Technically it is a reused rocket.. it’s been rolled out, put vertical, fueled, and test fired....... several times.... they should take the payload off this antique, and put it in their new VULCAN CENTAUR. And yes I know the delta 4 isn’t the issue, it’s ground equip. The swing arm ain’t’ swingin’ or some shight. I wonder why they are not keeping the public more informed on what’s going on.. it’ smells of conspiracy I tell ya... come on flat earthers chime in any time now..
@@Planteatingmammal it’s the national reconnaissance office.. they probably secretly attached some secret material they are trying to get to their space base, but they don’t want it to get destroyed so they are taking their time
Or even better make sure everything is working before you try and launch. I can understand a few delays and maybe one abort, but two aborts? Something just feels fundamentally wrong at this point.
InventorZahran Yea, that’s right! Just launch anyway and risk both vehicle, payload and pad just because a certain “InventorZahran” think you should! Just go ahead!
In a room in Langley, Virginia, some CIA technician has His Head on a desk slowly shaking it while pounding His fist saying No, no, no, no, no . . . . . Not again.
Was standing on the sidewalk in my robe... yeah... in my robe. I live up in Bradford County but I can still see ‘em from here when conditions are right.
Almost nothing goes up the first date that they set some of the launch calendars that you can sub to list all the past dates that they were planning to launch and it's nearly always a list of several dates, just usually they're rescheduled hours or days rather than seconds before launch. and this is sure to be asked this was originally due to launch late 2020 then it was brought forward to June 2020
Funny u mentioning it... they are building a new rocket right now , single stack, with more lift capacity.. it should be a beast .Vulcan? I think it’s called?
For the 5 or 6 weeks that they've been trying to launch this, have you been trying to figure that out the whole time? You should find a hobby. All these people you don't know don't really care. Maybe try Google next time instead of wasting 6 weeks trying to figure that out, Einstein.
Any updates Tory ?. What caused it this time? New date?. Anything? .. Are you guys testing Vulcan Centaur hardware on this launch?. Is that causing any of these delays?
Yes scrubs happen. But it’s getting a bit ridiculous at this point. Multiple delays and two aborts within 10 second countdown. This really isn’t the normal ULA we all know.
It is a dinosaur. No surprise the tech is failing. Even the ignition system works the way it does because it is outdated. Nice tho it did quite a bit of work. It is time to do better. I love dinosaurs.
Take your time? This "vital piece of equipment" was set to launch over a month ago and now it's gonna sit on the ground for another month because the rocket failed again. But hey maybe third time a charm.
@Don Quarnstromthat is very true. Just seems odd to say take your time when they've had years to do this, millions of tax payer dollars and the same rocket failed to launch at t -4 seconds a month ago and here we are again. I'm just hoping at some point they can figure it out.
Launch attempts being scrubbed is OK, I think most people here is just in awe because the presentation and event cover was a bit awkward, but maybe you guys didnt account for the fact the launch could be aborted and werent ready for it lol
But when it does launch, (and even when it aborts, sometimes) it SETS ITSELF ON FIRE so spectacularly! Not just the engines but the whole body of the rocket too. Surely the sight of a rocket setting itself on fire *all over* inspires confidence?
@Savage RR get outta here man, you obviously don't know what space exploration is about. Also, thought I should mention that ula is a private company, formed by Lockheed Martin and boeing. So thanks for your meaningless argument.
@Savage RR also, as for your second comment, that is false. The Delta iv heavy can put a bigger payload into low earth orbit and geostationary orbit than almost any other rocket... That's what it was designed to do...
@@mav01 space exploration to old space is about exploiting the ignorance of the general public so that the engineers/execs can sit around and twiddle their thumbs while wasting billions in public money on old obsolete hardware and at the same time claiming that they are innovating and pushing boundaries!
Wow, what a joke you guys are! Way to hold up the launch pad for another month!! Get you’re stuff off the pad and out of the way of all the other launches that need to go!! No wonder spaceX thinks you’re a joke! The American taxpayers just took note!
Cut them some slack. Remember that this is a VERY EXPENSIVE bird being flow by what is really still a developmental booster. (only 11 launches for Delta-IV Heavy, with one a mission failure) They need to make sure that *everything* is *perfect* before committing to launch.
ULA I support you guys in all the endeavors you do, but seriously before the customer goes all Karen in you guys, you definitely need to fix this rocket or just let someone like SpaceX take over because this is getting ridiculous. Wasn’t expecting 3rd times a charm antics from you guys.
September has been a very poor month for space exploration in America. Multiple scrubbed launches from ULA, SpaceX and Blue Origin. Plus Astra Space's failed launch on the 11th. China is now taking center stage for rocket launches and I find that very frightening. All things considered, Delta IV Heavy is aging. It may be time for retirement.
Dillon Augustine tbh they were mainly pushed back due to either weather, and this mission being delayed also caused a delay in the Starlink mission. But yea in general not the best month.
And some of Spacex launches delayed because this thing was still in the bay! I remember one weekend Spacex would have 3 operations. The hop, one commercial, and a starlink deployment. But nope.
Can't wait for this thing to be put out of service after 4 more launches so as to stop wasting taxpayer money that is better spent on SpaceX or other pressing issues with our country.
@@adamharris6251 if they put the satellite in there: 1) the rocket would lift off then fall back to earth and explode due to weight issues 2) i don't know why you think a 20 foot tall satellite can fit in 17 foot tall fairings
Of course they can. They successfully launched all other satellites of this series. Having that many aborts due to technical reasons is unusual, also for ULA, but nothing that SpaceX is immune to. They already lost an entire rocket including it's payload during a tanking test.
@Alpha Ghost falcon heavy can' be vertically integrated for now and switching over to another payload fairing would mean more costs. The amount of low IQ elon fanboys in this comment section is appalling.
Soooooooo..... no news ... at all...... why so quiet...... so ..... dark....... like... black.... , oh, ... yeah..... 🕵️♀️ 🛰 📡 . For our government.... That may not exist after November 3rd.... not so Lol....
@@dongiovanni4331 D4H can also lift more in higher orbits than FH (more C3). If it's heavy and going to GTO, D4H is sometimes the only option. Until Starship gets NatSec certified, that is.
Why would they? And you know the Falcon 9 has also aborted within the last few seconds for tech issues at least 3 times this year as well, right? Plus, SpaceX doesn't have the infrastructure to support this launch.
This is becoming a Joke ULA this is making your company look bad just scrap this mission Cut your losses already move on move forward with Starliner instead
Starliner? You mean Boeing's hopeless capsule-shaped thingy? They have to do another dress rehearsal launch after redesigning the bus between the capsule and service module, sending their software engineers to remedial software engineering school, and their flight operators to remedial flight operations school and each having their code and playbooks reviewed with an endoscope. You can buy 2+ Crew Dragon Launches for one Starliner Launch; with NASA backing away from Artemis, I don't see this as a viable option past 2023. That means someone in government will buy it, but it will make about sense as an elevator in an outhouse.
@@matthewhelton1725 Right?! Isn't the next test flight scheduled in 2021? I mean literally 1 test flight per year when there's another company that routinely makes multiple flights to space every month, using less money. Come on...
I think this was a payload that I read about not fitting in the Falcon Heavy faring section. So even if the government wanted, they have no choice but to painfully wait till ULA can get things right.
ULA buys the fairing from a 3rd party. I heard that.SpaceX tried to get the 3rd party's assistance with a larger fairing for falcon heavy specifically for payloads like this and ULA played dirty and blocked it.
@@KaziusAzran Wow didn't know that...not good. I won't watch live anymore, I will wait to see if UA-cam ever shows a replay...I have wasted enough time waiting and watching for nothing.
Ritik ya, we know, won’t be long and ULA will be left behind. Stop supporting this waste of money! Can’t get it off the ground again! My wife would leave if I had this hard of time getting my rocket up!
ULA's concept of a Reusable Rocket?
Attempt to launch the "Same One" again and again...
Technically it is a reused rocket.. it’s been rolled out, put vertical, fueled, and test fired....... several times.... they should take the payload off this antique, and put it in their new VULCAN CENTAUR. And yes I know the delta 4 isn’t the issue, it’s ground equip. The swing arm ain’t’ swingin’ or some shight. I wonder why they are not keeping the public more informed on what’s going on.. it’ smells of conspiracy I tell ya... come on flat earthers chime in any time now..
@@Planteatingmammal it’s the national reconnaissance office.. they probably secretly attached some secret material they are trying to get to their space base, but they don’t want it to get destroyed so they are taking their time
Better to scrub on the ground then wishing you can scrub in the air.
Or even better make sure everything is working before you try and launch. I can understand a few delays and maybe one abort, but two aborts? Something just feels fundamentally wrong at this point.
The Best i completely agree. Still glad they scrubbed rather than risk the vehicle and cargo.
The Best Although if they scrub enough times - they might even get to send the payload on the next Starship...
*than ffs
@@TheBest14184 I am pretty sure these guys know better than you and everyone you know combined
ULA: Untimely Launch Abort.
InventorZahran Yea, that’s right! Just launch anyway and risk both vehicle, payload and pad just because a certain “InventorZahran” think you should!
Just go ahead!
@@Tramseskumbanan Bro it's just a joke chill no need to take it to heart
@@Tramseskumbanan why do you space nerds get so upset when somebody makes a joke?
Brett Grelle Launch aborts and scrubbs are a natural part of the space launch business. But maybe you have to be a “nerd” to understand that?
I think the rocket is afraid of heights 😂
In a room in Langley, Virginia, some CIA technician has His Head on a desk slowly shaking it while pounding His fist saying No, no, no, no, no . . . . . Not again.
Was standing on the sidewalk in my robe... yeah... in my robe. I live up in Bradford County but I can still see ‘em from here when conditions are right.
I saw you. You are cute!
@@michelleroberts1370 You are Beautiful
You are all beautiful.
I'm in St. Johns and launches are clearly visible when the weather is right.
Now I have an acid stomach. Gonna eat some Rolaids and watch Apollo 13 for the one millionth time....
Still no news on NROL-44?.. this is very strange.. atleast update every 2 weeks or month.. this is crazy.
When was the last time ULA launched a Delta IV on time?
Have they ever?
Well the Space-X Falcon 9 Starlink 12 launch has been scrubbed several times.
Almost nothing goes up the first date that they set some of the launch calendars that you can sub to list all the past dates that they were planning to launch and it's nearly always a list of several dates, just usually they're rescheduled hours or days rather than seconds before launch.
and this is sure to be asked this was originally due to launch late 2020 then it was brought forward to June 2020
sierratango Yes, I saw that live. But half an hour earlier the Antares/Cygnus successfully launched.
egg No, they don’t wait to hold the countdown clock until a few seconds prior to liftoff due to weather issues!
I think now would be a good time to disassemble this rocket and start over. Honestly, ULA has cold feet now!🤣😂
The first 2 scrubs were caused by ground equipment, no need to disassemble the rocket.
Funny u mentioning it... they are building a new rocket right now , single stack, with more lift capacity.. it should be a beast .Vulcan? I think it’s called?
Tax payer dollars 🔥 It is only a matter of time. SpaceX will make the needed modifications and ULA will disappear.
United Scrub Alliance be like :
😂🤣
🤣🤣🤣 that's the best one I've heard yet
I understand the logo of the howling wolf, now !
For the 5 or 6 weeks that they've been trying to launch this, have you been trying to figure that out the whole time? You should find a hobby. All these people you don't know don't really care. Maybe try Google next time instead of wasting 6 weeks trying to figure that out, Einstein.
Best launch ever. Congrats ULA.
How many times is this gonna get scrubbed?
The times it Is needed to ensure a secure mision, that's how the space is
They are dealing with federal tax payers money. Scrub as many as needed. Do you like money explosions?
@@SpencerJewell theyre cool to watch
@@boatchips7820 can't argue with that🤣
@@SpencerJewell As a non-american, yes!
When will NROL-44 Launch never................
Hope tomorrow is a better day !!
that's another 30 day wait...
Wrong. The rofies only take a few days to reset. They can launch as soon a seven days.
NorthernChev ya, they said that last time and it was a month wait... made every other launch wait for them... not cool!
Adam Harris they also had to deal with other issues like the MST and several weather delays
Supposed launch either 12/10 or 12/11! Still 2020. If it don't launch by Friday my guess would be not til 2021
Any updates Tory ?. What caused it this time? New date?. Anything? .. Are you guys testing Vulcan Centaur hardware on this launch?. Is that causing any of these delays?
When is next opportunity for launch ?
what's happening to you ULA?
Is the Oct 23rd launch in Florida still taking place?
Space is tough, but the Delta IV is a fantastic piece of hardware. Scrubs happen people. Get over it
Yes scrubs happen. But it’s getting a bit ridiculous at this point. Multiple delays and two aborts within 10 second countdown. This really isn’t the normal ULA we all know.
@@TheBest14184 better to have a scrub than a boom
Maverick correct. But it’s also better to have the payload in orbit than still sitting on the ground
@@TheBest14184 correct. It may be getting close to a retirement for the delta iv heavy.
It is a dinosaur. No surprise the tech is failing. Even the ignition system works the way it does because it is outdated. Nice tho it did quite a bit of work. It is time to do better. I love dinosaurs.
Yall doing a live launch tonight oct 23rd?
Rockets are tough, tomorrow is a new day
They have to wait a month
Take your time? This "vital piece of equipment" was set to launch over a month ago and now it's gonna sit on the ground for another month because the rocket failed again. But hey maybe third time a charm.
R L Hi Roman, how are you?
@Don Quarnstromthat is very true. Just seems odd to say take your time when they've had years to do this, millions of tax payer dollars and the same rocket failed to launch at t -4 seconds a month ago and here we are again. I'm just hoping at some point they can figure it out.
@@lumberman7843 has it even been confirmed that it was the rocket itself? Could've been the ground systems for all we know
This Mark's my 5th time that it aborted or scrubbed
Yep. Staying up late in the East for nothing.
Yep 5 for me too.
How many times has this launch been scrubbed now?
Who's in charge? Wile E. Coyote and the ACME rocket company?
Wile E.
So, ummm, when is the next scru.. I mean launch ?
ULA> I THINK WE FORGET SOMETHING?
ME> I THINK YOU FORGOT HOW TO LAUNCH ROCKETS INTO SPACE!
LOL
They should try falcon heavy.
I’m glad I didn’t drive to the cape this time.... they have a great track record for a reason. Yes it sucks, but it happens..
Equilibrium Goodium,you said it👍
I'm hopefull for a successful launch,why the fuzz,try & try again guys👍go for it🚀
Delta IV Heavy - "the nation's proven heavy lifter". So long as you're not in a hurry to have your payload get to orbit.
I'd like to see the Delta heavy launch one polatician into space. If we can send one polatician into space we can send them ALL into space..
Better scrub than boom...
ULA have to speed up Vulcan Rocket development their got no choice now.
I thought they cancelled the development
I thought they cancelled the development
@@phinadelphiahlongwane3485 they are launching it in 2021
@@phinadelphiahlongwane3485 The ULA ACES upper stage Rocket is cancel.
Launch attempts being scrubbed is OK, I think most people here is just in awe because the presentation and event cover was a bit awkward, but maybe you guys didnt account for the fact the launch could be aborted and werent ready for it lol
At least ULA laves videos of a scrub up and available to watch, unlike SpaceX who unlists every scrub lately to hide the video from the public.
good ol' delta 4 never fails to uninspire the little kids with its many aborts/scrubs.
what an old finnicky obsolete thing this is.
The delta 4 is an amazingly capable rocket, but there can be lots of difficulties, cause it burns hydrogen.
But when it does launch, (and even when it aborts, sometimes) it SETS ITSELF ON FIRE so spectacularly! Not just the engines but the whole body of the rocket too.
Surely the sight of a rocket setting itself on fire *all over* inspires confidence?
@Savage RR get outta here man, you obviously don't know what space exploration is about. Also, thought I should mention that ula is a private company, formed by Lockheed Martin and boeing. So thanks for your meaningless argument.
@Savage RR also, as for your second comment, that is false. The Delta iv heavy can put a bigger payload into low earth orbit and geostationary orbit than almost any other rocket... That's what it was designed to do...
@@mav01 space exploration to old space is about exploiting the ignorance of the general public so that the engineers/execs can sit around and twiddle their thumbs while wasting billions in public money on old obsolete hardware and at the same time claiming that they are innovating and pushing boundaries!
Just give Space X the control for NROL please.
Wow, what a joke you guys are! Way to hold up the launch pad for another month!! Get you’re stuff off the pad and out of the way of all the other launches that need to go!! No wonder spaceX thinks you’re a joke! The American taxpayers just took note!
Cut them some slack.
Remember that this is a VERY EXPENSIVE bird being flow by what is really still a developmental booster. (only 11 launches for Delta-IV Heavy, with one a mission failure)
They need to make sure that *everything* is *perfect* before committing to launch.
Savage RR like Vulcan and Starliner 😩
@@Lorneehax37 Neither of which work yet?
Marvin Kitfox NEITHER
ULA I support you guys in all the endeavors you do, but seriously before the customer goes all Karen in you guys, you definitely need to fix this rocket or just let someone like SpaceX take over because this is getting ridiculous. Wasn’t expecting 3rd times a charm antics from you guys.
The customer is the US Tax Payer(you).
Spencer Jewell yes, so ULA needs to stop wasting my money! Give the contract to someone with great ROI, like SpaceX!
Lololol, and yet they laugh at spaceX. How many rockets has spaceX launched in the time it's taken ULA to launch this single Delta Heavy?
What happened this time?
September has been a very poor month for space exploration in America. Multiple scrubbed launches from ULA, SpaceX and Blue Origin. Plus Astra Space's failed launch on the 11th. China is now taking center stage for rocket launches and I find that very frightening.
All things considered, Delta IV Heavy is aging. It may be time for retirement.
@R L Actually, Starlink-13 and GPS III SV04 were supposed to launch in September. They were repeatedly pushed back.
@@dil.aug.8489 weren't they pushed due to this launch?
China has a pretty high failure rate still... they might launch often, but they have far more rockets fail than we currently do
Dillon Augustine tbh they were mainly pushed back due to either weather, and this mission being delayed also caused a delay in the Starlink mission. But yea in general not the best month.
And some of Spacex launches delayed because this thing was still in the bay! I remember one weekend Spacex would have 3 operations. The hop, one commercial, and a starlink deployment. But nope.
The launch team this time doesn't seem surprised
Usual deal here.. :)
Mas de novo. Nesse ritmo, até o SLS vai lançar antes.
SpaceX please
All good it’s still safe on the pad and not spread all over the countryside,
Can't wait for this thing to be put out of service after 4 more launches so as to stop wasting taxpayer money that is better spent on SpaceX or other pressing issues with our country.
4 more launches and about 12 more total scrubs remaining lol
Quesque c'est ?
Hey, ULA. List this video as (ABORTED) so we know to wawtcvh or not watch another failure.
This cr4p is delaying Starlink launch.
low iq elon fanboy
Yarp.
But they are paying $440 million for the launch, and *who knows* how much the spysat itself costs, so they do kinda get priority.
@@aerojetrocketdyners-2538 Oh I see, I guess that would make you a "genius iq inflated-budget-with-taxpayer-money-and-ancient-tech fanboy".
Savage RR as much as I disagree with what he said. Don’t come after the RS-25 like that.
@@fernandomartin4141 if you think the RS-25 or the RS-68 is outdated tech, read more you 16 year old elon fanboy
Unbelievable, so gunshy now ya just Can’t pull the trigger 🏹😱😳😂🤣
Congratulations The United Launch Aborters, you didn't check out your gigantic triple bundle cigarette closely enough..
just put the payload on the falcon heavy already
the falcon heavy has too small fairings and no vertical integration dumbass
low iq elon fanboy.
TickoGrey and still more likely to get it done than ULA!
@@adamharris6251 if they put the satellite in there:
1) the rocket would lift off then fall back to earth and explode due to weight issues
2) i don't know why you think a 20 foot tall satellite can fit in 17 foot tall fairings
@@tickogrey5846 yeah falcon heavy is just cancer and doesn't have a launch abort tower
Sapete le cose.. sto nervoso..
Hoje não! Hoje não! Hoje sim. Hoje sim?
NRO, who you gonna call? SpaceX.
SpaceX doesn't have the facilities yet to process the payload.
They say competition is good, yet ULA never get's into the game. Then cries foul.
Did the rocket go off tonight
Nope. Aborted at T-7 secs
pls give it to spacex falcon heavy
SpaceX can't do it for now. It's as easy as that.
blablubb12345 neither can ULA. Is the mission to hold up all the other launches waiting?
Of course they can. They successfully launched all other satellites of this series. Having that many aborts due to technical reasons is unusual, also for ULA, but nothing that SpaceX is immune to. They already lost an entire rocket including it's payload during a tanking test.
And, as if i knew, SpaceX just had a scrub due to a faulty sensor today.
Was this a test?
More like April fools day for us suckers.
16:18
Again? How embarrassing. Time to call SpaceX for some help.
Spacex can't carry the payload because of performance constraints and a lack of vertical integration facilities.
@Alpha Ghost falcon heavy can' be vertically integrated for now and switching over to another payload fairing would mean more costs. The amount of low IQ elon fanboys in this comment section is appalling.
@@aerojetrocketdyners-2538 sorry for such a dumb question, but what is vertical integration facility?
@@BayuSanjaya Essentially placing the payload while the rocket is upright.
bruh ULA wtf again
bene così...!
Wtf guys?
Soooooooo..... no news ... at all...... why so quiet...... so ..... dark....... like... black.... , oh, ... yeah..... 🕵️♀️ 🛰 📡 . For our government.... That may not exist after November 3rd.... not so Lol....
No launch no landing space x is killing em all haha
Ula should be shutted down ! Old technology
What the hell?
They are professionals at scrubbing, they should rebrand to SSS;Super Scrub Scrub.
illudium Q36 explosive space modulator must be launched to protect the earth
I was angry at my mom because she didn’t let me stay up!
This is Killing My mind.Just Give it to SpaceX.They Will integrate the Fairings the way they need For Falcon Heavy.
Iirc nro requires vertical integration, and they want the ula insertion accuracy
@@dongiovanni4331 HmmmmmmmMMMMMM
@@dongiovanni4331 D4H can also lift more in higher orbits than FH (more C3). If it's heavy and going to GTO, D4H is sometimes the only option. Until Starship gets NatSec certified, that is.
its amazing how elon fanboys always want a monopoly.
Vertical integration is only required for the secrecy of the payload correct? How lame...
ULA better leave rocket launching to Spacex
spacex fairing are not big enough and plus reusabillity is useless
how many interplanetary payload that spacex has sent?
ULA, just handover the payload to Spacex please
Why would they? And you know the Falcon 9 has also aborted within the last few seconds for tech issues at least 3 times this year as well, right? Plus, SpaceX doesn't have the infrastructure to support this launch.
that's not how aerodynamic fairing works
Scrubba dub dub
This is becoming a Joke ULA this is making your company look bad just scrap this mission Cut your losses already move on move forward with Starliner instead
Starliner? You mean Boeing's hopeless capsule-shaped thingy? They have to do another dress rehearsal launch after redesigning the bus between the capsule and service module, sending their software engineers to remedial software engineering school, and their flight operators to remedial flight operations school and each having their code and playbooks reviewed with an endoscope. You can buy 2+ Crew Dragon Launches for one Starliner Launch; with NASA backing away from Artemis, I don't see this as a viable option past 2023. That means someone in government will buy it, but it will make about sense as an elevator in an outhouse.
@@matthewhelton1725 Right?! Isn't the next test flight scheduled in 2021? I mean literally 1 test flight per year when there's another company that routinely makes multiple flights to space every month, using less money. Come on...
2 SCRUBS IN 2 STREAMS NOOOOOOOO
You waste my data AGAIN!!
Lol😁🙈
bruh i got canceled
Rogozin manager
dura(k)
@@ЛКМПКМ sam(a)
Just forget about it.
bruhhhhhh
just put it on a SpaceX and get it done.
I think this was a payload that I read about not fitting in the Falcon Heavy faring section. So even if the government wanted, they have no choice but to painfully wait till ULA can get things right.
ULA buys the fairing from a 3rd party. I heard that.SpaceX tried to get the 3rd party's assistance with a larger fairing for falcon heavy specifically for payloads like this and ULA played dirty and blocked it.
@@KaziusAzran Wow didn't know that...not good. I won't watch live anymore, I will wait to see if UA-cam ever shows a replay...I have wasted enough time waiting and watching for nothing.
@@KaziusAzran Thank you!
@@alanthompson7674 Thank you!
Now I unsubscribe
Can get a job
United States Air Force!!!!
Eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeiiiiiiiiiiissssssssshhhh
Booooooooooooooooooooooo!
FAIL....time to call elon & falcon heavy
Fairings of FH are too small and there is no vertical integration
Ritik ya, we know, won’t be long and ULA will be left behind. Stop supporting this waste of money! Can’t get it off the ground again! My wife would leave if I had this hard of time getting my rocket up!
@@adamharris6251 Delta IV Heavy is going to retire anyway,Vulcan might change the game for ULA
@@adamharris6251 and ULA is not a bad company, why do you think it still launches Flagship interplanetary NASA missions ?
Ritik this has been holding up every other launch.... they’re bad because they are so far behind it’s not even funny. Waste of money.