US New F-16 Fighter Jet After Upgrade SHOCKED The World!

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 28 тра 2024
  • There are some fighting aircraft that have reached legendary status in the world of flight. The one we’re looking at in this video has had a distinguished 50-year career and still remains in service to this day. This is the F-16 fighting falcon, a jet that is used all over the world and for very good reasons. Let’s go into a bit more detail about what makes this plane one of the most trusted and impressive of its kind.
    For copyright matters please contact us at: ytproductionvideo@gmail.com
    Video and image credit: Lockheed Martin.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 235

  • @ericl3870
    @ericl3870 Місяць тому +22

    50 years! The fact that I remember their introduction makes me feel old:)

    • @adamlyman8293
      @adamlyman8293 Місяць тому +3

      Vintage…seasoned…experienced…..not OLD. LOL.

    • @MichaelRoy-hc3lz
      @MichaelRoy-hc3lz Місяць тому +3

      Me too

    • @roystewart4386
      @roystewart4386 Місяць тому +2

      Haha Time flies like an F16

    • @MAGAman-uy7wh
      @MAGAman-uy7wh Місяць тому

      You are! Me too! It looks like we are in good company.

    • @-Gramps
      @-Gramps Місяць тому

      Gotcha beat! I remember when my USAF pilot father went to flight school to learn to fly the “new B52s!” He’s now 92 & last piloted an airplane at age 84!

  • @MAGAman-uy7wh
    @MAGAman-uy7wh Місяць тому +46

    A pure fighter for the times. Like the F4U Corsair and the Hellcat it has what it needs to do the job. It will go down as one of the best ever.

    • @MichaelRoy-hc3lz
      @MichaelRoy-hc3lz Місяць тому +3

      Wasn't the F4U the most badass looking fighter in the Pacific? With those bent wings and huge prop it probably terrified the Japanese before firing a shot!

    • @ThomasBestonso-zr4ko
      @ThomasBestonso-zr4ko Місяць тому

      THE LOCKHEED F-16 FALCON !
      She's got that P-51 game changer quality about her and is as bad as ever approaching her 50th anniversary, way ahead of her time by 20/25yrs and is constantly finding new ways to deliver in a multiroll facet , I think she's got a record that's not quite undefeated, yet undisputed as the most successful multiroll fighter with a roughly 206 to 2 record worldwide, the first computer integrated fly by wire fighter, In block 80 something ? she's more lethal than ever , yet esthetically she's almost identical to her 1st combat ready squadron ... a true modern marvel of aviation .

    • @ThomasBestonso-zr4ko
      @ThomasBestonso-zr4ko Місяць тому

      ​@@MichaelRoy-hc3lz The Curtis P-40 Tomahawk was also a great indo-pacific Zero killer as well , china's free people called her the "FLYING TIGER " because they felt safest when she was up in the skys above... she was the original Flying Tank !

  • @kayringelstetter8633
    @kayringelstetter8633 Місяць тому +16

    MY SON FLEW THEN FOR 10 YEARS AND LOVED THAT PLANE. NOW HE IS AN f35 INSTRUCTOR.

  • @chriscolley2229
    @chriscolley2229 Місяць тому +40

    F-16 and the B-1 bomber are two of the most beautifully designed aircraft to me 😊

    • @Rairai54321
      @Rairai54321 Місяць тому +1

      For me f 16 , B 1 lancher n B2 spirit

    • @anndroid8734
      @anndroid8734 Місяць тому

      Curvy design

    • @KlipsenTube
      @KlipsenTube Місяць тому

      And the H-58 is the third.

    • @pike100
      @pike100 Місяць тому

      ​@@KlipsenTube Did you mean the B-58 Hustler? If so, then I agree with you.

  • @grumpyoldmad
    @grumpyoldmad Місяць тому +25

    Finally a good and detailed overview without any "Fighter Mafia" BS
    Good work!

    • @military_world
      @military_world  Місяць тому +2

      Thank you!

    • @dickslocum
      @dickslocum Місяць тому +1

      Before they were called the "Fighter Mafia" they were referred to as "The Tribe of the One Hearts" one plane, one pilot and one Engine as aircraft were intended to be flown. A sub set of the Tribe of TAC...

    • @brealistic3542
      @brealistic3542 Місяць тому +1

      Does the Fighter Mafia fly Italian Fighters? 🤔

  • @MichaelRoy-hc3lz
    @MichaelRoy-hc3lz Місяць тому +4

    The F-15 F-16 combo maybe the most successful one two punch of air dominance and attack fighters in history. Half a century after it's first availability the F-16 is the fighter our Allies want and enemies fear.

  • @tonybrowne3378
    @tonybrowne3378 Місяць тому +12

    I'm amazed how often the world seems to be shocked

    • @CerberusTenshi
      @CerberusTenshi Місяць тому +1

      Especially, if no-one even heard of anything about whatever the videos claim shocked the world this time. Clickbait title is clickbairy AF.

    • @marktimmer2212
      @marktimmer2212 4 дні тому

      54000 million metric tons at 28.9 km/s doesnt shock easily.

  • @garymccann2960
    @garymccann2960 20 днів тому +2

    I brushed my teeth this morning and SHOCKED the world.

    • @yeahnah7220
      @yeahnah7220 15 годин тому

      I shocked myself and wiped my arse with my toothbrush.
      Respect🤛

  • @vinnie1889
    @vinnie1889 Місяць тому +6

    Thank you I had no idea, the F16 is an excellent fighter jet, glad the US with smarts and ingenuity has put it all together 🇱🇷👍

  • @Earthstein
    @Earthstein Місяць тому +1

    Shocking how beautiful this plane is.

  • @wreckincrew2714
    @wreckincrew2714 Місяць тому +3

    My Mother and Father (Air Force Captain) were at the first Roll Out of the F16 and were given 16mm film of the historic moment by McDonald Douglass.

  • @bugstomper4670
    @bugstomper4670 Місяць тому +13

    A pilot dodged 6 SAMs, in sequence, during the Gulf War, and landed safely at base. That's without all the new avionic upgrades.

    • @lenzielenski3276
      @lenzielenski3276 Місяць тому

      As the line in Remo Williams goes "sometimes blessed with ruck". --Chun/Joel Grey.

  • @kencadby6586
    @kencadby6586 Місяць тому +12

    I am so tired of the word SHOCK in titles. It just doesn't mean anything any more. Too often it's click bait.

  • @bobpawtucket1336
    @bobpawtucket1336 Місяць тому +1

    In 1980 I worked on them them at Hill AFB tail numbers like 008 and 012. It is so cool to see them still going!

  • @lakeliving2013
    @lakeliving2013 Місяць тому +4

    You haven't lived until you've experienced the: “Falcon Turn“...

  • @ivanhicks887
    @ivanhicks887 Місяць тому +2

    Excellent Presentation - Thankyou

  • @jst4curiosity704
    @jst4curiosity704 Місяць тому +3

    Great report on a great fighter! F16 Falcon is in a class all by itself!

  • @Ruteger100
    @Ruteger100 17 днів тому

    You forgot to mention the on board pizza oven and New soft serve ice cream dispenser. It's truly a fighter with something for everyone.

  • @jrtstrategicapital560
    @jrtstrategicapital560 Місяць тому +5

    Its a hot sports car in the air!

  • @johndyson4109
    @johndyson4109 Місяць тому +5

    I know one thing it's the best in the RATE fight! It's a sports car for a jet fighter.. I'm a 15 fan myself...

  • @born2fly1948
    @born2fly1948 Місяць тому +1

    Most beautiful aircraft!

  • @dickslocum
    @dickslocum Місяць тому +8

    As one of the first Avionics Instructors at Hill afb back when MOTE was just starting out I am impressed with the detail and attention to detail of this video. When I went back to the F-15 program the Block 41 aircraft were the "coming thing" Thank you for bring back some of my fondest memories of the USAF days.

    • @davegt27
      @davegt27 Місяць тому +1

      thanks for your service, I worked AIS

  • @user-ux6wp9zi4x
    @user-ux6wp9zi4x Місяць тому

    As a retired Msgt, USAF I'am proud of my Air Force F-16.

  • @frankurso888
    @frankurso888 Місяць тому +1

    Beautiful plane, watching it Wishing I was Fly in it. Great video

  • @user-en9zo2ol4z
    @user-en9zo2ol4z 27 днів тому

    The F-16 was the first of its kind in the world, and in the USAF. It was the first to use "relaxed aerodynamics", which means it must have computer aids to fly. In addition, it was the first to introduce, both fly-by-wire and, a side stick control. It also has a more raked seat, which diminishes the G-loading on the pilot. It is indeed a legendary aircraft for these and other reasons. The original fighter held a limited amount of fuel (which has since been augmented with conformal fuselage tanks.) Even though its original fuel load was low, for European customers, which cover small regions, they are ideal. They were developed by the so called 'Fighter Mafia' in the Pentagon, themselves former or current Fighter pilots, it met the needs at the time, for an aircraft with great agility. Did I forget to mention they are very beautiful.

  • @GregSr
    @GregSr 21 день тому

    I am a vendor to a company that builds components for weapons systems. One day I saw a thick circuit board that was about 5 or 6 feet long. Without thinking, I said "what does that go into?". The engineer tried to provide an answer that didn't give up classified information. He said, "it goes into a system that is a one-time use". It wasn't hard to figure out what he meant.

  • @clintonreisig
    @clintonreisig Місяць тому +3

    So many advantages of the F-16

  • @lindamaclaren1866
    @lindamaclaren1866 27 днів тому

    I was with General Dynamics when the first test aircraft came to Edwards AFB, and I saw that amazing near-disaster with Phil Oestricher in the cockpit. What memories! They'd load it down with so many armaments that it would waddle down the runway like a fat Christmas goose. Once it was airborne, though, it lived up to its name and was quick, precise, and beautiful! I could never have imagined the legendary fighter plane it would become.

  • @jamesmterrell
    @jamesmterrell Місяць тому +2

    Good video but you need to update it with current information regarding the Block 70/72 new production and upgrade.

  • @peterj.f.blackwood-davis7840
    @peterj.f.blackwood-davis7840 11 годин тому

    It was the legendary Falcon F16 that was sent armed with a single missile,...which climbed to the very darkness & emptiness of space, ( a unique feat.!) where,....with engines running out of available oxygen.....fired that missile to destroy a satellite many, many miles distant again.
    Right on target,...the pilot headed back to base....once more with another successful mission accomplished.

  • @mxr572
    @mxr572 Місяць тому +3

    Israel uses modified F 16s as fighter/bomber super speed to hit past radar targets with great accuracy. USA still makes great planes.

  • @zeuso.1947
    @zeuso.1947 Місяць тому

    Great channel, and top tier compliments to the narrator.

  • @darrencorrigan8505
    @darrencorrigan8505 28 днів тому

    Thanks, Military World.

  • @user-uu5dn8do2o
    @user-uu5dn8do2o Місяць тому +1

    Likely the most successful combat fighter aircraft of the modern era.

  • @user-zc5qy2sr1c
    @user-zc5qy2sr1c Місяць тому +2

    An Awesome ship.

  • @tommac597
    @tommac597 Місяць тому +1

    Nice video. You forgot to mention the podded SENSOR Systems (LANTIRN & Lightning pods) which add a great amount of precision to the ground attach missions.

  • @MrRoutal
    @MrRoutal 29 днів тому

    I noticed that you didn’t mention that the first versions of the F-15 engine produced more thrust than the airplane weight which enabled it to accelerate through the sound barrier going vertical. It still capable of this feat! I also recall that the F-15 was similarly capable.

  • @TomatoFettuccini
    @TomatoFettuccini Місяць тому

    The modern Block 60 F-16s are marvels of modern technology.
    Now, just imagine if we had gotten the F-14 ASF. _sigh_ We can dream.

  • @albertosolon8769
    @albertosolon8769 Місяць тому

    To All-Pilipino love th F15 , STRIKE EAGLE II.THE BEST FIGHTER JETS AMERICA CREATED I HOPED AMERICA GIVE TO THE PHILIPPINES,ONE OF THOSE F15 , strike eagle II.We like it very much 💔.PBBM

  • @MPrybil
    @MPrybil Місяць тому +8

    The F-16 is the sports car of fighter aircraft.

    • @patrickle8105
      @patrickle8105 Місяць тому

      Dont forget the Eurofighter😉

    • @lenzielenski3276
      @lenzielenski3276 Місяць тому

      More like the Miata of aircraft.

    • @joedokes3406
      @joedokes3406 27 днів тому

      True, but we were usually in the trucking business. Still miss my jet.

    • @lenzielenski3276
      @lenzielenski3276 27 днів тому

      That would be the F15, fast AND quick.

  • @undercrackers56
    @undercrackers56 Місяць тому +4

    Imagine this thing with thrust vectoring. Would that even be possible? That aside, what is this NEW upgrade that shocked the world. I think I missed it.

    • @dickslocum
      @dickslocum Місяць тому

      It was the latest ECM and RADAR System Numbers. In a decade or so We will find out what kind of GEE WHIZZ processors are in them. There are Avionics things on that airplane i taught back in the early 80s that I have not seen written down on the internet to this day Look up Ternary computer on Wikipedia

    • @ThomasBestonso-zr4ko
      @ThomasBestonso-zr4ko Місяць тому

      I think that they were gonna try thrust vectoring in the F-16 XL Deltawing, gorgeous girl, she was gonna be faster with almost double the payload and more range... like a Falcon on steroids, gorgeous as well

  • @reggierico
    @reggierico Місяць тому +4

    Your first flight story is inaccurate from what I've read. This test was supposed to be a high speed taxi test, not a flight test. But when the pilot got up to the speed for the test, the aircraft simply wanted to fly and the pilot obliged it!

    • @ThomasBestonso-zr4ko
      @ThomasBestonso-zr4ko Місяць тому

      Never argue with a lady when she's ready to go ! Its bad luck...

  • @topturretgunner
    @topturretgunner Місяць тому +2

    All time great fighter. What would a P-51 Mustang be if it were a jet fighter. An F-16.

    • @ThomasBestonso-zr4ko
      @ThomasBestonso-zr4ko Місяць тому

      Most definitely, the P-51 looks great next to a couple Vipers .

  • @Beebo-kc3fx
    @Beebo-kc3fx Місяць тому

    My favorite military aircraft!

  • @menguardingtheirownwallets6791
    @menguardingtheirownwallets6791 19 днів тому

    It's a great design because it is basically one jet engine with wings strapped to it, not much more. Similar to that of the F-104 starfighter, except with double the wingspan, and a more efficient single lower air inlet instead of two side inlets.

  • @emiliomurillo20
    @emiliomurillo20 Місяць тому

    f14 is the uf killer

  • @BlackhawkPilot
    @BlackhawkPilot Місяць тому +1

    A lot of COL John Boyd’s research into energy use is in the F-16.

  • @PassivePortfolios
    @PassivePortfolios 21 день тому

    The experimental F-16 with the Delta wings would have made a good long range fighter-bomber.

  • @SB-qj3cn
    @SB-qj3cn Місяць тому

    She is a beauty!

  • @okeefenokeetheseventeenth2200
    @okeefenokeetheseventeenth2200 Місяць тому +3

    The headline promises more than your video actually gives. Disappointing.

  • @apegues
    @apegues 27 днів тому

    I’m shocked!!!!!!

  • @jaycooper2812
    @jaycooper2812 Місяць тому

    The latest versions of the F-16 are no longer called the Fighting Falcon. The newest versions are so different from the original that the United States Air Force has re-designated the block 70/72 F-16 the Viper.

  • @proveritate9312
    @proveritate9312 Місяць тому +1

    1 Formidable aircraft ! Put them against Put-in !
    In the 70's i remember the engine pushed out over 23k thrust. I'm wondering if it's now more.

  • @davidwalker2396
    @davidwalker2396 22 дні тому

    Is that the new block -70 or 71 they are definitely upgrading the f-16 that’s a great fighter jet it have delivered

  • @KernowekTim
    @KernowekTim Місяць тому

    Wonderful gems come in smaller packages. Here is one such jem.

  • @jc1701
    @jc1701 Місяць тому

    2:15 It was a high speed taxi test that was a whoops accidental takeoff. I think it was something to do with the new stick sensitivity/programming was a bit off.

  • @EddieLopez711
    @EddieLopez711 Місяць тому +1

    F-16 😊 F-16XL 😎😎😎

  • @antasosam8486
    @antasosam8486 Місяць тому

    I like it

  • @Granados-pv9ql
    @Granados-pv9ql Місяць тому +2

    This is the reliable jet fighter used by Israel in their war effort in the middle east

  • @jaycooper2812
    @jaycooper2812 Місяць тому

    My cousin flew the F-16 for over 20 years. He put in his retirement papers when they converted his squadron to the F-35. He said he refuses to fly the "Plastic toy" as he calls it. The F-35 is a much less maneuverable aircraft and the only advantage it has is that it can't be seen on radar.

  • @stephen5147
    @stephen5147 27 днів тому

    Pilot comfort & G-tolerance were NOT the reasons the seat was reclined 30°.

  • @nnonotnow
    @nnonotnow 17 днів тому

    One flew over my house but that was a long time ago

  • @Taffeyboy
    @Taffeyboy Місяць тому

    I met man from Terra de Fuego and he wasn’t shocked at all!

  • @Paulftate
    @Paulftate Місяць тому +5

    👍

  • @InssiAjaton
    @InssiAjaton Місяць тому

    Once upon a time I was told that for every “shipped” F-16 there was a companion tractor-trailer load of printed documentation. I wonder what shape the present version documentation might take…

    • @pike100
      @pike100 Місяць тому

      Digital documents. Were you expecting a paper owner's manual in the glove box? 😉

  • @user-nn6fy5gt8u
    @user-nn6fy5gt8u Місяць тому

    Is maintenance an issue with all the high tech equipment?

  • @gabytrifan5708
    @gabytrifan5708 Місяць тому +1

    What world did it shock. The world that didn't hear about it?🤣

  • @pilgrim....
    @pilgrim.... Місяць тому

    How much do the boxy looking fuel tanks affect the airflow and how much drag do they cause.
    Honestly it looks like a different aircraft.

  • @user-nt7hc8tq9q
    @user-nt7hc8tq9q Місяць тому

    May god be with us all

  • @butterwaffeln
    @butterwaffeln Місяць тому

    AAM-N-5 Meteor missile as well.

  • @user-nt7hc8tq9q
    @user-nt7hc8tq9q Місяць тому

    I know thay need them but we r going to need them

  • @andym4695
    @andym4695 Місяць тому

    And they're STILL upgrading and selling it - and for good reason. According to the internet (always dangerous), an F-16 costs 1/3 that of a JSF.

  • @richardkroll2269
    @richardkroll2269 Місяць тому

    By the early 1980s, the American AIM-7 Sparrow radar-guided missile in its "M" version was realistically exceeding a 60% kill rate, and was integrated onto the F-20. Brigadier General Chuck Yeager, test pilot and the first man to break the sound barrier, referred to the F-20 as "the finest fighter".[157] Despite its performance and affordable cost, the F-20 lost out for foreign sales against the similarly capable but more expensive F-16, which was being procured in large numbers by the US Air Force and was viewed as having greater support. Think Lydon Johnson and Ft. Worth, Texas

  • @PanioloBee
    @PanioloBee 22 дні тому

    Wonder if they could develop a “F-16” equivalent for the F-22? Smaller, cheaper, stealthy for going in, less stealthy going out to cut cost. Just wondering.

  • @willymac5036
    @willymac5036 Місяць тому

    Every single F-16 in the USAF inventory needs to be upgraded to the block 70/72 standard.

    • @niweshlekhak9646
      @niweshlekhak9646 Місяць тому

      Only 240 are getting upgraded to block 70 standards.

  • @billotto602
    @billotto602 Місяць тому +7

    I sure hope the Ukrainians get these IF they ever get ANYTHING !

  • @franciscook5819
    @franciscook5819 Місяць тому +3

    Great video. A couple of minor points. ALARM was a British RAF missile, also used by Saudis but not on F16 (Tornado only, I believe). I get that this is more about operational characteristics/capabilities but it would have been nice to see a mention of the F16 XL (cranked delta - like the SAAB Draken) which was an excellent but abandoned development.

    • @dickslocum
      @dickslocum Місяць тому +1

      I hate to disagree but the ALARM was tested and certified to fly on Falcons at Hill AFB rather early on in the F-16 Multi National Operations Test and Evaluation Program. (MOT&E) Just because we did not use a weapon often does not mean the capability was not there. The Nordic NATO made great efforts to make every possibility available from the very start.

    • @franciscook5819
      @franciscook5819 Місяць тому

      @@dickslocum Understood. Tested but as I understand it, never operationally used (even if not launched).

    • @pike100
      @pike100 Місяць тому

      I'm not disappointed that the F-16 XL wasn't covered. As you stated, that project was abandoned.

  • @BennyCFD
    @BennyCFD Місяць тому

    The Israeli F-16 SUFA is the ultimate iteration of the F-16..................................PERIOD !

  • @Yewbzee
    @Yewbzee 8 днів тому

    Am I missing something? What part of this shocked the world?

  • @koshersalaami
    @koshersalaami Місяць тому +1

    Who is this video for? The title suggests unqualified viewers but the details about the latest F16 iteration carrying the Raythrop Douglas 7.4 ASHRAAM 86E Fuzzbuster Mark 3 Anti-Radar missile suggests otherwise.

  • @vonbautista2016
    @vonbautista2016 Місяць тому

    And bring my jordan shoes 😅

  • @Crissy_the_wonder
    @Crissy_the_wonder Місяць тому

    Was the world shocked? Not sure those that know aviation were 'shocked', let alone the world

  • @brankokruskovic-dg3nd
    @brankokruskovic-dg3nd Місяць тому +1

    Gamechanger 🤣🤣🤣

  • @jimbay6084
    @jimbay6084 Місяць тому

    I just wonder what version Ukraine is getting. Especially which radar.

  • @philipking8497
    @philipking8497 Місяць тому

    Two F16's on one SU57 for half the price of Ivan. No Brainner.

  • @Jon.......
    @Jon....... Місяць тому +2

    3:11 | There isn't a refueling "probe" on an F-16, only a receptacle. The tanker has the probe. Also, get rid of the clickbait title (Shocked the World) and please have your scripts proofed for accuracy and outrageousness before producing. TD

  • @lenzielenski3276
    @lenzielenski3276 Місяць тому +2

    Its the VW Bug of fighter jets. Not horrible. A little better than 'just good enough' but cheap enough to build in large numbers. Let's face it, when an F16 beats an Eastern Block countries current generation jet, its not the plane that wins, its the pilot and his/her training. That's what makes "good enough" a viable option.
    As to the video, it sounds like a car dealer listing all the possible options. 'Can fire the blah, blah, blah' turns into the voice of adults in a Charlie Brown cartoon. This was supposed to be about the PLANE, not about what you can hang on it. What can it turn? What can it OUT turn? What can it out climb? These are what SHOULD have been discussed, not a laundry list of what you can strap to it. You could get nearly the same results if you could strap the same weapons on an F4U.

    • @Juan-os4hs
      @Juan-os4hs 15 днів тому

      No, if there was a car I'd compare it to, it would be a 1970 El Camino SS 454.
      Fast and able to haul loads of munitions.

    • @Juan-os4hs
      @Juan-os4hs 15 днів тому

      The F-4?
      America's testament that if you strap a big enough engine on it, you can make a brick fly.
      There's no comparison.

    • @lenzielenski3276
      @lenzielenski3276 15 днів тому

      @@Juan-os4hs Its not that fast. Now where near F15 or SU27 speeds.

    • @Juan-os4hs
      @Juan-os4hs 15 днів тому

      ​@@lenzielenski3276
      Well, I had to look around, alot.
      Well you're right in regards between the F-15 and the F-16, with the the '15 having a 374 mph advantage over the '16, its due to the '15 having two of the engines that the '16 has, well duh.
      But if it comes down to twisty turny, the '16s gonna eat the '15s lunch... that is if the Eagle driver is dumb enough to let the Falcon get that close.
      As for between the F-16 and the SU-27, they're prettily evenly matched, with the F-16C only being shy of 50 mph MAX speed.
      There however I'll give the edge to the Su-27-if the pilot thereof can successfully execute the "Cobra" maneuver, otherwise they're so evenly matched, I'd be hard pressed because of bias for the '16 to give any advantage to the SU-27, it would basically come down to pilot skill/experience at that point.

    • @lenzielenski3276
      @lenzielenski3276 15 днів тому

      @@Juan-os4hs "Well, you're right..."
      I know. I was wrong once, I remember, back in '82. BTW, that's why the F15 is the Air SUPREMACY fighter. None ever shot down. Not so for the F16. Case closed, the F16 is 'good enough', just like a VW Bug

  • @mikelittle5250
    @mikelittle5250 28 днів тому

    if it works, don't fix it

  • @aleksandarstix3097
    @aleksandarstix3097 22 години тому

    Serbia 99 f117 is down f16 b2 a10 mirage 2000/5

  • @user-rm1rh9jl7u
    @user-rm1rh9jl7u Місяць тому

    it's Viper dude, that show's you're no expert

  • @franksanchietti7108
    @franksanchietti7108 Місяць тому +2

    Why switch to F35's?

    • @Juan-os4hs
      @Juan-os4hs 15 днів тому +1

      Pentagon desk jockies pissing contests.

    • @beeg693
      @beeg693 14 днів тому

      Yes, the pissing thing, but also those F-16 radars don't see "stealth aircraft". Dog fights don't happen anymore (???)and missiles are fired long before the enemy is within visual range.....especially with the F-22. Although...only Russia, China and USA have stealth fighters. Oh yes and most NATO countries have them too now.

    • @Juan-os4hs
      @Juan-os4hs 14 днів тому

      @@beeg693
      What makes you think F-35s radar "sees" stealth either? 🤔
      Or F-22s for that matter?

    • @beeg693
      @beeg693 14 днів тому

      @@Juan-os4hs That is a great question. I don't really know. To be honest I had to look it up. From what I could gather it is that cross section and time are the two important elements. It is a yes and a no. It is a yes because although there is a small return the pilot or the instrument can't tell what it is. Not having a big enough cross section return. The enemy plane can't see the stealth plane ( it doesn't get a large reflective frequency return) until it is too late. And no, because when it can see the stealth plane, the stealth plane will have already taken a missile shot. By then It is to late for the enemy plane to take a shot. That's my understanding. What did you find out??

    • @Juan-os4hs
      @Juan-os4hs 14 днів тому

      @@beeg693
      Given, if a stealth plane, can't "see" another stealth plane via radar... how can it launch a missle to shoot it down? 🤔
      Then, it follows logically, that at some point one stealth plane will invariably stumble upon another stealth plane, IN VISUAL RANGE ≈ 30 MILES, and at that time, they will be within "dog fighting" distance.
      That is however if they are not using AWACS or ground based radar, which, BTW Russia has already perfected a mobile g/b stealth detecting radar, which allowed Iran to shoot down a stealth drone (LM RQ-170 Sentinel) in 2011, and even before that an F-117 was shot down over Serbia in 1999.
      Stealth technology was obsoleted in 1999, but the greedy politicians and military industrial complex IGNORED THE MEMO.

  • @fatmangoboom7722
    @fatmangoboom7722 Місяць тому

    F16 is loved by all because it is cheap and capable!

  • @frederickhildebrandt3892
    @frederickhildebrandt3892 Місяць тому +6

    We will see how they work or used in Ukraine

  • @No1floatsting
    @No1floatsting Місяць тому

    How many times, and how well, has this jet handled 🤔 against top notch adversaries - like the Russians? "That" is the true measure, is it not?

  • @user-nt7hc8tq9q
    @user-nt7hc8tq9q Місяць тому

    Know we need them here

    • @pike100
      @pike100 Місяць тому

      Where is "here"?

  • @JZsBFF
    @JZsBFF Місяць тому

    Too much "SHOCKED" on this channel!

  • @brealistic3542
    @brealistic3542 Місяць тому +1

    I have a Super Hetrodyne radar receiver in my car. I bet it cost far less then theirs ! 😁
    I have to share this true but very strange story.
    At one time the USAF and Navy put two different American fighters in pilot to pilot competition as they often do. I believe one was the very advance radar F14 and one was the Phantom or maybe even a early F16 without advanced radar like the F14. Anyway the F14 was cleaning the Phantoms/F-16? clock with its long range radar capability. That was until the pilot took his FuzzBuster radar detector and managed to wire into his cockpit.
    Everytime he was lit up he did a max g break and the F 14 pilots didn't do so well after that. .😁

    • @pike100
      @pike100 Місяць тому

      I don't believe you.

  • @Doesntcompute2k
    @Doesntcompute2k Місяць тому +1

    Clickbait :( Very sad

  • @carlosdasilva7444
    @carlosdasilva7444 Місяць тому +2

    better than the Sweden gripen

    • @dickslocum
      @dickslocum Місяць тому

      But much more labor intensive , at least back in the 80s and 90s

    • @viktorgv7937
      @viktorgv7937 Місяць тому

      no way... grippen, rafale is way better. Not even to mention the Eurofighter

  • @chocolate_squiggle
    @chocolate_squiggle Місяць тому

    Lot of F16 info but what was that about an upgrade? What was so shocking? Seems like clickbait. Bit of a waste of time.