I don't know what % of your actual max level of understanding and explanation some of (and especially this video) your videos are, but whatever level you deliver (and I find you are very consistent in anticipating which hypothetical lines are interesting and what needs to be explained as well as when to get back to the game) is phenomenal. If I had one question, it would be "how many drafts and how many takes do you need to make a video" because it seems like you could improv it but bump the quality by not doing so. Ps. I don't want to know; I like the shades, and I like to not know and just enjoy. thanks again
Thanks for the kind words -- I will say the majority of the time spent is going through the game with Stockfish and trying to figure out why each move was played!
Could we get the times per move? Also, if you are calculating lines, could you show accuracy percentage as well at the end? Also, arrow analysis is hard to follow, can you bring up a separate board and just move the pieces to show alternative lines?
At 4:51, after white plays Nxd5, why does black not play ... Qxc2+ as an intermediate move? Then he can safely recover the knight after Kb1 (forced) by playing ... Bxd5, with an extra pawn at the very least. Am I missing something?
Not only that. After ... Bxd5 black also threatens to take the bishop on e2. And white's Rc1 is not playable, because nothing at the back rank is hanging for black: Qxc1+ Rxc1, and Rxc1# black wins.
Ah, not really for the second part, because white's bishop is also on e3, so Rc1 is playable. But then in that case after Kb1 Qxe2 instead of Bxd5, taking back the minor piece with an extra pawn.
@omarhaddad2504 thanks for bringing this line up... my initial thought was Nc3 threatening the queen as well as mate on d7.. but Nf6 appears to mate in 2
@@waynemccuen8213 the bootlickers are too afraid, because their source of income would be jeopardized. question for you - where is carlsen’s proof that the autistic tool niemann cheated in their games from 2022? all his salivating fanboys didn’t ask that question, now did they? look into carlsen’s game against kosteniuk from the 2009 world blitz championship (otb, no less). or lichess titles arena 2021, there is a livestream, where sven takes another player’s advice to gain the upper hand against naroditsky. carlsen is a decent player, but also quite the kunt, like most professionall chess players. no need to swoon over them for being good at playing board games.
Just like that ? Nieman himself has say he did cheat , no one ever did say that magnus cheat , he play face toface chess and was always the no.1..jalousy or what ?
@@nabilfennia5388 you fail to comprehend several different things - niemann admitted to cheating when he was younger and started playing chess. his wins over serial cheater carlsen were clean, for all we know. serial cheater carlsen accused autistic tool niemann of cheating without providing evidence for his claim. do you get it now? do you know what a jalousie actually is? XD
Impressive game. Impressive commentary too.
Thank you!
Best chess analysis on UA-cam in my opinion
Wow, thanks so much! That's my goal, so always trying to improve!
A very exciting and complex game indeed! Great commentary as well. I may want to revisit this one, there was a lot to chew on and to learn from. 🙂
Thanks! Glad you liked it!
The commentator is a bloody genius thank you sir
Thank you for watching! :)
I don't know what % of your actual max level of understanding and explanation some of (and especially this video) your videos are, but whatever level you deliver (and I find you are very consistent in anticipating which hypothetical lines are interesting and what needs to be explained as well as when to get back to the game) is phenomenal. If I had one question, it would be "how many drafts and how many takes do you need to make a video" because it seems like you could improv it but bump the quality by not doing so. Ps. I don't want to know; I like the shades, and I like to not know and just enjoy. thanks again
Thanks for the kind words -- I will say the majority of the time spent is going through the game with Stockfish and trying to figure out why each move was played!
The commentary is always good
Thanks!
I got the 16 core cpu, lol. such flex. love your vids!
Could we get the times per move? Also, if you are calculating lines, could you show accuracy percentage as well at the end? Also, arrow analysis is hard to follow, can you bring up a separate board and just move the pieces to show alternative lines?
Plot twist: after letting the cpu run for another 40 cycles, stockfisk 27 changes its mind again! Bau a habha ha ha!!!!
It is possible!
At 4:51, after white plays Nxd5, why does black not play ... Qxc2+ as an intermediate move? Then he can safely recover the knight after Kb1 (forced) by playing ... Bxd5, with an extra pawn at the very least. Am I missing something?
Not only that. After ... Bxd5 black also threatens to take the bishop on e2. And white's Rc1 is not playable, because nothing at the back rank is hanging for black: Qxc1+ Rxc1, and Rxc1# black wins.
Ah, not really for the second part, because white's bishop is also on e3, so Rc1 is playable. But then in that case after Kb1 Qxe2 instead of Bxd5, taking back the minor piece with an extra pawn.
@omarhaddad2504 thanks for bringing this line up... my initial thought was Nc3 threatening the queen as well as mate on d7.. but Nf6 appears to mate in 2
White lost at Rc3 17:23
Magnus probably has 17 cores 🙃🙂👍
Ha ha! seems like it!
Wat a game 👍
nobody has the balls to say that carlsen is a serial cheater, he’s no different from niemann.
That's big talk with no proof. Where are people calling Magnus out?
@@waynemccuen8213 the bootlickers are too afraid, because their source of income would be jeopardized. question for you - where is carlsen’s proof that the autistic tool niemann cheated in their games from 2022? all his salivating fanboys didn’t ask that question, now did they?
look into carlsen’s game against kosteniuk from the 2009 world blitz championship (otb, no less). or lichess titles arena 2021, there is a livestream, where sven takes another player’s advice to gain the upper hand against naroditsky.
carlsen is a decent player, but also quite the kunt, like most professionall chess players. no need to swoon over them for being good at playing board games.
Just like that ?
Nieman himself has say he did cheat , no one ever did say that magnus cheat , he play face toface chess and was always the no.1..jalousy or what ?
@@nabilfennia5388 you fail to comprehend several different things - niemann admitted to cheating when he was younger and started playing chess. his wins over serial cheater carlsen were clean, for all we know.
serial cheater carlsen accused autistic tool niemann of cheating without providing evidence for his claim. do you get it now?
do you know what a jalousie actually is? XD
Lose the oversized sunglasses, you're indoors dude.
I think it's a good look. How else are ya gonna see the black pieces in a white room??
..
I think the glasses rock. He should keep em!
Misuse of the word hell expresses contempt for God.
you need aid, games are good but your expression and talk?