Forget politicians - here's the experts' view of a No-Deal Brexit

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 25 січ 2019
  • With Theresa May's Brexit deal struggling to get support in the House of Commons, a number of MPs believe the country is getting closer to a No-Deal Brexit.
    (Subscribe: bit.ly/C4_News_Subscribe)
    Some politicians say it could be a great opportunity; others warn of Britain “crashing out”.
    But what do people away from Westminster think might happen in the case of a No-Deal Brexit?
    We’ve compiled the predictions of a range of different experts: from Wetherspoon founder Tim Martin, economist Roger Bootle - to the CEOs of Airbus and Jaguar Land Rover.
    And not just them - people who work at airports and ports as well those in the food and farming industry.
    Here’s what they all say about a No-Deal Brexit on 29 March.
    -------
    Watch more of our explainer series here - ua-cam.com/users/playlist?list...
    Get more news at our site - www.channel4.com/news/
    Follow us:
    Facebook - / channel4news
    Twitter - / channel4news

КОМЕНТАРІ • 8 тис.

  • @ruk2227
    @ruk2227 5 років тому +1739

    A part of me hopes we get a no deal just so the British populace can get some perspective. This level of arrogance and anti-intellectualism is actually sickening for what is meant to be a first world nation. When did believing and rhetoric overtake models and actual evidence based analysis.

    • @casperslaststandme5991
      @casperslaststandme5991 5 років тому +55

      When did grand political ideological schemes ever benefit the people ?

    • @TheSpiritOfTheTimes
      @TheSpiritOfTheTimes 5 років тому +144

      I completely agree. The UK is facing a serious societal crisis, and it appears an actual crisis will have to happen for a large segment of the population to come to terms with the realities of the world and its place in it.

    • @Godhorus
      @Godhorus 5 років тому +5

      I agree, but I do hope we just get that withdrawal agreement sorted. Really need that transition period.

    • @casperslaststandme5991
      @casperslaststandme5991 5 років тому +4

      @@wolfthequarrelsome504 are you saying your in favour of the USA then Pat ?, of course i can try and ask you to defend the USA but i suspect that would put you at odds with the position of the native American Indians, or i could make the point that the founding of USA in fact was a reaction to the same type of political aggression that the EU are embarked upon at this time, no taxation without representation and all that, there are plenty of other view points we can expand upon within that subject, where would you like to start with that particular can of worms Pat ?

    • @masterc1ip
      @masterc1ip 5 років тому +4

      So do i to prove you wrong Ru K

  • @ChristianIce
    @ChristianIce 5 років тому +1094

    Leave means Leave.
    People in UK didn't vote for any deal, so let's just close airports and borders, separate UK from the rest of the planet, like voters intended.

    • @Daniel31415
      @Daniel31415 5 років тому +234

      Better idea. England and Wales voted to leave. Let's just drop them out of the UK too

    • @CharalamposKoundourakis
      @CharalamposKoundourakis 5 років тому +236

      How dare you. And what, remain on earth? That's NOT WHAT WE VOTED FOR!

    • @ChristianIce
      @ChristianIce 5 років тому +195

      @@Daniel31415
      Are you suggesting that Scotland and NI are victims of the english dictatorship of the UKssr? :)
      How dare you using logic and reason?
      Brexit is about feelings, you have to go where your erection points :D

    • @goblinwisdom
      @goblinwisdom 5 років тому +14

      What nonsense are you talking ? I mean I see words, but they make no sense.

    • @MPostma72
      @MPostma72 5 років тому +32

      @? I think you missed the satire

  • @bigtastyforlife9367
    @bigtastyforlife9367 4 роки тому +158

    Did you notice most of the remainers brought up figures???
    Brexiteers hardly ever do.

    • @d.h.repair2480
      @d.h.repair2480 4 роки тому +7

      Predicting numbers laughable they predicted we would vote remain

    • @royboy6301
      @royboy6301 3 роки тому +8

      90% of British businesses don't export....1:43 .sounds like figures to me.

    • @georgenewlands9760
      @georgenewlands9760 3 роки тому +21

      roy boy They May not export but they will rely on imports. My local florist doesn’t export but guess where 100% of their flowers come from (spoiler alert!) the Netherlands.

    • @williamdickerson8898
      @williamdickerson8898 3 роки тому +1

      @Budo Ka many countries outside the eu and far cheaper and also free trade at 10 billion a year is not free

    • @Skiddins
      @Skiddins 3 роки тому +5

      @@williamdickerson8898 And the EU has free trade deals with a lot of those countries.
      How much has this cost the UK economy per year, before we're even out of the transition period?!

  • @davidraman3477
    @davidraman3477 4 роки тому +260

    The mega rich in the UK are loving the thought of no transparency into their dosh in shady off shore havens.

    • @W1DO
      @W1DO 4 роки тому +11

      It's not just the mega rich, it's the whole top 20%

    • @alicie649
      @alicie649 4 роки тому

      @Gwyddion Flint From the EU perspective I would prevent it. Not with gunships, but some Iranian type Stuxnet gift :)

    • @alicie649
      @alicie649 4 роки тому

      @Gwyddion Flint Why not ? My ebay account was hacked, as Yahoo, many other millions of people all over the world.
      Hackers can be political or (with stuxnet) also a war game, others like the Russians during the Trump /Hillary campaign, but not all are. They can do it for some cash, for fun... There are complex or simple ways to block places

    • @alicie649
      @alicie649 4 роки тому +6

      @Arbiter Lite I really learned a lot in these last few days. So many rich guys putting their businesses, and cash in Euro Zones. So Ironic as their argument was that the EU was preventing their 'freedom'

    • @alicie649
      @alicie649 4 роки тому

      @Arbiter Lite "we atleast get to vote those rich guys out." But beware of all these flights of wealth. It doesn't all belong to them.

  • @darthforexvader7201
    @darthforexvader7201 5 років тому +114

    Bottom line, we need Neo to reset the Matrix

    • @comochinganconesto
      @comochinganconesto 5 років тому +2

      I just realized that The Matrix trilogy is all about a computer technician turn the server off then back on again because it wasn't running right XD

    • @thandie67
      @thandie67 4 роки тому

      Wont help

    • @Sifar_Secure
      @Sifar_Secure 4 роки тому

      A no deal brexit is like leaving the matrix without finding a telephone.

  • @carebearcarebear8185
    @carebearcarebear8185 5 років тому +361

    I VOTED FOR LEAVING AND NOT FOR BEING CONFRONTED WITH FACTS!!!

    • @adamjones120w
      @adamjones120w 5 років тому +19

      @Yorkshire Lad so all the facts about where our exports go aren't true?

    • @drmodestoesq
      @drmodestoesq 5 років тому

      @Yorkshire Lad
      As Nietzsche said, "There are no facts, only interpretations."

    • @adamjones120w
      @adamjones120w 5 років тому +6

      @Yorkshire Lad idk like the fact that almost 50% of our exports will go to the EU and if we leave with or without a deal that will be disrupted which will cause job loss.

    • @adamjones120w
      @adamjones120w 5 років тому +8

      @Wat ching u the overwhelming majority voted to stay in 1975. Why should we upturn there result?

    • @adamjones120w
      @adamjones120w 5 років тому +4

      @Wat ching u I know why its because people's opinions have changed in that time. But what's not to say that they haven't changed now after the reality has come to light of what brexit might actually be.

  • @ruthlogie2212
    @ruthlogie2212 4 роки тому +93

    I think the people in this country have had enough of politicians.

    • @ruthlogie2212
      @ruthlogie2212 4 роки тому +2

      Point taken. That being said, voting in an election counts as democratic participation and is a sort of a licence to complain. Non-voters should definitely shut up.

    • @CLEFT3000
      @CLEFT3000 4 роки тому

      fireson23 so when might you be running?

    • @RonWylie-gk5lc
      @RonWylie-gk5lc 4 роки тому +3

      Your right Ruth, we need a different way, party politics is unfair and completely corrupt

    • @dvidclapperton
      @dvidclapperton 4 роки тому

      Johnson rushing around like a madman trying to cut off all legal avenues to stop No Deal on October 31st.

    • @ld8341
      @ld8341 4 роки тому +1

      @@ruthlogie2212 " Non-voters should definitely shut up." Why? What if none of the parties represent them? I haven't heard much from them, TBH. On the other hand, I have heard a lot from politicians funded from foreign countries and oligarchs which don't have our interests at heart and from news companies owned by a few billionaire tax dodgers.

  • @timsteppeler7489
    @timsteppeler7489 4 роки тому +92

    After the Brexit vote, the UK was congratulated on its decision by Trump, Putin and the Islamic State.... do any of these entities have the UK’s best interest at heart?

    • @graceomalley4
      @graceomalley4 4 роки тому +6

      Absolutely. How could any Brit feel encouraged by that crowd?

    • @yoyoyo3531
      @yoyoyo3531 4 роки тому +5

      And George Soros is the main man funding the remainers. Famously known for being the guy that broke the bank of England. He's sticking his nose in everyones business world wide funding it with his billions and coursing major disruption. Either way we are in for a bumpy ride for a while.

    • @graceomalley4
      @graceomalley4 4 роки тому

      Eykis 11:11 I have read that the anti Soros stuff is linked to anti-semitism . Is there any proof at all who he supported in the referendum?

    • @yoyoyo3531
      @yoyoyo3531 4 роки тому +3

      @@graceomalley4 he gave best for Britain £400,000, best for Britain was co founded by Gina Miller the woman that keeps taking everything to court. That's most well known of top of my head, surprised you haven't heard of that. The antisemitic thing is his go to defence for everything he does.

    • @graceomalley4
      @graceomalley4 4 роки тому

      Eykis 11:11 I didn’t know. It ought to be a crime to amass so much dosh. Exploitation.

  • @XiagraBalls
    @XiagraBalls 5 років тому +854

    Hmmmm. Let me think... who should we believe? A load of experts from a wide variety of organisations and industries or Tim Martin, a clueless pub landlord?

    • @61shirley
      @61shirley 5 років тому +48

      Matt OToole Hmmmm, who's got the best track record? No your "experts" thats for sure

    • @Daniel31415
      @Daniel31415 5 років тому +59

      @@61shirley You know the track record of each business person interviewed in this video?

    • @swanhildm
      @swanhildm 5 років тому +32

      @JCBAirmaster73 Tim Martin, you brexidiots always have to be told twice, that's the root of the problem.

    • @sklify1232
      @sklify1232 5 років тому +43

      ​@@61shirley It's like discarding doctors because they've missed an epidemic. Talk about not seeing forest for the trees. The entire nation has already taken a paycut (pound exchange rate), how blind do we have to be?

    • @janet8126
      @janet8126 5 років тому +36

      Matt
      We need to leave the EU, they are becoming world Dictators . I read the Lisbon treaty .
      They want complet power over us. We will be puppets in our country. These remoaners are more worried about what they will lose , not our country.

  • @gajustempus
    @gajustempus 5 років тому +1083

    Brexit negotiation in a nutshell:
    UK: We want a unicorn
    EU: We don't do unicorns. None of us have unicorns, There are no unicorns.
    UK: But we promised unicorns and the people have spoken. We want unicorns
    EU: That's not really our problem. There are no unicorns
    UK: You're being unreasonable. We demand unicorns
    EU: There are no unicorns
    UK: You are bullying us with your outrageous demands!
    EU: Eh? We just said there are no unicorns because... well... there are no unicorns.
    UK: OK! We get your game. You're stalling! We're prepared to walk away without a unicorn you know! (Thinks: that'll show'em)
    EU: There are no unicorns.
    UK: You bastards! Nigel was right. You're out to destroy us. We'll go and speak to Donald instead. HE has unicorns!
    EU: Errrrrmmm, there ARE no unicorns.
    UK: That does it. This is our final position. We want unicorns...right now... gold plated... fluent in greek....ermmm.... or we're off!
    EU: Are you still here? There are no unicorns.
    UK: DAMMIT! What about a packet of crisps then?
    EU: Sorry we're busy.

    • @DivingDog0
      @DivingDog0 5 років тому +48

      Psst. Ask them for a Pegasus too.

    • @Ax18NY
      @Ax18NY 5 років тому +75

      BRILLIANT! I can't stop laughing. Lol

    • @horsthofsass765
      @horsthofsass765 5 років тому +70

      Fantastic! The best description of the negotiations so far. Straight to the point and easy to understand for everyone. Thank you!

    • @rafalobo5308
      @rafalobo5308 5 років тому +33

      Nailed it 👍

    • @shoelessjoe428
      @shoelessjoe428 5 років тому +29

      This is the best thing I've seen on the internet so far today. Nail - Head.

  • @cambs0181
    @cambs0181 Рік тому +6

    Tim Martin. 'We should leave the EU!' Five years later 'Could we change the rules on immigration, as I can't get people to work in my pubs!'

  • @Dave-uw2ul
    @Dave-uw2ul 4 роки тому +46

    But don't forget, to counteract these professional and measured arguments we have Tim Martin slurring in a pub somewhere.

    • @celsiusmillo7915
      @celsiusmillo7915 3 роки тому +1

      LOL

    • @PM-gf1nj
      @PM-gf1nj 3 роки тому

      Cheap orange juice!

    • @chinalad1049
      @chinalad1049 3 роки тому

      I wish I was fuc*in sitting next to him hic!!

    • @metalthrashingmatt
      @metalthrashingmatt 3 роки тому

      pinkie perky all the leave argument fell apart under the sheer amount of remain arguments ..that’s what I got from the video.

    • @junkybabes
      @junkybabes 3 роки тому

      @pinkie perky go on then, name some

  • @smokin999uk
    @smokin999uk 5 років тому +131

    About 20 years ago, due to a dispute, lorries blocked oil refinaries for a single day and the UK suffered a severe petrol shortage for a day or two at the pumps. I remember it and the nation collectively SHAT itself. To suggest we can deal with disruption this will cause is laughable all for a political vanity project and a national identity crisis.

    • @pmiller4799
      @pmiller4799 5 років тому +18

      lol we get light layer of snow and people clear the supermarket shelves and the country goes into meltdown.

    • @fatherdougalmcguire9129
      @fatherdougalmcguire9129 5 років тому

      yes you are truly rooted i think

    • @Morbuto
      @Morbuto 5 років тому +2

      ayo unfortunately government spending ultimately requires having a tax base for a country that is already highly leveraged. Remove a lot of good jobs and companies from the country, as you acknowledge, and a downward spiral of reduced tax income, investment, and spending power across the economy kicks in. Combine it with a weakened currency and an already jittery global economy. Add unrest on the Irish border (still haven't seen any explanation what a no-deal Irish border looks like... does Northern Ireland just join the EU?).

    • @Tzctplus
      @Tzctplus 5 років тому

      @@domdonald
      Yeah right. The media. And you think the media will behave in a no deal scenario?

    • @Tzctplus
      @Tzctplus 5 років тому

      @Spinler Muckflitt
      Liar.
      Please explain how the EU funds the media.
      Liar, liar, liar.

  • @naping
    @naping 5 років тому +94

    "The forces of the establishment will say it's controversial, but I think it's common sense" that is the stupidest sentence I have heard in ages.
    From that alone, you can understand the context of Brexit.

    • @marcosdheleno
      @marcosdheleno 5 років тому +5

      i would agree, if i had not watched a flat earth defence video...

    • @hc2155
      @hc2155 5 років тому +5

      It does make sense though- £39 billion for nothing in return when we have a trade deficit with the EU.

    • @HuguesTalbot
      @HuguesTalbot 4 роки тому

      @Hauke Holst You are absolutely right. A no-deal Brexit would be terrible for everyone. The negotiating tactics of the hard Brexiteers similar to those of North Korea. Threaten armageddon.

  • @Richard_is_cool
    @Richard_is_cool 4 роки тому +21

    This country *hasn't* had its share of experts. More experts on TV, please! It's refreshing.

  • @junkybabes
    @junkybabes 3 роки тому +23

    Some idiots voted to get poorer some con men voted to get richer.

  • @MCGreen13
    @MCGreen13 5 років тому +225

    The whole keep the 39bn thing is hilarious. As if the EU would just let it, the EU will get it's money either now or it'll be first thing on the table come trade deal time. The economic contraction will dwarf 39bn anyway.
    And as if any other country will want to do a trade deal with a country that can't keep it's promises.

    • @Drumm3rBo186
      @Drumm3rBo186 5 років тому +15

      Surely the fact the UK is leaving the EU shows it keeps its promises...

    • @robjworkshop5692
      @robjworkshop5692 5 років тому +8

      So, New Zealand, Australia, Canada, USA, and now Lithuania don't count, then?

    • @MCGreen13
      @MCGreen13 5 років тому +6

      Daniel Smith that’s not the type of promise people care about in trade negotiations.

    • @MCGreen13
      @MCGreen13 5 років тому +9

      RobJ Workshop what’s that list of countries?

    • @cloudstrife206
      @cloudstrife206 5 років тому +2

      GreaterThanJake that’s fine than we can use it at the negotiating table. That’s the whole point if you hand it over without a trade deal that’s idiotic

  • @colinire15
    @colinire15 5 років тому +236

    A Scotsman, an Irishman and an Englishman go into a pub. The Englishman didn't want to stay so they all had to leave.

    • @GraniteInTheFace
      @GraniteInTheFace 5 років тому +7

      @@fmbmrtjdpcmrtb8030 So nominally wise, where did most of the leavers come from?

    • @knietiefimdispo2458
      @knietiefimdispo2458 5 років тому +3

      Boston, South Holland, Castle Point, Thurrock ... and maybe Swindon :- )

    • @dvidclapperton
      @dvidclapperton 5 років тому +1

      @@@fmbmrtjdpcmrtb8030
      All 32 in Scotland too, the vast majority of areas in Northern Ireland (all of them on the border), or about half the areas or in excess of half the areas in Wales.
      All of these areas usually elect multiple MP's. All the remain area MP's are not going to ignore at least 50%+ 1 of electorate who voted for Remain and most who see them at surgery seriousky worried ablut the implications of leaving, and opt for the most damaging extreme Brexit amendments at Westminster if it's likely they themselves preferred that the UK remained in the EU rarher than to leave it. It's human nature.

    • @dvidclapperton
      @dvidclapperton 5 років тому +1

      @@Spinler Muckflitt
      You do realise how important our prescriptions and university degrees for our students are.

    • @theoilandgasresourceportal2132
      @theoilandgasresourceportal2132 5 років тому +5

      He left with the Welshman. Got sick of buying all the drinks.

  • @trudilm3864
    @trudilm3864 3 роки тому +5

    There has been four years to prepare. Four years! Still they talk like it's fallen from the sky? They have no excuse, none whatsoever.

  • @johnjeanb
    @johnjeanb 3 роки тому +26

    It is very interesting to watch this video a bit more than 2 years later. We can now see all the empty reasons of Brexiters and all the true predictions of remainers. We have to keep on watching videos like this one to remember the stupid No Deal influencers (Roger Bootle " its not a no deal, it is a multi deal; Tim Martin /Wetherspoon, Bill Cash and many more). Agreed we are not (yet?) on a no-deal situation because 1 it is a very thin deal and 2 it is not ratified and in danger never to be. Where are those key no-deal influencers now? Very discreet indeed and probably with a European passport.

    • @juguez1
      @juguez1 2 роки тому

      @johnjeab ABSOLUTELY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ;-)

    • @captainl-ron4068
      @captainl-ron4068 2 роки тому

      ‘True predictions of the remainiacs’ - So where is the ‘Super-Gonorrhoea’? Show me a chucnk if fallen sky 😂
      If you clowns had brains you’d be dangerous, for the last few years all we have heard from the professional doom-merchant class is that every bad thing in their life is ‘because of Brexit’ .....they’ve pretty much kept up the evidence-free ravings that they were spewing before they lost the referendum, and in the period where they tried to subvert the democratic will of the people.
      You’d think they’ll learn at least one new trick in the intervening years.....I mean if a dog can....

  • @yusuffusuy4971
    @yusuffusuy4971 5 років тому +160

    “Forget politicians” greatest advice I have ever heard

    • @happychappy7115
      @happychappy7115 4 роки тому +9

      Any politician opens his/her gob to express a view on Brexit - my ears immediately on high alert B/S detection.

  • @AnotherDred
    @AnotherDred 5 років тому +14

    "for the people" is the most lyingly overused frase ever imo.

    • @EmVeeBeen
      @EmVeeBeen 4 роки тому

      Except probably when Lincoln said it.

  • @zapfanzapfan
    @zapfanzapfan 4 роки тому +80

    Thanks for the mess, David Cameron...

    • @sadmansakib6753
      @sadmansakib6753 4 роки тому +1

      zapfanzapfan what did he do? I thought he was against leaving the eu? Need some context

    • @liecron
      @liecron 4 роки тому +2

      yes ,he soon done a runner didnt he,

    • @bigfred0997
      @bigfred0997 4 роки тому +7

      He used the promise of a referendum if we voted him back in as prime minister as he thought he was smarter than the voters and we would vote to stay and as soon as he lost the referendum he resigned and left all this mess. Referendum should never of been used just to become prime minister

    • @carolynjiang1642
      @carolynjiang1642 4 роки тому

      Isn't referendum your own way of decision? the public decision? you blame it on Cameron?

    • @bigfred0997
      @bigfred0997 4 роки тому

      @@carolynjiang1642 their would not of been one of Cameron never promised one to the public and once he done it and lost the referendum he resigned from prime minister so what was the point of him doing it

  • @musicman9724
    @musicman9724 4 роки тому +46

    How is Tim Martin an expert? I'm glad he said orange juice will go down in price, that £1 I spend in Sainsbury's is killing me

    • @boulevard14
      @boulevard14 4 роки тому +4

      Most of our oranges originate from spain. Leaving the customs union will almost definitely increase the price of orange juice.

    • @garethh9440
      @garethh9440 4 роки тому +1

      After a few years we may be able to get a deal for cheap oranges from South Africa. That'll be cheaper than trucking them from Spain, surely.

    • @paulhcan
      @paulhcan 4 роки тому

      is it coincidence that the prices he sees falling are for products he uses in his pubs?

    • @boulevard14
      @boulevard14 4 роки тому +4

      @@paulhcan He thinks he's so smart.. he missed out the part that Brexit hasn't happened yet. But woooh look cheaper drinks at Wetherspoons!! Brexit is great! 👍

    • @tomeyckmans9389
      @tomeyckmans9389 4 роки тому

      @@garethh9440 good luck on trucking them from SA :-)

  • @SALZOPYRIN
    @SALZOPYRIN 5 років тому +202

    THERESA MAY
    The kind of negotiator to come out of DFS with a full priced sofa.

    • @pandora8478
      @pandora8478 5 років тому +1

      Haha!

    • @promosolo
      @promosolo 5 років тому +1

      HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!

    • @anghinetti
      @anghinetti 5 років тому +7

      SALZOPYRIN: And agrees to pay double the price for delivery...

    • @tjsluxmeachristus1936
      @tjsluxmeachristus1936 5 років тому +1

      Or even pays full price for a worn out second hand sofa at that! 😁

    • @kevinbuckley8458
      @kevinbuckley8458 5 років тому +2

      She goes in, forgets what she went in for, and then comes out.

  • @alg2990
    @alg2990 5 років тому +237

    Nigel Farage left his office and his job right after the vote, so he hasn't any responsibilities to bear. This tells everything we need to know.

    • @johnkennedy6753
      @johnkennedy6753 5 років тому +14

      nigel garbage wifes a german citizen.

    • @jacobjorgenson9285
      @jacobjorgenson9285 5 років тому +11

      So did Cameron

    • @DragonDyce
      @DragonDyce 5 років тому +7

      1.85% of global trading takes place outside of the Eu | 2. 90% of companies in england do not export 3. Eu needs Trade with Britain they will suffer without it | 4. Being part of the Eu you cannot directly negotiate trade with countries outside of the Eu | 5. with the current deal on the table britain pays 39billion dollars and gets no guarantees. 6. Leaving without a deal is best for britain, this is all a scare tactic , Eu will still trade with britain no doubt , they will lose more then England would. 7. Nigel Farage is only at fault for not thinking the politicians would even partaken in a stupid deal after the fact.

    • @rockattack
      @rockattack 5 років тому

      @@DragonDyce and?

    • @rockattack
      @rockattack 5 років тому +13

      @@DragonDyce staying in the EU is the best deal for Britain. Any other deal is simply worse 😅

  • @tonyneve2410
    @tonyneve2410 3 роки тому +10

    Only a fool bends down and picks up nothing.

    • @guff9567
      @guff9567 3 роки тому

      A gay who just can't get enough perhaps too.

  • @desoliver9712
    @desoliver9712 4 роки тому +4

    The EU has trade agreements has about 40 free trade deals, covering more than 70 countries. That means the UK, as a member of the EU, can currently trade with countries like Canada without having to pay taxes on imports (tariffs) on most goods.
    Leaving the EU on a no-deal, not only means having to renegotiate a trade deal with the countries in the EU, it also means renegotiating trade deals with those 70 countries.

    • @myeffulgenthairyballssay9358
      @myeffulgenthairyballssay9358 4 роки тому +1

      Why are you obsessed with making sure bureaucrats get in the way of trade? This smacks of the approval of big government tyranny and creeping control of all of everything. Human farming in fact.
      No thanks. We don't actually need all these bureaucrats and technocrats and their unnecessary regulations to falsely justify their unneeded gravy train positions.

    • @desoliver9712
      @desoliver9712 4 роки тому +1

      @@myeffulgenthairyballssay9358 Trade legislation is a highly specialised field. I want people who are highly attentive to detail and understand the complex nuances involved.
      Corporations are not moral entities, they require regulation and I would like that regulation to be enforced by people who are elected so that they can ensure the public are protected.
      An example of this would be advertising; without stringent regulation, companies would be able to make all kinds of false claims about their product, some of which may actually be dangerous.
      The recent changes to legislation regarding data collection is another example. The EU has an opt-in procedure, which means the public have to give their permission for companies to collect their data. This is different from countries like the U.S which are effectively run by corporations and have an opt-out policy which most of the general public are completely oblivious of.
      Without legislation, factories would be able to pollute the water supplies, regulation protects you from this-why would you want your water supply polluted?

    • @fredflintstone9963
      @fredflintstone9963 4 роки тому

      @@desoliver9712 You regulate them your way and we will regulate them our way. Sounds fair to me!

    • @fredflintstone9963
      @fredflintstone9963 4 роки тому +1

      @@myeffulgenthairyballssay9358
      Good comment. Most of the EUs so-called trade deals are worthless in monetary terms; they actually amount to about 7 worth mentioning at all, and we already have better lined up. WTO is a fine basis to rejoin world markets, and we'll rapidly build on this if the remoaners don't tie us to the EU corpse.

  • @memisemyself
    @memisemyself 5 років тому +58

    We often hear that 90% of British companies don't export. That's not entirely accurate. It's true that hairdressers, cafes, dentists and their equal do not export but many of the manufacturers and service providers who don't export directly do so indirectly. For example, if company A makes bottles and those bottles are used for beer exported by company B, then A is an indirect exporter. When B loses market share because of extra costs or just can't export, A loses as well.
    Similarly, if famer Jack supplies milk to dairy C and they in turn supply processed milk to yogurt maker D, who exports it's product, then farmer Jack and dairy C are indirect exports and will lose to the same extent or more when D has problems exporting. It could be that all of Jack's milk and 50% of C's produce are exported by another company. The 90% figure has no relavance in the debate. It is used to promote a lie.

    • @grahamjohnson4702
      @grahamjohnson4702 5 років тому

      memisemyself, since when were hairdressers, cafes and dentists manufacturing companies, making your argument senseless.

    • @memisemyself
      @memisemyself 5 років тому +15

      @@grahamjohnson4702 The claim being made by the likes of Rees-Mogg is that 90% of British businesses do no export. (Note; manufacturing is not mentioned because the claim would be false if it was.) That's the very first line in my comment. Perhaps, you have a comprehension difficulties or maybe you don't read comments in full before responding to them.

    • @grahamjohnson4702
      @grahamjohnson4702 5 років тому

      @@memisemyself Twisting the words to suite YOUR argument does not alter the fact that hairdressers do not export their product and I think it is perfectly correct that the majority of manufacturing in the UK is not directly exported. The bottle manufacturers are not exporting as they do not get export licences so can not be counted as exporters. It's like saying that the grower of a tomato is an exporter because his tomatoes are included in the recipe of an exporter of foods to Spain.

    • @memisemyself
      @memisemyself 5 років тому +13

      @@grahamjohnson4702 I didn't twist any words. Read the first line of my first comment, there is no mention of manufacturing. Your attempts to start an argument is a waste of time. I don't debate people with comprehension problems.

    • @grahamjohnson4702
      @grahamjohnson4702 5 років тому

      @@memisemyself What you mean is because you have a comprehension problem you don't argue with people that use the true facts because it makes your argument incorrect. You are not an exporter if somebody else exports your product in combination with their product.

  • @lpjarrett
    @lpjarrett 4 роки тому +36

    Well done for making clear we should sack the people who had 3 years to get ready!!! And are these the same experts that didn't see the 2008 crash.

    • @mrrolight
      @mrrolight 4 роки тому +10

      No they're not "the same experts that didn't see the 2008 crash" - well that is to say they are experts in other fields and it wasn't their responsibility to foretell of market crashes. So far 5 people have 'liked' your comment which means your false assimilation is making an impression on impressionable people. Congratulations on the successful propagation of disinformation. You really can make anyone believe anything with your utter bullshit. What power.

    • @samuelthornton9179
      @samuelthornton9179 3 роки тому +1

      @bethere5151 that's a strawman

    • @sidneyeaston6927
      @sidneyeaston6927 3 роки тому +2

      Forget experts they are all biased towards the view that pays them, there are no experts, The closest you will get to an expert are those sat in Brussels scraping the cream of a whole continent they are doing just fine. It is Brussels that made the laws that stopped us preparing for Brexit and striking deals outside the EU. The up side of Brexit is that fish and chips may come back into fashion at a reasonable price.

    • @Julian-ux5xd
      @Julian-ux5xd 3 роки тому

      @@sidneyeaston6927 Can you name few of this laws that stopped you preparing for Brexit? A link maybe?!

    • @sidneyeaston6927
      @sidneyeaston6927 3 роки тому

      @@Julian-ux5xd They are not written laws but trade agreements basically contracts between Brussels and the European countries within the union. They like any other contract are enforcible by law. The problem is not getting out of the EU but ending the contracts that the EU wants to hold us to. Now guess which court decides on the way those contracts can be legally ended if both sides can not agree. As part of the contracts we can not sign trade agreements with countries outside the EU without the consent of Brussels. The UK can talk with any country about future trade but can not sign agreements until we are free of Europe. Mean while the EU is signing deals with the countries that we have talks with just to prevent the UK from getting deals with them.

  • @jamespotter2736
    @jamespotter2736 4 роки тому +4

    There cannot be experts on Brexit until it happens

    • @jamespotter2736
      @jamespotter2736 4 роки тому

      James Fox anyone with a grain of sense would'nt get in debt in the first place

  • @beggins5102
    @beggins5102 4 роки тому +7

    I was too young to vote in the referendum that took us into the common market (not EU).I respected the result until we were asked to vote again (in or out). I expect others to respect the result (that's democracy).

    • @Malt454
      @Malt454 4 роки тому

      I agree that's democracy - which is the tragedy of the situation; the people did it to themselves - but it doesn't address whether Brexit, particularly without a deal, will be an economic catastrophe. Although they reflect self determination, self-inflicted wounds still hurt.

    • @blog251
      @blog251 4 роки тому +4

      Laid back gaming - Well said, and this country will soon be a self governing independent country which is uninfluenced by foreign policies.

    • @Mugdorna
      @Mugdorna 4 роки тому

      @@blog251 except Trumps USA of course.

    • @Mugdorna
      @Mugdorna 4 роки тому

      The 2016 was an advisory referendum which the Tory govt took as guidance. They could have ignored the vote and still been seen as listening to Democracy.

    • @blog251
      @blog251 4 роки тому +1

      @@Mugdorna You've probably been told this before but to cut to the chase, you are stupid. I don't set out to insult you , that is a fact. The Tory Government did not take the result of the referendum as "guidance" at all. The Prime Minister and the Government’s leaflet delivered to all households in the UK advocating a Remain vote, told voters that the Government would implement the result of the referendum so it's a moral issue rather than a legal one.
      We had their word ... and they're sticking by it.
      For anyone to say that the Government, "could have ignored the vote and still been seen as listening to Democracy." points to them being a complete idiot.

  • @SKumar-mj6gf
    @SKumar-mj6gf 5 років тому +133

    UK in very miserable situation. Good luck from India.

    • @anghinetti
      @anghinetti 5 років тому +14

      S Kumar: Mind your own business...

    • @tyrant_hermit
      @tyrant_hermit 5 років тому +10

      Yeah sever ties, Viva la Commonwealth.

    • @luciatilyard2827
      @luciatilyard2827 5 років тому +2

      S Kumar Think it might work out, once May is gone.

    • @guylawrance2216
      @guylawrance2216 5 років тому +16

      S Kumar - An Indian says Great Britain is in a miserable situation - that’s rich 🤣🤣🤣

    • @SKumar-mj6gf
      @SKumar-mj6gf 5 років тому +13

      @@guylawrance2216 : The Great Britain doesn't have colonies though like before to save from Brexit. Why don't you go ahead without a deal?

  • @thedude9014
    @thedude9014 5 років тому +404

    Tim Martin is happy cause a lot of brits will turn to alcoholism

    • @VolkerHett
      @VolkerHett 5 років тому +15

      As long as they can pay for their pints ...

    • @rab2826
      @rab2826 5 років тому +14

      They already have a long time ago but they wont have anymore cheap beer and wine from the EU.

    • @239Timmyg
      @239Timmyg 5 років тому +3

      the dude 😂

    • @alex16alexful
      @alex16alexful 5 років тому +3

      😄🍺

    • @VincentRE79
      @VincentRE79 5 років тому +4

      @the dude Yes Wetherspoons will probably be the biggest company left in the country after Brexit as some celebrate and other drown their sorrows.

  • @davidstewart58
    @davidstewart58 4 роки тому +6

    I think that Britain will prosper out of the EU. Before we joined the EU in the 1970s VAT had not been introduced in which the Pound was linked to the Dollar at the rate of $2.40. Our imports at that time came from the Commonwealth countries more than today and less from Europe. We were advised that joining the European Market would make everyone wealthier however the opposite has occurred with manufacturing jobs being decimated. I can see Britain becoming the Hong Kong to Europe in which we benefit from not being tied to European legislation nor the rising cost of the bureaucracy of the EU. Countries such as Greece, Italy, Spain and Portugal are struggling financially. Empires are built and fall and surely in time the EU will collapse.

  • @christopherward5065
    @christopherward5065 3 роки тому +2

    It feels like the ground-rush after a free-fall anticipating the impact.

  • @66BranDo
    @66BranDo 5 років тому +56

    What happened with those leave campaigners that wanted to stay in the CU and SM but now only aim for a no-deal? Why doesn't that upset many leave voters? Before talking with any of those talking heads I'd run a video compilation of them claiming to stay in the SM and CU every single time. Either that or don't go on TV anymore. Face up to your lies.

    • @VolkerHett
      @VolkerHett 5 років тому +3

      Reversed history tells us, that they never campaigned for staying in the CU and/or SM and everybody voted no deal!

    • @stephenconway2468
      @stephenconway2468 5 років тому +4

      Do you mean?
      Conservative MEP Daniel Hannan said during an interview in 2015 that: "To repeat, absolutely nobody is talking about threatening our place in the single market".
      Arron Banks, a founder of the Leave.EU campaign tweeted in November 2015 “Increasingly the Norway option looks the best for the UK”.

    • @VolkerHett
      @VolkerHett 5 років тому +1

      @@stephenconway2468 sounds familiar, but I may come from an alternative reality :D

    • @ByronHawk
      @ByronHawk 5 років тому +1

      The EU has gave us what they refer to as the Only Deal. So they are unlikely to let us be in those as they won't take a different deal.

    • @MikeStock88
      @MikeStock88 5 років тому

      @@ByronHawk they will if the red lines move

  • @lamichiganr326
    @lamichiganr326 5 років тому +40

    I come from a screwed up country, the USA. But from what I've studied is that Brexit will be a mess. When you are in a union you have more variety and power; no union is perfect, but it is better than nothing. The UK has cut themselves off from a more stable base as I see it.
    I pray Northern Ireland doesn't go back to the time of the "Troubles," again.

    • @hypothebai4634
      @hypothebai4634 5 років тому +3

      I too hope that the Irish revolution does not start again. What a lot of people here do not know is that NI is being governed by the UK central government - sorta like your state being run from Washington. So, revolution is definitely a possibility.
      In any case the Brits are going to be in a world of pain without a deal. I think, that within 20 years, they will be a very unstable country.

    • @dankjae
      @dankjae 5 років тому

      @@hypothebai4634 There's a possibility that the troubles may not last long or happen much at all, cause numerous polls say that most of N.I would vote to reunify in the event of No-deal, and so far terrorist attacks have only been made by the republican side because N.I. still exists. So if a no-deal brexit occurs, the republican side will simply ask for a referendum, and if reunify wins, the unionsts have no choice but to accept democracy. Assuming that the Republican terrorists have common sense.

    • @DavidsonDave
      @DavidsonDave 5 років тому +5

      You must not have been a good student. Mainland Europe is a lot less stable that the UK. Always has been and always will be.

    • @hypothebai4634
      @hypothebai4634 5 років тому

      @@dankjae The choice is democracy or civil war. If the North does reunify as the result of a democratic vote that would be good.

    • @giddyupgazboy1
      @giddyupgazboy1 5 років тому +1

      'Comes from a screwed up union'

  • @obiwankenobi661
    @obiwankenobi661 4 роки тому +3

    what i got from this video: a bunch of drunk old men sitting in pubs think no-deal would be smashing, while ceos and actual economy experts say it would be a disaster.

  • @drpeterthompson5894
    @drpeterthompson5894 4 роки тому +5

    sack the whole of the house of commons

  • @OgallalaKnowhow
    @OgallalaKnowhow 5 років тому +405

    Parliament is sovereign.
    If a majority of parliament don't want Brexit, they should stop it.
    Let Brexiters vote in a UKIP government if they want to their idiocy to happen.

    • @tracibeacer670
      @tracibeacer670 5 років тому +32

      Or remoaners can vote libdem

    • @imthedaddyq9087
      @imthedaddyq9087 5 років тому +6

      @@tracibeacer670 labour baby, labour, the man before superman, jeremy corbyn.

    • @davidrobertsemail
      @davidrobertsemail 5 років тому +51

      You are conflating the sovereignty of parliament with the purpose of the referendum.
      The referendum was an instance where parliament gave up its right to decide on a particular issue.
      However after the people voted 80% of the MPs got elected on manifestos that stated they would honour the result.
      Then again 80% of MPs voted to leave deal or not on the 29th march.
      If they don’t honour the referendum, their own manifestos and the withdrawal act then they will lose the support of the public.
      Then it’s yellow vest time.

    • @wiamoaw
      @wiamoaw 5 років тому +9

      @@davidrobertsemail I think you'll find only the Tory manifesto promised to implement Brexit come what may and that was only there to appease the Brextremists. The labour manifesto promised to keep us in a customs union but leave the EU. The libdem manifesto called for the people to have a final say on the deal with an option to remain. The SNP just wanted another independence referendum but were open to looking at ways to stop Brexit if they can't have Scottish independence.

    • @davidrobertsemail
      @davidrobertsemail 5 років тому +22

      wiamoaw the Labour manifesto actually didn’t say that it would keep us in the customs union. It stated it would leave the EU and honour the referendum result. I’ve just read it I suggest you do too.
      Staying in the customs union is not leaving the EU. Here is Corbyn even saying it. ua-cam.com/video/m6S9rMZOKJY/v-deo.html
      Those parties that wouldn’t honour the result in their manifestos saw their votes decline.
      80% of MPs (that includes Labour) voted to leave on the 29th deal or not.
      You may not like the result but if you believe in democracy then you should honour it.

  • @1rjona
    @1rjona 5 років тому +32

    Good luck UK

    • @desertmandan123
      @desertmandan123 5 років тому +6

      We don't need luck. Just the opportunity to do our own deals away from the EU.

    • @philipconnolly748
      @philipconnolly748 5 років тому

      @@desertmandan123 Really? On what basis? By reneging on the Good Friday Agreement? The US have said many times now that they will not do a trade deal if it contravenes the spirit or the terms of the Agreement. Where then?

    • @desertmandan123
      @desertmandan123 5 років тому +4

      There is no need for a hard border, so it won't be reneging on anything to do with the GFA....

    • @mirthy8219
      @mirthy8219 5 років тому +1

      @@desertmandan123 there will be a need for a hard border if no deal brexit will happend

    • @philipconnolly748
      @philipconnolly748 5 років тому +2

      @@desertmandan123 simply saying or wishing that there is no need for a hard border will not make it so. Please can you explain why it wont be required.

  • @oliverrimes9057
    @oliverrimes9057 4 роки тому +4

    Maybe I'm missing a very simple principal here, but if you incentivize the transporter to complete and submit paperwork before going through customs (i.e. prior to departure) then you will reduce congestion and checks can be more efficiently directed towards those who have not taken such pre-emptive measures (probably catching out more smuglers etc in the process)

    • @totokfr
      @totokfr 4 роки тому +3

      What your missing is that even a cursory check of paperwork at Calais will build in a delay into a finely tuned system for getting lorries off the ferries and out of the terminal . That small delay will be the grit in the works that causes delays and queues backed up for tens of miles on the M2 and M20 . Look what happened when the french introduced increased security checks after the terrorist attacks on Paris . 20 mile queues into Dover The snarl ups caused by that will be nothing to what will happen after a no deal Brexit . And that's even if the French are fully cooperative . Fat chance of that . It will be chaos . All the "boots on the ground " are saying it . Believe them or believe the politicians ??

    • @totokfr
      @totokfr 4 роки тому +4

      @James Berry Of course your counting on the full cooperation of the French . After a no deal brexit that welches on all our treaties witht he EU and causes damage to the French economy what chances do you think there are of that on a scale from 1 to 10 . The French can play silly buggers ( and will) letting through stuff they want to , and controlling other less welcome imports down to the last detail . So much for taking back control of our borders . Borders are two way things . There is a country on both sides . And their side will no longer be bound by all the current rules .

    • @totokfr
      @totokfr 4 роки тому +1

      @James Berry Yes only two months to go so every partiotic Briton must fight to the last to end this stitch up by the foreign financed leave movement that will destroy the UKs prosperity and more importantly its social cohesion .

    • @totokfr
      @totokfr 4 роки тому +2

      @James Berry Good question . That the current enquiery is trying to find out . In any case Arron Banks hasn't given a convincing explanation of where the money came from . And he was in " business " talks with Russia just before . Best 8 million quid Putin ever spent . It will , in the end , do more damage than all of Hitlers bombs that cost quite a few bob more .

    • @antonionacionreluya8707
      @antonionacionreluya8707 Рік тому

      Principal? Maybe you mean principle.

  • @GavinFreedomLover
    @GavinFreedomLover 4 роки тому +3

    As usual Germans and French and the Dutch moaning about a no deal , WE VOTED OUT !!!

  • @frannbug
    @frannbug 5 років тому +7

    What a biased selection! No, Tim Martin is not the only prominent CEO who has it all under control. These people have all been burying their heads in the sand and hoping a multi-deal wouldn't happen, while Tim and the others not featured here were busy sourcing other suppliers and making sure their business would not be affected. And why was he the only one here? Where were all the small business owners who can't wait to throw off the shackles of EU regulations, saving them unnecessary time and effort? Where are the fishermen who want the UK to get its fish back? And why are none of the TV media exploring the possibilities of Article 24 which could alleviate most of these fears? These people seem not to even know about it!
    So why are prominent business leaders so upset at Brexit? Some are upset because they gain a lot economically from the EU, at the expense of those small businesses I've just mentioned who only trade here but have to comply with all the regulations and extra paperwork. But at the bottom line, many of these people have a romantic dream of the whole world being ruled by a single government, preferably with them in charge. The EU and similar alliances form the building blocks of this globalism and leaving the EU thus goes against their religion. Such a structure would only work with a marvel of selfless perfection in every echelon, people who are so liberal they will allow almost anything to happen without interference. If such people are not found, we will all be forced to become one giant herd who download our opinions daily from our overlords and never deviate for fear of having nowhere to run. That is why Brexit is a vital step in the right direction.

    • @ernestrogen4639
      @ernestrogen4639 5 років тому +1

      You would nearly think it was the BBC but then we all know the EU pay them and probaly pay this lot as well. Fat cats looking after each other.

    • @benghiskahn3673
      @benghiskahn3673 3 роки тому

      Anne, over 50% of UK fishing vessels are owned by Europeans....... We sold our fishing quotas to the Europeans just like we sell everything and then complain about it afterwards.
      Brexit is going to mean MORE paperwork, MORE red tape, MORE immigration distant parts of the world, LESS economic growth and activity, LESS demand for British exports, LESS money for public spending and a much weaker foundation on which to interact with the rest of the world.
      You write a lot but understand so little. You speak about subservient population downloading opinions from our overlords but completely miss that this you are describing the UK perfectly. All brexit does is allow those overlords more room to manipulate and exploit the wider population.

  • @papadoi1
    @papadoi1 5 років тому +14

    In Greece we had a referendum and it was ignored, no one is able to predict the price of stability. Does eu integration bring stability? In Greece we haven't seen palpable progress in the economy or any measurable goodwill approach from the eu. The European Union is not self reflective in its core. The main question you should be asking is this : do we have a country bent on promoting healthy social cohesion and honest bilateral relations? Will you be bullied into submission or do you promote ideals and policies that will work towards the prosperity of the British people? Don't underestimate the vindictiveness of the European Union.

    • @sanhcman666
      @sanhcman666 2 роки тому +2

      True, but the one who started the problem greek politicians were never put on trial

    • @cyclometre
      @cyclometre 2 роки тому +2

      you are forgetting the fact that like Greece the UK also has major problems with corruption in high places.

    • @sanhcman666
      @sanhcman666 2 роки тому

      @@cyclometre also more people worldwide have more sympathy toward greece than uk,.perfida albion pirates den.

    • @peterdegaccio5592
      @peterdegaccio5592 2 роки тому +1

      Greece does not belong in the EU, for a start, and the EU vindictive? If you are too stupid to understand what the EU is about, start reading what the EU is in its core: a European Economic Community! And if you want to stop working at 50 years of age, you just don't fit in the EEC!

  • @blogman8712
    @blogman8712 4 роки тому +14

    Minette Batters, President of the NU of Farmers, seems to like the EU Common Agricultural Policy. I wonder why?
    "The Common Agricultural Policy is inefficient, and much of British food production is uncompetitive in the absence of tariffs. And free trade deals of the kind the UK plans to pursue outside the Single Market will hurt farmers even more than the loss of subsidies. Dieter Helm says Brexit is a chance to stop subsidising large landowners and spend more on environmental protection."
    "The core problem with the early CAP was that it aimed to increase production, and it was very successful in doing so (and it was the explicit objective). Rational profit seeking farmers confronted with guaranteed prices above world market levels, and export subsidies on top, responded as any business would: they increased supply above the competitive market levels dictated by underlying supply and demand. This reduced imports, squeezing developing countries, increased exports, and delivered surpluses. This is exactly what a drive to “food security” requires. Consumers, through significantly higher food bills, paid for all of this. Since food is a basic requirement taking up more of the household budgets of the poor, it was regressive. The poor paid to boost farmers’ incomes.
    The normal way a market gets rid of surpluses is through the price mechanism. Excess supply leads to lower prices, bringing markets back into equilibrium. The CAP however continued to prop up prices and hence had to resort to direct quantity interventions to try to ameliorate the worst of the consequences. It ended up fixing both prices and quantities. These quantity interventions took the form of quotas and set aside. The former drew the Commission into directly managing outputs, and the latter introduced the idea that farmers would be paid to take land out of production. They were therefore paid to increase production and then paid to stop producing - both at the same time.
    The enlargement of the EU confronted the Commission with the potential for a very large increase in CAP spending. The new Eastern European countries had a higher dependence on agriculture, and in general poorer farmers. So the total spend had to be capped. It could not be done without the mechanism itself being reformed.
    The first key breakthrough was to break the link between subsidy and production. Over time the CAP has morphed into a system of income support, largely independent of production. Whilst this allows production to adjust to more market-oriented prices, the worst impacts of the CAP have at least been ameliorated, even if the tariffs were not entirely removed, despite the Uruguay trade round. Now the Commission justifies the main subsidies as a policy “to help stabilise farm revenues in the face of volatile market prices, unpredictable weather conditions and variable input costs.”
    www.dieterhelm.co.uk/natural-capital/environment/agricultural-policy-after-brexit/

    • @W1DO
      @W1DO 4 роки тому +1

      Or.....brexit is a chance for the land owners in the UK (eg Tory party) to repeal environmental laws and remove workers rights...

    • @W1DO
      @W1DO 4 роки тому

      @Spinler Muckflitt not in Scotland you cant. . Almost every pro brexit and every pro EU argument can be used by the SNP.

    • @W1DO
      @W1DO 4 роки тому

      @Spinler Muckflitt are you trying to tell me that England is a safer place to live than Sweden? Scotland wouldnt have to reduce spending, it would have to increase productivity or focus on providing things that people in Scotland want (eg not trident).

  • @bryangeake5826
    @bryangeake5826 3 роки тому +15

    Project Reality!!! Now where is Rees Mogg????

  • @iloveyouzion1
    @iloveyouzion1 5 років тому +107

    as an asian looking at this 'brexit' from far away, it will not be an 'apocalypse'...but it will certainly bring lots of damage to uk...i think many british people still have too much pride from their 'empire' days...the truth is uk were strong whenever they were either in a war with another country or had colonies...i'm not an economy expert or a politics expert..but this whole 'brexit' thing came out of stupid ignorance by, first david cameron himself, who brought the whole vote thing in the first place, believing that surely uk people will vote to stay in, and then secondly this whole 'fake news' got people hooked...stats full of lies printed by tabloids and people believed in it...british people are one of the laziest people i've ever seen...sorry, but it is true...and now suppose if majority of foreigners aren't there anymore...do you really think people will then go, 'oh, i'll do this job now' no way....

    • @darryllesunderland7368
      @darryllesunderland7368 5 років тому +6

      Looking at Asia - I don't see much where you can advise.

    • @SuperHooverman
      @SuperHooverman 5 років тому +4

      And what of this 'Empire' the EU is amassing ?

    • @zoetropo1
      @zoetropo1 5 років тому +2

      Darrylle Sunderland: ahem, Malaysian election 2018.

    • @Arcaryon
      @Arcaryon 5 років тому +17

      @@zoetropo1 The EU is the concept of uniting the countries of Europe in a single administration. Not an empire of the past mind you. Realistically. Where do you think the future of the human civilization lies? In isolated nation states who have managed to cooperate with their overlords like the bigger, highly developed nation states (China/US) (if you want to hear my opinion why this doesn't work out, look at the middle east, at Vietnam, Venezuela today... Proxy wars and conflicts as far as the eye can see. My point - we had this model. The next one would be an utopia of nation states who cooperate for the sake of peace. Which will not happen for a long time.
      Look at Turkey. NATO member and
      ruled by an elected autocratic leader who plays a dangerous game of balancing his own nation between the Russian local military power and the NATO influence of the US.
      The EU is the future. Or better, the right step in the right direction. As long as you on your own are unable to rival the US or China or any possible new superpower in a single national state (India) - an alliance is in your best interest.
      With it we have influence and can choose our own path. Without? We are just puppets of the highest bidder. Thats the international side of things. The EU is btw. not perfect in anyway and needs reforms. But these reforms are a most thing that while not being easy or a short undertaking - is more than possible.

    • @Arcaryon
      @Arcaryon 5 років тому +6

      @Spinler Muckflitt Ok you clever genius. If you import more than you export - tell me. Who is gonna loose more. 450 million people with 11 trillion euro or 60 million with 2 trillion? Ever heard of a free trade agreement? Thought so.

  • @kopeducati
    @kopeducati 5 років тому +78

    The Brexit potential for structural damage to businesses lies in many layers..
    1. All current modelling is based on continued growth. All problems are compiled and amplified in any downturn. this downturn seems to be coming, partly due to Brexit.
    2. Brexit impacts main business adagio’s:
    a. 20% of your clients make 80% of your business/profits
    b. It costs 10X as much to make a new client than to keep one
    3. Even in current day economics, vast percentages of businesses operate in constant survival mode with very low gross and net margins. Very few can afford a 10% drop in sales and hardly any can afford a 10% rise of costs. Brexit will very likely cause both.
    4. Costs likely to go up are:
    a. Currency: Depreciation of GBP
    b. Tax & Tariffs
    c. Supply chain handling and financing costs
    d. Cost of Capital / finance
    e. Labor costs
    5. In manufacturing, the main USP is no longer engineering skills but the capacity to embed products in a highly sophisticated supply chain. it has all to do with integration of systems. Quality control, warrenties handling, ... Once in, you are hard to replace. Once out, you don’t get back in. A disturbed supply chain also means that customers incur significant costs to cope with disruption on their side. This boosts any EU based competitors’ attractiveness. Clients do not adapt well to supplier’s hassles. They may not be in a position absorb the costs for their own competitiveness reasons.
    6. Stockpiling is expensive. Since 3 decades, the main drive of productivity is the reduction of inventory. It drastically reduces the need for working capital and risk of inventory depreciation losses. Especially for small businesses, this could prove to be outright impossible. Stockpiling one month worth of goods = 8% of turnover. Most companies only make 5% of turnover as profit.. so stockpiling 1 month of goods = 1,5 years of profits blocked or debt increased.
    7. Tarrifs are calculated on goods + clearing. Any handling is 40-60gbp.. This will impact total cost for any order beneath 200GBP packages more than tariffs. This will likely kill off most webshop sales to EU.
    8. Disturbed supply chain incurs risks and will impact payment conditions, putting huge stress on cash requirements. Again, small businesses will suffer most.
    9. There is nothing the UK makes that competitors don’t make. The strongest MonoIndustry UK has is Finance (City). All other activities operate in a very high competition environment.
    10. All the Future Markets (US, China, India, North America, South America,..) are 5 to 10 times farther away. Only very high value products will merit the extra supply chain costs. Covering 800miles of transport on a truck = 24 hours. Covering 3000 miles by boat = weeks. Solving Warranty issues are 5 x as expensive and cumbersome. Distance means local representation is required. This is extremely costly. Fierce competitors are at half the distance away and in place.
    11. Many businesses will become chronically un(der)profitable. And reduced rewards no longer allow for increased business risks. A sustained loss of profitability reduces the capacity to finance by more than 60%. Not only to grow, but also to survive any impact.
    12. Even if big industry is mainly profit oriented, in a downturn, companies will always favor closing plants in foreign countries. Many main industries are foreign owned and have a production overcapacity.
    13. Main industries are best paying ones so even if jobs are found, in 90% of the cases, it is at lower wages or inferior packages. In general, training opportunities are higher in large industries.. If they disappear, whole regions suffer for decades… some never recover.. “ Trickle down” economics work very well with calamities.
    14. Most affected will be investment of all kinds. 1 trillion GPB was invested because of EU access. That access will be significantly hindered. How appealing is a depressed UK home market to foreign investors? UK based investors are not in the business of “saving GB” and will look elsewhere. So, when UK will need investment most, it will be less attractive. And TAX incentives are of no meaning when profitability is not guaranteed.

    • @Tabacish
      @Tabacish 5 років тому +6

      yup, i'll copy this one for future use, thanks for the info 👍

    • @cartmann227
      @cartmann227 5 років тому +1

      Brexit means Brexit

    • @Tabacish
      @Tabacish 5 років тому +11

      @@cartmann227 wow, and that's the best response brexiteers have...

    • @cartmann227
      @cartmann227 5 років тому +1

      @@Tabacish Please have faith in the strength of Britain. It will be be fine. JRM promised that.

    • @OtocinclusAffinis
      @OtocinclusAffinis 5 років тому +3

      cartmann227 yes, he said that you might see benefits of leaving in as soon as five decades. How old are you btw?

  • @natschaefer1044
    @natschaefer1044 3 роки тому +15

    What exactly is Tim Martin an expert in?

    • @ianbettley1925
      @ianbettley1925 3 роки тому +3

      Been a Alcoholic

    • @adrianday
      @adrianday 3 роки тому +3

      Being a gammon

    • @paulbaines2561
      @paulbaines2561 3 роки тому +1

      @@adrianday hes an expert at f/a

    • @mpstab6276
      @mpstab6276 3 роки тому +1

      Skanky pubs with poor food made from all frozen ingredients. Underage drinkers and students love them! I wonder where he keeps his millions?

    • @notroll1279
      @notroll1279 3 роки тому

      Tending to the pro Brexit beer bellies propping up the bars of his pubs.
      Nice strategy: make a visit to his pubs a political statement for Brexiteers and position his pubs as a fact-free zone where they can exchange their twaddle freely.

  • @bikerbisht110
    @bikerbisht110 4 роки тому +3

    There is no such thing as no deal, EU and UK will have to deal with each other under the established WTO rules ... like the rest of the world does

    • @bikerbisht110
      @bikerbisht110 4 роки тому +2

      @@darryllesunderland7368 - Absolutely right, they will clamour to give us a deal after brexit is completed

  • @Keltik0ne
    @Keltik0ne 5 років тому +232

    All this so rich tory donors can avoid the new EU tax avoidance laws

    • @Lesserthannone
      @Lesserthannone 5 років тому +12

      Ah there it is, and I thought it was to destabilise the NATO members at the benefits of China and Poohton

    • @dvidclapperton
      @dvidclapperton 5 років тому +11

      Indeed so true on tax avoidance.
      The UK will also be leaving NATO, the UN, the G7 and the G8.

    • @dantaylor7344
      @dantaylor7344 5 років тому

      yep

    • @dvidclapperton
      @dvidclapperton 5 років тому +13

      @@Spinler Muckflitt
      The tories will have unilaterally ripped up the Good Friday peace agreement if we leave with No Deal.

    • @richy1606
      @richy1606 5 років тому

      With non elected eu commissioners who hold the real power , ok I'd rather be able to vote for our leaders

  • @erikje7352
    @erikje7352 5 років тому +17

    maby i am wrong ,,,, but ,,,,,
    when i look at UK politicians i can not help but think that darwin,s evolution theory is wrong

    • @rok1475
      @rok1475 4 роки тому +2

      erik je Darwin was right. Not enough genetic diversity on an isolated island leads to deterioration of the species and ultimately to its extinction.

    • @W1DO
      @W1DO 4 роки тому

      That's what some of them say...

  • @Spikesw15
    @Spikesw15 3 роки тому +24

    So the sum total of the “Brexit Bonanza” is cheaper NZ Sauvignon Blanc in Wetherspoons. Let’s hope it’s several tens of billions £££ cheaper, to partly compensate for the negatives.

    • @cliveadams7629
      @cliveadams7629 3 роки тому +3

      Mate, drink as.much as you can so it's less painful to suffer the tribulations of losing our markets, our freedons and the protection of our rights.

    • @kevinshanahan6064
      @kevinshanahan6064 3 роки тому +1

      You are being very cruel to Timmy the Wetherspoon, who out of the goodness of his heart he employs all these people on minimum wage, some earning enough for him to pay employers National Insurance. Every kid at school costs the taxpayer about £5,500 a year and some of his staff earn enough to pay income tax! Think of all that Wetherspoons add to the economy. OK I am struggling big time to find out what it is, but give me time. And all you want to do is deny him the right to buy cheap NZ Sauvignon - hang your head in shame.

  • @ludwigvanel9192
    @ludwigvanel9192 4 роки тому +8

    No deal = brexit.
    A deal means Europe still has political & economic power over Britain, so is no Brexit.

    • @MubzxayStar
      @MubzxayStar 4 роки тому

      Sorry, Wrong!
      Brexit means leaving the EU...

  • @Mataeus
    @Mataeus 5 років тому +171

    The politicians that pushed for brexit should be put in jail for convincing the public that it would be easy with no consequences. May could never get a better deal, no one could! What bargaining power does the UK have when the EU hold all the cards?

    • @stumccabe
      @stumccabe 5 років тому +18

      Mathew Fuller You must be kidding, they should be put in jail! Why, because they want our country to be independent and free. I suppose I should say that the politicians that pushed for no brexit should be put in jail, but I believe in democracy - you don't seem to understand the concept, you talk like a nazi.

    • @61shirley
      @61shirley 5 років тому +4

      Mathew Fuller 😂😂😂

    • @TheCyricson
      @TheCyricson 5 років тому +17

      Stu McCabe So the UK is not free or independent within the EU? Tell me what exactly the UK lost...i know i am entering stupid territory now but i will take the risk, plz go on...

    • @kebjenkins
      @kebjenkins 5 років тому +7

      It's the corrupt MP's who have deliberately made a mess of the negotiations to try and prevent Brexit who should be jailed, they have committed treason by trying to overturn democracy.

    • @Locutus
      @Locutus 5 років тому +1

      The politicians that pushed for NO Brexit, should be put in jail for convincing the public that it would be better in the EU with no consequences. Corbyn could never get a better deal, no one could! What bargaining power does the UK have when the Remainiacs hold all the cards?

  • @MoraqVos
    @MoraqVos 5 років тому +89

    Why do so many British people believe that the UK doesn't have to pay their EU bill? That money is their unpaid membership fee. If the UK were to 'dine and dash' they can forget about any deals with the EU.

    • @VolkerHett
      @VolkerHett 5 років тому +1

      That's the ultimate no deal then!

    • @davidrobertsemail
      @davidrobertsemail 5 років тому +9

      Daniël van Werven we are owed money from the EU not the other way around. Who paid for everything!
      We paid in more every single year than we got out except the year we joined!
      Are we going to get all our assets back?

    • @tigercat418
      @tigercat418 5 років тому +4

      @@davidrobertsemail black people

    • @PanglossDr
      @PanglossDr 5 років тому +22

      And forget about deals with others too. Who would deal with a Country which does not keep its agreements. But, has the UK ever kept an agreement?

    • @davidrobertsemail
      @davidrobertsemail 5 років тому +6

      PanglossDr name the broken agreement?

  • @barrywebber100
    @barrywebber100 3 роки тому +1

    Why is it I just don't believe the people in this film arguing that Brexit is a good thing?
    Most sensible opinion say it is damaging for the UK.
    Next year we will find out what is reality and what is "project fear"!
    I fear the worst.

  • @GTX311
    @GTX311 Рік тому +1

    I can't believe that you can be a businessman and yet have no idea what damage Brexit was going to do to the U.K. 🤣

  • @Doomedcreatures
    @Doomedcreatures 5 років тому +78

    we have already lost jobs at work over Brexit as we supply clothes to the EU, and those stores are worried about tariffs. This is going to be a total disaster, why are we doing this?

    • @rogerturner1757
      @rogerturner1757 5 років тому +7

      And your solution would be to ruled by a dictatorship? and lose any chance of being able to be independent no doubt you would have supported Hitler

    • @rasputinswalloper475
      @rasputinswalloper475 5 років тому +30

      We're doing it because half of our population are idiotic bigots.

    • @fenhen
      @fenhen 5 років тому +39

      Roger Turner What dictatorship? You mean a democratic organisation of democratic countries in which we are an equal partner with many special privileges?

    • @alankenworthy9722
      @alankenworthy9722 5 років тому +6

      @@fenhen Where is that then? Have you found that somewhere?

    • @kungazopa2831
      @kungazopa2831 5 років тому +8

      Then your company should get off their behinds and create deals with other buyers. The EU wants to export to us and will not under WTO trade rules want to risk us raising tariffs on their goods. Get out of your fear mentality mate.

  • @oneoctavelow
    @oneoctavelow 5 років тому +13

    The 39 billion pounds represents money owed to the EU as liability for exiting their club. Its what he UK politicians have signed up for way back without first checking with its people.So really...What does he mean when he says “why should we pay that much money when we get nothing in return ?” If UK doesn’t cough up the 39 bill, the EU will marginalise them economically into poverty so as to discourage other countries from ever following suit. Either way the UK will be the one paying a heavy price by example....as for refusing to pay thinking there will be no consequence ? That’s amateurish ...

    • @Archeaon
      @Archeaon 5 років тому

      well not really, it is the price of the pacts and collaborations signed so far, not paying them would be breaking unilaterally international agreements.
      For example ITER the fusion reactor that is being built in France, UK got money for building JET another fusion reactor.

    • @drunkensailor112
      @drunkensailor112 5 років тому

      Exactly. UK will pay the 39 billion anyway. That's like having a speeding ticket and not wanting to pay.

  • @ofcoursepenelope1238
    @ofcoursepenelope1238 4 роки тому +1

    2 mins into "here's the experts' view of a No-Deal Brexit" from Channel 4 and they've got the owner of Wetherspoons on.

  • @brian8616
    @brian8616 3 роки тому +2

    Protection for tax evaders with off shore accounts. NO DEAL SCAMMERS 45000 out of 60 million

  • @jacobwhite9006
    @jacobwhite9006 5 років тому +5

    "We know in business that no deal is better than a bad deal"... right don't sell anything then... you'll be out of business in 10 minutes

    • @desertmandan123
      @desertmandan123 5 років тому

      So if the EU don't sell to UK , who will they sell our massive share to? Where has the British Car industry gone, sold out to Europe and the rest of the world. That makes sense doesn't it?

  • @user-ll8mh3rh1x
    @user-ll8mh3rh1x 5 років тому +5

    Its a sign of the times calling people experts on something that has never happened before.

  • @thomasjamison2050
    @thomasjamison2050 2 роки тому +3

    "Free trade deal with the US. That will be the first deal." giggles here from the US.......

  • @mayal5206
    @mayal5206 4 роки тому +6

    They found some "experts" to recite the desired opinions. That's some amazing journalism right there.

  • @wilverbal
    @wilverbal 5 років тому +11

    Before calling people experts, ask about their track record. Where did they stand on issues such as the Euro? The ERM?

  • @amartyaroy3754
    @amartyaroy3754 5 років тому +29

    I think people forget about Northern Ireland when they talk about no deal brexit

    • @CmdrTobs
      @CmdrTobs 5 років тому +1

      It's a bit of scam that's why. If Britain leaves it will not be putting up a boarder in N. Ireland in any event.
      It has been a great and successful ruse for the Republic of Ireland's dilemma to be made into the UK's dilemma.

    • @dvidclapperton
      @dvidclapperton 5 років тому +1

      The bombs in relation to Northern Ireland that go off outwith Northern Ireland would still go off in London, Birmingham and Manchester, not in Dublin, Paris, Brussels, Munich and Amsterdam if the tories unilaterally rip up the Good Friday Agreement.
      The UK tory goernmebt are being blamed in the whole of the island of Ireland or the way they have approached Brexit talks resulting in the Northern Ireland public'scfearof the return of bloodshed like before the Good Friday Agreement was signed.

    • @dvidclapperton
      @dvidclapperton 5 років тому

      It's not a scam.
      On No Deal, Dublin and Larne is a legit route (well it already is but no need to use it at present becauze the UK is still in the EU, but after we have left it will be widely used if the border in Ireland is left open while th vast majority of borders between the UK and the EU (not any of those between the UK and Ireland) are closed) between France and Stoke on Trent, Newcastle or Aberdeen e.g. and if the border in Ireland is wide open while the highest of security and thorough customs checking at both Calais and Dover/Folkestone, the Dublin and Larne route will be faster EU mainland to/from the north of the UK.
      Dover/Folkestone to Calais isn't the only way for all you know.

    • @dallysinghson5569
      @dallysinghson5569 5 років тому +1

      @@CmdrTobs No border in Northern Ireland means that you will not be able to control immigration... You need a solid border/check to prevent people coming in. Then, there's the smuggling of goods... You can compromise another country's economy/regulations without a border as well. That's going to cause a shitstorm with the EU (or UK), and if you think the other countries won't complain about this to the WTO...!

    • @CmdrTobs
      @CmdrTobs 5 років тому +1

      @@dallysinghson5569 Irish have dual passporting so not an issue.The odds of someone 'sneaking' into Ireland to go to northern island then on to mainland Britain are unlikely. If this were a worth while route this would happen now. We won't check your passport from British dependencies anyway so if not having a boarder with a non-EU territory was a great boon to smuggling why aren't people and goods 'sneaking in' though the isle of man now?
      You do realise the EU actually has porous boarders in it's continental territory?
      This WTO thing is odd. A lot of countries in the WTO have open boarders, some are even failed states. Pakistan, a country that has open boarders with narco and terror states is in the WTO.

  • @janlievens6964
    @janlievens6964 3 роки тому +2

    UK: we want to controle our own borders
    EU: you do right now within the EU
    UK: we want to controle our own money
    EU: errr...you use the pound
    UK: we want to controle our own laws
    EU: the UK parliament is making them...
    UK: we want our own fish
    EU: why did you sell your quotas then?
    UK: we want do not want to follow the tax avoidance rule
    EU: Good luck, see you later when you have a government who has some common sense

  • @RazORKful
    @RazORKful 4 роки тому +17

    How does british farming suffer when in the same video, you reveal that we import 60% of food?

    • @tafamusoni
      @tafamusoni 4 роки тому +9

      Khorneflake May the bulk of the food imported cannot be grown in the UK whereas Europe can easily replace what the British farmer supplies to them. The loss may therefore be one sided for the British farmer .

    • @sexgod6909
      @sexgod6909 4 роки тому +6

      Farmers have been molly coddled for far too many years!!! They need to get off their assets and start finding other markets or selling their goods in the UK at a reasonable price!!!

    • @sorennilsson9742
      @sorennilsson9742 4 роки тому

      Simply overproduction in some areas and not being able to produce at all in some areas. A good example is sheep and tomatoes. 95% of exported sheep products went to EU. The UK only produce 30% of its tomatoes the bulk close to 70% comes from other EU nations.

    • @allanmacauley
      @allanmacauley 4 роки тому +5

      British olive and orange farmers are going to make a killing!

    • @sorennilsson9742
      @sorennilsson9742 4 роки тому

      @@allanmacauley Do not underestimate Huggit's Farm in Kent since I do think they represent 100% of UK olive production. Do not know if they have managed to get any olives yeat but they are trying.

  • @mattpryokra2245
    @mattpryokra2245 5 років тому +6

    That thumbnail is scary lol one looks like Doc Brown out of Back to The Future 😭💀

  • @matthewstone1660
    @matthewstone1660 5 років тому +8

    U need an electorate that care, politicians who put them and country first and courage/determination/will.

  • @brucemaclennan9879
    @brucemaclennan9879 4 роки тому +3

    "Crashing out" - "cliff edge" - "abyss" - "catastrophy" I've heard them all now.

    • @W1DO
      @W1DO 4 роки тому +4

      I know, missing out on a few items of food and paying more for things isnt such a big deal.

    • @trevorb.yokkanan9801
      @trevorb.yokkanan9801 4 роки тому +4

      @@W1DO It really isn't. Im looking forward to losing my job, so I dont have the option to pay for foods that I can't get my hands on anyway - no biggie!

    • @W1DO
      @W1DO 4 роки тому

      @@trevorb.yokkanan9801 joking aside, I'm not looking forward to taking advantage of people in the UK after this happens...

    • @markdeakin4773
      @markdeakin4773 4 роки тому +1

      You know have armageddon to add to that list

    • @kevinrogers2949
      @kevinrogers2949 3 роки тому

      Marky's Bike Lab Well it is if you’re poor.

  • @farrahkhalid9138
    @farrahkhalid9138 3 роки тому +2

    What these weird business men forget is that the govt is not a business and cannot be run like a business. The govt job is to govern.

    • @garyantoni4658
      @garyantoni4658 3 роки тому

      But your forgetting is most of these MP'S GOT THERE OWN BUISNESSES

  • @brianrodney5202
    @brianrodney5202 5 років тому +7

    The main expertise that the Sunbed Queen from France has is the ability to dodge a prison sentence.

  • @allwynbarreto3558
    @allwynbarreto3558 5 років тому +117

    You can see from the slowness of his speech the pub guy thinks at the rate of a pint pour per idea

    • @ewancullens9633
      @ewancullens9633 5 років тому

      You don't need the ' pour '. Doubt? Did you mean poured?

    • @leonbell5141
      @leonbell5141 5 років тому

      Allwyn Barreto 🤣

    • @stevetaylor4672
      @stevetaylor4672 5 років тому +8

      Think he's sampled too much of his own product

    • @nsmcnair
      @nsmcnair 5 років тому +2

      😄😂😂

    • @GasFinger1
      @GasFinger1 5 років тому +5

      The wetherspoons boss is right on the money !

  • @thelab8770
    @thelab8770 4 роки тому +1

    Thats pure comedy love it 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

  • @celsiusmillo7915
    @celsiusmillo7915 3 роки тому +6

    I voted Brexit but now I regret it, only plonkers and the ELIT wants that they never made so much money

  • @alistairrazi7303
    @alistairrazi7303 5 років тому +8

    Brexit is a tiring mess.

  • @smogmonster1876
    @smogmonster1876 5 років тому +55

    Putting it simply. We’re screwed.

    • @beetleything1864
      @beetleything1864 5 років тому +2

      Smog Monster yep Britain will sink & disappear 🤔🙄🤣🤣

    • @joshuadrew6246
      @joshuadrew6246 5 років тому

      WTO is the best option to go with.

    • @smogmonster1876
      @smogmonster1876 5 років тому +3

      Joshua Drew we want to leave the EU because we can’t have our own way and that’s with 27 others.
      How are we going to manage when we can’t have our own way with the WTO of which there are 164 member (136 not in the EU)?

    • @joshuadrew6246
      @joshuadrew6246 5 років тому

      @@smogmonster1876 they don't controll every aspect of government, the wto is just an economic trade framework not something witch controls your entire country and expects you to pay for the privilege.

    • @George-jt1rs
      @George-jt1rs 5 років тому +1

      We voted to leave because we are losing our sovereignty

  • @Grifiki
    @Grifiki 4 роки тому +2

    "The Chunnel doesn't help western England, nor the north of England, where industry is dead,"

  • @aleksm3401
    @aleksm3401 3 роки тому +4

    I highly recommend the video about no deal brexit made by Pindex and narrated by Stephen Fry on yt, provides some more figures to work with about the no deal situation.

  • @andrewpaulogrady2681
    @andrewpaulogrady2681 4 роки тому +9

    Anyone would think Channel 4 news had an opinion on this matter.

    • @tonypate9174
      @tonypate9174 4 роки тому +1

      " so what you're saying is" ?

    • @kimweaver3323
      @kimweaver3323 4 роки тому +3

      It just shows what the experts think. So, are you going to believe experts over politicians, and singularly inept politicians at that?

  • @tonyclay8364
    @tonyclay8364 5 років тому +110

    Liam Fox has been trying to get trade deals for 2 years ... result ... 0.

    • @hpvspeedmachine4183
      @hpvspeedmachine4183 5 років тому +2

      What do you expect, he is not even able to feed his dog!!!

    • @AAAA-gs2mw
      @AAAA-gs2mw 5 років тому +1

      a lot are ready to be signed off... Dr Fox said ahahahah

    • @ByronHawk
      @ByronHawk 5 років тому +6

      Our very own trade deals can not be established while in the EU.

    • @AAAA-gs2mw
      @AAAA-gs2mw 5 років тому +2

      thank you for the obvious however we are, in the EU, enjoying several trade agreements so I am just wondering what the Fox does have that we haven't?!

    • @romevo100
      @romevo100 5 років тому +4

      Britain as been trying to amend the EU for 40 years. results 50 plus times tried, 50 plus times voted down, every time. Oohhhh EU is so amazing

  • @EH-lz8in
    @EH-lz8in 3 роки тому +2

    How wrong they were

  • @montygemma
    @montygemma 4 роки тому +2

    I live in a mostly leave voting area and in my job I get to talk to a lot of people, and all I hear from them is no deal is better than a bad deal. This doesn't mean a deal is not appealing, it's what most of them want but it's got to be a lot better than the one on the table.

  • @BinkyTheGoddessDivine
    @BinkyTheGoddessDivine 5 років тому +197

    Don't worry UK, you will have your "freedom" while your economy collapses. The poor people who voted for Brexit to learn a harsh lesson.

    • @61shirley
      @61shirley 5 років тому +13

      Binky Ferrari 😂 don't talk wet

    • @Wichnam
      @Wichnam 5 років тому +11

      Well a poor person won't notice much difference would they? >.>

    • @hpvspeedmachine4183
      @hpvspeedmachine4183 5 років тому +6

      @@Wichnam the poorest no but the less poor certainly yes

    • @nibler887
      @nibler887 5 років тому +2

      The 54 year old man that never has voted can not be denied democracy!!!

    • @Imman1s
      @Imman1s 5 років тому +1

      But is a valuable one: the rich have tender meat full of calories and it goes great fava beans.

  • @rosejuliette5965
    @rosejuliette5965 5 років тому +124

    This is absurd... Why didn't you get an expert to talk about how nice the colour blue will be for the passports we won't be able to afford and won't be useful for travel unless we pay for visas each time we go abroad. Britain voted for a blue passport and I think that the people of this country deserve to know if it's a cerulean or an aquamarine.

    • @emm_arr
      @emm_arr 5 років тому +6

      It looks like a Prussian blue to me. It's not even the right colour for the silly sod brigade.

    • @rosejuliette5965
      @rosejuliette5965 5 років тому +1

      @@emm_arr gosh darn it... I knew I should have voted Teal.

    • @patricksmith797
      @patricksmith797 5 років тому +2

      Why would the UK need visas? I have an Irish passport and have been able to travel almost everywhere in the world without a visa ( pre 911). Its just a matter of UK telling the EU that if its citizens have to have a visa then EU nationals must also have a visa to come to the UK. If they charge tariffs on trade and goods then the UK charges an equal amount of tariffs, get the picture?

    • @rosejuliette5965
      @rosejuliette5965 5 років тому +7

      @@patricksmith797 you are definitely trolling 😂😂

    • @taunteratwill1787
      @taunteratwill1787 5 років тому +2

      You really have no idea what they actually have done to your rights and money do you?

  • @theveryfirst
    @theveryfirst 4 роки тому +4

    So we should buy British products and support our own economy.

  • @Filbert66
    @Filbert66 3 роки тому +2

    All these people are covering they're own backs and worried about they're own salaries!

  • @williamgreen8330
    @williamgreen8330 5 років тому +8

    NO DEAL is the only deal best option ..do what the people VOTED and leave

  • @waikanaebeach
    @waikanaebeach 5 років тому +7

    Rather than rhetoric, what are the facts of leaving without an agreement. Are there any trade deals ready to go in the next 6 months - no. How much is the government spending on risk mitigation ~2bn. How much is business spending on risk mitigation-

    • @skyblazeeterno
      @skyblazeeterno 5 років тому +1

      Facts are rarely mentioned here....well done

    • @waikanaebeach
      @waikanaebeach 5 років тому +1

      randomguy8196 yes... Poor brexit supporting politicians don't understand even the basics of WTO treaties. That's why Tusk's statement has received so much condemnation. ... Shakespeare .. '...[s]he douth protests too much..'

    • @bmoore1908
      @bmoore1908 5 років тому

      Richard Hatfield Thank you for the information

  • @JLPC13
    @JLPC13 4 роки тому +8

    I still don't understand how we were allowed to vote on something which:
    A. Nobody had a plan for
    and
    B. The experts were in agreement that any way of delivering on the referendum would be objectively damaging to our national interests

    • @GR-dl4bi
      @GR-dl4bi 4 роки тому +3

      Because billionaires stand to pay less tax, must be at least 25 billionaires who stand to gain from a no deal Brexit, surely 30 years of economic ruin is worth it for these guys to pay less tax, think of how many more private jets and super-yachts they can buy with their tax savings. Our politicians are bought and paid for by these guys, the rest of us can go and starve to death for all they care.

    • @Alternate1234ify
      @Alternate1234ify 4 роки тому

      @JLPC13 Your statements are incorrect. Various leaders in UKIP had worked out a strategy for leaving. The various ways of arranging Britain's affairs outside the EU are almost infinite, with many different visions for what constitutes the national interest.

    • @justjc51
      @justjc51 4 роки тому +1

      @@Alternate1234ify Can you please link to these plans and tell us why Teresa May and Boris Johnsons teams have not been made aware of them. After all if UKIP have had it all planned out for years it should be possible to implement before November comes.
      By the way Norway+, as promised by Farage, has no chance unless the UK accepts the backstop. It should not be a problem as Norway is known to be one of the countries who have implemented the most EU legislation in order to keep trading barriers to a minimum and thus can be said to have a backstop plan.

    • @Alternate1234ify
      @Alternate1234ify 4 роки тому

      @@justjc51 You can check out the book by Gerard Batten entitled "The Road to Freedom: How Britain can leave the European Union - The case for unconditional, unilateral withdrawal."
      I think Canada's trading arrangements are a better starting point than Norway's.

    • @W1DO
      @W1DO 4 роки тому +1

      @@justjc51 norway+ = the UK implement EU legislation and lose ability to shape and veto EU legislation...

  • @llc1976
    @llc1976 4 роки тому +6

    Why do this at all? What is behind it? It makes no sense at all? E.U. has worked for 40 years why break it up now?!

    • @pandrisn646
      @pandrisn646 4 роки тому +2

      @@MrTwistedNutz where do you have this information that " it will implode soon"? im just curious

    • @memayotte8344
      @memayotte8344 4 роки тому +1

      @@MrTwistedNutz you are really a prophet. Why not give our MPs your intelligence ?

    • @MaisieDaisyUpsadaisy
      @MaisieDaisyUpsadaisy 4 роки тому +1

      LLC The main thing people like about the EU is free trade, and some like free movement of people. However, EU membership does not just mean you are trading, it means that the sovereignty of your country is also compromised. The problems with Brexit pretty much all concern is placed on economics and Ireland. Everything else, such as the intelligence communities sharing intelligence, can be rectified through negotiations.

    • @jamesleon4883
      @jamesleon4883 4 роки тому

      People watching too many stupid UA-cam videos indoctrinating them. It’s the old the grass is greener in the other side. People have had such luxury that they have grown so used to it that it is not enough for them.

  • @markterrell4441
    @markterrell4441 5 років тому +21

    Every person, without exception, who advocate no deal, does nt give a reason why it will be good for the economy. Why?
    Here's the timescale for no deal:
    30 March "see, no problem, a few delays, but we're all ok!"
    1 May "ok, so a few prices are going up, there's bound to be adjustment"
    1 Sep "why are the prices so high? just be cause there is 15% on imports does not mean prices should rise?"
    2020: "why didn't the government tell us this would happen!!!!!?"

    • @markterrell4441
      @markterrell4441 5 років тому

      @Wary of Extremes we do given ourselves.

  • @fredhuybens2783
    @fredhuybens2783 5 років тому +21

    Were there to be a no-deal departure, the UK will want to make arrangements with the EU on many issues. The EU's first reaction will be: "Where's my 39 billion?".

    • @derekparke9482
      @derekparke9482 5 років тому +1

      True. Plus they will require a backstop.

    • @Mugdorna
      @Mugdorna 5 років тому +5

      Dont forget the 2000 customs officers who need to be hired within the next 2 weeks for all the truck inspections. The UK currently has 200 at Dover, before 1993 there were 2000. And in that 26 years trade has doubled.............

  • @zibbezabba2491
    @zibbezabba2491 4 роки тому +25

    They all forgot to mention the sky collapsing... how could they be so careless with the truth

    • @Same--xb3rb
      @Same--xb3rb 4 роки тому +5

      There so many free market around the world to engage in with very good deal. UK will be free to trade world wide. UK trusts its people and people don't trust those corrupt and moron politicians

    • @bryangeake5826
      @bryangeake5826 4 роки тому +1

      Oh ha ha!!! You Leavers would see your Granny sold for fertilizer before you would admit any ill effects of 'taking back control' sick joke if there ever was one!!

    • @bryangeake5826
      @bryangeake5826 4 роки тому

      @@Same--xb3rb There are NOT so many 'free markets' around the world, name them??? WTO is not free and as soon as a country goes into WTO it tries to find deals to come out. the EU internal market is pretty unique, the US 'Free Trade Deal' will be anything but!!

    • @zibbezabba2491
      @zibbezabba2491 4 роки тому +3

      @@bryangeake5826 Ill effects? For god's sake see a quack or something.

    • @bryangeake5826
      @bryangeake5826 4 роки тому

      @@zibbezabba2491 5 to 8% loss of GDP by 2023 the Bank of England predict, that far worse than 2008 crash at 2% loss of GDP. But of course that is 'Project Fear'.....best ignored, your prejudice has no room for objective based ideas. Stick to the xenophobia and bigotry!

  • @trafalgar1938
    @trafalgar1938 3 роки тому +3

    Every one of them has either a personal reason or frightened they will have to work.

    • @samuelthornton9179
      @samuelthornton9179 3 роки тому

      Yes because these are union leaders, economists or CEOs.

    • @daveansell1970
      @daveansell1970 3 роки тому

      Why is it a good thing to make ourselves poorer, weaker and have fewer personal rights. What is the immense positive that is needed to make up for all the huge negatives. There are so many other better things to spend the money on than Brexit.

    • @trafalgar1938
      @trafalgar1938 3 роки тому

      @@daveansell1970 You mean to spend it on the EU?