

      um i though we was called homo homo sabiens?

    • @D0N4R_
      @D0N4R_ 8 років тому +2

      +JONNY CRASH No, Its Homo Sapiens Sapiens

  • @jamieriley8444
    @jamieriley8444 8 років тому +15

    *"If everyone had a voice, nobody would be listening because everybody would be too busy talking."*
    That's a pretty sad fact I can't dispute...

  • @hannahshark8080
    @hannahshark8080 8 років тому +23

    I love how feminists always parrot the brand new definitions of sexism and racism. When did the dictionary definition for these things change?

    • @jamesluqqy3697
      @jamesluqqy3697 5 років тому +3

      Yeah. Neither definition includes the words "institutionalized" or "priviledge" or "power"

    • @c.l.freeman7654
      @c.l.freeman7654 5 років тому +3

      Yet they cling to the dictionary definition of feminism to claim they want equality and they’re fighting for men too so no need for men’s rights

  • @ciarmcgregor8997
    @ciarmcgregor8997 7 років тому +16

    I feel bad for the actual feminists that are actually fighting for female equality and not using the the term as a shield

  • @thezdude8512
    @thezdude8512 9 років тому +60

    I legit got bullied for showing emotion.

    • @rcdotjpeg
      @rcdotjpeg 9 років тому +5

      people are really biggoted. honestly i blame the bible for most sexism and most standards set for men and women

    • @matt0331
      @matt0331 9 років тому

      I know how you feel Zach

    • @vampuricknight1
      @vampuricknight1 9 років тому +11

      +zachary neil Your not the only one man... No one can be the tough guy all the time.

    • @MJuegaES
      @MJuegaES 9 років тому

      I know that feeling.

    • @badnewsBH
      @badnewsBH 9 років тому +1

      +zachary neil People really suck sometimes. Sorry to hear that.

  • @Anna-zf5jb
    @Anna-zf5jb 8 років тому +22

    Yes I am a girl. No I'm not a feminist

    • @eddykurniawan
      @eddykurniawan 8 років тому +10

      ....
      Nobody cares -_-

    • @kat-gf4wb
      @kat-gf4wb 8 років тому

      Don't you think that, as a girl, you should want political, social, and economic equality for women? I mean, as a girl, shouldn't you want your own sex to be considered equal to the opposite everywhere in the world? I mean, you don't have to be an active feminist, but don't you think that as a girl you should at least consider yourself a "feminist"? (As feminist just means you support feminism, which is, according to Google, the advocacy of women's rights on the grounds of political, social, and economic equality to men, not that you have to work actively to achieve this.)

    • @HexManiacQuinn
      @HexManiacQuinn 8 років тому +4

      @Trash in general As a girl, I would feel like I'm dishonoring myself by associating with such a toxic movement #womenagainstfeminism

    • @TheMyopicFed
      @TheMyopicFed 5 років тому

      Ok lol

    • @wyvern5890
      @wyvern5890 5 років тому +2

      @@kat-gf4wb how about let her identify with whatever movement she wants to? Fucking hell

  • @UchihaSumairu
    @UchihaSumairu 9 років тому +27

    Not institutional? I don't think it gets any more institutional than LEGAL RIGHTS. Men lack 5 of them in the US that women have and feminists have yet to give me a SINGLE legal right women don't have that men do. How is this not institutional?

    • @UchihaSumairu
      @UchihaSumairu 8 років тому +1

      ac05jn Yep :) And we've spoken before. Nice to see you again. stop stalking me! :P

    • @juzeus9
      @juzeus9 8 років тому

      Curious Wars hard to not stalk you after i added u to my 'circle'

    • @UchihaSumairu
      @UchihaSumairu 8 років тому

      ac05jn I'm sorry for any videos you may have seen me watch or any comments you may have seen me post :P I can be a bit passionate. Didnt even know you could see this kind of thing through google+. I cant see it from anyone else :(

    • @juzeus9
      @juzeus9 8 років тому

      Curious Wars i think we watched the same video by chance and g+ bumped your comment to the top of the list for me to see. I can be plenty , uh, "passionate" as well. too many people say a lot of pointless nothing.

    • @UchihaSumairu
      @UchihaSumairu 8 років тому +1

      ac05jn ahhh gotcha lol. That makes sense lol. Well nice talking to you again. see you when some random person comes in here to argue with us.

  • @mattgieslerrocks
    @mattgieslerrocks 6 років тому +14

    I once posted a #Notallmen meme on Facebook one time and a girl I knew from high school went berserk over it. Even when I explained my position, she made it look like a competition on what gender has it worse. Long story short, we’re not friends anymore.

  • @TheAlmightyAsser
    @TheAlmightyAsser 8 років тому +38

    This is what happens when you forget to lock the kitchen door.

  • @undrhil
    @undrhil 8 років тому +37

    There was a post on Facebook a week or so ago where Feminists were shown in a bad light and there were quite a few posts of "Well, yeah, those feminists are bad, but I'm a feminist and I'm not bad" and all I could do was post a reply to one "Why don't you let all the #notallmen people know how that #notallfeminists thing works out for you."

  • @RobinSwede
    @RobinSwede 7 років тому +22

    there no such thing as reverse sexism.

    • @arsenic3086
      @arsenic3086 7 років тому +18

      There is nothing to 'reverse' to begin with

    • @ajoliver74
      @ajoliver74 5 років тому

      @Juice The Orange Yoshi So true. That would pretty much mean tolerance.

    • @infinityalbi9840
      @infinityalbi9840 5 років тому +2

      Yes there is...
      Equality.

    • @brendanswain939
      @brendanswain939 4 роки тому +1

      It's just straight sexism either way

  • @LunerisSentry
    @LunerisSentry 8 років тому +11

    So according to this I cannot be racist but merely discriminatory?

  • @Bobcat665
    @Bobcat665 8 років тому +30

    >anti-sexist
    “The Fascists of the future will be the anti-fascists.” - Winston Churchill

    • @marsglorious
      @marsglorious 8 років тому +6

      +Bobcat665 There doesn't appear to be any record of Winston Churchill ever saying this. Not that the quote isn't cool.

  • @Sarachouska
    @Sarachouska 8 років тому +15

    Of cours "not all men", it's obvious.
    But i dont see why those words are a problem for feminists.

    • @Team3SA
      @Team3SA 8 років тому +11

      Because modern "feminism" isn't even feminism, it's a female superiority movement. What was traditionally known as feminism is now known as "egalitarianism" (egal being a root word meaning equal). Modern feminists claim they want equality for women, but what they really want is for women to be a protected class. If "not all men" hate women, they aren't being protected well enough.

    • @Sarachouska
      @Sarachouska 8 років тому +2

      Feminism is about doing actions to reach the state of egalitarianism...

  • @Ilovevidgames123
    @Ilovevidgames123 9 років тому +21

    "Not all ______" is almost always a worthless thing to say, not because it's untrue (it may be, but in this case, it is most certainly true), but because it almost always points out something as plain as goddamn day and uses it to trivialize and distract from the actual problem.

    • @Ilovevidgames123
      @Ilovevidgames123 9 років тому +1

      RandomHelpingGuy The world you just described is the one in which we live. You're imagining the generalization.

    • @Ilovevidgames123
      @Ilovevidgames123 9 років тому

      RandomHelpingGuy Because they are imagining the generalization. Didn't I just say that?

    • @WitchRaccoon
      @WitchRaccoon 9 років тому +10

      most of the time, it wouldn't even have to be said if people just used the word "some" when they make their sweeping generalizations...

    • @Ilovevidgames123
      @Ilovevidgames123 9 років тому

      PhantmLeader2 It doesn't need to be said. It's obvious, addresses a non-existent problem, and in doing so, derails any attempt to address an actual problem.

    • @Ilovevidgames123
      @Ilovevidgames123 9 років тому

      RandomHelpingGuy The generalization is not actually there, but as men, they feel defensive about criticisms aimed at members of that group ("that group" means men, just to be clear), so they imagine the generalization.
      It's not that hard to understand.

  • @adrianmurphy619
    @adrianmurphy619 8 років тому +14

    "The Fappening" - The Amazing Atheist
    11/10
    Definitely getting a book made about it...

    • @maybeuchuu
      @maybeuchuu 8 років тому +1

      'twas a real thing

    • @land-fish5159
      @land-fish5159 8 років тому

      Lots o' celebs nudes were leaked. 'Twas the sound of porkchops slapping echoed in the streets.

  • @mwharton838
    @mwharton838 8 років тому +12

    Wouldn't 'reverse sexism' surely be not being sexist.

  • @kacperm6555
    @kacperm6555 7 років тому +12

    The funny thing is that many of those morons criticising #NotAllMen and saying it derails conversation about the problem of violence against women at the same time defend phrases like 'not all muslims' (are terrorists) or 'not all feminists' (are man haters). They basically contradict themselves which is pretty pathetic.

  • @ZeeDrakon
    @ZeeDrakon 8 років тому +7

    the comic is even more stupid considering if you reversed the roles it would actually be more likely (since feminists are basically the only people i can imagine doing such things as interrupting private conversations to shame someone for generalizing), and the feminist movement would SUPPORT it

  • @bakurafann
    @bakurafann 7 років тому +11

    I'd argue women have more of a voice than men on the internet. If a woman wanted to open a UA-cam or Instagram, her social media would grow 100x faster than a man. Woman play social media management on easy mode while men play on veteran difficulty. It's not fair feminists, I agree. (I mainly refer to the game and entertainment focus channels. If a woman started a gaming channel, it would explode in 2 seconds.)

    • @ARCtheCartoonMaster
      @ARCtheCartoonMaster 6 років тому

      But here's the thing: do most women *want* that special treatment, or do they just want to be normal?

    • @ARCtheCartoonMaster
      @ARCtheCartoonMaster 5 років тому

      Mir Pur But what about the women who just want to be treated as normal, average people? The women who actually have dreams and aspirations beyond just looking pretty? What about, oh, I don’t know... *Tomboys?* Maybe you should go out and meet some women, and you’ll see that not all non-feminist women are a bunch of dumb bimbos who rely on their looks all the time.

    • @familyguysofunny1933
      @familyguysofunny1933 5 років тому

      @@ARCtheCartoonMaster Sorry

    • @ARCtheCartoonMaster
      @ARCtheCartoonMaster 5 років тому

      Mir Pur Eh... no hard feelings, I guess. :/

    • @familyguysofunny1933
      @familyguysofunny1933 5 років тому

      @@ARCtheCartoonMaster 👍

  • @kalt7990
    @kalt7990 5 років тому +4

    There's a wage gap between me and Bill Gates where do I apply for my victim status, please?

  • @justamobilegamer6927
    @justamobilegamer6927 5 років тому +3

    5:45 I loved that lightly southern accent more than life itself

  • @littlesherlock2313
    @littlesherlock2313 8 років тому +6

    "Not all men" should be fixed to "not most men"

  • @lonredstar6904
    @lonredstar6904 7 років тому +4

    I decided to look up what reverse sexism is, the main google result was this: "Efforts to assist minorities to achieve parity are sometimes labelled as positive or reverse discrimination. For example, an effort to do outreach to women and recruit them to a software project may be described as reverse sexism. ... "Reverse sexism" claims are often disproportionate, or used to obscure larger problems." (from geek feminism wikia)
    I can't be bothered to figure out what this means, so I decided to scroll down to find an actual dictionary-like definition, and The Free Dictionary answered:
    sexism
    1. Discrimination based on gender, especially discrimination against women.
    2. The belief that one gender is superior to the other, especially that men are superior to women.
    This is literally just sexism. I would have figured the reverse sexism was something like providing more praise to one sex, but no, it is just sexism.

  • @Sclasspsycho
    @Sclasspsycho 8 років тому +5

    I'm all for equal rights, but I mean EQUAL! Not making women superior or men superior. If a woman hits you, hit her back! I hit you, you hit me!

  • @zombiegrrrrl3512
    @zombiegrrrrl3512 8 років тому +23

    I don't agree with you on everything, such as God, but I think you are super funny and spot on with your humor.

    • @603xxg
      @603xxg 8 років тому +2

      Same

    • @goosetheft4187
      @goosetheft4187 8 років тому +7

      Congrats! You just had a normal reaction to comedy instead of hating something that disagrees with you.

    • @tothemax26
      @tothemax26 8 років тому +2

      You are a good person.

    • @HexManiacQuinn
      @HexManiacQuinn 8 років тому +4

      Question! I disagree with him about God as well, but not about religion. I consider myself an Agnostic Theist, meaning I believe in God but I decided to make observations on the world around me and make guesses about the afterlife and creation from what I see instead of learning from some religion. Leading to the question, do you disagree with him on religious grounds or SPIRITUAL grounds? I assure you, they're different.

    • @zombiegrrrrl3512
      @zombiegrrrrl3512 8 років тому

      Well,
      While my parents did raise me Christian my Father insisted on me learning 12, yes 12, other religions before they allowed me to go through confirmation. He did not want me to feel like a drone doing as I am told rather than coming to my own conclusions through research, study, and mediation.
      There had to be 3 big well known religions and then 9 smaller based ones.
      Polytheism, Atheism, Science, and Monotheism (don't worry I do know what an Agnostic is as well)
      In the end I became Christian with my own sense of spirituality (my Holy Spirit) and thoughts of what God is.
      The reason I chose Christianity is because the Bible is one of the most historically accurate books with external support for MANY of its books within (the Bible consists of 66 BOKS. It is not just one giant book, it is a collections of works of centuries.)
      Therefore you can say I disagree with him on both accounts.
      Because if you are truly an Atheist you do not even believe in spirituality or God.
      You believe people are just an end result of many generations of breeding.
      That there is nothing unique or special about them.
      They are no different than any other animal on this Earth, even if they are more intelligent and more advanced than nearly all species on Earth.
      If you DO believe in spirituality you are an Agnostic. You are able to concede your connection to the universe and all its dementions even if you cannot explain it. You see the intelligent design around you and are able to wonder.
      If TJ has ever claimed a sense of spirituality before I am unaware of it.
      God and Spirituality go together like PB and J.
      Every religion I have ever studied I find confirms that statement.
      But that is just me.

  • @MetalCooking666
    @MetalCooking666 4 роки тому +3

    @16:55 - I think the point she’s making here is that it’s wrong for you to make a big deal out of the fact that you are not personally sexist when the bigger issue is that sexism is a problem. Which is a “black and white” fallacy.
    I feel this is part of what I call a “Trojan horse” fallacy - burying a controversial statement (e.g. “men are all sexist” or words to that effect) within several other, less controversial statements (e.g. “sexism against women is bad and here are some examples”) in the hope that you won’t notice. Then, if you actually pick up on the controversial part, they accuse you of “missing the point” by focusing on some obscure detail when in fact they knew very well what they were trying to do.

  • @Blooddeath35
    @Blooddeath35 8 років тому +2

    The biggest issue I really see is the argument between the radical feminists and the 'equal-rights' feminists and the difference. The big issue is literally the word. Feminism has a certain root word in it; female. It raises the concern that the word is for females only and not equal rights. Definition of words can be changed, twisted and/or misused; perhaps its time to stop using the word feminism as a term for equal rights (its really not). We had to stop using the word gay as an insult because the world became more accepting of homosexuality (not saying it isn't still used as an insult, but it is used less as one). Egalitarian is the word for wanting equal rights for all, I believe.

  • @sheepthehack
    @sheepthehack 8 років тому +24

    The problem here is that MEN AND WOMEN ARE DIFFERENT!!! BUT!!! They are 2 HALVES OF A WHOLE!!! This whole argument is like asking a LOCK and KEY to come up with reasons why one is better or equal to the other, both are vital for the purpose they were created but pretty much useless on their own.

    • @Obviouslyced
      @Obviouslyced 8 років тому

      +sheepthehack I agree - It lies in the nature of the matter. Self-esteem seems to be somewhat rare in both sexes (or more, in whatever gender context) otherwise people would/could get along better with others, but particularly with themselves.

    • @sheepthehack
      @sheepthehack 8 років тому +4

      ***** HOLY SHIT!!!! Someone with a brain.. I didnt think they existed on here.. :) Seriously.. your spot on. If people had no hang ups about life or were treated nicer then all this feminist bullshit wouldnt even exist, thats not to disparage women, men as just as bad.. The problem is we were never meant to have this intelligence.. NATURE could give 2 fucks if we are happy.. NATURE doesnt even have morality considering it couldnt care less how pro creation gets done, you could be the biggest rapist in the universe and NATURE would be as indifferent to you as it would the ripples on a pond.. Its only human beings and our NEED for self importance that creates these stupid situations.. If 99% of these idiots actually looked around at the world they would come to the conclusion that there are more important FIGHTS going on in this world. Tnx for being so enlightened.. its refreshing :)

    • @kumbandit
      @kumbandit 5 років тому

      You misogynist (just kidding lmao) :D

  • @ArtinoBandito
    @ArtinoBandito 5 років тому +2

    I swear to god, my fucking fifth grade teacher convinced our entire class about the flawed wage gap. A few days later, My father told me that he pays all his clients (both men and women) the same (he owns a company) So I decided to do some research. I came to the conclusion that due to my dads company being small and just started, no one had asked for raises, worked late, or any other variables. I asked my father, and he said that no one had done anything to gain more money. I presented this to my teacher, with my sources so she knew it was legit, and yelled at me, told me that my dad was a “sexist lying loser”, and kept scolding me. She then gave me a detention and lied about it. She was good friends with the teacher that gave detention, so she thought it was legit (apparently she said I sweared or something) and I sat throw that whole detention. On the bright side, My dad picked me up, and thought I did the right thing. He took me to gamestop, bought me a game, and told me that if I speak loud enough, people would hear me. So I guess it was a good lesson for me in the end

  • @pipervibes5793
    @pipervibes5793 7 років тому +7

    I'm a feminist and you're one of my favorite youtubers. speak. the. truth!

  • @funkoverload9488
    @funkoverload9488 7 років тому +7

    I love that hat amazing atheist, speaking of which I'm going to need a drink after this.

  • @RavenDravenek
    @RavenDravenek 5 років тому +2

    “A transgender werewolf hates Macadamia nuts at a Bar Mitzvah”
    I’m gonna start using that

  • @stormy6990
    @stormy6990 8 років тому +11

    Not all Feminists

    • @increase8849
      @increase8849 8 років тому

      True

    • @HexManiacQuinn
      @HexManiacQuinn 8 років тому

      The feminists that are the exceptions should call themselves egalitarians, as they are not getting their voices heard with the feminist label the way it is.

  • @jeffharper9703
    @jeffharper9703 6 років тому +2

    They hate that sentence "not all men" cus all Men need to be the same in order to bash them.

  • @MIKAASOKOA
    @MIKAASOKOA 8 років тому +6

    Ironic. A lot of what I've learned comes from him, an atheist. And I'm a christian. Anyone see a bit of irony in that?

    • @MIKAASOKOA
      @MIKAASOKOA 8 років тому

      How so.

    • @MIKAASOKOA
      @MIKAASOKOA 8 років тому

      yup

    • @HexManiacQuinn
      @HexManiacQuinn 8 років тому +1

      What would you feel you could learn from I, an Agnostic Theist, then? Don't judge someone's common sense by whether or not they have a God, or what they believe their God wants them to believe. Only by how blindly they follow it.

    • @christopherjakel1049
      @christopherjakel1049 8 років тому

      I haven't learned anything from this guy. I already knew all of this stuff and all the stuff that he says in his other videos but damn! he is funny and inspirational. He truly knows how to destroy the filter.

    • @TheMyopicFed
      @TheMyopicFed 5 років тому

      No

  • @Halloween111
    @Halloween111 5 років тому +2

    Next time a Feminist calls you a misogynist, say "Nope. I'm a misanthrope. Don't get them confused" Watch her brain freeze for a few moments.

  • @kenstr321
    @kenstr321 8 років тому +5

    6:20 lol, I always thought the wage gap was one of the weakest arguments feminists make. I had this argument with while talking to a group of my colleges (I do computer tech support) we were having a talk about how few women are in the field, and why that is. It's a skilled profession but nothing beyond the ability of women. It's well paid and we were talking about other jobs that have a scarcity of women working them. Noticed most all of them are professions that I've always heard "we need more women working in this field". So we asked some... all of the women doing our job we could find to ask them why other women aren't drawn to field. The majority of the responses were odd to hear from women, but they said, "most women look for jobs in creative fields, communication, arts, and psychiatric studies." The tech, chemistry, and engineering fields were described as "uncreative". I asked, do women understand when choosing to study "creative" fields that the jobs offered had lower salary's? They answered "you don't think about that, you are just drawn to jobs that you want". Right away I saw the flaw in the "wage gap" argument being that women choose not to enter higher paying professions based the inflexibility of the jobs. Kind of makes you feel like that information is being withheld for some reason.

    • @straightforwardmath
      @straightforwardmath 8 років тому +1

      How are tech, chemistry, and engineering uncreative fields lol? There's plenty of room for creativity in them, especially in research and product development

    • @kenstr321
      @kenstr321 8 років тому

      straightforwardmath Those weren't my words, you'd have to ask the young lady's I spoke with.

    • @crogers3602
      @crogers3602 8 років тому

      Well I suppose most women just aren't interested in those fields. If you're going to spend money on an education it should be in something you enjoy, regardless of how much you get paid when youre out in the workforce. When feminists talk about the wage gap they're referring to how a man in the same exact position as a woman will often get paid more per hour than his female counterpart. While the wage gap may be small it adds up over the years. The problem we find in this is that we may be more qualified and hardworking than our male counterparts but they get paid more than us and it simply isn't fair.

    • @straightforwardmath
      @straightforwardmath 8 років тому

      crogers3602
      There are other factors to consider besides profession. Men are more likely than women to work full time and women's careers and wages sometimes decline after having a child since some choose to stay home for a while and take care of the child and thus lose some of their passion for their career, even if they do decide to go back. Women don't have to do this they choose to. On the other hand, generally men's wages gradually increase over the course of their life whether or not they have a child. Finally, I think you're forgetting the societal pressure on men to earn a lot and be providers for their family. In the same way women are bombarded with messages to stay young and beautiful, men are told over and over that women love a guy with money. This might cause men to be a bit more ambitious career-wise. Ignoring all of what I said and simply concluding that the system is rigged against women is irrational.

  • @mauriciozappa
    @mauriciozappa 8 років тому +11

    NOOOOOOOOOOOOO! The right thing to say is: ALMOST NO MAN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    • @ladyclassicalwrites
      @ladyclassicalwrites 8 років тому +1

      14:10 = Attempt at pack-mentality mind control. YOU MUST OBEY...RESISTANCE IS FUTILE... *zombies march down streets chanting a monotone "ALL HAIL FEMINISM"* This is some scary shit, folks.

    • @Ari33sa
      @Ari33sa 8 років тому

      that'S what I thought... 'Not all men' is just wrong. It indicates that most men are, but some are not. ....

  • @jacknaruko-stewart3486
    @jacknaruko-stewart3486 4 роки тому +1

    I’ve actually had my private conversations interrupted by feminists claiming that I was being sexist multiple times. Ive never done so to a private feminist conversation though.

  • @saltypotato53
    @saltypotato53 5 років тому +3

    "Sexism against men is just sexism"
    I dont disagree.
    *But it feels like 20% or more people disagree*
    Without telling you because they are cowards ofc,but when they have a stupid argument they go super saiyan on people.

  • @Pabloworldwide
    @Pabloworldwide 8 років тому +4

    I identify as a trans-gender werewolf punk and I love Macadamia nuts and going to bar mitzvahs...Carry on. ;)

    • @moonlightdrown9366
      @moonlightdrown9366 6 років тому +1

      Max Wild you can't identify as a werewolf except for in a larp

  • @bigpepsi6597
    @bigpepsi6597 8 років тому +1

    When I told this to a feminist friend of mine, her response was:
    "Well, most of them."
    What she is trying to say is that,
    "MY EXPERIENCE IS THE SAME AS EVERY OTHER WOMAN!"
    But hey! She's a 40 year old single mother. She's lived a while, obviously this means that she's right! *COUGH*

  • @totesmuhgoats4287
    @totesmuhgoats4287 9 років тому +4

    Does TJ get paid by Jack Daniels to wear that hat?

    • @a.i.privilege1233
      @a.i.privilege1233 9 років тому +14

      +Natalie Herndon
      Yes.. but don't tell Jill Daniels.

  • @TrichterNET
    @TrichterNET 8 років тому +314

    i use tumblr and i dont see feminist but thats mostly because i use tumblr to get porn

    • @GabeJenkins7777
      @GabeJenkins7777 8 років тому +25

      GG

    • @Bike_Lion
      @Bike_Lion 8 років тому +54

      And the porn on Tumblr is generally of higher intellectual caliber than the feminist SJW crap there :-P

    • @nathanielholland-pass4618
      @nathanielholland-pass4618 8 років тому +8

      +BikeLion well played

    • @Hal-kj8ip
      @Hal-kj8ip 8 років тому +5

      Dem gifs tho

    • @saxa-uta
      @saxa-uta 8 років тому +5

      You should check out e621.

  • @JohnMarkIsaacMadison
    @JohnMarkIsaacMadison 8 років тому +6

    ""Not all men", all men's favorite argument."

  • @ryanjensen5897
    @ryanjensen5897 7 років тому +2

    It's only bad if it's "Not all men" even though everyone likes to use "Not all" for literally everything. "Not all muslims","Not all blacks","Not all women are" etc. If you're going to hate the "Not all men", than you should hate "Not all" as a whole.

  • @imfromfuture4925
    @imfromfuture4925 8 років тому +14

    Yeah I like my own comments, so what?

    • @TheMyopicFed
      @TheMyopicFed 5 років тому

      So I’m calling the UA-cam police

  • @JadenTapscott
    @JadenTapscott 8 років тому +3

    I'm SLIGHTLY sexist against my own gender.

    • @JadenTapscott
      @JadenTapscott 8 років тому +3

      I'm a guy, in case you wanted to know.

  • @Syklonus
    @Syklonus 4 роки тому +2

    Not all men is valid, for the simple fact that not all men " Insert whatever positive or negative trait you want".
    We males aren't against the calling out of bad men. By all means do it, but do not generalise and lump every man into the same category, and then deny us a defence when we speak up.

  • @theflyingseabass2205
    @theflyingseabass2205 8 років тому +3

    #malerightsmatter. make it viral please

  • @johnjohnson201
    @johnjohnson201 5 років тому +1

    How can people try and argue that they can’t be discriminatory against others, simply because they were born a certain way? Just because you’re black doesn’t mean you can’t be racist, and just because you’re a woman, doesn’t mean you can’t be sexist.

  • @iquestioneverything3426
    @iquestioneverything3426 9 років тому +5

    who the hell dislike this video ?

    • @DerNamenlose1991
      @DerNamenlose1991 9 років тому +5

      wanna guess?

    • @Orbital_Dew
      @Orbital_Dew 9 років тому +3

      #AllMen ?

    • @adamcummings20
      @adamcummings20 9 років тому

      I didn't know Khal Drogo was the son of Aquaman.

    • @DakodaOK
      @DakodaOK 9 років тому +1

      +Conveniently Placed Goat Excuse you that terminology discriminates against women it's AquaINDIVIDUAL.

    • @werewolfofoblivion7287
      @werewolfofoblivion7287 9 років тому

      I did. Cry me a river

  • @3xclu5iveOfficial
    @3xclu5iveOfficial 8 років тому +3

    Oh Lord, it's World War Zimmerman again.

  • @merksip1704
    @merksip1704 5 років тому +2

    Why can't people be like me, I'm a Christian but I'm still fine with watching this dudes opinions even tho he is an Aethiest which doesn't bother me, just his opinion

  • @rockarollawmn
    @rockarollawmn 5 років тому +1

    @amazingathiest
    I think I love you!
    Respectfully, A cis, bi, 44yr old, ginger by choice, thick h2w proportionate, white/native american/irish/ jewess who hates that anyone has to start a sentence with "NOT ALL ____", let alone DEFEND their-self with it.

  • @anniefaucher8143
    @anniefaucher8143 7 років тому +2

    Honestly I'm a feminist and I say "not all men" when people say sexist things like men don't get raped or men can't control themselves

    • @amitjose3739
      @amitjose3739 6 років тому

      Annie Faucher you are no feminist

  • @walterheisenbergwhite6034
    @walterheisenbergwhite6034 5 років тому +2

    Woman Interruption?
    Not all men interrupt people.

  • @JamesPlaysGames95
    @JamesPlaysGames95 8 років тому +2

    all these crazy "feminists" are always from america. at least in ireland, if you say not all men to them, they will polity say "oh, why would you say that? please i would like to hear your side. then we can discuss it". then we discuss, both learn things from each other, shake hands and be equal friends

  • @Lepong20
    @Lepong20 7 років тому +1

    As a man I have interrupted a conversation between 2 women.
    But I was waiting in line behind them and they were talk about one of my favourite TV shows so we just talked till they left.
    Nice girls, also the show was Archer. Check it out

  • @darthplagueis13
    @darthplagueis13 5 років тому +1

    Question: If the official definition of sexism said there could not be sexism against men, could that be considered institutionalized discrimination against men based on their gender? And also, historical structures... How does "Males were once very sexist and were not discriminated against" lead to "thus, if a man is discriminated on base of his gender this discrimination is not sexist"? History is history and it is not an institution of the presence.

  • @epitaph1006
    @epitaph1006 5 років тому +1

    I'm not gay, I've just run out of worthy women.

  • @jasminelove9370
    @jasminelove9370 8 років тому +1

    lol I've always loved the idea of woman having their place as well as men.I am very traditional, I believe that women should stay home cook, clean and take care of the household while the men provide. it offers a fine balance... and it's less complicated an exhausting.

  • @no_good_bruh9673
    @no_good_bruh9673 6 років тому +1

    The fact that sjws and feminists call it reverse anything just shows how self serving they are to themselves and how ignorant they are about the other end of the spectrum.

  • @kvarnerinfoTV
    @kvarnerinfoTV 4 роки тому

    Man and that picture is best of her pictures, you were nice and kind and presented her in best light regarding looks.

  • @MyCrystalPlaid
    @MyCrystalPlaid 6 років тому

    (18.24) "..all individuals are different and that lumping people into groups is nothing more than a recipe for really bad arguments based completely on stereotypes". Amen!

    • @luuk3213
      @luuk3213 5 років тому

      Amen is sexist!
      /sarcasm

  • @yipitchi
    @yipitchi 5 років тому +2

    From harassing a mailman to comics feminism has become stranger and (I'm female btw)

  • @joshzwies3601
    @joshzwies3601 7 років тому +1

    The Words "Men" and "Man" don't just refer to the male sex, they also refer to us as Human, aka Man-kind, so the phrase "Not all Men" could be interpreted as being inclusive of both of the sexes, depending on the context. for example "I am a man" without context can mean "I am male", but the same phrase still without context could also mean "I am a Human".
    Males are Men, Females are Men, together we are Man-Kind.

  • @DraconiusDragora
    @DraconiusDragora 8 років тому +2

    Actually there is a Reverse Sexism, it is also known as not being sexist, so being Reverse sexism means you respect both genders equally and have no prejudice against a person for what gender they have. It just is stupid when people say that Reverse Sexism is pointed to Sexism against men, when in fact if you Reverse sexism you have no sexism. Similar to Reverse Killing someone, is to let them live XD

    • @ResidentStump
      @ResidentStump 8 років тому

      +DraconiusDragora lol well then.

    • @DraconiusDragora
      @DraconiusDragora 8 років тому

      ResidentStump
      It is stupid, but it is true, reverse is the opposite to something. Which makes the whole thing even funnier when they 5 things she said about reverse sexism, which also shouldn't exist if she said Sexism is a fake idealism from Feminists XD

  • @jnwoodard8764
    @jnwoodard8764 8 років тому

    It's wonderful that not only has Combat MOSs have opened to women, but as of 01 Jan 2017, all women ages 18-26 will have to register for selective service (aka the draft). When that info was posted, all of a sudden, equality became something to complain about. Women felt they shouldn't have to register. Equal rights were wanted, now you're getting them.

  • @patrickgarvey5739
    @patrickgarvey5739 8 років тому +1

    The problem is, for SJWs, if you're not a strong activist for feminism and you're not actively working to change it, its automatically deemed that you don't care and therefore, hate women. No I don't hate women but I don't feel the need to campaign for rights and that SHOULD be okay. I wasn't subjugated to sexism, I feel bad for people who are and I wish that it wouldn't happen but I was never affected so I feel as though I shouldn't have to campaign against it. And that should be fine, But for them, its not good enough. you have to actively stand with them and by a strong activist or you're scum.

  • @bobnonya6863
    @bobnonya6863 5 років тому +1

    Sexism combating sexism, two wrongs make a right, right?

  • @xanderclemente6250
    @xanderclemente6250 7 років тому

    at 12:32 the video started buffering while TJ was in the middle of saying the word, "interrupt."

  • @prodigioussquid5143
    @prodigioussquid5143 8 років тому +1

    I love this channel so much, you come across as an incredibly intelligent and talented person, thank you so much : )

  • @Ploofles
    @Ploofles 5 років тому

    I once got kicked out of a library for putting a women's rights book into the fiction section

  • @Jacktavias
    @Jacktavias 7 років тому

    I just got out of the Marine Infantry. My class at SOI had some of the first females, as well as my unit. It really depends on the woman in question, but for the most part, it is seen as more of a social experiment than anything else.

  • @nyaccoon
    @nyaccoon 6 років тому +1

    Hey, are safespaces still a thing if so does places are trying to fight sexism or racisme with borderline sexism /racism