Takeoff From Roosevelt Field | The Spirit of St. Louis | Warner Archive

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 26 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 436

  • @reynaldoflores4522
    @reynaldoflores4522 2 роки тому +30

    I appreciate that there was just the sound of the roaring engine during the take-off. NO distracting music playing.

  • @bcgrittner
    @bcgrittner 2 місяці тому +2

    My Dad grew up in Little Falls, Minnesota. He was five when Lindbergh made his famous flight. Charles came home and did a lengthy flight with many maneuvers above Little Falls. Per my Dad everyone was out on the streets yelling and waving, including my Dad. Some day, huh?

  • @tomservo5347
    @tomservo5347 4 роки тому +139

    I know Jimmy Stewart was near 50 when he filmed this, but he was a true aviator and commander of a bomber squadron during WW2 so who better to know what Lindbergh went through. 'Flight of the Phoenix' is another favorite.

    • @lt4324
      @lt4324 4 роки тому +15

      Lets not forget "Strategic Air Command", great movie and fantastic REAL footage.

    • @tomservo5347
      @tomservo5347 4 роки тому +5

      @@lt4324 '12 O'Clock High' while we're at it. Love Jimmy's line in 'Flight of the Phoenix' when they're burying passengers that died in the crash. Someone asks him "Would you like to say a few words?" Jimmy glares at him and says "What do you expect me to say, Sorry?" His loathing of Herr Dorfmann (Hardy Kruger) is almost comical sometimes.

    • @lt4324
      @lt4324 4 роки тому +2

      @@tomservo5347 Yes, Great movie! as many fastastic shows and or movies back then!

    • @lt4324
      @lt4324 4 роки тому +1

      @@tomservo5347 I loved 12'Oclock High! Movie and series

    • @airzulu2733
      @airzulu2733 4 роки тому +2

      Mr Stewart flew for the USAF in england during the second world war . A truly talented man .

  • @scottfarmer8758
    @scottfarmer8758 2 роки тому +73

    The most incredible thing about Charles Lindbergh's flight is not that he was able to fly from New York to Paris, it's that he was able to stay awake for over 33 hours during the flight.

    • @paulbizard3493
      @paulbizard3493 2 роки тому +15

      And he didn't sleep - or barely - the night before the take-off...

    • @paulbizard3493
      @paulbizard3493 2 роки тому +8

      @@ZenYoda Yes, more famous than Neils Armstrong. But then Slim accomplished his goal alone. He held so many skills.

    • @JAEUFM
      @JAEUFM Рік тому +3

      Also, no forward visibility really, few by instruments and dead reckoning.

    • @CharlieBam
      @CharlieBam Рік тому +4

      And he navigated across the Atlantic with only a hand made chart and a compass, reached Ireland within a few miles of his planned course

    • @davidhall8874
      @davidhall8874 Рік тому +2

      He should have just turned on the autopilot and taken a nap.

  • @cipherthedemonlord8057
    @cipherthedemonlord8057 6 років тому +49

    I will forever love this movie. It was one of the things that made me fall in love with aviation at an early age and continue to present.

  • @markmanning5683
    @markmanning5683 10 місяців тому +3

    Freaking Missouri rain! One of Jimmy's best films. RIP Sir.

  • @robertlight5227
    @robertlight5227 4 роки тому +110

    My grandfather saw the Spirit fly over St John's Nfld. They let the children out of classes to see the plane as the local newspapers had announced the time the Spirit would be flying over the city enroute to Paris. He said it went high over the port as if Lindbergh wanted to be seen. People waved hankies and signs. He soared up, flew right over Cabot Tower atop Signal Hill, clearing it by about 500 feet, and then headed straight out east into the North Atlantic.
    Signal Hill is where Marconi received the 1st trans Atlantic wireless signal from Europe.

    • @David-lb4te
      @David-lb4te 4 роки тому +2

      ".. signal from Europe." From Poldhu, Cornwall, England to be precise.

    • @CaesarInVa
      @CaesarInVa 4 роки тому +4

      My mother saw him take off when he cross-countried the Spirit up to Roosevelt Field. Funny you should mention St. Johns, NFLD. in 1943, she later married my father, a naval aviator, and they ended up spending 3 years at NAS Argentia, NFLD in the late 50's (he was nearing retirement at that point and was flying EC-121 Lockheed Warning Stars).

    • @javiermachin1
      @javiermachin1 3 роки тому +3

      Very nice comment. Thanks for sharing...

    • @adamdorgant9454
      @adamdorgant9454 3 роки тому +2

      Good to know!!!

    • @gazza2933
      @gazza2933 Рік тому +1

      Robert.
      That is fantastic, to have witnessed such an event!
      I believe St John's is still a 'jumping off'
      point for Transatlantic flights.
      🇨🇦 🇺🇸 🇬🇧

  • @paulmurphy42
    @paulmurphy42 3 роки тому +7

    Can you imagine how much music they'd add to this scene if it were filmed today!

  • @mariocisneros911
    @mariocisneros911 5 років тому +8

    My father was 3 in 1927 and Lindbergh became 1 of his all time heroes . Loved this movie

    • @guardsful
      @guardsful 3 роки тому +3

      He was one of my heroes as well until WW11 where he trashed his legacy by becoming an adoring fan of Nazi Germany.

    • @bcgrittner8076
      @bcgrittner8076 Рік тому +1

      My late father was raised in Little Falls, MN, home of Charles Lindbergh. Dad was five when the solo transatlantic flight occurred. Lindbergh came home and spent a summer’s day flying over Little Falls while performing a one man air show. The people of Little Falls were waving and yelling enthusiastically. Dad clearly remembered that until the day he died.

  • @elfowl6873
    @elfowl6873 6 років тому +46

    One of my top 5 all time movie favorites!!!! absolutely wonderful depiction of the famous aviator!!!!!, I miss Jimmy Stewart, THE BEST!!!

    • @BWolf00
      @BWolf00 3 роки тому +2

      I actually can't recall ever seeing the movie...but it's amazing piece of work.
      It built the suspense relaying in general what it was like...all without the use of CGI and fireball explosions.

    • @spikespa5208
      @spikespa5208 2 роки тому +1

      @@BWolf00 By all means, find it and watch it. Worth the time.

  • @robertlight5227
    @robertlight5227 4 роки тому +43

    "Flight's neither science nor art. Flight is and always will be a miracle."- Charles Lindberg.

    • @tomcooper6108
      @tomcooper6108 3 роки тому +1

      That's bullshite.

    • @robertlight5227
      @robertlight5227 3 роки тому +2

      @@tomcooper6108 That's what he said. I like the poetry of it. What's yr issue with it?

    • @robertlight5227
      @robertlight5227 2 роки тому +2

      @@BurntPlaydoh He was clearly being poetic. Allegory is something you dont get?

    • @fluffy1931
      @fluffy1931 7 місяців тому

      Lindbergh would spend the years leading up to WW II actively campaigning to “protect the white race” and for the U.S. to maintain strict neutrality toward Nazi Germany.

  • @TheRoyalBavarian
    @TheRoyalBavarian 7 місяців тому +6

    A great film with a truely great actor. Thank you Jimmy for helping us to escape.

  • @dorothygale5896
    @dorothygale5896 4 роки тому +6

    That solo flight is still the Mount Everest of solo flights.

  • @delavalmilker
    @delavalmilker 6 років тому +16

    I just watched this on BluRay HD. Having only prior seen the film cropped and shrunk-down on a TV screen, I was amazed at the amazing detail, and the efforts the producers the went through to accurately depict every detail of the original Spirit. Great performance by James Stewart!

  • @josemoreno3334
    @josemoreno3334 2 роки тому +1

    Love this movie and Jimmy Stewart. Thank You For Your Service Sir. I'm Retired USAF.

    • @fluffy1931
      @fluffy1931 7 місяців тому

      Lindbergh would spend the years leading up to WW II actively campaigning to “protect the white race” and for the U.S. to maintain strict neutrality toward Nazi Germany.

  • @bengus8148
    @bengus8148 5 років тому +61

    Lindbergh actually cleared the trees by 20+ feet and the backers of the Spirit weren't down at the takeoff roll part of the runway as you see in the movie,they were down at the other end with fire extinguishers just in case Lindbergh crashed.

    • @angelreading5098
      @angelreading5098 4 роки тому +8

      Snagging the wires although in the actual take off he cleared them was considered dramatic enough to be left in the film.

    • @MarkWilliams-pg5gk
      @MarkWilliams-pg5gk 2 роки тому +1

      Filmed at Hancock Field, Santa Maria, CA

    • @josephpadula2283
      @josephpadula2283 Рік тому

      Than k you for saying where it was filmed.
      In the movie Pearl Harbor the opening scene is suppose to be Mitchel Field but the mountain behind it looks more like SantaPaula California ?!!
      Probably 35 % of the USA from the East coast could tell you Long Island has No mountains within
      100 miles!

    • @ISIO-George
      @ISIO-George 7 місяців тому

      @@josephpadula2283 Also Long Island in that area was not open fields at that time. In the 1960s I spent a lot of time at the shopping mall they built after the air base was closed.

  • @James-ok7ii
    @James-ok7ii 3 роки тому +1

    my oh my.. i was maybe 6 when i first saw this about 20 years ago maybe even longer. i hunted the name of this movie for years after my dad passed. ive finally found it. im more than happy, thank you for posting this tiny clip, this helped me more than you could ever imagine.

  • @roconnor01
    @roconnor01 4 роки тому +50

    James Maitland Stewart was just as brave in real life as Charles Lindberg.

    • @sethkimmel7312
      @sethkimmel7312 4 роки тому +4

      Braver....

    • @mercian7
      @mercian7 4 роки тому +1

      @@sethkimmel7312 They were both..lets not play games

    • @sethkimmel7312
      @sethkimmel7312 4 роки тому +1

      @@mercian7 its not games shithead bigot! GENERAL Stewart did EVERYTHING lindberg did without hating any of his fellow countrymen! reported and blocked!

    • @mercian7
      @mercian7 4 роки тому +2

      @@sethkimmel7312 Flippin eck

    • @georgewhitworth9742
      @georgewhitworth9742 3 роки тому +1

      @@sethkimmel7312 Umm...he didn't hate his fellow countrymen

  • @Geense2525
    @Geense2525 2 місяці тому

    I was just reading Bill Brysons book 1927. This is very accurate to how the takeoff was like. The crappy runway, the bouncing, the near miss. Great stuff.

  • @flyinhawaiian5848
    @flyinhawaiian5848 4 роки тому +14

    Watched this wonderful movie for the first time as a kid in 1966, and it would become one of my inspirations to pursue an aviation oriented career. This takeoff scene and many other flying sequences were filmed at Santa Maria Municipal Airport and nearby Hancock Field, now Allan Hancock College in California. Those eucalyptus trees at the end of the "runway" (actually an abandoned taxiway) still exist at the airport and throughout the Santa Maria Valley.

    • @Mikhail-Tkachenko
      @Mikhail-Tkachenko 4 роки тому +2

      I wish the federal government hadn't implemented the 1500hr law for first officers. Destroyed my hope of a flying career, now I have a useless CPL and instrument rating. Whoever voted that in are unforgivable. I'd give anything to be able to fly for a living.

    • @flyinhawaiian5848
      @flyinhawaiian5848 4 роки тому +1

      @@Mikhail-Tkachenko Yeah, it's very difficult to become an ATP, easier if you're ex-military, then you only need half of those total hours. You could get your CFI and build hours that way, but it's still gonna take time. Wishing you the best of luck!

    • @daytonasixty-eight1354
      @daytonasixty-eight1354 3 роки тому +1

      @@Mikhail-Tkachenko Go build hours. You can say the 1500hr rule made it hard to get into a flying career, but you also can look at it with a positive mindset. It made wages increase dramatically. Regional pilots used to make minimum wage, now they actually make decent money.

    • @Mikhail-Tkachenko
      @Mikhail-Tkachenko 3 роки тому +2

      @@daytonasixty-eight1354 Can you send me the contact info to the companies you're in touch with who hire low hour commercial/instrument rated pilots? I can relocate anywhere in the world within the week. My only lead was a close friend & dropzone owner killed in a plane crash at Skydive Hawaii 2 years ago.
      I've yet to find another company in my searching & networking but that'd be really a great piece of luck if I unexpectedly met someone who owns or know of a company I haven't contacted yet. I'm happy for you to have been able to increase your income from the 1500hr law. It's certainly good you were born early enough to start your aviation career & build enough hours prior to the implementation of that law so you weren't affected in a negative way by it. I'm strongly against corrupt politicians regulating things they know nothing about. Free market capitalism has historically shown to be the best course of action.
      Anyway, I'm also a licensed skydiver as well & hold a BASE # I don't wish to share here. Also certified master watchmaker and skilled TIG/SMAW/MIG welder & metal fabricator.
      Edit: Anywhere that doesn't still have closed borders that is.

    • @daytonasixty-eight1354
      @daytonasixty-eight1354 3 роки тому +1

      @@Mikhail-Tkachenko California has pretty routine openings for skydiving and banner towing. Cost of living is high. CFI is the most reliable way to build hours low time. To use your commercial ticket, you really need to get 500+ hours minimum because that is what a lot of insurance these companies carry requires. Look into Ameriflight, FedEx caravan, Mountain Air Cargo, etc. Basically any of the small feeders for UPS, FedEX, DHL etc are good for commercial. Typically require a multi engine and around 500-750 hours for first officer in something like a metroliner. Need multiengine obviously. Ideally get CFI and try to get a school to pay partially for Multiengine instructor.
      Survey companies in California, Texas, and Midwest. They tend to be around 500 hours or so. Sometimes less.
      Again, CFI is most reliable. If you are in Hawaii, you need to go to the mainland. Otherwise Mokulele might be a shot but it's not ideal.

  • @marsmars9130
    @marsmars9130 2 роки тому +4

    I grew up right by those fields, played on them as a boy! Never really knowing the important history that was right beneath my feet

  • @bradfordeaton6558
    @bradfordeaton6558 4 роки тому +5

    I don't know how accurate that was but it's still a great scene.

    • @mkor7
      @mkor7 Рік тому

      In actuality, he wasn't anywhere near the trees or power lines upon takeoff. Check the actual film of it.

  • @ozzie-sk9dh
    @ozzie-sk9dh 4 роки тому +6

    Jimmy Stewart was great at underplaying so the story can be told. He was the same as Glenn Miller. One of the good guys.

    • @angelreading5098
      @angelreading5098 4 роки тому +1

      One of three replicas made by Paul Mantz for the film,the aircraft were converted from Ryan Broughams a similar commercial design.

  • @randymiller3075
    @randymiller3075 5 років тому +5

    One of my many lifetime HEROES!

    • @kevincorcoran6493
      @kevincorcoran6493 4 роки тому +1

      Jimmy Stewart. Yes. Lindbergh was an anti semite.

  • @rcsutter
    @rcsutter 7 місяців тому +1

    I love this movie but I have to make a pot of coffee to watch it, I get so sleepy with Jimmy towards the end! Good movie though. Jimmy Stewart loved aviation, you know he enjoyed making this and many other movies about it. This movie captures an important milestone in aviation and helps pass down the story of how it happened.

  • @7775Kevin
    @7775Kevin 2 роки тому +6

    Beautifully filmed. I love this movie and have watched it many times. A great book on the flight is Dan Hampton’s “The Flight - Charles Lindbergh’s Daring and Immortal Transatlantic Crossing”.

  • @Martin-sr8yv
    @Martin-sr8yv 4 роки тому +2

    This is a Masterpiece of filming.

    • @mkor7
      @mkor7 Рік тому

      A masterpiece? It was exaggerated to all hell. In actuality, he wasn't anywhere near the trees or power lines upon takeoff. Check the actual film of it.

  • @MrEab2010
    @MrEab2010 6 місяців тому +1

    growing up on Long Island, I was used to seeing the commemorative stone in the parking lot of the Roosevelt Field shopping mall in Garden City marking the spot where Lindbergh took off.

  • @beegee22
    @beegee22 2 роки тому

    It never gets old to hear the music cut in after he clears the trees! 👍

  • @TralfazConstruction
    @TralfazConstruction 4 роки тому +4

    _Every_ time my brothers and I watched this when we were kids we'd yell 2:37 right there as he snagged the cables. How in the world did they compose this scene? Amazing!

    • @angelreading5098
      @angelreading5098 4 роки тому +3

      They did not compose the scene,it was by accident that Paul Mantz snagged the wires,it was considered dramatic enough to leave in the film.

    • @mkor7
      @mkor7 Рік тому +1

      In actuality, he wasn't anywhere near the trees or power lines upon takeoff. Check the actual film of it.

  • @Seasider70
    @Seasider70 Рік тому +1

    SIMPLE and BRILLIANT.

  • @Howrider65
    @Howrider65 2 роки тому +2

    Jimmy reminds me of pilots back in the day everyone one of them I met was a credit to the human race.

  • @abundantYOUniverse
    @abundantYOUniverse 7 років тому +9

    Greatest movie with one of the true heroes of aviation, James Stewart

    • @kennethroyer9949
      @kennethroyer9949 6 років тому

      James Stewart a great actor and an even better Intelligence Officer spreading propaganda regarding Charles Lindbergh hoaxed hop from New York to Paris. It was completely faked. America wanted to be the first so they faked it to win. Simple nothing more than propaganda!

    • @ffjsb
      @ffjsb 5 років тому +2

      @@kennethroyer9949 STFU troll

  • @edwardpate6128
    @edwardpate6128 4 роки тому +6

    An amazing film about a great man!

  • @elfowl6873
    @elfowl6873 6 років тому +5

    THE SPIRIT!!!!!! What a beauty!!!!!!!!!.God speed!!!!!

  • @voluweb
    @voluweb 4 роки тому +3

    They are awesome! The runway is aimed directly at the tallest trees in the area!

    • @cowboybob7093
      @cowboybob7093 4 роки тому +2

      0:32 "Pull the chocks!"
      0:38 Eight men and the propeller straining to move that winged gas tank through the mud.
      IMO they didn't need the chocks. #humor

    • @mkor7
      @mkor7 Рік тому

      In actuality, he wasn't anywhere near the trees or power lines upon takeoff. Check the actual film of it.

  • @PDZ1122
    @PDZ1122 4 роки тому +46

    One of the best flying films ever. Before everything turned to CGI shit.

    • @55pilot
      @55pilot 4 роки тому +2

      Ditto!

    • @mariacornwallis1602
      @mariacornwallis1602 4 роки тому +2

      @PDZ1122 Obviously you have never seen "The Battle of Britain"

    • @mariacornwallis1602
      @mariacornwallis1602 4 роки тому

      @@55pilot Obviously you have never seen "The Battle of Britain"

    • @BWolf00
      @BWolf00 3 роки тому +1

      @PDZ1122 - I commented to that affect before I way this post.
      I actually can't recall ever seeing the movie...but it's amazing piece of work.
      It built the suspense relaying in general what it was like...all without the use of CGI and fireball explosions.

    • @mkor7
      @mkor7 Рік тому

      Best? It was exaggerated to all hell. In actuality, he wasn't anywhere near the trees or power lines upon takeoff. Check the actual film of it.

  • @WanganTunedKeiCar
    @WanganTunedKeiCar 4 роки тому +5

    I don't think this scene could be filmed any better today!

  • @toml.1408
    @toml.1408 5 років тому +2

    I saw this movie "Spirit" plane at Movieland of the Air Museum in Orange County, CA. several times, starting in 1965. The plane had 2 sets of flight controls: 1 for Stuart and 1 for stunt pilot Paul Mantz who did all of the actual flying. The plane was the prized showpiece of the museum.

  • @briandeline5065
    @briandeline5065 4 роки тому +1

    God, I loved him. One of my favorites along with "Mr. Hobbs Takes a Vacation."

  • @juanpennisi1202
    @juanpennisi1202 4 роки тому +1

    All the trees right at the end of the runway. Great!

    • @reynaldoflores4522
      @reynaldoflores4522 2 роки тому

      They are there to protect the public. Those trees form a barrier to prevent wayward planes from crashing into the road and houses beyond the runway!!!
      If a planes crashes on takeoff he will hit the trees and
      kill himself. But without the trees, he would crash into the houses beyond and kill a lot more people.
      Lindbergh knew what those trees were for.

    • @mkor7
      @mkor7 Рік тому

      In actuality, he wasn't anywhere near the trees or power lines upon takeoff. Check the actual film of it.

  • @dickjohnson4268
    @dickjohnson4268 4 роки тому +28

    Briefly; The SoSL had never been tested with this fuel load, the prop had been increased 1° in pitch for better cruise speed, contaminated runway conditions, all with an aircraft about the size of a Cessna 207, and an engine with about 223 horsepower. When they got back from overseas, the Navy Sea Bees put her back together. They found a cracked wing attach point, and the number eight cylinder had a cracked valve lifter. There's lots more involved with the build that CAL didn't know about. A broken wing rib, and a lost rubber vent hose inside a tank. Talk about a stacked deck.

    • @bbface21
      @bbface21 4 роки тому +3

      I thought the delayed takeoff was for the fuel load, and not the director being melodramatic.

    • @samsharp8539
      @samsharp8539 4 роки тому +2

      @@bbface21 The above conditions were for the actual flight, not for the movie. Cal's fuel situational awareness was paramount. Frank Tallman's 1957 performance in flying the replica was with a very light fuel load.

    • @dickjohnson4268
      @dickjohnson4268 4 роки тому +4

      @@samsharp8539 Actually, 'replica' is not correct. SoSL-II was more of a sister ship. There were other replicas

    • @gregson99
      @gregson99 4 роки тому +2

      @@bbface21 it was close one for sure. but the movie makes it even more dramatic then it was.

    • @PointyTailofSatan
      @PointyTailofSatan 4 роки тому +1

      So basically you are saying Lindbergh was an idiot. Because it's the pilot's responsibility to make sure a plane is in proper working condition before a flight.

  • @stephenburgess5109
    @stephenburgess5109 5 років тому +31

    The late Brigadier General USAF Reserve Jimmy Stewart RIP

  • @er1073
    @er1073 4 роки тому +2

    The reason there isn't a windshield is that an extra fuel tank was added at the cowling between the engine and firewall. From I remember reading about this it was Charles Lindbergh's idea and mount a periscope to see out of. Can any of you imagine doing this for 33 hours? Thank you Charles Lindbergh and Col Jimmy Stewart for pioneering aviation.

    • @scotpens
      @scotpens 4 роки тому +1

      Lindbergh figured that since most of his flight would be over water, he didn't really need a windshield. He could use the periscope to assist in takeoff and landing. The extra fuel, as well as the aerodynamic advantage of fairing in the cockpit, was worth the loss of forward vision.

    • @er1073
      @er1073 4 роки тому

      @@scotpens I would think that the extra fuel would have been better than the periscope I noticed if the portrayal is true to the story that Lindbergh would have been looking out of the side windows. Either way 33 1/2 was a long uncomfortable flight.

    • @petrberanek4230
      @petrberanek4230 Рік тому

      You dont need to see forward from a plane. In mail plane he was sitting on the back, as there were mailbags on front seat. When you need to see directly in front of plane, just use you rudder to lean a little. There is a periscope mounted on dashboard to see obstacles when landing and taking of. Rest of light was done using only compass and looking left or right from windows.

  • @airzulu2733
    @airzulu2733 4 роки тому +1

    My favourite aviation movie .

  • @enedenedubedene4811
    @enedenedubedene4811 2 роки тому +2

    Ein Meilenstein der Filmgeschichte.👆👆👆👆👆😍😍😍😄😄😄😄 Viele Grüsse aus Germany

  • @dutchflats
    @dutchflats Рік тому

    And this movie was filmed only 30 years after the real flight took place. What incredible progress we've made in aviation over the years, man really does want to fly!

  • @kimnamlee5732
    @kimnamlee5732 5 років тому +10

    I always dreamed of traveling on a plane around the world all by myself

    • @visualonestudio
      @visualonestudio 4 роки тому +2

      And hopefully your plane has a windshield!

  • @millimetreperfect
    @millimetreperfect 4 роки тому +1

    I often shout “Which way to Ireland”? in my best Jimmy Stewart voice from altitude (when Solo, I wouldn’t want to look silly)! as a tribute to Mr Lindbergh

  • @alanstrong3295
    @alanstrong3295 4 роки тому +1

    Lindy did it best in those days. It took bravery.

  • @christopherthorkon3997
    @christopherthorkon3997 4 роки тому +5

    And today we fly across the ocean with comfortable seats, full meals served to us, and our own individual TV monitor on which we can watch TV shows, watch movies, and play video games. And we complain about how "hard" it is to do a long flight. Oh my goodness. Could you imagine what Lindbergh went through?

    • @lawrencelewis8105
      @lawrencelewis8105 4 роки тому

      One comedian, I think it was Louis C.K. said something like, "you are sitting in a chair, 35,000 feet in the sky being served drinks and food, so what the hell is the problem? "

  • @ultrakool
    @ultrakool 4 роки тому +77

    that's the oldest looking 25 year old I've ever seen

    • @YesYouAreAbsolutelyCorrect
      @YesYouAreAbsolutelyCorrect 4 роки тому +4

      Man got through some rough... air, ya know.

    • @STho205
      @STho205 4 роки тому +9

      Probably the most qualified actor at the time to play the role. In his 20s in the 20s so he knew how American men thought at the time, a pilot, an officer in the USAAC, USAF and Brigadier General USAF Reserves.
      Sure James Dean might have looked the part in 57, but he would have played it as James Dean like all his roles till his young death.

    • @houstonhelicoptertours1006
      @houstonhelicoptertours1006 4 роки тому +6

      Have you ever been to New Mexico or Arizona? People there are dried up like prunes by their early 30s.

    • @betaorionis2164
      @betaorionis2164 4 роки тому +4

      Then, you haven't seen the supposedly young Robert de Niro at The Irishman

    • @Nangleator22
      @Nangleator22 4 роки тому +2

      I loved the WWII movies with Robert Mitchum and John Wayne and others playing 20-25 year olds.

  • @alexanderreimer387
    @alexanderreimer387 6 років тому +4

    Soooo riveting... I feel it in my gut...!!!!

  • @FitzArias
    @FitzArias 11 місяців тому

    "for me to succeed, the others must fail."
    -Charles Lindbergh

  • @paulw176
    @paulw176 2 роки тому +1

    Now That's a takeoff!

    • @mkor7
      @mkor7 Рік тому

      In reality, if you look at the actual film of the take off, he wasn't anywhere close to the trees when taking off.

  • @JoseAlarkon-d4y
    @JoseAlarkon-d4y 6 місяців тому

    El histórico vuelo del.piloto y aviador Charles Lindbergh , basado en un hecho real e historico con su protagonista James Stewart

  • @windhoek-land8339
    @windhoek-land8339 4 роки тому

    My mum heard this song and that's why I'm called Emilia.
    This is a coincidence
    Emilia is a beautiful name.

  • @alexalex13131
    @alexalex13131 7 років тому +15

    Very, very accurate and close to the real thing of that takeoff from Roosevelt Field.

    • @avmtech1968
      @avmtech1968 6 років тому

      Except in reality he cleared the telephone wires by 10 feet.... The plane used in filming was weighted down and the stunt pilot didn't lift her off in time to clear the wires during the filming of the sequence....

    • @bengus8148
      @bengus8148 5 років тому

      @@avmtech1968 Yeah...or even more than ten feet. And...that white scrap of material on that stake in the ground next to the runway is true, but it was used by Lindbergh to mark the half way point of the runway. In this clip it looks like it's almost at the end of the runway.

    • @Imnotyourdoormat
      @Imnotyourdoormat 5 років тому +1

      the records show he cleared the cables by 20 feet.

    • @davidsmith4416
      @davidsmith4416 5 років тому +2

      Whoever that actress was looking adoringly as The Spiritof St..Louis was very cute. That Spirit replica flown by James Stewart in the film was donated to the Henry Ford/Greenfield Village Museum in Dearborn, Michigan shortly after the film was completed.
      Captain James Stewart/ United States Army Air Force.

    • @SSN515
      @SSN515 5 років тому

      @@avmtech1968 the whole thing was fake. lindberg shacked up in a whore house while a black dude flew the atlantic. he took a ship over to paris a week earlier.

  • @rayopezzo4052
    @rayopezzo4052 4 роки тому +4

    The plane used in this film is displayed at Henry Ford Museum-Dearborn MI

    • @ronashman8463
      @ronashman8463 3 роки тому +1

      @ Ray Opezzo thank you! Gives my good incentive to get there.

  • @crazyman8472
    @crazyman8472 3 роки тому +1

    Up, up and awaaaaayyyy!!! 😎

  • @matrox
    @matrox Рік тому +1

    Jimmy Stewart was actually a real pilot. He flew bombers in ww2, also flew his own plan as a civillian.

    • @Nighthawke70
      @Nighthawke70 Рік тому +1

      And SAC line aircraft, all types, including B-57's and B-52's. He probably rubbed elbows with Yeager, but Chuck was a fighter jock and stereotypicaly hated bombers.

  • @bigbob1699
    @bigbob1699 4 роки тому +7

    The plane was one giant gas tank strapped to a great engine with one purpose , Get to Paris .

  • @mitchellminer9597
    @mitchellminer9597 5 місяців тому +1

    Lindbergh was 25 years old.

    • @historybuff66
      @historybuff66 5 місяців тому +1

      Yes, Jack Warner selected a 27 year old actor but unfortunately he turned down the role.

  • @andrewallen9993
    @andrewallen9993 4 роки тому

    Lindbergh's amazing achievement of this crossing a mere 8 years after Alcock and Browns flight across the Atlantic in a first world war military aircraft!

    • @RandomDudeOne
      @RandomDudeOne 4 роки тому +2

      Lindbergh's flight was for the Ortieg Prize. He flew twice as far as the John Alcock and Arthur Brown flight.

  • @rfletch62
    @rfletch62 4 роки тому

    Great, suspenseful (though the outcome is never in doubt). Like the original "Day of the Jackal".

    • @mkor7
      @mkor7 Рік тому

      In actuality, he wasn't anywhere near the trees or power lines upon takeoff. Check the actual film of it.

  • @Nangleator22
    @Nangleator22 4 роки тому +1

    You could feel every butterfly in his stomach, facing that terrible flaming death in the face. And was that an amazing miniature, or did somebody fly a replica Ryan for this movie?

    • @BWolf00
      @BWolf00 3 роки тому +1

      They flew a replica for this.

  • @stephendavidbailey2743
    @stephendavidbailey2743 4 роки тому

    Wonderful movie about a deeply flawed man.

  • @Jo71603
    @Jo71603 3 роки тому

    Great Movie!

  • @calvacoca
    @calvacoca 4 роки тому +6

    A perfect runway to take off from with a plane overloaded with gas 😱

    • @patrickwheeler5144
      @patrickwheeler5144 2 роки тому

      And came close to costing Stewart his life!
      But he made it.

    • @mkor7
      @mkor7 Рік тому +1

      @@patrickwheeler5144 In actuality, he wasn't anywhere near the trees or power lines upon takeoff. Check the actual film of it.

    • @patrickwheeler5144
      @patrickwheeler5144 Рік тому

      @@mkor7 I know. It’s been a while, but I’ve read his “Spirit of St. Louis” and “We.” The movie is still good, with a few embellishments every now and then.

  • @daninbox
    @daninbox 4 роки тому

    Is this coming to blu-ray?

  • @pinksin103
    @pinksin103 3 роки тому +1

    Good idea to have high trees at the end of a runway in those days!

    • @reynaldoflores4522
      @reynaldoflores4522 2 роки тому

      They are there for the protection of the public. Precisely to prevent wayward planes from crashing into the road and houses beyond.

    • @mkor7
      @mkor7 Рік тому

      In actuality, he wasn't anywhere near the tree line upon takeoff. Check the actual film of it.

  • @sporty1701
    @sporty1701 6 років тому +3

    I consider Lindbergh's 1927 solo flight , an act of unmatched courage...even to
    this day. The technology of that era was primitive, to say the least. He relied on
    his gut and his flying skills...nothing more. There were no preflight checks, no
    computer simulations...just his sheer will. What Lindbergh did is nothing short
    of miraculous. Few individuals have changed the world as profoundly as Charles
    Lindbergh did, in that flimsy little plane. Bravo to Jimmy Stewart for such a
    wonderful performance...one of my favorite movies ever!

    • @mikebird2571
      @mikebird2571 6 років тому

      Seen the plane, when i was younger, either they photoshopped it out , or removed it... Older pics had it, but for some reason, newer history books, have sanitized and deleted embarrasing, chapters, or misleading facts, to bend their minds, to a biased outlook, on history.....

    • @brit1066
      @brit1066 5 років тому +2

      Scott Lunsford Perhaps but consider the immense bravery of the two British pilots Alcock and Brown who flew the FIRST TRANSATLANTIC FLIGHT 10 YEARS EARLIER.
      If things were primitive for Lindbergh JUST IMAGINE WHAT IT WAS FOR Alcock and Brown.

    • @vksasdgaming9472
      @vksasdgaming9472 4 роки тому

      It was state-of-the-art airaplane custom-built just for that one purpose with all possible available simulations and calculations. And Lindbergh certainly had to do pre-flight checks necessary for that airplane. He was gutsy indeed, but first solo flight from New York to Paris was more a technical achievement instead of gutsy display or piloting. Gutsy piloting (and luck with following winds) was needed, but all the work was more than halfway done before he even took off. General James Stewart also performed really well in this role.

  • @oscarsajovic6
    @oscarsajovic6 Рік тому

    Fabuloso.
    Parabéns.
    Grande exemplo p/ toda a humanidade.
    Cresci ouvindo essa linda história.
    Meu conterrâneo, filho de família amiga, de Jaú SP, aviador João Ribeiro de Barros concluiu a travessia entre Europa (Ilha da Madeira) e Brasil (Ilha Fernando de Noronha) na mesma época que Charles Lindemberg concluiu a travessia entre EUA e Europa.
    João era filho de um grande cafeicultor, e batizou seu avião bimotor com o nome de Jahu.
    Na ilha da madeira seu avião foi sabotado, e ele mesmo precisou desmontar os motores, tendo encontrado dentro do motor, areia, sabão e pedaços de bronze.
    Enquanto desmontava os motores, o ditador Getúlio Vargas lhe mandou um telegrama, falando p/ deixar dessa loucura, desmontar o avião e embarcar em um navio, remetendo-o para o Brasil.
    João respondeu:
    Presidente, cuide do seu trabalho, que do meu cuido eu.
    A mãe de João enviou-lhe outro telegrama dizendo:
    Continue Filho, a Bandeira Nacional do Brasil está nas asas de seu avião.
    Qdo João conclui sua travessia, meus avós paternos estavam no Adriático, e comentavam que houve uma grande comemoração, por lá, do feito de João Ribeiro de Barros.
    Minha avó, ao ler nos jornais, sobre a conclusão da travessia de João Ribeiro de Barros, ficou impressionada e falou para meu avô: Olha, é o Joãozinho!
    Ele estudou com minhas tias + velhas.

  • @nathanduckeorth806
    @nathanduckeorth806 2 роки тому

    BALLS OF STEEL!!

  • @daytonasixty-eight1354
    @daytonasixty-eight1354 6 років тому +2

    I like that they chocked the wheels even though the plane was stuck in the mud and needed to be pushed by a bunch of guys.

    • @reynaldoflores4522
      @reynaldoflores4522 2 роки тому

      Everything had to be done according to the pre-flight checklist!!

  • @johnrandom
    @johnrandom 2 роки тому

    Does it make sense to have a power line and trees at the end of a runway?

    • @mkor7
      @mkor7 Рік тому

      If you look at actual film of the take off he wasn't anywhere near the trees and lines in actuality.

  • @GH-oi2jf
    @GH-oi2jf 4 роки тому

    I saw this in original release at a theater. I remember it as being in black and white.

    • @borisromanoff6956
      @borisromanoff6956 2 роки тому

      It's interesting that such a dangerous take off had to be made because of the race, but who else was competing for the prize I'd like to know?

    • @mkor7
      @mkor7 Рік тому

      @@borisromanoff6956 In actuality, he wasn't anywhere near the trees or power lines upon takeoff. Check the actual film of it.

  • @track1219
    @track1219 4 роки тому +1

    Nice takeoff! Tom cruise had a similar scene in an Aerostar in the movie “American Made”

  • @bertsmith7013
    @bertsmith7013 7 місяців тому

    Fancy building a plane with no windscreen, I would have thought being able to see where you're going is the most fundamental requirement when traveling forwards at speed.

  • @Kharkovkid
    @Kharkovkid Рік тому

    2:38 in the video. Someone dropped the ball! Those phone wires should have been clipped, then rehooked up after take off...And the trees at the end of the runway trimmed or removed also...

  • @gotch09
    @gotch09 5 років тому +10

    Jimmy was too long in the tooth for this role. Lindbergh was only 25 yrs old when he did this.

    • @steveconkey7362
      @steveconkey7362 4 роки тому +1

      Lindbergh wasn't an Air Force General you moron.

    • @alanboston5811
      @alanboston5811 4 роки тому

      Probably

    • @gotch09
      @gotch09 4 роки тому

      @@steveconkey7362 No joke, Woodrow. Now, do bears really crap in the woods?

    • @steveconkey7362
      @steveconkey7362 4 роки тому +1

      @@gotch09 Who's Woodrow and why would he be involved in this discussion? No joke...The Pope shits in the woods, and the bear wears a funny hat.

    • @gotch09
      @gotch09 4 роки тому

      @@steveconkey7362 AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

  • @dclark142002
    @dclark142002 3 роки тому +1

    Lindberg the man may have been an ass...but he was a great pilot.
    One of the great moments in aviation history...

  • @jebise1126
    @jebise1126 4 роки тому +1

    imagine hitting those trees... shortest movie ever

    • @mkor7
      @mkor7 Рік тому

      In actuality, he wasn't anywhere near the trees or power lines upon takeoff. Check the actual film of it.

  • @tungstenkid2271
    @tungstenkid2271 6 років тому +1

    Hey Ken, you say another crew flew to Paris before Lindbergh.If that's true why have we never heard of them?

    • @kennethroyer9949
      @kennethroyer9949 6 років тому

      I never said that! What I said who ever made the hop from New York to Paris it would have been done in a tri-motor of its day with a pilot, co-pilot, and navigator/radio operator. Plus thrown in just for grins a front windshield!
      Since he faked it who ever did it as the second team would have done it first. But in life who remembers who did it after the hoax master Lindbergh??

    • @Skyking67832
      @Skyking67832 6 років тому +1

      I think he is referring to Commander Richard E. Byrd who (almost) completed the New York to Paris flight, crash-landing on a beach in Normandy five WEEKS after Lindbergh's flight.

    • @tungstenkid2271
      @tungstenkid2271 6 років тому +2

      The 25,000 dollars NY to Paris prize money would certainly have been an incentive for somebody to fake a flight, but how exactly would Lindbergh have faked it as you claim?

    • @kennethroyer9949
      @kennethroyer9949 6 років тому

      Tungsten Kid.....Here is a link to Miles Mathis who has researched past [including Lindbergh] and present hoaxes and faked events.
      mileswmathis.com/lindy.pdf

    • @tungstenkid2271
      @tungstenkid2271 6 років тому +1

      Thanks but saying Lindbergh never flew the Atlantic is like saying men never walked on the moon.Tell Mathis to come and post his theory in the Fortean forum where I hang so it can be discussed fully..:)..forum.forteantimes.com/index.php

  • @mustang6172
    @mustang6172 3 роки тому

    Who puts power lines at the end of a runway?

    • @reynaldoflores4522
      @reynaldoflores4522 2 роки тому

      Who builds a runway next to power lines?

    • @mkor7
      @mkor7 Рік тому

      In actuality, he wasn't anywhere near the tree line upon takeoff. Check the actual film of it.

    • @mkor7
      @mkor7 Рік тому

      Or power lines.

  • @ericnolan2969
    @ericnolan2969 7 років тому

    He had balls, no forward vision, no brakes

    • @kennethroyer9949
      @kennethroyer9949 6 років тому

      No front windshield; no radio; and no compass. Balls?? No! It was faked so the U.S. would win the prize as propaganda for the masses!

    • @bengus8148
      @bengus8148 6 років тому

      Forward vision periscope. Small but he could see forward.

    • @kennethroyer9949
      @kennethroyer9949 6 років тому

      True but takeoffs and especially landings would be a complete bitch. Nothing more than a death trap. That is why it was faked. The Lindbergh's were nothing more than a clan of hoaxer's that is why our intelligence services pick him. He loved playing the part. And by the way James Steward retired as a General and since he was in the movies then he was in intelligence!

    • @bengus8148
      @bengus8148 6 років тому +1

      Because of tank placement he was so far back in the fuselage where he set he could touch BOTH SIDES with his out stretched elbows. All he had to do was lean a bit and he could look out the window. Gawd....

    • @kurtfrancis4621
      @kurtfrancis4621 5 років тому +1

      @@kennethroyer9949 Ah, another flat-earther type. Go back in your hole.

  • @jimdrake-writer
    @jimdrake-writer 7 років тому +1

    The role of Lindbergh was offered to John Kerr by Jack Warner, but Kerr turned it down because of Lindbergh’s association with the Nazis in the late-1930s. Stewart lobbied for and got the part, but had to lose 30 lbs and be fitted with a curly brown hairpiece to look anything like the 26-year-old aviator. Lindbergh was very impressed with Stewart’s performance, especially an unscripted moment when Stewart tapped the glass of the oil gauge. “Only an experienced pilot would do that before starting the engine,” Lindbergh commented to director William Wyler.

    • @kennethroyer9949
      @kennethroyer9949 6 років тому

      There is a secondary reason why John Kerr turned down the part as “Lucky Lindy” as he most likely knew that it was staged - FAKED - as military intelligence wanted to be the first to make the hop from New York to Paris. Failure was not an option but absolutely an option for the actor John Kerr. If the cat got out of the bag that it was FAKED along with Lucky Lindy’s love affair with the Nazis his acting career could have been ruined. Why Jimmy Stewart despite his age?? He was connected to military intelligence for years.
      Who made the hop?? Don’t know but you can bet it was a tri-motor of its day with a pilot/co-pilot plus a radio operator/navigator with a compass and just for grin’s a front windshield.

    • @avmtech1968
      @avmtech1968 5 років тому +5

      @@kennethroyer9949 The most idiotic comment I have ever read.

    • @avmtech1968
      @avmtech1968 5 років тому +2

      @@kennethroyer9949 You're a God damned idiot.

    • @kennethroyer9949
      @kennethroyer9949 5 років тому

      @@avmtech1968 Wow what a reasoned and well positioned argument I can see you are a man of aristocratic upbringing along with being highly educated with an arsenal use of the English language. Wow! I'm impressed!

    • @avmtech1968
      @avmtech1968 5 років тому +1

      @@kennethroyer9949 You're still an idiot. time to change the tin foil hat of yours....

  • @historybuff66
    @historybuff66 5 місяців тому

    Eight years later Jimmy Stewart would barely manage to take off in “Flight of the Phoenix”.

  • @randymiller3075
    @randymiller3075 5 років тому +2

    And oh yes,I have a plastic model of the "SPIRIT OF ST. LOUIS"!

    • @leifvejby8023
      @leifvejby8023 4 роки тому

      Me too - FROG 1/72

    • @dickjohnson4268
      @dickjohnson4268 4 роки тому +1

      Only one? You can never have enough. Still have the one that came in a cereal box in 1957. And my first Spirit that I built when I was 10 years old.

  • @billbright1755
    @billbright1755 5 років тому +1

    1/2 inch lower, well, it would have been a different story.
    Took off one time with one of my r. c. pusher type electrics. Knew I was close to a concrete curb stop on take run but had a good flight. Would oft fly for two hours or more on thermals, fifteen minutes of full power battery life.
    But after landing, the bottom of the left wing had a 1/8” deep grove about 6 “ out from fuselage. A piece of re-bar to locate the curb had left its mark,,, cutting it close.

  • @B-and-O-Operator-Fairmont
    @B-and-O-Operator-Fairmont 4 роки тому

    I'll bet a tail wheel instead of a tail skid would have been helpful. But, any takeoff that you can land from is a good one.

    • @samsharp8539
      @samsharp8539 4 роки тому

      No brakes on the Spirit. Tailwheels were just being thought of in 1927.

    • @B-and-O-Operator-Fairmont
      @B-and-O-Operator-Fairmont 4 роки тому

      @@samsharp8539 All the years I have been interested in planes and with your help I just realized that the tail skid was to stop the thing on landing. Any day one can learn something is not a wasted day!

    • @samsharp8539
      @samsharp8539 4 роки тому

      @@B-and-O-Operator-Fairmont Exactly... That's the fun part. Now TURNING the plane around back then, require the pilot to add down elevator, full rudder, and 'blip' the engine. I still teach in taildraggers on occasion, and it's fun to watch a nosewheel pilot try to do a 180 degree turn with the engine at idle while moving. No rudder authority there. Doh!!!

    • @samsharp8539
      @samsharp8539 4 роки тому

      @@B-and-O-Operator-Fairmont I forgot to mention... The R/C modellers that have built the SoSL in various scales are fun to watch. The handling of the Spirit in scale shows just how much adverse yaw and instability the Spirit had inherently by Eng. Hall's design. Some of my best students (now major airline captains) are still R/C and tailwheel pilots. R/C and me?? I have tried... And failed miserably.

  • @dankwartdenkhardt5714
    @dankwartdenkhardt5714 4 роки тому

    The plane looks wonderful by design but how can a plane be without front window?

    • @Gwaithmir
      @Gwaithmir 4 роки тому

      The plane was fitted with a periscope for forward vision.

    • @ernesthill2681
      @ernesthill2681 3 роки тому

      He really didn't need a windscreen, this airplane was custom built for one purpose. To win the $25,000 Ortieg prize by flying nonstop from NYC to Paris.
      Since there was no other traffic to be concerned with out over the Atlantic, the space for a windscreen was given over to fuel tanks. This improved the C/G and lessened the risk of the pilot being crushed to death in the event of a nose-over on takeoff.
      The Ryan aircraft was equipped with a periscope to see over the nose, but as he had learned flying mail planes, Lindbergh simply yawned the plane when he needed a good look ahead

  • @andrewallen9993
    @andrewallen9993 5 років тому +1

    How incredible! An American managing a crossing of the Atlantic only a decade or so after Alcock and Brown did it in a Vickers Vimy!

    • @bengus8148
      @bengus8148 5 років тому +1

      Actually Lindbergs flight was eight years later,a solo flight,a much longer flight from NY to Paris instead of St.Johns to Ireland and a safe landing instead of a crash. Other than that............

    • @andrewallen9993
      @andrewallen9993 5 років тому

      @@bengus8148 Well let's face it The Spirit of At Louis was a much more modern aircraft and didn't even have biplane wings with a better engine and navigation equipment and of course he knew it was possible as it had been done before by somebody else :)

    • @henryhall9623
      @henryhall9623 5 років тому

      He also did it solo.

    • @andrewallen9993
      @andrewallen9993 5 років тому

      @@henryhall9623 Amazing he was able to do it with an aircraft as technically more advanced over the Vickers Vimy as the Vimey was over the first1908 Wright flyer purchased by the US army.

    • @leifvejby8023
      @leifvejby8023 4 роки тому +1

      @@andrewallen9993 It wasn't just a flight across the bloody atlantic, but a flight from New Your to Paris!
      St Johns to Eire is only 3150 km, New York to Paris is 5830 km, 85% longer.

  • @bigearedmouse17
    @bigearedmouse17 4 роки тому

    Where is he going ?

  • @RickJones222
    @RickJones222 3 роки тому

    This story has a happy ending, but it also explains the failures of pilots trying to do the same thing in the days of "daredevil" flying. Lindbergh depended on luck for many things, short runway with obstacles at the far end, underestimating the distance required for the over weight plane, the weather, not sleeping the night before. Pilots now would never take so many chances. Makes a great story but he could have easily been another tragic footnote in history, and remembered as a reckless fool, not a hero.

    • @vksasdgaming9472
      @vksasdgaming9472 Рік тому

      The biggest stroke of good luck Lindbergh had was wind. It was practically always behind him giving him a boost of speed. Risky undertaking, but using state-of-the-art design optimized for long-distance flight was not taking a chance. It was combination of daredevilish antics and carefully calculated science.

    • @mkor7
      @mkor7 Рік тому

      He wasn't, in actuality, anywhere near the tree line upon takeoff. Check the actual film of it.

  • @marcocasati6953
    @marcocasati6953 4 роки тому +1

    "We can have peace and security only so long as we band together to preserve that most priceless possession, our inheritance of European blood, only so long as we guard ourselves against attack by foreign armies and dilution by foreign races." Charles Lindbergh - 1939

    • @mkor7
      @mkor7 Рік тому

      What a nice chap he was.🙄

  • @amandasteven1400
    @amandasteven1400 4 роки тому

    if this is indeed how it happened... it's kinda comical how nobdy thought to extend the runway for the day by lowering that power line? and maybe removing those trees?

    • @jkorshak
      @jkorshak 4 роки тому +1

      This is a dramatization made in the golden days of hollywood when audiences kind of understood even an unknown mail pilot can't just snap his fingers and extend runways, drop trees, and lower power lines. Lindbergh knew he had enough runway barring engine failure and I imagine most of the audience knew the outcome of this flight before going into the theater. I wasn't there but newspaper reporting of the event does make mention of the mud and rain and the takeoff's proximity to the power lines.

  • @SilverWrinkly
    @SilverWrinkly 3 роки тому

    Did he really clip those wires? In the original footage on here, it doesn't seem like he did!!

    • @RichardsModellingAdventures
      @RichardsModellingAdventures 3 роки тому

      I think the slip stream made them move

    • @mkor7
      @mkor7 Рік тому

      In actuality, he wasn't anywhere near the trees or power lines upon takeoff. Check the actual film of it.

  • @mariacornwallis1602
    @mariacornwallis1602 4 роки тому +7

    WHY DOESN'T HOLLYWOOD MAKE A FILM ABOUT THE FIRST MEN WHO FLEW NON STOP ACROSS THE ATLANTIC IN JUNE 1919? ..... OH I KNOW, THEY WEREN'T AMERICAN

    • @blueskynevada8466
      @blueskynevada8466 4 роки тому +1

      That's a good point Maria...however, Lindbergh won the Orteig prize for being the first to fly non-stop from NY to Paris. You are correct, other aviators managed to clear the Atlantic before Lindbergh. I always thought the outpouring of adulation was way out of proportion to Lindbergh's accomplishment. It was truly just a matter of time before someone managed to fly a plane from NY to Paris. It was just a matter of stepwise improvements in technology leading to the eventual day that someone would make it. Not long after Lindbergh's flight, several other teams duplicated the feat without much incident.

    • @mariacornwallis1602
      @mariacornwallis1602 4 роки тому +2

      @@blueskynevada8466 I think crash landing a Vickers Vimy first world war bomber in an Irish bog would make a more exciting ending to a film than landing safely on a French lawn.

    • @blueskynevada8466
      @blueskynevada8466 4 роки тому

      @@mariacornwallis1602 Absolutely! People don't realize how much the "lucky" in "Lucky Lindy" really meant.

    • @ernesthill2681
      @ernesthill2681 3 роки тому

      Good point, friend. Few Americans are even aware of the remarkable flight of the RN R-34 dirigible in 1919. Perhaps because it simply wasn't dramatic enough fodder for a film.
      Cool, capable, competent, that is the British way

    • @mariacornwallis1602
      @mariacornwallis1602 3 роки тому

      @@ernesthill2681 I was thinking about Alcock and Brown in a Vickers Vimy bomber also in 1919 .... Very good sir ... I think crashing into an Irish bog makes a better film climax than landing safely on a French lawn.. lol

  • @jamescaputo5095
    @jamescaputo5095 3 роки тому

    Read the spirit of st Louis Lindbergh's publisher prize novel about the story of his historic quest to be first from new York to Paris across the Atlantic. Spellbinding story you will be with him each mile of his journey and the torturous fight he had to stay awake.