Dr Rutter says complex mitochondrial processes and structure are elegant. To physicists, elegance is simplicity behind complexity. Opposite situations evoke the same feel - interesting!
Every time I learn one thing, I realize there are about 100 things that I need to learn or re learn to understand the one thing that I'm trying to learn.
That was an amazing video. Thank you for your efforts and time. Could you please provide the link to your work on how you genetically deleted the MCP protein (silenced/knocked-out the gene) from the mitochondria? Thank you again.
THE most important process in cells. All else depends on ATP for energy. An amazing process even more incredible by way of its evolutionary emergence and refinement.
How can you possibly think the mitochondria, of all organelles, resulted from evolution? He just explained how very carefully factors have to be *managed* or electrons would do damage. Did the mitochondria go through trillions of years of damaging arrangements before they got it right?
@@Fossilized-cryptid: _"you clearly dont understand ..."_ Hah! That's the standard retort. If I don't bow to evolution, then clearly I don't understand it. I'll bet _you've_ never even tried to examine the math. You just believe by faith that new proteins can evolve. And indeed, the belief that new types of proteins can evolve can _only_ be believed by faith.
You just explained it, Mr. Rutter, you have just explained the cause of cancer: disruption of the normal cellular functions by any mean which may cause the cell's electrical functions to malfunction.
I would be _delighted_ if you could show me some math that demonstrates it's plausible for a brand new protein to evolve in less than a trillion trillion trillion years, @@Fossilized-cryptid. You can even use an outrageously large population size and make assumptions that give evolution very unfair advantages.
Layperson here. We spend gazillions of dollars on trying to get people to Mars, which is an utterly ridiculous proposition for the near future, mainly because whatever we might use Mars for can more easily be done by AI instead of by one way trips by humans, yet here we have a frontier that should be explored for the good of all humanity, and it goes relatively unnoticed. Did I understand everything I saw/heard? No, but what I got out of this lecture is that you really do not want to mess with consuming things that humans are not meant to consume or you risk messing with your physiology in minute ways. How can we expect our body to function properly when the poor thing is being submerged in an environment of ever-increasing numbers of compounds entirely foreign to it?
@@Fossilized-cryptid I have been in love with space travel since I read Heinlein's Red Planet in 4th grade. I am much older now and I believe that our priorities must change. I have nothing against space exploration but our machines are going to have to do it. Wasting people on a one way trip to a planet we cannot inhabit as Potential Planet B is a waste of resources. Our eyes should be on saving this planet, not plundering another.
Dr Rutter says complex mitochondrial processes and structure are elegant. To physicists, elegance is simplicity behind complexity. Opposite situations evoke the same feel - interesting!
Every time I learn one thing, I realize there are about 100 things that I need to learn or re learn to understand the one thing that I'm trying to learn.
I am fascinated with mitochondria, have been reading about them for years now, from the helical coupling rod of complex 1 to quantum superexchange
That was an amazing video. Thank you for your efforts and time. Could you please provide the link to your work on how you genetically deleted the MCP protein (silenced/knocked-out the gene) from the mitochondria? Thank you again.
THE most important process in cells. All else depends on ATP for energy. An amazing process even more incredible by way of its evolutionary emergence and refinement.
How can you possibly think the mitochondria, of all organelles, resulted from evolution? He just explained how very carefully factors have to be *managed* or electrons would do damage. Did the mitochondria go through trillions of years of damaging arrangements before they got it right?
@@Fossilized-cryptid: _"you clearly dont understand ..."_
Hah! That's the standard retort. If I don't bow to evolution, then clearly I don't understand it. I'll bet _you've_ never even tried to examine the math. You just believe by faith that new proteins can evolve. And indeed, the belief that new types of proteins can evolve can _only_ be believed by faith.
very nice work! finally this weird acp interaction with OxPHos is being resolved!
such an interesting work !!! thx u for those presentations
Mitochondria metabolism is really one of the most important process in cells
Is he talking about mitogenesis? Or is this an ongoing thing in functioning mitochondria?
The cytochromes are also light antennas, can produce atp independant of food.
Good job
Amazing what we know are learning and maybe even more amazing is that there is funding as well as people doing the research...
You just explained it, Mr. Rutter, you have just explained the cause of cancer: disruption of the normal cellular functions by any mean which may cause the cell's electrical functions to malfunction.
finally something interesting and challenging stuff ))
interesting study
POWER HOUSE!!!!
_"... have to be managed very carefully"_ by a well *designed* system. How can anyone think this was designed by an unguided process (evolution)?
I would be _delighted_ if you could show me some math that demonstrates it's plausible for a brand new protein to evolve in less than a trillion trillion trillion years, @@Fossilized-cryptid. You can even use an outrageously large population size and make assumptions that give evolution very unfair advantages.
Thanx you, pls wrire yuor email
Handsome and brilliant 👍👍
@@privatejeffrey1830 ? unnecessary and stupid reply
Layperson here. We spend gazillions of dollars on trying to get people to Mars, which is an utterly ridiculous proposition for the near future, mainly because whatever we might use Mars for can more easily be done by AI instead of by one way trips by humans, yet here we have a frontier that should be explored for the good of all humanity, and it goes relatively unnoticed. Did I understand everything I saw/heard? No, but what I got out of this lecture is that you really do not want to mess with consuming things that humans are not meant to consume or you risk messing with your physiology in minute ways. How can we expect our body to function properly when the poor thing is being submerged in an environment of ever-increasing numbers of compounds entirely foreign to it?
both arent mutually exclusive, you can do both..
@@Fossilized-cryptid I have been in love with space travel since I read Heinlein's Red Planet in 4th grade. I am much older now and I believe that our priorities must change. I have nothing against space exploration but our machines are going to have to do it. Wasting people on a one way trip to a planet we cannot inhabit as Potential Planet B is a waste of resources. Our eyes should be on saving this planet, not plundering another.
Seinfeld improved!