I’m actually glad we got a sample via a purchase vs. PSA sending it. This is less vetted over and more likely to see what a random example of what they would send.
Go watch Focustripp's video on the Jakl. His had an out of specc pic rail and it was significantly out of specc such that he couldn't mount any conventional optics and when he made a video about it PSA ended their partnership with him. Just food for thought.
@@InrangeTv wonder if it's because your habits of being open about DEI and talking about history as related to guns. I like your content, maybe they're not keen on more open mined/ forward thinking channels getting T&E items.
@@rhubarbpie2027 They don't seem to like channels pointing out their allegedly out-of-spec 1913 rail... as happened the other week on the FocusTripp channel.
PSA keeps getting shit talked about "the poors," seems to me they're just pissed off that everyone has the option to own a quality rifle and the bougie are mad they spent multiple times as much for the same thing.
Go watch Focustripp's video on the PSA Jakl. His had an out of specc pic rail which he proved with pin gauges and it was significantly out of specc preventing the mounting of conventional optics. Then when he posted the video showing the situation PSA ended his partnership.
But really what did you expect? Focustripp is a relatively small content creator who was condescending in his video about it lambasting PSA. Should the pic rail been out of spec? Of course not. But he put a high precision mount with recoil lugs intended for a precision weapon on effectively an aluminum AK and expected something more than he got. Should the pic rail have been out of spec? Of course not. Were his expectations from a proprietary gun at that price point misplaced? I think so. Was his approach poor, most likely but I think he did it for clicks and drama and the obvious reaction from PSA gave him more I mean if that’s the worst thing about the Jakl, there are worse things to have issues with.
First time being within an hour on InRange! Might I request a mud test of the Perun X16? It is an interesting rifle and I suspect it will do well, but who knows until it's covered in mud.
I am impressed,...and relieved. I bought a JAKL pistol upper in .300blk because I wanted a folding brace little quiet beast. I wasn't necessarily looking for an item that would beat the mud test. But it is AWESOME that it does. Now I have much more confidence in my choice and like it much more.
Oh no! PSA once again proves they make well designed guns. If you look at the JMac videos conducting burn downs with the OSA AK47 GEN 5 E it out performed every military AK they tested it against to include Russian ALs by thousands of round over what those various companies could do. Just because a company offers budget doesn’t mean they are crap. Let this be a reminder of that. I’m not saying a cheap AR with cheap parts is going to perform like a Daniel Defense or Midwest Indiatries AR but PSA offers quality weapons as well. And here you go, a well designed weapon that continues to improve based on customer feedback! Cheers
Can you talk a little bit more about the recoil impulse? How comparable is it to, say, something like a well-gassed carbine length AR-15? I love the aesthetics of this rifle but I doubt I'd be able to get my hands on it anytime soon haha
2:27 this feels like a non sequitur. firstly, I think most guns you have passed on this series have been short-stroke pistons. I think you could say that many/most long-stroke/AK platforms you've tested have failed. But more importantly I think the fundamental stress point on the AK is the dustcover-receiver construction vs receiver-receiver or upper-lower. As an upper-lower gun, I don't see what the long-stroke piston would have to do with the mudtest, except that with all that added momentum, it might theoretically have an advantage in reliable cycling (this is why Eugene Stoner did *not* gameify the AR15 bolt to be as light as possible).
PSA’s politics and QC aside at least they can put there concept rifles into retail spaces and not charge 2500$ for an AR18 derivative. Bushmaster’s 2010 world changing rifle… remember that.
Here comes Focus Dips minions .. if this gun failed on the second round or the entire mag was spent the anti PSA minions would still have something negative to say. I own Jakls, PSAs and they run when needed .. nuff said
You sound like a paid spokesperson. Calling PSA out on bad quality control is not hating on them, it’s pointing out they have issues that need to be fixed. Glad your PSA products are free of issue. I can’t say the same.
@@SlaterRecreational Acting like an out of spec scope rail is the biggest issue in the world when there are millions and millions of guns made by that company which are 100% functional is ridiculous. Send the fucking thing back for warranty repair and go about your day, I've had Colts where the whole FSB fell off right out of the box.
@@hornmonk3zit He makes UA-cam videos, pointed out an issue he had and updated us that PSA revoked his account. You don’t think that’s shady? I guess we should all just praise gun companies and when they mess up we should give them more money? Colt was constantly berated for their horrible QC years, no company should be free from criticism when they have serious problems like PSA consistently shows…
Oh nooooo.......don't you dare say anything nice about a PSA product and more so the JAKL?!! This goes against what Focus Schmuck and the PSA hating minions are telling us. Thx for the fair and honest test! Seeing how many firearms have failed this in the past I was actually suprised how well it did.
Seems like so many people are hating on the JAKL. I was expecting it to fail based on all the negative comments I see. Looking forward to seeing more. 😮
Yeah I don't understand that. Did he mean to say something else? The G36 is short stroke, and the Jakl is long stroke. It's not like Karl doesn't know this, he literally owns/owned a G36 from Tommybuilt.
In your video it makes me think of a cheap acr or scar, other videos make it seem like a crappy ar 15 wannabe. Honestly I like it, but concerned about the rail.
Everyone knows that mud doesn't really exist in Arizona, you just have soggy grit sand, you need West Bavarian dirt to make the proper mud you'll see in trench warfare....
praying that these come to canada. even if they have to neuter it so it cant take ar15 lowers and has to come with a proprietary lower, itd be great to see some more options in the market, aside from bren2/apc223/keltec/tavor (not even considering the canadian shit rods)
I just finished an article that was bound for Recoil Offgrid but may be hold. I’ve been quite pleased with this platform and the long stroke gas system is a an intelligent move.
I'm not familiar with the jackl but he didn't charge a round into the chamber while the handle is cover in mud and if he did I wonder how the gun would handle that.
@@CMINCOGNITOWhy not? The 550 was developed for a mainly conscription based military. E.g., It was clear from the start that those things will be abused.
@@CMINCOGNITO Take Deep Breaths, I didn't mean for a mud test, I meant in a general shooting, handling type of comparison and if it just happens to fall into a random wheelbarrow of mud that just happens to be lying around then so be it. 😀
@@CMINCOGNITO Will it help if I tell you that I killed my first one because the Piranha (stryker) hatch crushed that thing? The barrel was pointing in a 70 degree angle to the left.
Im surprised it passed. I have seen on youtube that this rifle is coming out of specs on some areas due to QC. I do however have some plane Jane ARs and a couple of GF3s from PSA no issues so far.
PSA's quality control has been a running joke at least since 2016 when they went full steam ahead on production and then had to start dumping guns when Hillary didn't win. I feel like you're always going to be rolling the dice with them (also with your credit card data, use a temporary card number).
Oh for gods sake give it a break already .. the thing passed where other weapons fail .. give it a break with I heard it on the internet bs @@eargesplitten9876
Welp, had that wrong. I would have thought it was going to fail on the first with that ejection port. As you guys said, it's stopping the stuff getting in, in the first place that really is the pass/fail here.
Does the charging handle work as well? That seems to be a common failure point for rifles with side charging. Both reciprocating and non-reciprocating types. Mud gets into the area where the charging handle rides, and it stops working. Even if the rifle runs fine otherwise, with a nonfunctional charging handle, should you need to operate it, that is a problem. The AUG is an example, that charging handle was seized tight. The big glob of mud sitting directly on top of the ejection port caused a malfunction, and then attempting to run the CH to clear the problem was not possible.
I'd be curious to hear how the mud affected the charging handle when used, if you got an insight. - Obviously because it locked back and ran properly you never needed to use it, but I'm wondering if it would have functioned properly if you had needed to, either due to malfunction, or just clearing the gun. Just remembering the AUG test where the cocking handle was totally locked up by the dirt.
@@BassJunkie200 I got that reference... Also honestly surprised. Then again, I guess when it comes to anything not AR-15, and even then, there is still a gamble. Im not complaining though, Ive still yet to have any problems, so I must be very lucky.
I've been impressed with everything that PSA does, except for their barrels. They shoot fine until they are quickly shot out. I think this is a heat treatment issue, which is probably why they shoot well for their price. If it's a softer heat treatment, there's usually less warping, causing less accuracy issues.
I don't get it ... if I had a company n even 1 person did a bad review (n there has been a few with psa) ... I would personally meet them n do a video vowing to correct the issue - not cut off sponsorship, or hide, or sue, etc - at least make an effort - geez - edit : just be honest n if you build toyotas for the masses there's no shame in that - every company can't be RR
I think the G36/SCAR style bolt group is just very reliable in general, with its well sealed up internals but also very high bolt carrier to bolt mass ratio which also likely contributes to its ability to slam the bolt back into battery even with dirt on it just by having a much bigger momentum. So I'm really not surprised at all this passed the test
Well I thought I was doing quite well guessing If a gun passed or failed, based on video length. Turns out I guessed wrong and the ACR we have at home passed with flying colours
I’m actually glad we got a
sample via a purchase vs. PSA sending it. This is less vetted over and more likely to see what a random example of what they would send.
And it passed ..
Go watch Focustripp's video on the Jakl. His had an out of specc pic rail and it was significantly out of specc such that he couldn't mount any conventional optics and when he made a video about it PSA ended their partnership with him. Just food for thought.
@@armorers_wrench I saw that video as well
@@armorers_wrenchdon't they apparently have a warranty
@@JordanI135 yes lifetime but the warranty should be there for the occasional hiccup down the road. You expect companies to ship functional parts
All manufacturers fear the mud test
Everybody is gangsta 'til InRange's mud test comes on.
Anyone who doesn’t mud test on their own is missing something important.
Did not see this result coming. Super impressed considering the laundry list of good and cool guns that have failed.
Yea the high end Gucci guns don’t work but the el cheapo in the rusted out ford just keeps going
@@ericgill6992 I'm guessing it's the design philosophy of "reach out and touch someone on the moon" vs "just make the fucking thing work".
@@warweasel2832 are they that accurate? I thought they where junk
PSA just sold a LOT more Jakl's on the back of InRange. nice!
Yeah, it's ironic considering how many channels they sent this gun to...but won't even respond to our emails. LOL
@@InrangeTv wonder if it's because your habits of being open about DEI and talking about history as related to guns. I like your content, maybe they're not keen on more open mined/ forward thinking channels getting T&E items.
@@rhubarbpie2027 They don't seem to like channels pointing out their allegedly out-of-spec 1913 rail... as happened the other week on the FocusTripp channel.
Finaly someone knows the difference between tolerance and clearance.
Well I do miss the "Im going to mortar it...at a 90 degree angle." Still cool it passed with no dust cover.
PSA keeps getting shit talked about "the poors," seems to me they're just pissed off that everyone has the option to own a quality rifle and the bougie are mad they spent multiple times as much for the same thing.
I remember the long stroke ARAK-21 failing this and wasn't expecting this
ARAK probably just not well designed. Alot of the "piston upgrades" are like this, ends up less reliable than DI
uh oh. didn't you know that by not complaining ceaselessly about jakl you're now a shill and a fan boy?
It's what I heard.
Lmao! Yep the anti psa trolls got mud in their face
"PSA didn't respond." Imagine my surprise.
I guess they are busy
@milkyyanks765 yeah busy droping people from their member club if you give a bad review .
My psa problem turned into a months long headache that required the bbb to make it right.
It passed … you may now toss your phone in protest
Ohh look another Focus Dip minion! It passed dumb ass .. lmao! @@COMMANDERHAWK22
Algorithmic booooooost for the algorithmic overlords
That was surprising! Cant wait for a deeper dive from the bad man instead of a sponsored influencer.
Go watch Focustripp's video on the PSA Jakl. His had an out of specc pic rail which he proved with pin gauges and it was significantly out of specc preventing the mounting of conventional optics. Then when he posted the video showing the situation PSA ended his partnership.
@@armorers_wrenchThat video caused some turmoil. Lol.
I have a Jakl and has done well… so far at least…
@@armorers_wrench You are really making sure people know about that. LoL
But really what did you expect? Focustripp is a relatively small content creator who was condescending in his video about it lambasting PSA. Should the pic rail been out of spec? Of course not. But he put a high precision mount with recoil lugs intended for a precision weapon on effectively an aluminum AK and expected something more than he got. Should the pic rail have been out of spec? Of course not. Were his expectations from a proprietary gun at that price point misplaced? I think so. Was his approach poor, most likely but I think he did it for clicks and drama and the obvious reaction from PSA gave him more
I mean if that’s the worst thing about the Jakl, there are worse things to have issues with.
Me: *can barely afford an airsoft gun*
Karl: *slathers multi-thousand dollar guns in mud*
This isn't THOUSANDS of dollars you poor!
bro its only 1300
Bought a jakal upper to have something "different".
It just works, all the time, every time. And it's fun to shoot.
Same here, man. For me, its a range piece or Novelty if you will. Super fun for sure.
First time being within an hour on InRange! Might I request a mud test of the Perun X16? It is an interesting rifle and I suspect it will do well, but who knows until it's covered in mud.
Oh that's some good goo.... shovel more on it..
Karl gets the wheelbarrow full of mud, and my wife's eyes start twitching. 😅
I am impressed,...and relieved. I bought a JAKL pistol upper in .300blk because I wanted a folding brace little quiet beast. I wasn't necessarily looking for an item that would beat the mud test. But it is AWESOME that it does. Now I have much more confidence in my choice and like it much more.
Oh no! PSA once again proves they make well designed guns. If you look at the JMac videos conducting burn downs with the OSA AK47 GEN 5 E it out performed every military AK they tested it against to include Russian ALs by thousands of round over what those various companies could do. Just because a company offers budget doesn’t mean they are crap. Let this be a reminder of that. I’m not saying a cheap AR with cheap parts is going to perform like a Daniel Defense or Midwest Indiatries AR but PSA offers quality weapons as well. And here you go, a well designed weapon that continues to improve based on customer feedback! Cheers
Yeah I watched that video too. I remember Wasr blew up at around 600 rounds and Russian vepr blew up at 1000 round mark
Can you talk a little bit more about the recoil impulse? How comparable is it to, say, something like a well-gassed carbine length AR-15? I love the aesthetics of this rifle but I doubt I'd be able to get my hands on it anytime soon haha
When we do a full review, yes.
@@InrangeTv Sweet, I can't wait!
@@InrangeTvcurious how the overall weight compares to a basic 16” AR and AKM
@@phillipk1258that's the only complaint I have with it, they weigh a ton
I would be very curious to see if the Kel Tec RFB (.308) would pass. Very well sealed firearm which seems to be the indicator of passing.
2:27
this feels like a non sequitur.
firstly, I think most guns you have passed on this series have been short-stroke pistons. I think you could say that many/most long-stroke/AK platforms you've tested have failed.
But more importantly I think the fundamental stress point on the AK is the dustcover-receiver construction vs receiver-receiver or upper-lower.
As an upper-lower gun, I don't see what the long-stroke piston would have to do with the mudtest, except that with all that added momentum, it might theoretically have an advantage in reliable cycling (this is why Eugene Stoner did *not* gameify the AR15 bolt to be as light as possible).
PSA’s politics and QC aside at least they can put there concept rifles into retail spaces and not charge 2500$ for an AR18 derivative. Bushmaster’s 2010 world changing rifle… remember that.
Thats a pass. Why do people shit on PSA?? Its a affordable and reliable rifle.
Here comes Focus Dips minions .. if this gun failed on the second round or the entire mag was spent the anti PSA minions would still have something negative to say.
I own Jakls, PSAs and they run when needed .. nuff said
You sound like a paid spokesperson. Calling PSA out on bad quality control is not hating on them, it’s pointing out they have issues that need to be fixed. Glad your PSA products are free of issue. I can’t say the same.
@@SlaterRecreational Acting like an out of spec scope rail is the biggest issue in the world when there are millions and millions of guns made by that company which are 100% functional is ridiculous. Send the fucking thing back for warranty repair and go about your day, I've had Colts where the whole FSB fell off right out of the box.
@@hornmonk3zit He makes UA-cam videos, pointed out an issue he had and updated us that PSA revoked his account. You don’t think that’s shady? I guess we should all just praise gun companies and when they mess up we should give them more money? Colt was constantly berated for their horrible QC years, no company should be free from criticism when they have serious problems like PSA consistently shows…
Oh nooooo.......don't you dare say anything nice about a PSA product and more so the JAKL?!! This goes against what Focus Schmuck and the PSA hating minions are telling us. Thx for the fair and honest test! Seeing how many firearms have failed this in the past I was actually suprised how well it did.
Seems like so many people are hating on the JAKL. I was expecting it to fail based on all the negative comments I see. Looking forward to seeing more. 😮
A jackal! Jackal! It's a jackal! It looks like a jackal! Jackal? Jackal! It's a jackal! Jackal?
No. It's a JAKL. 🤫
“IT WASN’T RIGHT THE FIRST TIME YOU SAID IT, WHY THE HELL WOULD IT BE RIGHT THE NEXT TEN TIMES?!"
@@dalecooper4051Shut up, Football Head!
I came to the comments for this and was not disappointed lol
Another mud champ to add to the list with the ar and luger.
Very cool. I'm actually surprised.
I love how people try to explain and describe the Jakl
Wow, I did not expect it to just pass. That is pretty incredible given what has been through the gaunlet and the respective results.
"It's like a G36" then lists all the ways its nothing like a G36
Yeah I don't understand that. Did he mean to say something else? The G36 is short stroke, and the Jakl is long stroke. It's not like Karl doesn't know this, he literally owns/owned a G36 from Tommybuilt.
LoL , its a masada with unrighteous buttstock. But run this mud tolerances pretty vvell
Title is misleading. I thought this was a Public Service Announcement regarding wild Jackals and how they terrorize rural Americans.
In your video it makes me think of a cheap acr or scar, other videos make it seem like a crappy ar 15 wannabe. Honestly I like it, but concerned about the rail.
Everyone knows that mud doesn't really exist in Arizona, you just have soggy grit sand, you need West Bavarian dirt to make the proper mud you'll see in trench warfare....
Not surprised by this at all.
I wonder if a military would want to adopt the Jakl. Ukraine is license producing the BREN 2
I wonden how the PSA JAKL handles the freeze thaw freeze test, ARs don't generally like it, and in my neck of the woods is quite a likele occurence.
of all inrange content, mud tests are top 3 favorite!
In the future every rifle, regardless of the operation, looks like an AR, and every pistol, regardless of looks, uses a Browning tilting barrel.
That weak ass mud test wouldnt be a problem for the AUG too... No Im not objective, still true :P
praying that these come to canada. even if they have to neuter it so it cant take ar15 lowers and has to come with a proprietary lower, itd be great to see some more options in the market, aside from bren2/apc223/keltec/tavor (not even considering the canadian shit rods)
This is the third time it has been promoted to me by UA-cam.
I just finished an article that was bound for Recoil Offgrid but may be hold. I’ve been quite pleased with this platform and the long stroke gas system is a an intelligent move.
❤🎉😅
Nice result. I have been tempted to buy a JAKL upper but haven't yet. Looking forward to more coverage in the future.
Impressive. Didn't seem to care about the mud. The number of guns on that list is pretty short.
Великолепный результат,однако заморозка традиционно пройдет неудачно из за не совсем удачной для этого шахты приемника магазина по типу м16
Yeahm ... another mud test video.
I was already missing this.
I'm not familiar with the jackl but he didn't charge a round into the chamber while the handle is cover in mud and if he did I wonder how the gun would handle that.
I wonder about the charging handle though. Would it still work? It didnt get used in this test.
I am looking forward to an honest review of this from somebody who's not paid
we're working on one. Real reviews take a little while.
I don’t have patreon dollars, I just go poor and stress out for awhile lol
Be interesting to compare it to a Sig 550 if you can get your hands on it as they seem to have a similar AK but westernised design.
noooo dont encourage him, not a sig 550 lol
@@CMINCOGNITOWhy not? The 550 was developed for a mainly conscription based military. E.g., It was clear from the start that those things will be abused.
@@slavepusher i know i know youre right its just such a lovely weapon
@@CMINCOGNITO Take Deep Breaths, I didn't mean for a mud test, I meant in a general shooting, handling type of comparison and if it just happens to fall into a random wheelbarrow of mud that just happens to be lying around then so be it. 😀
@@CMINCOGNITO Will it help if I tell you that I killed my first one because the Piranha (stryker) hatch crushed that thing? The barrel was pointing in a 70 degree angle to the left.
Is that bolt made of Teflon !? jk Really tho its like the mud slides right off the thing.
Oh cool, another entertaining gun from the boys in my home state
"The JAKL is basically a G-36 with a long-stroke gas piston..."
So a Korean K2 then, not a G36.
It's a million guns. It's just an AR18 with a slightly different gas system, outwardly thing thing is just an "ACR at home."
Y'all.... If I remember correctly, the SCAR did worse than this.....
DID THIS JUST BEAT THE BEST BETTLE RIFLE ON THE PLANET FOR $1500?!?!?!?!!?
You remember incorrectly. The malfunction with the SCAR was a single dud round that was easily cleared while muddy.
Just got the PSA MK12 18 inch. Can’t wait to test it
3 minute video, I take it didn’t go well by the length of the video
G36.... so an AR-18
In this case, the ejection port and the side of the bolt is more akin to the G36 in the shape. The AR18 has a dust cover and a different sized port.
heck yeah nice gun, very nice gun
Shoot, now I want one... Thanks carl...
That went very well. Just one more reason for me to buy it.
I'd be interested if they ever make one in 308.
but... muh forward assist!?!
Masada🇺🇸 masada 🇺🇸masada🇺🇸 masada 🇺🇸
Glad to see it earned the InRange Seal of Hubris.
Good design other than the way the handguard mounts.
Impressive
Im surprised it passed. I have seen on youtube that this rifle is coming out of specs on some areas due to QC. I do however have some plane Jane ARs and a couple of GF3s from PSA no issues so far.
PSA's quality control has been a running joke at least since 2016 when they went full steam ahead on production and then had to start dumping guns when Hillary didn't win. I feel like you're always going to be rolling the dice with them (also with your credit card data, use a temporary card number).
Oh for gods sake give it a break already .. the thing passed where other weapons fail .. give it a break with I heard it on the internet bs @@eargesplitten9876
Impressive!
Impressive!
Oh wow 👍
That is some seriously nasty mud
im impressed! good job PSA!
Hmm... I think PSA are on to something this time. 9HoleReviews like it too and that's pretty good in my book. Kind of different design for sure.
Welp, had that wrong. I would have thought it was going to fail on the first with that ejection port.
As you guys said, it's stopping the stuff getting in, in the first place that really is the pass/fail here.
Wow 🤯
Does the charging handle work as well?
That seems to be a common failure point for rifles with side charging. Both reciprocating and non-reciprocating types.
Mud gets into the area where the charging handle rides, and it stops working. Even if the rifle runs fine otherwise, with a nonfunctional charging handle, should you need to operate it, that is a problem.
The AUG is an example, that charging handle was seized tight. The big glob of mud sitting directly on top of the ejection port caused a malfunction, and then attempting to run the CH to clear the problem was not possible.
"People are gonna ask" Yeah - you closed the bolt before the mud test.
No gun will work dumping mud into an open action, that's just stupid.
Success. Thank you.
But this is not the correct Shovel!
Give it a dust cover?
And it's reliability might be even greater.
It seemed fine without one, at least in this regard.
Pleasantly surprised.
this did better than the M7 spear😂
Yes.
Look like a decent design
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤ InRangeTV!!
I'd be curious to hear how the mud affected the charging handle when used, if you got an insight. - Obviously because it locked back and ran properly you never needed to use it, but I'm wondering if it would have functioned properly if you had needed to, either due to malfunction, or just clearing the gun.
Just remembering the AUG test where the cocking handle was totally locked up by the dirt.
A PSA Jakal with no optic attached?
I've seen this somewhere before. 🤔
we will be doing a full review. This is not that video.
☝️Focus Dip minion
@@InrangeTv It's a reference to a FocusTripp video.
@@BassJunkie200 I got that reference... Also honestly surprised. Then again, I guess when it comes to anything not AR-15, and even then, there is still a gamble. Im not complaining though, Ive still yet to have any problems, so I must be very lucky.
@@InrangeTv hey how much for you guys to mud test a kel tec sub 2000?
Oh he got the dookie sauce
I've been impressed with everything that PSA does, except for their barrels. They shoot fine until they are quickly shot out. I think this is a heat treatment issue, which is probably why they shoot well for their price. If it's a softer heat treatment, there's usually less warping, causing less accuracy issues.
I don't get it ... if I had a company n even 1 person did a bad review (n there has been a few with psa) ... I would personally meet them n do a video vowing to correct the issue - not cut off sponsorship, or hide, or sue, etc - at least make an effort - geez - edit : just be honest n if you build toyotas for the masses there's no shame in that - every company can't be RR
I think the G36/SCAR style bolt group is just very reliable in general, with its well sealed up internals but also very high bolt carrier to bolt mass ratio which also likely contributes to its ability to slam the bolt back into battery even with dirt on it just by having a much bigger momentum. So I'm really not surprised at all this passed the test
Lol. Idk why. Whenever Inrange TV do these mud test I always end up thinking about the AK mud test and read the butthurt comments.
You gonna bring this to High Desert? Actually surprised it ran as well as it did.
We're loaning it to a shooter at HDB, so it'll be there. I won't be using it, I'm shooting in Dead Eye and Cyberpunk.
@@InrangeTv I initially entered Cyberpunk but felt like I wasn't meeting the intentions
I got to admit I like the JAKL and after seeing this, I want one even more. I wish they'd make one with an 18" barrel though.
Well I thought I was doing quite well guessing If a gun passed or failed, based on video length. Turns out I guessed wrong and the ACR we have at home passed with flying colours