I think I would have anger issues if someone kept calling me a muppet, To me it seems so childish. Don’t get me wrong I’ve no time for the police so it seems just a waist of time arguing it doesn’t get you anywhere.
This video exemplifies everything that’s wrong with police, starting with contempt for the public and ending with breaking the very laws they are paid to uphold. What’s concerning is that this officer is still on the street. Can you please do a follow up? Thanks for all the great work,
Yes he was nearly crying when he found no grounds to arrest the auditor from the look of hs face. I bet a searcrh of this pairs records' would bring up heaps of misconduct. And after witnessing their abuse and threats I would not want them within half a mile of my children, elderly relatives, other vulnerable groups or pets. They are a danger to the public imo!
4:40 he won't admit he lied, instead of apologizing he chooses to double down and says "just give me your F'ING DETAILS" - he's been practicing to be a bully all his life, you can tell, i feel sorry for everyone in his family and life
If he has children I think social services hould be checking them out. The police are regularly at peoples doors ho have children for far less abuse and temper than both these cops showed. They are ot above the law!
Police stations aren't restricted like military bases for police stations you can legally film the outside that you can see from a public place. You can't film inside without consent though because of issues with data protection (other people getting arrested or reporting crimes)
@Gavin Lisle no, not quite. Trespassing is a civil matter not a legal one, except for MOD, railways and a few places owned by the Crown. Police station car parks aren't restricted anymore than any other public service like hospital car parks. Every police station I've been too you can drive into and have visitors parking spaces. They asked his details because they thought his actions were suspicious not because filming in the car park itself was illegal. In none of the videos has he been charged for filming in the car park nor have any of the videos been taken down by police for 'illegal filming'. If a specific law exists that bans filming in their car parks they would have used this law to get his details and not used section 43. They had to because there's no specific law against what he was doing. The park of the car park he was in wasn't fenced off, you can see when he was leaving that he walked between the bushes straight onto the path. I do agree that they abused the terrorism act to obtain his details. I don't believe for a second that they thought that he was a terrorist. I do how think that they believed he could be a thief and wanted his details in case one of the cars was broken into later. Public place includes areas where the public generally have access too. You can drive into and park (specific bays) in police station car parks. You can't do this on MOD land.
That cop should be fired. He just illegally detained you, threatened you with arrest and illegally searched your property w/o a warrant to find NOTHING. LAW SUIT PENDING I HOPE.
Well it's been 10 months. No update nothing. So we can assume nothing came from it like the majority of these videos and these thugs got away with it scot free
From another country Australia. Mat love the video. Keep up the good work. Pc Vickie is a bad officer. She stood back and did nothing that is a bad police officer the two thugs suffer from the 1 inch problem. One inch Brain one inch heart and a one inch? His wife looks elsewhere for a real man
@@iby914 .. I agree. It's very frustrating .. Threats by all the auditors that the police will be held accountable for bad attitudes and abusing their powers but rarely any follow up at all. I wish they wouldn't 'cry wolf'.
I would have defended my dog and the BASTARD in uniform would have been in deep doo doo not only with a bloody nose but a criminal offence of animal cruelty - ALL on video. You have a right to defend yourself and others, including animals
Couldn't agree more...having a pop at me is one thing but touch my dog and all laws are broken...a price would need to be paid whatever job you do...ld bet he's not so tough at hone at 6am in his dressing gown with no mates to protect him...big mistake to hurt animals.
No updates mat again? Love your vids but we the people who love and watch them want to see you following through and letting us know what happens to these scumbags
Police Code of Conduct requires officers to identify themselves on request, when engaging with the public, by stating their name, collar number and their base station. To invoke Sect 43 of the Terrorism Act the apprehending officer must have reasonable grounds to suspect the individual is engaged or intends to engage in terrorist activity. In conducting a search under Sect 43 (including intellectual property on a smart phone) the officer must state before the search what he or she is specifically looking for. If the officer cannot cite what he or she is looking for they cannot lawfully search you under sect 43. Not only would you have a case for a civil suit for unlawful detainment and assault, there are also grounds for a criminal complaint under Section 26 of the 2015 Criminal Justice & Courts Act. This covers improper exercising of the powers of a constable and carries a maximum penalty of 14 years imprisonment, though in this case would be more likely to result in a fine (and a career ending conviction). The only area where this plank of an officer was within the law was where he trespassed the cameraman from the property. A Police Station may be publicly funded, but it is not technically a public place. As a serving officer PC Out of control ego, was within his rights to revoke his implied right of access as the cameraman was not on the grounds of the police station to engage in any kind of business with the force. Everything else he did was unlawful - I would contact Crimebodge and ask him about a private prosecution under sect 26. If the cameraman had stated he wished to make a formal complaint in person at the moment that PC Ego had trespassed him, then PC Ego could not have enforced it as the cameraman would have been entering the property on legitimate business. A police force cannot trespass any member of the public from a station if they are seeking to engage with the service.
@@mat12128 You're spot on apart from the trespass angle. It has to be the property owner who claims trespass. A police station does have public right of access unless otherwise stated by signage.
@@dc1283 I agree, can you imagine if this person turns up at a property where the family are on benefits - just think how he would treat them - with contempt. He needs to be re-trained on confirmation bias. If we don't challenge these prejudices, then what would be his views on gays, blacks, women, etc. Bias would run through his veins, and if we don't stand up to this we are next!
@@mobbarley7517 Whether the police have 'reasonable grounds' to suspect you're involved in a crime or carrying any of the above items or not, they aren't legally allowed to look through your phone unless you give them permission or they have obtained necessary legal documents relating to terrorism or child sex offences.
Number and station are all that is required for a Sec 43 stop. Sec 1 PACE, Sec 23 MDA etc require name, badge and station to be provided, but sec 43 and 47a stops are governed by a different Code of Practice, with different provisions.
As soon as he revealed that you were 'one of those youtubers that do this for a rise...', after he searched you under the act, he revealed that he knew 'what' you were, before he searched you. He had no suspicion of terrorism, he already adjudged you as a youtuber. He did not like what you were doing, so he used the act, illegally.
When he says "I'm paying your benefits" that is a derogatory and highly offensive term and could be a breach of the peace as its provoking. These are thugs and not public servants and this thug needs reporting to the RSPCA.
You're, likely, right there....with reference to remarks being derogatory and inflammatory. They are - at the very least, grossly unprofessional, from that of a public servant.
That cop said at the end that he knows you have been going to other stations, and lists them. If he knows that, he also knows that you have not been charged with section 43 following investigations previously. So him using that again and telling you he knows about you is proof that you are being targeted for harassment due to who you are.
They will never do that,... these IGNORANT BULLIES (aka order followers) are what the TOP BRASS like to have around them,... like A COWARD having a pit-bull to frighten everyone away and keep them in check. - These PIT-BULLS are dispensable and will be - thrown out - to keep the HEAT off those UP THE CHAIN, & THE PRETENSE of law & order alive,... . Total fabrication and abuse of powers IS the basis of their ADDITIONAL revenue stream & that keeps their ever growing numbers & all those employed in the LEGAL SYSTEM in work,... THEY HAVE TO KEEP THE - JOBS WORTH CULTURE - alive & kicking at any co$t. .
Both male cops were bullies and thought it okay to insult this man and to tell an ex vet that they pay his benefits - to me those are firing offences right there. On the clock they are not at liberty to address the public in such a derogatory manner or articulate their assumptions of his economic state etc. As they know nothing about this man who may even be disabled it implies they think he is a layabout, a scrounger, a criminal or less of a citizen in their opinion. They are quick to say if he swore in public his voice would carry but have no compunction in slandering this man where their voices may also carry. When you encounter police like this you either say nothing or turn everything they say back on them.
Me and my partner live in Lytham st annes, we are from Blackpool and have been abused by police offers for over 20 years, recently we have started to document everything and we can not keep letting them get away with this, we need people like u to help and your giving us inspiration. 😀
it makes me sad when people just say police are great, when any human should know a % of any walk of life are assholes, to jump to police are right everytime is just utter nutz
The only way to stop police harassihg you is to stand up and make them accountable. Unfortunatel they pick on the vulnerable or those they percieve to be in a loewer social racket than them; which is discrimination and profiling whichever way you look at it. They would not have the nerve to pick on the wealthier in society because they know they weill have to face the full force of the law for their 'mistakes'. However therre are ways to claim against police even if you have nothing. I am sure any auditor on here would tell you how!
The sad thing is I believe that coward would kick your dog across the road if you never had a camera, I could feel his love he has for the general public let alone a lovely little harmless dog.
Threatening (and carrying out) a search because you've refused to give your surname is a definite abuse of his authority. 'Can you describe a terrorist?' - 'Yes, black trousers, black shirt with POLICE on it'.
They don,t care..( thick or not ) They know the Krays stuck with their gang members and the Government is NO different. Turning the other cheek will not last for ever Boris & co.
That cop admitted that he knew you went around to get a reaction, so, the terrorism act was a load of bull shit. I hope you follow law suits through or else the whole thing is a waste of time.
Classic example of the police Unnecessarily wasting their own time due to their own control issues whilst blaming a member of the general public for the time that was wasted.
What's the number for that police station. I'd like to formally complain about the outrageous threat to kick your dog. If that's how he behaves with a camera on him.God alone knows what he's like at night in an alleyway!!!
Maybe we should all ring the RSPCA and make a complaint about him saying that he will kick that poor dog.. And dog group's on line about that police officer.. And need the phone number of said police station also to complain
Just ring 101 in front of them, give the operator their collar number and they will tell you the officers name. Then tell them their own name. They don’t like that!
You need to state very clearly that it is completely legal to film anything you can see from public property, including police stations, police cars, police and ANYTHING else. Then tell them you do not need to give your details unless you have broken the law. Photography CANNOT be used as suspicion under section 43. They CANNOT look at your phone unless you are arrested or they have a court order.
They don't care whatever you say to them, they don't care about the law; if they even know any. They are basically just thugs like these two officers just proved.
They can't. They want his details to put in their system whereby they can track him, his home and his car. they will track where he shops, eats and worships. With over 6 million CCTV cameras and 11k ANPR cameras that submit 50 million reads a day, they actually can follow you when you leave home and return at night.
They want the name to see if the person has warrants, asbo's, is on probstion etc - anything to lock soeone up. And right there it is profiling as they seem to think this auditor is a benefit scrounger and in their minds he must be a criminal. That is why they treat him so bad! In fact the only criminals at that scene are the cops!
Ten thousand, more like near two hundred thousand views, unbelievable the attitude of this man , supposedly there to keep the peace, shouldn’t even be a security guard. Keep up the good work exposing these idiots.
In the past 20 years less than 100 people have been killed by terrorist attacks in Great Britain. In the same time over 7000 have died from choking. What legislation has been passed to prevent people from choking?
PC Mug said he wouldn't 'allow' someone to walk towards him or approach him for any reason. Yet PC Mug and PC Muppet aggressively approached this guy multiple times in this video.
Hi Mat, I have to say I love watching your work, You always show great restraint in the face of moronic behavior, However I am losing interest because when they do go beyond their remit, you never seem to take it further, These people need to be brought to book, if you are not prepared to follow up there is no point.
No, sorry, he will still have the last laugh. When he collects his pension we will still be bloody paying for it ! Still at least we can have the chance to say "I pay your benefits". Oh no sorry again as this utter buffoon will try and tell you how much additional percentage he pays from his wages towards his super annuated protected pension .
This one is actually shocking. Seen plenty of audits. Threatening to kick a dog on camera? Absolutely vile. I wouldnt care how good a mate my colleague was, if they said that id go absolutely ballistic dont care what position they held
I think we, as public citizen’s who have the legal right to video police stations, should turn up in our hundreds and do our own audit. I’d love to see what they do then.
I think that when we get abused under the colour of law by police we need to make citizen arrests and call 999 for back up to detain them and transport the to the station. Until we are in crime we have the same authority as they do and can make a citizens arrest for any indictable offence. Abuse under the colour of law carries a prison term so when the strp out of line in this way we should be arresting them! Just listening to their insults snfd threats was quite enough for me and if cops ever treated me like that I would certainly use my authority.
the high court has made judgement , members of the public have legal right to film police officers , police vehicles police property and public photography is not grounds for stop nd search under terrorism act and such action would be unlawful, confirmed by numerous civil ctions for unlwful arrests
Police and auditors are like Tom and Jerry, a natural hatred, they'll harangue , intimidate ,and search them just for revenge, they know throwing accusations of sec 5,43 , or 50 won't stick ,so they just throw them out there as an excuse to harass. The latest section the police are using with the civil unrest is section 35 dispersal order, they used it on Reggie ,just because he walked past an illegal immigrants shelter.----- Walking solo was all it took.
I think people should go online and complain about this officer. The threat to kick an innocent dog is very alarming and could not only cause distress to the dog but also us as members of the public. This is not on and we must all complain.
Ah comon, he was saying the dog will piss on ur shoes and the launching was a comeback, these guys had good comedy comebacks while being consistently goaded
And the moment he said... “ been to Kendal etc, to film only to get a reaction”... the search become unlawful, as he expressly stated he knew EXACTLY what you were doing and it was nothing to do with terrorism. But he searched you under s43 of the Terrorism Act! Bingo - sue. And as stated many times, the Police Code clearly states there MUST be prior national intelligence on the individual indicating “terrorism”. So the search was uncouth, violent, illegal, immoral and professionally unethical. What an ignorant clown, he brakes the law, meanwhile others don’t.
Exactly. Also no matter what crime is being suspected searching through phones is NOT legal without a court order unless you’ve given permission...... this policeman is an absolute disgrace...... makes me livid.....
Pisses me off..they just adding hate after hate onto their shoulders..they keep it up and they'll come a time they won't be able to rely on any member of public to be civil to them.
Where in the police code does it state there must be "prior intelligence" to ONLY justify a section 43 search? Whilst I'm nlt defending this officer what you've said is incorrect, there needs to be reasonable grounds to suspect terrorism to justify a 43 search but that doesn't mean only prior national intelligence counts.
See Mr justice Bean ruling on swearing at police, as long as other members of the public who could be offended don’t hear. It’s ok if they are not offended.
@@barneybiggles Actually he said in his judgement, 'This is not to say that such words are incapable of causing police officers to experience alarm, distress or harassment. It depends, as the court said in Orum and Southard, on the facts; but where a witness has been silent on the point it is wrong to draw inferences.' I agree that broadly, it is unlikely that courts would find that officers would feel genuinely alarmed or distressed by hearing swear words, it is untrue to state that he said they CAN'T be. It would still be a matter determined by the courts.
What is wrong with the police these days, they just don't have any control or respect anymore and have to over compensate with this sort of behaviour.... very sad......
I returned to this one. Has anything happened to rectify this Plod’s behaviour? As you said, ‘one day they will learn.’ But f you let them get away with this, they will never learn.
Love you Cavalier King Charles, in owned 5 of them in my life. Sweetest pups ever! If he kicked my dog, I’d kick him back. Evil people mistreat animals...
Fair play to you I'm impressed how you keep calm with some of these. Looking forward to hearing about some of these idiots getting sacked. You should do a follow up on some of these where you take highlights of the interactions and follow up on the complaints you make regarding the conduct and the responses you get. I'm surprised that the police complaints authorities aren't all over stuff like this
Wow just as I thought the first guy was a childish bully, along came the second bloke. Utter disgrace some of the comments he made about paying your benefits etc. Then the threatening behaviour about kicking your dog, is uncalled for. Getting into your space to force you to leave was I in-sighting fear through intended threats of violence.
@@mat12128 and now its at 176k :) you should sue the police for this mate. after the police illegally searched your phone he stated he knows who you are and that you've been to x y z. therefore he knew you were a vlogger and not a terrorist.
This cop needs help. he has serious anger issues! He is also a stranger to the truth!
I think I would have anger issues if someone kept calling me a muppet, To me it seems so childish. Don’t get me wrong I’ve no time for the police so it seems just a waist of time arguing it doesn’t get you anywhere.
I don't think the problem is anger issues. I think he's just a complete pr1ck. Shame to his family.
@C J Roberts SBK FAST Ha ha
@@teddybear9029 don't you mean waste instead of waist??
No, he needs a slap.
Just when you think you've seen the biggest muppet in uniform , this one pops up.
He is so distressed at not being able to arrest the auditor that I bet after the enounter he went for a good cry!
Watching in August 2024, they always surpass themselves in stupidity, just when you think you've seen the worst........ You haven't.
Even the thought of someone threatening my dog makes my blood boil. You can tell a persons nature by how they treat animals.
Not many things that would make me hurt another human.However,you kick my dog,and I will show you why life in prison means less to me as I get older.
Well if he threatened to kick my dog that's the last threat he would ever make
@@oxyfee6486 Exactly and very well said... Thanks for your great comment...
I can see how I would have kicked the shit out of that prick for threatening a dog. Yes jail for me. Kicking for pig.
Absolute txsser...I would have taken him out
This video exemplifies everything that’s wrong with police, starting with contempt for the public and ending with breaking the very laws they are paid to uphold.
What’s concerning is that this officer is still on the street.
Can you please do a follow up?
Thanks for all the great work,
@@TomRogersOnline Except the cops knew exactly what this guy was doing. They had disdain and made a point to express it.
@@mjohnston8313 Did you read the whole of my comment or just the first line or two?
Such "ordinary men" committed massive war crimes in a time WWII and people are amazed up today how this was possible.
@@TomRogersOnline '' why they would want to speak to him'' there was NOT just a speak and they wanted something else
DEFINITELY bullied at school, still hurts him,wouldn’t like to be his kids,
Or wife
Yes he was nearly crying when he found no grounds to arrest the auditor from the look of hs face. I bet a searcrh of this pairs records' would bring up heaps of misconduct. And after witnessing their abuse and threats I would not want them within half a mile of my children, elderly relatives, other vulnerable groups or pets. They are a danger to the public imo!
What a load of crap!!
“I’m doing a documentary about police abusing powers”
Officer: “my time to shine”
Shining red liike hell imo!
Haha he would make a damn good Nazi!
Disgraceful police behavior.
Makes my blood boil the way these pigs treat law abiding citizens
makes my blood boil to see our union flag being defaced ...pig filth
They don't call them the filth for nothing .
BOOM! :)
I thought that’s what they call there mother’s for giving birth to scum
SNOUTS in the TROUGH. OINK OINK SAUSAGE MEAT!
Hooraah for the filth!!
Spot on lad.
4:40 he won't admit he lied, instead of apologizing he chooses to double down and says "just give me your F'ING DETAILS" - he's been practicing to be a bully all his life, you can tell, i feel sorry for everyone in his family and life
If he has children I think social services hould be checking them out. The police are regularly at peoples doors ho have children for far less abuse and temper than both these cops showed. They are ot above the law!
this guy is the prime example of a bullied boy who joined the police to bully others...
The Outdoor Outlander or just a pathetic bully
Gavin Lisle snitch
@Gavin Lisle the guy is a obvious bully he’s dying to beat up our camera man there a lot worse we’re am from I’ve grown up with arse holes like him
Police stations aren't restricted like military bases for police stations you can legally film the outside that you can see from a public place. You can't film inside without consent though because of issues with data protection (other people getting arrested or reporting crimes)
@Gavin Lisle no, not quite. Trespassing is a civil matter not a legal one, except for MOD, railways and a few places owned by the Crown. Police station car parks aren't restricted anymore than any other public service like hospital car parks. Every police station I've been too you can drive into and have visitors parking spaces.
They asked his details because they thought his actions were suspicious not because filming in the car park itself was illegal. In none of the videos has he been charged for filming in the car park nor have any of the videos been taken down by police for 'illegal filming'. If a specific law exists that bans filming in their car parks they would have used this law to get his details and not used section 43. They had to because there's no specific law against what he was doing.
The park of the car park he was in wasn't fenced off, you can see when he was leaving that he walked between the bushes straight onto the path.
I do agree that they abused the terrorism act to obtain his details. I don't believe for a second that they thought that he was a terrorist. I do how think that they believed he could be a thief and wanted his details in case one of the cars was broken into later.
Public place includes areas where the public generally have access too. You can drive into and park (specific bays) in police station car parks. You can't do this on MOD land.
That cop should be fired. He just illegally detained you, threatened you with arrest and illegally searched your property w/o a warrant to find NOTHING. LAW SUIT PENDING I HOPE.
It seems their scraping the bottom of the barrel nowdays.I suppose there aren't many decent people willing to be police and who can blame them.
Well it's been 10 months. No update nothing. So we can assume nothing came from it like the majority of these videos and these thugs got away with it scot free
And threatening to kick his dog :(
From another country Australia. Mat love the video. Keep up the good work. Pc Vickie is a bad officer. She stood back and did nothing that is a bad police officer the two thugs suffer from the 1 inch problem. One inch Brain one inch heart and a one inch? His wife looks elsewhere for a real man
@@iby914 .. I agree. It's very frustrating .. Threats by all the auditors that the police will be held accountable for bad attitudes and abusing their powers but rarely any follow up at all. I wish they wouldn't 'cry wolf'.
Anger management needed. Further training needed. Disciplinary action needed.
But only if it comes with a free brain for him because quite clearly, he hasn't got one.
And a kick up the arse
You canot re-train tyrants! FIRE THEM AND MAKE OUR STREETS SAFER!
Firing needed - you cannot re-train thugs or idiots!
Mat: “I’m doing a documentary on police abusing powers” muppet police officer: “hold my pint”
Lmao brilliant
Twas great timing for that comment to be used seconds before the “officer” abuses it 🤣
@@mat12128 his mates avoid him till he bangs on they're door at 3 am drunk forcing himself on them
Stuart u boy 👍👍👍
I would reach a new level of anger if anyone kicked my dog
Totally agree , cops like that need to be sacked on the spot , if he threatening to kick little dog what’s to stop him kicking a child .....
Absolutely, like a red rag to a bull 🤬.
I would have defended my dog and the BASTARD in uniform would have been in deep doo doo not only with a bloody nose but a criminal offence of animal cruelty - ALL on video. You have a right to defend yourself and others, including animals
Or threathened to
Couldn't agree more...having a pop at me is one thing but touch my dog and all laws are broken...a price would need to be paid whatever job you do...ld bet he's not so tough at hone at 6am in his dressing gown with no mates to protect him...big mistake to hurt animals.
No updates mat again? Love your vids but we the people who love and watch them want to see you following through and letting us know what happens to these scumbags
Police Code of Conduct requires officers to identify themselves on request, when engaging with the public, by stating their name, collar number and their base station. To invoke Sect 43 of the Terrorism Act the apprehending officer must have reasonable grounds to suspect the individual is engaged or intends to engage in terrorist activity. In conducting a search under Sect 43 (including intellectual property on a smart phone) the officer must state before the search what he or she is specifically looking for. If the officer cannot cite what he or she is looking for they cannot lawfully search you under sect 43. Not only would you have a case for a civil suit for unlawful detainment and assault, there are also grounds for a criminal complaint under Section 26 of the 2015 Criminal Justice & Courts Act. This covers improper exercising of the powers of a constable and carries a maximum penalty of 14 years imprisonment, though in this case would be more likely to result in a fine (and a career ending conviction).
The only area where this plank of an officer was within the law was where he trespassed the cameraman from the property. A Police Station may be publicly funded, but it is not technically a public place. As a serving officer PC Out of control ego, was within his rights to revoke his implied right of access as the cameraman was not on the grounds of the police station to engage in any kind of business with the force. Everything else he did was unlawful - I would contact Crimebodge and ask him about a private prosecution under sect 26.
If the cameraman had stated he wished to make a formal complaint in person at the moment that PC Ego had trespassed him, then PC Ego could not have enforced it as the cameraman would have been entering the property on legitimate business. A police force cannot trespass any member of the public from a station if they are seeking to engage with the service.
That's interesting....
And trespass is a civil matter so pc muppet should not be enforcing it anyway
Yes a lot of ppl do not know that he could trespass me from the station grounds and are happy to give me shit about moving!
Great explanation, worth mentioning though that Crimebodge has stated multiple times in his videos that he will not assist auditors.
@@mat12128 You're spot on apart from the trespass angle. It has to be the property owner who claims trespass. A police station does have public right of access unless otherwise stated by signage.
I pay your benefits ! That’s a disgusting thing to say , assuming that all of the public are jobless ! What a prat!
I agree, confirmation bias at play!
We pay for them
@@dc1283 I agree, can you imagine if this person turns up at a property where the family are on benefits - just think how he would treat them - with contempt. He needs to be re-trained on confirmation bias. If we don't challenge these prejudices, then what would be his views on gays, blacks, women, etc. Bias would run through his veins, and if we don't stand up to this we are next!
That was funny tbf 😂 and probably true
@@UA-camr-qt5rn Absolutely, at the very least treat them with the contempt they deserve
Sue him he can’t go through your phone without a warrant period
Incorrect
@@mobbarley7517 no you are wrong. You are entitled to be safe and secure with your papers, property etc etc. look it up
@@mobbarley7517 Whether the police have 'reasonable grounds' to suspect you're involved in a crime or carrying any of the above items or not, they aren't legally allowed to look through your phone unless you give them permission or they have obtained necessary legal documents relating to terrorism or child sex offences.
Fancy saying I pay your benefits, to a man who clearly has a life , kick his dog shows you the way they think , should be sacked . Sue the pricks .
PLEASE PRESS THIS. MAKE THE SCUM CRAWL!
Karma will come to police men
thing is people scream police as racist, they are not, they treat us all like shit
@@nigget-tv-videos4135 Yep, and even the 'nice' ones like that lady would not hesitate to back up the colleagues if they arrested someone unlawfully.
Failing to identify means he not acting like a policeman therefore totally illegal detainment and search etc
he also needs consent from a superior before carrying out S43 and has to give Matt a report
@@idaslpdhr He does not need authorisation for a sec 43.
Sec 47a requires authorisation.
He also needs to give him a record of the search
Number and station are all that is required for a Sec 43 stop.
Sec 1 PACE, Sec 23 MDA etc require name, badge and station to be provided, but sec 43 and 47a stops are governed by a different Code of Practice, with different provisions.
He's filth. Simple. The very few that are ok won't grass on the scummy ones. So that makes them as bad.
As soon as he revealed that you were 'one of those youtubers that do this for a rise...', after he searched you under the act, he revealed that he knew 'what' you were, before he searched you. He had no suspicion of terrorism, he already adjudged you as a youtuber. He did not like what you were doing, so he used the act, illegally.
Quite correct.
He stated clearly that he knew about his UA-cam activities.
There is no doubt whatsoever that the poluceman broke the law.
It is abuse under the colour of law and carries a prison term!
The search und S43 was unlawful because all he wanted was the auditors details! He knew he was not a terrorist!
When he says "I'm paying your benefits" that is a derogatory and highly offensive term and could be a breach of the peace as its provoking. These are thugs and not public servants and this thug needs reporting to the RSPCA.
You're, likely, right there....with reference to remarks being derogatory and inflammatory. They are - at the very least, grossly unprofessional, from that of a public servant.
Breach of the peace 😂😂😂
@@User1906B Of course it could be
Bellend.
Hate crime and discrimination against those on benefits as well. I’m on benefits and work as well.
Legal action mate, these coppers crossed the line.
The ‘thick’ blue line is represented here …
That cop said at the end that he knows you have been going to other stations, and lists them. If he knows that, he also knows that you have not been charged with section 43 following investigations previously. So him using that again and telling you he knows about you is proof that you are being targeted for harassment due to who you are.
If the Chief Constable doesn’t fire this nasty unprofessional, bully, then he/she should resign.
They always cover for each other lying constantly breaking the law and nothing gets done
Never happen,police literally get away with murder, thousands in fact. dirty cowards.
They will never do that,... these IGNORANT BULLIES (aka order followers) are what the TOP BRASS like to have around them,... like A COWARD having a pit-bull to frighten everyone away and keep them in check.
- These PIT-BULLS are dispensable and will be - thrown out - to keep the HEAT off those UP THE CHAIN, & THE PRETENSE of law & order alive,...
.
Total fabrication and abuse of powers IS the basis of their ADDITIONAL revenue stream & that keeps their ever growing numbers & all those employed in the LEGAL SYSTEM in work,... THEY HAVE TO KEEP THE - JOBS WORTH CULTURE - alive & kicking at any co$t.
.
Both male cops were bullies and thought it okay to insult this man and to tell an ex vet that they pay his benefits - to me those are firing offences right there. On the clock they are not at liberty to address the public in such a derogatory manner or articulate their assumptions of his economic state etc. As they know nothing about this man who may even be disabled it implies they think he is a layabout, a scrounger, a criminal or less of a citizen in their opinion. They are quick to say if he swore in public his voice would carry but have no compunction in slandering this man where their voices may also carry. When you encounter police like this you either say nothing or turn everything they say back on them.
Me and my partner live in Lytham st annes, we are from Blackpool and have been abused by police offers for over 20 years, recently we have started to document everything and we can not keep letting them get away with this, we need people like u to help and your giving us inspiration. 😀
it makes me sad when people just say police are great, when any human should know a % of any walk of life are assholes, to jump to police are right everytime is just utter nutz
@@Ficial well anyone who knows the police will no there not racist but treat everyone like shit
The only way to stop police harassihg you is to stand up and make them accountable. Unfortunatel they pick on the vulnerable or those they percieve to be in a loewer social racket than them; which is discrimination and profiling whichever way you look at it. They would not have the nerve to pick on the wealthier in society because they know they weill have to face the full force of the law for their 'mistakes'. However therre are ways to claim against police even if you have nothing. I am sure any auditor on here would tell you how!
Imagine bringing oscar into court. And the cop has to explain why he kicked him to the judge.
Officers were complete sausage meats 😑😑😑😑😑
What a disgrace that officer is, he has serious anger issues and should not be near the public or vulnerable people.
The sad thing is I believe that coward would kick your dog across the road if you never had a camera, I could feel his love he has for the general public let alone a lovely little harmless dog.
Just wow!!! Searching through your private phone and pictures, and threatening to kick your dog. Talk about a modern day gestapo...
A peeping tom he is!
Hate the bastards 😅
Boot those bastards
Omg these officers acting like children .
Yeah it takes too tango!
if they suspect you of something, its how they usually act. are you from planet earth?
@@teddybear9029 it takes two to tango
@@pluckypluckster wake up are you saying they seriously thought he is terrorist? if they would, they would not get closer and thy would call CT squad.
Threatening (and carrying out) a search because you've refused to give your surname is a definite abuse of his authority.
'Can you describe a terrorist?' - 'Yes, black trousers, black shirt with POLICE on it'.
Bully boys in blue, they find it impossible to back down EVER!
Have you noticed that they aren't in blue anymore, they look more and more like the stassi
this thuggish behaviour must stop its criminal how they abuse s43
Report him to the RSPCA
It was absolutely cruel the way that lad was bullied at school - and now he's getting his own back for it!
another thug on the police force not knowing the laws and getting taught by an educated photographer thumbs up sir
Police kill humans. Money is the force of evil 😈 they need to be trained better
What a ego warrior the police officer is, totally lost it.
How on earth do people get into the police force like this , or do they become corrupted once they become inducted into the gang.
they think they´re intelligent. They´re just thick.
They prove everyday that they aren't very bright. They only think they know the law. Let's hope those 2 muppets do read all the comments.
Thick is too good a name for them.
IQ matches their boot size
They're pillocks
They don,t care..( thick or not ) They know the Krays stuck with their gang members and the Government is NO different. Turning the other cheek will not last for ever Boris & co.
That cop admitted that he knew you went around to get a reaction, so, the terrorism act was a load of bull shit. I hope you follow law suits through or else the whole thing is a waste of time.
Classic example of the police Unnecessarily wasting their own time due to their own control issues whilst blaming a member of the general public for the time that was wasted.
What's the number for that police station. I'd like to formally complain about the outrageous threat to kick your dog. If that's how he behaves with a camera on him.God alone knows what he's like at night in an alleyway!!!
Scary stuff eh...
Maybe we should all ring the RSPCA and make a complaint about him saying that he will kick that poor dog..
And dog group's on line about that police officer..
And need the phone number of said police station also to complain
@@daipigeon7561 google it numpty
Ask to see his warrant card. That solves the name problem.
Just ring 101 in front of them, give the operator their collar number and they will tell you the officers name. Then tell them their own name. They don’t like that!
@@robs715 Never ever thought of this - cracking.
You need to state very clearly that it is completely legal to film anything you can see from public property, including police stations, police cars, police and ANYTHING else. Then tell them you do not need to give your details unless you have broken the law. Photography CANNOT be used as suspicion under section 43. They CANNOT look at your phone unless you are arrested or they have a court order.
They don't care whatever you say to them, they don't care about the law; if they even know any. They are basically just thugs like these two officers just proved.
I still don’t understand how by giving them your details they can work out what you are doing or alleviate their concerns 🤔
They can't. They want his details to put in their system whereby they can track him, his home and his car. they will track where he shops, eats and worships. With over 6 million CCTV cameras and 11k ANPR cameras that submit 50 million reads a day, they actually can follow you when you leave home and return at night.
They get you on their system to use against you if they see fit.
@@mrb4408 that's what they are doing to Live Free right now.
It gives them legal right to detain you with force..providing they abide by the law...oh wait
They want the name to see if the person has warrants, asbo's, is on probstion etc - anything to lock soeone up. And right there it is profiling as they seem to think this auditor is a benefit scrounger and in their minds he must be a criminal. That is why they treat him so bad! In fact the only criminals at that scene are the cops!
They can't handle their own feelings. And to think the power these fragile egos hold
Put the grunters on a spit and roast them
Ten thousand, more like near two hundred thousand views, unbelievable the attitude of this man , supposedly there to keep the peace, shouldn’t even be a security guard. Keep up the good work exposing these idiots.
The word disgraceful doesn't even come close to describing these things in their gang colours!
had same problem when I was there a year ago
Well if they are so thick they don't learn....
In the past 20 years less than 100 people have been killed by terrorist attacks in Great Britain. In the same time over 7000 have died from choking. What legislation has been passed to prevent people from choking?
They need to be accountable for their actions. Things need to change. IM OUTRAGED.
Here, here!
Wants sacking doesnt know the law. If he knows you go to get a reaction then he's just been suckered
OMG the last one when he made the comment about benefits, he needs sacking ASAP!!!
The last straw Oscar the dog...Cop "If it does, it will be getting launched across the lawn". ..This man is dangerous.
Paranoid officers with anger issues and ego driven is not a good recipe.
i wish more people had the balls to stand up b4 its 2 late
Time for a body cam that can't be turned off?
PC Mug said he wouldn't 'allow' someone to walk towards him or approach him for any reason. Yet PC Mug and PC Muppet aggressively approached this guy multiple times in this video.
Exactly - they are above the law in their own minds! A very dangerous concept!
Exactly!
Hi Mat, I have to say I love watching your work, You always show great restraint in the face of moronic behavior, However I am losing interest because when they do go beyond their remit,
you never seem to take it further, These people need to be brought to book, if you are not prepared to follow up there is no point.
One of the worse I've ever seen, please follow this up with Lancashire Professional Standards Dept
Start a "Go fund me page" to prosecute this police bully
He wants fucking dragging down road by a Horse.
When he collects
his pension he can go and be a security guard.
Complete and absolutely pondlife
No, sorry, he will still have the last laugh. When he collects his pension we will still be bloody paying for it ! Still at least we can have the chance to say "I pay your benefits". Oh no sorry again as this utter buffoon will try and tell you how much additional percentage he pays from his wages towards his super annuated protected pension .
He'll be retired by 55
Probably not adverse to using every illegal corrupt angle, that badge is cover for crims,wonky bastards.Talk about hiding in plain sight.
This one is actually shocking. Seen plenty of audits. Threatening to kick a dog on camera? Absolutely vile. I wouldnt care how good a mate my colleague was, if they said that id go absolutely ballistic dont care what position they held
I think we, as public citizen’s who have the legal right to video police stations, should turn up in our hundreds and do our own audit. I’d love to see what they do then.
They wont do anything they pick on what they think is an easy target
I think that when we get abused under the colour of law by police we need to make citizen arrests and call 999 for back up to detain them and transport the to the station. Until we are in crime we have the same authority as they do and can make a citizens arrest for any indictable offence. Abuse under the colour of law carries a prison term so when the strp out of line in this way we should be arresting them! Just listening to their insults snfd threats was quite enough for me and if cops ever treated me like that I would certainly use my authority.
I remember people like those from School we used to call them bullies...
that officer is an absolute disgrace , i hope complaint has been registered
I hope you will be making a formal complaint about your detainment and search If you don't then the education of these mugs means nothing
Massive lawsuit!!! This guy has violated so many laws. This will be a great payout, you will be able to buy yourself that Porche now.
He won't, they never do.
Policing the police on amazon for £5.99. It has all the templates and information on how to successfully claim form the police. Check it out
@No Commentz In what video?
Strangely that copper isn’t a detective, and hasn’t any stripes! Amazing.
"It's really windy...." No wonder there is so little respect for police officers with this sort of behaviour.
So pathetic
I'd refer this to crimebodge who specialises in sueing them.
He won't help any auditors because of the chav scum blagborough
@Bill Smith Totally agree, he makes a bigger fool of himself than the people he encounters. He needs to learn from the likes of AB, Audit Ed, Mat, etc
@@billsmith756 what happened there ?
@@billsmith756 I think it's because he deals with more serious cases than people who knowingly put themselves in harm's way.
the high court has made judgement , members of the public have legal right to film police officers , police vehicles police property and public photography is not grounds for stop nd search under terrorism act and such action would be unlawful, confirmed by numerous civil ctions for unlwful arrests
Police and auditors are like Tom and Jerry, a natural hatred, they'll harangue , intimidate ,and search them just for revenge, they know throwing accusations of sec 5,43 , or 50 won't stick ,so they just throw them out there as an excuse to harass.
The latest section the police are using with the civil unrest is section 35 dispersal order, they used it on Reggie ,just because he walked past an illegal immigrants shelter.----- Walking solo was all it took.
What an absolute bell end that cop is
Exactly created a situation out of nothing
🔔 🔚 ♾ 😂
Unfortunately so many of them are.
They want your name but don’t want to give theirs .
With this video as evidence I hope this gentleman had the good sense to file a complaint and sue them.
Sue first and then make the complaint.
We need number of that police station to complain about they saying they going to kick dog. And report them to MP and RSPCA
Wow...public servants and they treat you like that. The benefits comment and threatening your dog...unreal 😤
@Sam Williams Shocking, their job is to uphold the law, not to have opinions on people’s hobbies and insult law abiding citizens .
As he drew his leg back... Something would happen... Lovely, little, peaceful, Oscar... Well done for being a GREAT dog Oscar!
What a sanctimonious cop!
He probably has 100 "Degrees" he got in a week. "Listen, do you want to know a secret. Let me whisper in your ear" Beatles.
They will know about it when someone sticks a tracker on their personal vehicles 🤪
If he knew you had filmed other places. He knew section 43 was miss used. Therefore broke the law.
I think people should go online and complain about this officer. The threat to kick an innocent dog is very alarming and could not only cause distress to the dog but also us as members of the public. This is not on and we must all complain.
Ah comon, he was saying the dog will piss on ur shoes and the launching was a comeback, these guys had good comedy comebacks while being consistently goaded
@@brianserious shut it piggy
I did!
Shameful bully ! 🤔
And the moment he said... “ been to Kendal etc, to film only to get a reaction”... the search become unlawful, as he expressly stated he knew EXACTLY what you were doing and it was nothing to do with terrorism. But he searched you under s43 of the Terrorism Act! Bingo - sue.
And as stated many times, the Police Code clearly states there MUST be prior national intelligence on the individual indicating “terrorism”. So the search was uncouth, violent, illegal, immoral and professionally unethical. What an ignorant clown, he brakes the law, meanwhile others don’t.
When he looked through is phone he seen is other videos off kendal and all the others that copper should be well told off for what is done
Exactly. Also no matter what crime is being suspected searching through phones is NOT legal without a court order unless you’ve given permission...... this policeman is an absolute disgrace...... makes me livid.....
Pisses me off..they just adding hate after hate onto their shoulders..they keep it up and they'll come a time they won't be able to rely on any member of public to be civil to them.
Where in the police code does it state there must be "prior intelligence" to ONLY justify a section 43 search?
Whilst I'm nlt defending this officer what you've said is incorrect, there needs to be reasonable grounds to suspect terrorism to justify a 43 search but that doesn't mean only prior national intelligence counts.
@@radg8894 the has to be a Sargent when he does the search you can bet 100% he won't be searching no one for taking pictures again thats for shore
Call him a knobhead he can't do anything he can't as a cop be offended plus it would be true. Please Educate the police.
how about a bellend?
See Mr justice Bean ruling on swearing at police, as long as other members of the public who could be offended don’t hear.
It’s ok if they are not offended.
@@barneybiggles You heard the other cop. He said there may be a child hiding behind a light pole.
@@barneybiggles Actually he said in his judgement, 'This is not to say that such words are incapable of causing police officers to experience alarm, distress or harassment. It depends, as the court said in Orum and Southard, on the facts; but where a witness has been silent on the point it is wrong to draw inferences.'
I agree that broadly, it is unlikely that courts would find that officers would feel genuinely alarmed or distressed by hearing swear words, it is untrue to state that he said they CAN'T be. It would still be a matter determined by the courts.
What a classic, we miss you Mat.
What is wrong with the police these days, they just don't have any control or respect anymore and have to over compensate with this sort of behaviour.... very sad......
Very dangerous and they destroy innocent lives.
This is why their is no respect left for these PUBLIC servants 🖕👍👍
I returned to this one. Has anything happened to rectify this Plod’s behaviour? As you said, ‘one day they will learn.’ But f you let them get away with this, they will never learn.
Love you Cavalier King Charles, in owned 5 of them in my life. Sweetest pups ever! If he kicked my dog, I’d kick him back. Evil people mistreat animals...
yeah i knoe same
I know they are the best dogs ever
Totally agree! Anyone threatened mine I’d throat punch em!
Abuse of police power. Does he know anything?
I still dont get it I've seen a few of these now nowt ever happens or goes to court
I seem to be have been lied to as a child. PC McGarry would never have been like this.
God knows what my blood pressure was watching that. Furious! Well done Matt! 👏🏻
Fair play to you I'm impressed how you keep calm with some of these. Looking forward to hearing about some of these idiots getting sacked. You should do a follow up on some of these where you take highlights of the interactions and follow up on the complaints you make regarding the conduct and the responses you get. I'm surprised that the police complaints authorities aren't all over stuff like this
Obviously no grooming gangs for these traitors to cover up that day....
Wow just as I thought the first guy was a childish bully, along came the second bloke. Utter disgrace some of the comments he made about paying your benefits etc. Then the threatening behaviour about kicking your dog, is uncalled for. Getting into your space to force you to leave was I in-sighting fear through intended threats of violence.
Very well broken down AA
Please report to Lancs Professional Standards, these two have severe issues and a threat to the public.
Be so happy to step in and defend any dog against the police myself. Seen too much corruption to consider them as humans anymore.
“You enjoy watching the video by yourself”
66,000 views later...
I know, someone said that at 10,000 views and even that was a small figure!
@@mat12128 and now its at 176k :) you should sue the police for this mate. after the police illegally searched your phone he stated he knows who you are and that you've been to x y z. therefore he knew you were a vlogger and not a terrorist.