george went ,,,,,,a dog,,,,,,,,,remind me when he busted Patrick McGoohan......over a bite of cheese lol.....george went a dog,,,,,,,pat went ,1 bite of chesse lol..😊😊😊
“You see sir, the camera pans to follow you as you cross the room, like in a TV show. And that’s what’s bothering me, sir. Who hires a camera operator, maybe even a focus-puller, to run a security camera? It makes no sense, there’s no need for the production values. Unless! Unless you knew this footage was your alibi, sir. You knew because you planned the crime.”
The way the killers realised that Colombo was pretending to act stupid to catch them out and to incriminate themselves by admitting to the murder.. Colombo is a lot smarter than he lets on.
If Lt Columbo ask you if you are sure you've never been to Bud Clark's house multiple times, chances are he has a shot of you being at Bud Clark's house in 4K
That tan is George's costar, it comes out with him in every picture he's ever made. Gets equal billing in the credits: "George Hamilton and his tan". Are you kidding? He even had that tan in "Love at first bite"... where he played a vampire!
Funny enough, Columbo is a great show to watch if you ever want to see how your rights protect you. Pretty much every single time Columbo catches them, with minor exceptions here or there, it's because he lies about evidence to get their confession OR because they say too much during their talks with him. I'd be willing to say that at least 80% of the suspects would've gotten off scot-free had they just gone "Talk to my lawyer."
George Hamilton played a pretty good villain but he seemed a bit wooden. Maybe his character was supposed to be this way. Still enjoyed it because Columbo is just fun to watch.
True I think the victim in this episode is telling him something like that.. I don't know if it was wooden but definitely something like that.. So I guess it was the character. When he played the psychiatrist he was completely different
GH was an amazing actor. I love him on Columbo. Poor writing though on this episode - they get the neighbors little kid to accuse a MURDERER! No threat to the safety of that kid!
When I see George Hamilton, all I can think of is Don Diego Vega from "Zorro: The Gay Blade" (1981). I don't usually like movies with prancing flamboyant gay men, but this was so over the top funny that is among my favorite comedies. I recommend it to anyone who is a George Hamilton fan. Don Diego: "There is something wrong with your bowels." Charlotte: "My bowels?" Don Diego: "Your bowels, a, e, i, o, u."
@@RJSRdg That’s about when I figured. The fact that they’re watching a VHS tape should have been the dead giveaway. Those definitely weren’t a thing in the early and mid 1970s.
@@artmallory970 I can forgive people for not recognizing the era when certain cars are from, but the second he pulled out a VHS cassette tape everyone (or at least every adult who was born in the 20th century) should know right away “OK, this one isn’t from the original 1970s show.” And the quality of the picture/clearness of the film should also be a giveaway. As should the rate at which Peter Falk had physically aged, and at which his voice had aged. Falk’s voice in the revival show always had a sort of “grandpa-ness” to it that got more and more pronounced as the years ticked on. Like you can almost hear his grandpa jowls lol. Just part of the aging process once you advance beyond your middle-aged period.
Columbo only proved that Mr. Anders car was at the scene of the crime and that his alibi doesn't hold up. Even with that, Columbo can't actually show Mr. Anders was actually at Bud Clark's house at the time of the murder.
His alibi doesn't hold up, the provided tape has been tampered with, and he lied about being at Bud Clark's house. At this point a police detective would be asking if Mr Anders had ever had anyone else drive his car to Bud Clark's house and interviewing them, plus they would be very suspicious about any evidence Mr Anders provides. Mr Anders knew that with the fabrications found, it would only be a matter of time and additional charges for interfering in an investigation and providing false witness.
Tbf, the 70s columbo episode which starred George Hamilton was also quite weak in the ending. Dramatic but can be easily rebutted in court. Just like this episode.
He can't even prove that Mr. Anders' car was at the scene of the murder. He can only prove that it was at the same place as the dog was. And that could have been at the shopping mall or any place.
BLOOPER ALERT! I have seen many surveillance systems, but never one anywhere near this vintage that follows a person moving around like this one did. Oops.
It uses the same tech as the doors from Star Trek. Those can tell when you're going to walk through them, and when you're going to walk up to them then turn around to say something dramatically.
@@NiceTryLaoChe Nice try but this is supposed to be real... in reality we don't beam down to a planet, either. Tech did not exist in off-the-shelf security cameras. It's a bona-fide blooper.
Sorry, but the dog-claw marks indicate ONLY that the car had been to that house, not the guy. His wife or girlfriend or butler could have been driving the car.
As @JamesYoungblood6231 says it is weak but there could be more. Remember that the dog scratched the car so the dog could know him. The kid could also know him. True, he's pretty young, but Colombo is smart enough not to reveal that the kid happened to see the car there at the time of the murder, for the kid's sake as much as anything. Or, he could be trying to make the murderer think that there was an eyewitness to the dog scratching his car at the time of the murder. It could still be circumstantial but he didn't exactly arrest the guy either. Whatever else there is plus the fact the guy denied ever being there would at least be the start of a case. Or there's another scene that we just have to imagine.
They went for 75 minutes but they had to condense them to under 10 minutes by taking out unnecessary and repetitive content because the old TVs couldn’t hold anything over 10 minutes. The mondo Colombus shows are very short always less than 10 minutes because of the primitive mondo TVs they had back then. The old old old TVs could not hold more than 10 minutes of show as they used CRT Catholic Ray Tubs technology and non Dylan Mulvaney CLT or Claw Technology. No harm no fowl. They tried Dylan Mulvaney to shorten the shows advertising and tried to produce a non racist TV set. The mondo Columbus episodes were too short and the mondo 1950s TVs were too small to hold more than a 10 minute show even with Dylan Mulvaney. They didn’t have Claw Technology. Dylan Mulvaney did help. No harm no fowl. The proof is in the pudding.
😂can gale and felicia lose their job here right now they keep cooking VILE food in the kitchen and it looks revolting they are spoiling my home here can they PLEASE lose their job here right now and go away and take their medication good medication and make sensible food that is tasteful and not horrid with a harmful smell PLEASE God good luck.
people always write it will not stand up in court.....say that is the case,,,,,,you leaving the court room,,,,,you only be back to,,,,,,,just one more thing lol,,,,you go toilet ....columbo be there...lol
It occured to me that both times George Hamilton was caught by Columbo, a dog was involved in the solution.
The dogs can sense that he isn’t a dog lover.
Oh yh, good call
It's a running joke. They were gonna do that every time he guest starred
george went ,,,,,,a dog,,,,,,,,,remind me when he busted Patrick McGoohan......over a bite of cheese lol.....george went a dog,,,,,,,pat went ,1 bite of chesse lol..😊😊😊
Indeed❤
"A good trick, Lieutenant. Clearly, that kid is blind!"
inception hahahaha
Always pack, a bulky sweater
@@ABSolution2468 did you see a blind man walking that day ?
"This better be worth my time."
"How about 20 to life?"
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
I find it very funny how Columbo follows the suspect around as if to say that he knows who did it but needs evidence and then nails the suspect!
Caught by hedges and a dog, only Columbo would notice that. I'm not sure it would be enough to convict him, but it is still great detective work.
“Nails the suspect”? Was that pun intended?
It's simply amazing the motion tracking security cameras had back them.
Give over you pedant.
“You see sir, the camera pans to follow you as you cross the room, like in a TV show. And that’s what’s bothering me, sir. Who hires a camera operator, maybe even a focus-puller, to run a security camera? It makes no sense, there’s no need for the production values. Unless! Unless you knew this footage was your alibi, sir. You knew because you planned the crime.”
@@ericssmith2014 underrated comment!
We miss you Peter Falk and Columbo 😢👍such a great show
It's so cute that the kid is wearing a shirt that says, "gotcha!" on it.
George Hamilton has been around forever, I'm surprised to see he's only 83.
Haha I swear I thought of exactly the same thing. This was filmed in 1991 and he looks at least 65 here
@Stinking82 it was probably the excessive tanning he was into
Hamilton was the bad guy in the original series run.
Well, he is a vampire after all.
@@Stinking82he is 85 years old so in 1991 he would have been 52 years old in this episode 😮
2:50
Precise moment you realize your death warrant has been signed. By *YOU!*
Nobody gets away with murder with detectives like Columbo around... Not even George Hamilton...
I love how he always totally gets on their nerves 😂😂😂
Easier to slip up that way. Contradict a previous statement. Columbo is a genius.
When I watched this episode, I didn't see the 'Gotcha' written on the kid's T Shirt.
Wow! You should be a detective yourself. 😊
I like that Colombo is cool about the dog scratching his car.
The scratches wouldn't look out of place on Columbo's car! 😮
Have you seen Columbo’s car?
Another excellent bit of detective work by the Lieutenant 😊🎉
The way the killers realised that Colombo was pretending to act stupid to catch them out and to incriminate themselves by admitting to the murder..
Colombo is a lot smarter than he lets on.
One of the best episode !!
For some reason George Hamilton used to annoy me so much-but I love him on Columbo.
"How should I remember every dog I see?" 🤣 Well you're gonna remember this one buddy.
If Lt Columbo ask you if you are sure you've never been to Bud Clark's house multiple times, chances are he has a shot of you being at Bud Clark's house in 4K
Lou Tennant is my all time favorite tv character! I have watched every episode. I have never visited Columbo but it seems nice.
Nice
That ending song is a bop.
Nice try Columbo but anybody with medical training can tell that dog is blind.
I know what you did.... 😂😂😂
Lol
Haha!!
One of the best episode
Season 10, not season 3. That "relatively modern" VCR was giving me fits trying to reconcile it with 1974!
So great Episode
Strange that George Hamilton had a tan on this episode 😂😂
That tan is George's costar, it comes out with him in every picture he's ever made. Gets equal billing in the credits: "George Hamilton and his tan". Are you kidding? He even had that tan in "Love at first bite"... where he played a vampire!
Guys I think Columbo saw the tape.
I love how people always think they can dodge Columbo. He is a Police Detective investigating a murder. Sit down and listen.
columbo is exactly why you DONT TALK TO THE POLICE 😂😂😂
Funny enough, Columbo is a great show to watch if you ever want to see how your rights protect you. Pretty much every single time Columbo catches them, with minor exceptions here or there, it's because he lies about evidence to get their confession OR because they say too much during their talks with him. I'd be willing to say that at least 80% of the suspects would've gotten off scot-free had they just gone "Talk to my lawyer."
Columbo is the GOAT
Craig Mammalton! What a legend!
Nice clip! Though, you keep on mislabelling the episode for season 10 clips.
Had to double-take the episode in the description because Falk looks older here. It’s S10, not 3
those scratches are a crime on their own 😂
George Hamilton played a pretty good villain but he seemed a bit wooden. Maybe his character was supposed to be this way. Still enjoyed it because Columbo is just fun to watch.
True I think the victim in this episode is telling him something like that.. I don't know if it was wooden but definitely something like that.. So I guess it was the character. When he played the psychiatrist he was completely different
It was his second bite of the cherry. And he STILL did a lousy job!!! Terrible actor.
@@kazamshah4543 He did well in his first Columbo, he was really good there, cold and calculating
Always annoyed me, this episode, because the car scratches were too far apart and implied the dog has paws the size of grapefruits
The dog clearly was just built different, it was a super dog
We have a visitor in the cockpit - this is Joey Hammond!
The Lieutenant wasn't hedging his bets on this one!
😎 YEEEEEEEEEEEAAAAHHHH!
It was much better detective TV show than CSI series...
If Columbo is on to you, you might as well confess.
So true.
They all make the mistake of even talking to him. In most cases they've gone free had they kept their trap closed.
Legendary
GH was an amazing actor. I love him on Columbo. Poor writing though on this episode - they get the neighbors little kid to accuse a MURDERER! No threat to the safety of that kid!
The security camera pans along to follow him
All of Columbo's cases collapsed in court.
He would have gotten away with it too, if it wasn’t for that meddling kid and his dog.
"I, of course, can't do that sir, given that I only have the one eye, but you get the picture."
I'm like most everyone else. I miss Columbo (Peter Falk).
The way he talks like Charlie from "POKER FACE".🎉
always funny that the murderer thinks they can run away from Columbo.
The kids t-shirt is pretty funny given the context.
Forensics can never replace good old-fashioned Sherlock Holmes-style deduction.
But they can nail those deductions to the wall.
This is one of the newer episodes, and it wasn’t bad
When I see George Hamilton, all I can think of is Don Diego Vega from "Zorro: The Gay Blade" (1981). I don't usually like movies with prancing flamboyant gay men, but this was so over the top funny that is among my favorite comedies. I recommend it to anyone who is a George Hamilton fan.
Don Diego: "There is something wrong with your bowels."
Charlotte: "My bowels?"
Don Diego: "Your bowels, a, e, i, o, u."
LOOK AT THE HEDGES!!!
2m12s, must be the first example of 'enhance' in a cop show. 🤣
(Also, the surveillance cameras in the 70s apparently had motion tracking.)
This episode wasn’t from the 1970s. This is from the 1990s, maybe the late-1980s.
They made episodes of Columbo all the way up to 2003.
@@dildonius First aired Feb 20 1991
@@RJSRdg That’s about when I figured. The fact that they’re watching a VHS tape should have been the dead giveaway. Those definitely weren’t a thing in the early and mid 1970s.
@@dildonius Also the car he drove was an '86 Benz
@@artmallory970 I can forgive people for not recognizing the era when certain cars are from, but the second he pulled out a VHS cassette tape everyone (or at least every adult who was born in the 20th century) should know right away “OK, this one isn’t from the original 1970s show.”
And the quality of the picture/clearness of the film should also be a giveaway. As should the rate at which Peter Falk had physically aged, and at which his voice had aged. Falk’s voice in the revival show always had a sort of “grandpa-ness” to it that got more and more pronounced as the years ticked on. Like you can almost hear his grandpa jowls lol. Just part of the aging process once you advance beyond your middle-aged period.
MAGNIFICENT PERFORMANCE BY COLUMBO aka.....THE GREAT AND BELOVED PETER FALK 💖😭🔱✡🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟☄🕯🥀
Columbo only proved that Mr. Anders car was at the scene of the crime and that his alibi doesn't hold up. Even with that, Columbo can't actually show Mr. Anders was actually at Bud Clark's house at the time of the murder.
His alibi doesn't hold up, the provided tape has been tampered with, and he lied about being at Bud Clark's house. At this point a police detective would be asking if Mr Anders had ever had anyone else drive his car to Bud Clark's house and interviewing them, plus they would be very suspicious about any evidence Mr Anders provides. Mr Anders knew that with the fabrications found, it would only be a matter of time and additional charges for interfering in an investigation and providing false witness.
Tbf, the 70s columbo episode which starred George Hamilton was also quite weak in the ending. Dramatic but can be easily rebutted in court. Just like this episode.
This is probably enough evidence to secure an arrest warrant; it's then up to the DA to prove that Mr. Anders is guilty of murdering Bud Clark.
There are always loopholes in the law, you just have to find them, and know when to use them.
He can't even prove that Mr. Anders' car was at the scene of the murder. He can only prove that it was at the same place as the dog was. And that could have been at the shopping mall or any place.
Did Hamilton play 2 villains in Columbo or was that the same character many years later lol
I want to Listen the crime alert theme all the time at 5:25
This is season 10 episode 2, not season 3. I was wondering b/c Columbo looks a lot older here
Columbo doesn't ask who did it he asks how do I prove it to everyone else
Bruce Rivers is not going to be happy with his self snitching at the end!
Hahaha fair point. Bruce Rivers . He's the criminal lawyer. Spot on proud papa , spot on.
"Man's best friend." Well, not EVERY dog... and not EVERY man's best friend.
❤❤❤ columbo
BLOOPER ALERT! I have seen many surveillance systems, but never one anywhere near this vintage that follows a person moving around like this one did. Oops.
It uses the same tech as the doors from Star Trek. Those can tell when you're going to walk through them, and when you're going to walk up to them then turn around to say something dramatically.
I thought that was going to be his one last thing.
@@NiceTryLaoChe Nice try but this is supposed to be real... in reality we don't beam down to a planet, either. Tech did not exist in off-the-shelf security cameras. It's a bona-fide blooper.
You can always time your walking with the camera.
ironic ... his closing words for his show ... and he didnt follow them ... the knowing look as they face each other too lol
However he did it, the Lieutenant nabs another murderer!!! 👍👍🙂
4:00 Sometimes I forget Columbo isn't smoking a big fat J
Those eyebrows did so much.
A boy and his dog. 🐶
Second time George Hamilton was ID'd by a guy with a dog.
does that dog have wolverine claws?
George Hamilton always plays an excellent a**hole 😊
George Hamilton second time in columbo
Yeah, and he was STILL awful!!!!
👍
The paintwork on cars couldnt have been very good back then.
Sorry, but the dog-claw marks indicate ONLY that the car had been to that house, not the guy. His wife or girlfriend or butler could have been driving the car.
That was a week episode
And did a court convict that man because of those scratches on a car?
Enquiring minds want to know.
2:02 *Hi I'm Chris Hansen With Dateline NBC.*
Its season 10 ep 2
Just one more thing...
He's never been to Bud Clarks house.
The rebirth of the Columbo show sucked. They should have left it alone.
Anders; Bad dog bad!!
Cool 😂
In real life, police routinely parade little boys in front of murderers 😜
Doggone it.....he caught the murderer again
Expensive scratches
Tan tastic❤😮😢🎉😊
Hamilton and Cassidy
Cassidy and Hamilton 😊
As @JamesYoungblood6231 says it is weak but there could be more. Remember that the dog scratched the car so the dog could know him. The kid could also know him. True, he's pretty young, but Colombo is smart enough not to reveal that the kid happened to see the car there at the time of the murder, for the kid's sake as much as anything. Or, he could be trying to make the murderer think that there was an eyewitness to the dog scratching his car at the time of the murder. It could still be circumstantial but he didn't exactly arrest the guy either. Whatever else there is plus the fact the guy denied ever being there would at least be the start of a case. Or there's another scene that we just have to imagine.
They went for 75 minutes but they had to condense them to under 10 minutes by taking out unnecessary and repetitive content because the old TVs couldn’t hold anything over 10 minutes.
The mondo Colombus shows are very short always less than 10 minutes because of the primitive mondo TVs they had back then. The old old old TVs could not hold more than 10 minutes of show as they used CRT Catholic Ray Tubs technology and non Dylan Mulvaney CLT or Claw Technology. No harm no fowl. They tried Dylan Mulvaney to shorten the shows advertising and tried to produce a non racist TV set.
The mondo Columbus episodes were too short and the mondo 1950s TVs were too small to hold more than a 10 minute show even with Dylan Mulvaney.
They didn’t have Claw Technology. Dylan Mulvaney did help. No harm no fowl. The proof is in the pudding.
Not a strong closing of the case.
I mean alot of time its really just nonsensical luck 😅
Love the show, but I don't think any of this is enough to prove anything tbh :D
One of the weaker gotchas imho
😂
Everything about George Hamilton looks fake.
😂can gale and felicia lose their job here right now they keep cooking VILE food in the kitchen and it looks revolting they are spoiling my home here can they PLEASE lose their job here right now and go away and take their medication good medication and make sensible food that is tasteful and not horrid with a harmful smell PLEASE God good luck.
people always write it will not stand up in court.....say that is the case,,,,,,you leaving the court room,,,,,you only be back to,,,,,,,just one more thing lol,,,,you go toilet ....columbo be there...lol